HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Lot1,ParrySubd.SneakyLane.20-81- Parry
E
C
A
I
• g018
G 1134'
I L.C. E,
NORTH UNIT
•• I
IDECK 3.G'S
/50UTH UNIT n
P c
co
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
CAROL YN PARRY CONDOMINIUM
AN EXISTING 0UPt,CX LOCATrO \_NT\RELY Otv
1,oT I- PARRY SU�Dt�/iS\01.11 PtTK\N COUNTY, CO\-0.
TAGERT
SuBoD
TV. LTELEPHONE BOXES
N 15�0911" W, IJ34.G5'� s
- N-15'09'EI"W IG3.00'-- J9184 HORIZONTAL C.ONTROL-
41.oG' 110.00' \ 018 • gol8
UN,T �
3.8 DECYCE OH. 11.0 E.
' NOR rH
N ZI Z' UN 7T
Z 570 R`(
W000jFRAME
3.1'0H, �w,
+ T B. M.
'L L C E T-7 \ y !
1 STORY
WOOD)FRAt
P1 I
In
• / L.G.E. �
/ SOUTH UNIT L
DECK
3 S,
aLIOU n
AREA 51,-TO ±
i PAVED
3.9 DECK. DRIVE \� \
/ OH, 'V
G.C.C.
/z-3.4,OH.
2
00/
np
jp I--.c.E SOUTH UNIT \C
I G�
o.-WELL
G.C.E
IE G
D_
I EI-EC, SERVICE G.C.E.
G.C.E.,
INTERMEDIATE REGIONAL
' FL.00D PLAIN LINE
/LIL
9184
\ / POWER POLE
O
w \
U
P
'�0•-0R!DC'
S�q>
g�o035
/ G \
3�q..
fiR M S4-,tiE
O,
SCALE 1 " = 1000
O 25 �00
10 50
,,. • 9164
ER
HOLE
SURVEY ORIENTED WITH F0UN0 MONUMENTS
CALLS IN C ) RECORD
• FOUN1Dx*5 RE -BAR WITH PLASTIC, CAP AS
DESGR IBED
L.C.E. LIMITED COmMON ELEmi� NT
G.0 E. GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT
ELE\/ATIC)N5 BASED ON TI-HE lg15 C17`( Of=
ASPEN AERIAL SURVEY( ON A T.B.M. OF r=125�
IN CENTER OF DRIVE
ZONED R-30
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
cAROLYN H%ATT PARRY AS OWNER OF LOT I PARRY 5UBDIVISION CITY OF
ASPEN COLORADO, HEREBY CERTIHESTHAT THIS PLAT OF THE C°,ROLYN PARRLY COt,100MINIUINA
HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES STATED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR
SAID CONDOMINIUM DATED THE DAY OF AND RECORDED IN BOOK
AT, PAGE OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
STATE OF COLORADO.
STATE OF COLORADO 1
j) S.S. CAROt_YN HIATT PAR1
COUNTY OF PITKIN
THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BE.FORF Mf Till'; I�AY ul
, 19_,BY _CARO\...YN F-I,AT"r PARRY
WI INI';S MY RANI) AND Of ICIAI ',1 Al
MY C0MMI'.';ION EXI'IRCS Nh1AI+Y 1'UFII I(.
SURVEYOR'S
CERTIFICATE
I, I)AVII) W M(, IJI(ll)l (',IIItVI ( I Wdrll II(',, IN(.
), A Itl (.I'. 111(1 II 1 ANI) ',()17V1 YOI+, 11110 Hr CI HI II Y
A', [()I 1 OW', IN FEB. 1g81 A 'AIRVI Y WA'i MADI
UNDI H MY 0110 (, I ION Ar111 '01PI I+VI',ION , OI LOT I
PARRYSUBD.CITY OF ASPEN ', IAI i Of (:UI ORAbO,
AND 1 OIINI) 1 HI I+l UN AIN) EXISTING OUPLEX
I OI.A I I U INI IHI I Y WIl IIIN THE, N(IUNI)ARY I INI " Of ',All) III'.(;RII11 I, 1'H0I11 H I I A', '.11OWN ON I IH', PI A I Oi(
NOII U(HA'A 1) ON THE F I I I D EVIDENCE- SHuWII A'.
10111,11)) IIII I O(,AIION ANI) DIMI N',II)N', Of I III
HOUNDARY I INI';, BUILDING, AND IMPROVE MENIS, IN
I VI Of N(.l OI+ KNOWN 10 Ml AI+1 A(AMPAII I Y
';IIOWN ON 1111', MAP,, AN[) IHI MAP' A(:(,0RAII I Y AND 'JIII'.IANIIAl I Y 1)1 Pll.l'. TIII I O(.AIION ANI) IIII
HOI+I/()NIAl AND VfI?IICAI_ MIAS()f+;I MINT1; Of IHI
DI III HIN(,, IIII ).))NU))MINIIIM IINI11; IIII RI IN, IHI
IINIT OF ;IGNATIONS THFRF.Of, III{ IIIMFN',ION'; Of
SAID IINITS AND IIII I I IVAT101 OI I..IIID
11 OOR', ANO CI II IN(;';Af�B�
4...
Z�Z3a1 cu, � ,
-r?l ',III(VI
DAI I DAVID W MC HRIDI
(W, 11 RI I) 1 ANI) YO N') 1111Bi w
sfA
Intl (if (.OIuI+AUO
(,OIINI( OI PlIKIN i
IIII I OPI r,Ulllr,',III(VI 004", 111(1II It All WA', Al KNOWI I I((J D 1111 OI+I MI IIII'. I)AY (II
111111 IIY DAVIO W MC 111RIP1
WI I NI '.', MY IIANO ANI) Of I I(AAI ',I Al
MY (.)MMI'JON 1 XI'IRf', NOIA1+Y 110111 1(
IA I I
PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL
I I11'. 1.1 A I OI LOT) PARRY5UBDiVISION I I ( (I A'.I'I FJ, WA', A111'1(OVI 1) 11Y I III I
Of A',('I N I I AIJrJ10(, If lurllN(, ( ()mmrJOrJ 1111'. 1)A( (d I'fll
rllAIRMAN
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
Till'; PIA 1 OI LOT 1 PARRY SUBD1V1510A1 (. I'+ (d !,'.f'I 1,�, WA', AI'I*o VI I) lit I111- CI I Y
COUNCII OF ASPEN THIS DAY OF IIM
ATTEST
CITY CLERK M/AYOk
CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL
THIS PLAT OFLOT I PARRYS3B1)NI5)or-I ,CITY OF ASPEN, WAs APPROVED BY THE CITY
OF ASPEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, THIS __ DAY OF _, 198_ .
CITY ENGINEER
CLERK & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE
THIS PLAT OF LOT I PARRY HBO. I C ITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
PITKIN , STATE OF COLORADO, AT O'CLOCK `.M., THIS DAY OF , 198____.
