HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Latta 1225 Mt View Dr.W. MeadowsVVI -- (�(D
LATTA 1225 Mt. Vew Dr ve
West Meadows Subdivision
E
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
County
00100 — 63711 09009 — 00000
Subdivision/PUD
63712
Special Review
63713
P&Z Review Only
63714
Detailed Review
63715
Final Plat
63716
Special Approval
63717
Specially Assigned
City
00100 — 63721 09009 — 00000
Conceptual Application
63722
Preliminary Application
63723
Final Application
63724
Exemption
63725
Rezoning
63726
Conditional Use
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00100 — 63061 09009 — 00000 County Land Use Sales
63062 GMP Sales
63063 Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Other
Name: Project
611 Voct Main Strapt
Address:,. Phone:
Check No. "' '
Receipt No. P
Date:
4b
4 `'�
orded at 3:48 p.m. Sep 2, Z980 Loretta Banner Recorder 22061 4,38
Reception No:
LATTA-GUBSER CONDOMINIUM3�4 58
(a residential condominium)
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into and made this 27th day of
August , 1980, by and between WILLIAM S. LATTA
(hereinafter referred to as "subdivider") and THE CITY OF
(ASPEN, COLORADO, a Municipal corporation (hereinafter referred
to as "City").
W I T N E S S E T H
WHEREAS, Subdivider is an owner of a duplex building
situate on a tract of land situate in the City of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described on
Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, and
WHEREAS, Subdivider has submitted to City for approval,
execution and recording a final subdivision plat of the
above -described property, such subdivision to be known and
designated as "Latta-Gubser Condominium", and
WHEREAS, the City has fully considered such subdivision
plat, the proposed condominiumization of the improvement of
the property shown thereon, and is willing to approve,execute
and accept the plat for recordation upon the agreement of
subdivider to the matters hereinafter described, which
matters are deemed necessary to protect, promote and enhance
the public welfare, and
WHEREAS, Subdivider and City wish to reduce this
agreement to writing,
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the
mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree
as follows:
= 394 59
0
1. Any existing tenant shall be given written
notice in the event that tenant's unit is offered for sale,
which notice shall specify the sales price. Each tenant
(shall have an exclusive non assignable right for the ninety
(90) days following the tenant's receipt of the notice to
purchase his/her unit at the price specified in the notice.
2. Each tenant shall have a ninety (90) day exclusive
non assignable right of first refusal to purchase his/her
unit, which shall commence when a bona fide offer is made by
a third person and accepted by the owner and notice of the
offer and acceptance and a copy thereof have been delivered
to the tenant. In the event this notice of offer and acceptance
is delivered to the tenant while the ninety (90) day right
set forth in paragraph one (111) above is still in effect,
the tenant may purchase the unit for the amount of the
initial specified sales price or the amount of the bona fide
offer, whichever is less.
3. Each unit of the duplex shall be restricted to
(six (6) month minimum leases with no more than two (2)
(shorter tenancies per year.
4. In the event a bona fide offer to purchase Unit
#2 of the duplex, also known as 1227 Mountain View Drive, is
(made to and accepted by Nicholas J. Gubser and Margaret B.
Gubser as the owners of the unit, the City of Aspen shall
have a ninety- (90) day exclusive non assignable right of
(first refusal to purchase the unit for the purchase price of
one hundred sixty-five thousand dollars ($165,000.00) plus
any increases as permitted by the City of Aspen Housing
Authority as dictated by increases in the cost of living, which
- 2 -
=394 1 6C
rVJ
CA
ninety-(90) day period shall commence when notice of the
offer and acceptance and a copy thereof have been delivered
to the City of Aspen. The City of Aspen shall give written
notice to the owner of the unit of its intent or nonintent
to exercise this right of first refusal within the ninety-
(90) day period. This right of first refusal to the City of
Aspen shall be superior to and have priority over any other
right of first refusal set forth in this Agreement. The
restrictions contained in this paragraph four (114) are to
run with the land and shall be binding on the owner, his
successors and assigns and all persons claiming under them
for a period of three (3) years from the date of execution
of this Agreement
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereto executed
this Agreement as the day and year first above written.
WILLIAM S. LATTA
�� ; .
