HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Kopf, Lot S, Block 56
RECORD 0:' PROCE[])ifIJGS
100 Lea VI'S
___-.:~~:;~:~'- '":. "~~~~2~.-.';;~-" ~.."==~-=:~":';,::::~.::-.:..:=.:c'=::,;==:=--=--::"-'-::'::~-::":~__
...."... .-.......----- ------,'--
____' '_"0 __ __ .__~. _____________.H__._.
---'-"-'-'~"'-"--'''--
..- _._--_._._~-- -....---
....")
OEDTNhNCE 1'10. -~
(Series of 19-'Te)"
AN OHDIN1,NCE llMENDING J\Ii'PICLE X OF THE l,SPEI-j
ZONING CODE BY TIlE I\DDI'J'ION OF 24-10.2(d)
l'llIICIl EXEBPTS 1'FOl1 THE J\I,LOTl1ENT PFOCEDlJRES
THE CONSTRUC'l'IO;j OF ONE s:mGLE FAHILY PFSIDENCE
or, !I LOT SUBDIVIDED 1\F'J'EF THE EFFEC'l'IVE UNl'j: OF
AH'l'ICI.J, X I~IIEmc; (1) THE T'FACl' OF LhND \;LICII WilS
SUBDIVIDED IIl';D II PRE--EXISTING DVIET,LING, IIN))
(::>') !'JO MOHE rriJ/\?,} 'F,IJO LO'I'S \'ICI.J..E CIU~j\'I'l~D BY 'I'ilj.':
SUP,DIVl~~ION
vni:;:SIU~i\r~ t the City Council d'~-;[:jii:(~s .to amc'nd j\r-ciclc: X of
t-~he Asp€'n Zoning Code hy -the adclit.ion of Sec. :?t1-10.2(d) fo~:
the benefit of the City of Aspen,
-JO'l'J I ~:TIEREFORE, 'J:, IrE ORD,T~INED BY I}'HE C:r1'Y COUNCIL OF
'TH:G CITY OF ASPEN, CU:LO:i.?)\DO:
Sc:ct:ion 1
Section 24-10.2(d)
The constJ-uctioE of onE' fjirl.glc: faEl:Lly
resic3cnce on a lot ~_;ubd_iv.-~ ;(-.<1 a-ftc.r th"~7 ef-.cc::c;tive do.1:"(;; c,-f
-this artic l(~ where th,:~ follo','linq cc)ndj t.io::-!~) arc I:le-c.:
(1) The tract of land \'711ic:h \',';:;8 slJh;i_i_vidcd bad
a prc-c,~isting dwellillg.
(2) No more th,'lfi tVJO (2) lots \\18[0 crc~atca by [.he
subdiv i~:iiol-L.
SC-:-'C::tiC)::-:1 2
C.L1hat Section ~',1~-10,,2 of the Lj,nr~icipal Co(~L~ iE3 hereby
(JnK:'l~(i0d by'the rCl1urnbc:cinq of tll(_~ (~xisting sn;.J~":'cctions (d),
(0), (f), ((ol) and (11) as subsections (e,) , (f), (g), (h) and
(i), H"'_",'ctively,
~_~C'C't ion 3
If dll"{ provi ~:;.;on or i..-]):i s cn--din~:l]icc~ or the applicatic'n
tl1,~'J:~~'of to dny po:'~..;::;on or C'i rCllJl1:;L lh-l' j ~~ held i_Ilvnlicl., :_:;uch
invdJid.iLy ~:;l1all (lot affect \llhvr pr~)\~i~Jionr; or ilppljcatio.l1f,
of 1:..hl' t11'djn~.:11{~(' h'J;-ic]1 C:dn l)(~ Sivc)) (~f:i~t'ct. v,!:ii._lIOllt tlit.' .inv.1Jid
!\J'ov:i ~d()n cr clj'pl ic,:!t.ionf ,.)nc1 t-o Llli E end th;:' prov:i ::-;ion:-; of
t.Jli.: l)l",1in,lil('(' ,:!"l' cll'l'l,!!-(',(j I,) :\,' ';\'\'('J"-,tl,]('~
~
RECOHD OF PFlOCLEDlr\lG~;
