HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.414 N 1st St.0014.2006.ASLU
h..".. ",~_"_."_~_ --.......-~--~..,...".~-....-.,,--.-----'_..
'!
City of Aspen Community Development Dept.
CASE NUMBER
0014.2006.ASLU
PARCEL ID NUMBER 2735-12-4-18-005
PROJECT ADDRESS 414 N FIRST ST
PLANNER CHRIS BENDON
CASE DESCRIPTION ESA - DEVELOPMENT OF A LAP SWIMMING POOL IN THE REAF
REPRESENTATIVE GYLES THORNELY 925-8354
DATE OF FINAL ACTION 12/27/2006 12
CLOSED BY Johannah Richards
,
.. ** --~
rul Permits ~~IIJ
Eie &.dit aecotd t!aviQal:e FQl"m Reports Format lab tielp
I;l /~J .
,
.;:;j
1il
# .
II
Roo.mgl:l~'OIY 1 ];ondil"'" I Sube..mils I \!-
M"" I RO!Jing S,atu, I ArchlEno P,,",,*, I
P<lIlM T l'P" 1Mi.l .JAsPer> hod u.. 2004
AddI." 1414 N FiRST 5T
City !ASPEN
Pem'lit'inforrMtoo
I Pltiic Commartl I Cu,tome< Rogue,' I
CwlomFjolds 1 F~ I FoeS_
!'emit ~ I0014.2006.ASLU
Zl AptlSulo r---
Stde ICO ~:J Zip
Attachment'
I 8cl~ns
^
, Mastel Perml Routing Queuelaslu06
I Proiodj St"M lpend"o -.-.-
I De,cript"" rESA. DEVELOPMENT OF A lAP SWIMMING POOL IN THE REAR GARDEN
1
SubmMod [GYtESTHORNELY 325-8354------
r~ Visible. on the web? PetmitlD'
Appiod 10311512006\
ApplQved
tssued
Final
E><Pires 153ilo/2ooT.J
j--OWl"lef
\ Las':: ITHORNEL y .j Firs' Name !GILES
[;1 Owner Is-Applicant?
ApOiicant
Last N~ IfHOR~----'~ Fifst Name lGiLEs~'-~'*-*~--
1120 E MAIN ST
IASPEN CO 81611
I
E MAtN Sf
PEN CO 81611
v
Phone
CustU
>
RecOfd: 1 of 2
Enter the main line of the
WW~
"
~
110 1':H~t ~laiJl t-ill'f'(-'I
\~IH'II, (;olorwlo
g]{Jll
TelephOlIt'
970 Q;2.,)-8:-35-t
Ftll'~ill1il(-':
(no 920-1 :387
.\,dlt',ilk
1)(-'11\'/'1'
Lab' 'l~dlO(,
PIl(Wlli~
~<dl I .akl' Cily
~all(u Ft,
t-inllliag('
,'-',In Paulo
~",<,,_..---...,..<._" ,--,-,,"^'~,""--"""'--~--">+'-"'--~-
--,
ArplW, )~~.
Dejign W'()rk:;h~ "II',
Lcllldscape AITllill'I'111n'
LlIld Pblllllill~
{'rllClll De~ii2n
StraTegi(' S('J'\"]('t'S
March 14, 2006
Mr. Chris Bendon
The City of Aspen Community Development Department
City Hall
130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: 414 North First Street Lap Pool Land Use Application
Response to Hallam Lake Bluff Review Standards
Dear Chris:
This letter explains how the proposed Land Use application for the 414 North First
Street Lap Pool complies with the Hallam Lake Bluff Review Standards-item
26.435.60, subsection B of the Land Use Code dates June 2005.
Please let me know ifthere is anything further you need from me pertaining to this
application
Condition:
1. No development, excavation or jill, other than native vegetation planting, shall
take place below the top of slope.
Response
.l"he proposed development does not involve any excavation or fill below the
top of the slope which is identified as being elevation 1001 (per resolution #98-
08 item one of the commission's resolutions) on the submitted drawings.
Condition:
2. All development within the jifteen-foot setback from the/op of the slope shall be
at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the jifteen-foot setback
shall not be approved unless the Planning and Zoning Commission determines
that the following conditions can be met:
Response
No development is heing proposed hetween the tifteen-foot setback and the top
of the slope.