Attest
'_FIftYN! K09fi, City Cler
.STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
CITY OF ASPEN
li• ,
By
HERMAN EDEL, Mayor
Acknowledged, s bscribed and sworn to before me this
day of 6zu'O-- , 1980, by WILLIAM S. LATTA.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
1
,)1'
Notary Public
- 3 -
r
O�t
l�o
No. q7 - hD
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED:— _j 3�. MOO— STAFF: V✓G�a�-
2. APPLICANT:
3. REPRESENTATIVE: 6, deck- /:�D L- F11 - ak
4. PROJECT NAME: LahL C — Leeo K45L4ye� -&7n
5. LOCATION: 1 Z Z <�- — ) -2. Z - /L1ov�,� ( aty'e� D� ✓�
We S-f- Me0-A 5 SI%�cfi 5/ elW
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning
P.U.D.
Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
�( Subdivision
_Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
Stream Margin
8040 Greenline
View Plane
Conditional Use
Other
h k a ( E/-� Qe �e �. Gv� �i'c�., Ld riled 14 /2_�—
yo -G ay llezr
REFERRALS:
Attorney
Engineering Dept.
Housing
Water
City Electric
Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
Parks
Holy Cross Electric
Mountain Bell
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: �-� C
School District
Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
State Highway Dept.
Other
9. DISPOSITION:
P & Z V Approved V
Denied
Date
D
"x4t t4, lea
�e �75-,
e,)� _
/��
(.f
- D
� ✓rD 7 t/ S a / l.� (�//�
Council Approved ✓ Denied Date
/4 D
41
10. ROUTING:
Attorney Building Engineering Other
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exception - Reconsideration
DATE: August 13, 1980 /
(Approved as to form City for Y Council ZP6V6"a
Background
At its January 14, 1980 meeting, City Council approved a subdivision exception
for condominiumization of the Latta duplex (1225 - 1227 Mountain View Drive,
West Meadows Subdivision). The lot had not been platted previously, therefore
City Council approved an exception rather than an exemption from full subdivi-
sion (on the recommendation of the Engineering Department) with the following
conditions:
1. The owner/applicant shall comply with six-month minimum lease restrictions
(Section 20-22 of the Aspen Municipal Code).
2. Upon the sale of the currently -rented half of the duplex, the owner/
applicant shall impose a three-year deed restriction, to include res-
triction of price/occupancy to meet City guidelines and to give right -
of -first -refusal to the City.
One half of the duplex has been owner -occupied for the past 7 years; the other
half has had the same renter for the past 5 years. In order to minimize impact
on the employee housing stock, the applicant agreed at the time of approval
to sell half of the duplex to the current renter with restrictions described
above. The technicalities of financing and selling the unit, however, took
more than the 90-day period allotted for recordation of the final plat.
According to Section 20-14(e) of the Municipal Code, the plat has therefore
become invalid. Reconsideration and approval of the priliminary and final
plat by P & Z and City Council, respectively, are required before its accep-
tance and recording. (See attached copy of original application and referral.)
Planninq Office Recommendation
The Planning Office recommends that the P & Z approve the preliminary sub-
mission on reconsideration, considering that no changes in regulations have
been made and that the applicant has fulfilled his obligation to sell to the
current tenant.
P & Z Recommendation
P & Z will consider this application at its regular meeting on August 19, 1980.
Suggested Council Motion
Move to approve final plat for condominiumization of the Latta duplex (1225-
1227 Mountain View Drive, West Meadows Subdivision) conditioned on the owner/
applicant complying with six-month minimum lease restrictions required in
Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code.
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN
DAVID G. EISENSTEIN
LAW OFFICES
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN
BOX 10001
611 WEST MAIN STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
July 31, 1980
Jolene Vrchota
City of Aspen Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Latta Condominiumization
Dear Jolene,
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 303
925-8166
I represent William Latta, and on his behalf, recently
secured from the City an Exception from Subdivision for the
condominiumization of his property located at (see Exhibit A
attached hereto). This Exception received P & Z approval and
final City Council approval. After securing City Council
approval, we unfortunately ran into a number of problems that
prevented us from filing the Final Plat in a timely fashion.
§20-14(e) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen requires
that a subdivider record the Final Plat within ninety (90) days
following full subdivision approval. We are, therefore,
requesting reconsideration and approval by the planning commission
and City Council per §20-14(e).
