HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Beuttas,LotsK-M.Blk52.1979\Dncl\
(�:* Aar
-- BEUTTAS
E
XI
CITY C,.'__'ASPEN
130 south (1,il.ena street
aspen, coiorado 81611
April 2, 1979
Mr. Chris Smith
0373 Sopris Creek
Carbondale, CO 81623
Dear Chris,
As per our phone conversation, enclosed you will find a
copy of the Statement of Exemption from the Definition of
Subdivision for the Beuttas/Hatch/Smith subdivision re-
corded in Book 364, Pages 91 and 92 in the County Clerk's
Office.
Please disregard the Recorder's note in the left hand
margin as this was recorded with several other documents
and the recorder mistakenly connected this with another
subdivision. We have also noted this in our files.
If you have any further questions, feel free to call our
office.
Sincerely,
Sher Simmen
Deputy City Clerk
enc.
{
Recorded at 2:53PMFeb
28,
Reception No. 20276
1979 Loretta Banner Recorder
« &$304 rxcW.
STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, DIANA H. BEUTTAS, DEBORAH S. HATCH and CHRISTO-
PHER H. SMITH are the owners of a parcel of land located in Pitkin
County, Colorado, more particularly described as:
Lots K, L and M
Block 52
City and Townsite of Aspen
WHEREAS, there are three dwellings located on said
property, and
WHEREAS, applicants have requested an exemption from the
definition of subdivision for the purpose of subdividing the
existing three units through condominiumization, and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and zoning Commission, at it
meeting held July 18, 1978 determined that an exemption from the
definition of subdivision is appropriate and recommended that the
same be granted, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined that the subdivisi
of the existing three units through condominiumization is not
within the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance set
forth in Chapter 20 of the Aspen Municipal Code,
THEREFORE, the City Council of Aspen, Colorado does
hereby determine that the proposed subdivision of the three units
located on said property by its condominiumization is not within
the intents and purpose of the subdivision ordinance and does, for
such reason grant an exemption from the definition of such action,
PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing exemption is condi
tioned upon compliance with the option/notice/right of first
refusal/lease term/time to locate other housing provisions of
Sec. 20-22 of the Municipal Code.
Dated this:�� day of 1911.
Stacy, Standle III, May
I, Kathryn S. Koch, o hereby (Zertify t at the foregoing
Statement of Exemption from th Definition of Sub ivision was
considered and approved by the Aspen City Council at its regular
'q.G*ti:n$ held August 14, 1978, at which time the Mayor, Stacy
:§tatAd"ley, XII, was authorized to execute the same on behalf of the
"City of
Kathryn Xoch, City Clerk
i
,..,r., a •..•.
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day
of 197V by Stacy Standley III, Mayor, and Kathryn S.
Koe ,;,,City lerk, both of the City of Aspen.
'`" Witness Y
m hand and official seal.
My commission expires: My Commission expfrc u :� .l u4
Notary ublic
f /Jfi11111j11
4 s
-2-
wAr---,
0
21,1079 i
q�
led 3:26 PM May 2 1979 Reception # Loretta Banrer Recorder
AGREEMENT
°oox 7 rust 7.52
DIANA H. BEUTTAS, DEBORAH S. HATCH and CHRISTOPHER H.
SMITH, for themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators and
assigns, hereby covenant with the City of Aspen, Pitkin County,
Colorado, that:
1. They are the owners of the following described
property together with the improvements thereon:
Lots K, L and M
Block 52
City and Townsite of Aspen
Pitkin County, Colorado
2. The above -described property shall be restricted
to six (6) months minimum leases with no more than two (2) shorter
tenancies in any calendar year.
3. At the time the property is offered for sale, in
whole or in part, those tenants residing in the above -described
property on August 14, 1978 who still reside in the property at
the time the property is so offered shall be given notice of such
offer together with the offered price. Each such tenant shall
have a ninety -day non -assignable option to purchase the portion of
the property he has under lease at the price stated in the offer o:
sale.
