HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Vincenzi/Goldstein Condominiumization
r
"-
"
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision
Exception (Condominiumiza~ion)
APPROVED AS TO FORM: i 1,1..( ( .
105,
DATE: July 2, 1981
Zoning:
Lot Size:
300 South Spring at East Hyman Avenue
Original Aspen Townsite)
o - Office
Location:
6000 square feet
Planning Office
Recommendations:
The applicant is requesting a subdivision exception for the
purposes of condominiumizing the Hannah Dustin Building
which contains nine commercial units. Since this is a re-
quest to condominiumize a commercial structure, the applicant
need not comply with Sections 20-22 of the Municipal Code
which concern the applicant's impacts on the supply of low
and moderate income housing.
In a memorandum dated May 5, 1981 (attached for your review)
the Engineer makes the following comments:
1) The applicant should obtain an encroachment license for
the intrusion of the building into the S. Spring Street
right-of-way.
2) The applicant should construct a five foot wide by four
inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman
Avenue property line.
3) The applicant should revise the site plan to include
the following corrections:
- completion of the site plan title;
- completion of the index listing; and
designation of the existing parking area in the north-
east corner of the property.
The Building Inspector performed a site inspection of the
premises and reported to the Planning Office that numerous
life, health and safety violations were found during the
visit. A detailed listing of the violations is attached
for your review within the memo from Herb Paddock dated
June 15, 1981.
The Planning Office recommends that you approve the applicant's
request for subdivision exception for the purposes of condo-
miniumization subject to the following conditions:
1) The applicant obtaining an encroachment license for the
intrusion of the building into the S. Spring Street
right-of-way;
2) The applicant agreeing to construct a five foot wide by
four inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East
Hyman Avenue property line;
3) The applicant revising the site plan to meet the comments
contained in the Engineering Department memorandum dated
May 5, 1981 and re-submitting the plat prior to recorda-
tion.
Applicant's
Request:
Engineer's
Comments:
Building
Inspector's
Comments:
c
~,
,.,
Memo: Vicenzi/Goldstein
July 2, 1981
Page Two
Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
P & Z Action: At their meeting on June 23, 1981, the Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission recommended that you approve the appli-
cant's request for subdivision exception, concurring with
the three conditions recommended by the Planning Office.
City Council Action: Should Council concur with the recommendations of the
Planning Office and P & Z, the appropniate motion is as
follows:
"I move to approve the Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision
Exception for the purposes of condominiumization, subject
to the following conditions:
1) The applicant obtaining an encroachment license for
the intrusion of the building into the S. Spring
Street right-of-way;
2) The applicant agreeing to construct a five foot wide by
four inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East
Hyman Avenue property line;
3) The applicant revising the site plan to meet the comments
contained in the Engineering Department memorandum dated
May 5, 1981 and re-submitting the plat prior to ~ecorda-
tion.'"
ASPEN.PITKIN ~EGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Allan Richman, Planning Department City ~pen /' _
Herb Paddock, Chief Building Official ~'~
FROM:
RE :
Vincenzi Condominization
DATE:
June 15, 1981
---------------------------------------------------------------------
The following are items the Building Department requires to be addressed
in conjunction with condominization of the above.
(1) Add sprinkler system per section 11 & 38 of 76 U.B.C.
(2) Provide separation at basement with 3/4 hour door assembly per
chapter 3305 of 76 V.B.C.
(3) Incomplete I-hour construction and rated doors (20 minute
rating) shall be added at basement.
(4) Exit doors adjacent to courtyard shall be replaced with 3/4
hour rated doors and closures rather than sliding doors. These
shall comply with height, width, and swing requirements of section
33 of the 76 V.B.C.
(5) Additional glazing at court area shall be replaced with wired
glass.
(6) Exit signs shall be placed at all exits at court area per
section 3312 of 76 V.B.C.
(7) Missing fire hoses shall be replaced, see 76 V.B.C.
(8) Handrails shall be installed throughout the building in
compliance with section 33 of 76 V.B.C.
(9) All exits shall swing in the direction of travel at courtyard.
(10) Guardrails shall meet requirements of section 33, minimum
42" height.