I believe that this matter can be expediously
accomplished. Nothing has changed to affect the validity of
the recent Exception, no ordinances have passed nor has there
been a change in Council position that would prevent the
Exception today.
If you have any questions on this matter, I would
be happy to discuss them with you. I hope we can set this
matter on the next available P & Z agenda, August 19, 1980.
Very truly yours,
#deonKaufman
GK kw
Enclosure
EXHIBIT A
A tract of land situate•in the}'
TownShl'1%! of Section
;ship 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian
,more fully described as beginning at a" point whence the 1/!
Section Corner between Sections 11 and12, Township 10 South°
;Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian -of the R Survey bears South 14020' W. 2498 fee
t],thence South BS"lS�b� _
East 906 feet to the point of true beginning; thence Nor th:6�30'
East 98 feet; thence South 85015' East 179.feetl.thence South;6030!i
West 98 feet; thence North 85015' West 179 feet to the point -'of
true beginning, containing 0.398 acres more or less.`_:Together'r
with a right of way over a road twelve feet wide.l in
east of a line beginning at t$e northwest corner of Ahe beae y, ely
described land thence North 6 30' East 320 feet.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exception - Reconsideration
DATE: August 13, 1980
(Approved for submission to City Council )
City Manager
Background I Vh%fT-,-
At its January 14, 1980 meeting, City Council approved a subdivision exception
for condominiumization of the Latta duplex (1225 - 1221 Mountain View Drive,
West Meadows Subdivision). The lot had not been platted previously, therefore
City Council approved an exception rather than an exemption from full subdivi-
sion (on the recommendation of the Engineering Department) with the following
conditions:
1. The owner/applicant shall comply with six-month minimum lease restrictions
(Section 20-22 of the Aspen Municipal Code).
V who-✓ 2. Upon the sale of the currently -rented half of the duplex, the owner/
applican
res-
triction of thprice/occcupancyall impose a rto eet City guidelineee-year deed s nand otongive eright-
Cru'i of -first -refusal to the City.
One half of the duplex has been owner -occupied for the past 7 years; the other
half has had the same renter for the past 5 years. In order to minimize impact
on the employee housing stock, the applicant agreed at the time of approval
to sell half of the duplex to the current renter with restrictions described
- 1 above. The technicalities of financing and selling the unit, however, took
more than the 90-day period allotted for recordation of the final plat.
According to Section 20-14(e) of the Municipal Code, the plat has therefore
become invalid. Reconsideration and approval of the priliminary and final
plat by P & Z and City Council, respectively, are required before its accep-
tance and recording. (See attached copy of original application and referral.)
Planning Office Recommendation
The Planning Office recommends that the P & Z approve the preliminary sub-
mission on reconsideration, considering that no changes in regulations have
been made and that the applicant has fulfilled his obligation to sell to the
current tenant.
-JI
gl2ol8o /74 :a rt VetA-pdgr" y-v pre
k r" lye, �1 G`z-t
LAW OFFICES •
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN
DAVID G. EISENSTEIN
GIDEON 1. KAUFMAN
BOX 10001
611 WEST MAIN STREET
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
July 31, 1980
Jolene Vrchota
City of Aspen Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Latta Condominiumization
Dear Jolene,
TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 303
925-81 66
I represent William Latta, and on his behalf, recently
secured from the City an Exception from Subdivision for the
condominiumization of his property located at (see Exhibit A
attached hereto). This Exception received P & Z approval and
final City Council approval. After securing City Council
approval, we unfortunately ran into a number of problems that
prevented us from filing the Final Plat in a timely fashion.
§20-14(e) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen requires
that a subdivider record the Final Plat within ninety (90) days
following full subdivision approval. We are, therefore,
requesting reconsideration and approval by the planning commission
and City Council per §20-14(e).
I believe that this matter can be expediously
accomplished. Nothing has changed to affect the validity of
the recent Exception, no ordinances have passed nor has there
been a change in Council position that would prevent the
Exception today.
If you have any questions on this matter, I would
be happy to discuss them with you. I hope we can set this
matter on the next available P & Z agenda, August 19, 1980.
