The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.870 Meadows Dr.0051.2006.ASLU6/U ME OWS UK Minor bFA Variance -273512129008 0051.2006.ASLU 4 60'ANWED le<NG P k ~ - r CITY OF ASPEN Permit Receipt RECEIPT NUMBER 00019219 Account name: 25646 Date: 9/5/2006 Applicant: ASPEN INSTITUTE INC Type: check # 8805 Permit Number Fee Description Amount 0051.2006.ASLU Cal fee to Receipt Deposit 1,395.00 Total: 1,395.00 City of Aspen Community Development Dept. CASE NUMBER 0051.2006.ASLU PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-12-1-29-008 PROJECT ADDRESS 870 MEADOWS RD PLANNER JESSICA GARROW CASE DESCRIPTION NON-COMPLIANCE PETITION & MINOR SPA VARIA-NICE REQUE REPRESENTATIVE JIM CURTIS 920-1395 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/12/2006 12 CLOSED BY Denise Driscoll lIa> MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Klanderud and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director 0 ~AM VI V' 1 i FROM: Jessica Garrow, Planner~~~ RE: Doerr-Hosier Building (Aspen Institute Conference Center) Height Increase - SPA Amendment - Second Reading of Ordinance 39, Series 2006 (APPLICATION WITHDRAWN) MEETING DATE: October 23,2006 The Aspen Institute (Applicant) has decided to withdraw the land use application requesting an Amendment to their SPA Agreement for an increase in height of two (2) feet six (6) inches. The height increase was requested in order to hide mechanical equipment from view. It is anticipated that the equipment will be within permitted noise (decibel) levels without the increase in parapet wall height. Should sound from the mechanical equipment exceed permitted decibel levels, the Applicant will explore possible mitigation measures at that time. ~URTIS 4*SOCIATEs MEMORANDUM TO: Jessica Garrow, Planner Aspen Community Deve. Office FROM: Jim Curtis Owner's Representative. Aspen Ins lit ute DATE: October 13,2006 RE: Doerr-Hosier Center Parapet Wall Height Withdraw of Minor SPA Variance Application. Dated 8/28/()6 Please withdraw the above referenced application. 13ased on the I Iistoric Preservation Commission (HPC) comments at their meeting of October 11. 2006. the Aspen Institute will lower the parapet wall by 2' -6" to be iii compliance with the SPA drawings recorded April 18,2005. We will strive to lower the parapet wall within the next two weeks. Once the wall is lowered. I will notify you for an inspectioli. As discussed at the HPC meeting, if lowering the parapet wall results in sound/noise problems. the Aspen Institute will want to revisit this issue. Please email or call on any questions. cc: Amy Guthrie 300 East Hyman Avenue Â· Secondfloor Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 Â· pb: (970) 920-1395 Â· fax: (970) 925-5046 Page 1 of 1 Jessica Garrow From: Jim Curtis [jcurtis@sopris.net] Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 9:30 AM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: Fwd: Doerr-Hosier Center--Parapet Wall Begin forwarded message: From: Jim Curtis <jcurtis@sopris.net> Date: October 13,2006 5:44:17 AM MDT To: Amy Guthrie <amyg@ci.aspen.co.us>, Jessica Garrow <jessica@ci.aspen.co.us> Ce: Amy Margerum <amy.margerum@aspeninst.org>, Billy Sallee <billys@shawconstruction.net>, Jeff Berkus <jeff@berkusdesign.com> Subject: Doerr-Hosier Center--Parapet Wall The Institute, Jeff Berkus & I discussed this yesterday. Based on the HPC recommendation, we have decided simply to lower the parapet wall the 2'-6". We do not feel this is a big enough issue to put City Council in a potentially awkward situation debating between the Institute & HPC. Therefore, I respectfully withdraw the application & there is no need to go to City Council. As discussed at I IPC, if we feel there is a sound/noise problem resulting from the lower parapet wall we will evaluate potential solutions at that time. While I personally feel this may not be the best long-term solution, I do respect HPC comments. However, I feel those comments may be premature based on viewing the building & its relationship to the Health Center now during construction, when everything looks its worst, versus when the building & landscaping is completed. For example, we are proposing installing specimen quality landscaping that will benefit both Doerr-Hosier & the Health Center, & soften the relationship between the two buildings. I will follow-up with a formal letter withdrawing the application. Please email or call on any questions. Thanks, Jim Curtis 10/13/2006 ATTACHMENT 7 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ~ .ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: %70' 1112076 vi Frt-?d , Aspen, CO A~ 7 ) SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: ~. ; /~ ~ ~f~Â»--Â·- . ~ f 1 , 2002 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) being or representing all Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ,~% Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of.Aspen at least fifteen (:5) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting ofnotice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing and was continuously visible from the day of , 200 , to and including the date and time ofthe public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing ofnotice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the infonnation described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date o f the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in ally way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision o f this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use ' regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description o f, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses o f owners of real property in the area ofthe proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. 4 0 jhfi-Cl Ch ] l,Cl u 1Â· 6-1'-,Â· r F V.l- C,/ v Â£ Signature a irÂ·42 The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was ackpqwledged before me *is y , day of 6-7-4,7172#r '200Â£ by . 3.el. 71'.-â€¢IC(5( 6-~ C< r'Xy/LL) WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL PUBLIC NOTICE My commission eipires: / 4// =f / 2 / 0 't RE: ASPEN INSTITUTE SPA AMENDMiNT TO IN- , 1 CREASE HEIGHT ON DOERR-HOS![R BUILDING I. CD NOTICE IS riEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, October 23, lyi Jiti ...fttr.tz.-U 2006, at a meeting w begin at 5:00 p.m. before the ~tary Public Aspen City Counc:!, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galina St., Aspen, to consider an applica tion submitted by Jim Curtis, on behalf of The As- pen institute, requesting an SPA Amendment to allow for an increase in height on the Doerr-Hosi- er Conference Center building. The subject prop- erty is located at 870 Meadows Road, Aspen, CO /02.~5=Ralk 81611. For further information, contact Jessica Garrow 1 />LKY...e.ltq<~ at the City of Aspen Community Development De- partment, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO ATTACHMENTS: 970.429.2780, (or by email jessicag@ci.aspen ~ 9 JACKta ; .CO.US). s/Helen Kaijn Klanderud, Mayor Â¥ OF THE PUBLICATION ~ 'Â· #04 U ~ LOTH\NA /O J Aspen City Council Published in the ilspen Times Weekly on October '%Â»Â·. ./932 8,2006. (4107) ..OF TALE POSTED jVOTICE 63*~~~F'("~LO. LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL 1-X q) NOTE TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission FROM: Sara Adams, Preservation Planner RE: Aspen Institute Conference Center/ Doerr-Hosier Building DATE: October 11, 2006 SUMMARY: The HPC is asked for a recommendation to City Council regarding a two (2) foot six (6) inch increase to the height of the parapet wall that screens the mechanical equipment. In November 2005, the Aspen Institute decided to make the k--~-_i,----*~=b,~~wzil~ Doerr-Hosier building into a "green" building and to pursue ~ - LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) ' - certification. In order to achieve LEED certification, a .r-- - Â· + number of changes were made to the building, including '* . :- 6-- - & .~ the use of different mechanical equipment that meets [. 2 31- - LEED requirements. This equipment is compatible with the " -2, I lilli geothermal energy used in the building and is less noisy .- 6 - than that originally proposed; however, the new equipment The lower wall is the approved height is larger in size, which requires a higher parapet wall. and the higher (left) wall is the proposed height increase. Photograph looks toward Red Mountain. There are two pieces of mechanical equipment that work to heat and cool the building, both placed on the top of the building in accordance with the original SPA approval and Ordinance 45, Series 2004. One is smaller in size and is lower in height than the originally approved parapet wall height. The second is approximately two feet taller, and sits higher than the originally approved parapet wall height. When the Aspen Institute decided to use this equipment in order to achieve LEED certification, the Institute also decided to increase the parapet wall height to hide the equipment. This decision resulted in a building height that exceeded the SPA height limits by two (2) feet six (6) inches. In July, 2006, the Aspen Community Development Department received a zoning complaint from a resident in the Pitkin Green subdivision regarding the height of the Doerr-Hosier building. Community Development staff inspected the Doerr-Hosier building and determined that the parapet wall exceeded the allowable height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The Aspen Institute then initiated an SPA Amendment request for a height increase Staff is looking to HPC for direction regarding the impact of the higher parapet wall on the architecture and its compatibility with the Aspen Institute grounds, and the trade- offs, if any, between LEED equipment and architectural integrity. Exhibit: A. Photographs B. Approved plans. C. Application with photographs. 1 GURTIS c~ W~SSOCIATES MEMORANDUM TO: James Lindt, Aspen Community Deve. Office Todd Grange. Aspen Zoning Officer FROM: Jim Curtis Aspen Institute Owner's Representative DATE: August 28,2006 RE: Non-Compliance Petition & Minor SPA Variance Request For Rooftop Parapet Wall Height Conference & Meeting Hall Building (aka Doerr-Hosier Center) 870 Meadows Road. Parcel # 2735-121-29008 Aspen Institute. Owner Request The Aspen Institute respectfully requests a 2,-6" height variance for a rooftop parapet wall surrounding and screening the mechanical equipment on the north roof of the Doerr-Hosier Center currently under construction. The parapet wall has been constructed (but not finished). and only recently did it come to our attention the wall was higher than the parapet wall shown oil the SPA (Specially Planned Area) drawings. The parapet wall hides 2 pieces of large rooftop mechanical equipment (air handling units) from the view of the public and the slightly higher wall is felt to be the best solution to hide the rooftop equipment. The alternative is to lower the parapet u all and expose the upper 2'-6" of the rooftop equipment to public view. The approved SPA drawings showed a parapet wall of approximately 4'-8" vs. the higher wall of approximately 7'-2". The SPA drawings were approved and recorded on April 18. 2005, prior to the September 2005 groundbreaking of the building. As is fairly typical, at the time the SPA drawings were recorded. the architect did not know the exact size of the mechanical equipment. Lie did know that mechanical equipment would be on the rooftop and that a parapet wall would be necessary to screen the equipment. SPAVariteqDoerr-Hosier{)8286 1 300 East Hyman Avenue Â· Second Floor Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 Â· pb: (970) 920-1395 Â· fax: (970) 925-5 046 Subsequetitly. the Aspen Institute committed that the building would be a -ereen" LEEDS Certified Building, which it will be. but because of this some of the mechanical -. equipment became slightly larger to be "more green and quieter. Therefore. the parapet wall was built slightly higher to hide the slightly larger - greener" mechanical equipment. The parapet wall will be covered in a gray non-reflective zinc metal paneling consistent with the SPA drawings. Background In late July, I received a call froni Mr. Todd Grange, Zoning Officer, saying lie had received a call from a resident asking us to check the Doerr-Hosier building heights. Pursuant to Mr. Grange s request, we survey checked the building heights and found all heights were in compliance or slightly lower than the SPA drawings other titan the parapet wall surrounding the mechanical equipment on the north roofofthe building. Once the survey heights were known, Mr. Grange and Mr. Stephen Kanipe did an inspection of the building with us. I have also recently inspected the building with Pitkin Green neighbors whose view planes are most directly impacted by the building. All parties I have personally spoken with leel keeping the higher parapet wall is preferred to lowering the parapet wall and exposing the mechanical equipment to view. Procedurally, the original 1992 SPA Agreement envisioned these type of minor adjustments and established a straightforward manner to handle them under Article 111(B)-Non-Compliance and Request for Amendments or Extensions. I and the Aspen Institute both thank you for your consideration of this item. CC: Amy Margerum. Aspen Institute SPA Vai-ReqDoenÂ·-1 losier()8286 to 7- ./Il./../le#til/.6.***32:nâ€¢4* RIVT. ~~:, .*70.Jit'RE.->14: / - -4 liE.: 1 .44. 14 ; ' *Â« ..' 4 ...., 424 5/ -4 14 >,d, F . i - -1 -L E-R[ El -1- - , mrâ€¢t W - 4 'k. r ..2 I f . - b . .4 -1.:. 4-24-/,1 7/*'Im-'/4:ig//~ ' rf'- 72:44 - er LiabLL1EF-2 Parapet Wall View From Front oiBuilding South-West Elevation '111 12 / fl 1....... 2i:;111Â·/111 *' I2 l. , ./ 43 >V . ...1 . ..2- 2-4. ' $ -,3,â‚¬ . fr 13 . 1 2Â« , I --1./1 - I =#Â» -- 1 :,f.-1&*&23%Â·12 ':9=i,titiÂ·~Â· Â· ~ltâ‚¬2*=:kÂ·*:i#"*4<&1%~r-AAL*f*atiffÂ£41.~ 7.Â·Â·Â·-992#65..2 Parapet Wall View From Side of Building North-West Elevation '6. ....................l, -lilli C -. W -7 t*-1 - A A.42 '' 4 Parapet Wall View From tjpper Terrace Looking North-West '7 - A i.1 . I. 010/Un, â‚¬k.. Ock. 0.- 727 /,1- r.Â· -i./.0.00/Imi***0*1.-mirk" M A *f.â‚¬- / 97; 1 5-- i 1 - I.-.... ......9 ...... f -4 ....... aly \*a...... - View of Mechanical Equipment Hidden by Parapet Wall -0 m 4 4 71 0 3 , :1 6. 1 fÂ¥.4 i 4 1 '12 - . ' ******2"m** 18*t* , flt,Â¢5=44. r 4 1 F" ~' ~:1Â·'~ ~~'~"t'ihlolittFAE#aND,/ 0~00* i - 1. 1 0 1,-JI (to: 'fl- 11141 1/111. L. m , 4,1 1-66#1 1 1 0 r. 1 f le 1 .1 11 1 1, 1 1.11 ..11 - 2. --r-~7'F '' 1 / E 1Fegi*:er 71 4-Â· -i ill 9-11 717 / L.6,/M# Ce ....14**etÂ¥*Ir'~~ ' 3 '.. 2 . f m . M I I V q M i 1 1,11 t. -1 -,1 3 3 1 11 Afcm ciflaPON "DGRADE e . , =.12. 111. 5 1 - 1,1.1 Y F . i *m Â« CO , .4 f . O 5:.t / d :iN e Â· 12 1. C _ 14 , ..4 'f~ 7*Filâ€žws*:it#*AN 1 ..... :f: EL : ,.. I 9 - ZI'I . 1, 0 . rT .3..1 9 . p ..1 1. 11â€¢ :t M r,- -- 1 R 1 1. 0,< 79 gra . 1' .(\ 1â€ž O FROW *fESPOID 1 1 0 In 1. 0:. 'a 11 1. 1 1 r ./ 1 | .,11 i---7"-I' -/ V.r Â·Â·,â€¢Â· jm#...4/ r-rw- - + pm' F'/I,g,II'FUF 1' : tÂ· ar -21 .=W .0 1-1 . 1 h 'mi L ft h , -i M fR tE 1 1 lili ..1 1 4 11 m . 111:t *.;~~~~~~ .***r.- - I 11 1 1 3 Ill M. .h . . G~ lili 11 : r -- 0 ri 1 .. i m,--Imt-Â·rnr~mÂ·in, ti,I, f.~ ~,1-~1 L 'X - . 11 1 1 - . Ra 11 '1 -mum,fai~ ~ / g t . / F 1. ip. 7. * imÂ® 1 '1 1 i ': b 1 1 lt_ Archl,2ct -i he Aspen Institute JEFFREY BERRUS ARCHITECTS 430 W. Main; Aspen, 00 81Â·611 970-923J0il - tia* 910.-0,25.7026 6, It - 41 1 1 m . .: 0 0, Doerr-,1. osier Le,ii-zer JOEDB SCHOEBERifii{Wilt,LGEYW ~ - CIVIC FORUM Associate tric. PO. Bux 550 Aspen, CO 81612 A--en Meade- Asean CO. n. 2,1, ..1,1 . I k, 970Â·9204)221 - Fax 970-920-7833 FACEOPST 13Aa-1 BEMM':1-3 5-WÂ·PACE OFBUfto VENTILATION laA31 Nim 3 3 F.F. LOWEREEVEL FF. MAIN LEVEL STACK 1/ IS .... C . 71.60 D 0./ =11.Immain ZE, 04/18/1005 .: 1/ 1 8 74 P73 9 30Â¥9 30Â¥Uwal.deDÂ¥ 8 - =6Â·h 14 r 4, J.60200 3 ~ ~ ~ ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES: E ED #mET .Â£-6 At[MITE [15 1 1 1 1 15.-0- L 15Â·-0â€¢ 15.-0. PCC : PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS - "SMOOTH" FINISH ' - ~~ (18.1 1 &7) lul) tup 41) U,KiD ' 1---1 - FABRICATED PAINTED STEEL FINISH PANELS W - 8-6' 1 sÂ·-6. 1.-0. 14'-0 1.-0 141-0 14 -0- 11-0 14.-0- l'i' 6-6. 8-6 31-6. 11'-6 - --. - = FABRICATED STEEL "CHANNEL" FINISH PANELS ' CJointl.ine tjoin:un. , ~~4'LUDE | p 'nt Un~ ?Joint 1 11.- r# t* Una r,+ 1 7 oint Lirle 3*71 - STUCCO 2|-r EQ. ; EQ. ~ ;2-6 t'-6"1 EQ. L EQ. L EQ. L |EQ. L EQ. 9. IEQ. IF'-'I 11 1 1 1 .. . I: 1 CIFC = CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE . .... . - ULL--211_21~_1_4-41=4 /240 GLAZING NOTES: h'JimPE) 1 Ill ! All glazing in hazardous locations shall comply with requirements of IBC paragraph 2406.3. 1.~hl 1,1 1 1 1 - \Â«30"13/0/ All glazing used in floors, landings and stairs shall comply with requirements of IBC Section 2409. Scupper- Ill 1 I I ~ -I-_-r-N52533333351 â€ž 11' L.H.--1--11,1 - 1 - - 1 -5.upper- 1 1 - . - F.F. at Upper Level I 1 1 2.k- 1 1 1+115'4 - 9*87 1,1 /LI, Ll_1__11\ 1 , 19 11/trifk1 1 L,ndir,s. Typ. . CD I-' - A Handa,+34Â·,0 +3r 01 / El ~ E-1 1 1 - pa_/ - I - 1Â·4 lA;Itt i L I IEL_-1 8 1641Â¢ I W N. 14- 1 ~ abv. Nosing~,Typ. 1 th 4 + --M.~e 5-_-al_ InÂ·*in- Horizant' Redet . W - . a -Â·-G2*ZgYÂ£0er---1 ~1%{ xft,Itielmina'ZI.~T=2*Ngn-fleU 2 F 20.1 /8.03: FF. â€ž Ground Level *h &1 F.F. at Ground Level W t,~UU + 100.-0. - 13'-BL L- PCCJointine 1 1 C.- +100Â·-0- 0 8 2, M -1 44 11 U...B. i T-7 Menal.- F ..& . , Ve* 1- i I i|' ~ ~~~ ~ RZ~ --- 4 -' -. 3-7 Fir,ili#Gride EE2EEE 1 Exi,tirl: Grade 1, 9./.Une â‚¬joint Une = 94.- 1 1 Â· . Louvered Reosters f & SÂ·E 2 5 â‚¬ Window i - 1 1 Behind, TypÂ·- Shown Dowl I| I 1 1 1 1 J F.F. .tlf.,er Level il 11 11 11 1 1 1 11 1 b 1 I - 11 6-Â»----- 2--------------- . +860- 0 0 CillOUTHIEAST-ELEYATION & 0 1. 3 . : 13 1 f /0 6 6.:23/ 0 0 0 1Â®98 + 19Â© 5 7 ~ 15'.0. i 150.7 15'-Or 15'-0 1 5'-: I 15â€¢-0- ~ ~5'-0Â· 15'-7 3 15'-0, I 15'-0- i 9 t.9 0 ~.99 %39 8 -1 7.9 9.~ * 64 BAFF- 1'-0 61-8. 7-4 1 - 14'0 1 14'-0" 14'-00 11 14-0 1'-0 7.-6 7-6Â· 1 13'-0" 4 7-11 m 7-101/2' 14'41/2. 7 0- 6Â·-6- 7-6' 1~ ' 11 11_UN--1_39- L_,QÂ· L 5.-0- L 2- . 10 ER VEiTICA] 11-3---T--n--T ,. . un 1 12=0 Gu~drails @ ~5 7 rl- 1-17 j ./O 1 ' ' , , +42 A'.F 1 + :Â£016 -5 U 1.25 0 1 IRTS! 0 G-doils @ Guardr,ils @ X. 0 - +42 AF.F. +42' AF.F. Scl,pper 94- N - hhInd - i liu 2'-6 a. I ! Hand/,6 +34Â· m +3/ Â·Â· . .7: Â· . . I F.F. I Upper Leval, abv. Nosing,. Typ. . 3 1 F.F. m Upper Level tone L +1157 ' aboveN=ing.and =24;;-- 1 Â£,Ce I L,ndinp, Typ. / '\ \. . . G-/iIi @ +42Â· AF.F. w FCC --7 Exterior Stair Beyond .6 Approx. Top & Slope , joirlt Line hhnd 1 Â· 6 Extz. and Ani,hed Grade @ Fice of Exterior Terrace ~ act, Grade 0=ip I t th Appr= Top of Slope Z : .O F.F. ~t Ground vvel -: -- 1-Â·zz ~--- -- ----.~:~Z~ | F.F. at Ground Level i211 +100'-0- 1 I.2.0 -4 -- - m is k < 41- 6 .WC~ 00 - ---------------- 1 -1 1 Hind,14 +34 to +3/ 0Â£ . 2- 2- ----T --- -- -- ---------7 Lope 1 abv. No..:.Typ. . t 7 1 Gu.dr.il: +42Â·.bove 0 11 1 1 +42-AF.F. ---- 4 -- /1 \+ Scupper Nos~n:$ and Landing Where 4 0 1 I 1/2%1/2Â· Hor.... Eng. Grade @ Fice . ~ PIC PCC Gr,de Diflerence is >30. Typ. 1 | Red.level T. - Ali:r, of Basement Wall 1 I with M- P- Module Joint One | Guardil @ 7 - - - - 8 kit F.F. mt.b5'=i/1!:f:/-~ ' 3 â€¢41-AF.F. i I Ext:. and Fnlhed Grade@ I -~ Ex,g Grade @ Fac, Face of Exter,or Terr:ce F.F. R Lc-r Le,el +86'/ SC- 1/8Â· = r-oÂ· of ~~rr,w,tÂ¥/,11 Or.-,N.1 A4.2 ; 4 -1 2. 3 .-- 2 -1 ; 71 IN\, /7\ NORTH-EAST ELEVATION 4:1 il?lfÂ·--13'1 A4.2 1/8.= 1,4â€ž , '1 .1=-28 -1- 3 ..~. .JI- 1. i -of- DEC O 2 2005 AtiFEN Rt!!I DINR 1'9:32 Em,ct:=r m ction Set 98% 11.qns)'P SNOI1VA313 1)(3 '%=Mâ„¢ Ui M suolimqns / â€¢uo*Mey â€ž20 IN 11 IZZO'0Z60Â£6 1 ZI918 O 'uad,V â€¢055 *Â°8 -O'd 50/Â£1/1 1 Z-SUOACIal3-12@ 'PU'-â€¢'0 U!29/9/0 SNOI1VA313 WOI"31>(3 141-0. 15'-0" f 9-e j il 4 43 9 L U V = V 'U 00 \ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES: JEFFREY BERKUS At Clill[[15 15'-0" 15'-04 15'-0. 15'-0- 15'-0" 15'-0Â· 15 / PCC = PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS - "SMOOTH" FINISH ** ~) <B.G) - = FABRICATED PAINTED STEEL FINISH PANELS 8-1 1/2- 6'-101/2' 1-(" 14'-0- 15'-0. 14'â‚¬ 6. 1.-0- 1|-0 6-6- 8-6â€¢ - = FABRICATED STEEL "CHANNEL" FINISH PANELS 7- U -r TAVEr- IN f ' ' f , ~ â‚¬'Â°~~ Une 1 qjoint Une â‚¬ joint Una Â¢ JO,1, Une ~Joint Une â‚¬Joi- .Ine â‚¬ joint Line â‚¬jal,lt Line V FFE31 = STUCCO QUEE[ DN - 2-6.' EQA EQ. A Â· j EQ. A f.15 EQ. B ~ EQ. B l EC, 8 i, EQ. 8 ,| EQ B L 11 â‚¬Joint Une joint L.. â‚¬Jet LI. CIPC = CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE 1 mil - #24 GLAZING NOTES: 2=4%1 E-1 _| 133 5 -- | azix71 / Gu/drwl@ 442/.F.F. All glazing in hazardous locations shall comply with requirements of 1BC â‚¬ joint line â‚¬Window paragraph 2406.3. (.C BERKUS ) r.iÂ· 1 r- - !-EFT--T u~ r ILL[ All glazing used in floors, landings and stairs shall comply with requirements ~Â¢Â· ~304419 0/ _L -7- 1 1 , of IBC Section 2409. \3*25' F.F. at Upper Level ~h 6/ l_ 1 .h EF- at Upp. L-1 . +115% C/ -v kwper PCC 7 10'4 t *-Ii--- Pcl ---- Inc 2-6 - KC joint lint Typ 6 trN - S C-- J-1 0 +42-AJA - Covered li# W; Kilatz wl 5,few Glang: ~ C! IL I /1~11 1 16--1.1 ,= -* 4 ./ !' I ' i ~1.5-tl---27&44=r=~ / -h F.F.at Lounge Level !,80 RF. at Ground Level //1 , +101Â·.Â· T--Ex, Gracie +,00Â·Â·OÂ· VI 1 --- - 9--- ---- .... Giard/Ws@ +42-:bove >twr- --------- --------7- 42'H-drail,+34 M+38' ---~4.---___t----C- - Nosh/and Landir,4 Ty/--~<r -ill ~ 1----~Ul -611 ~ ~ ~ abv. No,Irls. Typ. 1- 11 \11 -G-ils@+422-e ' 6 0% ee E'4Â· Gradâ€¢@ / ~ \1 \ \ 1 Nisil///-nAT/. .. 8 0 -r i 1 \ Fice/Build,4- / L 1 \\1=-- i I 11 1 - -. . .0 Anished Grade- i ~ - Gtardrail @ +41 AF.F. 1 .bv. No.irÂ¥$. Typ -- cmered Ught w.1 i i w/947/2/9 1 1 1 F.F. at Lo.- lev' 41 ~~ F.F. a Lower LeÂ¥,1 1 1 1, 1 1 , 1 1 \Â·~ +86'-0~ +86'/ Ly -0. L Mnished God, 1 1 1 1 .-T - I,Grade - Gu-drgil @ +42 AF.F. ...... 1\ - f ' Shown Domed rih NORTH-WEST ELEVATION . 19 1 1& 10 1 99 0000 7 5 3 1 ~ 5'-0- 15'-0. 15'-0" 15': 15'-0 15Â·-0Â· 15'-/ 15'-0- 15'-0" 15'-0. TABCBT + 4% ty (Â® eÂ® (19 (9 Â® 9) 68â‚¬) 14-0- 7 2" 14-41/r 7'-101/2- 7'-1 1/2- 1Â·-(- 13'-0- 1 -C- 7-6 7'.6 1 -C 14'Â« 1-0 14'-: 141-0- 1'-0- 14'-/ 1.-C 7-4- 6'-8" 11-c. 2*m Une F Joint Une â‚¬J.,int Une â‚¬ Joinâ€¢One ~ C joint Une 9 JoInt Une , i â‚¬ joint Line EJoint Line 1 7 Line T JOInt l,ne ' nt Line EQ 1 EQ ,Q- 23.-O L 2' 6.1 EQ 1 EQ- | | rl ]2'-6Â·1 | EQ- ~ EQ- 121- 5- 2'-6' 01 f Â·' r f -1 , 1, -- l i i ; i 12 -n ill i ! %0 Pcc -7 Steel C.nn. i 11- AFI.I.. \ 17! !0- 1 40 U Me' C/- 51'4 1 '[! M ~ E--kupper ' 1 11 1/ \1:4<4~ 1 1 W u - ' ! ,; j j'.- I Gu//das@ +42Â· IF.F, | | 1 1 117 N 11 10 2 =h==11~7Xlr-lr--Ilr7-911 -H Handrai,$ +34- w +30 1 .-Ic. - - F.F. .t Upper Lcvâ€¢/ ~h abÂ¥.Nosig. T/.- -- -+ 3 -- 1.. .11 - 1 - Â£ F.F It Upper L- , ! Â£ -FCC - ' â€¢115'-0Â· l./ PC'*.Uns- ~~~Zb-6*830 | -1-----L-- / I , 1 / GumÂ·draili @ +42'-. F195*X#91 - 1-%55~ -2-'.I= 'bcve NosirÂ¥ and Landing, Typ. - - --| Â£-PCC Gu-drails@ +I - 1:-tz ~ AP.P. Ty, . 0 ri-t, 1- -Pcc m- - |LPCC 7 - =3 -1 C - FCC ~ I 41 # 1 -vi 1 4 1 . I , -m~-1.--0--fF=*=1= / ~ mfm--7- ~ Ir- ~ - ----- ' ---*-------I------------- 1,4 R.F. at Lour. L.vel .h < F.F.# Grot~,d Le~1 , EXU '11 1,112 li : C 6 - \ I 1 L-ap< 1: L câ€¢, 1 41,1, 2 < 4 - eal Colâ€žr,n d M -..- /1 to+38*1 1| 9)...Une 'Joint/le. â‚¬ *k Une U ~HeG~az,9 N...Typ. - . 14-Cov*.di.Ightwell 11 â‚¬W,ndow 4 ,| 11 11 C Joint Une I C Window ' I * :- S ~~ F.F. at Lower Level 1 4 11 ''fill F 0 0. 00000 a. : 1 +1154 --1.-Lc=EEEBEEEL.-L-- 11 11 11 11 â‚¬ Joll ur,e . 1 1 1( 4.1. 11 11. 1. j CV +86'-0. 1/8" = 1'-0" A4.1 ~-7-~ SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION - A - Of- L:tL 2 Â£005 03"FEN - ~c,ADThENT 1 11 111 1 158119 1)tj A i iii 50/ZI/11 331N3D'83tSOH-~Itl3OCI ./ W-- 21Â£1111 on ZOn 9Z0Z'5160Â£6 :1 10Â£516-0Â£6 :uoissiluqnS / SUO!,May @leQ Â·oN 50/Â£1/11 IED-016'0Â£6 / 21910 03 'uadsv 'OfS x00 'OW on,truction Set as ! 50/LUz uiepjaq@04)5 apeof SNOt1Â¥A313 WOIÂ¥31-XB %86 'eS 110!Dn.asuo SNOI1VABÂ·13 -D<3 R/qns 110@ '* 'S@,EpOSSÂ¥ Uln,Oj 3!A!0 e t Main Street :-Suopm@8-13 â€¢0Ull,"JO DU~ 05Â©all t 91 p 93 - 1- 1 1 509067 Page' 7 Df 7 I m int mil & 1 limt im 1 im mi int /10/2005 $0:laf SILVIA DAVIS pr.KIN COL,rrr I R 71.0, . 0.0. U W. A /2 I . #<43 16 * - 5 *38 5-0 2 26*9 2.2 ~ PEAKOFPYRAMID ~ $006 PARAPET 24' BAOKEROM - n PARAPET @ N-W 33 /41/ I NE *ACE OF BUIED]NG .4. . - . 4 FACE OF STAJR 1-- ~IRATION // 1- 12 : Si 1 W : ST*OK iy- 2% :41 i~~:i- ~~~_- : ~-Â·SLOPE~862\~ 03 9, 2 6.... J. el. - - WÂ·/4 - .a eu ./. J,'~ . } 6 1--1. 05+ -. 1 w,~ Â»Â·1~R*EL . .' ~' ' ~ -Â·'_52, -irk,0 1 7 Â·11@j -:f{?El{~Â·---r~,.-~~f-@27lti..)6. 5Â¥44"6 G.C.L- 31 1?,-- 1.-==â€¢-2'kB .. '~ f.,:111Â·1 . 1. 1 ,wl L & '-T M . % -1 F.f. UPPER LEVEL C APPROX TOP OF St:OPE 4 ' 3[.1.-76=.TÂ»r- .- ..IL:.AcI~ -- 3 31~4-Â·Â¢~-- - .- ~~~-rl ~Â·.4'~----- Â»764-- 1.- - " 1 1/ 4 6764 , , ~- ...,0.9 -1. ... I - -2> # Jt:,at * . - .i. --Â·'Â· Â· r 1 , E 7- . :i 11 . - APPROX. loP OF SLOPE *43 04/ 7. /-- EGG. GRADE Â· 21?k 941 3,87</* 1 ~~ ~ Tft.:47F1, k%11~-E;i~f ,~ ,-- k.[~ t.: 1.'i-,I N'.-'-12.-Â·--~~:Et, =:. ~? ~- -:.~ %:, fr-~---11 . , il 5 --1# . ~~-iÂ·~. Â·'-~~~. -}1:~'41Â·-k-@ ; J#.4- .#.31.*.- 2/ . I ,- i Fl.WEMENEL f :---f'lp~Â® - Â·Â·-1.- / FA MA}N LEVEL WU -- # Â· 14 -it-1-1.1~1.ILLL.;-- - ' 12 14 W**=4 6 4 / 1 , mil * 11.-It . 7 -11 1]I:' _~1_4:411 - .1 1,3 ~Â«,4-211- j . +... ., . 4..1.:r. t. .- +, EXIG.a,DE#*ME 1 1 *4 ~ 0,} OF BASEMENT WAa - - . AR.*9*RiEVEL F.F. LOWER LEVEL i -1 A -- EXTG. GRAdtÂ®FACE EXTG. ANC)*INISHED GRADE @ -~ EXW. NiDEINISHED'&886* ~~ OFBASENIENTWALL , FACE OF EXTER:OR TERRACE , â„¢2Â£11#32% -Â·'~ L EXIE GRADE# PACE0PEXTER10%1*RR~58 ---- PMEOF BUINDING FACE OF BDIWING 9 04 30 - -leo ,â€¢64 PAJRAPEr 11 *61:Reot, 1 64 N.WFACE OF#WILD#*: ././ 84%967*Nm 4.- em Pti?OFETMR ~ . Empe*14* 0 & FACE 0801/f,NG A / .2 r--t $ 4 14- *L. 1 11 -I .. r - i ..7. 9 1 Ff UMERtemt. Â· ' '~ - 1 '.1 '/ 3/ 4 .6 1 -=t. :4 EXTG. GRADE@ ' -0 1\ - - FACE OFEUILD b 1,-: 11â€¢IFI 8,1. 4. . -It 6 1 ./ R 11.",= EXm. GRADE s SCHEMATÂ© Â· FINISHE"*+41 2\ 141 2 8 ,' ~ .7-: i 4 ~ -- ~ * -1.4.- ,5 ,~, .~ EEVATIONS 3/30/05 1 - .F. LOUNGE I J p,F.Wat.EVELÂ· ' 1. F t 1 2 -' EXUR. GRADE - a Â· 2 MNISMENÂ·GRIDE-t . . .4 Ff.teÂ¥?EP*Â¥El . , 110*Te*Â®NEÂ·ARD,QUING-HEIGH,5 MAY VARY INSUBSJANTJAUÂ¥ ACCORDING NORTHÂ»WEST 6-6.F---2---r ToÂ·RNA[ Btli[DING PEI*r DRAWINGS SHEET 68 OF 6 . 1 1 1 1 1 ET919 80 'ua c + dEV 61 *OPEapÂ¢ â‚¬â‚¬WZi016046 *98 - IZZC-OZ6-026 HONÂ¥ 113*NFIEI AHÂ·*ddISI 'hitâ€ž , Â£Â£*006,006,011 - lam-'036-OL6 E-[9(03 'uatist, 09 '08 09 003 'uadsv *SAAOpleaw uadsv %9 BUTS#112*0*Ev Â¥*1HCDd CHAD & E- 41 31?Elitlll:>1#Â¥Nf414*8Â·ROHOR %1091Of f - 94 u. 76â€¢ 814*19 01.110,4,52011Â£'* 331Â¤33 JOISOH-11@OCI * ' *o 05 in 9004-gZA-,04Â»â€¢3 - 410435*6+Â·0Â£6 ~ 1/r#r# ob "108*fÂ¥ ut.â€¢Fl '7% '09, . 