Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Fellman Lot Split Block 33, Lots ABCD '- CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 04/26/94 DATE COMPLETE: ttl61'il'/91/ PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. 2737-182-04-002 A32-94 STAFF MEMBER: ML PROJECT NAME: Fellman Lot Split Project Address: Lots AoBoCoDo & E Block 33 East Aspen Add. Legal Address: APPLICANT: Thomas Fellman Applicant Address: REPRESENTATIVE: Kaufman and Representative Address/Phone: -------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------- FEES: PLANNING ENGINEER HOUSING ENV. HEALTH TOTAL $ 978 $ 96 $ $ $ 1074 # APPS RECEIVED # PLATS RECEIVED 7 7 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: -X- 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO YES NO AES) P.r;;/ rtkll tflftfl0~ ~ ~ f~d.v~ CC Meeting Date J"'h e J 3 ;2n4M~lkly 1/ DRC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: VESTED RIGHTS: =============================================================== REFERRALS: city Attorney Parks Dept. School District X City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other DATE REFERRED: Lf/;l..'l/qtf INITIALS: -::J>]). DUE: s/:17ht./ ;~;~~=;~;;~;~7================;~;;=;~;;;;711~71~;~;~~~71rlu ), ___ City Atty ___ city Engineer ___Zoning ___Env. Health ___ Housing ___ Open space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: MEMORANDUM V\\ a. TO: Mayor and Council Amy Margerum, city Manager~ Leslie Lamont, Interim City Planning Direct~ THRU: THRU: FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner DATE: July 11, 1994 RE: Fellman Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption - 2nd Reading of Ordinance 28, Series 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Applicant (Thomas Fellman, represented by Gideon Kaufman) proposes to divide a 15,000 square foot parcel into two 7,500 sq.ft. lots pursuant to the Lot Split provision of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The entire property is presently vacant. One lot will be permitted to build a duplex residence, the remaining parcel will be permitted to build a single family residence. This application is a one-step subdivision exemption before city Council. The Planning Office recommends approval of this Ordinance with conditions. CONSISTENCY WITH THE ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN: Lot Splits require that development on the new lots provide Accessory Dwelling units that are deed restricted to resident occupancy requirements. Such mitigation will meet the Housing goals of the AACP. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: City council approved first reading on their consent agenda on June 13, 1994. BACKGROUND: The parcel is located at the southwest corner of E. Hopkins and Cleveland Street and is zoned R-MF, Residential/Multi- Family. In 1975, implementation of growth management required that all adjacent lots held in single ownership were merged for development purposes. At that time, lot splits were created as a one-time exemption from the full subdivision process. Refer to Exhibit "A" for the application information and proposed plat. REFERRAL COMMENTS: city Engineering- Refer to Exhibit "B" for complete referral memo. CURRENT ISSUES: There are no outstanding issues relative to the Applicant's request for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption. It should be noted that a duplex is presently permitted on the parcel. Therefore, this request for a Lot Split permits the applicant to create a new parcel and obtain a development right for a single family residence in addition to a duplex. Should the applicant wish to build two duplex units, a growth management allocation would need to be obtained for the fourth dwelling unit. Pursuant to sections 24-7-1003.A.2. (Lot Split) and 24-8-104.C.1.a. (GMQS exemption), staff finds that the review criteria have been met. The specific criteria and staff responses are attached as Exhibit "C". FINANCIAL IMPLEMENTATIONS: None are anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Lot Split subject to the following conditions: 1. As recommended in the city Engineer's referral comments dated June 6, 1994 the applicant shall: a. The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top- of-structure elevation. This area may have once been a dump and could require special foundation construction. b. The Plat does not indicate at least two surveyor's monuments. Two new monuments must be added at the split line wi thin one year of acceptance. The transformer should also be shown on the Plat for reference. c. The parcels shall meet storm run-off requirements of section 24-7-1004.C.4.f at the time of development. . " ~ {: d. Any work in the public right-of-way including landscaping shall obtain permits from the City streets Department. 2. Lots A, B, and the western one-half of C will be the single family parcel. The eastern one-half of Lot C, D, and E will be the duplex parcel. Any additional development is required to comply with the underlying zone district regulations and growth management. This shall be noted on the Plat. 3. The new Subdivision Plat and Subdivision Exemption Agreement must be approved by the Planning Office and Engineering Department and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within 180 days of approval by City Council. Failure to do so may render the approvals invalid. 4. A Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a certificate of Occupancy for the residence on each lot. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, both lots are required to build an Accessory Dwelling unit (ADU) at the time of construction, pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2.b of the l ~ I , Aspen Land Use Regulations. 