HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.council.097-00 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL READOPTING
THE CITY OF ASPEN ANNEXATION PLAN
Resolution No.
WHEREAS~ pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) 31q2q05, all cities within the
State of Colorado must a have a "Plan" in place to guide future annexations; and
WltEREAS, the last update of the City of Aspen Annexation Plan was approved by Aspen
City Council through Resolution No. 62, Series of 1999, on July 26, 1999; and
WltEREAS, the Aspen Area Community Plan (AACP) differed from prior comprehensive
plans in that the document was a "character" based plan that did not include the adoption of a
revised Annexation Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Aspen/Pitkin County Community Development Department has initiated
a process for a joint City/County review of the plan; and
WHEREAS, State Statute requires this reauthorization of the plan annually; and
WItEREAS, the current plan is acceptable for readoption until such time as the joint
City/County efforts reflecting the newly adopted 2000 AACP results in a revised annexation plan;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLYED BY TItE CITY COUNCIL O17 THE CITY OF
ASPEN, COLORADO:
That the City Council has reviewed the proposed 2000 Annexation Plan and has formally adopted
the Plan.
RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this 24th day of July, 2000, ~Council
for the City of Aspen, Colorado. ~~¢~ ·
IRachel E. Richards, Iv~yo~
I, Kathryn S. Koch, as duly appointed City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and
accurate copy of that resolution adopted by City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a
meeting held July 24,2000
Kathryn S. I~l~,~it~ Clerk -
Approved as to Form:
f'6t~rce~er, City Attorney
C/joyce/annex00
City of Aspen
AnnexatiOn Plan
THE CITY OF ASPEN
Last Revised July 3, 1996
Readopted August 28, 1998
Readopted July 26, 1999
Prepared by:
Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(970)920-5090
RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL ADOPTING
THE 1999 CITY OF ASPEN ANNEXATION PLAN
Resolution No.
wHEREAS, pursuant to Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS) 31-12-105, all cities within the State of
Colorado must a have a "Plan" in place to guide future annexations; and
WHEREAS, the last update of the City of Aspen Annexation Plan was approved by the Aspen City
Council on 28 August 1998; and
WHEREAS, the AACP differed from prior comprehensive plans in that the document was a
"character" based plan that did not include the adoption of a revised Annexation Plan; and
WHEREAS, The Aspen/Pi(kin County Community Development Department has initiated a
process for a joint city/county review of the plan; and
WHEREAS, State Statute requires this reauthorization of the plan annually; and
WHEREAS, The current plan is acceptable for readoption until such time as the joint city/county
AACP '98 revision process results in a revised annexation plan;
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF 'tHE CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO:
That the City Council has reviewed the proposed 1999 Annexation Plan and has formally adopted the Plan·
RESOLVED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED this ~ day o£ ~__~ 1999, by the City Council
for the City of Aspen, Colorado·
· Ra¢e/~~'~~ '
Ra~c el~ 'chards, Ma~
I, Kathryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Clerk do certify that the foregoing is a true and
~..4curate copy of that resolution adopted by City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at a meeting held
~, 1999
Kathryn S. Ko~,~2l~ty Clerk
Approved as t° form ~_.~~~/7'., ~..~:__
Johri WorCester, City Attorney
RESOLUTION OF 'rx-~ ASPEN CI'IY COUNCIL ADOPTING TE[Z 1996 Cl'l ¥ OF ASPEN .4~NNEXATION
~M.I£RE.4.S. pursuant m Colorado Revised Stam:~s ;CRS] ] 1-12-L05. all c:ti~ within the State of
Coioracio rnus: a have a "P~an" in place to ~uide futur~ anne.~ans: :ma
WItEIZEA~. the lasz update of me City. of Aspen Annexanon Platt was approved by Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission on Oc:ober 18. [9~ll in association w~ the i988 Aspen .Area
Comprehe~ive Pian: and
V~.iREAS. the 1988 Ashen Area Compreheraive ?!em was m,,:erseded by the adoption of the
1993 Aspen Area Community Plan .AACP); :md
~Id~RF_.%S. the AAC'P. differed .'Yom ~rior comprehensive plans in that the document was
"chares:er" based p[an that did eot include the a~aounon ora r~vised Annexation Pi:m: :md
WIIEPdLAS, The As~e.'u'Pitkin County, Community. Deve!o~ment D~ar~enr i~as reined and
updated :he pre,Aousiy adopted Annexation Eiemen~ to be cansiaen~ wkh :he ,-%AC?: and
V~i-t~IZEAS. State Smm~e allows the adoption of separa:e pians by CitT. Council t'oilowing review
by the ?terming Commission: :md
% ~,:REAS. the .aspen Piunning a: Zoning Commission mvie,.ved and formatly ,-eoommended
.-knne.-mtion P!an for adoption at their meeting of J'une IS, 1996.
