HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Lindner, Lots 3-5, block 2
.
CUSTOMER
o
CITY OF ASPEN
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
o
CASHIER'S RECEIPT
01-111 LICENSES & PERMITS
511 0 BUSINESS LICENSES
512 0 SALES TAX LICENSES
513 0 BEER - WINE - LIQUOR LICENSES
514 0 CONTRACTDR'S LICENSES
516 0 LIQUOR LICENSE APPLlCA TION
517 0 DOG LICENSE
518 0 CENTRAL ALARM LICENSE
519 0 BICYCLE LICENSES
520 0 EXCAVATION PERMITS
521 0 CONSTRUCTION PERMITS
522 0 ELECTRICAL PERMITS
523 0 PLUMBING PERMITS
524 0 HEATING PERMITS
525 0 SEPTIC TANK PERMITS 01.988.632.03 0 XEROXING (DESCRIBE)
~HER-ACCT.NOO-( \ 1-~
01-111 FINES & FORFEITS
561 0 COURT FINES
562 0 COURT BONDS - FORFEIT
563-01 0 TOWING FINES - IMPOUND
563-02 0 TOWING FINES - NOT IMPOUND
564 0 TRAFFIC FINES
566 0 FALSE ALARM FINES
568 0 DOG IMPOUND FINES
569 0 OTHER FINES & FORFEITS
01-111 OTHER MISC. REVENUES
579 0 MAPS, CODES, ZONING REGS.
589 0 OTHERS (DESCRIBE)
DESCRIPTION, (NAME, NUMBER, ETC,),
~ )~1 \UIS\ 00 Q--I+1,lDl1(1)
I
, ~
I
CAlER VAl:-l . ION' -'"
RECEIVED FRD~r(1~ or fiji/a \W)€t' ldih
.L\'v2NUl2.
Z
'-J
V1
DO f!
()\ .
e' &
'J!
1)\
"'. '1
~ N
;:; \Jl
.\ 10
~~
:;
"/
~is' "
~,
i',,\<,
---------28.75-..
~.
/',! J.-
t /. }
~\1~
I
~ - ---- -
~
V
I (). .,
r; ~ r- ~
:J' 0
/ N .b.-I -I r
/ f "
f f \J1 ~
, f
, f
, f ~
, f
, ,
,
50S.48'Cb"W 5e.4e
')J1Jl
>rnrn
-\ r;. -\
~- !~ '
'l
Ij\ .
. <:
~-:.;'
~r"
OJ'
-J \J'
-'l
('
-"
~
t
~
H'-' ~
v v
-------- '9 "~--...,,,.~~.
I~ -5____
p
lJ
>'
8.1
r-:
:-J
"'
~
o
Q
(~: ) $
'n
r-
o
--i
i}J
'" 14.134 00 "E:;,
~~\J'
~~?
;s>~
""-
~~
--.j~
\'
4o.ez
,
,
,
,
.6;
o
/
I
i:J
V'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
------------------ ~
..
I ~
'lJ
:~
:2
:~
't
'G'
, .
N
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(j\
I)l
\9
o
h
\)'.
()
Cl~
[T1
J
I
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
J
I
I
'-,
I
I
...j
N
~ ()
1,' N
,
f
_<C
~~~
r~
il'~
- "-
Nil
~~
---J\!j
l'
\~~
-
~
","'~"'
MEMO
TO: KAREN SMITH
PLANNING
FROM:
DAVE ELLIS
ENGINEERING
~
DATE :
December 16.
1977
RE: Subdivision Exemption Request -
Portions of Lots 3,4, & 5, Block 2,
Riverside Addition
Based upon a new improvement survey and confirmation of
an access and parking easement on Lot 2 for the benefit
of the subject property the engineering department con-
cerns stated in the December 1 memo have been resolved.
Therefore, the recommendation is for approval of the
exemption request.
jk
I.
.
":''-;'
." ~- .\' .
: ..
',," ~J
,,"',:'
I"--'l"
r IJr:
~) r: ;~
o
o
P~K-,\ \ 1.'-fUr"
",1'"
'. ~
~ ~ ,.
r-------:._____~..,. .
---- '"''''\.;(\'''''
f:;-;---::-...~
'-:"'~.r,j _______
.--------------r7
t
,
,
i
/
( 1
: i
Ii
il
,
I
(j.
C,
"'1'
-,'
I
i
,
I ..,.,________"..."'~
,
i
I
i
I
,
,
I", ","
:. C,:
;. $
, ,
?~
"
,
'.
,
'.
: "
"
;j ~~
-:s
o
v ~~.
\'; ~
'.
r'
. "
~I' ::..
