HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ex.Bekkendahl, Lot 6, Snowbunny SubdivisionBEKKEDAHL Lot 6 Snowbunny Sub:I
E
FEE SCHEDULE
(City)
�Name of Project:
Address: ,y
Applicant's Name: 412a46 pyO4y RePhone: 92S-4. 17-Y
Applicant's Address: 3dX A04�
Amount of Payment: - 50 Date: 22
FOR ZONES WHICH ARE R-15, R-30, R-40, RR and CONSERVATION, the Subdivision
Fee Formula is as follows:
Conceptual $100 + $5.00/dwelling unit
Preliminary $22.00/dwelling unit
Final $3.00/dwelling unit
FOR ALL OTHER ZONES the Subdivision Fee Formula is as follows:
Conceptual $100 + $60.00/acre of land
Preliminary $280.00/acre of land
Final $35.00/acre of land
,--rX'EMPTION FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION
REZONING APPLICATION FEE: $125.00 (once a year)
CONDITIONAL USE: $20.00
m
CITY 04-ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspen, —mLorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 23, 1979
TO: =�ichard Girce
FROM: Ron Stock
RE: 3ekkedahl Subdivision Exemption
I have reviewed the attached letter and plat requesting
subdivision exemption for the purpose of condominiumization
of the duplex in the Snowbunny Subdivision. There exist no
legal or technical reasons to deny subdivision exemption.
Since the application is aimed at solving the housing
problems of two local residents and thereby increases
the amount of low, moderate and middle income housing within
the community, I recommend approval of this subdivision
exemption.
RWS:mc
•
C�
MEMORANDUM
TO: t-i6n Stock, City Attorney
Dave Ellis, City Engineer
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Bekkedahl Subdivision Exemption
DATE: January 8, 1979
The attached letter and plat requests subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of a duplex in the Snowbunny Subdivision. This item
is tentatively scheduled for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission at their regular meeting on February 6th. In order to make
that date, we will need to have your written comments returned to the
Planning Office no later than January 26, 1979.
Thank you very much.
ff-'1IFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Dallas
Owner Policy
of Title
Insurance
SEAL' r
POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE issued by USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Dallas,
subject to the Exclusions from Coverage, the exceptions contained in Schedule B and the
provisionsof the Conditions and Stipulations hereof, USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE Company
of Dallas, a Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, insures, as of Date of Policy
shown in Schedule A, against loss or damage not exceeding the amount of insurance stated
in Schedule A, and costs, attorneys fees and expenses which the Company may become
obligated to pay hereunder, sustulned or incurred by the insured by reason of:
1 . Title to the estate or interest described in Schedule A being vested otherwise than as
stated therein,
2 Any defect in or lien or encumbrance on such title,
3. Lack of a right of access to and from the land: or
4. Unmarketability of such title.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Dallas has caused these
presents to be signed by its duly authorized officers in facsimile with its corporate seal
hereto affixed to become effective as Its original signature and seal and binding on this
Company as of the date shown in Schedule A, the effective date of this policy.
fN ,,,dery 8 Chief E+Teeccu'hve Office,
A/rexr Semw ✓nr erep(tenr. Sec-rx✓ •.:! 7'r r. r
urh-wed S,gneaoe - .----
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD OWNERS POLICY FORM 6 1970 - AMENDED 10.17 70
Formerly DALLAS TITLE AND GUARANTY COMPANY f (CO) tail 1.7611
• SCHEDULE A
=:.e No. or GF 78-04-16 Date of Policy: June 9, 1978 POLICY NO.
at 8:00 A.M.
','VlOUNT $ 160, 000. 00
Name of Insured:
THOMAS D. HINES and KENNETH A. BEKKEDAHL
0 1 590845
The estate or interest in the land described herein and which is covered by this policy is: (a fee, a leasehold, etc.)
Fee Simple
3 The estate or interest referred to herein is at Date of Policy vested in:
Same as insured.
The land referred to in this policy is described as follows:
Lot 6
Block 2
SNOWBLTNNY SUBDIVISION
Pitkin County, Colorado
�pPY
Aspen USLIFE TITLE INSURANCE Company of Dallas
1301 Main Street
Dallas, Texas 75202
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY, FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70
Form 1M (CO) Schedule A 1OM1276H
SCHEDULE B •
POLICY NO 0 1 590845
' ! is Policy does not insure against loss or damage by reason of the following:
Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspec-
tion of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
t. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown
by the public records.
The lien of all taxes and assessments for the year 1978, and thereafter.