DESIGNWORKSHOP
"
-
~
'"
'-
Condition:
3. All development outside the fifieen-foot setback from the top of slope shall not
exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle
from the ground level at the top-ol-slope. Height shall be measured and
determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for
height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and the method of calculating height set
forth at Section 26.575.020.
Response
The closest point that any development per the definition in the land use code is
the edge of the lap pool which is 34'-6" from the top of the slope (contour
1001). The maximum height of any proposed structure is the pavilion which is
8'-105/8".
Condition:
4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such
plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less thanfijiy (50) percent
of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative
screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same
or comparable material should it die.
Response
No planting is proposed to screen the lap pool since it is a below-grade
structure. The pavilion is located behind several coniferous trees larger than 80
feet tal! and would by no means be visible or detract li.om the integrity of the
Hal!am Lake area.
Condition:
5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward
the nature preserve or located down slope and shall be in compliance with
section 26.575.150.
Response
Other than in the pool the only proposed exterior lighting would be in the in the
seating walls and in the pavilion. The light fixtures for the walls would be
downcast recessed, incandescent, low volIage step lights and the pavilion would
be a downcast recessed, incandescent, low voltage lighIing located in the ceiling.
2
.I
-,
"
"
./
Condition:
6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face ofthe slope. Historic
drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be
drained down the slope.
Response
There will be no fill material or debris placed on or around the face or top of the
Hallam lake bluff Thc pool will be drained for maintenance reasons only and
the pool waler will run into the central sewer system.
Condition:
7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer
shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top
slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level.
Responsc
Landscape architecture drawings showing the lap pool have becn includcd in
this application to show the relationship hetween the lap pool and the
proximity to the top oCthe Hallam Lake Bluff. It is our intention (0 submit more
detailed sections and details as a pan ofthe building permit applica1ion.
Sincerely,
DESIGN WORKSHOP, INe.
~ /5!:~'AA~
Gyles T ornely
Associate
3
.F""~
16
· y6:- ~J4~
~
CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
*
Al!Teement for Pavment of City of Asoen Develooment Aoolieation Fees
!
CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and V""OIl//1-17f,IfIV' ~ /S
(hereinafTer APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
I. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for
1'/1- /'I()tl-11f Ai1Sr ~~ t-t9-1' I't?P'-
(hereinafter, THE PROJECT).
2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 57 (Series of 2000)
establishes a fee structure for Land Use applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condilion precedent
to a delermination of application completeness.
3. APPLICANT and CITY agree lhal because of the size, natufe or scope of the proposed project, it
is not possible at lhis time to ascettain the full extenl of the costs involved in processing the application.
APPLICANT and CITY futther agree that it is in the inlerest of lhe parties that APPLICANT make payment of an
initial deposit and to lhereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis.
APPLICANT agrees additional costs may accrue following lheir hearings andlor approvals. APPLICANT agrees he
will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the
CITY when they afe necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty
of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application.
4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete
processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission andlor City Council to enable the Planning
Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project consideration, unless current billings
are paid in full prior to decision.
5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its righl to collect
full fees prior to a detennination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the
amount of $ {, 60 which is for _3 hours of Community Deve10pmenl staff time, and if actual
recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse
lhe CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review at a rate of $220.00
per planner hour over the initial deposit. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date.
APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing, and
in no case will building permits be issued until all Cosls associated with case processing have been paid.
CITY or ASPEN
APPLICANT
By:
B0J1_~~~
Date: ~ II 1- /" 6
I I
Chris Bendon
Commnnity Development Director
Mailing Address:
IZo lE,*,rn1r91/v :Sf, ,4-S~A/
c.PloM17t:JO /816//
.
g: \support\forms\agrpayas.doe
1/10/01
RETAIN FOR PERYAMENT RECORD
-
~ ~
ATTACHMENT2-LAND USE APPLICATION
APPLlCAN.1l
Nalne:! C)b/ll~ tJE-W/S
Location: 1-1-9- A/oJllfJf -P/Jar 5~, ASf?BV, CO
(Indicate street address, lot & block number, lepa! descriptiDn where appropriate)
Parcel ID # (REQUIREDl 273'5 - J z1-/ f)- C> (15
REPRESENTATIVE:
Name:
'I ~ 17Io1t1//&Z
/ UJ ,Ef'90r 111111/1/ 57 J9$ 'ffrV c t:J g /,5 /,
q':;-tJ. 92-:' . 835-1-.
