Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Lindner, Lots 3-5, block 2�on--),- cx,.oj RIVLR- LI DNER, LOTS 3-4, BL L,SIBL E CUSTOMER CITY OF ASPEN 0 FINANCE DEPARTMENT CASHIER'S RECEIPT 01-111 LICENSES & PERMITS 511 ❑ BUSINESS LICENSES 512 ❑ SALES TAX LICENSES 513 ❑ BEER - WINE - LIQUOR LICENSES 514 ❑ CONTRACTOR'S LICENSES 516 ❑ LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION 517 ❑ DOG LICENSE 518 ❑ CENTRAL ALARM LICENSE 519 ❑ BICYCLE LICENSES 520 ❑ EXCAVATION PERMITS 521 ❑ CONSTRUCTION PERMITS 522 ❑ ELECTRICAL PERMITS 523 ❑ PLUMBING PERMITS 524 ❑ HEATING PERMITS 01-111 FINES & FORFEITS I 561 ❑ COURT FINES 562 ❑ COURT BONDS - FORFEIT 563-01 ❑ TOWING FINES - IMPOUND 563-02 ❑ TOWING FINES - NOT IMPOUND 564 ❑ TRAFFIC FINES 566 ❑ FALSE ALARM FINES 568 ❑ DOG IMPOUND FINES 569 ❑ OTHER FINES & FORFEITS 01-111 579 ❑ 589 ❑ OTHER MISC. REVENUES MAPS, CODES, ZONING REGS. OTHERS (DESCRIBE) 525 ❑ SEPTIC TANK PERMITS 01-988-632-03 ❑ XEROXING (DESCRIBE) ❑ OTHER - ACCT. NO �/ ESCRIPTION: (NAME, NUMBER, ETC.): 10731. RECEIVED FROI t plat and application to Ellis 11-17-77 lmk TO Date Time WHILE YOU WERE OUT M of Phone Area Code Number Extension TELEPHONED PLEASE CALL CALLED TO SEE YOU WILL CALL AGAIN WANTS TO SEE YOU URGENT RETURNED YOUR CALL Message Operator EFFItI- CYp LINE NO. 2725 AN AMPAD PRODUCT 60NSFEETS rv K �k 6kA t f 0� tAA 'b TV • r it ,Pfj r6. Ci a"4-CAOo -eA I c /. - SET FZFP_ w/PLASTIC CAP L.Z. 12707 CC R�f�:R. w; F�l-ASTIG CAr i_.S. 17707 6� w _0 o�P SPLIT RAIL FENCE � -ROOF pvF-RFiAlV STOF�� �i.9 � �5 I � 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I FEE C7UPLE X �? v I 1 ► 3"c.w. I I 1 i N � ' 1 2'C.A. N /Z. 3 S 8004CO' DO" E 72. OZ woo p DEC,►t. I ` ` � ' � - 2-7.c, 3"ASP. q o aQ 5FT RE&A;- w/PLASTIG CAP L.S. 12707 0 0 MEMO TO: KAREN SMITH PLANNING FROM: DAVE ELLIS ENGINEERING DATE: December 16, 1977 RE: Subdivision Exemption Request - Portions of Lots 3,4, & 5, Block 2, Riverside Addition Based upon a new improvement survey and confirmation of an access and parking easement on Lot 2 for the benefit of the subject property the engineering department con- cerns stated in the December 1 memo have been resolved. Therefore, the recommendation is for approval of the exemption request. jk 4 ' Sit v.°4Cc�00'� 72.OZ _-:�s_iT aye F'E�acE CL,V L-.5. 12707 - ' �.L - kod' cv�-u.. :� J _ - - - `-` .,.. lOT f h:: �,...? •.t','s�:. . �- _ _ _- __ t• ''/' / 1 s :may- t_.•�. �� . i - I j J ONE 5T0 I cw r tr / __________J - --- J Y. z 1 r.:l.:_;z •a-r,':"..1a5T1! `\ � A:.'£-,4 • `'^^� �. �� L(17 ti I RAIL- f %r • 0 .,r M E M O R A N D U M TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Lindner Subdivision Exemption DATE: December 14, 1977 This application involves the condominiumization of a recently remodeled duplex in the Riverside addition off Park Avenue. The structure is located in the R-6 zone district on a lot which is less than 4,000 square feet owned by Julie and Richard Lindner. Dave Ellis requested only conditional approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission because of a suspected problem with parking for the duplex. Dave suggested that the parking might be taking place on adjacent private land rather than on a vacated city street as was thought by the applicants. Dave requested an updated improvement survey showing parking area and true location of the remodeled building in order to resolve the question prior to council action. We expect to have his comments later this week. Planning and Zoning recommened approval of the exemption at their December 6th meeting subject to: 1. Resolution of the Engineer's question 2. A 90 day right of first refusal 3. Six month minimum lease restriction 4. Payment of the park dedication fee The latter three conditions should be specified in an exemption agreement, similar to a subdivision agreement, which should be prepared prior to recording of the exemption. The Planning and Zoning Commission also referenced the Council public hearing regarding condominiumization policy. Since that was adopted on December 12th, we have asked the applicant to provide us with relevant infomration prior to Monday's meeting. lmk E 0 GIDEON I. KAUFMAN c 46" of %"' Box 10001 1260 UTE AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 (303) 925-816a December 14, 1977 Ms. Karen Smith City Planning Office City Hall 405 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Karen, _This letter is being written to you concerning the compliance