6. All mater ial representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the City Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended in the conditions. PROPOSED MOTION: "I move to adopt Ordinance 28, Series 1994 approving the Fellman Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption for the Lots A, B, C, D & E, Block 33, East Aspen Subdivision." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: . Exhibits: Ordinance 28, Series 1994 "A" Application information and proposed plat "B" Engineering referral memo "C" Planning staff responses to Code sections 24-7-1003.A.2 and 24-8-104. C. 1. a. "D" Public Notice i ~: \ \ l < 1 'r r- - z - ... ".... J.I '-l \ ~t; /, "'~~c';;"""'" > ~.... - - 7 t.... ". --- - ............ . - .. ----.. Exhibit A ., ' i?5~", \ \/-> . : "8 ~ ~ '1: "\~ '- - ~~ ~~ '.\' ~ '" '--' ~ 5 b.:~ ...-", )~~ lll'l ~"' ." .t V._l ., .M"Io>V,OGM <;; ,CO'CO' 0---------- 8 ~ ------- hi ,0:7=' :;0 ,,""",0;;..101 N ~ ~ ',~ ,==1 :;O"h/>', 0.;;;.101 N o ~ -< \W ----- Q 8 ~ -- 8 g ~ ~ ~ z. -- ('I) r", I.' " " a " ~ \II ... -\. . ~ '-1 't -- ,. ,.... ""'._""_'"u.....~._~"" "...._,,_"_'.~.,_..._~,,"'" BROOKE A. PETERSON GIDEON I. KAUFMAN' ERIN L. FERNANDEZ .. LA W OFFICES OF IC-\lJFMAN 8< PETERSON, P.C. 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925,8166 FACSIMilE (303) 925.1090 ROBYN J. MYLER u* . ALSO.\OMITTEOIN M.\R'fLANO April 26, 1994 - USO .\OMlTHD IN nORIO.\ - .\LSO .\OMITTEO IN NEW 'fORI'i .\NOCONNECTICUT Ms. Mary Lackner Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lot Split for Lots A, B, C, 0, and E, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen Dear Mary: Pursuant to a number of telephone conversations, and a letter that I wrote to you on February 18, 1994, please consider this letter an application for a lot split pursuant to 97-1003.2 of the Aspen Municipal Code, We are requesting the division of Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen, as shown on the attached plat, into two lots of 7,500 sq.ft, each. No more than two (2) lots will be created by the lot split, both lots will conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. No portion of the property under consideration has been the subject of an exemption under the provisions of this article, or a lot split exemption pursuant to 98-104(C) (1) (a). Enclosed please find the proposed subdivision plat which will be recorded after final approvals are obtained. I believe that this lot split meets the requirements of subdivision in that the division will assist in the orderly and efficient development of the City, will insure the proper distribution of development, and encourages well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of subdivisions. It also improves land records, coordinates the construction of public facilities, safeguards the interest of the public, and promotes the health, safety and general weltare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $1,084.00, a copy of the title commitment showing ownership, and a letter authorizing me to proceed with this applic~tion. I believe that this application requires only a one-step process to the City Council. Ms. Ma~y Lac}::ne~ April 26, 1994 Page 2 Once you have had an opportunity to review the enclosed, please contact me about when it will be set for an agenda item. As always, thank you for your help and consideration. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, P.C., a Professional Corporation BY~eon Keufmen GK/bw Enclosures _..M_____.~_._....__"'.~,.___.__... ... BROOKE A. PETERSON GIDEON I. KAUFMAN ~ ERIN L. FERNANDEZ ** LAWOFFICESOF KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P,C. 31S EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925-8166 FACSIMilE (303) 925-1090 ROBYN J. MYlER ~n . ALSO ADMITTED IN MARYLAND May 6, 1994 - ALSO ADMITTED IN FLORIDA - ALSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK ANDCONN(CTICUT Mary Lackner 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 a ~ Re: Fellman Lot Split, Case 832-92 Dear Mary: Please consider this letter a supplement to my application for the Fellman Lot Split. I wish to identify the duplex lot and the single family lot. Lots A, B and half of C will be the single-family lot and half of C, D and E will be the duplex lot, both of which will be exempt from Growth Management Plan. This should be reflected in the Ordinance of Approval so that there will be no misunderstanding when someone goes for a building permit. The other lot will obviously have to compete in the growth management plan if a second duplex is to be built. Thank you for your help and consideration. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C., a Pro essional Corporation n Kaufman By GK/go --~--'--'-'__ "_"~___.~m~__....._._,~-"~_,.._~~~,"",~_",-,,. Exhibit B Memorandum To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office Cris Caruso, City Engineer ~ From: Date: June 6, 1994 RE: Fellman Lot Split Upon review of the above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: Site Elevation: The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top-of-structure elevation. This area may have once been a dump and could require special foundation construction. Storm Runoff: A condition should be made to the lot split, that development of the property meet storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004. C. 4,[ Plat: The Plat does not indicate at least two surveyor's monuments. Two new monuments must be added at the split line within one year of acceptance, The transformer should also be shown on the plat for reference. Boulder: A boulder located partially on the property and in the ROW should be investigated for historic and survey significance, Vegetation: There is substantial vegetation along the north and east property limits in the ROW. The Engineering Department recommends this vegetation remain undisturbed, Any work in the public ROW requires a permit and the applicant's site design should provide for maintaining the bushes and trees. Removal of trees over 6" in diameter on or off site requires a permit. Curb & Gutter: A Curb & Gutter Agreement should be executed indicating that the property owners will install curb and gutter as directed by the City. ~400 l.ref Exhibit C Fellman Lot Split Proposal section 24-7-1003.2 (review criteria for lot splits) Lot split. The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling unit on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met. a. The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners or the city council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdi vision regulations by the ci ty of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Response: This parcel is configured as the East Aspen Addition of the City of Aspen which was established prior to the formation of either the BOCC or City council. The parcel has not been subdivided after 1969. b. No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district and the applicant commits that any lot for which development is proposed will contain an accessory dwelling unit. When there is demolition on the property which makes it subject to the provisions of Article 5, Division 7, Replacement Housing Program, the standards of that program shall supersede these requirements; and Response: The newly created lots comply with the dimensional requirements of the R-MF, Residential/Multi-Family zone district. An on-site accessory dwelling unit will be provided with the development of both lots. If a duplex is constructed, two ADU's will be required on the duplex parcel. The applicant has committed to incorporate the affordable housing mitigation requirements into the subdivision agreement and to depict this information on the final subdivision plat. c. The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of an exemption under the provisions of this article or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to section 8-104 (C) (1) (a); and Response: The parcel has not been involved in any prior subdivision exemption actions. d. A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this article and growth management allocation pursuant to Article 8. Response: The applicant has committed to recording this information on the final subdivision plat. cc.rev.ls.fellman .y^,...",~_.."_.~._-~-~-.__.- section 24-7-104(C) (1) (a) Review criteria for GMQS Exemption for a Lot split Lot split. The development of one (1) detached residential dwelling on a vacant lot formed by a lot spli t granted subsequent to November 14, 1977 pursuant to section 7- 1003 (A) (2). In order to be eligible for this exemption, the property need not contain any development on the original lot. Response: The applicant is obtaining an approval for a lot split as specified by this code section. As indicated in the applicant's supplemental application letter, Lots A, B, and one half of C will be the single-family parcel. The remaining half of C, and Lots D and E will be the duplex parcel. Exhibit 0 Public Notice Saturday-Sunday, June 25.26, /994. the Aspen Times U-D PUBUC NOTICE RE; FEUJdAN SU801VISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPUT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hear. Ing will be held on Monday, July II, 1994 al a meellllR 10 begin at 5:00 pm belore the Aspen elly Council, City Council Chambers, City Ifall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen 10 consider an appUcallon 5ubmllled by Thomas Fellman, c/o Gldeoll Kaufman, 315 E. f1yman Ave., Aspen, CO, requesllng approval of a Subdivision Exemp- lion lor a Lot Spilt 10 create one single family 101 and one duplex lot. The property Is localed at Lois A, D, C, D & E, Block 33, East Aspen Addition. For lurther InformaUon. contact Mary Lackner at the Aspett/Pltkln Planning Olllce, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5100. stJohn Bennell, Mayor Alpen elly Council Published In the Aspen Times June 24, 1994 MEMORANDUM Vlh . TO: Mayor and Council l / [W/ Amy Margerum, City Manager\} Directo~ THRU: THRU: Leslie Lamont, Interim City Planning FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner DATE: June 13, 1994 RE: Fellman Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption - 1st Reading of ordinance~, Series 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Applicant (Thomas Fellman, represented by Gideon Kaufman) proposes to divide the 15,000 square foot subject parcel into two 7,500 sq.ft. lots pursuant to the Lot Split provision of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. The entire property is presently vacant. One lot will be permitted to build a duplex residence, the remaining parcel will be permitted to build a single family residence. This application is a one-step subdivision exemption before City Council. The Planning Office recommends approval of first reading of this Ordinance with conditions. CONSISTENCY WITH THE ASPEN AREA COMMUNITY PLAN: Lot Splits require that development on the new lots provide Accessory Dwelling Units that are deed restricted to resident occupancy requirements. Development of the vacant lots will require housing mitigation to be provided by the applicant. Such mitigation will meet the Housing goals of the AACP. PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: None. BACKGROUND: The parcel is located at the southwest corner of E. Hopkins and Cleveland Street and is zoned R-MF, Residential/Multi- Family. In 1975, implementation of growth management required that all adjacent lots held in single ownership were merged for development purposes. At that time, lot splits were created as a one-time exemption from the full subdivision process. Refer to Exhibit "A" for the application information and proposed plat. REFERRAL COMMENTS: City Engineering- Refer to Exhibit "B" for complete referral memo. CURRENT ISSUES: There are no outstanding issues relative to the Applicant's request for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption. It should be noted that a duplex is presently permitted on the