The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutagenda.hpc.19970611AGENDA ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION June 11, 1997 REGULAR MEETING CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 5:00 I. Roll Call and approval of April 9, and April 23rd, 1997 minutes II. Public Comments III. Commissioner and Staff Comments IV. OLD BUSINESS A. 04(514 N. Street - Conceptual Development (no packet). 90 6,+ 32 -P N - 5:45 B. OK-432 W. Main - discussion of roof and basement (no memo) 9% 61,4 -1- 1---)/ 6:15 C. Brand Building - Minor /0 1 C 6:30 D. 1008 E. Hopkins Ave. - Fina~ Development -fE -IC(*) YA Â® ,|4 j/n o-n ,-t-0 F- -- 6;l o.f /,0- I V. NEW BUSINESS 7:00 A. Trustee Townhomes - Conceptual LY< 0 4 )6 ?abl i c Â« 47 *-,1 1 1 U m \ 95 IE 7:45 VI. ADJOURN Reminder: Nore Winter Workshop will be held on June 9 from 3-8 p.m. Dinner will be provided. NOTE: P&Z is doing a slide presentation on Ord. #30 - June 10th 4:00 p.m. at the j Library - All HPC members are invited to attend. -FkoJECT MONITORING JakeÂ·*iek@4, . ---Meadows-*erinitte.-be-issued soon) --7.9351._tlym-an_Aymne-fond=pernlit) ,520 Walnut Street - GfeliiWood-(notaggive) 435 W.-Main -1-'Auberge-(not active) Roger Moyer 303 E. Main (permit to be issued soon) 420 E. Main (not active) ISIS 939 E. Cooper 426 E. Hyman- Curious George (under permit) Susan Dodington 616 W. Main (complete) 316 E. Hopkins - Howling Wolf (complete) 712 W. Francis (stalled) 918 E. Cooper (under permit) 132 W. Main Asia (door and windows, skylights) LiA -C C. 4 0 1 'J b Melanie Roschko 918 E. Cooper (temporarily covered by Susan and Mary) ISIS 123 W. Francis (covered by Suzannah and Mark) 706 W. Main (not active) Suzannah Reid 320 Lake Ave. (active?) 303 E. Main (permit to be issued soon) 702 W. Main (approval expired) 315 E. Hyman Benjamin's (trellis not completed) 411 E. Main - Cantina 218 N. Monarch - Halfhouse Mark Onorofski 426 E. Hyman (under permit) 123 W. Francis (under permit) 517 E. Hopkins (project abandoned?) ry Hirsch Meadows (permit to be issued soon) 918 E. Cooper (under permit) Gilbert Sanchez 420 E. Main Galena Plaza (not active) 820 E. Cooper (not active) 411 E. Main - Cantina 514 E. Hyman - Mason Morse bldg. Jeffrey Halferty 939 E. Cooper 325 E. Main - Baang Cafe 715 W. Main (roof material) CONCEPTUAL APPROVALS WHICH HAVE NOT GONE TO FINAL: 939 E. Cooper (Langley), expires November 9, 1997 - Unit E 520 Walnut (Greenwood), expires March 22, 1998 834 W. Hallam (Poppie's), expires April 26, 1998 123 W. Francis, Lot B (Vickery), expires May 24, 1998 Awards 1997 550 Gillespie - Beck House Amy Amidon thoughts: Elizabeth Paepcke award for Markalunas's (care of the Aspen grove Cemetery; Ramona's involvement in HPC and charter member of the historical society) E)<161- ourgeâ€¢C FIREA.AcE'~n p.rearY L."5 -2 4* lf, 2 40 -AtiviR A exler: WaLl- I LIMING ROOM EÂ·*ter 20 , 'R' SE 1 - 41.1~,Ad;E a 4% RE,10.0 -2_,1 N Ekl APP lÂ·r.+1 HOUSE 4,0 e.M -1- nâ‚¬/ E)<1â€¢51 -~1 ENTâ€¢Y e â‚¬AlneY MAN /'1~~~'L- ~1/1 1-6â€¢usg Â·2 ' u (301 3 0 --~..x 1 1- vv/2 24\-1--8 - b q [-000% 6 El 0 14kmasift:42 3 GRAVE,- PARMIA,9 0 1 4 ~_%.1 0 ty) - . - //Â«r ~-350~0~---eftzi~ Â»SS>UB60 /=7 206Â£2 *F_~:Z~_ 1Â»za 14 -T ...ni L,N D.SeAA Al 0FL, . , p.-19 o N HAre+IED AVEA 1- 91408 s Bew â‚¬Â£:e F l Ll - filif 911'Pll 'i ~-1-J // //9 /\ t E- 1 4Â« FLAN 49-LE I: 10 4*\ DASHED LINE SHOWS CO'*1â‚¬CT,0.) To MAIN 1 . MOUSE . 'C. Ex,5TIN4 -= WAIA, .. E OPEN To ExisT,%4 IC<124#EN 2 Te aâ‚¬ REMOVED 1 7, 4-lial 1-#tu AporrioN 9/ MAIN Houâ€¢se Be#.4 1> 4541.â‚¬ 12 1O 0 0 0 1. 1 E)(1511NG -KEW APPMON -1--EX]511NG-- 1&2LEEVA{.EL 5CALE 1/8" - 1'-0" 0 - 0 0 0 4144 -, 6, .0 E /,0 ,/ lil . ~- E)(1511NG-NEW APPITION - E)(1511146 --| WAVIELEVATION_ 5CALE 1/8" - 1'-0" 0 0 . Roil=Z=4-,95 . Go '49#~v . 4 W/-Â¥W -6,2 1 .M'*2 1+09 AA 8 NO'1093 8 9-- L 7kâ‚¬1400-7 <744' Â¥7140,4 31-2/0-U W 09'194/JA,//1-3,1 *4HL 099679##99 44* Gal@,053VSO 39 Ca Â¥|0Â¥d SiS Ne . f i . .- --944001, 42>2 14 *s *WI JQ -9NM % . 1 kW .1 \1 ~14.Ic\.4 * . - . ' . 1. . 341Â®Wear JA>#A d N 16"4 09)Udad . I l> . \L /0 MJ<?4700,;14 /4 ' 392+.76â‚¬,20 94 ah-1/ a . 45*11+1.649,*5 wj .46\0 41 . 1Abl J 4-1*41 9% ld 4 4-&1 4 ke C#Â·99Â¥74*1 39 01 (53,00144 -02,~/ \ + *2 St.Sho 4- I \ 1 ligIHXail Â¥17 N XV:19568 Â· Â£96 Â· 046 2990Â·â‚¬96Â·0Â£6 Â£29 Le .00 '31VaNOSWVO DllÂ·Â£11 tc, :V, OlanlS '133819 NIVVY Â£ 1* l661 1 1 NOf t. S1031IHOBV â€¢ NOS1BaSOM '0 'M m EXHIBIT 1 2/-97 Ir I -% g W UA!111- r 4 1 I ... .e ..... ./4 Â·44 4 9,- 44-wad////I/A..-2',1 ~~â€¢%:*FA~p: 4 . mW.I.@*"r l - .'" .w LIT- ~- _- Â·te. 1/./. -ah,adew ~. 94 - 2 Ardr . u -44 4.killilmli lillill'll'llillill//It 33 . -- 1-N--- - 1*, . ..le..1 . -miti- ~2 . 1.- & FÂ®N 1 411 9- I . i 7/"1* i Z' ~ W" am . ////r /'22 . Â·A: . li .~.E- ... I I I /'I -- 'V.i .......' ..2 Â·Â· Â·0 '~ ~'~' 2 3. .4 -J '11 4/'*4 :.ilp- . ./ 1 1 4 12:2 1 9,41.11''ll i 141.- -11.-..7 - 2 k 1,11,1 1 *# . 1 : 1141 4/ - e.:fli ....6. 1. Â·2; 1 V ..342 4 l.. ' 'i.~ Â·'. ii.Â»tie Â¢h' . s; Â·Nk Â·I - . *4*4*40 :.1,0; ;4ia t. I 'W A $. , 1 ' ..111 '571 - Wa#*6./.** wri 4Â» V. 61, 0. '~-as~L - 4 1. 1.f, l'af#40>f<Â¢ 144~ - ~--It j.k r r * 0 1 %.1*4 5-rdi 4 4 - 16 r . 3 ' - ~Â· Â·r~~*Â»=:/M.3-5r~ wv..-Â·-:-e-- Â·'â€¢~~9~9~â„¢mm+~D-ElÂ·'-â„¢'0"â€¢99.mMI.m.p---.-W3--.---."r7- Â· Â· -64 Â·0.-p, 6Â¥044~ V . 'M n 4 7.Imill'.4.........t ...P et 1101r~Â·t . 1 I *ii *74 1 d~.9.~ 4'i~ 4 44.tit 4% 4 .-:- 4 i ..., 4 *ftâ‚¬ t: W ./.* t<~ 7 4.6~~~1.141, ~~:~_9'~7-1~.~ ~*~~67@~ 4 ''fi~~ 4 1-:1 - 1 1111/4 13, 4 r 1 ,-fy ! 12 t.7 1 3 9 2- r )-I 4 1/. 99- .vt .2. 4, I Wil *% ,1 ~ - 7. 4 1 - - % .75: . 2: 3 1/1 ./** .-.F.'"Il'ew; 1*. .../1.#*.#4 am 1 * ././Ma ,Â·. z la*KN . &-i. Â·31,.=4 9.4.2~Â·f 1-7 - 62 40 -- Idi~ fi.f.Â¥- - I ..m X 4.........5 L e - q .-2 Els I - 1 Â¥ f *44 - -Ele# . 4- 2/'lli <Sir- 1 . 3 0-~/3-*.Fl-'P.-Ill -...?ft ~ME f-*//1///iw 4 732.;.- 11//~/&/bp 7 6.1 .4,1 Â·.:.i'Â·46*-411 *4 zi Â· SÂ· , 1~L .11Â£ -A.1 -=.8 f a $ 2 .1 -2-I-- I.-I..#I- ~Ill:..~4./.-*.vi A.I- 4//- * - 8 v' 1 ...Ll...lill- ..124.1 .1,-1 - ..3-S. : 1., '1-110?.&*, - ' 4. 1 1 I '4- ..0 9 VT#/I'llil LUG'll/A . 3 :- 4 I X 4 4 -1 i â€ž 2 ~i= I. 54 1 1 - tÂ»fi 1- -, i. Â· K Â·>r r e'lite:01'~' Â·:4,B*Vf 49* UÂ«Kt ~ %03%5.AÂ· ...... 9... h . ... .- 01.... : ... ...(*44 - 4 ..' -.m' 2-. '..... 1*NN.-4*2-*:'. 7-94 34-A\ "B :.*23..~ - HIA -7. .tr~--.~ *47.2*LTAi-'i t I -*t%,2 Â· ..i -4 44.1,&.:0 -*41~16*2/Ima~~**1. I ' 401"/Woof. 1.: 1 19//4)//* 5.4-r,b. -k:Â·4*9 -~.Â·~..2,?r . *2 Â·&28,".b- .... '4~7~4 "2 4 :â€žÂ· .7 + , t 4-4 ::---~,~b- ..rilit. Â· 1- .9*&~:9- .....1.,i.2.;2. V.I-- . 04 ,.9641' &1~04 / 4 C I Â»14 -'.-L. ..le.*% 4.. 4â‚¬ ........ - 4 .%, '-///&. ;IÂ·* ./ *%9mL, ~ ' *. 4 + - - - .. 4.1 7%1.- 1 1 4 . F%2~--m- 0-, -4* :y I - MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 203 S. Galena Street (Brand)- Minor DATE: June 11, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC approval to remove the existing stone thresholds at each retail storefront so that the spaces are accessible (no step up). The Brand building is listed on the National Register, is a local landmark, and is within the Commercial Core Historic District. APPLICANT: Harley Baldwin, represented by Ted Guy. LOCATION: 203 S. Galena Street PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with the designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a historic landmark .... Response: The applicant requests HPC approval to remove the stone threshold at each retail space in the building so that the shops are accessible to the disabled. Historic photographs of this building show that the building originally had a sandstone threshold running along the base of the building, however the stone that is currently in place is probably not the original since the openings have been altered numerous times, including one period when the first floor was a Jeep dealership and garage doors existed in the openings. The wooden store fronts that are currently in place are not original and are not a completely accurate copy of the original storefronts. Staff finds that a' cut in the sandstone threshold for the width of the door opening is acceptable. The applicant proposes to lower the existing door and make a taller transom to match the existing detailing. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proposed changes will not impact the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The proposal affects non-historic material, so the historic significance of the building will not be impacted. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The architectural integrity of the building has already been affected somewhat by the elimination of the original storefronts. Staff finds that it would be appropriate to consider reconstructing them at some point. The proposed alteration in this application do not further diminish the building's architectural character. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC approve the minor development application. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "1 move to approve the minor development application for 203 S. Galena Street." ExaTING STOKE , '600'i:*al,r #- I - - I.Xm.â€¢Le~WDf*BalÂ® 21.e,tr r --1 ' ExaTINe *Â·raN*~ &,-IDGST,le STONE / . m, - 00]yAÂ£ STORE FRONT BEFORE - E,]91'IN6 GYCKE Gg,441> BIALPNe Be'ING STÂ¢*4*l ~~EX!*TING STCNE \4 -1 .=1 11 11 . / r#Impl 11Â· 1 0.-- f 1 : 4 1 I - ..