of Brownell and Lindner with the new condominiumization policy. The Brownell condominiumization involves one four plex consisting of four two -bedroom units. None of the tenants will be displaced by the conversion. The Brownells intend to sell one unit per year. One tenant has presently agreed to purchase his unit; the other tenants have been given rights of first refusal and their leases will continue to be honored. The duplex involved in the same condominiumization is presently occupied by the Brownells. They intend to continue residing there. The tenant in the other half of the duplex will also continue to reside in his unit. He has a long-term lease; and, as long as the Brownells continue to reside in their half of the duplex, they do not intend to sell the other half. The Brownell condominiumization adheres to the tenant displacement guidelines sought under the new condominiumi- zation policy. In fact, the proposed condominiumization will not currently result in the displacement of a single tenant. The unit to be sold will be sold for $62,000.00, a price within the reach of moderate income parties. The Lindner duplex has not had tenants for a considerable period of time. One unit will be sold while the other unit has been placed under a long-term lease with an option to purchase. The unit that will presently be sold along with an unfinished basement contains approximately 1,300 square feet. It will be sold for under $100,000.00, and owner financing will be provided to the tenant. This condominiumization will also adhere to the tenant displacement guidelines of the new condominiumization policy, as it will not displace or remove low - to middle -income housing. �9 • L� Ms. Karen Smith December 14, 1977 Page Two I hope this answers any questions or concerns you might have on the foregoing condominiumization and their compliance with the new City guidelines. I will be more than happy to answer any questions or respond to any in-house comments. I will, of course, be.attending any hearings held on these matters before both the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Sincerely, Gideon Kaufman GK ch P. S. Karen, let's resolve this quickly so that I can go skiing! i • �i M E M O R A N D U M TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Lindner Subdivision Exemption DATE: December 2, 1977 This application involves the condominiumization of a recently remodeled duplex in the Riverside addition off Park Avenue. The proposal is located in the R-6 zone district on a lot which is less than 4,000 square feet and is now owned by Julie and Richard Lindner. Dave Ellis has reviewed the application and requests only conditional approval by the P&Z. An updated improvement survey will be required by him prior to proceeding to City Council in order for him to resolve a suspected problem, with the location of parking for the duplex and in order to show the true location of the reconstructed building. Dave suspects that their parking area may actually be on adjacent private land. Subject to Dave's concerns, the Planning Office recommends approval inasmuch as the pruposes of the Subdivision reviews have apparently been met. We also recommend the conditions of: 1. A six month minimum lease restriction 2. A 90 day right of first refusal 3. Payment of the park dedication fee. This should be calculated prior to City Council approval and no exemption recorded until payment is made and an Exemption Agreement is drafted. Although we have not made this request in the past, we think it is appropriate since it is too easy to lose track once the exemption is approved. The Planning Office should sign off before the resolution. For your information, City Council passed a revised version of the condominiumization policy at first reading on November 28th. A public hearing will be set, I believe, for their December 19th meeting. lmk MEMO TO: KAREN SMITH PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: DAVE ELLIS _b� ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: December 1, 1977 RE: Subdivision Exemption Request - Portions of Lots 3,4, & 5, Block 2, Riverside Addition The engineering department is recommending a conditional approval of this exemption request. Prior to proceeding to City Council an updated improvement survey needs to be submitted. The present survey does not reflect the recon- struction of the building which occurred this past summer. Another possible problem is the true location of