Very truly yours,
PdWeon Kaufman
GK kw
Enclosure
EXHIBIT A
A tr4R of 'land'sitt uae'•in thc��Sf
Township 10 Sou /4 0.fI Sectic;j y
more fully describeRange 85 Nest of the.6d as beginning at a point whenceathee.
l/4 n
!Section Corner between Sections 12 and'12, Township 10 South
6th Principal Range 85 West of the Meridian.of the.Xi �.rl
Survey bears South 14020' W. - 2498 feet1 . thence South_=B5a15 _
East 98 feet to the point of true 'beginnin thence .North tO -
East 98 feetJ thence South 85015' East 179.feetJ thence South�6030!�
West 98 feet; thence North 85015' blest 179 feet" the .
true beginning,g point)' � containin 0.398 acres more or lesTogetber; '
with a right of way over a road twelve feet wide 1 in
east of a line beginning at t�e northwest he' aboeae.ytL-1-
corner of ,t
described land thence North 6 30' East 320 feet. '�
01
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption
DATE: December 14, 1979
Zoning: R-15, Residential
Location: 1225/1227 Mountain View Drive (West Meadows Subdivision)
Lot Size: Approximately 17,534 square feet
Rental History: One-half of the Latta duplex has been owner occupied
since 1973. The remaining unit has been leased to its
current tenants for approximately five years.
Engineering
Comments: The Latta property has never been platted. For this
reason, the Engineering Department recommends that the
applicant be granted an exception from full subdivision
compliance rather than subdivision exemption.
Specifically, Engineering recommends that you grant an
exception from conceptual review before City Council and
preliminary plat before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Engineering Department's comments are contained in
a memorandum dated December 12, 1979, which is attached
for your review.
Attorney's
Comments: Owner/applicant should be required to obtain full subdivision
or subdivision exception review rather than exemption
in order to secure a final plat for the property. Any
approval, however, should be conditioned upon the owner/
applicant complying with the six month minimum lease
restriction of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code.
Housing Director's
Comments: No objection, impact negated by proposed sale to the
current tenant with additional safeguard in the form of
proposed three year deed restriction.
Planning Office
Recommendation: Denial of request for subdivision exemption and approval
of exception from full subdivision review. Approval to
be conditioned upon the owner/applicant complying with
the six month minimum lease restriction of Section 20-22
and the imposition of a three year deed restriction,
said restriction to be based upon price and occupancy
guidelines for the low, moderate and middle income
housing pool.
P and Z
Recommendation: Concurred with Planning Office recommendation.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Office
DATE: December 12, 1979
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption, Southwest 1/4, Section 1,
T10S, R85W of the 6th P.M.
Having reviewed the survey map for the above subdivision
exemption and having made a site inspection, the Engineering
Department recommends the following:
1) We recommend denial of the Latta Subdivision Exemption
and recommend Mr. Latta be granted an exception from full
subdivision compliance. Mr. Latta's exception would re-
quire conceptual from Planning and Zoning and final
approval from City Council for the final plat.
2) We recommend the improvement survey as submitted
by the owner/applicant be accepted as a conceptual plat.
3) We recommend that the owner/applicant follow section
20-14 of the Municipal Code regarding final plat procedures,
and submit a final plat for review by the Engineering De-
partment per section 20-15 prior to placement on the
Council agenda.
0 •
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption
DATE: December 14, 1979
Zoning: R-15, Residential
Location: 1225/1227 Mountain View Drive (West Meadows Subdivision)
Lot Size: Approximately 17,534 square feet
Rental History: One-half of the Latta duplex has been owner occupied
since 1973. The remaining unit has been leased to its
current tenants for approximately five years.
Engineering
Comments: The Latta property has never been platted. For this
reason, the Engineering Department recommends that the
applicant be granted an exception from full subdivision
compliance rather than subdivision exemption.
Specifically, Engineering recommends that you grant an
exception from conceptual review before City Council and
preliminary plat before the Planning and Zoning Commission.
The Engineering Department's comments are contained in
a memorandum dated December 12, 1979, which is attached
for your review.
Attorney's
Comments: Owner/applicant should be required to obtain full subdivision
or subdivision exception review rather than exemption
in order to secure a final plat for the property. Any
approval, however, should be conditioned upon the owner/
applicant complying with the six month minimum lease
restriction of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code.