Â·,11/j /â€¢~ l'rnICAL STORE 920147 AFIER v-* AS.1 06/05/1997 15:33 9709274B13 THEODORE K GUY ASSOC PAGE 82 .ilillit 14- O MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission ft 1 TIIRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development Directorl/U FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 1008 E. Hopkins Avenue- Final DATE: June 11, 1997 SUMMARY: The applicant has received HPC conceptual approval to move the existing house forward, to demolish recent additions and to create a new addition to the existing historic house. A west sideyard setback variance, a combined sideyard setback variance, 500 square foot FAR bonus, and Ordinance #30 variances have been approved. Minutes from both March 26, 1997 and April 9, 1997 are attached. Staff recommends HPC grant final approval with conditions. APPLICANT: Arthur Bellis, represented by Dave Rybak of Bill Poss and Associates. LOCATION: 1008 E. Hopkins Avenue, the east 12 feet of Lot L, all of Lot M and the east 3 feet of Lot N, Block 25, East Aspen Addition to the City and Townsite of Aspen and the east 12 feet of Lot B, all of Lot C and an adjacent parcel of land described as follows: beginning at a point 12 feet west of the northeast corner of Lot L, thence northerly to Lot B, thence easterly to the southeast corner of Lot E, thence southerly to the northeast corner of Lot D, thence westerly to the place of beginning. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) ofthe Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The applicant proposes to move the existing house forward on the site, to restore it to its historic appearance and to make an addition to it. 1 The building envelope on the site is fairly restricted for several reasons. The lot is only 45 feet, instead of 60 feet wide, and slopes toward the river. A sewer line easement, which is not part of the applicant's property, runs along the west side of the site. Along the back of the proposed building, the applicant must avoid development in the area of a sewer line extension, a fishing and trail easement and the stream bank. As a result, the house is proposed to be set on the west lot line, and sideyard and open space variances have been granted. Because of the sewer line easement on the west the house will be sufficiently distanced from the building on the west and will appear to have a large yard. The property is not served by a functioning alley, however the applicant has been creative in arranging to share a driveway with the neighboring building, leaving the front of the property landscaped, with no driveway cut or garage visible. In terms of the architecture, staff is in support of the proposed remodeling of the historic house and the entryway linkage to new construction, an approach which has been successful in many other projects. The design and materials selected for the new addition are compatible but different from the historic building, which is one of HPC's goals. HPC has made a finding that the massing of the new addition is compatible with the historic resource. The drawings provided for final show the restoration of the historic home, but include an ornate window on the west facade for which there is no historical evidence. Staff recommends against adding such conjectural details to the building. The applicant must provide a preservation plan showing how the materials of the historic structure will be retained or repaired where necessary. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character ofthe neighborhood ofthe parcel proposed for development. Response: The house has been located on this site for over 30 years. Most of the neighborhood is multi-family or duplex units, which have to some extent isolated this building. Staff finds that the applicant's effort to retain the building on-site and restore it to an improved condition is commendable. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. Response: The historic significance of the house is not diminished since demolition is limited to recent additions. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. 2 Response: The applicant proposes to restore the original character of the building and improve its physical condition. COMPLIANCE WITH ORDINANCE #30 Response: Windows shown on the south, east, and west elevations of the addition extend into the "no window zone." The applicant may either accept a double FAR calculation for the interior space associated with these windows, eliminate the windows where they violate the standard or ask for a variance. Staff has recommended that no variance be granted on the south facade because of the scale issue it creates with the historic resource, while HPC has felt that the transparent element helps to mitigate the scale issue. HPC must determine whether or not the east and west windows overemphasize the volume of the interior space. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the Development application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that HPC grant final approval with conditions. 1. Eliminate the bay window on the west facade of the historic house. 2. Provide information on how historic materials will be preserved and repaired for approval by staff and monitor. 3. As part of the on-site relocation approval, the applicant must provide a bond in the amount of $30,000 to insure the building's safe relocation, a site plan showing how and 3 where the buildings will be stored, and a letter from a structural engineer indicating how the building will be braced for relocation. 4. HPC must grant waivers for the windows on the south, east, and west of the new addition or they must be modified to meet Ordinance #30. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to grant final approval with conditions. 1. Eliminate the bay window on the west facade of the historic house. V 2. Provide information on how historic materials will be preserved and repaired for approval by staff and monitor. 1 n v 1--Art& A( ,cl '-1-'c -,0-n u L ~ 24- 1 at -511 h, . 1 : 3. As part of the on-site relocation approval, the applicant must provide a bond in the amount of $30,000 to insure the building's safe relocation, a site plan showing how and where the buildings will be stored, and a letter from a stale#Mial--98% meer indicating how the building will be braced for relocation. rt) M i 1 V i . 3 MA OV --4 414* 4. HPC must grant waivers for the windows on the south, east, and west of the new addition or they-must-bem '*fed*meet Ordinance #30." C- De 7 Â·Aluc/- kjcut 41-*-/-1-----* t L r.> 1~ dâ€žn. --h .,4 f A J j f l..~- 1/LA Ot 06Â«4 14-03 A O Q *Ltc *~ *~(~ *~ 9 kl--,~ A / 2 L , 4 upi ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 Charles stated that the frame will be tied into the existing window sash and basically it will be a box frame that projects out. Members concluded that the straight sides and curved front were a compromise in the design. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the minor development at 403 S. Galena, application for the River Valley Ranch Aspen information center recommending that the applicant use a square side and curved bay window as presented in exhibit #6; second by Melanie. All infavor, motion carried. 1008 E. HOPKINS - LANDMARK, CONCEPTUAL Gilbert seated but did not vote due to a full board of 7 members. NOTE: 1008 E. Hopkins has three exhibits. Assistant City Attorney, David Hoefer stated that the affidavit of notice reflects adequate posting and HPC has jurisdiction to proceed. Amy stated that landmark designation requires that two standards be met. Staff stated that architectural importance has been met. It is a typical Aspen miners cottage and has had few alterations. Standard E, community character has also been met. The cottage is a modest scale, style and character of the late 19th century. The site is narrower and longer than most in the neighborhood; however, there is an 18 foot sewer line easement that runs down the west side. The applicant cannot build on that easement and they are trying to get a driveway access permit across it. The applicant wishes to share the driveway with the property owner to the west so there would be no parking on the street and no garage doors on the street. Staff also stated they are in favor of moving the house forward. There is a connecting link between the cottage and addition and HPC encourages that in projects. The materials for the proposed addition are appropriate; however, the mass overwhelms the historic resource. It is essentially four times the size of the original structure. A few bonuses are being requested. A side yard setback variance is being requested as the proposal is to set the 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26, 1997 addition on the lot line so there would be no side yard setback variance there, however because of the sewer line easement it would not impact the neighbor. They also need a combined side yard setback easement waiver for the same reason. They are also requesting the square footage bonus that is available to landmarks which is 500 sq. ft. Staff is recommending against the bonus because the massing is not compatible with the original building. Staff is also recommending tabling. Chairman Jake Vickery opened the public hearing. Dave Rybeck, Bill Poss & Associates represented the owner. Dave stated about 32% ofthe existing structure will be removed. There will be a connector and a two story addition to the back of the site. Within the historic cabin there will be a two bedroom guest suite. There will also be a two car garage. They are required to have two parking spaces and the applicant chose to put them in the garage so there is no on-site parking. They do not want to impact what yard exists. The adjacent sewer easement will be landscaped. Suzannah stated that she would have a problem approving a variance for the side yard. She is also concerned about the house being lower than the street. Amy stated part of the bonus is attributed to the garage and she feels that does not deserve a square footage bonus from the HPC. They are not required to build a two car garage. Dave stated with the narrow lot and trying to separate the two buildings they can only meet 28% ofthe open space requirement and they are 7% short. They are going to the Bof A for a variance. Gilbert asked about the South elevation and breaking down ofthe front facade. Dave stated the entire front gable will be separated from the shed roof about a foot to break it up. 4 . ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26, 1997 0 Charles Vresilovic, adjacent neighbor to the east stated they take great pride in keeping the yard cleaned and flowers planted. They have seen the neighborhood change and have put up with three years of non-stop construction on that street. Construction workers park illegally. Five feet between the building is too close. Eventually improvements will be made to the property they live in presently. They are willing to give them what the law allows, 3,279 sq. ft. A house the size that is presented is too large for that lot. 28% open space is not enough. It is essentially too close to the street. They have eliminated any appearance of a yard in the front. There are four local men that live in the present house and they will be displaced. John O'Donohue, adjacent neighbor at 1010 E. Hopkins stated that five feet is too close. His western windows upstairs will face the wall of the addition instead of his present view of Aspen Mtn. and Shadow Mtn. If they are digging five feet there could be structural damage. A monster onto a tiny lot is inappropriate. Brian Gonzalles neighbor requested that they mitigate construction impacts as the neighborhood has had severe construction impacts. 0 Mary stated that the applicant is proposing to move the building forward two feet in front of the complex to the left. She also stated that she is sympathetic to the neighbors. Dave stated during the history of the town lot lines moved and set backs have changed. Five feet is part ofthe allowable setbacks. Susan suggested that the historic part of the building should be moved to the west. Melanie inquired about the adjacent parcels. Dave stated that the duplex is on its own lot and the three condos are on one lot. Melanie stated that the adj acent house is too close to its property line and 0 the dimensions are about 45 feet by 100 feet. That parcel could be torn down and developed. 5 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26. 1997 Roger stated that the fenestration on the south side is too vertical. He feels the bonus is justified due to the connector and the fact that there is a garage, rather than having cars out on the street. He also stated that he would request a restudy of the resource and its placement a little more to the west to address the concerns of the neighbors. Overall due to the slope of the lot it is a good solution. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC supports landmark designation finding that standard B (architectural character) and E (community character) are met. The partial demolition and on-site relocation are supported. The Public Hearing and Conceptual are continued to April 9th, 1997, with the following conditions: 1) Restudy is made of the south side and therefore no variance at this time is given regarding ordinance 30 until the study is complete. 2) A study is made of the placement Of the historic resource in regards to the setbacks east and west; therefore HPC is not granting a five yard west sideyard setback or 13 foot combined side yard setback variance until the restudy is done. 3) The entire project is subject to the applicant avoiding development in the area of the sewer line extension,fishing and trail easement and stream bank In addition the applicant must obtain an Board of Adjustment variance. 4) AIso stated that a letter be drafted to BofA asking for a variance in order that we may save an historic resource and place it within the confines of the property to allow the applicant to build an addition and that the design is compatible with the neighborhood; second by Susan. Motion carried 7-0. Roger stated direction is given to move the building as far to the west as possible and still work with the excellent landscaping plan. Jake stated that the intent of the zoning code was to get ten feet between the buildings and if there were overriding issues to reduce that they could be presented. Dave Rybeck stated they might be able to provide 10 feet at the historic house but the actual setback might be less where the addition is sitting. 6 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MAR. 26, 1997 0 Mary stated that the addition doesn't impact the neighbors it is the historic house that does. Roger stated that the board is concerned about the historic house and its impacts. Melanie stated that the ultimate benefit to the resource is to move it as you don't know what is happening next door. Amy stated she is also concerned about the house being lower than the street and she feels awarding 125 sq. ft. for the applicant to build a two car garage really has nothing to do with preservation and is not in keeping with the bonuses that were awarded in the past. They are already getting 375 sq. ft. free for a garage. Mary stated that she understood the FAR situation but in looking at the entire project she has no problem with granting the FAR. 0 Suzannah stated that generally she could support the bonus primarily due to the lot size. Roger stated that he would favor the FAR bonus. Jake stated he would support the bonus pending the restudy recommendations. Susan stated she could not make the FAR determination. Melanie stated she would support the bonus. Mark stated that in this particular case he would support the bonus. Gilbert stated that the site is unfriendly right now for the little building and the FAR bonus would enhance the project. 0 7 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 9. 1997 4) Approval from the BofA if required. second by Mary. All in favor, motion carried. 9-4- Regular meeting was called to order by Jake Vickery, Roger Moyer, Susan Dodington, Suzannah Reid, Gilbert Sanchez, Jeffery Halferty and Mary Hirsch. Excused were Mark Onorofski and Melanie Roschko. 611 W. MAIN - PARTIAL DEMOLITION Amy stated that the property is in the Main Street Historic District and is not actually a designated landmark but is worthy of being one but it is on the historic inventory. The application is to demolish a shed at the rear of the property. Generally outbuildings should be preserved that are part of the way Aspen used to be. Barns have been retained as garages etc. On this particular property it cannot be established when the building was built as it is not on the Sanborn map from 1904 so it was probably built subsequent to that. The owner feels it was around 1930. The shed is colapsing on itself and Staff is recommending demolition. Dan Levinson, owner stated that he purchased the property from Harry Shaw and the grandson stated that Harry constructed it out of old wood. The house has been proped up several times. 1008 E. HOPKINS - CONCEPTUAL David Rybeck presented drawings. The landscaping has changed and the model has been revised. The window at the addition has been changed to give the facade more proportion with the historic structure. The plate has been dropped to 10 foot five. At the last meeting it was requested that we look at the historic structure in its relationship to the road vertically. Roger stated that the distance from the lot line on the east of the historic structure will be five feet and the new addition will be seven feet and that changes a little with the shed. 2 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 9. 1997 0 Public stated that Mr. Bellis has done everything to make this a good descent proj ect. Chairman Jake Cickery closed the public hearing. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS Roger stated that he found the original design to be compatible with the historic structure. Because ofthe fact that the slope backed down the original design was not that impacting from the street. If we are asking them to create more verticality it is against our goals. They did the study on moving the house over but it doesn't work. Suzannah stated that she likes the new elevation better. Gilbert stated that the original proposal had a better relationship and lowering the plate height making a taller presence is not a good situation. He also stated that he likes the shadow line that has been created as it has a 0 good relationship to the window on the existing building. He stated because of the constraints keeping the building five feet from the property line is acceptable and it has been looked at satisfactorily. He also stated that the little historic building suffers because the scale is smaller than what is around it. Jeffrey stated that the site plan really shows how the house is set back and he feels will be an improvement to the site. He stated it was a well studied project. He also stated he like the pitch of the roof of the first design but with the overall massing it wouldn't make a difference to the eye. Susan stated that she is concerned about the addition being too massing. Mary asked which design the owner preferred? David Rybeck stated that he and the applicants preferred the new design because of the massing and the final result ofthe gable. They feel the pop out of the bay and the addition of the shed roof breaks down the massing 0 even more as well as give it more relationship to the front gable of the 3 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 9. 