Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Hoag .JOT. . TO~OGR.~~V r"OWl ~U';!..~t'( ~ GU~V&.'( ~>lG.""U.T(,~. .>le.. "I"t'h , , ~lJ -E . "'" ~l;: i' '1~ ]-~ " " ~/.' ',' '- P lA~ '-'~~' I,I,,-u&, ,'_ 0 \ \ y ~ "" lOT 4 . &.joA.Go -:'Ue>D,-li<;.'O.J ~1,&~'2." A DupL..f..x. ~T' 3 .;OA,.G .~. V-r..:J"LI r<.~ Lei .I, '" . ...0....(;, ~U!>ooI...,~.l.....~ p&..l O"VII> L....,;J:\uk& +\"f"<.,.l.. . "''IC~IT''cT ."~ pL.l.,olIl'tll. . l'.()' .... "'7 . """"~. col.OIl....OQ 8'<1.1\' (t."")'1l.~-2<lol . " \ \ \ \ \ y' \ ~ ~ "I ~ cOllTOU" II\T",,,v,,,L ,,' '" 1..0.,.. <3"- '.....~- -.... <~ /~ /' ~); tS::~6 r ~/~V'.;lo"_i\q, " ) I . ~~ ",- ',"-..- n", .~ ~ o " \ t-~D.!'T . I', -w UNlj' '2' --;z, Ct" To'r.i. L :J <( ." _.-._._.__...ll--.__~_ _' -- - -----..------ ....... \t'r. \ '. \.... ,Up}'~-p\ L~v'.. L u.N1T '.1. 9 (P I II ~Hjq' .'.~. -44,_9 t! TOTA,L 14 '0" r- f~20~ pL-t\NS I/It:.". 11_ 0 , "~'''''k' ,.,;C,;- ~d. ..,t\. - '.jh:';: ~45 rI lJN:7 '_' ""45lf "'O"",A ~ I '2. 9 0 ~ , ., - -'-'-<.j; .. . ' -. ,\\ \ ' . .\'.., ' '''V~I' ~,'..... -~... -- 1/,-:-" ~ .:; ~ 1~4'2l I 1b'J'j>< -':'2(D ,,, ..... -- ~ / '-OWt..'Z LE.\'/E.'_ Ul'HT .t. U>-J'T ,~. ,.CoI" ""!"Oil.L ?~: ~ -A DU'Pt..;f:X ;-'01" 3 '*1ot\G : ~. \/DJT'JR.~ 1.",.11, 4 . <\Olo,ca <;lU~CI~I...b>l' ,,'!puJ -ll 1 . > / o......,~ L.."w~..",~ -l-l,ol'l<.'ol. . ","'Co". 'i H.T A.C l"l~~~",t:. .. ;L'P.,~ :'t., ,,-,,~,...\ , col.c.....~O ....\1. (~~'2'- 'HOI . \ \, .I / / ..---.-+ ~1I .' .' ~OR..T4 r"r1- ... { , 1Tl1 c. .; ., .....--t , . ." --tr.A..~T "'.-r J .~J .~.;. ~'-- ~--.~- I ) ..Jt.c;,T ~._..- 'uTI . co- , . _ .._~\~, "~h.... . '.~.r .sOUT41 A DUP L-E,X {Ot' ~OA~ . ~. v'..r..NTUt<,-t. l,.C,..I, 4' ~O~Go IAllaQ.VI'OIO!ol. ,,~l'...t DAIoIlt> L...Jotc.\C& -1-101'11,,,.1.. . ",~e,\l'-l-"~ pl.~~ . -.",. ~"'" "'," . "",..~. illcLOit~ .,6" '. ('60)~UF~#oO" ~ ~L-t.V~T\oJs . tc"LI. . IIv".. " - 0 ~m, "" , \ MEMORANDUM TO: Richard Grice FROM: Dave Ellis ~~ RE: PUD Exemption - Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision DATE: May 17, 1979 After reviewing this application and making a site inspection, the Engineering Department has comment on several of the items presented in the application. Contrary to the statement in the application that all utilities are present in Ute Avenue, our records show that there is only water, sewer and gas and that an extension of some distance will be required for power, telephone and cable TV. Although there is a road above the building site, there is no evidence presented that it is a legal private access across Lot 5 to Lot 4, Even if it were a legal access, it would provide poor access as the road is poorly maintained and frequently closed due to avalanche runouts in the winter. It is important to note that what are called snowslides are in fact the lower edges of avalanche runouts. The runouts frequently cross the upper road throughout the length of the Hoag Subdivision carrying debris with them. Even at this date, there is evidence of avalanches having crossed the road this year, In reviewing the title commitment on the property, we are concerned as to whether or not the proposed structure will be within the aerial tramway easement which is reserved for the Little Annie Ski basin. Considering these comments, the Engineering Department recommends granting of the PUD exemption subject to the following five conditions: 1) All necessary utility extensions shall be underground, 2) Due to the presence of avalanche runouts, the structural design of the building shall take this into account and be approved by a registered structural engineer prior to issuance of the building permit. Secondly, the owner shall record a covenant running with the land holding the City harmless from any liability associated with avalanche hazards. 3) Parking and site access shall be from Ute Avenue rather than the upper road, 4) A clarification should be made of the tramway easement and the building located outside of the easement. 