100 Leaves
~--.::.~'_':~'~~':~..~___~_____.___________.__~_______
______________.____~___.___ "0".'___--.-.----.--.-.----- _________
___ ___ -__-0._-'__'-- ..' .
- -_._--._~_._------
-::--:-"'::':':::o::;'.:..:::..:;:;..-c".=-:o'- -__.._ __::-=,,-:=~~:o:;c:..::=-
Section 4
A public hearinq on the ordinance shall be held on
_..lJfd/L!~ / ;;;,-__, 1978, at 5:00 p.m. in the City
Council ChiH'1bers, llspcn City naIl, l\spen 1 Colol'a.do, 15 dill'S
prior to which notice of the same shall be given in a news-
paper of general circulatj.on withill the City.
INTRODUCED, RUeD AND ormElUcD pu!~lished a,~ provided by
law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at
_7 I".f-{
i-ts regular meetinq beld at th~~ City of Aspen on the _.b.~~.~__
day
of ,//c..Y(UJ:!A~~ ,
- /- - - (J ------
1978. ,C--'-"
/ y /"
/ jl /1 - // !
I <1/;l',/1f'l' / ) ~{t1?L-
,:-'~;:L~. _,L_L_c'_,:,/_'.~.__"--/~~___ I. 7~ ~L~,/_ f_' __~__
E. !.i iCh-cfC 1 , n2hrcn,d t:' ~-
!'1U)-'or Pro Tern
A'IlIrES1r:
}~athryn s. HalJtei--;-Cl~fy Cler}'~-"---
FINALLY adopted, passed and approved on the
day
of
, 1978
s-~G c~;--S tai1(-jT(~y I Ti-----~-~---- -----
tli1yor
ATTEST:
Ki1TJ-i"ry'n S. '~Tfa-liL e l~~-l'~CC~-cT(-:-l': f~---
'ORll'~ C, r. Wlfr.KH 8. B.II l. (;'J.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
Apr]:TTI~T'rr8
Spec~al Beet~ng
AspenPI~']1n:rng and ' ~,onlrlg ,
The Aspen Planning and Zoning Comr:lission held a special meeting on April 11,
1978, at 5:00 PB in the City Council Chambers. Bembers present were Charles
Collins, Frank Baranko, Donald Ensign, Welton Anderson, Olaf Iledstrom and
John Schuhmacher. Also Bill Kane and Karen Smith of the Planning Office.
Approval of liinutes
Kopf, Subdivision
Exemption
Arrowhead
Condominiumization
FAH -
Reconunenda tion
to City Council
Ensign moved ,to table t,he approval of the minutes' to
the next meeting, Hedstrom seconded. 1'.11 in favor,
motion approved.
Smith gave the presentation. She showed plats for
the application. This is a request to separate
Lots 0 & P from Lots Q, H, & S, thus creating two
building sites. The existing house does comply with
setbacks, zoning, etc. This application is exempted
fro~ the Gl1F but any development on the second lot
would be deducted from the quota. The Engineering
Office has no probler1s with the, application. The
park dedication fee does apply on the second lot and
the Planning Office recommends that it be deferred to
issuance of a building permit. The Planning Office
recommends approval. Smith noted that the recently'
passed Ordinance 3 of 1978 exempts this from the GHP.
Hedstrom moved to recommend exemption from the strict
application of the subdivision regulations for the
separation of Lots 0 & P, Block 56, from Lots Q, R & S,
on application of Don and Carol Kopf, inasmuch as the
purpose and intent of the regulations have been satis-
fied and subject to paym~nt of the park dedication fee
at such time as a building permit is obtained for
Lots 0 & P, Ensign seconded. All in favor, motion
approved.
Hedstrom moved to table the Arrov/head Condominiumization
item on the agenda pending completion of the Housing
Impact statement, Schuhma'cher seconded. All in favor,
motion approved.