1997 historic structure. It also reduces the heights ofthe windows. He also stated that it will be difficult to pick up the difference in the pitch. Jake stated his thought was a smaller element that stepped down to the cottage. He likes the 9 foot plate and the 12 x 12 roof. The intention was to bring things down to the cottage and not to emphasize vertical height. The cottage needs prominence to the street. David Rybeck stated if he raises the historic house it forces him to raise the plate height of the upper floor which then forces him to raise the height of the building. Roger stated when the building next door is torn down it can never come anymore forward than what the applicant is at this time unless the setbacks change. Bill Poss stated with the little structure sometimes it is better to have it a little depressed to call attention to it. It adds vitality. The mere fact that it has been moved forward will call attention to it and it is unique in the neighborhood. The applicant wants the view but he wants daylight also. Mary stated that she is comfortable with the plan as is and being 2 1/2 feet higher is not an issue for her. Susan stated that she would like it higher. Jeffrey stated that he is comfortable with the plan as presented. Gilbert stated that the applicant is satisfying all the requirements and he is OK with the plan as presented. MOTION: Roger moved to grant conceptual approval to 1008 E. Hopkins; supporting landmark designation finding standards B & E have been met. That a restudy be done of the roofpitch being brought back to the original design 12 x 12 with the placement of the current window design into that original roof pitch (restudy ofthe southfenestration ofthe addition). Also that partial demolition be approved as requested and on-site relocation as requested. Also supporting a five yard west setback variance and a 13 feet 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APRIL 9. 1997 combined side yard setback variance. HPC supports the 500 sq. ft. FAR bonus and allowing a variancefor Ord. #30 to be met at final depending upon the restudy ofthe south elevation. second by Mary. Motion carried 5- 2. Susan and Jake opposed. 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Development D i rectof~ FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer RE: Trustee Townhouses, Units 2 thru 9- Conceptual DATE: June 11, 1997 SUMMARY: The Aspen Meadows SPA, including remodeling and expansion of the existing Trustee Townhouses, and construction of three new units, was approved by City Council in 1990. A building permit has recently been issued for the construction of the three new units, but the approved addition to the existing units has never been carried out at least in part due to the high cost of construction. Instead, the owners of the historic units have made minor changes with HPC approval. On June 19, 1997 the vested rights that protect the approval for the significant addition to the historic townhomes will expire. New approvals could probably not be obtained because of changes in the Land Use Code which have subsequently reduced the floor area available to the parcel. Although the townhome owners do not appear to be interested in pursuing the approved addition, they wish to receive a Conceptual approval for a more modest expansion of 256.5 square feet to each of the units before the expiration of vested rights. Staff recommends approval of the proposed addition. An application for an "Insubstantial Amendment to the Specially Planned Area" has been submitted for Community Development Director approval. APPLICANT: The Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc. and the Aspen Institute. LOCATION: Condominium Units 2-9, the Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows, a Condominium according to the Condominium Plat thereof recorded in Book 39 and Page 16 and as described in the Condominium Declaration for the Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows recorded on February 6, 1996 as Reception No. 389723. 1 0 ZONING: RMF-SPA Conceptual Development PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an "H," Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 26.72.010(D) of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: The applicant proposes to convert the existing foyer into a guest bedroom and to add a guest bathroom and solarium in the area that is currently an open terrace. The addition is a two story volume with a flat roof. The guest bathroom walls will be sided with wood siding to match the existing. The solarium is proposed to be a metal structure with windows 0 and sliding glass doors. Staff finds that the addition is compatible with the existing architecture in materials and form. Other than the addition of the guest bathroom, there is no demolition of the historic structure. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The addition will not be easily visible from the front of the units, but will be viewed from the pedestrian path at the rear. Staff has some concern with the issue of light spillage and would ask for an applicant response as a condition of conceptual approval. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 0 2 Response: The proposal involves little demolition and is not easily visible from the street, therefore staff finds there is no impact on the historic significance of the original buildings. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development is compatible but distinguishable from the historic structure, therefore the architectural integrity is preserved. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Development application with conditions to be met prior to issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (specific recommendations should be offered) 4) Deny Development approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. Recommendation: Staff recommends HPC grant conceptual approval following discussion of light spillage issues with the new addition. Recommended motion: "1 move to grant conceptual approval for the proposed addition to the Trustee Townhomes, Units 2-9, with discussion of light spillage issues." 3 PUBUC NOTICE DATE UÂ«/47 TIME:,7~ 1 PLACE Â·sU PURPOSE *eâ€¢ 7, I..'lk i i.,Ir 6 -* . M , 7167 F b . SENT BY:SAVANAH LTD PARTNER ; 5-28-97 ; 2:42PM ; 3039254387-6 9709259199;# 2 ~ County of Pitkin } AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE PURSUANT } SS. TO ASPEN LAND USE REGULATION State of Colorado } SECrION 26.52.060 (E) L Laurie J. Spakanik , being or represeming= Applic=Irro the City of Aspen. personally cm~ify thar Ihavecomplied.with thepublicuotion requir-041â„¢ pursnant to Section 26-52.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Regulations in the fojlowing manner: l, By mailing of nonce. acopy of which is mached hereto. by first-class. posrage prepaid U.S. Mail to all owners of prepeMy WiIhin three hundred (300) feet of the subject property, as indicared on che atmched list. on the 28tbday of Mav , 191 (which is 14 days prior co che public heanng date of 6/11/97 ). By posring a sign in a conspicuous place on [he subjec: propeny las it could be seen from the nearest public way) and thar :he said sign was posted and visible continuously from the 29th day of May , '99~ (Must be posted for ar least ten (10) full days before thehearing dare:. A photograph of thÂ© posted sign is amiched hereto. 6 , --0,3 4 - (/-3/<MUL)4102(Milb (Actica phocograph here) ligndrure Signed before rns this 62â‚¬14- day VÂ»Al , iggz by Of 1_AuÂ·cr, e EpaUL A 2- L WrrNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires :_ M, Commission explies August 17,1998 Notary Public Notary Public'**mm- 1 Attachment to Affidavit of Notice List ofProperty Owners Within 300 Feet Aspen Institute, Inc. 1000 N. 3rd Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Aspen Meadows Lot 4 City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 McPherson/Lind, LLC. c/o Doug McPherson 514 E. Hyman Ave. Aspen, Colorado 81611 Application for Insubstantial Amendment to Specially Planned Area and Historic Preservation Commission Significant Development Review I. Applicants: The Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc. 1000 N. 3rd Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 544-7922 The Aspen Institute, Inc. 2010 Carmichael Road Queenstown, MD 21658 (410) 820-5429 This application is filed by the Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc. (The "Association") on behalf of the owners of Units 2 through 9. The owners ofeach of the Units are as follows: 0 Unit 2: Bell Mountain Partners Limited Partnership Unit 3: The Aspen Institute, Inc. Unit 4: Presley O. Reed Unit 5: Merrill M. Ford Unit 6: Esther B. Ferguson and James L. Ferguson Unit 7: Jan Jones Sarpa, Mary Sarpa, John Sarpa and Dr. J.R. Sarpa Unit 8: David T. McLaughlin Unit 9: Richard D. Lamm and Harris D. Sherman Pitkin County Title, 1nc. has prepared a certificate of ownership, confirming the list of owners. A copy ofthe certificate is attached hereto. The Aspen Institute, Inc. is an applicant based on its status as the Declarant under the terms of the Condominium Declaration. Bilk 35 \*<OUW_ 41 4 & veÂ« 0 0 II. Applicants Representative: Rhonda J. Bazil, Esq. Rhonda J. Bazil, P.C. 323 W. Main St., Suite 301 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-7171 Letters from the Applicants authorizing the representative to act on their behalf are attached to this application. III. Street Address and Legal Description: Condominium Units 2 though 9, the Trustee Townhomes at the Aspen Meadows, a Condominium according to the Condominium Plat thereof recorded in Book 39 and Page 16 and as described in the Condominium Declaration for the Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows recorded on February 6,1996 as Reception No. 389723. 