5) The calculation for the setback from Ute Avenue should not include the ten foot strip of land reserved for future right-of-way expansion. CC: Clayton Meyring DE/ss M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: RICHARD GRICE, PLANNING DAVE ELLIS, CITY ENGINEER~ May 24, 1979 FROM: DATE: RE: PUD Exemption - Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision As a follow-up to the Planning & Zoning Commission's approval of the PUD exemption of Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, I had a meeting with David Hopkins, the designer of the project I to clarify item 5 of my earlier memo on May 17, This recommended condition of approval was that the calculation for the setback from Ute Avenue not include the ten foot strip of land reserved for future right-of-way expan- sion, After discussing the project in detail with Mr. Hopkins, it would appear that the overall advantages of calculating the setback from the current right-of-way line outweigh the disadvantages, and therefore, the engineering department is satisfied with the set- backs as originally shown, A change in the method of calculating the setback would create adverse impacts on existing large trees and would also place the house within a few feet of the upper trail easement. In addition, should the ten foot strip of land be required for right-of-way, it is extremely unlikely that it would be used for actual paving but rather for sidewalk I drainage & grading. Mr, Hopkins also clarified the location of the tramway easement to the west of the building location and the location of the parking off Ute Avenue, As a result of our meeting, items 3,4, & 5 of the May 17 memo have been satisfactorily resolved, jk cc: Clayton Meyring David Hopkins ,. , , DAVID LAWRENCE ARCHITECT AND HOPKINS PLANNER .ox 715 ....PIE:N, COLCAAOO 81611 (303) 925-2-401 April 10, 1979 Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City Hall Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ladies and Gentlemen: Respectfully submitted for exemption from mandatory PUD procedures are these schematic drawings of a "duplex" for the Hoag-3-Venture, to be located on Lot No.4, Hoag Subdivision, City of Aspen. The lot has 21,832 sq. ft. and the structure will cover 1,550 sq. ft. approximately. The total area of the "duplex" will be about 3,300 sq. ft., excluding porches and overhangs. The following is offered for your consideration in review of this 1 ) All utilities are located in Ute Avenue. Water pressure should be 40 to 60 pounds pressure. #6'J~ C, 0 -1'0 Ju-:T .c:-. 2) Access is directly off Ute Avenue with additional road above the building site. 3) No unstable slopes or rock, land or mud slides are in evidence. No unusual soil conditions were encountered in ~ the excavation for the residence on Lot No.2. The stand of mature evergxeen trees within which the building is situated indicates lack of avalanches in that location. There have been low velocity snow slides in the near vicinity, but main chute is 100' west of Lot No.2, and 330' from this structure. Special con- sideration will be given in structural design of the building to possible avalanche danger. 4) Natural watershed, run-off, drainage, soil erosion or water quality will not be aqversely effected. > , ,11"'>" , ~_.""" - 2 - 5) A "duplex" in this location ..ould have negligible effect upon air quality. 6) The building shall be dug into the slope so as to af- fjord protection from possible avalanche. It shall be located behind large trees so that it ..ill be par- tially screened from vie... Trees ..ill to..er above it, and fe.. trees ..ill be removed, none of major importance. Driveway and parking ..ill require minimum grading and no tree removal. 7) Most material from the excavation ..ill be hauled a..ay. Min.imum fill ..ill be used onsite. The design of the stru,cture has been based upon preserving the trees and the natural character of the land. No trees shall be cut for construction purposes. 