4. At the time a bona fide offer to purchase is made
and accepted, those tenants residing in the above -described
property on August 14, 1978 who still reside in the property at
this time shall have a ninety -day exclusive non -assignable right
of first refusal to purchase the portion of the property which
they each have under lease. In the event that such offer is made
while the ninety -day option is still in effect, such tenant may
purchase the unit for the amount of the bona fide offer or offered
price, whichever is less.
5. It shall be adequate proof of satisfaction of the
foregoing two paragraphs if a statement executed by an official of
the City of Aspen is filed that the option/right of first refusal
BOOK 361 i'AU 75J
provisions have been met.
6. In the event that any improvement or improvements
required by Section 20-16 of the Code of the City of Aspen become,
in the sole judgment or discretion of the City Council of the
City of Aspen, necessary or desirable, no objection will be made
to any special assessment or special tax or proceeding therefor,
on the basis that the property is adequately served by existing
improvements, nor on the basis that the premises will not be
served or benefitted by the improvement or improvements proposed.
7. The covenants contained herein with respect to
minimum lease terms (paragraph 2) are to run with the land and
shall be binding on all parties and all persons claiming under
them for a period of twenty (20) years from the date these
covenants are recorded, after which time said covenants shall be
automatically extended for successive periods of ten (10) years,
unless an instrument signed by the City of Aspen and the then reco.-
owners of the oroperty has been recorded, agreeing to change said
covenants in whole or in part or agreeing to release said
covenants.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been duly execut
this , day of November, 1978.
Diana H. Beuttas Deborah S. Hatch
14
Christoph r H. Smith
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
COUNTY OF PITKIN )
The foregoing instrument was duly acknowledged before me
day of November, 1978 by Diana H. Beuttas, Deborah S.
_Ftc!ia'gand Christopher H. Smith.
'= Witness my hand and official seal.
My commission expires:
�••• .....•moo
•/�•IIt111'Il1l`
-2-
Notary Public'
rd
ATKIN COONTY
Qc
C."/- -
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Beuttas Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K - M, Block 52,
City of Aspen
DATE: August 9, 1978
The attached application requests exemption from subdivision procedures
for the condominiumization of three units located at 234 West Hopkins,
Aspen, Colorado. This property is zoned R-6 and contains 9,000 square
feet. In the R-6 Zone District, an additional unit is allowed for each
4500 square feet of land area. However, this property constitutes as
valid non -conforming use.
The application was referred to Clayton Meyring, Building Inspector. Clay-
ton has verified the non -conforming status of this property and the exis-
tance of valid building permits for the construction of all three units.
Until 1974, the small unit located in the garage at the rear of the property
was used as a veterinarian's clinc. This was a legal conversion, in that
it reduced an existing non -conformity.
The application was referred to the City Engineering Department which made
the following comments, "After having reviewed the improvement survey and
making a field inspection of this project, the Engineering Department finds
only one major deficiency as far as the subdivision design standards are
concerned. The property is within the City's master planned area for side-
walks, and although there is curb and gutter, there is not a sidewalk. We
recommend granting of the exemption for condominiumization subject to con-
struction of five foot sidewalks on both Second and Hopkins frontage. We
feel this is a reasonable request in that there is existing sidewalk immed-
iately to the north on Second Street and at a good many locations further
west on Hopkins Avenue."
The Planning Office has received a letter from Kay Reed of Reed Real Estate
and Rentals which verifies the fact that the duplex has been handled by this
firm for short term rentals off -and -on, since 1968. At the present time
both units of the duplex are vacant as their interiors are being remodeled.
The third unit, which is in the garage which was previously used as a
veterinarian's clinc, is presently rented by Mr. John Kohler, of Sunshine
Landscaping. In the application, the applicants submit that, if condo-
miniumization is approved, the supply of low and moderate income housing
will not be reduced, but, in fact, will increase by virtue of the applicants
compliance with Ordinance #53 requirements regarding long-term leases. Mark
Danielsen has recommended approval of this subdivision exemption request
provided the applicants are willing to agree to a 90-day right of first re-
fusal and six month minimum lease term for all three units as provided by
Ordinance #53.
