Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutagenda.apz.20180220 AGENDA Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission REGULAR MEETING February 20, 2018 4:30 PM Sister Cities Meeting Room 130 S Galena Street, Aspen I. SITE VISIT II. ROLL CALL III. COMMENTS A. Commissioners B. Planning Staff C. Public IV. DRAFT MINUTES FOR FEBRUARY 6TH, 2018 V. DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST VI. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. 1130 Black Birch Dr. - Special Review, Stream Margin Review, and Residential Design Standard Variation VII. OTHER BUSINESS A. Appoint chair and vice chair VIII. BOARD REPORTS IX. ADJOURN Next Resolution Number: Typical Proceeding Format for All Public Hearings 1) Conflicts of Interest (handled at beginning of agenda) 2) Provide proof of legal notice (affi d avit of notice for PH) 3) Staff presentation 4) Board questions and clarifications of staff 5) Applicant presentation 6) Board questions and clari fications of applicant 7) Public comments 8) Board questions and clarifications relating to public comments 9) Close public comment portion of bearing 10) Staff rebuttal /clarification of evidence presented by applicant and public comment 1 1 ) Applicant rebuttal/clarification End of fact finding. Deliberation by the commission commences. No further interaction between commission and staff, applicant or public 12) Chairperson identified the issues to be discussed among commissioners. 13) Discussion between commissioners* 14) Motion* *Make sure the discussion and motion includes what criteria are met o r not met. Revised April 2, 2014 1 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 Vice Chairperson Walterscheid called the meeting to order at 4:34 p.m. Commissioners in attendance: Spencer McNight, Rally Dupps, Ryan Walterscheid, Kelly McNicholas. Absent was Skippy Mesirow. Staff present: Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk Justin Barker, Senior Planner Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director Phillip Supino, Principal Long Range Planner COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. McNight mentioned Jasmine Tygre’s retirement from P&Z and suggested recognizing her or having a party in her honor. I said that Linda and I will discuss and reach out to her to see when is a good time. I also let the board know that Mr. Goode resigned from P&Z today and that the City is looking for two regular members and two alternates and to please send people our way. STAFF COMMENTS: None. PUBLIC COMMENT: None. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Ms. McNicholas motioned to approve the minutes of December 19th and January 16th, Mr. McNight seconded. All in favor, motion carried. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None. PUBLIC HEARING: 230 E. Hopkins Avenue Justin Barker This is a final commercial design review and growth amendment for the Mountain Forge building. The property is a 6000-sq. ft. lot and zoned as mixed use. The existing property includes one affordable housing unit and the rest is commercial. This is at the corner of Hopkins and Monarch and just across from White House Tavern. The proposed project includes a remodel of the existing building and relocating the affordable housing unit within the existing structure and adding one free market unit to the upper floor of the property. This project received conceptual approval in June or July of 2016 and is subject to the pre-moratorium code. The two reviews for tonight include final commercial design review. This will deal with materials, fenestration, landscaping, lighting and public amenity. The other review is the growth management amendment and the reason for this is that the conceptual approval included two free market units on the second floor and the applicant has revised the application since then and is now down to one free market unit. In terms of commercial design, Mr. Barker showed slides of materials, fenestration and landscaping. Regarding growth management, at conceptual, this was approved as two free market units with a combined area of 2249 sq. ft., which calculated out to a mitigation total of 1.69 FTE’s through affordable housing credits. The revised design for final, sort of changes the layout down to one unit. The sq. footage is slightly higher than what was for the two combined units so what was 313 square feet is now up to 1.73 FTE’s. What is going to be addressed in P1 IV. 2 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 this review is the overall size of the unit and has been written into the resolution. The second item, is the .04 FTE’s above what was originally approved and has been written into the resolution and accommodated in the increase in affordable housing credits. Since the unit is slightly larger, there is a slight reduction in the commercial area, so those numbers that have changed, are updated in the resolution. Staff is recommending approval and has added a condition for the FTE’s. Ms. McNicholas asked if there is a mechanism to confirm that the employee housing unit is occupied by an actual employee. Mr. Barker said this all takes place through APCHA and he is sure they have some level of enforcement. He said he is not sure about how they receive documentation about that, but it is completely governed through APCHA. Ms. McNicholas asked if ComDev informs APCHA of the space and if it is added into their inventory to track and Mr. Barker said yes, APCHA reviews the application. Ms. Phelan said that APCHA also approves the deed restriction so they are made aware at that point. APPLICANT PRESENTATION: Dana Ellis of Roland and Broughton and Brett Krudener of Stan Clauson Associates. Ms. Ellis mentioned for the record that John Roland is in attendance as well as the owners of the property. Ms. Ellis said they took consideration from City Council on the volume along Monarch so they have made some edits there and noted that the building itself has gone from a grey tone to much warmer. As far as existing conditions, they are trying to keep the building intact from a demolition standpoint, while trying to modernize it. They are still under the proposed allowable floor area and their objectives are to remodel and recognize common neighborhood forms while creating a better use of the site features. They are keeping the courtyard level important for commercial use and feel they are meeting and exceeding the goals of a mixed-use area. They have spent a lot of time thinking about the pedestrian experience and the compatibility of materials, etc. Mr. True entered the meeting. Mr. Krudener spoke about landscaping and said the footprint will remain the same and the façade will remain as specified. Their focus was really on sidewalk improvements and off-site amenities. This is located at a prominent intersection and they want to accentuate the remodel and pedestrian space and corridor. At the front façade, they are incorporating concrete or stone paving bookended on the south side with a steel wall and mountain graphic with a backlight. Within the plaza space, they have incorporated slab stone benches to offset from the wall and landscaping. There will be some monumentation dedicated to Francis Whitaker, which would be a small plaque of some sort with minimal info to the historic component to the site. The paving, from his side of things, is to stop users from passing through and take a moment to browse the history and take in the site and take notice of the architecture and what is being done there. Around the other side of building, there will be some simple plantings and some light parking. Ms. Ellis pointed out that the joint pattern proposed for the sidewalk mimics what is around the crystal palace and has been done historically. It was a way for them to do a subtle nod to the Forge history of the site. The exterior materials they are looking at would be brick for the central volume, a core tin steel P2 IV. 3 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 siding done in a modern application, but not super rough. There would be a super warm wood finish exterior. Ms. Ellis passed around samples to the board. She feels they are sticking to a concept of the materials relating to the adjacent residential zones. She said they didn’t want to do painted wood and they felt that high quality materials were appropriate. The central volume is broken up and relates to the White House Tavern across the way. The corner is mainly wood with metal being the railing material. The wood transitions highlight the residential forms. As far as fenestration, they are looking at doing dynamic windows, which would be metal clad aluminum. On the first-floor storefronts, they are assuming they have to replace fenestration. Those store fronts both on the main and lower level, they are looking at doing a black clad window. They are looking at Pella and their wood windows because they have a low profile. They will look the same as the ones above and work better with the dimensions that exist. A big change is taking what was two small windows and opening them up so it’s all glazing for the commercial space inside. They are replacing the windows on the second floor and creating a more linear look. The opening to the commercial space stays as it is with an upgraded door system. They will add step lighting on the stairs and recessed canned lighting where they can. Any of the decorative lighting is an understated metal, but references the Forge look. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Ms. McNicholas asked what the theme is behind the landscaping. Mr. Krudener said the intention around the monument would be seasonal colors that can be changed out. On the other side would be grasses with a minimal water requirement and similar plantings. Ms. Ellis said they will also need to upgrade the right of way grasses, which will also be low water use. Mr. Krudener said they are also proposing a green wall or living wall in the courtyard space. It’s not zero scape, but close. PUBLIC COMMENT: Ruth Carver Ms. Carver asked questions about the plans regarding the white hanging pots and the sidewalk going past the monument. Mr. Krudener said the Forge was crafted with a ledger piece where planters can be used. It’s an idea and they are flower pots, essentially. Ms. Ellis said the sidewalk does go right past the monument and is ADA accessible. Mr. Krudener said that on the monument, there is a core tin steel wall cut out and backlit from within and there is a bench inside of it. It will be 4 to 8 inches dependent upon materials. They will be depicting an anvil and a hammer with a date range for Francis Whitaker with a quote and the base thickness is 24 to 34 inches. Public comment closed. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. McNight said he likes it, thinks it’s a good design and agrees with staff. He likes the paving and the flower pots, white or not. This project has his approval. Mr. Dupps said he agrees and doesn’t have anything further to add. Ms. McNicholas said that everything shown in white might look better black, as the applicant has suggested. Even the flower pots, which she does like. Ms. McNicholas verified that staff added the TDR into the resolution, which Mr. Barker confirmed. P3 IV. 4 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 MOTION: Ms. McNicholas motioned to approve resolution #1, Mr. McNight seconded. Roll call vote: Mr. Walterscheid, yes; Ms. McNicholas, yes; Mr. Dupps, yes; Mr. McNight, yes. 4-0 motion carried. Mr. Supino gave the board an update on the miscellaneous code section of the land use code. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Mr. Walterscheid said this discussion probably has more effect for him and the way in which it is implemented has way more weight, than the actual numbers. This is completely about the way you go about doing it. He is interested in this because it is drastically important to his work. Mr. Supino said they are most concerned with the methodology and the focus of their discussions. Mr. Walterscheid noted that he is very interested in what they are changing the methodology to since he is not on the board of consultants for this project. Mr. Barker said that they do want to run a few test projects through because it will make a dramatic difference and they need to determine how to adjust, etc. Mr. Dupps exited the meeting. Ms. McNicholas asked about calculating grade and said she doesn’t get it at all and how this will be done in the future without manifesting a very different result. Mr. Supino said that grade relative to height is a perfect example and there are many instances where grade is manipulated up or down on a site. Ms. McNicholas clarified that when these changes get adopted, they will compare the pre- and post-changed permits and Mr. Supino agreed. She asked if people are on to this and Mr. Supino said yes, very much. Ms. McNicholas said the thing that raises a flag for her, is the fact that this board relies on the code. If something like vesting rights, comes down to the only reason to deny something is in policy, is that a defensible reason or defensible document for us to use simply based on the subsidy that they would be getting. Mr. Supino, said in general, the information provided to a board is sufficient grounds to base a decision and must line up with the standards provided in the code, but something like the granting of an extension, is a discretionary action. Mr. True agreed and said an extension of vested rights is absolutely discretionary and subject to referendum. Mr. Supino said this provides staff and decision makers with more flexibility to say we want to know x, y and z. Mr. McNight said he likes what they are doing and that his comments would come in these meetings where things are being discussed, but here on the surface level, he doesn’t have anything. Mr. Supino said that he sensed some trepidation with the draft ordinance. Mr. Walterscheid said he would like to see it and knows there is a number of people who are working on it. He is not sure how much the rest of the board cares about it and he trusts the work being done, but this is just more for his personal interest. Mr. Barker said they can send him the draft ordinance individually and he is welcome to contact them with concerns. Mr. Supino said their intention and goal is to save some brain damage, frankly, but they want to be respectful and he feels that Mr. Walterscheid’s input is important. Ms. McNicholas said she thinks the little food carts should be as funky as can be and as colorful as can be. That is the point of food carts. P4 IV. 5 ASPEN PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 6, 2018 Mr. McNight motioned to appoint the new chairs at the next meeting, Mr. Walterscheid seconded. Mr. McNight motioned to adjourn, Mr. McNicholas seconded at 5:43 p.m. _________________________________ Nicole Henning, Deputy City Clerk P5 IV. RESOLUTION NO. (SERIES OF 2018) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION APPROVING SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TOP OF SLOPE DETERMINATION, A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARD VARIATION FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY 1, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244, COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE. Parcel No. 2735-013-07-009 WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from Beth Held at Forum Phi Architecture LLC, on behalf of Riverfront Fork LLC, requesting Special Review approval for an alternative Top of Slope Determination, Stream Margin Review, and Residential Design Standard Variation for the property at 1130 Black Birch Drive; and, WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application for compliance with the applicable review standards; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Engineering Department provided consultation to the applicant and approved the proposed alternative Top of Slope; and, WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards, the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Special Review for an alternative Top of Slope, Stream Margin Review, and denial of a Residential Design Standard Variation; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public hearing on February 20, 2018; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and, WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and, P6 VI.A. WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution _, Series of 2018, by a ___ to ____ (_ - _) vote, granting approval of Special Review, Stream Margin, and Residential Design Standard Variation as identified herein. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission: Section 1: Special Review for Top of Slope Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves an alternative top of slope determination via Special Review as identified in the attached Exhibit A. The applicant shall submit a Site Improvement Survey/Plat for the City of Aspen Review and approval depicting the approved Top of Slope within 180 days of this approval. Section 2: Stream Margin Review Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Stream Margin Review with the following conditions of approval: A. Engineering Conditions of Approval 1. All vegetation below the 15’ top of slope setback must be replaced with native vegetation. 2. Any excavation below the 15’ top of slope setback must be performed by hand. 3. All stormwater runoff must be captured and treated outside of the 15’ Top of Slope setback. 4. Ditch must be lined with bentonite liner. Details to be provided at Building Permit submittal. B. Parks Conditions of Approval 1. No machinery, storage of material, foot or vehicle traffic allowed below 15’ top of slope setback. 2. Any roots over two (2) inches will require inspection and approval of City Forrester before cutting. 3. Air Spading required around perimeter of building. Section 3: Residential Design Standard Variation Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Residential Design Standard Variation for Section 26.410.030.E.2, Window Placement to allow for a twelve (12) foot tall window on the front most street facing façade of the proposed development as shown in Exhibit B. Section 4: This approval does not exempt the project from compliance with applicable zoning, building, or any other applicable code regulations within the City of Aspen’s Municipal Code. The applicant P7 VI.A. must submit a building permit application demonstrating compliance with all applicable codes prior to any development on site. Section 5: All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized entity. Section 6: This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. Section 7: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on February 20, 2018. APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION: ____________________________ ______________________________ Jim True, City Attorney Skippy Mesirow, Chair ATTEST: ____________________________ Nicole Henning, Assistant City Clerk Attachments: Exhibit A: Site Improvement Survey/Plat Identifying Alternative Top of Slope P8 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 1 of 8 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Garrett Larimer, Planner Technician THRU: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director MEETING DATE: February 20, 2018 RE: 1130 Black Birch Dr. – Special Review, Stream Margin Review, and Residential Design Standard Variation Request. APPLICANT /OWNER: Riverfront Fork LLC 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 REPRESENTATIVE: Beth Held, Forum Phi Architecture LLC, 715 W. Main Street, Aspen, CO 81611 LOCATION: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Parcel ID No. 273501307009 CURRENT ZONING & USE This property is located in the Low-Density Residential (R-30) zone district in the Black Birch Estates subdivision. The property is developed with an existing single-family home. PROPOSED LAND USE: The Applicant is requesting an alternative top of slope determination from what is specified by the City of Aspen Stream Margin Map. Two other reviews are requested by the applicant; a concurrent stream margin review based on the newly established top of slope, and a Residential Design Standard Variation. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for a new Top of Slope Determination and Stream Margin Review, and deny the request for a Residential Design Standard Variation request to redevelop the site with a new single family residence. Figure A: Subject property P9 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 2 of 8 LAND USE REQUEST AND REVIEW PROCEDURES: The Applicant is requesting the following land use approvals from the Planning and Zoning Commission: · Special Review (Pursuant to Lane Use Code Section 26.435.040.E): An application requesting an appeal of the Stream Margin Map’s top of slope determination requires Special Review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. · Stream Margin Review (Section 26.435.040): An application for development on a property within one-hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the Flood Hazard Area require a Stream Margin Review. Development in those areas are subject to heightened review because they are in an Environmentally Sensitive Area. An application for a Stream Margin review is typically reviewed administratively, but because the review is contingent on the top of slope determination, the applicant requested to include the review in a one-step review process by the Planning and Zoning Commission to simplify the process. