HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Otte/Melton Condominiumization
, ~.
..
'~
\-'(!~ \IJe-J
" = g'I
1)("
- ---
No. 5f-1I
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen !
:tt1l". Need pia ts /}. If /1{ ,_ 7),
1. DATE SUBt1ITTro: AVjtJJf .;21', r1Y/ .- STAFF: G8-(/~Jl rfJllt2~
2. APPLICANT: If!;#.?Jfte 'if.-- tXJ/J;d.ffW~) &13~/SI 4,pwt, CtJt!'lb/~
As~ J CtJ qO)S-~9'~
3. REPRESENTATIVE: (lI,'/(e Olle or .bau/eI /1Jl"lIhJ
4. PROJECT NAME:#jlklkL llJhrl,'/JIJih' J [;Yt'er/,'d71/ ('lry7t:14)
5. LOCATION: J35!1I 1J(i?/I1" Aspe--n/
lotJ 1Ia-/3, 'f,/CifkS9
I
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning
P.U.D.
Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
X Subdivision
-2L.Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
_____Stream Margin "
_____8040 Greenline
_____Vi ew Pl ane
_____Conditional Use
_____Other
Crm chm;tI;uml 'l-11/,'/-rJ
,~ ? --j() (?tfy I~f 3 &n ./ld. &1 /9t1
7. REFERRALS:
.i-Attorney
~Engineering Dept.
_____Hous i ng
Water
_____City Electric
Sanitation District ____School District
_____ Mountain Bell _____Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Parks State Highway Dept.
.Holy Cross Electric ~Other
~Fire Marshal/Building Dept.
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:
..
9. DISPOSITION:
P & Z j
(~I,
Approved
/
Denied
Date
!olml!?,
L+f (; J
.f :'~
,w:J-.
(
, ,~ Ilc__
I. ",.<'d.;", n
6.
t i ),'X-'
~ b,-~o,"c c\
councilL 'APprOVed-CL// Denied
'I",~-\"l,' C,::I, ,c
..' ",s..... \,"\ u .- _.~.
Date 10 /Z{> /R I
(:"UI \'...Q
(
\
(~~".
a1" ~:')
10. ROUTING:
/Attorney
~lding
~ngineering
Other
PEN
130
asp
MEMORANDUM
DATE;
September 4, 1981
TO.
COlette Penne ~
Paul Taddunr'~ I
FROM.
REi
Otte/Melton Subdivision Exception (Condominiumiza-
tion)
Generally, it would be n~ opinion that the requirements
of Section 20-22 are applicable to all condominiumiza-
tions. However, I believe that the-P&Z, as a matter of
policy and historical precedent, has determined that
commercial condominiumizations do not fall within the
intent of Section 20-21. Could you please check into
this for me.
PJ'l';mc
..
;if" "
""""....
'.~L.
"-1/:::.
MIKE DTTE
P. O. BOX 3715
'i;INVESTMENTS :
\~3~~p~ ASPEN, CO 81612
Augus t 26, 1981
Planning Commission
City of Aspen
Aspen, Colorado
To Whom It May Concern:
Request
We hereby respectfully submit this letter as application of
Subdivision exception according to the provisions of Section
20-19 of the Aspen Code.
Location
The subject property is located at 135 W. Main, Aspen,
Colorado and it's legal description is Lots A & B, Block 59,
City and Townsite of Aspen.
Grounds
There are special circumstances affecting the subject property
which we feel make strict application of the Code an undue
hardship. The granting of the exception will not, in our
opinioJl, be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the area of the subject property.
The applicants, David Melton and Mike Otte, who formerly
practiced together in a partnership providing services as
Certified Public Accounts and in that pursuit utilized the
entire space of the property. Since January 1, 1981, the CPA
partnership has been dissolved and David Melton presently
continues to occupy approximately one-fourth of the space in
the property, still engaged in providing accounting services.
The remainder of the building is occupied by other tenants
who have various office-type uses.