Reservations and exceptions as contained in United States Patent recorded June 8,
1888 in Book 55 at Page 2 as follows: right of proprietor of a vein or lode to extract
and remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the
premises.
Right of way for irrigation ditch and power line as shown on plat recorded May 2, 1957
in Ditch Book 2A at Page 229.
Easement 10 feet in width along the Northerly and Easterly line of subject property for
utility and drainage purposes as shown on plat recorded in Ditch Book 2A at Page 229.
Easement 5 feet in width upon rear lot lines and side building site lines of subject
property for utility installation and maintenance as reserved in Paragraph 6 of Pro-
tective Covenants recorded in Book 181 at Page 255.
Terms, conditions, obligations and restrictions, which do not contain a forfeiture or
reverter clause, as set forth in Protective Covenants recorded May 2, 1957 in Book 181
at Page 255.
Terms, conditions and obligations imposed upon subject property by Declaration of Trust
recorded August 8, 1958 in Book 184 at Page 435,
Any tax, assessments, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of subject property
in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation and/or Aspen Water and
Sanitation District and Aspen Valley Hospital District.
Deed of Trust from Thomas D. Hines and Kenneth A. Bekkedahl to the Public Trustee of
Pitkin County, Colorado, for the use of Aspen Savings and Loan Association to secure
$30,000.00, dated June 7, 1978 and recorded June 8, 1978 in Book 349 at Page 514.
Deed of Trust from Thomas D. Hines and Kenneth A. Bekkedahl to the Public Trustee of
Pitkin County, Colorado, for the use of Janice M. Coakley fo secure $25,000.00, dated
June 7, 1978, and recorded June 8, 1978 in Rook 349 at Page 518,
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY, FORM B 1970 AMENDED 10-17-70
Form 1M (CO) Schedule 8 12M1276H
•
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Ron Stock, City Attorney
Dave Ellis, City Engineer
FROM: Richard Grice, Planning Office
RE: Bekkedahl Subdivision Exemption
DATE: January 8, 1979
The attached letter and plat requests subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of a duplex in the Snowbunny Subdivision. This item
is tentatively scheduled for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning
Commission at their regular meeting on February 6th. In order to make
that date, we will need to have your written comments returned to the
Planning Office no later than January 26, 1979.
Thank you very much.
• 0
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Office, Richard Grice
RE: Bekkendahl - Subdivision Exemption
DATE: January 31, 1979
The attached application requests subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of an existing and a yet to be built second unit
on lot 6, Snowbunny Subdivision. This area is zoned R-15 with a duplex
permitted on a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. Lot 6 contains
a total of 20,669 square feet.
This application is submitted by the owners of the property, Ken Bekkendahl
and Thomas Hines. The owners are each persons of moderate income who are
attempting to solve their personal housing needs. The property was pur-
chased by the owners as tenants in common. Mr. Hines and his family has
been residing in the existing unit while the Bekkendahls have been living
in the housing unit supplied by the First Baptist Church as a parsonage
until the construction and condominiumization of the second unit is com-
plete. Neither of the two owners felt that they were financially strong
enough to purchase the property independently. Therefore, approval of
this application will result in increasing the supply of low and moderate
income housing by providing housing for two specific local families.
Ron Stock has reviewed this application and comments as follows: "There
exists no legal or technical reason to deny subdivision exemption. Since
the application is aimed at solving the housing problems of two local res-
idents and thereby increases the amount of low, moderate, and middle income
housing within the community, I recommend approval of this subdivision
exemption."
The application was also referred to City Engineering. Dave Ellis has
verbally commented that he does not forsee and engineering problem with
this application which would prevent it from being approved. Dave has
not yet had an opportunity to personally inspect this property, but
he recommends your approval subject to his forthcoming comments which
will be made formally prior to review by City Council.
We recommend you approve this subdivision exemption subject to the 6-
month minimum lease restrictions of Ordinance #39 and the forthcoming
comments of City Engineering.
0
F]
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
MEMORANDUM
Aspen City Council
Planning Office, Richard Grice
Bekkendahl-Subdivision Exemption
February 8, 1979
The attached application requests subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of an existing and a yet to be built second unit
on lot 6, Snowbunny Subdivision. This area is zoned R-15 with a duplex
permitted on a minimum lot area of 15,000 square feet. Lot 6 contains a
total of 20,669 square feet.