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. · Residential Design Standard Variation (Section 26.410.020.C): Applications that do not comply with the standards contained in the Residential Design section of the code, in which an applicant is applying for a variation, require approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The applicant is requesting a variation of the Window Placement standard for a window on the front façade that is taller than allowed by the code. The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final review body. SUMMARY OF PROJECT: EXISTING CONDITIONS: The property, 1130 Black Birch, is located in the Black Birch Estates subdivision outside the Aspen Infill area. The property is zoned Low-Density Residential (R-30). The lot is approximately 20,171 sq. ft. and contains an approximately 3,014-sq. ft. single family residence with a 363-sq. ft. detached garage. The property is located along the bank of the Roaring Fork River at the confluence of Castle Creek and the Roaring Fork River, shown in Figure B. The property is located within the Stream Margin Review Area, see figure D. PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing single-family home and construct an approximately 9,488 gross square foot residence with a 560-square foot deck to the rear Figure B – Subject Property P10 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 3 of 8 of the property and a 180-square foot front porch. The proposal includes a basement, main level, and an attached two-car garage. The center portion of the proposed residence includes a twenty-one (21) foot tall roof, while the remaining height of the building is around fourteen (14) feet, as shown in Figure E. The applicant has indicated and shown that no development will occur inside the 15’ Top of Slope setback of the new proposed Top of Slope. All trees and vegetation within the 15’ Top of Slope Setback will be protected and restored to native vegetation. See Figure D-H for illustrations of the proposed development. Figure C – Existing Site Plan P11 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 4 of 8 Figure D – Proposed Site Plan Figure E - Proposed West Elevation (Street Facing) P12 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 5 of 8 Figure F – Proposed East Elevation Figure G – Proposed South elevation Figure H – Proposed North Elevation STAFF COMMENT: P13 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 6 of 8 Stream Margin & Special Review: Section 26.435.040.E, Special Review, requires an application seeking an appeal of the Stream Margin Map’s Top of Slope designation be processed as a Special Review. The criteria for seeking variance from the adopted Top of Slope map requires a surveyor to make an alternative determination which is substantiated by the City Engineering Department. Stream Margin Review applies to areas located within one hundred (100) feet, measured horizontally, from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within the one-hundred- year floodplain where it extends one hundred (100) feet from the high-water line of the Roaring Fork River and its tributary streams, or within a Flood Hazard Area. Any development in these areas are subject to heightened review to reduce and prevent property loss by flood, and to ensure the natural and unimpeded flow of existing watercourses. The intent of this review is to encourage development that preserves and protects existing watercourses. The applicant has requested a combined Special Review to establish a new Top of Slope and Stream Margin Review. There are eleven (11) review criteria associated with Stream Margin Review, and two (2) associated with Special Review, Section 26.435.040.E. Staff findings for the review criteria for the Stream Margin Review are included in Exhibit A and the Top of Slope Determination Special Review are included in Exhibit B. The Top of Slope determination was submitted by a licensed surveyor and referred to the City of Aspen Engineering and Parks Departments for review. The Engineering and Parks Departments have reviewed and approved the Top of Slope proposal submitted by the applicant. While considering the application against the applicable review criteria for Stream Margin review and the Top of Slope Determination, the main concerns of staff include the following: 1) Does the City of Aspen’s Engineering Department support the proposed Top of Slope determination? The proposed Top of Slope determination was confirmed onsite by the Engineering Department and verified in the application. The Top of Slope provides the basis of the Stream Margin Review. Given the approval from the Engineering and the Parks Departments, staff reviewed the proposed development based on the new Top of Slope. 2) Do any of the proposed additions to the rear of the property extend into the Top of Slope setback? The proposal does not include any development in the 15’ Top of Slope Setback. 3) Do any of the proposed changes infringe on the 45° progressive height plane from the Top of Slope? P14 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 7 of 8 The proposed development does not infringe on the 45° progressive height plane, see Figures J & K. 4) Will the proposed changes to the property affect riparian vegetation and features? The applicant has indicated no work will occur below the 15’ Top of Slope Determination and a fence will be erected to prevent damage to the vegetation below that setback. The applicant will continue to work with the City of Aspen Parks Department through the building permit review process and during construction to ensure compliance. Residential Design Standard Variation: Section 26.410.020.C, Residential Design Standard Variations, require applications that seek a variation from the Residential Design Standards be reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Planning and Zoning Commission can approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application after considering a recommendation by the Community Development Director based on the standards outlined in section 26.410.020.C, Variation Review Standards. The applicant is requesting a variation from the Window Placement standard in the Residential Design Standards. The applicant has requested a Residential Design Standard Variation be reviewed as part of the combined Special Review and Stream Margin Review. The Residential Design Standard Staff Checklist is included in Exhibit E. The general intent of the Residential Design Standards is to encourage development that connects to the street, responds to the neighborhood character, and reflects traditional building scales in Aspen. The review criteria for a variation must meet the following two (2) conditions; the design must meet the overall intent of the standard and it must be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness due to a site-specific constraint or hardship. The window placement standard states that any street facing window shall not span more than one story as defined by that section. One story is defined as ten (10) feet, the proposed window spans twelve (12) feet. Figure I & J - 45° Progressive Height Plane Illustrations P15 VI.A. 1130 Black Birch Drive Stream Margin, Special Review, and Residential Design Standard Variance Page 8 of 8 The intent of the window placement section is to encourage designs that preserve historic architectural character of Aspen and relate to human scale. Staff has reviewed the proposed design against these two criteria and have determined that there is no hardship or unusual site- specific constraint that would prohibit the applicant from complying with the window placement standard. This standard is important in all areas of town. Staff feels the proposed design does not meet the intent of the standard, and does not support approval of the variation request. The Top of Slope determination is supported by the Engineering and Parks Departments. The proposed project meets all of the standards in 26.435.040.C., Stream Margin Review and 26.435.040.E, Special Review. The proposal does not comply with section 26.410.030.E, Window Placement. Staff does not support the approval of the Residential Design Standard Variation request. RECOMMENDATION: The Community Development Department staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission approve the request for Stream Margin Review and Special Review, with conditions, and deny the request for Residential Design Standard Variation. RECOMMENDED MOTION: The Resolution is written in the affirmative, meaning all requests are approved in the Resolution. If the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the denial of the variation request, and chooses to recommend approval for the request for the Stream Margin Review and Special Review for the Top of Slope Determination, the following motion may be used “I move to approve the requests for Stream Margin Review and Special Review at Black Birch Drive and deny the request for Residential Design Standard Variation.” If the Planning and Zoning Commission supports the recommended motion to deny the RDS Variation Request and approve the Special Review and Stream Margin review, the following edits will need to be made to the Resolution: · Add “and denial of a Residential Design Standard Variation” in the Resolution title. · The 6th “whereas” statement will need to add, “meets applicable review criteria with the exception of the Residential Design Standard Variation. · The 8th “whereas” statement will need to add the denial of the Residential Design Standard Variation. · Section 3 – Add “denies” and strike “approves” ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A – Stream Margin Review Criteria Exhibit B – Stream Margin Special Review- Top of Slope Determination - Review Criteria Exhibit C – Residential Design Standards Variation Review Criteria Exhibit D – Application Exhibit E – RDS Staff Checklist Exhibit F – Improvement Survey with Proposed Top of Slope Exhibit G – Public Noticing Affidavit P16 VI.A. Exhibit A Stream Margin Review Criteria C. Stream margin review standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including, but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and Staff Response: The development will occur outside of the Special Flood Hazard Area and will not increase the base flood elevation as no site work or development will occur in that area. The Special Flood Hazard Area is below the 15’ top of slope setback that restricts grading and development. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The recommendations of the Aspen Area Community Plan: Parks/Recreation/Open Space/Trails Plan and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman's easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded "Fisherman's Easement;" and Staff Response: At this time no public use, access, or easements exist on the property. Staff finds this criterion to be not applicable. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut or fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040.F.1; and Staff Response: The applicant does not propose any development below the 15’ Top of Slope setback. The applicant has indicated no vegetation will be removed or damaged, and no slope or grade changes are proposed within the top of slope setback. Native vegetation may be used below the 15’ top of slope setback if approved by the City of Aspen Parks Department. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to P17 VI.A. prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Staff Response: The applicant has indicated that sedimentation that occurs during construction will be mitigated in accordance with an erosion control plan to be submitted for review as part of the building permit. Drainage from the development will be treated and detained in accordance with the City of Aspen URMP. Pools and hot tubs will not be drained into storm water systems. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and Staff Response: No alteration of the watercourse is proposed. Written notice to the Colorado Water Conservation Board and the Federal Emergency Management Agency are not required. Staff finds this criterion met. 5. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and Staff Response: The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and Staff Response: No development is proposed within the 100-year flood plain (Special Flood Hazard Area). Staff finds this criterion met. 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation planting taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and Staff Response: No development other than approved native vegetation is proposed below the 15’ proposed Top of Slope. All landscape plans will be subject to the approval of the City Parks Department. The Applicant proposes a new Top of Slope. The proposed Top of Slope location has been approved by the City Engineering Department. Staff finds this criterion met. P18 VI.A. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure "A"; and Staff Response: The existing structure does not project into the restricted height area as defined by this standard. Height will be verified by a Zoning Officer during building permit review. Staff finds this criterion met. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and Staff Response: A lighting plan was not submitted with the Application. The following condition of approval will be included in the resolution: 1. All exterior lighting will comply with the provisions Outdoor Lighting, Section 26.575.150 of the Land Use Code. Staff finds this criterion met with conditions. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. The applicant has indicated, and no documentation has been found by staff that there are any wetlands or riparian zones located within the property. Staff finds this criterion met. P19 VI.A. Exhibit B Special Review Criteria Sec. 26.435.040. Stream margin review. E. Special review. An application requesting a variance from the stream margin review standards or an appeal of the Stream Margin Map's top of slope determination, shall be processed as a special review in accordance with common development review procedure set forth in Chapter 26.304. The special review shall be considered at a public hearing for which notice has been published, posted and mailed, pursuant to Subsection 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A special review from the stream margin review determination may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following review criteria: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado professionally licensed surveyor shows a different determination in regard to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department; and Staff Response: The Applicant is proposing a new top of slope determination, and has submitted a survey from a licensed surveyor showing the proposed Top of Slope and 100-year flood plain. The Applicant has coordinated with the City of Aspen Engineering and Parks Departments. Staff finds this criterion to be met. 2. The proposed development meets the stream margin review standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. Staff Response: The proposed development meets the review criteria of Section 26.435.040.C., Stream Margin Review. Staff finds this criterion to be met. P20 VI.A. Exhibit C Residential Design Standards Review Criteria D. Residential Design Standard Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or Staff Response: The window placement standard is important to all areas of Aspen. The intent of the standard is to prevent overly tall expanses of vertical glazing that dominate the street-facing façade and do not relate well to human scale. The structure is one story where the window is located, and is located on the front most façade of the building. The height of the building is shown at approximately thirteen (13) feet six (6) inches tall, the window is shown at twelve (12) feet. The intent of the Window Placement section is to encourage designs that relate to human scale and preserve the historic architectural character of Aspen. Although the location of the property is in an area with less pedestrian traffic than other areas of town, and has a larger minimum setback than is seen in other areas of town, the code states that this standard is important in all areas of town. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints Staff Response: There are not site-specific constraints or unusual circumstances that would prevent the applicant from complying with this standard. Staff finds this criterion to not be met. P21 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Ben Anderson 970-429-2765 DATE: May 2, 2017 PROJECT: 1130 Black Birch Dr. REPRESENTATIVE: Steev Wilson, Forum Phi APPLICATION TYPE: Top of Slope Determination/Stream Margin Review DESCRIPTION: The potential applicant is interested in demolishing an existing single family residence and redeveloping with a new single family residence. The development is subject to the Stream Margin review standards in Land Use Code Section 26.435.040. The Stream Margin Review was created to “encourage development and land uses that preserve and protect existing watercourses as important natural features.” First, the existing home (and the entire parcel) currently sits below the established Top of Slope (according to the adopted Stream Margin Map). To redevelop the property, based on the initial proposal, an alternative Top of Slope Determination must be established through a Special Review, by the Planning and Zoning Commission pursuant to Land Use Code Section 26.435.040.E. If an alternative Top of Slope and corresponding 15’ setback can be established, the proposed redevelopment will then be subject to a Stream Margin Review based on the new alternative Top of Slope. Depending on the applicant’s preference, this review could be folded into the Top of Slope review by Planning and Zoning Commission, or it could be handled as a separate Administrative Review. Important to this process, early consultation with the City of Aspen’s Engineering Department in determining if an alternative Top of Slope is possible and the location for an alternative is highly recommended. The application for this project will be referred to the Engineering and Parks Departments. Since at least one aspect of this project is being reviewed by the Planning and Zoning Commission, the applicant may want to consider any other possible dimensional variances or variations to Residential Design Standards that may be required for the project – so that these could be reviewed simultaneously if necessary. Relevant Land Use Code Section(s): 26.304 Common Development Review Procedures 26.430 Special Review 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.575.020 Calculations and Measurements Land Use Code is available at: Land Use Code Land Use Application is available at: Application Review by: Staff for completeness, P&Z for Special Review and Stream Margin Review (one step) or P&Z for Special Review and Staff for Administrative Stream Margin (two-step) Public Hearing: Yes, with the Planning and Zoning Commission – Public Notice Required Referral Agencies: Parks & Engineering Figure 1. 1130 Black Birch Drive. The Top of Slope is illustrated with the red line P22 VI.A. Planning Fees: One Step: $3250 for ten (10) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. Two Step: (P&Z – Special Review) $3250 for ten (10) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. and a second application for (Admin Review) $1300 for four (4) hours of staff review time. Any additional hours will be billed at a rate of $325/hr. Referral Agency Fees: One Step: Parks. $975.00 (flat fee). Engineering: Deposit is for 1 hour at $325 and billed hourly thereafter. A two-step process would incur additional referral fees for the second application for the Administrative Review. Total Deposit: For the One-Step Review (Special Review and Stream Margin by P&Z) $4550.00 To apply, submit the following information: ¨ Completed Land Use Application and signed fee agreement. ¨ Pre-application Conference Summary (this document). ¨ Street address and legal description of the parcel on which development is proposed to occur, consisting of a current (no older than 6 months) certificate from a title insurance company, an ownership and encumbrance report, or attorney licensed to practice in the State of Colorado, listing the names of all owners of the property, and all mortgages, judgments, liens, easements, contracts and agreements affecting the parcel, and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply for the Development Application. ¨ Applicant’s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant that states the name, address and telephon e number of the representative authorized to act on behalf of the applicant. ¨ HOA Compliance form. ¨ A written description of the proposal and an explanation in written, graphic, or model form of how the proposed development complies with the review standards relevant to the development application and relevant land use approvals associated with the property. ¨ A site improvement survey (no older than a year from submittal) including topography and vegetation showing the current status of the parcel certified by a registered land surveyor by licensed in the State of Colorado. ¨ One 11x17 copy and one full sized copy of plans depicting the project and the Stream Margin Review Area, Top of Slope, and the 15’ setback from Top of Slope to confirm applicability and any impacts to these areas. (Existing and Proposed) ¨ Written responses to review criteria outlined in section 26.435.040 B. ¨ An 8 1/2” by 11” vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. ¨ 1 Complete Copy. If the copy is deemed complete by staff, the following items will then need to be submitted: ¨ One additional copy of the complete application packet. ¨ Total deposit for review of the application. ¨ A digital copy of the application provided in pdf file format. Disclaimer: The foregoing summary is advisory in nature only and is not binding on the City. The summary is based on current zoning, which is subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not create a legal or vested right. P23 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  GENERAL LAND USE PACKET  Attached is an Application for review of Development that requires Land Use Review pursuant to  The City of Aspen Land Use Code:  Included in this package are the following attachments:  1.Development Application Fee Policy, Fee Schedule and Agreement for Payment Form 2.Land Use Application Form 3.Dimensional Requirements Form 4.Matrix of Land Use Application Requirements/Submittal Requirements Key 5.General Summary of Your Application Process 6.Public Hearing Notice Requirements 7.Affidavit of Notice All Applications are reviewed based on the criteria established in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Title 26 of  the Aspen Municipal Code is available at the City Clerk’s Office on the second floor of City Hall and on the internet  at www.cityofaspen.com, City Departments, City Clerk, Municipal Code, and search Title 26.  We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre‐application conference with a Planner in the Community  Development Department so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully  described. Also, depending upon the complexity of the development proposed, submitting one copy of the  development application to the Case Planner to determine accuracy, inefficiencies, or redundancies can reduce  the overall cost of materials and Staff time.  