913%11,IHONV SnN*EIH Aalld:IRE alnljlsul uadsÂ¥ 341 19Â·0114'j'Y Â» 1 7 *Raam #//M/ *. T kIER,2 4#1*/Mimp,/arv 11// I . /1 1 1 ..1 I I -31/25 1 ..1~...Â·n.ruÂ·'lll!7~ . .,AW Â§11:4.1-11.l . PINDER+ 8 0-#22 1 &1 1 4/02 La dal:=I'Al-'. \ , 1 \ \ /1 mod /<Bx Er 1. A bo, 47Â«''A 9!<all ~ .Â·41./v,5202\ _ 7 - 2 ~ 6 - W mUI 1, 4% 1 kew#Mul"'5*37 1% mO %97Â«Â» r \ Â£ I < A N *11 9 - '1, e m O , . 4 r , 16 1.\ 3 1 /4 J i I. Ch , . I U W.W '44&,Di.,1.rabi) lw<48'r,"iNINIA' .ir., M I / , 0... #*0. a *AltÂ©*My 1,119'iâ€¢, 114' r 9. A fil- 4 :~~.~ 13/ -3- 7 , , 4 ' I I ' / I 4. I\.\ fud" 1,1,1% 4 f 21/' I I ,8%74n. 1 4 .2-/2-1- 0 -1 '<dEath. 1 *'' 1 -/ A /5 5 Ujui \.4.2 4 4% , % - I d-Q lA 191 %99+ 1 . ' C .234 \ I IL: 7.-fitild Z I , , ---/ -1Â· I 4/ r, \ 1-1*Ay , 1 21( + - - - -4, - , } 9Â©5=- , 11Â§ t '' 9, 11 r 6. \ 1 , / 0 0-B M r - t . 2k I 0 I ..1 J '4 i ) '' / : 111 * 110, % 2 Â£ mi, , ., .b ~,5 129 2. '07 .3 2 - ' .1-5 - i ./ EM di a. 4 L 59 w , . 1/' .. 4, rE E: . g 4% ..1\ \:\ I 1, \ ELL ,\~,~ \11 b 1 / 1 h . p 1 11 \1 11:. 19\ i .C g 7 / 1 I. 1 1 '1-. , , --n / 4 , :. .0..3, , 4 > , 1- 1; g , . , #1 r I .'. V ---: _ , 1 / 74 , t * 1 1 #Ar â€ž 1,1-11'k .0 i . r. , -, , -a / 11(Â¢ 6 1 L____ , 5 .ES'---,- , .1 1 - 0 . 1. 1 Z ),2 , Wh i 25 1 M. 1 -Ah 23.01 #2 m ' DJ 1. ,12 1,1 7 A E - " E 4 ~ 1 1 1 & I iff.lf 25 8 gj 7 4 1'- 11 lili !1 11 2 1.9 A- 2 . r'.1.,1 *El 2 1 IlyÂ· i . 4 2 .< f ... -Â· ~1- â€¢Â· J ~ * 0 128 1.- ft'.b. 6 , 6./, ' 55, 1 1 4.1 i . N 1/ i fr LeÂ· 1 # 1 8 111 21,1 1 2 i 'li ~- 16 .1- r. 1* -8 1 & 5 1 . 0. - 1- 2. Que , ./0 . 35 6 ' Â¥ el f T ms= Fam-ih i i , * 2 1 - i *299*01FfW i ft_48 1-18 1,11, 11 1~ &*le+CU'=itEâ„¢19 \ IC r, Ir,LE!! Iii *-tiER , I 'll Ill 269111-MUW.T F - I 1 Â·~ /\.. nÂ¥+129.607 , Â§1% % # 23.: U; 2 .6 5 * mia r-- Flem biliat ; , E - ' ' ' mul i . M + 1 25 1% 8!2&!ER.*, 12Â§1*i'g , / %1 2 1 I I 0 3 , 1 I ~1-. t- 1 e .2 5 9- % I %01#42,1.% 7%#4:86 1 h' 11 , m + *a \ m i - , 1 4, ; . 1 li , 1 . f I aiiimiimmwiniinigiiiimMMIianWV ::~z..... _311 P 91, j ASPEN?PRFECT NEW ASPENS TYPICAL- EXTG- ASPENORaTTOMWOOD Page 1 of 2 Jessica Garrow From: Jim Curtis Ocurtis@sopris.net] Sent: Monday, October 02,2006 5:24 PM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: Fwd: Doerr-Hosier AHU-6 Exterior Noise The email below is from our acoustical eng. Cristina Miyar from Charles M. Salter Associates in San Francisco. The Air Handling Unit (AHU) on the rooftop is estimated to have a 40 dBA 10' away at the parapet wall. As I mentioned, this is a custom unit which is quieter which is one reason why the unit is slightly larger. As Cristina points out, a standard commercial unit is likely to be 15 dBA louder than the unit we have. Also, as Cristina points out it is beneficial to have the parapet wall higher than the AHU to direct the noise upward & help diffuse the noise. A lower parapet wall below the height of the AHU would not act as a shield & the noise would spill out rather than being directed upward. Hopefully this helps. Thanks. Begin forwarded message: From: "Cristina L. Miyar" <cristina.miyar@cmsalter.com> Date: October 2,2006 2:56:48 PM MDT To: "Jim Curtis" <jcurtis@sopris.net> Ce: "David Schwind" <david.schwind@cmsalter.com>, "Rebecca Berkus" <rebecca@berkusdesign.com>, "August Hasz" <hasz@regine.com> Subject: Doerr-Hosier (06-7014) AHU-6 Exterior Noise Jim, At your request we have reviewed acoustical performance data for AHU-6 to evaluate exterior noise levels due to this unit. The unit is a custom unit; exterior noise levels are controlled be the outside air intake for the unit. Based in data from the manufacturer, we estimate the sound pressure level ten feet away from the unit to be about 40 dBA, A typical unit of this size (i.e., off the shelf unit with forward curved, centrifugal fan) would be about 15 decibels louder than this fan (about 55 dBA at 10 feet). Rooftop mechanical equipment noise is shielded by the parapet. The parapet forms an acoustical barrier to reduce noise at the project's outdoor use spaces. Reducing the height of the parapet would result in higher mechanical noise levels at outdoor use spaces near the mechanical equipment. Do not hesitate to contact me if you have questions or need further information. 10/12/2006 Page 2 of 2 Best regards, Cristina Cristina L. Miyar Principal Consultant Charles M. Salter Associates, Inc, Consultants in Acoustics, A/V System Design, and Telecom 130 Sutter Street, Fifth Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 t 415 397 0442 x233 f 415 397 0454 www.cinsalter.com 10/12/2006 MEMORANDUM TO: Mayor Klanderud and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director FROM: Jessica Garrow, Planner, 1= RE: Doerr-Hosier Building (Aspen Institute Conference Center) Height Increase - SPA Amendment - First Reading of Ordinance-; Series 2006 /~;as:c<Â»-AY.Qbj. 1 44,ket- Rt - MEETING DATE: September 25,2006 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Institute 1 6 4...~...":... - ...Sys .4.. + REPRESENTATIVE: t.'- 4 - -: ~ 4%4Â¢21,0 1~ A " - I ---Â·.~ +1 1 +1 ~ Jim Curtis, Aspen Institute .. 14 i - LOCATION: dz -r-: i i L Af# :ro . r Lot 1 -A Aspen Meadows Subdivision commonly known as 870 Meadows Road y Photo of the smaller, and shorter of the two pieces of mechanical equipment, with the proposed parapet wall height. CURRENT ZONING & USE Academic with an SPA overlay PROPOSED LAND USE: '4% 4 -Â£ 7 ;49 i Ebi-.:t. I .2 1,4 04.9 7 Academic with an SPA overlay -t r-Â· "f U _#* '-f 1 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Deferred to Second reading, following :. 1 : referral comments from the Historic Preservation Commission.. 34/f filavt.aâ€ž,lh -Â· - x44 61* 4 + r.-64-\Â· Ut>Vt p 1 / Photo of the larger, and taller of the two pieces of mechanical SUMMARY: equipment, with the proposed parapet wall height. The Applicant requests an amendment to their SPA agreement to increase the height of the Doerr-Hosier Building *.44*11* (Aspen Institute Conference Center) by 4 two (2) feet six (6) inches to hide mechanical equipment. t . - 2â€¢75/ : . . 1 Photo of the parapet wall height: the lower portion is the height that was originally approved, and the higher portion is the proposed height with the two (2) foot six (6) inch variance. --pÂ« , 44# AffLI-, 47*(9 E- rp { - r - LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval for site: â€¢ SPA Variance to increase the height of the parapet wall by two (2) feet six (6) inches on the Doerr-Hosier building pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440 (City Council is the final review authority who may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal). PROJECT BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY: In 1991, City Council approved Ordinance No. 14, approving the original Aspen meadows SPA Agreement. This SPA agreement established dimensional requirements for the SPA area. The SPA Agreement, dated January 24, 1992, outlines review procedures for all SPA Variances and Amendments. Ordinance 45, Series 2004 amended the Aspen Meadows SPA to allow for the construction of a conference and meeting hall in place of a lodge building that was approved in the original SPA Agreement. This Ordinance allowed for the construction of the Doerr-Hosier Conference facility. In November 2005, the Aspen Institute decided to make the Doerr-Hosier building into a "green" building and to pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification. In order to achieve LEED certification, a number of changes were made to the building, including the use of different mechanical equipment that meets LEED requirements. This equipment is compatible with the geothermal energy used in the building and is less noisy than other non- LEED equipment. In order to achieve a lower decibel level and LEED compatibility, the equipment is slightly larger than the equipment originally intended for the building. There are two pieces of mechanical equipment that work to heat and cool the building, both placed on the top of the building in accordance with the original SPA approval and Ordinance 45, Series 2004. One is smaller in size and is lower in height than the originally approved parapet wall height. The second is approximately two feet taller, and sits higher than the originally approved parapet wall height. When the Aspen Institute decided to use this equipment in order to achieve LEED certification, the Institute also decided to increase the parapet wall height to hide the equipment and to maintain architectural consistency with the building. This decision resulted in a building height that exceeded the SPA height limits by two (2) feet six (6) inches. In July, 2006, the Aspen Community Development Department received a zoning complaint from a resident in the Pitkin Green subdivision regarding the height of the Doerr-Hosier building. Community Development staff inspected the Doerr-Hosier building and determined that the parapet wall exceeded the allowable height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The Aspen Institute then initiated an SPA Vadance request for a height increase. NÂ»/.A*VA . STAFF COMMENTS: 61 41 46Â£- or 4'lit,1.~41$Â«h ~ SPA VAPTI)*E: The AppliEAnt is requesting a vw.iance from the SPA Agreement to increase the height on the Doerr-Hoser building by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The review criteria are outlined in Land Use Code section 26.440.050, and the review procedures are outlined in the original SPA Agreement, dated January 24,1992 (attached as Exhibit C). V. 0,01/Ul,-/t.h-- /41'btâ‚¬/ fGM )44 li.Â£ 0 .4 In reviewing theapplication, Staff believes that the proposal meets the applicable SPA Review Criterion/Staff finds the proposal is consistent with the goals established in the 2000 Aspen -Area,Community Planl Staff supports the Institute's decision to achieve LEED certification and is in general support of increasing the permitted height in 91*tuo minimize the noise impacts on the surrounding neighbors and environment. The increasiinparapet wall height will project the noise up towards the sky, rather than out the sides of the building. Staff is waiting for referral comments.from the Historic Preservation Commission before a jinal staffjinding is made , REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: The City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Aspen Sanitation District, and the Parks Department have all reviewed the proposed application and their requirements have been included as conditions of approval when appropriate. The Historic Preservation Commission will review the proposed height increase at their October 11 th, 2006 meeting. Those referral comments will be included in the Staff memo and findings at second reading.j th I W' 1 /'- RECOMMENDATION: / Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached ordinance on first reading, approving a variajibe to the original Aspen Meadows SPA Agreement to increase the height of the Doerr-Hoster building by two feet six inches. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Ordinance No. , Series of 2006, upon first reading." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A - Review Criteria and Staff Findings ExHIBIT B - Amended SPA Development Plan including Doerr-Hosier Center architectural drawings EXHIBIT C - SPA Variance Procedures, from original SPA Agreement dated January 24,1992 EXHIBIT D - Application Exhibiy--A 26.440.050 Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA). In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The requested variance would increase the parapet wall height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. This height increase is proposed in order to reduce the visual impact of the machinery on the roof of the Doerr-Hosier building. The machinery is larger than originally anticipated because the building will undergo LEED certification and the larger equipment will help the building achieve that certification. There are two (2) pieces of mechanical equipment that are needed to ensure the building is energy efficient. One piece is hidden by the original parapet wall height. The other piece of mechanical equipment is taller than the approved parapet height, and requires an increase of two (2) feet six (6) inches in the parapet height in order to conceal it from view. The parapet wall also functions as a noise barrier for the pieces of equipment. The mechanical equipment is estimated to produce noise equal to 40 to 45 decibels. The higher parapet wall helps minimize the impact on the surrounding neighbors by directing the noise towards the sky, rather than allowing it to easily come out the sides. The parapet wall will be made of insulation and a metal material, which was approved as part of the original parapet wall. This ensures the higher parapet wall matches the rest of the building material and architectural program. Staff will make a finding on this criterion following the review by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 11, 2006. The staff finding will be included in the staff memo at second reading. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The requested variance is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. The height increase will not impact public facilities or roads. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mudflow, rockfalls, avalanche dangers and flood hazards. The requested variance is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and Â£,4Â¢Â¥ 4<yar 510 Auduj- ty 4 29 1- V.- provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. The proposed parapet wall height increase is intended to minimize the visual and audio impacts of the machinery. The parapet wall creates a larger mass than the equipment, as it encloses both pieces of equipment and the approximately four (4) feet of space between the two (2) pieces of equipment. This larger mass is visible from neighbors living in Pitkin County in the Pitkin Green subdivision across the Roaring Fork River. The parapet wall will decrease the noise impact associated with the equipment, as it will direct the noise up rather than allowing it to disperse. This will minimize the audio impacts on the neighbors. Staff will make a finding on this criterion following the review by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 11,2006. The staff finding will be included in the staff memo at second reading. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The requested variance would increase the parapet wall height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The relevant AACP sections for this variance request include Parks, Open Space, & the Environment, and Design Quality. [Note: the original SPA Agreement established the overall development' s compliance with the AACP-] The proposed height increase will help reduce the noise pollution associated with the mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment is larger than original anticipated in the original SPA Agreement because the building is attempting to attain LEED certification. The equipment itself meets the AACP goals in terms of achieving environmentally friendly development and design and by reducing the energy costs associated with the approved development. The height increase meets the AACP goals by reducing the adverse noise impacts on the surrounding environment. The proposed height increase meets the AACP's goal of achieving good design quality. The proposed materials are the same as were approved in the original SPA Agreement, and will compliment the original building design by ensuring a consistent architectural program. HPC evaluated the design originally proposed for the building and approved it, as it was consistent and appropriate with the Aspen Institute area. The increase in the parapet wall is consistent with this initial HPC finding. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 6. Whether the proposed development wil[ require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. The requested variance is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040(B)(2). The requested variance is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. The requested variance is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. GURTIS c-0/1<2~SsociATES MEMORANDUM TO: James Lindt. Aspen Community Deve. Office Todd Orange, Aspen Zoning Officer FROM: .1 im Curtis Aspen Institute Owner's Representative DATE: August 28,2006 RE: Non-Compliance Petition & Minor SPA Variance Request For Rooftop Parapet Wall Height Conference & Meeting Hall Building (aka Doerr-Hosier Center) 870 Meadows Road, Parcel # 2735-121-29008 Aspen Institute, Owner Request The Aspen Institute respectfully requests a 2'-6" height variance for a rooftop parapet wall surrounding and screening the mechanical equipment on the north roof of the Doerr-Hosier Center currently under construction. The parapet wall has been constructed (but not finished), and only recently did it come to our attention the wall was higher than the parapet wall shown on the SPA (Specially Planned Area) drawings. The parapet wall hides 2 pieces of large rooftop mechanical equipment (air handling units) from the view of the public and the slightly higher wall is felt to be the best solution to hide the rooftop equipment. The alternative is to lower the parapet wall and expose the upper 2'-6" of the rooftop equipment to public view. The approved SPA drawings showed a parapet wall of approximately 4'-8" vs. the higher wall of approximately 7'-2". The SPA drawings were approved and recorded on April 18,2005, prior to the September 2005 groundbreaking of the building. As is fairly typical, at the time the SPA drawings were recorded, the architect did not know the exact size of the mechanical equipment. He did know that mechanical equipment would be on the rooftop and that a parapet wall would be necessary to screen the equipment. SPAVarReqDoerÂ·-Hosier08286 1 300 East Hyman Avenue Â· Secondfloor Â· Aspen, Colorado 81611 Â· pb: (970) 920-1395 Â· fax: (970) 925-5046 Subsequently, the Aspen Institute committed that the building would be a "green" LEEDS Certified Building, which it will be, but because of this some ofthe mechanical equipment became slightly larger to be "more green" and quieter. Therefore, the parapet wall was built slightly higher to hide the slightly larger "greener" mechanical equipment. The parapet wall will be covered in a gray non-reflective zinc metal paneling consistent with the SPA drawings. Background In late July, I received a call from Mr. Todd Orange, Zoning Officer, saying he had received a call from a resident asking us to check the Doerr-Hosier building heights. Pursuant to Mr. Orange 's request, we survey checked the building heights and found all heights were in compliance or slightly lower than the SPA drawings other than the parapet wall surrounding the mechanical equipment on the north roof of the building. Once the survey heights were known, Mr. Orange and Mr. Stephen Kanipe did an inspection of the building with us. I have also recently inspected the building with Pitkin Green neighbors whose view planes are most directly impacted by the building. All parties I have personally spoken with feel keeping the higher parapet wall is preferred to lowering the parapet wall and exposing the mechanical equipment to view. Procedurally, the original 1992 SPA Agreement envisioned these type of minor adjustments and established a straightforward manner to handle them under Article III(B)-Non-Compliance and Request for Amendments or Extensions. I and the Aspen Institute both thank you for your consideration of this item. CC: Amy Margerum, Aspen Institute SPAVarReqDoerr-Hosier08286 2 2.li"graT,2 ; ~03*24Â« 4 S Â· . ..':...:2;:Z. â‚¬ 4 ' -4 Â¥iâ‚¬.4 Â·.4 W I : f. Â·Â· - i r n .94 1.li~ 'Â·402 - 'Tir,t. . ' -1,1 -81 â€¢ ' f '32 44 4 4, r , I '. 4.k T - 2 '- A. / Parapet vâ‚¬all View From Froilt ol~ Bilililing Nouth-\\'ext Elevation 7'9'1*!71~, 13 - fi p -9 2 #5l~ p.* 1*44 0 , 4,. A. t -- a Â·Â·. . , -FL p T Ill . 1 4 34 1 . 4 . G Â·t. ;r r tr U A I \X, \ 2.'#Mik. =#:-y- -~*4:4~ z Ik.Â· - ilin.-4 A <13*71/ilik... Parapet Wall View From Side of Building North-West Elevation ....................1, 4 - U. .7 l i.,4-7 j 7-:4 4/.: . , .I , 9 9 kt. 1 Parapet Wall View From t Jpper Terrace 1 .ooking Nortli-West - C - 7 4 4.--0 1.-- - .f View of Mechanical liquipment Hidden by Parapet Wall THE CITY oF ASPEN Land Use Application Determination Of Completeness Date: September 6,2006 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application and reviewed it for completeness. The case number, name, and property identification number assigned to this property are 0051.2006.ASLU, 870 Meadows Drive and 2735-121-29-008, respectively. I will be handling this case. 1 Your Land Use Application is incomplete: We found that the application needs additional items to be submitted for it to be deemed complete and for us to begin reviewing it. We need the following additional submission contents for you application: Please submit the aforementioned missing submission items so that we may begin reviewing your application. No review hearings will be scheduled until all of the submission contents listed above have been submitted and are to the satisfaction of the City of Aspen Planner reviewing the land use application. Â® Your Land Use Application is complete: If there are not missing items listed above, then your application has been deemed complete to begin the land use review process. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2780 if you have any questions. Thank You, 4 - 4 (/9*v~ #ssica garrolv, Planner ~ity of ~p~, Community Development Department C:\Documents and Settings\jessicag\My Documents\Cases\Aspen Institute\CompletenessLetter Aspen Institute.doc U, 41 9.) P 7 18.04.010 Declaration of policy. The city council finds and declares that noise is a significant source of environmental pollution that represents a present and increasing threat to the public peace and to the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen and to its visitors. Noise has an adverse effect on the psychological and physiological well being of persons, thus constituting a present danger to the economic and aesthetic well being of the community. Accordingly, it is the policy of council to provide standards for permissible noise levels in various areas and manners and at various times and to prohibit noise in excess of those levels. ~ 18.04.020 * Definitions and standards. (A) All terminology used in this chapter and not defined below shall be in conformance with applicable publications of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) or its successor body. For the purposes of this chapter, certain words and phrases used herein are defined as follows: (1) Commercial district. An area zoned primarily for commercial use as defined in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, areas designated CC, C-1, S/C/I, NC, O, P (when surrounded by these designations), SKI, and as such designations may be amended. (2) Construction activities. Any and all activity incidental to the erection, demolition, altering, assembling, installing or equipping of buildings, structures, roads or appurtenances thereto, including land clearing, grading, excavating, filling, landscaping, use of power equipment and the delivery, loading or unloading of materials and equipment. (3) Dynamic braking device (commonly referred to as Jake Brake). A device used primarily on trucks for the conversion of the engine from an internal combustion engine to an air compressor for the purpose of braking without the use of wheel brakes. (4) Lodge District. An area zoned primarily for lodge use as defined in Title 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code, including, but not limited to, areas designated L/TR, CL, LP, P (when surrounded by these designations) and as such designations may be amended. (5) Nighttime. Shall mean the period from 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. daily. (6) Property line. An imaginary line, at the ground surface, and its vertical extension, which separates the real property owned or rented by one person from that owned or rented by another person and separates real property from 1 the public premise, or in multiple dwelling units from the adjoining unit, such as the wall between two apartments. (7) Residential district. An area zoned primarily for residential use as defined in' F Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. including, but not limited to, areas designated R-3, R-6, R-15, R-15A, R-158, R-30. R/MIt RR, M/MFA, AHPUD, A, C, PUB, P (when located adjoining properties with these ~ designations) and as such designations may be amended. (8) Sound level meter. An apparatus or instrument including a microphone, amplifier, attenuator, output meter and frequency weighting networks for the measurement of sound levels. (9) Special event. Defined in Section 14.20.010 of the City of Aspen municipal code. (B) Standards used in the measurement of sound as provided for in this chapter shall be those as specified herein: (1) Sound level measurement shall be macie with a sound level meter using the "A" weighting scale, set on "slow" response. (2) Measurements shall be taken at the property line of the source. The meter shall be used according to manufacturer specifications. The meter shall not be held in front of the person taking the reading. (3) Background noise levels shall be taken for comparison with a given source for accuracy of a measurement. Enforcement actions will be taken if the source of noise is greater than the stated permissible levels and the background noise level. (a) Extraneous or momentary spikes in the background noise readings shall not be used to compare with the source noise readings. (b) If the source is constant and too loud to determine the background noise level, then the enforcement officer must find a similar site and distance to test for the background noise level. (4) These noise regulations are enforceable by all City of Aspen law and code enforcement officers. 