The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.610 S Original St.A089-98r 7 -- PN: 2737-182-53002 Case A089-98 1 610 S. Original DRAC 5 6 dj/1 01Â£ c| '2~ 2-92 - 4 . Ch.. 1020 ' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 City of Aspen Land Use: 1041 Deposit 1042 Flat Fee 4 3,73 -. 1043 HPC 1046 Zoning and Sign Referral Fees: 1163 City Engineer 1205 Environmental Health 1190 Housing Building Fees: 1071 Board of Appeals 1072 Building Permit 1073 Electrical Permit 1074 Energy Code Review 1075 Mechanical Permit 1076 Plan Check 1077 Plumbing Permit 1078 Reinspection Other Fees: 1006 Copy 1302 GIS Maps 1481 Housing Cash in Lieu 1383 Open Space Cash in Lieu 1383 Park Dedication 1468 Parking Cash in Lieu Performance Deposit 1268 Public Right-of-way 1164 School District Land Ded. TOTAL NAME: 3-Â·ok, A (.4,11.Ly-,r- I- ADDRESS/PROJECT: " 1(3 -> ~L. PHONE: CHECK# CASE/PERMIT#: Â·-' ' . # OF COPIES: 8 DATE: f '/9 4 .1 + yel INITIAL: S .ID . t.~C . j CASE STATUS SHEET Case No. 4069 +98 Representative' s Name: ,33 4â€ž W A , r,4.- Representative' s Phone: 9827-E 7 7-Gy Fax: DATE ACTION OR ACTIVITY toi / /24/96 6- 4-,ird -6. CA& 19 * 406.wo a~f"1 9-2 Â· Dec PARCEL ID:~2737-182-53002 DATE RCVD: |10/23/98 # COPIES:~8 CASE NO|A089-98 CASE NAME:{610~2Origing' DRAC PLNR:| PROJ ADDR:~610 S. Original 1 CASE TYP:|DRAC STEPS:~ OWN/APP: Kenneth Hannan 6 ADR~750 Lexington Ave,, C/S/Z: ~New York, NY 100 PHN:~(212) 319 2878 REP:|Wheeler Architecutre ADR:|48 Katydid Lane C/S/Z:~Snowmass, CO 816 PHN~927-9765 FEES DUE:|450 FEES RCVDf _ _ STAT: r- REFERRALS~ REFI BY| i DUE:| i MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED lr-r-9% 1 ue- i -73 Y 1-1 1 DATE OF FINAL ACTION:| LK 5 1 b CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| O'rpnue~/ PZ: BOA: CLOSED:| 6 26'11 BY: | C~vl DRAC: 2210__ PLAT SUBMITD: | ~ PLAT {BK,PG):| ADMIN: - L I '.-Ty>. I 72&57 (201 9, 0-thiwi 4.. 94 Wki_Ulk Â£* 41*6. 46*k.1- R M. 24* D 9/"1 tB-0 09/1 \11 Li Nf'*U 5-2 :tz -IE A. MEMORANDUM TO: Design Review Appeal Committee THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director 4\/i'. Y u - FROM: Christopher Bendon, Planner ~~1 IAA ~ UlvwÂ¥ 1 RE: Hannan Residence, 601 South Original -- Public Hearing Garage Setback Volume (Windows) DATE: November 5, 1998 SUMMARY: The applicant, Kenneth Hannan, owner, is requesting a waiver of two Residential Design Standards concerning the volume standard, for windows within 9 to 12 feet of floor height, and for the garage setback for a redeveloped single-family home at 601 South Original Street. Waiving the window standard will allow the placement of these windows as proposed without a Floor Area penalty. Waiving the garage standard will allow the garage to be setback less then the required 10 feet. Staff does not find the variance criteria to be met and does not support the variances. The window standard allows for larger windows but requires a floor area penalty. The purpose of this standard is to allow either large houses or large windows -- but not a large house with large windows. With respect to the garage setback requirement, staff again does not believe the criteria for a variance have been met. The applicant has provided a plan which does meet the standard and, in fact, has been issued a building permit based after being found in conformance. The applicant would like to reduce the extent of the porch projection and, therefore, reduce the garage setback. Staff believes the porch projection could be reduced and the garage setback be maintained by doing one of two things: 1) moving the garage back by reducing the amount of space devoted to the garage bathroom, or 2) reducing the internal garage length from 22' to 20'. The Committee may waive the Residential Design Standards upon finding the proposal meets one of the variance criteria for each of the standards. Staff's response to these criteria are included in Sta#Comments, below. Staff recommends the Design Review Appeal Committee deny the variances. 1 APPLICANT: Kenneth Harman. Represented by John Wheeler, AIA. LOCATION: 610 South Original Street. ZONING: Lodge Tourist Residential (LTR) (non-conforming). REVIEW PROCEDURE: DRAC may grant relief from the Residential Design Standards at a public hearing if the variance is found to be: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, b) a more effective method of addressing standard in question; or, c) clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site specific constraints. GARAGE: The applicant's proposed development is not in compliance with the following Residential Design Standard: Garage. For single family homes and duplexes with attached garages or carports, the garage must be set back at least ten (10) feet further from the street than the house. In response to the review criteria for a DRAC variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variance is not in greater compliance with the goals of the Community Plan. This standard was written in response to the AACP. b) a more effective method Of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: The applicant has shown the standard can be met. The applicant is seeking to reduce the size of the porch which affects the garage setback. However, the standard could still be meet with a reduced porch if the garage were either smaller (the garage is 4 feet longer than required) or if the bathroom in the garage were reduced or eliminated. Applicants and their representatives usually seek a high level of internal design quality in the products they propose. Bulk and mass are taken to the limits of the zoning. This is reasonable and expected in a market with such high land costs. These standards were written for a reason -- to ensure a level of external design quality for the community. Staff does not believe the committee should waive a standard because the applicant wishes to have a bathroom in their garage. 2 c) clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site specifc constraints. Staff Finding: There does not appear to be any site specific constraints to this property which prescribe the placement of the garage. The lot is fiat, buildable, etc. Furthermore, the applicant has shown how the standard can be achieved. Staff does not believe there exists a hardship. WINDOWS (VOLUME): The applicant's proposed development is subject to a FAR penalty with the following Residential Design Standard: All areas with an exterior expression Of a plate height greater than 10 feet shall be counted as 2 square feet for each 1 square foot offloor area. Exterior expressions shall be defined as facade penetration between 9 and 12 feet above floor level and circular, semi-circular, or non-orthogonal fenestration between 9 and 15 feet above floor level. The subj ect windows are the large window in the center o f the south facade and the small oval window on the east facade. The applicant may have amended the east facing window into compliance. In response to the review criteria for a DRAG variance, Staff makes the following findings: a) in greater compliance with the goals of the AACP; or, Staff Finding: The proposed variance is not in greater compliance with the goals of the Community Plan. The Residential Design Standards are a direct outcome of the AACP. b) a more effective method Of addressing standard in question; or, Staff Finding: The standard specifically says no windows in this area unless the house size is reduced by the Floor Area penalty. While this window is not on the street facing facade, staff does not feel this is a superior alternative to the standard. Staff recommends the windows be allowed only to the extent that the Floor Area for that interior space is counted twice towards the Allowable Floor Area for the property. c) clearly necessary for reasons offairness related to unusual site specijic constraints. Staff Finding: The site, again, is relatively flat and buildable. Staff does not believe there exists a hardship which prescribes larger windows. 3 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends DRAC deny the variances for "volume" and "garage setback" for the Hannan residence, 601 South Original Street. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to deny the requested variances of the Residential Design Standard for Volume and Garage Setback for the Hannan Residence, 601 South Original Street." ALTERNATIVE MOTION: "I move to grant the requested variances of the Residential Design Standard for Folume and Garage Setback for the Hannan Residence, 601 South Original Street, with the following conditions:" 1. The Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) hereby waives the "garage setback" standard for the proposed Hannan residence, 601 South Original Street. The Design Review Appeal Committee (DRAC) hereby waives the "volume" standard for the proposed Hannan residence, 601 South Original Street. All other aspects ofthe "Residential Design Standards" shall apply. 2. The variance is granted for the specific proposal presented to the DRAC. Any substantial change to the proposed residence which necessitates an additional or different variance from the design standards shall require review and approval by the DRAC, or any other board from which the project requires land use approval. 3. This approval shall not represent approval for any other required land use action. 4. Before issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall record this Resolution with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder located in the Courthouse Plaza Building. There is a per page recordation fee. In the alternative, the applicant may pay this fee to the City Clerk who will record the resolution. 5. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Design Review Appeal Committee shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A - Application 4 CERTIFICATE OF TITLE The undersigned, Leonard M. Oates, an attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado (Colorado Registration No.: 2760), hereby certifies that he has reviewed the Title to the following described real property situate in the City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado, and that the Title thereto lies in Skegby Holdings Limited, free and clear of all liens and encumberences: The South 50 feet of Lots R & S, Block 107 City and Townsite of Aspen. Title to the above described property is subject only to reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 482, providing as follows: '~ That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". DATED this 26th day of October, 1998. By: ~ Qef &~~~ Leonard M. Oates, Co~rado Attorney Registration No. 2760, attorney for Skegby Holdings Limited . W MCILER â€¢ AIA AR(MITE(TURE & PLAnnind October 22, 1998 Pitkin County / City of Aspen Design Review Appeal Committee 130 S. Galena St. Aspen Colorado 81611 Dear Board Members: We are requesting a design review to address the following two areas for the proposed Hannan Residence. The property is located at 601 South Original, the South 50' of Lot R&S Block 107 City of Aspen, and is zoned LTR Lodge / Tourist Residential. The property is surrounded by multi story condominiums. We are asking that the glazing indicated on the South elevation be approved as it does ~: not face the street and does not compromise the intent of the "Residential Design Standards". We feel that the surrounding larger scale condominiums allow for this larger window to be acceptable and we would not expect any objections from the surrounding building Owner's. The second area we would ask the board to review is the covered entry porch. We are ~~~~ requesting that the porch roof projection be as close to the primary facade as possible. The current design indicates a projection so that the 10' garage setback requirement is met. We feel that the projecting 2 story bay window is a dominant enough mass to be considered as part of the primary facade. The garage does meet the requirement of the 10' setback if the bay window is considered. The project has been reviewed and deemed in conformance with all aspects of the "Residential Design Standards". Thank you for your consideration in this matter. Sincerely, 18 +P VY- 06 r. * I *1) John Wheeler AIA ~ .01 0 48 KATYDID LANE SNOWMASS COLORADO 81654 ~ PHONEE 970 927 9765 . FAX: 970 927 0778 _' .lat~--... ATTACHMENT 1 - LAND USE APPLICATION FORM 1. Project name FAul NA-A Râ‚¬-1,06 NCE 2. Project location GO \ S. 02.\40(MArL_ 50 writ- 5-e' â€¢FL LoT- 8-6 5 BLOCK 161 61 -rY Â®F ASPenÂ·( (indicate street address. iot and block nurAber or metes and bounds description) 3. Present zoning LT R. 4. Lot size -3000 9+ 5. Applicant's name, address and phone number 4'E,/u& 77/ /0,4/9.0/.0 d 9-4 150 (66<-GTD,U Avâ‚¬- 16- 14.-D,R. NEâ€¢09â€¢'LE N. 4 Ill- 319-1611 6. Representative;s name, address. and phone number WHâ‚¬-Â£(6< Med-,9,/ t-<5: ,7-L"d<f 4â€¢ kA'Di Di a LA- 934 â€¢W MAES C D . P, 1 4 r + 417-9 763- 7. Type of appiication (check ail that appiy): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA Conceptual HPC Special Review Final SPA - Final HPC 8040 Greeniine Conceptual PUD Minor HPC Stream Margin Final PUD Relocation HPC .- Subdivision Texi/Map Amend. Historic Landmark -. I- GMQS allotment GMQS exemption Demo/Partial Demo View Plane Condominiumization ~>4 Design Review Lot Split/Lot Line Appeal Committee Adjustment 8. Description of existing uses (number and type of existing structures, approximate sq. ft., number of bedrooms, any previous approvals granted to the property) 7 )4 e E E- 1> 6 0 21,0 M F A 61 F Uv 82/' /4 K, .Â»4-T--lh \-1 9 5 5. 6 9. Description of development application. 9+00 5. F. A /5 0 vâ‚¬- L n 4-0 L lu /7 A /6 0 0 4. F. 6 Ace bte.Jr. -1-074 L *21 86,7,2-CDÂ© 04 PAY,1 1 6 9. 10. Have you completed and attached the following? 4-- Attachment 1- Land use application form c- Response to Attachment 2 - Response to Attachment 3 1 V V 3 7 4 Â¥ 5 7 6 Ch ' -40 IA i 3 \9. Â»A., \ 16 >44 .Â«44 -. --7:- AJ A ASPEN Hollow A A , O +Vi, Â£ Ij:1 12 1 doll 4/2(44,1 4 Ap \.-3 M a N \ % P'(Clf'tiW<)O(1 I.i J -C 4J COLORADO O \CON A-lougtain View 1}r ~ 4- \ Bennett B ~int,W Illl/),1 , .~ S eec d 91 WiR 1 %4 \ 61 44- To Glenwood Springs o and Aspen Al,poit Sier/Â· ~rY - H,4Â»9(i.!1 -1 lÂ·31 NO,19 r 204 # 6 -a B ''1 1 \ JU 0 0= Â»7 .1 7 3 4 4 0 . a 82 ncep ct w (;ille,Pjc .91 1 -' 6 1 Silver King Dr ~ / Ir - \p 2 Race St \L_J 3 N Spring St ' Mr QL~ 2\ Sm, 1- 4 g 6 4 4 ... /ers, <% 4 Cotionwood En 5 Alax Ave ral Cls S, f - pmt/ 6 (lak 1." C C C te Martan # An"tilill 3 7 Maple Ln \ L I v 0 M 416< 4 ft 2 Al ~' st 7-4 t' 6-1 0 9 Mascolle Ln 8 Midland Park PI t, 3 S f + r, ,- a 4 7 0 C r O 4 -y 10 Smugglei Grove Cl 11 Ardmore Cl < ly 2+EA 12 Riverside Ave .' 