NOW. THZR.EFORE BE iT RESOLVED BY TTrlZ tci-l'f CO~k'NCIL OF ~ Ci'iY ~F ASPEN,
-COLO~O:
~1~ ~he CiU Council h~ ceview~ ~e pmpos~ 1996 ~on
' ', 1996. by ~e Ci~ Council
~SOL~, .~PRO~, .~ ~0~ ~ .
tbr ~e CiU of Aspera Coio~o.
John S/Bennett. Mayor
I. K, athryn S. Koch, duly appointed and acting City Cl~-k do certify that th.e. ~r~going is a true and
accur~copy of that ~tion adoptS; by ~he Ci~ Council or'the City. of A~pen. Color'ado, at a m~ting
held' t. ga~ -~-., ,/~ 1966.
Kathryn S. Ko~fi, ~ity Clerk ' ,
RF.~OLUTION OF TI'tE ASPEN ?I,..M.NTq'llNG
TO ~iE ASPEN C~ CO~C~
Cauncil~ ?l~ be
Planning :md Zonia.% Commission:
~ ' ~ ~ .,..//- ,:t.-~/~ ~, _
'" ~Ci.!.. ~' '.~/,~','t.2 C,- .
.q. my $cfihaid. Deputy City. Clcrl.; Sara Garto~, Clmir
L I~TRODUC't~O~
"P~or ~o compienon of any ann~,az~on~. :,rt/,t~n ;he .~hree mile arza. .*he m~nzc:pafi~, shaft
in ?iace a pian fbr the area. whic,~ generait.v describes ~.he ?oposed focanon, character, a~d
extent of srreet& tubways, bridges, water'/~ays, ware .r~ronrs. parkways, piaygr, ounds, s.am:res.
park& Cana~on fieM& other ?ublic w~. . ground~, open spaces, pubiic unfines, a~d terrmnais.for
water, fight, sca~itatton, tra-nsporrat~on, and power :o be ?mmaded by the muntC;pali~, and the .
proposed land z~ses ?hr the area."
Pas~ A.n_ne~n'~n- Plans by ~e City of .-Lsat. The CiU
1988. From ~e ~ of ~984 ~ ~e ~ of I9~5, Tae Ci~
P~ Co~ Baar~ of Co~ C~e~. m~ ~e~yzo
~ ~e.
The 1988 plzm wa~ ac~nlly an -.ndivi&,al element so the !983 .-k.~m .~a Compr~hm~v~ Pt~
1993. ~ 1996 ~M~ ~ ~ p~ ~ o~m m~e ~o~ ~ ~C~
H~r, ~e ~ ~e~ a~ i~ ~ ~ p~ ~ ~s~ily ~e ~ ~ ~ose
i~ ~ ~e 1988 pl~ ~d ~e ~mt ~0~ Sr.~ ~s ~&~ ~
City. of..-~ Ann~Zmon Plan. r~v. 3 J'uiy [996
Page 2
growth ~ rie urban/rural fringe of~e Cky. The~e ~eral ~ hold true ~r rie 1996
Annexa~on Plan as weil.