21-91 Meadows Trustee. IV. Present zoning: RMF-SPA. Lot Size: 2.953 acres. VI. Existing Uses: The eight existing Trustee Townhomes are located on Lot 5 of The Aspen Meadows Subdivision and consist of approximately 1,750 square feet each. Each Unit originally had three bedrooms and two baths. The Townhomes were originally designed by Herbert Bayer and are listed on the City of Aspen's historic inventory. The Specially Planned Area Development and Subdivision Agreement for The Aspen Meadows provides for an expansion and renovation of the existing Townhomes to create eight three-bedroom units of 2,500 square feet of FAR each. The relevant portion of the SPA Agreement is attached hereto. The owner of Units 1, 10 and 11 previously received approval to relocate the unit boundaries and to revise the SPA approvals. The owners of Units 2 through 9 previously applied for and received approval to add a window, revise the entryway and construct a storage area. 0 2 VII. Written description of proposal: 0 The Applicants would like to modify the previous expansion approval to allow for the enclosure of a portion of the terrace. Viewed from the Typical New Unit Main Level Floor Plan from the SPA expansion approvals, part of the foyer would be converted to a bedroom and a portion of the terrace would be enclosed to provide a solarium and a bathroom. By enclosing a portion of the terrace, the existing Unit will increase in size from 1,750 existing square feet to 2,006.5 square feet. This would result in a net reduction of 493.5 square feet for each Unit from the SPA approvals. Square footage ofaddition: 256.5 Existing square footage: 1,750 Square footage of each Unit with proposed addition: 2,006.5 Square footage allowed in SPA approval: 2,500 Net reduction in square feet for entire project: 3,948 The building materials to be used in the construction are as follows: Roof: flat built-up roofing Walls: Solarium - sliding glass with frame color to match existing siding Guest Room - Wood siding to match existing. VIII. Drawings: The following drawings have been enclosed with this application: 0 First Amendment to the Condominium Plat of the Trustee Townhomes Floor Plan Herbert Bayer Floor Plans (showing existing configuration) Typical New Unit Main Level Floor Plan Page Al.3 (showing expansion approved in SPA) Backen & Gilliam plans showing view inside new solarium, section, view of new addition and floor plan IX. Development Review Standards for HPC 1. Standard. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels. The addition has maintained a design compatibility with the original Herbert Bayer plans. It was designed to compliment the existing structures and to protect the views of each of the Unit owners. The original building materials will be repeated in the addition. This addition is on the western or back side of the Units and will not be visible from Meadows Road. 0 3 2. Standard. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Units 1,10 and 11 of the Trustee Townhomes are currently under construction. The design of new Units echo the Herbert Bayer plans, but do not match the existing Units exactly. Therefore, the addition will be consistent with the character of the neighborhood. 3. Standard. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. The historic significance of the existing structures is not affected by the application. 4. Standard. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. The architectural character of the existing structures is not diminished by the proposed addition. X. Development Review Standards for SPA 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The proposed changes will not change the mix of development. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The proposal does not increase the demand on public facilities and roads because there is no increase in density. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mud flow, rock falls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. These are existing units and all construction will be within existing building footprints. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the 4 public at large. This proposal is designed to protect the views of the Unit owners by eliminating the ability to expand to the west. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The proposal is not in conflict with any elements of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. The proposal does not require any additional expenditures for public facilities. 7. Whether the proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.84.030(B)(2)(b). The requirements of this Section are net by this proposal. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. The proposal does not require any additional GMQS allotments. 0 5 77ie Trustee Townhomes it the Aspen Meadows 1000 North Third Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 544-7900 Condominium Association, Inc. Fax: (970) 925-4188 Dasid T. Mci.aughlin President Merrill M. Ford May 29,1997 Vice President Jolm G. Satpa Serrelmy Presley Reed 1*reasitirr Mr. Stan Clausen Director of Community Development City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ile: Application of Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association and The Aspen Institute, Inc. Dear Mr. Clausen: The Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association, Inc. authorizes the office of Rhonda J. Bazil, P.C. to act on its behalf in pursuing an application for 0 an insubstantial amendment to a specially planned area and asignificant development review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Our representative may be contacted at the following address and telephone number: Rhonda J. Bazil, Esq. Rhonda J. Bazil, P.C. 323 W. Main St., Suite 301 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-7171 Please contact Rhonda Bazil if you need any additional information relating to this application. Sincerely, TRUSTEE TOWNHOMES AT-THE-ASPEN MEADOWS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. ftÂ»-3 0 By: / /41dfinlirpa, Secfetary Ad,ninistratiue Center 1*,idqi,n## SrmhimÂ· De},tri 2010 Carmichael Road 15133 New f liti,apshire Ave.. NW 1000 NwÂ·th Third Su'ecl The ~ PO Box 222 S/tite 1070 Aspen. (:0 8161 I Aspen C Queen.lowu. MD 21658 Wart,inqum. DI : MIX)36 (970) trE,Â·71)10 (410) 820-5429 (202) 736Â·ARD{) Fax (1)70) 925-41 88 Institute Fax (110) 827-9182 Fax (202) 4674)790 May 29.1997 Mr. Stan Clausen Director of Community Development City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Application of Trustee Townhomes at-the-Aspen Meadows Condominium Association and The Aspen Institute, Inc. Dear Mr. Clausen: The Aspen Institute, Inc. authorizes the office of Rhonda J. Bazil, P.C. to act on its behalf in pursuing an application for an insubstantial amendment to a spccially planned area and a significant development review by the Historic Preservation Commission. Our representative may be contacted at the following address and telephone number: Rhonda J. Bazil, Esq. Rhonda J. Bazil, P.C. 323 W. Main St., Suite 301 Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 925-7171 Please contact Rhonda Bazil ifyou need any additional information relating to this application. Sincerely, The Aspen Institute, Inc. By: David T. Mel,a~lilin, President E.d HOM=1 Hd09:L S66 l-62-E , 6,7 t.. 758 I. . , , (Note. Minir,ium RMF Zone District open space requirements have been waived by the City for Lot 5 in consideration of the open space otherwise provided in the SPA development plan.) i) External FAR (maximum): 1:1 11 Internal t .\R: no requirement k) Off-street parking requirement: 1 space per bedroom *. 2. ' Condominiumization and Six Month Minimtim Lease Requircnie,it Pursuant to findings made during the approval process and in accordance with '' Section 24-7-1007 of the Municipal Code, the City has granted and awarded condominiumization approval for all eleven units contemplated for Lot 5. Condominiumization of the eight existing units is subject to payment of an ~ affordable housing impact fee according to Section 24-7-10O7ACI)(c). The fee d totals $64,240 and shall be paid at time of recordation of tile condominium plat r- and declaration for the units on Lot 5. 1 1 The six month minimum lease requirement for condominium units as contained 1 at Section 24-7-1007 (A)(1)(b)(1) of the Municipal Code has been and hereby is waived as to all the condominium units' on Lot 5 as approved by this SPA plan. 3. Site Improvements 1Â£ (a) Utilities. All telephone, electric and cable lines on the Properly servicing the improvements shall be undergrounded. All water and sanitary sewer Â£ 1 lines shall be designed and constructed in accordance with standards of the !1 A City and of the ACSD and written easements will be provided if and as required confirming the as-built location of each easement (b) I.andscape Improvements. Savanah shall abide by and fubstantially conform to the tree removal and landscape plans recorded as part of the Â¥.- Plat in Book .2 9 at Page 5- , et seq. of the Records. The landscape plans depict and describe the nature, extent and location of all plant materials in appropriate relation to scale, species and size o f existing plant matcHal, flower and shrub bed definition, a plant material rchedule with common and botanical names, sizes and quantities, proposed treatment of at! ground surfaces (e. g., paving, turf, gravel, terracing, etc.), decorative , water features, retaining walls, fencing, benches, and all other agreed- ~ upon landscape features. Such landscaping shall be completed in a logical : sequence commensurate with the staging of improvements as contemplated , 0 in the Lot 5 Construction Schedule, but in no event later than (,ne year 24 0 . h ,;Â· 4 1 4.0- . . , #... Â¥4,#~.0,0*1'ij~**~f'*:121:1~2:' ' ,:.-,-4- I ~6 .M' *, hedâ€¢!1.{4.1Â·:11.13"*'.4 5./0, f 0 1 1 i 667 'C 757 period next succee:!ing turte ;(1, : 991, ally 5ubsequently adepted reduction in or change to the definition or calculation of FARs. The three new residences haw: received an allotment under the GMQS and have received variations for setbacks, height and open space, as noted on the Plat and as des:ribed beldw. 1. Dimensional Requirements and Variations 1 herefrom The following dimensional requirements are for the RMF Zone District; variations in these requirements that have been granted for the development activity contemplated fer Lot 5 are noted: a) Minimum lot size C ul. it.): 6.000 b) Minimum lot area per dwelling unit: 0 i) 3 bedroom unit: 3,630 sq. ft. c) Minimum lot width: 60 feet d) Minimum front yard: D Principal building: 10 rect T t 0 ii) Accessoty buildlitg: 15 feet " (Note. A variation from minimum RMF Zone District front yard * i sctbacks for accessory buildings has teen granted by the City to ? zero feet fo. Lot 5.) 1 e) Minimum side yard: 5 feet ' 4 0 Minimum rear yard: t i) Principal building: 10 feet . t ii) Accessory building: 15 feet g) Maximum height: 25 feet (Note. A dimensional height variation for the two northernmost trustee I houses has been granted by the City for tip to eight feet,) h) Percent of open space rcipi, cd for fluilding site: 35% 1 23 f I 0 -- - .1 .43 . I ' I .,; 1 1 . I. 4 ,/ ' ... I .... ] 1. Â·: f r.g' f: - ff 72'9; .'