IN PLAT BOOK _ AT PAGE RECEPTION NO.
CLERK AND RECORDER
INDEX
SHEET NO. I CERTIFICATES, VICINITY MAP, SITE PLANT LEGEND e NOTES
2 FLOC>R PLANS, ELEVA_TICUN VIEW
SHEET I OF Z
U
z
rr
LLJ
W
z
W
n
W
CIL
W
JOB NO.
11035-A
FIRST FLOOR
EAST ELEVATION
5EGUND F LUUK
NORTH ELEVATION
io
5
SCALE I "= 5
SHEET 2 OF 2
TAG ERT
su E50.
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
CA ROL YN PARRY CONDOM//V/UM
AN EXISTING OUPLEX LOCATco ENTIRELY ON
L_OT 1 PARRY COUNTY, COl-.O.
UTI LlT ; cASEIVIr_� T TV . L TELEPHONE BOX !E5
• G018 �N 15�0�1' I I" VV. 1134.65� a
_ N -15' OG' 21" W I G3.00'- -J\9184 HORIZONTAL CONTROL
41.06' 10.00' \ 018 '� • `a018
G1841. _ \
I L.C. E. ID.
L oT
NORTH UNIT L.C.C. NORT UNIT (i
3.8 DECK E OH.
CASTL)E CRZEK '
SVDOIVISION ui � 21.,
IDECK 3.G'
• L ` . c -L STO RY i
W
r.
N OR rH \C\X r�
UN 1T
T7 e
WOOD FRAME. I Y
n,
�I'1 / 3.1'
n041. � N 4 ENE / f Z
1 rt T B. M. �j� ^ O
L.C.E. Zo,c, / 1925i / olS
ROUT H UN IT
P •• / t� PAVED L.C.F- �� Z2-'
1 STORY DECt kDRIVE
/ WOOD OH.
o� / 3.4 oH. I ' FRAME �Z3 4 OH. G.C.E.
PI?
� PATIO G� s W
c.E. 300TH UNIT
SOUTH UNIT
DECK �WELL
3 G.C.E 5
P A:DU n
AREA 51,11O±SQ.PT) �
r I EG.C.E. D- Sf LEC. SERVICE �_ M
G.C.E., G
5
INTERMEDIATE. REGIONAL
U FLOOD PLAIN LINER / G
1 9184 J� \
�
R PO \ POWELE
o ,; RaM �eoE
a
o
(9
9 �6.
1�0(ZTION, .
CAS`-L,L`-
J
CRECK SU>3
WOCLOMoU�)y 1'�\MA\UD
SCALD I " = 1000
UNPLATTED
L. AND
• 9164
HOLE
O Z5 (-00
10 50
SURVEY ORIENTED WITH FOUND MONUMENTS
CALLS IN C ) RECORD
• FOUND 5 RE -BAR WITH PL.ASTIG GAP AS
GIBER IBED
L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT
G.0 E. GL.NERAL COMMON EL-EMENT
ELEVATIONS BASED ON THE 1915 GIT`e(D
ASPEN AERIAL. S RV EY ON A T. B. M. OF 7c125 L
IN CENTER OF CDRIvE
ZONED R-30
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
CAROLYt.1 HIATT P4xRR`1' AS OWNER OF LOT I PARRY SUBDIVISION CITY OF
ASPEN COLORADO, HEREBY CERTIFI6STHAT THIS PLAT OF THE CARO>-YN PARRY CON1001MIN101NA
HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES STATED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR
SAID CONDOMINIUM DATED THE DAY OF AND RECORDED IN BOOK
AT, PAGE OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY Of PITKIN .
STATE OF COLORADO.
FIRS'i' LIENHOI_O1cR:
CAROL.vN HIATT 1 ARRY SIGNC=77
STATE OF CCLOR 00)} 1
S.S.
COUNTY OF PITKIN —
THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF
I9__, BY CAROL-.YN H IA, -TT PARR( As owr1c-72, At -An l3Y
A3 r--Iasi �I�NHo�..D1=R.
WITNI_'iS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL_ iFAI
MY CUMMI ;SIGN EXPIRES! N01AHY I'Mil I(,
SURVEYOR'S
CERTIFICATE
I, UAVII) W M(. Ifltllll (',IIPVI ( f N(,INI I I(',, IN(,
I, A lei (,I', 11 Itl II I ANI) '1111/V1 YOB, III lei Ile ('.I if II /
A', I Of I UWS, IN FEB. IG81 A SURVI Y WAS MAN
UNDI H MY Ull+f 1, LION AND ',UI'I IrVI',ION, io LOT I
PARRYSUBD.CITY QF ASPEN '; TAT I Of CUI URADO,
AND I OIIND lift RFON A(N) EXI57ING TOUPLEX IF
1 O(,A I l U 1 N TIRI I Y WI 1IIIN lHL BOUNDARY I INI 1, OF
',AIL) DI ',(;kllll 1( PHOPI FIT Y A', ',IIOWN ON 1111', PI At Ote
NOTFWHA`FD ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE SHOWN A', IOUNO
fill IO(.AIION ANI( IIIMIN',ION', O1 IIII
HOIINUA[?Y I INf',, BUILDING, AND IMPROVEMENTS, IN I VIAL NO'I OH KNOWN I() MI API A(.(AItAI I I Y
'iIIOWN ()N 1111', MAP, AND IHI MAP A(',(,URAII I Y AND
'011V,IANIIAI I Y DI {'I(.I', IIII IO(.AIION AND INI
N()I41/ON TAI AND VERTICAL MI ASUR',l MINTS of [III
HIM DIN(,, INI CONDOMINIUM IINI I'i 1 NI RI IN, 1 HI
IINIT DE',IGNATIONS THEREOF, lift DIMENSIONS OF SAID I)N11S, AND IIIF I I I VAIION', OF 1',14I1)
I l OOR5 AND C1 II ING S.
YI. {/
Z /Z.3 FBI /
cu.
(
if
DAI1 DAVID W MCIIItIDI
(I (,I'.II I(I U I ANTI ',11{rVl 'YO Ni, Ir1161i,'h SiS
Jam' e
su
v�ti°~�"'
inn (11 (.()I 01rnD(,
°•°PPa ' `cOF co
(.0111`1 1 f OI I'I l V iN � , ,
[III IOHI IiUIPIIi',IIHVI YOIO!", 1.1 111 11 If /III WA', n(.KPI((WI I D1,I D III I ()I?l MI fill'' 10f ()1
I'M HY DAVID W M(, HHIDI
WI INI'.', Me IIAND AND Of 11C1Al ',I At
Me (OMMI',ION I XPIM', NOIAI(e I'11111 If
IIAf(
PLANN ING & ZONING APPROVAL
r III'. 1'I Ai 11 L071 PARRYSUBDJVI510N (If ( OI A',I'I rl, WA', AI'I'1(nVl I( Ile fill 1
Of A'0 1 N I'l /Ultllll(, /(irIIN ( ()MMI'JON fill,, wu (11 I'IIf
rIIAIRMAN
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
Till" P'LA 1 Of LOT 1 PARRY SUBDIVISION C I Y 01 ASPEN, WA!, APPHOVLD HY fill- CI f Y
COUNCII. OF ASPEN THIS DAY OF ,198
ATTEST
CITY CLERK MnY()k --- ----_._.._--
CITY
ENGINEERS
APPROVAL
THIS PLAT
OF LOT I PARRYE53BON1510N ,CITY
OF ASPEN, WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY
OF ASPEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, THIS _____DAY
OF — ,198, .
