The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.816 E Hyman Ave.0014.2016.ASLUi 0014.2016.ASLU 820 E HYMAN AVE ~ 273718226001 RDS 1- \ s 5.6 0,4.8 â‚¬.4.-4 1/11 7, 1 -- 7 --- PATH: G/DRIVE /ADMINISTRATIVE/ADMIN/LANDUSE CASE DOCS THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen Community Development Department CASE NUMBER 0014.2016.ASLU ilt PROJECT ADDRESS 1*b E HYMAN AVE PARCELID 273718226001 PLANNER REILLY THIMONS CASE DESCRIPTION RDS REPRESENTATIVE FORUM PH3 DATE OF FINAL ACTION 5.11.16 CLOSED BY ANGIE SCOREY 1.17.18 02 78-7/827 coa f 06 14Â· 2-0 16- AS L U Elle Edit Record Navigate Fgrm Reporis Format Iab Help I =#*...,W#k..%**, 1@ 30(, â€¢,4 181 ~ JilÂ®13 08.~i}1 1 > Dim@tiumpl ,)~1016~ ly 0 1 9 3 3 ./. 3 3 % a .0)01 IY [im' Custom Fields Routirig Status T Fee Summary 8dions Routing History I ~0 J i 0=621*grb 13 i lrermlt type =aslu I v ~Aspen Land Use Pennit# 00142016.ASLU 0:.0 *11AMÂ·I P i ~ Address 820 E HYMAN AVE Apt/Suite A P City ASPEN Â·..,..., .... . State Co Â· ZiP 81611 14 | t Master permit Routing queue aslu15 Appled 02/26/2016 3, ~'9~~ 1 ~~ Project Approved 5 ' ~ Description APPLICATION FOR RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD - HYMAN DUPLEX REMODEL Asued - 816 E HYMABI Closed/Final V Submitted FORUM PHI 7974880 Clock ~ER*] Days Fl Expires 0220./2017 v m Submitted via v , - ,-Z-*...... ' # th Â¥92 394 I Owner 1/ Â·j 1 Last name HALL First name MURRAY AND CHERYL 715 W MAIN ST -, 204 Phone (760) 773-2142 Address ASPEN CO 81611 S 4 ~ ~ Applicant E Owner is applicant? Il Contractor is applicant? Last name HALL ' ~ First name MURRAYAND CHERYL 715 W MAIN ST 204 Phone (760) 773-2142 Cust # 30292 Address ASPEN CO 81611 Email Lender Last name First name Phone () - Address â‚¬Al 9 '4 AspenGold5 (server-"angeles ~ 1 of 1 - ._ ., Clt * 2 21 1- P 9 1 * i,yo Read, ok A-wÂ»k G 90 Â·00 112 4 (1â‚¬\ luf k 1 02 5-5 I ON 39~511 *ogiaoil[ Elir #24 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.070 AND CHAPTER 26.306 ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 920 E. *rvww, 105 - Aspen, CO STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. County of Pitkin ) - I, 1- ~ (name, please print) being or representindan Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (IE) or Section 26.306.010 (IE) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: ~Publication ofnotice.- By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fourteen (14) days after final approval ofa site specific development plan. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. 9 Publication ofnotice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official paper or a paper o f general circulation in the City of Aspen no later than fifteen (15) days after an Interpretation has been rendered. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Signature The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice" was acknowledged before me this 3-- day of M~ , 2(44, bz Anda S,Â»,-Â·-1 PUBLIC NOTICE of WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval 01 a site-specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to My commission expireS: al l,al CIO the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24. Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertain- ing to the following described property: Parcel ID 273501 303012: legally described as Condominium Unit A, 820 East Hyman Townhome Condomini- ums, according to the Plat thereof recorded June LUÂ« Ruat- fit-Â£19*- 16, 1988, in Plat Book 20 at Page 96 and as de- fined and described in the Condominium Declara- Notary Public lion for 820 East Hyman Townhome Condomini- ; ums, recorded June 16,1988 in Book 566 at Page 639, City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, Colorado. The KAREN REED PATTERSON approval grants an RDS Variance per Section 26.410.040.D.3(b). The change is depicted in the NOTARY PUBLIC land use application on file with the City of Aspen. For further information contact Reilly Thimons at ATTACHMENTS: STATE OF COLORADO the City of Aspen Community Development 0ept., NOTARY ID #19964002767 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, Colorado, reilly.thi- mons@cityofaspen.com, (970) 429-2754. My Commission Expires February 15,2020 ' City of Aspen COPY OF THE PUBUCATION Published in The Aspen Times on May 5, 2016. (12089772) RECEPTION#: 627721. 03/11/2016 at 11 39 AM, 1 Or 4, R $26.00 Doc Code APPROVAL Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO NOTICE OF APPROF AL ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL GRANTING A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIANCE AT, PARCEL ID No. 273501303012, 816 EAST HYMAN AVENUE, LEGALLY DESCRIBED AS CONDOMINIUM UNIT A, 820 EAST HYMAN TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED JUNE 16, 1988, IN PLAT BOOK 20 AT PAGE 96 AND AS DEFINED AND DESCRIBED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR 820 EAST HYMAN TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS, RECORDED JUNE 16, 1988 IN BOOK 566 AT PAGE 639, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO. APPLICANT: Murray and Cheryl Hall 816 East Hyman Aspen, CO 81611 (760)773-2142 REPRESENTATIVE: Lori Dunn, Forum Phi 715 West Main Street, suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 797-4880 SUBJECT & SITE OF APPROVAL: 816 East Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 SUMMARY: The Applicants have requested a Residential Design Standard (RDS) variance to replace an existing non-orthagonal window in the gable end with a new non-orthagonal window to match the other side of the duplex, Unit 818 East Hyman Avenue. The subject parcel is within the Aspen infill area and is subject to Section 26.410.040.D.3 (b); which states that no more than one non-orthagonal