Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Jenkinson LotK-Blk87.1978I E lit ll(I11! I i11111 ly 11111 J0IIIO :;J I C'l; IM- 101,; h L1110II(ill 1', )IJ C)C'I: .::I, JOC.I I.0 (I E.011 I[(Jp t: l l l l; I;I I"ceL tllnl 6t 1, !:1 1 (ts: ;'hero is; our: Hour.:(. rlow. Kolle st;lfed the plJlunirtg off ice! full t here: C:.u: no pill l- 1 1,y (IO i cl.l ,Ir r.I04; t hroullh Lit(, (Ir)l i l e st J r i un procedur(':;. 'i'lli s )1:0; b.•rll I.f..I(:I�•.1'?e, t)Igino�-rin(1 office; thl• (,';JlUtrl: wA the, I- igill:. Lu pro!-o.,:t {:Ile fotu;:lt ion of ill L dil;Ll-icl.. Krlllc: .:.I.icl tllc par). (. I zitiun feo dues not now appl;( to the c:;is:t_iny 1<,u:;e; fur Llt,:• other two 1011: it. will. ll•.v(t to be paid at the t•.ilne of bui ldinq pc rini t. Counc:ill:trin i'itrry Moved to approve the. subdivision exi::mpI i. oil with the conditions; sec'ondod by Councilman Wi.;h:-irt. Colln C i i wolOa rl Johnston asked about PAR requl:l Lions fur buildi.nq on the other Lwo lot:;. 1411jo Lold Council Lhry had fintil.ly had approl,al from Y & 7, to .i.nsti.Lutc VARs in Lite rVS!(1c:nLial parts of the City. This will h.Jvc to be a City code amendment. All. in favor, motion carried. SUL'DIVISY011 ESR!•1PTION - Jellk.inson Rane explained this: is. the salve type of cx:.mption rcquesl., splitting up land ill r:ingle. ov,ner.s;!lip. This: %-:ill sleparrli.c lot: K, which is 3,000 square feet. - a m.inimu(n sixc• lot. Kane :;,aid it was found that the Isis t.heatie encroaches on lots Y. 6 inches on fit(- front-. and 3 inches oil the back. This can be remedied either by an easement from Ms. J :nl:ill:;ur, to the Iris or could c_;o to the Board of Adjustment. Kane said the planning off.ic • fell the easc•ateni would be better. Th(r FAR is 1.5:1, by right, which could be a buildin(i of 4500 square feet. There are no set back requirements in tho CC zone. Counci l nian I'ar. ry moved to approve the subdivision exemption; seconded by Counci l m:In It"i s laI11 . Council:•:oman Johnston added that the appropriate part, dedication fee should be i•aic] for thU vacant lot. All in favor, motion carried. PUBLIC II0US1,':G AUTI!ORTTY - Public Hearing Mayor Standley opened the public hearing. Jcnifer Carr told Council. that this p hl.ic hearing had been advertised to determine whether or not. there is need for a Plli. to function in the City of Aspen. Ids. Carr read a totter from the fire r:arshal s:tr:tin;; that unsanitary -or unsafe dwellings do exist in the City. There are physically i.nade ualu units. 'There is also excessive cost:; for these units and overcr.owdinq. Vs. Carr explained that. the Council had to clo through Lhis process again because it was. nol_ properly documented the first time. Mayor Standley closed the. public hearing. Councill:Ian PJishart moved that the Council having found that the basic n^ed cr.itetia have not. been met for housing Within the City of Aspen, the Aspen City Council th-refore c:.tabl.ish(:s a housing authority; seconded by Councilt•:olian Johnston. All ill favor., motion carried. Councilman 1\ilihd171". moved to read Resolution 62, Series of 1978; seconded by Cuunci.la:a^.r:n Johnstol:. A1]. in favor, motion carried. RESOLUTION '112 (Series of 1978) BE IT RESOLVEn I;Y Till: CI'.'•'Y COUNCIL OF TEE C;I1 Y OF ASP ):"4 , COLOR' DO: That a petition liacing been filed with tho City Clerk of. said C i u y to twenty-five (2.5) residents; thereof, scttin i forth that th(•rc is a nc.c•ci for a liousi.n:I Authority to function theroin, and a public hunting havinc. been hold, upon due notice Riven by said City Clerk, all pulse.::nt to the "Housing Authorities Law" of the State of Colol.a•.lo, its al„•ndvd, the City Council of Said City finds, determines and declares, that: 1. Unsanitary and unsaf.