CITY ENGINEER
CLERK & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE
THIS PLAT OF LOT I PARRY 5U0D. , CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
PITKIN , STATE OF COLORADO, AT --O'CLOCK `.M., THIS --DAY OF —
IN PLAT BOOK _ AT PAGE ,RECEPTION NO.
CLERK AND RECORDER
INDEX
SHEET NO. I CERTIFICATES, VICINITY MAP, SITE PLAN, LEGEND e NOTES
2 FLOC>R PLANS, ELEVA-TIC�N VIEW
SHEET I OF Z
U
z
w
n
V /
rr
W
W
Z
V
z
W
al
JOB NO.
11035-A
FIRST FLOOR
EAST ELEVATION
LEGEND
L-IMIT1=0 COMMON ELEMENT
GFN><l?AL COMMON I;LEM>=NT
= r) NOTES G.C.E , WALL, FLOOR,
CEIt.IN.�, OR, ROOF
DENOTrS CHANGE 1N t=1,00R
OR CE'L-1NG E>_EVATION.
5tUUNU t- LUUK ¢- y'"
NORTH ELEVATION
o ;o
5
SCALE I"= 5
SHEET 2 OF 2
I/035-<,
TAGERT
SUED.
UTILITY CASENIC T
G018 `N 150Oc1' 1 1" W. 184.G5
-- N 15' 09' EI" W I Co3.00'-- -
• 4-110G'
9184� .
IL.C. E.
t..OT 1 NORTH UNIT L.C.C. NORTr1 UNIT r�
I 3.8 DECK E. OH.
CASTLI CRZ7-- K
SUpOlV1SION .. � ' +�
DECK 3.G'
�.r.c 2 STORY 1
W
CONDOMINIUM MAP OF
CAROL YN PARRY CONDOM/NI UM
AN EX 1 ST I NG OUPLEX LOCATE C-� \=NT\RE\ Y ON
L-.OT L COUNTY, COI-.O"
TV, E TELE PHONE BOXES
a
9184 HORIZONTAL- CONTROL
-10.00' \ n Ole 0 G018
L
e ,
A \
a'��- z
vo
L.C.E. 2o.0 I *�92S1 \<j
• SOUTH UNIT
�P Lo PAVED L.C.E V� %�%/ � �(1 UNhLATTED
/ 15TORY Cco 3.�i DECrt�E DRIVE \� ` 9 L_ AND
3.4 OH. I W000)FRAMF_ OH. G.C.E.
3.4'0H.
P /
(9 q.o
L.c. H.
N O R-H
LINIr
to WOOD I FRAME )
6v / 3.1'OH.
L+Ne ) T F3 M
I
2.a
/
)
'n
I PATIO
�
y.O'
• /
I
L.c.E.
50UTH UNIT
/
�
_ _
�
_ I
WELL
DECK
�G.C.E
3
S'
0L(DU n
AREA 51,1-70 t SQ.FT.)
E
G
G.C.E. D
�
ELEC.SEP.VICE
I
G.C.E,
G
Z/r
INTERMEDIATE REGIONAL.._
44
t FLOOD PLAIN LINE
2 Q
U
1
9184
/—
O
`
POWER POLE
W
/p
I�
na
W �
(Z �.
co
(9
P
i10
UN1_,OTTCD Q
1�ORTION, �.
�A
CA S--V I-
L J
CRECIc SUt3 .
r
C04,1RA01�1
Ex/S
> R s� tiE
6p
W0(E0M0U"d F\_ C A�EP
SCALE I " = 1000
09164
ER
HOLE
N
O 25 GO
10 50
SURVEY ORIENTED WITH FOUND MONUMENT-5
CALL-5 I N ( ) RECORD
FOUND `r5 RE_- BAR WITH PLASTIC, GAP AS
CDESGR 10ED
L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON EL_E_E MEN-T
G.0 E. GENERAL. COMMON ELEMENT
EL_EVATION5 BASED ON THE 19-15 C.ITYOF
ASPEN AERIAL. SURVEY ON AT B.M. OF -7925 .L
IN CENTER OF LDRIVE
ZON EO R - 30
OWNER'S CERTIFICATE
GAROLYN H\ATT PA[2C�Y AS OWNER OF LOT I PARRY SUBpIV1510N CITY OF
ASPEN COLORADO, HEREBY CERTIFItSTHAT THIS PLAT OF THE CAR01-YI-1 PARRY CONDOMINIUM
HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES STATED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR
SAID CONDOMINIUM DATED THE DAY OF AND RECORDED IN BOOK
AT, PAGE OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF PITKIN .
STATE OF COLORADO.
C.Ai301-.4N H1ATT 1 ARRY
STATE OF coL.ORADO )
3 _
COUNTY OF PITKN S.S.I— — —
THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORF MI T111s DAY OI
19__,BY CARo\..YN 1-11ATT PARR`( AS (D n,CR., ANIJ Q`f
A.5 FIRST L--1CNHOL-0MR.
WITNI ,S MY HAND AND OFFICIAL '.I Al
MY COMMI ;SION EXPIRES- _
SURVEYOR'S
rJ'IfAP+ I•lrlfl I(.