These reflect all changes required by the Building Department. If
some question about waivers by the Board of Appeals on those items
arise we need to contact Paul Taddune. If any of those items were
waived, they were done so outside the perimeters of the Board's
rights and power.
cc: Gideon Kaufman
Paul Taddune
506 East Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303/925-5973
o
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Alan Richman, Planning Office
Department ~
FROM:
Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering
DATE:
May 5, 1981
RE:
Vicenzi/Goldstein Exception (Condominiumization)
After reviewing the condominium map submitted by the above applicant
and conducting a site inspection of the requested condominiumization,
the Engineering Department has the following comments:
I. The site plan title needs to be completed.
2. The index listing needs to be completed.
3. An encroachment license must be obtained for encroachment
of building into the S. Spring Street right-of-way.
4. The site plan is missing designation of existing parking
area in the northeast corner.
5. The construction of a five foot (5') wide by four inch
(4") thick concrete sidewalk be required adjacent to
the East Hyman Avenue property line.
o
o
t4EMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: May 27, 1981
Location:
Zoning:
Lot Size:
Applicant's
Request:
Engineer's
Comments:
300 South Spring at East Hyman Avenue (Lots A & B, Block 105,
Original Aspen Townsite)
o - Office
6000 square feet
The applicant is requesting a subdivision exception for the
purposes of condominiumizing the Hannah Dustin Building which
contains nine commercial units. Since this is a request to
condominiumize a commercial structure, the applicant need only
comply with Sections 20-22(a) and (b) and not Sections (c) and
(d) which apply to the applicant's impacts on the supply of
low and moderate income housing.
In a memorandum dated May 5, 1981 (attached for your review)
the Engineer makes the following comments:
1) The applicant should obtain an encroachment license for
the intrusion of the building into the S. Spring Street
right-of-way.
2) The applicant should construct a five foot wide by four
inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman
Avenue property line.
3) The applicant should revise the site plan to include
the following corrections:
_ completion of the site plan title;
_ completion of the index listing; and
designation of the existing parking area in the north-
east corner of the property.
Planning Office The applicant should comply with Sections 20-22(a) and (b)
Comments: of the Code by meeting the following conditions:
- Existing tenants should be given written notice when their
unit is offered for sale with a 90-day option to purchase
their unit at preliminary market value. Tenants should
be provided a 90-day right of first refusal to purchase
thei r unit; and
Building
Inspector's
Comments:
Planning Office
Recommendation:
- All units shall be restricted to six month minimum leases
with no more than two shorter tenancies per year.
The Building Inspector performed a site inspection of the
premises and reported to the Planning Office that numerous
life, health and safety violations were found during the
visit. A detailed listing of the violations was not made
available to the Planning Office, but the Inspector will
be at your meeting on June 2 to report on the results of his
inspections.
The Planning Office recommends that you approve the applicant's
request for subdivision exception for the purposes of condo-
miniumization subject to the following conditions:
""
t
....,,/
"....
-
(~ondominiumization)
Memo: Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision Exception
Page Two
May 27, 1981
1) The applicant obtaining an encroachment license for
the intrusion of the building into the S. Spring Street
right-of-way;
2) The applicant agreeing to construct a five foot wide by
four inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East
Hyman Avenue property line;
3) The applicant revising the site plan to meet the comments
contained in the Engineering Department memorandum dated
May 5, 1981 and re-submitting the plat prior to review
by City Council;
4) The applicant giving written notice to tenants when their
unit is offered for sale with a 90-day option to purchase
their unit at preliminary market value. Tenants should
also be provided a 90-day right of first refusal to
purchase their unit;
5) The applicant agreeing that all units shall be restricted
to six month minimum leases with no more than two shorter
tenancies per year.
"..."'"
"..;'","
......
l'lEMORANDUM
DATE:
April 30, 1981
'fO:
Alan Richman ....----.
(7\\
Paul Taddune \. \
FROM:
RE:
VicenzijGoldstein Subdivlsion Exceptlon (Condomin-
iumization)
Even though the units are to be used for commercial pur-
poses, it appears that the applicant must still demon-
strate corr~liance with S8ction 20-22, in particular,
Section 20-22(a).
PJT:mc
~
II
II
I,
II
il
L
"
.,
,..-....
~
-
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made on behalf of GEORGE VICENZI and
ALAN J. GOLDSTEIN, (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"applicant") under !;20-19(a) of the City of Aspen, Colorado,
subdivision regulations for approval through the subdivision
exception process of applicant's plan for condominiumization
with respect to real property described as:
Lots A & B,
Block lOS,
City of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado
An exception in this case would be appropriate.
