The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.54 Shady Ln.0016.2017.ASLUO .. .. 0016.2017.ASLU 54 SHADY LANE RDS, STREAM MARGIN, SETBACKS 2737 0720 0026 3 :Â«An ed \ (Ative& 2 /(3 ~ S PATH: G/DRIVE /ADiv[INISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0016. 2017.ASLU PROJECT ADDRESS 54 SHADY LANE PARCEL ID 2737 0720 0026 PLANNER REILLY THIMONS CASE DESCRIPTION RDS, STREAM MARGIN, SETBACKS REPRESENTATIVE ALAN RICHMAN DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5/04/2017 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 1.12.18 FF Permits 2737- 0720 30227 00 {S.n , R --At> lt| m x Elle *dit Record Navigate Furm Repor:5 Format Iab Help 11 i @. 09 0< B + k/7 28 31 b i R Â¢39 -1 2 8- I i N I > ..2] ri k} 13& lump 1 . gs m :dAlia. $.ant & 4*EFA -- 3. k] 6 @ 4 -j Â© EX " I3'9 Rb ia 2 4 t* 0 ~Main~ Custom Fields I Routing Status I Fee Summark: Actions i Roubng Mistory 1 ~ permit ~*}e bslu Aspen Land Use Permit# 0016.2017.ASLU 59%/Fl Addr&12 54 SHADY LN Apt/Suibe aty ASPEN State CO Â·Â·Â· Zip 81611 Â·Â·Â· Permit Information Master permit Routing queue aslu 1 5 Applied 02/0 7/2017 Project Status pending Approved Description APPLIC.ATION FOR STRE.Al.1 MARGIN REVIEW - RDS REVIEV,i Issued SETBACKS VARIANCE Closed/Final Submitted ALAN RICHMAN 920-1125 Clock Running Days 1--61 Expires 03/02/2018 i I ~ Submitted via |~ Owner Last name LEILA, LLC First name ASPEN STAR\'40 0 D 623 E HOPKINSAVE ASPEN CO 81â‚¬11 14 Phone (970> 920:-1125 Address i â€¢13 Applicant E Owner is applicant? m Contractor is applicant? Last name LEILA, LLC First name ASPEN STAR'WOOD 623 E HOPKINSAVE ASPEN CO 81â‚¬11 Phone (970} 920-1125 Address Cust # 30584 Email Lender Last name First name Phone (} - Address â‚¬ IAspenGold!5 [serveri-1'1Rgelas ~ Tof 1 dâ‚¬,4 1 00 G 2*-ras *--f V(~ 4-TGA Z* 4 4 25-5-0. ex Pov-ki 764 A 431150 '00 Fel 337Illas 1 seloN In-611*04*Â°oimisdnoig qell P /1/*'t.6.3 t:ff? 6 '~444*i A 111111111 - 1 1111-1[[ 11-1.1 RECEPTION#: 638055, R: $38.00, D: SO.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 6,05/04/2017 at 01 :13:10 PM Resolution No. 8 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO (SERIES OF 2017, RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND A SETBACK VARIANCE TO DEMOLISH AND REPLACE THE EXISTING RESIDENCE AND BUILD A DRIVEWAY AT 54 SHADY LANE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273707200026 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting Stream Margin Review Exemption approval, a Residential Design Standard Variation, and a Setback Variance for the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a new residence at 54 Shady Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is zoned R-30, Low Density Residential in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards, Residential Design Review Standards, and Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff found that a Residential Design Variation was not needed due to the parcel being outside of the Infill Area with a slope greater than ten feet; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Stream Margin Review, and a denial of a Setback Variance finding that the review standards for the requests have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public cornment al a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City ofAspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves with conditions, the request for a Stream Margin Review and the request for a Setback Variance to demolish the existing residence and construct a new residence in the Stream Margin ofHunter Creek as shown in Exhibit A, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: General Approval Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request and approves the Setback Variance request to allow for the development of a single-family residence and a driveway that exceeds the height limitations outlined in the Land Use Code. The driveway variance is specifically for the elevated driveway represented to the Commission both in materials and form. These approvals, with conditions, will allow the Applicant to replace the existing residence at 54 Shady Lane with a new design and footprint further away from the Hunter Creek Stream Margin. Section 2: Conditions of Approval A. Parks Department Conditions 1. An approved tree permit is required before approval of the building permit. An approved tree permit requires a proposed landscape plan identifying trees for removal and means and schedule for mitigation. 2. A construction fence must be erected along the entire dripline o f all trees on site and any tree canopy from neighboring property. This will serve as the tree protection zone (TPZ).This fence is to be constructed in such a manner that the area inside the dripline is protected. An inspection of this fence must be performed before any construction or demolition activities begin. please arrange this inspection with Ben Carlsen at 429-2034. 3. No materials may be stored in the TPZ, including but not limited to, construction backfill, construction traffic, or any other construction materials. 4. No excavation, grading or trenching may occur within the TPZ without the consent of the City of Aspen Forester or his designee. 5. No parking of vehicles or equipment may occur in the TPZ. 6. No dumping of any waste products may occur in the TPZ. 7. Any roots cut during excavation shall be pruned with sharp loppers/pruners back to the soil line. The roots will further be protected by burlap draped over the side ofthe excavation covering the exposed roots. This burlap shall be kept moist until the excavation is backfilled. 8. Pruning to provide clearance for construction activities shall only be done under the direction of an arborist. 2 9. Site inspections shall be performed on a weekly basis, to ensure the above listed conditions are met. 10. Any unapproved,improvements or activities outside of those approved within this permit will be subject to mitigation in the form ofrestoration. 11. This permit must be posted on site during the construction process. 12. The Applicant shall submit a detailed plan for erosion control. Plans should detail location of fencing and type of fencing. This fencing, at a minimum, shall consist of barrier fencing at the top of slope. Beyond this barrier fencing shall be silt fencing installed to the City of Aspen standards. Additional erosion control measures may be necessary depending upon the site. Sill fencing shall be installed along the top of slope. 13. Demolition of the existing carport will require a permit from the City Forester, 14. Excavation for proposed garage must be 15 feet away from Tree 171 and 12 feet away from tree 102 with no fill permitted in this area. 15. Footers for car bridge must be 12 feet away from tree 102. 16. Special root excavation techniques will be required in along the southern perimeter of the proposed residence. B. Engineering Department Conditions 1. No plantings other than native riparian plantings are permitted within the 15' top of slope setback. 2. Existing utilities run through the top of slope and top of slope setback. These utilities shall be abandoned and any new utilities must be installed outside of the top of slope and top of slope setback. 3. The driveway entrance must be a minimum of 25 ' from the Shady Lane turn off. 4. Vehicles must be able to turn around in the auto court to prevent backing out onto Red Mountain Rd. 5. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Additionally, the following items are required: a) A no rise certificate. ' 3 b) Any federal and state permits associated with development in the floodplain shall be submitted, as necessary. C. Planning Department Conditions 1. The applicant shall submit a Site Improvement Survey/Plat for City of Aspen review and approval depicting the building envelope and top of slope within 180 days of this approval. This survey will be recorded prior to the submission of a building permit. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtueofthe ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on April 4,2017. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLA~NING-AND-ZQNING *JOMMISSION: 1 james R True, City Attorney Ski,gl[~.-1.--/ ATTEST: CU Ky- Cindy'Klob, Records Manager Attachments: Exhibit A Application Drawings 4 5-k Exhb,t A .- ' t * 4 + G HUN;IR .' ,, 0/14.2:.20. r h - V -* , j 0-- r - , 1, --A I 1 1 V Â· 1.1 i f ' I --I. L . 1 g,W. - .---- â‚¬ T.I 1 -- 1.7-:-a r.1 t -- 1 11. -- ,:.. ~ ~-1 -: 16-%-AA p --- ---7 'll 6 *3: 44#lek;,1 34*1*a)4 r , , HI 'Altq#F 2 1 , i 19# s.,Â· 4 1 -'----* j i Â·~ ?l i t:=..#8 1 i ty .r Â·, I l.*, i 2.-9410. -- =-i ..Fi-3 . .â€ž, 9. , MN# 1 3 ! 14*.1 ' Cl -- , . cÂ¥;tr 1'- , Il / t 1 1 . -.= f 1 Â£ . 11 -- 1 1 4 / L Â·1. - .1 1 1 b. . ' 1 / ' - 1 1 11 - 1 , ' 157* Kâ‚¬*4*113Â¥44- 1 1 - . D SIIWLANDSCAPE PLAN PREFERRED OPTION oil â‚¬ L - *,1 . I .3 G ...- k " 4 42 f Â· -- Â« de 2 3,# I 2.5 i: I . I 4 .1 -,c...5,9 ki:.5 / . rE 144. 1 ... Â¥J -1 J . t.~~ Â·:y ~' 1. ..... 6- if. 1 1 t. 6. =..... - 4 I .Gf . . ..4 -4 ---W- -.- ... . e e. ... t '4 , .'*44 : 9\ 3SnOH AdONVJ 3SAOH AdONVO O.7 Nk. I 41 40Â¥WS . 11 II I *'. 7.4.2414,1,Â·i ' -4*7 . i ' i Ii,16 %1 < ,.1~Gl AÂ¥\<'.)Â¢.Â·:- .IMAE- .Y, , v +H. J : .44Â¥C*'Cff.vf~,9 .A-/ . 9 , fi .. C -il// illi .iiI 4 y. .0 1 -- 3 44. 1,0 '....:.4 11 *. , }49- I 4 '9,/S'I' A{>\, - Â· 4 46 ! 410 :. .. -~V a L . i 6. lA -Il /=9 6 L AG#* + 1 // ti .'r.)4. .: -1.1-â€¢W :4*F'' f..1 ,/0,~. 4-40'Op ,~ i -45<, 4'4 '--JEK 1. - -fl Â· .A ./.- . r.540 ' * . .7, . f . i. 1 ;. Â¥7. ; 6 ', . . 3, P - - . - 4 j . . ... 4 .. i 4...9 ,If< V:-' f, ..P './.. 1$421#121'1 Â« 2. '. 2 79/405 1 -f - . - 'flp j - .f. - :I.Â»,1--If -4-~jt)9-,274/144Â» -- -46-Â« 7 . tr. I â€¢ U.4 . *510, . =. Ve i .Â·1:1>,T~~3~ 4 + -M 3 .5- 2 . , ..40.-~.~~~~il~97.f.~.*I,I;â‚¬1 <:e, ~,i. .... el, 42'â€¢\7"147,6 - .79/ R'bjk A . ' - . -e ... - ' L 1. I. 0 . ' *4" . 7 M. ;4*r ' -'.* Vil %*.2 T~ * 6 . 24 .1,4 4.4/'' ... . 0 - Aol 0 E LL Resolution No. 8 (SERIES OF 2017) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND A SETBACK VARIANCE TO DEMOLISH AND REPLACE THE EXISTING RESIDENCE AND BUILD A DRIVEWAY AT 54 SHADY LANE CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 273707200026 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Alan Richman Planning Services, requesting Stream Margin Review Exemption approval, a Residential Design Standard Variation, and a Setback Variance for the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a new residence at 54 Shady Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is zoned R-30, Low Density Residential in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, . WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards, Residential Design Review Standards, and Variance Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff found that a Residential Design Variation was not needed due to the parcel being outside of the Infill Area with a slope greater than ten feet; and, WHEREAS, upon review ofthe application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Stream Margin Review, and a denial of a Setback Variance finding that the review standards for the requests have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives ofthe Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves with conditions, the request for a Stream Margin Review and the request for a Setback Variance to demolish the existing residence and construct a new residence in the Stream Margin of Hunter Creek as shown in Exhibit A, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: Section 1: General Approval Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the Stream Margin Review request and approves the Setback Variance request to allow for the development of a single-family residence and a driveway that exceeds the height limitations outlined in the Land Use Code. The driveway variance is specifically for the elevated driveway represented to the Commission both in materials and form. These approvals, with conditions, will allow the Applicant to replace the existing residence at 54 Shady Lane with a new design and footprint further away from the Hunter Creek Stream Margin. Section 2: Conditions of Approval A. Parks Department Conditions 1. An approved tree permit is required before approval of the building permit. An approved tree permit requires a proposed landscape plan identifying trees for removal and means and schedule for mitigation. 2. A construction fence must be erected along the entire dripline of all trees on site and any tree canopy from neighboring property. This will serve as the tree protection zone (TPZ). This fence is to be constructed in such a manner that the area inside the dripline is protected. An inspection of this fence must be performed before any construction or demolition activities begin. please arrange this inspection with Ben Carlsen at 429-2034. 3. No materials may be stored in the TPZ, including but not limited to, construction backfill, construction traffic, or any other construction materials. 4. No excavation, grading or trenching may occur within the TPZ without the consent of the City o f Aspen Forester or his designee. 5. No parking of vehicles or equipment may occur in the TPZ. 6. No dumping of any waste products may occur in the TPZ. 7. Any roots cut during excavation shall be pruned with sharp loppers/pruners back to the soil line. The roots will further be protected by burlap draped over the side o f the excavation covering the exposed roots. This burlap shall be kept moist until the excavation is backfilled. 8. Pruning to provide clearance for construction activities shall only be done under the direction of an arborist. 2 9. Site inspections shall be performed on a weekly basis, to ensure the above listed conditions are met. 10. Any unapproved improvements or activities outside of those approved within this permit will be subject to mitigation in the form of restoration. 11. This permit must be posted on site during the construction process. 12. The Applicant shall submit a detailed plan for erosion control. Plans should detail location of fencing and type of fencing. This fencing, at a minimum, shall consist of barrier fencing at the top of slope. Beyond this barrier fencing shall be silt fencing installed to the City of Aspen standards. Additional erosion control measures may be necessary depending upon the site. Silt fencing shall be installed along the top of slope. 13. Demolition of the existing carport will require a permit from the City Forester, 14. Excavation for proposed garage must be 15 feet away from Tree 171 and 12 feet away from tree 102 with no fill permitted in this area. 15. Footers for car bridge must be 12 feet away from tree 102. 16. Special root excavation techniques will be required in along the southern perimeter of the proposed residence. B. Engineering Department Conditions 1. No plantings other than native riparian plantings are permitted within the 15' top of slope setback. 2. Existing utilities run through the top of slope and top of slope setback. These utilities shall be abandoned and any new utilities must be installed outside o f the top of slope and top of slope setback. 3. The driveway entrance must be a minimum of 25' from the Shady Lane turn off. 4. Vehicles must be able to turn around in the auto court to prevent backing out onto Red Mountain Rd. 5. The Applicant's design shall be compliant with all sections of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, Title 21 and all construction and excavation standards published by the Engineering Department. Additionally, the following items are required: a) A no rise certificate. 3 b) Any federal and state permits associated with development in the floodplain shall be submitted, as necessary. C. Planning Department Conditions 1. The applicant shall submit a Site Improvement Survey/Plat for City of Aspen review and approval depicting the building envelope and top of slope within 180 days o f this approval. This survey will be recorded prior to the submission of a building permit. Section 3: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 4: Ifany section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion ofthis Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent j urisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity ofthe remaining portions thereof. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on April 4,2017. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: Andrea Bryan, Assistant City Attorney Skippy Mesirow, Chair ATTEST: Cindy Klob, Records Manager Attachments: Exhibit A Application Drawings 4 . MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Reilly Thimons, Planning Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: 54 Shady Lane: Stream Margin Review, Dimensional Variance MEETING DATE: April 4, 2017 APPLICANT /OWNER: STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Leila LLC Staff finds that the application meets the criteria for Stream Margin Review. However, staff finds that the REPRESENTATIVE: application does not meet the criteria for the Alan Richman, Alan Richman Planning dimensional variance as requested. Services; David Johnston, David Johnston Architects Vicinity/zone district map of the site LOCATION: / ....i' r t 'I. 54 Shady Lane , 4/ / , , CURRENT ZONING & USE , 1 , . I 1 Located in the Low Density Residential , 11 , (R-30) zone district ' i .\. , \\\ 1 PROPOSED LAND USE: |Red Mountain Road 1 , . N. The Applicant are requesting a Stream . Â·Â· 32 4 |Shady Lane| Margin Review and Dimensional 0 Variance ., Red Mountain Road view . 2 -' 'f ji ~; ; i k'*f . *21'. C i. 31 '.,r Â£ 1 th~i 1. . 4 1 ' LAND USE REQUESTS AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant have requested the following land use approvals from the City Council: â€¢ Stream Margin Review (Chapter 26.435.040) for the demolition and replacement of the existing residence. (Planning and Zoning is the final review authority.) â€¢ Dimensional Variance (Chapter 26.314) with regard to a front yard setback requirement. (Planning and Zoning is the final review authority). BACKGROUND: The subject property is zoned R-30, a low -density zone district with a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet, making the property a lot ofconforming record. The lot is approximately 34,768 square feet (0.798 acres) in size, not taking slope reductions into account. The parcel is along Red Mountain Road and abuts Shady Lane to its southern border, however there is no access available from Shady Lane. The entirety of the property along this border belongs to a neighboring property owner, and no access easement from Shady Lane has been granted. The Applicant currently access their property off of Red Mountain Road via a carport located in the northeast corner of the property adjacent to the bridge over LIunter Creek (see Figures 1 and 2 below). From the carport, the Applicant access the existing house through a flight of stairs from Red Mountain Road. In 1987, prior owners of the parcel granted Pitkin County approximately 4,000 square feet, or .09 acres of land, to widen and elevate Red Mountain Road (Reception # 296212). In exchange for the forfeited land, the County agreed to construct a two-car parking platform that is still used today, and the stairs down to the current residence. The previous owners turned the parking platform into a carport in accordance with the agreement with the County. r. 1 / Ill' 1 - ~ 1 1, t<- 1 6, Â¢Â¢ 1 Irl ' I. 1 1 - ' '4 f, . t * *0 1191 9--0- Figure 1: View from Red Mountain Road Figure 2: Existing car port The existing residence partially sits within the top of slope setback from Hunter Creek, and consists of a two-story compound with three linked structures built in 1971, with subsequent remodels. The property has undergone a stream margin review and received approval in 2004 prior to its latest remodel (Resolution No. 26, Series of 2004). Page 2 of 9 A prominent feature o f the parcel is the existing tree-scape providing significant canopy coverage with 255 deciduous and 13 coniferous trees located within the property boundaries. PROJECT SUMMARY: The Applicant initially requested three reviews from the Planning and Zoning Commission. One request is for Stream Margin Review for the demolition of the existing structure and construction of a new residence. Secondly, the Applicant requested a variation from a Residential Design Standard, which upon further review was deemed non-applicable. Finally, the Applicant would like a variance for exceeding the allowable driveway height within a front yard setback. Since the Residential Design Variation is not necessary only two requests are under consideration. Land use reviews: Stream Margin Review: As noted previously, the property underwent a stream margin review and received approval in 2004 for a remodel of the existing structure which currently sits within the Hunter Creek top of slope setback. The proposed structure will be centered on the property moving further away from the top of slope and top of slope setback and towards the southern property line. The Applicant has not proposed any grading, plantings, or development within the top of slope or top of slope setback, and has stated there will be no development outside of the setbacks illustrated on the improvement survey, Figure 3 below. Legend jâ‚¬f < f f < \~ <"'\111-Imu-jtS qi, //0, 0 1/ .11*CRIEK 1 / Seto : *.CA- 1 â€¢ Top of Slope (TOS) ~ ~ !-~ I .-- A'FI~ Â«~M*t. ~~1,1~U 0 -- ":42 15#74 Â©q -c , / .--po ... I TOS setback ':..1 Dtt. ' ..1 I >f-AMPUeSk<.A<84*dz# 4%*01* NA 6 1 '11 ?Â»" . v / im ~/ -211-1 +4~ 4 1:I;~ -4ierr-PL I :4>1.MftÂ·fl'Â·TEiÂ· 2- -~#- t. ra 959 cl, ~14.4 1 Â£1-7 Y 4. ' \ \ \1 ilif~42113-244 -721= .-- , 01 ,-,ip:, 3 - '1 Â· 0 -16 1 F--------9 , 0>V u Lee#lt - 1:AX-Â·&. 1 1 '9/ # C 9 24.1 1 ...61 1 ~ 1\. " â‚¬ AV Â¥ I ...' + 2 "4. 1 ' :'Â¥#f.m /Â· J g'i, P / -- 49 5 2 1 ri- / :j .7" > li I_ _i-.1, l'' 1* Â·v f yo . 0/Qui, .0-i, ~ *ek, I I I p r ....L . 3,+372 8. 0* i i W."â€¢r,1*r' / \ / 1 -4* 1 1 ' ___ 1 I ./ \\1 . / 1 / \ .... 0/ f \\ \ Shady Lane _ ' 1 â€¢O*, 11 Figure 3: Site Plan Page 3 of 9 X.4 -+.9, The Parks Department has expressed concern over the demolition of the current structure due to its proximity to the top of slope, and has outlined conditions for construction management which can be found in the Referral Agency Comments below. The proposed development will not alter, pollute, or interfere with the natural course of the waterway and relevant water features will be drained within the building envelope. The proposed structure will not exceed the height limit delineated by a 45-degree line drawn from the top of slope, Figure 2 below. A lighting plan will be submitted with building permit. 45 DEOMEE â€¢WE FROW 1 <TOP BeÂ« SET 90[LmE li ILLUSTAirlF UOST PEETÂ·,CTriE 'OP,T -2-34 -------1 _-I--tHIHN-I -Ii[HHIHil-Ill}1HtH+Ht[IP ----- -Â·------Â·-'.<+F(-~-----Â·----------------- -1-10= -7 I. j ./.i#*/LITT#riTIT#Liz/Lizz.1/ht 0 45 1 - U --~4 4 Figure 4: 45-degree angle from top Of slope Stafffinds that the application meets the Stream Margin Review criteria, and has included referral agency conditions for demolition and construction mitigation plans in the Resolution. The placement of the proposed structure further away from the top of slope and top of slope setback will work to preserve the Hunter Creek riparian area and will bring the parcel into conformance with current Stream Margin Revie-w standards. Dimensional Variance: The Applicant has requested a variance to allow for their driveway to project above 24 inches within the front yard setback. Section 26.575.020.E.5.q ofthe Land Use Code allows for driveways too project into a setback under the following conditions: Driveways not exceeding twenty-four (24) inches above or below natural grade within any setback of a yard facing a Street. Within all other required setbacks, finished grade of a driveway shall not exceed thirty (30) inches above or below natural grade. The application proposes an elevated driveway (Figure 1) that would connect to the second story of the proposed residence. Page 4 of 9 .' , 4 , /â€žf --- . i j f . 6.k Â· .:'. --....-.- ~f>,,.2Â¥9Â· 0 PED ,51-.~f~-,33 52 - 1 V.Â«-7-2 , ~ \ 114 ! - . ...r- 513 ~=:.1 4.-Cl~ .-- S â€¢ r ~ 4---4 1;1 1 :..e"M . 1/ -Â¥11 9 6,4 114 -./ f ~ & 1 2 Ua 91.-<- 1.b.22<i -*74\1 4 / 1\ *4= 1-36 1 'W > A. 11 1 971 54 SHAUY LNE 1 ..t- 3 - 4 - /9737 /1 1 li 1 ./.-1 I 1 1 2= 9. 1 1-I , ~ - In --*1111 - .4 ./, .1 - 1 / Â· Â·ULL # - j Â£ // 1.-1.-1 1 2 w 9&44. i -1 6/# : Al., 1 2 , &1Â·:Â·--IM 1 , W..14 i - ,- =3 -0-9 41*33 1.85*94 -\CEjeÂ·\ 1, 4~2*144tkt ./ ,f U V +9* 42*5#-4*13 ~2-~ 4â€ž2~03Â»:2*r, 1 N At r 1'/ -'' >4 1. 1/ SIA"rn--9 .