18.04.040 Noises prohibited, nuisances. (A) General prohibitions. It shall be unlawful, with penalties provided in the Aspen Municipal Code, section 1.04.080, for any person to create, cause or allow the 2 continuance of any unreasonably loud, disturbing, unusual, frightening or unnecessary noise, which interferes with neighboring residents' reasonable use of their properties. Such noise may include, but is not limited to, the following: (1) Horns and signaling devices: The intentional sounding of any horn or signaling device of a motor vehicle on any street or public place continuously or intermittently, except as an emergency warning device. (2) The sounding of a security alarm for more than five (5) minutes. (3) The repair, rebuilding or testing of any motor vehicle during nighttime. (4) Operating or permitting the operation of any motor vehicle or motorcycle not equipped with a muffler or other device in good working order so as to effectively prevent loud or explosive noises there from; operating any such vehicle in a manner as to constitute unreasonable, disturbing noise that constitutes a nuisance. (5) Dynamic braking devices (commonly referred to as a Jake Brake). Operating any motor vehicle with a dynamic braking device engaged except for the aversion of imminent danger. (6) Noisy parties: Congregating because of, or participating in any part or gathering of people, during nighttime in such a manner as to disturb the peace. (7) The playing of any radio, phonograph, musical instrument, outdoor speakers, television, or any such device in such a manner as to disturb the peace of nearby persons, particularly during nighttime. (8) The yelling, shouting. whistling or singing on the public streets or private property at nighttime in such a manner as to disturb the peace. (9) The use of leaf blowers other than electric-powered leaf blowers. (10) Construction between the hours of 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Saturday in any Zone District. (11) Construction on Sundays in any Zone District. (12) The use or firing of explosives, firearms or similar devices, which create loud sound. 18-04.050 Allowed Noises based on time of day and other restrictions. 3 (A) The following noises are allowed to exceed the Zone District noise levels during specified times of day unless deemed a disturbance of the peace by an enforcement officer. (1) Sound emanating from outdoor athletic events between 7:00 a.m. and 9:00 P.m. (2) Construction activities between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.ill., Monday thru Saturday, with the following conditions: (a) Noise levels do not exceed 80 decibels at the property line; and (b) Equipment is operated in accordance with manufacturer's specifications and with all standard manufacturers' mufflers and noise-reducing equipment in use and in properly operating condition; and (c) Notices shall be posted to inform workers, including sub-contractors, about the basic noise requirements, as well as specific noise restrictions, to the project; and (d) Jack hammering. drilling, large compressors, and other types of equipment that exceed 80 decibels must be used in conjunction with an approved noise suppression plan outlined in 18.04.070 of this chapter. (3) Special Events or other events to which the public is invited with the following conditions: (a) The maximum decibel level at the perimeter of the event does not exceed 100 decibels; and (b) Amplified noise shall be created only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 9:00 p.m.; and (c) Neighbors within two hundred fifty (250) feet of the site of the proposed sound source are notified. Such notification must be in writing and be done seven (7) days prior to the starting time o f the event; and (d) The arrangement of loud speakers or the sound instruments must be such that it minimizes the disturbance to others resulting from the position or orientation of the speakers or from atmospherically or geographically caused dispersal of sound beyond the property lines; and (e) All reasonable measures are taken to baffle or reduce noise impacts on the neighbors; and 4 (f) Event organizers agree to cooperate with the Police Department in addressing noise complaints from neighbors, which may include the termination ofthe event. (g) Organizers of special events governed by the City of Aspen Special Event code (14.20.030*) may request a variance from noise restrictions to the City of Aspen Special Event Committee. (1) The variance request shall include reasons why the variance should be granted, how the public good will outweigh impacts on neighbors and other factors supporting the request. (2) If approved, the variance shall contain all conditions upon which said variance has been granted, including, but not limited to, the effective date(s), time(s) of day, location, sound pressure level, or equipment limitation. The Special Event Committee may prescribe any reasonable conditions or requirements deemed necessary to minimize adverse effects upon the community or the surrounding neighborhood. (3) Decisions on variances by the Special Event Committee may be appealed to the city council. An appeal shall be made by filing with the city clerk a signed statement that the appellant desires to appeal to the city council, along with a copy of the application and the written denial or the permit objected to. Each appeal shall be filed within two (2) days, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays, ofthe decision appealed from. The right to appeal to city council shall be contingent upon city council's regular meeting schedule. (4) Private events to which the public is not invited and that are located at a park, business or nonprofit facility with the following conditions: (a) Private events must comply with the requirements of parts (c) thru (f) of section (3) governing public events; and (b) Amplified noise shall be created only between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.; and (c) The maximum decibel level at the perimeter of the event does not exceed 80 decibels; and (d) Maximum of two per week at any property; and (e) If complaints are received from neighbors about noise from a private event, the event organizer must meet with the Environmental Health Department and implement additional control measures for future events to prevent disturbance of neighbors. 5 (f) An administrative fee as set in the City Fee Ordinance is required for review of the additional control measures: (5) Farmers' Markets. Sound from the Farmers' Market during times and dates specified in its current vending agreement with the City of Aspen. Â£18.04.030 F Maximum permitted sound levels in zone districts. (A~'1~'~3'person or group of persons shall operate or cause to be operated any 7, continuous, regular or frequent source of sound that exceeds the maximum permissible sound pressure level listed in Table 1. Table 1: Maximum noise level by Zone District 1, Zone District Nighttime 9:00 p.m. to 7:00 Daytime 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. P.m. Residential 50 dBA 55 dBA Commercial 60 dBA 65 dBA Lodging 55 dBA 60 dBA (B) No person shall drive, operate, move, cause or knowingly permit to be driven or moved a motor vehicle or combination of vehicles at any time in such a manner as to exceed the noise limits for the category of motor vehicle shown in Table 2. (C) Noise shall be measured at a distance of at least twenty-five (25) feet from the vehicle with the sound level meter at least four (4) feet above the immediate surrounding surface: Table 2: Maximum Vehicle Noise levels Type of Vehicle Noise level dBA for Noise lever dBA for Speed Speed of 35 mph or less over 35 mph Motor vehicles with a 86 90 manufacturer's gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) or gross combination weight rating (GCWR) of 10,000 pounds or more, or by any combination of vehicles towed by such motor vehicle 6 Â· I . Any other motor vehicle 82 86 (less than 10,000 pounds) or any combination of vehicles towed by any motor vehicle 18.04.060 Exemptions. (A) The following uses and activities shall be exempt from noise level regulations: (1) Emergency construction work that is necessary to restore property to a safe condition following a fire, accident or natural disaster, or to restore public utilities, or to protect persons or property from an imminent danger. Such work must comply with the requirements of this ordinance for a noise suppression plan. (2) Noises of safety signals, warning devices, and emergency pressure relief valves. (3) Noises resulting from any authorized emergency vehicle when responding to any emergency call or acting in time of emergency. (4) Noise from snow plowing, street cleaning or trash collection. (5) Lawful fireworks. (6) Electric leaf blowers. 18.04.070 Noise Suppression plans for construction activities where decibel limits will be exceeded. (A) Noise suppression plans shall be submitted for approval to the Aspen Environmental Health Department or Police Department. (B) Noise suppression plans shall include: (1) contact information, (2) dates of the activity, (3) hours of activity. (4) location of activity, (5) any equipment constraints that prevent common noise reduction measures, (6) description of how sound blocking or reducing measures will be used, (7) layout map of the locations of baffles and other sound blocking or reducing measures with relation to source of noise. 1 . (C) Submittal must be timely for adequate review. (D) Approval may be granted upon good and sufficient showing: (1) That the activity, operation or noise source will be of temporary duration and cannot be done in a manner that would comply with this chapter; and (2) That no reasonable alternative is available to the applicant. (E) An administrative fee as set in the City Fee Ordinance is required for review any noise suppression plan. (F) The City of Aspen may prescribe any reasonable conditions or requirements deemed necessary to minimize adverse effects upon the community or the surrounding neighborhood. 18.04.080 Enforcement. (A) Enforcement officers may issue a warning notice or summons and complaint to any person in violation of this chapter. (B) An Enforcement Officer shall have the right to inspect property concerning any noise complaint. 18.04.090 Penalty assessment. (A) Any person violating any provision of this chapter may be punished by a fine, imprisonment, or both a fine and imprisonment, as set forth in section 1.04.080 of this Code. Each day any violation of this chapter shall continue shall constitute a separate offense. 8 MEMORANDUM VII i a, TO: Mayor Klanderud and Aspen City Council THRU: Chris Bendon, Community Development Director ~AW) FROM: Jessica Garrow, Planner ~~ RE: Doerr-Hosier Building (Aspen Institute Conference Center) Height Increase - SPA Amendment - First Reading of Ordinance@(, Series 2006 MEETING DATE: September 25,2006 Second Reading scheduled for October 23,2006 APPLICANT /OWNER: Aspen Institute ** * ~) 1 :'Â· ~P~ -~ ~ *4~ *:..1 .171 r REPRESENTATIVE: 1 .i. 1 60* i'! iwi. Jim Curtis, Curtis & Associates 4. -9 - 1- 11 1 1 -4.- #st~t,1. 31 ~' R.' '-L-:,F.Y. LOCATION: Lot 1 -A Aspen Meadows Subdivision commonly known as 870 Meadows Road . -&-&6-/all Photo of the smaller, and shorter of the two pieces of mechanical equipment, with the proposed parapet wall height. CURRENT ZONING & USE Academic with an SPA overlay v r PROPOSED LAND USE: 4>,1 Academic with an SPA overlay L.... 1. It t ! STAFF RECOMMENDATION: 2..1 41 : ' 'J- t ~Â·'Â·iÂ·,i 1-' 1 Deferred to Second reading, following E..... 1.-- ... :-1 1 referral comments from the Historic 4..1, Preservation Commission. Staff lt- - po*~**.f in-19:;z fi Â«-1, recommends adoption upon first reading. Photo of the larger, and taller of the two pieces of mechanical equipment, with the proposed parapet wall height. SUMMARY: The Applicant requests an Amendment to their SPA agreement to increase the height of the Doerr-Hosier Building * ~ , ... - ... U. t.- . Â·~-.14***uff~Z90,i,f, :'.94:*112. (Aspen Institute Conference Center) by L. .1 . r:-, 4-22.4.~.- two (2) feet six (6) inches to hide mechanical equipment. ke ' i Â·... Photo of the parapet wall height: the lower portion is the height that was originally approved, and the higher portion is the proposed height with the two (2) foot six (6) inch variance. Doerr-Hosier SPA Amendment Staff Report, page 1 LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approval for site: â€¢ SPA Amendment to increase the height of the parapet wall by two (2) feet six (6) inches on the Doerr-Hosier building pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.440 (City Council is the final review authority who may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the proposal). PROJECT BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY: In 1991, City Council approved Ordinance No. 14, approving the original Aspen meadows SPA Agreement. This SPA agreement established dimensional requirements for the SPA area. The SPA Agreement, dated January 24, 1992, outlines review procedures for all SPA Variances and Amendments. Ordinance 45, Series 2004 amended the Aspen Meadows SPA to allow for the construction of a conference and meeting hall in place of a lodge building that was approved in the original SPA Agreement. This Ordinance allowed for the construction of the Doerr-Hosier Conference facility. In November 2005, the Aspen Institute decided to make the Doerr-Hosier building into a "green" building and to pursue LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification. In order to achieve LEED certification, a number of changes were made to the building, including the use of different mechanical equipment that meets LEED requirements. This equipment is compatible with the geothermal energy used in the building and is less noisy than other non- LEED equipment. In order to achieve a lower decibel level and LEED compatibility, the equipment is slightly larger than the equipment originally intended for the building. There are two pieces of mechanical equipment that work to heat and cool the building, both placed on the top of the building in accordance with the original SPA approval and Ordinance 45, Series 2004. One is smaller in size and is lower in height than the originally approved parapet wall height. The second is approximately two feet taller, and sits higher than the originally approved parapet wall height. When the Aspen Institute decided to use this equipment in order to achieve LEED certification, the Institute also decided to increase the parapet wall height to hide the equipment and to maintain architectural consistency with the building. This decision resulted in a building height that exceeded the SPA height limits by two (2) feet six (6) inches. In July, 2006, the Aspen Community Development Department received a zoning complaint from a resident in the Pitkin Green subdivision regarding the height of the Doerr-Hosier building. Community Development staff inspected the Doerr-Hosier building and determined that the parapet wall exceeded the allowable height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The Aspen Institute then initiated an SPA Amendment request for a height increase. STAFF COMMENTS: SPA AMENDMENT: The Applicant is requesting an Amendment from the SPA Agreement to increase the height on the Doerr-Hoser building by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The review criteria are outlined in Land Doerr-Hosier SPA Amendment Staff Report, page 2 Use Code section 26.440.050, and the review procedures are outlined in the original SPA Agreement, dated January 24,1992 (attached as Exhibit C). Staff supports the Institute's decision to achieve LEED certification and is in general support of increasing the permitted height in order to minimize the noise impacts on the surrounding neighbors and environment. The increase in the parapet wall height will project the noise up towards the sky, rather than out the sides of the building. Staffis waiting for referral comments from the Historic Preservation Commission before afnal stafffinding is made REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: The City Engineer, Fire Marshal, Aspen Sanitation District, and the Parks Department have all reviewed the proposed application and their requirements have been included as conditions of approval when appropriate. The Historic Preservation Commission will review the proposed height increase at their October 11 th, 2006 meeting. Those referral comments will be included in the Staff memo and findings at second reading. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve the attached ordinance on first reading, approving an Amendment to the original Aspen Meadows SPA Agreement to increase the height o f the Doerr-Hosier building by two feet six inches. RECOMMENDED MOTION (ALL MOTIONS ARE PROPOSED IN THE AFFIRMATIVE): "I move to approve Ordinance No. '41, Series of 2006, upon first reading." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A - Review Criteria and Staff Findings EXHIBIT B - Amended SPA Development Plan including Doerr-Hosier Center architectural drawings EXHIBIT C -SPA Amendment Procedures, from original SPA Agreement dated January 24,1992 EXHIBIT D - Application Doerr-Hosier SPA Amendment Staff Report, page 3 ORDINANCE NO. ~ (SERIES OF 2006) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVING, AN AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN INSTITUTE'S SPA AGREEMENT FOR THE DOERR-HOSIER CENTER AT 870 MEADOWS ROAD, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CO, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO PARCEL NO. 2735-121-29008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from the Aspen Institute, represented by Jim Curtis, requesting an amendment to the Aspen Institute's SPA Agreement to increase the parapet wall height by two (2) feet six (6) inches on the Doerr-Hosier building at 870 Meadows Road; and, WHEREAS, the subject property is zoned as a Specially Planned Area; and, WHEREAS, the original SPA agreement allows the applicant to request an amendment to the original SPA agreement of City Council ; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, and the applicable code standards, the Community Development Department recommended approval of the variance request; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on October 23rd, 2006, the Aspen City Council approved Ordinance No. _, Series 2006, by a _ to _ C._-_3 vote, approving the Aspen Institute's SPA Amendment request for the Doerr-Hosier building at 870 Meadows Road; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Section 26 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, and the Aspen Institute SPA Agreement dated January 24, 1992, the Aspen City Council hereby approves an amendment to the SPA Agreement to increase the parapet wall height of the Doerr-Hosier Building by two (2) feet six (6) inches. Ordinance No. Series 2006 Page 1 Section 2: Vested Rights The development approvals granted herin shall be vested for a period of three (3) years from the date of issuance of the development order. No later than fourteen (14) days following the final approval of all requisite reviews necessary to obtain a development order as set forth in this ordinance, the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to this Title. Such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a vested property right, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 870 Meadows Road, City and Townsite of Aspen, CO, by Ordinance No. _, Series of 2006, ofthe Aspen City Council. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity o f the remaining portions thereof. Section 6: A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the 23rd day of October, 2006, in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City o f Aspen. Ordinance No. Series 2006 Page 2 INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the _ day ofNovember, 2006. Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this _ day of October, 2006. Helen Kalin Klanderud, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: John P. Worcester, City Attorney C:\Documents and Settings\jessicag\My Documents\Cases\Aspen Institute\Aspeninstitute ORDINANCE 9-25-06.doc Ordinance No. Series 2006 Page 3 Exhibit A - Staff Findings 26.440.050 Review standards for development in a Specially Planned Area (SPA). In the review of a development application for a conceptual development plan and a final development plan, the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council shall consider the following: 1. Whether the proposed development is compatible with or enhances the mix of development in the immediate vicinity of the parcel in terms of land use, density, height, bulk, architecture, landscaping and open space. The requested Amendment would increase the parapet wall height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. This height increase is proposed in order to reduce the visual impact of the machinery on the roof of the Doerr-Hosier building. The machinery is larger than originally anticipated because the building will undergo LEED certification and the larger equipment will help the building achieve that certification. There are two (2) pieces of mechanical equipment that are needed to ensure the building is energy efficient. One piece is hidden by the original parapet wall height. The other piece of mechanical equipment is taller than the approved parapet height, and requires an increase of two (2) feet six (6) inches in the parapet height in order to conceal it from view. The parapet wall also functions as a noise barrier for the pieces of equipment. The mechanical equipment is estimated to produce noise equal to 40 to 45 decibels. The higher parapet wall helps minimize the impact on the surrounding neighbors by directing the noise towards the sky, rather than allowing it to easily come out the sides. The parapet wall will be made of insulation and a metal material, which was approved as part of the original parapet wall. This ensures the higher parapet wall matches the rest ofthe building material and architectural program. Staff will make a finding on this criterion following the review by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 11,2006. The staff finding will be included in the staff memo at second reading. 2. Whether sufficient public facilities and roads exist to service the proposed development. The requested Amendment is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. The height increase will not impact public facilities or roads. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 3. Whether the parcel proposed for development is generally suitable for development, considering the slope, ground instability and the possibility of mudilow, rock falls, avalanche dangers andflood hazards. The requested Amendment is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. Doerr-Hosier SPA Amnendment, Exhibit A page 1 4. Whether the proposed development creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve significant view planes, avoid adverse environmental impacts and provide open space, trails and similar amenities for the users of the project and the public at large. The proposed parapet wall height increase is intended to minimize the visual and audio impacts of the machinery. The parapet wall creates a larger mass than the equipment, as it encloses both pieces of equipment and the approximately four (4) feet of space between the two (2) pieces of equipment. This larger mass is visible from neighbors living in Pitkin County in the Pitkin Green subdivision across the Roaring Fork River. The parapet wall will decrease the noise impact associated with the equipment, as it will direct the noise up rather than allowing it to disperse. This will minimize the audio impacts on the neighbors. Staff will make a finding on this criterion following the review by the Historic Preservation Commission on October 11,2006. The staff finding will be included in the staff memo at second reading. 5. Whether the proposed development is in compliance with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan. The requested Amendment would increase the parapet wall height by two (2) feet six (6) inches. The relevant AACP sections for this Amendment request include Parks, Open Space, & the Environment, and Design Quality. [Note: the original SPA Agreement established the overall development's compliance with the AACP] The proposed height increase will help reduce the noise pollution associated with the mechanical equipment. The mechanical equipment is larger than original anticipated in the original SPA Agreement because the building is attempting to attain LEED certification. The equipment itself meets the AACP goals in terms of achieving environmentally friendly development and design and by reducing the energy costs associated with the approved development. The height increase meets the AACP goals by reducing the adverse noise impacts on the surrounding environment. The proposed height increase meets the AACP' s goal of achieving good design quality. The proposed materials are the same as were approved in the original SPA Agreement, and will compliment the original building design by ensuring a consistent architectural program. HPC evaluated the design originally proposed for the building and approved it, as it was consistent and appropriate with the Aspen Institute area. The increase in the parapet wall is consistent with this initial HPC finding. Staff finds this criterion to be met. Doerr-Hosier SPA Amnendment, Exhibit A page 2 6. Whether the proposed development will require the expenditure of excessive public funds to provide public facilities for the parcel, or the surrounding neighborhood. The requested Amendment is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 7. Whether proposed development on slopes in excess of twenty (20) percent meet the slope reduction and density requirements of Section 26.445.040(B)(2). The requested Amendment is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. 8. Whether there are sufficient GMQS allotments for the proposed development. The requested Amendment is to increase the parapet wall height on an approved building that is currently under construction. Staff finds this criterion to not be applicable. Doerr-Hosier SPA Amnendment, Exhibit A page 3 6 14 r l,O b.fllk 1Â¥1 t .1 U U ' â€¢ L, u U U. Â¥ 1 â€¢J I V.. L. Amended S.P.A. Development Plan GRAPHIC SCALE rial,Â£01,rts in T= /% ir' 11 1 F. itt Amendment No. 5 of the Aspen Meadows S.P.A. Plan ..+ 3 ' --23~ nl=' AUG 1 1 2006 Thus Plal amends the Aspen Meadows Speclilly Pionned Areo -~ Development ond Subdivision Plon recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of PHI<in County, Colorado on June 24, 1992 in Plot ASPEN Book 28 ot Page 5. 4, 6 1 Cul BUILDING DEPARTMENT \ Asnpo Ch# Coung,1 AD,rovg bi Amendment No. 1 is on file ot Book 30, Poge 17 & 18 1 - This Plot of Amendment No. 5 to The Aspen /eadows Specially Plonned Ario KNOW ALL PERSON BY THESE PRESENTS thot the undersigned being the owner Amendment No. 2 is on me ot Book 38, Poge 13 - 15 '3 - was approved by the City Council of the 4 of Aspen. Colorodo or, the 13th of property described es Lot 1/ of the Aspen /ecdows Subdivision doy of December. 