Smith gave a short history of their consideration of
this item. Anderson distributed a sketch of two houses,
both of which had a .31 FAR with 1800 square feet. One
house had a volume of 48,600 cubic feet and the oth'er
had a volTh~e of 16,200 cubic feet. He was demonstrating
that although they have the same number of square feet,
one house was physically three times the size of the
other. He feels that the FAH will not accomplish what
they are attempting to do. He feels they should study
the possibility of a volume ratio instead.
Bill Dunaway, of the Aspen Times, did no~ feel that
people would build a shell-like house and exploit the
ordinance. ,Anderson noted that they could easily slip
in an illegal second floor and have twice the FAR pos-
sible. Gideon Kaufman noted that Anderson was showing
ways that people would use to get around the FAR.
Collins said there is always a potential for someone
to skirt the intention of the ordinance but that they
should enact the ordinance anyway. Dunaway felt they
should adopt the FAR and look at a volume control later.
Kaufman felt the majority will not build offensive
houses. Dc felt they should deal only with those who
will abuse the FAR. Smith said she anticipated a real
problem in figuring volume ratios in houses with circle,,;..
cylinders i1nd the like.
M E M 0 RAN 0 U M
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Kopf - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: April 24, 1978
This application requests subdivsion exemption for the division of a parcel
consisting of 5 city lots into two separate parcels of 2 and 3 lots each.
Specifically, the applicants, Don and Carol Kopf wish to create a separate
building site out of Lots 0 & P, Block 56 by separating them from Lots Q,
R, and S, on which their house is now located. T~e property is located on
Hallam between First and C t Streets - in t . . t. The
dlvlsion would create a 9,000 square 00 lot with a house on it and a new
vacant 6,000 square foot lot. Both conform to zone district requirements,
so no non-conformity would be created.
Such divisions are exempt from the Growth Management Dolicy plan by virtue
of Ordinance 3, series of 1978, recently passed by the City Council. If
divided, this lot could be developed with a single family house with no
further reviews. Any development would, however, be subtracted from the
quota available that year.
Dave Ellis has reviewed the propoesed lots with respect to subdivision design
standard conformance. He recommended the exemption be granted without con-
ditions inasmuch as those criteria had been met.
We note that the division is subject to a park dedication fee on the lot to
be separated. The lot is vacant and new development is still required to
pay a fee based on the number of residents. Because there are no building
plans and the number of bedrooms is unknown, we recommend the fee payment be
postponed until building permit application.
This item was presented to the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission at their
regular meeting on April 11, 1978. The Commission recommended exemption from
the strict application of the subdivision regulations for the separation of
o and P, Block 56 from Lots Q, R, and S, inasmuch as the purpose and intent
of the regulations have been satisfied and subject to payment of the park
dedication fee at such time as a building permit is obtained for Lots 0 & P.
sr
t
~ ~ rf\ 4\/ ~, I~l~
CO' l<PfV~ Q (:Ii I
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Karen Smith
RE: Kopf - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: April 7, 1978
This application requests subdivision exemption for the division of a parcel
consisting of 5 city lots into two separate parcels of 2 and 3 lots each.
Specifically, the applicants, Don and Carol Kopf wish to create a separate
building site out of Lots 0 & P, Block 56 by separating them from Lots Q,
R, and S, on which their house is now located. The property is located on
Hallam between First and Center Streets - in the R-6 zone district. The
division would create a 9,000 square foot lot with a house on it and a new
vacant 6,000 square foot lot. Both conform to zone district requirements,
so no non-conformity would be created.
Such divisons are exempt from the Growth Management policy plan by virtue
of Ordinance 3, series of 1978, recently passed by the City Council. If
divided, this lot could be developed with a single family house with no
further reviews. Any development would, however, be subtracted from the
quota available that year.
Dave Ellis has reviewed the proposed lots with respect to subdivision design
standard conformance. He recommended the exemption be granted without con-
ditions inasmuch as those criteria had been met.