Please recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use  Regulations.  While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as they apply  to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code.  If you have  questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member  assigned to your case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Use Regulations.  P24 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  Land Use Review Fee Policy The City of Aspen has established a review fee policy for the processing of land use applications.   A flat fee or deposit is  collected for land use applications based on the type of application submitted.  A flat fee is collected by Community Development for applications which normally take a minimal and predictable amount of  staff time to process.  Review fees for other City Departments reviewing the application (referral departments) will also be  collected when necessary.  Flat fees are cumulative – meaning an application with multiple flat fees must be pay the sum of  those flat fee.  Flat fees are not refundable.  A review fee deposit is collected by Community Development when more extensive staff time is required.  Actual staff time spent will be charged against the deposit.  Various City staff may also charge their time spent on the case in  addition to the case planner. Deposit amount may be reduces if, in the opinion of the Community Development Director, the  project is expected to take significantly less time to process than the deposit indicates.  A determination on the deposit amount shall be made during the pre‐application conference by the case planner.  Hourly  billing shall still apply.  All applications must include an Agreement to Pay Application Fees.   One payment including the deposit for Planning and  referral agency fees must be submitted with each land use application, made payable to the City of Aspen.  Applications will  not be accepted for processing without the required fee.  The Community Development Department shall keep an accurate record of the actual time required for the processing of a  land use application requiring a deposit.  The City can provide a summary report of fees due at the applicant’s request.  The  applicant will be billed for the additional costs incurred by the City when the processing of an application by the Community  Development Department takes more time or expense than is covered by the deposit.  Any direct costs attributable to a  project review shall be billed to the applicant with no additional administrative charge.  In the event the processing of an  application takes less time than provided for by the deposit, the department shall refund the unused portion of the deposited  fee to the applicant.  Fees shall be due regardless of whether an applicant receives approval.  Unless otherwise combined by the Director for simplicity of billing, all applications for conceptual, final and recordation of  approval documents shall be handled as individual cases for the purpose of billing.  Upon conceptual approval all billing shall be  reconciled and past due invoices shall be paid prior to the Director accepting an application for final review.  Final review shall  require a new deposit at the rate in effect at the time of final submission.  Upon final approval all billing shall be again reconciled  prior to the Director accepting an application for review of technical documents for recordation.  The Community Development Director may cease processing of a land use application for which an unpaid invoice is 30 or more  days past due.  Unpaid invoices of 90 days or more past due may be assessed a late fee of 1.75% per month. An unpaid invoice of  120 days or more may be subject to additional actions as may be assigned by the Municipal Court Judge.  All payment information  is public domain.  All invoices shall be paid prior to issuance of a Development Order or recordation of development agreements and plats.  The City  will not accept a building permit for a property until all invoices are paid in full.  For permits already accepted, and unpaid invoice  of 90 days or more days may result in cessation of building permit processing or issuance of a stop work order until full payment is  made.  The property owner of record is the party responsible for payment of all costs associated with a land use application  for the property. Any secondary agreement between a property owner and an applicant representing the owner (e.g.  a contract purchaser) regarding payment of fees is solely between those private parties.  P25 VI.A. C¡rv Or ASpe ru COUMUNITY DeveIoPMENT DepnRTMENT Property Owner ("1"): Phone No. Email (806) 543-3200 john@depermian.comRiverfront Fork LLC Address of Property: (Subject of a pplication ) Billing Address: (send bills here) 1 130 Black Birch Drive Aspen CO, B1 61 1 1401 Ballinger Street Fort Worth. TX76107 Agreement to Pay Application Fees An ement between the of As S gzs tlat fee for Parks Review n flat fee for 5.- flat fee for - and I understand that the City has adopted, via Ordinance No., Series of 2011, review fees for Land Use applications and payment ofthesefeesisaconditionprecedenttodeterminingapplicationcompleteness. lunderstandthatasthepropertyownerthat I am responsible for paying all fees for this development application. Forflatfeesandreferralfees: lagreetopaythefollowingfeesfortheservicesindicated. lunderstandthattheseflatfeesare non-refundable. 5 325 deposit deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour City of Aspen: Jessica Garrow, AICP Comm unity Development Director City Use: Fees Due: S4,550 Received S- flat fee for hours of Engineering Department staff time. Addit¡onal time above the Property Owner: Riverfront Fork LLC Name For Deposit cases only: The City and I understand that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to know the full extent or total costs involved in processing the application. I understand that additional costs over and above the deposit may accrue. I understand and agree that it is impracticable for City staff to complete processing, review and presentation of sufficient information to enable legally required findings to be made for project consideration, unless invoices are paid in full. The City and I understand and agree that invoices mailed by the City to the above listed billing address and not returned to the City shall be considered by the City as being received by me. I agree to remit payment within 30 days of presentation of an invoice by the City for such services. I have read, understood, and agree to the Land Use Review Fee Policy including consequences for no-payment. I agree to pay thefollowinginitial depositamountsforthespecifiedhoursofstafftime. lunderstandthatpaymentofadepositdoesnot render and application complete or compliant with approval criteria. lf actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, I agree to pay additional monthly billings to the City to reimburse the City for the processing of my application at the hourly rates hereinaft er stated. S 3,250 deposit for- I0 hours of Community Development Department staff time. Additional time above the deposit amount will be billed at $325.00 per hour. s _1tor I Title: of March, 201-7 city of Apen 1130 s. Galena st.l(970) 920 5090 P26 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  ATTACHMENT 2 – LAND USE APPLICATION   PROJECT: Name:     _______________________________________________________________________________________________  Location:_______________________________________________________________________________________________  Parcel ID # (REQUIRED)  APPLICANT:  Name:     _______________________________________________________________________________________________  Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________  Phone #:         REPRESENTIVATIVE:  Name:  _________________________________________________________________________________________________  Address:________________________________________________________________________________________________ Phone#:     TYPE OF APPLICATION: (Please check all that apply):    EXISTING CONDITIONS: (description of existing buildings, uses, previous approvals, etc.)    PROPOSAL: (Description of proposed buildings, uses, modifications, etc.)  Have you attached the following?      FEES DUE: $ ______________    Pre‐Application Conference Summary           Attachment #1, Signed Fee Agreement           Response to Attachment #3, Dimensional Requirements Form           Response to Attachment #4, Submittal Requirements – including Written Responses to Review Standards           3‐D Model for large project  All plans that are larger than 8.5” X 11” must be folded. A disk with an electric copy of all written text (Microsoft Word Format) must be  submitted as part of the application. Large scale projects should include an electronic 3‐D model. Your pre‐application conference  summary will indicate if you must submit a 3‐D model.   GMQS Exemption   Conceptual PUD          Temporary Use    GMQS  Allotment   Final PUD (& PUD Amendment)      Special Review                     Subdivision              Conceptual SPA   ESA – 8040 Greenline, Stream               Subdivision Exemption (includes         Margin, Hallam Lake Bluff,          Condominiumization)   Mountain View Plane          Final SPA (&SPA    Commercial Design Review           Lot Split          Amendment)    Residential Design Variance      Lot Line Adjustment     Small Lodge Conversion/        Expansion   Conditional Use         Other:  Riverfront Fork LLC 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen CO, 81611 #273-501-307-009 Beth Held 715 W Main Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (970) 319-2095 Forum Phi Architecture LLC 715 W Main Street, Aspen CO, 81611 (970) 279-4157 X X The existing building is a two-story, single family residence with detached garage located outside the infill area at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek. The current home and garage are encroaching on each of the side yard setbacks and the existing deck goes into the 15' T.O. Bank Setback. The scope of work includes demolishing the existing two-story home and detached garage to be replaced with a new single family, one-story residence with attached garage and full basement. The proposed residence will be located entirely within the setbacks and outside of the 15' T.O. Bank Setback. X X X X 4,550 P27 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  ATTACHMENT 3  DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FORM           Project: ______________________________________________________________________________       Applicant: ______________________________________________________________________________         Location: ______________________________________________________________________________  Zone District: ______________________________________________________________________________         Lot Size:  _______________________________________________________________________________   (For the purpose of calculating Floor Area, Lot Area may be reduced for areas within the high‐water  mark, easement, and steep slopes.  Please refer to the definition of Lot Area in the Municipal         Code.)      Commercial net leasable:         Existing: _____________ Proposed: _________________________________  Number of residential units:    Existing: _____________ Proposed: _________________________________  Number of bedrooms:             Existing: _____________ Proposed: _________________________________  Proposed % of demolition (Historic properties only): ______________  DIMENSIONS:         Floor Area: Principal bldg. height: Access. Bldg. height:           On‐Site parking:           % Site coverage:           % Open Space:             Front Setback:         Rear Setback:           Combined F/F:          Side Setback:           Side Setback:            Combined Sides:     Distance between Bldgs. ______ Proposed: _ __      Existing: _ _________ Allowable: _ _____ Proposed: _ _______      Existing: _____________ Allowable: ________ Proposed: ____________   Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________      Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________     Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________    Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________   Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________     Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________   Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________  Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________   Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________          Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________  Existing: _____________ Required: _________ Proposed: ____________ Existing non‐conformities or encroachments:   ______________________________________________________________________________ Variations requested:  ______________________________________________________________________________ 1130 Black Birch Drive Beth Held 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen CO, 81611 R-30 20,171 +/- SF        Lot Area: ____Gros____s ___: 20,253 +/- SF __________________________ Net: 14,999 SF________________________________________  4 7 N/A 0 The existing residence encroaches on the north side setback, the existing deck encroaches on the 15' T.O. Bank setback, and the existing garage encroaches on the south side setback. Existing residence, deck, and garage to be demolished. Seeking RDS variation for 26.410.030.E.2.c - Window Placement; one window located on the street facing facade to span 12' instead of the maximum per code which is one-story or 10'. 2,912.75 ___25'-4" 25' 2 13.31% N/A 25' 11'-4" 36'-4" 5'-7" 9'-11" 15'-6" 19'-4 3/8" N/A `  Existing: _ _______ Allowable: _ 4,_____361.19___ SF     ____23'-4 1/2" N/A 2 22.89% N/A 25' 15' 40' 10' 10' 20' N/A N/A 4,499 SF ______ 25' 25' 2 N/A N/A 25' 15' 40' 10' 10' 20' 10' N/A PER PLAT 20,253 +/- SF PER SURVEYOR CALCULATION P28 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  ATTACHMENT 4 – MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS  For application requirements, refer to the numbers in the second column.  These numbers correspond to the key  on page 9.  For multiple reviews, do not duplicate information.  All application materials must be complete and  submitted in collected packets. All drawings must include an accurate graphic scale Type of Review App Submission  Requirements  (See key on page 9.)  Process Type (See Process  Description in Att.5)  Number of Required  Submittal Packets   8040 GREENLINE REVIEW  1‐7, 8‐10, 35  P & Z  10  8040 GREENLIN EXEMPTION  1‐7, 8‐10, 35  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW  2  STREAM MARGIN REVIEW  1‐7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35  P & Z OR ADMINISTRATIVE  (based on location)  2 FOR 0 ADMIN., 10 FOR   P & Z  STREAM MARGIN  EXEMPTION  1‐7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 35  ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW  2  HALLAM LAKE BLUFF  REVIEW  1‐7, 13 , 14, 35  P & Z  10  MOUNTAIN VIEW PLANE  1‐7, 15, 16, 35  P & Z  10  CONDITIONAL USE  1‐7, 9, 17 P & Z 10  SPECIAL REVIEW*  1‐7, Additional Submission Req. depend on nature of the Special  Review Requested.  P & Z 10  SUBDIVISION  1‐7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 21, 35  P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL  20  EXEMPT SUBDIVISION  1‐7, 18, 19, 20, 21, 35 CIITY COUNCIL  10  LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT  1‐7, 22 ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW  2  LOT SPLIT  1‐7, 22 CITY COUNCIL  10  CODE AMENDMENT  1‐4, 7, 23 P & Z, AND CITY COUNCIL  20  WIRELESS TELECOM.  1‐7, 16, 24, 25, 26, 27, 35  ADMIN, OR P & Z  2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR   P & Z  SATELITE DISH OVER 24” IN  DIAMETER  1‐7  ADMIN, OR P & Z 2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR   P & Z  RES. DESIGN STANDARDS  VARIANCE  1‐7, 9, 28, 29, 30 P & Z OR DRAC  10  GMQS EXEMPTION*  1‐7, Additional Submission Req. depend on nature of the Exemption  Request.  ADMIN., OR P & Z AND/OR  CC (BASED ON EXEMPTION  TYPE)  2 FOR ADMIN., 10 FOR   P & Z, 20 FOR P & Z AND CC  CONDOMINIUMIZATION  1, 31 ADMINISTRATIVE  2  PUD 1‐7, 32, 33, 35 CONCEPTUAL – P & Z, AND  CC FINAL – P & Z, AND CC  20 FOR P & Z AND CC  (Submit Separately for Final  PUD Review)  LODGE PRESERVATION PUD  1‐7, 35 P & Z, AND CC  20  P29 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  ATTACHMENT 4 – MATRIX OF LAND USE APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS   (CONTINUED)  PUD AMENDMENT 1‐7 ADMIN., OR P & Z, AND/OR CC  (BASED ON AMENDMENT  TYPE)  2 FOR Admin., 10  for P & Z, 20 FOR P  & Z AND CC   SPECIALLY PLANNED AREA  (SPA)  1‐7, 35  CONCEPTUAL – P & Z, AND CC  FINAL – P & Z, AND CC  2 FOR Admin., 20  for P & Z AND CC  AMENDENDMENT TO SPA  1‐7 ADMIN. OR CC (BASED ON  DURATION TIME)  2 for Admin., 20 for  P & Z and CC  TEMPORARY USE  1‐7 ADMIN OR P & Z (BASED ON  DURATION TIME)  2 for Admin., 10 for  City Council  ACCESSORY DEWELLING  UNIT  1‐7, 9  ADMIN OR P & Z  (BASED ON IF  THE PROPOSAL MEETS REVIEW  STANDARDS)  2 for  Administrative  Review  REZONING  1‐7 P & Z AND CC  20  DIMENSIONAL  REQUIREMENTS  VARIANCE  1‐7, 34  BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT  9  * Consult with a Planner about submittal requirements. **    A pre‐application conference with a Planner should be conducted prior to submitting any land use application.  Please call 920‐5090 to schedule a pre‐application conference. P30 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  ATTACHMENT 4 – CONT’D – SUBMITTAL KEY  1.Land Use Application with Applicant’s  name, address and telephone number,  contained within a letter signed by the  applicant stating the name, address and  telephone number of the reprehensive  authorized to act on behalf of the applicant.  2. The Street address and legal description  of the parcel on which development is  proposed to occur.  3. A disclosure of ownership of the parcel on  which development is proposed to occur,  consisting of a current certificate from a title  insurance company, or attorney licensed to  practice in the State of Colorado, listing the  names of all owners of the property, and all  mortgages, judgments, liens, easements,  contacts and agreements affecting the parcel,  and demonstrating the owner’s right to apply  for the Development Application.  4. An 8 ½” X 11” vicinity map locating the  subject parcel within the City of Aspen.  5.A site improvement survey including  topography and vegetation showing the  current status of the parcel certified by a  registered land surveyor, licensed in the State  of Colorado. (This requirement, or any part  thereof, may be waived by the Community  Development Department if the project is  determined not to warrant a survey.)  6.A site plan depicting the proposed layout  and the project’s physical relationship to the  land and its surroundings.  7.A written description of the proposal and  a written explanation of how a proposed  development complies with the review  standards relevant to the development  application.  8.Plan with Existing and proposed grades at  two‐foot contours, with five‐foot intervals for  grades over ten (10) percent.  9.Proposed elevations of the development  10. A description of proposed construction  techniques to be used.  11. A Plan with the 100‐year floodplain line  and the high water line.  12.Accurate elevations (in relation to mean sea level) of the lowest floor, including basement, of  all new or substantially improved structures; a  verification and recordation of the actual  elevation in relation to mean sea level to which  any structure is constructed; a demonstration  that all new construction or substantial  improvements will be anchored to prevent  flotation, collapse or lateral movement of any  structure to be  constructed or improved, a  demonstration that all new construction or  substantial improvements will be anchored to  prevent floatation, collapse or lateral movement  of any structure to be constructed or improved;  a demonstration that the structure will the  lowest floor, including basement, elevated to at  least two (2) feet above the base flood elevation,  all as certified by a registered professional  engineer or architect. 13.A Landscape plan that includes native  vegetative screening of no less than fifty (50)  percent of the development as views from the  rear (slope) of the parcel.  All vegetative  screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and  shall be replaced with the same or comparable  material should it die.  14.Site sections drawn by registered architect,  landscape architect, or engineer shall be  submitted showing all existing and proposed site  elements, the top of slope, and pertinent  elevations above sea level.  15.Proposed elevations of the development,  including any rooftop equipment and how it will  be screened.  16.Proposed elevations of the development  and how it will be screened.  17. A sketch plan of the site showing existing  and proposed features which are relevant to the  review.  18.One (1) inch equals four hundred (400) feet  scale City Map showing the location of the  proposed subdivision, all adjacent lands owned  by or under option to the applicant, commonly  known landmarks, and the zone district in which  the proposed subdivision and adjacent  properties are located.  19. A plat which reflects the layout of the lots,  blocks and structures in the proposed  subdivision. The plat shall be drawn at a scale of  one (1) equals one hundred (100) feet or larger. Architectural scales are not acceptable. Sheet  size shall be twenty‐four (24) inches by thirty‐six  (36) inches. If necessary to place the plat on  more than one (1) sheet, an index shall be  included on the first sheet. A vicinity map shall  also appear on the first sheet showing the Subdivision as it relates to the rest of the city  and the street system in the area of the  proposed subdivision.  The contents of the plat  shall be of sufficient detail to determine whether  the proposed subdivision will meet the design  standards pursuant to Land Use Code Section  26.480.060(3).20. Subdivision GIS data.  20. A Landscape plan showing location, size  and type of proposed landscape features.  