(- inhabited dwo.1.1iny accommociati.ons exist ill the City of Aspen, Color.t6o; anti 2. There is a lack of s:afc and sari tar}' dtccl l i ne; ace or.tmoda tions; i :I the City of Aspen, Colorado, itva.ilab.lc lot- all thel inhahit-ant!: thereof, and 3. There is it nc�od for a ilout;ing Authority to function in the City of Aspen, Colorado; and 4. A puti.tion s:et t i nq forth the nerd for a llouscing T+ut horif.y to 1 ulu-t ion ill the City of Aspen, Colorado, has not been dcnic:? 1(y the City Council thereof within LhreQ months of the cl<Itc of the fi.lincl of the aiorc:;aid p•ti t ion; and 5. Tht' Mayor of the City of A::pen, Colorado, be i-oompt.ly notified of the adopt.i.on o1 this rc::ol ut:iorl; and 6. '.I'hc Mayor bo and !,c hereby is clircctccl to fiAc in the office of tt)e Cit.} Clerk of the: City of Aspoll, Colorado, th( ucccl:s,ary col -I i.fieate evidenc•incl the deli gnat iou of tilt, C.i tv Counr.i l as: the Ccnnmila: irll( rsl of the Hous:inq Authority, pursuant to `cct ion ?9-4-205(2) of "The, llouninq Authc,rit.ic:: Law" of tho State of C'c)loradc)- 7. The aforc:;,tid conditions: in the City of At.pcn, Colorado, c•ompol pot —.kills of low J llcolllf` to occupy t1111-.In i t.tt y ((l' unGa l t' d1:'(•1 1 .1111t-ict*-(�I;tm(,- d.ltionsl or ok'%,VC1,owllc•d and cou-le!Aod (w. 1l.inq acevnlltodot.ion::; that tlir aI'orcl;a.id condition[: catt!;c an i11,•t-I•.IrI, ill lhl, ,.plcad of di .(`a:;1• ;ul(1 crime; Lhat t111• c11 ai.,III v and r(•I:Ilnt:tlll( fiI,II (II the art n:: .in whi1.11 e,t,•:nnitary nt urIl,;;l • hou.inn coIitIitiull:, cxi:;t and tIko I,Icvi(Iin•l of M E M O R A N D U M TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office, Bill Kane RE: Jenkinson Subdivision Exemption DATE: January 19, 1978 This is a request for exemption from the full subdivision procedures to separate Lot K from Lots L, M and N of Block 87 in the Aspen Townsite. This site involves the Isis Theatre and the vacant Lot immediately to the west of it. The lots are owned by Majorie Jenkinson and the cum- ulative lot ownership regulation in the City Subdivision Regulations requires a request for Subdivision Exemption procedures to separate and separately convey existing cumulatively owned contiguous townsite lots. In the course of discussions with the Engineering Department and applicant, and upon review of the plat, we note that the Isis Theatre encroaches on Lot K by 6 inches on the front side of the Lot and 3 inches on the back. There was some discussion about requiring this lot to go through the Board of Adjustment to seek a variance for minimum lot size requirement. It has been agreed by the applicant represented by Albie Kern that rather than pursuing a variance, the applicant will simply convey an easement to the Isis Theatre which would allow the owner to obtain 3,000 square feet of fee simple land on Lot K and there- fore avoiding the problem of a sub -standard sized lot. 3,000 square foot lots are permitted as a minimum lot. size in the CC district. We also discussed the park dedication fee; but at this writing, I just learned that the District Judge has ruled against the City park dedication fee in certain respects and we will defer the City Attorney's opinion as to the appropriateness of the fee on this particular application and by way of this memo, request her to make a comment at Monday's meeting. With provision of the easement, and payment of a park dedi- cation fee, if it is any longer appropriate, we recommend approval of this exemption request. The exemption request was granted unanimous approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission at their meeting of January 17, 1978. lmk PROPOSED WORDING FOR DEED FROM MARJORIE JENKINSON TO BUYER OF LOT K, BLOCK 87, ASPEN, COLORADO "Reserving to grantor herein, her