> ' ' Â· 1 .- 1 I !'Â·Â· ,Â·, : 667 - â€¢ 756 Â·1-,t requirements for form and content above set forth. Any such substitution shall be subject to the prior approval of [he City Attorney iii his determination. i 3. Trails i The Final Plat depicts a trail easement across the Physics Property from Gillespie Street to the race track trail on Lot 1. Physics and the City agree that this trail easement is not to be paved. Physics is granting this easement but has no i financial obligation of any kind for the trail or any related work. D. 1.0 r 4 - CONSERVATION LAND: Lot 4 is to be sold by Savanah to the City of Aspen for tile purpose of open V,ace, Lot 4 shall be zoned Wildlife Preservation (WP). It is the intention of 111:s zone district that this Property remain open with a trail syste:n and appropriate bridge connections to the Rio Grande Trail. Neither the Consortium nor any of its individual members thereof <liall have any responsibility whaboever for the construction, installation or mairt:enance of any trail or other recreational facilities !0 be incorporated into Lot 4. Exact trail 018'.Imp locations must be approved by the Planning Director giving priority to those alignments which minimize damage or disruption to existing vegetation and landscape and which subordinate grade considerations and, thus, minimize switchbacks, to preservation of i existing topographb 1. Site Improvements (a) Utilitki. The Final Plat shows utility line casements as existing and proposed for electrical, gas, storm and sanitary sewer, and water. E. LOT 5 -THE TRUSTEE HOUSES AT THE ASPEN MEADOWS: | Lot 5 is Savanah's Properly and is zoned Rt.IF according to and as shown on the Plat. Existing development on Lot 5 consists of the eight trustee houses, each of approximately 1,750 square feet, consisting of three bedrooms and two batts. Development has been approved for an expansion and renovation of the existing trustee houses to create eight Ihree-bedroom units of 2,500 square feet of FAR each. In addition three new trustee houses shall be developed on Lot 5, one on the South end of the existing units and two on the North end of the existing units. Each new unit will be 2,500 square feet of FAR with three bedrooms. Total build out on Lot 5 shall consist of eleven units with {hirty- three bedrooms and 27,500 square feet of FAR, excluding carports (up to 500 square feet per dwelling unit). FARs and the definitions Ihereof for the existing and new trustee houses shall remain as set forth and defined in thl. Aspen Land Use Regulations in effect as of June 10, 1991, notwithstanding and shall survive for not less than the three year , 22 - \ , 1 11. 1 L. 63-42:\ 1 Â· 1021 1 THKE.5Mt[) 558 DETAIL 4MEET Ne. A-5 p-ED'22'-u FeD- CK'P 1/4 1 1 -1 11 !4' To -NOSE QM TUÂ© .1 0 4/4 7 1 .., .9 1 , EXHIBIT ~~-1~ / ~ 2 - -;, x L. D. \ It I T ril A ~ /.Â« / .9 /\ \ 40 0. 1- 1 AND PLYVP. PECK i :Ft..1/ 1 1 1 ; HER Err'l' ki,Â¥r Q n 1 _ E,AC I.- 4.917 , \24 KE 'Â·''EZ; '5 Al n 11 'IN' j-EL,Nov 'C.Eu-- 13 -2-1-- 4.'AT.5 Top O F C.11: 9 .. N C. - Or \ , Tllylrrnrrr,rrrT -r bOTT. .5!D 9,4 j 1-0. (CIP ' ' T MV E.L.E_c-. SEL â€¢AlT- t.| . \ - - . .0 4 4- - ..1 . cal- el IC)., - 3 4. b Â· m.1 -e) 104 x '0 1 7. 011 90 1Â« b - f 'L- -1 ==li -= ' 0 A M - M r k ~72-. il.-,41Â«\1 v A ""I I 't. 1. ... I --1 1 --VY, --V, ~V- -4111- - --Ic--CRF- 1=12'-1 - 1 11 Â· . I .2 ' f ,Â« \1 1 11 11 -1 1 '1 1,-*--101.-iD WACE. 614'04 '1 4 11 I <Cluilfictiz-7 -e I.#I.Ii~ - p=u:=44i r.ph. 'Aul u.c 1 -Ne- 1.11 -i _21_4 -401 : ; TU *-- -- , '02&- 1 1''I j 11 - , 0 3-,4 4 j Ir P H /'2-ER :45.33 ~ 1/ I 1 ON ENDS. --/ . 3< 3 4 Â·\ GONCKETS VA'-6 11 1 1-Â»----iLl N I'. 4 -- 642'NC,42-5- 6-11>3<~ ---L c 3' x <92' x..j- -7.-~--Ex 'A w brIBEL -- -il--- . 1 A 179 .. '' 1 CARPET ON ./f-> ExfAN ON. 5HIELD >:4 â€ž-4; F plwpetoma~ FADD|KE / _-_ --- PAMPPKOOFf!<C 11Â»1 Lj" 5 h u + 0 - _-_ - --#- f--I-- ' ~fiLL 1/4' R.Wobtig <*..3 ---= 1 \9. (LANDNG ONLY) , RECEIVED ..\r 6 A - - -. 07. , 1 8 -.-- SAVANAH 90â‚¬3 /JF I ''- 1-t - 2:. I ~ ~~r~) 1~ ~\*~~ 5,60,L:," 00.-: ~ ~ .~A - r L.G, 0 1< -cri JUL 1 4 1992 ' 1.1 2 a ) \\ 6 69 ..~ A Uu ..2 11 . A -' . 1 5.-00 g DE-T>\'L M Ei<KTMI -- â€ž I - 1 11 1 r .-. -- 0,# ps-~ Â«u\'1 ,-' M 2 . 36 -1 .11 1 11 0 Â· 1-1 1 \ \ i !5 1 11 . 970 Â· .r.\ -hi '7 ~ ~ \ 91| avi.HICKY TILE 4" w 8' ON '' \ \ P LETTINatED 'G// 2'42'-16/16,v.V.F. 2 r r.N - 0 F, c C - 9.~ / 4 .-4 - *-in.-1 '14&,9444, 1 r j I fr)? A~V U Â·Â·Â«30- / 31 \ 1' ~~. ~ , LOLE/Â«<A.GE IVIEMORANE , ..' ..l, \\/1' 2 COPPER ?\ JN /\5'f 42 i. 2.1 CK.AL'EL 06.1 H \ 11 2*4' PLATE (7 k.'00'.1.63/3'-dac ---2-==27--,4-- LJ,4, PLYWOOD DECK f E K 3 3 RT 3â€ž0-~F E K >40 0 w 16' / 16' O. C. -- - - ~Lj DE-KeL E.><TR.,theE .'FOOT <3 213. e ACC:-1~10.- 1 ~ 1 t.,11 /~5 Â° E h' / C C> CD 1 11 0 1 . , i )9- 1 11:.1 '' 1, -- 1 ..0 e o â€¢ p''t :17 1 1 1 4, 1 1 - 1 f E.. h.21'-- X 1 1 ., p. -,112__-F - K. EL<~litrc--i=-1 --- .r------, 11 . i 1 , -------- , . -- 4 7 It : 11 1 1 - 1 4 '1 - _ , 01 -7 4 ' '- i : ' 24â€¢ - 7--7- 1 --. -, , 1 ' DÂ·' om 5. 10 : -1 1 j . Tor, ( . , 13' 1 I "--7 12 1-2 h . - , - , 1 r ' 1 -49 - LÂ·IL.14-1.4, 1.-r, .1 -T- 1 -2 01 . i - 1 , ..Fl, . - -' M f 1 1 1 ' 5 J k LT , J r k e u F P --rÂ·--p--22 - --- -- ! 1 U., 8 JetÂ·,T i . - L". /9 - '22- . - +-I- v . 1 1 L u./. ' ' - 2/. 1 . I. . Al . 1 \ r E.1 2.iâ€¢.C~ - 7339 -En~ u , 4 ,% 5 V , 7 -24. 27 2 U, i If ' 4 , .9-1. - . ,- 1 r -- - .. : .0 4. A , ' -1-0209 21Â·,2.2.,12 w v .1 -. 1 - i i + 0, 9.-I Â·02 -.2 , h .1 - F r-\ , 9, 1 1.4 1 ' #' 1 - I P . . - -- -.- .. ~474- ----Â·t '.1 1 1, ; 4 .A.>Lk 4 1 7 1 1 9 , . I. -;Â© 1, 1 1 1 2 -L ._ 0. 0 .. 1 01 1 ., 0 / L-,1 G -2 U 1.40: . - 1 . 4, - -1 r--224 -.-. -* ' . 61 --- - . - U - 6- P .. f --2--- k . 0-0 49'-'17Â« - -- 820&-ur i i , .: 5, 91 u -- ....- , 1 9.-/ Â·. I .. 0 , I A, 6 ---. -i - . / -â€žâ€žA '91. , N ;\ 1 . 4 -2 2 + -UU= 1 I ''111 1 1 1.1 1 11,1 1 .1 I \ â€¢ , ~ . rr.. -4 1 -4 _ 1 -- 01 , 1 , . ,4 , 6. 1 , ' -'. . -,~- I Ff . 0 --70-_ -_- %4 . A Â·v -0 4. I I , - - ___ ~ ' ' *-- - -Â·. , --' -- - 1 1 ; 32: ,-*,.TA.*4- -3 --'I *~ --- f 5 - -/ - 2.1 71 -12 Â· Â· 2.14 . - 1 4 / SAL- c G h.Â¥ Ar,O V -- - 1 1 5. c. h - f l., ..,_-' Â·t ' --- -ir C < ---- i i / ' 1 S' r ..1 ) 38 1 2 5 211 2207, _ -g.Â· C,pus S . L '/2 47 :i"../. 1 7 1 - 9 1- - . H- / M. CLOK,t <ift Â«2..1., .4.--i.4.h.-3.33 -7--. C,, ,.. 1./ j k k --- -LI - -- " 6.1.-19 1 ~ ... i , * 4 --P 1, - 1 41 h '' 0,10 - " S-rekAGE.r . , I. fl X -- 1 1 - 1 , -n DLL |' -- - A- rkt - Ii, /1.1 'IN --4-1--4 g --3~31 f. ' - - 737 .1-' '--7- 4.-7 .*- .-- ' = P'~0~r-1-,tr 1- 1 1 1- . t < 6,2, 1~ k ' '~ ~I.k 1 ~ ~ i' -~4~ t - , 5:ALT 1 1 2 1/ ) i t:2-7 , : U , D L v Ami N. I r=3111 - O,N NIG | [t_93] ,-r. 1 - R 9--- ... 12 ~ . ./.1 -I . li ' tri , . . .' I Ft 4.7 , ..GOD 20> ll-, , 1 46 1 . f. , r.1 \ 1 2>*C N k ._ , ,-T--1 1 1 -Tr -T'-f <~ 1 4- 4 k 2 ---1 - 1 1 -- 1 . . NOT '.4 â€¢.1 -â€¢ 00:V.--1.-1 -11 - & , 1 -2.--- f / 1 1 \ - 2*5 4 6.-T p I -1 . -1 / 0 4 .,1 - -r -4--,0 ' 'o r 1 .../.- - 1 C/â€ž1 K.ACT'f y j-i:*357<--'rni, r;tlld ...?fut' 91â‚¬91 4---1 i r L 'll 1 , _ ~ -~~...9= - - Â«13/ 12' c-YAN/L , -.--, r .* J- --... e.ht ---- I ' . - I . / f-' k~' I* b p*,4 2 K 6 6/. 1 .Â·2 h 1. 2 'tp ,r.Ttit 3-2Â£Â£â€ž4 ,~12,2 ,~ ' ~174'i 0, - . 1, -1 - Ch 42 tf: .-,NI 2 -17 \ , ..Câ€¢NO- ------ i i--# - ~ %; ~ /1 .* j; 9r1- ) 14 +-- a .., --i, - L 1 1 -2 r </ - , . 1 4 74 ' ...1 ' â€¢1 _ ; . #I ./ i (11 -4 -- k V L 4.7 , 2, f i I ry --Â· 1 Â· 11 Y 1,1 , A 'i O Â· L i 4%.: =72Â·Â·Â· ...-1 - 1 2-71 031-----0 -- - 1 1 U'Â«7 6*p'---Â«--~i -r, -41 1 51 2-3< 4 -- T .1 11 21.-2~ 113 -71(21 : *p- 1 -- - 1 - - ;1 4 ' ---- c 1 -- -- I,- '. w ' - L L!_2 ty) 01 , . i, V * k I. 417.12. ' 11* 17/4.: - -1 - , - 8 1 - 13 1 .....8,; ~ f - 1 q I / cv /1 i --- 9 / =-7.1 -rl Z IM 6 1. Â· id; i 3.' 0 -\. 7. 1--- - L 1 4--- 1 . -- d..11 .. 1 Ch.-r 9 -1. ! 1 7 2.ATH / 17 10 1 KITGMEN Â· i 1 1 + i k . 1 1 '11 111 1.-\ 4 . -,-- W , 1 ' - --- .-- V 1. 1 1-- - ' Iii ' - 4-93:ff#r<TIble-F21 ~2]-- N--1 66.6 Ima-LT 4-a 1 71 2,Â· , , i 1, 2431' , , I , .--, 6-J [713-1 / . i\ LE Â£:42<>,vi 7 , . 11 AF -# 0,.4, 9 ' Ff/_4,70.~tlphst; 10 --1' --- -- --ip h \ M= 112 Â» 1 i Z 1 1- ru-in ' ~ :2 09 :13 Â· 1 1 m x 1 1 . Mi /Wit 76,6 1 9 I 1 - Ck' .' f~--r.1 1 0 (-1:4 ,/--1 1-031, 1 .Lo~ c.,Irw.7 'UL 94 1, 1, -- l/ A , .,1 1 77 -9-4,1 E.., . 1, J /4. : 1 1 N.ri F / r 1 1 7 It .4 2 EÂ¢=Ad,t -3373 . . c.2, 6101 6.-/r#*9 #-2=$2#14-,447---*Ii-12-4/~-2.-7-I -- Â· ' 41'' b 1 (1 i j 1 /3 . L... V-r-C - --7- ----- r - 1 1 pl : 0 1 CLO-. E.T'It 2 3 - 4 6'1 41 C r--1-JA paijj ki Vc,q i i , 1 ' 19 f> â€ž/:2 rh 0 \ 41, ; a 1 1 , 1---, -, - U,/ ., -'.0 4 1 ,-, / r-Â· 1 11 1 41 1 1 I . / I 4 ; ' -7, - L - 2 -4. .1 - .. '.Yl, 4. .- 1 r - . + 1 \ ,:t---h--~ -- M -- - --- : x.41,434 k - _17_i - --- 1 â€¢' , / I< -2.4.> , i '" U-/ _.1 ,~. ~ s . 4 76 1 . 1Â©1 -9, b '71 37: 2 / -1 701 2- t i 1 % r-- ,-b Li_ <21 ' -1 1 1 + 4 111 125 . .. ---7 : . - , " 0-- --/ 1 12.2 -re- 7- , ' LEE' 1/1 \ . 41 < /5 N ' . Cil) 0 1 -. m, ,- 4 , 2 1 - 11 â€ž- 11 t r 1 r. I \N!, /; 3 0.\ 1 n -' ..:t. '44 ~ 0 Ul k C .1 j I - 1 ri--t-25JI B Tc~ r, --Â·eW -Â·f- 1 . 1 , (E..1 11 1,1 , /. 742-T. N..1, Pla' --- 1 .-- .) - -.- k. J Â©-9-0 -1 , TYPic*L. l . 40. r -14 9.... 1 .. - , t - '. 6 --1 --9 , 4 KED=.1,0/Vi ,) Cri klED'.L OG,A -- 4 - -9 1- U,/ 1 1 \ 7--' , 2 .... 1 1, .,1 2._Li.J '0 ~ o 1 4- + - - r-- , , --kt.1.~:1Â»nint.St,1 -- 1 - S 6.0 r.- 6, ,0 - i 2/ 1'1 .r A L-7 L le. N -Cr . ' 1 1 t. 1 d; 4 1 4.- 4- 40-r -2.0. 1-Ip 4 - , K.0 '> k -.4 --F- -1 - Al- 4 1. 41 4 1 -- ' I /1 1 + 2 1 , ink.L r - 1 I /1 / 1352.7 ..r,Â£Â£*174?131 it 4.Zi J L /31 1 1 1 -, 1 'I Fe u v. r. -.7 1 W ...1 -1- - -+ , i . I J I | 70- 1 I V ------L '- \\, n.\1 32 ...L r - 41, 771 #Vol ' 1 1 , ~1,91 1 -1, - I ..$' -- I. ./- : ; 1 --00 1 7 1, 41 5 9/JO ' f ' 1. ! / .up; t- - r. ....., # L 4 L_ w - Â· 4 11 r l - ALL j T t.. 1/.