The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application at their
regular meeting on August 1, 1978, and recommended approval of the subdi-
vision exemption request subject to an improvement agreement for the con-
struction of five foot sidewalks on both Second and Hopkins Streets front-
age and to requirements of Ordinance #53 as described by the Housing
Director.
sr
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM SUBDIVISION REQUIRE14ENTS
On behalf of Diana H. Beuttas, Deborah S. Hatch and
Christopher H. Smith, application is hereby made for exemption
from subdivision requirements for the proposed condominiumization
of three units located at 234 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado.
Applicants submit that it would be reasonable to exempt
this proposed condominiumization from subdivision requirements in
that only three units are involved, and that granting the exemptior
would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the area in which the subject property is
situated.
The subject property, Lots K , L , and M Block 52
Aspen, is zoned R-6 and contains 9000 square feet. There are
three units on the property. Units 1 and 2 are each two -bedroom
apartments, containing approximately 1100 and 1900 square feet
respectively. Unit 3 is a one -bedroom unit, containing approxi-
mately 456 square feet, with a storage area of 72 square feet.
The three units constitute a valid non -conforming use.
The property is located in an area which contains lodges
end other high density uses. Applicants have owned the property
since 1968. It may be recalled that at one time Unit 3 was a
veterinarian's office, which was terminated in 1974, thereby
substantially reducing traffic, noise, etc.
Unit 3 has been rented long-term since then. Units 1 and 2
have been short -termed, through a local realtor. No-one presently
accupies Units 1 and 2, as the interiors are being remodeled.
kpplicants submit that, if condominiumization is approved, the
supply of low and moderate income housing will not be reduced but,
in fact, will be increased by virtue of applicants compliance with
Drdinance 53's requirements re long-term leases. Thus, instead
"of one long-term and two short-term situations,
there would be
rT,
three long-term housing situations.
Because the buildings are existing, have all utilities,
have no engineering problems, etc., it is submitted that the
requested subdivision is not within the intent and purpose of
the City's subdivision regulations and should be approved.
Dated: June 7 , 1978.
-2-
(a t t-o k, I I - 4+,�
C ftilis 11
er H. Smith
506 E. MAIN STREET
j�
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
.ram
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FRGM: Mark A. Danielsen, Housing Director
RE: A. Frishman Subdivision Exemption
B. Beuttas Subdivision Exemption
FIA-i E : August 14, 1978
A. Frishman Subdivision Exemption:
Recommendation is for approval due to the fact that the
Frishmans do intend to occupy the same unit as before and will
continue to lease the new unit to the Aspen Institute. As
there will be no tenant displacement Ordinance 53 is satisfied
and approval should contain the appropriate 90 day Right of
First Refusal, 6 month relocation time for existing tenants
(if any), and 6 month minimum lease terms.
B. Beuttas Subdivision Exemption:
Of the three units on the property, two have been short -
termed. The third unit has been rented on a long term basis
to John Kohlar and Ronnie Linquist, employees of Sunshine
Landscaping and Aspen Leaf, respectively. They have paid
$325.00/month plus utilities for the one bedroom unit.
Recommendation is for approval provided that the current
tenants be given a 90 day Right of First Refusal, be given
a 6 month relocation period if necessary, and that all three
units have a 6 month minimum lease.
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Beuttas Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K - M, Block 52,
City of Aspen
DATE: August 9, 1978
The attached application requests exemption from subdivision procedures
for the condominiumization of three units located at 234 West Hopkins,
Aspen, Colorado. This property is zoned R-6 and contains 9,000 square
feet. In the R-6 Zone District, an additional unit is allowed for each
4500 square feet of land area. However, this property constitutes as a
valid non -conforming use.
The application was referred to Clayton Meyring, Building Inspector. Clay-
ton has verified the non -conforming status of this property and the exis-
tance of valid building permits for the construction of all three units.
Until 1974, the small unit located in the garage at the rear of the property
was used as a veterinarian's clinc. This was a legal conversion, in that
it reduced an existing non -conformity.
