HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sp.Rubey Park SPA.1983X &4_�VLed S-J7-%aZ)
�
�
Lu�c
CC
yz
a�ca>v
a
4J Z z
Z o a
aU.
I—oaLL.
Zoo
uUA
w
o J v
a N Z
a ul
aiv�
1-
' ww
V
cc
W
m
cc
W
H
N
W
G
z
J
W p
F-
W� a
F- v v
— w
V W W
z a
Qm4c
a
C
C
z
a
ZW
Q cc
�z o
Z2 a
Om
v= o
LF) ~ v
W W
W>
Wm o
C'
c
c
w
w c
A
N
o U
w
F
k
sv��a'3���
�o
N M
y
CD [,� 06 0'i
a �
cu
A z a Cy
a
0 � o c
O ,Qj U C '� O F N E C z O
d p= � o cu bCh no is 'c; o °' a� o
= oC o3��t- H� aiio.a m v
O
Z z z 3 e m w Q m
>
c
O
'C o
o cz as
0. O U
CD
O
h C O N U .0 O 4'y
° ¢cl .0 a c°� U r.
d x o R cv U N
N i0 .0 O OU y � "' •U 'aJ R1 G
y
>cu
ai
c a .o
w o o m o c m oo a, a a
to a a on r o o h
m c c> E° s c o. o
>
o ro to
y E o ai 41
m 3 o CID .a o,
(p� n O U � O
6 c.
�
O C a> O O C
d b
GL p id cc 3 C CL Q U ao O [ d w
c ti o Y 4
y c �
C Z C C O d O a C 7 C acU. C
U O C
E �a ° E° a E
cz
a E z a E 4 a
y c `� -0 > ° T aki 00
Z� U o., V cCd p .O y � � `° cU,,• v y y �y U .0
Y m 3 3
G7 o a y o m c ti 'o n b 'E
rO t ,0 .0 a d go
U y
5
r c. Q O m 7 ij p C a > o C
y ed a v U C A by U C a
3 b o U 0.
a
a a y C 7 > tom. O y
QI o 0.
.$ CDw a E c
a a '£o .E a I-- r° a .0 E° y c y a
�••' 'C •� K O bA iey v°j O
0 0 O• Q O E a
Y
^ . O 4 .SC ed -e C d O. N a U a� C .' . p E
F�1 td N 'p O C «: 3 id =� .., C Y y c. m. E
W bp a[°° .d .� 3 cc. 0. 0
c C6 'm .0 a� x a� E b ° ai b4
7'>>
O a d c o .: 3 •E o Q) c
ro
0
a�
a
y
a
U
3
E
`°
W
C7
m o
'"'
�L
U
11
d
a
A
-
7
v
b
vi U
d
O
O 'O
�.
U
id
y
O
L
C
7 7 7
0.
c
by
O
Q rUn
C
U
•y
UCLblO
07
U
,c
c
U
y
C7 i
yy
y
`
0
c
m
y
y
�°
w
>
r-
bf
c y
CL
�
`ID
�
'ti
U
nEi m
�
7
�
�
U
y
U
C
�
+•
�
.�
O
C
C
C
n
a�
C
tbc
fl
N
N
CC
H
A
N 61
to
O
w
O
�
v
a
°
°
•O
�
«L.
C
C
`�
U
O
c.
C
of
ny
C
�«,
'fl
m
0)
O.
y�
O
O
O
o
C O
C
NCO
C
L
L
n
O
�°
w
o,
w °
In
is
O a�
oc
E
c
z
o "'
E
a°i
b
o
c>
°
p
c
`
U
m
E
td
O
cd'
CD
aci
d
C
m
4
6C7
O
y
C
v�i
cu
.r
d
>
L O
O
In
C
d
O a
'0
—0
7 y
C
d
a�
U
A
C
C
d
o
i'
°
n
opo
w
a� °
o
t
o
c
c:
c
c
d
o
c
o
O
'Moot
0
>
^y
y
a�i
aDi
y
°
�'
O
a0.i
m
4
0.
C
m
In
r
y
h
a�
7
4o
y
0
>
U
O
O
LL
A
�
°,
°
3 a,
c
c
�
`o
L
id
3
•E
c,
�
3
�
�
n.
.e
'o
C
0
O
;v_
O
v
�,
d
ro
�,
C
w
.E
l
.; r
b
�
d
C
y
67
m
.UO
C
C
O
'ed
a
OUi
C.
LGl
y
'b
L
a
CCUI
w
U
U
O
¢
A
C
U
U
C
L
m
W
^C
4-
L
°0.
Q
3
m
o E
c#
o°
'c
c
U
E
O
'y
C
a
v
�
7
g
>=
°
aEi
Q
L
O
0.
y
y
ocC o
•`
°
.°
y
p°
O"
V
y
y
V
o
c .0
a
0.
c, T
w
O
U
w
U
m
4
C
d
Z
L O
a
m
U
"w0
.E 47
id L
by
G
y
O 'L
O
•V
C
CC
�
�
cu
�
'O
>
0
W
4)
0.
F
� �
0.1 n
d
W
0
>
07
7
c F
C
ti
'O
3
G
7
�
•C
¢�
.�C
C
a>i
v,
y
y
"[
G)
'U
y
,E►
¢
01
OD
H
[
C°7
LL.
Q
cV
0.
c+•i
7
td
:d cG
U
g
"'r.
r
o
c
�
b
�
�
�
C O •�
'y
'E
C
cc
u
y
a
C
C
C
C7
47
0
C
0Oo
pp
y¢
C U "Auy
d
y
p
d
'�••�
�+
ey
47
w
�
by
C � �
•Q
y
C
,C
U
w
o
a
c
am[
S o
w
c
E
a�i
[
au
a.
3
d
C
L7
y
cy
C
U
ti
O
vUi
'Si 'b � �
�
b
C
+••
C
ti
too
p
E
to
wc
a s
m
to
v°� �
M
ago
to.0
w
ocu
d
F
3 2 3
E
F
3
ci
CD
b
0
C
U
d
(U.
W ae
Q —
ae
LO 00
ae
C
yCO
Q
U
•p
«+
C
Q
�
p
�
W �•r �
M
O
U
�
cd
O
Cr
M
H
CL
$
aoi
i
iTy Q
ni
:�
Q
.)
Q
O
�
E
.�
y
m
c
'�
c
❑
z
y
^c
cn
w
a
d
U
id
U
V
d
w
y
w
:C
'v
o
S
co
U C
E
Q
w
z❑ Qm
nb o
a
O
"
= .
C y
p
C U
O a_
t,
y«+
C
b
¢
CC
>
ed
E
cu
o3i
O
F"
�
00 'O
c,
ai
CD
U
C
a
L
E
y b
C
•�
y •G
O
C
�d 4
b
no
�o
U
::
w
47
CD
6Ui �
�
0" ��„
p
,G C
•Y
y
y
R
C❑
O
�
y
w W
O
�
U
U
�
_�
_
M0)
'c
� c
'm
•� y�
�. o
a
m
y
.0
�
a �
� ❑
� y
�
a� d
.n
a
r,
v ':
U
A O.
C
C
o.
v�
F �
�
y �
�
'
�
M
H
� •`
[
��
soe
33 U
m
•.•
N•3
.�
�•
C
He
�F�"a.aki
3
�y
C
61
y
O
y
N
N
D
aor
a
y
U
y
ro
w
0
y
w
y
i0
d
y
°IZL
d
t0
G.
L
w y
5rL
c
O
m
y
U 67
Q
fl
w
.o
.".
F
o
>
'O
V7
�
U
,p
4
o
cc
a
d
�
•V
ed
..
A
o
o
CD
�
_b
0
3
0
m
no
00cc
C
� b
to C 'A'd d G w 0 'ti C C U C C I '> T C
y � � y � C O
�c•a'o av � c c
S a cCD
AS
°• c ' aEi ° d o
id Gw C F�> a ' C b>— d no = d 0 E.2 '� a
CD °� Q 0. a°i y [ CD
44
c oCD
,
Ear ,� ° ; � � � b� �•E � >,� >,n' °'� y� d �
n °' y a '� a a� d c E° 3 o a, �•
,, y
aU L a� fl L p c d o c .. yCDw o0
y t C O C
CD$b ti oo p, a) 3 y
0 3° (D c d¢ c '� 67 U° d a L :°
Q id
CD«: o c y° c aci c Q c Fes-
ti E° a q d ° c o• g y y o a, C y c �I ° 'c La a� a
a� E � „ ° a y •� a � _, a� N d y r a� a� ° a a o• .p � U ny
N r a a > I� Q by y S o• �
A m � R� � U CDny ¢ 0c
ao •o > a a �
c
L
C
2 C
•U 'ti U
L=
U
U
O
d d,
C
«O w
p•
L)co
CD
m
CD
y
$
L L
c
C
0.
ID
a
..
c
tb
y
a
A
E
o
U
E
i°
C°
C v
o
y
b
a)
y
m
a
�..
•L :.
•O
U
y C
C
m
°�
�
�R�ggI
�
y
y
v�
U.0
_
U
ca
.>
C=
.N
m
O 0.
be
p
w
0
34
0.
�>
O
a o
°
ND c
>
oS
Cry
C
a)
E
> vi
c
cc.
m
C
E
eo
w
°
3
CU
L L
0o
p
c
c
eo
o
0>
y
c
c
co
O
to
>
Q'
t
O
a7
ee
O.
7
•�
U
;C
E
O
«+
O
c m
DG
O
m
O
U
C
U
CC
C
a
c ed
°
U
U
C
a
7
p
G
w
.°.
c
'�
�
'C
y
S
L
w �
m
.E
eo
�
O
a7
�
c
C
�
d
«
c
a
C
p
U a
� 'L7
r.
a�
..
•o
o
uj
co
a
021to
c
vi
?
v
y
w
E by
•Qi
a
U
e0
E
c
.d
y
m
U
y
bU
•�
W
M U
CD
cc,
w
y d
m y
O
°
ti r
N
d
ai 'L
cc
� 3
3
C
C N
d
C k
U «O
0.
a) O
C
0
�
� c
3 L
o
r c y
x
Co 07
y
o a
>
U w
w y
cc
C >
eE
Q
3
¢
[ c
m
vi
mCD
0
U
a) p w0
0
E� "o
C to c
--
°°
c
•�
° E
�'
Q)
C y
U
E
A
U
C
U
C
fl
C7
U
b
L
V)
L
U
7
to w
Q C�C
G
O
U
E
oo
c
U
Q L
y
a
O
C
d
o 0
o
L
C
dCOMM
�
y y
C
p
aCi
p 'O
U
U
O
C
y U
U d
y«
m
w !0
Cd
3
0
y O C p p ^O aUi G O C y C
CD
4) `° 3 a y `- b 3 3 o c ed
-cm on " .3 -0 'c 0 0 L >, a v Q) 3 3 0
D c� 20 C
O y 6) •� ~ L w O^ U 0 G 3 r O i
O c. U,' •� p, L 6Li a O 3 Q. y op
o L C
u o 15
C C w oq
° «. o no O L
o •S �, ., o U
U CD
Q)
CD y d U oG cU,
n ed 21.1 ed a) O end Q)to
on
ed C
w to °' to .c
Q) a° cc °) o
U ea Q) �c C p 0 D CD
cc CD C C a� aCi =� fl b m
O . O
y ed Q) ed L r. O C m
to
cc
Qo
td ;C O co •� [ 0 sL O y ¢ � � � U 0. L m T7 C •,O C L v) U a
ed
L 7 G) id 0. O w d A U U L •= L, d C d y .� .a .0 L
CZ
.04
<d � v� a� N � 01 a� a m >, y 'O �d � 'y y � m •ti ::
o c
r.
a
a
°
9� ..
c
"o
V
o
v
H
a�
-o
a�
=
o
�
a�
4°
oLn
to
a
th
8
Gyi
b
C
c
$
G
E
cc
C
cc_
T.
U
o
6)
�a
r.