21. A subdivision plat which meets the terms of  this chapter, and conform to the requirements  of this title indicating that no further subdivision  may be granted for these lots nor will additional  units be built without receipt of applicable  approvals pursuant to this chapter and growth  management allocation pursuant to Chapter  26.470.  22. The precise wording of any proposed  amendment.  23.Site Plan or plans drawn to a scale of one  (1”) inch equals ten (10”) feet or one (1”) inch  equals twenty (20 ‘) feet, including before and  “after” photographs (simulations) specifying the  location of antennas, support structures,  transmission buildings and/or other necessary  uses, access, parking, fences, signs, lighting,  landscaped areas ad all adjacent land uses within  on‐hundred fifty (150’) feet. Such plans and drawings should demonstrate  compliance with the Review Standards of this  Section.  24.FAA and FCC Coordination. Statements  regarding the regulations of the Federal Aviation  Administration (FAA) and the Federal  Communications Commission (FCC).  25.Structural Integrity Report from a  professional engineer licensed in the State of  Colorado.  26. Evidence that an effort was made to locate  an existing wireless telecommunication services  facility site including coverage/ interference  analysis and capacity analysis and a brief  statement as to other reasons for success or no  success.  28.Neighborhood block plan at 1”=50’  (available from City Engineering Department)  Graphically show the front portions of all  existing buildings on both sides of the block and  their setback from the street in feet.  Identify  parking and front entry for each building and  locate any accessory dwelling units along the  alley. Indicate whether any portion of the  houses immediately adjacent to the subject  parcel are one story (only one living level).         (Continued on next page.)  P31 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT  March, 2017                  City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090  28.Roof Plan. 29. Photographic panorama.   Show elevations of all buildings on both sides of  the block, including present condition of the  subject property.  Label photos and mount  on a presentation board.  30.A Condominium subdivision exemption  plat drawn with permanent ink on  reproducible mylar.  Sheet size shall be  twenty‐four (24 inches by thirty‐six (36)  inches with an unencumbered margin of one  and one‐half ( 1 ½) inches on the left hand  side f the sheet and one‐half (1/2) inch  margin around the other three (3 ) sides of  the sheet pursuant to Land Use Code Section  26.480.090.  31. A description and site plan of the  proposed development including a  statement of the objectives to be achieved  by the PUD and a description of the  proposed land uses, densities, natural  features, traffic and pedestrian circulation,  of‐street parking, open space areas,  infrastructure improvements, and site  drainage.  32. An architectural character plan  generally indicating the use, massing, scale  and orientation of the proposed buildings.  33. A written description of the variance  being requested.  34.Exterior Lighting Plan.  Show the location,  height, type and luminous intensity of each above grade fixture.  Estimate the site illumination as  measured in foot candles and include minimum,  maximum, and average illumination. Additionally, provide comparable examples  already in the community that demonstrate  technique, specification, and/ or light level if they  exist.  P32 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT   March, 2017                                                           City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090    ATTACHMENT 5  DEVELOPMENT REVIEW PROCEDURE    1.     Attend pre‐application conference.   During this one‐on‐one meeting, staff will determine the review process  which applies to your development proposal and will identify the materials necessary to review your application.    2.     Submit Development Application.    Based on your pre‐application meeting, you should respond to the  application package and submit the requested number of copies of the complete application and the application  and the appropriate processing fee to the Community Development Department.    3.   Determination of Completeness.  Within five working days of the date of your submission, staff will review the  application, and will notify you in writing whether the application is complete or if additional materials are  required.  Please be aware that the purpose of the completeness review is to determine whether or not the  information you have submitted is adequate to review the request, and not whether the information is sufficient  to obtain approval.    4.    Staff Review of Development Application.  Once your application is determined to be complete, it will be  reviews by the staff for compliance with the applicable standards of the Code.  During the staff review stage, the  application will be referred to other agencies for comments.  The Planner assigned to your case or the agency may  contact you if additional information is needed or if problems are identified.  A memo will be written by the staff  member for signature by the Community Development Director.  The memo will explain whether your application  complies with the Code and will list any conditions which should apply if the application is to be approved.    Final approval of any Development Application which amends a recorded document, such as a plat, agreement or  deed restriction, will require the applicant to prepare an amended version of that document for review and  approval by staff.  Staff will provide the applicant with the applicable contents for the revised plat, while the City  Attorney is normally in charge of the form for recorded agreements and deed restrictions.  We suggest that you  not go to the trouble or expense of preparing these documents until the staff has determined that your  application is eligible for the requested amendment or exemption.    5.    Board Review of Application.  If a public hearing is required for the land use action that you are requesting,  then the Planning Staff will schedule a hearing date for the application upon determination that the Application is  complete.  The hearing(s) will be scheduled before the appropriate reviewing board(s).  The applicant will be  required to nail notice (one copy provided by the Community Development Department) to property owners  within 30 feet of the subject property and post notice (sign available at the Community Development Department)  of the public hearing on the site at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing date (please see Attachment 6 for  instructions).   The Planning Staff will publish notice of the hearing in the paper for land use requests that require  publication.    The Planning Staff will then formulate a recommendation on the land use request and draft a memo to the  reviewing board(s).  Staff will supply the Applicant with a copy of the Planning Staff’s memo approximately 5 days  prior to the hearing.  The public hearing(s) will take place before the appropriate review boards.  Public Hearings  include a presentation by the Planning Staff, a presentation by the Applicant (optional), consideration of public  comment, and the reviewing board’s questions and decision.  (Continued on next page)    P33 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT   March, 2017                                                           City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090      6.    Issuance of Development Order.  If the land use review is approved, then the Planning Staff will issue a  Development Order which allows the Applicant to proceed into Building Permit Application.    7.    Receipt of Building Permit.  Once you have received a copy of the signed staff approval, you may proceed to  building permit review.  During this time, your project will be examined for its compliance with the Uniform  Building Code.  It will also be checked for compliance with applicable provisions of the Land Use Regulations which  were not reviewed  in detail during the one step review (this might include a check of floor area ratios, setbacks,  parking, open space and the like).  Fees for water, sewer, parks and employee housing will be collected if due.  Any  document required to be recorded, such as a plat, deed restriction or agreement, will be reviewed and recorded  before a Building Permit is submitted.                                                                                P34 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT   March, 2017                                                           City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090        ATTACHMENT 6    PUBLIC HEARING NOTICING REQUIREMENTS      The forms of notice are required by the   Aspen Land Use Regulations:  publication in the newspaper, posting of the property, and surrounding landowners.    Following is a summary of the public notice requirements, including identification of who is responsible for  completing the notice.    1.  Publication ‐ Publication of notice in a paper of general circulation on the City of Aspen is to be done at  least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.  The legal notice will be written by the Community Development  Department and will place the notice in the paper within the appropriate deadline.    2. Posting ‐ Posting of a sign in a conspicuous place on the property is to be done fifteen (15) days prior to  the hearing.  It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain a copy of the sign from the Community Development  Department, to fill it in correctly and bring proof to the hearing that posting took place (use attached affidavit)    3. Mailing – Mailing of notice is to be made to all owners of property within 300 feet of the subject  development parcel by the applicant.  It is the applicant’s responsibility to obtain a copy of the notice from the  Community Development Department, to mail it according to the following standards, and to bring proof to the  hearing that the mailing took place (use the attached affidavit).    Notice to mineral Estate Owner.  An applicant for surface Development shall notify affected mineral estate owners  by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application for  development.  The applicant shall certify that the notice has been provided to the mineral estate owners.    The names and addresses of property owners shall be those in the current tax records of Pitkin County as they  appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of public hearing.                              P35 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT   March, 2017                                                           City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090    AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE  REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE    ADDRESS OF PROPERTY:  _____________________________________________________, Aspen, CODE     SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE:  _____________________________________________, 20______.    STATE OF COLORADO        )                                                  )   ss.  County of Pitkin                  )    I, ____________________________________________________ (name, please print) being  or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with  the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner:    _______      Publication of notice:    By the publication in the legal notice section of an official            Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days                        prior to the public hearing.  A copy of the publication is attached hereto.    _______     Posting of notice:   By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the                        Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof                       Materials, which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty‐six (26)                       Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height.                        Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the                     _______ day of ______________________, 20____, to and including the date and                        time of the public hearing.  A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached        hereto:    _______      Mailing of notice.  By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development                        Department, which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2) of                       The Aspen Land Use Code.  At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice                       was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of                       property subject to the development application.  The names and addresses of         property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they         appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing.  A copy          of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto.     ________    Neighborhood Outreach:   Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized                         and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section            26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach.  A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary,            including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was          presented to the public is attached hereto.      (Continued on next page)             P36 VI.A. CITY OF ASPEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT   March, 2017                                                           City of Apen|130 S. Galena St.|(970) 920 5090      _______      Mineral Estate Owner Notice.  By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested,           To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled            for the initial public hearing on the application of development.            the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax             tax records of Pitkin County.  At a minimum, Subdivision, Spas or PUDs that create more            than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are             subject to this notices requirement.    _______       Rezoning or text amendment.  Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be            changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, to whenever             the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title          and enactment of  new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate          survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names           and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be           waived.   However, the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior           to the public hearing on such amendments.              _____________________________________            Signature    The foregoing “Affidavit Notice” was acknowledged before me this _______ day    of _____________________________, 20 ____, by _____________________________________.                WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL                                    My commission expires: _____________              _________________________________            Notary Public                      ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE:   COPY OF THE PUBLICATION   PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES  (SIGN)   LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED  BY MAIL   APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED  AS REQIURES BY C.R.S §24‐65.5‐103.3  P37 VI.A. MEMORANDUM OF OWNERSHIP-ACCOMMODATION NO LIABILITY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., A DULY LICENSED TITLE INSURANCE AGENT IN THE STATE OF COLORADO. BY EXAMINATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, DISCLOSES THE FOLLOWING: GRANTEE IN THE LAST INSTRUMENT OF CONVEYANCE RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. DEED OF TRUST APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE LIENS AND JUDGMENTS (AGAINST LAST GRANTEE) APPARENTLY UNRELEASED NONE THIS INFORMATION IS FOR YOUR SOLE USE AND BENEFIT AND IS FURNISHED AS AN ACCOMMODATION. THE INFORMATION HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM THE PUBLIC RECORDS, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO, OR EXAMINATION OF, INSTRUMENTS WHICH PURPORTS TO AFFECT THE REAL PROPERTY. THE INFORMATION IS NEITHER GUARANTEED NOR CERTIFIED, AND IS NOT AN ABSTRACT OF TITLE, OPINION OF TITLE, NOR A GUARANTY OF TITLE, AND OUR LIABILITY IS LIMITED TO THE AMOUNT CHARGED FOR THIS REPORT. EFFECTIVE DATE: November 27, 2017 PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. BY: Authorized Officer JOB NO: ACCOM2818 P38 VI.A. PROFORMA TITLE REPORT SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: November 27, 2017 at 8:00 AM Case No. ACCOM2818 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: Proposed Insured: PROFORMA 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment is at the effective date hereof vested in: RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC, A TEXAS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, ASPEN, CO. 81611 970-925-1766 Phone/970-925-6527 Fax 877-217-3158 Toll Free AUTHORIZED AGENT Countersigned: P39 VI.A. SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS THIS REPORT IS FURNISHED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, IT IS NOT A CONTRACT TO ISSUE TITLE INSURANCE AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED AS SUCH. IN THE EVENT A PROPOSED INSURED IS NAMED THE COMPANY HEREBY RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND/OR EXCEPTIONS AS DEEMED NECESSARY. THE RECIPIENT OF THIS INFORMATIONAL REPORT HEREBY AGREES THAT THE COMPANY HAS ISSUED THIS REPORT BY THEIR REQUEST AND ALTHOUGH WE BELIEVE ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS ACCURATE AND CORRECT, THE COMPANY SHALL NOT BE CHARGED WITH ANY FINANCIAL LIABILITY SHOULD THAT PROVE TO BE INCORRECT AND THE COMPANY IS NOT OBLIGATED TO ISSUE ANY POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE P40 VI.A. SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Right of the proprietor of a vein or lode to extract or remove his ore therefrom, should the same be found to penetrate or intersect the premises hereby granted as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 17, 1889 in Book 55 at Page 5. 8. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Plat of subject property recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. 9. Those terms, conditions, provisions, obligations, easements, restrictions, assessments and all matters as set forth in Protective Covenants for Black Birch Estates recorded June 22, 1967 in Book 227 at Page 452 and by First Amendment to Protective Covenants recorded January 30, 1992 in Book 668 at Page 215. , deleting therefrom any restrictions indicating any preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin. 10. Terms, conditions, provisions, obligations and all matters as set forth in the Articles of Incorporation of Black Birch Estates Homeowners Association, Inc. recorded February 23, 1987 in Book 530 at Page 103 and in Book 530 at Page 105. 11. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations as set forth in Letter recorded November 22, 1996 as Reception No. 399318. 12. Easements, rights of way and all matters as disclosed on Stream Margin Review Survey of subject property recorded November 12, 1997 in Plat Book 44 at Page 1. 13. Encroachments and all matters as disclosed by Survey of Aspen Survey Engineers, Inc. dated April 2017 as Job No. 2101D. (Continued) P41 VI.A. SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS - (Continued) 14. Any question, dispute or adverse claim as to any loss or gain of land as a result of any change in the river bed location by other than natural causes, or alteration through accretion, relict ion, erosion or avulsion of the center thread, bank, channel or flow of waters in the Roaring Fork River and/or Castle Creek lying within subject land; and any question as to the location of such center thread, bed, bank, bed or channel as a legal description monument or marker for the purposes of describing or locating subject lands. NOTE: There are no documents in the land records of the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of Pitkin County, Colorado accurately locating past or present location(s) of the center thread, bank, bed, or channel of the above River or indicating any alterations of the same as from time to time may have occurred. AND Any rights, interest or easements in favor of the riparian owners, the State of Colorado, The United States of America, or the general public, which exist, have existed, or are claimed to exist in and over the waters and present and past bed and banks of the Roaring Fork River and/or Castle Creek. P42 VI.A. PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. 