-.. L Â·10.4 k. 0 '4 7/ L 2 2 â€¢- "LL-T- S A < 1 Y â‚¬ fÂ» j C AL -1-M AL-L- 9 1 ' L - ,-1 T , c h. 2 L. Â·, *. 0 -f . 1 ,_ .1Â·. i ... L - â€¢-/ 1- LP - 4 1/6, - 1 r l./im t> 1 /VI L H-. t '0 /Je -A. L. 7 4, 5, 7 2 L, ... - L t. _. F -, t_ '1 40,9, . l. 1\14 , 1 1 #1- lin F 1 N j i r.1 t. C / 6.-1, U L. /- 41 12Â· r.-r .-4 4- 5 M / L L_ p.- 6 l- u- II> I. LJ- % 1 2 'U I. 7 -1.- bl 2 1-0. 1 25 - .1 L. d. , -,--7 - 1 I 41 - '-T- - ./ 1- -. 4-1'- 4" - N O Al T H , 1 : 7/.-- - == 70 '4 0 ; 1 t l r - ' 42! b 1 6 -0 7 1, 1 ; 1-7 24- 9 1 Â· Â· a . 1 Ill 1 + t . , i . - 1 -7-YPâ‚¬AL Fl UST FL.002 PLAN! . 1 '--' - 1 1 1 1 0 -1- V {3~> 1 (IZ. /t.~ 1.- ECON 71 ' Al 1 Fr 2-03 4> 2 ~ ' ' S- r) L_ /-1 . 1 3 09 0 - I r . ~~~ ~~ ~ ~i~! e t -, ~ -7- .~ '' - ' , =3 . '..'id 4 , roof --. h â€ž--I , 'St'-2.--2-IA-i~J 84 LI. 1 5 -71'- C' / ,<-d&)~~~12:'5~-4*f~932 -.:, ','i-~ ~- I. /9.6:;:-.:.:6Â¢4*--Â·Â·. Â· Â· ---rbi, 3,3,9- c EXHIBIT -, ... . Â· ..:40*12-23% f - ->~-52%222*k,z-t.wA;I-;i-~3.,iÂ·.i ~- ....roj-~t:4., ., - P. ' 71.-292'....: I.' *-,1. '.,1..0.49 . 92.4 .5 7 . .P. I z.ph-7 MÂ·K Â¢ C.< - 2 07 .Orr 1 -3-â‚¬ ASPE' â€¢EADO*6 6.v*OD "510% . * i N .:..3/*'r . e. 4 . '0.2% 4.,e-Â· Â¥ 26295 â€¢Ne ~42â€¢ - 011*/ a- ~r ~ 4,t , *we~ ~~~,4 1, ..19<*4*- -~-7 Â· Â· Â· Â· -tile:..e. Â¥1 - *1.:'.I-/.I Â·Â·Â·er' 0- 4 '1 , I , % 0 - 12-4 ..agn =z-,=~ ~ ' â€¢Â· /4 -,7 Â· 1 40?c I I.*; . , 6 I Â¥ I , - . '4Â·Â· 4. 3 Num:,1. *- .11111~ 'r ... . . -.- a . 0 4. .. ., - .... I D : , 1, .. .- ... . . lillil' 4 . . , I . ~m , e * . . . 4 d , . . . i 1 . IT- I . I. C .. . .1... ~ ... , . . . . .. S . a. 4 . , . . . 4. 4 . .. ' I, 1 '''IW Il . .. I , 1..........di//1 - .. I .,4 ........ . --i. - ifil~i~~,I..ailiqmi . I--1.9.k . 2.~ 10 , 4 .. . ' J - . 1 + , . . , I .4, 1 ? 6 f~ I Â« I .A These documents ore the BACKEN & GILLAM . property of Backen and G.1/crn Anv unouthortied use without the written - ARCHITECTS consent is prohibited by 10â€¢ Bocken and Gillom discloims responsibility for the 2342 Marins/up Fay, Sausalito. CA 94965 documents if used who&e or In port ot any other Tel (415) 289-3860 Fal (415) 289-3866 IOCotion. ...... - .. ..1 R .. .1. . r / r . . b b . 01 -0-Ii,// 0 dw 6â€¢ 44 4 ---â€ž0 i 1 #~$ 7* I .(A . 9,1 ...-,- 1/ , . , , j 1 - . 4 \ /4 1 , , - - 44 1 EXHIBIT 1/ ARCHITECTS, PC WN $ D e . f 300 S. U.. .T...t t '. 0 A..... .......0 .1/1' 'i ..1, 1 1 .. F.. .IS..... 9 ---- 1 1 - 1 1 1 , -- BAH.Em: 1 1 1 1 |1 | tl -- 11 1 Ill- 1 1 1 9 r : il - -i I - 7 5 F I* - - -- --El- 1 -'*MV Â·*-f'Â·MIÂ» Â·''t 1 1 1 -- 7 : 12-1 1 1, *.I...~9~.~ly<.. f ' 1-22<33 646 or piev I ous 1 11 - , Mf?kileÂ·- Vi 322=c- i Repf.Â£5eu-ret> er> â‚¬*- 11 <-244,- .. 1 11 1 11 - - m:Ell> E -<3~ 1-ms koeÂ·. 1 11 TERRACE ' /' 4,/.0 ~~.....I. 1 . = 1 I - ........ ---0 . f I.[MIall~flaM 4 i 1 11 -- E% 1 11 : j 1 .......1 111 : / * Â© . 1 1 1 1,1. 1 11 ./ . I. 1. â€ž 1 1 1 j == - .--0 .L i H ; 11 b L la' f EEZIL- //9 ./ , 1 1 1 ~ -- .1 1 1 '0.-.- -LUE 11 +=Â£ ' 1 Â§ 4.-1-I.- 1 I 1 A -3 Â¥ -7 ---- Et - urill IF 0 I.-01.- 1 - ' u'lll' 5 1/1 [.1 0-0- - -- 21 1 1. . =:16 1 : 71-1 -I ..er.... L. 0 - :S, hi U. KE[Clim â€¢ - Irm , . ID " ." 7 I f- 1- irue*r 1 tic 7-_1 1-- . XI -- 3+ .t .) 11 / 3 - L --- llc)1.(M- 1 6 1 + . , t. I . ...........1 : 1 1 -- EE6--fi mimlQEN DATE'-4-/4 1 b === ERII~ '- E 1 Z SAVANAH UMFTED PARINGSHIP . .~ : nEIZEQQM 1 -- Â· - OWNER: EEMICOM-1 Â· == :11 80,m, aâ€ž- Sr-T. -- CO - 6 : T= : F , --- \/ 1.- 11\ : 2 1 j....I- 4 ASPEN MEADOWS 1 11- 1 , -S ..~ 9 E 1 TRUSTEE 1 - 1 1 1 \ 4 1 -1- -- TOWNHOMES ~4 -+7 9- -2--- 0. .1 -4\ ~..1-U= REMODEL/ADDNION T - . ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 1101.1211 MEADOWS TFtt,2rrEE . OFF OF MEADOWS ROAO EE:-0.. FR 18r FLOO R PLAN DISABLED ACCESS MODIFICATION ' _re,1-200*gir_ -3- Al.3 : imrÂ· t . *:wmp. :M /7 W r I. Â¢ I i - -\ - % i --. '- 1 BACKEN & GILLAM property of Bocken ond These documents ore the Gill orr. Anv unouthon,ed use without the written ARCHITECTS Bocken ond Gillom discloims consent is prohibited by low responsibility for the 2342 Martns/Up Fay, Sausalito, CA 94965 documents if used whole or In part ot ony other Tet (415) 289-3860 For (415) 289-3866 location. . 4 .. .. 47%*t:+9Â· 4 Ket. 4 Â· . rlyÂ»4" - . .2 I. . #I .. . - 1:it .im . --h 1 . . I . 01 51 0 ",0 P I k- 7 - -- kit i 4, 4 i .9, 11 0 II 1 '191:01. 1 0 \ 1 41/./..7"INIIWE.1 --/0 1 al , ~ .~a. I..ill....p b. . Ilfi/i:i'.I./ -46/311~4041 ................11:11 ---------- I 100 TEAR. FLOOD pLA/N -Â«49// - ...%... ./,51/1:/:.../.*- Al INTEFOLATED FROM -- / /2 i D , FEMA FLIDOD NOF]LE PANEL 91 r Go FEET -09/4 / / \ ' 5-14Â°\1 'OGE 45.0 J E. 4-AE 1-:WE/140 (THEORETICAL POSTIONA ABOVE UREAM DED) ~' / ,/ /' iâ€ž-0.-re.IrFIERMENI_--LE_.f vi / \ 4.1/ ./ ~\ / / /5>0>7-Ir?941Â£14 2.-6- 51* ) 90-----4-- /// //2 4/ 05,8 *93 &-00 =/(*.---Ill 649\ 94 - 92-----1-/ / 2 6 /4~or , Â¥ 4 94 ---- 1 C E /1 0.2 / Ny\ , 9 \ j ' , E 3OFT \ 0 5 10 20 30 40 - t Top or - --too_- lilill .1 1 1 1 / L i - ~\~ 9"AyN ~ + ' dCALE* 1"=10 U l- C. ;02.4 BAÂ© 1â‚¬) OF iDEA-Rbi(2)' 70/, 3 1 004/lfr)'23 4- --or--O--6 - - WEST LINE OF LOT- L Ffek'I r'M:,ry]CLE, -EUO/'Er ,â‚¬Ea,4,â‚¬ 4 CAP -' '~Â·Â»Â·V C mp I ':414 / S \ tu k j 2-5/4/3/ 1, 1.) \2\ /03./ 14 - BLOCK 25 C?-5-5 7 \,1 EAST ASPEN TOWN(6/TE ALLEY MANHOLE 73Â»1 2./00-00 z~ Cp-52 + ) G- 6 --4 < 44 SURVEÂ¥011'5 CERTIFICATE . N 10.-7 0 4- 11. 6 N 1, JAMED E FESEâ‚¬., HEREOr CEIâ‚¬Tl FY- THAT 9/ / /12 01\ -, 44 THIâ‚¬) MIAr- ACCURAT-E-Dr A-Err<E.5Â£NTE> A FIELD EURVEr VE-19:01â‚¬191EC> A- ME ON OCTOFâ‚¬A 7, 1990. 9l 7207 _ +~ |< A 1 RJUND' ALrIKIE SURVE)[D, IKIC, 1 8 *- - --- 1 /7 RE&AIR. 4 CAP I 1 5 .~~al - 7~ \ DATE' Or: 1 c_JAVIED M IMDER., / 0 ----------------- L.0. 11214 J 2 - 1 40 :: / - Â£4 jourl-4 Â· 1 Moâ€¢rE,411Â¥ . 100 ---- 14' )3 0 2 -101 1 '09.5 720.7 / 1 U f /\ 1 1% ELJ \ \ 4 \1\ 11.11 1 11 1105 - '01 0 1 / / / / e . 1.i L h /4 43 /. i 0 ~ / / 3 435/ 5 CONegETE~ 4/0.9 : 1 1,&15'ZE,4 l ci / L.1-_Ur;42@2~1.-__1 ' / 1 0/ m, \ i \/ . 0Â·7' DLAM. 1 , , .O.'Â©'Re = - 97 11 / -,r 1) / /01 9- 11 / EVEJT . - \1//IN 1 0 -IWO OÂ·-1' DAM. $ COTTONW(DOC) 1 i i lift f ---- -- - 104 - a 4 + / 1 1.' q \ 119 - \\0 .5ER)/ICE 1 / , BERKÂ¥ 104 -' +C,-7 009/4 K L Â»1 \ 0 NORTH T' AgEN , 4, I . ,9 26Â· , N / 1 /.- / ./&.=.t, k Aor L=>4 rED 1 . --1//-- ; j--7 - . 1 10@ 1- - 7. G â‚¬ A.v E L 'P A a.kiÂ· N. 6 - \ % , 1-2 -- 1 1 1 0 11Â£91 /0.724 9 . 1 - , P b i & 0 1 12 0 300. i 3.0 0-. -3 EAOT - 475Â°019/"* 45Â·00 - JADEWÂ·A,LIZ. PEDEOTAL-5 t Of- 50 1 1 0 1 i 63 0 EAbT HON<IN5 AVENUE ~ , 1/ i 1. 1 L/ NOTICE According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action based upor, any defect *n this su,vey within three years after you first discovef such defect. Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed O.07 15# dFIEL Revisions 5.14.17 EXTEND -TOD 10 KIVE-PA Title BU I LOING FERIVIIT 5UIKEr- Job No 10-Â°Il-5 In no event may any achon based upon any defect In this survey be commenced . Drafted la ID).16 J.H152 more tha,1 ten years from the date 01 the certification shown hereon. Post Office Box 1730 h *4 i Client BILLIE Aspen, Colorado 81612 1 â€¢-1&Â£9. y I/*p.. % . 970 925 2688 E '* I I 41 MT , J . . bit. .-. 'i 'F .1 r ., . 0 4- 61 L_V Lf--- r /- 3%12 tv"Ir -/ff-------// / I / 1 / // e 4 f- --,Ic,~c- xz / . C.0-. W-- 24 ; - --- - - --- Z.Z 0 - %/ lip-- -i-il. -- - t'' -C- 0. I --1- ---- . C :0 ..4 - U , 1 -- .lu-- - // + 42 M 514dl:2'00"IE 45.01 0------- -- - u: -- - 0 AND It. EASEMENT 0 \ U, U - = -iN 0 0 w U / - Z- t 1-/ / 1 + < i / - 100 for or *+ir _ / % 1:,\ 1, /, 336 3< r zz (AG 'p>Â«M/Â¥:pAJoF leÂ¥44*14 c r -rt- \ 19 '4 r:,4,*) Â· /k\Nu'C / x O =c 4>02â‚¬ 9 gkt.ke,Â·u 1,6 1 i e Z 3 ul *4 54.-. 19,6' f 04,4 \\ 3 0 /\ mt \ - SPA , : :C ' 02- O 0 34\ 1 1 ,\: \ \ 1 a ----2' 4 WitÂ©JelpH, ,~s /, - -1 4 1 I 1 f FO -7 -/7 V 0 1 IR' 1 i / 11--1 / 11/ i I r~ i BELLIS ADDITION ~ 1 7 /ill 1 I 211 Â£ 64 - it L 1 Ch 4 1 / 11 1 ' 1\ 1 1 44 #i ~4~4 WAL-'./Uâ„¢.Ul lk] 1-1- 1.,val 11 /.1 44PT=Â£1 NÂ¥N<*3 L-1-- 1/rte,Na Ill d .\Il / 5* ~ ' kll,1- *19\1 -! - j El 4* 22 1 7%*41 %?(Te> *0<02'ite AAWFAT 59 o 13 \.: t. 1' w .- f 1-// B t z'4-4.91 9 :... â€ž BELLIS **93 B RESIDENCE 1 1 . 41 W -- Ill 1 RM *41 K e Â· Ill I ' . A - - - cy/.41 k SITE > HI~TORicâ‚¬ABIN (t :41 W'/4.I X 6 1 i}*Ef. PLAN 11 , RE/. 1 1&0 Q141 DI 1\ ARMI Date: 5.23. 41 11 11 1. 7. [LlE \\ E-1 J'12â„¢ Scale: r = 101-0â€ž Dra.,In By: 5.5. Â·Â· u -' . -- - 1--1.0 11.f' :6Ni 9 21 1% AFS i r A I n . %1/1/ I Revised: /-- 1.' Al --1 / ' 4 21 1 2 1 foe }: Cl \ A .' .: 94- \\ ta<â€ž06* 'fcÂ»KI.41 9+1Â¥- Q 2%.*<491 10"Ul:~919 11 * -1-11 2, -,2 =13_1-4 1 N-15604'11Â·94 45.DO /- 18'-0Â» SANITATION RO)â€¢1 -- BELLIS LOT EAST HOPKINS AVENUE Sheet: L- 7 OR -- 00 'UodEV 10'lls f\\/ill\{f gÂ· a. -w 4 -; 1 .42>%.>I,F.,,4...2.. Â·llp/.frvi. S-"I"Jf-r:-7 -'5 -37 --r.Â¥4 --Â· Â·Â· r 3 : 4 11 44. SÂ· 4% 4 r F - -------7 1 7-ITT -1-- 1 [ r v.rl IT .-I- 1,. 6!1 !. Ir - W 1 1 1 11,0 f 11 1, 11 1 1 r i 1 i . TO BE REMOVED ~ ;11 1 4 f R i' 11 04;ZE~ 1-27'~ 1 i N v= -i, 1 Act 1 U , S jti 1 11 134-E 27.741 1 A 1 1 9122 - -- r *99 <rE-IP_111114 : J It' LU.Cil.W Il:*.id-U.ft~p 1__R+H HAgm rt r=.-p~--&-- d;, 4 1 . 111 ':1 il .~ 1 1 -51 M.1 - 14*11' - -1.1 !1 Â£14 11 -1 -O k Ll TH 41 7 IiI 111 ~ff-~~~:-* ]PII][Il '1~- _-1 00 11~~ Ibl- 11'~~ 14 ---i 1 04 - 11 -- 8 Il I 1 1,/5- - - lisma L- - -146343 I 1 FLAT L.- PROPOSED HISTORICAL ~ 3,4 -=4 = - e=-2~== I - * - 1 { 11 ... . ROOF 1 ==3927*# L 1 CURRENT - - - 1 1 . 47<. -21 lili . SCUTH ELEVATION ''04.1 1 ' ~ -=50'11 , 323 1 4.* V.ti --44 Â«11 f lilI - ?, I 1 -1 It ..9".=.All~ 1"*~ 1 m . 20-'.401==.=. $ 111 11 --41! U- it'' F N 8,4# I , 0 t: 01 T rp~ _ AA- ----- -- - Â·Â·-Â·-+-- - 7 I- 11 lit 1 1 bIL 74 ~~~1 k>J ;i.: FiFF:iii? j Â·i trill - ==71 '' i 1 I 3-3, -, 2 ' ' 3 / 1 1 ' ROOF PLAN 41 '9 1 0 , 7 / 11' .1 91 ROOF PLAN â‚¬4*kkil l' Illk!=41 1 11 }94~ 1/1.'-1 3 1~ + 1-U Â» 1 A j jil 11 Ill NX, 1 1 1 9 11 1 !53. h 494*~87 2= f 2-41*AH 'Al 11 i N g Â£ a i :\1. â€ž 1. 1~ 1.7-r- 71 r. i 1 HI!14 1 1 4 11 ffÂ»:,'Â·,- 1 t~!