The application was referred to the City Engineering Department which made
the following comments, "After having reviewed the improvement survey and
making a field inspection of this project, the Engineering Department finds
only one major deficiency as far as the subdivision design standards are
concerned. The property is within the City's master planned area for side-
walks, and although there is curb and gutter, there is not a sidewalk. We
recommend granting of the exemption for condominiumization subject to con-
struction of five foot sidewalks on both Second and Hopkins frontage. We
feel this is a reasonable request in that there is existing sidewalk immed-
iately to the north on Second Street and at a good many locations further
west on Hopkins Avenue."
The Planning Office has received a letter from Kay Reed of Reed Real Estate
and Rentals which verifies the fact that the duplex has been handled by this
firm for short term rentals off -and -on, since 1968. At the present time
both units of the duplex are vacant as their interiors are being remodeled.
The third unit, which is in the garage which was previously used as a
veterinarian's clinc,.is presently rented by Mr. John Kohler, of Sunshine
Landscaping. In the application, the applicants submit that, if condo-
miniumization is approved, the supply of low and moderate income housing
will not be reduced, but, in fact, will increase by virtue of the applicants
compliance with Ordinance #53 requirements regarding long-term leases. Mark
Danielsen has recommended approval of this subdivision exemption request
provided the applicants are willing to agree to a 90-day right of first re-
fusal and six month minimum lease term for all three units as provided by
Ordinance #53.
The Aspen Planning and Zoning Coimnission reviewed this application at their
regular meeting on August 1, 1978, and recommended approval of the subdi-
vision exemption request subject to an improvement agreement for the con-
struction of five foot sidewalks on both Second and Hopkins Streets front-
age and to requirements of Ordinance #53 as described by the Housing
Director.
sr
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
1 _
FROM SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS
On behalf of Diana H. Beuttas, Deborah S. hatch and
Christopher H. Smith, application is hereby made for exemption
from subdivision requirements for the proposed condominiumization
of three units located at 234 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado.
Applicants submit that it would be reasonable to exempt
this proposed condominiumization from subdivision requirements in
that only three units are involved, and that granting the exemption
would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the area in which the subject property is
situated.
The subject property, Lots K , L , and M , Block 52
Aspen, is zoned R-6 and contains 9000 square feet. There are
three units on the property. Units 1 and 2 are each two -bedroom
apartments, containing approximately 1100 and 1900 square feet
respectively. Unit 3.is a one -bedroom unit, containing approxi-
mately 456 square feet, with a storage area of 72 square feet.
The three units constitute a valid non -conforming use.
The property is located in an area which contains lodges
and other high density uses. Applicants have owned the property
since 1968. It may be recalled that at one time Unit 3 was a
veterinarian's office, which was terminated in 1974, thereby
substantially reducing traffic, noise, etc.
Unit 3 has been rented long-term since then. Units 1 and 2
have been short -termed, through a local realtor. No-one presently
occupies Units 1 and 2, as the interiors are being remodeled.
Applicants submit that, if condominiumization is approved, the
supply of low and moderate income housing will not be reduced but,
in fact, will be increased by virtue of applicants compliance with
Ordinance 53's requirements re long-term leases. Thus, instead
of one lone -term and two short-term situations, there would be
.to
i
three long-term housing situations.
Because the buildings are existing, have all utilities,
have no engineering problems, etc., it is submitted that the
requested subdivision is not within the intent and purpose of
the City's subdivision regulations and should be approved.
c
Dated: June
-2-
Ch istopher 11. Smith
I
F
N
N
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Beuttas Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K-M, Block 52, City
of Aspen
DATE: July 19, 1978
The attached application requests exemption from subdivision procedures for
the condominiumization of three units located at 234 West Hopkins, Aspen,
Colorado. This property is zoned R-6 and contains 9,000 square feet. In
the R-6 zone district, an additional unit is allowed for each 4,500 square
feet of land area. However, this property constitutes a valid non -conform-
ing use.
The application was referred to Clayton Meyring, Building Inspector. Clayton
has verified the non -conforming status of this property and the existence of
valid building permits for the construction of all three units. Until 1974
the small unit located in the garage at the rear of the property was used as
a veterinarian's clinic. This was a legal conversion, in that it reduced
an existing non -conformity.