//254"me'Fic/"EXP \ i Figure 5: Proposed auto-court and elevated driveway The Applicant feels that this design would address the steep slope from Red Mountain Road, which exceeds 30% within the front yard setback, and would limit the overall impact to the lot by negating the need to create a sloping driveway that would necessitate the removal of a significant number oftrees. This option was explored by the Applicant and is labeled Alternative A (Figure 2). An additional option, labeled Alternative B consists of another version of the proposed elevated driveway and auto-court but would significantly regrade the site to create a new finished grade (Figure 3). The regrading and tiered lawn would span approximately 76 feet wide and infringe upon the southern property setback and the top of slope setback to the north. Page 5 of 9 , . U -- - ./-J.--.-'ll.----.*-- aMS- . / .1,1 / U..... .- - - -- ' 15bd . - 0 4/ A t Â· - ~f-.-ry:ra _mi- . 1 1 -- V - 211 1 . I . . 0.'y / /-or i , 1 44 1 â€¢ 1 ~J' / . .l A /4 1 . 1 1 1 ,PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 0' 0 2. b /) 111 l , :1/ 1 1 1 1 1 ' . 11 . -f\<11< 1 4.-1 . - - - 2------ -1-4 .4 - .. Â·Â» , i-t-ff Figure 6: Alternative A, Sloped Driveway Page 6 0 f 9 4.5 -51'* &gl=--t:-4- .~122'Â¥4&?tor ilarr.15 V.kACAL * 03'~1 Â£22BLk - 1.-i & 1....N/'$ 4 -11/$ .-IV'*EÂ¥Â·: VS-m~ *REA Â·dkw ry,4,8 1'#1.-'' AN.49 *2'"*CC ' 9111 AW' F~~Aillri Â¥~1121 11 .ai 0 * Mi,//4;:9djftaip Â· =D<1# 3Â£111,7 C CAOrÂ·- gllt 1 994. ./WQW r- r-= Â·' ' tÂ¥31 1 l~~ 1 - . 11 i . i -1.ML - 1! .' ...... .â‚¬216,1 f" al== 9 t20 -i t'?~3>:2~~.489# 406 LAÂ« Â· ~~ 511 P.AN I CONCEMHAL RETA;NED DRIVE f, At:TOCOI;RT - Figure 7: Alternative B, Tiered Elevated Drive Staff Comment: The criteria for a variance in the Land Use Code state that a variance can be granted under the following conditions: The appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1. The grant of variance will be generally consistent -with the purposes, goals. objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and 2. The grant ofvariance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use ofthe parcel, building or structure; and 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement ofthe terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a) There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure -which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b) Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the terms of this this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Page 7 of 9 3SAOH AdONVO i.~D-n.Â·-Ovt~ -.4,N C-â€¢-$~~-.-:â€¢ ~11 Â· 1:â€¢W Stafffinds that the proposed auto-court and elevated driveway address many of the site constraints and provide a valid design response minimizing the impacts to the topography and removal of vegetation on the lot. Parks and Engineering similarly supported this option over Alternatives A and B, as theyfelt that it focused development awayfrom the Hunter Creek top ofslope and created less of an impact on the existing tree inventory and site canopy coverage. While Staff ackno-wledges that this lot is subject to steep slopes and certain site constraints that will affect its site planning, Staff finds this to be an inconvenience rather than a condition that would preclude the ability to successfully develop the site, due to the existing carport providing access, and cannot find that the request requires a Variance due to these inconveniences. REFERRAL AGENCY COMMENTS: Both Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed and provided comment on the subject application. Their referral agency comments are listed below: Engineering Engineering was concerned with the slope ofthe site and proximity to Hunter Creek riparian area5 and provided the following comments: â€¢ No plantings other than native riparian plantings are permitted within the 15' top of slope setback. One sheet calls out "Wild Grass Mix" another sheet calls out "New on Grade Manicured Lawn." Lawn is permitted only outside the setback. â€¢ Existing utilities run through the top of slope and TOS setback. These utilities shall be abandoned and any new utilities must be installed outside ofthe top of slope and top of slope setback. â€¢ The driveway entrance must be a minimum of 25' from the Shady Lane turn off. â€¢ The Engineering Department supports the elevated auto court and bridged option as this is the least impactful to the topography and limits tree removal. â€¢ Vehicles must be able to turn around in the auto court to prevent backing out onto Red Mountain Rd. Parks Parks also acknowledged the site-specific constraints that are present, and while in support of the proposed bridge option as the least impactful to the existing tree inventory, outlined conditions to be met through the permitting and construction process to preserve the Cottonwood resources that are currently on the site. â€¢ A tree permit will be required and mitigation fees will be assigned by the City Forester. â€¢ Hand-work only in top of slope â€¢ No machinery in top of slope â€¢ Wild grass mix must be Aspen native seed mix â€¢ New utilities, when located, may not be within the dripline of any trees unless approved by the City Forester. The new utilities will likely have to go through auto-court access area. â€¢ No compaction of any soils, addition of fill, or cutting of roots within the dripline of any trees without a permit from the City Forester. â€¢ Excavation of the E-W berm will not be permitted where large diameter cottonwoods must be preserved. Page 8 0 f 9 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Stream Margin Review and denial of the Dimensional Variance request. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. XX (Series of 2017) approving the Stream Margin Review and denying the Dimensional Variance request." ALTERNATIVE PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to approve Resolution No. XX (Series of 2017) approving both the Stream Margin Review and the Dimensional Variance request." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: ATTACHMENTS: EXHIBIT A - Stream Margin Review Criteria EXHIBIT B - Variance Review Criteria EXHIBIT C - Referral Comments ExHIBIT D - Application Page 9 of 9 44 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIR-ED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHA-PTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 54 56,6 L (,#rig _ 5 Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) L-46 lee.0,1 (name, please print) being or representing an Applicadto the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that Ihave complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) or Section 26.306.010 (IE) of the Aspen Ladd Use Code in the following manner: 0 Publication ofnotice. By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no latef than fourteen (14) days after final approval of a site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal hotice section o f an. official paper or a paper of general circulation.in the City of Aspen no later than fift6en (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signatdre The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowl*lged before me this /3 day of A f 'A l , 2041, br 4'art= 55- PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL - Notice is hereby given to the general public of the WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL approval of a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following described property: Parcel ID # My commission expires: NEAO 273707200026, legally described as Section: 7 Township: 10 Range: 84 Tract Of Land Beg At A Pt On The Ely R-O-W Of The D&Rgw Rr (Aspen Branch) Wh The W4 Cor Of Said Sec 7 Bears W 602.4ft The 214.6 A To The Wly R-O-W Line Of 4.Yan * A 441/A/0.-- Red Mountain Rd Th Along The Arc Of A Curve To The Right The Chord Of Which Bears N 12 Deg Notary Pubhc 56'e 215.5ft To The Center Of Hunter Creek Th S Along The Center Of Hunter Creek Along The Arc Of A Curve The Chord Of Which Bears S 68 Deg 02'04"W 296.19 Ft To The Ely Line Of Said Rr R- 6 O-W Th S 08 Deg 57'e 90.6 Ft Along The Ely Line f Of Said Rr R-O-W To The Pt Of Beg Less A Tract Cont 0.0924 Ac MA- Deeded To Pjtkjn Co For Rd- r KAREN REED PATTERSON wy Drainage Easement Bk 554 Pgs 159-161 &185 ATTACHMENTS: ~ Subject To Us Patent Reservations Bk 35 Pg 116 NOTARY PUBLIC R-0-W Granted By Bk 29 Pg 582, City of Aspen, ~ STATE OF COLORADO Pitkin County, Colorado; commonly known as 54 ~ Shady Lane, Aspen CO 81611. The applicant re- COPY OFÂ·THE PUBLICATION ~ NOTARY ID #19964002767 ceived a Planning and Zoning Commission ap- proval for a Stream Margin Review for the demoli- ' My Commission Expires February 15,2020 tion of the existing residence and construction of a new residence and a Dimensional Variance for a driveway extending higher than twenty-four inches within the front yard setback. The approval is de- picted in the land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Reilly Thimons at the City of Aspen Community Development Dept, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado. (970) 429-2754. City of Aspen Published in The Aspen Times on April 13,2017. ~ (125758726} 8 vil?Rf-*13 f' :i Â·t 'Â·i Â·:)1'2..411-3-,y.'- . 1 4/ i Y. ..' U .4 . , 3? ]BU9 ','FIATOM A ' J.,L' ;C. 4 4 1 ~ Flill; I t.9410 .,6 <14Â· Â·Â·, , f , r ..., 1+ 1. , 4,'Â·JOI/1 )gos .,1 i YUL-110 1 29:Â· .cd :,Â·,teeimmeD VM 4 , tion. to insert a new Section 7.16 setting out a rea- . ig property rental and management se,vices to indi- .tion 12.1 ot the Declaration in order to simplify vot- mon. iers as set forth above. The First Amendment must .R.S. Â§ 38-33.3-217(1)(b),by one hundred percent deeds of trust affecting any or all of the Units. In il the First Amendment was mailed to all holders of iat pursuant to C.A.S. Â§ 38-33.3-217(1)(b),if a hold- 3 of the amendment within sixty (60) days alter the e consented to the amendment. g in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin dominium is located. Except as specifically amend- enants, restrictions, and limitations contained in the ntact the attorney for the Associatton, Eben P, Clark akerlaw.com. Â·IT A DMENTTO ON FOR TIMBERLINE CONDOMINIUMS claration for Timberline Condominiums, (this "First 2016. Als; ind subject to that certain Amended and Restated n book 395 at page 452 as reception no. 227548 of Â·ation and governed by the Colorado Common All capitalized terms not otherwise clefined herein ation. is modified by C.R.S. Â§ 38-33.3-217(1)(a)(t), the of the Owners holding at least sixt'y-seven (67%) of nsent of one hundred percent (10096) of the holders iny or all of the Units. mend Article 7 of the Declaration, to insert a new Â·ion on the persons and entities providing property vners within Timberline, and to amend Section 12,1 s for future amendments to the Declaration. y Owners holding at least sixty-seven percent (67%) r deemed approved in accordance with C.R.S. Â§ the holders of recorded first Mortgages or deeds of DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order, hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development ofa site-specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit application submittal is accepted and deemed complete by the Chief Building Official, pursuant to Section 26.304.090, or unless an exemption, extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect, excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470, but shall be subject to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date ofthis Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site-specific development plan as described below. Leila LLC 623 East Hopkins Avenue. Aspen, CO 81611. Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address SECTION: 7 TOWNSHIP: 10 RANGE: 84 TRACTOF LAND BEGAT A PT ON THE ELY R-O-W OF THE D&RGW RR (ASPEN BRANCH) WH THE W4 COR OF SAID SEC 7 BEARS W 602.4FT THE 214.6 FT TO THE WLY R-O-W LINE OF RED MOUNTAIN RD TH ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THECHORDOF WHICH BEARS N 12 DEG 56'E 215.5FT TO THE CENTER OF HUNTER CREEK TH S ALONG THE CENTER OF HUNTER CREEK ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 68 DEG 02'04"W 296.19 FT TO THE ELY LINE OF SAID RR R-O-W TH S 08 DEG 57'E 90.6 FT ALONG THE ELY LINE OF SAID RR R-O-W TO THE PT OF BEG LESS A TRACT CONT 0.0924 AC M/L DEEDED TO PITKIN CO FOR RDWY DRAINAGE EASEMENT BK 554 PGS 159-161 &185 SUBJECT TO US PATENT RESERVATIONS BK 35 PG 116 R-0-W GRANTED BY BK 29 PG 582, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 54 SHADY LANE. Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property The applicant has received approval for a Stream Margin Review for the demolition of the existing residence and construction of a new residence and a Dimensional Variance for a driveway extending higher than twenty-four inches within the front yard setback. Written Description of the Site-Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Stream Margin Review and a Dimensional Variance approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 4, 2017. Resolution No 8 Series of 2017. Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) April 13.2017 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication ofnotice of approval.) April 14,2020 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension, reinstatement, exemption tpom expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City ofAspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 4th day of April, 2017, by the City of Aspen Community Development Director. c 4944 Ofy\AÂ«i 2 ~l~sica Garro~>~Community Development Director 1,~ 187.N/17 EXHIBIT ---12!191â‚¬9 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 3-4 ShaÂ® leuL , Aspen, CO SCHEDU]pED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: -T-ae _7ApA{ 44 â‚¬ 4:3*0101-7 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) (name, please print) bei4 or rdpresenting an Applicant-telhe City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: l/- Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the day of , 20 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage io. prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records o f Pitkin County as they ' appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Â£ U Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text ofthis Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. .0Â«U___ 1 c--~ Signatdre The foregoin "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 14 day of H.4-EL , 2012 by '4vure-6'L Sc c--4-23 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL My commission expires: 691 â‚¬il i (p 4.42Â« 0 1 4*4 Notary Public GURENREEDPATTERSON NOTARY PUBLIC | STATE OF COLORADO ATTACHMENTS AS APPLIC+BL*bTARY ID #19964002767 . COPY OF THE PUBLICATION lEY.emmissionExPIesfehniary.15,20' â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 NOTICE OFPUBLIC HEARING RE: 54 Shady Lane Public He-Ing: Tuesday Ap,H 4,2017,4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cittes Room 130 S. Gatena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 54 Shady Lane, Parcel ID. 273707200026 Legal Descrlption: Section: 7 TownshipÂ· 10 RANGE: 84 TRACT OF LAND BEG AT A PT ON THE ELY R-O-W OF THE DBRGW AR (ASPEN BRANCH) WH THE W4 COA OF SAID SEC 7 BEARS W 602.4FT TH E 214.6 FT TO THE WLY R-0-W LINE OF RED MOUNTAIN RD TH ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE TO THE RIGHT THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS N 12 DEG 56'E 215.5FT TO THE CENTER OF HUNTER CREEK TH S ALONG THE CENTER OF HUNTER CREEK ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE THE CHORD OF WHICH BEARS S 68 DEG 02'04'W 296.19 FT TO THE ELY LINE OF SAID RA R O-W TH S 08 DEG 57'E 90.6 FT ALONG THE ELY LINE OF SAID RR A-0-W TO THE PT OF 8EG LESS A TRACT CONT 0.0924 AC M/L DEEDED TO PITKIN CO FOR ADWY DRAINAGE EASE- MENT BK 554 PGS 159-161 &185 SUBJECT TO US PATENT RESERVATIONS BK 35 PG 116 R- 0-W GRANTED BY SK 29 PG 582, County of Pit- kin, State of Colorado. Description: The Applicant is seeking to demol- ish and replace an existing residence and has re- quested Residential Design Standards variations, and a setback variance to allow a driveway ex- ceeding 24 inches above grade to extend into the setback. Land Use Reviews Req: Stream Margin. Resi- dential Design Standards Review Variation. Set- back Variance. Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning Commission Applicant: Leila LLC, c/o Aspen Starwood, 623 East Hopkins, Aspen CO 81611 More information: For further Information related to the project contact Reilly Thimons at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2754, reilly.thimons@ cityofapen.oom. Published in the Aspen TImes on March 16, 2017 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 54 â‚¬UDy LA-e. , Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: '2011 STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) A I *,4 Ri <-L-a- (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. ~ Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials, which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 14 day of A.Ari-\A , 20 \1 , to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. J Mailing of notice. By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E)(2) of the Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S. mail to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. H lA Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notififation and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) 1'~A Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAs or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subj ect to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text o f this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. pl/- 911 Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was ackpowledged~efqre me this day of , 20 , by A L,Frt< 14. 64 Â·Â»ti- NICOLEELIZABETH HENNIN&- 1 WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF COLORADO 1 Notary Identification #20154012950 L-MLETS*Â®22Â£,res?/31/2019 Mv commission exvires: 3\31]/9- LA,j 2Â£Â«- Et**,2-7â‚¬2::,c Notary Public ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: â€¢ COPY OF THE PUBLICATION â€¢ PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) â€¢ LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL â€¢ APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY C.R.S. Â§24-65.5-103.3 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970) 920.5197 w: www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 54 Shady Lane Public Hearing: Tuesday April 4, 2017; 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities Room 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 54 Shady Lane, Parcel ID: 273707200026 Description: The Applicant is seeking to demolish and replace an existing residence adjacent to the Hunter Creek has requested Stream Margin Review, Residential Design Standards Variations, a Setback Variance to allow a driveway exceeding 24 inches above grade to extend into the setback. Land Use Reviews Reg: Stream Margin. Residential Design Standards Review Variations. Setback Variance. Decision Making Body: Planning & Zoning Commission Applicant: Leila LLC, c/o Aspen Starwood, 623 East Hopkins, Aspen CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Reilly Thimons at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2754, reilly.thimons@cityofaspen.com. Pitkin County Mailing List of 300 Feet Radius From Parcel: 273707200026 on 03/09/2017 4),THIN ' Cou,i 74 Â©Otc-\*) Instructions: This document contains a Mailing List formatted to be printed on Avery 5160 Labels. If printing, DO NOT "fit to page" or "shrink oversized pages." This will manipulate the margins such that they no longer line up on the labels sheet. Print actual size. Disclaimer: Pitkin County GIS presents the information and data on this web site as a service to the public. Every effort has been made to ensure that the information and data contained in this electronic system is accurate, but the accuracy may change. Mineral estate ownership is not included in this mailing list. Pitkin County does not maintain a database of mineral estate owners. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content at this site or at other sites to which we link. Assessing accuracy and reliability of information and data is the sole responsibility of the user. The user understands he or she is solely responsible and liable for use, modification, or distribution of any information or data obtained on this web site. http:Uwww.pitkinmapsandmore.com HINES ISSUE TRUST FBO T HINES HINES ISSUE TRUST FBO S HINES CITY OF ASPEN 2800 POST OAK BLVD #4900 2800 POST OAK BLVD #4900 130 S GALENA ST HOUSTON, TX 77056 HOUSTON, TX 77056 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN CONSOLIDATED SANITATION WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST PITKIN COUNTY 565 N MILL ST 1 N FRANKLIN ST #625 123 EMMA RD #204 ASPEN, CO 81611 CHICAGO, IL 60606 BASALT, CO 81621 WEDUM JOHN R BOUGHTON WILLIAM & JACQUELINE HALL JO ANN 101 INDEPENDENCE PL 102 INDEPENDENCE PL 103 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 MADSEN DIANNE G & TIMOTHY T NELSON BRETT DAVID BUESCH THOMAS A 104 INDEPENDENCE PL 205 INDEPENDENCE PL#205 206 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 FRANKLIN DAVID M & MICHELLE HAGGERTY BEATRICE M DECAMPO RICHARD & SUSAN 207 INDEPENDENCE PL 308 INDEPENDENCE CT 309 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BONDS MICHAEL S & ELAINE JOHNSON SLADDIN MICHAEL D LUTZ CATHERINE 310 INDEPENDENCE PL 311 INDEPENDENCE PL 311 INDEPENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 EINARSDOTTIR ARNA BRUNSWOLD KIRK W LANE TAMMIE A 412 INDEPENDENCE PL#412 413 INDEPENDENCE PL 413 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEKLIK ROYA IRELAND MICHAEL C GOSHORN MARCIA L PO BOX 7640 515 INDEPENDENCE PLACE 516 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOLMSTEDT MONIKA LASKO ELIZABETH JACKSON LAURI A PO BOX 1141 618 INDEPENDENCE PL 619 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 816113204 ASPEN, CO 81611 HARRISON TRENTON A BIELINSKI BRIDDGET WILLIAMS STEVE PO BOX 11165 620 INDEPENDENCE PL 620 INDEPENDENCE PL ASPEN, CO 81612 ASPEN, CO 81611 ASPEN, CO 81611 HIPP CHRISTINE A MITCHELL MARIAN RUBEY TRUST RUBEY ROBERT NEAL TRUST 621 INDEPENDENCE PL 3903 BELLAIRE BLVD 9 GREENWAY PLAZA #1000 ASPEN, CO 81611 HOUSTON, TX 77025 HOUSTON, TX 77046 BAAR HUNTER CURTIS RUBEY CATHERINE B BERING KAREN RUBEY PO BOX R 2106 MATHEWS 2106 MATHEWS ASPEN, CO 81612 AUSTIN, TX 78703 AUSTIN, TX 78703 RUBEY ROBERT B 100 RMR LLC 110 VALHALLA LLC 2106 MATHEWS 320 W MAIN ST 9201 WILSHIRE BLVD #305 AUSTIN, TX 78703 ASPEN, CO 81611 BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210 ROARING FORK I LLC KELLY HALL ASPEN LLC MUSTANG HOLDINGS 11 LLC 7800 BEVERLY BLVD #3371 6001 POMPTON CT 715 W MAIN ST #201 LOS ANGELES, CA 90036 DALLAS, TX 75248 ASPEN, CO 81611 CALLWINNIE LLC PO BOX 2920 ASPEN, CO 81612 PUBLIC NOTICE D_ate_:_ â€ž349(191, April 4,2017 Time: 4:30 PM Pla-c_e; -130-9.-Galen-al_Pity 11214__ - SistgriCitits__rÂ®m. __ Purpose: _Applicant _Leila_Ll=Q (623-E Hopkins Aveoug, 8speni_0_0_816_11) is se@king Jo_derno]iÂ® an_d -replace all_ - existing_residenceprl this @ite._Thy Planning and Zoning Commission will review-applicatidn for Stream Margin_ Review, Residential Design T Standards Varifitiontanclfor a Setback Variance in order to build a single family home. ./ 10 . For further information contact + ..9..45,1-' Reilly Thimons at the Aspen 10,151. ... , Planning Department at . + I . 970-429-2754. . ..... . . ::*' . - 6- Â¢ f I. .. + 'f â€¢ 4. 4 Â¥ 4 2 Â·AU Â£ * 1 a: py : :i: 4.: I )i ele@-fd~MmmNimiMEÂ¢Mfimmi~ RECEIVED Aspen Historic Preservation Land Use Packet MAR 0 7 2017 Agreement to Pay Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and COMMUNITY DEVELOPME~ Property Phone No. owner("r): Le,â€¢\A LLc Email: ,6*'-4\Arwook-2 3..,1-Co.. Address of Billing 623 â‚¬#54 *ofÂ¥-,wâ‚¬ A" e. Property: â‚¬4 full (,1 Address: (Subject of (send bills here) Atee- co 25\6 \/ application) ~.5 B/%', CO .BUs i \ 00 L 6.20 1 c.p . -Asl--Ul I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable., $ 415 flat fee for ?AMU Q.4.uâ€¢ l s flat fee for $ flat fee for $ flat fee for For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice bythe City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. s 835-0 / deposit for \ 0 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. deposit for 1 hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. City of Aspen: Property Owneg.-s Jessica Garrow, AICP Community Development Director Name: Mkke- FAL,0\Â».1.0 City Use: Fees Due: $ V Received $ Title: Su v.,*2 6 4. .TAJN FOR PERMANENTRECORD RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2017 CIE {BefrdiNATi-UIDBbilaft*}fam?Nt?;18,.068Â£8877 fEill-OE ciYY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bv the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: LenÂ» Cl. c Property Owner ("1"): Email: Â»pfM #1Â·â€¢24Â·04.ae-\Â·00Â·Â·Â· Phone No.: Address of 9446,91 LAMV 006'f~%, Co 9\U \ 1 Property: (subject of application) I certify as follows: (pick one) ~ This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. El This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. Evidence of approval is attached. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: date: / Owner printed name: 6644 -A< WJ (A-v or, Attorney signature: date: 2-1 29{,9 Attorney printed name: A.cK Ne..\l~ RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2017 CITY OF AS*'t.N COMMUNITY DEVELOPEN CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT 2 - LAND USE APPLICATION PROJECT: Name: 54 44541 1,â€¢AL <GkkA,0.- 4&441 6,&._, *-,5 VAAI.-#ce Location: .94 Li,Ah ld"~e, 4, Tz- 6 9\ 6\ 1 Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 1-12,1 9110 0026 APPLICANT: Name: Lt X k AL L Address: c.\ o k F. 4.lc*a woo 9 623 Â£*14 U,oe#-4 471- G 9%.1, Phone #: REPRESENTIVATIVE: Name: k \12*1 Q<,-L".6,4~ e\vc~ 54-. t'U Address: 00 6074 556,3 A p_ O 10 Cl. Le Phone#: 41 4. 4 20' 4 .1- 4 CJ GMQS Exemption E Conceptual PUD El Temporary Use 1 GMQS Allotment ~ Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) Special Review Subdivision D Conceptual SPA [*] ESA -8040 Greenline, Stream Â£ Subdivision Exemption (includes D Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, Condominiumization) E Mountain View Plane ~ Final SPA (&SPA E Commercial Design Review D Lot Split Amendment) % Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment E Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion 2 Conditional Use Other: EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) 522 Aub,U PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) 9-u- A 48-0-9 Haye you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ X550 Pre-Application Conference Summary Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements - including Written Responses to Review Standards ~ 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate if you must submit a 3-D model. RECEIVED -----...--.-.-.-JEW 82017 CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNtTY DEVELOPMENT 54 SHADY LAN E (LEILA LLC) STREAM MARGIN REVIEW RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STAN DARDS REVIEW SETBACK VARIANCE RECEIVED FEB 2 8 2017 SUBMITTED BY CITY OF ASPEN ALAN RICHMAN PLANNING SERVICE~Ffl~EY DEVELOPIEAT P.O. BOX 3613 ASPEN, COLORADO 81612 920-1125 FEBRUARY, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. Introduction ...................................................1 11. Summary of Existing Conditions..................................2 111. Proposed Site Plan .......... ................................... 5 IV. Stream Margin Review ...........................................8 V. Residential Design Standards Review ............................. 12 VI. Variance From Dimensional Standards ............................ 15 VII. Conclusion ...................................................17 EXHIBITS #1. Certification of Ownership #2. Letter from Owner Designating Representatives #3. Pre-Application Conference Summary #4. Recorded Documents Addressing Red Mountain Road #5. P&Z Resolution No. 26, Series of 2004 DRAWINGS 1. Vicinity Map 2. Stream Margin Review/Improvement Survey Plat 3. Inventory of Existing Trees 4. Analysis of Existing Slopes 5. Proposed Site/Landscape Plan: Preferred Option 6. Proposed Site/Landscape Plan: Alternative A 7. Proposed Site/Landscape Plan: Alternative B 8. Top Of Bank Section (45 Degree Angle) 9. Proposed Floor Plans: Preferred Option 10. Proposed Floor Area Calculations: Preferred Option 11. Proposed Elevations: Preferred Option 12. Proposed Elevations: Alternative B 1. Introduction This is an application requesting stream margin review approval for the demolition and replacement of the existing residence located at 54 Shady Lane in Aspen. The property's Pitkin County Parcel ID # is 273707200026. A vicinity map showing the location of the subject property is included in this application package (Sheet #1). The subject property is owned by Leila LLC (hereinafter, "the applicant"). Proof of the ownership of the subject property is provided via the Certificate of Ownership prepared by Neilly Law Firm, LLC (see Exhibit #1). The property's legal description and a list of the exception to title are also included in the Certificate of Ownership. The applicant has designated Neilly Law Firm LLC, Alan Richman Planning Services, Inc., and David Johnston Architects, Inc. as its representatives for purposes of this application (see the letter attached hereto as Exhibit #2). Several pre-application discussions were held between the applicant and staff of the Community Development Department prior to submission of this application. A copy of the pre-application form staff provided to the applicant is attached hereto as Exhibit #3. According to the form, the applicant has been directed to respond to the following sections of the Land Use Code: Sec. 26.435.040: Stream Margin Review; Sec. 26.410: Residential Design Standards; and Sec. 26.414: Variances. The following sections of this application are organized to demonstrate how the proposal complies with the applicable review standards of the Aspen Land Use Code. First however, some background information is presented describing the existing conditions at the property. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 1 11. Summary of Existing Conditions According to the Improvement Survey Plat (Sheet 2), the subject property is approximately 34,768 square feet (0.798 acres) in size. The property is zoned R-30, a zone district with a minimum lot size of 30,000 square feet, so it is a conforming sized lot of record. The property is located along Shady Lane, a street that intersects with lower Red Mountain Road. However, as the Improvement Survey Plat demonstrates, there is no driveway to provide access to the property off of Shady Lane. This is because the entirety of the frontage along Shady Lane is owned by a neighboring property owner and an access easement across that property does not exist. Legal access into the property is from Red Mountain Road. However, the existing access does not take the traditional form of a vehicular drive into the property. Instead, there is a two-space carport located directly off of Red Mountain Road at the elevation of the road, with steps down to the house from the carport. This means that any vehicle exiting from the carport must back out onto Red Mountain Road, which is an undesirable situation for both the property owner and for the public. This access configuration came about in 1987, when Pitkin County widened Red Mountain Road and elevated the roadway to create a safer public roadway. The prior owners (Marc and Karen Friedberg) conveyed to Pitkin County approximately 4,000 of land (0.0924 acres of land) to allow the road to be widened and elevated. The documents of record which describe this conveyance, including the deed to the County, and an associated Road Improvements Agreement, are attached as Exhibit #4. These documents indicate that the land was conveyed to the County without financial compensation to the owners. Instead, the Road Improvements Agreement states that the County agreed to construct a two space parking platform on the owner's property to replace the parking spaces which would be displaced by the road construction, and to build stairs down the slope to connect the platform to the house. The County also agreed not to oppose the construction of a garage on the platform (the owner ultimately built a carport rather than a full garage). The survey also shows that Hunter Creek flows along the northern side of the property, with the centerline of the Creek generally representing the property boundary. The floodway and 100 year floodplain boundaries of Hunter Creek, as established by FEMA mapping and verified by the City Engineering Department, are shown on the Stream Margin Review/Improvement Survey Plat. Also shown is the top of bank, which was set in the field by the applicant's engineer and accepted by the City Engineering Department. The property is improved with a two story residential compound of three linked structures that was built in 1971 and remodeled several times thereafter. The residence has received stream margin review approval once before, in 2004, prior to its most recent remodel/addition. Approval was granted pursuant to Planning and Zoning Commission Resolution No. 26, Series of 2004 (attached as Exhibit #5). 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 2 Another important feature of the property is its existing trees. As anyone who walks by this property can attest, there is a significant tree canopy on this property today. The Inventory of Existing Trees (Sheet #3) shows the locations and dimensions of the 255 deciduous trees and 13 coniferous trees that are located throughout the property. In order to determine how much of the land area of the property may be utilized for purposes of calculating the property's allowable floor area, several important features need to be evaluated. First of all, a determination must be made as to how much of the property is under water and therefore does not count towards lot area. Sopris Engineering has performed this calculation and determined that the area of the parcel that lies outside of Hunter Creek is approximately 23,146 square feet in size. The slopes on the property must also be mapped, to determine how much of the land area has slopes of 0% to 20%, 20% to 30%, and greater than 30%. According to Sec. 26-575- 020.C of the Land Use Code, lands with slopes of less than 20% count 100% towards lot area, lands with slopes of 20% to 30% count 50% towards lot area and lands with slopes greater than 30% do not count towards lot area. The Analysis of Existing Slopes (Sheet #4) demonstrates that the following areas are present on this property: Area of Property Lands That Count Towards Lot Area Lands of less than 20% 18,838 square feet 18,838 square feet Lands of 20% to 30% 1,317 square feet 658 square feet Lands of greater than 30% 2,991 square feet 0 square feet Total 23,146 square feet 19,496 square feet Considering these calculations, 19,496 square feet of land area on this property may be utilized for calculating the allowable floor area. A lot of this size in the R-30 zone district is permitted to contain up to 4,769 square feet of floor area, plus areas exempt from floor area calculations (such as garage space, decks and subgrade areas). The existing residence contains considerably less than this amount of floor area. Setbacks in the R-30 zone district are as follows: Front yard = 25' for residence and 30' for accessory buildings; Side yard = 10'; and Rear yard = 15' for residence and 5' for accessory buildings. The Stream Margin Review/Improvement Survey Plat shows that the existing residence is located toward the middle of the lot. As a result, the structure meets all of the underlying zoning setback requirements. However, the drawing also shows that the existing residence does not meet the stream margin review standard that it be set back by at least 15' from the top of bank. That is a situation that can be rectified by removing this structure and replacing it with a new residence that is appropriately located with respect to the 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 3 stream setback. The applicant's plans to redevelop the site in this manner are discussed in further detail in the next section of this application. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 4 111. Proposed Site Plan The applicant proposes to demolish the existing residence and replace it with a new residence and accessory garage, as shown on the attached Site/Landscape Plan (Sheet #5). The applicant also proposes to install a short elevated driveway to provide vehicular access into the site. The proposed residence and the elevated driveway are also illustrated on the elevations and computer renderings provided in this application package. In formulating this site plan the applicant needed to navigate several critical features of this site, as follows: â€¢ The new residence needed to be located so as to be set back by at least 15' from the top of bank of Hunter Creek and so no portion of its mass would intrude upon a 45 degree angle drawn from the top of bank, as specified in the City's Stream Margin Review standards. â€¢ The driveway needed to be designed in a sensitive manner that would minimize the impacts on the relatively steep slopes located along the property frontage. â€¢ Both the driveway and the residence needed to be situated in a manner that would avoid the existing trees on the property to the extent possible. The resulting site plan demonstrates that these three factors can be successfully addressed via an innovative design that complies with the standards of the Land Use Code. The design begins with an elevated driveway that provides access to the proposed residence by spanning the slope between the road and the house. The location for this driveway was arrived at as a result of several on-site meetings with representatives of the City Engineering Department and the Fire Marshall. The applicant evaluated two other driveway options before arriving at the elevated driveway plan. First, Sopris Engineering prepared a design for a driveway that would traverse the slope to bring vehicles into the middle of the property where a garage could be attached to the residence. This design, which we have labeled as Alternative A and is shown on Sheet #6, was found by the applicant to cause extreme disturbance to the property, including extensive grading/retaining that would occur to build up a road platform and the loss of in excess of fifty (50) trees that are located where the driveway would meander along the property frontage and in the southern portion of the property. We do not view this as a realistic alternative for development of this site. Second, the applicant evaluated the possibility of creating an elevated driveway directly into the residence, but building up the grade below the driveway in a series of platforms and retaining walls to "fill in" the space below the driveway. However, this approach, which we have labeled as Alternative B and is shown on Sheet #7 and in rendered form on Sheet #12, would also cause excessive disturbance on the site, require more than 65 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 5 trees to be removed and significantly alter the natural setting of the lower portion of the site, which is contrary to the fundamental purpose of stream margin review. The applicant believes that the preferred solution would be to bridge the slope with the elegant trestle-like design that is illustrated in the rendering of the proposed driveway (see Sheet #11). This bridge creates the least visual impacts when seen from neighboring properties. Moreover, by spanning the slope, it limits its on-site impacts to those few spots where the bridge abutments would land. The bridge has also been located so as to avoid the loss of trees to the extent possible. However, as the elevated driveway was being designed and presented to City staff, the following two challenges arose: 1. Because the bridge would be located more than 24" above finished grade within the setback, it does not comply with the City's setback standards. Therefore, Section VI of this application presents the applicant's request for a setback variance to allow the bridge to be built as designed. 2. Staff has informed the applicant that they consider the elevated driveway to be a "deck" as that term is used in the City Code and therefore its area would count towards the property's floor area. The Code provides a 15% floor area exemption for decks, balconies, stairs, etc. 15% of the property's 4,769 square foot allowable floor area = 715 square feet. If the driveway were to be counted as deck, the area of the elevated driveway and auto court would exceed the 15% exemption, thereby eliminating the applicant's ability to create any exempt decks and similar features in the residential design. These kinds of articulating building elements are generally acknowledged to help to reduce the mass of a structure and are encouraged by the City's design standards. So it would be counter- productive to good design to count the driveway and auto court as decks. Moreover, the auto court and the elevated driveway do not fit within the Code definition of a "deck". The Code defines a deck as 'An outdoor, unheated area appended to a living space but not intended for living". The auto court is not "appended to a living space". It is appended to the garage and to the front porch. Neither of these two spaces are "living spaces". A front porch is defined as "An uninsulated, unheated area under a roof, enclosed on at least one side by an exterior wall of a building and open on at least two sides to the outdoors, with or without screens". The driveway is even more clearly not a deck. It too is not appended to a living space; it is appended to the auto court. Furthermore, a deck is not permitted to be built within the front yard setback whereas a driveway can certainly be built within the front yard setback (although limited to just 24" above natural grade). So the staff determination that the driveway is a deck clearly cannot be correct since a deck is not permitted in a setback. Therefore, the applicant requests that the Planning and Zoning Commission make a determination that the driveway is not a deck, but instead is what it is - an elevated driveway and elevated auto court that should not count towards the 15% deck allowance. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 6 If the Planning and Zoning Commission does not concur with this position, there is another way to address the question of whether the elevated driveway is a deck. That approach would be for the applicant to go back to the idea of filling in the grade below the driveway, thereby placing the driveway and auto court at finished grade, rather than having them float above natural grade. Since these features would then be at grade this design would clearly meet the definition of a driveway and not the definition of a deck. However, that design alternative would still require a variance, since the driveway would be elevated by more than 24" from natural grade, but the deck issue would be resolved. Given the impacts this would cause in terms of grading and tree removal, we believe that filling in the grade below the driveway NOT the preferred solution for this property. Therefore, we appeal to the P&Z to not penalize the applicant in terms of floor area calculations so the preferred design solution to this property's unique topographic conditions can be implemented. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 7 IV. Stream Margin Review Given the location of this property, its proposed re-development is subject to Stream Margin Review. The proposed residential design complies with the City's Stream Margin Review standards found in Section 26.68.040 B. of the Aspen Land Use Regulations, as demonstrated in the following responses to those standards: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State of Colorado which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development. Response: The floodway and the 100 year floodplain of Hunter Creek are shown on the Site Plan. The floodplain boundary has been mapped by Sopris Engineering and is derived from the most current floodplain maps prepared by FEMA for Pitkin County. The proposed residence and all proposed accessory structures will be located outside of the 100 year floodplain boundary. Therefore, the proposed development will not have any impact on the base flood elevation of Hunter Creek. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork Greenway plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement". Response: The applicant is not aware of any trails or open space recommendations that would impact this property. There are not any areas of historic public use on the property. The Roaring Fork Greenway Plan recommends that trees not be cut along the River, that the River not be filled in and its banks not be graded. It also recommends that disturbed areas be brought back to as natural a state as possible, including the use of native plant species. This application does not propose to fill in the Creek nor to grade along the Creek bank. Instead, the proposed site plan would move the house further from the stream bank than the existing structures, creating a more open feeling along the Creek. Locating the house in this manner also ensures that trees will not be cut along the River, and that tree removal will be limited to the areas to the south of where the existing structures are located. To make up for the trees that are removed, the Site/Landscape Plan shows that approximately two dozen new trees will be planted in clumps around the residence. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 8 The applicant will agree to designate on the Stream Margin Review Plat a Fisherman's Easement within the high water boundaries of Hunter Creek if requested to do so by the City. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Sub-section 26.435.040.F.1. Response: A building envelope has been designated on the site plan. The applicant does not propose to remove stream bank vegetation or to make grade changes along the stream bank outside of this defined envelope. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope. Response: The development will not interfere with or change the course of Hunter Creek. The proposed development will be designed to comply with the City's adopted stormwater management standards. This will ensure that on-site drainage is accommodated within the building envelope and does not cause water pollution or other impacts on Hunter Creek. Any hot tub or pool installed on-site will be designed to drain within the building envelope and not to the Creek. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course, and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Response: No such alteration or relocation is proposed, so no written notice is required. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished. Response: Since no alteration or relocation is proposed, no such guarantee is required. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the one hundred (100) year floodplain. Response: No work is planned within the 100 year floodplain, so no permits are needed. 8. There is no development other than approved vegetation planting taking place 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 9 below the top of slope or within 15 feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100 year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department. Response: The applicant reviewed the Stream Margin Map to determine the top of slope for this property along Hunter Creek. Unfortunately, this map does not designate the top of slope along Hunter Creek through this property. Therefore, the applicant conducted several site visits to the property with the City Engineering Department. Prior to the initial site visit, the applicant's surveyor placed stakes along the top of the bank to verify the location of the top of bank in the field and then add that designation to the site plan. Staff concurred with most of the field staking, but adjusted several stakes to reflect field conditions. The applicant's surveyor adjusted his demarcation accordingly, so the top of bank line that has been accepted by the City Engineer is shown the site plan. The Site/Landscape Plan has been drawn to comply with the requirement that no development other than approved vegetation planting will take place below the top of slope or within 15 feet of the top of slope or the high waterline. No new planting is proposed outside of the building envelope. 9. All development outside the 15 foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth in Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020, as shown in Figure A. Response: Sheet #8 provides a site section illustrating the relationship between the closest portion of the proposed residence and the top of the slope. It shows that the proposed residence complies with the requirement that there not be any penetration of the height limitation established by a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast, with no lights directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications. Response: The applicant will comply with the City's lighting standards. A lighting plan will be submitted at the time of building permit review demonstrating this compliance. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 10 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Response: The site visit with the City Engineer confirmed that the wetland and riparian zone of this property is located below the top of bank. No development or other disturbance of this area is proposed as part of this application. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 11 V. Residential Design Standards Review The proposed development of a new residence is subject to Residential Design Standards Review. The City's standards for residential design review are found in Sec. 26-410.030 of the Municipal Code. The applicant's response to these standards follows below. 1. Articulation of Building Mass (non-flexible). A principal building shall articulate building mass to reduce bulk and mass and create building forms that are similar in scale to those seen in historic Aspen residential buildings. Response: The building mass has been appropriately articulated in several aspects. First, the main residential form has been separated from the garage with a connector element. The design also uses decks which protrude from the main mass to break up the building form. It is important to note that if the City were to count to the area of the elevated driveway and auto court as deck area, it would restrict the applicant's ability to construct decks attached to the house, which would severely limit the design options for breaking up the mass of the residence. Overall, the form of the building is similar to that of other residences built throughout Aspen in terms of it being a rectilinear structure in a two story design with each story having a typical residential building height. 2. Building Orientation (flexible). The front fagade of a building shall be oriented to face the street on which it is located. Response: The front door of the residence will face Red Mountain Road. 3. Build-to Requirement (flexible). At least sixty percent (60%) of the front fagade of a principal building shall be within five (5) feet of the minimum front yard setback line. On a comer lot, this standard shall be met on at least one (1) of the two intersecting streets. A front porch may be used to meet this requirement. Response: The front setback in the R-30 zone district is 25'. At least 60% of the front fagade of the proposed residence will be within 5' of the front yard setback. 4. One Story Elements (flexible). A principal building shall incorporate a one-story element on the front fagade. Duplexes in a side-by-side configuration are required to have a one-story element per dwelling unit. Response: It is difficult to strictly comply with this standard because of the topography along the front side of the lot. The house, as viewed from this road, will appear to be a one story structure, with the lower level being invisible due to the topography, such that the upper level will be the visible element. However, technically a variation from this standard is required because the structure will be two stories in height along the front fagade. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 12 5. Garage Access (non-flexible). A lot that has access from an alley or private street shall be required to access parking, garages and carports from the alley or private street. Where alley access is available, no parking or vehicular access shall be allowed forward of the front fagade. Response: There is no alley or private street access to this lot so this standard is not applicable to this property. 6. Garage Placement (non-flexible). A garage or carport shall be placed in a way that reduces its prominence as viewed from the street. On a comer lot, this standard shall apply to both street-facing fagades. Response: The garage has been placed along the front of the structure to minimize the required length of the elevated driveway. However, the garage doors do not face the street, so the design complies with this standard. The garage is located 25' back from the street (to comply with the front yard setback), further reducing its prominence and is hidden from view by the many trees located along the front side of the property which will be preserved by the proposed driveway location. 7. Garage Dimensions (flexible). The width of the living area on the first floor of a street-facing fagade on which a garage is located shall be at least five (5) feet greater than the width of the garage or carport. The total width of all vehicular entrance(s) to garage(s) or carport(s) that are visible from the street, whether on the same plane or offset from one another, shall not exceed twenty-four (24) feet. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 8. Garage Door Design (flexible). A garage door that is visible from a street or alley shall utilize an articulation technique to break up its fagade. Response: The garage door will not be visible from a street or alley. Nonetheless, the garage facade has been broken into two doors to comply with this standard. 9. Entry Connection (non-flexible). A building shall provide a visual and/or physical connection between a primary entry and the street. On a corner lot, an entry connection shall be provided to at least one (1) of the two intersecting streets. Duplexes in a side-by- side configuration shall have one (1) entry connection per dwelling unit. Response: The elevated driveway provides a physical connection between the primary entry and the street. It will include a sidewalk to allow for pedestrian connectivity to the street. 10. Door Height (flexible). All doors facing a street shall not be taller than eight (8) feet. A small transom window above a door shall not be considered a part of the door for the 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 13 purpose of this standard. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 11. Entry Porch Height (flexible). An entry porch or canopy on the front fagade of a principal building shall not be more than one-story in height as defined by this chapter. Response: The entry porch will not be more than one story in height. 12. Principal Window (flexible). A principal building shall have at least one (1) street- facing principal window or grouping of smaller windows acting as a principal window on the front facade. Duplexes in a side-by-side configuration shall have one (1) principal window per dwelling unit. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 13. Window Placement (flexible). A street-facing window on a building shall not vertically span more than one story as defined by this chapter. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 14. Non-Orthogonal Window Limit (flexible). A building shall have no more than one (1) non-orthogonal window on each fagade of the building that faces the street. A single non-orthogonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still be considered one (1) non-orthogonal window. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 15. Light Well/Stair Well Location (flexible). A light well, areaway, skylight or stairwell shall not be located between the front-most wall of a street-facing fagade and any street. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 16. Materials (flexible). The quality of the exterior materials and their application shall be consistent on all sides of the single-family or duplex building. Response: The proposed design will comply with this standard. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 14 Allowing this variance is the minimum action necessary to allow access to be provided in a manner that causes the least possible environmental and visual impact to the property. 3. Literal interpretation and enforcement of the terms and provisions of this Title would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other parcels in the same zone district and would cause the applicant unnecessary hardship, as distinguished from mere inconvenience. In determining whether an applicant's rights would be deprived, the Board shall consider whether either of the following conditions apply: a) There are special conditions and circumstances which are unique to the parcel, building or structure which are not applicable to other parcels, structures or buildings in the same zone district and which do not result from the actions of the applicant; or b) Granting the variance will not confer upon the applicant any special privilege denied by the terms of this this Title and the Municipal Code to other parcels, buildings or structures, in the same zone district. Response: The topography of this site is a special condition and circumstance which is unique to this parcel. The property does not have frontage along Shady Lane and so cannot take access from that roadway. Therefore, access to this site is limited solely to Red Mountain Road. However, as shown on the Analysis of Existing Slopes, this brings the access in across a relatively steep slope which drops from the Red Mountain Road elevation. This slope is not a circumstance brought about by the applicant; it is a combination of natural slope conditions, exacerbated by the conveyance of land by the former owner of this property to permit the widening of that road by the County. These conditions are not shared by any other property in the surrounding area and establish the necessary justification for granting the requested setback variance to this project. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 16 VI. Variance from Dimensional Standards Section 26.575.020.E.5.q of the Code allows a driveway to project into a setback under the following conditions: Driveways not exceeding twenty-four (24) inches above or below natural grade within any setback of a yard facing a Street. Within all other required setbacks, finished grade of a driveway shall not exceed thirty (30) inches above or below natural grade. The proposed elevated driveway (and driveway Alternatives A and B which are presented herein) would not comply with this standard. However, the elevated driveway has been shown to have the least impact on the site of these three design options. Therefore, the applicant proposes to have an elevated driveway that spans the slope and arrives directly at the upper level of the house, so as to minimize the on-site impacts. The elevated driveway would be considerably more than 24" above natural grade and so requires a dimensional standards variance be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The standards for granting a dimensional variance are found in Sec. 26.314.030 A of the Code. The language of this Section and the applicant's responses, are as follows: In order to authorize a variance from the dimensional requirements of Title 26, the appropriate decision-making body shall make a finding that the following three (3) circumstances exist: 1, The grant of variance will be generally consistent with the purposes, goals, objectives and policies of this Title and the Municipal Code; and Response: Granting of this variance would be consistent with the purposes, objectives and policies of the Land Use Code because allowing an elevated driveway will considerably reduce the environmental impacts of the proposed development. It will avoid the necessity of extensively building up the grade along the relatively steep slope at the front of the property and limit the project's impacts on the floor of the property to those places where the bridge abutments will land. It will also considerably reduce the loss of native trees and vegetation from the property by avoiding the need for the driveway to meander through the site or to build up the grade below the elevated driveway. 2. The grant of variance is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the parcel, building or structure; and Response: The variance is necessary to allow reasonable vehicular access to be provided into the property. The existing situation, with a carport built along Red Mountain Road, is not a safe or effective solution for either the applicant or for the public, which must endure the cars which back out onto the roadway from this garage. Red Mountain Road is the sole access available to this property. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 15 VII. Conclusion The above responses and the attached exhibits provide the information the City has requested to process this application. The materials submitted demonstrate that the application complies with the applicable provisions of the Aspen Land Use Code. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you need anything else during the review process. 54 Shady Lane Stream Margin Review and Variance Application Page 17 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT #1 LEILA, LL... c/t, Aspen Starwooa LLC 623 Eaft Hopkins Avenue Axpen. CO 81611 (970) 928-1280 FebirildI) 24. ll) i 7 City ofAspen Commiinity Development 130 South Gatena Street Aspen. CO St 611 RE : 54 Shadv Lane. L 11)0 01 Aspen State of Colorado Parcel 11) No. 27374:720(:'26 Dear Sir/Madam: pkilsÂ¢ accept Chis lel!Â¢r as .illithoTizjilli,or'] tur R.ichard V. '<File&*. .,r. -1T1, t,ic Neile> :.21,4 -. Finn TIC , ,1.Â·94 : u.Â· c. m: Alan Richman :and Alan Rich.man Flannping bervices. Inc., ar,6Â· ;: 4,1 Â·. Â·.. ~ Â·,~ :...;-Â·..1 and 1)arid Johtisk>n e.gu 1,7,<id Joi-izist.on .A'fl.Chitects. 5 . 51'~*r~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~.* *':., ':,Al,41'.11,~~~~* .., I .2212. [ 1.f < irt: iÂ·Â·Â·1-iÂ·~Â·2~2Â·*1,-~- 1"Mit:,,4 1: 1 4*.11'~8 s ot:JC, Al)plicatloIl tor a wu. .*.1Â·., .Va - 4.Â·.... -â€ž.u.)4 Li' 1.-:4 Â·'61 " .' ..Â· â€¢il ...ill/%.14,4.1, ./c:LA U ....14.1 1.~ .... 1 , :1 4 r 'MA f variance from the 11-plicability ofChapler 26,410,029.i- iz i el the City 01 45729 L.ld 1.9.c Code. Â« . . I Residential Design Stalidards 343:lev', Stream >Â¢faryin Re't'1*2'.: cind related la:ld uS;:e DerlÂ©'ws un:J approval< fur the anove-reterenced properly. By, Â·m=rERS:â€ž. /Z G.e Mark Fri:diatid. Manacei' 01- ASper'. Stal'wood- 1.- I :C'. 5<T E T 7 9 >fanatz:er 01 1_el~a.1-:u<- EXHIBIT #2 CERTIFICATION OF OWNERSHIP The undersigned, Richard Y. Neiley, Jr,, an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Colorado, Colorado Attorney Registration No. 9878, hereby certifies as follows: 1. The owner of the real property located at 54 Shady Lane is Leila LLC, a Colorado limited liability company. The Deed vesting title to the owner was recorded on December 19, 2014, as Reception No. 616177, is appended hereto, 2. There are no mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts or agreements affecting the use and development of the subject real property or that could conflict with the approvals requested for the property. 3. The address of the property is 54 Shady Lane, Aspen, Colorado 81611. The Parcel ID No. is 273707200026. : 4. There are no mineral reservations and there are no third parties who own any mineral i interests in the subject real property. 1 5. There is legal access to the subject real property via Red Mountain Road, a public right of way. 6. The manager and authorized representative foâ‚¬Leila LLC is Aspen Starwood LLC. The manager and authorized representative of Aspen Starwood LLOis Mark Friedland. 1 $ 1/1.1 ' 5 {i i Â· 3 1*CHARD Y. NEILEY, JR. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. COUNTY OF GARFIELD ) ": liA The foregoing Certificate of Ownership was acknowledged and signed before me this.417 day of February, 2017, by RICHARD Y. NEILEY, JR. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: 6 Â«j- - cal '/ CONNIE A. WOOD . I . / , / / .1 1 33 7-1 j NOTARY PUBUC . O-ft. AL Â£ .L/. . 1. /,i... c.,16./ L.3< STATE OF COLORADO Notary- Public NOTARY ID #19944009825 My Commission gxplres June 24, 2018 1.' ...-/ - IL'.--- 1 i.4, RECEPTION#: 616177, __/19/2014 at 03:24:05 PM, 1 OF 4, R $26.00 DF $710.00 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED THIS DEED, Made December 19,2014 between MARC S. FRIEDBERG AND KAREN PHILLIPS FRIEDBERG of the County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, of the first part, GRANTOR and LEILA LLC, A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY whose legal address is: 4 Embarcadero Ctr., Ste 1900, San Francisco, CA 94111 of the County of State of California, of the second part, GRANTEE WITNESSETH, That the said parties of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten dollars and other good and valuable considerations, to the said parties of the first part, in hand paid by the said parties of the second part, the receipt whereof is hereby confessed and acknowledged, has granted, bargained, sold and conveyed and by these presents do grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm unto the said parties of the second part, its successors and assigns forever, all the following described lots or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of PITKIN and State of COLORADO, to wit: See Attached Exhibit "A" Subject to those matters as set forth on Exhibit B Together with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances there-unto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof; and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever, of the said parties of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances; TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described, with the appudenances, unto the said parties of the second part, its successors and assigns forever. And the said parties of the first part for themselves, their heirs and assigns do covenant, grant, bargain and agree to and with the said parties of the second part, their successors and assigns, to WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession ot said parÂ·ties of the second part, its successors and assigns, against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, by through or under the said parties of the first part The singular shall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. hall include the plural, the plural the singular, and the use of gender shall be applicable to all genders. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said parties of the first part have hereunto set their hand(s) and seal(s). SIGNATURES ON PAGE 2 CITY OF ASPEN CITY Of- '4@Pei WMErr PAID 1 HNIT PAID DATE REFL, NO. 4,6/560 P//91)V . G DATE REPA, NO99/42 RECEPTION#: 616177, __/19/2014 at 03:24:05 PM, 2 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO f SIGNATURE PAGE TO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED PAGE 2 /7 an 4690Â« i # D 1 m . 4-272Â»Â·~ L/1 AA? m 11\1/%(ARF-M//10/4 MAttt339, 0 RAREN ECHILLIPS>*RIMBERG A- d STATE OF COLORADO ) SS COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged beforemethis 1 ~14-k day of December, 2014 By: MARC S. FRIEDBERG and KAREN PHILLIPS FRIEDBERG WITNESS my hand and official seal 8 1--44_a Gk~Olary Public ~ my commission expires: JOY S. HIGENS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID # 19944004644 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JULY 18, 2018 PCT24230W5 ' RECEPTION#: 616177, --,19/2014 at 03:24:05 PM, 3 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION A tract of land situated in the SWIM NW1M of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Easterly right-of-way line of the Denver & Rio Grande Western Railroad (Aspen Branch) whence the West Quarter Corner of said Section 7 bears West 602.4 feet; thence East 214.6 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of the Red Mountain Road; thence along the arc of a curve to the right, the chord of which bears N 12Â°56' E 215.5 feet to the center of Hunter Creek; thence Southerly along the center of Hunter Creek along the arc of a curve, the chord of which bears S 68Â°02'04" W 296.19 feet, to the Easterly line of said railroad rightwf-way; thence S 08Â°57' E 90.6 feet along the Easterly line of said Railroad right-of-way to the point of beginning. TOGETHER WITH a parcel of land situated in the SWIM of the NW1/4 of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian, more fully described as follows: Beginning at a point on the Westerly line of Red Mountain Road whence the West Quarter Comer of said Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian bears S 80Â°26'18" W 829,66 feet; thence 17.0 feet along the arc of a curve to the right, having a radius of 218.33 feet, the chord of which bears N 23Â°12'01" E 17 feet; thence S 64Â°34'07" E 13.00 feet; thence 15.99 feet along the arc of a curve to the left, having a radius of 205.33 feet, the chord of which bears N 69Â°01 '53" W 15.99 feet; thence 69Â°01'53" N 13.00 feet to the point of beginning, EXCEPT that portion of the above described property as conveyed to The Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County in Deed recorded December 31, 1987 In Book 554 at Page 159. But excluding from this 1 EXCEPTION the portion thereof reconveyed to the Frledbergs by Quitclaim Deed recorded November 2, 1993 in Book 729 at Page 114. ' RECEPTION#: 616177, x.,19/2014 at 03:24:05 PM, 4 OF 4, Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO EXHIBIT "B" 1. Taxes for the year 2014, and subsequent years, not yet due or payable. 2, Right of the proprietor of a veln or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or Intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded December 24, 1902 in Book 55 at Page 116. 3. Right of way for electric wires across the Sl/2 NW1/4 and the NE1/4 SWIM of Section 7, as granted to James H. Devereux by instrument recorded January 30, 1887 in Book 29 at Page 582, as It may affect the subject property. 4. Terms and conditions of Agreement for the Construction of Road Improvements, as set forth in instrument recorded December 31,1987 in Book 554 at Page 161. 5. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters asset forth in Ordinance No. 87-42, Series of 1987 by Board of County Commissioners recorded December 31, 1987 in Book 554 at Page 185 and Ordinance No. 93-03, Series of 1993 recorded March 24, 1993 in Book 706 at Page 872 and Quitclaim Dead from Pitkin County recorded November 2, 1993 in Book 729 at Page 114. 6. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in Resolution of the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recorded August 10, 2004 as Reception No. 500597 as Resolution No. 04-26. 7. Any question, dispute or adverse claim as to any loss or gain of land as a result of any change In the river bed location by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion, relict ion, erosion or avulsion of the center thread, bank, channel or flow of waters In the Hunter Creek River River lying within subject land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed, bank, bed or channel as a legal description monument or marker for the purposes of describing or locating subject lands, NOTE: There are no documents in the land records of the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado accurately locating past or present location(s) of the center thread, bank, bed, or channel of the above River or indicating any alterations of the same as from time to time may have occurred. AND Any rights, interest or easements in favor of the riparian owners, the State of Colorado, The United States of America, or the general public, which exist, have existed, or are claimed to exist in and over the waters and present and past bed and banks of the Hunter Creek River River. EXHIBIT #3 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 DATE: 7.29.16 PROJECT: 54 Shady Lane REPRESENTATIVE: Alan Richman, 970.920.1125 DESCRIPTION: 54 Shady Lane is a 35,600 square foot lot that contains a single family home built in 1971, designed by Arthur Yuenger. Art Yuenger is among the architects profiled on the aspenmod.com website. The property is eligible for voluntary historic designation. The property is zoned R-30. The proposed project is to demolish the existing development and construct a new single-family home. The applicant is requesting a variation from Residential Design Standard 26.410.030.C(2), Garage placement. This is a non-flexible standard which requires P&Z review for a variation request. The applicant has discussed driveway access with the Engineering Department. Access will either by via an elevated driveway or a driveway that follows grade. There is a relatively steep drop off of 10' from the elevation of Red Mountain Road to the flatter portion of the site. Either development scenario will likely require a variance request for the front yard setback. A setback variance request may be reviewed by P&Z as part of a consolidated application. Stream Margin review is needed because a large portion of the property is located within 100 feet of the mean high water line of Hunter Creek. Development is required to be setback at least 15 feet from the top of slope and cannot exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Staff recommends this review be consolidated with the RDS variation and setback variance at P&Z to simplify the review process. Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.314 Variances 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020.C RDS - Variations 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.080 Low-Density Residential (R-30) zone district Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20Iand%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planninq-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Review by: Staff for completeness and recommendations Parks & Engineering for referrals P&Z ASLU 54 Shady Lane Variance 273707200026 1 Public Hearing: Yes, at P&Z Planning Fees: $3,250 Deposit for 10 hours of staff time (additional planning hours are billed at a rate of $325/hour) Referral Fees: $325 Deposit for 1 hour of Engineering review (additional engineering hours are billed at a rate of $325/hour) $975 Flat fee for Parks Total Deposit: $4,550 To apply, submit the following information: Â¤ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â¤ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). Il Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. Il HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. Â¤ Scaled drawings of the proposed site plan and all proposed structure(s) or addition(s) depicting their form, including their height, massing, scale, proportions and roof plan; and the primary features of all elevations. Â¤ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. Â¤ An 81/2" by 11"vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. [1 1 Complete Copy of all application materials. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: Â¤ 4 additional copies of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings, 0 Total deposit for review of the application. O A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 EXHIBIT #4 4 ~I ~ Â· Recorded at .4)'clock . 800% 554 m5159 1 i ItcÂ¢eption No. . . . .._....._ ._._.__ Recorder. 1 1 RECORDER'S STAMP C] TIHS DEED, Mnitethi. 2911, "Ayor December , 1987, A a N - i 9 CO 1.et,verâ€ž Marc S. Friedberg and Karen P. Frieciberg or Z rE 07 0 * orthe Counly of Pitkin ailtl slateor N Colorado.oftliefim part.and The Board of County W < Commissioners of Pitkin County â„¢ N 0 - 00 - .hertega'addrusts 506 East Main Street, Aspen, 1 Colorado 81611 Ortile County or pitkin andstateof Colorado, orthesccon,1 part. WITNESSETH.That thesablparlieswihe first part, forandinconsideralionofthestl,nof Ten Dollars and 00/100 ($10.Â·00) and other good and valuable consideratirnall;*Rs, ! lothesal,tparties,rthe first part inhan,4.lit bythesnid part y of the second part, 1 hereceltit whereof - is herel,>- coniessed ami ack nowledge,1, have emised, released, sold, conveyed n, 1 QUIT Cl,AIMED, and by these 1â€¢res'ltsdo remise, release, sell, eonvey and QUITE!,Al M un to t hesnid party orthe secund part, its heirs, sl xessors an,1 Asslgns. forever, Ill the right, title, interest, clatm and demand which the said parl iest t he first Iâ€¢3rt 1 a Ve in nnit to l lie rollowing,lescribcallot o r larcel o fland sit,inte, lying and being in the County or Pitkin and St n le o f Colo rado, to wit: As described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference. STAIE DOCUMENTARY FEE , 4 DEC 31 887 j 1 -0- J 11,04â‚¬11*Wn-as'Heetan,klember ~ ~~ TO HAVE AND TO 1101.D the sarne. together with all and singular tile Apptâ€¢rtenances and privileges t hereunto belonging or In anywise thereunto appertaining. and all the estate. right, title, intrrest and claim whatsoever, of the mid part ieeflhe firsi part,dtherin laworequily,tollieonly properuse,benefil and behooforthes,id pait y or thesecond rail, itS licirsand assigns fore,Â·er. I N W I TN E S S WI t E R EOF, T h e sai d p a r o-e s o r t he fi rs t t, Eit. V e h e râ€¢~ n 1 oMe tt h e i#~ s antisealS thed.yamiyear first above wrillen. . ~ v VA : K.dif-,01 Dlarc S. 1.'LASÂ·â‚¬42*rg. ,~4/ 1Sful Signed, Sonded a nd D e verc J i n t he Presence o r IRMA 1,1 IRKA 1.} ? STATE OFCOI.ORADO, 1 4 i /3. coll/yor Pitkin J ..9039:, JO p. 190:EN,o.re~;,~:3"r.~;y:112:0,~ed:Cy'eforemet'P ,~ b, c',.1-- r<p...... .... .9, f /0 n u nÂ·*- : Jly commission expires Â¥-2-1 - .19 f / .Witnessm>Â·handandoffirialseal 4%4112 No. 933. QiÂ·,TrIA,>IrDEIP. eâ€ž JAIJ n.,Iiâ€¢hiv. 'miÂ·. #th.he..1.1Â¢.,â€ž1.CUMN,-i,0.4233.65Â»}-2." C#:+ 39 ' J & / , tk,4. I . I F Itt TY RECORDER _ 1 . . 1 - poox 554 PA.160 EXHIBIT A FRIEDBERG TO PITKIN COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: fryf'.. Beginning at the SE corner of the Friedberg parcel as described in Book 532, Page 549, from which the West 1/4 corner of Section 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 West, 6th P.M., Pitkin County, State of Colorado, bears N 90'00'00" W 817.0 feet; thence along thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is the south lot line of said parcel N 90Â·00'00" W 14.43 feet; 213.33 feet and central angle is 25'17 119" and whose long chord bears N 03'24'59" W 93.39 feet; thence S 80'46'19" E 8.00 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is 205.33 feet and central angle is 11'44'26" and whose long chord bears N 15'05'54" E 42.0 feet; thence N 69'01'53" W 13.0 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is 218. 33 feet whose central angle is 07'50'44" and whose long chord bears N 24'53'29" E 29.87 feet; thence N 28'48'51" E 25.23 feet; thence N 68'02'04" E 37.26 feet; thence along the arc of a curve 1 to the left whose radius is 300.00 feet and central angle is 40â€¢03'30" and whose long chord bears S 12'56'00" W 205.50 feet to J the point of beginning, containing 0.0924 acres more or less. c: \word\contract\friedbrg."Al' . W ..n b 12.-31- 87 . 4 1... Dil.. . mox 554 PAGf161 Recorded at /O: 3/ 6'clock .4 M /2-3/-97 Reception No 7.4 4,7/7, SILVIA DAVIS MTKIN COUNTY RECORDER AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT made this 7(~~' day Of- A~/le,it.~.LU , 1 198.1, by and between Marc S. FPiedberg and Karen P. Friedberg, hereinafter referred to as Friedberg, and the Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin county, Colorado, hereinafter referred to as County; WHEREAS, Friedberg has granted to the County a certain deed for roadway purposes; and WHEREAS, to protect the remainder of the Friedberg property, the County has agreed to construct certain improvements and make certain design changes, more fully described below. NOW, THEREFORE, Friedberg and County, in consideration of the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, agree as follows: Article 2. Parking and Stairway Improvements The County shall construct two parking spaces on the Friedberg property to replace the existing spaces which were lost due to the reconstruction of the Red Mountain Road. The new parking spaces will be constructed on a platform 24- foot wide by 24-foot long and retained by a masonry block foundation as shown on the attached sketch. Building materials shall be similar to the structure of the Friedberg residence. In addition, the County shall replace the existing stairs using materials and design techniques similar to those of the existing improvements. Article 2. Building Setbacks The county shall not oppose exemption from the Building Setback requirements of the Pitkin County Land Use Code upon Â· application to the Board of Adjustments should Friedberg wish to construct a parking garage on their land at the location of the new parking spaces. Article 3. construction Practices During construction of the Red Mountain Road, the County shall take all reasonable care to protect the evergreen trees adjacent to the construction area. Prior to beginning construe- tion on the road, the trees shall be inspected and measured. Should any of the evergreen trees die or show abnormal distress for a period of one year following completion of the road ~ improvement, then the county shall replace the trees, in kind, at County's sole cost. 1 1 n 1 9 1 :1 e *26% .- 0 11. , 1 >6 . 1 - I Il-30 - 87 I. 4 - y BON{ 554 ma162 Article 4. Design Changes The County shall modify the current construction plans for the Red Mountain Road to reflect the following design changes. 1, The concrete curb and gutter shall be eliminated along the West side of the road adjacent to the Friedberg property. f 9..2., 2. No parking limitation shall be placed at the Red I Mountain road adjacent to the Friedberg property. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Friedberg and County have signed this ' 1 ac,Fkement in triplicate. This agreement will be effective on i 1984_â€¢ FRIEDBERG: COUNTY: Â« R.410-1 0 1 9 . BY '$<C<? f ~ 4 66.4-â‚¬'- Mara,fledberg< 7 1- 0 41# OL V 2 py M,FMe/n r <Pbl.26Â«.Â»teh Karen PÂ· Friedberg / c:\word\contract\friedbrg.agr 2 li ..Â· f,l Fic' 3-1.- . 1 1 1-31-87 ./ . . 4 . U et 1 t BOOK 554 PAF163 EXHIBIT A FRIEDBKRG TO PITKIN COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: }-'-Â·Â·?fÂ·Â· Beginning at the SE corner of the Frledberg parcel as described in-book 532, Page 549, from which the West 1/4 corner of Section , ~ 1 7, Township 10 South, Range 84 Went, 6th P.M., Pltkin County, . state of Colorado, bears N 90'00'00" W 817.0 feet; thence along M the south lot line of said parcel N 90'00'00" W 14.43 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is ~ ~ 213.33 feet and central angle is 25'17'19" and whose long chord bears N 03'24'59'1 W 93.39 feet:, thence S 80'46'19" E 8.00 feet; thenco along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is ! 205.33 feet and central angle is 11'44'26" and whose long chord bearâ€¢ N 15'05'54" E 42.0 feet; thence N 69'01'53" W 13.0 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the right whose radius is 218.33 feet whose central angle is 07'50'44" and whose long chord bears N 24'53'29" E 29.87 feet; thence N 28'48'51'1 E 25.23 feet; thence N 68'02'04" E 37.26 feet; thence along the arc of a curve to the left whose radius is 300.00 feet and central angle is , 40'03'30" and whose long chord bears S 12'56'00" W 205.50 feet to i the point of beginning, containing 0.0924 acres more or less. c:\word\contract\friedbrg."A" i 1 -Ct. A ..1/ 14 I j . 1.-31-87 12-31- 87 -- 1-*- ---- - NOR-7,4 S 1 -- (Mooo.~1 tiAx R 2 ]+58-22.5 ~ LT. ~ -I 7 1 1 217 -4 / 1 1 PSTALL-efr , 79 , 1 /\ \1 40 - -rp=:rl - 24'X 24' Park, 49 Acca \~\ ~ 10Â«40\4-09 Pfopâ‚¬47 4~ui Appro,<t>,044 l.~otion -4.-ELev 44 -- T vi 7--- - ------ N/~<~ ' I. r ~ Ed,t 4 A>fult Â· Bo CURS - F===::1 <ri ->Z>oc~y~A . J i ' 1243- 012 43 1, f---*Ii- -- HER-!32Â£"Al N D ---- -.-*< +I-- 21+00 -0----733 _ -2:2\ -C. - il 1 - 1 2, / ... 1 . 0 ---an'.I- - -M nz~ ---AA.--1- / --- - ** Scal. 1 = 10' . 4 X, BODH 554 FASE185 Â·- EMERGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - 1 < == OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, APPROyING FRIEDBERG LAND DONATION m = 2.4.:... to- 9- 19- EM " Ordinance No. 87 - N 29 RECITALS 53 UZ - 1 E a Marc s. Friedberg and Karen P. Friedberg are the ~ 1 owners of certain real property in Pitkin County, colorado, described as follows: the SW 1\4 NW 1\4 of Section 7, Township j 1 1 10 South, Range 84 West of the 6th P.M., more fully described in . , Book 532 at Page 549 of the Pitkin County Records. i 2, The Friedbergs wish to convey, and the Board ~ , wishes to accept, a portion of the above-described property 1./J i consisting of approximately 4,000 square feet for public roadway, (1. drainage, and utility purposes, as described in Exhibit "Al' to f the quitclaim deed attached hereto, 3. It is necessary for the Board to act on this donation on an emergency basis without notice as required by law, in order for the transaction to be consummated in 1987, or ~~ l the County would be required to purchase or condemn the property at considerable expense in order to construct the proposed iL /J roadway, drainage, and utility improvements. THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, that acceptance of the i quitclaim deed attached hereto is hereby authorized and approved. 1 1 j . , 2 9 6 2 2 Z h 4 0 I . BOOK 554 me186 INTRODUCED, FIRST READ, AND ADOPTED THIS 29TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 1987. PUB~ISHED AFTER ADOPTION IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE /~ DAY hi, 1 OF I 10/!UtoÂ»I , 1988. Or k BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ; OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO 1 1 /A , BN yâ„¢k- 1/ 11 4 4,/t,- GdbrgÂ¢ Madsen, Chairman ATTEST: 4 /7 1 L?l ale#Z, Uht fn) dianette Joneâ‚¬ ~beputy Clerkut Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: Thomas Fenton Smith County Attorney c:\word\contract\friedberg.ord ? LD t r. 2 1 / 1 . I J 3:4 ' I. /2 '. 9 -1 i '1-30 0 ;7 00862004 EXHIBIT #5 Resolution No. 26 (SERIES OF 2004) RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW TO CONSTRUCT A 470 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION TO THE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 54 SHADY LANE, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. Parcel No. 2737-072-00-026 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Marc Friedberg, requesting Stream Margin Review approval for the construction of a 470 square foot addition to the existing single-family residence located at 54 Shady Lane; and, WHEREAS, the Applicant's property is a 35,600 sq. ft. lot located in the R-30 Zone District and in an Environmentally Sensitive Area as defined by the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the Application for compliance with the Stream Margin Review Standards; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, site visits, and the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Steam Margin Review finding that the review standards have been met; and, WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions ofthe Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets or exceeds all applicable development standards and that the approval of the development proposal is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Aspen Area Community Plan; and, WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approves with conditions, the Stream Margin Review request to construct a 470 square foot addition to the single-family residence at 54 Shady Lane, by a vote of five to zero (5 - 0), and, WIIEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Commission: RECER/gn . 4 r ha 2%1 JUL 3 0 2004 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 00862004 Section 1 Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a stream margin review request to construct a 470 square foot addition to the single-family residence located at 54 Shady Lane, with the following conditions: 1. The Applicant shall place vegetation protection fencing and silt fencing directly adjacent to and on the north side of the pedestrian path (adjacent to sculpture) that runs from the corner of the carport steps to the north side of the existing deck. The Applicant shall provide a detailed tree protection fencing plan at the , time of building permit submittal and have the City of Aspen Parks Department inspect and approve of the erected silt and tree protection fencing prior to commencing construction. 2. The Applicant shall store construction materials adjacent to the cari)ort along Red Mountain Road to ensure protection of native vegetation on the site. The location of the material storage shall be shown on the construction management plan that shall be submitted by the Contractor at the time of building permit submittal. 3. There shall be no excavation, storage of materials, storage of construction backfill, storage of equipment, foot or vehicle traffic allowed within the dip line of any tree on the site. 4. All outdoor lighting shall be downcast and meet the requirements of the City of Aspen Lighting Code pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.575.150, Outdoor Lighting. 5. The primary contractor shall submit a letter with the building permit application stating that they have read and understand the conditions of approval contained herein. 6. The Applicant shall provide a drainage plan prepared by a licensed engineer prior to building permit issuance that demonstrates that the properly' s historic runoff will not be increased as a result o f the addition approved herein. Section 2 This resolution shall not effect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. PrÂ¢*wiwirD JUL 3 0 2004 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT 00862004 Section 3 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. Section 4 All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, . are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. APPROVED by the Commission at its regular meeting on July 20,2004. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: CE Attorney Ruth Krueger, Acting (Mair ATTEST: Jackie Lothiag,Deputy City Clerk 1.1 %1 42 4, 1 4 yk f) , JUL 3 0 2004 ASPEN BUILDING DEPARTMENT DRAWINGS 11~~t d ~ T i'~--1-n i- i- ' ' _ I r 11-61rual J . , /1 ./TJ_ _l J._11__......9- - TREEINVENTORY - 54 SHADY LAN E Pt.No Dl~ETER tin.} ORIPLINE (Ft.) 256 56 A PARCEL OF LAND BEING SITUATED IN SWA NWA OF SECTION 7, 25 4 2 DECIDUOUS TREES l 178 U la 258 4 5 TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. 179 113 2, 259 6.4 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. .â€¢0. 01-ETER (in.) ORIPL*IE {Fl) NOTES 100 10,6 21 260 U 15 SHEET 1 OF 1 1â€ž 25 181 17.2 1 261 4.1 13 182 138 27 262 7.0 14 101 14.8 183 153 31 263 103 20 102 245 184 13 264 8.4 15 103 U 185 22 4 . 26' 83 17 104 113 186 144 . 266 5.1 10 105 12/ 'El .5 - - 48 108 .7 188 Li 17 4.1 8 109 14.2 189 7/ 16 110 *3 190 U 17 m u / ZONE AE (29-16*16LOOD) 26 8 268 191 7-2 14 112 7.4 10 113 - I 192 132 26 - 114 193 . 17 194 119 8 115 24.7 20 195 108 22 116 4.3 7 5AND BAR (,SLAND,- 117 u 12 196 425 9 ~ 118 8 15 197 W 26 198 7.7 15 119 9.7 199 11â€¢ 31 0 120 e 8 200 Me n 8 121 122 U 10 201 96 30 2â„¢Ea ~ - U 253-le / 123 62 10 202 9 1 1. .\\ i i 124 60 . 6 189 204 . 1 -1 1 0 - 20 212 e 185 186 205 18 12 126 . 10 1. b 206 15.8 40 2 ./. 20 4 / 127 . I 3 1 00 *N M. mi= 32 21 4 â€¢ I 197 in . 207 93 19 198 0 208 213 . 129 - 13 1 FL 130 - 10 209 7' 205.- M Wly 1/41 p 22;n 226 **W.I/,4 W D* i j m + 1 211 U 15 3â„¢EB 234 1 ~11 eamp, 1 132 &1 10 133 0 8 212 17 6 35 1 /3 D,-Â·\ f.23%69â€ž .74 -al W eg - Bu I 213 86 13 ~ ~83~~â€¢C~~~2 ~ 253 I 176 1,4-1 79 214 -i 22 ~2311,~ 232Â·Â·~0~ ~ 4~ 9-,iP .~1~ 1 136 w 0 215 15 5 31 238--'G' 0.3 / s, rwo s:o,y House h | I./fl -0,-(Dumb Waited 4399% 1 1 216 114 - t ZONE AE 231-' 1~-23'F 3.3'1 137 iu 23 [3--1 b, 1.Ucon<. 010* cor'.. 1 -stone walk rry,) FT ) U.0.11 138 17 12 217 191 (100 YEd# fLORS' /* 0 153 164 139 - 10 218 11.7 n * 4~ 0 259 1 // 260 I 140 . . 219 242 il l 141 4.5 220 10.3 20 q 142 2.7 20 m 10.7 n 2 0 /~/Col",â€žAmp; \,4.th?Epvs-.2~l-Jl~~::~::~::/~ / 222mi Â·14 2,3-/' 724~ u.,uÂ·.-- i Â°Mu- I '47(TEY*y" 1 Â¥4 144 U 15 223 . W 147 J l.__al_-1 7 lilli .. to Wood Shed 102 145 . 15 224 141 . 2.5 ~m 103 146 225 u. 4:2 115 w 249 -N k 247 '0 226 15.1 30 i .2 147 110 25 24 & 54 SHADY LANE 111 /7 U U *112 9 \-10' 34- 149 -7 25 228-1, =53 & 0 150 &9 15 229 &6~ e e 1*139 1 127 137123 u 13 230 14.1 ex =136 e 152 73 12 231 4.9 130~128110-e 1* 0# \\ 232 18 11 ~* 134~ ~121 0~-125 233 6.6 13 129 1.20-Â·'9. ~*-126 154 118 30 i i 155 -1 0 e m \ . 235 ]&6 33 z 66 135 9 W 243 236 15 n 589- 060 08~E 200.17 e 113 I 237 11-5 a -254 73 n 159 .3 20 239 14 9 160 12.1 25 16 2 240 U 162-241 40 A 163 . 242 7.1 14 111 le U . 165 110 i 244 - B 111 21 245 M 30 / 1 167 m - 246 m 168 U . 247 n. = -- 14% --- -- ~ 248 U 17 16@ U m ' 249 1, e LEGEND -- 171 SU 75 250 n / DECIDUOUS TREE ~ M u - 251 111 3 / 252 ek / 173 14 n -- CONIFEROUS TREES ~ 253 172 35 / 97, 174 U . i K 254\\ / 175 u I 176 17/ . 255 . -- TREE INVENTORY SUMMARY-2016 9 u. / / DECIDUOUS TREES-15S / - CONIFEROU5 TREES--13 1 L__ --- / 6482& SURVEYORS STATEMENT TREE DISCLAIMER NOTES: ---- NORTH SOPRIS ENGINEERING PERSONNEL ARE NOT TRAINED ARBORISTS OR LANDSCAPE PROFESSIONALS. THE TREE INFORMATION SHOWN HEREON WAS FIELD SURVEYED BY SOPRIS 1) Date of Survey--August 15 & 16, 2016 1, Mark S. Bedder, do hereby state that this survey was prepared by Sopris Engineering, LLC for Leila, LLC, A Colorado Umited tjability Company, and that ENGINEERING TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITY AS PART OF THE PROJECT'S SCOPE. DATA WAS SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC GRAPHIC SCALE it M true Ind correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ACQUIRED PER PROCEDURES OUTUNED IN THE CITY OF ASPEN ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTS 2) Date of Preparation--August 19-20. SUBMITTAL CHECKUST. CIVI L CONSULTANTS 3) Refer to the Improvement Survey & Stream Margin review 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE AB Mark S Bedder LS. No. 28643 for this property for more information on boundary and rCnCE: -CORD-6 TO aXORADO LAW,OC MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL .....loN,-De*.1~SI.Aâ‚¬fv~D-T~aÂ¥Â£~ flood plain information. CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 (IN FEET ] AFTERÂ¥OUFRSTDIS{COWRSUOIDEFECT. INOafENr-YAN, MmON 8~ED UPON U~ DEFECT IN T~ gaa'Ef BECO,*e~,C~DMr~E - # (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 1 inch = 20 ft S.r 23/2.6 14237 RJ 0 221,1 142:- x..Msur,e, Ov.C _ K .= =E .EVORÂ¥Â·2016 + YEARS.0/ â„¢E DATE OF CER'nACAT,ON Sâ€¢,OWN HERES' ~ _ i â€ž r 2 I 3 91 558.0.GISM - .44 4 OVOW NtÂ¥1NnOW 0321 ' 19 1 -1 , 1 \,1 / *4-1-...~ ./ 1, / / t -- // t l if f<-i ff < f f f 11 f---f f_f ij 01 1-44{--10<1,~~-1 - / 35. i:*213*9>4< , 4< 70 r-- 27-90'Idkee 2 --+01.2#Â· , 44*2-/ 4%2#WAT -y A / \1911 ~ \ DAVIDJOHNSTON , 2-7 . 4. I. 8443 _ ARCHITECTS.c / 437 24<934>34,21 , - / , f /~f TE~~~68~~ 4 1/4//4 91/ - /-1. r 119 South Â»Ing St /9 91 EXISTING CAR PORT /71 9/3-,t,1,- 3--M_Z... 41041 . il W 970-920-2186 . I k .. 241/.1 \ 1 .' 6/41 4. iÂ·... . .*3**%12â‚¬761'L. i; 1 ~ ' 1 - - , Â·Â·*,~422, Â· 6'iT iliÂ·.eÂ· 0, ..ar i / , , 1 0~~~Z~47//AN"-,1EVA,41 - -' - -- '0 --1 ,-4575:L--Â· t~ - *-: 124' 1 - - 0 -aDLE ----- - <>k N<1 RIll Â· --3*#Â£*Ilim&~t re. 1 4 -'L ' 44Â¢<Â·'0~ > Â·C r . . ---7/ 0- V, 1 1 / 4/ , - , 1.1 r-- V .0 4 32 j 7 , -- \ A..,/4. / N U (r Â·1/1 I.- .,it. - 1 / - I / -| Al a8al dagn=.......ments ....Ins -- / , - ---- '~2~ n 41 Â»4Â£ 7.: 0.* -d=red./,e,eseâ€žfed & ..d,-/g le 1- / -Â·,dtÂ¥--*dD,4*,4tw , P . 1,3 Arch*cti PC ./ed f. u... . till'Trt / I / \ Ic NEW TREES 1 -- - <Â»n,I,Metion ..... s,lecrflcd p,clec' Ne. w. G - Offheâ€¢1=rs.d2gg.1~ arâ€¢mgemenco,/ns e / : 1 19 *1 - / \ \ 1 0 6.-M 19.- ./ \ -1.dar~sc~sed~ron,pu,Aose / of D .d Joh,=lan . . tecm PC~ . --- ilt 17/ - /09 -Â·Â«- -'41 , /6 1 \% C- ./ 73 -- 1. ..l , c~- f..34>~44, \ iN v 2 K - . 1 9--40344'- < \ U " 6 NEW WILD GRASS MIX *-1 , Vt-~4---- -~ ~fea#e- I i 443(;. Liq / 4 / 1 SPA BELOW I I ON GRADE PATIO BELOW I Â¢,1; 1;i #./ Â· / A '14 4/ Vw/' -24 + 1 L.'- 1/1 1 N 0% .1*--12 - 1 t. N ' 0 i 0 U 1 I . -4.1.:Â¥0*4 4 Z ~-* -tl pa'54.--<#s , 6 1/ 1 ~1, 4 ...., 1 - 'FIN ' I. 1 1 , b / .i 1 :/ N\,5/ C . 1..4 Â· w i. ,ELEVATED DECK BELOW Y, ~ Â·ICL '1' 6 1.- ~,-& . 4|6~' " t --FTNo n.44-- 44 \ tr E~7~Prr 172-~â‚¬- j + I < / T, 24 . 1 -' , / jIlll .1 -F.i ~~ ~ A.AN==Flu~1 4. 11,~' 1 6> 4 F V .. ~15 -1 1 1 44*,h, ~ l ~ '1' r , r - A F - - 14*41, I 1 - 0 , 1, A I. ~ ~ : -' "~~~' / / - W ~, 1 4_.2~ ~~ -7..1 F i\~.1 1 At i 3 1 j ss.Â«Â«1 ~ Â· 1.. 4Â·-- Â· Ir. 1,1 t 11 . -\-:. 6/2 1, / - -4. 71,1 -=ERP,2**1. \ 229.=22= -9-MN0116~<-:vwba , 0 =.,1 4.73 4.1 5 ~~~>2Fti f JAINI~,H-f 2. 3 1-Ii,55, 42 113< c Â·i . ~ -it Â·. .. 11 ''11?.C~.../. 1 - I ./.-1 ;*ELEVATED DECK BELOW t/ / i i . r 0 - - 0 1 FE - - -1 17 -+4#6%* .Â· , ' I--9/0/.4/1,/ , Â·, Â· -4 4,1 4. \ 1 (In ...4 . --- . .j,/,/1,1 1 1\ \1 1 - 1/1 1 / ~b~~kO~tn:f~~h==~~*=2===x=====:= -I , ' '* 1~3,1 . , -LAL.Li & ~ . \ .... "4 Z /1 af>-2 -Â·M E E Z : f' /- / , / i /7 ~ -7 < r -t :'1' Jk / 1\11)r :" Â¢ 1 '11 / _ .. -w 2- 7 t~ r ' 4;tf')444 1 >7 4 lk'' Ll" ~ '~ \1,1 I k=Â«,- . . 1. -4- f// 0 ' 3 NEW mEES / ., J . V -Ill L-- ---*F[No 111~422~_r _ ~ 1 1 /0 1 4~0- POOL BELOW 9479 1 . :4 Ift ,\ 1 -1,Â»pm. 164<1 1 F - 7<Â· iÂ· 43- <47444/k'.\ L /4-: / V - i /0 -446.. -- --2/Â»F'% 108<53 1 jilm'11%11, --==41.92 ' / 1 / ./9 1 At <4 2/,7 FK - "'Â· 21 -: D ~-pt,14-:.Qâ‚¬ 1 u. 1=.â‚¬~w.v j/// - 1 Â©Pile 137-'0~2 - a.to d'Opt/1 : 32<1 14;// g 'r n (flk..z 1 k i 1 T i 1 1 . 1 . .1 l S \ E-430.4./- j=:,Al'v 44 / 1. 7 .i-: 0 57 --/ \ I \\ -Â· 8%:w, . ......C /s <WyÂ®Kt-' - . L 4Â» DRAWING ISSUE 1 1 71-4 22. y.- / /f~ CONCEPTUA~ Darm jllstil iÂ· 4- .'.2. . -VAM-,fir.. cÂ·.Â·0 - 3 '> .14% ,â€žriT, \ \ Puk;44: I i.: 1 4'VY+N :.1 \. fof...4.3 / \\ .t>. 