Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Charlie & Winston 305 W Hallam St.A64-94 J'~ ~\1D ~ \\)\,>\ ........ ". ~ fJ - ~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 08/23/94 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE C~LETE: 'A~,-_ 2735-124-34-003 A64-94 . 4 \ J~ STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJE T NAM : - ~ .J~_ Lot Soli t Subdivision Exemotion ~ ,,'fl' _, / Project Address: 305 West Hallam Legal Address: Lots F.G.H.I. Block 43 APPLICANT: Andrew Doremus Applicant Address: 85 Glen Garrv Drive REPRESENTATIVE: Marti Pickett 925-2211 Representative Address/Phone: 320 W. Main Asoen. CO 81611 -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING ENGINEER HOUSING ENV. HEALTH TOTAL $ 978 $ 96 $ $ $ 1074 # APPS RECEIVED # PLATS RECEIVED 5 5 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: -1L 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date -D~~ I"{ PUBLIC HEARING: ~ NO /;(IV trio VESTED RIGHTS: NO DRC Meeting Date --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------- REFERRALS: city Attorney ~ Parks Dept. School District )( City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space ,~~ Envir.Hlth. ACSD X other-1f'f>c... ~'(j X Zoning Energy Center Other . DATE REFERRED: --.!1j (q INITIALS: 'JLJ DUE: ,b (I t./ --------------------------------------------/---7--------------- ;i;A~-;~;;i;~~--iJt7~~--------~A;;-;~;;;~~-ILI~- ~v-i;i;iA~~-?~- ___ City Atty ___ City Engineer ___Zoning ___Env. Health ___ Housing ___ Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: -- - .-, - ORDINANCE NO. (o~ (SERIES OF 199~ AN ORDINANCE OF THE ASPEN CITY COUNCIL GRANTING A SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AND GMQS EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT FOR 305 WEST HALLAM STREET (LOTS F, G, H, AND I, BLOCK 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN) ASPEN, COLORADO WHEREAS, pursuant to sections 24-7-1003 and 24-8-104 C., of the Municipal Code, a lot split is a subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption reviewed by City Council; and WHEREAS, the applicant, Andrew J. Doremus has requested to split his 12,000 square foot parcel to create two 6,000 square foot residential parcels; and WHEREAS, the Planning Department, Engineering Department, Zoning Enforcement Officer, Historic Preservation Officer, and Parks Department have reviewed the application and recommend approval of the lot split with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Aspen City Council has reviewed and considered the subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as identified herein, has reviewed and considered those recommendations made by the Planning Department and has taken and considered public comment at public hearing; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the lot split, with conditions, meets or exceeds all applicable development standards; and WHEREAS, the city Council finds that this Ordinance furthers and is necessary for public health, safety, and welfare. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO as follows: ,-,' ......... >oJ - section 1: Pursuant to sections 24-7-1003 and 24-8-104 C. of the Municipal Code, and subject to those conditions of approval as specified hereinafter, the City Council finds as follows in regard to the subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption: 1. The applicant I s submission is complete and sufficient to afford review and evaluation for approval. 2. The subdivision exemption is consistent with the purposes of subdivision which is to assist in the orderly and efficient development of the city and safeguard the interests of the public and the subdivider and provide consumer protection for the purchaser. Section 2: Pursuant to the findings set forth in Section 1 above, the City Council does hereby grant a subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption for 305 West Hallam Street with the following conditions: 1) The Plat must meet the requirements of Section 24-7-1004.D. of the Municipal Code. 2) The developer shall replace the damaged curb and gutter on the Second Street frontage before issuance of a Certificate of occupancy. 3) Any development on the parcel must comply with storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004 C.4.f. 4) An electric transformer easement shall be provided for the existing meter box on lot 1 and a 4'x4' easement is required at the southeast corner of lot 2. 5) The applicant shall agree to Jo~n any future improvements districts for improvements to be constructed in the public right-of-way. 6) Permits from the Streets Department are necessary for any work in the right-of-way, including landscaping. Approval of building permit plans does not constitute approval of design or work in the public right-of-way. 7) Development on each parcel shall meet current driveway requirements. 8) Pedestrian space must be retained along the street rights- of-way. 2 - '-'" -. '-" 9) The encroaching fence along Second Street must be relocated or removed at the time of development of Lot 2. lO) Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits, tree removal permits from the Parks Department are required for any tree 6"diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Submit for tree removal permits at least two weeks prior to submitting for building permit. 11) Trees which will be retained must be protected prior to any demolition, grading, excavation or material storage by the placement of barricade fences around the driplines of the trees. 