heirs and assigns, an easement in perpetuity for a building encroachment on Lot K, Block 87, Aspen, Colorado, described as follows: (Description) Anything to the contrary notwithstanding, in the event the building, known as the Isis Theater, is removed, de- molished or completely destroyed this easement shall terminate and be of no force and effect." • • M E M O R A N D U M TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Jenkinson Subdivision Exemption DATE: January 13, 1978 This is an application for subdivision exemption involving the separation of Lot K from Lots L, M, and N of Block 87 in Aspen. The 4 lots are now owned by Marjorie Jenkinson and the site is currently improved by the Isis Theatre. Lot K is the vacant lot immediately adjacent to the Isis. The Isis sits on Lots L and M and encroaches onto K by one foot. The Engineering Department has noted that encroachment and requested a revised improvement survey showing same. That has recently been sub- mitted. The Engineering Department also states that an easement for this encroachment should be obtained by the present owners before Lot K is sold. We suggest this occur before final exemption approval by the County. They recommend the exemption. The Planning Office notes that Lot K at 3000 square feet conforms with the minimum lot size of the Commercial Core district which is the current zoning. However, we do not know what effect that easement has on the calculation of lot area. If the encroachment area must be subtracted, then the Lot would be non -conforming and the division of property should not be permitted. We are asking the City Attorney to advise. We also note that the full foot side yard setback should be observed and calculated from the point of the encroachment easement. The Lot will therefore in any case present a narrow building site. Only if the problem of minimum lot area can be resolved should the exemption be approved. It seems likely that there must be a variance applied for and received from the Board of Adjustment for less than the minimum lot size, and if this is so, we would suggest conditioning your motion on receipt of the variance before Council consideration. We note too, the encroachment of the Isis in the alley. As with the ARI exemption, the Engineering Department feels it is not a big problem and would require no modification. The park dedication fee appears not to apply in the 0-Office District but again we defer to Dorothy. lmk • i MEMO TO: KAREN SMITH PLANNING FROM: TOM JONES ENGINEERING ' DATE: January 11, 1978 RE: Subdivision Exemption Lot K, Block 87, O.A.T. The only comment the Engineering Department has on this request is to point out that the existing building on Lots L,M, and N encroaches on Lot K by as much as half a foot. An easement for this encroachment should be retained by the present owners before Lot K is sold. A revised improvement survey has been requested which more clearly shows the nature of the encroachment. Approval of the exemption request is recommended. jk CITY OF ASPEN CUSTOMER FINANCE DEPARTMENT 10 CASHIER'S RECEIPT 01-111 LICENSES & PERMITS 01-111 FINES & FORFEITS 511 ❑ BUSINESS LICENSES 561 ❑ COURT FINES 512 ❑ SALES TAX LICENSES 562 ❑ COURT BONDS - FORFEIT 513 ❑ BEER - WINE - LIQUOR LICENSES 563-01 ❑ TOWING FINES - IMPOUND 514 ❑ CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES 563-02 ❑ TOWING FINES - NOT IMPOUND 516 ❑ LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION 564 ❑ TRAFFIC FINES 517 ❑ DOG LICENSE 566 ❑ FALSE ALARM FINES 518 ❑ CENTRAL ALARM LICENSE 568 ❑ DOG IMPOUND FINES 519 ❑ BICYCLE LICENSES 569 ❑ OTHER FINES & FORFEITS 520 ❑ EXCAVATION PERMITS 521 ❑ CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 01-111 OTHER MISC. REVENUES 522 ❑ ELECTRICAL PERMITS 579 ❑ MAPS, CODES, ZONING REGS. 523 ❑ PLUMBING PERMITS 589 ❑ OTHERS (DESCRIBE) 524 ❑ HEATING PERMITS 525 ❑ SEPTIC TANK PERMITS 01-988-632-03 ❑ XEROXING (DESCRIBE) ❑ OTHER - ACCT. N0, DESCRIPTION: (NAME, NUMBER, ETC.): 11655 CASHIER VALIDA RECEIVED FROM CITY OF ASPEN MEMO FROM KAREN SMITH 12-21-77 Dave, Please find attached two requests from the definition of subdivision. One is for Marjorie Jenkinson and the other is for Bill Drueding-. 