window shall be allowed on each fa~ade of the building. The existing window can be maintained as a non-conformity but the proposed change to the window requires a Residential Design Standards (R_DS) variance approval. REVIEW PROCEDURE: RDS Variance, per Section 26.410.020.D ofthe Land Use Code. The Community Development Director may approve, approve with conditions, or deny an administrative request for an RDS variance based on the review criteria found in Exhibit B, attached. BACKGROUND: The subject parcel is a 6,000 square foot lot located in the R-MF zone district. it is one of two townhomes in the 820 East Hyman Townhome Condominiums, known as 816 East Hyman Avenue. The units have two non-orthagonal windows on the street-facing fa*ade which are considered to be an existing non-conformity. The unit at 818 E. Hyman replaced their original non-orthagonal window in late 2014 with a larger triangular window during a remodel. CURRENT PROPOSAL: The Applicants have proposed replacing their current half-circle non- orthagonal window with a larger triangular non-orthagona[ window, in order to mirror that of the adjoining townhome at 818 East Hyman Avenue (see Figure 1). The Applicant is requesting a Residential Design Variance to the following standard: 1 â€¢ (26.410.040.D.3) No more than one (1) non-orthagonal window shall be allowed on each fagade of the building. A single non-orthagonal window in a gable end may be divided with mullions and still be considered one (1) non-orthagonal window. o The requirement shall only apply to Subsection 26.410.010.B.2: All parcels located within and partially within the Aspen infill area shall be required to comply with all of the standards. U , /tri ti'Tt~[1....T 10. Iti-IC 'AE I kÂ«-1 /. I' 0/ 1 4- 1 -0- --- ' * 1â€¢ rge et MED *4446*1-9 / 0 'ta -AA_./AL I # Existing non- 1,Â·-' 111 2 ==Â· 3 Remodeled orthogonal -=Â·==*31#3== 0~ \32\Â«1 - non-orthagonal window window - ------ -1-----------r----------------------------- - -4 ---L - G :Tlull#Â£444 - - 1 '. 1 - - $1- 1 4 121 E - -- -- ~4816 E. Hyman [*i- --2-.z.---_--818 E. Hyman -~, - -==-- Figure 1 Design Proposal STAFF EVALUATION: The purpose of this Residential Design Standard is to limit the number of non-orthagonal windows on street-facing facades. Section 26.410.040.D.3b allows for only one non-orthagonal window, whereas the units at 820 East Hyman have an existing non- conformity of two non-orthagonal windows. With the purpose of this standard in mind, Staff has reviewed the request against the RDS variance review criteria. The Code states that the request for an RDS variance must meet one of the following criteria. 1) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting, or broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or 2 2) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff finds that the proposal meets and responds appropriately to the review criteria by updating the current window to mirror the adjacent duplex unit and responds to the adjacent neighborhood character; as outlined in Criteria 1 above. There are no site-specific constraints associated with this parcel. DECISION: The Community Development Director finds the application for a Residential Design Standard Variance at 816 East Hyman, as depicted on Exhibit A, is consistent with the review criteria (Exhibit B), and thereby APPROVES the request. APPROVED BY: h k A; 1 -/ ./ 1 1 . Mafl 11 , 20;llc 20 Â»Ll C i l,.1 C 1 l l. ( L ( # C'L Jessica Garrow < Date Community Development Director Attachments: Exhibit A - Approved Drawings (recorded) Exhibit B - Review Criteria (not recorded) Exhibit C - Application (not recorded) 3 Exhibit A Approved Drawings EXIsliNGPAI~PETTOGE E--REMICNED 'EHE'-1-1 -0./0.29 1Â«1Ht./T # 'iPONTEE-'ASENHiD.'AU)541:Ir Â·-0 161&-220=--=~41__ fl --=11- ----------- - 4-2------------ --re- -+ - - - --*p LfÂ» lili 42 1--IIi 7411-frt'El=- > '1'I -- - - - - -MASTERLEMEL---9~- 111Â·Â·61Â·4 A \ -t---- 64%4 ------------------------ NOW.INDOWSM,-WEEN~-12 \ loTHER 1...TRANSOM *EADOOR'TO COMPCY r-7 7- -Â·- E Â· z ~ NU 'CRE Â·Â·AN , 1 ----- 1 4-=1â‚¬U:4 2 MAIN LEVEL - 100'. 0 -1--- -------------------------------r----- ~963 1 GARAGELEVEL ~ LOWER LEVEL _1_ -----____-________---------------- 4- ----------- 88' 9 1- - -1 --I X-3 EXISTING SOUTH El. EVATION 1/4 = 1Â·-0- WGC~kNEY lee,EMAN I.V CH:UNEY PRO.EC TION. IC ~ROM -aeÂ·Tof Buter.G -1=2 WECâ€¢OUPER,6576.iw-F'A ,/tEl-\\ 1 LINE.F./601'- 4/ .1/1\\1 I.-ki_ k--41 1 , 1 T)POINIeE!WEENRIOC.EA'.DEAVE 13.0.1.-4..MHO.-EAP/pt~ .'UW~~FA9 +1'))1~__1 -vt f'? 9.11Â«-11 -2 - FIEL -_ __ 21[=7------1-=6=111- - ---- - 119Â·- 10 1.'4- F' -6 Â·14--7 FFTTE---FEE~ - E SÂ·*il'Re' 1 1 [IZEk-1%--5.1- 1=71 -1'tu@LII.1 W El I T-i 91.11 v, 111 1 4, 1,; f an==uzz= fljirrft--ttc~~~~::- .EL_-~__ _'-- == - :__I- 3~r~ 2 -M~Sl~Rl:EXEL- i* 6 111'-61/4. ---------- -1- --------- -al--J-/ - -1------------------- T -9, Del. Eâ€¢ ~S TO Htâ€¢ I - f i,ANE ~ -3 e- 'h _ _ _ _ - - _MAIN LEVEL leo'- F 1 GARAGE LEVEL Lgve 12&+ .I_ ____ _______________________-------L-__--- 1 1 1--- 88*Â· 9 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4 = 1-0 FORUM PHI I 715 W MAIN ST, STE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: LORI DUNN I 970.797.4880 I LDUNN@FORUMPHI.COM ff ff Exhibit B Review Criteria 26.410.020.D Variances. 