The applicants seek the exception from subdivision so that the
building can be condominiumized and separate ownership patterns
can be developed.
ff.....,
--
--
~
"'",.......
Planning Commission
Ci ty of Aspen
Page 2
Augus t 26. 1981
The building is an existing structure where residential use
has not been made for well over 5 years.
The granting of our request would provide us with a way to
enjoy ownership of portions of the building more desirous
to us. The use of the property and its' impact on the
neighborhood and local service would remain the same.
We hope you will find our application acceptable.
Yo rs truly.
. (".~,-1}
(~U'l-.
Mike Otte
~~~
David Melton
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: OttejMelton Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: October 26, 1981 APPRDVEO AS TO FORM: /IJo~ ,,'
Location:
135 W. Main Street, Lots A and B, Bloq 59, City and Town-
site of Aspen
Zoning:
o - Office
Lot Size:
6000 square feet
Applicant's
Request:
The applicant is requesting subdivision exception for the
purpose of condominiumizing an office building at 135 W.
Ma in Street.
Referral Agency
Comments: City Attorney
Generally, it would be my oplnlon that the requirements of
Section 20-22 are applicable to all condominiumizations.
However, I believe that the P & ~as a matter of policy and
historical precedent, has determined that commercial condo-
miniumizations do not fall within the intent of Section 20-22.
Building Department
On Friday, September 25, 1981, an inspection of the subject
property was made. The following is a list of problems
noted during that inspection.
1. Service disconnect not properly grounded as per
National Electric Code, Section 250.
2. Subpanel neutral is connected to ground.
3. Lower east unit missing cover plates on all switches
and receptacles.
4. Insufficient number of receptacles on all first floor
offices.
Engineering Department
The Engineering Department reviewed the above application
along with a site inspection and has the following comments:
1. The application (plat) shows nine (9) units, three (3)
being located in the basement, four (4) units located
on the first floor, two (2) units on the second floor.
The Building Department will need to comment on the
health and safety of units located on each floor.
2. The two (2) units on the second floor have extremely
low ceilings. The Building Department should comment
on this also.
3. The following information is missing from the plat:
A. Scale, North arrow
B. Basis of bearings
-"
-
Memo: Otte/Melton Subdivision Exceptt~n OCondorntnturoizqttonl
Page Two
October 26, 1981
Planning Office
Review:
Planning Offi.ce
Recommendation
and P & Z
Action:
C, Street and qlley wi,dtlis, curb. /lnd gutter loci:1tion
from street center ltne,
D. Zone district of the property
E., Sheet index
F. Legend for symbols i:1nd i:1bbreYiations
4, As tnis /lpplication is located in the first block West
of tne existing underground po~~r. it is logical tlie
applicant agrees to join any underground power improve-
ment district.
5. Following final approvals, the mylars should be submitted
to this office with the surveyor's signature and seal,
In discussion with the applicant, the Planning Office was
informed tnat the nine units outlined will more than likely
be sold in combinations. The logical division of these will
probably be four units. due to the fact that there are four
entrances, In checking the question raised by the City
Attorney, the provisions of Sec. 20-22 are not applied to the
condominiumization of a commercial building. There also is
not a definite size parameter to comply with. The exception
is allowed under Sec. 20-19. The building conforms with
area and bulk requirements also.
The Planning Office recommends approval of this request for
subdivision exception for the purposes of condominiumization
with the following conditions:
1. The requirements of the Building Department as a result
of their inspection be met.
2. That mylars of the final plat be submitted with surveyor's
signature and seal to the City Engineering Department
with the information required in #3A-F of their memo.
3. Applicant agrees to join any underground power improve-
ment district that may be formed in the future.
.
&
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: OttelMelton Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: October 6, 1981
Zoning: 0 - Office
Lot Size:
135 W. Main Street, Lots A and B, Block 59, City and Town-
site of Aspen
6000 square feet
Location:
Applicant's
Request:
The applicant is requesting subdivision exception for the
purpose of condominiumizing an office building at 135 W.
Main Street.