Regent Street. As "used" for parking and access, it abuts Lot 3 on the south side; however, city maps indicate that this land is privately owned as Lot 2 and that Regent Street is actually farther south by 50 feet. More time will be re- quired to assess the situation, but should be done before the exemption goes to council. jk 0 • APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION FRDM SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS Request is hereby made on behalf of RICHARD LINDNER and JULIE LINDNER (hereinafter referred to as applicants) under Section 20-19(a) of the Aspen, Colorado, Subdivision Regulations, for an exemption from the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect to the real property described as: Lots 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots Block 2 Riverside addition It is submitted that an exemption in the case would be appropriate. The application involves subdivision of an existing duplex. A subdivision of one lot with a duplex on it creates conditions whereby strict compliance with subdivision regulations would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of their land. If an exen tion is granted, the owners of the property will have a ccmmn interest in the land and there will be a condominium declaration and maintenance agreement applicable to the property which will not in any way increase the land use impact of the property. An exemption in this case will not conflict with the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to assist the orderly, efficient, and integrated development of the City of Aspen, to insure the proper distribution of population, to coordinate the need for public services, and to encourage well planned subdivision. The granting of this application will not undermine the intent of the subdivision regulations as it is clearly within the area intended for exemption under Section 20-19. The building is already in existence, and there will be no change in density which is presently in line with the desired population density for the property. The applicants would appreciate your consideration of this application at your next regular meeting. Very truly yours, Gideon I. ufman Attorney for Richard and Julie Lindner (Applicants) DATED THIS 14th day of October, 1977. 0 FEE SCHEDULE 10 (Subdivision, Exemption from Subdivision, Rezoning, Park Dedication) Name of Project: Subdivision Exemption - Richard Linder Address: Lots 3,4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots, Block 2 Riverside i ion Applicant's Name: Richard Linder Phone: 925-7200 Applicant's Address: P.O. Box 2191, Aspen, Colorado FOR ZONES WHICH ARE R-15, R-30, R-40, RR and CONSERVATION the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows: Conceptual $100 + $5.00/dwelling unit Preliminary $22.00/dwelling unit Final $3.00/dwelling unit FOR ALL OTHER ZONES the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows: Conceptual $100 + $60.00/acre of land Preliminary $280.00/acre of land Final $35.00/acre of land X EXEMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION FEE: $50.00 REZONING APPLICATION FEE: $125.00 (once a year) PARK DEDICATION FEE SCHEDULE r,: cox„) or IC, Lr.i%-cs currant market value of a percentage of the land proposed as the development site, the percentage of the land being determined at the rate of two and ono -half (211) acres for every one thousand (1,000) residents of the proposed development - (that is, the number of residents multiplied by twenty-five ten thousandths (.0025) of an acre per resident). The number of residents attributable to the development shall be calculated in the following manner: Type of Dwelling Number of Residents Per Dwelling Unit Hulti-Family r studio 1.0 one bedroom 1.3 two bedreom 2.7 three bedroom 4.0 and 1.3 for each additional bedroom Single Family or Duplex one bedroom 1.3 two bedrea:a 2.7 three bcd_ocm 4.0 and 1.3 for each additional bedroom A duplex structure shall constitute two dwellinc units for the. purposes cf this subsection. (3) An example of the application of the above formula is , follows, assuming the construction of one single family residence containino two bedroom!; on a lot containing 15,000;n,:re feet with a market value of $65,000.00 (or $4.33 per square foot) : 2.7 (2 bedroom - 2.7 residents) x 0.0025 acres x 43,560 (:square feet per acre) x $4.33 (mar- ket value of land per square foot) - $1,273.15 (h) Unimproved land shall be appraised at thn currant