6escript o of the property are also attached. We are tentatively scheduling both of them for the P&Z meeting of January 17th. May we have any comments that you may have before the 17th. Thank you. Karen • FEE SCHEDULE (Subdivision, Exemption from Subdivision, Rezoning, lark Dedication) Name of Project: Marjorie Jenkinson - Subdivision Exemption Address: Applicant's Name: Albie Kern (Attorney for JenkinFllione: 925-7411 Applicant's Address: P.O. Box 389, 430 East Hyman Street, Aspen, Colorado 81611 FOR ZONES WHICH ARE R-15, R-30, R-40, RR and CONSERVATION the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows: Conceptual $100 + $5.00/dwelling unit Preliminary $22.00/dwelling unit Final $3.00/dwelling unit FOR ALL OTHER ZONES the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows: Conceptual $100 + $60.00/acre of land Preliminary $280.00/acre of land Final $35.00/acre of land X EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION FEE: $50.00 Pk 1-1'-0/"*7 7 REZONING APPLICATION FEE: $125.00 (once a year) PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULE F11COGn or IT ?:Gs It..` (.elves current market value of a percentage of the land proposed as the development site, the percentage of the land being determined at the rate of two and one-half (2'1) acres for every one thousand (1,000) residents of the proposed developmcnt•(that is, the number of residents multiplied by twenty-five ten thousandths (.0025) of an acre per resident). The number of residents attributable to the development shall be calculated in the following manner: We of Dwelling Number of Residents Per Dwelling Unit Sulti-Family studio 1.0 one bedroom 1.3 two bedreom 2.7 three bedroom 4.0 and 1.3 for each additional bedroom Single Family or Duplex one bedroom 1.3 two bcdrec-i 2.7 three bcdfoc-t 4.0 and 1.3 for each additional bedroom A duplex structure shall constitute two dwelling unit: for the purposes cf this subsection. (3) An example of the application of the above formula 4s as foll0o:s, a::r.nminT the construct'' -on of one single f.::aily re :i,ionc•e containing two bedrooms on a lot containing 15,000 sq:rtrr fort with a market value of $u5,000.00 (or $4.33 per square foot): 2.7 (2 bedroom = 2.7 residents) x 0.0025 acres x 43,560 (square feet pot acre) x $4.33 (mar- ket value ut land per square foot) _ $1,273.15 (b) finirtproved land shall be appraised at tit( - current n.tl-l.rt. v.i l w• 0f t hr :.i to 111i lll.11itq iU: V.l1uC attlibtrt:lhI to curt., gullets, str.•rt., eutiew,tlk nn,l utiliti,.^, 1i tn•.t.tll,•.I nn the <!ate o: � ratit is:.tt.1Ill'0 L:.rtc•,' .! l.ul.i:; :It.tl1 1— .Ipy•r.u:r,l .1,.,.t,1in to their Iti.tIt, t I 1-1 It:., taking 111to ..•u:.t.irra Lion 2ie,t_in,l •'rtlrtuna wheth, r nr net they .ter ConforntiI . !I.tIIct v.tlur miry br :.uhr.tantl.tt,•.l by a ducuutcnled purchase prier ( i t an armrt; len,llh U.ut:.actinn n.,t tit„tr th.tntw„yr.tte; r,l.l) ut by any other rccogni:•ed means; ,,rovitiod that a:avn%Cd ValuaLicnl r.hall noL Ito relied on its evidrncr of rnrr.