We note that the division is subject to a park dedication fee on the lot to
be separated. The lot is vacant and new development is still required to
pay a fee based on the number of residents. Because there are no building
plans and the number of bedrooms is unknown, we recommend the fee payment be
postponed until building permit application. '
Doremus & company
postollice box 224 . 602east hyman ave, . aspen, colorad081611 .303925-6866
March 13, 1978
Ms. Karen Stanford
City/County Land Use Administration
Aspen City Hall
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Don and Carol Ann Kopf
Exemption
Dear Karen:
Please consider this letter formal application to the
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission for an exemption from
the term "subdivision", as provided for in the Aspen Muni-
cipal Code, sec. 20-19 (b.), with respect to the proposed
division of City lots.
As the accompanying map shows, the property consists
of Lots 0, P, Q, R & S, Block 56, City of Aspen with a 2-
story victorian frame dwelling, presently the residence of
the applicant.
Don and Carol Ann wish to parcel off Lots 0 & P from
the remaining 3 lots and dwelling so that these lots might
become available as a single family building site. As can
be seen, the new building site (Lots 0 & P) will consist
of 2 vacant City lots of 6,000 square feet in size. The
existing Kopf residence will remain on Lots Q, R & S con-
sisting of 9,000 square feet. A further examination of
the map indicates that the Kopf residence will be conform-
ing as to side, rear and front yard setbacks. The property
is presently zoned R-6 Residential, which allows single
family dwellings on 6,000 square feet of lot.
It is respectfully submitted that the contemplated
division does not fall within the intent or purpose of
Aspen's Subdivision Regulations, which are expressly de-
signed to assist in the orderly, efficient and integrated
development of the City of Aspen, to insure the proper
distribution of population, to coordinate the need for
public services, and to encourage well-planned subdivisions.
Doremus & company
post office box 224 . 602 east hyman ave. . aspen, colorado81611 .303925-6866
Ms. Karen Stanford
Page two
March 13, 1978
Current City policy allows an exemption from subdi-
vision requirements for the division for lots in this
manner and we would appreciate your earnest consideration
of this application. Please find our check for $50.00
representing our fee for this application enclosed.
JD:abs
Enclosures
, NOTE-O-GRAM@
@THE DRAWING BOARD' BOX 50S' DAl.LAS. TEXAS
CITY OF" ASPEN
P. O. BOX V . A5PEN, COLORAOO B1611
.
TO I j;~ S~{fI.. I
~: 5~{'d,v, qelM-!4,~ ~(
L ,J",,~ t:J-S) S/~< .s-<;; ~
DATE 1~rI7t3
fk- ~/fl~ +1 hC<f ~
C( /;efl I;'S:~~ c.f -/fu~
rfO>R-/ eX~f~ --c! l-rPJi-t;4
re~h<~ ~i ~ e,r~~y;~
~ g41 0/~Y ~c/t~>.
'-
BY 0~ 7/fi;
REPLY
DATE
SIGN-ED
. . , u ' - Y 1 (1 ~~, "', l "
"
., FEE SCHEDULE ""
(Subdivision, Exemption from Subdivision, Rezoning, Park Dedication)
Name of Project: .)0,,-1 i C4/L CL., #r/nJ- IGPF- Cl<~-t/';'"
Address: {.or~ we of P
Applicant's Name: Pt1?' ~ C~ 4;;,-,,'tif;d Phone:
Applicant's Address:_~ y /ho2 a-s/"f'.v.