[
67
a
t-
`
ib
C
a
o
y
a>i
id
O
a
O.
mto
w
CD
cc
a:
O
y
E
U
C
y
U
U
E
y
°
cu
p
A
C
C
'E
a
y
C
z3
S
U
c
y
°
«
c
o
U
y
ea
a
«
r
H
r
H
v
r
p
ed
>•
w
U
a
E
u
°
a°i
to
e
o
o
c
>
U
b
.�E
y
�
CD
La
C
U�
C
U
O
O
3
67
'U
O
y
..
U
C
U
�•
'C
C
y
O
U
>
id
y
>
td
�d
`C
U
,[
w b0
o
y
o
L
[
{d
•� G
b
y
f.
Jf
co
U
Vl
fA
ti
o
9
Z
'S
E
'S
w
5 U a ° � oa[
8 b [ y 3 8 c n o to
° Q
a' .° y CL c •� .c � y y Z � � c Q)
E E ntoto
bo Fro E u o c c r o
U y a V U O /� [ w vi C o d p a y O w C
y O 3 > a O C m
m c 0 a c E at°i r ° r a c M o 8 4° E m
41
bo
w 3 o c w 0 8� 61 0 Z g a� '[ r o c E y c 0
id ` U U C •� y ,C 4 L '] .C+ ,N GU7 'C 'A U C
67 c b E A a�
Q '0 G E n ° 'L .� ea t ec to i° bo C a�i y �C [
n O G7 3 0 w m S 67 O 7 Q �" O n v y bD ,O
�"� �7 � S O c, 0. '[ 'E C O O .a `� °' U .•aG p � + � .yO ,� E� G7 .0 � a' 6`) "�O
c a, '� y E •v `° E 'H n. ,c a� c 't
d o 5 a> a
o r r b d
j A o d m a ^' S c E x ai a
-ai W 'a c o w C 8 8 � � _o b � '°
a a A y[ c ed U t CD
ti v d a� o f m
boo w y i
4) ° > C y ` 6) .O U G .O U C a tu0 .� bbt .0
F E a E r E° n. HFes- u
y
�
'C
�
� o�
y
v,•
7 vi
�
7
+�
O
H
.y.
U
y
U
r.co
t�
°do
E
m
o
�.?
b
7
C
G
C
y
'fl
.d
cd
E
o
w
b
cn
o
U c
a
y
U
<
d
C
act
°
O C
CDA
e0
qy
°
O In
a
n)
a
ro°
ti
R7
U
�
c
'E
�
°w°
•� �
o a
y
RI
Vi
.'ten
y
w
t,
:117
4
C
y
to
id
A
a°
d
U
m
L
o
y
«O
i�
a
c
a�i
E
c
y
b
m
w
O
td
CZ
C
y
IV,0
y
C
U
C
c0
r4
C
go
co
o
CD
f
'6
y
E
o
go
f
o
r
o
`c
c m
ti
A
IWb
v
C
U
4
ro Q
C
R7
C
0
>
d
ro20
a0i
c
�i
y
tvCD
U m
O
t.
0.
0
O
C9
w
Z
O
I;
to
a
A
E
ci
O
y
U
U C C U
n
a
oo c 3
y7
G'
V
J.,
cu
[
O
o w w, O y
ro
C
O
w
U
`
y
co
a
y
U W
O
G)
gd y X.
C
0
G
ppG,' yCU
bO
L.0
y Go
a
b
4
a
y>
y
O U
C m
b
U
C D U w
C
ro
ed ro O
^ca
A
y
ro
O q
yy.
tUtl
'L7
C 0 A
N
G
Q
•tC�
'Ly
•C
"� '
iC
C7My
�
y
�
Ll
vy
U 6�i O G
It
N
Ei
p
c
«.
4
d
Op
DUo
C
U
Q'
CL
Q
,V
d
e
�
3
c
�
0
C U
C
O
F�
co
c
y
a �,
c
cn
�
e0e M aCi
o`d.
[ O C O U C 14
C C OCi c`y�. iU. cpp
U vJ O 5 .,, C y c. 'n c0 0
O O q�y7 U p
y 5 5 C
7 .N. «.�', U bD �" C � tb •� «�+ G7 vUi 'cc " C '0
c c y' 3 b b c 3 7
�j 0± C C M
�U A > DD y U 7 0 A '' C
,�
c c
0 C e0 U W c m y rA - w ^" C m -w 7
o a� �' a� v, C x y is 4 Arn
�o o
'm � a ° a y y0 IUD ID � toaU�i y c
R7 0 F U O�yy � U U� U U
U m U U m 3 V U �p 0. U C fl id C
y o o c n c
o c. d •o o h ,e
0° 3 CO ° d
8�s ° N C7 y b ° p w c U
U
n,
M
7
O
CD
n
CD
N
N
00
� Ln
7
to
O
Cn
O
to
m
CD cn
N
7
N
.Nr
y
kn
iA
CND
n
M N
M
y
-It
00
M
N
M
C•.1
CD
7
cn
M O
7
7
N
y
M
N
in
u]
~
N ~
N
N
N
ell
I
N
O
n
c1l^
O
M O
O
CD
n
N
Q7
00
M
nl
7
O
O
O
O
O
C
CD
.,,,�
�
N
N
N
M
N
N
1n
N
CD n N LO
O
7
CD
�
N
7
N 7 y
O M CD try
7
M
cci a C0
in
0
S7
kn
^
t`
=
N
d
y
—
M
O
ti
61
a
C
7
OC
g2
y
`
U
•O
O
'C
co
v
E
ti
tV.
C
0.
o
E
E°
CA
E
H
c
h
d 0E
co
cu
`0
y U y O
V1
.M..
eVa
c o
cn
co
H
, �
CA
°C
E
o
�y�e�ny
�
�
�
bo�•cy
c�v
�
�
�
E
�
.;
mo .� OC I c[ o�= d Cp C c°7i `� a 'C:o � .. .o � o v � � ti Rs E � o
4
do >, c
> l $ x T!
C C y C cp, d EO Ow, "U ti w 6Ui ti -CQQ U
p IV 7 >, UO '00 C7 Op � b c. b � Cy V r„� F
C C �L y «: 7U7 C- to C« C� U � O C id Zf C
O c� id 10, i. tvp C � C 0 a' « «. C 0 C p too
y� c
y «. E c o cc o
a 5 °, b o H o c
to
acE
o$ M. aro Q o �° C c a
y •v 'ti v, �' N •C eo
a np a y a H e° ° c>$ ypp c
d 'O S E w •V• y ai va ti°pid m . •C Lr.
o
1 to o c a
oc Soy Rs a� E yy > c °:
y c0 a,C GJ p U m w cu > C U A R7 �, 0 C 6> Q m d
d E 5 m z 'fl s a� •� 0; O "au'C ir" 'C p v U : : O •R
d o, c °' C 8 '� y a)oA > a° w m e 5b a� C
8_ �' m o c A �' y m o b o aEi ? O° i' 0 o p
j' b .5 v c •E n° z c a a toto K
o
M G) � 0. C :: C •• m 0. U ,[ C C r.r O E .a V M RI
, c m
Ci > Dtj y O «'�+ w g? U �"�,'y" '� '�" .��" 8 O C O
8 c e?
40 o$ F E 8 rj w Z nip E m a
E
0 ;bc 5 Zy� d� �s c oNo�° ° �' e
CD M
b NCL) C C O y c c y L. E O V
O C 7 p C m M U ed 3 G ed G U d
0 o °cutj) a
( 8 Cc
E c
E c N U c 8 a 3
° -0r 3 dE; aci
c $ E c o $ E
y o wL. °
3 co (D
vy C ar � Y Q
L 'C W U a�. n% p •y .L' m•> •_�"' c^ •� E G7 V V]
E d b o ai °'
O 3 p C T7 07
.'�. O H O p ,� G7 .0 ° ^p O A '� Ecu
O p O id C "O O E O ° 4 O p 7 C G cxu 0. C
a O CL p p C 0 ` a�
U C G O
'K '° d 0. y m d
.V O 7 O erly N 0. �d N
tC0 y = :b cOy,7 U N� U O ` eat .�' N `'w «y.• vyi
°' 8 i" ao o0 4. ° °' 7 a� y� � 0. nip «. N U M O o A E o. 3 U d m a
.O O d U O d 67
.. ai c •p = d c �, > 3
�- _° t E
O y 7 4 0CD
OD 3 fl vOi U
m co co N o
CD C 'c y0. "C y y.
` y " in
o
nOyo 3 °� °�' ZCD
Ow
SO
> co cca E c b _c b a cOc
co s no a y°> CD
U ,O E C of d> G aEi r C ro CD
cc
w
3
0 �
;> 0. C K.
.� d a� 0 y C G
y, CL i � c a
0
bo
7 Uccgo
CD to
c aU M E o b 'rw
U a 00 E U
a. '� E
x G N b 6i > 7 ro U O y
ro y a .,
0 aU d
oto
ro 4 y .ticu a>i m
d y '.�� 0. d rocu
o t
E
CDw c o a� °
Q ro r Y 5 .5 c c$ 0 �� � E i0
o: '.° 5o E U rob
E o > �aci E ¢ b
nioCL o a�i °d' c o �_ •c
x cc s
_ pp ro a. no
y U b to
UD
b T n"`°o ti a o 4 a. Z°0 Go a CD
3 a�
a o
pa «+ cc y C bpA y 7 7
> p U C O
S ro a y C E >„ U y° 0.
d
C U
v 05 C o f ai n o ,°e"
.�. :: 'O co a' OM 0
b° ,� 0C C to °' 3 E a o a� •O d aci
y y
C
O ro U r O y C •p U ? fi b ro Dp C
a r y y .. ro C ro m 4 ,[ c. y° c
Cd
d oG ^. EIjcL d uy Y o d y
3° F w o
r4, "�'!s
V
12
M Mr Park K❑ ❑
II I
II
Cooper Mall
• II
II I
I
I •I •
I
I
I
❑ ❑
El
— I ❑ El
I � I ❑ I
E-
--------- G———— — —-II—---G----------------'�-------
Parking " — ---�
Ski Bus Loading
I II I
I I
II I
ja �T
j I I
I
I
tl1 Durant Ave.
°ml 3
�I I
MILL STREET c.
GALENA STREET
Legend RUBEY PARK
—� Electric --S D — Storm Drain —� Telephone Catch Basin Street Light Existing
Conditions
Gas —� Sewer Water Fire Hydrant Switch Box
oew w .o
y
z
O W O
H
zz Y z
c7 a y O
U
F- W O Z
ymt_a
X y 0
lu > Q
3
Legend
0 Switch Box
e Street Light
Q Catch Basin
CB
Itl STREET
i
--..--� Surface Drainage
Traffic Direction
Sits, Area
TH15 EFi ELTIV6 9iTC ARCM GO—,— 6y 59C 6B FT
OR �.�KRLS. WHiCX INC,4mb RUDCY PARK,RMTIdY!
90uTN DYR — T-T BiDEWALK A D`?M G AALLEY RdWe
Building Area
AGLCS30RY GOMMERGIAL ArM1IDJeD
uNOeR Gbx{N MV+Me+�Cr17 rIJ�N � C�D�o a�.pT
vie�TOR G61yTfJt, PUO�iG 71KC,
CM�IOYEC uNR a eq FT
TOTAL DUIupINq MM s Ig ]jD Oi. PT
GALENA STREET �..---
RUBEY PARK
Site
gPlan �I
I u u
o¢
iu
z
W Q
ci
Q d 5a
EL }p
C.
W CO t �W5
N M3 d
El
S�
i>.
I.0
a 6
I
L
• 9
C.
B A
'
•
ROOF LEVEL EMPLOYEE UNIT
L MEN OTC. }.'�'.,�
•
y
__.. �_ a— • WOMEN
_t
ACCESSORY COMMERCIAL MEZZANINE _
tto.n.ta•.I
:.wWrEFI-
•
F
CffY
� VISITOR EI�ITER eus
'
1
WAffm
1 ATION /
•
i+`
ACCESSORY CgB61CIAL
ww tw.n.ta■t+l WENE
I + i
I i I t
I
1 WET
¢
00
H
'"
J
LL
J
W-O
tu
W10
W 0.
J
y oc 0
cc
W
a.