parcel. Therefore, this request for a Lot Split permits the applicant to create a new parcel and obtain a development right for a single family residence. Al though the parcel is presently vacant, this approval will allow a duplex and a single family unit. Should the applicant which to build two duplex units, a growth management allocation would need to be obtained. Pursuant to Sections 24-7-1003.A.2. (Lot Split) and 24-8-104.C.l.a. (GMQS exemption) staff finds that the review criteria have been met. The specific criteria and staff responses are contained as Exhibit "C". FINANCIAL IMPLEMENTATIONS: None are anticipated. RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the proposed Lot Split subject to the following conditions: 1. As recommended in the City Engineer's referral comments dated June 6, 1994 the applicant shall: a. The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top- of-structure elevation. This area may have once been a dump and could require special foundation construction. b. The Plat does not indicate at least two surveyor I s monuments. Two new monuments must be added at the split line within one year of acceptance. The transformer should also be shown on the Plat for reference. c. A boulder located partially on the property and ROW should be investigated for historic and significance. in the survey d. The parcels shall meet storm run-off requirements of Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f at the time of development. e. Any work in the public right-of-way including landscaping shall obtain permits from the City Streets Department. 2. Lots A, B, and the western one-half of C will be the single family parcel. The eastern one-half of Lot C, D, and E will be the duplex parcel. Any additional development is required to comply with the underlying zone district regulations and growth management. This shall be noted on the Plat. 3. The new SUbdivision Plat and Subdivision Exemption Agreement must be approved by the Planning Office and Engineering Department and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within 180 days of approval by City Council. Failure to do so may render the approvals invalid. 2 4. A Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Agreement shall be executed at the time the Plat is recorded with the city. This agreement shall indicate that the property owner will install a sidewalk, curb and gutter at such time as directed by the City. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, both lots are required to build an Accessory Dwelling unit (ADU) at the time of construction, pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2.b of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the city Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended in the conditions. PROPOSED MOTION: 1994." "I move to read of Ordinance c2"f!:, Series of "I move to approve the Fellman Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split and GMQS Exemption for the Lots A, B, C, D & E, Block 33, East Aspen Subdivision at first reading." CITY MANAGER COMMENTS: Exhibits: ordinance~~, Series 1994 "A" Application information and proposed plat "B" Engineering referral memo "C" Planning staff responses to Code sections 24-7-1003.A.2 and 24-8-104. C. 1. a. 3 . " ._~,._..,~-,-,------~~._--'.'''--''''''''''--'.-'~- ORDINANCE NO. dJ7f (SERIES OF 1994) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ASPEN, COLORADO, GRANTING SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION AND GMQS EXEMPTION APPROVAL FOR THE FELLMAN LOT SPLIT (LOTS A, B, C, D, AND E, BLOCK 33, EAST ASPEN ADDITION) WHEREAS, section 24-7-1003.A.2 of the Aspen Municipal Code provides for city council approval for lots splits as Subdivision Exemptions; and WHEREAS, the Applicant, Thomas Fellman, submi tted an application for a lot split and GMQS exemption to the Planning Office; and WHEREAS, the city Engineering Office has provided referral comments on the proposed application; and WHEREAS, the Planning Office reviewed the proposed application pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2 of the Aspen Municipal code and the comments received from Engineering and recommends approval of the Subdivision Exemption for a lot split with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Aspen city Council having considered the Planning Office's recommendation and section 24-7-1003. A. 2 of the Aspen Municipal Code does hereby grant the Subdivision Exemption for the Fellman Lot Split. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: section 1: That it does hereby grant SUbdivision Exemption and GMQS Exemption approval for a lot split pursuant to section 24-7- 1003.A.2 and 24-8-104.C.a of the Aspen Municipal Code subject to the following conditions: 1. As recommended in the city Engineer's referral comments dated June 6, 1994 the applicant shall: a. The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top- of-structure elevation. This area may have once been a dump and could require special foundation construction. b. The Plat does not indicate at least two surveyor's monuments. Two new monuments must be added at the split line within one year of acceptance. The transformer should also be shown on the Plat for reference. c. A boulder located partially on the property and ROW should be investigated for historic and significance. in the survey d. The parcels shall meet storm run-off requirements of section 24-7-1004.C.4.f at the time of development. e. Any work in the public right-of-way including landscaping shall obtain permits from the City streets Department. 2. Lots A, B, and the western one-half of C will be the single family parcel. The eastern one-half of Lot C, D, and E will be the duplex parcel. Any additional development is required to comply with the underlying zone district regulations and growth management. This shall be noted on the Plat. 3. The new Subdivision Plat and Subdivision Exemption Agreement must be approved by the Planning Office and Engineering Department and recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within 180 days of approval by city Council. Failure to do so may render the approvals invalid. 