12) All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. l3) The subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments and shall be filed within 180 days of final approval or the subdivision exemption approval is void. 14) The plat shall contain language stating that the setback non- conformities created by the new lot line shall be eliminated during redevelopment on the two lots to conform with the setback requirements of the R-6 zone district. section 3: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or portion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. section 4: This Ordinance shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances. section 5: A public hearing on the Ordinance shall be held on the 3 c "" ","'" day of , 1994 at 5:00 P.M. in the City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen colorado, fifteen (15) days prior to which hearing a public notice of the same shall be published one in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the City council of the city of Aspen on the day of , 1994. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, city Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this day of , 1994. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk 4 ,{ - '-' .""', ...~ MEMORANDUM To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department C-t2- Date: October 14, 1994 Re: Charlie & Winston Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Site Draina~ - Development on each parcel must meet the storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f and maintain historic drainage on site. 2. Drivewavs - The current driveway loops onto West Hallam. City Code permits one driveway per lot (Section 19-101). Development on each parcel must meet current requirements. Access from the alley is preferable to driveways accessing the streets. Section 24-3-101 (definitions, "Floor area") provides a 500 square foot exclusion for dwelling units for garage access from alleys. This should be included as general note on the final plat. 3. Sidewalk Curb & Gutter - The site is in the West End where concrete sidewalks are not required, but pedestrian usable spaces are required. The site currently provides pedestrian usable space between the curb and the property line. Such space must also be provided for prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for development on either parcel. About ten feet of curb and gutter on the Second Street frontage has heaved and must be replaced prior to certificate of occupancy. 4. Encroachment - There is a fence encroaching into the Second Street right-of-way. It must be relocated or removed at the time of development of Lot 2. 5. Utilities - The final plat must indicate an easeIljlent for the existing electric meter box at the southeast comer of Lot 1 and a 4' x 4' easement at the southeast comer of Lot 2 for possible future relocation of the existing utility pedestal near that property comer. { ,-'- ..... ,.e-<"" 6. Final Plat - The final plat must meet the requirements of Section 24-7-1004.0. 7. Improvement Districts - The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement dis- tricts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way. 8. Work in the Public Right-of-wav - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights-of-way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as follows: The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights-of-way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way from city streets department (920-5130). cc: Cris Caruso, Andrew Doremus, Martha Pickett M94.3S1 """ '-" '..".....,-- PUBUC NOnCE RE: CHARLIE ol WINSTON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPUT .....- .~. N011CE IS HEREBY GI'lEN that. ."publlc hear. .... win be held on Monday'.BreiEember 12. 1994 .-: a meeting to begin 'at 5:00 pm before the Alpen City Council. City Council Chamber., .' Cft7 Hall, 130 S. Galena. Aspen to consider an QplkaUon submitted by VEJ.. AJO Partner- PIp, u.c. C/o Andrew Doremus., 85. Glen Gary Drtve, Aspen. CO. requesting approval 01 a Sub- dtvtskJn Eem.puon for a Lot Spilt to create two 6,000 square foot lots. The property Is located .. Lots F, G, H &. I, Block 43, City and Townsite .; of Aapen. For further information, contact 10m :~-Iobuon at the AspenjPltkln Planning Office, 130 S. Galena St.. Aspen. CO 920-5100. , . stjohn Bennett, Mayor As)>e!l CIty CoUncil Published In the Aspen TImei on November 25.1994. . ~ ~ City Council Approved By Ordinance Exhibit , G 19 . ~ o :) ., /" 10~) '. ....',.; i PUBLIC NOTICE RE: CHARLIE' WINSTON SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, December 12, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen city council, city council Chambers, city Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by VEJ & AJD Partnership, LLC, c/o Andrew Doremus, 85 Glen Gary Drive, Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split to create two 6,000 square foot lots. The property is located at Lots F, G, H & I, Block 43, city and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Kim Johnson at the Aspen/pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena st., Asp~n, CO 920-5100. s/John Bennett. Mayor Aspen city Council Published in the Aspen Times on November 25, 1994 " ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------_._,--------~--------------------------------------------- City of Aspen Account ~~'~ c '" /' LANDOWNERS WITHIN 300 FEET OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY VEJ & AJD Partnership, LLC 85 Glen Garry Dr. Aspen, CO 81611 Esther Benninghoff 233 W. Hallam Ave. Aspen, CO 81611 " Joel D. Sax 303 W. Francis Aspen, CO 81611 John A. & Ann F. Scheid 500 S. Arroyo Blvd. Pasadena, CA 91105 Brian & Pati Eberstein 6561 Cliffbrook Dallas, TX 75270 Sharon M. Prior PO Box 656 Aspen, CO 81612 Merrill Ford 323 W. Francis st. Aspen, CO 81611 Jack Barker Carryn Adrianna Barker Trust PO Box 7943 Aspen, CO 81612 Helmut J. & Brunhilde P. Schloffer PO Box 941 Aspen, CO 81612 Marjorie Ann pinnington 46 willoughby Rd. Hampstead, London UK NW31RU John C. & Sara F. Dobbs PO Box 241750 Memphis, TN 38124 Sally Allen Potvin 320 W. Bleeker Aspen, CO 81611 Phillip N. & Susan J. West 2114 Mt. Calvary Rd. Santa Barbara, CA 93105 Eugene siegel 310 W. Bleeker st. Aspen, CO 81611 : ~, William Lloyd Davis Trustee of Davis Living Trust 