CERTIFICATE
I, DAVII) W Mr. 111001 (',I)1(VI Y I N(,INI III',, IN(, ), A fN (,I', I I I(1 I) 1 AND ',III(VI (OH, 111 I+I lie (3N I II r
A', I Ill I OW'S IN FEB. IG81 A SURVI Y WA', MADE UNDE R MY 1I1+1' f IOrI ANU ',III'I I+VI',IuN , 'rl LOT I
PARRYSUBD.CITY pF A5PEN , FA T I OF (:UI UI+ADO, AND I OHNII I III 10 ON AIN) EXI57ING IDUPLEX
1 'n"A f f D I N f Iltl I Y WI f IIIN THE BOUNDARY I INF S OF ',AID III ',(,kllil D PROPI H I f A', ',IIOWN 'IN I Ill', PI At Oil
NOII D(HASF D ON f I1E FIELD EVIDENCE SHOWN A', I OUND) 1111 1 O(,A f ION ANU DIM{ N',ION', (11 fill
HOUNDAHY I INI',, HUILDING, AND IMPROVEMENTS, IN I VIOL N(.I Of? KNOWN 10 MI Af+1 Af,f,UlfAf I I Y
',IIOWN ON fill', MAP, AND fill MAP A(;(,UPAII I Y ANU ',IlIV,IANflAI I ( Ir{PILL', 1111 If(,AIION D ANfill
HORI/ONfAI AND VERTICAL MI A.',IIF(GF MENTS Of [III HIIIi UIN(,, I141 (ONDOMINIIIM I)NIf ; I11110 IN, 1111
UNIT DF',IGNA (IONS THFRFOI , 111F DIM1 N',ION', OI ',AID UNITS, AND fill 1 1 1 VAI ION011',OF1',10 D
F I fOH', ANU Cf II LNG" Z)•gamDAII DAVID W M(,I11(II)f +I (W.II1111) 1 ArIfr ',III+Vf YOI{d Pp0IAII (+I (.f10I+AI,(r ) "
(.0111,41Y III 1111KIN )
IIII IOl+lr,f)Irlf,',IIHVI00? IIrlllI'_IVII WA', A'.KNOWIID(,II, 1111OPI MF IIII', DAY OI
11,011 IfY DAVID W M(, HI+IDI
Wl f Nl '.', MY IIAND AND III I I(.IAI ',1 Al
MY (.OMMI' ION F XI'II+I ', NOIA1+Y {'lull I(
awl
PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL
I ill', 1,1 A I ()I L071 PARRYSUBDIV1910N ,('I I ( Of A'.111 H, WA', AI'1'I(OVI 1)Itf I III
01 A'11•I r+ I'I A itillf(, +1 /ONINO + OMMI',ION 1111'. I,A( Of I'rlt
rIIAIRMAH
ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL
Till', PI Al' Of LOT 1 PARRY SUBDIVISION,(:I f Y Of ASPEN, WA'- AlIl l(OVf 1) Hy fill CI L Y
COUNCIL OF ASPEN THI'; DAY OF 198
ATTEST-
CITY CLERK MAY'ik
CITY
ENGINEER'S
APPROVAL
THIS PLAT
OFLCT I PARRYSUBON1510N ,CITY
OF ASPEN, WAS APPROVED BY TFIE CITY
OF ASPEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, THIS
_.__DAY OF _____._ _,198_
CITY ENGINEER
CLERK & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE
THIS PLAT OF LOT I PARRY SUBp. , CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO
IS ACCEPTED FOR FILING IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF
PITKIN , STATE OF COLORADO, A7 O'CLOCK _.M., THIS -DAY OF
IN PLAT BOOK _ AT PAGE ,RECEPTION N0. -
CLERK AND RECORDER
INDEX
SHEET NO. I CERTIFICATES, VICINITY MAP, SITE PLAN, LEGEND 1. NOTES
2 FLOC>R PLANS, CLEVAiION VIEW
HEET 1 OF Z
U
Z
0%
r n
V /
rr
W
W
Z
V
z
W
0
W
Q
Q_
W
Q'
n.
JOB NO.
11035-A
5 3 . /S
DECK L.C.E. . 15WTFI UNIT
FIRST FLOOR
C% ROL YN PARRY CONDOMINIUM
N
v3.o5'
EAST ELEVATION
--
,9 DECK L.C.E. NORTI1 UNIT
LEGEND
L.C.E L.IrniTE0 COMMON KLEMENT
G.C. E GI=IvT---RAL COMMON ELEMENT
DL NOTES G. <:. E WALL, FLOOR,
CEILIN S, OR, POOF
— DE NOTt_ S CH /�.NGC 1N S=LOOR '
OR CE',L-ihIG ELEVATIOf`l. �N
5tuuNu rLuur< y�
NORTH ELEVATION
J G
5
SCALE I"= 5
SHEET 2 OF 2
! i
ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
LAND USE APPLICATION FEES
County
Jsrn-
GW
00100 —
63711
09009 — 00000 A'M-q M'/PW
63712
Special Review
63713
P&Z Review Only
63714
Z, Detailed Review
63715
Final Plat
63716(
+n Special Approval
63717
Specially Assigned
City
00100 —
63721
09009 — 00000 Conceptual Application
63722
Preliminary Application
63723
Final Application
63724
Exemption
63725
Rezoning
63726
Conditional Use
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00100 — 63061 09009 — 00000
63062
63063
Name: -
Address: ---
Check No. —
Receipt No. P
County Land Use Sales
GMP Sales
Almanac Sales
Copy Fees
Other
Project:
Phone:
Date:
f
�1
: i *• 0 •
�S�aglpi
�A
Ole COPY No.
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
1. DATE SUBMITTED: a a 5 Zel STAFF:�a
2. APPLICANT: (2ayolur, fa Y'1f' y
3. REPRESENTATIVE: �)f-rS f- it Roy � 9 � � ► � S pF n C� � � � � �'—"
�aS — 3W`i�
4. PROJECT NAME: Sv6d'u'siZen
6. TYPE OF APPLICATION:
Rezoning
P.U.D.
Special Review
Growth Management
HPC
7. REFERRALS:
v Attorney
ZEngineering Dept.
Housing
Water
City Electric
Aubdivision
V Exception
Exemption
70:30
Residential Bonus
Sanitation District
Fire Marshal
Parks
Holy Cross Electric
Mountain Bell
e
Stream Margin
8040 Greenline
View Plane
Conditional Use
Other
School District
Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
State Highway Dept.
Other
8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: -to P OR
0 • It
9. DISPOSIT✓ TIION: Approved /
ed ✓ Den.i ed sl
P&Z ov _ Date
1) The applicant revising the condominium plat prior to review of this
application by City Council to correct the errors identified by the
Engineering Department in their memo dated March 10, 1981;
2) The applicant agreeing that the units shall be restricted to six
month minimum leases with no more than two shorter tenancies per year;
3) The applicant applying for the appropriate permits for the furnace
and wiring found in the garage prior to review of this application by
City Council and permitting the necessary Building Department inspections
of these facilities;
4) The applicant eliminating the illegal kitchen facilities in the south
unit and replacing them with the appropriate washer and dryer and
eliminating one of the two kitchens located in the north unit prior
to review of this application by City Council; and
5) The applicant agreeing not to lock off the bedrooms in the north unit,
instead utilizing them as a single two -bedroom condominium unit while
also not creating a second residence in the south unit.