The annemm~n ~a mcwu an ~Zib/t A ~mer'aily ¢orr~sacnds with '~e
,~'~a Commumry Plan. ,a4th a ~ ~xc~s. %e ~ pcm~ of E~b~ .& ~i C,~
Ma~ Cr~ ~d ~e ~ si~ o[~e Ko~ Fo~ ~ ~a me w~ si~
Comer, ~ ~ ~e bo~ oi~e ,~< .~ Co~ Pt~
p~os~ ~e~ ~a. ~e ~ have b~ ~clud~ ~ :=i~mm
~ ~ m i~c~r. ,~ ~e !~e~ for ~e pro~sicn of.u~ or m~cip~ sedco.
Based on rile 1995 Coua.wmiry Deve!cpmem Department ~m~. ~e p~ ~e~ ~
Z869. By ~ ~e 199~1995 ~ p~ ~r~e C~ ~.~ ~
~prox~m~ty 5,851 md ~e p~ p~ ~ ~ ~ ~,000)
~ a mn~ ~g96 m 1,130 n~ ~e~g ~ ~ ccncei~ty be &~!op~ M ~e p~
~ ~1 ~eili,g ~t ~d ~on ~m~t~ ~ ~ on c~on ~m 1990 U.S. C~ ~
c,.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.~ace~tml approval o{~e Hi~l~-ds Base VillaS. The rammary by ann~,mo~ group is sho,,xm
Table I.
for ~g ~e ~e~ a~ ~'~ ~ ~oups
Group ]{-Roaring Fork E~st. Red Moanmim Ntt<in Green
Cume~y, suburban ~e,x~cm ar~ comprised ofpredommmxty devolved ~ubdivisions.
Several o£flae~e subdivi~ie~z have be~ already am~exed in:o the Cky, ~ as F. aztwood
and Kaollwcod. Rern~thg ar~,~as include ,M!)e~ Grove and Mo,train Valley.. The major
land use issues aff~:rrnz ~ g='oup include floor area :',mo and ! _~!klwb'-~z "bancik
dwelling ,mir_~ ' Another issue relativ~ to Pad Moun~i. is the sams of R~ Mountain
Road and the ability, o£'ae City. w adeq.~iy maimam and up, g~ace it as aecessaxy.
Group C-Me~dowood, Smugger, .~spen Highlands Baze and New Development, State
Highway 82 Corridor
'Fnese areas ¢~k~ Im~e develepmem parcels with sig~ifican: gruv~ potezu~i. There are
munerous land use p lam~g ~ which need to be resolved prior r~ aane.~on,
regarding appropriate developmem deasities. The Maroon Creek Development
Corpor-ddon ar~ has compleri~, the County land use process and has been ay, tarried land
us~ approvals. The .Mpea Highlands projec: is curre~y in the ¢oum'y land use process.
rev. 3 Juiy 1:996
T.4JII. X I
5~Y OF .MVlV'~-'XATIO1V A. RY-~
Mabiic
L0 Shadow 2~ I ; 10-t¢ Rm~.