r..::-.et Value of the siteincludinq it.,; value attributable to culh, quttor::, str.rt, sidrw.rlk and utiliti •. i:' iustallcd on th,� cL.to of la•T ,it it.:u.m: r. ir:q,r.nr.l lar.J:-. ,:ial l h. _pprat :r,i Cotdtnr- to their hiytu•:.t an.l bast u:.o tak.tng into con.,.r.lera- tion exint.ing str..... rce: whrthor or not they aro contorminq. Narkrt value may he r.ub.ntant.iata.l by a documented purchase price (if an arm's length transaction not mote than two yoars old) or by any other recognEted moans; �lrovided that assessed valuation r.:1.111 not be relied on as evidonr•e of current mar).ot value. In the event the City and SET ' RE W/ PEAS l 12.3 ,fAV L.g.12707 ePLIT {SAIL FENCE EJ 8S'>0A 0 OO I- 7Z•OZ STOR^C� 4.45 RaoF G�ERFI4NC� S.g 35 j LOT 5 -� Ji ' I I I OttE - STOGY � I FRAME DUPLE X I N 1 'q I Tg (� --------- ----------------------------- / dl woop DECK '- In l z-7.5 W I' / � �� AAA J ` 3lo7Z SEr Z P't_eAP, IPLASiIG SgfT: CI.P L.S. 12707 7�•� SPLIT AIL F�NG'7 3 Y �o O Q V fl 0 aR W%PL_Aemc- GAP L.b Z-27lo 5w GOP ek� 2 � S 74g 9 TRI-CO Management, Inc. Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 303.925.2688 0 tJ RE6AR WIP�AS-rIG cAP L 5. 12-707 SET TPG4C W/F-L��C:INCo IN FFrtJGE RA,I. _FQ� '_- REE+�R PO.L. SOUTH LANE j3L % 2 SURVEYED date: Ma Y 14, o-17 JFg DRAFTED date: MA REVISIONS A, N AO 50 F�r' 0 5 to ZO '� c,CAf_E I II_ IO paA515 OF 61 P R1 OTO PDI N ONE La N� OF RIVE�E-ADE ADDITION OCo Oo E e,AID &LccK 2 SoRv�YDW b CERTIFICATE I , JOHN HEREBY CERTIFY THAT NIDER MY SU pReL_ 1 ONI�NIAY 14RIgT7 f E LOTS 3,4 5, t E55 THESi;RLY IFEET OF SAID LffT`�, 13L1xK 2 RNS17't�E PDDFTt�� LOTS T1 {AT PART OF -n-- EASTEFZ� Y CIO F>= ET 3, 4 F 5 pE�aCR16Efl Ae FOU LOWS �C�Ih1NIN� Lii A Pr' FROM v� IIGH SE gT GARNER OF" gAID LLTT 3 � �0.00 FEET ; TI 1ENGE N W �100" 1- � l09 FEET TNENGE S 89 4Co 00 10.00 FEET ; T��EN 5 0S 48'OOI,VV �,O. 55 FEET; -T-HENGE N75°Olo 00"W IG, 00 FEET TO -THVi POIN-" OF �C�INb IINC�. MEt�IT, INC. N F- F3EI��-IEL TV,,_Cc MAl`IAC 12707 MAY 15, 1077 r�'fe 12707 ' TITLE: 6U11-DING T SUR�/EY T]!� PORT1 o INVEFZSIDE DDITION, pEN 1. GOL.09ADO i JOB NO.: -7"7 - ro4 CUENT: UNDNER SHEET NO.: I OF I r M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Lindner Subdivision Exemption DATE: December 14, 1977 This application involves the condominiumization of a recently remodeled duplex in the Riverside addition off Park Avenue. The structure is located in the R-6 zone district on a lot which is less than 4,000 square feet owned by Julie and Richard Lindner. Dave Ellis requested only conditional approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission because of a suspected problem with parking for the duplex. Dave suggested that the parking might be taking place on adjacent private land rather than on a vacated city street as was thought by the applicants. Dave requested an updated improvement survey showing parking area and•true location of the remodeled building in order to resolve the question prior to council action. We expect to have his comments later this week. Planning and Zoning recommened approval of the exemption at their December 6th meeting subject to: 1. Resolution of the Engineer's question 2. A 90 day right of first refusal 3. Six month minimum lease restriction 4. Payment of the park dedication fee The latter three conditions should be specified in an exemption agreement, similar to a subdivision agreement, which should be prepared prior to recording of the exemption. The Planning and Zoning Commission also referenced the Council public hearing regarding condominiumization policy. Since that was adopted on December 12th, we have asked the applicant to provide us with relevant infomration prior to Monday's meeting. lmk or • APPLICKfION FOR L: ,JvF'TION FROM SUBDIVISION REGUI-ATIONS Request is hereby made on behalf of RIQVJ' D LINDNER and JULIE LINDNER (hereinafter referred to as applicants) under Section 20-19(a) of the Aspen, Colorado, Subdivision Regulations, for an exemption frcm'the definition of the term "Subdivision" with respect to the real property described as: Lots 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots Block 2 Riverside addition It is submitted that an exemption in the case would be appropriate. The application involves subdivision of an existing duplex. A subdivision of one lot with a duplex on it creates conditions whereby strict ccarpliance with subdivision regulations would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of