2004. by Ordinance #45. Series of 2004 recorded in the ' - Office of the Cle,k ond Recorder of PitIOn County, Colorado cs Reception No. A troct of land as shown Ind described os Lot l A. Aspen Meadows Subdivision Amendment No. 3 is on file at Book 40, Poge 25 - 29 Aiper , -h. 506&1&~~dedkations Ind eosements shown herein are hereby occepted herein. hove by these presents subdivided said parcel ond do hereby dedicate 44 /, 71 â€¢ *44,01â‚¬--14,112/S.C23Â»â‚¬- oil eosements os shown hereon, Amendment No. 4 is on file at Book 50, Page 49 Mea.dowâ€ž 1\\ - Helen K KIS.JhuG- dlyer 1 / Dde The Owner and Subdivider its successors ond ossigns, in considerolion & Subdiviaton 49 b LOT U 3 , Attest: hicl~-iuM.------------- occeptince of this plit und lond development approvits, convenant end agrees thot a /1 join any improvement district, which benefits the property 2 OP ~20.540 me. 4 City Cler* constructing storm drainoge systems. street lighting. sidewalks. cuc.bs. and 1. Itern,zolion of resolutions, ordinonces ond agreements related ta the herein described, formed for the purposes of plonning, designing ond L__ gui'. Ind street constuction. under grounding '(utilities. Ind 'Imilor types opprovel or This gmendment of improve.Wls. under on ossessment formulc. 1 ,11 n H Int 1 346 Â· ./,-iII I commitment issued by Stewart Titte of Aspen. inc. as Order No. 42853 dated B. The "5 P.A. Agreement"Â· Book 667 ct Page 731 as RecepNon The obove described property is the scme as the property described in title A. City Council Ordinance #45 (Series / 2004) Snobble 1 '44- July 19.2004. C Amendment to the SPA Agreement Book _2._ al Poge ///_.1 as .04 j i , th.140%11 I E""ted this _(33 coy I ZE*d- 2005. Reception No __S-0-4#-44-- / < 41. Curnmunaail==LQi[~LA==~ ..Â· 2 This amendment ollows for the construction of o Conference ond Meeting 4. --lk--tril#6Ug-_--- Hol; on Lot l A of the Aspen Mecdows Subdlvision es set forth in City Council Amy **um U Chief Finoncial & Administrative Officer ,%{EXE* Ordinance #45 (Series of 2004) All other aspects & the Aspen aeodows S.P.A + 4;;'tkle It This Plit of Amendment No. 5 to The Aspen yeodows Specially Plonned Area wos approved by the Communly Developmenl Director of the City of Aspen. The Aspen Institute. Inc. If hs Development Plon, 08 Â·amended from time te time. remain in full forge Ind doy of w< 41__, 2005 1000 North Thrd Street 1 LOGAN j 27*k_-1-12_ f CRISTAL ~ effect. ubdivision Aspen. CO 81611 :44 4 3. Adjustment of the 20' Emergency Access Easement on lot lA This 42442- Community Development Director Stole of Colorado ) amendment does not 0/ect Lot size or other mosements os shown of the p}ct )ss of Aspen Meadows Subdivision Eximption. PIct Â£*ok 17 Page 84. ..Sion 4 The foreaoing *,strument wos ocknowledged before me this |Rth dcy County of Pitkin ) of.~J-- A D. 2005 by Ary Morgerum, os Chif Finincial & Adminishotive Officar of The Aspen Institute. Inc Clerk & Recorders Cerificntr; -- Hy commiawn Expires JJ,+ 7,-1.00< I hereby certify thot this Amendment No. 5 of the Aspen Headows S.PA Plon GILLESPIE AVENUE 9 Fng,neer Aporovul Wlt,Â·*1 .My Hand ond Seal County, Colorodo, & -,Â£12- o'clock _1 m or this 181 doy al wes occepled for recording in the Office W the Clerk and Reodrder of Pitki# .,UL-_. 2005 end is duly worded in Book -MA St Poge 626 STREET m ~//0'v~d~yinth:~VIÂ©EAJnliert; 20~ecn,tyludmen~,p=Zorrr= Nltror 87-Â» Reteption No _ic]90*3_... day of _Apri-, 2005 '102) '2#.4-LOCE:2Lb.6- _ ~~/1,4, 'dkin County Clerk & Recorder (1 83.-,Â£3-Â£-O.-~4â€¢___-_-- /City Engineer Ia-2.B..d AMENDED PLAT SHEET INDEX The underigned, a duly-outhorized representative of o corporate title insurer registered to de business *n Pilkin County. Colorado. does hereby certify, pursuant to Section 20-15 61) of the Aspen Municipal Code, that the person(m) Sheet 1 - Signoture Page Usted os Owner(s) on the pict do hold fee simple tvtle to the wilhl described Sheet 2 - Amendment No 5 of the Aspen Meadows S.P.A Flon reof property. free c~d cleor of 0/ liens ond encurnbronce e*cept those shown J ,/Â·Â·2!%6-Â·.'p,0-4.5"5 .r;k~~~~toÂ«, Musir A,sogintes of Asnen ADorivol m described on this plot Although we believe that /octs st/ted are true. this Sheet 3 - Existing Conditions Map certil~cote i. not to be construed M obstroct of,title. nor on opinion of btle. Sheet 4 - Illustrative Site Plan This Plot of Amendment No. 5 to The Aspen Meodows Spec~olly Plonned Are{] nor o guafonly of title, Ind it is understood und agreed that Stewart Title of Sheet 5 - Schemotic Landscape Plan :P. 1 1--- .., . r,,1-1- .1 j.': t.-:Al,.. .7...5:*>A.J wos opprmd b~le I.lusic 49/ciates of Aspen. dbo Aspen Music Fest,vol end Aspen, Inc.. neither mumes, nor will be charged with any linone,01 obligation Sheet 6 - Schemotic Building Elevotions or liability whotever on any stoteâ€žInt contoined herein. Doted this -49*~,1--- , 2005 AMENDED PLAT DIRECTORY 24%1~ -ral,"1 '. Muslc Associotes of Aspen Print Name & Title: SUL-DÂ» ___--_- ~ 1~111#+71 1 Prop'rt, Own., Ind Applicant: kilitut '' 1,11 The Aspen Institute. Inc. lili 1~11111111~[~11'111~1111.'11111111: 71?016.I 7 1 1 ~~iq#64 - 7- 1 IL I State of Colorodo ) 1000 North Third Street â€¢2'21/â€¢LT'Un_' .. -1-j-L_1!21. )ss Aspen, CO 81611 $ A-c"-r ..,- 4.#yl''i County of Pitkin ) 7he A.02/ CAnter for Phvâ€žcs An{>royal The litle Stotement hereon wes ocknowledge before me the _16*h coy of Architect: 1,1 **CIL -, 2005 by .UhlUE&....hoKht. Jeffrey Berkus Architects Ths PIct of Amendment No. 5 to The Aspen Meodow. Specially Plonned Arec 1.4~Â£-Â£*MAWLEI ,/r Stewort Title 01 Aspen' Inc. Vicinity Map ICâ„¢ approved by The Aspen Center for Physics thi -19* day of 430 West Main Street DL\gadL__-, 2005Â· 0464' My commission expires: ___t-1/11- Aspen, CO 8161 3 Not to Scale Wilness My Hond end Officiol Sell. .. -er-62&4,3/lity--- -- C (~6.)) Sur, yer: Schmueser Gordon Meyer, Inc 24&2441__2*41---5 Notary Pub'Mc 1%..1~ 6~/Wij) 601 Street Ic...,LE..... Glenwood Sprmgs. CO 81601 'm- . Coer* ul .u mu. SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 1 Mfl. RE11SON sui 1 - 1 a NE 960570 - I , .4 , tks, 1 calmrâ€¢# q *-leâ€¢ â€¢cu .- I'l 118 W. 6th Street. Suite 200 Lot lA, Aspen Meadows Slihri ~ j SNJZ=Trly:727 Signature Gler,wood Springs. Colorodo 81601 1.* 0*'24/05. ~F 1 (970) 945-1001 FAX (970) 945-5948 - I.â€¢ i./. 0, e-<Il m.i .... Aspen. Colorcdo (970) 925-6727 City of Aspen, Colorado \ ', \ \ Page SCHMUESER I GORDON l MEYER Crested Bulte, CO (970) 349-5355 E-11; ,u,v....&/.com F Â· '.4485 i I Amendment -No. 5 8 72 1' 69 25}soo (A S 7593 02 E i Lot lA Aspen Meadows Subdivision ' LOT 4 11 Â· ~, City of Aspen, Colorado 1 111 * Il 2 t H 509067 â€¢. :f 7 n,/16/26*S 16 ., N 68Â·54'00 1 6 6.515 6- 1 i S 5572'36 Â£ \ 144 22 7 -03318'rn re f \ LOT lB 4 9 W ---- Notes. A -- -1 Ae., ..râ€¢Raf . I ' - Prup./ Des/lil'.IÂ· Le' j. 7~ I.en ./ad/# 6/// S... 0-/Imele P./ I./ Frlo/ S.Â»lis.I ./4 'IM .2 fecoe,d . June $992 0/ Ph,1 8* 28 I Page 5 & Recept./ No. 340936 Ind IN~ An~end.ent to th' Aspel ~I I C On,~ru4':a~ â€ž. Â· -*' Fino} S PA De~â€¢a;spmenl Man and FT,Â¥01 Subdiv,s;Â£,n Ac( r~ceÂ©ded ! 7 6*ember f#92 in Pja! 50tk 30 ot 0 40 4~ - f 4,002--- i-1////1/i///Cupt / M 1/ NofÂ¢h ,/2. Sectio~ 12. .~AEhip . South Rong~ 85 Weall fhe .h PU 20" '7 C. Rec*tio~ %. 3S,951 iÂ» Me em'c, 0/ the ..4, md *um~I. A',En Coun., 20/aroA ..0 .,,hg . . \ \\ A. - The ..â€žal "Ops '.ed . P.Pore thi wrly mch,de le 'bow' refe... plots g.d ..641Folcily le Plot c' '. * Uum. hue } < ' W *254 Asp,/ 14,>dows Subdiveion .emptiof,. Act 8Gok !7. A. 8/ Second Am,/Iment f. le *see 4Â¢g.*5 'not SPA ./\ T ... C 4-' ~1-~~ ._,e ,u.e.â€ž ..,e-n~ / / *\.'. L. 1 ./ ,\ .. .velop-Mt m.n, Plul Book 38 *- '.cnd th.Off~,hi ~p â‚¬ity 0, Aipen asce~.*d byed,â‚¬6%. 16 \P I \ ./ / 3\ 4 - Recm' .re retat- 0, I bae./g . N DeÂ·27'0 . /. MW. beo,ine ........9 m.....8 4 7/1 44 .43-- ~~\,4" LOT lA - rhz, ,ur,ty d.el not repre'Int c ./ ...rch / Uus ....ycl '/ daierm'n, I.ne/ship or to 'ss... kle,fall I. ofher encumb,c'lls of fecord IÂ« I.rmotion perte./. to ........ e...... 0, .... InÂ¢Imbronces 0, .... ho, b,>an fo,en ,*ern (he Â«,jo k.wrollce Or~er No 42~3 rss,le by St-ort We af *I, fna dated . # '004 + pea,$, 10 .ail D.* * 42853 leDe#/ 8-2 0=- T -4:.*.1...,.- gy p. . 44 \V\<26.540 acres +/- yr 52 -Ar.y.$ ./ t~ _ PeAcining to lert.. ao-NI -scnpe- and fhe.f Fph= de-lien os la.d /0 02 I. PI recer/ed I Pa~ cs- ,-9 not"/ Book 30% Pcge . le de,c,ipton, * he Phn./ Canl,r Pelh cncf the Rece Trock PeÂ¢h gs deseriat In pe,ge S-3 * 0/ Wid ./ do .0, ..arl W./ m. grophâ€žÂ· Illia. os .....I M ..... S~,2. cons,que/* .....W.I. ..... 4/ 4 . LOT 2 huv, * ted ,1 Ihi, drul,ing ty mointoinin~ the oppoant 20 0' offse{ ta Â¢ha -s[*. Nrle ef tot TA. % 1 9 0, At m % # ..., his mqua,~d 'hd, m ss#.g ..........e /0, W I .0, 80 m#yahed . Mys Ame 26/ 6%/. Â£â€¢*Frâ€¢' IÂ·.. 46, i <g ,/ 4 %41 4 :N - .~c~, *ho- he,- - /e,,Â»/o,mat,o~W pwpo,e~ 0~~ * no~ %~s,i,~ m0 ~Â»1.#, 0~0~e,shp 8,e# 202. P4, 0~6 ...,4- A '4 'P-- I X :1 11 9004 0 \\ \\ \ n.# \ * FOUND REBAR AND CAP LS 20133 O 51 LOT 6 1 \A 4 \ 4 \ O FOUND REWR INO CAP LS 26296 ,\' 0 1 L./ lili ) / \ 1 lIE ./.I ' ....'ll I . I . , 34146 \ SleÂ·5â€¢'De-* 1 584,609 I \P 1 . 1 33/0 1 ,i,~pÂ·pr'00* 1 rown.M V.'W ao,1 3610 4/ 1 1 1 .3 1 48 '. 1 5.0.2,@03â€¢ j 4â€žccep/ed I Ae 1 Â£4 1 61.58 1 .irecu ot Lo~d *na-ment 1 .3 1 22.93 1 #â€¢Â·r..Â·go. 1 .....ded Res.,Wey ./ 1 \ 4, \A 1 - 12 70wnshu, 10 South \1 4 % 1 1 .6 1 ...7 1 NM?Â·J~ 'ge. \ Rclge 85 *el . the .... * I 7 1 Â£7 1 #,45 1 N.,7Â·.79.T I doted * 30.1980 Â£3 1 849 1 m,Â·49'* 1 % 4 1 . 1 9.03 \ NlfÂ·44'42~. / Snobble \%* 1 L. , 67.36 \ -703Â·377 1 \" 4 i L. 1 79.06 1 ..Â·0479Â·I Subdivision \ 1,~ 1 4,2 I 81 93 I N,7'10 437 1 \ \1 & 4 Â· LOT 3 1 .,3 1 83.- 1 519'27 22. \ I "' 1 0" 1 49Â·34Â·03: 1 1 6 \4 419 1 1 ./ 1 50.97 1 A#re'39-* \ 4 19\~ 1/- acs*' 1 Â£,6 , .725 \ ..'10'00/ 1 .7 1 66.5 1 .1Â·54'00/ 1 41% 0 " / 4 / 1 95 ! 5%21; 1 i Pine ~ ~ ~ I Â£20 , t.'10 \ 507.19Â·12. \ I ./ 1 48.7/ 1 504Â·1â€¢ 00Â·. 1 liollow ~1344 \?, .0 h..-M., ' \ '22 1 ..:14 1 ..Â·Â«'68/ 1 Ph-m'... Knhrliviginn \.a\% 4 Cmn - \ Â©8*~ ' ..... 1.#.*.I.HOAD ' ....6 1 Mi' 1 I / I ..... ' 00. I ./., 0/. I ...... R ..... ' IJ5614 I, I ./.1 .. 1 ',23 ' I. | ..... | r./. 1 I o I iehoo i IniÂ«, I n.:e i ue jo i â€ž,7~7?L. . 1 r.â€ž* 1 Nkf 4 4,/j US .rOR' CE,fr#X:4/ t, Slephon L DIA. o k:Jy regis'n,d Prolus,oril Lend Sur,eyor m " 9/4 / fkker/c. dr herety cerÂ» Re 1 4, 1 ..... 1 .... I ./4, I //1/0 I .....7 I ./0/ I 1 1* 59, AMENDED PLAT OF lat lA ASPEN WEADOWS 5U851'05 ON 5.P.AJ rapreâ„¢ts :he reswil I a su-y or, i . i ./.0 1 ./. 1 0,Â·. ....0 1 Mer#,Â·0,-1, ' 17Â·./ Subdivision \30417(\\ 1 Septs:nb.r 17. 200â€¢ and up*Red.Â¥* 16, 200& mads und~ my dited M.my#, Mwign orld checÂ»79. 1 Y Fl | 5 | 9 ~ 10 ifilijii*:Li.*)*~.g.~.**$13..]LN]St which sur,8, â€¢us Pe,Pc~80 h 1!t~-1~1* W, ArtÂ£<2~ 51 UNM 2 ' It~ Catepx)* '0-0 Statotes. and th: Â¢th GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 00 40 4 51\ 1 ~ch . 100 M ~~~ ~ORTH ST'RE~ 1 ~ f 72-7 F,&4~ ~978 , Found CS '/4 '6 'gs, 9 .%/NI -5 J *nob,/ L/58Â£/.#/ Cap am air ~ ey a e , 02;570 4 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER 239Â°6)56= 6 7 1 1, No. 5 0. 04/12/05 - -9 .0, .0 meâ€¢ .0,0 -I. dA" {;334>33' FE~AIX~~~~00~8~g-5948 Lot lA, Aspen Meadows Si,hrl, Amendment GPa- 6' SJ.4 Â· 42, # I...rve, De enÂ¥-.0~,4 ./I ./ I. Aspen. Colorado (970) 925-6727 *I *0- me 0~, ~ W ***,- SCHMIESER I GORDON | MEYER CTested tutle. CO (970) 349-5355 City of Aspen, Colorado \ \ OF 6 su â€¢ I'. Iâ€¢, E*'....#'ll/Â£# 1 | ~I ...,ell'LI.'-S/Â·97Â· N 57*06'Ji v 19â‚¬*04. 480.00 9 77.04'45 1 495.93 Existing Conditions Map B 72770 / 5- C..... f ..../. 11 Lot lA Aspen Meadows Subdivision HEAL?M C~.3 k--*/Â·.t NX :Y.W. City of Aspen, Colorado 14* /4 - 7 40~o " Â«T-Lie~â‚¬ F.'.:. Het. CE-w::. 2 1-/9-64-1~.2--i-:i-I~-- t;: mW Â£LEV'aa ]5 , Vt ,\6 1 \40 I :I '/ I 6)44... Ck 1\ 1 '.A ' '' .. h\11' 4 \\ \ ,// 9/ M U j /,11 i b UX \ " . V Th*4 :4/64 .. 4 j ,\ 3 %@ 4/ 9,99/711.0 '' / 11â‚¬X~ER 80~U)~NC 4/37 I / i-J VACA'ED PORTION 01 . 33 /1 1\ 4, ' Q P- t..4.0 20 E#AERGENCV ACCESS [~SEWE,IT 20' IMIGENC r ACEE 5S Â£ A SEA,EN ' IN I: \ 1 . 4% A / .4 % 1 .// /0 A 1.87 9 V. 91\ 1 . GRAPHIC SCALE 1 1 '1 11 lilli ..lili L / F) 1 ~,i ,Â·'WL~*<Illt -78â€¢M -9(132 g /7 1 L.ch 1 30 I 'IN FECT > J .1 '~t rf,4 010<1 2-~ Al'111~.11...111~-C 0---:- *3~9-/V// V tfi \ 509067 4% Â·6.an. d,jin, i %/ 41. A ;/ i 0- 3, 7 â€¢in./201,3 0 18 =Ret,04Â® -*&9 \\\ L. 0 f. 0/ '' ' 41 J 1.,M 9 20 EUERGENCY .COES. E.5.-ENT \Â· A \ 2,1Â¢ RE'oc. 1.0 70 /.,0/ E.vis.NG PATH 9 1 / =-*t 42 ' LOT SITE MAP M - 94 1 2 ~ 1/~11 *r.:.I '14 44.~ %. - i ill A " LEGEND .AND NOTES SITE) I SPIKE lilli<X PIN 1 .1 FOO~ NE'*R IND CAP " 20$33 pu 6,/ ~Â£0AR .ND .4.P L. 26296 .9'2.th:.0, m:':1 7:r.6.,Â·)1~, 2 a4p L- - It â‚¬ UT}UTY. ORAiNAGE AND i d LOT 5 Â® 5:=~/. m AZ.M.. ,-DE' ~/Af/*44__-cOÂ» ' ~ LOT 4 pmu. .CCESS .SEMENT ' / d mâ€ž ELE,Â·.idâ€¢J,r' IRmIDâ‚¬W CONTPOÂ£ VAME ...el. \ \ / W- '11 CONIEROUS TREE \ 2% i I ./ VA(. 1-6,1 1 44- -(--44,4 1 f~RE H=Â£ 1 4/ .1â€¢â€¢, ~ / 1 10:=Qdv 0 i /:il.r' -4. \\\ :' r./ 5.0 ELECIC W*.E ' 5 -/ 1 I LOT 1A 'XX, ; N fLE'C.j' ME./ I g. ..\ 1 ..... // 3 / I . TE'E.H./ PEOEst. LOT 6 1 ED a.c?Ric Im .RuER LOT 5 ' . 1 . ./.-...2 LOT 18 FE NO ....0/6 laN 2 1 CE] cer,c~Ul p..0 .\ A Id 4. r - mi,i E.int~.g Ga~,01~. Uop ji in ;000 X 0, .0.. co ~. Fed.ra~ Emerg,ncy ~ * rna~t Agâ‚¬ncy (FEMA) Map4 02097[020JC. dole OUne 1987 Â»00 of *c X ImM /6.-Â¢Â»1* ~he 500.. noed p,) 00-flons .. DIsed upon NAD M --- ~ ~ ' wi#ng #he bench nian, . P/fkh E-fy Geurt Hou- , I. I ,.... 1 1 Sur~eyoir. C,itif.te: a ; 5 .DE ec'. P./' .\ '. *- L Â£1Â»Im. be,ng o Regmlered Land Surve,or in 'h. Stot. 01 Coloiodo. do h.'eby . .ptil~ thot this ... eondition. map wc, mod' unde m, aup,n-0/ and im Irle Ind 0k= * â„¢AiL EASDAEUT cor-1 . 1. 88.t o~ 9 .Ii'Ind knoâ€¢ed.. I lurthe .ey Ihot & imp.0Â¥nment' an the obov' .aclbal 00,/I on ./ ... .ptem- 17. 2004, I!.c.p[ Â®rily connocuoyls ofe;*nti.ely ~ithin lhÂ» houqdarlâ€¢, I 14* .râ€žI, M. - ,hcwn, ~hcl ther, -..- 4 if 4 / .2:\ 1 -no ,~moÂ¢hfn481, upon Ihe da,-d pfem,9- by improv~mente on on, adÂ»Ing pre--0 -ept " Iâ€¢dlecte#91Â¥M!'~IN-e 1, - opporer,( -idenc~ or,ign of en, ~050,â„¢,rt en,~~InS c,r~~/re,1. 0*Â©,pt 0* noted \C>X LOT 2 i.20133 M:*frd Â·za:,FÂ· 3//0 9 1 ~9=fi-~.,<: <*t' a /,41 LOT 6 7 1 LOT 3 I M topogrophy â€¢,00 eomolleâ€¢ 1,~14 Nmllof,ol MÂ¤P Accurocy Siondord; for lopogropbuc / 1 5 9 mops ./0 ch.'ad 90% 01 polati 'll.4 84 .Nh~ 1/2 /8 co~our int~r~ 1,nd vÂ®Il / 70 I d...4 ./. *Id . pitted .... '/50 . th/Â·r hui position C./col d..ign .culd 4094' GILLESPIE AVENUE I be b.9/ 'pon 10/ efÂ«Wation' 'hose Contoc' Schrnie~r Gordon yeyer. Inc Ir thie Bpot ~~Mâ€¢ IWormotlm STREET 4.*. I .brr% .* wv -,f SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER I 17: HON fWN % [*b. 06[572 - % UB W 6lh Street Suite 200 Lot lA, Aspen Meadows Suhrl , ............ ..t .... .im... Ill# *04 Existing ,I- . 5*4,0â€ž Â· 3 f *# I Â£48 '*ty ~Am .- toer ./ Glenwood Springs, Colorado 81601 . ..../. leaue'le,f m.ull deto ./05 Conditions 1 ~oy e, Â¥Mt or* ~ed **#I (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 I me 'un. De 'Dmme.ce' mal I. /1 Aspen, Colorodo (970) 925-6727 . C.cree ..... Ind ./ Se /0. 2&/5 . â€žIll hr. le ...f . ...#In .... SCHIUESER 1 GORDON I MEYER Crested Butte. CO (970) 349-5355 City of Aspen, Colorado 4 ..a.y e. Iddiben /1 p./.5. bull/ 02/24/05 ~Ac Map I.P.. 04-12- 05 OF k j jree~Cr. ,/''I"I ' I Sli l l [ 0/S ..801 0urv...rnMnecom 5 70~ EÂ»ot/.I .....ed I .... /4/23 54 120: e,4..850..: Exhibitg 1413 e...De. "90. EGEND ~ '~-41 P? 1 ' HEN RETAMMMS WAIL - NEWCARTPATH 1 MOUND EIT END OF WEXNER. ~2Â®6 VERIfYINFELD , V .pw ~ EXTO ASPEN OR COTTOMNOOD 4 509067 P.:4 a' 7 /' ''/ '/ > e Ira?se EXTG. SPRUCE OR PINE . . 0.7 4 mr, roWT. ' 71 ee NEWABPEN '0 . .e:..i ..14/ir -r **i% 4 4%* 49:#ellimmaligi*.. U * 0, S d 1,8 i U NEW SPRUCE OR ANE NÂ«0)40.7 /AR.E GARDENÂ· 1. fÂ¥ 4, I V solfl/TURE NEWCARTPA NOTESÂ· / 6.0.1 Â» , ER i An i 1 THESITEPÂ¢/NAS.OVIHEREONIS / NEWAETAÂ»ING'All.. 40, . g'/Â«â€¢ 78) ' CONCEPTUNLANO SUBJECT TO CHANGE WORMING VERIFY IN FIED '* ' 4- , â€¢ A . WITHTHECITYOFASPEN,NUrSOEFT â„¢EANDY =====Uto XERET MI BEEN REAOHED Wmi MIt $, 1. 1 / CHANG# OR Ell~NATION, NO ANAL Ce#ISSION .,r 0/ I ~ U e - 1 1),11 f I,J" b., #1.2 - GOLDSWORTHY // IME FILND /38 - PLAT. 5 1417 ' 4 . HE 2 THE SITE PUN AS SHÂ®N HEREON I Ner FOR -2 ' WEXNER U 1, ' E !4!ji, Â· ii!,i, '00Â¢88'.DIG CoNS1WCTI0N AND 16 SUBECT TocHEMGE 8*SED , mi agea=m-=a= DRANAOE PLâ€¢NS. EROSION COMT HOL PLANS, r 64 ONREVIEWANO*APPROVALOFMNAISITE ,./ , * Ill"Ir--~ ACCES# & INFR'81*OCTURE PERUIT PUNS, AND - r - C42,/' ' I--1'42%,1.' - ~'- 'iti,I~'. 41 1-~*IL-re aulloING PERMIT M.N,58Â¥ THE CITY OF ASPEN HERIFF#YERÂ·S , -, a .....5013@ZE>,-9 .... i 4 lib -----77 9-1Â»0<94 13 V r'Y-'~/Â·',il,B' ~- "~~~M,Â¢NTCE,-7-G. urlril.Â·~A QU 7Â¢ER Clw a.,14& 1 " 111 13 , - iÂ·-E NUT +IOF 214 0 91}11? f (''/ 4 , I 4, . .& J - -- I I , / fiaill-1 ,EAL,-1.-Ill ~,3 .7 - ~' â‚¬8_4'EN[drcll~<26~2Â·Â· PROPOSED NEWBUILDING ~~ ~ 11 U 1 re,: wri ' 14 -,/. - I - - . li~ 2Â©*# 2 , 1 0 64 'ffd##.#*A**1I 1 4 ,1--, <* ; ~=-3<1 73 : -- A~ 41,1-~'~ 41,+*-:--2-9-3'~.+ m-4p 1 Â·1 TERFEARRE , - =41' I _,0 L _ - - - .n- HEALâ„¢CENTER , A-â€¢7< L - 2 = , 71 , CONATE .acur - -- h '3 triÂ· 4'- 1 f ,râ‚¬GDÂ· 1 X - - - - - --- - ...11 --------- IL Q 8UIL0ING 4 3701.RET. WAU e.' \ .. 0 SERVICE 'AE'e E-4 1 - - I 'mil' , -PE Â·ENTAL,Â©11â€¢11= ,-1- ---- 1 ' '1 RECE'noN , r ' r--LEGENONOT~ r ; 1-8. .OING 16 -1 ..4 I , -/ -r -4 - 1~ ~6'fi*M"<, F/7*4 0 i $ , 4/0 .. - --.... r .1, 11-1 -- t.-- 27"vid/9- - ~JIDNEWALL . /4- 1 -2 - -- K- 01~WALL_ . .1 ./ . .ik//&,IM/94/#:Mmal# --- SITGMAN 411/05 414--0.6'4Â¢Arl,JEORDMIc> . - . - t ~ \ __ , \/f - m Erm. TRUSTEE 1 1 E -.14 -1~ \ 9#A/Sup V //~~*~; ~-4 . 2- - -- --- ~1 -3411----3 1,1 ''1 .\ wooo RET WALL 8. TRUETEE 1 TOWNHOOSE 1 4 1 ...* 1 - p.-- SPA1 . I . i ' *.Ille Ality k -1 il , ' TRU~TE Â·r -/9* ifig Â«m.#lir"em i ._J lOWNHOUSE /L-- -VI-- /111- G./.E 9-/=20-0, e i ' , 8 TOWNHOUSE ~ SHEET 1 TOWNHOUSE , TONNHOUSE G TRUSTE TOm[HOUSE , / ~610 20 40 50 ~ ---* TOMI'lolk Tâ‚¬~SE 1 Scal, 1' = N Â· 0' /9 '' 11 - txhiblt 8199 1....... SUI UD 91%2116%: NIErn13$130HJ EIGHOL Hadaf Iadsv 'smopea W uadsv . hi ~ 11 i . SO -1130 \ 9090/' Ulp r f- ' ,+TA-Â·u>\. Â¥ .U.e LEGEND % ~ LITG ASPENORCOTTON,Â¥000 P* . A FXTG. SPRttE OR P/NE .., 0 ,.f>ifff- 2 2/4 6 ' ..."m*'IM , F:'Amt//in/l e NEW;ASPEN 6 Â· i NEW S*RUCE OR PINE . X7Â«K 7 HERBERTBAYERS *. 4.! ..57 , p#V 'MARBlE GARDEN' G NEWSHRUBS , /5.0 U.Wit NEWCÂ¥TPA Â£1'679 ?t -bi- viy 1 -V SCULFTURE , 98 NEW ASPENS IYPICAL -1 47 < ... NOTES , Â£42-01 , i NEW SPRUCE NEW RETAINNd WALIN 4,4' 4 L IMESITEMAN AND1*DCAPEPLANAS,HCm! VERIFYINE!ElD '< ' /,Â· , 81 HEREON m C:Â»ICERUAL â€¢NO SUBJE:- To:114NGE HATCHED AREA INDICAiESAPPROXNATE EXTENT OF # 9 -4. /, C tw f,/ , WOPURING WITH #15 cry (y AB~11 '/rs DEPT. REPORED Â»,DIGENOUS Â¥EGETAnDN- TYPES OF PLANT IHE ANDY GOLOSWOR-HY ENVIR(*1~ENTAL *r...tzY M+ OW , - - - F ~}A*KS-- .l' E SCULO~URE A8SIRMNH0REON' CONCEMIUAL - ANDS JBJECTTIGHAIGEMP.1-7,ON),0 4 ' C'.AL CON/IBIN CONT~CrBAS IBENPEACHED INITH BAZIOU]3WORTWY AS OF iHEAWNG OF TH18 .EKNER *.IT NEW.PEN LODGE MADING , ,Â·r~ 1.,7 , - U' - 1-=' 1.:..., Z=====m= :-4Â·' 81*4 Â£2/ 1 1* _ , , 4 -..-- [2)>6~ , g..v" EN~ m -AP Wry:,TZ, FN,4,811â‚¬ ORAIGEMNS, EROSONCO~TROL PLANS, ACCESS&*IFISIRUCIUREPERMITPLANS. ~.0**whs/â„¢Ecm. _. 4 .5 --9.- 9 b 943,#fil<W&4'22Â£/;'~*~P'E ' dilliliPEIâ€¢fr:Eigals,F#J.;'&%*4&*: /F},6 1%.414- 1, 0 11,1,14.1111-y f NEW*RUCE ~ 1~ 2- 1 lit 2- 44* 1 -6- -1 - 0â‚¬9 5 -4 - 111 . - 4ROPOSED NEW BUILDING ~ , -1111.tr-nD !0) ' ' .RAISCRE-reÂ· Â· -- N \ 1 1 -f, -~ . l/ -Â» \ 4, 4 * - -- <Pr< Â· 1 1 ' Ir -7 ,_ - --*41 ' r.-*--'a7 T - - HEALTH CENTER I *r -11- 2 W - -_z Â·Â·.41 cormâ€ž00,1/#14 MiERFAU#,-1 0.- 4 i.' 1 1 El 1 '. â€¢ ' ./. I * SE./E ARE, E-4 -CON.*10 . 14,4 k.%71, 1 - ~STONBRETWALL , ~ ">* 8 MONG O cOTTomÂ¥0005 PROTECT -1~ * ' 1,4,6-JÂ· & * RECEPTIOPO ~ I. . ~~--~ ASPE. PROIC UTIve'Ir luu'Me \ -7... d .1'irt +4@7 . g 11 - / E I I 4 G. TREE . . i + : ./ '9 - - \ 1 .STONEVAL ' - 'i' -4 UNDSCAPEMAN 411.5 : SPRUCEP'ROTE, , ~ SCHEMalle EWAI - .*4. i.. r' '' ' , PINE PROrECT ,-1 % i 9.w"*0%,4-51'~Â·0Â£-@p~ _ - - - . 0-~b- 1- Ve*dek,k4 a , -- ~*t,:f*%fÂ®f~.1. -1. 90..0* XI + 9 DITI TRIFEE I T."I"USE 4. m 5HRUM TO BE DETERMINED BY MUTUAL '1 1 - - *- 7EM:I-PAI~ZOEP.â€žIâ€ž : ,- i * 4/Ed-5 --/~/-n -r L .s.~1.~0Â·m -7 -LL + , EXT{1 TRt]3'IEE SPRUCE PROE' ....rECT -- -T TOWN'/" ./ I I ; '' 1 G. mUSTE Ll TOWNHOUSE , '10,1 //,3-,/, ~ \ TOWNHOUSE ~ , 1-1 nG Tm.157E 1.Xm. mUSTE TOWNHOUSE , : SHEET TOWNHOUSE ' -/ 3 50F6 / '' 1 i .:.1, :/1-0 ././ 1 1 ExhibiBMÂ¥ 920'-'.6 ** 10.-Gu-046 10 , Etfy! agit ID gagot 101 a ) .IDISOH-1100 'O ) 'uadsv 'SMopEDIN uadsv 'su Uadsv 3 Exhi bits/,L 1 1 1 4 - IR- 1% 'im ri 11 1/ i 03 , "1Â¤i -27 1 iq i E f 'III[' 'Â·a.Â· 1 Er 5@Rt 1121 4 - 81 16 - 2 - gl=FIE - 2~ 1 i A $-UIGO-:=Â· Â«*=~ - i LNE~EM Â· - 1 ILIE[ 7-N - Â·1~ p - 1 : 1 H. 1 r+r- I i r ' re- 1 1 1 . i t. - 4-=29- ~ ii i CO 0 11 . , C L I i 4 ". 520 -Il -3 - t, 77 - r I :-3-1 h & -m 01 5 r/' -=4- -~ 1 83- - A / .1 1 2 !: 1 T 2[Lip E - +A=fi - ~1 'TT 1 1-1 Tfth---rt/7 -. . .-I & 1% 1 lf\Z lim .: E , 1 1 6 f Im : 1 1 1 IiI",â€¢ct !1 The Aspen Institute JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS 430 W. Mâ€¢inA'pto. CO a1611 â€ž 970-915-â„¢17 - 6 970-925-7026 9 m Doerr-Hosier Center **6 #0!tâ€¢el C> + JOEDB SCHOEBERLETNARCHITECT CIVIC FORUM Associates Inc 1 Aspen Meadows, Aspen, CO. 20 80*550 Aspen. CO 81612 #.n.,1,71 .-v.un.*,rk.:n,qi 1341 //4401 nl 1SV3-HlnOS FF. LBIRLEVEL - 509067 6 71 M 73 ' W 1 - C 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Nil lilli 'll 'lillillill"'ill'lilill ..â€ž.â€žoes '. '. 509067 :09=2 ing@ -0. â‚¬ e .. I. F mMiÂ» PYRNAID PARAPET 24' 84CKFROM - PARAPET@N-W 71 NE F~CE OF BUILDING ~ .- 1-- FACE OF IR ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ r VENTRATION 1 51.K FTOPOFRAIL 4â€ži . 4 ,â€ž~~~.i; ~~~~1211~-.~111 11 1 .1 . 11 32 5.:& F.F. tl~EFUEVES. - : F.F. UPPER LEVEL - U APPROX TOP OF SLOPE --- ~*~ ~~~~~~~ ~ 1' Â· 66/9146, Â· 1.*.*. ,>i. '- t..~.-i:t:.j L..0. ~ ~'Iâ€¢-& rÂ·, â€ž14.-:17 - â€ž 4~ ; . 54.i. ~~ F APPROXTOPOFS~E 6 . . ' -''-Trjm,~74 4?fil ~ f-, 2~! v-+<-1-w.*>21171 4 -~9 9-1 >j. 11:~ ~~17.14* ~ Â·.(, ~~?3Â·1'ji ...12.1 ..44 6 A. 1/ $-f d ~-- Erm (GRADE ---- - .*- .fl--ARL-=y - L [:tz#-iltril ]L r-:111~ P+;1 211 1 1, 1 1,4-L-LiJMÂ·1'.... !' ~Ii IlL vjllia~~%4==-=-Â·-/Â·rze 3U lili \ LOWERLE'â‚¬1 .--. F.F 'OWER LEVEL U . . L M. GRADE e Fo EnG E FINIS"0 GRADE 0 1 m _~ OFBASEMENTWALL FACE OFECPRIDITERRICE ANHMED GRADE@ ..GRIE@ S. Â·' Â· 1ACE OF BUILDING PACE OF8UILDING NORTH-EAST -4.-1,4.-0 0 0.-4 - P..... .ACKFROM NWN/SUILDING ~ g 1Â»' i d 1-L_]1 F F. UFFERIML , "" , I jtill 1 3 enG OtteE 0 - ~.111 P f FACEOF.MURDIC. .~ ,-~ ~ - EXTO GRADE i ANImIED GRADE -1 i ' r ' ELEVATIONS ~05 ' '/ 61[.1.4 FF.MANLEVa ~ ~ ~ | 1 1 - f=' 1 1 --1 - . n. --Â·m= 1-.. - \. F#4181Â·IED Glt,â€¢DE-#** 2~ o ji F.F.LOWER EVEL NOTEÂ· ELBAT~13 AND WIDING HEIGHTS MAYVARY IN81&8#TRINTINKÂ¥ ACCÂ®ING NORTH-WEST -4..154.=-N To ANAL BUILDINO PERMIT DRAWNGS SHEET 68 OF 6 1 1 1 1 1 di YA'blt-8 717- ...4 , .1/100... SOH-1100G ZI9'B(JO 'uadsv 'smopeaw uadsv .UI epog Kn IO N//38 AEHE:IHI alnUisuI uadsÂ¥ a f. 0109.. 4 4 - ...'- A'... lilli .ASS GOLD Â¥ noo ssno r"-â‚¬1.- i : Av ./ . 8,4Â£.0,01'2 19 F - i i 963.. Â· .*/F' I. ./ 4/5~~ii.~ Â·1. . 1 12*h ti . 4 .. LASS DENSGLASS GO. + fâ€¢~i.i..3â€¢,i~.4, 1 -la FILTER SECTION * .lAi 1 * ,', . SOLASS - 1- 1 ~la 1 1 . 4 . f. I: r. - Ill -9 \ t .t Â· 1 I # 6 I L , 1 1 . 11 ; c. i ..1- . t~ - 4 N. i .... I ....4 . ./4 ..iff/ . 1- 1 Â£ r. . I - . Â¥!} ./ .'-0119 1 Â·Â· '~1* ~ 4': . I ..' :4' 3 ' -*I 2 . .- - # - fr I ..0..m- . ali/31/ 4../.- co' 1, -4, - 0. Y 7, 4. . b# t,4 ~ Â£ 4 . f . ,i 1/4 . . '$49 .. t I. ,# 5.. ' . 3 h. â‚¬Eil ' r; . . I . p + 4. e Â©,Ttn â‚¬+ .9 fÂ·kw,V Â·. 1 1 44. , >, .~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 2~~ ~~it 4 ~ r 2 2 M.*i,6... . 0 -le'll. 2 l.. Â· .,.216â€¢',,tr 4:z .., 47 .11 , t. 4 I. $ 1 . -. AMENDMENT TO ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLAN#ED AREA DFVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT is made this ~* day of MA<OV> , 2005, between the CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, a municipal corporation, THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, INC., MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN d/b/a ASPEN MUSIC FESTIVAL AND SCHOOL, AND ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area (SPA) Development & Subdivision Agreement was recorded in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado, on January 24, 1992, in Book 667 at Page 731, at Reception No. 340937 (the "SPA Agreement"); and WHEREAS, the recording of the SPA Agreement was the culmination of numerous public hearings on the adoption of a Master Plan for the Aspen Meadows, as well site-specific development approvals; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Institute was granted various development approvals including approval for 110 new and renovated lodge units totaling 78,360 gross interior square feet. The Aspen Institute has constructed and renovated 98 lodge units totaling 64,943 square feet to date; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Institute retained the vested rights for the development of the 12 unbuilt lodge units (Building #3 on Lot 1A) as set forth by Aspen City Council 1 -T â€¢ -1 / r. ' Â£"/d//1.1/ _ _ -1 liesolution iNO, 4 / peneS OI ZUU-)); anu WHEREAS, on September 13,2004, the Aspen Institute submitted an SPA Amendment Application including an Amendment to the Aspen Institute's GMQS Exemption For An Essential Public Facility to the Aspen Community Development Department to not build the 12 remaining lodge units and to convert the remaining unbuilt 13,417 square feet to a Conference & Meeting Hall and to reserve approximately 1,500 square feet for future expansion of the Aspen Meadows Health Center, (the "Development Proposal"); and WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the Development Proposal in accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria o f the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen (the "Code"); and SPAAmendment I Ill[ 111- lili [ - 111 11 lillillill I ~lll~ 509066 Page: 1 of 9 04/18/2005 10:161 SILL IA D L IS PITKIN -OL. TY CJ R 46.00 D 0.00 I * . , WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and considered the Development Proposal at its regular meetings of October 13 and October 273 2004, and as a referral agency recommended approval of the Development Proposal; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Development Proposal on November 16,2004, in accordance with Sections 26.440.080 and 26.470.120 of the Code, and reviewed and considered the Development Proposal in accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria ofthe Code, and recommended approval ofthe Development Proposal; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council conducted a public hearing on the Development Proposal on December 133 2004, in accordance with Sections 26.440.080 and 26.470.120 of the Code, and reviewed and considered the Development Proposal in 0, accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria of the Code, and approved ~ ~ d Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004) approving the Development Proposal. E2 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the SPA Agreement is hereby amended to provide as follows: 1. Applicant shall abide by the provisions of Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004). incorporated herein and attached hereto. 