Address:
Phone #:
PROJECT:
Name 1-/1- !IItJl'tUf hItSr.5~ ?#,e? ~t:7c?L
Address: 1-/1- #t1rtn1 HrlSr s-rree&-r )'1r, - " Ct:/ JlN6//
Phone#: Cfr-V. rZO,' 2.731-
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply):
D Conditional Use D Conceptual PUD D Conceptual Historic Devt.
D Special Review D Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) D Final HistDriC Development
D Design Review Appeal D Conceptual SPA D Minor Historic Devt.
D GMQS Allotment D Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) D Historic Demolition
D GMQS Exemption D Subdivision D Historic Designation
~ ESA. 8040 Greenline, Stream D Subdivision Exemption (includes D Small Lodge Conversion/
Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condomininmization) Expansion
Mountain View Plane
D LDt Split D Temporal)' Use D Other: ,
D Lot Line Adjustment D Text/Man Amendment
rovals, etc.)
FX / S 'f] JIll 9 -rw tJ S 7l'J I1A?'1 /'US/ ftI!3W c-e- IN /fit /9177'rC.Hek7 'TWO s m ,-e,C-y
I'J1w1 6- t t(J~ ON.4- 661 1ZG!. SF 51 T"C
Ptl/'6U?fMGw"r r-.4- tAf? .5Wlf11M/'7 j?OOt. frl/A(;J ft4-VIUON IN -mt=
~~
Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 660
D Pre-Application Conference SummaI)'
~.\ttachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement
G'Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Fonn
[?' Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards
All plans that are larger than 8.5" x 11" must be folded and a floppy disk with an electronic copy of all written
text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application.
RETAIN FOR PERMANENT RECORD
Project:
Applicant:
Location:
Zone District:
Lot Size:
Lot Area:
-
.,
,
"
,..... J
ATTACHMENT 3
DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM
-1-14- If/tJWf7{- rMSr 5~ trl'f? I'tJO l-
JlJ I1/VI11HHl/ t..-PW 1.5
"TIt- tl/(J~ PInS r 51', l'/$;:1tW / c:a
(L-6
66, '!z5 $,c
35,tJ66s'?
(for tlie purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas
within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the
definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.)
Existing: 0
Existing: z. ('lItH/)
Existing: +-
Proposed: 0
Proposed: 0
Proposed: 0
Commercial net leasable:
Number ofresidential units:
Number of bedrooms:
Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): 0
DIMENSIONS:
Floor Area: Existing: 8S5~ Allowable: S6tJI Proposed: N lit
Principal bldg. height: Existing: 30 '3 I Allowable: 2.5' Proposed: tV lit
Access. bldg. height: Existing: N I 4- Allowable: 25' ' "
Proposed: ~ -10
On-Site parking: Existing: 5 Required: 1- Proposed: 0
% Site coverage: Existing: /of R . d vI' 25'/, Proposed: /0 '2. /.
eqwre : TD
% Open Space: Existing: N lit Required: /1M Proposed: " /14
Front Setback: Existing: 125' Required: /~ I Proposed: tVIII
Rear Setback: Existing: 0' Required: .,. t_6" Proposed: N / 11
0' ~" Proposed: rJ / tI/
Combined F /R: Existing: Required: /1:
Side Setback: Existing: 0' Required: 15' Proposed: t/ / If
Side Setback: Existing: 0' Required: /5 ' Proposed: NjA
IZI 50 I Proposed: /1/ j ,4-
Combined Sides: Existing: Required:
Distance Between &isting 0' Required: 5' Proposed. N 1ft
Buildings
Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Blllt 1:114 tI~tjlf-r , ftf19/IL.5ffBJI1 t.k.
~1t)6- Gh 6t4tk.-5 ,c.cP161~ ~/&I~ s~" Jc.5
,
Variations requested:
1110111 & .