Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.295 Silverlode Dr.A037-98
2737-074-30-009 lb..1 A037-98 Silverlode Lot 9 DRAC 295 Silverlode Drive 2 953 SCO-«04 4-29 < \ 1 1 tS r - 1.. 4 R 6 1 A CITY OF ASPEN PLANNING CASELOAD INDEX mator=. .: '....~ li~.va--Ii- I .0 t... . : . :. ...: 1. ... I. . ...... . . ..... . 0 -1 ... D. . 1, . 4- - . .. MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Appeal Committee THRU: Stan Clauson, Community Developnlpqt Direof~ Julie Ann Woods, Deputy Director ~,|~£,... V FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner /9% / RE: Silverlode Subdivision Lot #9 -- Public Hearing DATE: May 14,1998 SUMMARY: The applicant, Greg Simmons, is requesting a waiver of the Residential Design Standard concerning garages and the window penalty for Lot #9 of the Silverlode Subdivision. Waiving this garage standard will allow the garage, as designed, to be less than 10 feet behind the main facade. Waiving the window standard will allow for windows between 9 and 12 feet above each plate, and non-orthogonal windows up to 15 feet above plate, without the Floor Area penalty. Staff recommends granting the variance for the placement of the garage, with conditions, and denying the window variance. APPLICANT: Greg Simmons. Represented by David Waugh, Architect. LOCATION: Silverlode Subdivision Lot #9. ZONING: AH1-PUD. Free-Market Residential portion of subdivision. REVIEW PROCEDURE: DRAC may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards at a public hearing i f the variance is found to be: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, c) clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. BACKGROUND: This lot is one of the free-market lots created by the Silverlode Subdivision, a private sector affordable housing project. The three-year period of vested rights, exempting these lots from the floor area penalties of Residential Design, has expired. The 1 12/ .. property must conform to all aspects of Residential Design unless specifically exempted by the DRAC. GARAGE: The applicant' s proposed development is not in compliance with the following Residential Design Standard: All portions of a garage, carport, or storage area parallel to the street shall be recessed behind the front facade a minimum often (10) feet. In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variance is not in greater compliance with the goals of the Community Plan. b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: The design is not more effective than the standard. However, this is the best design for a garage in the Silverlode subdivision which staff has reviewed. The applicant has mitigated the garage appearance by providing two single doors and by providing a porch element closer to the street than the garage. c) clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site specific constraints. Staff Finding: Properties in this subdivision are difficult to access with a car due to the steep terrain, building envelope designations, and predetermined access points. This waiver is necessary and the resulting design is appropriate for the site. WINDOWS: The applicant's proposed development is subject to a FAR penalty with the following Residential Design Standard: All areas with an exterior expression of a plate height greater than 10 feet shall be counted as 2 square feet for each 1 square foot offloor area. Exterior expressions shall be defined as facade penetration between 9 and 12 feet above floor level and circular, semi-circular, or non-orthogonal fenestration between 9 and 15 feet above floor level. In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variance is not in greater compliance with the goals of the Community Plan. The AACP specifically rejects two-story window expanses. 