4. A sidewalk, Curb and Gutter Agreement shall be executed at the time the Plat is recorded with the city. This agreement shall indicate that the property owner will install a sidewalk, curb and gutter at such time as directed by the city. 5. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, both lots are required to build an Accessory Dwelling unit (ADU) at the time of construction, pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2.b of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. 6. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the city Council shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended in the conditions. 2 , section 2: A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the day of 1994 at 5: 00 P.M. in the City council Chambers, Aspen city Hall, Aspen, Colorado. Fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing a public notice of the hearing shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the City of Aspen. INTRODUCED, READ AND ORDERED PUBLISHED as provided by law, by the city council of the City of Aspen on the day of 1994. John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, city Clerk FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this , 1994. day of John Bennett, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, city Clerk ord.cc.ls.fellman 3 \ \ [Um mn~ l i < 2 'r r- - z - u . ... ,..N.u \ ~t; /, _""~,~;......... > ~- - - ::i'.,....t.'. .. --- -... - . - .. _......~.. ". .. ". .,. ".-. Exhibit A " ' '~ \ ~~~ ~ ~_ 8 ~ ~ , - "t 10' ,,~ '" :- ~ ~ ~~ ~ '.\' 't Co , ,M"w.a;;..vl ,;; ,CO"O?I ~--------- ~ ~ -------- ,0:70:/1 3.Wp;;..vl N ~ ~ \W Q <J Q ---------- ~ ~ .." ~f' "~~ llll ~ 41 ," iV_l ,CO<:Yl1 '3"W,ai.vl N '" -< ---- -- -- 8 ~ ") I" \" " i) - -( 8 '?:) 't-l..., , '< ~ 't: " " BROOKE A. PETERSON GIDEON I. KAUFMAN '" ERIN L FERNANDEZ H I.A W OFFICES OF I\:AUFMAN 8" PETERSON, P.C, 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TElEPHONE (303) 925-8166 FACSIMILE (303) 925-1090 ROBYN J. MYLER-u . ALSO AOMITT(D IN MAr:lYLAND April 26, 1994 -ALSO AOMtTTEO IN FLORIO'" -ALSO AOMITTED IN NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT Ms. Mary Lackner Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Lot Split for Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen Dear Mary: Pursuant to a number of telephone conversations, and a letter that I wrote to you on February 18, 1994, please consider this letter an application for a lot split pursuant to 97-1003.2 of the Aspen Municipal Code. We are requesting the division of Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, City and Townsite of Aspen, as shown on the attached plat, into two lots of 7,500 sq. ft. each. No more than two (2) lots will be created by the lot split, both lots will conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district. No portion of the property under consideration has been the subject of an exemption under the provisions of this article, or a lot split exemption pursuant to 98-104(C) (1) (a). Enclosed please find the proposed subdivision plat which will be recorded after final approvals are obtained. I believe that this lot split meets the requirements of subdivision in that the division will assist in the orderly and efficient development of the City, will insure the proper distribution of development, and encourages well-planned subdivision of land by establishing standards for the design of subdivisions. It also improves land records, coordinates the construction of public facilities, safeguards the interest of the public, and promotes the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Aspen. Enclosed please find a check in the amount of $1,084.00, a copy of the title commitment showing ownership, and a letter authorizing me to proceed with this application. I believe that this application requires only a one-step process to the city Council. ,"","--"",-","'~"----'" ~ ~ <.... Hs. f"jC1~'Y Lac::r:nc::" April 26, 1994 Page :2 Once you have had an opportunity to review the enclosed, please contact me about when it will be set for an agenda item. As always, thank you for your help and consideration. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, P.C., a Professional corporation By __ W Vc1eon Kaufman GK/bw Enclosures I .. -. .~_._.,...~ -_.-..,-"~~~_..,--_._<- ---_.,.".~~..._"._"-'''..-_._~~.~- - ~ , \.. BROOKE A. PETERSON GIDEON I. KAUFMAN. ERIN L. FERNANDEZ U I.A W OFFICES OF KAUFMAN & PETERSON. P.c. 315 EAST HYMAN AVENUE ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE (303) 925,8166 FACSIMILE (303) 925.1090 ROBYN J. MYLER .u . ALSO AOMITTE01N MAIlYLANO May 6, 1994 -ALSO AOMITTEOIN HOlltOA _ AlSO ADMITTED IN NEW YORK AND CONNECTICUT Mary Lackner 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 81611 ,',li\'i 9 Re: Fellman Lot Split, Case 822-92 Dear Mary: Please consider this letter a supplement to my application for the Fellman Lot Split. I wish to identify the duplex lot and the single family lot. Lots A, B and half of C will be the single-family lot and half of C, D and E will be the duplex lot, both of which will be exempt from Growth Management Plan. This should be reflected in the Ordinance of Approval so that there will be no misunderstanding when someone goes for a building permit. The other lot will obviously have to compete in the growth management plan if a second duplex is to be built. Thank you for your help and consideration. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF KAUFMAN & PETERSON, P.C., a Pro e sional Corporation By n Kaufman GK/go - , " -... Exhibit B Memorandum To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office Cris Caruso, City Engineer ~ From: Date: June 6, 1994 RE: Fellman Lot Split Upon review ofthe above referenced application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: Site Elevation: The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top-of-structure elevation. This area may have once been a dump and could require special foundation construction. Storm Runoff: A condition should be made to the lot split, that development of the property meet storm runoff requirements of Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f. Plat: The Plat does not indicate at least two surveyor's monuments. Two new monuments must be added at the split line within one year of acceptance, The transformer should also be shown on the plat for reference. Boulder: A boulder located partially on the property and in the ROW should be investigated for historic and survey significance, Vegetation: There is substantial vegetation along the north and east property limits in the ROW, The Engineering Department recommends this vegetation remain undisturbed. Any work in the public ROW requires a permit and the applicant's site design should provide for maintaining the bushes and trees. Removal of trees over 6" in diameter on or off site requires a permit. Curb & Gutter: A Curb & Gutter Agreement should be executed indicating that the property owners will install curb and gutter as directed by the City. lJ4001.ref ,'-^--,-~,--------~.---,..,.,...'"'.,"-....,'~-,'-',,~., ,-.- - .,-,...,~;-,- " Exhibit C Fellman Lot Split Proposal section 24-7-1003.2 (review criteria for lot splits) Lot split. The split of a lot for the purpose of the development of one detached single-family dwelling unit on a lot formed by a lot split granted subsequent to November 14, 1977, where all of the following conditions are met. a. The land is not located in a subdivision approved by either the Pitkin County Board of County commissioners or the city council, or the land is described as a metes and bounds parcel which has not been subdivided after the adoption of subdivision regulations by the City of Aspen on March 24, 1969; and Response: This parcel is configured as the East Aspen Addition of the city of Aspen which was established prior to the formation of either the BOCC or City council. The parcel has not been subdivided after 1969. b. No more than two (2) lots are created by the lot split, both lots conform to the requirements of the underlying zone district and the applicant commi ts that any lot for which development is proposed will contain an accessory dwelling unit. When there is demolition on the property which makes it subject to the provisions of Article 5, Division 7, Replacement Housing Program, the standards of that program shall supersede these requirements; and Response: The newly created lots comply with the dimensional requirements of the R-MF, Residential/Multi-Family zone district. An on-site accessory dwelling unit will be provided with the development of both lots. If a duplex is constructed, two ADU's will be required on the duplex parcel. The applicant has committed to incorporate the affordable housing mitigation requirements into the subdivision agreement and to depict this information on the final subdivision plat. c. The lot under consideration, or any part thereof, was not previously the subject of an exemption under the provisions of this article or a "lot split" exemption pursuant to section 8-104 (C) (1) (a); and Response: The parcel has not been involved in any prior subdivision exemption actions. d. A subdivision plat is submitted and recorded after approval, indicating that no further subdivision may be granted for these lots nor will additional units be built without receipt of applicable approvals pursuant to this article and growth management allocation pursuant to Article 8. Response: The applicant has committed to recording this information on the final subdivision plat. cc.rev.ls.fellman , \" Section 24-7-104(C) (1) (a) Review criteria for GMQS Exemption for a Lot Split Lot split. The development of one (1) detached residential dwelling on a vacant lot formed by a lot spli t granted subsequent to November 14, 1977 pursuant to section 7- 1003 (A) (2). In order to be eligible for this exemption, the property need not contain any development on the original lot. Response: The applicant is obtaining an approval for a lot split as specified by this code section. As indicated in the applicant's supplemental application letter, Lots A, B, and one half of C will be the single-family parcel. The remaining half of C, and Lots D and E will be the duplex parcel. ....~_.,'_"_~.~.....~...________.,.-.o-.,~_".~">^ '. # " PUBLIC NOTICE RE: FELLMAN SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION FOR A LOT SPLIT NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Monday, July 11, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 pm before the Aspen City Council, City Council Chambers, city Hall, 130 S. Galena, Aspen to consider an application submitted by Thomas Fellman, c/o Gideon Kaufman, 315 E. Hyman Ave., Aspen, CO, requesting approval of a Subdivision Exemption for a Lot Split to create one single family lot and one duplex lot. The property is located at Lots A, B, C, D & E, Block 33, East Aspen Addition. For further information, contact Mary Lackner at the Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office, 130 S. Galena st., Aspen, CO 920-5100. slJohn Bennett, Mavor Aspen city council Published in the Aspen Times on June 24, 1994 ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- City of Aspen Account 6r1/~~ h6td<-~ (P/21/9{ -, r ~ ".. ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone 920-5090 FAX 920-5197 MEMORANDUM DATE: City Engineer Mary Lackner, Planning Office Fellman Lot Split Parcel ill No. 2737-182-04-002 April 29, 1994 TO: FROM: RE: Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by Thomas Fellman requesting approval of a lot split for Lots A, B, C, D & E, Block 33, East Aspen Addition. Please return your comments to me no later than May '27, 1994. Thank you. c"."", - t./ - ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 FAX# (303) 920-5197 April 29, 1994 Gideon Kaufman Kaufman & Peterson 315 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Fellman Lot Split Case A32-94 Dear Gideon, The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. Please submit the following information: 1. Please address the fact that one lot will be a duplex lot and the other will be a single- family lot and identify which lot is which. 2. Please return a signed agreement to pay form (enclosed). We have scheduled this application for 1st Reading before the Aspen City Council on Monday, June 13, 1994 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p,m. Second Reading and Public Hearing will be on July 11, 1994. Should these dates be inconvenient for you, please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda dates will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting dates, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. Please note that it is your responsibility to mail notice to property owners within 300' and to post the subject property with a sign at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, Please submit a photograph of the posted sign as proof of posting and an affidavit as proof of mailing prior to the public hearing. If you have any questions, please call Mary Lackner the planner assigned to your case, at 920- 5106. Sincerely, 6J~~~ Deborah DuBord Office Manager cc.pb Fl"R 22 ' 94 10: 3EFt1 KA..f."" & PETERSa'! -'" \, AOTHORIIATYOK TO SUBMIT I.AHD USE APPLICATION P,2 THE UNDERSIGNED, as the owner of Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, city and Townsite of Aspen, hereby authorizes Gideon Kaufman, of Kaufman & peterson, 315 E. Hyman, suite 305, Aspen, Colorado, to submit a land use application on my behalf to the City of Aspen for a lot split of the above-mentione~ property, and to execute any and all documents Which may be required to obtain approval for a lot split. DATED this "J 1.- day of April, 1994. C:\CLIENTS\iiLLMAN\CON~ENT.APP , , -- <.. '-.. SCHEDULE A ORDER NUMBER: 00020731 1. EFFECTIVE DATE: December 16, 1993 AT 8:00 A.M. 2. POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED: AMOUNT OF INSURANCE A. ALTA OWNER'S POLICY $ 1,300,000.00 PROPOSED INSURED: THOMAS FELLMAN B. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: C. ALTA LOAN POLICY $ PROPOSED INSURED: D. $ 3. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT AND COVERED HEREIN IS FEE SIMPLE AND TITLE THERETO IS AT THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF VESTED IN: HARRY W. BASS, JR. AND R. D. BASS 4. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS COMMITMENT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Lots A, B, C, D and E, Block 33, EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN. County of pitkin, state of Colorado OWNERS: TAX CERT. $ 2,792.00 $ 10.00 " ~ /j) yk~ K T~ZED SI~NATURE STEWART TITLE OF ASPEN, INC. 620 E. Hopkins ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 303 925-3577 FAX 303-925-1384 -, ,-., ( .... SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 ORDER NUMBER: 00020731 REQUIREMENTS THE FOLLOWING ARE THE REQUIREMENTS TO BE COMPLIED WITH: ITEM (A) PAYMENT TO OR FOR THE ACCOUNT OF THE GRANTORS OR MORTGAGORS OF THE FULL CONSIDERATION FOR THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED. ITEM (B) PROPER INSTRUMENT(S) CREATING THE ESTATE OR INTEREST TO BE INSURED MUST BE EXECUTED AND DULY FILED FOR RECORD, TO WIT: 1. Evidence satisfactory to stewart Title Guaranty company, furnished by the Office of the Director of Finance, city of Aspen that the following taxes have been paid, or that conveyance is exempt from said taxes: (1) The "Wheeler Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and (2) The "Housing Real Estate Transfer Tax" pursuant to Ordinance No. 13 (series of 1990). 2. A. certificate of non-foreign status, duly executed by the seller(s), pursuant to section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code AND B. satisfactory evidence of the seller(s) colorado residency (or incorporation) pursuant to colorado House Bill 92-1270. NOTE: section 1445 of the Internal Revenue Code requires witholding of tax from sales proceeds if the transferor (seller) is a foreign person or entity. Colorado House Bill 92-1270 may require witholding of tax from sales proceeds if the seller(s) is not a Colorado resident. Detailed information and Forms are available from stewart Title. 3. Duly acknowledged release by Richard D. Bass, Jr., Bonnie L. Bass Smith, Barbara J. Bass Moroney and James E. Bass of Mortgage from Richard D. Bass in favor of Richard D. Bass, Jr., Bonnie L. Bass smith, Barbara J. Bass Moroney and James E. Bass, for and in consideration of those certain Indemnity Agreements dated October 5, 1988, dated January 5, 1989, recorded January 17, 1989 in Book 583 at Page 794 as Reception No. 307933. 4. Duly acknowledged release by James E. Bass of Mortgage from Richard D. Bass in favor of James E. Bass, in the amount of $400,000.00, dated January 5, 1989, recorded January 17, 1989 in Book 583 at Page 798 as Reception No. 307934. 5. Deed from vested owner, vesting fee simple title in purchaser (s) . , , -~ (. '- SCHEDULE B - SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS ORDER NUMBER: 00020731 THE POLICY OR POLICIES TO BE ISSUED WILL CONTAIN EXCEPTIONS TO THE FOLLOWING UNLESS THE SAME ARE DISPOSED OF TO THE SATISFACTION OF THE COMPANY: 1. RIGHTS OR CLAIMS OF PARTIES IN POSSESSION NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 2. EASEMENTS, OR CLAIMS OF EASEMENTS, NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 3. DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS IN BOUNDARY LINES, SHORTAGE IN AREA, ENCROACHMENTS, AND ANY FACTS WHICH A CORRECT SURVEY AND INSPECTION OF THE PREMISES WOULD DISCLOSE AND WHICH ARE NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 4. ANY LIEN, OR RIGHT TO A LIEN. FOR SERVICES, LABOR OR MATERIAL HERETOFORE OR HEREAFTER FURNISHED, IMPOSED BY LAW AND NOT SHOWN BY THE PUBLIC RECORDS. 