8) Building placement and height permits the evergreen trees to dominate the site as they do no... The height of the structure "steps" ..ith the slope. The "open" part of the site ..ill remain "open". If the required parking can be allo..ed on the upper road, the vie.. of the site from Ute Avedue would be unimpaired. Our request for exemption from PUn requirements is predicated on a design that will have minimum impact on the site, neighborhood, and commurlity. In 1977 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a "duplex" that I designed for Lot No. 2 in this subdivision. The slope on this site is 10'~ less, and the trees offer more screening on Lot No.4. We submit our design of the residence on Lot No.2 as evidence as ..hat can be done on a difficut site, and feel that our design for Lot No.4 ..ill have even less impact. ~j~/, David L. HopK s \ DLH: prf Encl. ~lmoRAND1JH TO: City Engineering Department ~ity Water Department City Building Inspector FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision P.U.D. Exemption DATE: April 17, 1979 The attached letter requests P,U.D. exemption for the construction of a duplex. This item is tentatively scheduled for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Conunission on Tuesday, May 15, 1979. In order to make that date, I need your written comments returned to the Planning Office no later than Tuesday, Hay 8, 1979. Thank you. , ~ ~,.''''') ~ t) .:-" $~ IN-#!- @;A-f'e.y bel -.r-~ fS; (IN S't;-~~ MEMORANOUM TO: City Engineering Oepartment City Water Department City Building Inspector FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision P,U,D, Exemption DATE: April 17, 1979 The attached letter requests P.U.D, exemption for the construction of a duplex. This item is tentatively scheduled for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, May 15, 1979, In order to make that date, I need your written comments returned to the Planning Office no later than Tuesday, May 8, 1979. Thank you. ^'I"lri'~UI~1 Tille AUOI:illlioll COIIIn,illlllllll M,.110I/;l . /' r;::.......JT'~~~..% '.' .,.."'....'.. ..., ...p....,. ......... .~., ~:t. .' ... ,.. .;. ~l:I,> .'. .,... .~' , -;t~~~U ..' \ COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY . , ~ . , I ~ . . 'l~ , . . ~,' :;) " . . I j ," . , -, ~i '. '. . .~ j J ~ .. . I ~ , ' I , " C': ~ ~~ ., ~ 3 , I 3 , I .. , Y', "'''-'-',~''P ..~. '~.' ..... ",-",~, I,' . STEWAll'I~ 'l~I'l~LE GUARANTY COMPANY , , STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY. A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company. for valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions and Stipulations hereof. This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company. either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement. _..IIjIII1H/~_ O","lE cil.' ".........,4b" 1...,,' .... ....~"=. ~: ("O'aPO"4 \~\ {"Eto+: * ~..(!;. _:' - - .0: I ~\ 1908./~ ~ .." ... .../ .........lctf.~.... il~A") ,i;~V;~1 , A' 1;~Y(il :'~" I,'l~ : + ':i! .r; .,l" "A" ~,V, ~l ,:~; t~:, 11:: , ,1;jO\, 'W :(;'~Y.,~ "A.'I :;.v:,'1 "'f ':.~ ;11 'Il., \~A~IJ, "V"'I 'l 'I;A:1 I;';,! (;J., ~,~~:. 'A" ~W~'I 'K 1';:v;",,1 "~,'A'1 "''I . '[:~;~ ':(~~A:'~ il'~~l .~) . ~" _, '~'f1'lj~'~, ,:J1 ~q' ,~. ~".)3~1 H .~., '~I . ."'?' ~"'" '~,.,.,;~ '--- Jj~ I This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months alter the effective date hereof or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company. This Commitment shall not be valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance with its By. Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date." l-\TI~"rAH:r TI'rLE GUARANTY CUM.'ANY -t:~ "h(~ Chairman of the Board eJAaw/$~ President Serial No. CC 64323 40GOOO . . -, SCHEDULE A Order Number: 8549 CC 64323 Commitment Number: ,. E Ih!CliVI! d"lj~: FEBRUARY 13, 1979 AT 8:00 A.M. 2 Policy Of POhcil!s 10 he ISSIJl!d Antounl 01 Insurancp. A, ALl A Owne,', POlocy JACK BARKER Proposed Insured: s 120,000.00 B. ALTA Loan Policy Proposed Insured: FIRST NATIONAL BANK IN ASPEN AND/OR ASSIGNS s 96,000.00 c, $ Tax Certificate 3. Thl! eslate or interf'5t in the land dl'set ,()I'd or referred to III Ilus commilnwnl ,lilt! c:oVI!u!d hl~n~in is let! simple and title thereto is at the eflective date hereol vested in: LITTLE ANNIE, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 4. The land ,eferred to in this commi!ment is described as follows: Lot 4, HOAG SUBDIVISION, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado. Page 2 HTH,\VAI{T'l'I'l'LB OU..II"NTY CUNI-ANY 1652 Premium $194.75 $ 20.00 $ 5.00 <,' ..~ ---, /' Order Number; 8549 Commitment Number; CC 64323 RClluiremenlS The following are the requirements to he complied with: hem (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to he insured. Item Ih) Proper instrument(s) ereating the csli.IIC 01 intcll~51 10 be insUlcd mllst be' CKccutcd ilml dulV filed for record t to-wit: (c) Deed from Little Annie, limited partnership, to Jack Barker (said Deed should except and reserve unto Little Annie, limited partnership, an easement across Lot 4, Haag Subdivision and Fractional Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision, for purposes of installing, maintaining and operating ski lifts, cables, gondolas, tows, aerial tramways and other devices similar or incident thereto). Cd) Deed of Trust from Jack Barker to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, for the use of First National Bank in Aspen and/or assigns to secure $96,000.00. 40G003 Page 3 STJ';WAU'I'TI'I'LE QUARA.NTY COMI"ANY , ,,,", "'''- /'-....- EXCC'IUions Order Number: 8549 Commitment Number: CC 64322 The l>olicy Dr IlOlicies to ue issued will contain exceplions to lhe lollowill!llllllcss Ilw same af(~ disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public reconls. 2. Easements, or ctaims of e,Ut~lllenls. not shown hy the puhlic records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in houndiuy lilll~s. !'ohmta~ll~ in au~.I. 1~IlCIO.l(:hIlU~111S. and ,lilY facts which a correct survey and inspection of the prt~miSI~s would disdasc (lnd whit:h ale not shown.. hy Ihe fluhlic records. 4. Any lien, or right to it lien, for services. labor or matcriJI therctofme or hereafter hlrnished. imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens. encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective {late hereof but prio. to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortnage thereon covered hV this Commitment. 6.Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any and all tax sales which have not been properly redeemed or cancelled. Treasurer's Certificate of taxes due has been ordered. 7.Right of way for ditches or canals constructed by the authority of the United States as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 175 at page 299. 8.Easements and covenants as set forth on the recorded plat of subject property. 9.Any tax, assessment, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of subject property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District, The City of Aspen and The Aspen Valley Hospital District. lO.Deed of Trust from David H. Farny to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the use of The First National Bank in Aspen to secure $72,000.00 dated February 24, 1978 recorded February 27, 1978 in Book 344 at page 01. Exceptions numhClcd are hereby omilled. Page 4 H 'rl'~ w ^ u:r 'r rr L J<; {JUAHANT. CONI-ANY 1654 M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: RICHARD GRICE, PLANNING FROM: CLAYTON MEYRING, CHIEF BLDG, INSPECTOR ~~ April 24 I 1979 DATE: RE: Lot 4, Hoag Subdivision - P,U,D, Exemption I have reviewed the preliminary plans and visited the site for the proposed construction of a duplex on Lot 4, Hoag Subdivi- sion, From the plans and information submitted, it appears the building would meet the regulations of the zoning ordinance except for providing the required off-street parking, Item #8 in the