their land. If an exemption is granted, the owners of the property will have a ccmon interest in the land and there will be a condominium declaration and maintenance agreement applicable to the property which will not in any way increase the land use impact of the property. An exemption in this case will not conflict with the intent and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to assist the orderly, efficient, and integrated development of the City of Aspen, to insure the proper distribution of population, to coordinate the need for public services, and to encourage well planned subdivision. The granting of this application will not undermine the intent of the subdivision regulations as it is clearly within the area intended for exemption under Section 20-19. The building is already in existence, and there will be no change in density which is presently in line with the desired population density for the property. The applicants would appreciate your consideration of this application at your next regular meeting. -i Very truly yours, Gic:eon I . h ufimn Attorney for 11-ichim-d and Julie Lindner (Ajr1_ica1t:,1 I'.1'!;:iI 'I"!f:, 1.1t1i u:r�s ��i. (�•1.�; �_ t-, 11117. Recorded 11:59 A.M. April 26,1978 Julie Hane Recorder Reception # 01 "OL1,5",3 STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION *M THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION WHEREAS Richard and Julie Lindner are the owners of a parcel of land located in Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly described as: Lots 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots Block 2 Riverside Addition Pitkin County, Colorado WHEREAS the Applicants have an existing duplex located on Lots 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 .feet of said lots, Block 2, Riverside Addition, and WHEREAS Applicants have requested an exemption from the definition of subdivision for the purpose of subdividing the existing duplex through condominiumization, and WHEREAS the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at its meeting held on the 1% day of TAu,;#R 1978, determined that an exemption from the definition o subdivision is appropriate and recommended that the same be granted, and WHEREAS the City Council determined that the subdivision of the existing duplex through condominiumization is not within the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance set forth in Chapter 20 of the Aspen Municipal Code, THEREFORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado, does hereby determine that the proposed subdivision of the duplex located on Lots 3, 4 and 5 less the easterly 40 feet of said lots, Block 2, Riverside Addition, by its condominiumization, is not within the intents and purpose of the subdivision ordinance and does, for such reason, grant an exemption from the definition of such action, PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that any existing tenants be given written notice when their units are offered for sale, which notice shall specify the sale price. Each tenant shall have a 90-day option to purchase this unit at this price. In addition, each tenant shall have a 90-day exclusive non -assignable right of first refusal to purchase his/her unit which shall commence when a bona fide offer is made by a third person and accepted by the owner. In the event that such offer is made while the 90-day option is still in effect, the tenant may purchase the unit for the amount of the initial sales price or the amount of the bona fide offer, whichever is less, and provided, however, that all units shall be restricted to six- (6) month minimum leases with no more than two (2) shorter tenancies per year. DATED: April a.5-, 1978. r 346 m% i -.I, KATHRYN S. HAUTER, do hereby certify that the fotegoing Statement of Exemption from the Definition of S,V4.41vision was considered and approved by the Aspen ity ti dil at.i'ts regular meeting held Monday, at which time the Mayor, Stacy Stan , III, wited to. execute the same on behalf of the City of ;���p•�n. - C, � (nA KATHRYN HAUTER, City Clerk STATE OF-COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) pt- e foregoing was acknowledged before me this ' 11 day of 1978, by Stacy Standley, III, an Kathryn S. Hauter, personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of the City of Aspen. Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires My Commission expires January 31.•1982 3/7 Notar -2- 0 L t .