W OIZ,
(—'W
ici>
RUBEY PARK
°"•
K�
"�` °�
Upper Level
Floor Plan
5
B A
tRl RACKS
- TRAER.t�
C. ....
I of i
f FOOp MEMRATIaI
ia]j •COUNTER SMLE LOCAL
. L`t IE00 SO. FT.1 YAM CE BUS
U OFFICE OFFICE
•� PUEtIC MAITINO- J'
-�I EEATIMO AREA
071110E OY!
` - E .._J POST AUTOMATIC
• OFFICE
PUBLIC SPACE SUBSArNEI
1 � i
LEST.
[ON
J
C
RUBEY PARK
Lower Level
Floor Plan
Z
Q
J
a
W
O
OJ W O
a Y � a
W W.O
> Q.v
W
w 3m W ~OiZ
a
i �>,a
0
Ytt rti-JZ=SIT i'--'
WAGNER PARK ELEVATION
DURANT AVENUE ELEVATION RUBEY PARK
Elevations
NORTH MALL ELEVATION
\ii"
,FT
,�J
SOUTH CANOPY ELEVATION
RUBEY PARK
Elevations
�e
pt
•�
vm"ft CEMTEJ c^�^
p - YIErtOLt1Eb1YET � �9'" '
-M 'C rpE:E
LOCK[RS pFFICE
• y���r
I!
i. IBI
•
SECTION A -A
•
KCES.pIr CO EKCIRL Y -
RCCO.•Ir piElCw
,
1��/- RUELIC SR�CE
/
.EEYM:E puc
-f
rood rR[v •w.ycv t.�
-
/
SECTION B-B
•
•
O
in
FW
- Q
Z
.�.•R p•EE! Cw
w
.,
VISO- IRiORMATI
\\
W
Q Q J
-
I
1�
y
a y
.caaaE m.cRcm
- _
a
W
}
rtTtr
y
O Z
HCL
RUBEY PARK
is
:InidlluwJl,l..mli I I
Cross
SECTION C-C
Sections
ftfl=�
0 w
9
MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP
ACCOMMODATION - NO LIABILITY
r-
THE CITY OF ASPEN
ATTN: MONROE SOMERS
L
Description
LOTS K,L,M,N,O,P,Q,R AND S,
BLOCK 90,
CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN
Please direct correspondence to:
-� 601 E. HOPKINS
ADDRESS
ASPEN COLORADO R1611
CITY STATE ZIP CODE
ORDER NUMBER 7300231
J
TRANSAMERICA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY HAS EXAMINED THE RECORDS OF THE COUNTY CLERK
AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO AND HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT:
(TITLE EXCEPTIONS ON REVERSE)
Grantee in last instrument xpptransferring ownership:
BOOK 251 AT PAGE 619 GRANTEE IS THE CITY OF ASPEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION,
IN FEE SIMPLE
Trust deeds and mortgages apparently unreleased :
NONE
Liens and judgements (against last grantee) apparently unreleased:
This information is for your sole use and benefit and is furnished as an accommodation. The information has
been taken from our tract indices, without reference to, or examination of, instruments which purport to
affect the real property. The information is neither guaranteed nor certified, and is not an Abstract of Title,
Opinion of Title, nor a Guaranty of Title, and our liability is limited to the amount of the fees.
Date: NOVEMBER 29 , 19 82 , at 8:00 A.M.
TransamericaTi le Insurance Company
By
Form No. C-567
TITLE EXCEPTIONS:
1. Reservations and exceptions in Patent and Acts authorizing the issuance thereof.
Patent recorded on subject property on March 1, 1897 in Book 139 at Page 216,
providing as follows: that no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold,
silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim of possession held under
existing laws."
2. Terms, conditions, agreements, provisions and obligations as contained in Agreement
between Hodge -Oliver Company, a Limited Partnership and the City of Aspen as recorded
April 7, 1970 in Book 247 at Page 864 which contains a first right of refusal for a
period of 20 years from January 5, 1971.
3. Notice of Historic Designation as recorded January 13, 1975 in Book 295 at Page 515.
n
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council June 13, 1983
members appointed by the county and the 5th member appointed jointly. The new board will
recommend the department director. Mayor Edel said the city is very much involved in the
process. Mayor Edel said he believed strongly that Duane Fengel has done an outstanding
job for the city.
i
3. Bil Dunaway asked that the Council add to the agenda using the streets for the foot
race for the Fourth of July. It is the same course as last year. Mayor Edel suggested
this be on the new Council's agenda.
RESOLUTION #16, SERIES OF 1983 - Milton Conner Memorial Park
Councilman Knecht moved to read Resolution #16, Series of 1983; seconded by Councilwoman
Michael. All in favor, motion carried.
RESOLUTION #16
(Series of 1983)
WHEREAS, Milton G. Conner (1898-1983) a native and life-long citizen of
Aspen, Colorado, was a member and manager of the Board of Directors of the
Fraternal Hall Association for 25 years; and
WHEREAS, in this capacity he acted as guardian of the Fraternal Hall
Building (City Hall) from 1928 until September, 1944, when he participated in
the granting of a perpetual lease of the building to the City of Aspen; and
WHEREAS, from 1944 until the mid-1970's, he was instrumental in
preserving this historical structure and in transferring permanent title to
the property to the people of As_nen in 1956; and
WHEREAS, the City Council, on behalf of the people of Aspen, wish to
express regrets and sympathy to his family and friends on his passing, and
WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to honor and remember Milton G. Conner
for hiF life and contributions to the people of Aspen.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
APSNE, COLORADO:
Section 1
That the City commemorate in perpetuity the name of Milton Conner by
naming Lots N, O and the west twenty-two and one-half (22-1/2) feet of Lot P
Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado, in his honor, to be known
from this time forward as "Milton Conner Memorial Park". was read by the city
clerk
Councilwoman Michael said she would like to see something like a plaque in the park
explaining about Milton Conner. Council agreed.
Councilman Knecht moved to adopt Resolution #17, Series of 1983; seconded by Councilwoman
Michael. All in favor, motion carried.
RESOLUTION #17, SERIES OF 1983 - Robert "Bugsy" Barnard Park
Councilman Collins moved to read Resolution #17, Series of 1983; seconded by Councilwoman
Michael. All in favor, motion carried. f
RESOLUTION #17
(Series of 1983) I
WHEREAS, DR. ROBERT A. BARNARD did ably and faithfully serve as a
Councilmember for two years and Mayor of the City of Aspen, Colorado, for
four years, and such outstanding service did contribute to the continued
prosperity of the City and the accomplishment of its goals, and
WHEREAS, Dr. Barnard was responsible for the annexation of the North
and South side, and
WHEREAS, Dr. Barnard was responsible for the adoption of the City of
Aspen's 1966 Master Plan, and
WHEREAS, Dr. Barnard actively worked for the elimination of all outdoor
advertising both in the City and County, and
WHEREAS, Dr. Barnard had unswerving faith in the concept of underground
parking at Wagner Park, and
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen desires to honor and commemorate a park
in memory of Dr. Robert A. Barnard.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RFSOLVED that the City commemorate in perpetuity
the name of Dr. Robert A. Barnard by renaming No Name Park to be known from
this time forward as "ROBERT A. BUGSY BARNARD MEMORIAL PARK" was read by the
city clerk
Councilman Collins moved to Adopt Resolution #17, Series of 1983; seconded by Councilwoman
Michael.
Councilman Collins suggested a plaque for this park also. Mayor Edel asked Chuck Dunbar
to get involved in the plaque. Councilman Knecht asked about the landscaping plan for
this park. Dunbar said he has gotten together some volunteers and they will submit a
plan to the city.
All in favor, motion carried.
ORDINANCE #23, SERIES OF 1983 - Rubev Park SPA
Councilman Collins stated there are several items on this agenda for second and final
consideration, and lie would like to propose that they be put off until the new Council is
sworn in.
Councilman Collins moved that Rubey Park SPA public hearing be opened and continued until
the next regular meeting; seconded by Councilman Knecht.
Councilwoman Michael said she is opposed to the motion as some of the ordinances to be
Regular Meeting Aspen City Council June 13, 1983
considered are not controversial. Councilwoman Michael said when this Council took office
four years ago, there old Council did not finish some business that this Council made
some bad decisions on because they were not familiar enough with the issues.
Councilmembers Knecht and Collins in favor; Councilwoman Michael and Mayor Edel opposed.
Motion NOT carried.
Mayor Edel opened the public hearing.
1. Francis Whitaker read a letter to Council. "Ladies and Gentlemen, I wish to oppose
the passage of Ordinance No. 23, Series of 1983 for the following reasons. 1. Just on
general principles, I oppose the rezoning of Rubey Park from P, park to any other land
use. For at least 15 years there has been a constant battle to protect our parks and
open space. Remember the Barnard administration's attempt to rezone Herron Park for
employee housing, and then its use as a winter snow and trash dump.
The Standley administration rezoned a portion of the golf course open space on
Cemetery Lane before anyone really know about it. Also tried to rezone and open for
development the lots on the north side of the golf course, purchased for open space. The
Edel administration rezoned, fortunately temporarily, a part of the golf course for an
automobile impound lot, and appeared ready to give a large portion of the Thomas property
to the Dividion of Highway for a four lane highway. Public opposition and the voters
turned the tide.
I believe the City of Aspen has a permanent commitment to the voters to keep Rubey
Park and a park. When this property was proposed for development, the then City Council
took quick action. We formed a Rubey Park Trust Fund, to which 36 locals loaned $88,975,
and which enabled the Council to hold the property until a bond issue could be submitted
to the voters. The bond issue was to purchase the property for municipal purposes. I
submit that commercial space is not a municipal purpose, and that the contributors and
voters wanted the property undeveloped.
The area is too small and in a highly congested area. The Rio Grande property was
purchased for transportation, there is plenty of room there. Any transit terminal must
have room for Trailways bus system, instead of leaving it out at the airport.
I am opposed to the three exemptions, growth management, employee housing and II
parking. Every exemption you grant further counteracts the whole idea of growth manage-
ment. Rexpectfully yours, Francis Whitaker." Whitaker read a letter from William and
Florence Beaumont, who loaned money for the purchase of Rubey Park and who object strongly'
to the proposed plan for the development of Rubey Park. Whitaker read a list of loan i
contributions to the Rubey Park Trust Fund. L. Schoolman, $1000; William Staley, $1000
Henry Stein, $1000; John Strandberg Jr. $1000; Don Swales, $1000; Tom's Market $2000; �
Ben & Katherine Wells $3000; Francis Whitaker $1000; Leigh Wilson $1000; Phil and Joan
Wright, $25; Michael Hernstadt $10,000; John Herron $1000? Thomas Daly $2000; Kettle i
Corporation $3000; G. Drummond Mansfield $500; Charles Nicola $100; Harold Pabst $6000;
Ruth Pope $1000; Eve Homeyer $100; Esco Development Corporation (Butch Clark) $10,000; r
Blaine and Caroline Fairless $1000; Giles Tilley and Mary Brown, $1000; Fox, Sweeney &
True $1000; Peter Guy $2000; Gus Hallum $1000; J. Sterling Baxter $2000; William and
Florence Beaumont $2000; D.R.C. Brown $1000; Canyon Cable TV $10,000; Peter or Penderal
DuBois $250; Aspen Skiing Company $10,000; Aspen Wildcat Inc. $5,000; Bank of Aspen $1000;'
Aspen Country Store, Inc $2,000; Tom Wilson (Hodge -Oliver) $3,000; 1i
2. David Zaagman said he did not think it appropriate to build commercial building betweel
the lodging zone and the mall. Zaagman said he felt there is further planning needed
for that area. �l
3. Mayor -elect Bill Stirling said the nature of the proposal is laudable and extremely
creative as it calls on the private sector to build a building for the city; but not at
all costs if it is in the wrong place. Stirling said there is a glut of commercial space
in Aspen, and to increase commercial space on city property is a problem. Stirling said
he felt the spirit was to retain that area as open space. Aspen is threatened with
losing open space.
4. L. Schoolman told Council he was one of the contributors to hold the property for the
city. At that time it was to hold Rubey park to keep it from being developed.