Suborn $58 351 ~ 26-35
2 . ~aring 66 ~ 0 5 28-~3 5~ Ail Mum~ro~ b~ait
Fork 1 ~ , 1 Subdivided
~ ~ o~4 ~ .~ 98424 S~ Numero~
~ounmin t 5~aivtde~ g
Unrabeivid~
5 P~n 319 . 0 2I 8949 5~u~ ~ Numere~ ~c~rzn:m
Grin { ~ ] Subdivided &
~ - Ua~bdivide~
S~rom 609 ~ ~ 215-256
Gcou~ C '
3 Lower 260 42 I0 37-[50 U~ Not
· Smuggi~ I { [ Subdivided { '
~ao~oa 366 [ 219 ~t [ 93-11¢ ~m~v~d~ & ] ~ow~5i~ific~t ~o~u~ for
~ A~pen l~ 2 1~ 15¢ { S~um~ O~ pot~
S~div~d~ &
i2 5H ~ 1~36 · 424 ~ 250-3 I0 U~ ~a 5i~: pot~u~ for
5~aivid~ ~d
U~bdivid~
Subm~ , 2709 [ 749 ~ 476 ' 655.839
G~ug D
Suutum } 2~32 t 0 ~ 130 { 0 t
TOTAL [ ~14 i 11~.5 I P2 I 89&I130 -
C~.t7 of.-~ea Aane.~on Plan. r~v. 3 5uiy 1.996
,aumexmmon of~hese areas would generally in¢iucb ~g d~e decisions o'fshese
processes. Aa issue Umque to the Stouter area is the Lmp. a~ ~m ~he Ck7, Coum?, and
residents of~e m-~ ,'eial~g ~.o ks desiderata as a "SU~er F,.md' ,hazardous w-~s~e size.
Group D-Aspen Highlands snd .ts.~m .~omv~i,, Skiing .~reus
These areas can'~.socnd. ,s~izi~ skiing s_rea .oerrnn: bcunoazles..-k~me.xa~lon wcuid
the dra:f~g ofaew land use le!~siamon :o gmd~ fumn~ grov~ and d~veiop, m~=
skiing mess.
An analysis ofland use issues [ndLc,w- rhnv ~e ~e~ o~ ~ Gmu~s A ~d B '~E ~t
~ ~o possfole ~ ~e M~d~ ~e~ ~ be omk~ ~o ~er p~. ac:or~ m
~g ~b~mns. For e~le. ~e M~d~oo~ .~ ~ md .~ T~i~ Club
STATUTORY .-L.NNEXATION CRITERLA
An area is eiigible for enne,~on if~e ~vermng body., a~ a hearing as provided in CRS 3l-t2-
109, ,~d~ and determines ~e f~H~n~.2
The~e ~nn~x~ion cr~er(a Mve beeu used ~ a ~e.~ ~d~ m idemiC~ ~u auuex~ou area ~round
'the l~er)phery o~ .~pe~.
ANNEXATION REaVORT REQU'IRF. M~ENTS
City. ofA.~Atme2t~onPlm~ r,~v. 3 July [996
map or rr~ps o£~e munic/palizy and adjacem :emmry re ~ow ~ following
6. A ~r~mea~ on the stsc: of azmmxa~/on ~on [oc~/~ublic sc~eo.[ d~._~ ~ i~ctucling
~te ~'im~r~l aumber of ~,~ ~er~.ed ;md the cagital ccns~c~im ~ to edn~,'~ suck,
Floor ~ Ratios
FIoor 3u-ea ,:Latias (F.-LR) are u~iii~d by ~e City and :be
dwelling tmi~ permi~ ~. zene dixtric~. Fl~r ar~a r~cs repr~e=~e rdation--"n~ betwe~x t~e
size ora stmcrare md ~e size o~'r. he lat.
Development ?or. em:i~, of Unsubdivided Land
A ~-un~ry of major ,msubaivicied land wirhi~ the amnex~m are~ is aav~ pre'Aormiy on Table t.
Im the p~,'a b~ ~e .~ pl~ing ~d Z~g Co~ ~d ~e .~ Ci~ C~c~ M~
~s~ ~ ~e co ~e~ perca~ !ack of co~aol over ~e d~M~m~ of large parcsts dn
~e~ ~e. ~e ~:o ~ b~ ~ ~x md ~ E~e Tr~r Tax f~ mv~u~ am
ca~e~g ~ :o p~ue ~sive ~e~
Environmental Review
The ,M-pen Cky ~ have begun ro exp. ~md beyond the odgkml towmi:,~ Iccated on lhe priwm:y
be=ches above the ~alley itcer. This has ~ a si~on whereby fuzure mxpansiczm will
brr~Iucs si~i~ ~mvkomne=~ml c.-~wam~ b :he z~m~xa~m: precis. The Pit.id= Co~:y La~d
Use Cccte is spe~ic~lly designed re addr~s ~ach envirenmenmt bsues ~uch ~s slope, erasic~
wildlk~e md ft~xiplain c~m~a~ms. In pm"dcular, ~he Colorado House Bill 1041 pawers have
Ci~ o£.-~-a .~me. xmion Plato r~v. ] luly 1996
allowed Pkkin County. to apply derailed crkaria :o mwiew potential ck, velopmmx in mvlionlvm'rr=lly
sem~lw areas.