Council ✓ Approved ✓ Denied
Date S 1 a d j% 1
A
,w 1< r_P, J-
6L'. 6)_c ;� .
s� /to-
S►X\ ... p v.11 L w. a. «. w v.� GIV-1-A ,,.� \ � w a w 0 Nam-
` ^J`-> �J L
g 4
A,�G..✓ �.�J' �/1
�h•J A�/�C,1 �`0� �s �oC\G a
N 0 %y F l V "cam A,'
L!•' �N VK \ Ky+� U h �. • lA� i, S `7 t`i \ �/w•�
10. ROUTING:
Attorney Building Engineering Other
SCHEDULE A
1
Order NumLar: 9048 Commitment Number: CC 82780
1. Effective date: SEPTEMBER 5, 1979 AT 8 : 00 A.M.
2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Amount of Insurance Premium
A. ALTA Owner's Policy Proposed Insured: CAROLYN HIATT PARRY �' 400, 000.00 $505.38
B. ALTA Loan Policy MAJESTIC SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION c 90,000.00 $ 20.00
Proposed Insured: AND/OR ASSIGNS
C. S Endorsement 100 $ 10.00
Tax Certificate $ 5.00
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto
is at the effective date hereof vested in:
CAROLYN HIATT PARRY
4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows
Lot 1,
PARRY SUBDIVISION, according to the Map thereof in Plat Book 6 at page 124,
County of Pitkin, State of Colorado.
NOTE: Upon payment of an additional premium of $10.00, Endorsement(s) 100
will be added to the mortgage policy to be issued hereunder.
Paget STEWAIZT TITLIE
GUARANTY CONPANV
1652
I
n
SCHEDULE B — Section 1
Order Number: 9048 Commitment Number: CC 82780
Requirements
The following are the requirements to be complied with:
Item (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest
to be insured.
Item (b) Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record ,
to -wit:
(c) Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County of Deed of Trust from
George Grant Parry and Carolyn Hiatt Parry for the use of The Bank of
Aspen to secure $75,000.00 dated January 20, 1976 and recorded January 22,
1976 in Book 307 at page 976.
(d) Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County of Deed of Trust from
Carolyn Hiatt Parry for the use of United Bank of Denver National Asso-
ciation to secure $15,633.47 dated July 20, 1979 and recorded August 10,
1979 in Book 373 at page 971.
(e) Partial Release by the Public Trustee of Pitkin County, releasing subject
property from the lien of Deed of Trust from Harold E. Valley for the
use of Diversified Investments, Inc., a Colorado corporation, to secure
$125,000.00 dated August 2, 1978 and recorded August 2, 1978 in Book 352
at page 457.
(f) Deed of Trust from Carolyn Hiatt Parry to the Public Trustee of Pitkin
County, for the use of Majestic Savings and Loan Association and/or assigns
to secure $90,000.00.
(g) Properly executed and notarized final affidavit and agreement by the
general contractor and/or owner delivered to and approved by Stewart
Title Guaranty Company.
NOTE: It is not necessary that the instruments called for under Require-
ment(s) (g) above be placed of record. However, the original must be
delivered for the files of Stewart Title Guaranty Company.
1653 Page STEAVART 'PITLE
GUARANTY COMPAN".'
11
0 0
SCHEDULE B — Section 2
Exceptions
Order Number: 9048 Commitment Number:CC 82780
The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the
satisfaction of the Company:
1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records.
2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records.
3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct
survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records.
4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law
and not shown by the public records.
5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public
records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires
of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment.
6.Any and all unpaid taxes and assessments and any and all tax sales which
have not been properly redeemed or cancelled. Treasurer's Certificate
of taxes due has been ordered.
7.The right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract and remove his ore
therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises,
as reserved in United States Patent recorded in Book 55 at page 32 and in
Book 55 at page 35.
8.A 16-foot easement for waterline, together with the right to enter along the
course of said easement for maintenance and repair, as described in deed to
the City of Aspen recorded December 10, 1959 in Book 189 at page 320.
9.An easement for a 15-foot roadway as reserved in deed recorded January 27,
1958 in Book 183 at page 286.
10.A right of way for ingress and egress 40 feet in width as described in deed
recorded February 18, 1963 in Book 201 at page 180.
ll.A 20-foot easement for road purposes as set forth in deed recorded August 19,
1964 in Book 208 at page 512.
12.Easement granted to Aspen Metropolitan Sanitation District as set forth in
instrument recorded May 17, 1978 in Book 348 at page 112.
13.Any and all interest of H. R. VanDemoer in subject property.
14.Any tax, assessment, fees or charges by reason of the inclusion of subject
property in Aspen Fire Protection District, Aspen Sanitation District, The
City of Aspen and the Aspen Valley Hospital District.
Exceptions numbered
are hereby omitted.
1654
Page 4
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
CONDITIONS AND STIPULATIONS
1. The term mortgage, when used herein, shall include deed of trust, trust deed, or
other security instrument.
2. If the proposed Insured has or acquires actual knowledge of any defect, lien,
encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter affecting the estate or interest or
mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment other than those shown in
Schedule B hereof, and shall fail to disclose such knowledge to the Company in
writing, the Company shall be relieved from liability for any loss or damage
resulting from any act of reliance hereon to the extent the Company is prejudiced
by failure to so disclose such knowledge. If the proposed Insured shall disclose such
knowledge to the Company, or if the Company otherwise acquires actual
knowledge of any such defect, lien, encumbrance, adverse claim or other matter,
the Company at its option may amend Schedule B of this Commitment
accordingly, but such amendment shall not relieve the Company from liability
previously incurred pursuant to paragraph 3 of these Conditions and Stipulations.
3. Liability of the Company under this Commitment shall be only to the named
proposed Insured and such parties included under the definition of Insured in the
form of policy or policies committed for and only for actual loss incurred in
reliance hereon in undertaking in good faith (a) to comply with the requirements
hereof, or (b) to eliminate exceptions shown in Schedule B, or (c) to acquire or
create the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. In
no event shall such liability exceed the amount stated in Schedule A for the policy
or policies committed for and such liability is subject to the insuring provisions and
the Conditions and Stipulations and the exclusions from coverage of the form of
policy or policies committed for in favor of the proposed Insured which are hereby
incorporated by reference and are made a part of this Commitment except as
expressly modified herein.
4. Any claim of loss or damage, whether or not based on negligence, and which arises
out of the status of the title to the estate or interest or the lien of the insured
mortgage covered hereby or any action asserting such claim, shall be restricted to
the provisions and Conditions and Stipulations of this Commitment.
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
Page 5
American Land Title Association Commitment 0ified 10/73
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE
ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate
or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the
premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount
of the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company,
either at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof
or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the
failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company, This Commitment shall not be
valid or binding until countersigned by an authorized officer or agent.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this Commitment to be signed and sealed, to
become valid when countersigned by an authorized officer or agent of the Company, all in accordance
with its By -Laws. This Commitment is effective as of the date shown in Schedule A as "Effective Date."