2 .. b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: The design is not more effective than the standard. The standards specifically says no windows in this area unless the house size is reduced by the Floor Area penalty. c) clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site specijic constraints. Staff Finding: There are no site specific constraints for this property which necessitate larger windows. The applicant has provided "views of Aspen Mountain" as a site specific constraint producing a hardship on the property. In staff' s estimation, the views do not represent a hardship and are, in fact, a significant benefit to the property. Furthermore, 9' high windows do not prevent the owner from enjoying those views unless the owner is taller than 9'. Staff also believes the community's view of Smuggler Mountain, and of this house, are important. Residential Design is an Ordinance passed for the benefit of the residents who look at other people's houses and who enjoy good architecture. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends DRAC grant a variance for the placement of the garage, with conditions, and deny the request to waive the window penalty for lot #9 Silverlode Subdivision. 1. The garage shall be developed as proposed in this application unless it is designed further from the street than the front facade. 2. The garage shall be developed with two single doors. 3. All other aspects of the "Residential Design Standards," as amended, shall apply at the time of building permit application. 4. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to grant a waiver of the Residential Design Standard for placement of the garage as proposed, with the conditions listed in the Staff memo dated May 14,1998, and deny the request to waive the Floor Area penalty regarding window placement for Lot #9 of the Silverlode Subdivision,." ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Application 3 l.-ANU WOC Mrri.!LA I /Unl 2 --1 3-3 0-j <·~ j_ · - g * f~/43 PROJECT: Name: 2.1 E~5I LVER- LaB pe-ive ~ Location: 1,£71- £1 1 51 LVEI2 Lo FE> (Indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) APPLICANT: Name: 41284 LIMIVIP 146 Address: 119 g,AFf E,2- AVEL . 0) 1 2 A-Gf Ek' i 07. 816,11 Phone#: el70_) 12,7 -94 le REPRESENTATIVE: Name: pAv i p WANA H INA U AH 0 255476 1 +TE.5 Address: 47362 -9*61-8 11·BSA PIE. ~ H-3291 EFULPER, 64. 00303 Phone #: (30) 499 -7494 - TYPE OF APPLICATION: (please check ail thai apply): Conditional Use C Conceptual PUD E Conceptual Historic Devt. Special Review I Final PUD (& PUDAmendment) C Final Historic Deve:opment Design Review Appeal 71 Conceonial SPA D Minor Historic Devt GMC?S Allotment 2 Final SPA (& SPA Amendment) E Historic Demoil,on GMQS Exemption E Subdivision C Historic Designation ESA - 8020 Greenline. Stream E Subdivision Exemption (includes 7 Small Lodge Conversier: Margin. Hailam Lake Bluff. condominiumization) Expansion Mountain Vin Plane Lot Split E Temporan- Use 6 Other: ~ Lot Line Adjustment C rext·Map Amendment EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings. uses. previous approvals. etc. ) VA cANT Li N P PROPOSAL: (description of proposed buildings. uses. modifications. etc.) 6 IKIA Le PA MILY 12<64 IDEN 68 Have you attached the following? FEES DUE: S 4 60· 6;97 5j Pre-Application Conference Summary &7 Attachment # 1, Signed Fee Agreement 0 Response zo Attachment #2: Dimensional Reauirements Form. E Response to Attachment #3. Minimum Submission Contents g Response to Attachment #4, Specific Submission Contents S Response to Attachment #5, Review Standards for Your Application I 1 El [ 1 M El m .. ATTACHMENT 2 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM PrOJect: '219 4 1 LVE,12 1-7 re P @IVE Applicant: 4 VER € 1 M M 0>16 Location: LOT 9, 4 !12·/ER L.·622 E Zone District: AH' Lot Size: . 393 *0225 Lot Area: 1 68°167 4. 