Ski .-~a'ea Base Zoning
The .-~.. en ,r-tighlencis Base V~llnge has obr. amed ¢~ncepmal devet~, me~ .a~proval i'am ,~itkm
Ca~.. If:he Hi~l=nd~ base area is annexed, by the City., ~he Ckl/s ~i.~i~i lodge zc~es .'nay
be suitable for the Aspen Hi~t~nds base are~. The potentml ann~Xmnou of Btrmrmi;Ic presemrs
similar cli~c-akies. The threshold issue wish. am~eXmg either base villn~ is the ~msive ~
which could ,uc~z~i~lly a¢¢ammcciaza 6.rowe d~vel~p, mem. ~nd',he [nt~mve namzm o/~msring Cky
zaning.
Ski .M'ea Zoning
5vady .~rea l i includes ~he ,Mpe~ Meuntaim Ski .M'ea. The aume.xa~ian office ski area would
r~quir~ the cmmiicm of a n~w zme disu'ic: for ski area recmmman, as ,~eil as an SPA ~y.
wide vari~-y ofisaue~ miami m ski eree e~aneic~ which ere ac~ addnmed by. the ¢~,.,,~
mUmcipal code, would hav~ to be reselved prier m ennex~ian. Pkkin Count. has edo~ the
SKI zone distric~ m regulate ski area devetopmem and ~l=anmc~. This Tool should be camsidemd
~r adolxim ~ the Ck'y if ~ex,~n ~n'e in ~i~ area. A.cMkkn~l issues ind,,.Me the retem, e
bene~ ~ enn~-xing federal lands inr. a the Ci~,, as well as the edd~! in~. a~ ~ emex~.~cy
respeme.
Ufillty Ert. ensiom
Typical amev, at:ion policies f~ms a greta: deal of ~cal amI.%-is ~n the potential e..,a'~,~i,~, c~war..er
amd sanimw, slX'er ~fmes by a -~mlcipaliry lo a'm'~zx~ t~rri~ries. W'~i, the A~em ~ ~
s~wer is prcMded bythe Aspe= Cansolic~ed Sm~:ati~n Dis~_, rauker th.'m the Cky. Ther~re,
.M ~he pe~'. ne~ of-~e City is developed. :he deve!cp, mere c~,,,,unn? is .~c~ ,~kfi a '~",oice of
joining ~e ,a~p. e~ w~er .sTsmm or devetop, mg .':heir ov~ d~rn~ac ,~a~r ;~. 'Foe C~y
and Coumy do act ~urzenfly .mqun'e tiaat new deveicpme~ join :he murat, poi v~ter ~.
Fu.~hernmre, '&e City mcornmends fl~at ~ae County. require ne.v devei~men~s which chcose m
pro, nde pnVam ~r~r ~ zo d~sign those s.vst~ns m me~,~ standards witich are c~,.~u~ble to
Ci~ s'~ndarde. When and ~:fie C~y, a~nexes t~ese areas, ~e w~.~r ~s-mms wouid othe,~hse
cr~e a liabiiky to Se Ci~.. 'Foe CiW also recommends ~h,~ ~fie County develop, standards which
ac~ as an mcen~we ~o have developme~s ~m~atly hook ohm Se Cky's ~ m order ~o avoid ~e
prolJ~e~/ca o~n~il uneconorn~' o~ten undep, e~dabie pm~m wa~r ~systams ~n ~e me~ro area.
ruction
l. Gui 'cm,.'ine
Generaily. an adorted Master Plan for an annexed area addressing ~ ,are and
c~itat ~tia~ imp~vemen~ sh~M be a pre-re~te to ~ne~non.