;Of
~ '~~
:.;
'..., i.;.~~:..",. CCo'l~
-:')....~2
" ~
,
/
,
'1'1 " ..........,'-\ ?
._-,g~) l"''''_h'''''' ,
\'-.:\..\\ -T~~"\\0~Jij
v' ", ( :" '" "" "'''1-'
'I"~ ~ '; \ : >, '""~ '" '~'''- "'Iii
i' & 'v : "'" 'n "".~
c; , ," '''1'",''
,~. f'-,c: , ,"",'-'\ ",,'~ if",,",, (, :'
; """~'" UO, , .;:
'" '. , , 'C 11 , ,
., '" ., ", !l-<,,", :
; g' J i;~"'S'5~~~;!
.' " (~, \: f i c," "'>'0, ',," "
;;'" \;,. ", """,,,~ 'I, :
.', " ' ", .
i"->\",> '" " ,
'.'\, c.. "\",
.;
z
'I ';
'"
I':
"
'.
l,
0,
r:
.,
"
~ 6
"
~[I
.,~
!~, '1
............... t ~, i
}f"' I, '1\"..--1'
:'. ; .. ,..
...:: J ",
' . ~
...."'->"...J
, \.
----,---
... " --. -'- '.
',' -'"'"
: /; {\..)
..." .........
1
~ I' ~
-I I~,
V,
y
...:-:-:--
f...>.:,,,.~,-;::-',.,").....v.. ~.;>: .10
, ~1
.R
-...- '.-
r, ,: ~
:;; ~\,', ~
,
I,
tt, ~
i, ~
/
""'"",,,
f"
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Office (KS)
RE: Lindner Subdivision Exemption
DATE: December 14, 1977
This application involves the condominiumization of a recently remodeled
duplex in the Riverside addition off Park Avenue. The structure is
located in the R-6 zone district on a lot which is less than 4,000
square feet owned by Julie and Richard Lindner.
Dave Ellis requested only conditional approval by the Planning and
Zoning Commission because of a suspected problem with parking for the
duplex. Dave suggested that the parking might be taking place on
adjacent private land rather than on a vacated city street as was
thought by the applicants. Dave requested an updated improvement
survey showing parking area and true location of the remodeled building
in order to resolve the question prior to council action. We expect
to have his comments later this week.
Planning and Zoning recommened approval of the exemption at their
December 6th meeting subject to:
1. Resolution of the Engineer's question
2. A 90 day right of first refusal
3. Six month minimum lease restriction
4. Payment of the park dedication fee
The latter three conditions should be specified in an exemption agreement,
similar to a subdivision agreement, which should be prepared prior to
recording of the exemption.
The Planning and Zoning Commission also referenced the Council public
hearing regarding condominiumization policy. Since that was adopted
on December 12th, we have asked the applicant to provide us with
relevant infomration prior to Monday's meeting.
lmk
GIDEON I. KAUFMAN
~at~
BOX 10001
12ao UTE AVENUE!
ASPEN. COLORAt;JO 81e1 1
C303, 82..., ee
\
\
December 14, 1977
Ms. Karen Smith
City Planning Office
City Hall
405 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
. Dear Karen,
This letter is being written to you concerning the compliance
of Brownell and Lindner with the new condominiumization policy.
The Brownell condominiumization inv6lves one four plex consisting
of four two-bedroom units. None of the tenants will be displaced
by the conversion. The Brownells intend to sell one 'unit per
year. One tenant has presently agreed to purchase his unit; the
other tenants have been given rights of first refusal and their
leases will continue to be honored. The duplex involved in the
same condominiumization is presently occupied by the Brownells.
They intend to continue residing there. The tenant in the other
half of the duplex will also continue to reside in his unit. He
has a long-term lease; and, as long as the Brownells continue to
reside in their half of the duplex, they do not intend to sell
the other half. The Brownell condominiumization adheres to the
tenant displacement guidelines sought under the new condominiumi-
zation policy. In fact, the proposed condominiumization will not
currently result in the displacement of a single tenant. The
unit to be sold will be sold for $62,000.00, a price within the
reach of moderate income parties. The Lindner duplex has not had
tenants for a considerable period of time. One unit will be sold
while the other unit has been placed under a long-term lease with
an option to purchase. The unit that will presently be sold along
with an unfinished basement contains approximately 1,300 square
feet. It will be sold for under $100,000.00, and owner financing
will be provided to the tenant. This condominiumization will
also adhere to the tenant displacement guidelines of the new
condominiumization pOlicy, as it will not displace or remove low-
to middle-income housing.
..
~
.
,"
",
j
J'
.
~.
