HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Aspen Professional Building\00c� -,(5%1 - 16
Aspen Professional
Building
E
X
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: inn Stock, City Attorney
Dave Ellis, City Engineer
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Professional Building - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: May 22, 1979
Attached is an application for Subdivision Exemption submitted by the Aspen
Professional Building Joint Venture. This item is tentatively scheduled to come
before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, June 19, 1979. There-
fore, may I please have your comments concerning this application by Monday,
June 11, 1979. If you cannot meet this schedule, please advise me immediately.
Thank you.
C
LAW OFFICFS
E
OATES, AUSTIN, MCGRATH & LJORDAN
600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
LEONARD M. OATES
RONALD D. AUSTIN
J. NICHOLAS MCGRATH, JR.
WILLIAM R.JORDAN U1
ROBERT W. HUGHES
RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH
City Council
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Planning Commission
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
May 22, 1979
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
AREA CODE 303
TELEPHONE 925-2600
Re: Application for Exemption from Definition of
Subdivision --Aspen Professional Building
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We represent the Aspen Professional Building Joint
Venture, a group of local business persons, including the under-
signed law firm, which recently acquired the Aspen Professional
Building. The Professional Building, as you know, is a three-
story frame office building situate on the corner of Hunter Street
and East Hopkins Avenue and bears the street address of 600 East
Hopkins Avenue. The property is legally described as being:
Lots K, L, M, N & the Westerly 1/2 of
Lot 0, Block 98, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado.
The owners seek by this application an exemption from the defini-
tion of a subdivision (Section 20-19(b), Municipal Code of the
City of Aspen) in connection with the proposed condominiumization
of the building. Improvement surveys of the property accompany
this application, along with our check for $50 for the filing fee.
The Professional Building, which was constructed in
1973, consists of three above grade and one below grade levels and
is situate in the C-1 zone district. It contains approximately
I—
LJ
OATES, AUSTIN, MCGRATH 8, JOROAN
City Council
Planning Commission
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
May 22, 1979
Page Two
18,000 gross square feet (i.e., including common areas) and
approximately 16,000 net (i.e., leasable) square feet. Seventeen
off-street parking spaces are appurtenant to the building, as well
as a closed trash -access area consistent with code requirements.
The building is exclusively of a commercial orientation, which will
be maintained, and presently accommodates fourteen spearate tenan-
cies in its twenty lease spaces --certain tenants leasing more than
a single space. Present occupants include on the patio (below
grade) level: the Stapleton Insurance Company, Aspen Home Mortgage,
Castle Creek Vending and private office space; on the first level:
Le Tub, Two Guys from Italy, Mountain High Music and Inner Visions
Art Gallery; on the second floor level: Attorney Jon K. Mulford
and the law firm of Oates, Austin, McGrath & Jordan; and on the
third floor level: the Shaeffer Group, Inc., the Aspen Music
Associates and the offices of Steven Marcus.
Other uses on the block include the Playhouse Theatre,
the Hunter,Square Building and the Spring Street Condominiums,
both of which are mixed commercial -residential condominium complexes,
the Aspen Psychiatric Building, a single-family residence, and the
KSNO Radio Station.
Naturally, the applicant understands that condominiumi-
zation of existing buildings under single -ownership technically is
a subdivision under state law and the City Code. However, given
that typical subdivision concerns related to a new division of
land, such as growth patterns, extension of public services,
geologic hazards, subdivision design standards and the like
obviously are not involved here, the applicant believes that condo-
miniumization of the Professional Building is not within the intent
and purposes of the subdivision ordinance and, hence, is appropriate
for exemption. And, needless to say, since the building is
exclusively commercial in nature concerns with the impacts of
condominiumization upon the local housing inventory similarly are
not involved.
We will be happy to supply you with any further infor-
mation that you might require and answer any questions you may have.
GATES, AUSTIN, McGRATH a JORDAN
City Council
Planning Commission
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
May 22, 1979
Page Three
We would appreciate an early setting on the Planning and Zoning
Commission agenda.
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
Sincerely,
OATES, AUSTIN, McGRATH & JORDAN
M
RI,TH / j m s
Original Signed By
ROBERT W. HJGHE8
Robert W. Hughes
l, A
LAW OFFICES
OATES, AUSTIN, MCGRATH & JORDAN
LEONARD M. OATES
RONALD D. AUSTIN
J. NICHOLAS MCGRATH, JR.
WILLIAM R.JORDAN IQ
ROBERT W. HUGHES
RICHARD A. KNEZEVICH
City Council
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Planning Commission
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
600 EAST HOPKINS AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
May 22, 1979
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
City Hall
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
AREA CODE 303
TELEPHONE 925-2600
Re: Application for Exemption from Definition of
Subdivision --Aspen Professional Building
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We represent the Aspen Professional Building Joint
Venture, a group of local business persons, including the under-
signed law firm, which recently acquired the Aspen Professional
Building. The Professional Building, as you know, is a three-
story frame office building situate on the corner of Hunter Street
and East Hopkins Avenue and bears the street address of 600 East
Hopkins Avenue. The property is legally described as being:
Lots K, L, M, N & the Westerly 1/2 of
Lot 0, Block 98, City and Townsite of
Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado.