Housing Director's
Comments: No objection, impact negated by proposed sale to the
current tenant with additional safeguard in the form of
proposed three year deed restriction.
Planning Office
Recommendation: Denial of request for subdivision exemption and approval
of exception from full subdivision review. Approval to
be conditioned upon the owner/applicant complying with
the six month minimum lease restriction of Section 20-22
and the imposition of a three year deed restriction,
said restriction to be based upon price and occupancy
guidelines for the low, moderate and middle income
housing pool.
P and Z
Recommendation: Concurred with Planning Office recommendation.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
FROM: Jay Hammond, Engineering Office
DATE: December 12, 1979
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption, Southwest 1/4, Section 1,
T10S, R85W of the 6th P.M.
Having reviewed the survey map for the above subdivision
exemption and having made a site inspection, the Engineering
Department recommends the following:
1) We recommend denial of the Latta Subdivision Exemption
and recommend Mr. Latta be granted an exception from full
subdivision compliance. Mr. Latta's exception would re-
quire conceptual from Planning and Zoning and final
approval from City Council for the final plat.
2) We recommend the improvement survey as submitted
by the owner/applicant be accepted as a conceptual plat.
3) We recommend that the owner/applicant follow section
20-14 of the Municipal Code regarding final plat procedures,
and submit a final plat for review by the Engineering De-
partment per section 20-15 prior to placement on the
Council agenda.
0 •
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Council
FROM: Jolene Vrchota, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exception - Reconsideration
DATE: August 13, 1980
(Approved for submission to City Council )
City Manager
Background
At its January 14, 1980 meeting, City Council approved a subdivision exception
for condominiumization of the Latta duplex (1225 - 1227 Mountain View Drive,
West Meadows Subdivision). The lot had not been platted previously, therefore
City Council approved an exception rather than an exemption from full subdivi-
sion (on the recommendation of the Engineering Department) with the following
conditions:
1. The owner/applicant shall comply with six-month minimum lease restrictions
(Section 20-22 of the Aspen Municipal Code).
2. Upon the sale of the currently -rented half of the duplex, the owner/
applicant shall impose a three-year deed restriction, to include res-
triction of price/occupancy to meet City guidelines and to give right -
of -first -refusal to the City.
One half of the duplex has been owner -occupied for the past 7 years; the other
half has had the same renter for the past 5 years. In order to minimize impact
on the employee housing stock, the applicant agreed at the time of approval
to sell half of the duplex to the current renter with restrictions described
above. The technicalities of financing and selling the unit, however, took
more than the 90-day period allotted for recordation of the final plat.
According to Section 20-14(e) of the Municipal Code, the plat has therefore
become invalid. Reconsideration and approval of the priliminary and final
plat by P & Z and City Council, respectively, are required before its accep-
tance and recording. (See attached copy of original application and referral.)
Planning Office Recommendation
The Planning Office recommends that the P & Z approve the preliminary sub-
mission on reconsideration, considering that no changes in regulations have
been made and that the applicant has fulfilled his obligation to sell to the
current tenant.
•
•
TO: Sunny Vann
FRM Jim Reents, Housing Director
DATE: December 12, 1979
SUBJECT: Condom-miumization
JR:ds
The Housing Office has no opposition to this application.
The impact is negated by the proposed sale to the current
tenant and an additional safequard of a three year deed
restriction for sale and rental.
r
•
CITY:OF ASPEN
130 s th galena street
aspen, colorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
DATE: November 21, 1979
TO: Sunny Vann
FROM: Ron Stock
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption
If the above entitled subdivision exemption is granted, the
approval should be conditioned upon the applicant meeting the
following requirements of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code of
the City of Aspen:
[ ] Notice and option provisions to current
tenants
[x] Each unit restricted to six-month minimum
leases with no more than two shorter tenan-
cies in a calendar year.
Because of [ ] the proposed division of the property [x] the
current lack of a plat for the property, it is my recommendation
that the applicant be required to obtain full subdivision or
subdivision exception review rather than exemption. The purpose
of this requirment would be to obtain a final plat.
RWS:mc
i
n
LAW OFFICES -+��"� ✓► '
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN►'
BOX 10001 OCT 30 1979 ►_
611 WEST MAIN STREET _
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 ,\ ASPEN / P(TKIN C.O.