15233 Ventura Blvd., #600 Sherman Oaks, CA 90403 Margaret W. Saunders 231 Encino Avenue San Antonio, TX 78209 Lynda Maccarthy PO Box 117 Aspen, CO 81612 Gretta M. Kettelkamp 3408 Morris Avenue Pueblo, CO 81008 Raymond A. Larson, Jr. Eric Jon Larson PO Box 1268 Eau Claire, WI 54702 M.D.W. Enterprises, Inc. 233 W. Bleeker Aspen, CO 81611 Leonard C. Horvitz Richard Horvitz Trust 85 Stonewood Drive Moreland Hills, OH 44022 Nicholas DeWolf 233 W. Bleeker Aspen, CO 81511 Sam & Laura Richter 21213 Harrow Court Boca Raton, FL 33433 Galardi Group, Inc. 4440 Von Karman Ave. Newport Beach, CA 92660 " c Arthur & Fredna stromberg 442 W. Bleeker Aspen, CO 81611 Arthur & Fredna stromberg 145 Bridge Road Hillsborough, CA 94010 Marion Tesitor 1136 E. Fifth Ave. Longmont, CO 80501 Chester & Beverly Firestein 9777 wilshire Blvd., Ste. 501 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 William D. & Patricia A. Hutzley 100 Cold Indian spring Ocean, NJ 07712 Marilyn Gallant 617 Vine street, Ste. 1430 cincinnati, OH 45202 Marybelle S. Robinson 2552 E. Alameda st., #97 Denver, CO 80209 Beryl Arthur & Mary Elizabeth Erickson PO Box 1207 Aspen, CO 81612 Felicia M. Lee 302 N. 2nd st. Aspen, CO 81611 George A. Vicenzi PO Box 2238 Aspen, CO 81612 James P.S. Griffith suite A, 3417 Milam Ave. Houston, TX 77002 Esther Leonard DeVos PO Box 3238 Aspen, CO 81612 .~ Leslie G. Rudd PO Box 968 Wichita, KS 67201 Josef & Margarete A. Uhl PO Box 122 Aspen, CO 81612 \, Frank E. Peters Marta Chaikovska PO Box 9698 Aspen, CO 81612 o. Louis & Frances Lynette Wille 200 W. Main Aspen, CO 81611 Don D. & Ann W. Pevehouse PO Box 7757 Aspen, CO 81612 Ruth Whyte PO Box 202 Aspen, CO 81612 vej\propownr.lst -2- Dobbs Brothers Management 5170 Sanderlin-Suite 102 Memphis. Tenn. 38117 Mailing Address: P.O. 80x 241750 Memphis, Tenn. 38124-1750 901/685-8881 FAX - 901/685-9053 ~ - ,,--' . \ . JOHN C. DOBBS PARTNER December 5, 1994 \)t.\., \ ?J 'fJlIt. Ms. Kim Johnson Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 s. Galena street Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Ms. Johnson: My wife and I have a home at 207 North Second Street in West End. We are opposed to the request that VEJ and AGD Partnershi p, LLC has made to create two 6,000 square foot lots located at Lots F, G, H and I, Block 43. We are opposing the request to subdivide because I think it would create additional car traffic in our neighborhood. Yo~rs . /?' }// . l/iPS J n C. Dobbs JCD:bc .... .~.""",~.____-,-,,,,,"",,,,,,~,,,"~,,,,,,,,,,,,'..~M'_ .,._ c :) MEMORANDUM FROM: Mayor and city council Amy Margerum, City Manager stan Claus~ Community Development Director Kim Johnson, Planner TO: THRU: THRU: DATE: December 12, 1994 RE: Charlie & winston Exemption for a Lot 63, Series of 1994 Subdivision Exemption Split, Second Reading of (Public Hearing) and GMQS Ordinance ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The applicant, Andrew J. Doremus, requests a lot split to create two 6,000 s.f. residential parcels from one 12,000 s.f. parcel. Pursuant to sections 24-7-1003 and 24-8-104 C. a lot split is a subdivision exemption and GMQS Exemption by Council. First reading was approved on the consent calendar on November 14, 1994. The property is located at 305 W. Hallam street. It is zonedl'f r~~ R-6 Medium Density Residential. t' ~- APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The request is for a subdivision exemption ~ ~ to split the 12,000 square foot parcel into two 6,000 square foot parcels. The underlying R-6 zone wi 11 allow a single family residence on each of the parcels. An existing residence straddles the proposed lot line, but is intended to be demolished for redevelopment of the new lots. Please refer to Exhibit "A" for the proposed plat. REFERRAL COMMENTS: "B". Please see complete referral memos, Exhibit Parks: Rebecca Baker stated that development on the two new parcels will have an impact on the mature deciduous and evergreen trees on the site. These trees should be saved or relocated o~ VJ,"A~L site. Tree removal/relocation permits are required prior to the fV~-'-~ issuance of any demolition or building permits. ~ ~ Enqineerinq: Chuck Roth forwards the following: ~~~ ~ ~ 1) The Plat must meet the requirements of section 24-7-1004.D. of the Municipal Code. 2) The developer shall replace the damaged curb and gutter on the Second Street frontage before issuance of the certificate of Occupancy. 3) Any development on the parcel must comply with storm runoff requirements of section 24-7-1004 C.4.f. c J 4) An electric transformer easement shall be provided for the existing meter box on lot 1 and a 4'x4' easement is required at the southeast corner of lot 2. 5) The applicant shall agree to join any future improvements districts for improvements in the public right-of-way. 6) Permits are necessary for any work in the right-of-way, including landscaping. 7) Development on each parcel shall meet current driveway requirements. 8) Pedestrian space must be retained along the street rights- of-way. 9) The encroaching fence along Second Street must be relocated or removed at the time of development of Lot 2. Zonina: Bill Drueding submitted the following: 1) Development on Lot 2 shall comply with the setback rule for corner lots under section 24-3-101 Yards (c). Historic Preservation: Amy Amidon stated that the owner has requested that the parcel be removed from the inventory of historic landmarks. The HPC has considered the request and is forwarding a recommendation to City Council that the property be taken off of the inventory. Council will hear first reading of this item in January. If Council denies the removal request, the demolition, partial demolition or relocation of the home will have to be approved by the HPC. If the Council approves the request, HPC review is not required. STAFF COMMENTS: There is an existing 1,200 s.f. single family residence on the parcel. As mentioned in the Parks referral comments, there are significant