5. Carolyn Doty told Council she is opposed to this project. Ms. Doty said that all
open space that exists should be preserved.
6. Mark F. said he has never heard people complain about the inconvenience of getting on
buses at Rubey Park.
7. Melinda Severence told Council that Rubey Park is a transit center, whether it should
have been there or somewhere else. For five years, the city, county and Ski Company have
all used it as their central transportation point. Ms. Severence pointed out the city
has tried parking and a bus shuttle at Rio Grande and people do not use it.
8. Mari Peyton said the city should investigate the possibility of adding bathrooms, a
waiting area and shelter but eliminating the commercial space from this project.
9. David Engler said changing the cosmetics will eventually lose some of the qualities
that make Aspen very attractive.
10. Council -elect Al Blomquist urged Council to put this off until the next meeting.
11. Francis Whitaker pointed out any measure submitted to Uie voters to take away open
space has been soundly defeated.
Mayor Edel closed the public hearing.
t
4
Continued Meeting Aspen City Council July 7, 1983
Walls said she would like to know how big a building, what are the uses, and where it
would be located. Councilman Collins said he would like to know density, open space,
parking. circulation, view planes, commercial build out and delivery access. Forsch said
that world by a GMP application, essentially. Mayor Stirling suggested a balance somewhere
of the two lists.
ORSJNrXNCE #23, SERIES OF 1983 Rubey Park SPA
*hyor Stirling opened the public hearing. Mayor Stirling entered into the record letters;;,
ane from George Byers, in favor of the proposal; Mary Faulkner, Tipple Lodge, in favor ij
of the proposal; Francis Whitaker, strongly opposed to the Rubey Park application; Michael;
Kinsley, Pitkin County Commissioner, saying Rubey needs improvements and upgrading; !i
William and Florence Beaumont, strongly objecting to the proposed plan.
Colette Penne, planning office, told Council this project is a successful competitor in II
the commercial growth management competition for 1983. An allocation of 5810 square feet
of commercial space has been made for the project. This ordinance requests rezoning from
P, park with a transportation/drainage overlay to Public/SPA. The ordinance also adopts
a precise Plan. There is exemption for the 9,070 square feet of public space from the
GMP competition, and exemption of an employee housing unit and parking for that unit.
P & Z send a resolution with their recommendation, with a list of permitted and conditional
uses. The P & Z recommends Council rezone this Property to Public/SPA and adopt the
precise plan, and grant the exemptions. P & Z was very sensitive, in the permitted and
conditonal uses, to the interplay of the public.space and the commercial space.
Mayor Stirling entered into the record Resolution 83-2, from the Commercial Core and
Lodging Commission, recommending that'Council encourage Trailways to bring their buses to
Rubey Park when the terminal is finished. Monroe Summers, representing the applicant,
said this process had evolved over a long period of. time and has adjusted itself to all the
laws and rules in the community designed to promote slow arowth. Summers said there is
a need for this project to deal with the transportation issues. Over 15 years ago, Aspen
recognized the: need for public transportation alternatives and a plan for auto disincentive.
As early as 1964, Rubey Park was suggested as a transportation center. The reason to use
Rubey Park is geographic; it is surrounded by the lodge district and the commercial core.
Summers pointed out Rubey Park evolved as a transportation hub; it makes it convenient
for people. i
Summers told Council the city has been running a transportation system around Rubey Park.
Summers said Aspen is on the verge of providing a state of the art transportation system.
The city and county are developing a consolidated transportation system; a county wide
sales tax is approved for transportation. There is a new bus maintenance facility being
built, which will allow much more flexibility and the upgrading the appearance of public
transportation. Pitkin County and Aspen will have the second largest transportation system
in the state of Colorado when all this comes together. Summers said there is a system but
no place to operate in otwn. Summers told Council the concept of putting the visitors
center and the transportation terminal together makes sense.
Summers told Council he spent a year at Rubey Park answering constant requests for informa-
tion, cultural tickets, and bathrooms. Rubey Park is a magnet; it is there, it is currently
the transportation system and it is Perceived as an information center. Summers told
Council the people are not presently being accommodated. Summers said there are concerns
with this proposal. The proposal was made to get a visitors/transportation center that
would not cost the taxpayers any money. Summers said taking busing out of Rubey Park is
not the solution; Rubey Park needs to be upgraded.
Charles Hopton said there was a downzoning after Aspen Square was built so that the town
would not get another building like it on Rubey Park. The voters voted to buy Rubev Park
for open space. Hopton said transportation should not be precluded from Rubey Park, but
commercial space should not be allowed there. Hopton said a transportation center is
needed; however, this is growing far out of proportion to what is really needed.
Jan Derrington said that Rubey Park was never a park, as such. Derrington said Aspen
claims to be a first class resort, yet does not have a transportation center. Derrington
said this facility is a reasonable solution to providing a facility that is badly needed,
using a mechanism of public and private partnership, alleviating the town from taking on
another tax burden. Derrington said he did not think 5,000 square feet of commercial
space would break Aspen. The services would not be competing with anything else around. �I
Derrington said having an attractive visitors/transnortation system is a very positive I
thing and would provide convenience for the visitors.
Molly Campbell, read a letter from the Cant into the record, saying they feel Aspen needs 1i
to continue to Aspen needs to continue to improve its visitors' services; they support the
proposed SPA overlay. The improvement if the transportation center is a necessity. Rubey;
Park is a convenient location for both summer and winter visitors as well as downtown
employees. Rubev Park should be ungraded to provide circulation, visitor management and
information. Ms. Campbell told Council when the.Gant was approved, they were forced to li
operate two shuttle vans as auto disincentive. One of the biggest problems was where to
drop guests on and off safely; Rubev Park has provided a safe, feasible, good alternative.
Ms. Campbell encouraged Council to leave their options on Rubey Park open. II
Peter Forsch, transportation manager for the Aspen Skiing Company,.told Council they have 11
been using Rubey Park for years and years and hundreds of thousands of people go through it
that area. Forsch said that Rubey Park is poorly designed for both auto and pedestrian ;I
circulation. Forsch said the location of Rubey Park near the lodges and commercial core I,
is one of the only locations which is -extremely important to transportation. Forsch urged,:
Council to consider this for the transportation hub and visitor center for Aspen. !I
Dick Jackson, operator of the trolley car at Rubey Park, told Council he runs both a wintei
and summer center at Rubey Park. Jackson said it is important to have an information
center at Rubey Park. Jackson said it is important to be able to offer all these facilities
in one place. It is done in many resorts in Europe.
Continued Meeting Asnen City Council July 7, 1983 a
Tom Clark.said when it comes to Rubey Park transportation center, the problems with visito
management did not happen yesterday. Clark said he hoped the Council is concerned about
visitor management; making it convenient and easy for people does not hurt the ambiance of
Aspen. This enhances what Aspen is trying to do. Clark said having a transportation center
has been a real priority of this community. Clark said he felt this center would be a
convenience for Aspen's customers; it would not hurt anything but would help the town.
Jon Busch agreed with most of the comments; however, there is the consideration that Aspen,
does not need such a big center. In peak periods of the winter, Rubey Park is full of
buses and people. The need to have Trailways come in has not been addressed. Once Amtrak)
starts serving Glenwood Springs, there will be increases of buses. This transportation
center is really needed. Busch pointed out that the Council's advisory Boards have said
this is a center that is needed and have recommended it to Council.
Hans Gramiger said he felt open space in the middle of town is important, and Rubey Park
compliments Wagner Park. Gramiger said he would not want to see a transportation center
in the middle of town. Gramiger pointed out looking at transportation in the long range,
this site is too small for what is being proposed. The Rio Grande for transportation has
to be looked at. Gramiger read to Council a transportation report from PBn&D that the
Rio Grande should serve as a parking area and as an anchor for the major transportation
routes. Rubey Park should only serve as a bus stop; all routes should terminate at Rio
Grande. Rubey Park will become less able to handle the buses as the transportation system,
grows; Rio Grande improved should be the terminus for all express and major local bus
routes.
John Coddle stated he is strongly in favor of both the information and transportation
center at Rubey Park as a great asset to the community. Coddle said a transportation !
center at the Rio Grande will necessitate another form of transportation. Coddle said
rejection of this plan will mean that streets will become increasingly contested; the more
cars there are, the less room there is for pedestrians.
Carolyn Doty, committee to preserve open space, told Council the committee opposes the
rezoning of Rubey Park because it has been a park for 12 years. The Committee especially
opposes any commercial use on anything zoned park. Ms. Doty said she thought anything
zoned park had to be submitted to the voters before any changes could take place. City j
Attorney Taddune said it is not the zoning but the monies which bought the property. t
Summers pointed out Rubey Park was not purchased with open space funds. Taddune said the :i
prior Council had committed to submit this to the voters.- Ms. Doty said this is the wrong,;
spot for the project; the area is too small, it is too congested already. Ms. Doty said
transportation systems do need parking area. The main massive buildings should be on the
Rio Grande. Ms. Doty said she felt there was too much commercial growth in Aspen already.'
Marvin Jordan, member of the CCLC, said both the Mall Commission and CCLC have been
concerned about Rubey Park. Aspen needs to be able to serve the visitors that are here.
Jordan said the CCLC is on record in favor of bringing bus arrivals and departures into
the center of town. It is a crime against the visitors to be dumped off. at night five
miles out of town. Jordan told Council the CCLC chose not to go on record about the
commercial space; however, individually, Jordan said he did not much care for the concept
of 5,000 square feet of commercial space. He feels the transportation/visitors center
is an imperative necessity for the continued prosperity of Aspen. II
Jerry Blann, Aspen Skiing Company, said they spend about $800,000 a year on transportat
to serve the customer. Blann said Aspen's need a focal point for transportation. Blann
said he did not think the Rio Grande is the place for a transportation center; it is
inefficient and energy consumptive.
David White said this is part of a long range plan, with Rubey Park, Rio Grande and the I�
airport as part of transportation. There should be a way to "get people from Glenwood
Springs to Aspen and back out again. Roger Hunt, P & Z member, said he has seen how
other communities handle their tourists; the way Aspen handles it's tourists is rather
disgraceful when it comes to community services. Hunt said he felt it would be a
calamity not to have a Rubey Park transportation center. Hunt said he did have concern II
about the commercial space in this center; however, this is a way for the city to get
services that are needed without putting the financial burden on the community. Hunt
told Council the P & Z was concerned that the commercial space should be auxiallary to II
the transportation needs. Hunt favors this as a solution to Aspen's existing problem.
Kandi Shaffron said the proposed commercial space is a negative impact because there are II
empty store fronts in town. Ms. Shaffron said with lockers in the center, there will be
a vagrancy problem. There is a need for a visitor center. Mari Peyton, a tour operator �I
in town, said she has never heard tourists complain about a bus stop at Rubey Park. She
has heard tourists complain that Aspen is being overrun by commercial space. Ms. Peyton !I
said she would hate to see Aspen calling itself a premier ski resort and having to trade
some rare open space because the city cannot afford to build bathrooms. Ms. Peyton said II
a visitors center, shelter, and bathrooms,is warranted. uu
Joe Cooper, Highlands, said Aspen needs a transportation center and needs to _get rid of
some of the cars. This should be a pedestrian community. One of the problems is the
11
locals. A good bus system and transportation center should be created. The streets should
be two-thirds open space and meander through town; one-way the streets and landscape them.,;
Bil Dunaway asked if the city is going to have to pay for anything at Rubey Park, or willi'
Hodge Oliver, in exchange for the commercial space, pay for everything. Summers said that
was the original concept; however, the arrangement was to get through the SPA process
before the negotiations were finalized.
George Parry said the city has built a good transportation system, and it is very impor-
tant to keep the terminal in the center of town at Rubev Park. Parry pointed out that
a good transportation building will eliminate a lot of the black top that is at Rubey I
Park now and will have more open space and landscaping. Parry said that Aspen has to
take care of the tourists in order to stay a tourist community. The town lacks a facility
where people can get out of the weather, get a snack and wait for the bus.