PLANNINu OFFICE
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN TELEPHONE
AREA CODE 303
DAVID G. EISENSTEIN October 26, 1979 925-8166
Mr. Richard Grice
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: William S. Latta Condominiumization
Dear Richard,
This letter concerns the condominiumization of the
Latta duplex located at 1225 and 1227 Mountain View Drive.
The Lattas have owned the duplex since 1973. In this par-
ticular condominiumization, we are proposing to provide some
permanent employee housing for the tenants of one-half of the
duplex known as 1225 Mountain View Drive.
Nick and Margaret Gubser have resided in the unit for
over five (5) years. As a result of negotiations with the
Gubsers, the Lattas have agreed to sell the Gubsers the unit
located at 1225 Mountain View Drive on the completion of
condominiumization. The terms of sale include a reasonable
price with owner financing and flexible terms including eight
percent (8%) interest. The Lattas appreciate the fact that the
Gubsers have been good tenants and, therefore, will make avail-
able to the Gubsers permanent housing that they would not
otherwise be able to afford.
In order to insure that the property is not immediately
resold by the Gubsers, the property will be deed restricted
for three (3) years. If the Gubsers sell the property within
three (3) years, the sale would be subject to the City's
Housing Authority regulations; and, thereby, the City would be
able to purchase the property for the same price the Gubsers
paid subject only to increases set by the Housing Authority.
Mr. Richard Grice
October 26, 1979
Page two
This novel approach to condominiumization of existing
units is a good one, because it makes available to local
tenants housing in which they have resided for some time.
If you have any questions on this condominiumization,
please contact me.
Very truly yours,
Gideon Kaufman
GK ch
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Glyn Stock, City Attorney
Jim Reents, City Housing Director
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption
DATE: October 30, 1979
Attached please find application for exemption from subdivision for the
purpose of condominiumization of an existing duplex located at 1225 and 1227
Mountain View Drive. This item is scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, December 18, 1979. Therefore, may I please
have your written comments concerning this application no later than Monday,
December 10, 1979. Thank you.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Dan McArthur, City Engineer
Ron Stock, City Attorney
Jim Reents, City Housing Director
FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office
RE: Latta Subdivision Exemption
DATE: October 30, 1979
Attached please find application for exemption from subdivision for the
purpose of condominiumization of an existing duplex located at 1225 and 1227
Mountain View Drive. This item is scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, December 18, 1979. Therefore, may I please
have your written comments concerning this application no later than Monday,
December 10, 1979. Thank you.
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made on behalf of William S. Latta
(hereinafter referred to as "applicant") under §20-19 (a) of
the Aspen, Colorado, subdivision regulations for an exemption
from the definition of the term "subdivision" with respect to
real property described as: See Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
It is submitted that an exemption in this case would be
appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing
structure. A subdivision of a lot with a duplex on it creates
conditions whereby strict compliance with the subdivision regu-
lations would deprive the applicant of reasonable use of
land. If an exemption is granted, the owner of the property
will have a common interest in the land and there will be either
a condominium declaration or use and occupancy agreement appli-
cable to the property which will not in any way increase the
land use impact of the property. An exemption in this case will
not conflict with the intent and purpose of the subdivision
regulations which are directed to assist the orderly, efficient
and integrated development of the City of Aspen, to ensure the
proper distribution of population, to coordinate the need for
public services and to encourage well planned.subdivisions.
• 0-
The granting of this application will not undermine the
intent of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly within
the area intended for exemption under §20-19. The building is
already in existence, and there will be no change in density,
which is presently in line with the desired population density
for the property. A follow-up letter will be submitted con-
cerning the proposed condominiumization's compliance with the
new condominiumization ordinance. The applicant would appre-
ciate your consideration of this application at your next
regular meeting.
Dated: July 13, 1979.
i
i eon I. Kautpeffn
Attorney for Applicant
- 2-
0 •
EXHIBIT A
TO
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
FOR
WILLIAM S. LATTA
A tract of land situate in the SW 1/4 of Section
Township 10 South, Range 85 West of the 6th Principal
more fully described as beginning at a point whence the 1/4�;;,
Section Corner between Sections 11 and"12, Township 10 Southf
Range 85 West of the 6th Principal Meridian of the Kimb�rl -'7
- .ram; -^r•_ ,a=�:
Survey bears South 14020' W. 2498 feet; .thence South 85 15.r_•,_, „_,
East 906 feet to the point of true beginning; thence North 6030';�h-r.