2. Applicant shall record an Amended SPA Plat in accordance with Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004). Said plat is recorded in Plat Book 7 A at Page 6 f as Reception No. 3996,71 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County. Colorado. 3. All other provisions o f the SPA Agreement shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands and seals the day and date first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO a municipa,lkorâ€¢Dor*on 4*34Â»-61 9 loU i l<6~QL Kathryn S.3NhÂ£/tity Clerk 06!en K. Klandef'Rd, -Diayor THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, INC., a Ctffbrado coreonation (44-< iY fl 0/Â» - Amy M~kerum, Chief~}in. & Admin. Officer MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN d/b/a ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS ASPENMUSIg fESTIVAL MSÂ¢PiOOL / By: OÂ»1141/W Â«fÂ»- A -UL + ~ Jane A. Kelly. Admin. -V~e-President SP/\Amendmentjaa,~~N~':~i~ 010 16( 509066 SIL\, LA GAL.3 PITKIN CC I TY Co R 46.00 . STATE OF COLORADO ) i illill lilil ilill lilli Iilimil jilill ill lilli fill lili 04/18/2005 10: le 509066 Page: 3 of 9 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 46.00 0 0.00 COUNTY OF PITKIN ) -It, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15 day of AÂ©vi I . 2005, by Helen K. Klanderud, as Mayor ofthe City of Aspen, Colorado, a municihal corporation. L- yÂ©â‚¬.Le#A ,..,.f> U Witness my hand and official seal My commission expires: t#~ /9~0 5- < JACKIE i Â¥1 <~potary Public 9 ~ LOTHIAN j g STATE OF COLORADO ) of.~.r.~4- Nt*40#r )Â§ 9*/ â€¢O COUNTY OF PITKIN ) f CR/STAL ~ . LOGAN; The foregoing instrument was wledgeÂ¢ f e me this / 6-1*day of *#PO'la . 2005, by Amy Margerum, as Chief Fin ... trative Officer of the Aspen Institute. Inc., a Colorado non-profit corporation. ' Witness my hand and official seal cit EA- My commission expires:6,/37<06 Notary PuMid STATE OF COLORADO ) 'J COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this jur day of An,rch 2005. by Don Roth. as President & CEO of Music Associates of Aspen d/b/a Aspen Music Festival and School. Witness my hand and official seal .- n l=AA-AL b tuilÂ«_- ~'~4#824* NotarÂ¢Mittfic STATE OF COLORADO ) MEISTER L 8 ; CRISTAL i #EM i LOGAN i COUNTY OF PITKIN ) '47,24..............;C@OF : n 4{~SC.119~~50,- 12.... ..â‚¬ Cy The foregoing instrument was acklitferEaged before me this 304!ay of . OCK>r 2005, by Jane A. Kelly as Administrative Vice-President oF*spen Center For Physics. l , Witness my hand and official seal f / 4, My commission expires:6/~ ~06- 1 9 jt,W&11- Notary Publi~ SPAAmendment Page 1 of 2 Jessica Garrow From: Jim Curtis Dcurtis@sopris.net] Sent: Wednesday, September 13,2006 7:50 AM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: Re Parapet Wali follow up Thanks for coming out yesterday. 11 always help to look at things "on the ground." Your review standard comments are factually correct. Additional information we discussed yesterday is outline below: A. LEEDS Certilication--We are going for silver. not gold as 1 mentioned yesterday. B. Timeline City Council Approval Dec 1-3,2004. Ord. 45,2004 SPA Plat Recorded April 1 8,2005 Construction Groundbreaking Sept. 5.2005 Aspen Institute Decision to Achieve 1.1Â·131)S Certification November. 2005 Aspen Institute Orders Upgracied Mechanical Equipment November. 2005 C. Upgraded Mechanical Equipment--1 he upgraded mechanical equipment was selected because it met LEEDS requirements, was geothermal compatibliÂ· & less noisy. l he equipment is slightly larger due to the above. D. Additional Thoughts 1. Building will be geothermal to met its heating. cooling & domestic hot water requirements. We feel this sets a good example & u as a big part of the I FEDS decision. There is limited mechanical equipment on the market which is geothermul compatible. 2. Per my 4:00 meeting with Pitkin Green neighbors yesterday. we have agreed to do additional & larger landscaping to soften the impact ofthe view oftlic building which impacts them the most. 3. As you pointed out in > our comments. the larger parapet wall will help diffuse noise & direct noise upward. Ihis will benefit the Institute & its surrounding buildings as well as Pitkin Green neighbors across the river Please email or call if'you need any additional into. from me. Thanks, Jim Curtis On Sep 12.2006. at 5:461'M..Jessica Garrow wrote: Hi Jim - Thanks for the tour earlier today I wanted to let you know that Ill be taking the proposal back to staff on Thursday. At that time the staff will determine an opinion regarding the height request. I've attached draft staff findings for the SPA review - there are no actual findings, just background information that will inform the staff opinion. I wanted to make sure those comments are correct and appropriately reflect the LEED certification, etc. If you have time before Thursday morning, could 9/13/2006 Page 2 of 2 you review the attached and let me know if I state and background facts or information that is incorrect. Thanks, Jessica Jessica Garrow, Planner Community Development Dept. City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 970.429.2780 www.aspenpitkin.com <staff findings.doc> 9/13/2006 - CITY OF ASPEN BUILDING DcrARTME>iT LINE,~GRADE VERIF]CATION FORM Verification of Building Location by Building Contractor THE CITY OF AspE,N Exemption A City verification of building location is I-10t needed when the project creates less the 200 square feet 1 of new floor area. PART A: Complete and Submit as part of the Bui]ding Permit Application â€¢ Proposed Building Address or Location: Doerr- -Ro~,2-reâ‚¬*44.-0 @ 45'Devi -Im %43|v kit â€¢ Your Name (Person Completing Part A): 300Â·4* At- v,2 4 â€¢ Your Company: SC,11 vuvt.ber Gork?vu I f"lew t) f~-Evic' , â€¢ Plans must show horizontal dimensions that 'tie' the building to the property boundary. Are building ties shown? (circle one) 'Yes' ~ Al 1 6(13Â¢91 On ElecÂ·buÂ·Â·0,~C Clt â€¢ An elevation benchmark needs to be established on the site by a licensed surveyor and shown on the plans. What is the elevation ofthis benchmark? 89 ' /0 â€¢ If the garage is located within 10 feet of the roadway or sidewalk, provide spot elevation On the on the roadway or sidewalk. Is a spot elevation shown? 'Yes' 'No' ~ â€¢ Provide the equation comparing site (surveyed) elevation to structure/ architectural plan elevation Ci e 100' first floor elev = 7962,50'): Sor-ve.j k., 4. 1 9 3 Â· 5 ' 2 /0o x,drol~ .1.2 iÂ·-lue<l PART B: To be completed by a licensed surveyor or an individual prequalified by the Cir>, prior to first Foundation Inspection: â€¢ Do field measured buildinyg ties to property match building ties shown on the plan (circle one): r ~ 'NO, Ad)Â«.C\- 40Â·4414420n/642*wal/5 rn*,40 In 5.1-t~A h Veled,42 4 -abied-c~t-- â€¢ Surveyor needs to confirm that one spot on the top of the foundation wall is at the same elevation b. 1 4 shown on the approved building plans. What is the field measured elevation of top of foundation wall relative to the site bench mark? 32.-75 -3 - oiScelÂ«ADÂ·Â·t 4.0 Surviy/ov, 1 8.r/1 According to the building plans, what was the design elevation for the same place on the 423 foundation wall: 91,35 accl/\ = 52,73 5 vrwl-7/6.1 1 -9 El 44 a rm 61 â€¢ Was the elevation of the building adjusted in field? (circle one) ' Yes' 8 -32 â€¢ If yes, why? u.495) The undersigned qualified individual certifies that the information in Part B is accurate, Signature: -9-41-- 3 f,6 0 6 Printed Name: grfr/&/ 0202< LO Company: ~ 0 N\L C:\Documents and Settings\denised\My Documents\email\attach\line grade verification form.doc Exhibt Map Doerr-Hosier Center Spot Elevations ~* 118.55 survey Roof Spot Elevations on~ Aluminum framing ~ --41 f Pyramid Peak Spot Elevotions on Spot Elevations Wood framing <118.55 *118.55 *118~5 on Finish Floor )< 116.43 Main Level & 4 x 51.40 X 8340 1 2/ j - Spot Elevations 9 on Finish Floor k Main Level FE 1 l 1/ . Note: Elevation Datum: 83.5 survey = 100.0 architectual 83.5 survey = 7843.72 USGS elev. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown hereon are relative to the survey datum. 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Exhi bi t 1 1 8 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8 1 601 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Map :HMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN. COLORADO (970) 925-6727 , ENGINÂ£ERS I.U.VE'ORS CRESTED BUNE. CO (970) 349-5355 Job No. 96057F_joate: 7Aug06 | Omm by: sah | FEN Spot Elev Exi NO# Exhibt Map Doerr-Hosier Center Spot Elevations 4- 1 ~ X 118.55 jurvey p:zk~ Roof Spot E/evations on// ~ Spot Elevations on Aluminum framing fl 8/rumid Peak Spot Elevations Wood framing x 118.53 X 118.55 * 118~5 on Finish Floor X 1 16.43 Main Level X 53.40 X 83.40 ~--~~~~~~=b C Spot Elevations ** on Finish Floor k Main Level 1% = Note: Elevation Datum: 83.5 survey = 100.0 architectual 83.5 survey = 7843.72 USGS elev. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown hereon are relative to the survey datum. 6 SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. Exhi bi t 1 1 8 W. 6TH STREET, SUITE 200 GLINWOOD SPRINGS. COLORADO 8 1 60 (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Map :HMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 ENGINEEAS SUIVE'ORS CH,beru BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 job No. 96057F_~Dato: 740906 ~Drown by: soh ~A: Spot Elev Ext to , ' 390 16 - i.'a 'J 4 141.3-. 4 r/:er =. Â¥ 4 Al.% I From: Jim Curtis <jcurtis@sopris.neb AUG 1 1 2006 Subject: Apen Institute Doerr-Hosier Center SPA Agreement & Plats Date: August 11, 2006 8:38:06 AM MDT Ad.PEN B' '1! r.14,0 ric'y~4 r.â€¢-, r, - To: Todd Grange <toddg@ci.aspen.co.us> 9-4.1 - v.trAX IMCHI It was a pleasure to meet you yesterday & thanks for coming out. Enclosed are SPA Agreement & Plat. The original 1992 SPAAgreement is about 100 pages & doesn't provide any specific info. on the current height issue. I will be happy to provide you a copy of the 1992 SPA Agreement if you would like, but I didn't want to just flood you with paper. I will be happy to take the Pitkin Green/ Willoughby Way neighbor on a site visit or just give them a call & update them. Whatever, the person may wish to do. After you & Stephen review the situation please keep me posted. As I stated yesterday, the Institute feels the higher parapet around the mech. equipment is the best solution both for itself & the neighbors. Please give a call on any questions or additional follow-up you would like from me. 'Â· Thanks, Jim Curtis 920-1395 ~b '33 Exhibt Map Doerr-Hosier Center Spot Elevations 6% (,9 o4 f 09 IL 574 - 1/G.5 â‚¬ 810 6 ' , 4 ~ X 1 18.55 survey f 11Â· 0 2 8*Â· G Grt44 Roof Spot Elevations onN Aluminum framing 1 3< 2 540 -ILL.4- Spot Elevations 60 J)Vood framing Pyromid Peak ciput Elevations on < 118.55 ~ 118.55 x 11*7 gpon Amkh /70077.-3 \_...u:s(116.43 6 - Main Level \49 4 X 83 40 x 83Â·40 L-J-===T 2,9 ~-~ Spot Elevations 9* on Finish Floor k Main Level l._~ f tpAÂ· 83.0 1 94 8'6 - 84.0 -B . <92 4\-, Ei,%07 5-/ Pig, Note: Elevation Datum: 83.5 survey = 100.0 architectual 83.5 survey = 7843.72 USGS elev. Unless otherwise noted elevations shown hereon are relative to the survey dotum. ~SCHMUESER GORDON MEYER, INC. 6 118 W. STH STREET, SUITE 200 Exhi bi t GLENWOOD SPRINGS, COLORADO 8160| (970) 945-1004 FAX (970) 945-5948 Map :CHMUESER I GORDON I MEYER ASPEN, COLORADO (970) 925-6727 CRESTED BUTTE, CO (970) 349-5355 Job No. 96057F_~Dote: 7Aug06 ~Drown by: sah ~ Fue: Spot Dev Exl ENGINEERS Su/VE.0 /5 Jessica Garrow From: Jim Curtis [icurtis@sopris.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 8:29 AM To: Jessica Garrow Subject: Aspen Institute Doerr-Hosier Mechanical Equipment Both pieces of equipment are air handling units. The bigger piece is 17'-10" length x 4'-811 width x 5'-3" height & sits on an 1'-0" high sound isolation platform for total height of approx. 6'-3". The equipment is approx. 10" higher than "standard" due to its better sound insulation specs. & being geothermal compatible & the 1' -0" sound isolation platform was recommended by the acoustical engineer. Both the type of equipment & the sound isolation platform were recommended by the geothermal system mechanical engineer & the acoustical engineer jointly once the Institute decided to go for LEEDS Certification in Nov., 2005. The gray zinc metal panels come in 1'-3" widths. An increased of two horizontal bands of panels are being proposed for 2'-6" variance. The SPA drawings were conceptually based on 4 horizontal bands of zinc panels & now 6 horizontal bands of zinc panels are being proposed. Please email or call on any questions. Thanks. 1 I I - From: Jim Curtis <jcurtis@sopris.neb Subject: Doerr-Hosier Center Information Date: September 15, 2006 10:08:12 AM MDT To: Jessica Garrow <jessicag@ci.aspen.co.us> .' .1/ . ~ " ~~~ T: As requested, 10 additional copies. I will follow-up with other info. you requested. Need to make couple phone calls & people have been out. Thanks, Jim Curtis ATTACHMENT 2 -LAND USE APPLICATION APPLICANT: 1,1 1 49, Name: Atil,triblpt. 'kÂ·hopvÂ·j tÂ¥'41* 4.AAW i*) Location: , UP -20/U, (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 4 27730 ' P ' 11290 REPRESENTATIVE: A \ Name: lyl/10.,~ftle Address: 4*94Â·Uwl tw Phone #: 5 769- 120- ty>rp PROJECT: 4 1 Name: 12)2Â·rr~ ti><7(â‚¬r (4. Address: 0 *~ FktÂ·Â© 16:>00 Phone # Â°10 Â·- *) - ~93 TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): Conditional Use U Conceptual PUD U Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) U Final Historic Development Design Review Appeal U Conceptual SPA U Minor Historic Devt. GMQS Allotment U Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) E] Historic Demolition GMQS Exemption E Subdivision D Historic Designation ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes El Small Lodge Conversioni Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Expansion Mountain View Plane E Lot Split ~ Temporary Use [2~'' Other: i E Lot Line Adjustment U Text/Map Amendment EXISTING CONDÂ¥rIONS; (description of exiping buildings, uses, Iyevious appro~Ns, c / /kÂ»fou~*P 4 6-~rievre 4 05*v*-1 ~+1ll idllÂ·~vn ( 414~ ~2%-41~- ttel-* Coyle /4 Fl*obeA % 8 #1 04- 0(30,26> p - 6.t,00- iN \AlA 0 -,7, PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modififatio , etÂ© 1 1 1' 2 ofA \ArwuvÂ© 64Â»t -R bw>~41 Â¢114 ff+0~:#2 16 nicle tat,15:f YKEY.UWN,Al 210' fvy*nt *tz/A*rettle FW*kSÂ· Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ U Pre-Application Conference Summary 2 Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement E Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form U Response to Attachment #45 Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards All plaIls that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. mumuum ATTACHMENT 3 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM Project: 14<4#4 8*A, Applicant: 11* Apperl .iv r LKA 1 V jA.L.. 11 4/ Location: 0 + Ainde<Â£Â© Pk~p < 1Â¥46(200 49~\OF*/) Zone District: 0 VA , 15 PÂ»fl l (L..0.- Lot Size: 90 #0\ Lot Area: (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: \D h Number ofresidential units: Existing: Proposed: \Aka Number ofbedrooms: Existing: Proposed: V{~21 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): Â¥~1 DIMENSIONS: iA 1101 r 1UUI /11 5,1. L.A.LJ Lt/LE. Allovvable: 1 / K,Fl./0 C.U . V I ' 1 Principal bldg. height: Existing: Allowable: Proposed: 1APAA Access. bldg. height: Existing.- Allowable: Proposed: 9 ~4 On-Site parking: Existing: Required: Proposed: OYA VEÂ¥1 % Site coverage: Existing: Required: Proposed: *FA PE,1 % Open Space: Existing: Required: proposed,Â· 5 fA Ph,+'7 Front Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: ATAP\(,M Rear Setback: Existing: Required: proposed: OFA PEÂ·vl Combined F/R: Existing: Required: proposed: *6Wk flun Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 9-k 14Â¥\ Side Setback: Existing: Required: Proposed: 6?AP*Â¥1 Combined Sides: Existing: Required: Proposed: ORA A*/1 Distance Between Existing Required: Proposed:APAP&M Buildings Existing non-conformities orteni:roachments: 5FA F/Cl ~70:Pu~{1 -- ~O \All,ltivED ttfuÂ»01' ~leEO Variatiqns qequested 1 / d 46) nicÂ» 17Â»40.06 *AMOWEe k k)41Â«, 12>\r2~~43tl#Â£2 11124 (/16VKE,01 1 U771 Py?01Â« - 40 01~{fittt 1 . CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Agreement for Pavment of Citv of Aspen Development Application Fees~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and 1150*fbvi *1*04*~ 6-r'-7 + <7 1 n ~819Â¥~0â‚¬pJ O (hereinafter .APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: API?UCANTIhaysubmitted-Ito CILY an applicgti (hereinafter, THE PROJEET) 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000) establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a detennination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because o f the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties that APPLICANT make payment o f an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to .APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following their hearings and/or approvals. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty ofrecovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. 5. There fore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the arnount of $ which is for hours of Community Development staff time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate o f $220.00 per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension o f processing, and in no case will building permits be issued until all costs associated with case processing have been paid. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT * Ae 144rÂ· By: By: LM 0.-1197 1.)49*940 Chris Bendon Community Development Director Date: \ 1Â» Mailing Address: * #41Â» Aa ke / A Blbi I g:\support\forms\agrpayas.doc 1/10/01 4 1-I' Â· ..7 13 - 667 I' 70 Property, subject to rea\01'able regul:ilions as may, from time to time, 11 established by:he owners thereof in order to protect their properly, :1.4 Licil :1: the academic privacy a:id screnity of the c:impus. ih pregrain, and thu h,Â·,1|th and safety of otlier users and vivitors. i 14) MA.\ Parking Lot. The N!,\A parking lot %11:ill be plowed ,.:id kÂ·.Â·i,i c:ear 0,1- srow during all wintertime performances or ftinctions at M.,\A facilitic,. III. MISC!Â·-/.!-311-Plf . A. PI-.RIODIC PROJECT RE.r.'TRW>; Id the extent practical and nelÂ·a..,tly, evel> 17 inonths ftillowing [Ile (late her':01 unlil 6 the construction of ail components of the Prc.ject is complete, thiÂ· Consortium dulll, if requested thereby. nicer with the City Planning Office for the purpofe of iii funm.ht the Planning Office as to the progress in developing the Project purst:ant to the terms hereof. 0/./.'llip It' the Planning Office deenis it necessary. the tioining Office will report to the AÂ·:pen Planning ?nd Zoning Commission on the otitconic of one or more of these meetings. Ilie Consortium and the City recogni70 tliat these meetings. when decnied necessan, are - for purposes of providing progress reports and developing mlitually accept:ible solutions 1/n to anv problems that mav bc encountered during construction. B. NON-COMM.MNCH AND RHONEST FOR ANTENDMENTS OR ENTENSIONS ,(~ . in the event that the City determines that an individual member of the Consortium is not ~ acting in sutstantic! compliance with the terms of this Agreement and/or cne or more of the Construction Schedules submitted to the Citv Engineering Department in accordance herewith (a "Non-Complying Menlher"), the City Council may issue and sent iii)orl tile ~ Non-Complying Member a written order spee;fyi,ig the alleged non-compliance and i requiring the Non-Complying Member to reniedy the same within such reasonable time as the City Council may determine. Within twenty days of the receipt of such order, the Non-Complying Member may file with the City Council either a notice advising the City P Council that it is in complionce or a written petition requesting a hearing to determine any one or both of the follow.ng matters: ' (a) ) Whether the alleged non-compliance exists or did exist. or *) 1 Whether a var iance, extension or time or amendment to this Agrecnient should be granted with respect to any such non-compliance whicli is determined to exist. - 1 4 4340937 2':'7 -1-3 r. cÂ·.2 Â·140,-1.00 1:4 667 -'0 731 F.Â· 2 0 J . "THE ASPEN MEADOWS" SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA 1 1Â£ .. DEVELOPMENT & SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT . 1 oPt* - 4 . .-11 , 0, i L, Â· li 1 (>- .-I ~ MAR 1 : 1994 THEODORE K GUYASSOCIATES, P. 1/I'llile...i:::6- 4 Â¥ 1, 667 771 U..un me receipt of such petition. the City Council >1:all promptly schedule a hearing to consider th. matters set forth in ike cease and desist order and in tile petition. The hearing sh:.11 be convened and conducted pursuant to the procedures normally e<tablished by the City Council for other hearings or pursuant to such 0(her procedures, formal or informal. upon which the City and the Non-Complying Member shall agree. If the City ( Council determines by tile evidence that a non-compliance exists which has not been remedied, it may i.bsue such orders as may be appropriate; pruvided, however. no order tirminating any approval granted herein shall be issued wihÂ·.: -' finding of tile City Council that e.dence waÂ·rents such action and affording the Non-Complying Member a reasonable time. not less than thirty days, to remedy such non-compliance. A final determination of non-compliance which has not been remedied or for uitic!1 no variance haN be'en granted may. at the option of the Cit> Council. and â€žpoll uÂ·ritten notice to the Non-Cor.i:liÂ·.ins McÂ·rher, termin:te any of the approvals conmined herein which are - ri.Â·:isenably related to the requirement:'0 uith which there has been fitch establisheci tion- 0 c,unniiance: however. wider no circumftances will a faill.re to comply oIl the part of the ~2 Non-Complying Meinber in respect of ary obligotions that :v.tend Iliat Component of l,lie Pro,ect for which it is responsible as outlined above. affer! the approvals for any of the remaining components of thÂ·.1 Project. The City Council may grant such variances, , exlensions of time or r., 4,id:-lents to thi., Agreement as it may deem appropriate wilder 0 4 A. circumstarces as an alternative dispesition of any finding of nori-compliance. 1 D Ir. addition to the foregoing, the Consortium or its succes.sorr or as:,igns, or any member thereof may, on its or their own initiative, petition tne City Council for a variance, an Â¥ < imeridment to this Agreement. or ar. exten:,ion of elle or more :11- th: time fleriods ~ ~|~ required for pcÂ· formance hereunder, m othenvise. The City Council mav grant such . vari:inces. amendments to thts Agreement, or extensions of time 2% it may deem appropriate under the circumstances: provided in al! events thal the City Council shall ' Â£ not Linreasonably refuse to extend the time periods for performance indicated in one or irore of the Construction Schedules it- tile affected mer,:ber of tile Consortium 0 1 i ~ beyond the control of such member, despite good faith efforts on its part to perform in denionstrates that Ilic reasons for the delity(s) which necessitate such extension(s) are a timely manner. Notwithstanding anything in this Section B to tile contrary, the '-iregoing concerning non-compliance and requests for amendments or extensions shall not :tpply in connection uÂ·ith any matter with respect to wMch the Aspen Ci:v Charter o. :he Municipal Code has invested original jurisdiction in other boards, such as the Board of Appeals arM Examiners. With respect to sitch matters the niles of practice and f procedure established for and/or by such boards shÂ·21, in the first instance, apply. 1 Noncompliance with onc or more of the Construction Schedules set forth above due to difficulties with func raising or other occurrences outside of the control of the no:i-profit mcm,vers of Che Consoilium shall be examined in :ny non-compliance hearing before the City Council and can be a basis for granting a variance from an extension of any o f such bcked!]:25. 1 37 - - 1 1-1 /11/1-11 - Vilil_ /1/114#11/1//IN ~ 506235 Page: 1 of 6 01/21/2005 10:05 SILVIA DRI:S PITKIN COUNTY CO R 31.00 0 0.00 ORDINANCE N0.45 (SERIES OF 2004) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA) AND AN AMENDMENT THE ASPEN INSTITUTE'S GMQS EXEMPTION FOR AN ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITY TO ALLOW FOR A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED LODGE BUILDING TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS A CONFERENCE AND MEETING HALL, 845 MEADOWS ROAD, LOT lA OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS SUBDIVISION/SPA, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel No. 2735-121-29-008 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from The Aspen Institute ("Applicant") requesting an amendment to the Aspen Meadows Specially PIanned Area (SPA) and an amendment to the Aspen Institute's GMQS exemption for an Essential Public Facility to allow for the construction of a Conference and Meeting Hall on Lot 1A, of the Aspen Meadows Subdivision/SPA; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Institute has provided written consent to apply for a SPA Amendment from the Music Associates of Aspen and the Aspen Center for Physics per the requirements for an amendment to the Aspen Meadows SPA; and, -- WHEREAS, City Council Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1991, zoned the subject 1 L / property to Academic with a SPA Overlay and approved the final SPA development plan subj ect to this amendment; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 26.440 of the Land Use Code, City Council may approve an amendment to a Specially Planned Area during a duly noticed public hearing after considering a recommendation from the Planning and Zoning Commission made at a duly noticed public hearing, and after considering comments from the general public, .a recommendation from the Community Development Director, and recommendations from relevant referral agencies; and, WHEREAS, the Fire Marshal, Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the City Water Department, City Engineering, City Streets Department, and the Community Development Department reviewed the proposal and recommended approval; and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on November 16, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a five to zero (5-0) vote, that City Council approve an SPA amendment to the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area (SPA) and an amendment to the Aspen Institute's GMQS exemption for an essential public facility to allow for the construction of a Conference and Meeting Hall in the place o f the unbuilt lodge structure on Lot 1A, o f the Aspen Meadows Subdivision/SPA; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, 1 1 111111Il lili- 1-1 1 1- -lilli 11111111 lili 04/18/2005 10:16$ 509066 Page: 4 of 9 SILVIA LUS PIT: IN COLNTÂ¥ CO R 46,00 0 0.00 ' 111 111111 -111111 lilli 111 lili 111 lilli 111 lili Page: 2 of 6 506235 01/21/2005 10:05 5.Lk.