STEWART TITLE
"11*•G(�4GUARANTY COMPANY
itpo
'Ni 1908 ,�o
„ t aXupS �i„iia
Chairman of the Board
President
I Serial No. CC O C 1 O U
406000
003
L � K.., � \ � �..Ow m.� � /► ��• � S � � � v 1-�" `tom �G .4 ��
^A-6�4 4��o
Zi tiR .wACi.� l �` 5 R
1 Jr" U ^-1
A A .\,�a -� ,�� L,o e A '�-�4 4-� c.s �-) f s — 4
eA .,0 5 - •--fl cam-- ` s k �. S , �� �`^�-.t S k Q ✓
�
c - mo
� ,o— s eFAo 4�"
ICZXj
.4 ^t �,, o P--,7"c,Q ,- 4z�,L -- A--.-
L0 lL /'�1 LR-. n� Gi4- V
�VCAC Q G-C— k -,ill � /V ( ,
'SL 6 A-s o �-,4 z d-4-, .-�
lit
0 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Parry Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: May 15, 1981 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Zoning: R-30 Residential
Location: Lot 1, Parry Subdivision, City and Townsite of Aspen (Sneaky
Lane along Castle Creek)
Lot Size: 51,770 square feet
Applicant's The applicant is requesting an exception from full subdivi-
Request: sion for the purposes of condominiumizing an existing duplex.
Engineering In his memorandum dated March 10, 1981, the Engineer iden-
Department's tifies numerous corrections which need to be made to the
Comments: condominium plat. The Engineer also incorrectly notes that
a condominium declaration should be submitted by the appli-
cant; the City has not traditionally required such a document
for the condominiumization of a duplex.
Attorney's The Attorney comments that approval of the application should
Comments: be conditioned on full compliance with the requirements of
Section 20-22 of the Code. The applicant has addressed these
provisions by indicating that neither unit has historically
rented at a cost that falls within the City's housing price
guidelines. The applicant has also demonstrated that the
lease for the current tenants will run out on May 1, 1981 and
the tenants will be leaving town at that time, eliminating
any displacement concerns. The other unit is currently
owner occupied. Therefore, the approval of this request need
only be conditioned on the following:
- the applicant's agreement that the units shall be
restricted to six month minimum leases with no more
than two shorter tenancies per year.
Building A member of the Building Department performed an inspection
Inspector's of the premises and this inspection was later repeated by a
Comments: member of the Planning Office. Several violations were
uncovered during the inspections, including the following:
1. There is a furnace in the garage which has been
connected without appropriate permits or inspections.
The wiring for this unit, along with other illegal
wiring in the garage, presents a clear life, health
and safety danger to the occupants of the residence.
2. The applicant was previously caught (October 1, 1980)
while in the process of converting the existing duplex
into a fourplex. In the so-called "north unit"
upstairs, there is an internal stairway leading up
to a two -bedroom unit which has separate doors to
each bedroom which can be locked off. There are rudi-
mentary kitchen facilities available for each bedroom,
including a sink, refrigerator and stove for one room
and a sink, cabinents and room for a microwave for
the other room. There are also separate outside stair-
ways which access these rooms from the patio. In the
so called "south unit" downstairs, an illegal kitchen,
including a sink, cabinents and refrigerator had been
installed in an area formerly used for a washer/dryer
unit. The applicant was in the process of creating
a second unit here as well.
Memo: Parry Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
Page Two
May 15, 1981
3. At the time of the most recent inspections, while
no rooms were locked off and only a duplex was in
existence, the presence of illegal kitchen facili-
ties continues to be a matter of concern since they
provide the potential for the creation of additional
illegal units. In addition, an illegal bedroom was
found in the garage which was being occupied. The
Planning Office recommends that the extra kitchens
and the bedroom in the garage be completely removed
to eliminate all violations of building codes and
zoning regulations.
Planning The Planning Office recommends approval of Caroline Parry's
Office request for subdivision exception subject to the following
Recommendation: conditions:
1) The applicant revising the condominium plat prior to review of this
application by City Council to correct the errors identified by the
Engineering Department in their memo dated March 10, 1981;
2) The applicant agreeing that the units shall be restricted to six
mont:i minimum leases with no more than two shorter tenancies per year;
3) The applicant applying for the appropriate permits for the furnace
and wiring found in the garage prior to review of this application by
City Council and permitting the necessary Building Department inspections
of these facilities;
4) The applicant eliminating the illegal kitchen facilities in the south
unit and replacing them with the appropriate washer and dryer and
eliminating one of the two kitchens located in the north unit prior
to review of this application by City Council; and
5) The applicant agreeing not to lock off the bedrooms in the north unit,
instead utilizing them as a single two -bedroom condominium unit while
also not creating a second residence in the south unit.,
P & Z Action: Following a site visit and thorough review of the
status of the building code violations, the Aspen P & Z
at their meeting on May 5, 1981, recommended that you
approve the applicant's request, concurring with the five
conditions recommended by the Planning Office. During the
process of P & Z review, the applicant brought both units
up to the code specifications of the Building Department.
The applicant has also submitted a revised condominium plat
to meet the requirements of the Engineering Department.
Council Action: Should you concur with the recommendations of the Planning
Office and P & Z, the appropriate motion is as follows:
"I move to approve the request by Carolyn Parry for
subdivision exception for the purposes of condominiumi-
zing her duplex subject to the following conditions:
1. The applicant agreeing that the units shall be
restricted to six month minimum leases with no
more than two shorter tenancies per year;
2. The applicant agreeing not to lock off the bed-
rooms in the north unit, instead utilizing them
as a single two -bedroom condominium unit while
also not creating a second residence in the south
unit."
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made by Carolyn Hiatt Parry under Section 20-19(a)
of the City of Aspen, Colorado, subdivision regulations for approval
through the subdivision exception process of her plan for condominium-
ization with respect to real property described as:
Lot 1
Parry Subdivision
City and Townsite of Aspen
City of Aspen
Pitkin County, Colorado
An exception in this case would be appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing duplex.
Council has, of course, permitted condominiumization of many duplexes
in the past, and this request is similar to those.
An exception in this case will not conflict with the intent
and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to assist
the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen,
to ensure the proper distribution of population, to coordinate the
need for public services and to encourage well planned subdivisions.
No tenants will be displaced as a result of this condominium--
ization. The lease for the current tenants runs only until May 1, 1981.
They will be leaving town at that time, and this was their intent at the
time they rented the unit. In fact, they were delighted they were not
required to sign a year's lease.
There are two units within this application. The south unit
contains 1800 square feet. From June, 1979 to October, 19801 this
unit was owner occupied. In November, 1980, it was rented for $1450.00
per month, which places it outside the guidelines for. low and moderately
priced housing.
The north unit contains 720 square feet. On May 21, 1979, I
was granted a permit to convert two existing bedrooms and baths into
2
a separate unit by the installation of a kitchen and construction of
outside stairs. From June 10, 1979 until September 20, 1979, this
unit rented for $700 per month. From October, 1979 until October, 1980,
the two rooms were rented as separate studios for $350.00 each. One
studio has an area of 350 square feet, the other, 370 square feet.
The rentals paid for this unit also place it outside the current
guidelines for low and moderately priced housing.