7 5/41* . 4. 13 Date Ave ef ' 14 Midland Ave : 1,/111 - , , 1 97 - i 6, ./ f 15 Maynower a I %90>S I -0 8 iltrt G 4 - /2 9 cÂ» in . F _f C -2 6 y i ff )--4 D I beli rÂ«-1 17,4,1 1 -- 1 -m f G . 15 4 r 2 b I. (4*124 '' / n'.10 8 - â‚¬ 0.,0,4 . f 14,/ . 0 4Â«(ca v XE t.1 O 3 ' -*~e MO â€¢,1~1*/4,1 !7134\ ROADCI.ASSIFICANON - - - // 1 /\ 9 ld://\, 172:'v'ew Dr'9\>h 1 }11' 1 1 4 1 & 14 -D 0 1 \ 1 04 Pilinary 1,141,wny I ik 1 0 Main roads 0 1/2 MILE / 4 ~V h?QUÂ» r V v 6 I.Ight duly roads / Â«Â«22\&1 4 HE --- Dirtioadi 0 1/2 KILOMET'in ' 1 1 --- . 1 Flallronds , i 6400~ec-r U - ,Mi ~ 9~ ~~ , ---- Ski lilli : i rvo rEW-1.Y 11-0/ttEÂ» 11 2 , Â©1996 Phone Directories Co. Inc. 1 A 2 A 3 A 4 5A 1 ; Â·1, it"i Aspen Street Index 1 11 h j 1 1' 1 COLONIAL NAVIGATION COMPANY, INC. 750 LEXINGTON AVENUE, 26â„¢ FLOOR NEW YORK, N.Y. 10022 TEL: (212) 319-2828 FAX: (212) 319-2826 TLX: 6790701 / 6790702 CABLE: "CONAVIT" October 23, 1998 Pitkin County / City of Aspen Design Review Appeal Committee 130 S. Gatena St. Aspen Colorado 81611 Dear Board Members: As Owners of the property located at 601 S. Original located in Aspen Co. we are aware of the review application requeit before the board and have no objections to it We authorize John Wheeler of: Wheeler Architecture and Planning 48 Katydid Lane Snowmass Co. 81654 Phone: 927-9765 to represent our interest in the application for a design review to the Design Review Appeals Committee. If there are any questions regarding this letter of authorization please contact us. Sincerely Colonial Navigation Co., Inc. As agents to Skegby Holdings Limited H. nannan r. President I 30Â¥d 9283 6ZE gig NOILVOIAVN -IVINNOTOO EE 01 (INd) 96. 62 130 11 1 1 1 1 GL ORY HOLE CONDOMINIUMS\ Ti 1 1 1 li I 1 1 1 11 EXISTING GRAB APPLE 1 -- 7 7 (2 L_ ENTRY STAIRS TREE TO BE ~PROTECTED I. j 1 MALICAAY - L- 445Â·09'irt -80,00~- ----- I - 0 -0 ... -C~~- U- /- 0 /---4 1 1 ------- in in I \ 1 PICNIC . TABLE ~ UN v 'L-7 | | M . DRIVEFNAÂ¥ . 'r I PROTECT ROOTS / 9% --- ff>f~J_-~ Â° ~~~ O Â· @ THIS SECTION 100 Il ADVYI/AK- ~ OF FENCE 1 6 00 -2%,\1//2 6 99E'- - -\ < 1 OPEN 7 ---7-7.-71-- Fr~- 9 92 \ SPACE 4 101-2,1 0/1 i j ; / 91-01' 5'-0" -6. OURB -1 i 1----4 4 1 1 1 1 - 2 A. ' ..1 0 911 - -- 1 111-!i 1, 1 -1 EXISTINe UTIL-117 | BOXES AND ELECTRICAL 1:1 4 *91 Â£/7 TRANSFORMER 1 /- 1 - -.- - ti 'll j I jit..1 ~ 1 W 44 , 1. A 1 4 -- m &01 j ---*-*-------1 1 0 - lu Fr#~1 0 -4 , -- ALPS PARKINS - "~~4f~-~1"~*'46-~fl-Â¥~- ------- . ,1 -w~--- -- Z ill 1 3 0 liN e 1 Z 1 X i - igy 1.4* 6â€žI#*VVi - .-.- --_ ~ r in , 10'-e" -2.7//re<%. 0 VU I 1 - rj 1,-7 - a. 1.r . U.-= T MY'li 60.00' *74*- I NO<AP --F _.., ~_~ RELOCATE STORM SEMER N 75Â°09'11'W ..F / BEN' i NER A i CONSTRUCTION LPS PARKINe I - --61Tifi-JfL,Â» Fl-----M-kik[ A.ARI~ 126-9 lk26~.-123-E 2 - SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: -, 1) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION 100'-0" 2) SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS Al.2 3) EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMIOVE 4) TREES TO BE MITIGATED INCLUDE DE PROTECT TREES OUTSIDE AND ADJAC 5) CONSTRUCTION FENCE PER CITY CO[ LL JI $)I2I 1 S UVN- 19 IUO 71Â¥MZIPS ~ A F 1 58-0 ISSUED PERM VT 8/27/98 . 71:49Â® -JE;._ f ...i 1 U 1 3 dll 11 11 '.EHANICAL 1, 0 al == L-[3 ROOM Â§! 2' : M 82 STOM&462 66 9 / LU d ( 11 : 11 1 1 1. 1-a b6- 1-09 STOR*6E FWIf 31~~1 -- --- -. - --4 - -.-- --- -2 W 01 mi 1 L--21 + 9/4 0â€ž0-33< ~ b 8 3 4 B k_ /2 MI \ i 1 BATH L.-r---1@f It -2 1/ +*P2Â»": 111 4t---' --- --tfulÂ« 4Â»72\1 , r-- BEPROOM ; * BEDROOM l - BAS AF-LIANCE SAS A,MLIA)ICE - ] 0 3 i{ 19 - 1 -4 4. LIGHT PELL ~â€¢CLL A-A_j . i i 5( I 21.-4. 5'-0â€¢ , 514Â· 7. HO. i : Mo PROJECT NO. .0 5.1-8. 9810 12'-4. 15'-4. 12'-4. DRAWN BY If. 351-0â€¢ SH 1 I CHECKED BY <41 lah *B) J=1 JW Â® LOVER FLOOR PLAN DESISNED % PLAN 1/4.. 160. LOWER FLOOR COSTAS KO,DYLIS Â¢ ASSOCIATES 6 MEST ISTH STREET, 5TH FL. A2.1 hFV'l YORK NÂ¥ Ity)11 14'-6. 30N301938 NVNNVH i 251 .F ISSUED 38'-O' 1 PEi*liT 8/27/98 211-8/ ~ 4.-4. . 4.-0/ 911-0. 464. , 4.-0. fl 9 5/9 1. 2 PTA..7-00 ~ 6'.0. 6.-8. '41/4'P'. 9-B. ~KÂ· 5U.. .KÂ· MIE. KO. 81 0 0 0 0 0 A * 9 1... .V -# 4.- - *----9 - .--r&E- 6 -----, -. n.- .---1 '......4 ~ - . A. K - eft â‚¬ /,iii T . 22/) 71- 0 ... TH 1 11 66 0. . - 1 ...tx - Pler#Y 32 Z Â¥ m.. 8 - 1 / *. 1 k\. 9 r . i *ARA,SE . . -\ 9 % , J 9 â€¢ 7 1- u J -_ _-~ rr..Ti I -- -Â· Â· LÂ·L-1 -- nr .r-i _ - ~ 7 0 3 i ./. I ,\ /1 1 0 _ ENTRY - 1, li 44 1 1 94 :* I k ~ 11* 12 . LIi L 1 9 9 , 19 Y ~- lool, U L J' ENTRY - Â· 9 8 3 ON-. CJ + / 1-0. c,Â»c. ! L' 14â€¢LL .....T-XECPEr . 3 3) t. .4 U 1â‚¬3 i \U~ N.