Referral Agency'
Comments: City Attorney
Generally, it would be my opinion that the requirements of
Section 20-22 are applicable to all condominiumizations.
However, I believe that the P & ~as a matter of policy and
historical precedent, has determined that commercial condo-
miniumizations do not fall within the intent of Section 20-22.
Bui19ing Department
On Friday, September 25, 1981, an inspection of the subject
property was made. The following is a list of problems
noted during that inspection.
1. Service disconnect not properly grounded as per
National Electric Code, Section 250.
2. Subpanel neutral is connected to ground.
3. Lower east unit missing cover plates on all switches
and receptacles.
4. Insufficient number of receptacles on all first floor
offices.
Engineering Department
The Engineering Department reviewed the above application
along with a site inspection and has the following comments:
1. The application (plat) shows nine (9) units, three (3)
being located in the basement, four (4) units located
. on the fi rst f1 oor, two (2) units on the second floor.
The Building Department will need to comment on the
health and safety of units located on each floor.
2. The two (2) units on the second floor have extremely
low ceilings. The Building Department should comment
on this also.
3. The following lnformation is missing from the plat:
A. Scale, North arrow
B. Basis of bearings
Memo: Otte/Melton Subdiyision Exceptten O:ondominiuroiz~tionl
Page Two
October 6, 1981
C, Street and alley ~tdtQs, curb and gutter location
from street center line,
D. Zone district of the property
E. Sheet index
f. Legend for ~bol~ and abbreYlatlons
4, As this appl i,cation is located in the first block West
of the existing underground po~er, it is logical tbe
applicant agrees to join any underground power improve-
ment district.
5. Following final approvals, the mylars should be submitted
to this office with the surveyor's signature and seal.
Planning Office
Review: In discussion with the applicant; the Planning Office was
informed that the nine units outlined will more than likely
be sold in combinations. The logical division of these will
probably be four units, due to the fact that there are four
entrances. In checking the question raised by the City
Attorney, the provisions of Sec. 20-22 are not applied to the
condominiumization of a commercial building. There also is
not a definite size parameter to comply with. The exception
is allowed under Sec. 20-19. The building conforms with
area and bulk requirements also.
Planning Office
Recommendation: The Planning Office recommends approval'of this request for
subdivision exception for tne purposes of condominiumization
with the followi ng conditions,:
1. The requiremen1;s of the Building Department as a result
of their inspection be met.
2. That mylars of the final plat be s~bmitted with surveyor's
signature and seal to the City Engineering Department
with the information required in #3A-F of their memo.
3. Applicant agrees to join any underground power improve-
ment district that may be formed in the future.
,,,
. r-"f
'), IE
,........
MEMORANDUM
TO: ~l Taddune, City Attorney
~!Y Engineering Department
~re Marshal/Building Department
FROM: Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: OttelMelton Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization}
DATE: September 1, 1981
Attached is an application requesting approval for subdivision exception for
the purposes of condominiumizing an existing office building located at 135
W. Main, Aspen (Lots A & B, Block 59}. The applicants are Mike Otte and
David Melton. This item is tentatively being,scheduled for the October 6,
1981 meeting of the City Planning and Zoning Commission. Please review
and return comments to me by Wednesday, September 16.
Thank you!
/""',
'./
........
'-..,.;'
P. O. BOX 3715
ASPEN, CO 81612
Augus t 26, 1981
Planning Commission
Ci ty of Aspen
Aspen, Colorado
To Whom It May Concern:
Request
We hereby respectfully submit this letter as application of
Subdivision exception according to the provisions of Section
20-19 of the Aspen Code.
Location
The subject property is located at 135 W. Main, Aspen,
Colorado and it's legal description is Lots A & B, Block 59,
City and Townsite of Aspen.
Grounds
There are special circumstances affecting the subject property
which we feel make strict application of the Code an undue
hardship. The granting of the exception will not, in our
opiniop,bedetrimental to the public welfare or injurious to
other property in the area of the subject property.