~'~ ~| I i| 1 ~~ ~Â·t-1~, ~ IEFI [Ir=i It 1 it 11 ,% EXÂ¢ 111[-~01 1 4 9 1~ 11 In 1 11 Ul' 1~ji i 1 11 11 4 - 9: lili j 1 - ' PROPOSED HISTORICAL ~ PROPOSED HISTORICAL . 1 ' -0 CURRENT ' CURRENT 1.- I 7 4 , 1 1 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1- A=L- I , -=r- Â« . Ly .â‚¬4 ' 4. Ir:-1 t- 1 Â· 1=Â¥=1=.C- -Ill U f X:-Â· L._ I'll': f--di--4 U -1 2329 U 1 f-| 1 1 h L~-lf:~11 = ' ' 1 1 1 41 1 9 I 7rtÂ·Â·~120,%~ ~1 1 1 r] 1 STREET ---- --7 --.. f-Â»--1 1 - if j- I ya -4 1 - 1111? - - - --1 L 1 1 020/ \ 1 1 f~ ; f SIDEMALK tv:=7- 3=L-7 - 1 \ I â€¢-Â·tr 1 1 I f 11'Â·11 1 :1111 61 44 1Â·, 2 'Â· d i: , a ji 11 i ell p F! 1 7.- - -CL - - 12; 1! h '1 Â·" " 14 k '91 ' i"'8 1 1- 1 , 1- L i:' 11 it 1 i! -7-F-1 ~~~~KW===S-F~~1 L__I> 4, r-tv 4# 1 J -----1 11'~..~1~ i' liti-{ <~ ;iiÂ·11.12.Jl Ll i !1 1 '1 1 :, 111 141= K.C ,Â·-f 4---'= --1-_4 Illdil~&:idMIL )11 1111Â¢}H ,L~N~11 1-11111;11 , PROPOSED HISTORICAL FLOOR PLAN CURRENT FLOORPLANF-hz- - 1 F -0 PROPOSED HISTORICAL z CURRENT r Ill . Z - W -1 U ; 0- k- 0 1 W 1 ILI [1- 1 0 14 QI 0- SITE SECTION LOOKING EAST --7-â€¢.:.= :. j.. kit.~ Tly/r, 719 .t~ 1 u Wl LedLLUS RESE)/El \3 \LA Â£1 0[Diâ‚¬411131neFUAL Ii,BESI[(GN 9 f * . r \ I *,1 j i EXISTING CONDITIONS-PLANS 4 ELEVATIONS FEBRUARY 26,161617 ASPEN, COLORADO NORTH 1. I -2 21* 0 ''. 7* 1/5,6ft.9*.Lif'/#A . K Â· BANK EDGE ~1'.'7~~ent'fl,r.Â·1-- , Â·-.--,Â·r 4. I / 2 -t#Aff f :g : I ' 2 'LTÂ· 'f 1 % , r , 279â€¢Â¥& ./ 4 01#3 , 26Â«': A 441.b 7.47* # IÂ¢,6,1 072* .: 1 ! , TO BE REMOVED /353 Â· ,\ , \ f.f'./ F---1 ' i i =1* 2 1 1 44'4.A ) I 1 1 ,==ar _ . 1 1 21 1 1 C 081/ U 1 ~1__j TO BE REMOVED'- 1 \ 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 --- ti 24.0. .Â· ,1 1 ..4*, /9 1 1.--- .I-*.i I.I.-- 1-- 1 - 00 1 1-111 00 M 1 9 1 -1- 1 1 1 1 1 1 , i I I . i . Â«-5 1,4 1 19- 3 ~ " 3 1 -r, -----1 ------1 i 1 0,1 *Em.=m=./.=2=4 ./me:/Fism"mifi- 1 â‚¬ 3 B: C $ --M- 1 .g . Fy r.6~=ru - 1 Â£21. > f â€¢--1 6 6 -, ~ 1 9.24' ~ 1 Â·. . 1,1 f r /1 f > 1 1 2/1 .1- i'20{ \ * 1 1 1 1 4, - 1 Filk__ _0_ - _-0-1 2*F- *.--*.-".-.-11 9 + ./ 4 - 1 -1. A 1 -2 ' PROPOSED HISTORICAL FLOOR PLAN CURRENT FLOOR PLAN e.. 32% OF EXISTINe STRUCTURE TO BE REMOVED ' 8- ; '44 . , . 'W ' f " , 1 r. 4 , 41 . . 4 1 1 + -7 . dr 1 , , . 0 I h \ PL.: 6 . I $ 7. ter & I. h: 1 Â· DN T- D T. 31 1- T- TT (C.3 1--D 1-11 63 TT T-'1\1--7 -RJ /[' 77 , I.' I h # LD.I_]~LALL.[12 131Â£1 291.1.I_J/L.21\~ VALL CONCEPTUAL IBILESIIGN Â» 1/ 1 e./ l*66 A I 4. ENLARGED EXISTING FLOOR PLANS FEBRUARY 26,149 7 ASPEN,COLORADO , 5. 9.1./ .1 / Â· /4 - I.- . - ............. ... 9 4- 1. 1 . I .3 ..4 , t 1. V ./ 1 4.% : . ... .1 - I Â£$* :. , , ., ./ i Â· Â·t.U I . ' I t- ,-,1 , . . . 02 .-4.- . ., 4 i-K ' :I l I . â‚¬ 4'. ' 1 h . 4 \ 1 - , .4 - , 2 I 4 I . 62 . I ,-..Â·/ . 4 , C '; / 4/, , 6 liT .7 I , , , I , r - S Ill - . 4 - , f Nt. ' I . *.e'l 1 > 2 4, 1 0 : .*L . 0 Â£/el A I I* - . . t. 9 4 -'. Pr ' 4 . 1 . li t. ' , ./. 4 Â·Â· 494 '4 . 5 1 p. 4 . . 4 ~.. eJ, 3:r. 1 Â¥ . 11 - 4 2 - . f< 4 .... f .. 1 6 . I .6 - . + I ..ft I . * I ... % '6 4. i 4 . .4-1-1 ' 5 1 / 6 A ... I -- P. . 1., r ./ - Â· f , I / I 9 , - .-4.~ B 1 1 564 - I B r y . 'Â·-' , j Â¥ I 14 .... I / 1 1 .~ 4.F . 41. - ' / 1 1 , ' >1 .r - // I A . 1 A 1 1 1 I. . 0 . &#,1â‚¬6 1 1 * d I ' 1--7 . , k Â¥ L . f * 1 ' ' 4 4 , h . //4-zr4r~7,4. a . , ' 1 1 / -1--/ 1141 -N Â·--11 /11+Waâ€¢ ~ PINIHor 4'Ngs 4. -1, .... .$,1- . . 1 2:' ...... I k.\ 1 . ., , . e T 0 " f. '- 1 t I I #I - I .... / 1 -. 1 /,7 /'tm/5537/7*~9~~176*flrt' rl=Â·~ <Ir.~2' 13~~22.....F~, --r. 11:Im. 1 -464 'Ntler ; 1 *. 1 ' t.. I ' 7 6 iTT ~!4 14â€¢A 1 -4 4 1 - .*4 1 - . .t I 1. 4 1&Eli 03{=- - / /,/1 1 .0 0 Â£ 1 11 1Â· I Â·- 1. 11 7 -, 1 rt,â€¢reâ€¢f 00*,-~ ' Tris--- $ . I - /./. , 10/4 .- 4 1 -1- F7 1 , ti -lilimz==== 1, : 1 -TI-3314-:12!4*m .Clke-. ji.tÂ·-....w,-,-:,-9-----r, 7-I 1 1 1111.----Â·.- 1 =611 110@5-1 11 e - - r. Â£ .4. 4 . /1 4* ,/ 11, , r I .. . 8 1 - . 1 \JI| U .. +|80*ANIRAL 11 HAID'e e,lire 12 4 v .3 , ...1 -~ 1 4 -- ..- -- . - Â· , 9 -I' I . U, .1 -4 4 Lor .f 1 W 101 / A Â· , F , .. -2 I 01 --.... - - + 4 - * 4-4 ..4 1 , ; 1' " 1 +. ---' 2,- .4 1 ' -I. 9 . '' 1 2. Â¥ 1%: , Â¢ ICâ€¢*K-INGr "of# 1,1 vE,2- , . *r. - + ' f 16 PT. dETMAÂ« . L i. '. 5 9- 44 ... # I . :'' 4- J le FE Ger#Aol< 4 ' Â»- 1 1. * - -1-0146[17@PINAL 0175/ #WILPINET *ED-FIDIN 1, H e.26,17 ME:VI*Els> /8 4 . r - '-t. b :. 1 -0 1 , .. Â·Â·:9,-rn..Â·sâ€¢ Â·4: . ....;Â·2.122 Â· *weer ' . 14. . - PL. 108 Iumul + 1 --1 1 arnBEr . ... A . ... - \ Â· ' 4' '4 1 / 4.1, .... C...fi f - - ./ T ' " 4 ., 0/ I f . - Â·l 4 . . I , -r ' ./ I. r Â¢ 1\ I ./ A *- I . 1. . Â» 2 - . 9 ' , ~ . 4 , -' 4' ~~ ~ ~ ..0. / , . I. I I : lia.:.. T--D T-N T- TTLY 1-D Til el T-7 I I --.SHET?F 1- O . :I.' f I . - : I I ip I]_11Â£1 /71 n- 1- LDÂ£1421_Al-LE A \4.41-2. Â· SC-ER'[[AFI[(0 11)1112LM h . -r Â· i t a -1 .3 .... ~, i '. BUILDING SECTION 4 1 . i SCALE: 1/8" =. | LQ~ â€¢.: ~~ ASPEN,COLORADO , 4 N. * I . 1 46.-C n .' . 4 1 - 4 9 ... ...4/4 - *41> F. .r- / . 6 . r'Â«,t. ... , h... -- .u Â·Â·Â·P , 6.2.2Â·~ 9. p''t Â· t.1-9. - 1,.1.-3 4 ek' r -:F ./ . L. 1 ' 2 . I 0 . - ..4**S '4Â·22 I , , - bil i ~ und rissori,itcy I I , 1 1 .1 11 11 0*R- 0.Â£Â¥*"t 1\ ttz,1 1 21 - 1 11. 1 0 BATH ~*u _ 1 605 EAST MAIN STREET -/ \ 111111 / 2- ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 ------- 1 1 #01 f ~ TEL: (970) 925-4755 ,/ /-1 PRESSING 11' |11 1 Il Il 0-0// l~Z~j .Â· - Issue: 9 - i El 92 - 1 U.C. 1 0 SPA 06-024Â©Il HPC FINAL ~ 1 911 ------ 7 --_---- 1 0- 1 0 MASTER SUITE r [L- Or- VESTIBULE SUEST ROOM F DN wp FOYER 6-----6 ~ HALL r - 1Â»HI 77 Ll-f * P<-10 01-1 11 B "P In 11 1 4 4-ni -SUEST SUITE ' , 1 - 1-1 9 -.... { 0 0 L- 9 11 1- DRESSING - 1 1~ BATH MJD ROOM U U - -1 r ' .. 1 . 1 -, - _L_ - ~ MASTER BATH L,7 :-I -1 110+ 1 F 14 6AiASE 060 0 h..\\\j TE lk--~1 -- i j f LIGHT AELL -Er 223<:CIT.Z~ 3 ., )* i . ~ LISHT ~ELL)I 0 1 Â© MAIN LEVEL PLAN 1 1 \ 3 6 1 ' I ~3 #=3--2-, L -, M H M ~ - 1 '93& 1 i . 011 NE RACK Dc Ill 1 El--2 CD EXEnCISE ROOM ~__- ENE-ROOM %31 ~ BATH 6) ;LELAL STAIR [**] \44=::M STORAGE ~ | STORAGE - .ZIIIIZI~InIII r -51 il ge BEDROOM BELLE RESIDENCE 2 -- 1 HALL e------ ~ d 9- 33 IL ~IUM ON 21. V - ~ 24 9 ASPEN, COLORADO , 1 1-1 = 1 | BOOKSHELVES r--1 1- --1 Al 1101 LAUNDRY KEY PLAN L.L.21 %01 BEDROOM 0 1 . - MECHANICAL 111 ..._ -_ ___ 031- _________ gl OFFICE 1 0 L."= -1_ EL 94 VESTIBULE 1 r a r=t MEDI A ROOM ~ ~-~] --=-Â·- - --Â· - Â· -+ - - - -Â· + --- Â·- -Â·- Â· --Â·-- -Â·- - - -Â· Â·- p - - - -Â· 0 1 ab 1 1 LISHT RELL u -bIQSIEL --------------- 2 - ~~'EctÂ« BELLIS RESIDENCE PROJECT ge= 00 4eR-A.21.PY'15 DESCRIPTION LOMER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ~ LOWER LEVEL PLAN 1/4"=1'-O" SHEET Â©1997 BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES P.C 87:22LW EÂ·'63~2Â»apya ,==:* - - "An.'. - On" 0â‚¬.'AU -9 '.* r.21 a . r.:44. 414: ' . 1 ' ~ clf?d cissorutcs 1 li 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 Aâ€¢446â€¢ts.~~- 1 i-Â· ------2 605 EAST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 , 1 TEL: (970) 925-4755 4 r - Issue: 1 1 / 06-02-17 HPG F[NAL 7 ~,7, / L--- --7 1 1 0 1 1 | j ROOF DECK < I 1 1 F 1 -7/ 1 1 1 1 3 1 r K I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 r-J - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 ROOF PLAN k> 6, r 1 -- ------------------7 .1 1 2 Â· 1I---11 11 --____-0.0 ---_ 1 - 1 0.0 1 KITCHEN | 1-1 1-1 n Â·- 1 /2 X L. j ! 1 , - ... -4 . -h 1 1 = D M. 1 -1 , STAIR DININe , %21 1 1 1/ BELLE RESIDENCE f -1 - - /L-- ---1 1 1 7 | REF. | _ 1 < - r ROOF DECK I DIO ' n ErÂ«~ ~12.-gÂ·~ ' ASPEN, COLORADO 1 %400 1 7 KEY PLAN < 1 I 1 ~ER~~_ - 1 PORIP 1 li E--.- ~ i==1 1 -1 l 1 rn I 1 1 1 L.3 '11112 53=21 - r_j 1 I 1 11111 /-*- . 1 1 Ji --3 LIBRARY : eREAT ROOM 1 1 L_ 10 233% f En Â· i 1 [3 2-3 1 - 1-7-1 11 , il LJ - L---2 :1 1-*71 11-L -blaIEL PROJECT -'' 11 ~ BELLE RESIDENCE 1 111 1 lili 11 11 1-1 1 Â¢1628.00 AER- A=Dye DESCRIPTION UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN ROOF PLAN 1/4..1,-0. ~ UPPER LEVEL PLAN SHEET AE 03B ~ 1997 BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES P.C *914~/Th/.95â‚¬t:,El:MA# - -'2 1.-iâ‚¬~.Iâ‚¬-- ..'... 3324 ..41 4, 47 #,4. 7.Â¢ 1.. Elri r 1 A, //17! rÂ·- ~â€¢ 11 -- ----- - =- .f 1<F-. .-- a r.- Â·<2 34-73< *EL.13. -- 1 l. I lili 11 -111 11 F *t=- 1 }-- 1 E- 1 1 | ~i~~~11 +mil U-1 41 111 1 ~~ ' L_~ ~r-2~1~U IL--t 1 Â»Putlt 1 1 11 'IL-3 11 lilli lili, --: 6-0 -I--1 Ill! 1- 1 111 7.-~ 1 11 1-12) l72=111 1 IN I 111' 6 bol - F-n li~ - E- Â£Eli1-_. -I--- L_ I[-]t- --~r--il 3] ~ 4.--2~JI #~EF~~~lE, E---7-2 -- |- 1 E-1 ~_lL-n--j--t=-*4'0 #-142Â© *=1 - - PROJECT _.......____-1 1 _____1 -~ - lillie 1 11 j elÂ·~ ~~ BELLIS RESIDENCE 1.6-1- # /== 7 w 12 a , 51 4 1 , 0, .-6- =,4 -4- 1 il 7.1 2 1 1 1- rEED .-1' .1 /, 01628.OO ' ' $2> - I. 4 DESCRIPTION PNEST ELEVATION SOUTH SECTION ELEVATION , SOUTH ELEVATION : - SOUTH SECTION ELEVATION ~-SOUTHELEVATION 1/4*=1'-00 .t- - SHEET NO. A 67 bn JUQID o ll Â® 1997 BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES P.C. ~ and associates , 6 ... . - -imm.Mill~ I 5 -Ill.0....I..//111/7...IWI........4,-Il i I. â€¢~ lili A. i. 1 - . .- .lill .. . * '~r-J~TÂ·ILÂ·--P ar~Mul,6 0*â€¢* 51 - 605 EAST MAIN STREET ' 3 I, ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 r 3 9 TEL (303) 925-4755 l.... L - IssueÂ· =:E=EMI: 14:~2:~13]El?%[22 \ \Ch 0 9 J ' - - --ill---*--1----.--*.--I+------*-------&---i j--~-I- - 1-1 r=r-- _~- - Â·,1.3 Cjc-j ~5 -211~~-21_-nun-_~1-9-- - - -. ..13~n - 3 - A C 99.-1 74 0-gob C+=9--n Un 111 11 - j ~ -77----- C.-1 7..1 Â»r:-r .26 -'1- ..'r-t ,- / 2-3 C. S *.- .' -1 0. ee F L.0 (237 r-tzE-=-_221.--- - - r - , 1 -3 \17 -)EAST ELEVATION ~ 3. 2 1- , /4 1 BELLIS RESIDENCE 1 ASPEN, COLORADO t â€¢ 2-2 L_-1 L_11_11 Z..ILLELLIZILIL 11 1 , | || |44- g 1 -- -9 1-Ze - Â· ~11 *%31 ~ 40 CUL 100 0 ~. i ~ .. I Il-1--Ill Il~_711 1 ! I 1 -- PROJECT --4 1-2---~ ~ BELLIS RESIDENCE 0 l 9625.00 . l, ,-7 -A- 0 - DESCRIPTION - - ---- - - ----- EAST ELEVATION - NORTH ELEVATION ~-MORTHELEMATION SHEET NO. A 57 00 AkeD ola ~ ~ Â® 1997 BILL POSS & ASSOCIATES P.C. 92Â· r ra //EfiTEER