This application is submitted by the owners of the property, Ken
Bekkendahl and Thomas Hines. The owners are each persons of moderate
income who are attempting to solve their personal housing needs. The
property was purchased by the owners as tenants in common. Mr. Hines has
been residing in the existing unit while the Bekkendahls have been living
in the housing unit supplied by the First Baptist Church as a parsonage
until the construction and condominiumization of the second unit is
complete. Neither of the two owners felt that they were financially
strong enough to purchase the property independently. Therefore, approval
of this application will result in increasing the supply of low and moderate
income housing by providing housing for two specific local families.
Ron Stock has reviewed this application and comments as follows:
"There exists no legal or technical reason to deny subdivision exemption.
Since the application is aimed at solving the housing problems of two
local residents and thereby increases the amount of low, moderate, and
middle income housing within the community, I recommend approval of this
subdivision exemption."
The application wa; also referred to City Engineering. Dave comments
as follows: "An examination of the improvement survey for this project
and a site inspection indicate that there are no engineering concerns
which would warrant full subdivision review. Therefore, the engineering
department recommends granting of the subdivision exemption request without
condition."
The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed this application
last Tuesday evening at their regular meeting. They felt that compliance
with Ordinance #39 had been clearly demonstrated and recommended your
approval of this subdivision exemption be subject to one condition, the
six-month minimum lease restrictions of the condominiumization ordinance.
0
0
Box WW
Aspen, Co 81611
July 18, 1978
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Aspen City Hall
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Co 81611
Dear Members:
This is a request for subdivision exemption for the purpose
of condominiumization of an existing and a yet to be built
second unit on Lot #6, Snowbunny Subdivision. This area is
zoned R-15 with a duplex permitted on a minimum lot area of
15,000 square feet. Lot #6 contains a total of 20,669 square
feet. An improvement survey showing all presently existing
improvements, exact location of the future second unit, as well
as all easements of record is submitted with this letter of
application.
A subdivision of one (1) lot with a duplex on it creates
conditions whereby strict compliance with subdivision regulations
would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of their
land. If an exemption is granted, the owners of the property
will have a common interest in the land; and there will be a
condominium declaration and maintenance agreement applicable to
the property which will not in any way increase the land use
impact of the property. An exemption in this case will not
conflict with the intent and purpose of the subdivision regula-
tions which are directed to assist the orderly
efficient, and integrated development of the City of Aspen,
to insure the proper distribution of population, to coordinate
the need for public services, and to encourage will planned
subdivision.
We submit that approval of this application will not
•
0
reduce the supply of low and moderate income housing. The
current situation is that one unit which presently exists is
unaffordable by persons of moderate income. By creation of
and condominiumization of a second unit, both units become
affordable to persons of moderate income. Therefore, the end
result is an increase in the supply of moderate income housing.
We are willing to accept a six month minimum lease as a con-
dition of the commissions approval.
Respectfully submitted,
Thomas D. Mines
Kennet A. Bekkedahl
Enclosures �z��
KB/mmg
•
•
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: RICHARD GRICE
PLANNING
FROM: DAVE ELLIS
CITY ENGINEER L�
DATE: February 2, 1979
RE: Subdivision Exemption Request -
Lot 6, Block 2, Snowbunny (Bekkedahl)
An examination of the improvement survey for this project and a
site inspection indicate that there are no engineering concerns
which would warrant full subdivision review. Therefore, the engi-
neering department recommends granting of the subdivision exemption
request without condition.
jk
I
1, 1-4,n,l Lo W, JQNN50N, (J0I4t,,150N-LCK)GFr--LLC)W 5 A550CUsTf'S, I NC1,L',
w6G1 5mv-&p 5oQ\/P-\,(op i N 7f 4= Smqg: OF coy:)PApo, Do cfpy, F-Y IT 4,L-T
ON 71-11- 24-11-4 0,6,Y C)FAPPI L, 1976, ', SURV EY WAS MpUr-- UNDER My 50p-,-PASiOM
OF -". ppopEZl>w S�-Cww NER1=OhJ �o i% OK)V-- STOW FplLWEz 1-� 5L WA15
FOUND TO BE LOC,nTQD V--t-MQQL\,/ WTVA1t-374i-= LCT LINES. GLL EASEMENTS OR
IN EVIDENCE CQ Kt,Y N -To ME AQF-- 15HCWN. SWo --Juw7 -=Y lS
TP pND ACCI.)RpiE 70 74 P- BEST OF W K NnW L C-- oG V-- 'L0 1 LIEF
-kDI4NS0N- LONIGPE-LL-OW 8, &55CX--I67,F-'5, INC.
N05,5ei p I
Fl
LOT (E)
BLOCK *a
1 77,757 7: 60 - so o-lO
,1�,PPI L Z7, t97,5
Y:.