â€¢0'31 ' 1 i V MeTER BAâ„¢' 5 k - Â· DREMINS AREA , MASTER BEDROOM Â£Ar , 9 k , 1 + .. 1 -V .. 0% h_ BIO i O /0 4 YAÂ»r i 1 S L-J - n *- ~C {4 n , 9â€¢ -- 1Â· u:.. . 4 L=* 1/ . ty O/ \ 0 ,-.1 1 O 0 ~--C O eATe-| 4-4",2-00 0 St-4. 7-0. 4 16'-6. 2'-0, r-47. PROJECT NO. 4 H.O. ' . '40. . MD.. I I , Mâ€¢-4. 9810 . 12.-4. 0.-4. 12.-4. i DRAWN BY 38'-oÂ· SH f 1 1 CHECKED BY (A) (B) ''Dj /~ MAIN FLOOR PLAN PLAN L./ w.r-0. * MAN FLOOR A2.2 --- "fk) 3 33HM 30N3G1S313 NVNNVH A E Â· /25) : F ISSUED PEFWIT 8/27/98 9 lighs 41 V . 16'-4. . 14.6. . 4040 : 441 ", pÂ· 15'4' P~. ~Â· 54' .0 51-4..KÂ· .. t 1 L- -4 - - - -'.- 7 k 6. ~ / 66 .T LIBRARY 6/ 9 1 /Zal - . /1 9 -J ./ + 0,4 -- .~/ dll 11 11 . tti 2 2 ... I . <795 ~~~illk| 16Â«~-LiN -55 -4' ' 1 *Trno i 1 1 /.2 :--3 POPPER I irâ€ž %Â·Ik#&~R-+49 ! i --4--I . ---,1 // r.\ - a : . 0.' Â·Â· 92 ~ I ___ : 99 :4 O 2 8 . KITC)EN d. I ---or-za~~z~~:~S , ..1 102 C â€ž 5'-2' , 5'4â€¢ t 67=5' h. 129 ~ - /.56. 56.- r - . 5 0 - 1 - La #---1 I 2 - 1 .1 To, 40*, 9 9 7 2.29. 1101 m 1.1 I . \ Â¥ 22 i 4 q y Â¥ DiNINS ROOM LIVINS ROOM *I 9 1 ~ *ML/**P / l 4 1 3 1 0.---I -- ~------- - I--I-- - -I---i.-I-, - I- # -7. L . : - . IP= img-< - i / T T n 0 1 " i .. . 4 4 . .6 2.1, 4 42 1 ,-4â€¢ 1,- -4. 4, Pt s'-4. , 5'-4' , 3'-8Â· L 2'-6Â· I 1,-6. . 2.. 1. 5'4â€¢ , 5'-40 MO â€¢ . ... â€¢ He ' .. PROJECT NO. 15'-4- , 12'-0- , 15'-4- 9810 -. 12.-4. 131-4. 12-4. DRAWN BY 35'-0. SH I i CHECKED BY /\: ~ UPPER PWOR PLAN UPPER FLOOR PLAN A2.3 : .g-,g ..Li.21 30N3G831:1 NVNNVH C E j . 115'% F ; 1 ISSUED PEFUIT 8/27/98 0,-4. 4.-4. 4.-0. 9 l= 4 !98 1 - 'j . 161-4. 14'-eâ€¢ 4'-4. - 4,-O. , 1 . . . . I. 15.-80 0 8,-6. f:. a.. .K- 8.-4. .K- 6'-4- 42 -Oâ€¢ 6'-4 8 -4. . / ' I I . It>. 'Al ~El 1 .4. .4 -- -- "5 i .1 1 Â§1 SS 0 OecÂ·K / FLAT ROOF\ .A/j .LAT .COM \\ J'-sÂ· . 0,4. 1/ 1 4 i' 1 . 6. 2 1 7-- ----- -- ---- ---- -- - - 1---\4\ 7 D /3, 1 SPA ne; - .. ArrIC _ B + R Imal li 9 9 1 1. . I ~ ~ *n;'Y'-iÂ· . 3 . e'-5. % 3'-3- , le:k. . ' l - / /1 - - 1 \ -W --1 ' 3 Nj 1. 5.2 / op,M TO 8,1.0.1 ...7 t,/ 1 -- 2 Â»1- Â¥ 3 4 ~11 - 1 ~1 f /VV\ / ti+1 11 Â¢ 4 - 4 e'-4. t J 3 6'-4. #4 8. alÂ· 12'-11- PROJECT NO. . 12.-4. 0 14.-0. 12.-4. 9810 I . . 12'-4. e'-4. 12â€¢-4. DRAWN BY ri i 35'-O' SH .i.-.1 CHECKED BY ;A) (P) ~ ROOF DECK PLAN ROOF DECK DESIeNED Bri PLAN COSTAS IODYLIS Â¢ ASSOCIATES A2.4 6 REST ISTH STREET, 5TH FL. 1541 YORK. Irf 10011 I to.> 26'-0. 30N301S3bl NVNNVH I E ) :EB I F 1 i 504 K ISSUED PERMIT 8/27/96 15'-4. 4.4. 44 16.-4. 144â€¢ i: 4-0. .1 1~25190 .. S. .5 .0 84. ..4 /- .0 g. 5,4â€¢ 1 ... I. , . 1 -- 61 A~L~ ~ ~~ SS DELK b . Â« .-, 1 LU w ..3 ' LU B i 3â‚¬S it i i I 'A i .ii D--7 i Bew" - t:-i. - le 1 3 4 m" 1.1 1 \ fâ€¢ 1 -- 1 31 1 t--- 4 - ; 1 /1 ' 1 3 8 8 1.1.d 1 ./. ;IMINE> 1 5 24 8 a _11 ~ . J , .4.1 8-* 1 > S 1 - gift 3 1 / 1 011 7--fl i al- 3 1 1 4 ; 1 4' n.ZV. t:Ir-Oâ€¢ f 0 0 OecK< . I ~~-9 1 11 2 ; 11 T "L.r '00/ -- ~ : /EL<:Â»N t: T- - . PROJECT NO. Â·4- 9810 .. 13'-4' , 12'-4â€¢ DRAWN BY SH i 1 1 CHECKED BY 3- 1 (21 ROOF PLAN ROOF * PLAN COSTAS KOherLIS Â¢ ASSOCIATES 6 rEST ISTH STREET, 5TH FL A2.5 &21.1 ....01/ Lh' 1/â€¢.All i .D > 24'-8â€¢ 26'-0" 15'-40 30N30S38 NVNNVH ISSUED PEFWIT 8/27/98 1 12 51 9 i A 8 0 25 F GALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN SEAM ROOF - COLOR To 82 KLEÂ·rm> HY NICHITECT 4' 7,41CK R)*17Â©ATED LI)â‚¬STÂ©1â‚¬ VENEeR COLOR TO 823 58.56171 5Â¥ ARCHMECT ' ~||~ 0 6116 i i ./, li 2,~ ~ il alli PRIMED , PAINTED PIEM<*2 I , 1 \ 4 i z_- I, lilli â„¢EATMIP 9â‚¬7. ell.INS. COLOR To 02 01177112~,Ille, 87Â· ARC,Â·L ' ~ 12 \ Efii:: i Ul Â£ ' /'- 96 *00, LIHESTONE CORNICE. COLOR i UU W . ! 1 1- .__ Il Eli --: 1 j i i LU 0 It'.1 , - -- - 111- i r.O. PAR,tlim 11 / It -- - --9-aryr 2-1 i ra co, 1 -TZ--*-a---4-*-Â·- - - Â·33=-----1-:--- r--F=EMN v . 72 + %4~ - 7---- 415.---....-.EIFEE~EE -im ._11 0 Ilet EE EEP--=-- ' ' U Â· 4--IL , MNI <D 11[2~ lcd =====91 11=Er- -- ---- . litÂ·4-Â·-.......Â·.- ' -- 1/FS===== . / 1.-fEEBERÂ· = ttr----Â·--Â· ..0 : *LE,1-GEEKY MIS-R BRICK OR EGUAL ---=======---== -1---'td---4---- ----'- .-I-.------I--I-------I--pl-'--- 1 ===.-I--p...I---.I-Il.*Il IN Sâ„¢ETC+ER POSITION- COLOR TO -------- --- ---- !,' U===CZ==I~Z=~---- 1 BE PETERMINeD BY ARCHTEC:Â·r ---ESE====~ 4 -.--.-----.--.----.--.--~BEEEB~ i' ---- . ltD. Cott. _ ------ F 7'EEV~-22a'-- =1 - e â„¢ICK BRICK Veâ‚¬ER a.â€¢ zma~. 2;333 -;~!t~Em~ I<9 9~ â€¢ ~~ COLOR TO ee SeLECTED BÂ·r ARCHITECT -i 11 ._Â·i==r----- -m- --2 -EnÂ·-ZEEff-LCIPE - r' Â·--LILI.21'21.22-1 ' INEâ‚¬ _=;:1 -6~L_ -222 ~'~-~ -~~~~~--- *LmÂ·~atf Pe-R BRICK OR SUAL IN 80(.PeR OCUME. COLOR TO 82 PeTERMI,ED alr NIc*11Â·reCT ===~-t:--Â·Â·-Â·-- --Â·---Â·---==ii-----;=-==6--3h~ f-----------------.---..- - '-3-7317 --------------------jEgff=E-EEESESEE 4 1 T.O. CONG. 0 7 CLEV. IO -O' ~ ---- 8 f ==ciz....-= i 1 1 , 1 1 . .. 