/"',,",
"...,/
,'""
,~-'" .
"
Ms. Karen Smith
December 14, 1977
Page Two
,
I hope this answers any questions or concerns you might have on
the foregoing condominiumization and their compliance with the
new City guidelines. I will be more than happy to answer any
questions or respond to any in-house comments. I will, of course,
be. attending any hearings held on these matters before both the
Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.
Sincerely,
~~
Gideon Kaufman
'GK ch
P. S. Karen, let's resolve this quickly so that I can go skiing:
.
-'
~
,
c
".
.:1
~
r,
"'
,..['Nj
/....
,,,,",,'
M E M 0 RAN DUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Conmission
FROM: Planning Office (KS)
RE: Lindner Subdivision Exemption
DATE: December 2, 1977
This application involves the condominiumization of a recently remodeled
duplex in the Riverside addition off Park Avenue. The proposal is located
in the R-6 zone district on a lot which is less than 4,000 square feet
and is now owned by Julie and Richard Lindner.
Dave Ellis has reviewed the application and requests only condittona1
approval by the P&Z. An updated improvement survey will be required by
him prior to proceeding to City Council in order for him to resolve a
suspected problem, with the location of parking for the duplex and in
order to show the true location of the reconstructed building. Dave
suspects that their parking area may actually be on adjacent private
land.
Subject to Dave's concerns, the Planning Office recommends approval
inasmuch as the pruposes of the Subdivision reviews have apparently been
met. We also recommend the conditions of:
1. A six month minimum lease restriction
2. A 90 day right of first refusal
3. Payment of the park dedication fee. This should be calculated
prior to City Council approval and no exemption recorded
until payment is made and an Exemption Agreement is drafted.
Although we have not made this request in the past, we think
it is appropriate since it is too easy to lose track once
the exemption is approved. The Planning Office should
sign off before the resolution.
For your information, City Council passed a revised version of the
condominiumization policy at first reading on November 28th. A public
hearing will be set, I believe, for their December 19th meeting.
1mk
MEMO
TO:
KAREN SMITH
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM:
DAVE ELLIS \'\c'
ENGINEERING DEPARTt{ENT ~
DATE:
December 1, 1977
RE:
Subdivision Exemption Request - Portions of
Lots 3,4, & 5, Block 2, Riverside Addition
The engineering department is recommending a conditional
approval of this exemption request. Prior to proceeding
to City Council an updated improvement survey needs to be
submitted. The present survey does not reflect the recon-
struction of the building which occurred this past summer.
Another possible problem is the true location of Regent
Street. As "used" for parking and access, it abuts Lot 3
on the south side; however, city maps indicate that this
land is privately owned as Lot 2 ~nd that Regent Street is
actually farther south by 50 feet. More time will be re-
quired to assess the situation, but should be done before
the exemption goes to council.
jk
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FroM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
FeqOOst is hereby made on behalf of RICHARD LINrtilER and JULIE LINrtilER
(hereinafter referred to as applicants) under Section 20-19 (a) of the Aspen,
Colorado, Subdivision Regulations, for an exemption fran the definition of the
term "Subdivision" with respect to the real property described as:
LDts 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots
Block 2
Riverside addition
It is subrni tted that an eJreIlPtion in the case would be appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing duplex. A subdivision
of one lot with a duplex on it creates ronditions whereby strict CCIlpliance with
subdivision regulations would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
their land. If an exemption is granted, the aomers of the property will have
a ccmron interest in the land and there will be a conchni.nium declaration and
maintenance agreenent applicable to the property which will not in any way
increase the land use inpact of the property. An exenption in this case will
not conflict with the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations which
are directed to assist the orderly, efficient, and integrated developnent
of the City of Aspen, to insure the proper distribution of population, to
coordinate the need for public services, and to encourage well p1armed
subdivision.
The granting of this application will not undermine the intent of the
subdivision regulations as it is clearly within the area intended for exenption
under Section 20-19. The building is already in existence, and there will be
no change in density which is presently in line with the desired population
density for the property.
The applicants would appreciate your consideration of this application at
your next regular rreeting.
Very truly yours,
Gi~~b
Attorney for Richard and Julie Lindner (Applicants)
Dl\.TED THIS 14th day of Octcher, 1977.