1 \, 11 4 NEW TREES , N .It ...., \ 1 / 11Â·. /1 \ . Â»47:. Â·Â·4' 5 NEW IREES 1 /1 ' PROPOSED SITE/ \ / / \ / C LANDSCAPE PLAN: /1 4 , / / \ i I * 1 PROJECT No 1609 PREFERRED OPTION < DRAWN BY CPF %/ 1 // ---R / / 1 i / SHEET No. \\ 2 / / / PROJE 5.2 // -. NORTH Â£ ~ SITE PLAN I W/ TREES TO BE REMOVED I 1/8" 0 4 8 16 SCALE 1/8- = 1'-0- lumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspen/'16 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Plots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&2/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:37 PM 3SAOH AdONVO oil DAVID IOHNSTON ARCHITECTS PC 119 South Spring St Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 m 970-925-3444 W 970-920-2186 Ag,dem. desgrl arlonge-.I Ind./ 45 DEGREE PLANE FROM 15' TOP BANK SET BACK LINE. -*or*d =.vp,e./ted by Ch.s d,0-in.0 oNe 0-dt,-1-tht,cperryallk-lk-:Un ILLUSTRATED: MOST RESTRICTIVE POINT ,khite,4 PC *=f fbf use and in -~aor.ef -#-r r.....monmeen MC- -,01 the,peâ‚¬.f.ed,fcÂ¥Â« None .*01 *$*71 onÂ·onge....pens ,1-.,aedtÂ¥.~steed.*Cst I.-6..... +12LOttâ€¢ 2 ROOFT LU 0/7 o *01 1 MAIN LEVELT -12'-0~A ~ I ~ \ \~ CJ 1 LOWER LEVELY - 1 U P.-' Ill 1 It DRAWING ISSUE CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 2/28/17 -25'-09 2 BASEMENT/FOUNDATIONS'I' C-) TOP OF BANK SET BACK I ZONING SECTION LL.7 SCALE 1/4- = 1.-0- 0 7 4 r TOP OF BANK SECTION {45 DEGREE ANGLE) PROJECT No 1609 DRAWN BY OF SHEET No 8.0 OD 'N3dSÂ¥ 1 3NVI AOVHS DS /Volumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspen/'16 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Plots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&Z/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:42 PM DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHITECTSpc 1195outh Spnng St Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 0 - Ta 970-926-3444 ' FAX 970-920-2186 1 - -, I - -- \ 4 1 ' \ /\ \ -\ 1 ----.4--t-t--4-\7 \ '' - \ l\ 1 / \ t \\\\'\\\ '4Â·~Â· v / .- , 1: :,7 .#.4 , '' 0, \\Nott f i \ -21 1. . w,doâ„¢d of.ep,esented 4 0'adreâ€¢,ng O r . ~ ,~reÂ»ets....ped....andin A .\ 4 1 1 r-ed#=1-9/plo~ertic#00,â€¢dklro~ .' ' !l .q ce~unc:bon-th the specrfed p,Â¥ct None i i I.= ~ ~HIER \ \\ . 1 -fiftiZ ~. r / *... : : \4 94 1.- 1 .*= de:gnk. 0'............1 , 1 ' . 1Â¥,eldeck 6eggna .tor p?crs +.7-:469 ' ~na=re*.Lhow..-fle-al#10=300.1 %.ugedhordisd=dbanypulpost --4 11/ ..1 < *21./.- - ....Joll/=/.ch./.. 2/I- reu- - . 2, qujm&p 7,4 Â·Â· ./ -- -'44 ' V--=V- i / k; 31 t, 1 5 -,-1 -, .:94 /7:62.2*22â€ž.a.*4- 1 1 0 /'L -4%4"1il,J-/..~Aby,4t.2$/H#&R.â‚¬&3?tuerÂ·. - 1 ' , la: / -1 :*2............u.......... \ 1*- ..1 u A--- e...f 30*-14.5-.r o - Ull'*91'1012:miÂ¥> 4t~~EEmmeme~Zâ„¢22'4Â·Â· 41 '/1 KA=Li-$1~%5.-=L . ' , : -1 1 \ \. A A= 6.=-1=.-.--,- 1 11,TA/%52'# / 11 -11 Off '11 ~*j*90.1 .~ ... f a , 1-6'.1 ,, 19' ~ 1 11 1 3 - ) M t 1 ij T I \ \ U . \ /,1, 8 /i' 8 I, 1 O 1,1.=d~.9 4 i - j 3 V 1\ V + - 'Z -4 -,kâ€ž C.5-1 .191 'b . /1 1. 1 /. .1 1 11 L .1 1 4 / t. 1. , \1 i I 4,--JL----44 --a- 1 ,/ 0 -1 . I % r- - . 0 / \1 . . / M %/ / \\\ 1 1 //X/Â«11 1 5 - / /1[ / 11 - - ./ // 1 1 \ i / 1 / . 1 I - / / 1 9 \ i . ./ S 2 m \ / / -0\\ \ I f ,/, // 2 DRAWING ISSUE \At / / CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 2/28/17 / 1; 1 . / / id,1. r / %444 LI / : i t. / // PROPOSED SITE/ LANDSCAPE PLAN: AUTRNARVE A PROJECT No 1609 DRAWN BY CPF SHEET No \ L PROJECT NORTH 6.0 ~ SITE PLAN I CONCEPTUAL RETAINED DRIVE Et AUTOCOURT 0 0 Â«1 SCALE 1- = 20 1 03 'NBdSÂ¥ 1 3NV1 ADVHS DS BS OH AdONVO /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20_E.pin Tuesday, February 28. 2017 1:32 PM 1 ~lICE: ACCORD~TOCOLOUI.WY'Ul~5TCO.M......1/Al ACrlo,1 USED .=.. ....111â„¢15 5~VE, .7,41â„¢REE Â¥EARS AFTER,OUARSTDISCCNERSUOIDEFECT. .~EVENTMATAN,ACTION STREAM MARGIN REVIEW/IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~AGEOUPON ANÂ¥ Dâ‚¬.CT . THS $41*vir. CO,-ENCED MORE â„¢AN./ YEARS .....1 0/TE OF CERrACATION 510'/4 HEREIN, 54 SHADY LAN E ..ill-=77 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION- (Origiflai Description) A PARCEL OF LAND BEING SITUATED IN SWA NW14 OF SECTION 7, --m @0&&@Rl [Wmal A tract of land situated in the SWINW< of SÂ«tion 7, Township 10 kouth. TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. Range 84 W.I of the SIxth Prlropal -fld" more fully descrlbed as follows. CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Be,hnir, at. point on the Ea=erly aght-of-wa, Ilne of the Der-r md mo , Grande Western Railroad tupen Branch) whence the West Chiarte, Corner SHEET 1 OF 1 ofsald Section 7 beas West 602.4 feet thence E=t 214.6 feet to Ue ' Westerly right-of-way line of Red Mountiln Road; therce @long the arc of a -0 cure to #,e right, the chord of which bears N 12-56' E. 215 5 feettothe ~ LOT 1-WILLOUGHBY PONDS ESTATES -I-'*F~ center of H untpr Creek; thence Southerl, along the center of Hunter Creek 1/WLLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST -- ~ ro"Mile,(im,ili alow the,rc of a curve, the chord of whlch bears S 68~0204- W, 296.19 OT 2-WILLOUGHBY PONDS ESTATE~ 180 N WACKER DR #001 feet t:o me Eusterly line of uid railroad right-of-way, thence S 08-57 E, 90.6 ~ WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST / CHICAGO, it 606 L --- -- le felt along the Easterl, line of sald ralic,ad Mght-of.way to the point of 180 N WACKER DR #001 / beginning. ~ CHICAGO, 1L 60606 ~ ./imil.lill//444.043"...P.BM...WA, :2/7/8...3.TWIUM 7, Township 105outh, Range 84Westof the SIxth P,incipal Meridian men ZONEAE (100,YEAR FiG,OD) TOGEnER ~TH a p-cel of and sluated In the SWi off- NWM ofie-n 7 fully described as follows A/, / Be,Innir, at a point on the Westerly ine of Red Mountain Road whence the \ f CREEK St ligilFllY;I~lilljt&E-27%.-mk- 2/1 West Qurter Comer of Section 7, Township 10 Swth. RINe 84 West of the Sorth Pnnopal Meridian bean 5 807618- W, 829.66 feet, thence 17.0 feet , SAND BAR i/5LAAID ...i.Â·n -,154 z 1 ..e'f ,I 1/"mi#emileaulm./,imi along thi arc of 0 Curvi to the rigM. h,Ing a radiu, of 21;.33 feet, the chord bear, N 23â€¢12'01" E 17.00 feet, thence 564*14'or E 13.00 feet ...Ary,gli<:04 1,49--El,=11â€žre~FIA~ thence 1559feetabn,theircofcur,elothelefth,~riaradkoof205.33 ~f0':439 9.2 - 4~ANOB ~ A / North/t,Bounaar,Uneoffarcel f' 1 1,0.10~ Cifterllrniof Hulter Creekâ€ž{See Nole No.'I . S & 7}Â· .. EXCEN Nt portion of the above deinbed propâ€¢rty as convit~d to The ~ ' ~ ~ ~ . . 1, Irom PRAm County Edlic, W,woÂ®* Board of/ount,Comminlonenof Plt,ineount,In Deed,Ecorded p VICINITY MAP 1. 5 \ ZONEAE(FLOODWAY) . t {P,~4*uN<*,aug-e, December 31.1987 In Book 554 / PÂ¥ 159. 8ut el,diding from this ~ 4~ NMES , EXCIPnON tri portion thereof reconveyed to the Frte*ergs * Quitdi,n . ~ ~~~ '~ ~_Cente,mâ€¢â€¢0#Hwneâ€ž0,0,t ~ SCALE: 1~=80(y Dged recorded levember 2, 1993 In Book 729 at /4/ 114 \./ 4 <Pe,F-/aphiâ€ž-edby/,HIC-tyÂ·/gle I /' , li 1) Dates of Survey- December 23.2014-January 8. MaÂ¥ 13, June 3-4, 2015. June 27.2016 -- ZONE AE (100 YEAR FLOOD) - , A ff h 2) Date of Preparation- December 2014-January. 2015,June 12,2015. Jul, 22. 2016. /' 2/0 - ~ --~1 1 11 9 DENVER ARIOGR~NDE RAILROAD-RIGHT OF WAY b. - - ~04 ~4Â® Nch,Na P, PROPERT' DESCRjPnONÂ·(Perthis Sur,W] *kestabW/d m june 27, 20164 3) BaM, of Bearing: BearNs are based an the 2009 Martin Er,Ime/M CIty 01 Aspen Control ; 100.0. - , 01-500. Er*â€žâ€ž*vndmea,yof,â€¢fpen ~ i~ 1 Mop, vieldir, i ske be,ing of 589'06'OCE from the Wn< Corner of Sec 7. T 10 S. R.Fl W., fith 44 0 ind sli/=d in the SWXNWXo# Sectior, 7, rownstwe tO Soud f4w,Ie --/.-/1.... 1 FL /..4 ~~~~33#19*~-1Â«~_ 2# ~FLrbi~ 849;1 ~ P.M., a found US Dipt. 01 Irterior-ILM Brass Cap dated 1954 ind a found Ret)ar and Cap k I#Of th. *0~ Pr~hIM,/IV* Cho~44,4 Coomy /P"**t Slateof 1 11 INTER marked LS. 2376, as shuâ€ž, Rewittne in a @ cockwls, rotation xgle of 0 -53'52' from the 22*26*EME:. 1 1.1.~ 09. 04 .0,0.1*9 -55'â‚¬4-0 I , C Er//Ill'*Dest -' iy-1 original deed bearing calls. 01 - 1 , 4) This survey does not constitute a Utle search by Soplts Englneenng, UC {SE) to determine5 422*%* -di foundlebar/IC,pmerkedLS 2376. Saddpm,mlifiandbeqmore 62> Ed, 0--ship or easements cf record For all information regarding iainnorts, rights of way 150 and/or title of record. SE relied upon the documents shown in the Source Documents belowv pmtlcularÂ¥ de.oÂ·lbâ€¢d I jollowA Nlirning/,foundreb,iwith*marked LS. 2376-ibei,~,pointond,Â® \ flj.-j ,;#&~ U 2 F i! R 137 9 -1 El,t,1, reM-of-way line of th, Der,ve, a Rio Ggrde Western Radroad (A,pen and a Proforma Title Report prepared by Pltkin CountÂ¥ rtle Inc , Cise No. PCT?4799W Effect* Date jull 15, 2016. $-:11 -1 /1/ being or the souther-411â€¢e of â€¢ parcel described in Book 384 / P,le 494 of the Prldneount,Colorado recorch:whencethe West *Quuter w. 5.1,0,1 7 ' -' IW ~' Tâ€¢-St,l#fouse p..I 1~ 0 ~It... 5) The decnption for the subject ,operly as referenced In Book 364 at Pag, 494 doe: not (Wle Coner of &@21 Section 7, a lound U.3. De:* of lt~â€¢lor-IM Sfass Capdated \ F/U.S. Oâ€¢Pt. Of â€¢-or .1 -t 1954 bears N89'06'08'W i cirtince of 601.22 feet, there ilor, the=*erly Inc 18-30/1354 1 vkCon. 04â€¢11 Â¥.es=r./40/â€¢h$ ~W/'20 11 -- -120Ew-scor r ZONE AE 1+1-Wn.1 r ione WAN#) of the parcel. The deed relerences th, northerly Exte of th, parcelto be the cer,terlne of matherriticallv dose by apprcÂ»dmately 10 feet In additkn the deed and descrption as '13 w..5.6. 27XL#w-Ly=m-:Lie'Xij=*.=47 stated, 1, dendent of curve information to odequatelÂ¥ descnbe ind place tf,e //rthen, extent countr ricords S:9Â·06'orE, a distanci / 200.17 f- tze a pow,t on the westerv 1 ty /1,1 for, Eaâ€ž,INI ROW'l / (100 YEAR FLOOD) 21 / ~ Effie ar errTT~*Al 15.--9=7- Set Eleb,i */C~ Ll 28643 (Typ Hunter Creek. The centerl,le o f Hunter Creek has been defined for thi: survey utilizing the r~M-<fiq ine of Red Mountain RId as de,cribed In document recolded In Book Cm:ruct&) center of the floodwaY as shown in the Proposed MÂ®ph: Chailm produced by the Flt kin L. 2 C ff Â° 554 / P,te 160; thence alÂ©,18 said westerly fight of,wy Ine the folowl,~l {6) 6 County-2016 Stormwiter Manalement. The eastedy boundary of the propert, b defined by La rolim fr-) additior,al portion of land m reacqulfed by Frieâ‚¬*,er: tom Pltkln County through a Qultd@Irn / 'GAT.32. 1.5*1.3,20â€ž1--... rp.wl , uÂ· 1* .SAL) 1 % m. 02 the portion of land deeded to PRIdn Couny * r,ferenced in Book 554 / Page 160. An U tlerce 1.15 leet ilenE ty arc of i crve to the right. having a racti 01 213-33 fwt, i cintrm, angle of 25*1714-,the cho'd bean â€¢02'31~07'W i dls-:* of 93.39 - J --1- 1 Ned referenced in Book 729 at Ple 114. Thedeed has tmographkal errors and Incowrect 13]~ /9 1 feel 4_ 3-1 2nd 1... Dâ€¢=â€¢-yâ€¢ , information that does not mathematicall, dose. ho-ever the intent of tht, corievance B b ra 579Â·52Â·271 2 di/2/)/ I.OOI~ ~ ah- Structlres notld In thi Exhibit Map * refer,nced * the deed andis shown hereon 31 therce 58.07 feet alont thi art di cl,ve to the tht. having a radka of 205.33 -0 2 \ / 7 11 - M 213' _- - 59 6' 1 feet; , central -gle of 16'1207. th, ch,rd burs N18-131/E i dr*anceof 5787 -1 9 6) It appears the intent of the southerly boundary of the sublect property (Book 314 at P,ge Mito thâ€¢ lortheastem, Corner of a /9,/ 4 tar/ de,/fted â€¢ 8** 729 / P~1 ~ ~ ~ ~ tte Elfl 1 4 1 494} i to adjoln the northerlv boundarY of a parcel of lawl described m Tract 1 in Refer 54 SHADY LANE 'IN, A :# 9 No. 501239 as they makethe gme boark, call Nom th, W* Corn/. However It ts noted that 4) thence alon, said parcel of land describ,d i Book 729/ P* 11â€¢ and Â©or-now 4 NeÂ·4~1599, a distinceof 1380 feeu Â¢2113 d~S*'LF. # n. .1....1. .1.. ... ... 5, thaic. -r, aid p-1 of land d-c-d In took 729 M Pili m and \ AC \ -- MA\1 1 34,7685,7. Ft. (0.798 Acrest) the monuments set in the fiekj have slight differences norn the common Ine, al shown. For this survey. the monurnert representir, an older survey has been helireflected by the conti,le~1104*/rcel dacrlbed;/ 000k 554 / Pa,e I50,12- f- don, Â· (Orjg. Parce/Â·-8ook 384.Page 494) ~ U~ < monument m-ked as LS. 2376 at the Southwest comet ofthe propertÂ© Thi monument also i the arc of. cirve to./right. having ..dium of 218.331Â®et i centml argleof ~ 03'ZZ'5r : - - Pitkin County Parcel No. determined by utillf ng the centiline cf the ex-, ble,e. as shewn. 6) theâ„¢:e 429â€¢42'4rE. 0 1-n,e of41-22 feettotheceÂ·*er of Hunter Creek. . h m I "264 2737-072-00-026 thence akon, the cente/- 01 Hir,t,r Creek ty* folo,4Â·Fl, eNrteen (13) couses (Merme/N,euninownj .9 / / / 71 me nood information shown Is derived from the proposed Piton Cotrt, Risk Map 1) 5820/47-W. a dhor- of 1% fea. tbice 1 EnlineerlrZ by the Pltkin County Stormwater Man,/rnent. The changa h,ve not bie i Fbodplaln changes. The Irformution Is derlved from GES Informituor suppled to Soprs formily adopted by FEMA,tthis time. X =44=AM*Ji \ 5Ct, ---- t\9 M_ 25 --1 6) $85'14'107/, aclstar=of]566 feet;0,= May 13. 2015 and should be used b gene,al rrfe,ence orlÂ¥ asthe the creek edie Is d,rwric &3 .4.- 7, Ner51'17'W, i distirce of 35 52 feet there WÂ¥ Sect=) 7 , ~1â‚¬L r zao' * R/barw/Cap LS. 2015~ - in nature and subject to fluctuations based on,emonal /0*3 ! 8) 582â€¢5729*W, a digince of 17.18feet therti F,14 U.1 D,p,. ofmre-&M . ' < F, XK LF*--u1 / 9 9) 57,4 23-W. i drance of 7-24 feet thence 8-(4199 .1 ~ ~ \~'~ & g}Thetopof tankshownforthesoutherlyskieoflurlt/,Creekwasd/terminedon J,-27, 10} 571'33~Sr/, a di/tance Of 15Â·72 f//t th,rICâ€¢ h Slul/' 601-22% r. IZA'Â»1â€¢M IS- NO- 5 8 6, B////Â·.Â·3212.321 \ 11) 54/45'ls-W. achianceo,12.108ettlence ~ - t.-14.439 b 2016 by Sopri, En:ineerin; LiC projecter,~neerand the Cit, Aspen Eiginee,ir, Dept. Staff. 12) 5539r15'W, â€¢ datance of 2117 feet dler= (Ore'll' Deed Cal"e. Note, No. 3.6 8 6} 589'06'084 200.17 la000 WRIe. C.. 4 1 w Ae//r -/C/ Li 414 13) 552-0/291/, a dltince of 1&28-1 to a point of Irrter-croa -thrN Easterly richt-of-Â¥ line of the Der- & le Gr-le Weltern R,ircad (Ali Ce,ner llcoon ....se,/10.1 7 0.35Â·..... 1 1 > 7\ .ranch); thence 1.aving -d centertl~* of Hur- Cr-k * *1- Gal Emt,fly \2/ t -------4-- i~ht-of- I* 507Â·13'5Er E, a I ce of 12{152 feet t the pohÂ¢ of be//W Â· ~ l.i hgo POINT OF BEGMNING 6 SOURCE DOCUMENTS: Said parsed of lar*1 cort,ir.Irâ‚¬ 0 798 acres Â·nore or k- t. #0 54'North ofcor-or, Lot Or,c #nd. &6- A- 11 2376 ~4 n1 Con //1-, ROW Lâ€¢le ind â€¢ DocumentÂ·Deec 800* 384-Page 494 S//ihe"r 'der Of Paeâ€¢0 CALLVWNNIE LLC '/ . %~ Une Tale â€¢ Document-De,d Book 554/40 159 0 Une. Direction Le.~ â€¢ Document-Recepbon No. 400339 PO BOX 2920 â€¢ Dociment-Dead Book 729-Page 114 EXISTING CONDmONS LEGEND t y il L & : . U NGre'15* 1100 . pht-Wilou~by Pond Estate.Mat Book 32 Page 36. ASPEN, CO 81612 4 0 â€¢ Map-Denver & Rio Grande Western Rilroad (Aspen Branch}-1919, Corrected 1927. (TRACT 1-REC. No 501239) U 579Â· Sy 27-2 8,00 Recorded as Rec. 134450 on March 13.1969 CATV PEDESTAL *1 1 46 (.1 ta . Dec* of Intirlor-BLM Plat of Section 7, as accepted b, Cht/Cadaitral Survey Feb. 14 TELEPHONE PEDESTAL ' L""001 I,00 198(1 ELECTRIC METER ~ 641k~E / / 1.4 -0,47-w 396 â€¢ Survirprep/red by Alptne Survey En/Ineers .lob 0263C October.2014. ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER X Â· LS ..53'25-W 2451 Ot, 4 4//Cortrol.*155. â€¢ Surier,repared by Alpire Suney En:ineeÂ»Job 26082GC.JuIY, 2006. SEWER MANHOLE , ~ ~.: pjrk/, ca./co-ousâ€¢ - - 94, / / ALL OF rHE PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO RECORDS GAS METER Elm. -7911.987 1 16 369' 26' 37-W MI 1 %4 9 0 371Â·.Â·50-1. k. CURB STOP /4 4 - 28 '75' My 23'w 24. SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE HUNTER CREEK FLOOD PlAIN LEGEND - Ut - 1,1, - UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE Soprls En,In-ri,Z uc (SE),or Lolli ul, A Colorado umRed uab,litv Company and Pan 1, s.....V 2566 I Russel G jones do hereby state that this Irrprove,nent SurveÂ¥ Plat was pregared bÂ¥ -I - t. - GAS UNE / * / \1. NW 51'17-W 3&52 / Ill Indicates Zone AE-100 Year Fbod County TItle, Inc . ge - 2 - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC / L.11 Â£78Â·41'23-W 714 .Wt ill 22- 57 .-W j7!. I furthermore state that the improvement on the above described paccel on the date. - ue - uc - UNDERGROUND CATV LINE 4 3 Indicates Zone AE-Floodway ~ Â· - .g - u - SEWER LINE ; \ -- ,/ W .3753-W lin ...1 m shcm, that there are no encroachments upon e. chscrlb.d pr,mises bY / // improvements on any adjoining premises, except m &*dic*ed, ard that WÂ·efe h rÂ© ----- Indicates Base Flood Elevatiorâ€¢NAVD 88 .4 5~4948-W 1110 - â€¢ -w - WATER UNE 1, 1.1 _. 1 - - - / 2/. Ot MONUMENT LEGEND .5 353 115* 23/7 ' r-trillons. cuvenants and easements of recod m In plac, 0 / Â£18 532-0729.W '22, UTIUTY NOTE: O Indicates a found monument, as shown. Th, Irrcrof doswe for this survey is less than 1/15,000 /*.fAL ,>0Â¥W The locadores of underground utilities h- been plotted based on u Hity :naps. V.. 1 - 8 Irdkates @ set monument, LS. 28643. TO BE SET AFTER CONSTRUCTION 'Diz102_1**Y Ruise|IG.Jones Li #25950 1-1- 25950 7 ~ Â·1 u, Curve Table 'AA<'Z-1 677 loc,tions In sorre instances These utfities, as shown. may not representactual fkld conditions. 1< 1- . *15' 31333' 25'1734- .Â·31 07-'W .E It is the respomibilitv Of the contractor to ar.tact *11 utiltÂ¥ comp>~es for lield loation of aive / L,# I/48 ri//I,t Pei= 00" /rece" 'mord ~R> utilities grior to coruction NORTH SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC 0 5,87 20533 2913~ 15-/W- *W 13' 31rE .Ir CZERIAND RECORDER;SCERnFICATE FOR INFORMATIONAL LAND SU~~F~f O 1229' 21*33 645' 37257 N20- 01' WE 1219' DEPOSTEDTHIS-DAYOF . 2016. AT M.,IN THE MTION 5,-r./ GRAPHIC SCALE - CIVIL CONSULTANTS A h.-7/3/53 / 290 2112 14.97 7-5~4; N25'sr 21-E -rhET ColmITY I, DEX FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY (,*er,peâ€¢~iE 1-Â» ~ . ~5.99' 20533' 4-27-45 m.'52"W 15.99' LAND SURVEY PLATS UNDER RECEPTION NUMBER SCO 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 DATE ( IN FEET) FIUNG INFORMATION: SECTION 7. TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH RANGE 84 WEST. THE 6â„¢ P.M. (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 1 inch - 20 ft 7/2UX)lg 1//7 I lt......Il....ur.e, D.. EU,1 MARG. RE'Ir. /..... OM ./.IN ............ *Â¤0 11 588 Ii--Ill-liJIL 0,% Ii--3 - . ........ill.................... I- ---- . I NOTICE ACCORINGTOCOLO~X).*Â¥oul#CmMEâ€¢.CE~Â¥LE.k ,Â£TION BASED UPON ANÂ¥ DEFECT 1,1 â„¢ts SURVEY WITH. THREE Â¥EARS SLOPE ANALYSIS AFTUR Â¥ou f,R5T DISCOvEn Suel DEFECT. IN NO EVENT.....,cnoN a*WID l. oN ANÂ¥ DEFECT,N T)Its SuRVEÂ¥ BE C06-ENCED MORE THAN TEN ~*0,s 'tol â„¢6 -TE of cERTIFIcAT,0,1 'HowN HEREON. 54 SHADY LAN E ...../..rl'*7-7 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION- (Original Description) A PARCEL OF LAND BEING SITUATED IN SW34 NWK OF SECTION 7, .........,M=MMAN] A tract of land situated in the SW/N\An, of Section 7, Township 10 South, TOWNSHIP 10 SOUTH, RANGE 84 WEST OF THE 6th P.M. Range 84 West of the Sixth mincipal Meridian, more fully described A follows: CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. Beginning at a point on the Easterty right-of-way line of the Denver and Rio SHEET 1 OF 1 Grande Western Railroad (A,pen Branch) whence the West Quarter Colner of said Section 7 bears West 602 4 feet; thence East 214.6 feet to the Westerly light-of-way line of Red Mountain Road; thence alofle the arc of a LOT 1-WILLOUGHBY PONDS ESTATES cure to the right, the chord of which bears N 12~56' E, 215 5 feet to the WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST OT 2-WILLOUGHBY PONDS ESTATE center of Hunter Creek; thence Southelly along the center of Hunter Oeek 180 N WACKER DR #001 along the arc of a curve, the chord of which bears S 68 02'04* W, 296,19 WILLOUGHBY PONDS TRUST feet to the Eastelly line of said railroad rightÂ·of-waÂ¥. thence S 08Â·57Â· E, 90.6 180 N WACKER DR #001 CHICAGO, IL 606 - '- &Â£1~4Ifi~FÂ¥6*18 feet along the Easterlv line of said raitroad rightÂ·ofÂ·way to the point of CHICAGO, H. 60606 - 4 ///9*///gJWÂ¥/Imillitlf/Imi~I#gU// beginning / 1 li~flllli----i~d"I'l-1'.-I.-11"ILAIGW--mEniâ€¢In ZONE AE (100 FLOOD>-- . TOGETHER WITH a parcel of land situated i,1 tti SWI of the NWI of Section - - 7, Township 10 South. Range 84 West of the Sixth Plil~cipal Meridian, more r- qi/,3....,U.'ll-///,Il'./.*6/'% Â¥.I/' .ribed uowâ€¢ / 1 Beginning at a point on the Watelly line of Red Mountain Road whence the u.. .M.lilgpic'"91/<lint.MPIE'Ii'MI.*glgA/VJ,Iii - Sm*'=...#p,- # Â·59 01 / 32Â©~alif ~*~p~I~h<~2,~~,l~/~75~~~~e k --<EQ-CREE|~ sAND BAR vsÂ£~No // 0..11 i-.*'r,.SPN~~~~~LkIadJ~~~~ :8:%;1:%7;:Â·11%;1: '523?Utarty~UFF'11221, / 201â‚¬ /54 ---Â· ----- ~~~~~-'a~-~~.r-~--~- -4 '--4 1 thence 15.99 feet along the arc of curve to the left having a radius of 205.33 ./ feet,thechordof whichbearsN69Â·01'53-W:5.991/et.thence69Â·01*53Â· 2 ' -- 1.4= 148 = N 13.00 feet to the point of beginning. Said /reel conlins 214.47 ,quare 7 teet, -e ~less / I ~ Centerflne of Hunte, Crve**r Note No $ 5&71. -. 3Â· k - / 4.633 ExCEPT that portion of the above described property as conveved to The ZONE AE (FLOO~Y) 0 -29. Pate.f# Board of County Commissioners of Pitkin County in Deed recorded / ~ 1 4 i 1'Irte' Deeded r. M#/bel from PN.n Cour,ty VICINITY MAP December 31, 1987 in Book 554 at Page 159. But excluding from thif NOTES EXCEPTION the portion thereof reconveyed to the Ffiedbefg5 by Quitclaim ~ ~ Coung 20165, w-~ 4 Â£ Center#nec/Huncer M K - 1 ***Th-*Ck,1tj SCALE: 1' = 800 Deed recorded Novernber 2,1993 in Book 729 at Pige 114. ~ ~1 . 3 .\l . (See Note No+ 71 --/:44 -170*G' 62 a./."Til. 4GEN: i, 6 1) Dates of Survey: December 23,2014-januarY 8, Mav 13, lune 3-4,2015, h,ne 27,2016 \ / ZONEAE (100 yEAR FLOOD) ~ 2) Date of Preparation. December 2014-January, 2015, Jutne 12,2015, JulY 22,2016 4 -Wed . junn 27. 20â€ž 4 l 1 / f -n 3) Basis of Bearing: Bearings are based en the 2009 Marcin Engineering City of Aspen Cont, 01 NDE --1- / DENVER & RIO GRA 6â€¢ILROAD-RIGHT OF WAY -100.0. PROPERT, DESCRIPnONÂ·~Per this Survev) /--' ScwÂ¥5 E~;neeriog and e:Ili lity of Asmn ~ ~~>f Map, yielding a site bearing of 589-06'087 from the W/ Corner of k. 7. T.10 S., R.84 W., 6th Â£Â®,peâ€¢n# Om~Â·f ~,~ NoteÂ·Nc W /3/// A parcelof land *tuated In the SWINWtiof Sectk,n 7. Township 10 Soul linge - x P.M.. a found U.S. Dept. Of Intefior-BLM Brass Cap-dated 1954 and i found Rebar and Cap 84 We,t of le Gth P,Incipal Meridian. atv oi Upen. county of P-, State d ~ <\ tr / _- 25.0' original deed bearing calls. % 560'Â£362_ -- nwked LS. 2376, as shown. Rewking ina a clockw,5/ rotation angle of 0â€¢53'52- from the En~neefing City 01 A,pen Control Map, yietding a site bea,ing of //89'06 /-W tz ==- Â« g., Colorado With a~ beark,scontained herein betng retatk to the 2009 Marcin *tf # // 3960 4/ from the wâ€¢ Corner of gid Section 7. a found US. Dept. of Interiof-BLM Brass Cap 1 \ a\> 15* 4) Thts survey does not constitute a title Harch by Sopris Engineering. LLC (SE) to determine <1*%L/1 ownership or easements of record For allinformation regarding easements, rights of way *I;':Z~Z~,ILI:~,ZI~iZE~Ill ~ / A~-~ - -- and/ortitte,ofreco,d,SErelied/ponthedocurne,luoymihiceDocumentsbelow partkularlv described /1 follows: tf# \- - # *OV < 6,1.04 7 ..4 and a Proforma Title Report prepared by Pitkin County Title, lnc., Case No. PCT24799W, ...,#SE No ~ - 3.3, - 4- 0 2 le J = Easterly r#ht of-way line of the Denver & RIO G,ande /05tern Railroad IAspen . / 4150' - - 2 - 2 1- -4--- - _ ) 51 The description for the subject property /5 referenced in Book 384 al Page 494 does not Effective Date kuly 15. 2016 Branch) and abo being on the southerivline of a parcel desÂ«[bed / Book 384 at WJ~ Section 7 Toc W .ne .'01* 814.16 Page 494 of the Pitkin County Colorado fecordiG; ~fherâ‚¬e the West One-Quarter 13.0' b ~ Fnd U.i Depl.. ountenor- Une# Direction Leagth 4/) Corner 01 sald Section 7,0 found U S Dept of inte/0,-811( Brass CapÂ·dated 8,2,5 0% 1954 -1 * 11 - arc Bloc* st.. Une Table 1 -3, - =.00Â· w/ness cor. N wce\6-(hÂ«latkhelatitte,dedk,ReceÂ®on*.501119/miplb l~~ '~ 5* rn"i"""be.an,dise#awomawt'illefee~. 3,~addlm,thedeÂ«handdes/:43~nas 1954 bears /9Â·06'08-W a distance of 601.22 feet thence along the southert, Ine End *5 Rebar Ll 579'522/E 8 00 ;tated, 8 deficient of curve information to adequately descnbe and place the northefty extent ~ILJI~~I~~I~~.~Â°~~,~~,I,~~II'~;Z,~tiEZI~I~IL~Z ~ ~ of the parcet. Thedeed,eferences the no,therly extent of tt,e parcel to be the centerine of A ~ 0' Easter*, RR ROW) 1 (100 YEAR FLOOD . 2 g // 3 U N63'40' 1574 ..00 Hunter Creek The centerline of Hunter Oeek has been defined for this survey utilizing the 1 i M.3 / ) Set Ae.â€¢f W 1 Â«.â‚¬ S. i â‚¬ U A,68- 08' 01Â·w 13.00 center of the floodway as shown In the Proposed Mapping Changes produced by the Pitkin rightÂ·o{-way line of Red Mountain Road as described In document recorded in Book Ir. / 1 /2 0 7 Sl H' 47-W 3.96 the portion of land deeded to Pitkin Counry as referenced in Book 554 at Page 160. An 554 #Page 160; thence along sald westerly rightÂ·of-wav tlne the following sill {64 ~< 13Â·,1 0.3 , '- 1/-5/"/9/ 14 County-2016 Stonnwate, Manageme,R. The easterly boundary of the property is defined by (CklfSÂ¢L b i 3 -1 Cok,m,1 .16' Z 1) thence 94.15 feet along the arc of a curve to the rIght having a radlur, of 213.33 1 9 feet. / central angle of 25â€¢17 14-. the chord bean N02â€¢3107-W a dlitance 01 93.39 , CS 569'26'37-W 3&41 information that does not mathematicah close, however the intent of this convelance is ~nces781/2/E, adistance*8.oofeet / - ~TÂ»0*0'y"~00~ U SS' 53'25-W 2â€¢33 ld}tion/l portion of Und wa5 re,cquired br Ffiedberg from Pitkin County through a Quitc~aim 3) thence 58.07 feet along the arc of i curve to the rtght. ha/,41 a radius of 20.33 N C=. Bld 00â€¢st 1 2 Deed referenced in 800, 729 at Pap 114 rhis deed has typographical errors and incorrect / illl noted in the Exhibit Map as referenced by the deed and is shown he,eon. "' 231 . _ " . 