The application was referred to the City Engineering Department which made
the following comments, "After having reviewed the improvement survey and
making a field inspection of this project the Engineering Department finds
only one major deficiency as far as the subdivision design standards are
concerned. The property is within the City's master planned area for side-
walks, and although there is curb and gutter, there is not a sidewalk. We
recommend granting of the exemption for condominiumization subject to con-
struction of five foot sidewalks on both Second and Hopkins frontage. We
feel this is a reasonable request in that there is existing sidewalk immed-
iately to the north on Second Street and at a good many locations further
west on Hopkins Avenue."
The Planning Office has received a letter from Kay Reid of Reid Real Estate
and Rentals which verifies the fact that the duplex has been handled by
this firm for short-term rentals off and on since 1968. At the present time
both units of the duplex are vacant as their interiors are being remodeled.
The third unit, which is in the garage which was previously used as a vet-
erinarian's clinic, is presently rented by Mr. John Kohler, of Sunshine
Landscaping. In the application, the applicants submit that, if condomin-
iumization is approved, the supply of low and moderate income housing will
not be reduced but, in fact, will increase by virtue of the applicant's
compliance with Ordinance #53's requirement regarding long-term leases.
Mark Danielsen has recommended approval of this subdivision exemption re-
quest provided the applicants are willing to agree to a 90-day right of
first refusal and six-month relocation time for the present tenant of Unit
3, as well as a six-month minimum lease term as provided by Ordinance #53.
Subject to an improvement agreement for the construction of five-foot side-
walks on both Second and Hopkins Street frontage and to the requirements
of Ordinance #53 as described by the Housing Director, the Planning Office
recommends approval of the subdivision exemption request.
RG:sr
-40
40
MEMO
TO: RICHARD GRICE
PLANNING
FROM: DAVE ELLIS ENGINEERING 1T
DATE: July 11, 1978
RE: Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K - M,
Block 52, Original Aspen Townsite (Buettas)
After having reviewed the improvement survey and making
a field inspection of this project the engineering department
finds only one major deficiency as far as the subdivision design
standards are concerned. The property is within the City's master
planned area for sidewalks,and although there is curb and gutter,
there is not sidewalk. We recommend granting of the exemption for
condominiumization subject to construction of five foot sidewalk
on both Second and Hopkins frontage. We feel this is reasonable
in that there is existing sidewalk immediately to the north on
Second Street and at a good many locations further west on Hopkins
Avenue.
Although there are several minor encroachments into both
the street right-of-way and alley right-of-way, we do not foresee
any major problem here, particularly since they are noted on the
improvement survey as encroachments.
jk
do
0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Marc Danielson
Dave Ellis
FROM: Richard Grice
RE: Beuttas Subdivision Exemption
DATE: June, 13, 1978
This applicant is seeking to condominiumize the three units located
on this property. Marc, for tenant information, you should contact Chris
Smith at 927-3227.
I have tentatively scheduled this for review by the City P & Z on
July 18. Written comments should be returned to the Planning Office no
later than July 12. Thanks
sr
ORDER NUMBER
3932236-0
AMOUNT
$77,000.00
I- -
SCHEDULE A
Dated this 16th day of _Tun ,1970 , at the hour of 8:00 A.M.
I. The name of the insured and the estate, or interest of the insured in the land described below and covered by this policy is as follows:
MNA 1I. DEUMU, Cr USTOPf=, U. SMJTu and
DEBORM SMITH, in joint tenancy, in fee simple.
2. The land, the title to which is insured, is described or known as follows:
Lots K, L and i•S. Black 52,
CITY AND TOt-111SM OF ASPE.J,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
SCHEDULE B
This Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
I. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown of record, including unrecorded easements.
2. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would disclose, and which
are not shown by the public records.
3. Mechanic's Dens, or any rights thereto, where no notice of such liens or rights appears of record.
4. Taxes and assessments not yet due or payable; and Special Taxes or Assessments certified to the office of the County Treasurer subsequent
to: any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any and all tax sales which have not
been properly redeemed or cancelled.
SHEET 1 OF 2,
Policy No. CO 184277-0
�--- SCHEDULE B
CONTINUED
3987.36- 0
5. D,�cd of Trust from Char1cs I,Tilliam Mencimer and Sally Marie Menciner to the Public
Tru:.•r.(,e of ZD-sa County, for the use of Valley Federzil Savings and Loan Association
to secure $20,500.00, dated May 26, 1967 and recorded June 7, 1967 in Book 227
at pag-c 297.