-A DAVIS Pi7KIN COUNTY CO R 31.00 D 0.00 WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for the promotion ofpublic health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: Section 1 That City Council hereby approves an SPA amendment for the Aspen Meadows Specially Planned Area (SPA) and an amendment to the Aspen Institute's GMQS Exemption for an essential public facility to allow for the construction of a Conference and Meeting Hall on Lot lA ofthe Aspen Meadows Subdivision/SPA, with the following conditions: 1. A amended SPA agreement representing the changes to the Aspen Meadows Subdivision/SPA discussed herein shall be recorded at the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 180 days of the final approval by City Council . 2. An amended SPA Plan shall be recorded in the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's Office within 180 days of the final approval by City Council shall include the following: a. A final plat meeting the requirements of the City Engineer and Â¢44 showing: easements, encroachment agreements and licenses (with the reception numbers) for physical improvements, and location of utility pedestals. b. An illustrative site plan of the project showing the proposed improvements, landscaping, parking, and the dimensional requirements as approved. c. A drawing representing the project's architectural character. 3. The dimensional requirements approved for the Conference and meeting Hall are as follows: . *Idii ~'dhi.,~litliPY'29ZM'~,~~-1 i*Y4f~ Per Final SPA Plans i'T.ra~11 'AcLA'Kr'(88-*111 ~14~~|AW|il ' Per Final SPA Plans &1110-M' *blt(*Ve#,dal'kFAN*10 11,917 SF 'Kk'~R?'lit'1!11111~711'4(lil**,Ilf,i KIÂ®Ijll'Â£'It'I~likt'~ Per the Meadows SPA approved 1111!11111.161'RIN''IN#m*0ll.I~wâ€¢,~'14+11~~ pursuant to Ordinance No. 14, Series of 1991 509066 lili.-1--' -111Ill -lili -lilli-Ilifillill lill'lll 04/18/2005 10: le Page: 5 of 9 SILVIA [ .VIS PITKIN COLN1 Y CO R 46.00 D 0.00 2 1!- 11 li li ll I ill- - 11 illi 111 lilli Iti ll -1 506235 Page: 3 of 6 01/21/2005 10:05 SILVIA DAVIS Fil-N COLNIY CO R 31.00 0 0.00 4. The building permit application shall include: a. A copy of the final Ordinance and recorded P&Z Resolution, as well as the Final HPC Resolution. b. The conditions of approval printed on the cover page of the building permit set. c. A completed tap permit for service with the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District. d. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan submitted for stream margin protection. The detailed plan shall identify; Location of silt fencing and erosion control along the hillside. The City can provide specifications if needed: minimum requirements include a silt fence and straw bales placed in a manner preventing erosion and protect the river from residual run-off. e. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan submitted for Construction staging. This plan shall detail how the construction will take place with staging, storage of materials and locations of vehicles so that trees remaining on site will not be impacted and remain protected, f. Building permit plans shall include a detailed plan submitted for Tree Protection. Tree protection fences must be in place and inspected by i the city forester or his/her designee (920-5120) before any construction activities are to commence. No excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed.within the drip line of any tree on site. There should be a location and standard for this fencing denoted on 1lle plan. g. Proposed art wall will need to be identified on site plans and constructed in a manner that impacts the least amount of existing vegetation. Construction plan for wall shall include tree removals and protection. h. All new plantings will need to be irrigated and landscape plan reviewed by Parks Department i. A restoration plan should be developed for the disturbed areas around the terrace and patio. j. A drainage plan, including an erosion control plan, prepared by a Colorado licensed Civil Engineer, which maintains sediment and debris on-site during and after construction. If a ground recharge 509066 ill lilli ll- 11- 111 lili Ill lilli 11111 lili Illi Page: 6 of 9 3 04/18/2005 10: 161 SILXIA DAVIS PITKIN -CJNTY CO R 46.00 0 0.00 M 3 m RE1 01/21/2005 10Â·05 506235 Page 4 of E .LVIA DAVIS PI-KIN C.LNTY CO R 31.00 D 0.00 system is required, a soil percolation report will be required to correctly size the facility. A 2-year storm frequency should be used in designing any drainage improvements. k. A construction management plan pursuant to the requirements specified in Condition No. 9 included herein. 1. A fugitive dust control plan to be reviewed and approved by the Environmental Health Department, as detailed in Condition No. 4 included herein. 5. Throughout the structure, the Applicant shall install a fire alarm system meeting the requirements o f the Fire Marshal. The Applicant shall also install a fire sprinkler system that meets the requirements o f the Fire Marshal. 6. Prior to issuance o f a building permit: a. The primary contractor shall submit a letter to the Community Development Director stating that all conditions of approval have been read and understood. b. All tap fees, impacts fees, and building permit fees shall be paid, If an alternative agreement to delay payment of the Water Tap and/or Parks C 3 Impact fee is finalized, those fees shall be payable according to the agreement. 7. The Applicant shall submit to the Environmental Health Department a fugitive dust control plan which includes, but is not limited to fencing, watering of disturbed areas, continual cleaning of adjacent paved roads to remove mud a, that has been carried out, or other measures necessary to prevent windblown SER dust from crossing the property line or causing a nuisance. This shall be Se rea required with the submittal for building permits. Â£22* 8. The Applicant shall comply with the City of Aspen Water System Standards, 9 with Title 25, and with applicable standards of Title 8 (Water Conservation W and Plumbing Advisory Code) of the Aspen Municipal Code, as required by the City o f Aspen Water Department. 9. The Applicant shall comply with the Aspen Sanitation District's rules and regulations. No clear water connections (roof, foundation, perimeter drains) ..---tz to sanitary sewer lines shall be allowed, All improvements below grade shall 2 8 require the use of a pumping station. 10. The Applicant shall abide by all noise ordinances. Construction activity is limited to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m on Monday thru Saturday. 4 10Â·18 509066 S_LV_'A DAÂ£.6 ki -KiN H Ilit-- li I ill i li lit lilli liti il i 506235 Page: 5 of 6 01/21/2005 10:05 S:LFIA DAVIS FITKIN Cl-'If CO R 31,00 D 0.00 11. There will be no construction material or dumpsters stored on the public rights-of-way unless a temporary encroachment license is granted by the City Engineer. In addition, the Applicant shall submit a full set of construction management plans that are consistent with the City Construction Management Plan Guidelines at the time of building permit submittal. 12. The Applicant shall submit a food service plan for review by the Environmental Health Department and obtain a food service license if required, prior to serving food from the catering kitchen. If determined to be necessary by the Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District, the Applicant shall install an oil and grease interceptor in the catering kitchen. 13. All exterior lighting shall meet the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting, as may be amended from time to time. 14. The applicant has agreed to meet with representatives of the Pitkin Green Homeowner's Association to discuss screening measures for the new building. Section 2: That the 1,500 undeveloped square feet remaining from the Conference and Meeting Hall (given it's slightly smaller dimensions than the previously approved lodge structure) be reserved for future expansion of the Health Club located on the same campuf subject to a ': k 41 Substantial SPA Amendment. Section 3: All material representations and commitments made by the applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 5: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. 509066 04/18/2005 10: 18 Page: 8 of 9 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 46.00 D 0.00 5 .. 1 lili 111[ 111 li -Ii -Ilill lili 111'll 1 Page: 6 of 6 506235 01/21/2005 10:05 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN .2_ TY CO R 31.00 D 0.00 Section 6: 1 A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 13th day of December, 2004, at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen Colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice o f the same was published in a newspaper o f general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City Council of the City ofAspen on the 22nd day of November, 2004. 412.. f j.,6'ftliti.t:4.Â« . ~~'Â· - Kathryn- 2'6 oth, City Clerk Helen K. Klanderud, Mayor FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this ld) day of~2004. if 43, 4 }WirJ â€ž - 1/iniwel.- J; 1Â®~ Ke*h; City Clerk 2 47,8.A Ao .4.,v Approved as to form: /7 l41J Ataibb:> 61Â«74Â£0 rOy 509066 a of 9 Page: + 1 lumullium jilit Immi \Imillimiall lut 04/18/2005 10:le SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CO R 46.00 0 0.00 6 I ... 374793 3-762 P-811 09/30/94 10:19A PG 1 OF 28 REZ DCC NL SILVIiA DA4IS PITKIN COUNTY C-ERM 8 RECORDER 140.00 ------- ORDINANCE NO. 14 (Series 1991) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO, GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE ASPEN MEADOWS SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA (SPA) FINAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN, SUBDIVISION APPROVAL, REZONING AND ZONING MAP AMENDMENTS, RESIDENTIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOT- MENT, EXCESS GROWTH MANAGEMENT ALLOTMENT, GROWTH MANAGEMENT EXEMPTION FOR ESSENTIAL PUBLIC FACILITIES, CONDOMINIUMIZATION, AND VESTING OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS. WHEREAS, that real property commonly known and referred to as the "Aspen Meadows" has previously been designated a specially planned area (SPA) on the City of Aspen Official Zone District Map; and WHEREAS, a master plan for the Aspen Meadows was adopted as a component of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan in September, 1990; and - WHEREAS, the City has received a comprehensive development plan for the Aspen Meadows known as the Aspen Meadows Final Specially Planned Area (SPA) Development Plan Submission (hereinafter the "Plan") ; and WHEREAS, on December 20, 1990, after review and approval and upon recommendation of the Planning Department and the Aspen - Planning and Zoning Commission, the Plan received conceptual approval, subject to conditions, by the City Council pursuant to the procedure set forth at Section 24-6-205(A)(8)(b) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, Savanah Limited Partnership, in conjunction with the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies (the "Institute"), the ~ Music Associates of Aspen ("MAA") , and the Aspen Center for 4- 374793 3-762 P-812 09/30/94 13:19@ 28 2 OF 28 . Physics ("Physics"), hereinafter jointly known as the "Developer", submitted an application for a residential Growth Management Quota System allotment as a component of the Plan on February 15, 1991; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 1991, the Developer submitted to the Planning Department a proposed final SPA development plan for the Aspen Meadows incorporating requests for subdivision approval, text amendments to the municipal land use code, requests for rezoning and zoning map amendments, growth management exemption for essential public,facilities, conditional use approvals for attached affordable housing units, and special review approval for parking in an academic (A) zone district; and WHEREAS, the Developer's proposed final SPA development plan has been subjected to review and comments by the Engineering, Water, Parks, and Environmental Health Departments for the City of Aspen, as well as review and comments by the Fire Marshal, Sanitation District and Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed the Developer'a development plan in accordance with those procedures set forth at Section 24-6-205(A)(8)(c) of the Municipal Code and did conduct public hearings thereon on April 2, 9 and 16, 1991; and WHEREAS, upon review and consideration of the Plan, agency ~~, and public comment thereon, the review undertaken and comments of 2 . 374793 8-762 D-813 09/30/94 10:19A PG 3 OF 28 - - the Plan as provided by the Historic Preservation Committee relevant to design, and those applicable standards as contained in Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, to wit, Division 8 of Article 7 (Specially Planned Area), Division 10 of Article 7 (Subdivision), Divisions 2,3 and 4 of Article 7 (Permitted, Conditional and Special Review Uses, respectively), Division 11 of Article 7 (Text Amendments and Zoning Map Amendments), and Article 8 (Growth Management Quota System), the Planning and Zoning Commission has recommended final approval of the Plan, subject to conditions, to the City Council; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the Growth Management Quota System the Planning and Zoning Commission evaluated and scored the residen- tial component of the Plan, consisting of fourteen (14) units, at 33.85 points, thus, meeting minimum development approval threshold and, additionally, awarded the Plan 1.93 bonus points as allowed under Section 24-8-106(E)(6) of the Municipal Code, thus, giving the Plan a total GMQS score of 35.78 points; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission further granted conditional use approvals for four affordable housing units associated with the residential component of the Plan and special review approval for parking in an academic (A) zone district; and WHEREAS, on April 16, 1991, the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion, after public hearing, incorporated its approvals, condi- tional approvals, and recommendations into Resolution No. 91-10 3 374793 2-762 4-814 09/30/94 10:19A DG 4 OF 28 and forwarded same to City Council in accordance with Section 24- 6-205(A)(8)(c) of the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the public interest would not be served by affording phased GMQS development allot- ments under the Plan and that an excess GMQS development allot- ment as permitted by Section 24-8-103(B) of the Municipal Code is desirable and warranted; and WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Plan under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered those recommenda- tions and approvals as granted by the Planning and Zoning Com- mission and the Historic Preservation Committee, and has taken and considered public comment at public hearing; and I WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the Plan meets or ' exceeds all applicable development standards and that approval of the Plan, with conditions, is consistent with the goals and elements of the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and the Aspen Meadows Master Plan; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for public health, safety and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: Section 1 Pursuant to Section 24-7-8048 of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified hereinafter, 4 374793 8-762 P-815 09/30/94 10: 19 A PG 5 OF 28 the city Council finds as follows in regard to the Plan's spe- cially planned area development component: 1. The Developer's final plan submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approv- al. 2. The Plan is compatible and enhances the mix of devel- opment in the immediate vicinity of the Aspen Meadows and the proposed land uses as approved hereinbelow are deemed to be appropriate and allowable in their under- lying zone districts as authorized by an SPA overlay. 3. The Plan incorporates and provides sufficient public facilities and roads for the requested development, and provides significant open space, trails and public amenities for the residents and users of the develop- ment. 4. The Aspen Meadows is generally suitable for the requested development in terms of topography and the Plan creatively employs land planning techniques to preserve view planes and avoid adverse environmental impacts. 5. The Plan will not require the expenditure of excessive public funds in order to provide public facilities for the development or its surrounding neighborhoods. 6. The Plan is' consistent with the Aspen Area Comprehen- sive Plan and the Aspen Meadows Master Plan. 7. The Plan demonstrates good and sufficient cause to remove the SPA designation for that portion of the Aspen Meadows property that is to be conveyed to the City and to adjust the current SPA boundary accord- ingly. Section 2 Pursuant to the findings as set forth in Section 1 above, the City Council grants final SPA development plan approval for the Plan subject to the following conditions: 1. A detailed construction timeline incorporating a specific construction schedule for the installation of 5 274793 B-762 P-816 09130/94 10:19A PG 6 OF 28 I - the new Meadows Road shall be submitted to and approved by the Planning and Public Works Departments prior to staff approval of the final plat. Upon completion of the new Meadows Road, all construction traffic associ- ated with the development shall use and be rerouted to the new Meadows Road. 2. The applicant shall provide 97 parking apaces at the West Meadows facilities pending construction of the West Meadows parking structure. 3. The Developer shall conduct a review and provide a written report of the development's traffic mitigation plan to the Planning Director on the anniversary date of the final passage of this Ordinance in years 1992, 1994, 1996, 1998 and 2000, and shall continue to con- duct and provide such reviews and reports every two (2) years thereafter unless deemed unnecessary by the City Council. Such report shall include, but not be limited to, traffic counts on Seventh Street, number of van trips pursuant to the development'a traffic mitigation plan, charter vehicle use, passenger counts and desti- nations arising from the use of the Aspen Meadows facilities. The review and report shall also incorpo- rate data and information from the Roaring Fork Transit Authority (RETA) illustrating its service to the Aspen Meadows facilities. The City will review the report and may require modification to the development's traffic mitigation program, including the addition of reasonable new mitigation measures. All modifications of the traffic mitigation plan shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission at a public hearing. 4. The shuttle van system as incorporated into the deval- opment's traffic mitigation plan shall be operated by that company or entity operating the lodge facility. 5. Delivery vehicles and delivery routes serving the restaurant facilities shall be limited to those hours of delivery and routes as delineated in the develop- ment's traffic mitigation plan, except when severe weather or circumstances beyond the control of the lodge/restaurant operator require a deviation there- from. The restaurant/lodge operator shall insure and enforce the delivery hours and routes by contractual obligation with its goods and services providers. 6. The thirteen foot (13') service access/emergency loop drive serving the chalets shall be constructed with an 6 374793 B-762 P-817 09/30/94 10:19A PG 7 OF 28 all weather surface adequate to support fire-fighting apparatus. Such access/emergency loop drive(s) shall be plowed, cleared and maintained to 13' widths at all times of the year and particularly during the winter months. 7. All buildings to be served and accessed from the 13' access/emergency loop drive shall have interior sprin- kling fire protection/suppression systems as approved by the Fire Marshal and such aystem(s) must be approved prior to the issuance of a building permit. 8. Specific fire hydrant locations for the development ahall be established and approved in cooperation with the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a building permit. 9. A detailed tree removal and replacement plan shall be submitted to and approved by the City Parks Department prior to staff approval of the final plat. Such plan shall indicate all trees to be moved or removed, their size, location, species, and time of planting, trans- planting, or removal. All tree replacement shall be on a one-to-one caliper inch basis with minimum size at 1 1/2" caliper. 10. The final plat shall depict all trails dedicated or conveyed to public use and all easements linking off- site trails to the development's trail system. The final plat shall particularly note (1) an easement for a trail link from the racetrack, and (2) the trail between the tennis townhouses and restaurant as depict- ed on the Master Plan. Exact trail locations must be approved by the Planning Director giving priority to those alignments which minimize damage or disruption to existing vegetation and landscape and which subordinate grade considerations and, thus, minimize switchbacks, to the preservation of existing topography. As-built easements shall be executed and conveyed after trail construction. 11. There shall be no interconnection of non-treated water systems to potable water systems. 12. Pursuant to Section 23-53(g) of the Municipal Code, the Developer shall convey all rights, titles, easements and interests to the Si Johnson Ditch and water right, water wells and appurtenant water rights on the Aspen Meadows property to the City. The City shall, in 7 374792 B-762 A-818 09/30 /94 10:19@ F'G 8 OF 28 exchange, lease back to Developer, or its successor(s) in interest, raw water from those sources for irriga- tion use within the development in an amount equal to that amount of water reasonably necessary for the efficient irrigation of the lands historically irrigat- ed, not to exceed the amount of water conveyed to the City by the Developer. Developer shall pay to the City its pro rata share of operation, maintenance and repair costs, plus One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per year. The lease as noted above shall not subordinate the use of the water right to the emergency needs of the City for minimum stream flows, hydroelectric power, or municipal purposes. 13. The Developer shall install at its own cost a water distribution system for the development meeting no less than the minimum design, engineering, materials and construction standards of the City for domestic munici- pal and fire protection purposes and shall convey same to the City upon completion, inspection and acceptance by the City. Developer shall also convey to the City a perpetual twenty foot (20') as-built easement extending ten feet (10') from each side of the centerline of all newly constructed water lines, and a construction easement extending an additional five feet (5') on each side of the centerline, along with a similar twenty foot (20') easement and construction easement for the future installation of a connector main to the existing city water main in Black Birch Drive. 14. Drainage design for the development shall not inten- tionally direct run-off into irrigation ditches or ponds. 15. All residential units shall comply with fireplace regulations as contained in the Municipal Code and enforced by the Environmental Health Department. No building permits shall be issued for residential units absent compliance with fireplace regulations. All disputes concerning the application or interpretation of fireplace regulations to the development shall be subject to review and determination by the Clean Air Board. 16. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each component of the project, a drainage mitigation plan for that component for run-off during construction activity shall be submitted and approved by the City Engineer so as to insure against or minimize run-off into Castle Creek and the Roaring Fork River. 8 .. 374793 8-762 7-819 09/30/94 10:19 A PG 9 OF 28 - 17, Prior to the issuance of a building permit for each component of the project, a fugitive dust control plan for that component must be submitted to and approved by the Environmental Health Department and such State agencies as having jurisdiction over Game. 18. A fugitive dust plan must be submitted and approved by the Environmental Health Department for the MAA parking lot prior to issuance of a building permit for the MAA rehearsal facility. 19. All energy conservation and efficiency measures as represented by the Developer in its GMQS application regarding insulation, glazing, solar orientation, HVAC, and plumbing fixtures shall be incorporated into all residential units and the design(s) for same must be approved by the City prior to issuance of any building permit for residential construction. These measures shall be further incorporated into deed restrictions and/or covenants for all single family homes and condo- minium declarations. 20. Non-residential construction and facilities shall utilize state-of-the-art energy conservation and effi- 11- ciency measures as represented by the Developer. Accordingly, detailed plans submitted for building permits for the lodge structures and the MAA rehearsal hall must be accompanied by the energy information provided to staff in the Appropriate Technologies Associates' letter of May 3, 1991, and the MAA/Rehears- al Hall Energy Conservation Description document sub- mitted to Planning staff on May 20, 1991. The engi- neered thermal envelope calculation will be verified by the Building Department according to the Model Energy Code. 21. The Developer shall pay to the City an affordable housing mitigation impact fee for 16.69 low income employees associated with ten new residential units, seven on Lot 6 and three on Lot 5, in an amount to be calculated pursuant to those fee guidelines in effect at the time the fee is to be paid. The fee shall be paid prior to the issuance of a building permit for any residential construction and shall be paid in amounts reflecting and corresponding to the number of residen- tial unita sought to be permitted at any given time (1.66 per unit). 