Continued Meeting Aspen City Council July 7, 1983
Charles Hopton said he is not against the use of Rubey Park as a transportation stop; this;1
plan is replacing blacktop with buildings. Theze are smokey buses sitting there all the
l time filling up the property.
Mayor Stirling closed the public hearing.
i
i Cburacilman Knecht moved to adopt ordinance 023, Series of 1983, on second reading; seconded
by, Councilman Collins. ;I
Councilman Blomquist said he would prefer to adopt only section 1 of the ordinance so the
rezoning is accomplished but not the aoproval'of the SPA. Councilman Blomauist said he i
would also prefer to eliminate the transportation/drainage overlay. Councilman Blomauist
objected to the commercial space! it is excessive. Councilman Blomauist said he feels
the city can handle improvements at Rubey Park without involving the private sector. j
Councilman Collins said he felt there is strong feeling in the community about this half
block as a park. Councilman Collins said he felt it was purchased for that; it was a
park at one time, and people feel strongly in that regard. Councilman Collins agreed this':
is not the appropriate location for such a facility in terms of the scope and magnitude
of this. Councilman Collins said a few years ago, there was strong feeling against large
buses coming into the center of town and feels this is a valid consideration today.
Councilman Collins stated open space is very precious. Councilman Collins said regarding
auto disincentive, at some point, Aspen will reach diminishing returns. Councilman Collins
agreed something needs to be done to inspire the tourists; Aspen needs an information
center. Councilman Collins said the downtown area is special, and bus terminals do not
compliment what Aspen is trying to do in the downtown area. Councilman Collins said he
would like the city to take another look at this site, to incluO.e some things needed to
handle the buses and a modest information center.
Councilman Knecht said the visitor's center is very important. The taxpayers will not have
to pay for anything in this proposal. Councilman Knecht said he felt the taxpayers should
be allowed to vote for this proposal. Councilwoman Walls said she does not like the size
of the plan as it is now; does not like the commercial space nor the uses that are listed
in the ordinance. Councilwoman Walls said Aspen does need a transportation/visitor
center with bathrooms, lockers, ski storage. Councilwoman Walls said Trailways has got
to come into town to be able to drop people off in town.
Mayor Stirling stated he is concerned about the conmerci.al space because the city should
not be a partner in commercial space. This space will be highly visible and rentable, and
will leave other already built commercial space empty. Mayor Stirling said he is concerned
about losing open space in this area, although Rubey Park is not an ideal park. Mayor
Stirling said a transportation center of this size will draw a lot of density into the
downtown area. Mayor Stirling said Aspen needs a visitor center there and a small trans-
portation center; the commercial space is not appropriate. Mayor Stirling said he would
like to see Rio Grande used as a secondary transportation center in a variety of ways.
Mayor Stirling said he is also concerned that the city does not know exactly what the
developer is going to do and what he is going to pay for.
Roll call vote; Councilmembers Blomauist, nay; Knecht, aye; Collins, aye; Walls, nay;
Mayor Stirling, nay. Motion NOT carried.
Councilman Blomquist moved to adjourn at 8:15; seconded by Councilman I;necht. All in favor,
motion carried.
Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk.
Reqular Meetinq Aspen City Council July 11, 1983
Mayor Stirling called tha meeting to order at 5:03 with Collins,
Knecht, Walls and Blomquist present.
i
CITIZEN FARTIC.T?I.TIOF �
1. Nicholas (Frenchy) DeMien saiC that tha bicycle traffic in the :.r•.a.11s 3e•ems to be ett.ing'!
worse, r...^a r= - . _ste:'. scmc� -,-ay : f enf:-rcinq thi_.. DeMien Fointea. out hsre ars lots cf I
peo.ls and R..=ica1 crcu^s in the mall, and. t!^,! bicycles do n:)t mix.'!.: -._ S`_i.rli.-•- _ai•`
at Parch, he '.C%t3 barely .-risse-a by some bicycl.es;, het.•o' .)e: some bicycle ridar= and c'.S%S ed I,i
them to ealk their bike_. John Gccdwir.., Asner.. Police nepartm nt, za.i.d t'-e p�l.i.ce 'arart._
ment tries to get out on the mall as often as possible. The police department -A:O l:' like
citizens to help. Edie Dunn said that bicycle riders, in general, are not obeying traffic
signals, stop signs, around town. Mayor Stirling asked if the police -_a_Ia::t:uC-.nt
bicyclers. Goodwin said they stop bicyclers and talk with them. The police department
has shied away .`rcm writing tickets 1 ecause the; found it wa.s not effective; it is rtore
effective 3pEakln-I to the.1. -it;1 Manaqer Chapm.aa 3ilggested making bicycle t`:af'fic irx tie
mall Folic: effcrt for the next ccu-le cf weeka. Chapman. said ke would have staff '
contact: the bicy.zle rental and repair _hc,:s to rami,d them there is nC :)i.c-,,,cle r id.ing i .
the mall.
2. 'Michael Gassman read to Council s let_ter tha'. he is also submittir_g tc t:�e C-tv Council
of Denver. "Council Members:
The Cities of A.^pen and Denver have a terrific onportu:�i_y to solve tow big 7=blems ;
at once.
People in Aspen have been complaining about this year's puny, lackluster, and generally
dissappointing Fourth of July Parade.
At the same time, people in Denver have been complaining about the traffic congestion
increased commuting times, and all-round inconvenience caused by the numerous parades
associated with last week's Shriner's convention.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: Rubey Park SPA
DATE: June 13, 1983
APPROVED AS TO FORM: C��,i
Location: Lots K. L, M, N, 0, P, Q, R and S, Block 90, original Aspen
townsite, City of Asepn.
Zoning: "P" - Park
TD Overlays - Transportation and Drainage
Applicant's
Request: The applicant is requesting rezoning from "Park" to "Public/SPA",
adoption of the precise development plan, exemption of the
9,070 square feet of public space from growth management
competition and exemption of the employee housing unit from
GMP, and exemption from the provision of parking for the
employee units.
Referral
Comments: The Housing Office points out that Sec. 24-11.2(e) Exemptions
from the Growth Management Quota System has been amended by
Ordinance No. 53 (Series of 1982) to read:
-All construction of essential governmental projects
other than housing; subject to the special approval
of the City Council upon the recommendation of the
Planning and "Zoning Commission. To be eligible for
said exemption the applicant shall be required to
document that the impacts of the project will be
mitigated, including the employee housing generation,
parking demand and the basic service provision."
The documentation needed for this project to be exempt would simply be
a pledge by the City Council that they will continue to require residential
development to generate employee housing.
The City Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Storm Drainage: The application is somewhat confusing with regard
to the handling of on -site storm drainage. The
site plan appears to indicate on -site drywell
detention systems. This is the desirable solution
to maintain the aquifer.
2. Trash Access: The trash area proposed for the structure is fully
enclosed and separated from the alley by doors.
Section 24-3.7(h)(4) requires an "open area"
accessible to the alley. The trash and utility
area should be redesigned to allow open access
to the alley.
3. The site design appears to eliminate public access to the parking
area north of the alley and south of the Stefan Kaelin building.
Memo: Rubey ParK -SPA
Page Two
June 27, 1983
9
WEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
The area included in the site is from the alley to the north, the
_sidewalk to the south and an additional 14,770 square feet which is the
extension of the malls on Galena and Mill Streets. The total land area
is 1.23 acres.
The proposed building totals 15,730 square feet of which 5,810
square feet was allotted in the 1983 Commercial Growth Management
Competition as accessory commercial space. A two -bedroom employee housing
unit of 850 square feet is part of the proposal. The remaining 9,070
square feet constiw to the public areas of the transit/visitor center.
BACKGROLUND
Since each of you has been given a copy of the SPA submission for
this project and it thoroughly covers the project history, we will move
ion to the evaluation of the proposal.
EVfrt_UATION CRITERIA
The criteria outlined in the Municipal Code for evaluation of a
Specially Planned Area are contained in Section 24-7.2(d) of the Code.
ITIl,__ plan shall be considered and approved ... as if an application by
private landowner for an amendment to the zoning district map." -The
review rinst be based on, although not necessarily limited to, the
evaluation criteria outlined in Sec.24-12.5(d)(1).
1. Compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding zone
districts and land use in the vicinity of the site,
considering the existing neighborhood characteristics, the
applicable area and bulk requirements, and the suitability
of the site for development in terms of on -site characteristics.
The transportation/visitor's center is proposed for location
adjacent to Aspen's primary-flourist lodging district and the Commercial
Core. The site is, of course, already in use as a transportation center
for the City, County and ski area bus systems. The building bulk is
compatible %•ri�t.h that surrounding the site, as buildings on all sides
are at least two-story and generally cover the lots they occupy to a
greater percentage than will this structure. To the west is Wagner Park,
wthich contains no structures. The continuation of the Mill Street
section of the mall should integrate well with the transition from
Rubey Park to Wagnes Park. The building has been placed on the westerly
portion of the site to eliminate the problem of sixable buildings on
both sides of Galena Street which would form, as the applicant has
stated, "a potential canyon effect." We feel that the applicant's
attempt to "create the greatest feeling of open space and least perceived
bulk and density with the available land" has been well executed by the
proposed site plan. As indicated in the GMP submission and worth
reiterating here, the project will nearly double the existing landscaping
and open space and reduce asphalt paving by approximately 20,000 square feet.
No site problems exist that require mitigation.
d d safety availability
2. Impacts upon expected traffic generation an roa ,
of on and off-street parking and ability to provide utility
service in the vicinity of the site, including an assessment
of the fiscal impact upon the community.
Kemo: Rubey Park SPA
Page Three
June 27, 1983
The project fs intended for use by the mass transit user. A minimal amount
of on -site parking is being provided (6-16 short term spaces, depending
on the season) so the project should not be a traffic generator. It will
simply be impractical in the winter to drive a car to the Visitor's Center.
In the summer, when the typical visitor is more likely to be driving a
car, there will be more parking spaces available. A stop at the Visitor's
Center should be relatively brief (half an hour or less). By' consolidating
visitor needs, there may be a traffic reduction (in terms of auto trips) and
the tourist will be made aware of the bus system by coming to the center.
If the decision is made to bring Trailways buses to this center, there will
be taxi cab activity that must be accommodated. The sacrifice of the
present parking lot cn the site (approximately 32 spaces) is unfortunate
because of the loss of spaces, (net = approximately 16 in summer, 26
in winter) but the overall benefit of the new center far outweighs that
loss. A decision in favor of this plan will also increase the need for
the parking garage at the Rio Grande to proceed in a timely manner.
Also, since buses presently access the transit center via the alley,
there is less than optimum interaction of cars., pedestrians, and buses_
The increased safety offered by the interior loop arrangement of the
plan is overdue. At present buses are forced to back up in potentially
hazardous areas of skier staging operations; they conflict with pedestrians
on Mill, Galena and at the entrance and exit of the alley; and interact
with automobiles on Durant Street. All of these unfortunate situations
are being eliminated by this plan. The provision of utility services is
adequately handled by existing levels of service. The applicant will be
required to provide on -site drywell detention systems to handle as much
storm runoff as possible, as represented in the GMP subdivision.
It is important to note that the approach taken by the applicant to have a
private individual develop a much -needed public facility by subsidizing its
costs via commercial development represents an important savings in
capital outlays by the public. This innovative financing mechanism
achieves substantial fiscal benefits to the.community, with the only
impact being the addition of new commercial space, which the applicant
has mitigated via the GMP Application.
3. Impacts upon expected air and water quality in the vicinity of the site.
Idling buses are not an enhancement to air quality. However, the proposal
does not include an increase in bus trips from the status quo. The
effect on water quality will be no greater than any typical commercial
development and should be mitigated by the on -site retention of drainage.
4. Analysis of the concnunity need for the project and the relationship
of the proposal to the goal of overall community balance.