57/2I'58-W 24 66 6 'â‚¬ t . d )# feet, a central angle of 16'12'05/, the chord bears N18'13'38-E, a distance 01 57 87 . U Sh' 1/ 73-W 2/98 6) It appears the intent of the southerly boundar, of the sublect propefty {Book 384 at Page 54 SHADy LANE . 585' 14' 10-W 25.66 1- No 501239. aithey make the same bearing ull from the wl Corner However it is noted that ft to & 0*e/ft/ty </m * Fral of 4/ descrld in log* 729 /1 /40 ~ 494) is to adioin the northerly boundary of a parcel of land described as Tract l in Reception 4} thence along Said parcel of land d/,cribed In Book 729 # Page 114 and ccmmon w 34,7 + =Total Parcel 1 1 #f f li 582- 52' 29â„¢/ 17./ Gne, ~163Â·4~15-W, i distance of 13.00 feet; 6 - 2 % 5 Lle .86'51'17'W 35 52 the monuments m in the field hbe slight differences from the common line, as 5hown For this survey, the monument repre~enting an older survey has been held, reflected by the 5) thence teavins said parcel of land described In Book 729 at Page 1 14 acid monurnent marked as LS 2376 at the Southwest corner of the propefty. This monument also conon,-4 along said parceldescrabed / Book 554 at P//e 150.12.89 feet along Set-..1 h ,1655 Acrest = r 1 Outside Area ~ li '12 SM/41 23Â»W 724 fits the prescribed 50.0' distance from the exbting centerline of the Rio Grande Trail as Rlm/ey'â€¢ 783889~ â€¢ determined by utilizing the centerte of the existing bridge, as shcwn the E of i a-ve to the right. having a radius of 218-33 keet i central ingle of 03â€¢2237-. the chord bears /28â€¢01'WE / disunce of 12.89 feet; (Orig. Parcel-Book 384- ) 1 \ 3 0 w 571'33'531Â¥ 15.72 *Iâ€¢ 7826.4' 5 Iry.. 0,/â€¢ 7826.3 Pitkin Count y Parcel N Floodolain changes. The information b deived from GISinfc*rnation supplied 70 Sopris ')-.4.;(Zlet,/2%12:1:%2.*#St \ a ...9.5I:~Unknown; 2737-072-00-026 6 U. NS-45 48-W 12,10 7) The flood information shown is derived from the proposed Pitkin County Risk Map 15 582'08Â·47-1. a d//nce 04 3.96 feet: thence US .3-28'15 W 23,87 Efeneering, by the Pitkin Col,Ity Stormwater Management The chames lave not been 2) 567Â·53'25-W. â€¢ distince 01 24 531-; mence / ly adopted by FEMA at this time. 3) S69â€¢26Â·37-W. a dbtance ol 36.41 feet; thence ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ * ~16 S~Or 29-W ..28 8) The edge of water for Hunter Creek, as shown is based on wrve, field shots ot-ned on 50/ ~Â»t,-Wint--BLM ~ t-7 , ~\ 6) 585â€¢14Â·10-W, adistance/25.66fee/0/â€¢ce IN 'sc ~ _ _ __jemele= 1//_ _ 7) N88â€¢51Â·17-W i disunce of 35.52 feet thence May 13, 2015 and should be used for general reference only as the the creek edge is d,namic 8) 582Â·52'29*, I dau nce 01 17.18 feet; Ihence Brass CapÂ·1954 / r..oose , / Â« W. Rebarw/(4 *n nature and subject to fluctuations based on seasonal floWL .. 20151 ;I. 91 578Â·41Â·23-W, i dktance of 7.24 reet. thenâ‚¬e r,r- _ A 589Â·06,-E 60122Â· A-, r 602.4'(Â»ed 5â€¢61 ;' . I (Sean NlÂ· 34 M. 2.329 91 The top of bank shoun for the southed, side of Hurle, Cfeek was dete,mined 4 June 27, 10) S71Â·33Â·sa-w. i dlilince of 15.72 feet theze 2Â·f~74ed CanÂ·See %:,8,, Â· 509Â· 06' 08 L 200.17' ..00' Wa~esl Cor. U \ 2016 bv Sopris Er~ineering, LLC proiecter~ineer and the Cit, Aspen Eng,neenngDept Staff 1 11) 549-45'48'w, i dI$:anceof 12. lofeet there 12) S53-28'15-W. i dk,tareof 23.87 feet thefe 13) /2*07'29-w, i di///ce / 18.28 feet to i peint ot Intersection -th/he Centersecton Un,-Sectk*, 7 SOURCE DOCUMENTS: ----- - â€¢ Document-DeedBook]84-Pase 494 Fnd. Rebi wÂ»p Li 44 A Easte,4 r*1Â·01-/iÂ¥ h of the Den- & Rio Grande Western Rairold (Asoen ... LFnd.ReD"de Bran<h), thence le,vk, *d ce,Rertlne of lete, Creek,nd alorl said Easterly LS. 25947 POINT OF BEGINNING ftghtÂ·01-Y kle 50/13'56- Â£ a astance of lx152 fee, to the point & beginning - Fnd Reba, I/(* Li 2376 4 R Sad paicel of IDâ€¢d containt 0.- acre,v more 0, h lon Eastery ROW Une and Southey Bar Â¥ of Paicen CALLWINANE LLC ~~ â€¢ Docin.lit-Deed Book 554-Page 159 PO BOX 2920 . Document-Deed Book 729-Page 114 ASPEN, CO 81612 . Document-Reception No. 400339 EXISTING CONDmONS LEGEND ~ .~ ~ O 0 Ma.-Der,ver & Rio Grande Western Rai,oad (A,peâ€ž Branch,1919. Co,rected 1927. ,â€ž (TRACT 1-REC. No. 501239) / / 1 â€¢ Plat-Willoughby Pond Esute$-Mat Book 32-Paige 36 Recorded as Rec 134450 on March 13, 1969 / â€¢ Dept. of lnteriorÂ·8LM PIat of 0,1 7. as accepted byChief QdastraI Surve, Feb. 14, ELECTRIC METER 4 ~ 1980 â€¢ Survev-Prepaced by Al/ne Survey Engineers Job 0263Â£-October,2014 C*yofllen Con:roklÂ·159Â· 1, 1 Curve Table . Survey-Prepared bv Alpine SulveÂ¥ Engineers Job 26092GC-lulÂ¥. 2006 ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ~ ~ w P#km Co-~ Counhoug Â· i Curve. length Radil' T2ngent Delta Chcal Direebon ChÂ©,0 All OF â„¢E MTKIN COUNTY, COLORADO RE[ORDS SEWER MANHOLE \1 1 / GAS METER \i / . 94.15' 213.33 47.- 25 17'14' N2'31'OPW 9331 CURB STOP ~/ ~atrof *pen Cont,okiPS, / Cl 5&0/ 20Â£33 29.8 16-12~09- Nt/13'38-E 57:r I // HUNTER CREEK FLOOD PLAIN LEGEND N G//dich A W. Fr-/8 50-23 " ~ 0 12.9, 218.33 6.â€¢5 3Â·~rsr Nl/011:E 12.0 -- ut - 6 -- UNDERGROUNDTELEPHONE W - ul - GAS UNE ~ 1 Cl 290 11133 142 750. 0.4/21.E 29.8/ ~ ~ Indicate, Zone AEÂ·100 Ye# Flood ue - ue - UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ~ \ Â© C k all 205,33' .00 4-]r45- S24'05'52"W 15.9% rm-7 Indkate5 Zone AE-Floodway uc - uc - UNDERGROUND CATV LINE ~ --- K 1, 1 -0 -9 - SEWER LINE ' \ - - ----- Indicates Base Flood Elevation-NAVD 88 -w -* - WATERLINE I ..L_ - MONUMENT LEGEND UTILITY NOTE: ~ $ ~------ <---= 0 Indiate/foundmonument, asshown Slopes Table The locations of underground utilltles have been plotted based on utility maps. ~. 2 Indicates a set monument. L.S. 25950 construaion/design plan$, other information provided by utility companies and actual field locations m some dances These ullities, as shown. mav not represent actual field condition; Number Minimum Slope Maximum Slope A,ea ColorÂ· It is the responsibikv of the contractor....act â€¢ utilit. companies for field loution./ 1 1 -/#Em##I 1 001% 20.00% 18859.58 ~ um,ties prior to comt,uction NORTH 2 20.00% 30 00% 1316.95 8 SOPRIS ENGINEERING - LLC 5-,e, MH GRAPHIC SCALE 3 *100% 1000 00% 303018 ~ Rim fleÂ¥ = 7830.53 CIVIL CONSULTANTS hâ„¢. mi m..6 80 ~â„¢. Out â€¢ M.5' i ~ 1 502 MAIN STREET, SUITE A3 (PIPâ€¢ 4pe and 're Unkno-V CARBONDALE, COLORADO 81623 ( IN FEET ) (970) 704-0311 SOPRISENG@SOPRISENG.COM 1 inch = 20 R 141/MIÂ· 14237 B Â· G \201~~14237/313#ErvAAÂ·SLOPE 'Ii/Â¥5,5\14237-/OPE ANALÂ¥,5/*/ 4,000580 DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCHiTECTSpc 119 South *Ing St Suite 203 Aspen, CO 81611 - - - TEL 970Â·Â·925<3444 FAX 970-920-2186 ' ~94*~\\\ \~ \\ i , / 0 /\\ 11\ \11\41(~.4-t-f-1914 / biiji-fI#ij-ii -i ; -< , '' 47& -Â·~-rq- ' \ ~44444 +1./ 61,3.---_ 1 f 0 4* 1, / & i / u.-W.e,we=nred brmts drowing o. 0-44*meth,#fe-- 2' 6, *KIN '\ 1 Uidea~ des,grts, ..ngemen[$ Int.. , , *aile.....tped....... ' ./.'Ill/*I.'Imfedpr.el. Na'â€¢e Ilheide~dâ„¢*u ..-ge~~rnesorpe,0 , 1.botme,efwr#-2 #,2 -m,- oun'Ice,tian 01[30Â«lk,h~to..2.. 1 X 0- / ?- r -, 1/1 \ 1 Uxu f f// 1 gif C -r V + â€ž, 1 t W ...1-50Â¢724 7 1 -741& Â»4.V . TV&#E.A , _ 4-4_ 2 2 t 4/Of 'Aluz--112- . * V -- a ... 2 1, Ck . . -- 1 1 ; 1 \61\ 0*Z- . .Ptv 0 . I g i. 4- LU .!, 451=.Y-527& CA \- L \-ir..:.ry,FJ 6 1 1 / / 'i~ 44' I - 1 K f 0 , if ~ --,i~---11'~7'k.~ 1,~.ict., T l.( A :'.2 i.*1 4/ , f'.I Vt ~~fvt 1,- -te li i '.!1 ~ 545HADYt.AN I - i '~1 V11 3,Â£ I j It i 11[- h..4~-=LL 1 1 11 - 1 Lk.&Â© ., f. / ..42-0 & 7 1 i :F :3* ;0-39et....alp - 6. 0 i'l CD 1 / ---/ . / \ I 8. rv / t\.1 \ / \\ \ / 1 :1-\1 3 /1 1 \ ( 1 - - ./---t f 11 0 i t 4 1 1-- - \ 1 \ / / / 'N,2 /1 j 9Â·38* i/' . 1 ! Â·Â«4 * 5,1 \ I /0 / \ / I '1 11/ I / . : .4,4~ ~ DRAWING ISSUE , 1 SHADYLANE CONCEPTUAL. DESIGN 2/28/17 1 ---- ,\ I . - / 109 M.5,-2.11 .%~ : 2 F / LANDSCAPE PLAN: PROPOSED SITE/ t Â»-U c PREFERRED OPTION i PROJECT No 1609 t , .1 6/ DRAWN BY CPÂ¥ , 1 + 01/,/ ' SHEET No PROJECT 5.0 NORTH ~ PROPOSED SITE/LANDSCAPE PLAN: PREFERRED OPTION 0 .. 47 SCALE 1- = 20Â· 'N3dSÂ¥ I 3NV-1 ACIVHS *9 /Volumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspenf 16 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Plots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&Z/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:37 PM Nolumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspen/'16 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Plots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&Z/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:44 PM 8 9 Eli wmmmmF mpwmmlf~, I '1'llit|||||li|||| i !Â·-Â·.................;'~----------1 C lili 1 1~ I"I I|| li ' .,4 1 ?123 9~/ bL 4 4 L Oi ---- tillt ..1 1 1_9 - -- - f, i - 11. . 1 ' -- 1 ~----------- T-* 1 1 ~-rh F J bu-W] WIll_ .. 1. / %1 612 M - 1.1. I j & W.. I I -2-1-15 4 1 \1 1_111't BENCH P #i 1+Ir 4 [-.--- L-,1 11 -3 1 Ri Â©q 13% 1 1,7 - 0 0- 2 02 * - El; 2 i ... LI- F ----E 4 9---/ 1 J\\T ' K /_i M Eli 31 11==fl â€ž.. --- .. 1 .~ 1 1,JEC ELJLJEL_-1 Ef!,1 81 â€¢-1 r -4 L f-- 2'- ~ 11 L .-- -- 2 1]1 = 1 - 1 .. Bal R 4-Jilut i'-Ft-Mii = 111 7 1111 1 E 4, 41 . '11 11 111 1 - 111 111 1~i '11 Ela ~ w lilli 8 111 111 T 111 V lilli CIM LL 7 fr-----------Tf !11 4 4 g g Uddl 1 J - 0 U LIm Wl 11 .~111 4 4 Iâ€¢ 1â€¢â€¢111 11Â¢, 1 1 11 1 1. 1 111 411 11, 4 1. 1. 1,1 111 4>en--- 111 11 m V v PE 111 Iii ~---1 t--:2 111 111 1-13 ~p IIi 1 1 - -Wl 1 n 4 3 . 4... U. En CE=I=r_ZEE_2223-Z_ -2-=ZIZEZZZI-I - ~ / 111 11 111 11 111 11 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 622~2aaEEE--EEEBE~~E.Em 0 1 111 -11: .1 IiI 1 .. Id I till! 1 -HI -. 611 # JIL , 822---aEEE--EIEEE*zES -'IIi iiI _N * 52 1 91 f qi Â» Â» 00 0 i litilil CJ,1 9 i ig I CANOPY HOUSE 1 -li ilill 20, = n #Pfi :00 8 I 02 :Wial E: 'llÂ· 0 Z , 54 SHADY LANE I ASPEN, CO ,g1i1t1 :t= r GS 1 E .lilliti RO Z ./.l * .91/E :31'05 13/\31 EI3MO1 SCALE 3/16-- 1'4 BASEMENT/FOUNDATIONS POOL M~H~ICAL '#'.-1 11111 1 --1, =*0-1 TOP *ON ON 133HS .=4==W~*WEN=trU P C= i. -1. r.- V.IR, 4*t - *. W JI , g.1 1 [1- 1 11-DF- rl TV R t ~ Int -- I 1-- DAVID JOHNSTON In P."h ARCHITECTSpc 'IH 119 South Spr~ng St ./. LEve. Suite 203 -=*..-.--.=*- FA * r t* ip 'IA - Aspen. CO 81611 m 970-92&.3444 FAX 970Â·920-2186 'al,1 ~. 1 $ 'I- l.~bil /lib.. 762Â¥ /*09:-/ 1 -/23922/j+I/&6 01 21 T 1 1Â£1~. tr'Va m#*$ , Â· aÂ»Â»1 1/, ..1 25.0 , .EME,IWOUNDAM.la .) .-.u'loluel ind,cored'irv,e:enledbyth:rd-ingafe 0 51/8.. A-*M un,hge,neatlendplen, RTH ELEVATION **MofÂ¢,hep,epelt,oÂ¢D-i- Aai-Cand devek.~d #10 in 1' -0~ 048 IEr Ykw**fied prqect tene 1 of#le,laesÂ¥,1 ....ent,of/1/.s s+enDe,csed#ed.Om,P.â€¢PO=e Â»f,ot=oe.e *,Ih.*.t 0â€¢8 -iâ€¢ren outh,*,200* of Ochâ€¢d Johnston .. .. . ".........................7 Â¥=1 63#wililim'll'li - :1?y Â°11~ 'Q MOOF r,1 ..02 .- 3/*Vt r' ..r-----7./. 11 ifil I I I T,u,kiN 'r,Irl ,#.,Mt' I /1-Nlt41 1./."//1. -. 1.27'.f . V mal m--r . b 1 ~y ~1 F .- .17,- I ' LOW'.1.21 1 .....' .LOWE~ UVEL ~..M _ 1-0, 1-25~- =WO . 2.0 :SA5â‚¬UENT......5, &%..uND~noâ€ž~ 2....c~no,60 9 ...I-no,6 Â® WEST ELEVATION ~ EAST ELEVATION SCALE 1/r = 1-0 " 8 16 SCALE 1/8 1.-0. 0 4 . 1. 1 1 ~'~CEII~3~Cm~lEE17-~ _~~ __~~~~~ ____~ 7--*- 7 MOOF. -~~ DRAWING ISSUE -*Il<(t. ,1~ . 9 env Â·A, q a.. 1,6 i*ili -:h mn f~ 32 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 2128117 -141 -26 *Â»I' '- /19-In . *able fie-=99- 6"r- -E . ; gs= . / 01_ MLE}tiEM b. ..9 1/ *1*lim,11!!TH!!HIWT 1 1- r -1 1 , '00,EM..' v *' * R ' ='*--- -trffil-wj..419&&6#.#,4,.-, k PROPOSED ELEVATIONS: -----*-0/9./.0,=lititioilitti5 PREFERRED OPT]ON PROJECT No 1609 DRAWN BY CPF 12/,NEW-94x~,a~nolli 2 .5Eutâ€¢,T,~OU~AliO~.T . 2*. SHEET No. C-) SOUTH ELEVATION 0 4 . 1/ 11.0 /Volumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspenf 16 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Ptots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&710 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:35 PM 3SAOH AdONVJ OD'NBdSÂ¥ 1 3NV1 ACIVHS *S 1 Ill 1 ON ORIDE PAno Bao, 1 1 1 DAVIDJOHNSTON ARCH ITECTSpc 119 South Spring St Suit. 203 Aspen, CO 81611 m 970-925-3444 FAX 970-920-2186 6~ - - 2-~ 1 . ~ t~-r . 12- Â»an ===E~~- Â® Le - 1 1 r- 1 , I ! I M~IN./.5/0-' .- ---- --- ----------/ LA ror-. - - ~â‚¬=~r - E--1 1. I /1 V 1 I /1 TOPO,~10.1 5=1=76â€ž78/ â€¢L [3 2 ' I / /1, 1 . / . / 1 - I. : . ,deck de.* onoâ€žg-~t~ and.% tls 0\ E . ~a .â„¢ker~f o. ~,escAId . /6 dro-â€¢g ./ 1 1 i,~ ,1 0--1.......p,~enÂ¥/D-1*~â€¢1-1 - / ~ / ~ , Aai=...led...sed. O,/ I , ~ , ~ ~ , c~,roon..01//000Â·44*.- I fhe,d=i *S*'I~ a~,Â¥~-21.p-$ ' ~ .....ed./.dis*ned....p,pe~ .. ~hange-~m-*-8--=m ...tc..Uter.FC En mgm 1 1 Emn - 1 1 Fool BELOW ~ 1 1 0 | -U- 9 . - 9 9 Y -- -2212 -tr ~V.m.n. 1 ~0*~~ arvATED -**Â· - Â· z - - 2- - alle .08Â£ 1 1 Al/0 Coll r '01Â£ -l-â€¢ - rh MAIN LEVEL dr=wrzr___~ - PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS: T. 009292Â¢noN DRAWING ISSUE CONCEPRJAL DESIGN 2/28/17 1 ! PREFERRED OPTION PROJECT No 1609 DRAWN BY CPF C-) ROOF PLAN ... l 3- 1 SCALE 3/16- = 1'-0- 0 4. , 1 21 9 %1* 18 :/ /Volumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspen716 Projects/1609 - Shady Lane/Plots/2017-02-28 FINAL P&Z/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday, February 28, 2017 12:44 PM U , 3SAOH AdONVJ 01'N3dSÂ¥ 1 3NVI *OVHS *S 1 --- 2525 ElÂ»E C~*3~11 -f'~r~ 1,978.78 sqft . DAVID JOHNSTON 1 ARCHITECTSpc 119 South Spnog St 263 6 8 1 m m e r s r~ r Suite 203 Aspen. CO 81611 . TEL 970-925-3444 R 970-920-2186 E-ih BASEMENT AREA FLOOR PLAN PROPOSED 0 4 . 16. C j %CALE 1 m 1,0 1 I .*..* .MVRsâ‚¬,Id/cel *ct~.,trwegnted#thdd,0,1,~ngoit LILI1 1 <-ed I 0,10 ar :brf*penÂ¥/Ckn,#Johnsron Are:,teâ‚¬t~ PC,;ndklhe~o~,1. useondul c,),une- .th ./speclfed... %. .med=icks~ ..r...Ins W- be .sed b, 0, diselkoed. omâ€¢ p,uoese 0*,1, 1 1 :ri Moilli- 0,Dal.dkA"sto"A,Ch,â€žec. ~f.1 7-25 :4111 MI~IM EDGE OF ROOF OVERH; NO ABOVE 1 EDGE oF MAIN FLOOR OVERHANG ABOVE -1 .r~Â¢*Â¥/ DECK 6 '97 54 79 Ke ft . U. 4 .. . 91"Vil DECK 6 ligi ;54<.Â·' ripÂ»*AN Ililli d, -- . faÂ»17'. - .0411 +62 .22/2, I.I-(0.1/1,1 'Milluitaid~att. -~ -11_1-im 12..: --- .....e-----1.- -8/, 63 t--4-Â·- IDECK 7 s -j .267.57 43 Y 9,433-53 1ft-- U - k ri=o 21Â£1 m ---1042 3 'm/1 4-1 Er, 3 [3~ - , 111 Ill 111 111 IN ; 4 iii 4 W EDGE OF ELEVATED DRIvE ABOVE 1 m Â· - M m M C= 0 N.M, _-31_.--r *-V~*6 Mi i D LU . vvi@Ha> -.~ ~5,â„¢ I . - 4Â£41&49:Ar=: .,r: ..36*El.A~ 6 -Il 8' 'M 'm" 1,1 Z EDGE OF ROOF OVERHANG ABOVE J '11 111 1,1 Â§11 Iii EDGE OF MAIN FLOOR OVERIIANG ABOVE - tâ€ž i, ii, N 111 w ul /1 EDGE OF ELEVATED AUTO COURT ABOVE Â·~ Â© LOWER LEVEL AREA PLAN PROPOSED SCALE 1/8 - 0 4 8 16 T ' EDGE OF ROOF ABOVE Â·Â·~ I - -- .---....---I i DECl[ 1 -Pi'-01 k*4:e,failii,LI-ir#&Iâ€žM 1W0 CAR GARAGI DRAWING ISSUE 1 '~214 33 R ft~ â‚¬21 31: "' 5 Â·- --- Sol 36 sq n CONCEPIUAL DESIGN 2/28/1 1 1//6/10/4 4 4 - .-- - a ' ill]~___J -Â» 1 & - 18 j~ m V IT 4 r, m. 81111911"'.-'~ -1 ~~+ 1. 2.131315qft . 1 alâ‚¬'01'**1 Ill-- 8#P ~----_-OVERHANG 1 - 10 -11 ,- 1 ~ 1.........6611. & â€¢ ~ 3422 w ft kE 219 55 11235 aÂ£__ COVER~ ti:1 -1~ . PROPOSED FLOOR AREA CALCULAIONS i P==1 1 1 ~11 7=5 - ... -R* 1 *--- -li 11 -- b N 1 PREFRRED OPTION 1 TRELLIS ABOVE PROJECT No 1609 ~ Â£*N46945qft... 1 _22./F' 1 ' ~tÂ»*57- ' - 1 -'I.=.-=. - S ~ 61 31>qft DRAWN BY CPF ELEVATED AUTO COURT-NO EDGE OF ROOF ABOVE J EDGE OF ROOF ABONE -~ 16'-11 ~ , SHEET No. 10.0 Â® MAIN FLOOR AREA PLAN PROPOSED SCALE 1/8 1/: 3SAOH AdONVJ 03'NBdSÂ¥ 1 VI AC]VHS *9 /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20-C_P&Z.pin Tuesday. February 28, 2017 2.19 PM oil ~:.i~:!I;If!!Ill!!I!;IÂ·-Â·MB--"E;E::...=- i.1 1- .q DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTS,c 119 South Spfing St GREEN ROOF Suite 203 1- 1 T Abpen, CO 81611 TEL 970-975-3444 FAX 970-920-2186 Del[8 GREEN ROOF -6/.)8 sq ft GREEN ROOF .>deq. dewgns. oi,on.tment10â€¢t.M i. ed IM..ed by .fs dfowing cle ~ ROOF AREA PLAN PROPOSED 0*nedb,rond,eLI,tp.epemofDg~d-k*,sloni #...ond de~Woped b use end in 0 4 8' 16 SCALE 1/8- = 1'-0- l ..,unct,on ....le specrfiedpÂ¥c[ ... 01 me,de~*sgMs, *mg-ents).0 -~ beâ€žsed I .,Nse'osed .an,pulpos, 1,602-wy *4#,out Dhe -riten ow#Infim.- of D.,d jo..=...vt,I. F'â‚¬ FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS CITY OF ASPEN ZONING SUBMISSION 54 SHDAY LN ZONE: R-30 PARCEL NUM 8ER: 273707200026 LOT AREA: 19,49G SF ALLOWABLE FLOOR AREA 4,769 PROPOSED BASEMENT LEVEL EXPOSED WALL CALCULAT10NS MAIN LEVEL WALL LABEL TOTAL WALL AREA ( SO FT) EXPOSED WALL AREA (SQ Fll 1 100 2 3 4 5 6 8 9 10 11 12 TOTAL (SOFO 2,904 100 EXPOSED WALL AREA PERCENTAGE 3% BASEMENT LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS SC R EAR BASEMENT LEVEL (Sq Ft) 1,978.78 68.14 CRAWL SPACE 475.93 0.00 BASEMENT LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ m 1.978.78 68.14 LOWER LEVEI. Fl.OOR AREA CALCULARONS LOWER LEVEL (Sq Ft) 2,433.53 2,433.53 LOWER LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (50 FT) 2433.53 2,433.53 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS MAIN LEVEL (Sq Ft) 2.131.31 2.131.31 GARAGE (TWO STAlt.) 501.36 125.68 MAIN LEVEL COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SQ Fll 2.632.67 2.256.99 DECK/PATIO ABOVE GRADE FLOOR AREA (Se m | | ISSUE | DRAWING 1 214.33 0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 2/20/17 2 191.12 0 3 46.94 0 1 4 46.33 0 ~ 5 63166 0 1 6 54.79 0 7 257.57 257.57 8 {ROOF DECK) 457.78 457.78 DECK COUNTABLE FLOOR AREA (SO Fl) 1.902.52 715-35 15% OF Al.LOWABLE FAR (715.35) |OVERHANG PROPOSED FLOOR AREA COVERED FRONT PORCH 136.68 0 Â· CALCULAIONS: OVERHANG 1 3422 0 PREFRRED OPTION TOTAL EXISTING FLOOR AREA CALCUWIONS PROJECT No 1609 BASEMENT LEVEL FIDOR AREA (St:1 Ft) 1978.78 68.14 DRAWN BY CPF LOWER LEVEL FLOOR AREA (Sq Ft) 2,433.53 2,433.53 MAIN LEVEL FLOOR AREA (Sq Ft} 2,632.67 2,256.99 DFCK/PORCH FIOOR AREA ISo FU 0.00 0 SHEET No. TOTAL FLOOR AREA CALCULATIONS 7.045 4.758.66 10.1 3SAOH AdONVJ 00'NBdSÂ¥ 1 3NV1 ADVHS +S /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20_C_P&Z.pin Tuesday. February 28, 2017 2Â·20 PM Z- - ,- 1-- 1 L. e r L 0 \\ 1 2 0 .2 . ARCHITECTS.c 1 DAVID JOHNSTON . f\ Suite 203 1 , / South Spring St 0- Aspen, CO 81611 )earl Ct r W TEL 970-925-3444 FAX 970-920Â·-2186 54 SHADY LN l -1 4 9.-, , I r.x i. L one p. : 6,, - i j \ 1 94 1 11 \ ? f---T_-- 1 0 - 0 3 0 --- k~El:j *f 2 2 Gibson A, Ha It a m St ~ 2 1 j Â¢f E Hallam St 11 /1. 1 f 4 f -- , - j; 11 1/ 8 j I r - _--1 L_ -<71~2 ~ k*-* Ii<37 Grencl ,0 It C - $ -W- U) 42 11 u -- 1 ~ Carl's,Pharmacy * *+ 0 0 ' DRAWING ISSUE M.--1.4 1 CONCEPTUAL- 2/28/17 RECE~Ex~/l 1 l C , . 1 0 1 1.- ~l 0 FEB 2 8 2017 g cm- 1 2-- 2--7 / - f Hopkins A~~ ------ ~~ 9-- - f 1/--22*Jl- 7 r- VICINITY MAP -3 [a- n ~ _ el* 4 .-i. PROJECI No: 1609 DRAWN BY: CPF L* SHEET No. C-) VICINITY MAP 1 1 j SCALE: 1:0.67 AMe,WcollinfriÂ»*Ci~op/SHA[~fLN_2017-02-20_C_Peplâ€¢ 1 125â€¢PM I TINI ZE 2.7 All kleci, disigni o,iongemenl ond plonsindicitedoriepiesenteeby th,sdiowinge,fowned*y ondo, f the/opeavoI Dovid Johnston Afihitef 1% PCoiddeveloped f ofuseand incon,unction wirhthe lecifiedprolect None of theideas.desigm. *tron,imentier plonâ€žhollbeu,edby 0, disclosed f orony pu, posewhotsoeve, withoutthe writtenouthof,zotionof Dovid Johnston Architeets.PC. 3SAOH AdONVJ 03 'NBdSV 1 141-1 ACIVHS *9 0 4. ' 'h I y.. ".r. r. I .1 - ' j'â‚¬, I i.Â· 4 14' 11 - r , CWlkAli { r 4 r# # 711"/Ill/MI, .i f. r I -, / . 41 i; Â¥ gil . t *. - 1 - .4 r 17 I , ,. ..h I . . . 4. . 14 31, ... 1 " 3 'It... I ... . ... : : e. I .*Ai,' te: 11 1: i .. 4 4 Aqm, , 244: r L 2-2-, 1 '11 1 + 1 A . UL . 2- . '3/*Irlp Â¥,r' '1*elfin ' Akâ€¢822 2* I , '94Irt, ~ .,6 4 , 414:~W :419#e-- -% 1, I- : 2.7- 'ai ',- git ' =50 3- 4 7~9~4 - /*7140 1 B-- ar . I , 5 4 ' ~ 14~ Â· 4 - loi}t- 'ek:-9,my:#471422. 4 - P % 7.9. 4 e + 1/.>../.wks ..~ .2 4 . -7 1,2 ~t 1 ., >r, ~~ 1 14*@Â·*~Â·.4..'ti.22 +2 , ..4 r. 1 - I . 43+Ected,~. 1 ' â‚¬ S I - b. ...fil'/3 I ..1 0 - ...... "afi'*+- b 1- 1 r , J, ~ 1,414,r '39 #4,1.3, ~r. *vic Gil ... i %4 Â· ..,U. . 1 Â· c .9--Ii-//A A 7/, . . 4 -%4 ' :44, i ~.. '2 .41, .r , , 01,'â‚¬26~.Q*'12#3:Zallk ' b> 1 ..lf - ..44 r 4,2,~I *419 E-.Ut' *,1.b L ' 160 4 9 0 . , 21 . 1 - . 1 ~~M/////2~&J&~/28( D'?31 f. 1 i Â»3'i 4 *~ 71 . I ./ ge&-illill#, Â· I ' ' -k. ' ' 70419 -4 . I. 9 .232,2 l . 4. . .7.-. 1, .,4 . '. ./ -'. . '1 ' ' .1â€ž l. I ..:*5. ' ' ), f:'?lt 'V . 1 1, ./ , 4. 1, , 4. 4 .. 3.4;NALI ..â€¢L ,44&:4â€¢': '4 - , 52 .1*EkÂ¥:16*13,4#~i~, . F. J i. 2 . 2,7 .' ' ,/, /, t t' 0 , .ftc, H Â·ruirt, , #4 e â€¢ ..... -...... -Il 3 ' ~ ...092 I '4 â€¢ ...... I 38, I 1, . t . ../ 2/.r ... &,9 - 4/../. t le.: %32; t,4 6 I L ' 11 " A.~ 8 04 9 Â· %Â·1 .,t , 0*Df* 4 :7- 4 p./f: I t, + I I I 7,U .â‚¬4?2, ' I ' â€¢ 40.% ,7.'15 . ' â‚¬ ..9 9- ~ 1 44Â· ~ .9.Â·044 ~ 29*97 :I :3 9 ,54: = - A *.27':* 9. F' 44 3 g**'ti.Â·. 7 Pe - i <MABB* 47 Ah.~C' .42*9,6 1 4 3 + 4.1 4 t' ': ,&. ~ 71'16: tt ' 1, 4*21 , . , g t< r TAV= . * Â·4*74$Â·~~~ 1.y.*1 ~ .2*Â®91Â· ..TE. . 192 4 1 1, . 1, L~ 1, 0, -5 7414 , I Â· ./. trt' ' C 9...9*- 9 ,Â». .4 , 1 7' 46, Er' *.- 126 ~~ : r 4. .939'~1~~2/, ,:322 4 30 2-7 r. 4 %,31 -8 i.... ./) 1 ,//3 0.141.2, .V. L 74â€ž41*1â‚¬ I i . ... r.2Â¢41 ...' . I I . /... W > V .1-i., 04&,Â· 12-- ti~ 4 , Al - ~ es N e 163:Â£*~d**WE&=APM er.if , -. Â·,1, 4.-.2.-M-~4~ .4 ..e '2.6.'=teÂ·_ .AT.:1 -7,Â¥/. 397 - ..,&2.<S~ 1 452dEE""9141#zv " . I : ...1.-~,7 66* 91& 7,/.1/ARIPM,rG~ f. m r 462.2 ,%1.4 b'.:%6:Btep- N - '' 31, 4 .5 .â€¢ 'Hipx.: , fitÂ¥//aum//wa#94va . I-.tÂ·r. '~37*4~5 ~ I â€ž--I '. :i>i:~*Â£3f ~ *9 Â· . 145*921â‚¬6099:Â· .$ '5# 5 -f . #5 1 b b , L.../.-r- 64. ' - A , *.4#35 &Â·4 -A,2,V - r " .&/0:.'e.eiÂ·;.1.ft"/,t.217/ . ; , .2 '. 1 4 91 .: . *42.04Â®,-'Â£ ,6 ' .1., .1: Â¢if: '19*6Ii*f**%.1,2, r , 111 .- t[# r. ' Â»1: , Â· rt'Â· Â·71*~sp 54 2 'A ' . r i tle :1? lÂ» : , 4. . 4,1 1 ' f L' 04' ' -7 2./ 40 '4% ' #mk. 3 . , 1 6. it.> 2Â»JI E -.. 1 *Al '11% - En-Â·:7 41 -- , 4:2., 1, .1 r: 1.'*:e- ' C, 12;t.. 'Â·1%*' d~* 4/ 1%*.'~ i . ..6, ~ "244,-Â· . -3. 4.. 1 . ..53*101* I : 1. : 4 7 87, 1 811 ' 4/6 *:.*,-3'' . 1*.. . * Â·41 , . =~;r..Sâ‚¬47 If imul' 3*.u.. ki: 1914 4/14*601 .16:~:1'9#. 1 2 fh'*'., AM~"(+1â€¢41. 1*elÂ¢ F ,46 **ac :yÂ· Â·Â·D f ~trfÂ¥'r + Se,~ :,74 'Pet)*2, '64 1 , -1' - 1% > it~?e;~~;.0, re :_'*Fe 4.1. 4\ 1 4 . 1. 43 f @"19881/*/..64/ 95 ' 14794 .\ : vr , HIC,7 , ." e y. , 1, .. , 1 426 . ...... C. 1 4. . Xe -1. , 'ks. 1. 4 12,4 2Â° + 44 1 33+ p..tily FL 1 ... - :** S L i * * 4:+ .., 4%2: ./.9Â»4: 44 Â« ." tky. 2 t - Â¢ 1% , e , 6/ ' i f ~ ~~4%**4'i ~ -fi ~ >fwp,~; ffit:** ~ t-l . --1 0.0/ , 1*,6'4~ . * 4 1, .9 -99-- ah â‚¬ . U.>r:- ' 2 >' i ~' tr~'~ 1*97. *2 -52>-24 - -Â«- 10&/ViA/Mt: Ult ' \ i y :â‚¬44.-Ill f , 4,09\.4 . #M ..7 'lip - . 0 - . I - A 0. 0 . . I. , - I .7/4'4'.' .,4 , .* t v ..f#, Â» 0 4 .. , 0, , '442*4 V dN 4 % , tf .'.1 1 Câ‚¬ cr 1 4 - 4 . ..~ }401 1 -1. . i~t''WIÂ¢â„¢ >~4 ; Â¢ 4/1 0 & 2..t > l., 9 . 54 , 1 ,#r f Ki ; 42 1 .' ~ - , , ' .. e. 447 acl h it, , .,1~ ,VIA ji*mT '~ t: 2 h , ...Â¥ 1: 11 1 4,.,1,1 1 . 41Â¥Â· 4., A 1.06 "1,2,92;m 0/M=jam/4 - f # .13 414? â€ž81 .Uvr U i * .' 1, 4/AC,6.Â· . 14.26 41 * .4 c,J,Mt#tti, Â·AM,>9 *Nâ€¢ " i , Â·r,Kit.SU, w '4192?.1.y" gatti Â£ 4. 2.1.,?b..%4; 1~. 4 , 4 . 3 1:419%4~1*: ' ki< !@t Â¢p'; ' i = 4, : .Ni 1 & 1 1 1 . 11 h 4 21., i?.*4. ' 1 ,& . 5, 10 21:Â« Â·- r. i r..i~ IT-~7, ' 4.1,Â· .10'. 4al.414 43Â» .6 : allar.. ,/ l' 1;.r...; ifif~ 44,tÂ·int.647 4 9?whtÂ· 1,46 .1 5. fl I p .4 1 cÂ·7' T,ti:R' :Â·, '121. 'C *46 3,0441â€¢: LI 4 - :4~4 2 , f 40:11:*.:4101:4 ' r,4,1 4, i .Â· 03'9,3 3. , 91.'.: 4, , 1 1 . 4. I ki.: 32.--7..1 F 4 4 + 4 N I Â«Â»r 1 :RE:' . 1 W 1 4 1 . .0,1.14 ' ./1, '.. 't le...'...# 4 '.11.t.,1 / 1 1.0, Le ~ 29 * 4 13Â£7'f''.- 6..4 1 +0 ,h 0.'LW'12:439'f , 1 f 0 2., . 4 4*<42.0 , 1,41<1 0 1. M 'A â€¢Â· 41.1 * 'MP*'14 4.4 .fli (,40,4* O : ,[40 4 ... , 1 1 0. 4 kle..4.7 , 0 0 , 1 4 70:91:.14 f ,Â¥? 49 4.4 4 4.2 .49'. ~ 4-~ ,. fil f. . ~ 1 I U. '.4 #tl FiÂ· ,3â‚¬:Â·,4 '5*<497- '. I ' ' A."l Â¥ f k '> 434.1 .Â· . :89*~. 23,'.11~422 r ,â‚¬4 .* Â¥. .292 p /fjâ‚¬:4 - ~ , .. .-1 160*r., ' â€¢ .4. Â· 1 f. 1,1.4 : 2 J . f.. C.; 92 *rÂ»= 4Â·: ' Â»~'~410t+4'At'L , 91 4(lin) I: 1 .â€¢1~ 4 I + .... I 7 b . 07Â· .1 0 F.~i"~14:. .: Vt't'Â· , -~ I , 441:' ~ .; i tts<Amep. 60 ... <41 ' ,AF. ~, .' Vlt 1.=~79>2~Ji S /'894â€¢,Â·'jlid .4 4,4Â§*4 ,"" 1 Â¢,4.9 4 , . . L IÂ·. ,-Â· 57 <C>:ekÂ·Â·GAI-44(, - 1 4. "5 "' 4'd *'b~litti f.; / , ' 4 ,Â£/. 1 4 ack, 4 ':7 1% 01:40.1 ..4 - I ll'l. 9,4, . . 