•nt m.,,Lot v.,1un_ Tn th, ,•v,•rit 1he C1tV 0tld :7 A L B E R T KERN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW P. O. BOX 389 430 E. HYMAN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81811 TELEPHONE (303) 925-7411 December 19, 1977 HAND DELIVERED City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission c/o Karen Smith, City Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Subdivision Exemption Dear Karen; On behalf of Mrs. Marjorie Jenkinson I am requesting an exemption from the Subdivision laws of the City of Aspen. Mrs. Jenkinson owns Lots K, L, M and N, Block 87, Aspen, Colorado and desires to obtain an exemption for Lot K from the Subdivision laws of the City of Aspen. I am enclosing herewith an improvement boundary line survey for the aforementioned four lots. Please consider this as an application for exemption of Lot K, Block 87. Yours very tr}al, Albert Ke n AK:ao Encl. cc: Marjorie Jenkinson ALBERT KERN ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW P. O. BOX 389 430 E. HYMAN STREET ASPEN. COLORADO 81811 TELEPHONE (303) 925-7411 December 20, 1977 HAND DELIVERED City of Aspen Planning Office c/o Karen Smith 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Jenkinson Subdivision Exemption Dear Karen; I am delivering herewith two (2) additional plats of Lots K, L, M and N, Block 87, Aspen, Colorado and the Subdivision Exemption fee of $50.00. Yours ver truly, Albert Kern AK:ao Enc1. cc: Marjorie Jenkinson RiL plol a s v I SL 'ONNOIiv4vH:) P,L P F- FND; RE5AR �% Ylr. L.5 918Zi FOUND, FOUND, RERAK 1'X" IN (Da"o , I W,IYFC. L5 016, i A 575'0-3)'I I "E 1r2030 A.7 Ion ,- 0.20 EI D. --- --- Oft. 1.0 r TV, TERM EEOX K H 0 P K N S Q d E N U FE }SAS METER n J ZZ :LOCK �7 I I I j I I I I I I I � j j I I j I j CCU j F I I I I I I I i i � I jl I i I Ij I I 1 I I � I j 1 j I it I i J Ij. l ILII IUIK�I SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, JAME5 F- KE5EK, t1En5Y CERTIFY THAT ON NOVEM5ER 1 1, 077 ASURVEY'vVA5 MADE UNpER MY 5Uf ERVI5CN 0FL0T5 K,L,M, AND N, 5LCCK 87, CITYCP ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLOKA)Q THE TWO STORY 5R(CK BUILDING WA5 FOUND TO P)E LDCAT -D A5 SHOWN HEREON, THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OFAL L 5UIL.D- 1� IN 5, IMPMVEMEt T5, E�,SEMENT5, R0HT5-OF WAY IN EVIDENCE OR KWCWN TOME. AND ENC< iMENT5 RYORON THESE PRE- M15E5 ARE ACCUf RELY SHOWN. 0 5 10 20 _qJ 50 5CAI F-, I, > 10' 15A5I5 OF SEARING.' FOUND Y C NO 0184 SW CORNER bi-cC TRICp MANAGEMENT kYAME5 F RE5EK L5. 01841 87 TO FOUNQ `(FC NO De/i NW CORNER LOT K BLOZC ,7 DECEMLER ni 1977 TRICO MANAGEMENT TITLE PO BOX 1730 ASPEN,COL_ORADO, 8I(3I 1 IMPROVL M NT 303- 925-2688 ac(-- K 87 CITY OFA5PDJ 005 NO. 77- IGO CLIENT UENKZN--CN SURVEYED II/11/77 CRATED 12✓10/-77 A D C 5751--01 I " E IT)-20- 0.20 EI". A.7 log nj — OH. 1.0 �, TV TERM tox PND; RE5AR W/ YFr. L.5 916� - -- -- �O CRAB METER 6.1 L' TWO STORY N B CK E)L' DC� 1 UN FOUND; REAR O 1 0 COIF W/YFC. L5 98� FOR J." 0.400ENC N7 ° '1 I" I �d L------ ROOF H 0p K N S �, v E N U IL, D NN BLOCK 87 m 0 G� I I I I Q � SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I, JAME5 F KE5EK, MF-FZf5Y CERTIFY THAT ON NOVEMfVP 11, 077 A5UFVEY WP\5 MADE UNDER MY 5UPERVISION 01-LU(5 K,L,M, AND N, 5L.00K 87, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORAGYO, THE TAC STORY DRICK BUILDING WA5 FOUND TO PEE LOCATED 45 SHOWN HERECJN, THE. LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OFALL. 5UILD- 1� ING5, IMPf OVEIvtENT5, FPSEMl=NT5, RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN EVIDENGF- OR KKOWN TOME= AND FNCKQAQHMFNT5 6YORCN THESE PRE- MISES ARE ACCt. WELY ,&H wN. -_-� _ - �_-_l O 5 10 20 1-210 i0 5p 5C'AI F, 10_ ,,01 5A515Or- F5EARING% FOUND Yf NO D184 5WCORNCR DL.CCt�---'"`- — -- TIZICQ MANf�C�MFNT JAMES C RE.SEK L,S. 9)18/-i 87 TO FOUNQ `(PC NO q)6NW CORNEK LOT K BLSxK87 DECE-MCTfZ 1511977 i f F TRICO MANPGEMENT PCB 13OX 1-730 ASPEN , CbLORAD0, 81GI I 303-(D2D-2E$S TITLE IMPROVEMENT -5-TREY LCTS K,L,M,N, CLOCK 87 CITY OF A5P _ J 605 NO. 7 7- IOO CLIENT iJIENKEN�N rJ' L)RVEYED 1 1/1 1/77 DFA' TED i2/io/-7-7