1. Administrative variances. The applicant may seek an administrative variance for not more than three (3) of the individual requirements. An applicant who desires a variance from the residential design standards shall demonstrate, and the Community Development Director shall find that the variances, if granted, would: a) Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the director may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the director feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or Staff Response: The duplex located at 816 and 818 East Hyman Avenue currently contains two street-facing non-orthagonal windows. The Unit at 818 renovated its windows in 2014 replacing the existing non-orthagonal half circle window set within the gable end with a larger triangular non-orthagonal window. The applicant at 816 East Hyman Avenue is requesting a residential design variance to replace their gable end window to mirror that of Unit 818 in order to create a more cohesive design program (Exhibit A). Upon review of neighborhood character and submitted architectural plans, the proposed window has been found to provide an appropriate design and respond to the purpose of the standard. Stafffinds this criterion to be met. b) Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. Staff Response: There are no site-specific constraints associated with this parcel. Stafffinds this criterion to not be met. 1 ARCHITECTURE INTERIORS PLANNING Variance Request I 816 E Hyman Feb 10, 2016 The owners of 816 E Hyman would like to apply for a variance of section 26.410.040.D.3.b. of the Residential Design Standards: No more than one (1) nonorthangonal window shall be allowed on each faÂ©ade of the building. a.) We have provided an appropriate design after carefully considering both the context in which the development is proposed and also the purpose of the particular standard. Within the extisting context, there are many non-conformities which we would like to fix in the following ways: Existing Non-Conformity The existing Struture is a Duplex in which each side is a mirror image of the other. Both sides had a small half round window centered on the peak of the roof. In a recent remodel, the 818 Hyman side of the Duplex replaced this half round window with a pentagon shaped window to better match the roof form. Proposed Remedy to the Existing Non-Conformity The proposed structure will comform in the following ways: The proposed design will match the other side of the Duplex and improve the Street facing fagade by continueing to mirror each side. Hardship associated with the Proposed Remedy This proposed change will not conform with the RDS Section 26.410.040.D.3.b because there will be two non-orthangonal windows on this Fagade. Our Hardship is that even with no change to the window, there will still be two nonorthangonal windows on this facede. Our solution enhances the uniformity of this fagade where both sides are mirror images of each other. b.) This situation is necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints as follows: The proposed Design enhances the unformits of this fagade. Diagrams showing this condition are on the following page. FORUM PHI 1715 W MAIN ST, STE 204 1 ASPEN, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: LORI DUNN 1 970.797.4880 1 LDUNN@FORUMPHI.COM FEB 1 6 2016 CITY OF ASPE CQI~Mry l)5*LopA I A EXET~NOPARAPETTOBE F AE=OVEDA.'REEll U F--..E.F 25 HEIQCUDAIT la#Knl4-lfIET-J~Â»N_alif---- 119% 10 la 921 1,1 1 / :1 - 1//TOREW 4 9=* r mil k / 1 T---T - 2-71--- /F-jll#*Â« 1 1 ~1 1 1 E Z 2-21 -1 ZI _ 22 El LE Z Z Z~ - - --*- -- 2_MÂ»gR-LFEL- -~- 111% 81/4- -Il'HERTH,0./TRANS'M 222 ABOVEADOOR)TOCOMPLY -THROS/le --1 - EE= E ~â„¢40101~-11 % rÂ· || = :i 11 '11 -1-- H .1 , 222 - EU RE :, 1 I Rd=11 3 1 : ' - := MAN LEVEL 100Â·. 0 7~~~~ 1 GARAGE LEVEL ---------1----------------- ---------- -------1------\98'.3' 1 1 ~ 1/MIEL _ 1 , i- 88Â·-9 L-2 X-3 EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4Â· z 1'-[r E*DNGCHiMNEÂ¥ TOREI.WNW. ---- E.1/Fautel. 1 CONNECTIONPE. 26.50.W I | ~LINE........T,1./ L~___LI- - 24Â·-'AKE#' ~3%#-NTeEr-EEN-,DGEANDEA, , 1,3 - I. e.rwEEN... I AN' EmE,Â»1Â·'/A--3./ <21<i-400.~ 3+40 EAVC PQ *IT UAâ‚¬%â€¢41% / --e _ ROOF DECK pa-~ - - ~666~-7-Fr=Â«- -- 1- i i gÂ·.ia 15- i EZZE' e=TINGTORE,Wi -1 1 - ' 'i P=-Â«19-. ILY, 11 I.' . 9 7Â»\\\\-3-19{5.*r ~0 . - -- - Â· - - - METER LEVEL /1 b M --------- _Elf -3 =..Ti ELE,JES) /__ _- ------------ 111 1 41- 1=1- -pr rANEL - i |,|~ 1 MA~N LEVEL 100: 0. i I GARAGEE LEVEL - --- -Â·---7------ - ------ ------- Â·Â·Â· ---- ------ --------------- T---- -- -998% 3 , LOWER LEVEL 1_ 1 -l ' -88'-9 t.__ --J 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4- = FOr FORUM PHI I 715 W,MAIN ST, STE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: LORI DUNN I 970.797.4880 1 LDUNN@FORUMPHI.COM '4 ft ft 1 C 0 Z 11 U O 4 itir + - I V. d $ ,/ I. '4 p -ir . 3- V ' ttlf Â«4 ' 99 1.4 , 2 t'" 111 ~ t Â¥ 9 1 â€¢4 h. , ./ &. 0 14 0.9: f&* I 1 04 A=" 413 i : .-. ' , Â·A f ''44*f .: . 1, - N h eli *3-..0 - %,Zz 4 * . 1%,t i ~Â» . 21 Â· ~ - 7 A Â· ... Ill. 1 I r - 9 f . I I ....42 , - :*YA.4.4 y r. Â· :4â‚¬1~ i:Â· / 4 ' 0 , 1 1 1 7 1 $ 4. 'l +42,12.. 1 1.11 . Â· - Â· ' . ..:f 40.53*14 I U . 1 ae ' iK. 1,1/ 14 , -0, -9 . 1 'â€¢ I. r . 11 4 . ... L ' lit 7 A D ... .0/7 4 , 0 4 k i 1 ./ 1 â€¢ic . % 1 4 '41 01 1 12 4 1 -0410 4 7, w 6 .1 0 0 Ir , 1 4 00 - , f t " 4. 9 1/. li 1 - 2. % I. I J 7,1, - 6 1,; 1 ..II - 1 61- * i.-I 9/'ll,MNk: 1 ...1 , P 1 S.E A 1 - rk - , 1 1 - ~ -4 -1, : .1 i k . 1 ..... m. 0 9 1 mt- 4 9 7.: : /1 - 1 . H j â‚¬Al tr .4 1 , , 1 1 4,1 1 110..,Â» Â· ->~'-4 "11"Al 'All.'-.6 . 11 1 >44.- 't , h t . I + 4% : bli . . 4. - t44--- $ 1 1 t ' :, ....E- 6 '. I I *1. I ~ *-,timmi"' I . b .- 11. - ,....8.-Rn/Ft: - -- 1 1 1 '104-9 3~ 1 ti,Ni 564 :b ' .... 4 6 -1 -.f, v - 1 . - 1 . . ... r . I -311..16*k i i ...Q /* ' .;t ... 1 Â£ *4>; 4, - , 4.1 1% . Â¢ 4 1 47 1 9 4 P 1 1 , â€žr---9 1 - 1 4,â€¢ fr 8-4//4/#.1///14 3 > Et - *Ir -4 kit V. 1 '* Par//f Im... 1.1.0, , , U-- 9 L.â€ž 4% 1 2 116.,1 4 4 1 - '1 0 11 & 1 1 '1 4,4 1 't 1 4 . I ma-EV . 4 , , 0, 1,1 . 11 . I 17. <%. 