E~o~ Co~
~pro~, m ~6~ ~ ~ ~ ofp~e~ ~ ~d n~bcm,
~c~d be a b~ic ~i~ M ~e l~d ~e ~ ~ proc~s.
Development po*?,,*~l W'rthin ~g Subdivided, Genermlly Developed
Ap?y zoning to anne:ed areas which generally maintains the sa'me deve!opment
r~ghts ',,qthfn the C~r/ as within umncorporated areas.
The ge~emi idea b~h~nd tl~ =~tideline is thru- a~mexm-ion and mbsequern' :cmmg
should not ~ a change in the ~arac:er of an annexed area. T.~t~e}. the City
land us~ r~gut,~ions ~culd be'oriemed to rn~nt=i,h,g the %5mr-e*~ of the
neighborhood.'
2. Guideline
Strv;e ro avoid :orang desigrtarions which make c.onformmg [and wes and
srrucrares nonconformzng.
3.' Guid~t/ae
Consider. '.hen appropriate, creating new !and Ye zone districts or formulating
code amendments, which may. also be applied on a City-wide basts, to address
spec(ftc ~robtems but avoid creanng custom [and use/egtsiarton co address
isolated special interest problems.
Explan~to~ Commenr~
4. GuideLLue
When creating new land use legislation for annexation areas, the Ci~. should
consider rite effects of the new le=~slat~on on the rem~rder of the Ci.ty of Aspen.
Pos~one the artnexarton of ansubdiv~ded vacam land ~hich is rural m character
unnI a de~eiopmenr ?oposai has been grepared.for the ~ by the proper~v.
ownerfs7 or a cteveiopmenr 2roposai is pemh'ng, unless the Ci~. de,des co ann~'
cerrann propernes ~:~e ;o ;beer vatue as ooen st~acz or ro achteve contZg,.tz~, for
the annexanon ora de,;e~opmg ar~a.
E.xplan~ory Caxmnem. s
Floor Are~ ~tlos
1. Guideline
The C~. 'should generally cry ro maintain b'?oor Area Ra~os comparable to the
CounC/'s.,:or ann~ced properties, unless it is demonstrated during the zoning
process that the F~oor Area Raaos are zmreasonably high or low.
Review
Guideline
Ut~!izz the Ci~. 's Planned Lrnit Development (~UD) re~daaons: 8040
Greenline. E,m~ironmenra!ly Sensitive ,-9'ea. and S~o. am :¥[ar~n [~ew when
Con.~der. ~ necessary, code amer~menrs ro expa~l the $cope of r~e Ci~ ~
e~ronmentat r~s ro inc!~ r~ mec~is~ which a~ress wi~ife
~b~tar. the Stare ..:g.~ ~2 Scemc Co~r. ~ other ~t
~nmentai [s~s.
Bandit l)weiling Uuks
1. Guideline
Use the .4ccessoE: Dwelling Umr (ADC9 provtszons of the Ci~. L~.rad Use Code.
tn conjuncnon with ;he O'nVbrm Su~ia'tng Code. ro [egaiz'ze "bandit units" .as
employee '~tnzrs.
Exp. lau~ory C e. rraueur, s
1. Ouidetiue
pUrSUe an agreement with PftMn County which insures that Pftk~n Count.
requires small, private, ut~fi~, systems co meec ali Ci~. stanJards.
I. G~id~iine
?urs~e ~e zz~ne~,~on o.£ Co~nq~ J~d~ oniy '~en ~ masons, of'~e gro,ver?
owner~ ~vor onne.v~no~.