In October, 1980, I was told by the building department that
I could not rent the rooms in the north unit as separate studios and
that I must remove the kitchen equipment from one of these rooms.
I complied with the request and these rooms have been restored to a
one bedroom apartment. The north unit has been owner occupied since
October, 1980.
The granting of this application will not undermine the intent
of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly within the area
intended for exception under section 20-19. The duplex is already
in existence, and there will be no change in density, which is
presently in line with the permitted population density for the
property.
I would appreicate your consideration of this application
at your next regular meeting.
Dated: February 24, 1981.
By_� 1
Carolyn Hiatt Parry
e� t��
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Code Amendment: Ordinance 26 Second Reading
DATE: May 15, 1981 APPROVED AS TO FORM:
The purpose of this ordinance is to eliminate the existing ristriction'/�n the
expansion of nonconforming lodges through the addition of employee housing
units. At the present time, the provisions of Section 24t13.11 limit that expan-
sion to only 700 square feet of employee space above grade or unlimited basement
employee unit expansion in the R-6 through R-40 zones. This section of the
Code places no limits on nonconforming lodge expansion for employee units in
the R-MF, CC, C-1, SIC/I, NC and 0 zone districts.
At a meeting earlier in the year you requested that we eliminate the limitations
on the expansion in the residential zones. Ordinance 26, Series of 1981 provides
for this code change by incorporating all of the above zones in the conditional
use review process, while also slightly revising the review criteria to be more
inclusive of the range of evaluation needs. The Planning Office recommends
that you approve Ordinance 26 on second reading.
. a 0
FORM N C. F. MOFCKFL R. K. A L. CO.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
ORDINANCE NO.o26
(Series of 1981)
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING AND RE-ENACTING SECTION
24-13.11 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE OF THE CITY OF
ASPEN SO AS TO CLARIFY THE LIMITATIONS ON THE
AMOUNT OF DEtD RESTRICTED EMPLOYEE HOUSING
UNITS WHICH MAY BE ADDED TO NON -CONFORMING
LODGES IN THE R-6 THROUGH R-40 ZONE DISTRICTS
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has
recommended that Section 24-13.11 of the Municipal Code of
the City of Aspen be revised so as to clarify the limitations
on the amount of deed restricted employee housing units
which may be added to non -conforming lodges in the R-6
through R-40 zone districts, and
WHEREAS, the City Council desires to repeal and re-enact
Section 24-13.11 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen
pursuant to the recommendations of the Aspen Planning and
Zoning Commission.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO:
That Section 24-13.11 of the Municipal Code of the
City of Aspen is hereby repealed and re-enacted to read as
follows:
Sec. 24-13.11 EMPLOYEE HOUSING IN NON -CONFORMING
LODGES
Notwithstanding the provisions of Section
24-13.4 of this Code, a nonconforming lodge
may be enlarged, extended, constructed, re-
constructed or structurally altered for the
purpose of constructing deed restricted
employee units accessory to tht principal use.
Such enlargement, extension, construction,
reconstruction, or structural alteration must
be reviewed and receive approval by the Plan-
ning and Zoning Commission pursuant to the
conditional use review process of Section
24-3.3 of this Code prior to the issuance of
a building permit.
f ORM 10 C. F. MOELKEL e. e. a L. LO.
0
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
The Planning and zoning Commission shall
use the following conditions and review
criteria:
1. For non -conforming lodges in the
R-6, R-15, R-15A, R-30, R-40;
R/MF, CC, C-1, S/C/I, NC and 0
zones, expansion of deed restricted
employee units provided there is no
increase in lodge units. Review
and approval pursuant to review
criteria as follows:
a. Compliance with any adopted
housing plan, specifically the
need for seasonal employee rooms
and deed restrictions against
commercial rental or sale.
b. Maximization of construction
quality and unit size.
C. Minimization of adverse environ-
mental and social impacts.
d. Compatibility with surrounding
land uses and zoning including
area and bulk requirements of
the underlying zone district.
e. Adequacy and availability of
utilities.
f. Adequacy and availability of
parking.
100 Leaves
2. In all zones: deed restriction to
employee rental price guidelines and
against commercial rental or sale. In
the event that the lodge is condominium-
ized, the deed restricted units must be
retained as a portion of the common
elements of the lodge.
3. Health, safety and fire inspection and
compliance prior to approval.
4. The expansion may be in rental rooms
provided an equal amount of existing
square footage is converted from rental
rooms to deed restricted employee units.
5. The deed restricted units provided at
the lodge shall be limited in their
rental solely to employees of that lodge
and shall not be rented to other employees
of the community nor rented on the open
market.
-2-
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
Rant_i can 2
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase
or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid
or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction,
such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and in-
dependent provision and such holding shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions thereof.
A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the
- day of 1981, at 5:00 P.M. in the City
Council Chambers, Aspen City Hail, Aspen, Colorado, 15
days prior to which hearing notice of the same shall be
published once in a newspaper of general circulation within
the City of Aspen.
INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED published as provided by
law by the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at
its regular meeting held on the .::�7 day of 1981.
erman Edel, Mayor
ATTEST:
Kathryn S. Koch
City Clerk
FINALLY adopted, passed and approved on the
day of , 1981.
0 ATTEST:
Kathryn S. Koch
City Clerk
-3
Herman Edel, Mayor
• 0
MPM0P eunTTM
TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office
FROM: Louis Buettner, Engineering Department
DATE: March 10, 1981
RE: Carolyn Parry Condominium Exception
c d
BAR 11 1981
ASPEN PITKIPY CO.
PLANNING OFFICE
Having reviewed the submitted plat for the above exception and having made a
site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. The condominium declaration and the condominium plat with corrections
should be submitted to the Engineering Department before recording.
2. The following corrections should be made to the Condominium plat:
SHEET 1
a) Owner's Certificate: Add Pitkin following "Clerk and Recorder of
the County of ".
b) Show utility easement located along the northerly and southerly
property boundaries.
c) Need location, bearings, lot boundary distances for the L.C.E.
Division line; and must be able to locate the division line on
the ground.
d) Show adjoining properties: Lot 1 and Lot 2 of the Castle Creek
Subdivision adjoining the westerly boundary, add Parry Subdivision
to the Lot 2 shown southerly, mark the easterly area of the pro-
perty as unplatted land.
SHEET 2
a) Show length and widths for all decks and stairs.
b) Label the stairs right end of east elevation.
c) First floor plan patio for south unit would be a L.C.E. not a
G.C.E.
d) On elevations label spaces to show which unit the space is for,
as to aid in greater understanding.
e) Legend for line, what lines are.
f) Put condominium title on sheet.
With the exceptions of these corrections, the Engineering Department has no
problems with condominiumization.