9 374793 B-762 P-820 09/30/94 10:19A PG 10 OF 28 - I - li- - 22. Developer shall construct replacement and/or additional fox dens in a manner and at locations to be selected in the field by the City, in consultation with the Direc- tor of the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies, prior to the issuance of any building permits for development under the Plan, or any other demolition or construction within the development area, to wit, the Aspen Meadows. 23. Revegetation of all areas developed pursuant to the Plan shall be implemented in accordance with those guidelines as set forth by Design Workshop in its letter of 3/21/91, which letter ia incorporated herein as if fully set forth. All revegetation shall be inspected and monitored by the City to ensure that revegetation efforts and the protection of same are successful. 24. New manicured lawn areas shall be minimized to the maximum extent possible, except in those areas adjacent to the Music Tent, and such areas must be depicted and approved on the final plat. 25. Prior to excavation, temporary construction barricades and or fencirig shall be erected within five feet of the building envelopes of the tennis townhomes and trustee townhomes to prevent damage from falling debris to the slope bordering same unleas unstable soils dictate alternative locations mutually agreed upon by the owner, the Building Department and the Planning Office. Prior to issuance of building permits for individual buildings, the locations of all fencing and barricades Department and the Planning Office. All fencing and shall be submitted to and approved by the Building barricades shall remain in place throughout the con- struction process. 26, Financial assurances in amounts and in forms acceptable to Developer and City shall be provided by Developer to ensure the satisfactory installation and completion of the new Meadows Road, all utility infrastructure, including water lines, the trail along old Meadows Road, and thg. parking facility. That portion of the above-referenced financial assurances reasonably found by the Public Works Director to be related to the work for which a permit is sought must be in place prior to issuance of that building permit. 10 374793 B-762 P-821 09130/94 10:194 PG 11 OF 28 27. The following language shall be included in the SPA/Subdivision Agreement: "Any SPA or Master Plan amendment or future development applications submitted by any non-profit user of the Meadows property (Lots 1, 2, and 3) shall be applied for jointly by all non- profit property owners. This shall supersede prior requirements requiring SPA submittal approval by all property owners. Similarly any SPA Amendment proposed to be submitted by any residential owner or association thereof shall require, in addition to the consent of the association of owners of the residential component involved, the approval of the resident non-profits of the SPA." 28. Public pedestrian access, excluding access to build- ings, will continue to be allowed at reasonable hours throughout the entire academic (A), open space (OS), and wildlife preservation (WP) zone district areas of the Aspen Meadows development, subject to reasonable regulations as established by the owners thereof in order to protect their property, as well as the academ- ic privacy and serenity of the campus, its programs and the health and safety of other users and visitors. 29. The MAA parking lot shall be plowed and kept clear of snow during all wintertime performances or functions at MAA facilities. 30. Pursuant to Section 24-7-804(D)(4) of the Municipal Code, the final plat, which shall, at a minimum, con- sist of final drawings depicting the site plan, land- scape plan, utility plan and building elevations, and a specially planned area (SPA) agreement, shall be re- corded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder and shall be binding upon the property owners subject to the development plan, their successors and assigns, and shall constitute the development regula- tiana for the property. Development of the property shall be limited to the uses, density, configuration, and all other elements and conditions set forth on the final development plan, and in this ordinance and the SPA agreement. Failure on the part of the Developer to record the final development plan, plat, and SPA agree- ment within a period of 180 days following the adoption date of this Ordinance shall render the development plan and plat in valid. If the 180 days lapse, recon- sideration of the final development plan, plat and SPA agreement by the Planning and Zoning Commission and 11 374793 B-762 P-822 09/30/94 10:19A PG 12 OF 28 City Council will be required before its acceptance and recording. Section 3 Pursuant to and by reason of the findings and conditions of approval as set forth above in Sections 1 and 2, specially planned area (SPA) designation for the portion of the Aspen Meadows property to be conveyed to the City is hereby removed and the City's Official Zone District Map shall be amended to reflect such removal. Section 4 Pursuant to Section 24-7-1004C of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified hereinafter, 1 the City Council finds as follows in regard to the Plan's subdi- vision development component: 1. The proposed subdivision is consistent with both the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and Aspen Mead- ows Master Plan and is, furthermore, consistent with the character of existing land uses in the adjoining areas. 2. The proposed subdivision will not adversely affect the future development of surrounding areas and will be in substantial compliance with all re- quirements of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code. 3. The proposed subdivision is compatible and suit- able with the topography of the area and will not present or create a threat to the health, safety or welfare of the residents or neighbors of the subdivigion. 4. The proposed subdivision does not create spatial patterns that cause inefficiencies, duplication or premature extension of public facilities or unnec- essary public costs. 12 374793 B-762 5-823 09/30/94 10:19A PG 13 OF 28 - 5. The proposed new Meadows Road has the primary function of providing access to abutting property and will not carry through traffic, thus, warranting its designation as "local street". Section 5 Pursuant to the findings as set forth in Section 4 above, the City Council grants final subdivision approval for the Plan subject to the following conditions: The new Meadows Road shall be dedicated as a pub- lic street from its intersection with Seventh Street and North Street to the south boundary of Lot 6. Right-of-way width, grades and intersection design shall be subject to inspection and approval by the City Engineer prior to staff approval of the final plat. 2. Irrevocable legal access to the new Meadows Road must be provided where necessary to all existing and future properties abutting that portion of the old Meadows Road that may be vacated and all ease- ments for euch access shall be depicted on the final plat. 3. All property exchanges between the Savanah Limited Partnership, the Institute, the MAA, and Physics shall be effectuated simultaneously with the re- cording of the final plat. 4. All sanitary sewer improvements as installed in the development area shall be inspected and ap- proved to the satisfaction of the Aspen Sanitation District. 5. Complete and detailed utility plans, i.e., alec- tric, gas, cable T.V., and telephone, shall be provided to and approved by the Planning Director and City Engineer at or prior to submission for recording of the final plat. Additionally, all utilities shall approve utility design and loca- tion prior to staff approval of the subdivision agreement and final plat. 13 374793 8-762 P-824 09/30/94 10:19A PG 14 OF 28 6. The final plat shall accurately reflect all under- ground utility installations, particularly those along roadways, trailways and cultivated landscap- ed areas. 7. Utility facility installatione shall be restricted to roadway, trailway and cultivated landscaped corridors wherever possible. If utility facility installations must occur outside of these areas, such alternate utility corridors shall be fenced or barricaded to the narroweet width possible so as to minimize vegetation disturbance or destruc- tion from construction activities and machinery. All utility location corridors shall be inspected and approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director prior to the issuance of any excavation permit. 8. Vegetation replacement necessitated by utility installation shall utilize the same plant species as the species of vegetation disturbed or damaged. 9. All ditches, swales, intermediary ponds and detention areas shall be subject to appropriate easements for access and maintenance purposes and be depicted on the final plat. 10. The Developer shall provide a digitized copy of the subdivision plat prior to recordation of the mylar copies. 11. Trench box construction methods shall be utilized for utility installations whenever possible so as to minimize site disturbance. 12. The Castle Creek sanitary trunkline shall be lined unless deemed otherwise by the Aspen Sanitation District. If sections of the trunkline must be replaced, such replacement locations shall be identified to the City Engineer and Planning De- partment and the least disruptive methods shall be identified and employed. 13. Detailed design drawings for the new Meadows Road and Seventh Street and Eighth Street intersections shall be provided to and approved by the City Engineer prior to staff approval of the final plat. All design drawings 14 374793 B-762 P-825 09/30/94 10:19A PG 15 OF 28 ---- shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado. 14. The speed limit for the new Meadows Road shall be reduced to a speed below thirty (30) miles per hour as determined by the City Engineer. 15. The existing old Meadows Road shall be converted to a pedestrian trial/bikeway with ownership thereto to remain in the City. 16. Pursuant to Section 24-7-1005E of the Municipal Code, the final subdivision plat and subdivision agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within 180 days following the adop- tion date of this Ordinance. Failure to record the final plat and subdivision agreement within the 180 day time period shall render the subdivision approvals granted herein invalid. If the 180 days lapse, recon- sideration of the subdivision and subdivision agreement by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council will be required before acceptance and recording. Section 6 Pursuant to Section 24-8-106 of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the Plan's residential Growth Management Quota System allotment component: 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission has forwarded to City Council a residential development total score of 35.78 for the residential component of the Plan, such score exceeding the minimum scoring threshold. 2. The residential development component of the Plan was the only development project submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for 1990 residen- tial GMQS allotments. 3. The GMQS residential scoring considered and reflected the waiver of the six-month minimum lease requirement as set forth in the applicable condominiumization regulations. 15 374793 8-762 P-826 09/30/94 10:]9A PG len OF 28 I -- i ---- 4. A multi-year or phased development allotment would not serve the best interests of the Plan or the general public. 5. Section 24-8-1038 of the Municipal Code permits the awarding of development allotments in excess of the maximum allotment level in any given year. 6. The Plan as presented by the Developer warrants an excess development allotment and the Planning Office has indicated excess development allotments are available. 7. No challenges to the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion's scoring or ranking of the Plan's residen- tial development component have been submitted as permitted by Section 24-8-106I of the Municipal Code. Section 7 Pursuant to the findings as set forth in Section 6 above and $ in accordance with Section 24-8-106J of the Municipal Code, the City Council awards and grants the Developer six (6) residential development allotments from the GMQS allotment pool for 1990, and eight (81 excess residential development allotments to be off-set in future years in accordance with Section 24-8-1033 of the Municipal Code. In accordance with Section 24-8-108(A)(1) of the Municipal Code, Developer, or its successor in interest, shall be eligible for exemption from the expiration of the GMQS allotments for residential Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 herein awarded upon proper demonstration that those conditions of final approval and the public improvements associated with Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 have been satisfactorily completed. 16 374793 B-762 P-827 09/30/94 10:19A PG 17 OF 28 -- - -i-- ------- Section 8 Pursuant to Section 24-8-104(C)(1)(b), as amended per ordinance No. 13, (Series of 1991), of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the Developerls request for Growth Management Quota System development exemption for essential public facilities: 1. The Institutels proposed development of new lodge units, expansion of the existing health club, expansion of the restaurant, and expansion of the tennis shop, including rest rooms, is essential for the revitalization of the Aspen Meadows prop- erty. 2. The MAA's proposed expansion of the Music Tent, the addition of a year-round rehearsal/performance hall, and expansion of the Music Tent gift shop, is essential for the revitalization of the Aspen Meadows property. 3. The programs and activities sponsored and or host- ed by the Institute and the MAA at the Aspen Meadows facilities have historically provided intellectual and cultural enrichment to the citi- zens of the City of Aspen without which the City would not have attained its present character and standing in the national and international commu- nity. Furthermore, the Aspen Meadows facilities, and those of the Institute and MAA in particular, have served and continue to serve important commu- nity needs and proposed expansions of same will only enhance their value and accessibility to the citizens of the City of Aspen and the general public. 4. The Inatitutels and MAA's proposed development involves essential public facilities, will enhance existing essential public facilities, and is not- for-profit in nature. 17 374793 B-762 P-828 09/30/94 10:19A PE 18 OF 28 ----- Section 9 Pursuant to Section 24-8-104(C)(1)(b), as amended per ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1991), of the Municipal Code, and the findings as set forth in Section 8 above, the City Council awards and grants Growth Management Quota System development exemptions from competition and affordable housing impact mitigation for the following Plan development on the basis that such development is for essential public facilities: 1. Fifty (50) new lodge units of 42,410 square feet, (Aspen Institute). 2. Health club expansion of 1,800 square feet, (Aspen Institute). 3. Restaurant expansion of 2,000 square feet, (Aspen Institute). 4. Tennis shop expansion, including rest rooms, of 980 square feet, (Aspen Institute). 5. Music Tent backstage expansion of 1,500 square feet, (MAA). 6. The new rehearsal/performance hall of 11,000 square feet, (MAA). 7. Music Tent gift shop expansion of 100 square feet, (MAA). Section 10 Pursuant to Section 24-7-1102 of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the zoning map amend- ments component of the Plan: 1. The proposed zoning amendments ae set forth in the Plan are not in conflict with the provisions of Chapter 24 of the Municipal Code, the Aspen Area 18 374793 3-762 P-829 09/30/94 10:19A PG 19 OF 28 - Comprehensive Plan or the Aspen Meadows Master Plan. 2. The proposed zoning amendments are compatible with surrounding zone districts and land uses. 3. The proposed zoning amendments will not adversely impact traffic generation or road safety when taken into consideration with the other aspects of the Plan. 4. The proposed zoning amendments will not adversely impact demand for public facilities or services nor adversely affect the environment. 5. The proposed zoning amendments will promote the public interest and character of the City of As- pen. Section 11 Pursuant to Sections 24-7-1102 and 24-7-1103, and Division 2 of Article 5 of Chapter 24, as amended per Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1991), of the Municipal Code, and the findings set forth in Section 10 above, the City Council does grant the following amendments to the Official Zone District Map and does designate the following zone districts for the development subject to the conditions as specified below: 1. R-MF (Residential Multi-Family) shall be applied to Lots 5 and 6 (townhomes). 2. R-15 (Moderate-Density Residential) shall be ap- plied to Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10 (single family lots). 3. WP (Wildlife Preservation) shall be applied to the 25 acres, more or less, of land conveyed to the city of Aspen (Lot 4)and to the racetrack area of the Aspen Meadows property as depicted in the final SPA development plan submittal. 19 374793 B-762 P-830 09/30/94 10:19A PG 20 OF 28 4. OS (Open Space) shall be applied to Anderson Park, the Marble Garden, and the Tent Meadow as depicted in the final SPA development plan submittal. 5. A (Academic) shall be applied to Lots 1, 2 and 3 within the Aspen Meadows owned by the Institute, MAA, and Physics, except where other zone dis- tricts have been designated as hereinabove provid- ed. 6. The zoning designations as specified in paragraphs 1 through 5 above are contingent upon the Develop- er providing precise survey boundaries of the zone districts prior to staff approval of the final plat. 7. Pending such time as the boundaries for the zone districts as described above are finalized and accepted, or no longer than six (6) months, which- ever period is shorter, no building permit shall be issued by the Chief Building Official for any development in the Aspen Meadows which would be prohibited by the zoning districts herein desig- nated and authorized. Section 12 Pursuant to Sections 24-7-8048 and D(2) of the Municipal Code, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the Developer' s requests fok variations from subdivision and subdlvi- sion improvement requirements, easement and utility requirements, design standards for streets and related improvements, and zone district dimensional and minimum lease requirements: 1. The proposed variations are compatible with exist- ing development and land uses in the area and surrounding neighborhoods and are not in conflict with the provisions or goals of the Aspen Meadows Master Plan. 2. The proposed variations will not adversely impact public facilities or public safety. 20 2747rS3 B-762 P-831 09/30/94 10:19A PG 21 OF 28 Section 13 Pursuant to the findings as set forth in Section 12 above and in accordance with Section 24-7-8040(2), as amended per ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1991), of the Municipal Code, the city Council grants the following variations from subdivision development standards and zone district dimensional and minimum lease requirements as set forth in the Plan: 1. Curbs, gutters and sidewalks need not be provided within the development. 2. Alleys, paved or unpaved, do not need to be pro- vided. 3. Traffic control signe shall be installed at the intersection of the new Meadows Road and Seventh and Eighth Streets, but no traffic signals need be provided. Speed zones shall be signed as deter- mined by the City Engineer. 4. If determined to be necessary by the City Engi- near, street lights need only be provided at the intereections of the new Meadows Road and Seventh and Eighth Streets. Ornamental street lights are desirable. 5. No street bridges need be provided. Culverts to accommodate irrigation ditches and drainage shall be installed. 6. Street right-of-way regarding new Meadows Road shall only be dedicated at lengths and widths as determined to be necessary by the City Engineer. 7. The minimum centerline curve radius for new Meadows Road may be reduced to 65 feet at and or near the intersection of Eighth Street, and right- of-way widths may be reduced to 40 feet. Maximum grade may be increased not to exceed 8%. All di- mensions shall be specified and confirmed on the final plat. 8. No street-end dedications need be provided. 21 e .. 374793 8-762 1-832 09 /30/94 10:19A Â©G 22 OF 28 9. Cul-de-sac dimensions for Meadows Road may be increased to a maximum length of 2,000 feet with a turnaround diameter at the administration building of approximately 50 feet. 10. The new road alignment for Meadows Road shall remain "Meadows Road" in name. 11. Street trees lining new Meadows Road shall consist of cottonwoods of 2 inch caliper spaced every 30 feet along the east boundary beginning at the intersection of Eighth Street and extending north to the tennis courts. 12. Fire lane and emergency vehicle access ease- ments may be reduced in width upon approval of the Fire Marshal. 13. Utility easement dimensional and location requirements on lots other than those associ- ates with the single family lots may be re- duced or modified upon the approval of the vided in the absence of actual utility in- City Engineer and easements need not be pro- stallations. All proposed utility easements should be reflected on the final plat. 14. Fire hydrants shall and need only be situated within 350 feet of all structures. 15. The six (6) month minimum lease requirement for condominium units as contained at Section 24-7-1007 (A) (1) (b) (1) of the Municipal Code ia waived as to the condominium units ag depicted in the Plan. 16. A dimensional height variation for the center portion of the Tennis Townhomes ia allowed for up to 3 feet. 17. A dimensional height variation for the north- ernmost Trustee House is allowed for up to 8 feet. 18. Minimum R-15 zone district lot size per dwelling is reduced to 12,000 square feet for Lots 7, 8, 9 and 10. 2 2 374793 3-762 D-833 09/30/94 10:19 A PG 23 OF 28 - - 19. Minimum R-15 zone district side yard setback requirements are reduced to zero (0) feet for the west side of Lot 7 and the east side of Lot 10. 20. Minimum RMF zone district front yard setback require- menta for accessory buildings may be reduced to zero (0) feet for Lots 5 and 6. 21. Minimum RMF zone district open space requirements are waived for Lots 5 and 6 in consideration of the open space otherwise provided in the SPA development plan. Section 14 Pursuant to Section 24-7-1007 B of the Municipal Code, the city Council finds as follows in regard to the Plants condo- miniumization component: 1. The 8 existing and 3 proposed Trustee Houses (Lot 5) and 7 proposed townhomes (Lot 6) to be condominiumized are not presently leased on a long term basis. 2. A variation in the six (6) month minimum lease requirement is warranted and has been authorized pursuant to Section 13 above. 3. The proposed condominiumization will not adversely impact the availability of afford- able housing. Section 15 Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 14 above, and in accordance with Section 24-7-1007 of the Municipal Code, the city Council grants and awards condominiumization approval for the Plan as follows, subject to the conditions as specified herein: 1. For eight (8) existing and three (3) proposed Trustees Houses (Lot 5). 23 .. 37H 793 B-762 P-834 09/30/96 10:19A PG 24 OF 28 - 2. For seven (7) proposed townhomes (Lot 6). 3. Condominiumization as awarded in this Section is contingent upon the payment of an afford- able housing impact fee of $64,240.00, which fee shall be paid to the City Finance Direc- tor prior to recordation of as-built condo- minium plate and declarations. Section 16 All material representations and commitments made by the Developer pursuant to the Plan approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, Historic Preservation Committee and or City Council, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific condi- tions. Section 17 The Official Zone District Map for the City of Aspen, Colorado, shall be and is hereby amended to reflect those zoning and rezonings actions ae set forth in Section 11 above and such amendments shall be promptly entered on the Official Map in accordance with Section 24-5-1033 of the Municipal Code. Section 18 Any development or proposed development in the Aspen Meadows not vested in accordance with law prior to the effective date of this Ordinance shall comply with the terms and provisions of the 24 1 . 374793 8-762 1-835 09/30/94 10,19 A PG 25 OF 28 zone districts and conditions of development adopted pursuant to this Ordinance. Section 19 Pursuant to Section 24-6-207 of the Municipal Code, City Council does hereby grant Developer vested rights in the Plan as follows: 1. The rights granted in the site specific de- velopment plan approved by this Ordinance shall remain vested for three (3) years from the date of final adoption specified below. However, any failure to abide by the terms and conditions attendant to this approval shall result in forfeiture of said vested rights. Failure to timely and properly re- cord all plate and agreements as specified herein and or in the Municipal Code shall also result in the forfeiture of vested rights. 2. The approvals as granted herein are subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. 3. Nothing in the approvals provided in this Ordinance shall exempt the site specific development plan from subsequent reviews and or approvals required by this Ordinance or the general rules, regulations or ordinances of the City provided that such reviews or ap- provals are not inconsistent with the approv- als granted and vested herein. 4. The establishment herein of a vested property right shall not preclude the application of ordinances or regulations which are general in nature and' are applicable to all property subject to land use regulation by the City of Aspen including, but not limited to, build- ing, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechani- cal codes. In this regard, as a condition of this site development approval, the Developer shall abide by any and all such building, fire, plumbing, electrical and mechanical . 