-
<-
FEE SCHEDULE
(Subdivision, Exemption from Subdivision,
.. d'""
Rezoning, Park Dedication)
Name of Project:
Subdivision Exemption - Richard Linder
Address:
Lots 3,4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots, Block 2 Riverside
Acldltlon
Applicant's Name:
Applicant's Address: P.O. Box 2191, Aspen, Colorado
Ri chard Li nder
Phone: 925-7200
FOR ZONES WHICH ARE R-15, R-30, R-40, RR and CONSERVATION the Subdivision Fee
Formula is as follows:
Conceptual
$100 + $5.00/dwelling unit
+
Prel iminary
$22.00/dwelling unit
Final
$3.00/dwelling unit
FOR ALL OTHER ZONES the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows:
Conceptual
$100 + $60.00/acre of land
Preliminary
$280.00/acre of land
Final
$35.00/acre of land
X EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION FEE: $50.00
REZONING APPLICATION FEE: $125.00 (once a year)
PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULE
nrconn or P:~JC[L~S:N~;S
It>:, l!'_''''TS
=:---==-==--".0"","-"'-''''-=0-_.:0...-0=,'=,-,=_ _'-'-'-==='''-'''~~=':-_"",=.'=~_---=C-=='.'_"""",'_' _.=-=__'
Cl,lrn'nl rr.:1Tko..'l v.lluc of a pcrccnt':HjC of the
1.:md propor;cd -'15 the dcvclopr.lcnt si tc, the
pcrccnl~19c of the 1.:lIld bcinq determined at the
rate of t\o.'O <lno o~c-h.:llf (21~l acre!> for every
one thousand {I. 000) residents of the propo~cd
development- (th.:1t is, the nu:nbcr of residents
mUltiplied by t\-:('nty-fivc ten thous.:l.nJths
(.0025) of an acre per resident). The number
of r~sidents attributable to the dcvclopr.lcnt
shall be calculated in the following manner:
'l'ypc of Owelli.!!.,2
Number of Residents
Per Dwelling V:ut
Hulti-Famlly
studio 1.0
one bedroom 1.3
t.wo bedrcom 2.7
t.hree bedroom ".0
And 1.3 for ~ach additional bedroom
/
Single Family or Duplex
one bcdro:::l~
two bccrc':::l
three b.;:c.~.~C'::'I
and 1.3 for e~ch additional
1.3
2.7
4.0
bedroom
A duplex st::t:::':.u=:-e shall constit:..:te 't..'O dlt.'clling
unit$ for t~~ ~U~?OS~s 0: th1S subsection.
(3) An exa~?lc of the application of the obovc
formula is <:$ foJ Im.:s, Clssuminq the c,:m~truC'ti.on
of Oll~ sinele Li:;lily r('~id~~nc~" - contilininq l\.:O
bcdroo::;s on a lot cont.lininq 15,000 s':;"J.1rc feet
with il r.:arkl~t \.'.:llut:' of $65.000.00 (or $4.33 per
f:qUilrt' fOOl);
2.7 (? b~'dt'oom "" 2. 7 rl'~idcnts) x 0.00;'5 acrt"S
X 43.~GO (:,qu.!rc f('l't pC"l. .1crc) x $4.33 (r:l<Jr-
kel volluc of land per squart> foot) ... $1,273.15
(h) Unirlpnwed 1.ltH1 !~h.:Lll hi' .lpp:--~li~i'(1 at thl"'
C1HTl'nl r.',,\:k~'l v.JJuv of tILl' \;jt.. ill,:llldlnq it:; vcllu0
attt-ibtlt.l['!., to CUlt>. q\lttt'r~;. ~;tl."t.. :;~d"\~.\lk
anJ ulili~!. If lw;t~1I1.-,.J ,'11 t'I" ,~'t,' l': !"I.'lit
j1,:-;1I.111;'t'. "h'.,,',! l.\::j,; \-,:,.1!! I". .:;-,;-.!".:: ;,'d ,.,__,'C1:d:n~'
to their hl<Jli.",t. d!;J bl'\,t. u:,,' t.ll..llhj .lul.) l"l'n:,j,h:r:.:\-
lion C'xi~.tiIHl <;tnwtnr,':; ..'ht'lh<'r o. not lh.,y <II'"
confoI'min'J. .'i,\l'b'l. v.du~ 11Id)" 1>..' !,Ub:;t,li\li,llf'd by
a documl'nted pun:h.l$l' price (if <111 drm's lCIl'Jlh
tl."I\~dl't ion IHlt l.l_lL., tJ1<1I1 llt.',1 Y_'."-!; olJ) 01 b~' iU\}'
other r('co'Jni:'I'rJ Ul'Jn!>i ~1rov.id_'d th.tt "!;i;c:.s~d
2
~g:..
~
~ {.~ . 1. ~ _
"i.. ~ V -e .J '_
'" ~~.~ 't-J' j
\€ ~ .~ \'(\
. ~
.... ......-
~ ~ ~ 11 ~
-
.
N
-