The Cik~/should ¢~.l.i~e
by s~e~ ~. ~e m~
~ ~d~ who ~ mom*~- 50 perc~ of~e l~d ~ ~ a pr~os~
~,~,~ ~.
S~ ~~ ~ ~i~ a ~er.
For ~dsting developed areas, the Ckylms pursued ~-ex~on by assisting
msideucs to gm:her ~exaz/on p~/ou signsuu~. When property owners of more
~m~ 50 perc~£ of the annex,~cn area have SUbmitted sm ~exa~/
m~exszicn has be~m pursued. The C~y Council may ~r~ ekher ~rr-ex~icn
me~. The ~ me~hod is ¢o:-qdm'~t to be pref~mble because k is more
reapcnsibte ~o local ¢~ and a more pe~cual approach m
The Ck'y should research the pros and cons ofholding an ~,,nexscion etec:i~n for a
Stage the an~e~',~rton and zoning process so ii, at the fi~l ~on o~n~ce
is co.tiered s~it~eo~ly w~t~ fi~l zoning ac~o~ in or~r to i~e t~t the
~jon~ qf owne~ are ~a~fied with zoning coluao~.
City/County Sales Tax Revenue Sharing
The Ci~. sra.~shatI annua~v monitor its costs for providing Muntc:.pa[ services
to ca~nexation areas on a compreher~ve bas~s to determine adrh'~onal costs
incurred by the Ci~. and report to the Ci~. Council. The Ci~. and Count. shall
renegot~ate an equitable distribution of sales tax reverrues or other methods of
revervae sha~ng, when Ci~. costs b~tve increased enoug, h to warrant a
redistribution of reve..rues.
In 1968 Pifldn C~uaty voraxx ~anr~u~L ~ ~olutica i,,,,.,osiug a 2 percaut Co, mry-
wida sal~s tax, inctuaiag a pruvisiou distributing 47 pm~:am of the tax pr~
Pitkia County and $3 perc-~-r m tim City of.4~peu. Followiug
r.o uhe Cky..~ ~ome poi,,,' zates ~ di~i'~u:i~ ~ould also be mdjusr.,~
c,v~ut the City dzcides ~o hold an a,m~xatiou et~ion iur a {arg~ a~a. the sales tax
agreem=g ahould be c~ego~ .~rior ~o the ~ieclacm. The Cky and the
have workzd joimty'co daveio~, au aau~xanou mcdat win'ch ~,,~y-z~ the ;m~. a~ of
a ~ec;.6~ armexamcn ou a comic, r~heusive basis. This modat ~hould sea'v~ as the
basis fur furriaer
Ski ~
I. Guideiiue
Prior rs anne'canon oFAsz~en M'ounra~n and/or ,4~pen [-tightands. the Ci~. of
Aspen shouid adopt a spe~ai zone dis~cr for ski areas comparable to the
Count. 's. AF-,.gi~ zone disrr~cr.
The Ci~ does aox hav~ a zone di~uic~ ~iich is desisn~ ~o address laud u~e i..ssu~s
assoc',axed v~i,], !ki ar~s. Il: will be nec~,/~o adetz, such a di~uic: {~e ski
sed L~nd Use Actiouz
llaw~, g ~e prop. Os~[ laxld use' acric~-~ to be pm'~"a~ by ~e City of A.spen.
2. Pr~ar~ I,~?~on for inctu~i~- in ~e C~ ~,~ r~d Use C~ '~
200 ~ ~ack ~om S~ ~y 82.
· A n~ Z~e Di~ui~ ~r b~e ~ s~ ~el~m~t.
~ am~dme~ ~hould be adqx~ ,z a pr~requime ro a--ex~iva of land in the Highway.
crid~)r.
~'t;eu A~-ea C~'....~;-~y Ptmm. %mzu~ 1993
AACP App~tix, J'a~,,~,~' I99'2
AACI~ P~ One R~. orr, S ~e~' 199l