7-2 - (for the purposes ofcalculating Floor Area. Lot Area ma> be reduced for areas within the high water mark. easements, and steep slopes. Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal Code.) Commercial net leasable: Existing: Proposed: Number of residential units: Existing: 6 Proposeds \ Number of bedrooms: Existing: 0 Proposed: 4 Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): DIMENSIONS: Floor Area: Existing. - Allowable: t\ 01.3 Proposed. 3239 Principal bldg. height: Existing. - .4llowable. 30' proposed._ 30' Access. bldg. height: Existing - Allowable: - Proposed: - On-Site parking: Existing.- Required. 1 Proposed: H 96 Site coverage: Existing Required: Proposed: _ 1 4.4 9/0 Open Space: Existing -Required Proposed 99.G Front Setback: Existing: '. Required 32 Proposed GS' 04 Rear Setback: Existing - - Required. 33 Proposed: 4 GOW Combined F,/R: Eristing: - Required: 10 Proposed: \091.9 Side Setback: Existing. - Required. R) Proposed- \O -C Side Setback: Existing- - Required. lo Proposed: \3' - 03 Combined Sides: Existing.· - Required: 10 Proposed: 023' Cu Existing non-conformities or encroachments: 1467 ME Variations requested: YO' 4»P•&45 <ET#»611 1~eaM Yhot HILH WINpow R..g. PENALTY .. 6 \ TY o 7 ~f E.h-i 91 L= . 3 i HA! N <*lZBET ViI t 1- I... C.* Le hi € FINe € 1 1/242 WILL66(45 lout RANCH ,>< l.al 1 I €110 E 0 1 6 04 <ty v 1 251 hi l TY H A F ok! All IAL- ST- 5/1-veR LAD E. P. -2 (I-~> 1 1 \ L --- . A \ - -- -«N».a~ . I - + N I ... \ /4 / + 43...# 1 ... Wh ' -i- I 1%-- . 44 c \DZ».4-1 . - ··-1. T g 4 9 1, k /36 · .4.8 , / \4 , 1 7/ 4 6 t 4&4 \ 4 4#flor 9 \\ k> 1 ·I .j . /.f €% 1 , . ./. i 1%40 J+CLf / i \ 00> /1 joi J 1 t & 3 0 0 *7406- 1//8/*// , / 3 \ CA: A /fi \ I / vx »u /' '0/Kill<'' / / iVE • \ 13 0\ / /. /tf, C 6 / 4 re t.\ Vr %£.<41 ..>1 1 16047 1% t 92\ t j 92227 3#V f ./ 1 I /00 * Ck..19 ~ 11 / ./55 6/ 222 :. 1 --Fr . . 1 1 030 2 7 %17.7 t I.L 8 - .-al . 7 4%412 1 ~-<2~#t- /0/4 - 32*t-1 ./. 4 \ -~re</ D4* 00'~ 4 7--kfic. e # a % A. N . . 1 n / W.Lri .. waugh- B as6ociatea architecture o planning o 60!ar design April 30, 1998 1-04- 9 Mr. Chris Bendon City of Aspen .-.. 130 South Galena Street - Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Design Review Appeals Board Lot 9, Silver Lode Dear Chris, We are requesting a variance on the above mentioned lot due to two factors. The first is the garage setback is not the required ten feet back form the building face. This could not be achieved in the design because of the topography of the site. We have mitigated the presence of the garage by recessing it four feet from the building face and twelve feet from the more predominant covered porch face. The porch will extend across half of the building and will feature moss rock and peeled log columns and a copper roof. The second reason for requesting a variance is the high glass windows in our design. We are requesting that the penalty be removed from the FAR calculation because of the tremendous views that the lot captures of the entire valley. As the home can be seen throughout the valley, we feel it is important to establish an appealing elevation. The turned roofs also reduce the primary mass and add character to the home. Due to the burying of the house into the hillside, and to the site configuration, the proposed encroachment will not hinder any other views of surrounding neighbors. 4730 table mesa dr. • boulder, colorado • 80303 • 303•494•7494 waug-1 0 8660(iateds architecture o planning o solar de*n April 30, 1998 Mr. Chris Bendon City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: Design Review Appeals Board Lot 9, Silver Lode The proposed project for Lot 9 meets the following criteria for the requested variance: Garage setback variance- Due to the topography of the site, we are requesting a variance on the 10' setback from building face to garage. The steepness of the site would not allow for a side load garage without unreasonable earth retention. High window FAR penalty * We are requesting this variance based on asthetic reasons due to the incredible views offered by this site. Based on the site configuration, the proposed encroachment will not hinder any other views of surrounding neighbors. 