architect's submittal is not clear on where he would propose a parking area nor does the site plan show location, I would recommend a P.U,D, exemption be granted if satisfactory evidence is submitted regarding off-street parking, jk .' "', ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office RE: Hoag Subdivision - P,U,D. Exemption DATE: May 18, 1979 The attached letter of application requests exemption for the mandatory P.U,D, requirements of the Aspen Municipal Code. The requests relates to Lot 4 of the Hoag Subdivision located off Ute Avenue, City of Aspen. The application was referred to City Engineering whose recommendation is for approval of the exemption subject to five conditions. That complete memorandum to the Planning Office dated May 17, 1979, is attached for your review. The Planning Office recommends you approve the exemption subject to the conditions outlined in Dave Ellis' memo, - t DAVID LAWRENCE ARCH ITEeT AND HOPKINS PLANNER .ex 715 .......EN. COI-ORACO 81611 (303) 925-2401 April 10, 1979 Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission City Hall Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ladies and Gentlemen: Respectfully submitted for exemption from mandatory PUn procedures are these schematic drawings of a "duplex" for the Hoag-3-Venture, to be located on Lot No.4, Hoag Subdivision, City of Aspen. The lot has 21,832 sq. ft. and the structure will cover 1,550 sq. ft. approximately. The total area of the "duplex" will be about 3,300 sq. ft., excluding porches and overhangs. The following is offered for your consideration in review of this project: 1) All utilities are located in Ute Avenue. Water pressure should be 40 to 60 pounds pressure. 2) Access is directly off Ute Avenue with additional road above the building site. 3) No unstable slopes or rock, land or mud slides are in evidence. No unusual soil conditions were encountered in ~.. the excavation for the residence on Lot No.2. 'Phe stand of mature evergreen trees within which the building is situated indicates lack of avalanches in that location. There have been low velocity snow slides in the near vicinity, but main chute is 100' west of Lot No.2, and 330' from this structure. Special con- sideration will be given in structural design of the building to possible avalanche danger. 4) Natural watershed, run-off, drainage, soil erosion or water quality will not be adversely effected. -r'''.... " , ......... - 2 - 5) A "duple,," in this location would have negligible effect upon air quality. 6) The building shall be dug into the slope so as to af- fjord protection from possible avalanche. It shall be located behind large trees so that it will be par- tially screened from view. Trees will tower above it, and few trees will be removed, none of major importance. Driveway ffi1d parking will require minimum grading and no tree removal. 7) Most material from the excavation will be hauled away. Minimum fill will be used onsite. The design of the structure has been based upon preserving the trees and the natural character of the land. No trees shall be cut for construction purposes. 8) Building placement and height permits the evergreen trees to dominate the site as they do now. The height of the structure "steps" with the slope. The "open" part of the site will remain "open". If the required parking can be allowed on the upper road, the view of the site from Ute Avenue would be unimpaired. Our request for exemption from PUD requirements is predicated on a design that will have minimum impact on the site, neighborhood, and community. In 1977 the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a "duplex" that I designed for Lot No. 2 in this subdivision. The slope on this site is 1cr~ less, and the trees offer more screening on Lot No.4. We submit our design of the residence on Lot No. 2 as evidence as what can be done on a difficut site, and feel that our desi~l for Lot No.4 will have even less impact. v~.z . DUI: prf Encl.