ASPEN4PITKIN SEGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT
M E M O R A N D U M
TO: Allan Richmond, Planning Department
FROM: Bill Drueding, Zoning Enforcement Officer
DATE: March 25, 1981
RE: Parry Subdivision Exemption (Condominiumization)
In answer to your request for comments from the Building Department concerning
this application I feel it is necessary that I provide the following history
and developments.
Building Department records show the residence was originally built in 1968
as a single family dwelling. In 1979, the property was subdivided and a
building permit was issued to change the residence to a duplex unit.
Acting on a citizen's complaint I inspected the residence on October 1, 1980.
I found a triplex in existence. The "north unit" was supposed to contain
two bedrooms, two baths and one kitchen. It contained a second kitchen,
independent entrances and was clearly a duplex in itself. There were also
two rooms added in the north unit garage without permits. Electrical wiring
was being done without permits and considered unsafe by Fred Crowley at that
time.
In the "south unit" a second kitchen was being added. The south unit was
being converted to a duplex dwelling also. Carolyn Parry complied with my
request to remove a kitchen in the north unit, but elected to go to court
on the kitchen in the south unit. She was found guilty of a zoning viola-
tion for this north unit and was supposed to remove the kitchen from the
south unit.
On March 24, 1981, I reinspected this duplex. Although the sink in the south
unit was not hooked up, the kitchen cabinets were still there containing food.
A refrigerator had been moved in which also contained food. We again have a
duplex in the south unit.
The configuration of this dwelling is presently a triplex and lends itself
easily to be reconverted to a fourplex. The additional work done under
permits has not been inspected by this department.
I am concerned about the life safety problems of uninspected electrical
wiring as well as the intregrity of the zoning laws. I am requesting that
a member of the planning office physically inspect the dwelling and receive
assurances from Carolyn Parry as to the future integrity of the dwelling
units in reguards to zoning as well as rectifying the current violations.
506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado B1611 303/S25-5973
•
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Parry Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: April 28, 1981
At your meeting on April 21, 1981 you heard a request by Carolyn Parry to condo-
miniumize an existing duplex located at 505 Sneaky Lane. At that time you were
informed that the units had been rented previously as a fourplex and that numerous
building code violations were found in the building during a recent inspection
of the property. You made two requests for further information before deciding
this matter including:
1) You wanted to see a detailed floor plan of the units or to perform a
site visit yourself to see the problems; and
2) You wanted guidance from the City Attorney as to whether the previous
rental history of the units, given the illegal nature of the arrange-
ments, qualified the applicant as exempt from the employee housing
guidelines of Section 20-22 of the Code.
In response to these concerns, we scheduled a site visit by the members of P & Z
so that you could get a first hand look at the violations still present in the
duplex. The City Attorney was consulted regarding the latter issue and it is
his opinion that it is inappropriate at this point in time to penalize the
applicant for past Code violations and that the applicant should be permitted
to proceed with the Condominiumization request. Therefore,. the conditions re-
commended for your approval of this application remain as you modified them at
your previous meeting, reading as follows:
1) The applicant revising the condominium plat prior to review of this
application by City Council to correct the errors identified by the
Engineering Department in their memo dated March 10, 1981;
2) The applicant agreeing that the units shall be restricted to six
month minimum leases with no more than two shorter tenancies per year;
3) The applicant applying for the appropriate permits for the furnace
and wiring found in the garage prior to review of this application by
City Council and permitting the necessary Building Department inspections
of these facilities;
4) The applicant eliminating the illegal kitchen facilities in the south
unit and replacing them with the appropriate washer and dryer and
eliminating one of the two kitchens located in the, north unit prior
to review of this application by City Council; and
5) The applicant agreeing not to lock off the bedrooms in the north unit,
instead utilizing them as a single two -bedroom condominium unit while
also not creatinga second residence in the south unit.
0 •
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Housing Director
Building Inspector/Fire Marshall
FROM: Plan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Parry Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
DATE: February 25, 1981
The attached application, submitted by Carolyn Parry, requests exception from
full subdivision regulations for the purpose of condominiumizing an existing
duplex located on Lot 1, Parry Subdivision. This item is scheduled for review
by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on April 7, 1981. Please return
any comments you may have concerning this application no later than Wednesday,
March 25, 1981. Thank you.
CITY OF ASPEN
130 south galena street
aspe olorado 81611
_ilk
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 12, 1981
TO: Alan Richman
FROM: Bob Edmondson
RE: Parry Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization)
If the above entitled subdivision exemption is granted, the
approval should be conditioned upon fuli compliance with the
requirements of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code of the City of
Aspen and compliance with the six month rental restriction.
RWS:mc
APPLICATION FOR EXCEPTION
FROM
SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
Request is hereby made by Carolyn Hiatt Parry under Section 20-19(a)
of the City of Aspen, Colorado, subdivision regulations for approval
through the subdivision exception process of her plan for condominium-
ization with respect to real property described as:
Lot 1
Parry Subdivision
City and Townsite of Aspen
City of Aspen
Pitkin County, Colorado
An exception in this case would be appropriate.
The application involves subdivision of an existing duplex.
Council has, of course, permitted condominiumization of many duplexes
in the past, and this request is similar to those.
An exception in this case will not conflict with the intent
and purpose of the subdivision regulations which are directed to assist
the orderly, efficient and integrated development of the City of Aspen,
to ensure the proper distribution of population, to coordinate the
need for public services and to encourage well planned subdivisions.
No tenants will be displaced as a result of this condominium-
ization. The lease for the current tenants runs only until May 1, 1981.
They will be leaving town at that time, and this was their intent at the
time they rented the unit. In fact, they were delighted they were not
required to sign a year's lease.
There are two units within this application. The south unit
contains 1800 square feet. From June, 1979 to October, 19801, this
unit was owner occupied. In November, 1980, it was rented for $14SO.00
per month, which places it outside the guidelines for low and moderately
priced housing.
The north unit contains 720 square feet. On May 21, 1979, I
was granted a permit to convert two existing bedrooms and baths into
2 10
a separate unit by the installation of a kitchen and construction of
outside stairs. From June 101 1979 until September 20, 1979, this
unit rented for $700 per month. From October, 1979 until October, 1980,
the two rooms were rented as separate studios for $350.00 each. One
studio has an area of 350 square feet, the other, 370 square feet.
The rentals paid for this unit also place it outside the current
guidelines for low and moderately priced housing.
In October, 1980, I was told by the building department that
I could not rent the rooms in the north unit as separate studios and
that I must remove the kitchen equipment from one of these rooms.
I complied with the request and these rooms have been restored to a
one bedroom apartment. The north unit has been owner occupied since
October, 1980.
The granting of this application will not undermine the intent
of the subdivision regulations, as it is clearly within the area
intended for exception under section 20-19. The duplex is already
in existence, and there will be no change in density, which is
presently in line with the permitted population density for the
property.
I would appreicate your consideration of this application
at your next regular meeting.
Dated: February 24, 1981.
B y1.
Carolyn Hthtt Parry