1, ,P......... i ' Me , 8,1:i. 1 Int . '4. , 71[1..,4144~Z~~/ ~ ~~k 1 ~11~~ Z lifil., .. .160 di~:dit-..ial; ieu05841.10 = leuoMequo -- -IVED CITY OF ASPEN FEB 1 6 2016 PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY CITYOFASPEN PLANNER: Justin Barker, 970.429.2797 DATE: 2.12.16 COMIANTY DEVELOPMEN1 PROJECT: 816 E Hyman Avenue REPRESENTATIVE: Lori Dunn, 970.797.4880 REQUEST: RDS Variance DESCRIPTION: The project representative is interested in pursuing a Residential Design Standard (RDS) variance for 816 E. Hyman Avenue. This is a 6,000 square foot lot located in the RMF zone district and contains a duplex. 816 E. Hyman is the west duplex unit. The project representative is proposing to replace the existing non-orthogonal window in the gable front with a new non- orthogonal window to match the other duplex unit, 818 E. Hyman. Section 26.410.040.D.*b) states that no more than one non-orthogonal window shall be allowed on each fagade of the building. The existing window may be maintained as a nonconformity, however a new non-orthogonal window requires a variance. Staff will accept an application for administrative review. The following two criteria are used in determining the appropriateness of a variance: a. Provide an appropriate design or pattern of development considering the context in which the development is proposed and the purpose of the particular standard. In evaluating the context as it is used in the criteria, the reviewing board may consider the relationship of the proposed development with adjacent structures, the immediate neighborhood setting or a broader vicinity as the board feels is necessary to determine if the exception is warranted; or b. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. If staff cannot support administrative approval, application can be made to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Below are links to the Land Use Application form and Land Use Code for your convenience: Land Use App: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Portals/0/docs/City/Comdev/Apps%20and%20Fees/2013%20land%20use%20app%20form.pdf Land Use Code: http://www.aspenpitkin.com/Departments/Community-Development/Planning-and-Zoning/Title-26-Land-Use-Code/ Land Use Code Section(s) 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.410.020.D Variances 26.410.040.D.3 Windows 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements 26.710.090 Residential Multi-family (RMF) Review by: Staff for complete application Public Hearing: none ASLU RDS Variance 1235 Mountain View Dr. 273501300812 1 k Planning Fees: Planning Deposit - $650, flat fee Total Deposit: $650 To apply, submit the following information: El Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. Â¤ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). El Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner's right to apply for the Development Application. D Applicant's name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephone number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. 1 HOA Compliance form (Attached) 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. m A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. 0 Written responses to all review criteria. 0 An 81/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. C] 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: Â¤ 1 additional copy of the complete application packet and, if applicable, associated drawings. 0 Total deposit for review of the application. 0 A digital copy ofthe application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. 2 THE CITY oF AspEN Land Use Application Determination of Completeness Date: February 22, 2016 Dear City of Aspen Land Use Review Applicant, We have received your land use application for 816 E. Hyman - RDS and reviewed it for completeness. 41~ Your Land Use Application is incomplete: i Please submit the following missing submission items. m HOA Compliance form. It was not completed. 0 A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. A better detail of the window should be shown. Is the window opening the same as proposed? You may not need a variance. U Written responses to all review criteria. The residential design standards are dijferent than when. you received a pre-application summary. The criteria have changed and should be updated. Other submission items may be requested throughout the review process as deemed necessary by the Community Development Department. Please contact me at 429-2759 if you have any questions. 3bank You, \J@Xnifer P~lan, Deputy Planning Director City of Aspen, Community Development Department For Office Use Onlv Qualifying Applications: Mineral Rights Notice Required New PD Yes No-2>C Subdivision, or PD (creating more than 1 additional lot) t.. GMQS Allotments Residential Affordable Housing 1 Yes No ~242 Commercial E.P.F. Lodging l.J FEB 1 62016 ATTACHMENT 2-LAND USE APPLICATION CITY OF ASPEN PROJECT: cll/z,Â«TY ly.VEL0PMEN1 Name: Hyman Duplex Remodel Location: 816 E Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 I Legal Description: 820 East Hyman Townhome Unit:A (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) Parcel ID # (REQUIRED) 273718226001 APPLICANT: Name: Murray and Cheryl Hall Address: 816 E Hyman, Aspen, CO 81611 Phone #: 760-773-2142 REPRESENTATIVE: Name: Lori Dunn, Forum Phi Address: 715 W Main St, Suite 204, Aspen, CO 81611 970-797-4880 Phone #: TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check all that apply): U GMQS Exemption U Conceptual PUD U Temporary Use U GMQS Allotment U Final PUD (& PUD Amendment) El Text/Map Amendment U Special Review U Subdivision U Conceptual SPA E ESA - 8040 Greenline, Stream U Subdivision Exemption (includes U Final SPA (& SPA Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff, condominiumization) Amendment) Mountain View Plane U Commercial Design Review U Lot Split U Small Lodge Conversion/ Expansion Uf Residential Design Variance U Lot Line Adjustment 1 Other: U Conditional Use EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description ofexisting buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.) Existing Duplex has two non-orthagonal Windows on one facade. PROPOSAL: (description ofproposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.) Proposed Design is to replace the existing non-orthagonal window on the 816 side to match the shape of the non-orthagonal window on the 818 side to maintain a consistent and uniform design from the street. Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: $ 650 ~ Pre-Application Conference Summary G Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement U Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form Â® Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements- Including Written Responses to Review Standards U 3-D Model for large project All plans that are larger than 8.5" X 11" must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3-D model. Your pre-application conference summary will indicate ifyou must submit a 3-D model. RECEIVED RETAIN F "IR crm 1 A 7('Its DER MANENT FILE S~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT COMMIJNITY DEVELOPMEN % Agreement to Pay Application Fees Colll-Â·201 6 Â·ASLU An agreement between the City of Aspen ("City") and Property Phone No.: Owner ("1"): Murray Hall 760-773-2142 Email: Address of Billing c/o Forum Phi Property: 816 E Hyman Ave Address 715 W Main St, Suite 204 (subject of (820 E Hyman, Unit A) (send bills here) application) Aspen, CO 81611 I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No. , Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and the payment of these fees is a condition precedent to determining application completeness. I understand that as the property owner that I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. For flat fees and referral fees: I agree to pay the following fees for the services indicated. I understand that these flat fees are non-refundable. 1 $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for $ flat fee for . $ flat fee for For deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. 1 understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review, and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services, b I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for non-payment. I agree to pay the following initial deposit amounts for the specified hours of staff time. I understand that payment of a deposit does not render an application complete or compliant with approval criteria. If actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinafter stated. $ 650 deposit for hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325 per hour. $ deposit for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $26 per hour. City of Aspen: 315Â·do Property Owner: Chris Bendon Community Development Director Name: 1,6 fl,C City Use: , /A ov -. Title: Fees Due: $ 650 Received: $ 6,5u lanuan 2015 Cit> 4,1 :\.licti 130 S. Galina St. i (970) 920-5090 i.1 RECEIVED FEB 1 6 2016 ATTACHMENT 3 CITY OF ASPEN DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM COAUNTY DEVELOPMEN} Project: Hyman Duplex Remodel Applicant: Forum Phi Location: 816 Hyman Ave, Aspen, CO Zone District: R-MIr Lot Size: 6,000 sq ft Lot Area: 6,000 sq ft (for the purposes of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high water mark, easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed. Number of residential units: Existing* 1 Proposed: 1 Number of bedrooms: Existing: 3 Proposed: 5 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing: 3,600 Allowable: 3,600 Proposed: 3,600 Principal bldg. height: Existing: 25' Allowable: 25' Proposed: 25 Access. bldg. height: Existing: n/a Allowable: nla Proposed: nia On-Site parking: Existing: 1 Required: n/a Proposed: n/a % Site coverage: Existing: n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a % Open Space: Existing. n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a Front Setback: Existing: 10' Required: 10' Proposed: 10' Rear Setback: Existing.* 10' Required:_10 Proposed: nia Combined F/R: Existing. n/a Required: n/a Proposed: n/a Side Setback: Existing: Required: 5' Proposed: 5' n/a Side Setback: Existing: _9 __Required: 5 _Proposed: nla Combined Sides: Existing: __ Required: 15' Proposed: nla Distance Between Existing n/a Required: n/a Proposed: nia Buildings Existing non-conformities or encroachments: Existing Duplex has two non-orthagonal Windows on one facade. Variations requested: To replace the non-orthagonal window with another non-orthangonal window. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT .. Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications. A flat fee or deposit is collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted. A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of staff time to process. Review fees for other City departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be collected when necessary. Flat fees are cumulative - meaning an application with multiple flat fees must pay the sum of those flat fees. Flat fees are not refundable. A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff review is required. Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit. Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in addition to the case planner. Deposit amounts may be reduced if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates. A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre-application conference by the case planner. Hourly billing shall still apply. All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees. One payment including the deposit for Planning and referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen. Applications will not be accepted for processing without the required application fee. The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a land use application requiring a deposit. The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant's request. The applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit. Any direct costs attributable to a project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge. In the event the processing of an application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited fee to the applicant. Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval. Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final, and recordation of approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purposes of billing. Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be reconciled and all past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review. Final review shall require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final application submission. Upon final approval all billing shall again be reconciled prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation. The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more days past due. Unpaid invoices of 90 or more days past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of 120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge. All payment information is public domain. All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats. The City will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full. For permits already accepted, an unpaid invoice of 90 or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is made. The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g. a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties. January 2015 City of Aspen I 130 S. Galena St. I (970) 920-5090 RECEIVED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT CY.% DEVELOPMEN.1 Homeowner Association Compliance policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed by the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: Murray and Cheryl Hall Property Owner (i"): Email: murraybhall@yahoo.com Phone No.: 760-773-2142 Address of Property: (subject of 816 E Hyman Ave (820 E Hyman, Unit A) 1 application) I certify as follows: (pick one) i U This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. U This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 0 This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. 1 understand that this document is a public document. 924,1/b L Owner signature: -7. 1 1 date: Owner printed name: Murray Hall or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT i Homeowner Association Compliance Policy All land use applications within the City of Aspen are required to include a Homeowner Association Compliance Form (this form) certifying the scope of work included in the land use application complies with all applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be signed bY the property owner or Attorney representing the property owner. Name: Murray and Cheryl Hall Property Owner ('1") Email: murraybhall@yahoo.com Phone No.: 760-773-2142 Address of Property: (subject of 816 E Hyman Ave (820 E Hyman, Unit A) application) I certify as follows: (pick one) El This property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. E This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. 0 This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this land use application have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand this policy and I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws I understand that this document is a public document. FAA -11 'f Owner signature: date 4,44, 1 1 Owner printed name: Murray Hall or, Attorney signature: date: Attorney printed name: CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT GENERAL LAND USE APPLICATION PACKET RECEIVED FEB 162016 THE CITY OF ASPEN CITY OF ASPEN COA*Nry DEVELOPMENT Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to the City of Aspen Land Use Code. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2. Land Use Application Form 3. Dimensional Requirements Form 4. Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5. General Summary of Your Application Process 6. Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7. Affidavit ofNotice All applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 ofthe Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk's Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet at www.aspenpitkin.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code, and search Title 26. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planner in the Community Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, insufficiencies, or redundancies can reduce the overall cost of materials and Staff time. Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections ofthe Aspen Land Use Regulations. ATTORNEYS TITLE INSURANCE AGENCY OF ASPEN, LLC 715 WEST MAIN STREET, SUITE 202 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 OWNERSHIP & ENCUMBRANCE REPORT This report is based on a search made of documents affecting the record title to the property described- hereinafter, searched by legal description and by the names of the grantor or grantee. Consequently, the information as to record owner is taken from the most recent recorded Vesting Deed, and the information as to existing encumbrances reflects those documents of record which specifically described the subject property by legal description or which refer to the owner of the property which are filed by name only and do not include the legal description of the property. No information is furnished relative to easements, covenants, conditions and restrictions. This report does include the results of a search under the names of the property owner(s) in the general index. Liability of Attorneys Title Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC under this Ownership and Encumbrance Report is limited to the fee received. Effective Date: November 17,2015 Property Address: 816 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, Colorado 81611. Schedule No: R012689 Parcel No: 273718226001 Taxes: Taxes for the year 2014 have been paid in full in the amount of: $2,540.48. Taxes for 2015 are not yet due or payable. Legal Description: Condominium Unit A, 820 EAST HYMAN TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS, according to the Plat thereofrecorded June 16, 1988 in Plat Book 20 at Page 96 and as defined and described in the Condominium Declaration for 820 East Hyman Townhome Condominiums, recorded June 16,1988 in Book 566 at Page 639, Pitkin County, Colorado. Record Owner: Murray B. Hall Revocable Trust dated September 16,1997 The following liens were found affecting the subject property: Deed of Trust from Murray B. Hall, Trustee, or any Successor Trustee, ofthe Murray B. Hall Revocable Trust dated September 16,1997, to the Public Trustee of Pitkin County for the benefit of MUFG Union Bank, N.A., to secure an indebtedness in the principal sum of $2,340,000.00, dated_September 16,2015, and recorded September 21,2015, as Reception No. 623399. Atm eyflritle Insurance Agency of Aspen, LLC 1 'bul 8 9-1 By: *~fer Van AlstinÂ©Nithorized AgentÂ· TELEPHONE (970) 925-7328 A A A FACSIMILE (970) 925-7348 Murray B Hall Revocable Trust 348 Metate PI Palm Desert, CA 92260 November 12, 2015 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Gatena Street Aspen, CO 81611 To Whom It May Concern: Please accept this letter as our approval for Forum Phi, Inc. to apply for any Land Use Approvals required to complete the remodel and repairs of the property 816 E Hyman Ave, Aspen, Colorado. The following is the name and address for the company Steev Wilson Forum Phi, Inc. 715 W Main St, Suite 204 Aspen, CO 81611 Ph: 970-279-4109 Fax: 866-770-5585 Thank you for your attention to this matter. Sincerely, Murray B Hall Revocable Trust 11/,11 4< I L i . Murray B Hall Revocable Trust Date RECEIVED 816 Hyman Ave Aspen, CO 81611 FEB 1 6 2016 Vicinity Map CITY OF ASPE' COMARMITY l.t VELOr 816 Hyman Property ' WL ... tâ€¢ N. # 12, - â€¢vt M.*, 6% ..4 -1-â€¢0%.jâ€¢ 7 i 1% *Vie, 1 .6 674. 'o f f 6, % . * LP,PUD:coL- ,/4#~j11~..~44485. 2' ' A'm taae'' . prbri Y .a:Â· *..1 1. '- 4 ~~~ k 4.7.2/AS=31!i /0 .at,& *44* 40 2 PUD SPA:, -*Â·<kt\ h * R- 4 82 4 //53. f .:â€¢9 ' Â·Â·1â‚¬ 4 4., I - Frt a **45<44 <119* .Un U , 4 4 1 . - 14 9*g*PA. 0.1,4'.7-9 f <20'. cc*449. * 65 4 4521011,r..4- u *0 4'01%46 ZI<' . 1 4-<-1*49,LTLA. m;......t: Â·2-SkSÂ» C.1- 2 - *127*63;4 ~, j642lf'jj9Â»Â·:c>-~~~/71 ~~~LU*92< ~~~ ~ f'%759*YA; 7 â€¢ â€¢1â€¢Wâ€¢ I O 6 ' 4( SM) 4 Â· 6 f ,.- 4-0 7 2 it. k Rcanng Fork Rivee 4.4â€ž k -/ 4 l YAL;h * b. 0 , 0 PrpER- 154 1 1 - _ _ 4<:7 47-4448;, li//44 , 4%,Â· 1;HUKAw. 1 Â» 0 Fi )4 - 74,~ 1 / i I k5,,ow \UU,d,~ 87- 1 , p,&42~48*rF68~-~8ZL CL k 4'V V F . r: -<.,6 2-AH,g Â¥Z~ ,,02 ~4*~ j . il 1 1 .. I & 722# :If <2 2%, - '-- - 4 . 19 1 Its C â€¢ n Â· G:%* 1.;r /1.3. 9 4 6 ./1 1. . ' I . 4.ff. v 3 '54 .. I. 0. 4 '- .47 2 . . 2.4â€¢1â€¢13 91216Bittlk,MEAR ASPEN GRovE RD 'f 6 *- 714,14 - + - 1/5553607,2/. P 2 < . 3>dÂ·'5>4#*64+7 C PUD L. 10.41 / 3 <k'lf Var,1,*0664,(1â€ž .,4,* r m 1.114*A 124 13 ./ 4 4 - I.7021)4, f,Sh=Aiâ€¢ f~51*FEKÂ©>Fs,~~,4,244-1Â»1-~:~t<t)~:tt,-4,3~~~~~~~ %0*~IEâ‚¬~DR-1 UL~~ t 20 \ 31~~'1162.46#haiLAB:249#afm<l.FLAV*340:%-Jft,<::A.Â· 41rdiw a~*M,#,Â·-m=:#.1 *, t: 3 1 / 6ACSK1 RECEIVED FEB 1 6 2016 CITY OF ASPEN COMPJFY DEVELOHIEN? I A : - â€ž~-â€ž.â€ž-I ~r -~,---â€¢I-'~â€¢,f~~~"-..1-*Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â·Â· '~Â·'--- -. 1â€ž. ~25 HE~OM-LIMIT ExiSTINGPANAPE"lb lie - A.~OVE[}Al; I /]IC' _*5*0 -21.-Al ROOF DECK 4 E ....0 RE:. N-| I JU 1 - 2 Fri - i - - - - - - - " ' - - - - -- --~- - - MASTER LEVEL - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -tw. /1,c - - -~ 4 L - - NOIN~WSBETWINg â€¢2 .t HERâ„¢ANATRANSOÂ¥ ABOVEADOOF=COMPLY 4497....03/ ZE-ZZ~| E: E F=NG Â·0 RE*I 4___Lt Ul i ~ 9 1 , 1 ,[73 2 : 1 MAIN LEVEL - ' 100'-Or - 1 GARAGE LEVEL ----- ------- ----------------t------96 3* : 1 1 : 1 1 4- ----------------------------------- 4. ------ LOWER LEVEL ii I- 88'-9 X-3 ExtSTING SOUTH ELEVATION 1,4 = 1Â·-0" EJUS-NNG CNjUNEY 10 REMM Iâ€¢ - ~ CH,!NEVPROJEC'IONÂ·Â· 1(rFROM -1----1 HE'/1 OF BuiD// - CONNE~TIONPER269=W // 1f31 L .. ~* . MEIGHT# -4 1 111 M \3'Nh- BEnWEEN,â‚¬,DGEANDE~ laPONT -Er*UNRED,4 A-Â£*0Â¤5/"-77 ykf Â·imâ€ž~-,FliÂ¥~PONT I 4 EA-pot ''I / , t ROOF DECK 243 - '~-~-1 119'Â· 10 1/4 37.|. E'lili -2~_1.....IOlK- --1 ~ - -Â·E---[IL-- ~ _ - - - - - MASTER LEYEL ----------------- - ---- -5 111:61/4, V ch. - - - - - - - - - -1 - - - - L---1 -- - 1- - -- - - - + - - - - - - I.- -1-2 1.- -- - - - - - - - DEÂ¥=9 G ** DOOIl E=.IT,NITORb-N . MAIN LEVEL 100Â·. cr 1 GARAGE LEVEL 98Â·. 3 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 4- _ _ _ _ _ _LOWER LEVEL , --- GLY -2-- 88-9 L_- 3 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4- = 1'.0- FORUM PHI I 715 W MAIN ST, STE 204 I ASPEN, CO 81611 PREPARED BY: LORI DUNN 1 970.797.4880 1 LDUNN@FORUMPHI.COM tf ft IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT RECtiVED UNIT A, 820 EAST HYMAN TOWNHOME CONDOMINIUMS ACCORDING TO THE PLAT RECORDED JUNE 16, 1988, IN PLAT BOOK 20 AT PAGE 96 FEB 1 6 2016 LOTS M & N, BLOCK 31, EAST ASPEN ADDITION, AKA LOTS M & N, BLOCK 110, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN CITY CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO COMMI'ki 9 N 130 w'luiLLIu,h,â€ž/ 30 ybs veyi 444, 300- Â·Â·1'4 5 3 ''B-~60 2lm A/, 0 0. w 270-g i ...Wth . 