trees on the site. The setbacks in the R-6 zone can accommodate many of these trees by keeping development from the root zones. However, there is no regulation that prohibits the removal of trees from the site. It is suggested that the applicant voluntarily agree to save and protect the four spruces along Hallam, the three aspens in the rear yards, and as many of the deciduous trees in the middle of the lots as feasibly possible. In order to protect the trees, barricades must be erected at the trees I drip lines prior to commencement of any construction activity such as demolition, grading, excavation or material storage. Based on current codes, the FAR allowed for each new single family home is 3,240 s.f. By designing two story homes, more yard area would be provided to accommodate the mature trees. The split of a lot for the purposes of the development of one detached single-family dwelling is a subdivision exemption by 2 .. c ~ Council. In addition, the development of a single family home on a lot formed by a lot split is also a GMQS Exemption by Council. Pursuant to sections 24-7-1003 and 24-8-104 C., a lot split subsequent to November 14, 1977 may be granted if all of the following conditions are met: A. The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the city Council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of the subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969. RESPONSE: The property is in the original Townsite and East Aspen Addition, thus is not located in a subdivision approved by either the BOCC or Council, and has not been subdivided after 1969. B. No more than two lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district and the applicant commits that any lot for which development is proposed will contain an accessory dwelling unit. When there is demolition of the property which makes it subject to the provision of Article 5, Division 7, Replacement Housing Program, the standards of that program shall supersede these requirements. RESPONSE: No more than 2 lots will be created by this lot split. The two parcels will conform to the underlying R-6 zone district requirements. HPC will not review any demolition or development on this parcel provided that the property is removed from the inventory as requested by the owner. Because the existing home conflicts with the proposed lot line bisecting the property, the Subdivision Exemption Plat must reflect that any new development on the parcels will require that these buildings conform to the required side yard setbacks. This Plat note removes the need to have the existing structures go before the Zoning Board of Adjustment for a variance to the new setbacks or to demolish the structure prior to recording the plat. The 1990 affordable housing mitigation requirements of Ordinance 1 (Section 24-8-104 A.1.c.) supersede the 1988 requirements that each lot created by a lot split must provide an accessory dwelling unit. However, if an accessory dwelling unit is proposed, it must receive approval as required by the land use regulations. Otherwise, Ordinance 1 allows for other options including deed restriction of the new units or payment of cash-in-lieu for new floor area on the parcel. C. The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of an exemption under the provisions of this article or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to a GMQS Exemption by Council. 3 c :) RESPONSE: The subject parcel was not previously granted an exemption under the provisions of Chapter 24, the Land Use section of the Municipal Code. D. A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this article and growth management allocation pursuant to Article 8. RESPONSE: A subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed by the Planning and Engineering Departments and shall be recorded within 180 days of final approval. Failure to record the agreement and plat shall nullify the approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed lot split with the following conditions: 1) The Plat must meet the requirements of Section 24-7-1004.D. of the Municipal Code. 2) The developer shall replace the damaged curb and gutter on the Second Street frontage before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3) Any development on the parcel must comply with storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004 C.4.f. 4) An electric transformer easement shall be provided for the existing meter box on lot 1 and a 4'x4' easement is required at the southeast corner of lot 2. 5) The applicant shall agree to join any future improvements districts for improvements to be constructed in the public right-of-way. 6) Permits from the Streets Department are necessary for any work in the right-of-way, including landscaping. Approval of building permit plans does not constitute approval of design or work in the public right-of-way. 7) Development on each parcel shall meet current driveway requirements. 8) Pedestrian space must be retained along the street rights- of-way. 9) The encroaching fence along Second Street must be relocated or removed at the time of development of Lot 2. 4 -- c .:) 10) Prior to the issuance of any demolition or building permits, tree removal permits from the Parks Department are required for any tree 6" diameter or greater which will be removed or relocated. Submit for tree removal permits at least two weeks prior to submitting for building permit. 11) Trees which will be retained must be protected prior to any demolition, grading, excavation or material storage by the placement of barricade fences around the driplines of the trees. 12) All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 13) The subdivision plat and subdivision exemption agreement shall be reviewed and approved by the Engineering and Planning Departments and shall be filed within 180 days of final approval or the subdivision exemption approval is void. 14) The plat shall contain language stating that the setback non- conformities created by the new lot line shall be eliminated during redevelopment on the two lots to conform with the setback requirements of the R-6 zone district. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve at second reading Ordinance 63, Series of 1994 for the Charlie & winston lot split subdivision exemption at 305 West Hallam street, Aspen Colorado." Ordinance 63, Series of 1994. EXHIBITS: A. Proposed Plat B. Referral Comments C. Published Public Notice 5 . -j;..L ~."'~ r,~.. ..'... ~ -~ .LCiIC/.LS aNO:J3S H3LL09 ~ SHno 313H~OJ Q.LC/ON Ci.ty counci.l AiflN'ovecl By Ordinance B,.hibit k , It..J 5 . ~ ~. .."i ~ "'., ::~. -~""':l Oocs:._ 'i~ ,~ ~"2.~ .~ o .00'001 6p.OS.pIN '<1. 'i .~ l'!. _ ,.. ~ .... t... ~ ';. ~ \ 't .. o f- o ..J .00'001 3.6y.05."IN ---'-'-'" . - .. ('1& ~.~ ~.~ I I I I o . - ~ '""" ~ ~ <3.Q 0 ...- ~ --..~ _/ !~' /< . I / . ~ I ~..,c. ~ ~'S~/:':' I ~I i - ~ ~ w z > .. .. " ~ o .. ';. ~ ~~ ., f- a ..J J'i I " I ~ .~ ./ / ./ ,/ / / / / / / ~/ / _----_.//--\ / / all / ..... / / r--f- / / 0 - -- / ~* _/ - / / / " .. -: / I I ...--- -,8 ) w / " o - - < .. ./ ...- ----- - + v ./ --==--- - /' * - - - " --~-;----- ...- .. .~ .... '; 'i . -----../ ~~ ...- d' ~~ ,/ ,..)." ,/ .. ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ / - - ...- / ,/ I' - - '- /' / ...- ...- ...- - --- ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ ,/ LJ...-'/ ...-.........- ,/ f- o ,/ ..J./ / ~ ,/ > 'i ,/ ,/ / / / .~ " ~ - r ' \ \ 01 -- ,/ ,/ ,/ /' ,/ ,/~./ ,/ /- ':l ,,- ,,> 0- .00'001 A.6p.OS.pIS h ~" c " ,; C1ty Council Approved By Ordinance Exhibit B , 19 MEMORANDUM TO: stan Clauson, Planning Director Kim Johnson, Planner FROM: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Planner RE: 305 W. Hallam DATE: November 7, 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- This house was moved to its current site from another location in the West End and has undergone major changes in terms of materials. It has been stuccoed, windows changed, roof changed and new features added. The original appearance of the house and any demolition which may have taken place is difficult to determine. In the 1980's, the City used a numerical rating system, 0 through 5 to identify the overall "quality" of our historic resources and the significance of individual structures. This building was rated a 1 (next to lowest), and was exempted by City Council Ordinance #5, Series of 1987, from a moratorium on demolition of historic resources which was in effect at that time because Council and HPC found that this and other buildings had lost their historic significance. Consultants hired by the City to re-evaluate the Inventory in 1991- 92 recommended that 305 W. Hallam be deleted from the Inventory of Historic sites and Structures because the only remaining historic significance of the building is its contribution to the scale of the West End. In September, HPC was asked to re-evaluate the status of a number of historically designated sites as part of a five year review which they are required to do. The recommendation from the consultants that 305 W. Hallam be deleted from the Inventory was presented to the Committee, and Staff specifically recommended that they carefully consider this site. A number of the Committee members made a site visit. They decided (by ReSOlution) that this house is only marginally significant, in terms of scale, and that it should be deleted. This recommendation is to be forwarded to City Council in January. c """ .....,; MEMORANDUM TO: THRU: FROM: DATE: RE: Kim Johnson, Planning Office George Robinson, Parks Director Rebecca Baker, Parks Department October 24, 1994 Charlie and Winston Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split & GMQS Exemption We have reviewed the application submitted by Andrew Doremus for Subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption for a Lot split on the property located at the corner of Hallam and Second Streets. Our biggest concem regarding this application is the current landscaping of this parceL The existing house is located in the center of the parcel with relatively mature landscaping surrounding the house. With a lot split and probable demolition of the existing house and development of two new houses, one on each lot, impacts the spruces trees currently on the property. A tree removal permit would be required if such a scenario takes place, and it would be encouraged to save or relocate those spruce trees on the lot c -""'" ~ MEMO TO: Kim Johnson FROM: Charlie, if' ~nston Wil~rre~ing Lot split RE: ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENTS: 1. A fence encroaches on city property east of Lot I off of North Second Street. 2. Are there plans to demolish the existing house? I don't think we should keep going to the Board of Adjustment to legitimize the setback problems if the house straddles the new property line. 3. Lot #2 would fall under the setback rule for a corner lot. section 3.101 yards (c). .,'.: ',' l!l! County of Pitkin ) ) ss. state of Colorado ) AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE BY POSTING -GF 1\ UARIl...UCE IIEARInG BEFORE ~u~ CITY OF A3PEN BQ]..R:B OF AlAJU::>TM..t.;Nl.'"> (Pursuant to section 2-22 (c) of the Municipal Code) The undersigned, being first duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: 1. I, Andrew J. Doremus or being representing an Applicant before the city of Aspen Board of Adjustment, personally certify that the attached photograph fairly and accurately represents the sign posted as Notice of the variance hearing on this matter in a conspicuous place on the subject property (as it could be seen from the nearest public from 2nd and that the said sign was posted DecEmber day of and visible continuously 19 94 to the -' way) the 12th day of Decanber for at least ten (10) full days before the hearing date) . 19.2i.. (Must be posted J' - ~~_"....... ~l. .....'. ,. ...... . ...t. . '}''f{~J~ ~~ ~.. I. . ..)0 I I . \ .