1 1 / 1 1 1 9 1 1 1 1 156,40 PROJECT NO. --â€¢--TEEEKa=ar 9810 BWN BY--1 CHECKED BY i (A._mgCH El-EVAION SOUTH DESIGNED BY', ~ ELEVATION ~ ~ COSrAS KONDYLIS & ASSOCIATES I AS-1 I 6 WEST 18TH STREET, 511{ FL 110/f Vilit, 1.i, d A-' I 30N301S3H NVNNVH ISSUED PERMIT 8/27/98 *gl 1 E SALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN 92*1 ROOM -1 F 55 2 GB A COLOR 70 me te-501-~ er ARCHI~rEOT ~ 4' THICK RUST10*TED LIPESTO,e VENEER ~ | |~ 9119 FOLDINa râ‚¬TAL CANS>Fr F*APE Slls /2/2 * 21, f i f i 1 1 i : A i , i / 1 1 1 1 i i ...1-- ./ lai 111 d i 1 12: 0 -J- 11 ======1/ : 1 1 1 1 i'227 /1-(22211./ Ind 011- Roor LU w 11 ELEV. 121.-5 5/B. LU Wi Il 11 1 h 1. ------ - *I IIi : 1/V. 124'-4 1 1 1 1 - , 829=-4 LtrÂ·â‚¬STÂ©NE CORNICE COLOR TO BE SELECTED 81 A#NO+L Â· - 1 - =. r ELEV. 121'-2 -E--.ee- ----rÂ·k EP E _.:SEEBE PRINED * PAINTED PRESSURE ----- --- - 0 . -ELI. .~1- Â· --1-t-- 3-6~ ------sa?3.-JEEEâ‚¬ru n â„¢EATED TO. RAILING. COLOR TO BE CH BY ARCM. --. -.-- -m ---'1---ra-._ 7 -Irt:-313 Â·" 1 Jâ‚¬F 1 12..------- =aSS=== ========r====7 EE -------- -----*--- :-=:--- i FEEIEEE - - ------- EEd.EEE- -- u.l#ZI-.22 - -- - 4* THICK BRiCK Veâ‚¬ER ---EEZ Â·---Â·--Â·--i ~.EEE'Eam --Â·-Â·- -----I--~ -Â·-----c~---uzz=-rl--i---=. 1 P. .Â· _C=:2==le......u--*..rrn - - ! ze=== =SE -tEE .rEEEFEEiI'-- - col oR To 82 521,Ecrec 51 mirecT â€¢ 4~nfliP : r./--=T-$.. --USNJÂ·Z:/. '~"Â·-Â·--'~Â·Â·Â·~-Â·----Â·- c-/=Cil=ZI:n~ U--I---M/=Tri.v/'/ --Â·--Â·Â·-4.- 2*.Â«52 .-- ---- -- IEJETiftl'59-1.-,.EkEEE#E--.,*3Ii --4- 2â‚¬922.-156.- ..Atief- 49 ----V #arr--I,--J'Inr--72.=2,=r--2...=7' 1 -------~-- -4----- 1 In~-72= el SLS+Â·emer MIS-R BRICK OR lat,IAL -~ EJEE~fi##imitjega# ' 1 3*3*EENtjAW-4,7 ;6 IN STRE-CteR POSITION. COLOR TO -- - -~- --1 -------------- ----/-- BE DETERMIED 87' ARCHITECT ;=:*.'.="I=.='=*.'==.:.'=.-U:Â©_1;. -- 'm'.--j===- ,===-V--V+..'-U-##.~Zi-72Â·t. . m.ev. i ieÂ·./. 1- E-. g=.E.-Â·=112=~_~~-915 =-r---3.~-Â·~31 Â·~ 7-~~~-~ PRIPED * PAINTED FRESSRE -in Â·-2-#--- Â·Â· - Â· -lin 't 1 -=-=-r=-2-11 ,91, -,-0.----sc.-- 2*rm, re>.COLLMâ€¢l COLOR Â© i 0.63 D he==236:1-1- E.ki, 0 )* .-EEER-FÂ·.- -11.<DNE?!92639=4999 21& D ) 1*-Â·Â· 3.k. Â·ra 66 K:f721O41MEP BY bilu#. -- ---- -- - - ' - = -- - ~~=~~ ~-~ -- - =-= - -- - ~ 0 -- -2 -37)~345*1---rz= -=-S.~'-.---:-=4 .ELÂ·~ELEHE==u:~~n~~=r- i- --m..:. . Â·-;-=tia=z~zÂ·Â· *LEÂ»Â·<SeRÂ·f MIS-â€¢t BRICK OR EUAL - 1 1 -sfIEEL=E*--=.Â·----- .~ .- ... --2_2=;.--.Tt*.s.....i:=2.#1.=In-I:--w-.-2=1-2=21 -7~ IN SOLDIER OCURSE. COLOR TO 82 PETâ„¢MthED er ARCHITECT . ' -_~_.- --Â·, r.-SEE 2-FEEZE-:--1- -239+..-=::=r=ztEEEZE'Â·:2~~--- ~.2.-- - CE----32~-- -= T. n.r/. 100'-O. 3 .:11 1 1 It 1 1 1 Z 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 B.EV. '10'-0. PROJECT NO. 9810 Fl CHECKED BY (ILHORTH-Â©2â‚¬ATION_ 1 ~RTH -1 I DESISKED BY: ~ ELEVA11ON ~ ~ COSTAS KONDYLIS Â¢ ASSOCIATES 1A3.21 6 reT ISTH STREET, 5TH FL. B |3~8311 ISSUED PEFUIT 8/27/98 1 Ilshz *AL-VANIZ~ ZNC BATTS( SEAM ROOF COLOR TO 82 1~ECTED 5Â¥ AMCHMEÂ© ~ 31 3 2 1 4Â· THICK< RUSTICATE> 1.1,Â·â‚¬STÂ©he Velâ€¢~ ; CCLOR TO BE SEECTED BY ARCHITECT ~ Â§11! 911. 0 6 116 liI'lli i Z LIPESTONE CORNICE. COLOR -1 d 1 % lliill1 a i 1 CC ~ /\ re BE SELETED BÂ¥ ARCH. \ ; 1 1 1 1 1 12 /i.--r.*--./. \112 i 11 lilli/- N ' n,r '(Â£/ \ ELEÂ·t /eâ€¢ 11111.154-4 1 '1 - - - lir-.r.EE?ZEF-4 -==27- : i 1 - -r-*=M=y- 11.L=#-#=.------------- aa-2 ----__1---L.i-2-2FIE-irliff-EET*~f ==.C=:y --1224Â· ---r--4-0*A -4- ..REHEE-=RE= ' sE:1221=36% 'Ii-/aFEr- E FIFIFRFR E E---=a men; 23247==r==TErLLE 11 1 1 11.JEEIEEE 3% El 1~21 E 9 7 ----r~~- ---TÂ·- ri~5:lE 11 /31 11 =12~ --LI -_3_-_--___L_...â€ž___1,__.---..1-_ MITI<"--*- 2 -SEEE- : 3 1 9-2--I==' : -----I-- 1 =I-=El --- 6 - ' 1 =-1 --- - --- --. I EE. 2 ..3#LE-F-I % -- E---/ -- - ELEV. 110Â· 11 1-4-p-62 --- U -- --=U-Z - 4Â· THICK =li< VE,eeR -- l--- .===--V=---%-4#I=i~-m-. C<Dt.OR TO Be SELECTED EY ARCHITEST -- 2-9;ENTÂ¥mm-E&Â¥;?7-3---r==-2 EME eLEN-*ERÂ¥ re-R emCK OR EGUAL 114 STKETC,et POSilloN. COLO~ TO - u= 3 n'J1-1 4 *LEN-eerf Mle-< aKICK Cl<EQUAL -===il- 213 PETeRMINED ey ARCHITECT te il =.1 --I-$* 12= 9 -rf- [~7 0 FE *~ F-1F7 r--1 Zia 221â‚¬EE@ta- - 4---. 272-3 T -- EL/V. too'-0 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1- - 7 ELy/. 400-0. -2,| 0.92 01#0 PROJECT NO. 9810 DRAWN BY 171 Gu~~(AT\ON- CHECKED BY J*4 1 EAST I DESIeNED 81: | 8-EVAnON | COSPAS KONDYUS & ASSOCIATES 1A3.31 6 WEST 1EITH STREET, 5TH FL NEIr YORK. NY 10011 3133HM 30N3G1S3H NVNNVH 6--z- ISSUED PEFWIT 8/27/98 712,/98 1 2 5 2-2 4 *ALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN SEAM ROOF ---x COLOR TO 82 Set.ECTED By ARCHITECT ~ .-â€ž- r 4' THIC-< 92$TlcATED L Nes-rOKe 42428â€¢ - -Nx COLOR TO EE SELECTED BÂ¥ ARCHITECT N .11Â§ Slls PRIHED 4 PAINTED PRESSURE / â„¢EATED .2. RAD. COLE. ~ 2 i . TO 82 PETeRMIDED er' ~RCH. 1 ' $ 1 + i ; 1 1 3 dild,/ :\ 'A 1 Â£ 1 1 I LU 1112 J .O LIHESTONE CORNICE. COL.