The applicants, David Melton and Mike Otte, who formerly
practiced together in a partnership providing services as
Certified Public Accounts and in that pursuit utilized the
entire space of the property. Since January 1, 1981, the CPA
partnership has been dissolved and David Melton presently
continues to occupy approximately one-fourth of the space in
the property, still engaged in providing accounting services.
The remainder of the building is occupied by other tenants
who have various office-type uses.
The applicants seek the exception from subdivision so that the
building can be condominiumized and separate ownership patterns
can be developed.
......-.,~
/",
Augus t 26, 1981
Planning Commission
Ci ty of Aspen
Page 2
The building is an existing structure where residential use
has not been made for well over 5 years.
The granting of our request would provide us with a way to
enjoy ownership of portions of the building more desirous
to us. The use of the property and its' impact on the
neighborhood and local service would remain the same.
We hope you will find our application acceptable.
Yo rs truly,
ilu1<-
~~ 1w.lh.-
Davi d Melton
MEMORANDUM
"5(nr'JDr::::'>
1 <;"l ill'" ','- Ii'
n cr. \l'i 11;-~i~ jl I
.L,__,~, : 1
SEP 171981 l\i I
_.---__ /'L.-/
ASPEN I PITKIN CO
PlANNING OF('ICE
TO:
Collette Penne /
Planning Office
FROM: Louis Buettner, Engineering Department
DATE: September 17, 1981
RE: Otte/Melton Subdivision Exception (Condo)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Engineering Department reviewed the above application along with a,
site inspection and has the following comments:
1. The application (plat) shows nine (9) units, three (3) being located
in the basement, four (4) units located on the first floor, two (2) units
'on the second floor. The Building Department will need to comment on the
health and safety of units located on each floor.
2. The two (2) units on the second floor have extremely low ceilings. The
Building Department should comment on this also.
'3. The following information is missing from the plat:
A. Scale, North arrow
B. Basis of bearings
C. Street and alley widths, curb and gutter location
from street center line.
D. Zone district of the property
E. Sheet index
F. Legend for symbols and abbreviations
4. As this applicatio~ is located in the first block West of the existing
underground power, it is logical the applicant agrees to join any underground
power improvement district.
5. Following final approvals, the mylars should be submitted to this office
with the surveyor's signature and seal.
ASPEN.PITKIN ~EGIONAL BUILDII\tG DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Colette Penne, Planning Office
FROM: Stan Stevens, Building Department
RE: Otte/Melton Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: September 28, 1981
On Friday, September 25, 1981, an inspection of the subject property
was made. The following is a list of problems noted during that
inspection.
1. Service disconnect not properly grounded as per National
Electric Code, Section 250.
2. Subpanel neutral is connected to ground.
3. Lower east unit missing cover plates on all switches and
recepticals.
4. Insufficient number of recepticals on all first floor offices.
506 East Main Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
303/925-5973
o
r'
,
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen. Colo,ado 81611
City
00100 - 63721 09009 - 00000 Conceptual Application
63722 Preliminary Application
63723 Final Application
'63n4-!t37,;(7- '173S0 -EKemption'JIiJJ. 'Z.'iCetf,
63725 5;; /60 Rezoning
63726 Conditional Use
Name: O!'j h C+l e..
.Jtte ~ metl&-M-J
Address: ~ "l'3 LJ 7
f\ \ ~n Cb J' /h/.:L
Check No.
'iH'1
LAND USE APPLlCA TIDN FEES
County
00100 - 63711 09009 - 00000
63712
63713
63714
63715
63716
63717
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00100 - 63061 09009 - 00000
63062
63063
Subdivision/PUD
Special Review
P&Z Review Only
Detailed Review
Final Plat
Special Approval
Specially Assigned
Is: O. d(J
County Land Use Sales
GMP Sales
Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Othe,
Project:
JJ I II/Uft- ~ ~
'JUC' 'vllvl X(l t't'
'. ' (('c'r1cfr. )
'1;)S -;)979
/
tit" d. [ /9r I
J
Phone:
Date:
Receipt No. P