~~ .."' .. ." /' ~. ~.,."I"':: -II \Aii.. ,.:j;.... ~.,. ~9""~ . ~. -;: ,. r "... ''''''''~ ~ ~ t ... . , . . ~ I Subscribed and sworn 1;q befor~ me, this I~ day of ~ 19:1!1 by Andrew J. Doremus WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. "...., ........, :) AFFIDAVIT OF NOTICE OF MAILING I hereby certify that the Notice attached as Exhibit "A" was sent first class mail, postage prepaid to all persons on the attached Exhibit "B" on the 1st day of December, 1994. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing was subscribed and sworn to before me this 1st day of December, 1994, by Jeanne C. Doremus. witness my hand and officiai.seal. My commission expires: Jj 17f1c:" () ~ Y\I\~ C--,~ Notary Public vej\mai l ing.ntc 1) project: Name C l\TmC11MENr 1. Il\ND USE APPLJ:CATION FOl<M CHARLIE & WINSTON LOT SPLIT .......\ '.....J " ~ " ..... 2) Project: IDeation 305 West Hallam Street. Aspen. CO (inlicate street adkess, lot. & block nuniJer, awrcpriate) Lots F, G, H, I, BLock 43, City and Townsite of AspJn, legal description YIhere R-6 12,000 sq. ft. 3) P.I;esent Za1in::J 4) lot size 5) 1'IW1icanl:'S Name, 1lddJ:ess & Ibone '. Andrew J. Doremus, 85 Glen Garry Drive Aspen, CO .(303) 925-496l . . Martha C. Pickett, McFlynn & Pickett, P.C. RepreSentative's Name, l\d:kess & Ibone , 320 W. Main Street, Aspen, CO 8l6ll (303) 925-2211 6) 7) 'J:Ypeof 1'IWlication: (please d1eck all that awly): _ 8040. GI:eenline _ ~ IUD. ~ UXIcepI::ual Historic Dev. :.:-- Fina1 Histaric Dev -. Minor Historic Dev_ carrlitional Use _~SPA Final SPA _ Speci,,' Review _ Sb:eam Mllgin Final IUD _ Hi$taric l)>o1n' iticn M:xmtain view Plane . SUbdivisicn _ Historic Designaticn . OXrlcminiumizaticn _ 'l'ext:/MaP A1oorrlne1l: _ XX IDt splitjIDt Line lIdjusbJrmt 8) Description. of. Eldst.in:J . Uses (n.mi:Jer am type of existing. st::J:uc:b.1I=;; awrarimate sq. ft.; JlImb>r of kili...:ms; any previalS 'aWrOVaJ.S granted b? the prqJerty) . _ GQ3 Allotment: _ GQ3 ExaIpticn One single family dwelling unit containing 4 bedrooms and is approximately l200 Sq. Ft. 9) DescJ;:ipt.ion of DevellJlAl""l1l: 1'IWlication Lot Split of 4 City lo. s into 2 parcels of 6,000 sq. ft. each lO) !five yoo attad1ed the folla.rin:J? Response to Attad1menl: 2, MinbIum Sl1m; .....icn 0Jrrt:ents -x-- Response to Attad1menl: 3, Specific S11m; .....icn 0Jrrt:ents -x-- Response to Atta<.iWl2<1Il: 4, Review starrlards for Yoor 1'IWlicaticn -. -' -. - AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT THE LAND USE APPLICATION THE UNDERSIGNED as the owner of Lots F, G, H, I, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen, hereby authorizes Martha C. pickett and Jeanne C. Doremus of McFlynn & Pickett, P.C., 320 West Main, suite 1, Aspen, Colorado, 81611, telephone number (303) 925-2211, to submit a Land Use Application on my behalf to the City of Aspen for a lot split of the above mentioned property and to execute any and all documents which may be required to obtain approval for a lot split. 5) DATED this &LI day of August, 1994. VEJ & AJD PARTNERSHIP, LLC. B . A drew J. D 85 Glen Gar Drive Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-4961 ~'" 'T'r:,~ "'l-('~~ "~'I;t~ -.. " I ' TTn EO"., L...~."":... c.:i.,U:L ,1,;11 f~ '>.. W ,MliGCllofl !'Tllf:f' '--.. rTrn-rT"'~rt'T"T1T:-~1 f:T'! It! r- f-!/.rrTI'"'l. .' UlJ ~' .u ," ", , "" \ I L......u .....~..... L-~.?......__ -..l_.....1.........., IT '''':rl'rr~ rrrriA",~- "CT!~I'" n'r ' "\- I'. 1,.. I ,! 0))1 " !..' "I', -1.1" " ': ill' '1 L. . l..W-L...._I.._........ .L~_ .. _ "'--, _ ,'W,FRANClS STP,EO ,Yf~h'Rr', ]1TIJ' ,I,... ,,' ". , "I-, I, ,IW iJ, ' ,1.J.j ii: [fT;~T~ ~ ;~ ; : 5.<1'ro'. ~ WAl}~ ~: n ~ [JfJ 0 ; ~ ]UJ] 1, I Z I:!!'; I ~ I I' ,1 :-1, 1..... I ;'rl I V\" I 'L;: J" J ' . i _Lt,:."';",,", ,.;.J; d.. ,. '", T.w ..;1 .,.J 1, .. HAI.LAM .!O'REET J: Q '"""..^", "" '" E HAl. '11"111 ~T". '" TTfl~, rrnJm], Q fTrri'~ ~ fT IT! TTTn., ... T I 'i~"" ;) Wi " ~ I 'J '.l U , i ' , L1, ' III- C .A~~~ 'r"~'., -';'; fi: fTr!', . rn ~ n Irr f i ~ iD!':7p.-:-D g :Jfl '!'m '" un IT'O"'~~ 'lr~ i.." ,,' I"J ,/,: :. Ij",:I)-U'j'I' :r 1'1 ~,",".-q.; .J.lf.-. '-I L~'~~~'CJ: '-'~T~'i':lOr~ z; Lc' , L L: oil I 1 'J ~ ~ 81. JEKEfI !rJlI fl ":.,"" r P,'r",T. r., wrwn n ~ ~'!~'nl ~ r IT,! rn t,trJ,;L;.,r'D ~:;~; ;~rr l, r. '~. '~r'~"I" r..Jn ii: ~;i '~, jJ1 :3[0 ~lll ill ~ ' " '.', ' , ' , ,I . , . ' I, " , '2! '" I .L.,l '-,,,.1.._,.. L..1._, ~.L UluJLl.LZ,d..Jd,U L <( . l..laRAk MAIN ':$,fREE T '#H1' ' , 1 fT1 f1! .: I r'T1 rr. IffiTTr rrr~~1 m mIl ~I' r--- f J I " 'L' , LI'WJ " W U I mi:'" 61 1LLL] ; :'jf:J1n : rrr]JJ Tn ~ lii L.IU PJl 1 m ti U[ L ~ I ~ u. t( $ W HOPKINS AVENUE _ t I' r' ; . r rJJ ~ [ml' n ~ ITlllifP ill " .1J] ~ ITlI1Ul D ~ f 'rr"f rn~rrr IJ]'" nlJ.rrT1fflm ~ m I/)di'l ,l..J: I IIQ ~ "'LIL.LlllJ iii .;' , '\ , rl~ ~ 'it. f' ,." I"'" -- ,..,-" "'~ ...t. ~~\:'~ " ml"',I', \f~'~ " I,-n \lU.M','::;,\\ " \,,\., rrrT'~~., " I ," \, " \ \ ~ \ ,,\.', : -, 1. --,,-, _J~,j ~L-'> "\" :f# '1~"T1 ; I I. ~. . ll...1...! l' '1 " ,.1,J.J , , .. . ,,,,...l' .... J' . I"~ _' .~ ' "Ii :j. i ~." to;: '~:.1:, ';'. . -'-', i VICINITY MAP 'lr!\f;'!l~i b:... .,.!II\/Ijii;" :"" '" ':\ft,II'liih.{I'~!I~WI;,; ,~) ,~,M!l),_ _I,'{t',l.. 'j 'J:;: ,1:',',,_"", .,...._; ~':~IK~rrJj~~;. -"". ,..,.., ~ [ill , CIT~ MONUMENT, f: LOT , . c .~ SCHEDULE A ORDER NUMBER: 00021126C2 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: July 19, 1994 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT OF INSURANCE A. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY $ TBD PROPOSED INSURED: TO BE DETERMINED B. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: C. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: D. $ 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: VEJ & AJD PARTNERSHIP, LLC., A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILTY COMPANY 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lots F, G, H AND I, Block 43, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN County of Pitkin, State of Colorado OWNERS: TBD ST)':WART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 E. Hopkins ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303 925-3577 FAX 303-925-1384 c :) APPLICATION FOR LOT SPLIT SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION August 22, 1994 This application is submitted on behalf of the owner of a parcel of land, described as Lots F, G, H, I, Block 43, city and Townsite of Aspen, to request a lot split by subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption approval pursuant to sections 24-7-1003(A) (2) and 24-S-104(C) (1) (a) of the Aspen Municipal Code. This application complies with the substantive development review standards as follows: 1. No more than two lots will be created by the lot split. 2. The resulting lots will conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district (RS-6) and the applicant commits that any lot for which development is proposed will contain an accessory dwelling unit. 3. The lots under consideration or any part thereof were not previously subject of an exemption under the provisions of either section 24-7-1003 (A) (2) or section 24-S-104 (C) (1) (a) . 4. The proposed lot split meets the requirements of a subdivision exemption in that the division will assist in the orderly and sufficient development of the City, will ensure the proper distribution of development and encourages well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of subdivisions. Attachments included: A. Copy of the Pre-application conference summary B. Five copies of application, with proposed lot split plat C. Consent for representation D. List of names and addresses requiring public notice E. Application fee in the amount of $1074.00 If you have any questions, or would like additional information, please call me. Respectfully submitted, McFLYNN & PICKETT, P.C. By: . Pickett ,." ,,;/ , " ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Al:reement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. - ",. ,f" :'~ -".-0' 5. Therefore, APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's waiver of its right to collect full fees prior to a determination of application completeness, APPLICANT shall pay an initial deposit in the amount of $ which is for _ hours of Planning Office time, and if actual recorded costs exceed the initial deposit, APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CITY for the processing of the application mentioned above, including post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the billing date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay such accrued costs shall be grounds for suspension of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPLICANT By: ~1Yl~ Diane Moore City Planning Director By: Mailing Addr ss: 32 D YV, '- cUrl Sf . 5/.-< A5peVll en 8 (0 Date: II 2 385973 B-795 P-182 09/28/95 04:26P PG 1 OF 5 SILVIA DAVIS PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER REC 26.00 DOC 0.00 NO SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AGREEMENT FOR mE WINSTON & CHARI.IE LOT SPLIT THIS SUBDMSION EXEMPTION AGREEMENT is made and entered into this 5th day of June, 1995, by and between VEJ AND AID PARTNERSHIP, LLC (hereinafter called "Owner"~and THE CITY OF ASPEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ("City"), as of the dates provided below. WITNESSEm: WHEREAS, Owner owns that certain real property (the "Property") located at 305 West Hallam (Lots F, G, H, & I, Block 43, City and Townsite of Aspen), State of Colorado; and WHEREAS, 'on December 12, 1994, the City Council of the City of Aspen granted approval for subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption for a lot split on the Property pursuant to Sections 24-7-1003 'and 24-8-104(C) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen to split a 12,000 square foot parcel to create two 6,000 square foot residential parcels; and WHEREAS, the approval of the lot split was conditioned upon the Owner complying with certain requirements including entering into a Subdivision Exemption Agreement for the Property; and WHEREAS, Owner has subplited to the City for approval, execution and recordation a plat for the Property (the "Plat") and the City agrees to approve, execute and record the Plat on the agreement of the Owner to the matters described herein, subject to the provisions of the Code, the conditions contained herein and other applicable rules and regulations; and WHEREAS, the City has imposed conditions and requirements in connection with its approval, execution and and acceptance of the Plat and such matters are necessary to protect, promote and enhance the public health, safety and welfare and, pursuant to the Code, the City is entitled to assurances that the matters set forth herein will be faithfully performed by the Owner; and WHEREAS, the Owner is willing to enter into such agreement with the City and to provide assurances to the City. NOW, mEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and the approval, execution and acceptance of the Plat for recordation by the City, it is agreed as follows: 1. Acceptance of Plat. Upon execution of this Agreement by all parties hereto, and upon approval of the final plat by the Engineering Department and planning Office, the City agrees to approve and execute the final plat for the subdivision exemption and GMQS exemption for a lot split submitted herewith, which conforms to the requirements of Section 24-7-1004(0) of the Code, 385973 B-795 P-183 09/28/95 04:2&P PG 2 OF 5 2. Public Improvement, L The Owner shall replace the damaged curb and gutter on the 2nd Street frontage before issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. b. Electric transformer easement shall be provided for the existing meter box on Lot I and a 4x4 easement is required at the southeast comer of Lot 2. Co The Owner shall agree to join in future improvement districts for purposes of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way. d. Pedestrian space must be retained along the streets' right-of-way. e. Any work, including landscaping, conducted in the public right of way requires a permit from the City's Street Department, and approval of building plans does not constitute approval of design of work in public right of way. 3. Landscapinr . a. Tree removal permits from the City Parks Department are required as part of the issuance of any demolition or building permits for any tree 6" in diameter or greater which shall be removed or relocated. At least two weeks prior to requesting a building permit from the City, the Owner must submit for tree removal permits.. b. Trees that will be retained must be protected prior to any demolition, grading, excavation or material storage by the placement of barracades fences around the drip lines of the trees. 