East 98 feet; thence South 85015' East 179 feet; thence South 6030'
West 98 feet; thence North 850oint,15' West 179 feet to the pt x
true beginning, containing 0.398 acres more or less.., Together-'---'-
with a right of way over a road twelve feet wide lying immediate
east of a line beginning at t$e northwest corner of.the above:;-',_-��F
described land thence North 6 30' East 320 feet. t.' a
K&E* MC9888
REBo Ho clip
NC.
ON
l
I-LI-- - -L -- 1
O 5' 10, ZO' 30'
SCALE' 111= la
8A515 OF SEAR N05 FOUND MOHUMEHTS
AS 5HOWH HEhiEom
ALPINE SURVEYS
SUI�VE(OK5 C-D�TIF16ATE
I, JAME5 F IiESF-K , HEAEO`( GEATIFY THAT TH15 MAp ACCURATELY D1-gtc.TS
A 5URVEY MADE UHPDE MY SUPERV I51 ON OH SEP T EMt3ER 2.4, 1979 OF A
TAAGT OF L HP SITUATED IH THE 5W %4 OF 5EC"Tlot A a-, T105, Ri35 w oF-
THE (vc� 1?M., MORE. FULL,-( DEXXi16ED A5 Oe&IHHIHe AT A 9OW47 WHENCE
THE. QUAIATF-R 5EGTION COR"EA 3ETWEEN SECTIONS 11 AHD 12 , -TDWS 4-
5HIP 10 S�, IRAAHOE 85 WE5T CiF THE 674 FAIMCIpAL MEei117AN OF THE
KIMMVE LY 5UR\fE`( OEAR5 SOUTH 14° 2O' L1J Z.49 8 FEET ; THENCE SOUTH 85l
15'00" FAST 9040 FEET TO THE VOIt-AT OF -TP,UE r4oRt1-1
(.' SO' Oo" EA5T 98 FEET; THENCE SaJrt-1 85' 15' 00" EAST 1-79 FEET; THtEHCE
SOUTH (�' 30'00" WEST 9b FEET; THENCE HOATIH 65' 15'00" WEST 179 FEET TO
THE POINT OF TRUE 0E&IHHIH0, LOHTAINIt-ICE 17534- SQUARIff FEET MORE 012i
LF-55. CTOÐEK WITH A At&HT OF LLIAY WEIR A V�CAO TWELVE FEET LLIIDE
LYING IMMEOIATEL,Y EAST OF A LIHE 06(0t441H& AT THE HOATHLUEST COp,HEA
OF THE. AOOVE DE5CA-A15ED i AH9 THENCE I-1OIK-n-A Co' 50,00" EA`jT 32,0 FEET")
ALL IN THE CITE( OF A59r-H,GOI-DI9A0O. THE ONE `STORY LOOP FV'AME HCk.L`E
LLA5 FOUND TO OE L.CCATE.D Eb-ITIIREL`( W ITHIM THE WUHt7ARY UHE5 of -r"E.
ABOVE e90VFKTY. THE LOCATION AHD 010EHSIOHS OF ALL- 80ILD-
IH&5, IMpl30VEMENTS EASEMENTS, KtOH75 or- U.AA-( IH EVIpeNGF_ CW, KMOLUH
TO MC AHO EHGV'2,0AGHMEN-T5 t3Y OA OH THE5E WEMISE5 AAF Acc'-
URATEL`( SHOWM.
,AMES F AE5F-R
U 5 9184
SEt�TEM13EFt Z8 , 1979
Alpine Surveys Surveyed 9 ZA- 79 Revisions
Drafted = 9 z1 19
Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303 925 2688
Title M ovEMENT suRvE ( Job No: "79-174-
51TUATED:N THE 5W /a SE-TION 1 T 105 A E55W OF THE 6—?M Client . L,ATTA/KAUFr1�
ALL IH TI-AE GIT'( OF ASpE-1, GOL�O'P,APO