4730 table mesa dr. • boulder, colorado • 80303 • 303•494•7494 ID i U 4* 71 i >4 - .i\) WS I . 1 --I 1,11111 /LE L 0 k-82S KITO.EN V , ,=1 - r= r Equ--dll 0 1 41 r \ -- i MST;2 CL ~ ~~~ g ./.r/-7 0 1 6/ i r-) PWDR MASTER 0 E-ax IM ~1 _an / X D..G <1 1 7\ / STUDY DECK El FAMLY E-c X lf-8' E~.1 I11t ~_11__ 8 . 1 I----1 Decl< 11 ~ UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - 1-0-r <1 SCALE , 1/8'-r-O' 2047 SQUARE FEET 14 1 [2 75/----<kk 11 - . 0 LWORY/MJD ~- - BATH 4 Eun f l--r- 0 04 BORM •2 /-11 V ]16 LP IR ON 162 3 CAR GARAGE . 1---6- Ell -A A XNE-----1 KIn=3 h I I GUEST/STLOY I • eC)RM •3 For52 G1 c_r-- -0 6 L I 7- 17 - 1215·014 6>:'VERED 9,7 for' ~ MAIN LEVEL FLOOR PL.,~1 - 1-aT 9 M SCALE : 1/8'-1'-O' Ki# ~<~ARA@E139 SQUARE FEET . 4-L -r al * LOWER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - Lo SCALE ' 1/e'=1'-O" »k FNSWED 793,r~fARE FEET x-v,r /7-ng 31 2.60/- Fu,r fl. + 1 1 - L GT €01 -51 L.vt P/VE, 1 1 L /T l l i 12 36> L o I t p . -h 43 -El - I 9 7'Pl LO'I 4 n vlzi. ,£1-~,22 0 SED -6 40541 444 att · -41 / / , 01 - 4 74 11 1 - /. / 14-· 4/736· / 17 '-4 ~ rl- O-12-->r\ 7--71 -* - - 4i -»4 1 -7 177-/ ---/ --- -7 9/ / ,--16 f f,Atv €L!/I « 1/ 1 Vix/PRO/ ./ / i./ X/ lili / t../fir-- r 4 y I . i / ff~~ , : 4 v rj 1213 '1 749.-' 777 fil 59 7 lAi 7 r/f~«~ ~~ « ~ »1 · l. 1 --1 9 d /1 213 61 + 6 1/1 - 11 1/IN 01<-121 . ,©F & 1 ~_1 e f.j /992 C , )k t F Atrpt .i 1 730 € . 6-a / f n 4 5.> . b.spen j C© 92 €11 90 -7-ks- € 174 e f 4.7"\.. 11 1 6-(97 9; M#eat , ern .2*1. eyipl ;t••6' Ae r 7>/ann,A~ 0.4 --Ern;.7 °Acl bic,/cl,'A, pUM,7 aPP);t 6-47 on 3 -A-r 1 02% A+3 ' r 6 7 j St /Off (©42 9(.liche >sib. , Aspe.. 09 e'/7//,7, Re,C h~ 0468-3 3 a.1 4 Pank- au..ov h i /(9 Cotpo< 600„9* /-2,%}Spen , (0 8/6// , (9103 9-26-99/g. I aw#Aer'-21 7)6©24 Le)"9 '1 5,7 649'c D,A 6458£ 0 k ;<prge.4 rn E ,-n o l / c*21 6<J-:ca_£ Ar-_r se.6. d y, E>per·kie" /As oddress dR p,{tne Ace.,Aer /11 9 73 0 741/2 *924 Dr.,-800/4/, (6 20 03 40 43 99 9-7997. -7-ke =4-4-44 aeUretses 4-, 649 969 4. luer _( ecte a r e -3 / 3 51 lu e, (Se KA Dr . 4,4, -z_gi 5,(oer Ct,41 1)6. re fpete)-;olly . , 7. 11 , +Lk app)te a.*, a,n curie,Jz/ 227 € 23/419FWL £ 4- 4 7.rOG-3 e /Us g 2*9, 9:/©er (e.4-~. to, +6 -/k.5- c/es 5.41 Wate- t»2 4 u ) 7/Le 3;33,#0/0~ /'5.'~~74749#yf .,5.21 J~J~~G~~F, ,t 76€Ce c €0141.4 44 644< 6-4 -7-6 + k fon,0,,»-4-4 1-720 YOU, GNXUL#©rAE"At '4 7-ha., fi ~,4 , ---7 - 6 r7 07< 'F. 9. "-0.1 63('/''AMS 1244<k lal.4- U~.4*-ro le)ber al'~tover 4- )711 794'c€w-;64. /«-07 3-0-- f -ff ~-O Q 4 *A v joef F «to j #4-9, Thi 6 -Al»-*f 1401 \AD 0-71 V .. APR 29 '98 81:52PM LAND TITLE ASPEN P.10 LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CU IVI .1 f ST O ../.. DISTRIBUTION . ..W I. April 29, 7998 Jur Crder No.: 0372068 Property Address: 7,4 0 C 1- 7 1 ,~tT D ' r D '0 "' -- ..9 . a C -1. I -,1 - 1./rl . V Y. ... r X.. .,0 Hibl. pr-ru-, v L' AT to'"- -- 4 4 0 • • L..m 14 Itj :P. 1 5 WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE 321' CAMPANILL DRIVE 13' L.vUL'l.. 91.6 SPEN, CO 81611 SANTA BARBARA, CA 93109 ttn: Attn· JOHN MARKEL 1,1 ' n 1 600 000-0000 v Jul JU' U) U Copies: 1 opies: . 