601 E. HOPKINS, THIRD FLOOR ASPEN, CO 81611 970-925-1766/970-925-6527 FAX TOLL FREE 877-217-3158 WIRING INSTRUCTIONS FOR ALL TRANSACTIONS REGARDING THE CLOSING OF THIS FILE ARE AS FOLLOWS: ALPINE BANK-ASPEN 600 E. HOPKINS AVE. ASPEN, CO. 81611 ABA ROUTING NO. 102103407 FOR CREDIT TO: PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., ESCROW ACCOUNT ACCOUNT NO. 8910 354 425 REFERENCE:ACCOM2818/PROFORMA P43 VI.A. FORUM PHI I Consent and Authorization to Represent Date: August '14,2017 Client: Riverfront Fork LLC Client Address: 1401 Ballinger Street, Fort Worth, TX76107 City of Aspen Community Development Department 130 South Galena Street, 3rd Floor Aspen, Colorado 8161 1 Re: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Director, This letter shall serve as my approval for Riverfront Fork LLC (represented by Forum Phi) to apply for and submit land use applications, building permit applications, and subsequent documentation for the property at 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. I authorize Forum Phi to subm¡t, represent and obtain materials on the behalf of the owner of 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. I hereby authorize Steev Wils.on and Forum Phi to perform and submit documents related to planning, Building Permit Application, or to gain building file information on our behalf for the project located at 1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611. They may represent us during the application review and approval processes. They may act on our behalf, may sign on our behalf all applications and permits, and any documents required or ancillary thereto. Steev Wilson, Partner, AIA Forum Phi Architecture 715 W Main Street, Suite #204 Aspen, CO 81 61 1 Sincerely, t2 Date Riverfront Fork LLC forumphl.com I p.970.279.4109 I f. 866.770.5585 Aspen:715 W- Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt:104 M¡dland Ave, #202 Basall, CO 81621 P44 VI.A. Permit No CovI IvI u Iv ITY DEVELoPM ENT DepRRrv¡ e rur Homeowner Association Gompliance Policy All applications for a building permit within the City of Aspen are required to include a certification of compliance with applicable covenants and homeowner association policies. The certification must be siqned bv the properlv owner or Attornev representinq the propeñv owner. The following certification shall accompany the application for a permit. Subject Property 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 8161 1 l, the property owner, certify as follows: (pick one) I fn¡r property is not subject to a homeowners association or other form of private covenant. This property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit do not require approval by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. n ff i" property is subject to a homeowners association or private covenant and the improvements proposed in this building permit have been approved by the homeowners association or covenant beneficiary. I understand the City of Aspen does not interpret, enforce, or manage the applicability, meaning or effect of private covenants or homeowner association rules or bylaws. I understand that this document is a public document. Owner signature: Owner printed na or, Attorney signature: Attorney printed name date date November,2014 Cityof Aspen | 130S. Galena St. | (970)920-5090 X 12-21-2017 P45 VI.A. Beth Held <eheld@forumphi.com> 1130 black Birch  Bill Gruenberg <w.gruenberg@comcast.net>Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:30 PM To: Beth Held <eheld@forumphi.com> Cc: "Darrell C. Morrow" <dcmorrow@comcast.net>, robt schultz <rjsasp1@gmail.com>   Dear Ms. Held, I have reviewed the plans that you sent on 15 and 18 December, 2017 showing the location of the above ground and below ground levels in relation to the boundaries of the lot at 1130 Black Birch Drive and the Black Birch and City of Aspen set back lines and based in large part to the approval by the owners of the lots on the South and North sides of such lot approve such plans, as amended to limit roof overhang to 18 inches on the North side, on behalf of the Black Birch Homeowners Association for the purpose of authorizing you to proceed with your plan to conduct a stream margin review of the planned construction on this lot.   The Black Birch homeowners continue to be highly motivated to prevent parking on the streets of Black Birch Estates and plan to assert their rights to prevent any unacceptable use of such streets for parking of vehicles related to the proposed construction. The approval given above is without prejudice of their rights to contest any such parking.   Thank you for your fine efforts to achieve the foregoing approval of your plans.   Sincerely,   William Gruenberg President of Black Birch Homeowners association 12/18/2017     P46 VI.A. forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 FORUM PHI | Description of Proposal Special Review and Stream Margin Review | 1130 Black Birch Drive Project Information Street Address: 1130 Black Birch Drive Legal Description: Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision Parcel ID #: 273501307009 Applicant: Owner’s Authorized Agent, Steev Wilson at Forum Phi, 715 W Main, Ste 204, Aspen CO 81611 Owner: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1401 Ballinger St, Fort Worth TX 76107 Project Description The subject site is a 20,171 +/- SF parcel located at the confluence of the Roaring Fork River and Castle Creek (the “Property”) and lies within the Residential (R-30) zone district. The applicant is requesting a one-step review: special review for the determination of the a newly established top of slope and 15’ offset from top of slope, as determined by the surveyor and approved by the City of Aspen Engineering Department, stream margin review for proposed development because the property is within 100 feet of the high-water line, and RDS Variation Review. All stream margin review standards will use the newly established top of slope. The parcel contains an existing single-family residence of 3,013.75 +/- square feet, an existing garage of 363.25 +/- square feet, and existing deck of 580.5 +/- square feet. These existing conditions make up a gross area of 3,377 +/- square feet. The existing house is located outside of the 15’ top of slope setback, however, the existing deck does encroach into this setback. Both the existing detached garage and the existing home extend into the side yard setbacks. The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing 3,377 +/- square feet residence for a new 9488.25 +/- square feet residence with 560 +/- square feet of deck and 180 +/- square feet of front porch. The proposed structure and all associated construction will take place outside of the 15’ top of slope setback. All trees and vegetation within 15’ from the top of slope will be protected during construction and restored to native vegetation. The proposed residence will meet the stream margin height limit as determined by a 45-degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope, as shown in the plan set on pages Z-401 through Z-404. P47 VI.A. forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 FORUM PHI | Land Use Code Responses Special Review and Stream Margin Review | 1130 Black Birch Drive 26.430 Special Review 26.430.010. Purpose The purpose of special review is to ensure site-specific review of certain dimensional requirements, mitigation requirements, encroachments, lighting or subdivision standards, which are specifically authorized to be altered or amended by specific provisions of this Title in order to maintain the integrity of the City’s Zone Districts and the compatibility of the proposed development with surrounding land uses. The applicant is requesting Special Review for the determination of the top of slope, as identified on the provided survey. All other dimensional requirements identified by section 26.710 Zone Districts will remain. The proposed design replaces a non- conforming structure, as the existing garage, home, and deck are located in the side yard setbacks and will be demolished. 26.430.040. Review Standards for Special Review. No development subject to special review shall be permitted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all standards and requirements set forth [in this section]. A. Dimensional Requirements. Whenever the dimensional requirements of a proposed development are subject to special review, the development application shall only be approved if the following conditions are met: 1. The mass, height, density, configuration, amount of open space, landscaping and setbacks of the proposed development are designed in a matter which is compatible with or enhances the character of surrounding land uses and is consistent with the purposes of the underlying zone district. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 2. The applicant demonstrates that the proposed development will not have adverse impacts on surrounding uses or will mitigate those impacts, including but not limited to the effects of shading, excess traffic, availability of parking in the neighborhood or blocking of a designated view plane. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review C. Stream Margin Review Standards. No development shall be permitted within the stream margin of the Roaring Fork River unless the Community Development Director makes a determination that the proposed development complies with all requirements set forth below: 1. It can be demonstrated that any proposed development which is in the Special Flood Hazard Area will not increase the base flood elevation on the parcel proposed for development. This shall be demonstrated by an engineering study prepared by a professional engineer registered to practice in the State which shows that the base flood elevation will not be raised, including but not limited to, proposing mitigation techniques on or off-site which compensate for any base flood elevation increase caused by the development; and P48 VI.A. 2 There will be no increase to the base flood elevation due to no proposed structures or grading will occur inside the 100 year floodplain as field located by the project surveyor. 2. The adopted regulatory plans of the Open Space and Trails Board and the Roaring Fork River Greenway Plan are implemented in the proposed plan for development, to the greatest extent practicable. Areas of historic public use or access shall be dedicated via a recorded easement for public use. A fisherman’s easement granting public fishing access within the high water boundaries of the river course shall be granted via a recorded “Fisherman’s Easement”; and Not applicable – no adopted regulatory plans are applied to the property. 3. There is no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes (cut and fill) made outside of a specifically defined building envelope. A building envelope shall be designated by this review and said envelope shall be recorded on a plat pursuant to Subsection 26.435.040.F.1.; and There will be no vegetation removed or damaged or slope grade changes made outside of the defined building envelope. See Sheets Z-003 and Z-004 for proposed site plan and proposed construction management plan. 4. The proposed development does not pollute or interfere with the natural changes of the river, stream or other tributary, including erosion and/or sedimentation during construction. Increased on-site drainage shall be accommodated within the parcel to prevent entry into the river or onto its banks. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained outside of the designated building envelope; and Sedimentation during construction will be mitigated in accordance with an erosion control plan for the site that will use BMPs as necessary to insure all runoff generated on site will be captured and treated for sediment removal. Drainage developed onsite due to increased impervious area will be treated and detained in accordance with The City of Aspen Urban Runoff Management Plan. Pools and hot tubs will not be drained into the storm sewer system. 5. Written notice is given to the Colorado Water Conservation Board prior to any alteration or relocation of a water course and a copy of said notice is submitted to the Federal Emergency Management Agency; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 6. A guarantee is provided in the event a water course is altered or relocated, that applies to the developer and his heirs, successors and assigns that ensures that the flood carrying capacity on the parcel is not diminished; and The proposed development will not alter or relocate the existing water course. 7. Copies are provided of all necessary federal and state permits relating to work within the 100-year flood plain; and The proposed development is not required to obtain federal or state permits, as no work is occurring within the 100-year flood plain, as defined by the City of Aspen Flood Specialist and Civil Engineer, Hailey Guglielmo, EIT. P49 VI.A. 3 8. There is no development other than approved native vegetation taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope or the high waterline, whichever is most restrictive. This is an effort to protect the existing riparian vegetation and bank stability. New plantings (including trees, shrubs, flowers, and grasses) outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved by the City. A landscape plan will be submitted with all development applications. The top of slope and 100-year flood plain elevation of the Roaring Fork River shall be determined by the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed at the City Engineering Department; and There is no development taking place below the top of slope or within fifteen (15) feet of the top of slope, as it is more restrictive than the high waterline. All existing vegetation and bank stability will be protected. New plantings outside of the designated building envelope on the river side shall be native riparian vegetation as approved be the City. See Sheet L-001 for landscape plan. The site in its entirety currently sits within the top of slope per the Stream Margin Map. The applicant is requesting a Special Review for a top of slope determination, as identified by our surveyor. See survey and floodplain exhibit. 9. All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Community Development Director using the definition for height set forth at Section 26.04.100 and method of calculating height set forth at Section 26.575.020 as shown in Figure “A”; and All development outside the fifteen (15) foot setback from the top of slope does not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a forty-five (45) degree angle from the ground level at the top of slope. See Sheets Z-202, Z- 204, Z-301, Z-302, and Z-303. 10. All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. A lighting plan will be submitted with all development applications; and All exterior lighting is low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the river or located down the slope and shall be in compliance with Section 26.575.150. See landscape plan for exterior lighting plan Sheet L-001 and for exterior lighting specs see Sheet L-002. 11. There has been accurate identification of wetlands and riparian zones. Not applicable – there are no wetlands or riparian zones located on the developable area of the property. 26.435.040 Stream Margin Review E. Special review. An application requesting a variance from the stream margin review standards or an appeal of the Stream Margin Map's top of slope determination, shall be processed as a special review in accordance with common development review procedure set forth in Chapter 26.304. The special review shall be considered at a public hearing for which notice has P50 VI.A. 4 been published, posted and mailed, pursuant to Subsection 26.304.060.E.3 Paragraphs a, b and c. Review is by the Planning and Zoning Commission. A special review from the stream margin review determination may be approved, approved with conditions or denied based on conformance with the following review criteria: 1. An authorized survey from a Colorado professionally licensed surveyor shows a different determination in regards to the top of slope and 100-year flood plain than the Stream Margin Map located in the Community Development Department and filed in the City Engineering Department; and Please see attached Survey for top of slope determination and the attached Floodplain Exhibit for 100-year floodplain determination. 2. The proposed development meets the stream margin review standard(s) upon which the Community Development Director had based the finding of denial. The applicant meets all requirements of this standard. 26.410 Residential Design Standards 26.410.020. Procedures for Review C. Variations. Any application that does not receive Administrative Review approval described above may apply for a variation, pursuant to Section 26.304.030, Common Development Procedures. An applicant may also choose to apply directly for a variation if desired. The Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, during a duly noticed public hearing, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny an application for variation, based on the standards of review in Section 26.410.020.D, Variation Review Standards. A variation from the Residential Design Standards does not grant an approval to vary other standards of this Chapter that may be provided by another decision-making body. The review process is as follows: Step One – Public Hearing before Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission. 1. Purpose: To determine if the application meets the review standards for Residential Design Standard variation. 2. Process: The Community Development Director shall provide the Planning and Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, as applicable, with a recommendation to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application, based on the standards of review. The Planning and Zoning Commission, or Historic Preservation Commission if the property is designated or is located within a historic district, shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny the application after considering the recommendation of the Community Development Director and comments and testimony from the public at a duly noticed public hearing. 3. Standards of review: The proposal shall comply with the review standards of Section 26.410.020.D, Variation Review Standards. 4. Form of decision: The decision shall be by resolution. P51 VI.A. 5 5. Notice requirements: Posting, Mailing and Publication pursuant to Subparagraph 26.304.060.E.3.a), b) and c). D. Variation Review Standards. An application requesting a variation from the Residential Design Standards shall demonstrate and the deciding board shall find that the variation, if granted would: 1. Provide an alternative design approach that meets the overall intent of the standard as indicated in the intent statement for that standard, as well as the general intent statements in Section 26.410.010.A.1-3; or Seeking a variance for 26.410.030.E.2.c – Window Placement The intent of this standard is to prevent large expanses of glazing on a street facing façade and to help differentiate stories. The variance requested is for one singular window with minimal prominence on the far side of the front façade. The window occupies less than 5% of the street facing façade. The window spans twelve (12) feet as opposed to the ten (10) foot maximum per RDS. The proposed structure is a single story residence that has twelve-foot ceiling heights on the north facing facade with floor to ceiling windows to capture natural light due to the heavily shaded nature of the lot and solar orientation. The single-story element has a plate height of twelve (12) feet, with no second story above. 2. Be clearly necessary for reasons of fairness related to unusual site-specific constraints. The proposed residence is located outside of the infill area on a private street with no sidewalks and minimal traffic, where the front yard setback is twenty-five (25) feet, but the proposed window is located approximately forty-four (44) feet from the property line and fifty-five (55) feet from the edge of street pavement. In-between the edge of the existing street and the proposed window is existing vegetation that will help screen the window from the street. The front façade of the home has a moderate orientation to the street which helps minimize prominence. From the street elevation to the elevation of the window, the window’s base elevation is depressed 2-3 feet, giving the proposed window a lower perceived height. P52 VI.A. forumphi.com | p. 970.279.4109 | f. 866.770.5585 Aspen: 715 W. Main St, #204 Aspen, CO 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81621 Pitkin Maps & More 4,800 800.0 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet0800.0400.00 Notes THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 9:37 AM 07/20/17 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com State Highway Road Centerline 4K Primary Road Secondary Road Service Road Full Address Parcel Boundary Rivers and Creeks Continuous Intermittent River, Lake or Pond Town Boundary Federal Land Boundary BLM State of Colorado USFS FORUM PHI | Vicinity Map 1130 Black Birch Drive, Stream Margin Review Pitkin Maps & More 23,018 3,836.3 Legend 1: WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere Feet03,836.31,918.14 Notes THIS MAP IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. Pitkin County GIS makes no warranty or guarantee concerning the completeness, accuracy, or reliability of the content represented. Map Created on 11:52 AM 07/24/17 at http://www.pitkinmapsandmore.com Rivers and Creeks Continuous Intermittent River, Lake or Pond PROJECT SITE P53 VI.A. Residential Design Standards Administrative Review Section 26.410.020.B. of the Land Use Code requires an Administrative Review for compliance with the Residential Design Standards (RDS) for all residential projects, unless otherwise exempted pursuant to Section 26.410.010.C. All residential projects shall submit for RDS Administrative Review prior to building permit submittal. If exterior work is proposed, and the scope of work meets one of the exemptions listed above, staff shall provide a signed exemption form to be included in the building permit application. Review Process: The Community Development Department staff shall review an application for applicability and compliance with Chapter 26.410, Residential Design Standards. If the application complies with all applicable standards as written, a signed Checklist and stamped plan set shall be provided to the applicant to be included with building permit submission. If the application does not comply with one or more applicable standards, an unsigned Checklist and redlined plan set shall be emailed to the applicant including comments from staff on which standard(s) the application does not comply with and a description of why the standard(s) is not compliant. The applicant shall be provided the opportunity to revise and resubmit the design in response to the comments. Staff will keep an application open for 30 days from the date an unsigned Checklist is emailed to the applicant. If after such time no revisions are submitted, the application will expire. Application for RDS Administrative Review: An application for RDS Administrative Review that DOES NOT require Alternative Compliance (see Page 2) shall be submitted to the Community Development front desk on a USB drive or emailed to justin.barker@cityofaspen.com. Applicants shall be notified of complete/incomplete application by email. Certain application requirements may be waived by staff depending on the scope of work. An application for RDS Administrative Review shall include the following documents in digital format: • Proof of ownership (no older than 6 months from submittal date) • Representative authorization letter from owner • Site improvement survey certified by a registered land surveyor (no older than one year from submittal date) • Site plan (scaled 24”x36”) • Floor plans (scaled 24”x36”) • Elevations (scaled 24”x36”) • Complete scope of work noting all areas affected by the proposed project • Complete RDS applicant checklist (attached) addressing how each standard is met with sheet references for each standard Page 1 of 2P54 VI.A. Alternative Compliance or Variation: Pursuant to 26.410.020.C, projects that do not meet the criteria for Administrative Review or Alternative Compliance (as determined by staff) may be reviewed by the Planning & Zoning Commission, or HPC if appropriate, at the applicant’s request. An applicant may choose to apply directly for a variation from the Planning & Zoning Commission or Historic Preservation Commission, pursuant to Chapter 26.410.020.C. A pre-application summary will be required for an Alternative Compliance or variation request. Application for Alternative Compliance or variation: An application for Alternative Compliance or a variation will require a pre-application summary provided by Community Development staff, and shall be submitted as a Land Use Application. Required application submittal items shall be outlined in the pre-application summary. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Review P55VI.A. Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2P56 VI.A. Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex P57VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-CVR COVER 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision Aspen CO 81611 1130 Black Birch Dr. BUILDING PERMIT & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM: NFPA 13D CODE EDITIONS: 2015 IRC, 2015 IMC, 2015 IECC, 2015 IPC, 2015 IFGC, 2017 NEC RDS REVIEW Residential Design Standards compliance must be reviewed and approved prior to submission for building permit. Reviewed and Approved for Permit Submission: Community Development Department Date: BUILDING PERMIT NUMBER ____________________ CITY OF ASPEN MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 8P58 VI.A. P59VI.A. P60VI.A. HWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W WWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G GGGG GGGGGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTV CTV CTV T T T T T T T T T T T EX-U E EX-UEEX-UECTVCTVEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S S S WV DYH W OSW EG I I 15.10 '9.00'17.20 '16.00'9.00 '19.90'4.80 '19.60'4.00 '6.30'26.20 '15.90'22.40 '25.20'2.70 '7.50'5.66'20.30'18.30 ' 20.30'18.30 ' N 85°08'41" E 1 9 4 . 9 0 'S 07°27'00" W 130.00'N 87°04'23" W 1 5 2 . 6 4 'N 13°23'00" W 107.55'9.9'66'5.6'43.6' STONE WALK IRR. CONTROL BOX (TYP.) TIE BORDER (TYP.) GASLINE STONE WALK BRIDGE 18" CMP II EL=7751.4' 18" CMP IO EL=7750.9' STONE WALK TIE STEPS TIE BORDER (TYP.)20' DITCH EASEMENTFLOWLINE DITCH 20'GASLINE (TYP.)WATERLINE (TYP .)SEWERLINE (TYP.)CABLE TV (TYP . ) ELECTRIC LINE (TYP.) TEL E P H O N E L I N E ( T Y P . ) SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAME GARAGE LOT 13 20,171 S.F.± PER PLAT 20,253 S.F.± CALC. MULTI LEVEL WOOD FRAME HOUSE 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE STONE BORDERTREX DECK F.F. DECK EL=7751.8' F.F. EL=7752.7' CHIMNEY EL=7782.5' RIDGE EL=7778.1' F.F. EL=7752.7' F.F. EL=7753.8' ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 10' HEADGATE P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 TBM EL=7755.51' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 52'W.C. #5 REBAR BEARS S82°55'48"W 50.56' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #2376 TELE. PED. SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYD. SEWER MANHOLE SEWER MANHOLE POWER POLE OVERHEAD E L E C T R I C TOP BANK EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 CAST L E C R E E K ROARING FORK RIVERCONFLUENCE GAS METER WATER SERVICE 10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 10'15' SETBACK FROM TOP BANK 15'10'10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 7750775 5 775 6 7755775077457745775077507746 19 2 9 7751 19 8 8 77 4 7 1 9 2 9 77 5 2 1 9 8 8 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA PANEL 08097C0203C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA PANEL 08097C0203C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 APPROX HIGH WATER MARK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT BK 3 PG 244 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE30' R-O-WASPHALTTRACT C LOT 14 LOT 8 PITKIN RESERVE OPEN SPACE 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA C.O.A. GPS #10S44°57'37"W1805.01'C.O.A. GPS S-159 N37°49 '33 "W2716.44 ' SEWER SERVICE PER ACSD T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15 T16 T17 T18T19 T20 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27 T28 T29 T30 T31 T32 T33 T34 T35 T36 SLOPE TABLE NUMBER 1 2 3 4 MIN. SLOPE 0.001% 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% MAX. SLOPE 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% 3000.000% COLOR 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com SNW E P e a k Surv ey ing, Inc. Since 20 0 7 17054 1 OF 1 RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IMPROVEMENT AND TOPO SURVEY LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE JRN JRN SEPT 24, 2017 054.DWG 1 12/06/17 UPDATE SURVEY JRN 2 12/15/17 UPDATE SURVEY JRN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY PEAK SURVEYING, INC. FOR RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE, SEPTEMBER 22, 2017, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. I FURTHER STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24994W, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 23, 2017 AND FIND ALL EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ERROR OF CLOSURE FOR THIS SURVEY IS LESS THAN 1:15,000. BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. NOTES: 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24994W, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 23, 2017. 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 22, 2017. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S87°04'23"E BETWEEN THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THE 52' WITNESS CORNER TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE BLACK BIRCH ESTATES FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7755.51'' ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13 AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-30 ACCORDING TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION. N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Peak Surveying , I nc.010 10 20 405 SUBJECT PROPERTY VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000'COLORAD O L ICEN S E DPROF E S SIONAL L A N D SURV EYORJASON R . N EI L37935 12/15/17P61 VI.A. HWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W WWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G GGGG GGGGGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTV CTV CTV T T T T T T T T T T T EX-U E EX-UEEX-UECTVCTVEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S S S WV DYH W OSW EG I I 15.10 '9.00'17.20 '16.00'9.00 '19.90'4.80 '19.60'4.00 '6.30'26.20 '15.90'22.40 '25.20'2.70 '7.50'5.66'20.30'18.30 ' 20.30'18.30 ' N 85°08'41" E 1 9 4 . 9 0 'S 07°27'00" W 130.00'N 87°04'23" W 1 5 2 . 6 4 'N 13°23'00" W 107.55'9.9'66'5.6'43.6' STONE WALK IRR. CONTROL BOX (TYP.) TIE BORDER (TYP.) GASLINE STONE WALK BRIDGE 18" CMP II EL=7751.4' 18" CMP IO EL=7750.9' STONE WALK TIE STEPS TIE BORDER (TYP.)20' DITCH EASEMENTFLOWLINE DITCH 20'GASLINE (TYP.)WATERLINE (TYP .)SEWERLINE (TYP.)CABLE TV (TYP . ) ELECTRIC LINE (TYP.) TEL E P H O N E L I N E ( T Y P . ) SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAME GARAGE LOT 13 20,171 S.F.± MULTI LEVEL WOOD FRAME HOUSE 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE STONE BORDERTREX DECK F.F. DECK EL=7751.8' F.F. EL=7752.7' CHIMNEY EL=7782.5' RIDGE EL=7778.1' F.F. EL=7752.7' F.F. EL=7753.8' ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 10' HEADGATE P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 TBM EL=7755.51' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 52'W.C. #5 REBAR BEARS S82°55'48"W 50.56' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #2376 TELE. PED. SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYD. SEWER MANHOLE SEWER MANHOLE POWER POLE OVERHEAD E L E C T R I C TOP BANK EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 CAST L E C R E E K ROARING FORK RIVERCONFLUENCE GAS METER WATER SERVICE 10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 10'15' SETBACK FROM TOP BANK 15'10'10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 7750775 5 775 6 7755775077457745775077507746 19 2 9 7751 19 8 8 77 4 7 1 9 2 9 77 5 2 1 9 8 8 CW 18" 15' 7754.6' BS 14" 15' 7753.1' BS 20" 15' 7752.4' CW 18" 15' 7753.2' CW 18" 15' 7748.1' CW 18" 15' 7751.7' CW 10" 15' 7748.5' CW 18" 15' 7751.5' CW 18" 15' 7750.1' CW 12" 15' 7749.9'CW 16" 15' 7750.3' CW 18" 16' 7751.8' CW 14" 12' 7747.1' CW 18" 20' 7749.7' CW 14" 12' 7750.0' CW 16" 12' 7749.9' CW 14" 12' 7750.8' ASPEN 14" 12' 7751.5' CW 16" 15' 7749.5' CW 18" 15' 7750.5' CW 18" 15' 7749.8' CW 24" 15' 7750.6' CW 16" 15' 7749.8' CW 16" 15' 7749.4' CW 18" 15' 7751.1' APPROX HIGH WATER MARK CW 20" 15' 7751.4' CW 20" 15' 7752.3'CW 20" 15' 7752.6' CW 18" 12' 7753.2' CW 18" 20' 7753.2' CW 18" 20' 7753.1'CW 18" 20' 7752.5' CW 16" 15' 7752.1' CW 18" 20' 7752.1' CW 14" 15' 7751.6' 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT BK 3 PG 244 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE30' R-O-WASPHALTTRACT C LOT 14 LOT 8 PITKIN RESERVE OPEN SPACE CW 18" 15' 7749.8' 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA C.O.A. GPS #10S44°57'37"W1805.01'C.O.A. GPS S-159 N37°49 '33 "W2716.44 ' SEWER SERVICE PER ACSD 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS SLOPE TABLE NUMBER 1 2 3 4 MIN. SLOPE 0.001% 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% MAX. SLOPE 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% 3000.000% COLOR 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com SNW E P e a k Surv ey ing, Inc. Since 20 0 7 17054 1 OF 1 RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE JRN JRN SEPT 24, 2017 054.DWG FLOODPLAIN EXHIBIT LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. NOTES: 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24994W, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 23, 2017. 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 22, 2017. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S87°04'23"E BETWEEN THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THE 52' WITNESS CORNER TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE BLACK BIRCH ESTATES FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7755.51'' ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13 AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-30 ACCORDING TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION. 8) THE 100 FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS AS SHOWN IS BASED ON CROSS SECTIONS ON THE FEMA FIRM PANEL 08097C0203C, DATED EFFECTIVE JUNE 04, 1987. PSI HAS RAISED CROSS SECTION ELEVATIONS SHOWN 5.31 FEET FROM NGVD 29 DATUM 5.31 FEET TO NAVD 88 DATUM AS SHOWN ON NGS DATA SHEET Q-159 TO MATCH SITE TOPOGRAPHY. PSI INTERPOLATED BETWEEN CROSS SECTIONS AND CREATED THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN AS SHOWN AT THE REQUEST OF THE CLIENT AND COA ENGINEERING. N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Peak Surveying , I nc.010 10 20 405 SUBJECT PROPERTY VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000'COLORA D O L ICE N S E DPROF E S SIONAL L A N D SURV EYORJASON R . N EI L37935 10/26/17 SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I, JASON R. NEIL, DO HEREBY STATE THAT THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY PEAK SURVEYING, INC. FOR RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC., THAT SAID SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND RESPONSIBLE CHARGE AND THAT IT IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE. BY:__________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935P62 VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-001 ZONING SUMMARY 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision 1130 Black Birch Dr. Proposed Development Single Family New Construction Parcel ##273-501-307-009 Zone District R-30 Setbacks Existing Allowed (Principal)Allowed (Accessory)Proposed (Principal)Proposed (Accessory)Reference Front 25'25'30'25'N/A 26.710.080 Rear 15'15'5'15'N/A 26.710.080 Combined Front/Rear 40'40'35'40'N/A 26.710.080 Side 10'10'10'10'N/A 26.710.080 Combined Side 20'20'20'20'N/A 26.710.080 Distance between Buildings 19'-5"10'10'NA N/A 26.710.080 Corner Lot No 26.710.080 Supplemental Breakdown Info Existing Required Proposed Reference Net Leasable/Comm SQ FT 0 Not req'd for residential N/A 26.710.080 Open Space %Not req'd for R-30 Not req'd for R-30 Not req'd for R-30 26.710.080 Site Coverage 2,696.50 N/A 4636.75 26.710.080 On-Site Parking 2 2 2 26.515.030 Site Coverage Existing Required Proposed Reference Gross Lot Area (sq ft)20,253.25 N/A 20,253.25 26.710.080 Area of Building Footprint (sq ft)2,696.50 N/A 4,636.75 26.710.080 Site Coverage %13.31%N/A 22.89%26.710.080 Transferable Development Right (TDR) Received TDR Certificate No Sent TDR Certificate No Transferred TDR Certificate No Land Value Summary Land Improvements Total Reference Actual Value $4,250,000 $2,744,500 $6,994,500 Pitkin County Assessor Assessed Value $306,000 $197,600 $503,600 Pitkin County Assessor Zoning Allowance & Project Summary Net Lot Area 1130 Black Birch Dr. Zone District Requirements Reference Min. Gross Lot Area (per R-30)30,000 sq ft 26.710.180 Min. Net Lot Area (per R-30)30,000 sq ft (detached residential unit)26.710.180 Lot Size 20,253 sq ft*Reference Reductions for area below high water line of a river or natural body of water (0% of parcel area to be included in Net Lot Area)4,545.29 sq ft Table 26.575.020-1 Reductions for area with slopes 0%-20% (100% of parcel area to be included in Net Lot Area)14,744.89 sq ft Table 26.575.020-1 Reductions for area with slopes 20%-30% (50% of parcel area to be included in Net Lot Area)510.36 sq ft @ 50% is 255.18 sq ft Table 26.575.020-1 Reductions for area with slopes greater than 30% (0% of parcel area to be included in Net Lot Area)452.72 sq ft Table 26.575.020-1 Total Area Reductions 5,253.19 sq ft Net Lot Area 14,999.81 sq ft NOTES:*Actual site area per Surveor is 20,253 +/- sq ft, size per plat is 20,171 sq ft +/- P63VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-002 RDS COMPLIANCE 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Instructions: Please fill out the checklist below, marking whether the proposed design complies with the applicable standard as written or is requesting Alternative Compliance (only permitted for Flexible standards). Also include the sheet #(s) demonstrating the applicable standard. If a standard does not apply, please mark N/A and include in the Notes section why it does not apply. If Alternative Compliance is requested for a Flexible standard, include in the Notes section how the proposed design meets the intent of the standard(s). Additional sheets/graphics may be attached. Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 SEE SHEET: Z-102, Z-201 The width of the living area on the first floor of a street-facing facade on which the garage is located is at least five feet greater than the width of the garage.4 SEE SHEET: Z-102, Z-204 We meet option (1), the front-most element of the garage is setback greater than 10 feet further from the street than the front-most wall of the street-facing facade. SEE SHEET: Z-003 The lot has access from a private street. SEE SHEET: Z-102 We meet option (2), there is a loggia that is open on two sides and faces the street. EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots with a required front yard setback of 25 feet or greater. SEE SHEET: Z-003 We meet option (2), the front facade of the building faces the street. EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside the infill area. 4 4 4 4 4 4 (970)319-2095R-30 eheld@forumphi.com273-501-307-009 Beth Held, Forum Phi Architecture LLC.1130 Black Birch Drive, Aspen, CO 81611 Standard Complies Alternative Compliance N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Applicant Checklist - Single Family and Duplex SHEET: Z-201, Z-202, Z-203, Z-204 Materials are used consistently and in a way that is true to their characteristics. 4 SHEET: Z-102 There are no light wells, area ways, skylights, or stairwells located between the front-most wall of a street-facing facade and any street.4 EXEMPT: Does not apply to lots outside of the Aspen Infill Area.4 Seeking Variance4 SHEET: Z-201 We meet option (2), the front facade has at least one group of windows with dimensions greater than 4 feet by 4 feet. 4 SHEET: Z-201 The entry porch on the front facade of the building is one-story in height.4 SHEET: Z-201 All street-facing doors are no taller than 8 feet.4 4 4 SHEET: Z-003, Z-102, Z-201, Z-204 We meet option (2), the front facade of the building has a front porch that is open on two sides, is greater than 50 square feet, faces the street, and has a pathway that connects the street to the front porch. SHEET: Z-201 We meet option (2), there is a two-car garage door constructed with one door that is designed to appear as two separate doors. P64VI.A. 7749 7750 7753 7754 7751 7750 7750 7751 7750 7753 7754 7751 7752 7747 7748 7749 7744 7753 7752 7745 7755 25'-0"10'-0"20'-0"EDGE OF WATER T.O. BANK MEAN HIGH WATER 15' T.O. BANK SET BACK DITCH EASEMENT DITCH EASEMENT BLACK BIRCH DRIVE IRRIGATION DITCH EXISTING DECK EXISTINGDETACHED GARAGE TRACT C LOT 14 LOT 13 BLACK BIRCH ESTATESLEGAL ADDRESS: 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE ZONE DISTRICT: R-30LOT SIZE: 20,171 +/- SF PROJECT 100': 7753' EXISTINGBUILDING FOOTPRINTUTILITY EASMENTFRONT YARDSETBACKEDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT 100 FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATERSURFACE ELEVATIONS 7745 PROPERTY LINE UTILITY EASEM E N T SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. B A N K S E T B A C K 7751 7752 7746 10'-0" 10'-0"15'-0"CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE SETBACK LINE IRRIGATION DITCH PROPOSEDBUILDING ENVELOPE SIDE YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SE T B A C K EXISTING BRIDGE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CULVERT TO BE REPLACED EXISTING DRIVEWAY IRRIGATION DITCH EASEMENTEXISTING DRIVEWAY IN TRACT C T.O. BANK SETBACK15' T.O. B A N K S E T B A C K T2618" T3114"T34 T32 16" T3318" T35 18" T36 18" T17 14" RESIDENCE ACCESS FROMPRIVATE STREET T16 T15 T14 T13 T12 T11 T10 T5 T6 T8 T7 T9 T4 T3 T2 T1 T28T30 T29 T27 T24 T25 T23 T22 T21 T19 T18 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND ASPHALT/PAVEMENT PAVERS DRIVEWAY EXTERIOR DECK EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVD WATER EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND TREE: T26T31 T32T33 T35T36T17 TREES TO BE REMOVED TYPE: COTTONWOODCOTTONWOOD COTTONWOODCOTTONWOOD COTTONWOODCOTTONWOODASPEN SIZE: 18"14" 16"18" 18"18"14"N0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" EXISTING SITE PLAN EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATERTHAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHTPER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORYPER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES &TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE& REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPERMOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6"ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHEDGRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SETBACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONEDOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES ANDMINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-003X EXISTING SITE PLAN 1/9/18 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P65VI.A. 7749 7750 7753 7754 7751 7750 7750 7751 7750 7753 7754 7751 7752 7747 7748 7749 7744 7753 7752 7745 7755 25'-0"10'-0"20'-0"EDGE OF WATER T.O. BANK MEAN HIGH WATER 15' T.O. BANK SET BACK DITCH EASEMENT DITCH EASEMENT BLACK BIRCH DRIVE COVERED ENTRY PORCH IRRIGATION DITCH TRACT C LOT 14 LOT 13 BLACK BIRCH ESTATESLEGAL ADDRESS: 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE ZONE DISTRICT: R-30LOT SIZE: 20,171 +/- SF PROJECT 100': 7753'UTILITY EASMENTFRONT YARDSETBACKEDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT 100 FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATERSURFACE ELEVATIONS 31 7751 7752 7746 10'-0" 10'-0"15'-0"PROPERTY LINE UTILITY EASEM E N T CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SETBACK LINE IRRIGATION DITCH PROPOSEDBUILDING ENVELOPE SIDE YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SE T B A C K IRRIGATION DITCH EASEMENTPROPOSED BUILDINGFOOTPRINT PROPOSED CULVERT DRIVEWAY NON-CONFORMITY TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. B A N K S E T B A C KT.O. BANK SETBACK 3 23 1 16 16 16 16 15 PROJECT 100' = 7753' 31 31 31 T34 RESIDENCE ACCESS FROMPRIVATE STREET 20 39 PROPOSEDFENCE T16 T15 T14 T13 T12 T11 T10 T5 T6 T8 T7 T9 T4 T3 T2 T1 T28T30 T29 T27 T24 T25 T23 T22 T21 T19 T18 19 42 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND ASPHALT/PAVEMENT PAVERS DRIVEWAY EXTERIOR DECK EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVD WATER EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND N0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED SITE PLAN AT GRADE 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATERTHAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHTPER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORYPER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES &TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE& REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPERMOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6"ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHEDGRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SETBACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONEDOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES ANDMINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-003 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 1/9/18 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P66VI.A. 25'-0"10'-0"20'-0"EDGE OF WATER T.O. BANK MEAN HIGH WATER 15' T.O. BANK SET BACK DITCH EASEMENT DITCH EASEMENT BLACK BIRCH DRIVE COVERED ENTRY PORCH IRRIGATION DITCH TRACT C LOT 14 LOT 13 BLACK BIRCH ESTATESLEGAL ADDRESS: 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE ZONE DISTRICT: R-30LOT SIZE: 20,171 +/- SF PROJECT 100': 7753'UTILITY EASMENTFRONT YARDSETBACKEDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT 100 FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATERSURFACE ELEVATIONS 10'-0" 10'-0"15'-0"PROPERTY LINE UTILITY EASEM E N T CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY SETBACK LINE IRRIGATION DITCH APPROX LOCATION OF PROPOSED MICROPILE CAP PROPOSEDBUILDING ENVELOPE SIDE YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SE T B A C K IRRIGATION DITCH EASEMENTPROPOSED BUILDINGFOOTPRINT PROPOSED CULVERT DRIVEWAY NON-CONFORMITY TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEOUTLINE OF EXISTING RESIDENCE 15' T.O. B A N K S E T B A C KT.O. BANK SETBACKPROJECT 100' = 7753' SITE PROTECTION FENCETO FOLLOW T.O. BANK SETBACK T34 RESIDENCE ACCESS FROMPRIVATE STREET PROPOSEDFENCE OUTLINE OFFOUNDATION FOOTING T16 T15 T14 T13 T12 T11 T10 T5 T6 T8 T7 T9 T4 T3 T2 T1 T28T30 T29 T27 T24 T25 T23 T22 T21 T19 T18 T2618" T3114" T32 16" T3318" T35 18" T36 18" T17 14" EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BEREMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW CONIFEROUS TREE SITE PLAN LEGEND ASPHALT/PAVEMENT PAVERS DRIVEWAY EXTERIOR DECK EXISTING SIDEWALK TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DRIVEWAY TO BE REMOVD WATER TREE: T26 T31T32 T33T35T36 T17 TREES TO BE REMOVED TYPE: COTTONWOOD COTTONWOODCOTTONWOOD COTTONWOODCOTTONWOODCOTTONWOOD ASPEN SIZE: 18" 14"16" 18"18"18" 14"N0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED CMP PLAN EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATERTHAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHTPER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORYPER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES &TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE& REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPERMOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6"ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHEDGRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SETBACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONEDOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES ANDMINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30"ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-004 PROPOSED CMP PLAN 1/9/18 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION:LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P67VI.A. FW/D DWDW53'-1"61' -7" 53'-1"61'-7" 1 8 '-1 "20' -1" 1 8 '-1 "20' -1" 100'-0" 98'-6" 4 Z-204X 1 Z-201X 3 Z-203X 2 Z-202X LINE OF ROOF ABOVE LINE OF ROOF ABOVEGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLFP APPLIANCE DECK OVEN OVEN UP ENTRY 101 MUD 102 SITTING 103 LIVING 104 KITCHEN 105 DINING 106 LIVING 107 BEDROOM 1 110 BEDROOM 2 111 BEDROOM 3 112 BATH 113 BATH 114 MECH 109 HALL 108 GARAGE 115 G G A A 5 5 SE TB A C K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 1 1 SE TB A C K L INE 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK DW DW N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING MAIN LEVEL EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-101X EXISTING MAIN LEVEL 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P68VI.A. 4 Z-204X 1 Z-201X 3 Z-203X 2 Z-202X 35'-0"35'-0" 32'-83/8" 32'-83/8" 110'-0" LINE OF WALL BELOW LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN TO BELOW DNGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLUP HALL 201 MASTER BED 202 MASTER CLOSET 203 MASTER BATH 204 G G A A 5 5 SE TB A C K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE1 1 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING UPPER LEVEL EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-102X EXISTING UPPER LEVEL 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P69VI.A. 4 Z-204X 1 Z-201X 3 Z-203X 2 Z-202X LINE OF WALL BELOW LINE OF WALL BELOW CHIMNEYGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLG G A A 5 5 SE TB A C K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE1 1 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 12:12 12:1212:1212:126:124:12 7:12 7:12 2:12 3:123:124:124:12 3:12FLAT4:124:12N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EXISTING ROOF PLAN EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-103X EXISTING ROOF PLAN 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P70VI.A. MAIN LEVEL T.O. FINISH 100'-0" = 7752'-8" MAIN LEVEL STEP DOWN T.O. FINISH 98'-6" ROOF T.O. RIDGE 125'-4" UPPER LEVEL T.O. FINISH 110'-0" CHIMNEY T.O. CHIMNEY 129'-10" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 EXISTING EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-201X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P71VI.A. MAIN LEVEL T.O. FINISH 100'-0" = 7752'-8" MAIN LEVEL STEP DOWN T.O. FINISH 98'-6" ROOF T.O. RIDGE 125'-4" UPPER LEVEL T.O. FINISH 110'-0" CHIMNEY T.O. CHIMNEY 129'-10" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 EXISTING EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-202X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P72VI.A. MAIN LEVEL T.O. FINISH 100'-0" = 7752'-8" ROOF T.O. RIDGE 125'-4" UPPER LEVEL T.O. FINISH 110'-0" CHIMNEY T.O. CHIMNEY 129'-10" MAIN LEVEL STEP DOWN T.O. FINISH 98'-6" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 EXISTING EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-203X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P73VI.A. MAIN LEVEL T.O. FINISH 100'-0" = 7752'-8" MAIN LEVEL STEP DOWN T.O. FINISH 98'-6" ROOF T.O. RIDGE 125'-4" UPPER LEVEL T.O. FINISH 110'-0" CHIMNEY T.O. CHIMNEY 129'-10" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 EXISTING EXITING RESIDENCE IS 100% DEMOLITION NOTE: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-204X EXISTING ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P74VI.A. WWDRDR 85'-0"83'-0"83'-0"85'-0" 88'-0" 87'-6" 87'-0" 88'-0" 85'-6" 1 Z-201 4 Z-204 3 Z-203 2 Z-202GRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLUPGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLDN LAUNDRY 003 BAR 009 REC ROOM 010CARD ROOM 017 AV ROOM 020 THEATER 019 GYM 022 MECHANICAL 021 PWDR 1 024 GYM BATH 023 ELEV 025 BUNK ROOM 2 015 BUNK ROOM 1 012 BEDROOM 4 007 STOR 1 004 BEDROOM 3 005 BATH 4 008 STOR 2 014 BATH 3 006 GUEST HALL 002 STAIR 001 BUNK HALL 011 THEATER HALL 018PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEDW 5 5 SE TB A C K L INE 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 40 40 40 BUNK BATH 2 016 BUNK BATH 1 013 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 G G F F E E D D C C B B A A N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-101 PROPOSED LOWER LEVEL 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P75VI.A. IMIMREFRGFDW W/DFDW1 Z-201 4 Z-204 3 Z-203 2 Z-202 85'-0" 85'-0" 22'-01/4"62'-113/4"83'-0"83'-0"20'-17/8"100'-0" 99'-6" 8 7 2 6 5 12 12 12 12 4 10 16 16 16 16 COVERED FRONT PORCH OPEN TO BELOWGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL DN ENTRY 101 WINE ROOM 110 DINING / GREAT ROOM 111 OFFICE 113 BEDROOM 1 104 BATH 2 109 BATH 1 105 MASTER CLOSET 115 MASTER BATH 116 MASTER BED 117 MUDROOM 121 PANTRY 120 KITCHEN 118 FAMILY ROOM 119 GARAGE 122 PWDR 2 124 ELEV 125 CLO 1 106 BEDROOM 2 107 MASTER HALL 114 VESTIBULE 1 103 STAIR 102 CLO 2 108 VESTIBULE 2 112 VESTIBULE 3 123 5 5 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 G G F F E E D D C C B B A A SE TB A C K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 40 40 40 31 31 31 39 19 42 WINDOW HEIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-102 PROPOSED MAIN LEVEL 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P76VI.A. 1 Z-201 4 Z-204 3 Z-203 2 Z-202GRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALL GRID TO EXTERIOR FACE OF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLGRID TO EXTERIOR FACEOF NEW FOUNDATION WALLPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE5 5 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 G G F F E E D D C C B B A A SE TB A C K L INE 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 3030 41 41 4141 41 N0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ROOF LEVEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-103 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P77VI.A. 5 7'-3"2'-6"63'-63/4"21'-9"13'-3"16'-23/4"12'-33/8"10'-0" 2 1 5 6 7 8 9 36 34 34 35 36 35 34 34 29 28 30 25 PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE4 3 2 1 2'-6"12'-0"11'-6"2'-0"2'-6"5'-6"A = 7764'-6"B = 7766'-6"E = 7764'-6" WINDOW HEIGHT VARIANCE REQUESTED MAIN LEVEL T.O. PLY 100'-0" = 7753 LOWER LEVEL T.O. STRUCT 88'-0" ROOF T.O. STRUCT 121'-6" MID ROOF T.O. STRUCT 113'-6" LOW ROOF T.O. STRUCT 111'-6" CLERESTORY LEVEL T.O. STONE 115'-6" CRAWL SPACE T.O. SLAB 84'-0" Height Over Topography 1130 Black Birch Dr. Elevation Label Elevation of Natural Grade Elevation of Proposed Grade Most Restrictive Roof Height over Topography Actual Roof Height over Most Restrictive A 7751'-3"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"13'-3" B 7750'-3 1/4"7752'-0"Natural 7766'-6"16'-2 3/4" C 7751'-5"7752'-0"Natural 7774'-6"23'-1" D 7752'-0"7753'-0"Natural 7766'-6"14'-6" E 7752'-2 5/8"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"12'-3 3/8" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"1 PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-201 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P78VI.A. 16'-23/4"35 34 3634 29 28 30 25 SETBACK LINEDITCH EASEMENT15' T.O. BANK SETBACK15' T.O. BANKMAIN LEVEL T.O. PLY 100'-0" = 7753 LOWER LEVEL T.O. STRUCT 88'-0" CRAWL SPACE T.O. SLAB 84'-0" A B C D E F G SEE EAST ELEVATION Z-203 FOR POINT C HEIGHT CALCULATION 2'-6"12'-0"11'-6"2'-0"2'-6"5'-6"B = 7766'-6" ROOF T.O. STRUCT 121'-6" MID ROOF T.O. STRUCT 113'-6" LOW ROOF T.O. STRUCT 111'-6" CLERESTORY LEVEL T.O. STONE 115'-6" 24 23 12 24 23 12 24 23 12 24 23 12 Height Over Topography 1130 Black Birch Dr. Elevation Label Elevation of Natural Grade Elevation of Proposed Grade Most Restrictive Roof Height over Topography Actual Roof Height over Most Restrictive A 7751'-3"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"13'-3" B 7750'-3 1/4"7752'-0"Natural 7766'-6"16'-2 3/4" C 7751'-5"7752'-0"Natural 7774'-6"23'-1" D 7752'-0"7753'-0"Natural 7766'-6"14'-6" E 7752'-2 5/8"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"12'-3 3/8" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"2 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-202 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P79VI.A. 5 23'-1"13'-6"29 28 30 34 35 13 34 36 1334 36 13 35 18 25 19 PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEMAIN LEVEL T.O. PLY 100'-0" = 7753 LOWER LEVEL T.O. STRUCT 88'-0" ROOF T.O. STRUCT 121'-6" MID ROOF T.O. STRUCT 113'-6" LOW ROOF T.O. STRUCT 111'-6" CLERESTORY LEVEL T.O. STONE 115'-6" CRAWL SPACE T.O. SLAB 84'-0" SEE EAST ELEVATION Z-202 FOR POINT B HEIGHT CALCULATION 1 2 3 4 2'-6"12'-0"11'-6"2'-0"2'-6"5'-6"C = 7774'-6" D = 7766'-6" Height Over Topography 1130 Black Birch Dr. Elevation Label Elevation of Natural Grade Elevation of Proposed Grade Most Restrictive Roof Height over Topography Actual Roof Height over Most Restrictive A 7751'-3"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"13'-3" B 7750'-3 1/4"7752'-0"Natural 7766'-6"16'-2 3/4" C 7751'-5"7752'-0"Natural 7774'-6"23'-1" D 7752'-0"7753'-0"Natural 7766'-6"14'-6" E 7752'-2 5/8"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"12'-3 3/8" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"3 PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-203 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P80VI.A. 2 7 36 34 34 36 34 34 35 13 25 15' T.O. BACK15' T.O. BACK SETBACKMAIN LEVEL T.O. PLY 100'-0" = 7753 LOWER LEVEL T.O. STRUCT 88'-0" ROOF T.O. STRUCT 121'-6" MID ROOF T.O. STRUCT 113'-6" LOW ROOF T.O. STRUCT 111'-6" CLERESTORY LEVEL T.O. STONE 115'-6" CRAWL SPACE T.O. SLAB 84'-0" G F E D C B A 2'-6"12'-0"11'-6"2'-0"2'-6"5'-6"22'-17/8" 4 29 28 30 19DITCH EASEMENTSETBACK LINEHeight Over Topography 1130 Black Birch Dr. Elevation Label Elevation of Natural Grade Elevation of Proposed Grade Most Restrictive Roof Height over Topography Actual Roof Height over Most Restrictive A 7751'-3"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"13'-3" B 7750'-3 1/4"7752'-0"Natural 7766'-6"16'-2 3/4" C 7751'-5"7752'-0"Natural 7774'-6"23'-1" D 7752'-0"7753'-0"Natural 7766'-6"14'-6" E 7752'-2 5/8"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"12'-3 3/8" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0"4 PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-204 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P81VI.A. 7749 7750 7753 7754 7751 7750 7750 7751 7752 7753 7752 7755 1 Z-201 4 Z-204 3 Z-203 2 Z-202 A B PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE7751 SE TB A C K L INE 15' T.O. BANK SETBACK 3030 C D E A = 7764'-6" B = 7766'-6" C = 7774'-6" D = 7766'-6" E = 7764'-6" 41 41 4141 41 NHeight Over Topography 1130 Black Birch Dr. Elevation Label Elevation of Natural Grade Elevation of Proposed Grade Most Restrictive Roof Height over Topography Actual Roof Height over Most Restrictive A 7751'-3"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"13'-3" B 7750'-3 1/4"7752'-0"Natural 7766'-6"16'-2 3/4" C 7751'-5"7752'-0"Natural 7774'-6"23'-1" D 7752'-0"7753'-0"Natural 7766'-6"14'-6" E 7752'-2 5/8"7753'-0"Natural 7764'-6"12'-3 3/8" 0 4'8'12'SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" PROPOSED ROOF TOPO EXISTING 1' CONTOUR PROPOSED 1' CONTOUR EXISTING 5' CONTOUR PROPOSED 5' CONTOUR TOPOGRAPHY LEGEND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-205 HEIGHT OVER TOPOGRAPHY 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P82VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-401 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision PROP ERT Y L I NE UT IL ITY EAS E M EN T SE TB AC K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK Z-404 Z-401 Z-402 Z-403 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE NSTREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGENDP83 VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-402 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision PROP ERT Y L I NE UT IL ITY EAS E M EN T SE TB AC K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK Z-404 Z-401 Z-402 Z-403 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE NSTREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGENDP84 VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-403 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision PROP ERT Y L I NE UT IL ITY EAS E M EN T SE TB AC K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK Z-404 Z-401 Z-402 Z-403 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE NSTREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGENDP85 VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: Z-404 STREAM MARGIN 45 DEGREE VIEWS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision PROP ERT Y L I NE UT IL ITY EAS E M EN T SE TB AC K L INE PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACK Z-404 Z-401 Z-402 Z-403 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE NSTREAM MARGIN VIEWS LEGENDP86 VI.A. EE F E E E E E E E F25'-0"10'-0"20'-0"EDGE OF WATER T.O. BANK MEAN HIGH WATER 15' T.O. BANK SET BACK DITCH EASEMENT DITCH EASEMENT BLACK BIRCH DRIVE COVERED ENTRY PORCH IRRIGATION DITCH TRACT C LOT 14 LOT 13 BLACK BIRCH ESTATES LEGAL ADDRESS: 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE ZONE DISTRICT: R-30 LOT SIZE: 20,171 +/- SF PROJECT 100': 7753'UTILITY EASMENTFRONT YARDSETBACKEDGE OF EXISTING PAVEMENT 100 FLOODPLAIN BASED ON FIS 100 YEAR WATER SURFACE ELEVATIONS 31 B B B 10'-0" 10'-0"15'-0"P R O PERTY LI NE UTI LI TY E A SEMENT CASTLE CREEK + ROARING FORK RIVER CONFLUENCE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY S ET BACK LI NE IRRIGATION DITCH PROPOSED BUILDING ENVELOPE SIDE YARD SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACK IRRIGATION DITCH EASEMENTPROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT PROPOSED CULVERT DRIVEWAY NON-CONFORMITY TO REMAIN PROPERTY LINESETBACK LINEPROPERTY LINESETBACK LINE15' T.O. BANK SETBACKT.O. BANK SETBACK 3 23 1 16 16 16 16 15 PROJECT 100' = 7753' 31 31 31 T34 RESIDENCE ACCESS FROM PRIVATE STREET PATIO CEILING 12' ABOVE GRADE PORCH CEILING 10' ABOVE GRADE PATIO CEILING 12' ABOVE GRADE 20 39 PROPOSED FENCE T16 T15 T14 T13 T12 T11 T10 T5 T6 T8 T7 T9 T4 T3 T2 T1 T28 T30 T29 T27 T24 T25 T23 T22 T21 T19 T18 19 42 A A A A A EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED EXISTING SHRUB TO BE REMOVED EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE TO REMAIN EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO REMAIN NEW DECIDUOUS TREE NEW SHRUB GRASS TO BE RESTORED TO NATIVE VEGETATION PERVIOUS PAVING GRAVEL PATIO/PAVING NEW CONIFEROUS TREE LANDSCAPE LEGEND ASPHALT/PAVEMENT PAVERS EXISTING SHRUB TO REMAIN WATER RETAINING WALL E F WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE: 8' ABOVE NATURAL GRADE LANDSCAPE LIGHTING LEGEND LED ILLUMINATING STRIP: 6" ABOVE NATURAL GRADE RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE: 1'-3" ABOVE NATURAL GRADE RECESSED WALL LUMINAIRE: LOCATED WITHIN EGRESS WELL A B C D OVERHEAD RECESSED DOWNLIGHT CAN OVERHEAD PENDANT N0 4'8'16'SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 CHANNEL BOARD WOOD SIDING TBD PROPOSED HOT TUB EXISTING GRADE PATIO MATERIAL TBD PROPOSED GRADE LINE OF ROOF ABOVE OPEN LOGGIA PER RDS B.4.d.(2) WIDTH OF FIRST-STORY LIVING AREA 5 FT GREATER THAN GARAGE/CARPORT PER RDS C.3.c ENTRY DOOR NO TALLER THAN 8FT PER RDS D.2.c ENTRY PORCH NOT MORE THAN ONE-STORY IN HEIGHT PER RDS D.3.c GROUP OF WINDOWS ON FRONT FACADE PER RDS E.1.d.(2) NO STREET-FACING WINDOWS MORE THAN ONE-STORY PER RDS E.2.c - SEEKING VARIANCE EXTERIOR MATERIALS CONSISTENT ON ALL SIDES & TRUE TO CHARACTERISTICS PER RDS E.5.c NATURAL CUT STONE TBD LINE OF EXTERIOR WALL BELOW DRIVEWAY MATERIAL TBD WINDOW WELL PANEL IS NON-LOCKING FLIP-UP GRATE & REQUIRE NO MORE THAN 15 LBS OF FORCE TO OPEN FLAT ROOF R-30 ZONE DISTRICT HEIGHT LIMIT 25' LIGHTWELL PER RDS E.4.c & IRC R310.1 LIGHTWELL MINIMUM OPENING AREA PER IRC R310.2.1 SNOWMELT PER IRC 310 LIFE & SAFETY FRONT PORCH PER PER 26.575.020.D.5 VERTICAL CIRCULATION NOT COUNTED ON UPPER MOST FLOOR PER 26.575.020.D.2.a PATIO AT OR WITHIN 6" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.D.6 ROOF EAVE <18" PROJECTION PER 26.575.020.E.5.g UNCOVERED PATIO / SLABS DO NOT EXCEED 6" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.j PROPOSED DRIVEWAY WITHIN 24" OF FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.q TOP MOST PORTION OF ROOF PER 26.575.020.F.2 FRONT FACADE FACING THE STREET, MODERATE ORIENTATION PER RDS B.2.d.(2) FRONT-MOST ELEMENT OF GARAGE/CARPORT SET BACK AT LEAST 10 FT FROM STREET PER RDS C.2.d.(1) VEHICULAR ACCESS VIA ALLEY OR PRIVATE STREET PER RDS C.1.c TWO-CAR GARAGE DOOR CONSTRUCTED AS ONE DOOR DESIGNED TO APPEAR AS TWO PER RDS C.4.d.(1) OPEN FRONT PORCH ON OPEN ON (2) SIDES AND MINIMUM OF (50) SQUARE FEET PER RDS D.1.d.(2) PERMANENT STRUCTURES SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.m BELOW GRADE OUTLINE SITE WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/ OR BELOW FINISHED GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.k MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 30" ABOVE AND/OR BELOW GRADE PER 26.575.020.E.5.n FENCES AND HEDGES PER 26.575.020.E.5.p ROOF OVERHANG FIREPLACE APPLIANCE MEMBRANE ROOF - SLOPED 1/4" PER 1' FOR DRAINAGE PROPOSED FIRE PIT DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: KEYNOTE LEGEND PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: L-001 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision P87VI.A. DRAWING ISSUANCE INDEX ID 01 02 03 NAME SD STREAM MARGIN REVIEW DD ISSUED DATE 11/9/17, 10:25 AM 12/20/17, 9:46 AM - COPYRIGHT: PROJECT NO: DRAWN BY: FORUM PHI LLC Aspen: 715 West Main Street, #204 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Basalt: 104 Midland Ave, #202 Basalt, CO 81612 forumphi.com p: 970.279.4157 f: 866.770.5585 DATE OF PUBLICATION: L-002 LIGHTING SPECS 12/28/17 BH, JR 1719.00 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CO 81611 1130 BLACK BIRCH LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 13 of Black Birch Estates Subdivision 05/12/2017 19:21:27 Date Name Client Project Name Quote# Type/Quantity 232 318 83 Weblink Specification Sheet MONTUR L PC LED INCL.PC SBL INCL.LED CLUSTER 14,7W / CRI>80 / 3000K / 1960lm INCL.LED POWER SUPPLY 700mA-DC 220-240V / 0|50-60Hz For detailed installation instructions, please consult the manual. 232_318_XX_HAND.pdf Available colors:BLACK (232 318 83 B) LED Technics:Light source: 1960 lm // 14 W // 133 lm/W Luminaire: 950 lm // 17 W // 56 lm/W Class:I Weight:2.6 KG Protection level:IP54 Minimum distance:n.a. 05/12/2017 19:17:42 Date Name Client Project Name Quote# Type/Quantity 202 20 811 932 Weblink Specification Sheet CARREE X LED 93033 S1 NON ADJUSTABLE INCL.1 x LED WHITE 7,1W / CRI>90 / 3000K / 774lm INCL.1 x REFLECTOR FL-33° INCL.PC CLEAR EXCL.LED POWER SUPPLY 350mA-DC For detailed installation instructions, please consult the manual. 202_20_811_XXX_HAND.pdf Cutout shape/size: 75 x 75 mm Recessed depth:80 mm Thickness of mounting surface:max.35 Available colors:ALU GREY (202 20 811 932 A) WHITE (202 20 811 932 W) DARK GREY (202 20 811 932 N) LED Technics:Light source: 774 lm // 7 W // 116 lm/W Luminaire: 8 W Class:III Weight:0.2 KG Protection level:IP44/20-22/20 Minimum distance:n.a. Options:LED POWER SUPPLY 350mA-DC DIM 05/12/2017 19:45:19 Date Name Client Project Name Quote# Type/Quantity 202 04 24 Weblink Specification Sheet HELI X SCREEN LED NW INCL.PC SBL INCL.1 x LED WHITE 1,1W / CRI>80 / 4000K EXCL.LED POWER SUPPLY 350mA-DC For detailed installation instructions, please consult the manual. 