1 .4 .. . b ' ..t'. , :-'qi 0,/ I.< f ... fi. :- Â·~: Â·'Â·Â·,f,44.5./1>f~'-'19 .~:.5 ;*45 E \ 1 4â€¢J.#1 .t . C.,1, Â· Â¥ .>362\ 49' b lilli. . , ..1 - Â· Â·. .7,1,-1 *.40.4;,0*,7. 4 . ..2.>.1..i,Â«.I. 432,0,~ r. '1'Â·144: /Â·11:,1il~Yl~~~ .., 4 f~C ) â€¢ F . X.3 419.J, 1 94.......1 ..1.-' '. '.9- :.14â‚¬Â¢94.40*~viti~trt:41.4 - -'ll R.." 6- -9.Â» 1 I - I. . . ..cr ... f 8%64/. >f Â£5 14/ . :0 .'Ir. , 1 2 - V : . _R~ ' .4- . 74Â· '. Â¢ t 1.Aie , .1-MI- Â£ I./ b. , Â·-Â· Â·- :,9*â€¢ PL- .â€¢ 4 14,1 .,A,te:â€¢ Â·~-~h -9: 431 , + 1,24,8 A 4-, 14*64*k~2120., .41 ~'Â»Â».jifA'Â·t~tÂ·40-1'tA~Hil<EuNMF60~ ': f# j. 4 04% 4,7.LeWwee.*44 19Â».U. 49.-Â·t~~ :+44 4 4,44*CAL,f./-72*64185%/def)61Â· , 44%~ .. 1 - 4 4 i 4 4/t . /4 ..41, mot#F~, '4 3.7, 246. . .. ..94, , 4 ...2'*Â¢ 3 1% 49_1. I.r . : * ... a..2 - . . I. I A 0. 0 . - . A. 0 ... 1 / P// \\\ -4, -3 1 1 -\ / / - / 2/1, i \ / /F / . 0, 7 . I / /:/1 - , / - g DAVID JOHNSTON * 1,3,2~ft\7*tud . - 1,~Sef ~ 14/Â« 4 1 -/diq'.'644.-6 - <I 29Â£ 21Â« e i r 119 South Spring St EXEIING CAR POR ~~~ Aspen. CO 61â‚¬11 7--N_, 1 ARCHITECTSpc 1 Suite 203 / 4% ux 970-920-2186 ./ / 9 ..0 Ta 970-925-3444 --- - -40.- \1 4 '11 -2--21 1 -ULÂ·.A.4:Â· 1 >~4 ~ 1 '-i--4-0~-â„¢ P--2-9-- ~tr*i- 4~4~fff 1 1 1 f /, ---211- , --- I t , 0 / -- - - ~ \ - CW 19/9 1.4 4 i - 2-- . ..4. / // .4 1 -/ / K . 1 1 il ./le#....1 0.,Ingemen/ol.. . 1 - 9.4- f. ffld. rdy,Â¤â€žesenfed/#Ns#,rh,#lgo.e ---3 /:6 1 ICNEWTREES A.dlirect....deâ€¢e,oped......in | -Â¥dt,Yarda,etht,operr,Gtk-ki,a- / - '/)- I.,-c~11-/Ihespecdiedp~ect.* f f f~- =I_: . 734 . V , - I Ar- , f / G *Â¤1~ I ~ed bÂ¥ #eO fo, eny pu,pat I 1 / - - -. 7 .''.71.F- -.:.. ~'~ p 'a,Â·0,4-0nA~i:re,~R, / *AU W,my*-- / i R Â·9.3 3 - Â·. >taff'NAFf< 'p- R --,j, 5 l It -< ffia?~ r.-.A- C,---3 / It 6 1 / * 1 ''7~-tfiÂ«* ' c-c-_c:3---c -- C-- 1 -9Â·- 3.erÂ«*- I Â· / C-. NEW NATIVE GRASSES '-7 2 2 1 / -il- N.. . . 4 iR 1 - \r: 5,- / -Â· / ./.' 3. , i iÂ·idpu I I SPA BELOW , ~522@4.-i. 1 --~2 N Â·. 1 ON GRADE PATIO BELOW I f \/// LL / 1 l/\ ' \ 4#'i 4 -T/ 1- -7 9-21 Ft.*.~ 17444â‚¬ ' 1 J.~P: 9 , z 0 ' c, i -42641]IN)]20'r '11 g 4 9 u 9 41/ 3 70#. Le- 11 I ~'~11||~~Fl-[VATLDDiCKB[LOW_21 YM/ 91 5 UJ / 1 ' 94 1 '~â„¢.ftÂ·iÂ«~ i -39'~TA hr* .. Al FSP / / fl fit :. â‚¬ fl *. ,@3 -5 11 I PTNo 17 _/I / 1 1 - t. >I- t.% 1 / :742'bl l f 7- I LU Z t O 0/ ~ f 64-4031.4-3.\\ 3 4/4 Tri F 9/6/:.1,\.: f S 3'8-g#3~~~~.* I~.Roffr.**1-I- . tl.=411 \ EES '*r -#/ PTNo 114 1%2 - >- - I , , ---- ----/-/ r=-- - ~%Ad:207. 2 "~ 3- N . -1-" 4"TA- 1 .. (=/ 12Â· FROMPI'~k~11Â§.FLOW]~ -PE~ p,No i;72. A A--- < MAIN LEMI â€žinw i if .1 rn ma 8ELOW -1 "----10Â·) 2 // f 1 flo\ ..2 .<\\. \ Z~>/vPTNko 153 - ft 10/1311\\01 - -1 ' F' M i * KN /41/.-4. , NY 9- 12 ' '. , 4 -c Â·Â·*,7-, ~ 13 r.'*-4// ' -< ' - 1 1 I. ./ 1 1 I / 1 li ':r ...' ... i. M /2,9 101~Â»141,11// 1 \/ \/ i l 1 m # . * . ,"' t./4/e- , ' 21 --' -27*46//4# , 751%9*Fl 11 0 11% 1 A TÂ·-- ~~ ~IL-r~ t'~2' +d'TA'~fflle -1 // I. ~ 44\\ 3: / 1 k =-?*72:tu i / ~ j 8>Â«,/', 'ij~,2 .4. 1 3 NEW TREES t FOOLBELOW L.__ 5---i.p[No 1119<044- , 1 ' 1 --53~34â€¢qâ€¢/-9~ LID <43 1 !714 21Â·WA,'p Â£ r . No 19Â§44'ir/9~~4~- #2-14 It-f--: 11 1 2-3 . 11 - 1, ellÂ«.3- k >4. 1 >0.. ., ./ i Â·-22 INNo le < C -1~~p-Fâ„¢0 108â‚¬41 1, 1 /1, #, 1. K , -NN. 131 4 -Â· Â·Â·Â·Â· -1.-1.3,1,#â‚¬â‚¬f -1 -1 ' IFY .. 1 / - -- -Z-,Pe' 138~0.7 0 4% , ~ Tl N' / ' \. ' - . J.FINo 11(1~<1 N A + 1 h 1--44 -4\ 41 ' a k / ~ 21' k ti. Tr r, 4 1 ' , V i ./ 1- T - ' /-99 5 V - H /4 4 I 6 91 1 \ i i, \. 41\ v d / 1 t. .+EMNI 13/Lb<lk, - 1 -O R 1-'13 ,\ ; 't r 41 lk: i - / 11 9/ 9--6.-Imt ,%\\ ) \-P~NO IKE I #Ati~93 -2 : i ' -- 1- ~: 17 4 -Llc tin 4 . 1 p,< ' .-1 - \ 1\ TZ,-il . .. , 4/%~~ M 4 - 1 *'441 /4;5 v <s'9-1~~ '~3Â·~ fl>~~17 722.1 9/ 1#L:)7 .7. I NG .0 , 1 - . \ M.Y/ Â·71 X. , 1. - l'11* /,1 Â» - ,4 h 1==--Â«-=I 4, * 1 \\ 1 \ 9\ \ J. .f.,14*...,J.- DRAWING ISSUE I P , .nt 1 - ~0 CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 2/28/17 0 It ~ ~ ->3% r , ' , ., , - * N.Â·-Â·97,12:~il<<-~ r \ \ :94 1 1 1 1 \\\1 i~ I N., 4 NEW TREES ~ U \1 1 1 , *av 1 0 2Â«43 ~ - In.101,~?ne<Â©SH, 45/ / / / i '.1 \ 1 1 9 -0 /403 / , \ 5 NEW [REES ifi\- Bv . '~k ~~1 , ~, ~ PROPOSED SITEJ i . * PROJECT No 1609 / C LANDSCAPE PLAN: ' ALTERNARVE A / 1 1 \ 1 / --1 DRAWN BY CPF \ \\ 1 \ ~ \ / SHEET No. 11 / / S / PROJEC 6.2 // / NORTH rh SITE PLAN I W/ TREES TO BE REMOVED I 1/8" 4' 8 16 1': 1 3SAOH AdONVO /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20_E.pin Tuesday, February 28,20 \\ \ - tÂ«L/ P // /// iffit-fff f IFIET' 1,-f-T\\\ -13- ZONE AL (FLOODWAY} ' \ , 11/4. 12 49 ' / // / < Ze,4~Â£160UUm> ~ HUNTERCRE 2 - 3/107 - -3 5. / 6 7 ARCHITECTSpc '2192-2 1, 119 South Spnng St / '11 I ', Aspen. CO 81611 1 < ''E)~ CAR PORT <~~; Suite 203 l TEL 970-925-3444 ~' .1 1.-' >:Â·-Â· M --1 FAX 970-920-218Â£ l \ // b T , . VORA: / 1 0-444. 0654/01-15-- 1- 1 1 -. A I ... / 1 0 - - -/ - 4, A -- J , ?> '' \ 41 \ \ i \ \/ 4,41 0.0 (; -79,2-f 2 i A 1sla 2. 4/ :: I -h. -4 .$ / , -- A. / / FM *--3~it k>.4 b R-1,2'7t:03, 077. Z & 4/% U N-2 . --V,-019 "=" 1 '0 4221 n /Â· 71 f--f f-il/, I .12\ A;},0205.1*sign'. ointh~emen' undlons < 4 1. 0 k .\> 4/Emp'~+,1,14.:...... 9..,.I X.f~P~ ' 1 - . 15' 5etback line ind,coâ„¢d. feplese,- I *.6-g m 14* /%81.QU-- - . \ ~>15,1.0-g 10 NEW TRE A -)' I ;,aikâ€ž1 PC und 4â‚¬â€¢elaped . =, and . (From Top of 82nl- - - .M...9/2 44 =WA.bi1-,63. -edwnâ€¢en tre plap~r,â€¢f[*Mdj,*,= --- *2(2 -- 1 1 6, 41 ~129.1.7.X .24 1 / sha#beused#.dise-fo,I.p- ,/J,1-".-- *-**specld.le/'Nor,c 1, *92' 9-4- '-40. i cj'-1 8*. 4rl=Â·1 4, n . rk _ of the deck *sangements or pk,~ 4- 1//f - 1 1,hotsoe- â€¢w#=tme -,rm, aufn.w=ear,n / 2- Â· vA> : I - 1 11 -- 3*Nlt Â·,ij - - - - -- J , 21 C- A- C ' *- I L 7.Â· F 1 / L. NEW NADVE GRASSES Â·-~ , C--cz~ C r Yi0 *Â¥74.-2Â«-F- < 1 r mrÂ® n / 1 Â£ "A i ' 29/'t C / 7 I ---.r..v~,:N,$ f 04 {From top d Bank) 2 1 SPA BE[OW 1 5 1...''PUL I / 1 ON GRADE PATIO BELOW I l. / . L-,-1 1/ I 1 , p .ltv 11/ 1 - V U -' 2 Â·10494 ~ 0 '0 / /1 / '\ i Ilit.%,trig#4718/1 r , Z , 2.1. % 1 82 3/1 6 1 1 \ I -L.211 ./ 1 2 f I . 11 J /1 (â€ž / , 1- li t# - & - =r- '7 ........~-*U U L . - '4%-9/1. ..... F'k -J U---=---l= z / 1 1 0 /1 1 /. -/ - _,5-23.Nagildi--_Â·~- ' Ii-ILLVâ€¢linliLLAI,ring ~ MAINLEVEL SHOWN Â·- ~1 1 Z < , 0 /T 9/ 4 4 222*1 1 64.--- --111&'~ (4Â· 12' FROM GRADE BELOV~ e.\ . 1 1 I /!; r I 1:"gize===gm*~ 1 , " "' h '1 01 , / 0 *SAÂ· i a f '1 1 54 SHADY LANE'ti W f, tru .0 -34,- -- . 1/ F' f 04 11 1 - 1 r,4 /r ~ 1 2- r -1 1 1 1 K A . 110 2 44 - . 1 11 /1 + \ 1/ Pc>y>re O ./1 j. 7 0.\,4 4 f=- 1: I / 44/ b \1= f,v m NEW TREEk B - 74. '-10-1 --..1 â€ž -*-I ) \ 3 - /1 1 1 / 41 J -ur r-flt-Zli#L- ' --* 1 L Lin Â·- 34,768 Sq Ft (0 798 Ac,est Val, /Â«An 7 1 1 C -j , 0 / (Ong Parcel-Book 384.Fage 4941 + POOL BELOW - ~ _- -7 16 1 1 lil .l li 1 ) 1 \ 1 \.4 P - --MUM County Pa,rei No a.~ . . 1 1 ~ / 8\ \ 2737-072-00Â·026 E i \ i 3~/0./91'2*Q#J1l5 /1- C / \ 11 L J 2/ / '1 2 S 1 < 10,E 1-kt~fÂ·Cl ,0/ '\ i i 2/ 1 \# \ 6-:rEft*E 4/49-4..,W'.4. / \ - 1 79 4 - i# 1 DRAWING ISSUE 14 ~- .. - -., ; t... . *~J 34 -, F-Arm'- ' .. 7-;f Â·Â¢4~1.4- 1 F ~ ~ J J \ r CONCEPTUAL DESIGN 178/17 -, 1 ... r *k.~00' 7.- 2 7 /4 \ . /5, 1%51 3 4. M 1 1 1 $ , %'13. ~26fkki: - i:,.r.-:tfiI ii C 1 - A X ' 231'7;724 NEWI}*ES ..1 0-''U;3?/ <. . 0 /X ./54% 1 10 P ./1\\ 1 -11- 214 10' Setback Line Â·Q_1 X / // - -1 ! 26*h. ' 3%2 I '~ ' PROPOSED SITE/ :\ 9 / \ 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN: 2~M;,25t~ ~~134~~06Â·08Â·E \ / / * - --L - 14.43' 1 PROJECT No 1609 w ~ COriginal Oced Call-See NoteS 10 3.5 86) M,;**0'' Â·Â·'-4 *0DL> 1 1, DRAWN 5, CPF / -1 \ I \ l 181 ' ALTERNATIVE A (11 \ / SHEET No. Sout~ 4 of #4 \~/ / i / I / PROJE 6.1 \ 1 - NORTH rh SITE PLAN I CONCEPTUAL RETAINED DRIVE Et AUTOCOURT LL,7 SCALE 1,8- t'-0 Of 'Â· 16Â· 3SAOH AdONVO /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN 2017-02-20 E.pin Tuesday , FebruarÂ·y 28, /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20_D_P&Z.pin Tuesday. February 28, 2017 1:39 PM ' /i ~yv~ - ' -55- / 1 It IM*%-SS<- 1 1 . I h / . --- 1 1 / / I I 1 1 42 ---1 0/ I I \ \ 1 1 2 ~iÂ° \ M \ 4 m m - 0 1 \ 1 -- 1 -1 U=-- --- -- -- ~ r I 1---,\ ill \ -- .- - 1 4/ 0-- - M 0 O - - 11 . -1 m \ 1, / -11/- 0 1 2.- A V.V \ m X, m 1 O m -- i \\ 1 -lil:1 - --U \' 1 1- \ \ -- \ 1 0 44)41,1 ,% 1 ~ {.~Â· 'r fl::,+-Â·-y - r ~ 1 .'Af' , -4 1.g -0/~ ['f; AILT m : - \ ;4246.424, L f ,, in:.igg~:>k. n_ .. 1 i I * **Amus, , , *.5M# 1 â‚¬ -- -72 i \ ./ 1.91 e 1 52Â¥1 Â¥ 1 1 ~-.17.*941,--M.....1 liew. . 1//1,\ -MZZA 1 4 jix 0, -Â·tti 1 4..4 â€¢. t(91 b~tte~ 12 -,52 l . . . m:/ I ir*b lili, : .:p ./ 5 4- - . 4. 3' 66 -2 1 +Pll . - 1 -X///r f 1 -39 fIRÂ¢ -9:4 9-5711 E - 'f-273Â¥ 1, ' I'.... n A \ 1 \ /t - 5/3212.. 1 2 d::AL' &&961Â· 263 / 31,3 it-7-235 .// r'Â¢\ 1 /1/1,\ - _/ '1 \ \* 1%&76>14#tbw. . 1 I | " 1 N l n -3 - - 1 \ 1 Lf i N /1 \ 99- 0,>,f.)/' 1-rÂ·:* \\ , \ 1 1 W / 1 1 / 1 1 1> 7,10614> 2 1. , - \ a .,52...<i '11*1 3-% .111,/ .44- ==P-- , % / 1 I I ..I).*..... '1 , ,\ i X.NE-*rÂ· \ , 1 0,1 th , . 1 - . 4 - i 0,9351/99. 2-91 e...i''ti,3118:41 1 ' , \ 7 -1' - N- 42 . \ \,~ 1 0-1--,1 ~ /1 :) 9,1 . ~.4Â£-222 l R Â·EJSE " / n Â·Â·Â·Â·Â»&1(,43r Â·Â·Â· " 414-0 -0 ..2.'- .f,~' 1>1~-~- O ~cÂ·00:> o M Â£ 1~Â· 99:- i r--7 ' 1~'~ X] 6 93: â€¢9 Ec (-' 1 \ 1 1 Tr aw*40% \ \ 9 , ~~Â·ef ' ~ Af *-44' 1 /1 I 4 1 - * 444. Â· l Â· VT 1 YA-3 0 '11,/ 0 i \ 1 1 1 -i 2 I h' P ./. i .CY I./ Â· ' 1 ~0_-i'~P v'. K ' -***k. , , .-/0,11 / . < b V ) ri. \'14Â¥Plv// ./...\ 30 \: 4/ 05 4/ ~ ~ fÂ·ir'trof .-'44-12 v't -33%* 2.1. 4 - 1 .:~1'~~~~V~,'.'If>L,4~lo)Â· 6Â©Alati ''~-3~0505 1 /1 /Â·~Â·, 4'~ .23~- :,~ .14;r f 1 ... - I 1 \ 43/ P i.: 11.,-54&4295Â·-r I.f 0 -9 0-3 1~Â» .00- ///1.\ $ ' 4Â» u: I t. 74./ t . i t?J ..461:-t>'*31~4a â€žLe., 't,O.0 4259 4V. t N A S \,\712 691 TF v A'Â· 1-'y//. I i y.-2-1 719(1 .r , rv-r < t. 1 , , 'r:.1 4 j i &- 1--4. 115Â·.53*5. 494 vf,.- 4 44<'' H. + V- /4 C, ' 21 4;'jf ~ - -~07*Atr~~ .---23?443 1 1 2 5 -A~' A f#49.*31 ,Â¢ 32*rÂ« ---% 1 Q , ->'Â·Â· t.44'tÂ·Â·Â·4(,fr:w,jet\\ \~ 1 , A-Â¥77>'flf-r-I,il i ~ff?&**EL_| I 93 : v' ' A -2,9/ Â· -Â°13,ft'; ' / 11 \ < L --~I~! ' *j 44/31/ 47 Â«4.0~44 1 / 7~, R.77 3/ tÂ· 6*"wi", 1 I \ ~ | ' 47> 1 43/.- % ~..23 ' 1 M-%*---i.1;1,/ /'.1, 1 4 m~ / r#,22Â· 1, - -21, U U 6 1 \ / %/ $ v O -4.'3#r- 1 ..C"r. 1 I4.7444 k /1 21 1 . c 1 2 . FRAMMNLi 3 1 1 1, / 4 1 1 --3 tfÂ«. ,(425 '''fli>22' 0/,<" ."t,-6-1 ..4, . A ' 3 4-6 V '1 I 1 . / i.74 47,0 6-3-24342.. 4 \ '79. 1 ~ - , , f~04"~~~~ iffi) S:4/ 5,2// ~ -// / I E ?14 Â·'46r:~~ffe :30_4 , 4 Ar "t-Em.Â¥1045 / 1 4 / , ' .V Â¢ 0 MIl / r I r 2 (i 312/94 13Â·Â·29 0 ,// I. \33'f.til "rÂ»>- , <fJ // 1 MA . .,ill////\La,~g-/ / ./'/0 11 T\\ 1 - *1-1,2 I -5 1 1.WtÂ·- -1 - 4<21-1 'i el \ ..1 - 1 2 6 i. \ :fâ‚¬% 7,46\1 LA \ 1 \ 41'6'\ 1-41 \F'66Â·Â·,3hE~ 2 'i'' A Y'- --1 i A- . 2 -5' 0 1 .111 / #?1, IF , I gil,/ I '\ - /10 51AlprÂ·VACT ~2 'S,Â»n , A -J 1* 1 ' 4*4~~ 4 '/'#<91Â·1% 4 'o A - ~ <A~-~ V Y , V J ///1.\ 6/ ** LL- .Ar r SpM,AA ' #PON! 4('. 1/// 12 -' 1 \ Fril< ' 9./bâ‚¬- d d . t //11 /'Al*. 1 \ , ' ' ,~ i, I'': .*Â£.t ' F,//: 7/ 1 \ , 0 0 ./ I I, I \\ 44%,Fr v~,9~~* Â·I 4.43: ADE 1 \ \ . ,\ 3./ / \-1. lilli/ 050* r - -1 Â»t,GEÂ»-- ..:Â· -22 -- - -iÂ»ffi-~ I \ A L... -4 7 . . / / .0 A.A I \11 \----47 v , \ // 1.\\ I . n r-* -*02'Â»~911 , 1 \ I , 1- 4 : 0\ I -9Â·,6 i .1.- .. 1.,j'* 1 I -- Ize k . ' 7 -A '4 .1 1- I O Z 441 . % ~AP.-:74% 21 , 8 k.!All.. .427,- . t) -9-9 i + NN -0 : 3/4.:0018-X 1-, ./ -J-1 \14 X -~ \ I--i- I, 3-0-EZ~ 1 - 1- j \ /11|111/3 '1*1Â§412* - mE H CANOPY HOUSE 44;fli! 202 2 I ~ 1815/ tol 111111111 p .34* -. Z W. -W 54 SHADY LANE I ASPEN, CO i1t15/1i mEE i lili:Ill il = .88 ITVDS Sllyl AUN â€¢ ~ ON GRADE MANICURED LAWN 'Â·~ 533H1 M3N S ~ 03mbld NMVWO ON 133HS UVNH 925-3 ARCHITECTS,c NOISNHOIOIAVO DAVID jOHNSTON / ARCHITECTS.c 119 South Spring St Suite 203 A:.pen. CO 81611 7 4 8 rn 970-925 3444 FAX 970-920-2186 8 - --~- --Â£ 0 -/ 9Â«U==33-r-Ji-- . e /. 1-- ./.-/. Az Â®15?1 ye - - mli --- 1 --- % '0-- --- - - -h j 9 0 - 1 \ 1.-â€¢ LS- - Â»41 -Â«ton 2 - 1-_-0 -- 1 e .1 I , AA'ide~de~,gâ€¢r. .fangementso~A,as If\ ,nd.trd .,rp.e,-~d I Ihc:*u.,ng m 4 4 "'14400,0-0,tp~â€¢mof{Â»96...61/b / 17 4 1-1,1 1 A.eliec~ FC,led de.eÂ®ped lb, u, and. Z_ -/K 9%q- * / I---.elt,"1* lee N / #4 *er -miout * -mon ' 1 / I D- Joheon, A,chiteen Pe 0.7, 1 . - 4 1 \ / e J /; . ~> e 1 4 e u 1 e e ~1.4' e e C e \.13- 1 18 1 // A V\ I< 10 1 ' 1 1 / 31.63 PROPOSED FOOTPRINT 0 1 il / / 7.08 17.04 Z 0- 3 e e ' Â· 1, 1 coli-48\- ESLI-_11~ 44 1 e LT f 1 ASPEN PUMPER - 5 MPS feet L_U_, l ' e -3----- Width 7.14 114 N / It \ ~ _9972-_1-9~ 0 Track 7.14 1 Lock to Lock Time 6.0 < Steering Angle 30.3 1 111 1 \ e.1 / \ /-1- 1 -- 7 / \ - \1 1 - - , e LY DRAWING ISSUE __Â£ 1 I CONCEPRIAL DESIGN 2/28/17 3 0 Ge \ - -Â»al 4 \ -1\ -__ _~I~_Â«_IÂ°--f_~-lf_ ~ --~ ~ PROPOSED Slm 1 \ LANDSCAPE PLAN: ~ ALTERNATIVE B PROJECT No 1609 ________ DRAWN BY CPI SHEET No r.n SITE PLAN I PROPOSED I DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION ~~0,0,' SCALE 1 6 19 , 0 5 17 70. 7.0 fÂ« /Users/collinfrank/Desktop/SHADY LN_2017-02-20_D_P&Z.pin Tuesday, February 28,2017 1:39 PM All id/$, de S,gfIS~ arringemnts{Ind plons indicated or iepre;ented by thijdiewing ole owned by end or e the p,ope/ y of Dovid Johme on Afchitect* Kend devel oped f or u,e ond in con/Mtion withthe specif ied project. N one of the idecI di:gns. c, iongements or plinsholl be used by or Câ€žclowd f orony pl},pOSe whetsoever w it hout t he Wfitten cuthorization of Dovid j ohnst on Architect, PC. . LI.. k ' 44 304 ~- 1.4, "*fe//9/4'. li.. -/â€¢ .14 ' .Al-/ .Ar 9 i 1'44<1 , '. -6. -Â».- :MJ- 14. . fe p..1 â‚¬ ...9 4 )~- Â·' C -2- i; .P , I '. A. 10 31 7 Ai. , 1 4'WA;74': ., '3 . 41, rd, , .-ip ' ~Â·Â·:...... '' 1 ibE f flut.- I '- .Â·;/ Â·4 4 ....... 1, I . t.1 Ab. 2 - 1 U,> I r ..11 1 14 1 .4. 1 1.'DI I. 3 + 1 , ,%A..7.4/7-4.4~2.al' 3- :,. V Â· Â· ./4/ i.1 p 4 .,4,Â·..29- .....3.k I I///I//9AYRjl 4 -6 ...#''Di"11&=ah --~Â»095 REA76Â· Â·SÂ·%Â·.1 I li(.~/.f//Il=1~ I 94 - ~lia.~ ~ ~ A * A. Â·Â·Â· . 1 - ..41â€¢ 'u,6,â€¢â€¢=*,4, - 99-1 . $ 1. . ft< -/E-48*#117'0"...6 " r . . .14* i 4 Â·'iÂ· ~6 /- ta f. 10, ~ i .1 ' :4 - :....ill- , . 9.4 . I ' k .,trtÂ¢ 91, 1 . 1 Mit 1 U . 4, ,. "7:fÂ»' ' , MÂ·71: 0 1 .7-~..IIA#=449, 5. 4 4 0.. ./.'ll *./ P 2 4+ Â· ' 9 97Â·9 '* A /2 : Prf*#Ike , /441*MZBWBRIFIr Â·A>. I -1 . -4 4 .6 - 1. . . , 1, 9 4: , I Â·4 '., .. , f 1 4 1 A-:m, 12 r 4% 1. 11*2 - .4,11.1 1 . 1/--, 1 1 . . 4- 1.4.,< 4 Â¢,4 -4 1 ... . F.,1 4 1 -I ., .1 + A 1 i / .'4::* i . . ft . 11 b 4â‚¬29 7 'f ,Â·93Â¥4 ' * 9 '1 9 .h..4.-,-/' . ' A . I. ./'. I. - ./. Ill b 1 1 ./.2 0 ... 4.- 1 , , ./ *44 - ....1-1.9 ! 1 J t' I T txjB==.d,1 , ..j '1 1 1'.1 '.44< .441'.Â·40 * "2.WNG.~ 9/t 2 f *.-.' , . ./Â· le...Â·'-X'Â·:/Â·i - ' . I ....... ...1 : --'. '. i. :' . 1-i =- 1 . ./ I. 7 .=rr..'///:'":/1,/,/Il:"/:" 4 11 . ... 0 4 . , 1....#3/,Al . Â·W ~. 13 ..A â‚¬. 2/' 'Irr - Â· -imi ' r .3 ..?=7==2. .,,.Gh ./ AW...EL . 2 : Â·.Â·â‚¬ . .4 -1 , 04:. .4- 11/ 13 * .11" .j Â· 4* ... 4-r 46, .lv 'di'..4'(11-I.'i.YI~~~~~&3lMWHUL l -1 i . I. 17 j.t Â· -1,1../El *F.../8&*6 6~-1/vija:Sm'. .Â·./4.1,5/Ultz., Allj ':-laail- 4,-3 -M 1., 4 9 9/91/AN.27J6lizill'll. .. ~1'.24*Â»0.- ...1 - - ., Â·Â·.#541.--- 7. Il 1Â·42 .....- I . 4 A .2 - .1 â‚¬1 - . I .14 U , 1 i r= L I 4 1 h l ... S 54 L .> I . -h 4.A' I 14 , 4 MC' ar 1 I * ,J .~II...7-7. . . BM./..' h Â·,4.,D ' I Ity ..:11 1,4, 1 tt42%< 91:l . 4. . .0 44; A . Â¢ . r 11 1, 6 k.'.' 1 -3~1.* . - .' % * 1 . $ 94 .. . , + .412: 44,Â¢212 , ' 7424.,4 I. I jt' Â· . VE. . 4 - ... 4. . 1 1 4 â€žM'~3011-2 - .1111 9.- - A# r t~ ~'' ' 11't'..1. lilli I .. . 1 1 11 11 - RF .A' 1.1 1, wy f LA" 1.,1 . i .i# !' t . w .1 C .1. 1 .... L 0'' , 1 1 . 't .... I. ' I. Ill ...,Itt.. 7 al., t. 4 1 1 A,1 112 ' LI 1 t, ' 21Â· ./ i. 1 , 41'K 1 k : .1.-i'Â·Â·'Â·'90/4 . .... 1 , i '164;411'11. r' , + . lip':11.t , 1. 1.1, . :?; . t 1 1,1 .~ ~ Ii:~,SiÂ·\ r f ti ..2 0.,; 1 t *9 19/4 1., '7 4441. .. 410 4 411' 1 4 I Â·'i'(pt,lij,) 12 i ' A: 8'C~ki t ' 'er - b 7//irttlik %#0 1% :6 TE .< 0 201 2 ng CANOPY HOUSE lizil E 9 m = 2 54 SHADY LN I ASPEN, CO %12 5 0 - 64 - Â£ 0 Z SHEET No SNOUVA313 O36OdOUd Â£1/BZ/Z HIT TS,c Al! idm. designs, oringementtond plons,ndfcoted or,ieplie~te'd~~7 t??sdic-1~ of<~WI~i~t<indort"(it~perty of ~Ed Johnstoe A,chit"t ~PConddevelooed for usecne in conjunction with the specif ied Â£*oject:Nonect the ,/9119<&12,1 ariongementso, plons#H be used by / disclosed / any purpoR *hot De ef without t he #ten nuihomoi,on of Dovid johnstor, Arch,tects, PCL h ' 1 i . L i .Â¢i h 1'.A>.IA,A 1. ,~ ?/6 < U " - - C :~M hal. ,?i':.0,L#;.0,Â·'Â·tÂ·-*.E . : 1, 2411 L 1 4'VÂ· 0 - -1- 44'i.fit<,t'./A .ti.~ 3Â£ . 1 / 1 , 91 1 / 4'/"1% ' Ill h 1 '11 /9 19.140:Wl . I .. .,2, ~ $1% , 44' iil 34Â·'4 9''Â·4~ I'~i.,4.Aa.,1.11*%**.tinY -2,4:' . ?$12*64.1 4; 1 I ' '.4 4 : 1 11.. 9 9 1 ' -/ 1 ' Wk.. 36: Â·â€ž NIK.' ~*V' l- a 1 45 lit.,â„¢' #,44'grk,MA A; Mt , c/l h 4 -986.Â· 7 Â§ ..7. i â€¢ j:1 -i.~ .2/1 I.Â¥*hÂ¥* *' , er.9...., ... . ' r.%957*t . t i. imil 777111 9, / 9,4 26-,r:....4.4,4 ..V=.'r-#ijA , * ~ 1 ,L 99- iE <2 11 .' Il f .IN ' I / ' litjam *~.lri 'eÂ· 1 1,2 1 i . ..41. i , * *,1, ... *A' i./lk i Â¥, Ll 1 .1 fl . 6 . 1 .1 1 . 10' 2AR' 1~Â¥ ' . F:I' ~-0 . 4,}~re .&44Â·:A %17Â· ~ 4 . '' 4 -Ck - - f~~ b tre,6.>,1 13*4 y - 65Â· 4. . , V=.. 1- I'll../..il....ill---Iit}11 2 3~11*. *::~16 * Â·2 *~ * ,, it ~.4? ' i 4 1 1 9...1 7 1 1' ....lf"rf.1.EN'.3/W/1 - 4.. * .A k. 1 'i 'f:,11, . 1 4 =.146*1/ fli//4/'/ |1 ' 12Â· I / ' . 0 ika . I. | , Mill 1 1. / ' & 424? ~ 1 # 1, . Â· ..2rd?C 4 $ ..' A.' r I . 1 VjÂ¥241 .1- 1 ..4*'*tl>,~ty... i ti k. a. 0.4,1 . 1 ., /7.rEA . 1 1 It . Â¥ 41,1- -cl I. 9 I q /2/ , '343,5 . r'/4 | 1,1 4 ./. L 1'1' , ! 4 1 1 * 'l' 3 +1 1 k ., 4 1 . . i 4 4 11" I , IT-., -1 AG ' ~ 5:4Â£, . '. 4% f 2 1 1 &94 K' .rj .1 1 6.41 ..:7,~3 9 . i i 1 i 1 1 1 1 + ...0 f ... 4 -Â· s A. 4.5-. - '4Â· 19Â» f I 1 A f , , . 3 1. d , % ..f .* 2 t. p , I : 4 1 + , -4 L /8. 1 f - ari JA 'K~ 1. 46 ,..,0 Â¢4.. â€žled . + 98 ".1,1. , 4 $* 6 . Â· - p i $Â· 39* r. I 9 . 4i~ ' , Ar . ern M . It t. 4 9 4 ely... 4.,.4 - 1 .r; .:17.2Â¥1 0 ~%1 0â‚¬' I 2 1 - RÂ»'hit'WL . 4414*4=4 / 1. , r 7% 7 Nuity:", 41 V. 'i > t lit...2 r ... 4. - I ..11 16 'V,/. k.. .,2 /- I , I .".4.- - . ' 1 A N ' 1 11 .. f. A ' .Â· . 8,7 4 ; f <-*-2/Â£ r 1 Â¢ :t,--4 j .t. N 1:l â‚¬ I...P - , n , .,1 ... . ' I. > 1 . 4.1 . 1 1 1 1 ;trÂ· : , i ./ 1 : 0 ... 4 , I:.171.4- 9 +2 1 " Â· ~ :,r 2 -2 1.- . .4Â¥ . C j - . -% ~ fle F . - Â£ P k *Z E . 2 / , ' I ... . 12 , 1 4 , 11 Â»Â» za .< Ear i CANOPY HOUSE 2 3 1 ~ i it- 23:Mf Rz -- 54 SHADY LN I ASPEN, CO %22 n -0 : O Z 1~gil 1 Ad SEn I â€¢4# 53119$ 01/241 -4 ., NOI.ldO 03My3=13Bd 3nSSI 9NIMVH] -ON 133HS SNOUVA313 035OdOWd Â£ l/842 1Â¥nld , e + i 4#â‚¬*9Â¢4, Â·*- t' ~.1,1-:t, *.i -- , Â·444#11 1.,2Cit ' .-Â·AA %>'#47 D 1. I , - .r- 1 'FAU -22159 k r . Â£ '. Â£Â£3"99 42'L>0 4 43<2 411* tz--t,â€¢ a,L -, 4 K â€ž 0 p li. '; ):SM.*1 1 . . ' J./.k r, A,j/ 3//7 2.Â· . .1.4..tht:V?.icl .41.... , 1, e I. /42' 944-4- ' 1- .01#921-,A I.- 2~2712*'2:Y~k'.#.~.~ I~il f. 44Â·42 - A.*4,<1â€¢2Â»4 ' 7....':,jz dtr# 1,*â€¢',-~ ..1 t, ~0~* ~ 1. 402 -,Â·:rfkÂ¥~51.<446<~~r. *~b, i~,7k*~6 e- 2/ I . )jg*/77%44* Â·3â€ž/~ -, 1 *92 )'~A/4~~~:~~~F~~~/~<rl~ 41 f ... MA -29- . k Â· f U Â·' & C,Â·:/. - .'Jr A,> 1 â‚¬ 'r. , W A . / I~.. *t . 5 ..4 . t..4 ~ ...,1- -, I ... 4. 1 0- ' 315. '4. :4 Â¢4* 4 . ~ 'te'- .1, 'Adâ€¢â‚¬~- -Â· B.Â· co ,"~4~'*~~3 41 1 - V' i I .1. 9. L.,14:, '1436 ':.t - 1. - 4 - - 7 2.3' . '. ... 2. 0 15,?09; . .1 . e V '464'2 -F C ., V I -p . : iâ€¢r 61- 7 i.13 7:- 3Â¥42~ - t' 6.-1 , - - -2.ilti-:i 3 -LI .2, h.' 41*jk, . f~if..41%: 2 _i t.. 4 '14 Y' 4 le"Nt, , . ,-'~f<Ffft:7-;ti-kiki...pr. --- :4 biT 1 ..... # . 9,1. I . \ ,>* ; IIA .. 2 -.. C '1 -4 - S.Â¥i'9--- ~. 9-,f ~12?) . - 2., -1. I - â‚¬4> -/ . (2 :.,-yp :>~111,<79 .4Â¢jl~<~~~~~Â»59, 4 : 9 15- 0-2 74:& fli: Â· . - 1./.L gr 14 r a Li - ,/bbil"/1 - 2 1':i iÂ· 4 , .., -Â·_f- Â·4:t f,, ~5,t~~ ,. 3 4.4 -.4-.' I. . 4 -- -911.*1711, i.~047:VÂ£~il. i' ... 1- - m n , 2. 4 . I .- 4/4.1,4 / I. '-i ' I. . 0 / t. - . '- - 9 . â‚¬=-2, ... D. I . I . ' I -- - 1 -'~ra././ ..Af * .. . . 5.,0 . 4 ... - I , *, i.lt@&,Vt:-9/34/5/4 2 4 *%=2=LI , 9 + 4 I . 1,02*43+TiA/4;,ty . - 2#4/ . - _ j.u*Â».9 4.11 - -t h. 4 .. . .-*fc, ur- 2 9. 1 0 < TAkef:~OC3544 99#3*4.-6* . D t 6- Irk-<,11" 11 - , - 94, 49 - - L- 4-1 r .Al J . ., 3. , . - :-4 + , 1Â·1Â«/,4-> ' .fyi 4,1,624*.r Â£5 Â· %Â£ tra? 442, . C- -=izi-3~-r=-==-- ele- . 1 't, 4, -- 9.--ik~~~*- . .,al '1,Jâ€¢ :dft 5 >25*,:*491 ri., -432 Y-I , i 0 : r . 2 -4, , . - - 4 4 5./4*#hipags~'Tzil,#C.'i# , 4.., . I. ... P " , 124 ... h * P -- 304-me , .4 - ..3 ' 1, . - 3 -- 1 Jf ... . . 1- -. ... 0 "/ 1 -t- - . - 0 X 1 7 1 - rt .. 5 1 ... - I . I. f 1 1 - 3...93*Â» 7 . 4.9 - 93#13 SI. -811 L . .1 G. - .6 . 924. I EV- 4â€ž' h 1 1.1 - . 44% 27Â»- . - - - ~930 Â· u 4Â£,-, ./.1. -br. .re. . r#13 119/7/4/Bar//ed **4 19 +20 , j.. F - ~4 ~ 84.~2.t# . : -- - 1 . 5. 1 : 4- : 1, *E U I ./ 6~S;*,r: ' Or. , 1 .. 1-2424 A- 1 .-54142 ' #b -9 <24 --/ 3/'#4=-/I S * /- : 29 ..hi?f---*121-0 . . - =Of/*Wkh#$97 ,/ Billi I . 10 0 0.- '?FDSÂ·~1.0Â» ~1.-5 - 4 - =1# -- -- _~2:va-*PX ' , /81 2*Â».w , U. e ......:...:/ I â€¢ S.3 ./ : -9.-- =93:MJE:bet- -3.-0.18*er'/tr . re ,/:DH- 10.Wt|ttly . 1 ~1384-. 1,2NiJAY@f...1.53..... _- - - - - PihtÂ¥.14941Â·,11 " . t.,Df'-' \ \ \ '114.- P /Â« // ZONE AE (FLOODWAY) ' 1 049Â«9\44\404ff_-Â«-/ / / fk/ = ..4-1 : Lt ZONE AE (100 YEAR FLOOD)-- ~ .2 4 ~HOTATER CREEK \ 1 -'.1- 1 1 , ~~<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~ <- - DAVID JOHNSTON ARCHITECTSpc / *- 5 ./ , 2: 1 9 South Spring St 5uite 203 / EXISTING CAR PORT ~ ~ Aspen. CO 81611 - . g /1*41 42-419.22*.Â·:. -- 1 1 / - f --- m 970-9263444 FAX 970 920-2186 *- 0 /5/~ / Â· - S,if.'iYX.AT,9 ~ /// / 70. r - . 0.49 - -T -- P i ok..31 Â·Â·li,=22,4.62.-/7- 1Â¢31 , S J#bati .1~41.:9/5,2 \ .. --*- f',#/- 7.'-3-<- 4- # - 21 ..#-.1.-- --*+ -- . - -- -- Irft ji - 6 443 (1 --7Â«q-' < ~ /93 7. ' Â« ; 1 -1 /3-/'- - / , ---_ .<.4/r.gre$"*-i,FW---2.47=,2.19* 1 - ..... -.. -*.> 1...7.{42-~. . 1 __ -- -- â€¢ .j ' 'Mitl/&7/./ - U - 1 # 1>1 -Â· - / ' % I .04 -14Â·\- 1/2 - _.. -7 . S .% r I..*J. 3213'631 0\, 27-- , (From Top of Bark) 24ic NEW 10 + **.- .15'Setback Une_ Mde~deNgâ€¢2 0.ungemennandpjans - 4,1-~.,9:34 - ..%:11 4/ CA, H inditeted.,e~â€¢et-kd bl :his dr-ng./ owned hÂ¥ ond artat pfapert,/ 00â€¢djohntz, f-<Aff . 7 2 m#,i.â‚¬.pron.de-0.ed,~Uwand, 7 of:he.#=. cres,gn. 0,~.geme.iti crplci *ef wie,ewt tke .mten 4â€žâ€¢M,Eza-, IC =bon â€¢nth #,t spec,f.pr~Ject No,le -0 be used b, w discoseor rw Om'Purpose / .. _ ~~5 L J2---*-8Â£~*A~fi~$ &~: -:~-r-:-I ~ â€ž-10,w,Â¤0,1*,er,1,~FC' l <Â·l *v<ii,ft**211%22 WA-5 , C- 4-1~ / 1 42%4~1.,17 j53 1-4.6.,Â·.- I / -4 lil.*.7-0-#Bfkj- ._- , : t / / ~~7' *9-*6Alfitypiâ‚¬#7442*â‚¬*.i:f C.- NEW WILD GRASS MIX --i c- C-- Cm--3- 44 f % r-- - 0 W,48*5 ' - 8 x , . 4 141 9.47 -, -----17 \ ~ 4,3f,1..~.1 9 ~ - ~ ~ - Ificm Top of BanO SPA BELOW '4/ 1 F 44Â· 1 1 ON GRADE PATIO BELOW i 1 11 Ilk/162"11&@F: . 4.l V 6, 7.Â· -3(y,11 - .-\ 8 1 / - 1 6/ r. 1 1 1:tÂ« Ullil~ATED DECK BELOW.:~ N , - 1.' 4 -El 1%.f 2/'VIUL]'!_1 ./w. 2/2 1,11~ / 186 ~ LU N /0 , 4,4 12\/ 1% LI, 11 / 4?\ 1 / 7 1 ..-1 kl / -C 3-/1//'llÂ·Â·tiff'Â·Â·:':3**Â· 0 --1 7 / Z 7-1 2 / 1 H Â· -...CiFF' \ LIZE,#/f' \ 25 -'' ~ MAIN LEVEL SHOWN - - 2111, â€¢ill,UL-1 -OW= â€¢ 1"91.- {=/ 12' FROM GRADE R/7 1 // 54 SHADY LANEI~1 /11/ / 1.VRe/Rfortri f 0 1 AP!04 41* 2 , , :3 , i ..1 ~ fÂ·* E--1 c*VE~EW TREES,~ Hz- . ik -3 2.74'-/.1 \ 34,768 59 Ft [0798 Acres,) \ .- --'.....P.. U....... It POOL BELOW ' | | li i IOr,q Parcel Â·Boik 384Â·Page 494) , 4( 1 i ' - - / 10./liNF-irt')<AYAil.al/~- 1* Liti/0,%3&. '-lill'/696'i~ 01 ' - - ~PJtkin County Pircel No ~t ~ - 1 .......11%.t-- 1 /11 i \ i vi *Arill / 1 1 E _VATED AUTOCO[. 4 ~ ~ 1 -2737 -072.-00-026 ~ N - ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 0/ -0 1 W L . * I O 0 161-Â« 8. -al \ / 21 Â·' I , I . . ~-1' It $ F 1 cÂ·- y ~Vâ„¢ eÂ¥6$.. Ju - . . I - / - , %\ 2-/. h j 4 -b, L.Â·- 3 0-3*4Â¥* 4*/4Â¢03,. _. ... Atfu)~ 3 - .2-4...213%3, / f 1 ' 0 -.1 .) '. 4: f \%11- 31. 1 -.- .....Z>.4*tov.. 2/ L Â·20 #'t<r:. / / i 311'~ -DltÂ» A ~ i DRAWING ISSUE , CONCEPTUAL. DESIGN 2/28/17 gI ./-Il - rf \ wifffer N . r-4 L'Â· k .- 09 hj Â·'~ ~~ â€¢~~~ ~l , t--192Â«-47 Â£ 126 :Ar / 1 ' < 1 - i 1*4?~2,43 ~ :2 I I . 1 \ 1, 1, K F.. 0 \' ed#A,INEWTREES ..;Ch- 2,27' ~ 1 10 *T_ _ -TE*ck_&0 - - -- - - * - 1- - - - - - -T - - - \ i 0 / i **Crs **crB , PROPOSED SITE/ 5 NEW TREE51 re.6, i - . i.. 0 0,-4*0:*' Â·~ ~,ih, 0 44-â€¢11Â£"r \ / c LANDSCAPE PLAN: ' 1 \ PREFERRED OPTION / Â¢-Â·06'08Â·E 200.17Â·__ _._4 -~- - 94'p e â‚¬~~f~ / i. \ 14.43' PROJECT No 1609 DRAWN BY CPF S / .1 7 - Dig-1 Deed Call-See Notes k 3,5 & 6) ~ N \ l 1831 \ / SHEET No. L NORTH \ /-/ / / PROJECT 11 5.1 , ~ PROPOSED SITE/LAN[ PE PLAN: PREFERRED OPTION SCALE 1/8- = 110 0 4' 8Â· 16~ 3SAOH AdONVJ /Volumes/DJA-COMMON/Projects/Aspen/'16 Projects/1609 - Sh L P&2/10 SERIES .pin Tuesday