5-90 E -- ._ - ,Â·TBLE FED. NÂ·:/... Â·#A:Â£' t~)'~ BLEC. PED. EL/926./ ..447 2 4 ~ ,i 'Â·~:' Â·dick Â· ' 1- 934 4, L liA 3 i) 6,3.JRVEY 1 0 240- 3& '60 120 3,00.-F= 30* . f he LOT M EL 7927.Cr 10' REAR BIlli)DNG SETBACK ] 210 - iÂ·Â·Â·1~0Â·n 150 PER BK 20 PG 96 I : 1 ....(I.) [ i -- - - - - 9.'mls 1 S 30.001 6 .21.7927.4 GRAPHIC SCALE ' / LOTN L CE UN/A / 7- / '-3.00os'FI FROPEZY DE:>CK.Fnet PERBKZOPO 96 f x - 1 -n UNrr A. 120 EASr HYMAN mWNHOME CONDOMCNIUMS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT PARKIN:--%%/ RECORDED JUNE 16, ]988, rN PLAT BOOK 20 AT PAGE 96. LOTS M AND N, BLOCK 31, EAST ASPEN L.C E. U.T B 49 9 9 --9*~L ADDITION, AKA LOTS M AND N, BLOCK ] 10, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, CITY OF ASPEN, PERBK 20 PG 96 COUNTY OF PlTKIN, STATE OF COLORADO C IN FEET ) 1 inch = 10 ft 1 P :EÂ« 1 21 1161 1 ' FINISHFLOORGARAGE ZS-.,75,Â· EL 7927.05' UNIT LINE PER ~ME"R BK 20 PG 96 GAS 5' SIDE BULDING SETBACK / , . 251 4 PER I] 20 Po m / ria :1* 1 . 1 El ?927.5 / 5' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK PER BK 20 PG 96 MULT1 LEVEL Ar-50 TREECRAET ~ woonvu~ m 4-2 52/ TREE TYPE TRUNK DIA. DRIP DIA. BASE ELEV TR-1 DECmUOUS 2Xll" 16' 7928.9 9 1 I *0 & TR-2 CONIFER 28Â· 24' 7929/ ADJOINER 1 TR-9 CON[FER 24 24' 7927.4+ BUU.DING & râ€¢f 1 TR-/ DECIDUOUS 10- 16' 7929.0' j , UNITA 2.14 DECIDUOUS 24- 30' 7928.6 O A. GPS ~ 822 E. HYMAN 1/ Ah/ TR-15 DEC[DUOUS . 30 7928.6' MONUMENT NO. 5 816 EAST HYMAN AVE. / 4 TOWNHOMES S GALENA & 018 EAST HYMAN AVE. Op TR-16 DECIDUOUS 6 12 7927.4 E.1{OPKINS 1 44 1 #9 1---04. 1 lrNDERIGNOUCnGN ; met 24 l TR-21 CONTPER 12 Â£ 792/1 BRASSCAP 3-22 CONIVER 4" 8 7927.I 4. / / /u TR-23 CON[FER 4 16+ wrts ~10 '4 z TR-24 CON[PER 8" W 7927.3 , 42.4 4, / trw?928.1':' 1. 4 13 1 '32,4L7 ,~ f / 03/ 1 /1 1 k-% , LADJOINER -ir-s BUILDING FINISH CLOOR 1.0 41. I - /4 EL 7928.95' , FINISH FUXOR *4 - 1 --u u Â· fl T -P EL 7928.4' / 4 ! FENCECIYP/+~ ELV.26.7.i.* /// ' .4 / ..=CONC i ti l FÂ»4 1- 1 7 f I- /2 in"K..0.00"c. 0 M ./.*ICAP 15 119544 AJNING WALL /1 575*56'23-W L.S.#20151 " Wmt FENCE 9 a=.74' / ]/ FRONT BULL[ING SETBACK â€¢ EL 7928.9 -~__~ER BK 20 PG 96 O A GPS MONUMENT L_Jil -~ .41'1 VPMENT STIR, 7%Â· 9..'U,# i NO 2 - S. GALENA & E. DURANT - BRASS CAP 1) THIS PROPERTY [S SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRIC'nONS, COVENANTS AND 1 HERBBÂ¥ STATE THAT THIS -ROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY PEAK SURVEYING. INC. EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCE,nONS TO TrrLE SHOWN [N THE TITLE FOR MURRAY B. HALL REVOCABLE TRUST, COMETMENT PREPARED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY. CASE NO. Per23331Wil, DATED EFFECIVE DECEMBER 7.2011, 2---- I FURTHER STAm THAT THEIMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCELON THIS DATE. EL 7929.9' JUNE 12.2014 AND NOVEMBER 11.2015, EXCE}r UT11.1TY CONNECTIONS. ARE ENnIUFLY Wr[HIN 2) â„¢E DATE OP THIS SURVEY WAS JANUARY 9, 2013. JUNE 12, 2014 AND NOVEMBER 11, 2015. - - LI-'-T==YPY THE BOUNDAR]ES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEIâ€¢T AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOIN[NG PREMISES, EXCEPT AS 3) BASIS OF HEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF Sâ„¢09'I 1-E BETWEEN THE [ND]CATED. AND THAT THERE [S NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT 7Â· CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL EXCEFT AS NOTED. I FURTHER STATE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF;20 EAST 1 rN M AN TOWNHOMECONDOMMIMS ALSO BEiNG THE .0 - 0 'k, 1 1. 1 5' 'i, E.7 SOUTHWESTCORNEROFLOTM. BLOCK),EASTASPENADDrnON.A#,REBARSCAP ~ 'J~'1.CT#hÂ¥.. THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE 1TTLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY WESTCOR LAND TITLE LS.#2015,FOUNDINPLACEANDTHESOUTHEASTCORNEROFLOTQ. BLOCKJ,EASTASPEN I - -1--2 INSURANCE COMPAWY. CASE NO P/123331,/4, DATED EFFECm'/ DECEMBER 7, 2011 AND FIND AD/mON, A.5 REBAR & CAP L S #91#4 FOUND IN PLACE ALL EXCEPTIONS TO TrrLE THAT AFFECT IHE SUBECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN HERRON To THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. 012.12-*A 4) UNrrS OF MEASURE FOR ALL D]MENSIONS SHOWN HEREIN IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. S) TH]S SURVEY I BASEDON THE 820 EAST HYMAN mWNHOMECONDOMINIUMS PLAT - RECORDED JUNE 14 1988 IN PLAT BOOK 20 PAGE 96 [N THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND - RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE, -1- - M /2'92(-*rik 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTa[ZING THE MESA COUNTY RTVRN NETWORK AND CO.A. GPS CONTROL POINTS (19811 ORTHO DATUM} YIELDING AN ON-SITE - Cr ELEVAnON OF 7928.74' ON â„¢E SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT M, BLOCK 3 1 AS SHOWN. --- #sy'7%5Â¢Q:fo 2 8 7) AT THE TIME OF THE NOVEMBER 1 1, 2015 SURVEY THERE WAS 6" OF SNOW AND ICE ON THE - GROUND [MPROVEMENTS MAY EXIST THAT WERE NOT VISIBLE. - ~f~ 12/01~15 5~ Drawn By: Revinon By NO. Date Project NO. JRN MURRAY B. HALL REVOCABLE TRUST 1 11/11/15 UPDATE UNIT A SURVEY JRN ~(\A . O=ked By CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO 12014 '30' PEAK r# 2 12/03/15 UPDATE UNrr A SURVEY JRN ]RN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT ~ Surveying, Inc. ~ D- UNIT A, 820 E. HYMAN CONDO JUNE 17, 2014 PO. Box 1746 - Rifle, CO 81650 Â· 816 E. HYMAN AVENUE 10F1 Phone (970) 625-1954 - Fax (970) 625-2954 Computer./Â· â„¢11 SUIC,~Y . COMMENCEDMORE â„¢AN lEN YEARS FROM n EDATEOFâ„¢E CERn}]CAnON SHOWN HERFON www.peaksurveymginc.corn 014A.DWG