The Aspen/Pitkin County transit system is second in size only to
Denver's RTD system in the state of Colorado. There are approximately
50 vehicles operating in this system and essentially no center from
which to operate. In order to make the system more attractive to both
the resident and visitor, the development of this transit center is
essential. For the visitor to be attracted to using the system, the
experience must be more positive than that offered by the 384 square
foot building that now represents a transit center. The building aside,
the present visitor experience of being corraled in a mud puddle when
awaiting ski bus boarding has to be less than memorable. For a major
ski resort that relies on a public transportation system to the degree
•
Memo: Rubey Park SPA
Page Four
June 22, 1983
that we do, a center from which to operate is a vital community need and
necessary to balance the system. The 1973 Voorhees Regional Transportation
Plan identifies Rubey Park as the location for Aspen's transit center
and for skier staging operations. There may not be a demonstrated need
for the commercial space, however the quota allocated in the T983
Commercial G14P competition did not exceed the year's available quota
and the 5810 square feet of commercial space awarded to this project
is necessary to underwrite the costs of the public components of the center.
5. Compatibility of the project with the Aspen Area General Plan
of 1966, as amended.
Rubey Park is sho►,rn on the plan as a Public area for use as a
"Transit Terminal." As noted above, the Regional Transportation Plan also
identifies the site for this purpose.
6. i1hether the proposal will promote the health, safety and general
welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of Aspen.
The free transit system is a necessary element of the town for.
many residents and especially winter visitors. The increased safety
aspects of the plan have already been discussed.
ADOPTION or THE PRECISE PLAN
The building facade has been modified in response to continents of the
HPC and received their approval on February 8th of this year.
The suNmitted narrative outlines in detail the site Plan, building
design and interior floor plans. This plan can be adopted as the precise
development plan for the parcel through the SPA process. The maximum exterior
FAR is 1.5:1 (in keeping with the adjacent CC zone district).
PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES
the Planning and Zoning Commission considered the permitted and conditional uses
as submitted by the applicant and Planning Office and the proposed function of
the facility and decided on the parameters for uses as listed in their attached
resolution.
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUESTS
Exemptions• from Growth Management Competition are requested in the following
categories:
1. Exemption for Public Space.
2. Exemption of Accessory Use Area.
3. Exemption of the employee unit being provided and from the provision
of parking. for the unit.
The public space in the building will be those areas used for the
administration of the transportation services and administration of winter
and summer resort services. The intention of the Public zone is
"to provide for the development: of governmental and quasi -governmental
facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other governmental
purposes." Permitted used influde "public transit stop; terminal
buildings; transportation related facilities; public park." Sec.24-11.2(e)
Of the i•lunic.ipal Code as amended by Ordinance 53, Series of 1982,
provides for exemptions from growth management for essential governmental
projects, subject to the review and recommendation of the P & Z and City
Council.
Memo: Rubey Park.SPA
Page Five
June ' 2 1 1983
To be eligible for the exemption, the applicant is required to document
that the impacts of the project will be mitigated, including the
employee housing generation, parking demand and the basic service provision.
The basic services are in place, the parking has been discussed earlier
in this memo and the provision of employee housing for a public project
is built in to the overall City plan to both provide employee housing
through public projects and the requirements that growth generates housing
to offset its impacts. This transit facility is also a response to a
lag in the provision of infrastructure for the transportation system and
is not a growth generator.
The exemption of the accessory use areas is being requested for the provision
of a food service operation of 900 square feet. This amenity would fall
into the permitted use section as a "transportation related facility" and
part of the "terminal building". The proposal is outlined in detail in
the submission and gill be a ".service queue/cashier/counter ser-i r'-
format." We believe that this facility is a subordinate use in structure particularly
since it will have coincident hours of operation with the facility. A snack bar
is a customary accessory use within the transit facility and is an amenity
that will increase the convenience and comfort of the transit user.
The employee unit being provided within the center is an 850 square
foot two -bedroom unit, as required in the GMP competition, for which an
exemption needs to be granted. The applicant is also requesting that
the provisions of parking spaces for the unit be waived. Considering the
proximity of the center to the Commercial Core, the mountain and certainly
all bus routes, the waiver of providing parking is very justifiable.
Planning and Zoninq
Commission and
Planning Office
Recomnendation:
The attached resoluz--ion is the recommendation.
Council
Action:
The appropriate motion is:
"I move to adopt Ordinance 23, Series of 1983."
MEMORANDUM
TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office
FROM: Jay Hammond, City Engineering Department
AN -
DATE: March 23, 1983
RE: Rubey Park SPA
---------------------------------------------------------------
Having reviewed the above application to establish a specific SPA
plan for the Rubey Park visitor's center, and having made a
site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following
comments:
1. Storm Drainage: The application is somewhat confusing with
regard to how on -site storm drainage is to be handled. The site
plan appears to indicate on -site drywell detention systems.
This is the desirable solution to maintain the aquifer.
The narrative in the application, however, seems to suggest that
all on -site storm water will be routed to the City storm drain
system. In view of our reluctance to allow private developers
to burden the storm drains with runoff from roofs and other
impervious areas, it would be most desirable for this project
to handle as much storm runoff on -site as possible.
2. Trash Access: The trash area proposed for the structure is
fully enclosed and seperated from the alley by doors. Aspen
Municipal Code Section 24-3.7(h)(4) requires an "open area"
accessible to the alley. The enclosed arrangement proposed
would not permit easy access to trash dumpsters, would not
permit placement of an electric transformer vault with a crane,
and would not allow easy reading of meters. The trash and
utility area should be redesigned to allow open access to the
alley.
3. The site design appears to eliminate public access to the
parking area north of the alley and south of the Stefan Kaelin
building.
JH/co
III
pitkin county community center
0100 lone pine road
aspen, colorado 61611
:5�r 303-925-6610
MEMORANDUM
TO: Colette Penne
FROM: Jim Hamilto
DATE: March 23, 1983
RE: Ruby Park SPA
I have reviewed the SPA application for the Ruby Park project and have
found that the applicants assertion that he has satisfied the employee
housing requirement through a previously developed employee housing
project is neither correct nor necessary. IT is assertion is incorrect
because this project is already developed and occupied and, therefore,
does not provide new housing for new employees generated as a result of
the Ruby Park project.
The applicants assertion that he needs to satisfy the employee housing
requirement at all, is incorrect because Sec. 24-11.2 of the Aspen
Municipal Code exempts the need to develop such housing even taking into
consideration Ordinance 53 amending said section.
Ordinance No. 53 (Series of 1982) amending Sec. 24-11.2(e) states:
"All construction of essential governmental projects
other than housing, subject to the special approval
of the City Council upon the recommendation of the
Planning and Zoning Commission. To be eligible for
said exemption, the applicant shall be required to
document that the impacts of the project will be
mitigated, including the employee housing generation,
parking demand and the basic service provision."
The sentence stating "To be eligible for said exemption, the applicant
shall be required to document that the impacts of the project will be
mitigated, including the employee housing generation . . ." is the
basis for the employee housing requirement associated with residential
development.
Colette Penne
March 23, 1983
Page Two
The reason being is that residential development does not precipitate
employee generation in the private sector per se. In other words, to
the extent that residential development generates the "need" for
another boutique, the employees of that boutique have been (or should
have been) housed in conjunction with the development of the commercial
space occupied by that boutique.
Then why do we have an employee housing requirement for residential
development? The purpose of the regulation is clearly to offset the
need for employee housing in the public sector. The premise is that
each residential unit developed precipitates the need for a fraction
of a public employee. In other words, once a certain number of residen-
tial units are developed, the community needs to hire more school
teachers, policemen, sanitation workers, bus drivers, etc., hence, the
requirement for employee housing associated with residential development.
Therefore, in my opinion, the documentation needed for this project to
be exempt would simply be a pledge by the City Council that they will
continue to require residential development to generate employee housing.
MEMORANDUM
T0: Aspen City Council
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: Rubey Park SPA
DATE: May 9, 1983 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Location: Lots K, L, M, N, 05 P, Q, R and S, Block 90, olyinal (�
Aspen townsite, City of Aspen VV
Zoning: "P" - Park
TD Overlays - Transportation and Drainage
Applicant's
Request: The applicant is requesting rezoning from "Park" to "Public/SPA",
adoption of the precise development plan, exemption of the
9,070 square feet of public space from growth management
competition and exemption of the employee housing unit from
GMP, and exemption from the provision of parking for the
employee units.
Referral
Comments: The Housing Office points out that Sec. 24-11.2(e) Exemptions
from the Growth Management Quota System has been amended by
Ordinance No. 53 (Series of 1982) to read:
"All construction of essential governmental projects
other than housing, subject to the special approval
of the City Council upon the recommendation of the
Planning and "Zoning Commission. To be eligible for
said exemption the applicant shall be required to
document that the impacts of the project will be
mitigated, including the employee housing generation,
parking demand and the basic service provision."
The documentation needed for this project to be exempt would simply be
a pledge by the City Council that they will continue to require residential
development to generate employee housing.
The City Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Storm Drainage: The application is somewhat confusing with regard
to the handling of on -site storm drainage. The
site plan appears to indicate on -site drywell
detention systems. This is the desirable solution
to maintain the aquifer.
2. Trash Access: The trash area proposed for the structure is fully
enclosed and separated from the alley by doors.
Section 24-3.7(h)(4) requires an "open area"
accessible to the alley. The trash and utility
area should be redesigned to allow open access
to the alley.
Page Two
Rubey Park SPA
May 9, 1983
3. The site design appears to eliminate public access to the parking
area north of the alley and south of the Stefan Kaelin building.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL
The area included in the site is from the alley to the north, the
sidewalk to the south and an additional 14,770 square feet which is the
extension of the malls on Galena and Mill Streets. The total land area
is 1.23 acres.
The proposed building totals 15,730 square feet of which 5,810
square feet was allotted in the 1983 Commercial Growth Management
Competition as accessory commercial space. A two -bedroom employee housing
unit of 850 square feet is part of the proposal. The remaining 9,070
square feet constitute the public areas of the transit/visitor center.
UrVr.pniINn
Since each of you has been given a copy of the SPA submission for
this project and it thoroughly covers the project history, we will move
on to the evaluation of the proposal.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
The criteria outlined in the Municipal Code for evaluation of a
Specially Planned Area are contained in Section 24-7.2(d) of the Code.
"The plan shall be considered and approved ... as if an application by a
private landowner for an amendment to the zoning district map." The
review must be based on, although not necessarily limited to, the
evaluation criteria outlined in Sec.24-12.5(d)(1).
1. Compatibility of the proposal with the surrounding zone
districts and land use in the vicinity of the site,
considering the existing neighborhood characteristics, the
applicable area and bulk requirements, and the suitability
of the site for development in terms of on -site characteristics.
The transportation/visitor's center is proposed for location
adjacent to Aspen's primary rourist lodging district and the Commercial
Core. The site is, of course, already in use as a transportation center
for the City, County and ski area bus systems. The building bulk is
compatible with that surrounding the site, as buildings on all sides
are at least two-story and generally cover the lots they occupy to a
greater percentage than will this structure. To the west is Wagner Park,
which contains no structures. The continuation of the Mill Street
section of the mall should integrate well with the transition from
Rubey Park to Wagnes Park. The building has been placed on the westerly
portion of the site to eliminate the problem of sixable buildings on
both sides of Galena Street which,would form, as the applicant has
stated, "a potential canyon effect." We feel that the applicant's
attempt to "create the greatest feeling of open space and least perceived
bulk and density with the available land" has been well executed by the
proposed site plan. As indicated in the GMP submission and worth
reiterating here, the project will nearly double the existing landscaping
and open space and reduce asphalt paving by approximately 20,000 square feet.
No site problems exist that require mitigation.
2. Impacts upon expected traffic generation and road safety, availability
of on and off-street parking and ability to provide utility
service in the vicinity of the site, including an assessment
of the fiscal impact upon the community.
Page Three
Rubey Park SPA
May 9, 1983
The project is intended for use by the mass transit user. A minimal amount
of on -site parking is being provided (6-16 short term spaces, depending
on the season) so the project should not be a traffic generator. It will
simply be impractical in the winter to drive a car to the Visitor's Center.
In the summer, when the typical visitor is more likely to be driving a
car, there will be more parking spaces available. A stop at the Visitor's
Center should be relatively brief (half an hour or less). By consolidating
visitor needs, there may be a traffic reduction (in terms of auto trips) and
the tourist will be made aware of the bus system by coming to the center.