0 0 >4 P " .. APR 29 '38 01 : 52PM LAND TITLE ASPEN P.11 YOUR LAND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY CONTACTS April 23, 1998 Oui Order No,: Q372068 Buyer /Borrower SPEGORY T. SIMMONS Seller'Owner: WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE, A A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP Property Address: 253 SLLVER LODE DRIVE ASPEN, CO 81611 ' If yoU have any inquirLes or .equire I iriner assistance, please centact one of the numbers listed below: 1 For -1O51ng Assistance: For Title Assistance: JAXICE L. JOHNSON DARIN AX HELM 817 COLORADO AVE 533 E, HOPKINS #102 , GLENWOOD SPRINGS CO 81 601 ASPEN, CO 81611 Phone: 970 945-2610 Phone: 970 925-1678 Fax: 970 345-4784 waX' 970 925-6243 ***** 4***** ********1**·r* ** **********4***%* ******** ************ ***** NOTE: ONCE AN ORIGINAL COMMITMENT HAS BEEN ISSUED, ANY SUBSEQUENT CHANGES WILL BE EMPHASIZED BY UNDERLINING. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ORDER E .. APP 29 '98 01:53PM LAND TITLE ASPEN r.la 4- OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Our Order # Q372068 For Information Only 253 SILVER LODE DRIVE ASPEN, CO 81611 - Charges - ALTA Owner Policy 3760.Co Alta Lender Poiicy $65 OC Tax Certificate 91¢.OC - - TOTAL - - $835.00 *** THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE, BUT AN ESTIMATE OF FEES. WHEN REFERRING TO THIS ORDER, PLEASE REFERENCE OUR ORDER NO, Q372068 *** 1. Effective Daze: Februaly 13, 1 998 at 5:00 P.M, 2. Policies to be issued, and preposed Insured: "ALTA" Owner' s Policy 10-17-92 $650,000.00 Proposed Insured GREGORY T. SIMMONS " ALTA" Loan Policy 10-17-92 $400,000.00 Proposed Insured: " TED" 3, The estate or interest in tne land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is: A Fee Simple 4. Title to the estate or interest covered herein is at the effective date hereof vested in: WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE, A A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP PAGE 1 .. -- APR 29 '98 01:54PM LAND TITLE ASPEN r'.1 5 OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY ALTA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE A Our Order # Q372068 5. The 2 and referred to in this Commitment fs described as follows: T rie' 0 -V . . 1 SILVES<LODE SUBDIVISION: ACCORDING 70 THE SUBDIVISION PLAT THEREOF FILED FOR RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 37 AT PAGE 3. COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO --- PAGE 2 .. APR 29 '98 01:54Ph LAr-ID TITLE ASPEN P. 14 ALTA COMMITMENT 8-1 SCMEOUJn (Requirements) Our Order # 0372068 The following are the requirements to be complied with: 1. Payment to or for the auccunt of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for tne estate or interest to be insured. 2. Proper instrument(s) creating the estate or interest to De insured must be executed and duly filed for record, to-wit: 3 . PAYMENT OF ANY AND ALL REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAXES DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE CITY OF ASPEN. 4. PARTIAL RELEASE OF DEED OF TRUST DATED April 17, 1995, FROM WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE, A A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP T¢ THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY FOR THE USE OF ALPINE BANK, ASPEN TO SECURE THE SUM OF Sl,500,000.00 RECORDED May 12, 1996, IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 816 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 381280 SAID DEED OF TRUST WAS FURTHER SECURED BY ASSIGNMENT OF RENTS AND LEASES RECORDED May 12, 1993, IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 836 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 381281. 5. PARTIAL RELEASE OF COLLATERAL FROM FINANCING STATEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALPINE BANK, ASPEN RECORDED MAY 12, 1995 UNDER RECEPTTON NO. 381282, 6. WARRANTY DEED FROM WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE, A A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP TO GREGORY T. SIMMONS CONVEYING SUBJECT PROPERTY. 