FOR ZONES WHICH ARE R-15, R-30, R-40, RR and CONSERVATION the Subdivision Fee
Formula is as follows:
Conceptua 1
$100 + $5.00/dwe11ing unit
+
Pre1 iminary
$22.00/dwe11ing unit
Final
$3.00/dwe11ing unit
FOR ALL OTHER ZONES the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows:
Conceptual
$100 + $60.00/acre of land
Pre1 iminary
$280.00/acre of land
Final
$35.00/acre of land
EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION FEE: $50.00
REZONING APPLICATION FEE: $125.00 (once a year)
PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULE
m:corm Of rn;)C[C::J:NliS
lL~ l!'.~..'cs
'~""""==~-="""-~=.-:-=':".._.~"-=",-,-",===-.~-=--~~-,.- ---.=:=--
"
curr"nt IR.:1Th.t v.11uc of a pl,"rccnlolCJc of the
101nd propoccd as the dcvc1ol'lncnt site, the
perccnta9c of the l.:md being tlctcrmincd at the
rate of tt..'O .lnu Or!c-hal! (2'2) .:lcrC5 for every
one thouso:lnd (1,000) residents of the pro?o:;cd
development. (that is. the number of residents
Ilultiplied by t\"'~nty-fivc ten thous.J.nJths
(.0025) of an acre per rcsiccnt). The number
of residents attributable to the dcvclop~cnt
shall be calculated in the following manner:
"
.'
Type of Dwelling
Nu~bcr o~ Rc~irt~nts
PC'r D.....cl.J.:..:-.,-:-~-::~t
l1ulti-:-amily
studio 1.0
one bedroom 1.3
two b~d~c~m 2.7
three bcdroo~ 4.0
and 1.3 for each additio~al bedroom
/
Single F3rnili or Duplex
one bcJro~~ 1.3
two b('d~==~ 2.7
thr~e bL~~~~~ 4.0
and 1.3 ;0: c~~h addi~ional ~cdroorn
--
A dupl<''{. st:-:':,':'~,l!'e shall C'o:1~ti-::~tc '::\"0 d....r.lling
unit!'. :0:; t=--o;. FU:"'iw~',,'$ c:- ~:,:$ s:.:os,,:..:-::ion.
(J} ,',n c)(.:l::~:-lc of the "~'i'lic"ti.":1 0: tl",,' o1.b,,\'c
for;::t:!.1 i~-. ,~~; foll,l..:~;. ,1::~ ',:;'",1:\1 lh.' c":;l:-.Lrth'~~{)n
or Oll" ~H'l,!Il' 1..:,;1 Iv r,";i,:.':h'~' ~','~ll,l:~,l:P: to;'"
bt-,h..,.l~,; l,.'I1 ,I h'L cont,ll:L:~_1 l:,.;.'00 ~;,,';.1!'L' :'l"'t.
"ith.:1 t:;,lrL..l't ....jlue o( $u5,vC'U.JO (or SLJJ r..:.'r
8qu<1re f",ll.!:
2.7 P hl'.:I(l,'m. 2.7 rt':~i{knt'i) X 0.00:''' .1l~rl'S
X 4J,~f;O (~'q".lrc f~'I,t 1"'1' ,l.:"h'l 'I( $-1. J1 {r.'.lt.-
"l'l '-'.dI1l' (11 t.lIh! Pl.t '''j1:.\[.' (;.,Pt.'-- ~~1,,~lJ.1S
(h) llldr'i'r'l\'I',l 1,111<.1 !'.h.dl I-l' '1]'1':,1\"".1 .1t !hr
('tllr,'I~f I l.! \'.dll.' ul tlit' '.It,. :11< iU.:l:-L.j I.l "'_Ilu~'
(t t I I I l 'l: : . i ~.: ,. 1,1 ,\ 11 :', q 111 t ,'I '" ~ t ' . " t , ,:. '\0" 1l..
III h I \I \ \ 1 It'... !, : ~ t ,Ii I L - , ~ ,'- , t' l1" ,', ~ ' (" : '. - . .) : t
.t :,' \. _,;, -,'. ~ ,". , 1 ,II',! . ,i .j: ' 'r.' ,n '
tHUll'll hl'~:" I ..".I h I \I !.1.1:!-l ,ill.' ....,..,',L.l.
l I " II 1" \, ~ ,'. I . _: I ", : Ii . ,", .. I" '. " (":" 'I ! l...,
(', 'II f ,'i ill I It. J ' .'; I I I., t l'.t Ill" to, _ "," I, ',' ~ t ,,~d :..; '. i t ''I'