If the decision is made to bring Trailways buses to this center, there will
be taxi cab activity that must be accommodated. The sacrifice of the
present parking lot on the site (approximately 32 spaces) is unfortunate
because of the loss of spaces, (net = approximately 16 in summer, 26
in winter) but the overall benefit of the new center far outweighs that
loss. A decision in favor of this plan will also increase the need for
the parking garage at the Rio Grande to proceed in a timely manner.
Also, since buses presently access the transit center via the alley,
there is less than optimum interaction of cars, pedestrians, and buses.
The increased safety offered by the interior loop arrangement of the
plan is overdue. At present buses are forced to back up in potentially
hazardous areas of skier staging operations; they conflict with pedestrians
on Mill, Galena and at the entrance and exit of the alley; and interact
with automobiles on Durant Street. All of these unfortunate situations
are being eliminated by this plan. The provision of utility services is
adequately handled by existing levels of service. The applicant will be
required to provide on -site drywell detention systems to handle as much
storm runoff as possible, as represented in the GMP subdivision.
It is important to note that the approach taken by the applicant to have a
private individual develop a much -needed public facility by subsidizing its
costs via commercial development represents an important savings in
capital outlays by the public. This innovative financing mechanism
achieves substantial fiscal benefits to the community, with the only
impact being the addition of new commercial space, which the applicant
has mitigated via the GMP Application.
3. Impacts upon expected air and water quality in the vicinity of the site.
Idling buses are not an enhancement to air quality. However, the proposal
does not include an increase in bus trips from the status quo. The
effect on water quality will be no greater than any typical commercial
development and should be mitigated by the on -site retention of drainage.
4. Analysis of the community need for the project and the relationship
of the proposal to the goal of overall community balance.
The Aspen/Pitkin County transit system is second in size only to
Denver's RTD system in the state of Colorado. There are approximately
50 vehicles operating in this system and essentially no center from
which to operate. In order to make the system more attractive to both
the resident and visitor, the development of this transit center is
essential. For the visitor to be attracted to using the system, the
experience must be more positive than that offered by the 384 square
foot building that now represents a transit center. The building aside,
the present visitor experience of being corraled in a mud puddle when
awaiting ski bus boarding has to be less than memorable. For a major
ski resort that relies on a public transportation system to the degree
Page Four
Rubey Park SPA
May 9, 1983
that we do, a center from which to operate is a vital community need and
necessary to balance the system. The 1973 Voorhees Regional Transportation
Plan identifies Rubey Park as the location for Aspen's transit center
and for skier staging operations. There may not be a demonstrated need
for the commercial space, however the quota allocated in the 1983
Commercial GMP competition did not exceed the year's available quota
and the 5810 square feet of commercial space awarded to this project
is necessary to underwrite the costs of the public components of the center.
5. Compatibility of the project with the Aspen Area General Plan
of 1966, as amended.
Rubey Park is shown on the plan as a Public area for use as a
"Transit Terminal." As noted above, the Regional Transportation Plan also
identifies the site for this purpose.
6. Whether the proposal will promote the health, safety and general
welfare of the residents and visitors to the City of Aspen.
The free transit system is a necessary element of the town for
many residents and especially winter visitors. The increased safety
aspects of the plan have already been discussed.
ADOPTION OF THE PRECISE PLAN
The building facade has been modified in response to comments of the
HPC and received their approval on February 8th of this year.
The submitted narrative outlines in detail the site Plan, building
design and interior floor plans. This plan can be adopted as the precise
development plan for the parcel through the SPA process. The maximum exterior
FAR is 1.5:1 (in keeping with the adjacent CC zone district).
PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES
The Plannina and Zoning Com:,ission considered the nermittod and corditional uses
as submitted by the applicant and Planning Office and the proposed function of
the facility and decided on the parameters for uses as listed in their attached
resolution.
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICANT REQUESTS
Exemptions from Growth Management Competition are requested in the following
categories:
1. Exemption for Public Space.
2. Exemption of Accessory Use Area.
3. Exemption of the employee unit being provided and from the provision
of parking for the unit.
The public space in the building will be those areas used for the
administration of the transportation services and administration of winter
and summer resort services. The intention of the Public zone is
"to provide for the development of governmental and quasi -governmental
facilities for cultural, educational, civic and other governmental
purposes." Permitted used include "public transit stop; terminal
buildings; transportation related facilities; public park." Sec.24-11.2(e)
of the Municipal Code as amended by Ordinance 53, Series of 1982,
provides for exemptions from growth management for essential governmental
projects, subject to the review and recommendation of the P & Z and City
Council.
Page Six
Rubey Park SPA
May 9, 1983
To be eligible for the exemption, the applicant is required to document
that the impacts of the project will be mitigated, including the
employee housing generation, parking demand and the basic service provision.
The basic services are in place, the parking has been discussed earlier
in this memo and the provision of employee housing for a public project
is built in to the overall City plan to both provide employee housing
through public projects and the requirements that growth generates housing
to offset its impacts. This transit facility is also a response to a
lag in the provision of infrastructure for the transportation system and
is not a growth generator.
The exemption of the accessory use areas is being requested for the provision
of a food service operation of 900 square feet. This amenity would fall
into the permitted use section as a "transportation related facility" and
part of the "terminal building". The proposal is outlined in detail in
the submission and will be a "service queue/cashier/counter ser%lirP
format." We believe that this facility is a subordinate use in structure particularly
since it will have coincident hours of operation with the facility. A snack bar
is a customary accessory use within the transit facility and is an amenity
that will increase the convenience and comfort of the transit user.
The employee unit being provided within the center is an 850 square
foot two -bedroom unit, as required in the GMP competition, for which an
exemption needs to be granted. The applicant is also requesting that
the provisions of parking spaces for the unit be waived. Considering the
proximity of the center to the Commercial Core, the mountain and certainly
all bus routes, the waiver of providing parking is very justifiable.
Planning and Zonin(j
Commission and
Planning Office
Recommendation:
The a�Lached resolu.;ion is the recommendation.
Council f;cti on:
If Council concurs with the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission
in Resolution 83-3, the appropriate motion is:
"I move to read Ordinance oe4_-4 , Series of 1983."
"I move to approve Ordinance , Series of 1983."
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: COLETTE PENN
JAY HAMMOND
FROM: MONROE SUMMERS 't ` APR 11. 1983
RE: RUBEY PARK SPA PF&TK ,
DATE: APRIL 11, 1983 OFFICE.
The attached from Timberline Disposal Systems is in answer to the
proposed SPA ordinance condition on subject submittal concerning
elimination of an enclosed trash area.
I feel that this is a stop in the right direction in cleaning up
our alleys. My sense of the P&Z is that they would support such
a change in policy.
MS/lc
Timberline
Disposal Systems, Inc.
serving
Aspen, Snowmass, Basalt
Jerry \'andervelde
Mr. Monroe Summers
City of Aspen
Aspen, CO 81612
April 7, 1983
Dear :r • Summers i
I have carefully checked out the preliminary plans for removing trash and
rubbish from the new Rubey park Visitor/^'ransit Center Project. I can
assure you that the system you propose of placing dumpsters within an
enclosed area will present no problems for my company. This type of
trash removal system is fairly standard. in my experience, and we
anticipate no problems in .rolling containers out to the truck.
Thank you for this opportunity to be of service to you. please f4el
free to call on me at any time if further questions arise.
Sincerely,
d',arry'.
anderVelde
/cb
Box 7936 • Aspen, CO 81612 Bus.: 925-3406 • Home: 945-7532
CITY/COUNTY PLANf4INQ OFFICIE
130 S. GALENA
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
:.' SENDER
CArOLLTON STATION
MAR 24 M'
NEW OE" .-:, :iS, LA. 70119
MOVED, I-L T NO ADDRM
GLEN CARIMI, NOFIO J. PECORARO
7934 MAPLE ST.
NEW OPSERNS, LA -70118
UL
(AR2 1-83
';-.20 !-
c; �, .
=i r.fi.si335.
`I �I
! ; 2 s 19R3
YFN i PITKIN CO.
°^;!!G OFFICE
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Rubey Park SPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 5, 1983 at a
meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall,
130 S. Galena Street, Aspen to review the construction of the Rubey Park
Transportation Center. Specifically, the Commission will review site
design for the bus circulation and visitor's center, and will set the area
and bulk requirements through the SPA process. For further information,
contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223.
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
By: s/Perry Harvey, Chairman
Published in the Aspen Times on March 17, 1983.
City of Aspen account.
Amk
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
L-CIM Engineer
busing Office
City Transportation
PLANNER: Colette Penne
RE: Rubey Park SPA
-,MATE• _ .,March
�i,,: uppl i cati on submitted for the Rubey Park Transportation
Center rezoning to SPA. We apologize for asking you to review this application
as expeditiously as possible, but the City was late in submitting it to us,
And.Ihe item iF.srheduled to go before the Aspen P&Z on April 5, so please
return your comments to the Planning Office no later than March 23.
Thank rij.
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Rubey Park SPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 5, 1983 at a
meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall,
130 S. Galena Street, Aspen to review the construction of the Rubey Park
Transportation Center. Specifically, the Ci4'e4h will review site
design for the bus circulation and visitor's center, and will set the area
and bulk requirements through the SPA process. For further information,
contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223.
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
By: s/Perry Harvey, Chairman
Published in the Aspen Times on March 17, 1983.
City of Aspen account.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on March 21 , 19 83 a true and
correct copy of the Notice of Public Hearing regarding Rubey Park SPA
was deposited into the United States mails, postage prepaid, and addressed
to the following:
See attached. -
Martha Eichelberger
0
T
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: Rubey Park SPA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, April 5, 1983 at a
meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers of City Hall,
130 S. Galena Street, Aspen to review the construction of the Rubey Park
Transportation Center. Specifically, the Commission will review site
design for the bus circulation and visitor's center, and will set the area
and bulk requirements through the SPA process. For further information,
contact the Planning Office, 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, 925-2020, ext. 223.
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
By: s/Perry Harvey, Chairman
Published in the Aspen Times on March 17, 1983.
City of Aspen account.
a
yr �c,rvn
® 914.420.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers,
_Plain Bond Labels _ _ _ _type using full sheet
NOTE: Do not type directly on the For XEROX* 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
EUGENE B. & MARLENE R. SHAPIRO
ROGELIO SADA
JOHN H.. & JOANNE CHILDERS
1870 ROSEMARY RD.
APANTEDO POSTEL 88
1299 KNOLLWOOD CR.
HIGHLAND PARK, ILL. 60035
MONTERREY, N.L.
LAKE FOREST, ILL 60045
MEXICO
NORTON & VIRGINIA B. SHARPE
ROBERT P. GARRITANO
GEORGE A. HYMAN
24500 JOHN COLTER RD.
THOMAS A GARRITANO
203 E. 72ND
HIDDEN HILLS, CALIFORNIA 91302
5302 WEST DRUMMOND PLACE
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10021
CHICAGO, ILL. 60639
AMELIA BRITVAR, LARRY 'SANDS,
A.J. GREGG REALTY, CO.
GERALD ENGMAN,DAVID F. GORDON,
WALTER BIRK, FRANK J. WOODS,
23511 CHAGRIN BLVD. SUITE 314
STEPHEN J. PHILLIPS
E. ROBERT GORDON
BEACHWOOD, OHIO 44122
P.O. BOX NN
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
730 E. HYMAN
•
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
DAVID KIRCHENBAUM
DAVID F. & LETRICIA B. GORDON
EDWIN Z . & ADELINE M. GROSSE
1015 EUCLID AVE.
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44115
P.O. BOX NN
34135 HUNTERS ROW
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
FARMINGTON HILLS, MICHIGAN
48018
MARYLAND ASPEN ASSOC.
BILL E. & XIOMARA CHILDRRSS
COPPER CO UNIT S, INC.