7. DEED OF TRUST FROM GREGORY T. SIMMONS TO THE PUBLIC TRUSTEE OF PITKIN COUNTY FOR THE USE OF "'I'Bot' TO SECURE THE SUM OF $400,000.00 --- NOTE: EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1, 1997 CRS 30-10-406 REQUIRES THAT ALL DOCUMENTS RECEIVED FOR RECORDING OR FILING IN THE CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE SHALL CONTAIN A TOP MARGIN OF AT LEAST ONE INCH AND A LEFT, RIGHT AND BOTiOM MARGIN o F AT LEAST ONE-HALF OF AN INCH. THE CLERK AND RECORDER MAY REFUSE TO RECORD CR FILE ANY DOCUMENT THAT DOES NOT CONFORM, EXCEPT THAT, THE REQUIREMENT FOR THE :OP MARGIN SHALL NO*T APPLY TO 'DOCUMENTS USING FORMS ON WHICH SPACE IS PROVIDED FOR RECORDING OR FILING INFORMATION AT THE TOP MARGIN OF THE DOCUMENT. --- PAGE 3 .. APP 29 '98 01:55PM LAND TIT~E ASPEN P.15 ALTA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order # Q372068 PAGE .. APP 29 '98 01:55PM LAND TliLE ASFc P.16 Ir-P.] ALTA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order # Q372068 The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same ace disposed of to the satisfaction of The Company: 1. Standard Exceptions 1 through 5 pri.need on the cover sheet. Taxes and assessments not yet due or ravable and special I asseasments not yet cersified to the Treasurer's office. 7. Any unpaid taxes or assessments against gaid land. 8. Liens yor unpaid water and sewer charges, if any. 9. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION. SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 10. RIGHT OF PROPRIETOR OF A VEIN OR LODE 90 EXTRACT' AND REMOVE HIS ORE THEREFROM SHOULD THE SAME BE FOUND TO PENETRATE OR INTERSECT THE PRF 1Ull T Cwl e AS RESERVED IN UNI:ED STATES PATENT RECORDED December 22, 1909, IN BOOK 136 AT PAGE 365, RECORDED MAY 20, 1949 IN BOOK 175 AT PAGE 162, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 1902 IN BOOK 55 AT PAGE 116. 11. RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES OR CANALS CONSTRUCTED BY THE AUTHORITY OF THE UNITED STATES AS RESERVED IN UNITED STATES PATENT RECORDED November 22, 1910, IN BOOK 136 AT PAGE 373, AND RECORDED DECEMBER 24, 1902 IN BOOK 35 AT PAGE 116. 12, PERPETUAL RIGHT OF WAY AND EASEMENTS TO EXTEND OR DRIVE LEVELS OR TUNNELS THROUGH THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS SET FORTH AND RESERVED IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 30, 1895 IN BOOK 131 AT FAGE 425. 13. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN AGREEMENT RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1988 IN BOOK 572 AT PAGE 72. 14. TERMS: CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND EASEMENTS AS CONTAINED TX INSTRUMENTS RECORDED JANUARY 25. 1985 IN BOOK 480 AT PAGE 494 AND RECORDED APRIL 2, 1986 IN BOOK 508 AT PAGE 3 - 15. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS, OBLIGATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS AS CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 94-15 RECORDED JUNE 27, 1994 IN BOOK 754 AT PAGE 194, AND RESOLUTION NO. 94-110 RECORDED SEPTEMBER 9, 1994 IN BOOK 760 AT PAGE 909 16. EASEMENTS, RIGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MA:TERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF SMUGGLER MINE SUBDIVISION RECORDED MARCH 15, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 36 AT PAGE 77. PAGE 5 .. APP 29 '98 31: 56PM LAND 11 TLE ASPEN P.17 ALTA COMMITMENT SCHEDULE B-2 (Exceptions) Our Order # Q372G68 17. TERMS, CONDITIONS, PROVISIONS AND OBLIGATIONS AS CONTAINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 07, SERIES OF 1994, RECORDED MARCH 15, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 299 AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED MARCH 13, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 301. 18 TERMS, CONDITIONS. AND PROVISIONS OF SUBDIVIDER'S AGREEMENT AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMENT RECORDED March 15, 1995, IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 307. 