25 374793 B-762 P-836 09/30/94 10:19A PG 26 OF 28 codes, unless an exemption therefrom is granted in writing. Section 20 The City Clerk shall cause notice of this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days following final adop- tion hereof. Such notice shall be given in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following-described property: The property shall be described in the notice and appended to said notice shall be the ordinance granting such approval. Section 21 The City Clerk is further directed to record a copy of this ordinance in a timely manner after its final adoption with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder. Section 22 This Ordinance shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. * 26 , 374793 3-762 7-837 09/30/94 10:19A PG 27 OF 28 Section 23 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 24 Public hearing(e) on the Ordinance shall be held on the LF_ day of //76:2~ , 1991, in the City Council Cham- bers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law by the City Council of the City of Aspen on the 019 day of /1 - LÂ»LE , 1991. William L. Stirling, Mayor e }~4Â£~Â»4, 4- 2*l-k_ Kathryn %6/KÂ®h, City Clerk COl mpLyÂ© ADOPTED, passed and approved this /2)*Bly of , 1991. U William L. Stirling, Mayor 27 TO h., i kilkg 1. AC.illy'It Koch, City Clerk cOLO A kt / 374793 B-762 P-838 09/30/94 10:19A PG 28 OF 28 28 WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed and considered the Development Proposal at its regular meetings of October 13 and October 27,2004, and as a referral agency recommended approval of the Development Proposal; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on the Development Proposal on November 16,2004, in accordance with Sections 26,440.080 and 26.470.120 of the Code, and reviewed and considered the Development Proposal in accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria of the Code, and recommended approval of the Development Proposal; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council conducted a public hearing on the Development Proposal on December 13,2004, in accordance with Sections 26.440.080 and 26,470.120 of the Code, and reviewed and considered the Development Proposal in ~ ,~ l; accordance with all applicable procedures and review criteria of the Code, and approved Â° 0 0 Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004) approving the Development Proposal, Â£3 NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that the SPA Agreement is hereby amended 0% to provide as follows: 1. Applicant shall abide by the provisions of Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004), incorporated herein and attached hereto. 2. Applicant shall record an Amended SPA Plat in accordance with Aspen City Council Ordinance No. 45 (Series of 2004). Said plat is recorded in Plat Book lA_ at Page 6 1 as Reception No. f3+6 471 in the O ffice of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado. 3. All other provisions of the SPA Agreement shall remain unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto set their hands and seals the day and date first above written. ATTEST: CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO a mun 545~on . .1 Kathfrn S.~bchÂ£/City Clerk PreteS K. Klinde#Ed,~{ay-O-r THE ASPEN INSTITUTE, INC., a Cidbrado corioution (4/kâ‚¬ fYi Ok------ Amy M~*crum, Chief#n. & Admin. Officer MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN d/Wa ASPEN CENTER FOR PHYSICS ASPEN MUSIV ~L ~OOL ~ Jane A. Kelly, Admin. V~B-President SPAAmendmentj.â€¢44 A.Ii'0-'W'* 6/}Al,Ak MP,Afli 509066 1#I 1 i I 1 ill 1 1.Ill _ 11 ilia/60 10-164 SILLIA 0 WIS PITKIN CCJNTÂ¥ CO 11--- - 667 770 Property, subject to reason:thÂ·le reculations as may. from zin-ie to time, b . established by the owners tile reof M order to prcitect meir priTert>'. ar Licil ,1: the acadenlic privacy and Sererli!>Â· of the campus. its pregramq and the hen|th and safety of other users and vifitors. 14) NIA.Â·\ Parking Lot. The MAA parking lot ,hall be ploÂ·,#ed ,ind k.%.1,< dear ,)1 frow during all wintertime performances or ftmctions at MAA Iticiliticj. HI. MISCIÂ·-!.!1611Â·~(315 A. PERIODIC PROJECT REVIE,VS 1-0 the extent practical and necÂ·:3.,aly, cvul> -ir inorith'; ftilloWinfl [he date her':(,1 until the construction of ail components of the Pr(ject is complete, the Consortium ~11,111, if requested Ulereby. meet with the City Planning Oftice for tile purrofe of mformi,ill the Planning Office as to tlic progress in developing the Project purs::ant to the ternis hereof. ff the Planning Office deems it necess:.rv. the Pianing Office will report to tile AÂ·:pen Planning and Zoning Commission on the outcome of one or nlore of tile.Ke meelingS. Tlie Consortium and the Citv recogni,e tliat thesc meetings. when decnied necess.in, are : for purposes of providing progress reports and developing nititually accept:thle sollitions ,~ 1 to anv problems that ninv he encountered during constrÂ·.,ction. .1-9 8. NON-COMPLIANCH AND REOUEST FOR AMENDMENTS OR BilINSIONS in the event that the City determines that an individual member of tile Consortium is not 1 i acting in sut.stantic! conipliance wi:h the terms of this Agreement and/or cne or more of tile Construction Schedules submitted to the City Engineering Department in accordance I -9 .< herewith (a "Non-Complying Memher"), tile City Council may issue and sent upon the * Non-Complying Member a written order Specifyi,lg the alleged non-compliance and I reguiring the Non-Complying Meinber to remedy the same within such reasonable time as tile City Council may determine. U'ithin tuÂ·enty days of the reccipt of such order, the Non-Complying Member may file with the City Council either a notice advising the City , Council that it is in complic.nce or a written petition requesting a hearing to deternline any one or both of the follop..ng matters: (a) Whether the alleged non-compliance exists or did exist. or (b) Whether a Â·.ariance, extension oT time or amendment to this Agreement should be granted with respect to any sitch non-compliance which is determined to exist. I 36 1 .!1 . 667 771 Up.in the reript of such petition. the City Councti 31:al! promptly schedule a hearing to consider th: matters set forth in the cease and desist order and in the peti:ion. The licaring sh:,11 be convened and conducted pursuant to the procedures normally established by the City Council for other hearings or pursuant to such other procedures, formal or mformal. upon which the City and the Non-Complying Member shall agree. I!-the City Council determines by the evidence that a non-compliance exists uÂ·hich has not been remedied. it may issue such orders as may be appropriate: pr.i';ded. however. no order terminating any approval granted herein shall be issued wiA,0 ; 3 finding of the City Council that evidence warrants such action and affording the Non-Complying Member a reasonable time, not less than thirty days, to remedy such non-compliance. A final determination of non-compliance which has not been remedied or for which no variance has beÂ·en granted inay, at the option of the Cit> Cozincil, and .,pot, U.ritten notice to the Non-CompiÂ·.ins Member. termin:.te any of the approvals connined herein which are n.Â·afenablv related to the requircment:.s) with which there has b.en such established non- 3 Cumpliance: however,under no circumv,inces will a faill:re to comply oil the part of the Non-Compl>Â·ing Meinber :r respect ofary obligutions tbat :t'terid that Component of t.lie Pro,ect for which it is responsibie as outlined above. affect the approvals for any of the r:maining components of th:' Project. The City Council iilay grant Such ,Â·ariances, 2- exlenqions of time or .2.11'?:id:7cnts to this Agreement as H may deem appropriate under the circumstarces as an alternative dispesition of any finding of non-compliance. 1 , h addition to the foregoing, the Consortium or its successorf or a,;:,igns, or any member , thereof may, on its or their own initiative, petition tne City Council for a variance, an :imendment to this Agreement. or art exten:,ion of cite or more of th: time periods required for pcÂ· formance hereunder. m othenvisc. The City Council [112.v grant such , variances, amendments to this Agreement, or extensions of time av it may deem appropriate under the circumstances: provided in al! events tha! tl:e City Council shall 1 not unreasonably refuse to extend tile time periods for perform:me indicated iii one or 0 nore of the Construction Scliedules if th: affected mer.:ber of the Consortium demonstrates that Ilie reasons for the delaÂ·ds) which necessitate such extension(s) are . 1 beyond the control of such member, despite good faith efforts on its part to perform in a timch manner. Notwithstanding anything in this Section R to the contrary, the 19 ' iregoing concerning non-compliance and requests for amendments or extensions shall not apply in connection with any matter with respect to which the Aspen City Charter ~ ~~â€ž~ o. :he Municipal Code has iiivested original jurisdiction in other boards, such as the Board of Appeals and Examiners. With respect to such matters the rules of practice anc! procedure established for and/or bv such boards shall, in the first instance, apply. 1 1 1 Noncompliance with one or more of the Construction Schedules set forth above due to difficulties with fund raising or other occurrences oiitside o f the control of the no:i-profit mcinhers of 'he Conjoitium shall be examined in any non-compliance hearing bel-ore the City Council and car. be a basis for granting a variance from an extension of any of Such scheditich. . r 1 1 !1 '11 ' li lili: â€¢ Â·f'' â‚¬1Â·~ :', ra,': 1~~~~'~, r,' *'*mÂ·*~.7&#urMâ€ž4,b~~ ,4~~#~~ e D Re.o' d 6.dvlgate Fym Reporip Format Iab tierp 1 * F U-b 71 6 49 2 =d d N 4 ' 34i 2.rp l C 40 0 0 ~iUR]custoÂ·r Fields Yaluation IParcels Actons 1 Feei IFee Summarz 'Sub Herms Conditons Routjng Mistory I Pernit TYpe ~-#.4,4, iMPFU.kgni/AddE-4 6.i~Â·.t.....2.,Â·Â·Â· i,...122 Permit * ~0051.2006.ASLU Address ~370 MEADOWS RD g] Apt/Suite ~ City |ASPEN statelEE-3 Zip ~81611 ~ ~ 'Â£] Permit Information Master- Permit ~ < 223 Routing Queue ~aslu06 Applied ~09/0 5/2006 1 Project i .21 Status |pending .Approved | Descripbon ~ NON-COMPLIANCE PETITION & MINOR SPA VARIANCE REQUEST Issued ~ 1 Final ~ Submitted DIM CURTIS 920-1395 Clock *Innit16 - Days ~-8 Expires I08/3 1000 7.11 | Owner PO BOX 222 ' i Last Name 'ASPE'. I'.S-TTJE I;.C 1 First Name ; QUEENTOWN MD 21653 Phone ' 14 Owner Is Appkcant? Applicant Â· Last Name ASPEN INSTITUTE INC 11.~ First Name ~ , 33 60'4 222 , ~ QUEENTOWN MD 21658 Phone : Cust Â¥ |25646 ~ Lender Last Name -12~ FIrst Name I Phone ~~~ Record 2 of 2 1 331 71 *3 ES 1 -+ 1 41, . 4 :3 E A O ip . .ZR -Â·r, 4 r M 9 93. 1 -1 %: 1 Ll lie ' m Â·121_***'*in#(wj#e Â»Ibt 1 :in ] Â¥# 1 Â·Â·-.!~~~-'iMI;.1.. 1"2.Â»04+4+4.121-Â·r'Â·-.4 4 I t~ 3 Â·t.- ~. 1.Mollro,-44*0~Id - F- :, 'r LIT,itt'b:- ~, EED ~ ~ NY ' RE .,-Frp--1$.9 -77=7 m 91 n ",1 1. . - 4 I .4/ ./1 ? 1 - / fi 4 .: '? aM %3 . :11 246-=7..47 1 2 2: v --44-â€¢-4- r Er. 11. < i ':.56 f f;,1 I R 1 1| PAI: k ./ : ------- P r i.f:'*#*-~ f.W ..1, 15% 'F M Ee Â· 1 Ectigity,2 2.1 ...: f '&-J/"-1- : i.. i rccot j~,t - '~ M*t~.-: - \V Â·H m LLA-1-131; :..1. 1<'1. -4.!'Â·, ; i I, I. I 1 FRON Clf#REAPOM m .4 -1 i 1 . 0 1 - nlp-'ll:. 0 . 1 W~ CO 0 , W , 4 1 . 0 5 1* L 1 ' ~7*N-~*67*406*kbe 'ir i: .'-.1 - ~ = k-LJ -LE 41 1 1.1 9 3; 1 1. , 1 L ~h. 9 2 4 i 1 8% : Al" 91 1 1 $% 44* " Â· 1. Â· 1 4 t 0 In , . -1- 1 1 - t CEL--32 N.L. -7, 4 1~ 4.. a -7 , - i ./22 . 1 51 A ' ; 2/09 1.0 BE Xg ./r= d r -Â·00,6"*iÂ¥00" ' , 4 31 01 L ta L ' k 1 14 ' 1; 18 g 1 1 1 Architect * The Aspen Institute JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS CD M. 430 W. Main Aspen, CO 81611 4* 970-915-7011 - Fax 970-9257026 Doerr-Hoster Center Associate ArthitÂ·ect ' JOEDE SCHOEBER1.;E.IN ARCHITECT I 5 CIVIC FORUM Associates Inc. Aspen Meadows, Aspen, CO. 1'0 Box:550 Aspen, CO 81612 :' - 970Â·93]-0221 - Fax 970-920-7833 13Aa1 EM01 -3 3 13/Gl NtÂ¢,63 - 1.WNJIWIA'-~3 lr EXIG. GRADE SILVIA CAV. p co ... FE LOWER LEVEL FF. MAIN LEVEL 1 11'in lim linll~IllÂ®Nlim lillillu 1111073 1 8 ri p 73 90402003 6@34(993% JEFFREY BERKUS ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES: At< MI/ECIS 1__rE__12_=n__2_231_1___2.EL__L__1-._Â»_11__L___21_4 PCC = PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS - "SMOOTH" FINISH 1 8 (Er) Â®.1,) 0.91) ltE) F.4 ~~ I 1~ = FABRICATED PAINTED STEEL FINISH PANELS f-"14-21-*f_u____~F--IL_~__21Â«g__UL-v-Â»L_1_Â»lut=mÂ» -| = FABRICATED STEEL "CHANNEL" FINISH PANELS ~ i â‚¬Joint Une (~ jant Une ~ ~ ~oint Line FJoint Llc I Joint UrÂ·,6 1 â‚¬loint Une p int + p inâ€¢Une â‚¬,oint ~ne i Boint Une ~ .... . _ ~I '1.4.....: r .--,4 1 11 1 . r H P 11 i 1 li EIZE] STUCCO , ..:.Â·Â·1Â·* :-~:-:1Â·....Â·-Â·'Â· 29 EQ. ~ EQ 112'-6Â·1 0'-6"i, EQ. L EQ. | -EQ!11-LL L ~EQ. ~ Â·2'-6" W 1 ' 11 1/-VIâ€žil,tion Sack ' 0 , CIPC = CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE 2-1 GLAZING NOTES: xs'of COLO Â· All glazing in hazardous locations shall comply with requirements of IBC - Gu,dmil @+41 All glazing used in floors, landings and stairs shall comply with requirements paragraph 2406.3. AF.F. Typ. of IBC Secoon 2409. Scupper -- - i -- r. 11 7 +---r-lit r.----211 - ri +:. .1. ~+1...:51 | Guard/iÂ¢ @ +42 C.joir,tUrle.Ty~n Ir'CC f t++Â»--1 : I .0.1 '': .~1 ' I,~3003 | LandirITyp. Exisong Graden ~ ~ / n r--11- 1 e= Handnds +34- to +I 11 #.4-ifiA.-1 444 8 | atv. Nosil. Typ. 1 1/1Â»/' Horizon=Re~et F.F.a,Ground Level ~ i 1 1 a. / I N . / . r Reve,1.Typ.-Alignwith Me.1 Â· .'AM 1.PQPQN I -h F.F.x Gr~und Level | 1 1.,1/2- ' 0.0 B a. F +100'-oIl' .21 PCC Jeig Line ~ ~2'-6Â· I Decorat,ve 4-4# Metal Low .Reve.1 - Vertial L . Exelting Grade 1 1 111 Reg. 11 i Reveal --- ' Â·#Â· Anished Grade w '~ all e =z: r 9./.Une â‚¬JointUne= Louvered Registers I . â‚¬ Window 2 1 1 1 1 "~~. Behind. Typ - Shown Comed ~Â·FÂ· at Lowe~ Level Â£ ~ e ~ ~~ el - +86 -0~ f/ - '1 11 11 1,11,1 U j' wi-- - r ~ [2~ZI~Z~|EZZZLIZZIZIEdÂ¢ILIZEJEEZZIZZLiEZZIZEZZI~ZIZEZZIEZZZz~zz**E33Â»Â¢3*~EzzY] -Eâ€¢7129--- ril SOUTH-EAST ELEVATION 413/ 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 9 9 3 2 4 6 89~~ 1 1 1 15'-0- Â· 1 5'-0" 15-0 15-0- ~ 15'-/ , 15'-0' , 15-0' I 15'-0" 15'-0 , 15'-0- i UÂ«~Â»_~~_L~~UÂ»~_a~1Â«Â»p_~~-6"97'-6~ fl *Ppl-- 9.1) (I7.1) 7.9 8.45 ~ 1 - -1 11 11 , u i , ] J g-4 4.* f=l-1 %1,4- ~4 1 il 111 10 1 VEâ‚¬]CN 5'.0. I EQ. 1 EQ. 1 5-0- | | 241 EQ, | ~ 1 , 1 , 'Eli .*, t I i... 1 1 11 i ||| | 7~- --17 +42 AF F. l 2 ! Gu-dulls @ Ven"t,on Sid< 1 TPO 1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 Â·1 i G=Â·drails @ +42 AF. F. 50Â®er . ,: 20 9,nt Une Guarda @ +42 AFF. Behind ..t Handrails +34- to +38- S.Â« .2 % F.F. .t Upper Level -1 ;~~~~ - /1 M i Upper Level i .bv. Noings. Tm. L . L - )/ LF +, isÂ·-oÂ· Gmrdrail @ +42 ~ ~'A- ' Â· --9 :bove No,inK.,nd .Pccy i 1 Landing:. Typ. PCC -7 Exterlor St,ir Beyond i Approx Top of Slope , ..6 joint Line Behind 1 1 1 Â·Â· .i. ~ 1 0 / /. \ Guidraili @ +42 A.F.F. 0, Extz. and Finished Grade @ Faceof ~Ter- . Approllop,/Slope 2-0 0 F.F. /Ground Level 11| |F.F. at Ground Level . O - - I - I +100Â·* ----- air 1 ----- - - --- '1 - SE==- ay -ru------*---_-___-21Â®01----6-r---- . . C Â·Â·~ ~Â· Â· Â· . 5â€¢uau ZICIP --- -I--------- . a = 11 Handralls +34 to +38 abv, Nosinp. Typ. Lapc i | i , +42-AFF. -~ Gurdn,l:+42/ove Scupper ----- --- . Nosing and ledings Where lili' Horizar. --Extz. Grade @Face , FCC PCC Gracie Diference is >30. Typ. 1 Re:let Reveal Typ. - Align Joint Une ~ Guardrail @ of Ba,ement Wail I with Metal hnel Modul J F F. It Lower Level /7 11 1 9 9.F. i , Ex:g. and Finished Grade @ -1,- r r r--4 j!'1 A Â£ F. Fat Upper- Level 1 1 , above Nosing ard L_!Ll___1 ' 1 Â· b 1\ Anel Module 2 -O 1 +100.-0- g â‚¬W- 11 1 */1 F.F. It lower LÂ®vel _L._lerrull.14 Err- i r-r, 1 1 ~ 14\ 0 IP 11 11 â‚¬,4 Une 'll too 00 TI 1 M V , 1'1' i i, 1 2'-6 - Ext: Grade -.- , Guardrails @ Extg. Grade @ Face 1 Face of Exterior Ternce --I.~------76+~-4-EZEZZ--22*-ZAEJEZZEZZE_____-_----____ ___________-t------CE----*-6I-zz=zz-----4------ - -------_-____--_ _____ ______ _________- ofBasementl/1 -------2-------------1-__...__ -h F.F. at Lower Level I - -----1 ------ -- --Â§141Â·/22/- -------- --EÂ«,GrU-iFU--- --i~402-- 1/8. =I'.0 of 8asement Wall 0-9 N. A4.2 I_NORTH-EAST-ELEVATION i< -'J~J w i.7- ~j ~ Of -- DEC 0 2 2005 AbytiV 44*,4 4 FF Clj~~~AT) T ;240Ue $ 5UO]Sâ„¢Jqns ~ SUOBay ama 'IN Somill IZZO'OU-0L6 1 ZI918 00 'uodsV '055 *09 Od 0S u. 50/LI/11 'iul 'slial!,4/JVÂ·Sn)peg Aa'!PI 73.LNED VBISOH-VHEOCI Â· %86 239 UO!12,0-11'uc)3 S :sa,joJ Z-sww'310*S 'â€¢U,u.: SNollÂ¥/a-13 1*3 Â£050 -"N.18 0Â¥3 u!DIJaqeo435 aPiol SNOI1VA313 kIOn131)<3 -- 430 West Main Street 1 1918 OD 'uadsv -JU~ 'SalE!0055Â¥ Lun,4 3!AID â€ž0-.Dl + = aSUOIDOJAUOD fo/Â£1/11 01 ZOSO 9Z0L SZ6026 J Z I OL'SZ6'0Â£6 d ...... 50/Â£ 50/Z rh - I :4 0 ''A r. - UUâ‚¬VLOUD ~FFREY BERIUS ELEVATION MATERIAL NOTES: ARCHITECM I Â· tE-- 15'-0 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0 TS'-or 1, 15'-0" 1 9-0- . PCC = PRECAST CONCRETE PANELS - "SMOOTH" FINISH Â· Â· 4 -- â‚¬4 60 48 (9 901) le) 1---1 = FABRICATED PAINTED STEEL FINISH PANELS 1 1 - 8-1 1/2" 6-101/2-1-[ 141-01' 15 0" 14'.6" 8Â·-6- - = FABRICATED STEEL "CHANNEL" FINISH PANELS ' '~'~ 6 14'-0. lf-0 6-6 'P*Fer- IN â‚¬Jointlne ~ CIJoint/ne â‚¬Join,Une â‚¬Joirt/ne â‚¬Joint Une â‚¬joint .ne â‚¬Joint Line Doil. Une '1 1 1 1 11 '1,1 /1 5- -42 ?.Â» 1%2.-+901~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 EUFFEl = STUCCO ...1 - .t.4.-?5-: t:..:Rt:. flall ON - 1 -- g,2"W 2'-6Â·i ECA EQ.A.i, EQ. A TICâ€¢ EQ.8 i EQ.B i EC.8 L EQ.B .1 14.1 L 1 1 = CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE CU-Â·91 ....Â·Â·~ ' 1\ 1 I .*Une â‚¬Join:16. /678323\ 11 1 1 -24 ./ 1 GLAZING NOTESÂ· 2-6-1 -& lili .... C.'. 'n 7---7-im; 1-- Guidrail @ +42 /.F.F. All glazing in hazardous locations shall comply with requirements of IBC /2/.EFFREY \ O\ - Fwintow 1 -ILLE- \ 1/ paragraph 2406.3. ~ CO < BEREJE ~ | 1 1 I of IBC Section 2409 i 11 1 L....Ill All giazing used in floors, landings and stairs shall compiy with requirements \0\ 304413 /0/ \0Â« 1191 \ U./2/perle./ /1 ---- IIi 1 / 1 1 \~ -.7.PEr - Sculper 4/. L-PCC-1-1 1 Â£ F.F. at Upper Level , L~ + 115'/ 11 1 11 Line '2-6 PCC joint Lint Typ 6 i El---- - L_pcc Jo,nt J * :1 m Â«fea r 334 Gu. 1 -il@+42 A.FF. - - 4- - KIC].Int w/ S.fety Glwng 3iji @ f 0 u..4 Typ. ,#\111 ~FF / Lou,le l=vel , ~ F.F a,Ground Level < Covered Ught Well 11 1 1 1, 'Cl\,\\1 1111 ..t~- 1 6, F- Enl Grade 14 3,/imi 1 / 11118% \~ +101Â·-6Â· Guardr@iii @ +42~ above %~- LabvÂ· Noâ€ž,r,gs, ~* =33&29 8 Nos,ng, and Landings. T/-74 L- 1 /lli--- ~ ' - ~ ~' \4 - G-drails@+42 /bove k I . A. 2 22 22 3 Extg, Grade @ Nosings and landings, TypÂ· |1 I \ Face of Build,ng _.1 / _ ~ _ m 1 1 /1 \ \\ Lape 11 It I Idl 1 Anished Gracie- ~ ~ - FCC joint Line 1 1 11 1 - Handralls +34 to +38 \ L-Giardrail@+42Â·AFF. F.Rat Low,r Level *13 11 1-r E--r--- - Coveâ€¢ed UÂ¥,t We| i 11 Z Nosl . Ty , w/Safelliabng 1 I 9 1 ~h F.F. = Lower LÂ£vel 0* hed.rade cz~zz-z==IZE=ZE---IZE=ZE--=2=23=En-~-ZEZZIZEZZIZEZZ-z=--_ZIZE=~2IEEZZI~t=ZE=ZED - Extg. Gae LP +86'/ E 8 2 Guardrail@+42- AF.F. Shown Dotted 0 ZM r~F~ NORTH-WEST ELEVATION 1. 1 ; 'g 1 8 3 z d 3Â¤i 9 00000 600 0 1 5 3 1 15'-0 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'-0" 15'.0" 15'-0- i 15 0 15'/ 15'-0" 15'-0' ~ 3*N*T (~ * 9~~) ~ C~ Â© Â© 1'-0/ 14'-0" 7 /2" 14'-41/2. 7'-101/2 7'-11 /2" R 13'-0" 1 -0 7-6Â· | 7'-6" 1 -C' 14'-Or 1'-0- 14'-0- 14'-: 1'-0" 14'-0" 1.-C- 7'-4 6 8' 1'-0/ IN ?VE*floN' 0-x ff 4 ,Â· - Â·Â· 1 11 - 11 '' ' 11 Â£Joint Une pint Une â‚¬Joint Une â‚¬Joint Line â‚¬joint Unt â‚¬joill! Une 1 ~ ~ ~ I C int Une 9 Joint Une I i â‚¬joint line (Ejo-tur- â‚¬ Jo;nt Line â‚¬Jon'Une q Joinc Line '7...e\.1. En, f-Di EQ. ~ EQ. 1, EQ. '' ' EQ Lj'-0'1 fll' EQ. ! EQ. )2'-7 2-6"| d 2'-F~. EQ, i EQ 2'-6" 1 , 1- +17 i 1 1 XX~,"T Steel Charn. ~7| 2-TPO ! 2 â‚¬Z U- 9 1/ liMii W N Meal Coiumn - 44-f~11 1 j,~r i E-.up.' .x/CO 1 ! 1 41 1 ' :r M 1 1 1 ! 1 2 Guwdrails@+42 AFF. | 1 Handrails +34'to+38- 11 111111 - 1 F.F. at UPFulls ~ abv Nosangs, Typ.- -I-=-- i i / 11 6 , 1 ji Pcc joiM Line - S,///-,1 </ Landing, I.- ./ 1~ - - t/-1 above Nosing and # L-PCC -7 Gu-dnils@ +42' ~~:~~| AF F. Typ_-__~**~ ;21. lin Z. pec -m, I i ~-FCC 7 - 11 - + 1,1.-6. O IZ-_pcc 7 - :T, - zl~ 7I E fl- ----- 4 BF4 RE at Lounge Level .h L! 4 Iii tÂ·~U----"Cl*E I j .a, - 11 0[6 FF.a,Groundled -4,0 , 1 1 L--CIPC 1, Lcipc Nx X *Als @ +34- 1 1 1 f? ll 1 4 4 2'.6- iJolntline= â‚¬)4Â¢ Une 1 0 7'--74 .Joint Une r<L-Cov*ed ught Well | | 1 . 2 Ch / /j F.F. at Upper Level 1 i â‚¬ Wndow 11 J * I w/ 52~ety Gla~ng 0.'-Il 9.n. Une â‚¬Joint Line = F.F. / Lower level ~~ 1 1 11 r /7 F.F.at Lowert-,vel 5 8 1 9 1 1 1 I. 1 K= \'-0?' 1 11 L. +06.-0- 4 - e.gÂ·Â· 1 1 7 . --j ~ 4 fr * j.1/1* 1 3 - A4.1 gT~ SOUTH-WEST ELEVATION Liti 0 2 2005 -4- 412/ 1/8.- 1.-0. Att'EN it mnING DEPARTMENT - Revisions /Submissions 14'-W %86 les 110!Un.11SUO SNOI1Â¥A313 iX3 5 9E0L+ 66 02 Sheet-Elevations-1 Ill 131N32) 213ISOH-333OC] " ' A..'../.I'-.A ~ Ii#I'll:/d~./.....M I ..- ''.....;-.|!*h|~Â·Â· 6.../..-â€¢.I r - ............. ain Street 1 ZZO 0Z6-0Â£6 / Z 19 18 00 'uadsV '055 x09 -Od 11918 00' ad u apaq@04DS epaof SNOI1VA313 VOIW31*3 Civic Forum Associates, Inc. - .3 91 PU 509067 Page: 7 of 7 i illi~ Ilin lili illil IMI lilill ill'll il~ liati Elli illi 4/18/20e5 :0:18f SILVIA DAVL5 PrT= CarrrY Co . 71.00 . 0.00 u ca MS Z *' 6; E! * . L> 0614 4-FA- 5 3 2 3 %83 53* 1 5 7<VI .. FACE OF STAIR PARAPET 24 BACKFROM PARAPET @NW EE Â§44%1 N-EFACE:OF:BULD]NG - ld: :420 54 ./'-- =rION A. . 93 123 i ~~6-polâ‚¬ t~-Â»-C -)4+-}1- -~--}4-- ---~- ' i- SLOPEBREAKI 202 21 2 1 / - 1 i %3,5 14*4 k 4 1 - .***mi~ 1 .M-4# 4.U 2,-~~Tmf-~ * = M OU -Â·fED,#1 1 1 Ii' 'Ir"=1=313*#fiE-*=a-~ilÂ·Â·1-_1-b: t/t- 31 - FIt-k -Â·-.1'=41*3Â°45 f.'-1*.0 - 1 FF.lpER*EVELÂ· . ' 1 ', . 2 Â» F.F.UPPER LEVEL . i M *,4 1FT* 1#V- 4. i'.1.-,~ 1. 1.L----i,+LiAQ- :~ Â· 40 irÂ·i,t- .-----------1.--1...Mt . 2 : * 113,% 1 i... ... , .ARAPET I ,1 1 6 2, r . I -1-1 . '3 ~f ' ' 7 ' W APPROX TOP OF SLOPE - = -~ r-ECTULJr-- 1/ 1 i 'TE-E 11. 4 : --8 i-~; 1 : : a = ..2.. i ~r- NPROK.TCP OF Sl.0E -i . . 14*Rj %:~i ' :1~ Â· * 1 EXTG. GRADE . r #- ,13fHi--2221 f /'Jt 1-,4,614. 1.1-2-i!' il-t.zjf lits#.=.. 1 - w.11 4 t 4. /2 / ---Â· --Fo 1 uaÂ· r--Â·=~--5 ./.i'F -1,LI--u -+* w Ff. MA#418%1 : r -- ~ FF. MAIN LEVEL 11 --- 1 24!â€ž 1 Â·' -./.- - --1. 1------- 0 - . C .1 .~e,e,LI.- ~* - L-1 -. C m. 1 ~1 Ii:IN -'.-- 'di "1= P. 0 EXTG. GRADE*FACE - 1 . 5 P OF BASEMENTWAUL F.F. LOVER LEVEL MU 6 FAROWERIEVEL -- f- EXTa GR)4DE *FACE EXTG.ANDANISHED GRADE * ~ L EXTG.*DFF,ISHEDMADE@ ' 0158ASEMENTWALL , FACE OFEXTERIORTERRACE FINISHED GRADE @ EXta GRADE@ FACE OF EXTER]ORIERRACE Â·Â·Â· +- 8*GE OF BUI[DING FACE OF BUIWING 9 $*F< NORTH-EAST .U~~0 ..4 C 00 T. NAÂ¥FAOE OR BOILOING ; ~~ ~- PARAPET 1Â£ BACKREOM FACE(*51*tR FARAPETÂ®Â·14*Â¥ Â· l[ : .4 .er ... - PAWEIGN,W E-1 FAICEORBUILDjNG . . r ~.- 1 .i -> - i 1 ; Ff. UPPERTEVEL , % :. 1 2%. I . 1 - 5 --1- :. 11 -14.1,3 1. h n .:,3 ft . 8 EXTG.GRADE@ 1 -4 ! ....1 - L:. 1. I 1 Â· . . ~ 5 FAcE-OFBUIm*q 1\-~ . r, 1 4 37 1 2 ' r- EXTG. GRADE - 1 FINISHED GRAC*El 6 -~ 4 1 1=4-*:12- -'.I=i i 21 Â· â€¢ 9 1 { ELEVATIONS 3/30/05 _._J - SCHEMATIC 9* -~ 2 - . 4f.|~| ~;:* Â·,:- ?,i It,Â·Â·rt ,- / F.F. LptÂ»IGE u.*ts,::6 + fl]T-1 -1 ., 1 ---- b 7 -11;1-i Liu 99 - 4 M / - EXEG. GME - r-1 11 -.-0-:---v,ei~Â».UZJ.---- JFIT- 1--'74----,--- 1 %. 4 j 1 %. M11!SHIED GRADE-t 2 RF.LOWERLEVEL , I . NOTEÂ·.Ela,ATIONS,NO Blm-DING HEIGHTS MAY VARY INSUBSTAINTIALLY ACCORDING NORTH-WEST 6-=-'.~~0 TO FINAL BUILDING PERMIT DRAWINGS SHEET 6B OF 6 1 1 1 1 1 ,Â£Â£39 {Eaf 2 'SMOPBOW UD OI ~ 110OG 1 t \ i % , 3- E l I ' ' . 1... - L : ' I 5Mra * c. mi; -4 Â·Â·â€¢' I ' t , .0 .84== - /39/em- 2 1 . '' 09 - 1 2/8-% %4*-2.22 4 i m#Re 4 0 / / - 2 ..,a m 2 9,1 :01% I In m 1 141 B :f Nd 2 2 ' I M on -1 A :*Swbo- 0 , - 1 , m 396/0, Alib p. 0 AM*44*le 7 , 1 --- Â¢*44 7- 9 11 r- %=r '3 S , r,\UW"-1 -' 1 97 \,- 60111%,iaN:W r ' , =11 ...r_ 1 ?3/6Â·Â·Â·jE*%Â§2 E . --\ 1- 7 2 99. / , ,.11*0*ek'Ne/ 'tal-- Â»Â®29-7- / - 9/ E-t ~Bil 2 21,l-'E- r iw /~MZ $ - r~ Â· 3kn,r~r k ' -4 t.p#/ %144 ' , ir -4 Â«k J - % ma gr '* iR j Â· .- i -g,- 42&rk J . le L S S. 4 .0 b $ ' .. l â€¢- 1-'ll "-W 1 1 . W A & 11014* 8-4t f - 1 }t#4.44 - . 191 6 - 4 1 1 ~ 4 1'' r-, 4 141 Na M E 0 Z j j.,1 111,11 1 1 4'!,M' i i ~~ ~ -; 55* 2 & '*r' L 11 ' A -. 1 h #W 1 1 1. 4 9 71 1. L i S = 47 iii 1,49 1 1.1.m I m 4 1 '4#111 9 1 9 7. I n 18 1 1+ .. % 8 -0/1 81Â¤7-:-- .. m.@Al.EdI .VAÂ·-'5, /' 1 1 < 1 - 31 .7/2 lilli:4 3 - 1 9, 04, , ..9% r , . I./frf - - Â¢ P 12 \ U,teei - - 16 \.6 - - '788*-2:liv,-' \ ' 1; .''lilli:i ,t' ~1 9 2 - Jt = 'Â· .11,17 *'Â·_'/.el.4,;Â·'~Â·-Â·,-~ Â· I '' *JI \1 ' 4 ;514. 4 I 1 r -- 1.1.-14 -1 1 1 - - ..10 1 , , 4-: - -1 1 1 , , ..1 .0 .Elli'.: . ) 44 1 ./ L ~ 4 1* :A\' \\ \ Â·1 4 .-..--, 41 f 11 1, 1 , T 1 J.,11 - . ,1 .I- ... L /IiI-1 '-Gil , , 81 1~~\~~~, . /0 t 1 1-1 - 6 - L____J 1 9. -9 . , \ \'/\ I. -' . t- ~ 1 -1,96 . 4 #. " .69 4 1 1/9 \ 'Â«% :/ p @* t.. I m E 11 -__-7 15 Vi 31 1 r ' ../.-Il. I , 1 1 1%.El -1:-70 . 0 ' 10 ** 4 1 , \ 0 ./t I '' . 5 3 4 1 Â§~i Uâ‚¬'61 1 'A -1 -1- It-*4 - 'h , u, Â· b/,i j r, \ 114-rE-i~-4.1 Q74\1 9- bsmitata , 1 1 . U9â€ž/AtV,b,52Erm -- 44ut,#' M C r An Â· 81 1/ Al 19 8 M Elf . J 'â€ž=m- ' 4 â€ži,~60(7 ' 3 g , am=murÂ«-1! 1 Locr i / ' ..11 '' . . 0 .Â£f.6042Â£ IM / IiI,~ i: ' $ ygl -4- , 1 .. 4 . 4- I tr /1 --'. TI 1 1 'Ir -0 --2 ' I. - \ 9 3 \\. 1:'*P#2994' A-- ' 1 01,i .'44 01*A 6* - 94,W\4Â¢t'~49A%*....~.=: C.'iÂ· 4 1 L ...WI.-/F < 59= C - Â·Â·- 2 3-h / 9* . , M / 1 11 ' 1=riot-78 1,602:, li g/im - 1-I Â£ 49".m,-151 .k . i. :W, , 1 1 1 '1 t; 41 3 1 U I . r , 6 4 1..,1-0-la .11.1,1, Pt I ?5 1 1 .1 1 /1 \ 3 1 . 447 3 ;t, 23 11Â·,il# 19\ - - 2 41*k 33 +9 , + ... < 1 I . 4 1 Us, 1 Il , 1 0 1 / 6 !1 111,1".!Ed E-â€¢. Â· IX -* Â· ' ,4 *, ,%*Frl 'WI m ' \U .. , f'VyfiR~~~,~;'0,~'-b'* \ lid \ r -ir --%-- 4 4.ra@,1, ' alim 0 - / 4 -#444Â£ . 1 6 --- -- -- - 1-=,- , 'ill , ,-As:i'lit:C? I :111 1,1,4.11' !4.--1,4 41 14'15*K - 1 E--1/ % 1% , i - - -A- - I /44 #bE.Al - 0 4 9 , 4 9"r, 2 - < &*.22 \ 1 , - - 0 - .Â«83(- 1 ,4 - -- '1- -A#: 1\\1 1 /,4, , \ ar /7 /h Â» m /Â§ Wt /2.'11RL , t>.'Pi .1 N.1 k , FE .6.01~1~Â£~#~4&.9.> \ /9 3 >4:1* 1 1 ' 04Â£Â©thEN r l 7 #14 / / m. .q AE 't 2&0 , maÂ« mAirn 9 , 484-1*%~4.,tu~14.~ =3 101* ,#4- I / 1 - , -74- -â‚¬m "1 - h.*3 Xyâ‚¬D .Aft 13 1 2 f - ,Â©r chitect a The A,pen Institute JEFFREY BERKUS ARCHITECTS 4130, 1Â¥, lit,in jÂ¥#peRN; 40 *1014 970â€ž925-7(]TY - Fax #Â¥0-925-7026 01 1 crl CO Doerr-Hosier Leiller 0 1 ' 71 iii ~ JOEME SCHOE.Â·BERI:H]NARCHITECT m -1 ClVIC DI)KUM Associates Ine. S P.U. Box 550 Aspen, CO 81612 a Aspen Meadows, Aspen, LU. 970420-0121 - Bar 970~920,7833 ..:.S r...A" ~ NEW-SPRUGE ORPTNE EGEN 804. SPRUCE OR PIN &.IN RASTRUCIUR ffEC Â·SCONCgPTUALINGSUBJECTTOCHANGE EXTG. ASPEN,ORCOTTONWOOD 1031OUd 5000*NOU ROPOSED NEW BUILD[ ERMIT PLANS BY THE SILVIA DAV15 PI IN COUNrY . 71.00 immm'"Immum ermb:-- w' Y INFIELD AININ{i VÂ¥All; t ,; TIE *PIPE INTO