The owners seek by this application an exemption from the defini-
tion of a subdivision (Section 20-19(b), Municipal Code of the
City of Aspen) in connection with the proposed condominiumization
of the building. Improvement surveys of the property accompany
this application, along with our check for $50 for the filing fee.
The Professional Building, which was constructed in
1973, consists of three above grade and one below grade levels and
is situate in the C-1 zone district. It contains approximately
OATES, AUSTIN, MCGRATH & JORDAN
City Council
Planning Commission
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
May 22, 1979
Page Two
18,000 gross square feet (i.e., including common areas) and
approximately 16,000 net (i.e., leasable) square feet. Seventeen
off-street parking spaces are appurtenant to the building, as well
as a closed trash -access area consistent with code requirements.
The building is exclusively of a commercial orientation, which will
be maintained, and presently accommodates fourteen spearate tenan-
cies in its twenty lease spaces --certain tenants leasing more than
a single space. Present occupants include on the patio (below
grade) level: the Stapleton Insurance Company, Aspen Home Mortgage,
Castle Creek Vending and private office space; on the first level:
Le Tub, Two Guys from Italy, Mountain High Music and Inner Visions
Art Gallery; on the second floor level: Attorney Jon K. Mulford
and the law firm of Oates, Austin, McGrath & Jordan; and on the
third floor level: the Shaeffer Group, Inc., the Aspen Music
Associates and the offices of Steven Marcus.
Other uses on the block include the Playhouse Theatre,
the Hunter Square Building and the Spring Street Condominiums,
both of which are mixed commercial -residential condominium complexes,
the Aspen Psychiatric Building, a single-family residence, and the
KSNO Radio Station.
Naturally, the applicant understands that condominiumi-
zation of existing buildings under single -ownership technically is
a subdivision under state law and the City Code. However, given
that typical subdivision concerns related to a new division of
land, such as growth patterns, extension of public services,
geologic hazards, subdivision design standards and the like
obviously are not involved here, the applicant believes that condo-
miniumization of the Professional Building is not within the intent
and purposes of the subdivision ordinance and, hence, is appropriate
for exemption. And, needless to say, since the building is
exclusively commercial in nature concerns with the impacts of
condominiumization upon the local housing inventory similarly are
not involved.
We will be happy to supply you with any further infor-
mation that you might require and answer any questions you may have.
OATES, AUSTIN, MCGRATH & JORDAN
City Council
Planning Commission
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
May 22, 1979
Page Three
We would appreciate an early setting on the Planning and Zoning
Commission agenda.
Thank you for your time and cooperation.
Sincerely,
OATES , AUSTIN , j cG � TIC & JQRDAN
Ex
RWH/jms
ert W. Hug
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Professional Building - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: June 26, 1979
The attached application requests subdivision exemption for the purpose of
condominiumization of the Aspen Professional Building. The Professional Building
is located at 600 East Hopkins Avenue on the corner of Hunter and East Hopkins.
The building is exclusively occupied by commercial businesses and professional
persons. There are no residential units involved in the application.
The application was referred to the City Engineer and the City Attorney.
Both departments have recommended approval of the application without conditions.
As there are no adverse impacts identified, the Planning Office recommends your
approval of the subdivision exemption without condition.
The Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their regular
meeting on June 19, 1979, at which time they recommended your approval of this
subdivision exemption without condition.
0 •
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Professional Building - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: June 13, 1979
The attached application requests subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of the Aspen Professional Building. The Professional
Building is located at 600 East Hopkins Avenue on the corner of Hunter and
East Hopkins. The building is exclusively occupied by commercial businesses
and professional persons. There are no residential units involved in the
application.
The application was referred to the City Engineer and the City Attorney.
Both departments have recommended approval of the application without condition.
As there are no adverse impacts identified, the Planning Office recommends
your approval of the subdivision exemption without condition.
0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: RICHARD GRICE, PLANNING OFFICE
FROM: LOUIS BUETTNER, ENGINEERING OFFICE
DATE: June 6, 1979
RE: Aspen Professional Building
The Aspen Professional Building had all improvements installed at
the time of construction.
This submission for exemption is lacking information on.quite a
few points, each point being small enough to be overlooked. The
Aspen Professional Building as a commercial enterprise would be
enhanced if there were a covered trash area as is now required
by code.