19. RESERVATION BY WRIGHT & PREUSCH MINING, LTD., OF ANY AND ALL SUB-SURFACE AND MINERAL RIGHTS BELOW 50 FEET' BELOW THE SURFACE; HOWEVER, SPECIFICALLY WITHOUT ANY ACCOMPANYING RIGHT TO USE OR IN ANY WAY BURDEN THE SURFACE ESTATE TO OBTAIN AND USE THE BENEFIT OF THE OWNERSHIP OF THE SAME, AS SET FORTH IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 22, 1995 IN BOOK 776 AT PAGE 880. 20 EASEMENTS, RTGHTS OF WAY AND OTHER MATTERS AS SET FORTH ON THE PLAT OF SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION RECORDED MAY 9, 1995 IN PLAT BOOK 37 AT PAGE 3, AND APPROVAL RECORDED MAY 9, 1395 IN BOCK 780 AT PAGE 368, AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT RECORDED MAY 9, 1995 IN BOOK 789 AT PAGE 369. 21. TERMS, CCNDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF ANNEXATION AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE AND THE CITY OF ASPEN RECORDED May 09, 1995 IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 370. 22 RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS, WHICH DC NOT CONTAIN A FORFEITURE OR REVERTER CLAUSE, AS CONTAINED IN INSTRUMEN: RECORDED May 12, 1995, IN BOOK 780 AT PAGE 755. 23. TERMS, CCNDITIONS AND PROVISIONS OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT RECORDED February 22, 1996 UNDER RECEPTION NO. 390141. PAGE 6 F'. 13 A» -9 30 1.11· 01=,M'i LHI I.j I i 'LL H'.,P' i ~ U ND TITLE GUARANTEE COMPANY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Required by Senate Bill 91-14 A) The subject real property may be located in a special taxing :district. 3, A Iert.:ficate (31 Tux·de .,ue _isting each taxing julisdiction v 4- --»13 ¥n.-1,1 ....Ar -- 71·A Cour y Treasurer or t.he Cianty -er's authorized rant The Information regardlrig specia, aistricts and the boundaries of such districts ma> De cotainea from rhe Board of County Commissioners, the County Elerk and Recorder, or the Councv Assesser Requirea oy Senate Bl-1 92-143 A J#:t:ficate of Taxes Due list:ng eacn taxing Jurisdictic sha.1 be Obtained from the County :reasurer or the County 239'arer's ad:horized agern ulsip--Nlos'lliffiff~d o amloalrqoJE SolDIOOSSE 9 43num 3 R ~I Il ~ |~ O([VEIOD 'NG[cISV ,LNTI*dOTRAJIG SID . I 0 1 1111 P' 111 1 11 1 1 1 1 Mli-MI hi - 5 1. 11,/~~1 1 11 ~ 111~ 1 111 111 I 1 111,- 11. , 11 111 1- lilli 1 5 11 F 1 -i .-0 -7----- 2\ 11;1 + 1 U F[ 1 :-= 1 IM a HULL 1 4 U. 1 "11: 11 -9 - 3 - , It \ - i l -4-0-1 'IP' 1 P 111 1 11 0 -1 4 1114 1 4 11 . 1.1 11241 1 1. 11 lili 1 1 . 11 1 - 1 1 fi4 -- , 1 !1 1 11 1! 1. 11 1 J I f ON 133HS 4€145,Ker ELEVAT{ Cl Floll*\919 1>gM Hlne il ----1 1 JIL illf 0 . . . 0-1 - t REvISIONS - f 1-- 0-i 0 -- U DRAIN 89 DWAUGM 3 - 1/ 1 - -J f' .1 PO FT.1.1 k.1 B er E.Le.verl 0 11 Z U 0 r inr--i--TE==3 rf-1 l-1 M 41 - 0 $0 rn E HIF2=J=1121£22=~ 023 / APPL 98 ROFTH 5.457 ELEVAT 1641 - OUVHOFOO 'NG[dSV ii'lip-lit6§--7-%(65§[d--T-i:ffii*w®ir-------Sel-21365Su-?y *6*L•,6,•COE • CO£09 • OP-0100 '/epmoq · UP I.I] Diqq 0££' SIONG[GISNH G[G07 ZISIATIS 18 3- _-/d....ill,-r-ZA- I Ill--1 ---- ..r, 1 - - i, / . C I 4- t ~,22420-5,7.pu„~A 1, 4 1 1 . 1, '-44dl ,-·T ., 2 I .1 11 **»IT. .... . 1 . *'.0151- , I 0 4. 1 - I -- $ 313 - ' -/ 0 1 ~ 2ri DE,19*7~*:I L - - - L "* - A ~ j -. - 1 - . 1 - 42.4:1,6#15£'i'P . mi / 6 - ' idu..b-l .14 iz - 9/Ad. 1.4&4. 3 »\,mi r~ A 4 7.-'. -- I , .. I ./ b -r= D ... - j , e! 4 I. - ..e£~ 1 h - -2- - . - $O/- P. - I . . M #* C * , ¥.e 4-16-4 ... 4 ¥4- n~*1 ©¢ ' - - j -6 :/646/441>t · -313,/ i.. 1 I - 1 1:t , v ---4 .. -- - , I J.=... 1-4/*".1 . . '~ ..It 1,~-9t<hdar€,·*0*~;~~~~ 44'A.*#89&*.5 -A M · ~**Pmees>.. 3411 El = aw T~ . LI--#,--./....-/41.1 ~;, ~ 4~~,D-.1.~t.efif=,F,-h~ ---4,49 ..m, A.8 ,~i•&~i.ma.jA. g*t.. *<;449 4*N 21 7.,M ~ f I~ 6~P E.-9 9 ·· 21-2-44 Hydj"-14"--,0'.v4 9*A~~-F,d"r ff- -4 ¢16,€, A. . -9 z42/ p -*- r 1. 1 . 1. --f>21 E-~ j# - . , .244 C 1!.IbLEJ- -24-3 95-9 -L 7-*0220'~~-£4% .ir:*4 ~1974 · -- . 4, - 4 -*dep, 1 *· 2,2"7' . 