<~ T ~ 1 INT /00/ LU w TO BE SELECTED BY ARCH. \: ' uv. crra aÂ· LU 15 : i 2 h --- Io 2% i 2.| .6 T.O. ' 7 1. 4, ELE./. 122.-4- - 4 6 T C. 40% ' 9 212Â·/. 121'-21 < I --- - 1 11 lilli 1-- ..IR7,61-q-Â·7 2.-1.ur.-93=95-i---3:EZE :3~997;:=n.-un _mn---.:u --J eLEN-eERY P,15-R BRICK OR ELUAL 5 N 5â„¢ETC+ER POSITION COLOR TO ___ .-- -2 --'~1 ----SEEEIESEEIEEEZE __ ==J-- - - Â·-Â·Â·Â· - BE DETERM]bED ey AITCHITECT 9 --~r .LE==rEEIErEE;EEEIFIc'Â·-*FEEE.f:~:ES==Efa--2-9 c=-- ~~r-----9..7-t.Â·1=1=2~.-1--71 ======u==-==2-i="rzrn. rri==mur==n.rrÂ·.-Â· r ...r n a-- u~ 9 -9--IÂ·EFEEFE~' -.9-~- r===92-2-~7*32)EEEIEST--f:-2-â‚¬ 1 2-27 Â·T,FrEâ‚¬7937~ Â· ~rel.liacer- 2. In-- -t-, - ./9 , 4â€¢ THICK BRICK VE!â‚¬ER COLOR TÂ© ec eneÂ¢70 - *OIT~'r ----- - / 942%23 ..Â·tal-23+Ult-EF.:deD- iIU) It: =911 Ul >i -3:3-iMM,1 It- . ..:~4---0-- SLE*-GatÂ¥ PlaÂ·-~ a~ICK 01 eouAL --* - - --p- - -4539~ IENâ‚¬*292Â·EELf~ 14.- -1-*f. 5- : -f 1- - -:~~Ri: f- -- Â·:12 J.E ; -f--- 24--~ -3 N SOLPInt (Ct/WE COLOR TO .52**= 26Â·2295%635~12*:r-':rn==763- 2 ...: Â·-Â·Â·Â·Â· - BIZ DETERMINED 87' ARCHTECT --1.....ZI-y=e. .---Â·. '_Leth:~=t___ar===ZE==-uk=*t:72 .7.~_- .1-- Z.U... ..~ -Â·-- -Â·-Â·---- ,//-1:~~- U...Cll'. --1=I-------I-///)/Ill/ -- Â·:Â· -Â· Â·-.Â·Â·.Â·tÂ·:- Â· 1 < 1 1 1 1 1 Z Al < 1 1 0 1 I i 1 1 1 1 1 1 .,1 1. /0 *,O PROJECT NO. r DRAWN BY CHECKED BY IA._MEST ELEVATI2L___-_ WEST DESIehED BY: ELEVATION COSTAS KOhefLIS Â¢ ASSOCIATES 6 rEST ISTH STREET, 5TH FL. A3.4 hEM YORK, NY 10011 P / 30 1 1 1.-1 1 1 1 1 - 0 --1 0 , 0 -6 , 0 0 -4 J. - 1 , . , -- 1 t f f 1 \ 1f ----------- , -- / \ PARKJNG ~EA 0 /1 -- 01 k- , 1940 -02<- ~ , : 0/- 1/ r99.-1 1 1 -- . \ 1 , 1 / , *Tr p \ 0 '~< 7939.9 1 + Â« 4,=-2--1 2 - CD PARK I NG,0F~A e / \ 1 0 9 1 , 1 17-3 0 ~ ---7- / pi M .- 1 -1 f Y 2. , ? t t 1 1 : :Â·r,' li '' 7 , /' f f o i < PON -D .:, tr 1 . I.' 1,1\ ) I 0 ~ fil I I li / N 1 \11 , -5 , 1 A \ / - N * I A. --J 0 IPOND; NO L -I I I I I , f I I ---- 0\ 42\ / 1 -- ol - ~ 0 4 -. . I - L O , 0 /2 - I.: I . - 0 0# 9 0 I I i / . // / --I I I .- .------ . ' h U ./ / I & f . . \ I I / 1 / , I ... I: I. 3:t~ 1 I I 0 0 h . 7950 *A iÂ» - , 0 \ tf -. ... ,/..1 , 04 1 1 , \ 1 , i N 49 /:\ ,. 1 , 1 , t , '/-4 - 01, 1 / , \ . / I . \ I I i i /1 ' x. , I . t ' t ' I 2 ,\ / 0 R> 960 /9 f O 44 1 , / r-\ 7 . 1 -1 r -1 1 14,0-8 1 1 Af.1 11 1 1 /.4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 'j 1 1 GLORY ' HOLE CONDOMINIUMS\ * 4 ASPEN ~ j 4 + i 1 CLUB 1 1 1 LODGE ' 1 ' 1 11 11 1 1 1 JZ _1 1 f 1 2- ------1 ----------- -1- 1 ENTRY STAIRS 3--1 MALKWAY | L - 6-15Â·09'ire -60,00Â£- - - -2.-- - 1- Il --4--- i 5 --Câ€žLU - ri T U -~ 10 10 k PICNIC C-AAE!/ tri TABLE U PRIVENAÂ¥, 11 OPERABLE GATE -1 I THIS SECTION A- 'los 11111/0 '1 PROTECT ROOTS ~~ OF FENCE /1 1 Cly-lenc - 0 | | OPEN k- -.-1. - - .- ...1- -- - -'... - I. 1114% SPACE MALK . 1 4 . 1 4% 9- 5'-0" -6. CURB ir. , " -1, 0 #-#--- 1.-*+I-- *---- . 1 Ir [El-- EXISTINe UTILITÂ¥ 1 !\ /1 /li w ..BOXES AND ELECTRICAL TIRANSFORMER TO BE . , i RELOCATED, VERIFY FINAL 1 1 - 1 1.-0 *7 ~ LOCATION WARCHITECT. Â¥.Ar - \ 1.-I.2 0 O Z 1 ' 44#I .-: -= -* -#.*--'.24...4 lin g 1 - 1 taL. 1 1 L--- ALPS PARKINe - I El 0 \ 1// 0 . 10'-6 f j-/\- 0 T 1=11 7 - -a-- BENT 60.00' ~~~ ~ -~c*f~ RELOCATE STORM SEMER / r AP I N 75Â°09'11'W 140 v i NEIN a I , CONSTRUCTION 0 PRIVATE DRIVERAÂ¥ TO ALIÂ©5 PARKING 0 SITE DEVELOPMENT NOTES: 1) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION 100'-0" = SITE ELEVATION 100.5' 2) SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS Al.2 3) EXISTING STRUCTURE TO BE REMIOVED 4) TREES TO BE MITIGATED INCLUDE DECIDUOUS OVER 6" AND CONIFERS OVER 4", PROTECT TREES OUTSIDE AND ADJACENT TO PROPERTY LINE. 5) CONSTRUCTION FENCE PER CITY CODE 6) --11 7) i , 1 9 ASPEN ALPS \ 1 :a i FOR REFERENCE ONLY FINAL SITINS OF EUILDINS E SUBJECT TO CHANGE. - DEMOLITION/SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (/Ar~) 4# CA) (7251*1 \U/// 1/811 = It-0 [1 1-~01 TRUE NORTH ARCH. PLAN NORTH = +14.85Â° r . 0 0 0 . . 0 101 6 ~ PERMIT 8/27/98~~== ~ CONST. 11/2/98 ~ Â¢14 %$ t. 91 DESIGN ARCHITECT A E D E.5 F~ :491 COSTAS KONDYLIS Associates, P.C. eALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN DEAM ROOF 3 West 18th meet New Yok N.Y. 10011 Lka COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT Tel 012) 727-8688 Fax gil) 727-8696 '41 4" THICK RUSTICATED LIMESTONE VENEER 6 E COLOR TO BE DELECTED 57 ARCHITECT 9& P= SE, i x U 9 i i PRIMED $ PAINTED PRESSURE 1111 \ TREATED Pe. RAILINe. COLOR . \2 U /1 1 TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCH. 86315.5/ ./Th,#We \\ 10// . 0 1/3 POINT OF ROOF ' 9 ELEV. 127'-5 3/8" LIMESTONE CORNICE. COLOR Nk /1 TO BE SELECTED BY ARCH. AÂ«9 -Jl l-k , A TO. E = ' 7 ELEV. 124'-4" AÂ©4 |L f' = ' 9 ELEV. 122'-8" I 2. 