After reviewing all materials and making a field inspection, I
would recommend that this application be approved.
jk
0
CITY OF
MEMO FROM RICHARD GRICE
1 `
J
ASPEN
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Stock, City Attorney
Dave Ellis, City Engineer
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Professional Building - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: May 22, 1979
Attached is an application for Subdivision Exemption submitted by the Aspen
Professional Building Joint Venture. This item is tentatively scheduled to come
before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, June 19, 1979. There-
fore, may I please have your comments concerning this application by Monday,
June 11, 1979. If you cannot meet this schedule, please advise me immediately.
Thank you.
r,,
FOUND COR
m
�, �dr��a w. �ouNsarc,(JC�uNSc�N-LONG���LSJW8�4`3Sctd-T�S,tNc.), n
R�Gt�Tt�C��� Sl..�t-�'Jt=`(CAR 1N THE"_�Td`T�C�t= C'�..C�R,L�CX7. UO 1-lE.t�E3Y C�S21`i�f �f�--1L�i
C)N TNT l ro i N DdY % MdY, I g7 g, I -IT 1E-- SHC7v1JN
1 1Et� i�t dND FCX )ND i t-tt= tMP )�✓�M�t\1TS TcJ 131 dS SHCWN ON-MiS PLdT
L C"CF-ELLOW & LDS C{I,TES.1 NG.
HL�ID `�JV. JCO1�Kt�1 L.S. 9018
V.
/ P 135 00
/L c.
�
0
/= w,TN0Rr �Rql l
ME /
94Sp 4f BLDG.
z�.,o, /
/ /0 Op` ^ Y
!�
NGe C/
/ /, ` 98
VE l0 /
RHAN
G & /BALCONIES_ l
—J
o
0
FOUND COR.
ll o pK1
NS
41
91
\J
�w
I, HAROLD W. JOHNSON (JOHNSON -
LONGFELLOW 9 ASSOC, INC.,) A REGISTERED
-SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS
MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
A THREE STORY FRAME BUILDING WAS FOUND
TO BE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE LOT LINES.
ALL EASEMENTS AND ENCROACHMENTS
IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE SHOWN.
SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
JOHNS0NN f- LONGFELLOW B ASSOC., /ABC.
HAROLD ",W. JOHNSON
RdT t V2F-R 8' P C-C=- C1 Ft�b M/SY tom, t�79
0)/
IV-
10
O
V�
co
37 50,
07
z
J
Z
FOUND COR
V.
I , I ad1L t� W. JONN SON, CJC at���-LONG��LLfJW 1�.S50C(L�T�S, tIVG.). Z\.
R4=C,1 S-t �R�D St l�/E`lOR 1N TNI=. S�idT� OF C' .�>RdC , to 1- g� ttY Cif-11=`� -TNL�`t
ON Ti-1 ICoTN bdYC M,�, Ig7-2), 1 INSPr=CTr--P- 4--PPZPV--P,i�"SNC7Wt�1
1E. Cif J dl`5t7 >`C�,hJC> Ti �1= IMS V�M�NTS ►�J B--- dS SHCWN ON7l m,5 PLAT.
...KJ�--i1�.l�N-LfJNGFELI_JW & L�.'S�C1A-t"�S.1IyG.
EiY:��r-'✓r ' ""
►-awl-D W..JO �� L . �. �,01 fS �"�,* * q�'� . ° �.
M
e
k �
3
I�G0 o,Al
o /
jo, -� .30.p0 �� I u t
Q �-- = 20
A , /5Oo FOUND COR.
�ro A
lQ S T° R Y FR 0
w,
r T h A M E
BA S . eCD
IENT G.
to, f l
Ak,00�
cp
o l0 00, ,� Y
320 N
q708
q /
0vRky
G �
0
0
n
NOpjk.
NS
FOUND COR
AS l l l l l
l EN TpW
� lSITE
09 1--- j
STR
EE 7-
a
1, HAROLD W. JOHNSON (JOHNSON -
LONGFELLOW & ASSOC, INC.,) A REGISTERED
SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS
MADE UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND
A THREE STORY FRAME BUILDING WAS FOUND
TO BE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE LOT LINES.
ALL EASEMENTS AND ENCROACHMENTS
IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE SHOWN,
SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF.
,1ONNS0N - LOMGFE-LLOW 8 ASSOC., MC
BY
HAROLD JOHNSON T
v "
-1 �5 PL1�T GZ�V t SE i� 8� CEP—n F=I LD M dY irb, ('-:D-7 e
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
LOTS K, L, M, N, & 1//2 0
BLOCK 98 - ASPEN,
JOHNSON - LONSFELLOW & ASSOC, INC.
PO BOX 5547 WEST VILLAGE • COLO. 81615 .
NOVEMBER 19, 1973
SCALE: I " = 20