6. Any tax, asscosment, fees or clinrgca by reason of the inclusion of the subject
Property in the Aspen Sanitation District, Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen
Street Imorov=cnt District, and Basalt and Plural Fire Protection District.
Sheet 2 of 2.
Policy No. CO 184277-0
OWNERS POLICY
) �w
L&L C�LLILC
cCnEALS
BOX 496 ASPEN, COLO. 81611 303-925-7691
June 14, 1978
To Whom It May Concern:
Mrs. Diana Beuttas purchased from Mr. & Mrs. William Mencimer
a duplex on the corner of Second and Hopkins in 1968. Following
her purchase of the property and some improvements, she gave
it to me to rent for a week or two at a time when she was not
in residence.
This I have been doing from 1968 through part of 1978. At this
time she is occupying it for her own use and making further
improvements.
Sincerely,
Kathryn K. Reid
Rental Agent for
Reid Rentals of Roy Reid Realty
KR: cjs
J a� ►� Igo h �.� �
MEN s �A
C,JJJEEN
L C
TLAIL3
ASPEN, COLO. 81611 303925-7691
June 14, 1978
To Whom It May Concern:
Mrs. Diana Beuttas purchased from Mr. 4 Mrs. William Mencimer
a duplex on the corner of Second and Hopkins in 1968. Following
her purchase of the property and some improvements, she gave
it to me to rent for a week or two at a time when she was not
in residence.
This I have been doing from 1968 through part of 1978. At this
time she is occupying it for her own use and making further
improvements.
Sincerely,
Kathryn K. Reid
Rental Agent for
Reid Rentals of Roy Reid Realty
KR:cjs
APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION
FROM SUBDIVISION REQUIREMENTS
On behalf of Diana H. Beuttas, Deborah S. Hatch and
Christopher H. Smith, application is hereby made for exemption
from subdivision requirements for the proposed condominiumization
of three units located at 234 West Hopkins, Aspen, Colorado.
Applicants submit that it would be reasonable to exempt
this proposed condominiumization from subdivision requirements in
that only three units are involved, and that granting the exemption
would not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the area in which the subject property is
situated.
The subject property, Lots K , L , and M , Block 52
Aspen, is zoned R-6 and contains 9000 square feet. There are
three units on the property. Units 1 and 2 are each two -bedroom
apartments, containing approximately 1100 and 1900 square feet
respectively. Unit 3 is a one -bedroom unit, containing approxi-
mately 456 square feet, with a storage area of 72 square feet.
L�a�kl� The three units constitute a valid non -conforming use.
The property is located in an area which contains lodges
and other high density uses. Applicants have owned the property
since 1968. It may be recalled that at one time Unit 3 was a
veterinarian's office, which was terminated in 1974, thereby
substantially reducing traffic, noise, etc.
7 Unit 3 has been rented long-term since then. Units 1 and 2
have been short -termed, through a local realtor. No-one presently
occupies Units 1 and 2, as the interiors are being remodeled.
Applicants submit that, if condominiumization is approved, the
supply of low and moderate income housing will not be reduced but,
in fact, will be increased by virtue of applicants compliance with
Ordinance 53's requirements re long-term leases. Thus, instead
of one long-term and two short-term situations, there would be
r
�J
three long-term housing situations.
Because the buildings are existing, have all utilities,
have no engineering problems, etc., it is submitted that the
requested subdivision is not within the intent and purpose of
the City's subdivision regulations and should be approved.
Dated: June 1978.
Christopher H. Smith
-2-
Box ` 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303-025.2688
I M ROVEMENT SURVEY'
LOTS K, -, 4 M OLCX K 52
A5 PEN -1 C.OLO KAI O
SHEET NO.; I of. 1
0
-11'I'm I-ODG-rcs', COMMERCIAL,
RAW MULTIPILF- UNIT$
T-E O-WAS t\j L-7�-
jAuo D
I U N 171 1 cl -r6