1 , i J /1 - . --4 n.:4. le It , 1.1 j P 3 1 £2~1 f i{ 1 ; 4 /1 1 4 1- / bt- L' •41 '1') /6 r). 2$*til -1 . -[¥1:®19. 1)400~D· 4UU. dllki~j=f;.%¢¢70 ' 1 0*1..i;~i, f Il! - fir' - 1,6'.. i '/ ..i .i 1 1 11 1 1 1 IVA 1 # , -=4 1 +HILS. 1-&, 1 , A pr--5 $ #f-~,5. * I, 1 - b ADDRESS 1.\\ l b\ LOTS - 1 \ \\ * CITY OF ASPEN_~~ 1\ t \\\ f \\%\. (1) S11-VER L®B , \ \ 1.1-| COUNTY OF FITKIN 1 _1 STATE OF COLORADO , REVISIONS: , / \ \ V \ \ \ fl \ 1. \ \./ * > SAEET INDEX 1 \ \ \ \ Al SITE PLAN \ \ f -,~ A2 FOUNDATION PLAN \ A3 MAIN LEVEL FLOO2 PLAN \ \ \\ A4 UPPER LEVEL FLOOR PLAN \ \ \1 11 A5 SOUTN AND WEST ELEVATIONS 1 - -1 *~ 11 f «f f \ DRAWN BY: D.WAUGH A6 NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS , A i., /1 / A7 SECTIONS , i AB SECTIONS \ i \% \ \ 1 \ \ 1 1 1 \ li.*\/ ¤ 0> 1\ \ 0 1 2 \ \ id, 1 \ \ \ 0 1 \ \0 \ \ i // a \1 4 0 0 \0 \0 .. - / 0 \ 1 =- 1%\ 1/ / A \ 1 \. ./0 i \\ 1 LOT \~9 1 \ 1 9 A \ \ i 1\% / 9 , 0 .01-0 . A = \ 8.35§ At .\ i . A 1 I lill a) S 0 41 / 1 ,/ 1* ,390 *Q.RT.\ 11 5 0 .S ' 4 )7'\ ~ 0 -0 / 3/ \ \\\ to /. I\6 f 444 (< 1 - 1 / 1 1 / i j- 16- cci \ \ 1 - \ E-4 0 - 1 \ = 07 1 - ' r + -1 (14 CO ---1 -3 CE I ETZ' 1 BA .C~ 1 m bil E- d 2 CO g 0 A \ -- 1 £ I r 6 i f 1 -I. 1, 1 /,15 r . SHEET NO.: DATE: GENERAL NOTES: 27 APRIL 98 ~DEVELOPER, OWNER, AND/OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR ·ARE TO VERIFY ALL EXISTING , . , CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS, AND SPECIFICATIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS PRIOR TO, AND DURING Al / CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES, OMISSIONS, OR ERRORS EXISTING IN THE DRAWINGS , SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ARCHITECT FOR CORRECTION PRIOR TO ~ . COMMENCING WORK. THE FAILURE TO NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT WITHIN TEN (10) DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE DRAWINGS SHALL CONSTITUTE THE FINAL ACCEPTANCE Of TAE DRAWINGS. ANY CHANGES MADE AFTER THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE DRAWINGS SHALL RELEASE THE 3 ~ SITE PLAN SCALE : 1" = 10' ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH, AND BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH, MINIMUM CONSTRUCTION PRELIMINARY 1 STANDARDS OF THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE NATIONAL ELECTRIC AND PLUMBING CODES, DRAWING , ~ ARCHITECT FROM ANY FUTURE RESPONSIBCUTY. AND ALL APPUCABLE. STATE AND LOCAL CODES. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND INSTALLATIONS SHALL BE AS ESTABLISHED BY GOOD AND NORMAL BUILDING PRACTICE AND MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS. NOT FOk - CONSTRUCTION 0GVH0700 'NadSV *6*446*•00£ • EC)£09 • OPeJoIoo '.1@Plnoq • Up US@UI @I 6 LOU- 10NfIGIS~I 3([OF H Al - f. 1 1 . ,Grid by Assoc•otes. ws of the 3 ond roads checking ond Moyee of belief icial seal 1996. , 1 - \\\ 4«04326«\ :\ \.4 7>0 \4~ 4=»1 1 \ 1/ \ \ i \ /1 <ty /., . DRAWN BY: REVIEWED REVISION DATE DESCRIPTION BY CH'D WILLIAMS RANCH JOINT VENTURE ASPEN. COLORADO SCALE: JOB NO· DATE: R.L.C. DATE: FOR ENGINEERS COUNCIL of COLORADO MAP OF EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR . SHEET NO- L DESIGNED BY: BANNER r. m 825648 e-20-96 AMERICAN CONSULTING If¥ H.E.B. LOT 9, SILVERLODE SUBDIVISION 0 li-of I L REVIEWED CHECKED BY: BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. • CONSULTING ENGINEERS 8 SURVEYORS :„ DATE: FOR BANNER ASSOCIATES, INC. 2777 CROSSROADS BOULEVARD e GRAND JUNCTION, CO 81506 0 19701 243-2242 WITH PROPOSED APPROXIMATE DRIVEWAY CONTOURS W.E.B. 1. 1 ,t,-44,2112.- c. \DCA\P\8256-18\9 Fri Dec 20 14 4, 4 I. : G .. D .4 4 - .. 0 . ... - -- r~, 9 . D .. . . :.:. . .. .. .. 0 . .0 0 0 .. ... . 0 . , ... .. 4 . . 0 . ... , .. .. . ...... . I. ....... I ... . . . . I . I. ..... .... . 1..... .... .. - L •• . ,€32:02' ... . A -- -& 1 .. I . . -