I The application involves subdivision of an existing
I structure. Requiring strict compliance with subdivision regu-
I lations for the subdivision of a lot with a nine (9) unit
I commercial building on it creates conditions which will
I deprive the applicant of reasonable use of land. If this
exception application is granted, owners of the property will
have a common interest in the land; and there will be a
condominium declaration applicable to the property which will
not in any way increase the land use impact of the property.
An exception in this case will not conflict with the intent
and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to
assest the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the
City of Aspen, to ensure the proper distribution of population,
to coordinate the need for public services and to encourage
well planned subdivisions.
, .
,'~
.
The granting of this application will not undermine
Ithe intent of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly
within the area intended for exception under S20-19. The
building is already in existence, and there will be no change
in density, which is presently in line with the desired
i[poPulation density for the property.
I There are no Ordinance 39 aspects of this application because
,
,
i the subject property is commercial and office property.
Ii The applicant would appreciate your consideration of this
I application at your next regular meeting.
I Dated: April &; , 1981
LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON KAUFMAN
i
I
,
I
I
I,
II
,I
il
I.
Ii
II
i.
il
COpy 0;:: GIDEON KAUFMAN
By
Gideon Kaufman
Attorneys for Applicant
611 West Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-8166
i:
Ii
"
Ii
Ii
Ii
il
I
i
I
i
I
I
i
- 2 -
Ii
II
/""'.
~
..,
~....
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Housing Director
Fire Marshal/Building Inspector
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: April 7, 1981
The attached application submitted by George Vicenzi and Alan J. Goldstein
requests approval for condominiumization of an existing nine unit commercial
building. The building is located on Lots A & B, Block 105, East Aspen.
This item has been scheduled for review by tne Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission on May 19, 1981; please review and return any comments to the
Planning Office by Thursday, April 30, 1981. Thank you.
...
.
~
"
---T-
#;"'>..
......
f
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made on behalf of GEORGE VICENZI and
ALAN J. GOLDSTEIN, (hereinafter collectively referred to as
"applicant") under !;20-l9(a) of the City of Aspen, Colorado,
subdivision regulations for approval through the subdivision
exception process of applicant's plan for condominiumization
with respect to real property described as:
Lots A & B,
Block lOS,
City of Aspen,
pitkin County, Colorado
An exception in this case would be appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing
structure. Requiring strict compliance with subdivision regu-
lations for the subdivision of a lot with a nine (9) unit
commercial building on it creates conditions which will
deprive the applicant of reasonable use of land. If this
exception application is granted, owners of the property will
have a common interest in the land; and there will be a
condominium declaration applicable to the property which will
not in any way increase the land use impact of the property.
An exception in this case will not conflict with the intent
and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to
assest the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the
City of Aspen, to ensure the proper distribution of population,
to coordinate the need for public services and to encourage
well planned subdivisions.
v~
/,"
'-'
...
.~~-iIIII
I
,
!
---1'-
The granting of this application will not undermine
the intent of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly
within the area intended for exception under S20-19. The
building is already in existence, and there will be no change
in density, which is presently in line with the desired
population density for the property.
There are no Ordinance 39 aspects
of this application because I
the subject property is commercial and office property.
The applicant would appreciate your consideration of this
application at your next regular meeting.
Dated: April G , 1981
LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON KAUFMAN
By ./
Gideon Kaufman
Attorneys for ~ licant
611 West Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 925-8166
(
- 2 -
f
l
,
,
,
~,
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
. 0 _-.. .
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAND USE APPLlCA nON FEES
County
00100 - 63711 09009 - 00000
63712
63713
63714
63715
63716
63717
City
00100 - 63721 09009 - 00000
63722
63723
63724
63725
63726
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00100 - 63061 09009 - 00000
63062
63063
Conceptual Application
Preliminary Application
Final Application
Exemption i ,,--5L11(~]
Rezoning
Conditional Use
Subdivision/PUD
Special Review
P&Z Review Only
Detailed Review
Final Plat
Special Approval
Specially Assigned
County land Use Sales
GMP Sales
Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Other
V/ ....!
fftli:T1 ;,',(/>1. ,,,,.//i.)
/ '.~ _, I .'-1
-. ',11' ,;. '_ ,~: 17","
a "C- ,;,. I '
70(',J - tf I' (C:, V"
Project:
Phone:
Date:
"I/7/v/
,
\..{. A 1"
Name: t)t(Jie/N1 Ult*-rJ
f#y loe ()
Add ress: . -;;t
{,// lUb1t matIl '
Check No. ~ff/h" CfJ '1/te/!
~9S!S
Receipt No. P