202_04_22_HAND.pdf Cutout shape/size: 75 x 87 mm Recessed depth:60 mm Available colors:ALU GREY (202 04 24 A) DARK GREY (202 04 24 N) LED Technics:Light source: 130 lm // 1 W // 133 lm/W Luminaire: 20 lm // 2 W // 10 lm/W Class:III Weight:0.3 KG Protection level:IP54 Minimum distance:n.a. Options:CONCRETE BOX 187 LED POWER SUPPLY 350mA-DC DIM 16/12/2017 16:43:32 Date Name Client Project Name Quote# Type/Quantity 232 812 82 Weblink Specification Sheet MONTUR SQL LED HW INCL.GLASS OPAL INCL.LED CLUSTER 7,4W / CRI>80 / 2700K / 1000lm INCL.LED POWER SUPPLY 350mA-DC 110-240V / 50-60Hz For detailed installation instructions, please consult the manual. 232_812_XX_HAND.pdf Available colors:BLACK (232 812 82 B) LED Technics:Light source: 1000 lm // 7 W // 135 lm/W Luminaire: 475 lm // 9 W // 56 lm/W Class:I Weight:2.1 KG Protection level:IP65 Minimum distance:n.a.P88VI.A. Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist - Single Family and Duplex Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Does Not Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes B.1.Articulation of Building Mass (Non-flexible) B.2.Building Orientation (Flexible) B.3.Build-to Requirement (Flexible) B.4.One Story Element (Flexible) C.1.Garage Access (Non-flexible) C.2.Garage Placement (Non-flexible) C.3.Garage Dimensions (Flexible) Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Address: Parcel ID: Zone District/PD: Representative: Email: Phone: Page 1 of 2 Approved: (Approved plans/elevations attached)P89VI.A. Standard Complies Alternative Compliance Doesn’t Comply N/A Sheet #(s)/Notes C.4.Garage Door Design (Flexible) D.1.Entry Connection (Non-flexible) D.2.Door Height (Flexible) D.3.Entry Porch (Flexible) E.1.Principle Window (Flexible) E.2.Window Placement (Flexible) E.3.Nonorthogonal Window Limit (Flexible) E.4.Lightwell/Stairwell Location (Flexible) E.5.Materials (Flexible) Residential Design Standards Administrative Compliance Review Staff Checklist Disclaimer: This application is only valid for the attached design. If any element of the design subject to Residential Design Standards changes prior to or during building permit review, the applicant shall be required to apply for a new Administrative Compliance Review. Page 2 of 2 Approved: P90VI.A. HWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWHWWWWWWWWWW W W W W W W WWWWWSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SS SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS SSSSGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG G G G G G G G G GGGG GGGGGCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTVCTV CTV CTV CTV T T T T T T T T T T T EX-U E EX-UEEX-UECTVCTVEX-UE EX-UE EX - U E EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE EX-UE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE OE S S S WV DYH W OSW EG I I 15.10 '9.00'17.20 '16.00'9.00 '19.90'4.80 '19.60'4.00 '6.30'26.20 '15.90'22.40 '25.20'2.70 '7.50'5.66'20.30'18.30 ' 20.30'18.30 ' N 85°08'41" E 1 9 4 . 9 0 'S 07°27'00" W 130.00'N 87°04'23" W 1 5 2 . 6 4 'N 13°23'00" W 107.55'9.9'66'5.6'43.6' STONE WALK IRR. CONTROL BOX (TYP.) TIE BORDER (TYP.) GASLINE STONE WALK BRIDGE 18" CMP II EL=7751.4' 18" CMP IO EL=7750.9' STONE WALK TIE STEPS TIE BORDER (TYP.)20' DITCH EASEMENTFLOWLINE DITCH 20'GASLINE (TYP.)WATERLINE (TYP .)SEWERLINE (TYP.)CABLE TV (TYP . ) ELECTRIC LINE (TYP.) TEL E P H O N E L I N E ( T Y P . ) SINGLE STORY WOOD FRAME GARAGE LOT 13 20,171 S.F.± PER PLAT 20,253 S.F.± CALC. MULTI LEVEL WOOD FRAME HOUSE 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE STONE BORDERTREX DECK F.F. DECK EL=7751.8' F.F. EL=7752.7' CHIMNEY EL=7782.5' RIDGE EL=7778.1' F.F. EL=7752.7' F.F. EL=7753.8' ASPHALT DRIVEWAY 10' HEADGATE P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 TBM EL=7755.51' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 52'W.C. #5 REBAR BEARS S82°55'48"W 50.56' #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #2376 TELE. PED. SEWER MANHOLE WATER VALVE FIRE HYD. SEWER MANHOLE SEWER MANHOLE POWER POLE OVERHEAD E L E C T R I C TOP BANK EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 EDGE OF WATER 09/22/17 CAST L E C R E E K ROARING FORK RIVERCONFLUENCE GAS METER WATER SERVICE 10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 10'15' SETBACK FROM TOP BANK 15'10'10' SIDE SETBACK PER R-30 7750775 5 775 6 7755775077457745775077507746 19 2 9 7751 19 8 8 77 4 7 1 9 2 9 77 5 2 1 9 8 8 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA PANEL 08097C0203C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN PER FEMA PANEL 08097C0203C, DATED JUNE 04, 1987 APPROX HIGH WATER MARK 10' UTILITY EASEMENT PER PLAT BK 3 PG 244 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE30' R-O-WASPHALTTRACT C LOT 14 LOT 8 PITKIN RESERVE OPEN SPACE 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA C.O.A. GPS #10S44°57'37"W1805.01'C.O.A. GPS S-159 N37°49 '33 "W2716.44 ' SEWER SERVICE PER ACSD T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6 T7 T8 T9 T10 T11 T12 T13 T14 T15 T16 T17 T18T19 T20 T21 T22 T23 T24 T25 T26 T27 T28 T29 T30 T31 T32 T33 T34 T35 T36 SLOPE TABLE NUMBER 1 2 3 4 MIN. SLOPE 0.001% 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% MAX. SLOPE 20.000% 30.000% 40.000% 3000.000% COLOR 18920.67 1476.22 448.12 1953.04 AREA NOTICE: ACCORDING TO COLORADO LAW, YOU MUST COMMENCE ANY LEGAL ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY WITHIN THREE YEARS AFTER YOU FIRST DISCOVER SUCH DEFECT. IN NO EVENT MAY ANY ACTION BASED UPON ANY DEFECT IN THIS SURVEY BE COMMENCED MORE THAN TEN YEARS FROM THE DATE OF THE CERTIFICATION SHOWN HEREON. ByNO.Date Project NO.RevisionDrawn By: Checked By: Date: Computer File: P.O. Box 1746 Rifle, CO 81650 Phone (970) 625-1954 Fax (970) 579-7150 www.peaksurveyinginc.com SNW E P e a k Surv ey ing, Inc. Since 20 0 7 17054 1 OF 1 RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO IMPROVEMENT AND TOPO SURVEY LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES 1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE JRN JRN SEPT 24, 2017 054.DWG 1 12/06/17 UPDATE SURVEY JRN 2 12/15/17 UPDATE SURVEY JRN IMPROVEMENT SURVEY STATEMENT I HEREBY STATE THAT THIS IMPROVEMENT SURVEY WAS PREPARED BY PEAK SURVEYING, INC. FOR RIVERFRONT FORK, LLC. I FURTHER STATE THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL ON THIS DATE, SEPTEMBER 22, 2017, EXCEPT UTILITY CONNECTIONS, ARE ENTIRELY WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PARCEL, EXCEPT AS SHOWN, THAT THERE ARE NO ENCROACHMENTS UPON THE DESCRIBED PREMISES BY IMPROVEMENTS ON ANY ADJOINING PREMISES, EXCEPT AS INDICATED, AND THAT THERE IS NO APPARENT EVIDENCE OR SIGN OF ANY EASEMENT CROSSING OR BURDENING ANY PART OF SAID PARCEL, EXCEPT AS NOTED. I FURTHER STATE THAT I HAVE EXAMINED THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24994W, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 23, 2017 AND FIND ALL EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE THAT AFFECT THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ARE SHOWN HEREON TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. ERROR OF CLOSURE FOR THIS SURVEY IS LESS THAN 1:15,000. BY:___________________________________ JASON R. NEIL, P.L.S. NO. 37935 IMPROVEMENT SURVEY PLAT & TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244 CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO PROPERTY DESCRIPTION LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH ESTATES SUBDIVISION, ACCORDING TO THE FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01. 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE 244, CITY OF ASPEN, COUNTY OF PITKIN, STATE OF COLORADO. NOTES: 1) THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, COVENANTS, BUILDING SETBACKS AND EASEMENTS OF RECORD, OR IN PLACE AND EXCEPTIONS TO TITLE SHOWN IN THE TITLE COMMITMENT PREPARED BY PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC., CASE NO. PCT24994W, DATED EFFECTIVE MARCH 23, 2017. 2) THE DATE OF THIS SURVEY WAS SEPTEMBER 22, 2017. 3) BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY IS A BEARING OF S87°04'23"E BETWEEN THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A P.K. NAIL & SHINER L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE AND THE 52' WITNESS CORNER TO THE SOUTHEASTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13, A #5 REBAR & CAP L.S. #25947 FOUND IN PLACE. 4) UNITS OF MEASURE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON IS U.S. SURVEY FEET. 5) THIS SURVEY IS BASED ON THE BLACK BIRCH ESTATES FINAL PLAT RECORDED MAY 01, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244 IN THE PITKIN COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER'S OFFICE AND CORNERS FOUND IN PLACE. 6) ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON A GPS OBSERVATION UTILIZING THE WESTERN COLORADO RTVRN GPS NETWORK (1988 ORTHO DATUM) YIELDING AN ON-SITE ELEVATION OF 7755.51'' ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 13 AS SHOWN. CONTOUR INTERVAL EQUALS 1 FOOT. 7) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ZONED R-30 ACCORDING TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. BUILDING SETBACKS SHOULD BE VERIFIED PRIOR TO ANY DESIGN, PLANNING OR CONSTRUCTION. N E S W 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 Peak Surveying , I nc.010 10 20 405 SUBJECT PROPERTY VICINITY MAP SCALE: 1" = 2000'COLORAD O L ICEN S E DPROF E S SIONAL L A N D SURV EYORJASON R . N EI L37935 12/15/17P91 VI.A. P92 VI.A. P93 VI.A. P94 VI.A. P95 VI.A. P96 VI.A. TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Jennifer Phelan, Deputy Planning Director RE: Election of Chairperson and Vice-Chairperson MEETING DATE: January 16, 2018 At the first meeting of the year, the Planning and Zoning Commission is tasked with electing a Chair and Vice-Chair. The appointment is for one year and currently elected members can be re- elected. RECOMMENDED MOTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission may use this motion “I move to make a recommendation to elect ____________, as chairperson and _______________as vice-chairperson of the Planning and Zoning Commission for 2018.” P97 VII.A. RESOLUTION NO. __ Series of 2018 WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission is required to elect a chairperson and vice- chairperson as outlined in Section 26.212.030, Membership-Appointment, removal, terms and vacancies of the land use code; and WHEREAS, the term of each position is for one (1) year; and WHEREAS, the commission voted to elect a chairperson and vice-chairperson on January 16, 2018; and WHEREAS, _______________was elected chairperson and __________________was elected vice-chairperson; and WHEREAS, both positions shall expire on January 15, 2019; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning and Zoning Commission of Aspen, Colorado, by this resolution that _______________be appointed as chairperson and _________________be appointed as vice-chairperson. DATED: January ____, 2018 _________________________ _______________, Chair ATTEST:__________________________ Nicole Henning, Deputy Clerk P98 VII.A. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060 (E), ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: - I L 3 C> ?p Aspen, CO SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: 30���, 201 it STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) 1, s� S'Gcrc-e �n (name, please print) being or representing,an Applicant-to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304:060 (E) of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section.of an official paper or a paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. Posting of notice: By posting of notice, which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof materials,,which was not less than twenty-two (22) inches wide and twenty-six (26) inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted atleast fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the_ day of 20_, to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice (sign) is attached hereto. Mailing of,notice. . By the mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department, which contains the information described in Section 26304:060(E)(2) of the Aspepl and'Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage _ prepaid U,S.'mdil to all owners of property within three hundred (300) feet of the ert sub ect to the development alication. The names and addresses of •_rJr"Cpropettf owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they _appeared po more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A aS`c" copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method ofpublic notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (continued on next page) Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, to affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty (30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. The names and addresses of mineral estate.owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivisions, SPAS or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Developments, and. new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notice requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title, or whenever the text of this Title is to be amended, whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of a new land use regulation, or otherwise, the requirement of an accurate survey map or other sufficient legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real property in the area of the proposed change. shall be waived. However, the proposed zoning map shall be available for public inspection in the planning agency during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. �c Sign re _ The foregoing "Affidavit of Notice"was acknowledged before me this;2f day of 20 by �. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HERRING RE:1130 Bleck Blrch Orlva Public Hal Tuesdey, February 20M, 2018; WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL 1'9 PM Mxting Location:City Hall,Sister Cities 130S.Galea SL,Aspen,CO 81011 Proles Loatbn: 1130 Black Birch Drive plpeaayyal Ova°ti,tiom Parce"°:2'350137008 Y;La- M commission expires: t dvbloru�e<oSub- efng 10 to IPlotBthereofEtmnes mrecordetl May 1.1967 in Flat Book 3 at Page 211. - - Uauriplkm:The bent u proposing b dam^F ish Ne ex T Structure and anstrucl 8 aiM/e- _ family home on the property. The property sib be. Notary Public bw the established Top of Slope a—hhng to the eilopted Sheam Margin Map.The bce"on of Ne '�lekelniimw ap df slop¢fmm Me river anapb th¢ppential 1p- KAREN REED PfAERSONcation of development.An enervative Top of slapsNOTARY Fdetermination b Baine proposed by the applicantthrough a special review request by the Planningand Zoning Commission.OtherreviewsthatwillbaI STATE OF COADO ndpletlat thesame hearingido a StraamMan reviewbasede newty establdhadTapATTACHMENTSASAPPLICABL NOTARYID902767 of sopa,aiq a Residential Design Sbndard Vane-� My Commission E�iresFebruary 15,2020 lend Use Reviews Req:Stream Margin Review, FTHEPUBLICATION Special Review,Residential Design Sumd.rd Vana- tOsclelon am Making Body: Planning a� Zanin9GRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICE (SIGN) Commission .AppllanL Rivedmnt Fprk LLC,1130 Black Biho' THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED Drive,Aspen,CO 81611 More Info...a on: For further information""'I" to the project,contact Garton Lanmer at the City ofL IM �alena St.,Community ((99n)42112739,ent Damn ANT ANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTAE OWNERS NOTICE published in the Aspen Times on January 25.20181UIRED BY C.R.S. §24-65.5-103.3 000018/128 I • • • AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIRED BY SECTION 26.304.060(E),ASPEN LAND USE CODE ADDRESS OF PROPERTY: 1130 Black Birch Drive Aspen, CODE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING DATE: February 20th 12018 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. County of Pitkin ) I, Steev Wilson (name, please print) being or representing an Applicant to the City of Aspen, Colorado, hereby personally certify that I have complied with the public notice requirements of Section 26.304.060 (E)of the Aspen Land Use Code in the following manner: Publication of notice: By the publication in the legal notice section of an official Paper or paper of general circulation in the City of Aspen at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing. A copy of the publication is attached hereto. f X Posting of notice: By posting of notice,which form was obtained from the Community Development Department, which was made of suitable, waterproof Materials,which was not less than twenty two (22) inches wide and twenty-six(26) Inches high, and which was composed of letters not less than one inch in height. Said notice was posted at least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on the 2nd day of February 2011 to and including the date and time of the public hearing. A photograph of the posted notice(sign)is attached hereto: X Mailing of notice. By mailing of a notice obtained from the Community Development Department,which contains the information described in Section 26.304.060(E) (2)of The Aspen Land Use Code. At least fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing, notice was hand delivered or mailed by first class postage prepaid U.S mail to all owners of property subject to the development application. The names and addresses of property owners shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appeared no more than sixty (60) days prior to the date of the public hearing. A copy of the owners and governmental agencies so noticed is attached hereto. Neighborhood Outreach: Applicant attests that neighborhood outreach, summarized and attached, was conducted prior to the first public hearing as required in Section 26.304.035, Neighborhood Outreach. A copy of the neighborhood outreach summary, including the method of public notification and a copy of any documentation that was presented to the public is attached hereto. (Continued on next page) March,2017 City of Apen 1130 S. Galena St.1 0 0 5090 • T • y Mineral Estate Owner Notice. By the certified mailing of notice, return receipt requested, To affected mineral estate owners by at least thirty(30) days prior to the date scheduled for the initial public hearing on the application of development. the names and addresses of mineral estate owners shall be those on the current tax tax records of Pitkin County. At a minimum, Subdivision,Spas or PUDs that create more than one lot, new Planned Unit Development, and new Specially Planned Areas, are subject to this notices requirement. Rezoning or text amendment. Whenever the official zoning district map is in any way to be changed or amended incidental to or as part of a general revision of this Title,to whenever the text of this Title is to be amended,whether such revision be made by repeal of this Title and enactment of new land use regulation, or otherwise,the requirement of an accurate survey map or other significant legal description of, and the notice to and listing of names and addresses of owners of real estate property in the ears of the proposed change shall be waived. However,the proposed zoning during all business hours for fifteen (15) days prior to the public hearing on such amendments. Signature The foregoing"Affidavit Notice'was acknowledged befrre,.m'e,this _day of 20—E by WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL JENNIFER Notary PuPublicblic My commissi xpires:l 2� I State of Colorado Notary ID 20074009921 My Commission Expires Nov 25, 2019 Notary lic ATTACHMENTS AS APPLICABLE: • COPY OF THE PUBLICATION • PHOTOGRAPH OF THE POSTED NOTICES (SIGN) • LIST OF THE OWNERS AND GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES NOTICED BY MAIL • APPLICANT CERTIFICATION OF MINERAL ESTATE OWNERS NOTICED AS REQIURES BY C.R.S §24-65.5-103.3 4.6 THE CITY OF ASPEN City of Aspen 130 S.Galena Street,Aspen, CO 81611 p: (970) 920.5000 f: (970)920.5197 w:www.aspenpitkin.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING RE: 1130 Black Birch Drive Public Hearing: Tuesday, February 20th, 2018; 4:30 PM Meeting Location: City Hall, Sister Cities 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 81611 Project Location: 1130 Black Birch Drive, Parcel ID: 273501307009; Legally Described as Lot 13, Black Birch Estates Subdivision, according to the Plat thereof recorded May 1, 1967 in Plat Book 3 at Page 244. Description: The applicant is proposing to demolish the existing structure and construct a single-family home on the property. The property sits below the established Top of Slope according to the adopted Stream Margin Map.The location of the Top of Slope from the river affects the potential location of development. An alternative Top of Slope determination is being proposed by the applicant through a special review request by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Other reviews that will be conducted at the same hearing include a Stream Margin review based on the newly established Top of Slope, and a Residential Design Standard Variation. Land Use Reviews Req: Stream Margin Review,Special Review, Residential Design Standard Variation Request Decision Making Body: Planning and Zoning Commission Applicant: Riverfront Fork LLC, 1130 Black Birch Drive,Aspen, CO 81611 More Information: For further information related to the project, contact Garrett Larimer at the City of Aspen Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO, 970.429.2739, garrett.larimer@cityofaspen.com t P Y ii III a NEW II la Ifr rl r , II 1z" 1130 + Co 161, k SAUSSUS GUY&MARTINE 20% SAUSSUS PATRICK T 80% CHARLES TIMOTHY JOHN 3015 BRYAN ST#3A 8576 E MINERAL CIR 1195 BLACK BIRCH DR DALLAS,TX 75204 CENTENNIAL,CO 80112 ASPEN,CO 81611 LPRP RIVER II LLC CAMPBELL MICHAEL HERNANDEZ LORENE M 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR 140 N DOWNING ST 140 N DOWNING ST ASPEN,CO 81611 DENVER,CO 80218 DENVER,CO 80218 BLACK BIRCH ESTATES LLC MORROW DARRELL C LPRP MILL LLC 6925 HILL FOREST DR 1120 BLACK BIRCH DR 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR DALLAS,TX 75230 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81611 LPRP RIVER LLC UKRAINE LINDA W REV TRUST 1180 BLACK BIRCH HOLDINGS LLC 1100 BLACK BIRCH DR PO BOX 10844 PO BOX 1860 ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612 BENTONVILLE,AR 72712 1160 LLC GRUENBERG WILLIAM A&JOYCE TRUSTS RANSFORD SARA P 1150 RIVER DR PO BOX 704 1150 RIVER DR ASPEN,CO 81611 ASPEN,CO 81612-0704 ASPEN,CO 81611 SCHULTZ ROBERT J TRUST ENSIGN I LTD CITY OF ASPEN 1140 BLACK BIRCH DR 2001 KIRBY DR#1300 130 S GALENA ST ASPEN,CO 81611 HOUSTON,TX 77019 ASPEN,CO 81611 PITKIN COUNTY 123 EMMA RD#204 BASALT,CO 81621