4 T.O. PARAPET ~ - 1{/ 1 1 4 4 T O. PhIP @ROOF - 1 - /I ' 7 ELEV. 121'-0" GLASS ABOVE 1 Â»f PER REVIEA 1 1 0 1 1 40 - ~ U b -f- _ '/41 (953 r- 01 eLEN-eERÂ¥ MIS-R BRICK OR EQUAL'-N... g - a.2 - 11 IN STRETCHER POSITION. COLOR TO - -- BE DETERMINED BÂ¥ ARCHITECT Â· - . â€¢h T.O.GONG. J ' 7 ELEV. 110'-O" LU .>* - '-'- A 0 1 (e>* 8 -2 7 W 1 4" THICK BRICK VENEER . LJ-D 9 COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT 0 0-12 - CO *U LLI BLEN-GERÂ¥ ~113-R BRICK OR EQUAL 1 ELEVÂ· 100 -O" z li _ IN SOLDIER COURSE. CÂ·OLOR TO , 1,1 42 BEE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT ' ..% A TO. GONG giÂ¥.+411 1 1 < '417 1 1 Z 1 1 4. Z . B 1 0 1 el < 1 1 1 - - . 4 TO. SLAB ' 9 ELEV. 90'-O PROJECT NO. P~ 9810 J, "it DRAWN BY Â· Â·*fg CNE SH :4.1 nt, CHECKED BY . -;t't' 9 rh SOUTH ELEVATION JW SOUTH .41 ELEVATION .am AB.~ 4- 0 . . 0 0 . . @ Wheeler Architecture & Plonning 83133HM DNINNyld 9 3801031IHOWV - I - - DESIGN ARCHrrECT COSTAS KONDYLIS SALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN SEAM ROOF n F E.5 E , E A & COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT < 3 West 180, Rreet New Yolk, N.Y. 10011 Tel (212) 727-8688 Fix (212) m-8696 1 :1 . 1 4" THICK RUSTICATED LIMESTONE VENEER 1 1 DOLOR TO BE SELECTED BÂ¥ ARCHITECT ~ . ~ 1 - FOLDINe METAL CANOPÂ¥ FRAME & //// \\ , 1/ 0 6 4 1 4 ' li 4 : 1 0 1 1 - 6 2. 31 Al f 1, i ' Ae.6 12 / GENJ 4 3 12 + Ptl' , ' 0; 9 12 1 . -\112 1.,4 4 . 1 1/9 POINT OF ROOF 74 \ 1 1 1 ' 9 ELEV. 127'-5 3/8" ~, A d . 8 'El -2---- \Â« .r f 1 /.i t. 4, t3/ t 1 1~4 -T---- Â£ T.O. t - =' 7 ELEV. 124'-4" 1 - h J T.O. PARAPET 9 1 /11-1 - - - LIMESTONE CORNICE. OOLOR - \ 31 = ' 7 ELEV. 122.-aâ€ž TO BE SELECTED BY ARCH. 1 1 < 1. J T.O. CONÂ¢. O PECK - ' 9 ELEV. 121'-2" PRIMED $ PAINTED PRESSURE ' - - TREATED AD. RAILING. COLOR ./1- TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCH. ..#R- .~ 1 .. 4" THICK BRICK VENEER 11 -I ./ COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT~ 1 *,3/ - -- --- -~-~- ------ -- -'--~ - Â·-- 1 00 k {AId) --- Â·/41 GLEN-GERY Kle-R BRICK OR EQUAL - - -- , IN STRETCHER POSITION. COLOR TO BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT - - - --- - - - --- - ----- --- 1=1 -r j 51 f V A . - i r--~ --- Â·- --- - -- - - - - -- ~ ~ 0~, T.O. GONG - ~ 9 ELEV. 110'-O" \\ -2 A67 PRIMED $ PAINTED) PRESSURE i. TREATED AD. COLUMN. COLOR 011 (63 -Â· _ TO BE DETERMINED BÂ¥ ARCH. U I 0 eLEN-GERÂ¥ 0113-R BRICK OR EQUAL IN SOLDIER COURSE. COLOR TO -,i,--- --Â·--- -- -- ..... - ... ... BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT 1 ti . A T.O. CONG. 1 1 1 1 . . 1 . . ' f ELEV. 100'-O" - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9 0 1 1 1 1 1 A 1 1 2-5 -------7-5 . J T.O. SLAB ' 9 ELEV. VOLO" L PROJECT NO. 9810 DRAWN BY r CHECKED BY 03 NORTH ELEVATION JW A NORTH ELEVATION A3.2 0 0 -0.- @ M-ler Ar,huituri 0 likir.hg 99Â£6 26 066 83133HM 30N301938 NVNNVH NNyld 9 3801031IHOWV . PE CONST. 11/2/98 DESIGN ARCHITECT SALVANIZED ZINC BATTEN SEAM ROOF COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT ~ ~ 3.2, 3 1 COSTAS KONDYLIS & 4 1) - Associates, P.C. 3 West 1801 meet, New Yot, RY. 10011 ~ Tel 012) m.Â·8688 8= 012) m-8696 4" THICK RUSTICATED LIN'IESTONE VENEER I 1, i COLOR TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT i 1 2 6E ! . 1 1'' && 1 0 SE 1 0 1 1 //Al i i ! Z P 8 1,//LA\\ CX: i f A D Ff /9 /7 \4 4 1 LIMESTONE CORNICE.COLOR 4~ ! , 12 /0 /2 \\1 , 0 R 4 4 i TO BE SELECTED BÂ¥ ARCH. ? 1 r.-30 /2 - 1.- \\ â‚¬ 4 1 , 121 307 0/. .... .1.. - \ , i ; d 1 --4 -7 1 11 11 11 X . A 1/3 POINT OF ROOF . '7 ELEV. 127'-5-8/8" ? It %04 \441 ' .. <1 4~ 1 1 1 :-7 - - - - - _ . 6 TO. e , . 0, f =' 7 ELEV. 124'-4" 11 1 0 1 1 1 . -1 1 -. i T.O. PARAPET f 1 1 = ' 7 ELEV. 122'-a" r 1 11 1 9 .'Ar 5 . J TO. P,NIP * ROOF 9: ' 1 ELEV, Cl'-0" .Z' ~21 J ' ' 1 ~'~ - j --I.-1 - -.hY.*~ *I. -.* 11 j /-- -. 1 1 . 1 .-- _ . 1, f 1.a* - Ii' ':NIBIJA ==== - 1 .... .1 - 41:M[0 0 1 0 1 - f. 11 011 I 1 -- 7.-:L - 3 21 = 0.-=2 - GEW .- - # .... b 1- - ..4??ga t-(3 ~ 14 1 - . .0. \--r : 11 Â· Â· Â· - 1 -- - L------- - ril = Ill------- ----- midj i.,A 1 /7\ 1 3 0 9 -- * .- hz = Â¢ I .. r 1 - ...... 1 -4%.=Â¢ 1 ... 1 1 1- ..0 . 4 To. GONG. ' 7 ELEV. 110'-O" LLI Pt.-- L ...'1 1 -'..&'.- 5.04.1*f r 4"THICK BRICK VENEER - 0 COLOR TO BE SELECTED BÂ¥ ARCHITECT - !1 - SLEN-eERÂ¥ Pe-R BRICK OR EQUAL 72 LU IN STRETCHER POSITION. COLOR TO .Fly. O f> ~ b BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT :Ch' : eLEN-BERÂ¥ Ne-R BRICK OR EGUAL-~ - Â· * --- *0Mf i . IN SOLDIER COURSE. COLOR TO --- *.26& BE DETERMINED BY ARCHITECT - ~- - -- . 21,441=6 LU *0 - EJUMS 1:1 1,1.1;311 1,11 1 lilli 'cr':Ar 1/ _ 393& A T.O. CONG .t* ' 7 ELEV 100'-01' hap SE .9 Z 1 1 1 1 1 1 ' 9 I 1 1 1 9 .t' 4 1 1 ' 7 ELEV. 90'-O" PROJECT NO. 4...03.i A T.O. SLAB 1 1 1 1 9810 hert DRAWN BY SH 6*. 1//01 CHECKED BY .--1 (<-) EAST ELEVATION Â· JW A 1-1 4-2 1/411= 11-0 1 EAST ~ ELEVATION I laR 1 ' A3.3 a 0 - . 0 0 3133HM I ld 9 3801031IHOBV