4. Miscellaneous. 2. Any development on the Property must comply with storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004(C)(4)(F) of the Code. b. The fence encroaching along Second Street must be relocated or removed at the time of development of Lot 2. c. Any development on each parcel shall meet current driveway requirements. -2- 385973 B-795 P-184 09/28/95 04:26P PG 3 OF 5 5. Material Representations. All material representations made by Owner on record to the City in accordance with the approval of the project shall be binding upon the Owner. 6. Enforcement. In the event the City detennines that Owner is not in substantial compliance with the terms of this Agreement or the Final Plat, the City may serve a notice of noncompliance and request that the deficiencies be corrected within a period offorty-five (45) days. In the event the Owner believes tht it is in compliance or that the noncompliance is insubstantial, the Owner may request a hearing before the City Council to detennine whether the alleged noncompliance exists or where any amendment, variance or extension of time to comply should be granted. On request, the City shall conduct a hearing according to its standard procedures and take such action as it deems appropriate. The City shall be entitled to all remedies at equity and at law to enjoin, correct and/or receive damages for any noncompliance with this Agreement. 7. Notices. Notices to the parties shall be sent by U.S. certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid to the parties may substitute in writing. Such notices shall be deemed received, if not sooner received, three (3) days after the date of mailing of the same. To the Owner: VEJ-AJD Partnership, LLC c/o Andrew J. Doremus 0085 Glen Gany Aspen, CO 81611 To the City: City Attorney City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 8. Hindin!: Effect. The provisions of this Agreement shall run with and constitute a burden on the land and shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the Owner, its successors and assigns and to the City, its successors and assigns. 9. Amendment. This Agreement may be altered or amended only by written instrument executed by all the parties hereto, with the same formality as this Agreement was executed. 10. Severability. Ifany of the provisions of this Agreement are detennined to be invalid, such determination shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof. -3- 385973 B-795 P-185 09/28/95 04:26P PG 4 OF 5 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Subdivision Exemption Agreement the day and year first written above. By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: TIIE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO a municipal corporation ATTEST: BY:~~~~fJ~ . e I ~tw>~ By: ~ ;d& Kathryn S och, City Clerk - T l. r STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) The foregoing was sworn and subscribed to before me this /::s). day of r!2.ji//A'k 1995, by Andrew J. Doremus, an authorized member ofVEJ-AJD Partnership LL . _ . Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires /t7 -&. .Cl g , ",,,......,,,,,,--- ,-,\\ ~ S . .Itl" ..\\~.~' ..t....:..lA..,~.. ' tf,$'" ........ .... t..'7(J ." !~l 'J1A.l?.r\C?\. .. 1l; I< . . .. . i 't~U- .. 'O~" '1.... ., ..... ..... ~.... . l'" ....... ~~. "'. ~ \..'" ".. ......, Or CO ,,-' "'h,,,,,,,,..,.." (No<oIy Block ... F....... p....] -4- 385973 B-795 P-186 09/28/95 04:26P PG 5 OF 5 STATEOFCOLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY OF PITKIN ) ~9I!<89.ip~~M '>>'.QI1l and subscribed to before me this~ day of ~ ~ 1995, by~athryn S. Koch, as Mayor and City Clerk, respectively, of The City of Aspen, a Municipal corporation. . -5- ~ . ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE '.f 130 South Galena Slreet Aspen, Colorado 81611 IA (303) 920.5090 ~()03 / \ LAND USE APPLICATION FEES d 13.$' - icJI/... '3 if A-17 ~ CITY: 11 TOTAL //)1 L./ 0 CI Narne{/P T <1-,4 r,tl ItL....,-L, /J Phone: Address: <'l S //f!..... d--:.;,ff, Project: {/tfT-;?1- liT ~ ~ (7~ /?/.,-?;b//'l-tAf / Check.: , Date: No of Copies: _ -63250-134 -6327()'136 -63280-137 -6330()'139 -6331 ().140 -6332()'141 -6333()'150 -63432-157 -63432-157 -MR011 GMP/Conceptual GMP/Final SUB/Conceptual SUB/Rnal AII-2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Perm~ Use Tax for Sign Permits HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 -63336-152 -63337-153 -63338-154 -63339-155 Exemption Minor Major Devel. Signn, Devel. Demolition COUNTY: -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -6319()'129 -6320()'130 -6321()'131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63240-149 -63450-146 -63235-148 GMP/General GMP/Detailed GMP/Final SUB/General SUB/Detailed SU8/Final All 2 Step Applications AliI Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Check REFERRAL FEES: -63360-143 -63340-163 -63340-190 -63340-205 Engineering - County Engineering - City Housing Environmental Hea~h 00115 00123 00125 PLANNING OFFICE SALES: -63080-122 -69000-145 County Code Other (Copy Fees) 1'1<fi,OtJ '76,00