P.O. BOX 1100
4033 HYGEL AVE.
ROCKVILLE, MARYLAND 20850
SARASOTA, FLORIDA 33581
a
PETER HERSHORN
M. JOAN FARVER
GRENKO PROPERTIES
4383 WESTMOUNT AVE
2609 SPRING GROVE TERRACE.
P.O. BOX W
WESTMOUNT, QUEBEC
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
MY 1W8 CANADA
JEROME L. SCHOSTAK
CHRISTIAN CHRIST
WOODSON A. WOODS AND LOUIS
17515 W. NINE MILE RD.
P.O. BOX 4947
UNION TRUST CO.
SOUTHFIELD, MICH. 48065
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
510 LOCAST ST.
ST. LOUIS, MO.63101
GERALD & MARY SALTON
ROBERT B.
ASPEN -COOPER
221 VALLEY RD.
1616 CHAMPA, SUITE 202
ITHACA, NY 14850
DENVER, COLORADO 80202
Xerox and all model numbers isled are mo"ered trademarks of Xerox Corporanom
AVERY is a reoslered trademark of Avery kuernabond Corporation
yr i�v�vn
® 914.426.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers.
Plain Bond Labels type using full sheet
NOTE: Do not type directly on the For XEROX' 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
KATHRYN BUMGARDNER CHEEK
THE TENNESSE THREE
GRAN COUCH, ANN CH
JOHN H. CHEEK, JR.
C/O KENWORTH OF TENNESSEE, JR.
6330 9U C D .
P.O. BOX 564
P.O. BOX 7406
SHREVEPO
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
NASHVILLE, TENN. 37210
R.P. FITZGERALD
DONALD B. MCCANN, TRUSTEE
GARY G. PLUMLEY
525 E. COOPER
300 NATIONAL CITY BANK BLDG.
P.O. BOX 38
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114
WOODY C COLORADO 81656
THO INS, KE<&CO
TENNESSE THREE RENTALS520
E. PER2700
FIRST AMERICANCENTER
ASPEN,. COL
NASHVILLE, TENN. 37238
BALMORAL REALTY
GLEN CARIMI, NOFIO J. PECORARO
300 NANTUCKET
7934 MAPLE ST.
BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MICH. 48103
NEW ORLEANS, LA -70118
JAMES P. & ELAINE B. MCDADE
JAMS & DIANA<MARTP.O.
BOX 3099
601 E .BLASPEN,
COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLO
ROBERT P. MORRIS
LARRY & JUDY JONES FLOCKS
P.O. BOX 9069
P.O. BOX 1628.
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
FT. SMITH, ARKANSAS
W.J. RAY, JR. J.B. SPEED
JAMES B. NOWERY, HAROLD J QUINN
50 SCOTT AVE..
100 TRAVIS PLACE.
COOKEVILLE, TENN. 38501
SHREVEPORT, LA.
BRIAN B. HARPER, JR.
FRANK GRIESINGER
BRIAN B. HARPER, SR.
SUITE 1412, SUPERIOR BLDG.
H&H PROPERTIES
CLEVELAND, OHIO 44114
402 LUPINE DR_
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
Xe"x and 0 model number, isled are re Stered t,demarka of zero: Corporatiorti
AVERY is a reostred IrWenwk of Avery kwernational Corporation
U
' 914.420.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers
_Plain Bond Labels _
_ _ _type using full sheet
NOTE: Do not type directly on the
For XEROX" 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in
broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
BRUCE E. CARLSON
MICHAEL E. KRAJIAN
P.O. BOX 3587
105 A COUNTRY CLUB DR.
,
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA
28025
CAROL SUE THOMAS
RONALD N. KRAJIAN, JACK B.
2172 PACIFIC AVE. #4
CRAWFORD, DON D. CRAWFORD
SAN FRANCISCO, CA. 94115
4321 BIRCH ST., SUITE 200
NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660
ROBERT B. BEAN
CRAWFORD PETROLEUM, DON D.
HILLTOP-WILSON POINT
& JACK B. CRAWFORD
NORWALDr CONN. 6854
5400 THE TOLEDO SUITE 700
LONG BEACH, CA.
COOPER COMMUNITIES, INC,
EDGAR BRIGHT JR.
LAND DEPT.
1415 EXPOSITION BLVD.
P.O..BOX 569
NEW ORLEANS; I.A.
BENTONVILLE, ARKANSAS
72712
KATHRYN BUMGARDNER CHEEK
HOSPITALITY INC.
NO ADDRESS GIVEN
555 E. DURANT
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
JAMES CROFT LOFT `
RICHARD A. & MARY WOJICK
444 AUDOBON ST.
NO ADDRESS AVAILABLE
NEW ORLEANS, LA. 70117
THOMPKINS, KERN & CO.
c/o ASPEN SLUE PRINT
520 E. COOPER
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
GRANTHAN COUCH, ANN COUCH
6330 QUEBEC DR.
SHREVEPORT, LA.
X mm and d model nurnbaro istad we rpstwed bademar%s of %aros Corporatgrt.
AVERY b a reystaad tradeffwk of Awy Wdornabor%d Coryoraborl
PS-5351-i
® 914.420.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers,
--Plain Bond Labels _ _ _ _type using full sheet
NOTE: Do not type directly on the For XEROX"' 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
HANS B. AND JUNE CANTRUP
HYMAN AVENUE LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
ROBERT.BARNARD
P.O. BOX 388
415 E. HYMAN
P.O. BOX 1880
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
RIFLE, COLORADO 81650
MOUNTAIN CHALET ENTERPRISES
AMELIA L. KOPP & CO.
RED ONION INVESTORS
333 E. DURANT
P.O. BOX 100
C/O OATES, HUGHES & KNEZEVICH
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
600 E. HOPKINS
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN SKIING COMPANY
BIRKWOOD ASSOCIATES
BERT BIDWELL INVESTMENTS
P.O. BOX 1248
P.O. BOX 3421
P.O. BOX 567
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
RICHARD R. WOODS
ROY & ANGELINE M. GRIFFITH
ARCADE ASSOCIATES, LTD.
413 E. COOPER
530 WALNUT
620 E. HYMAN
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
DONALD J. & DAVID M._FLEISHER
G.L.C. ENTERPRISES
T & E RESTAURANT CORP.
401 E. COOPER
P.O. BOX.348 -
P.O. BOX 4069
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
a
GUIDO PAUL MEYER
DONALD J. FLEISHER AND JOHN E.
JEAN INGHAM
P.O. BOX 1799
GRIFFIN, TRUSTEES
P.O. BOX 1103
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
620 E. HYMAN
ASPEN., COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
FRITZ & ERIKA LINDNER
GOLDEN HORN BUILDZNG,.LTD.
DIKRAN A.S. DINGILLIAN
P.O. BOX 1126
P.O. BOX 4947
160 W 225 ST
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10463
ASPEN SPORTS
ANDRE ULRYCH
B & K ASSOCIATES
408 E. COOPER
P.O. BOX 2202
ST
308 SO. MILL ST
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
Xaroa and r model numbers isled are reyistereA trademarks ol Xerox Corpwatan
AVERY is a re rsawed trademark of Avery Was -atonal Corporason
PS-5351-A
® 914.420.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers,
_Plain Bond -Labels _ _ _ _type using full sheet _ _ _
NOTE: Do not type directly on the For XEROV 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
RUSSELL VOLK (ESTATE)
ASPEN SKIING COMPANY
PARAGON ENTERPRISE
C/O RICHARD W. VOLK
P.O. BOX 1248
P.O. BOX 9064
217 N. WATER
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
WICHITA, KANSAS 67202
HEINZ & ELAINE E. WOLF
AJAX MOUNTAIN ASSOCIATES
JOAN L. KLAR
MYRTLE AVE.
C/O STEPHEN J. MARCUS
P.O. BOX 722
.1221
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92103
P.O. BOX 1709
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 61612
C. A. MUER CORP.
BRUCE E. CARLSON
KRISTIN CALDER
1548 PORTER ST.
P.O. BOX 3587
P.O. BOX 15175
DETROIT,•MICHIGAN 48216
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ROBERT B. GOLDBERG
ROARING FORK LIMITED PARTNERSHII
TED KOUTSOUBOS
500-5TH AVE. SUITE 3000
415 E. HYMAN
419 E. HYMAN
NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10036
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ASPEN GROVE ASSOCIATES
THEODORE A. KOUTSOUBOS
P & CRAIG I S
P.O. BOX 3421
P.O. BOX 9064
HERBER VIS
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
a
STEIN ERIKSEN
VALLEY AND C CO.
CHARLES W. RACIN E
P.O. BOX 1245
P.O. BOX E-2
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLORADO
81615"
JOHN R. FAULKNER, TRUSTEE
TED A. KOUTSOUBOS
ROBERT E. & DYANNE M. BRANAND
P.O. BOX 601-'
P.O. BOX 3291
449 1ST STREET SE
FRANKLIN, MICHIGAN 48025
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20003
THE TIPPLE LODGE
CAROL S S
J.D. MULLER
P.O. BOX 147
2172 PACIFIC
P.O. BOX 4361
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
SAN FRAN O, CALI 941
O15 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
Xerim and d model numbers isled w re4sterad trademarks of XNOX Corporabort
AVERY Y a reprsiered trademark of Avery Mlamabonal Corporabon
PS-5351-A
® 1 914.420.720.1000.2400
3600.4000.4500.7000
very
7700.9200
and most other plain bond copiers,
Plain Bond Labels type using full sheet .
NOTE: Do not type directly on the For XEROX`" 660 do not type above
Typing Guide or place it in broken line.
copier because the black
lines will copy onto the
labels.
LEONARD & FLORENCE PATTERSON
KENNETH R. & MARTHA STERLING
MILES•C. ANDERSON
P.O. BOX 8979
P.O. BOX 1366
10227 LONGMONT
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
HOUSTON, TEXAS 77042
MICHAEL E. ARLIN
LEONARD W. & BARBARA W. KOVAL
HUGH LEE BAKER JR. AND WANAH B.
105 A COUNTRY CLUB DR.
920 FOREST GLEN WEST
CASEY
CONCORD, NORTH CAROLINA 28025
WINNF.TKA, ILL. 60093
P.O. BOX 122
CROSBY, TEXAS 77532
RONALD N. JIA
JOHN THOMAS GUSSET;
JAMES M. & RUBY J. FRAZIER
14000 PALAW Y
555 E. DURANT #2-3
1330 W. GIACONDA WAY
MARINO a"VAY, C IFORNIA
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
TUCSON, ARIZONA 85704
RONALD N. KRAJIAN, ACK B.
CRAWFORD, DO D. WFORD
KARL G. & MADELEINE LARSON
EDITH L. & ARTHUR D. RESNICK
4321 BIRCH ST. ITE 200
2425 SO, 162ND STREET
12821 CAPITAL
NEWPORT BEACH C IFORNIA
NEW BERLIN, WISCONSIN 53151
OAK PARK, MICH. 48237
92660
CRAWFORD PETROLEU CO.
RICHARD A. & Y WOJICK
ROBERT M. & SHELLY J. KATZMAN
DON D. & JAC B. CRAWFORD
5635 MAPLE RD.
5400 THE TO SUITE 700
WEST BLOOMFIELS, MICH. 48033
LONG BEACH, LI RNIA
a
KEITH J. NORMAN
EDGAR BRIGH JR
HUBERT L. & JOANNE BURGESS
IRVIN S. NAYLOR
1415 EXPOSITI BLVD.
6413 HILLCREST
R.D. 9
NEW ORLEANS,
DALLAS, TEXAS 75205
YORK, CONN. 17402
DA47ID C. & ELIZABETH WEATHERBY
HOSPITALI C.
JMC CO.
20 CEDAR LANE
555 E. DU
3534 SOUTH LINCOLN ST. SUITE 10
ITHACA, NEW YORK 14850
ASPEN, C RA 81611
ENGLEWOOD, COLORADO 80110
VANCE GRENKO
EUGENE B. & MARLENE R. SHAPIRO
SELMA FELDMAN
555 E. DURANT
7500 LINDNER
6754 LOS OLAS WAY
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
SKOKIE ILL. 60077
MALIBU, CALIFORNIA 90265
Xerox and M "to" nun� iskfd are repslered trademarks of Xerox Corporabom
AVERY is a repstered trademark of Avery Werneronal Corporation
r_ 1 • II PS-5351-A