5. DEFECTS, LIENS, ENCUMBRANCES, ADVERSE CLAIMS OR OTHER MATTERS, IF ANY, CREATED, FIRST APPEARING IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OR ATTACHING SUBSEQUENT TO THE EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF BUT PRIOR TO THE DATE PROPOSED INSURED ACQUIRES OF RECORD FOR VALUE THE ESTATE OR INTEREST OR MORTGAGE THEREON COVERED BY THIS COMMITMENT. 6. UNPATENTED MINING CLAIMS; WATER RIGHTS, CLAIMS OR TITLE TO WATER. 7. ANY AND ALL UNPAID TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ANY UNREDEEMED TAX SALES. 8. THE EFFECT OF INCLUSIONS IN ANY GENERAL OR SPECIFIC WATER CONSERVANCY, FIRE PROTECTION, SOIL CONSERVATION OR OTHER DISTRICT OR INCLUSION IN ANY WATER SERVICE OR STREET IMPROVEMENT AREA. 9. Right of way for ditches or canals constructed,by the authority of the United states, as reserved in United States Patent recorded August 29, 1958 in Book 185 at Page 69 as Reception No. 106874. NOTE: Provided that stewart.Title of Aspen, Inc. records the documents of conveyance in the proposed transaction the status of title will be updated from the time of this commitment to the time of said recording. If said update reveals no intervening liens or other changes in the status of said title Exception No. 5 herein will be deleted; if said update reveals intervening liens or changes in the status of said title appropriate action(s) will be taken to disclose or eliminate said change prior to the recording of said documents. NOTE: policies issued hereunder will be subject to the terms, conditions, and exclusions set forth in the ALTA 1992 policy form. Copies of the 1992 form policy Jacket, setting forth said terms, conditions and exclusions, will be made available upon request. t1AY-03-1994 15: 59 FROM ASPEN/PITKIN BLDG DEPT TO 9-'3c_:>1090 P. 03 ( "- \. ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Develogment Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CITY) and Thomas H. Fellman (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Fellman Lot Split, Case 832-92 (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2, APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 77 (Series of 1992) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application, 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. , .. 8kOHUMUuK uEVELOPMENT TEL:402-392-2502 ~la~ 00 ':14 lU'vl No,UU0 ~,ul . . ~. " '. MAY-IlJ-1994 17:00 FROM ASPEN/PITKIN IIUlG DEPT TO 9~51090 P.04 '- .' . 5. Therefore. APPLICANT agrees that in consideration of the CITY's walver of its ri2ht to co11ect full fees p~j<?r. to a dc~~inatlon of application completeness, Al'PLICANT .halI pay an IDltlal depoSit In the amount of $- which is for ~ hours of PlaImilll Office time. and if aem.) recorded costs tlltceed the initial deposit. APPLICANT shall pay additional monthly billings to CITY to reimburse the CrrY for the proces5iDl of the application mentionett above, ineludin~ post approval review. Such periodic payments shall be made within 30 days of the bllllni date. APPLICANT further agrees that failure to pay 5Uch accrued costs sban be grounds for suspel1$ion of processing. CITY OF ASPEN APPUCANT BY' ~ji""~, n f~ Mailing Address: ~ /S- AS" r/y,....,.,,} f1J~. fH e..l""'1 (CJIo, G'/ t, I! Date: r;/ / ~ BY: ~11J~ . DUlne Moore Ci~ Plannlnl Director Post.It" brand fax transmittal memo 7lfTl To , 0.( k (l.f!. pA Fro Co. Co. Oept. Phone If Fa. If Fa. * SX;'d TOT.:L P.04 ':)'d'~S!!313d (Nj ~ ~E:t0 lilt. lil2 ~ .,..,._^_~,."~"_~.,..."_.~.,,,,m_____" ,. ". ._.,_', ,'''"" ,".~. -~___,_._"~"~.,,,,_~.,,~..,,~"_._,~.,.~.,, ,.-..-"- -.-" ' 37593'+ B--7&5 P-97)/ :l0/31/94 1,,:,49P PG 3 OF. " STATE OF NEBRASKA COUNTY OF lxJC0j 0-5 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /( day of October, 1994, by THOMAS H. FELLMAN. ss. WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notat~ t ~~) P~1- ,'; \CLIE:nS\fr:LUt~Ji\:: bt::'D'::', - 3 - .,r._~ 375934 8-7&5 P-977 ~~/31/94 12:49P PG ~ OF 3 7. Prior to issuance of any building permits, Lot 2 shall obtain approval for an Accessory Dwelling unit (ADU) , pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2.b of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. 8. All materi~l representations made by Applicant in the application and during public meetings with the city council shall be adhered to, and shall be considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended in the conditions. DATED this :11 day of October, 1994. ~1&L- 1./ FELLMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM: CITY OF ASPE , a municipal corpo ation /'71i/J1 t-i.iUiJ - " , city Attorney By ~ a Augi Reno, tt.:; ~~ Mayo Pr~-Tem I, Kathryn S. ~och, do hereby certify that the foregoing statement of Exemption from the Full Subdivision Process for the Purpose of the Split of Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, East Aspen Addition to the city of Aspen, was considered and approved by the Aspen city council at its regular meeting held July 11, 1994, at which time the Mayor, John Bennett, was authorized to execute the same on behalf of the city (If Aspen. STATE OF COLORADO 55. COUNTY OF PITKIN WITNESS my hand and official seal. My commission eo' pires: MyCommleelonexplreo9/27196 Qe1l<< cJ ~ '~ N. ary Pub ic (ADDITIONAL NO"'ARY ACKNOWLEDGMENT FOLLOWS ON this ~day S ~ i'!O>q)) , ~ s ,,:??ral~. , ./r ,., . The foregoing l~strument was acknowledged before me of October, 1994, by John Bennett, as Mayor, and Kathryn city Clerk, on behalf of the CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal d ;, ,~~.. , PAGE 3) - 2 - 37593'+ B-765 SILVIrJ DrJVIS P--9'76 10/31/9'+ 12:49P PG 1 UF '" PITKIN COUNTY CLERK & RECORDER REC 15.00 DOC <f'7 Fe.. STATE:::T ~F EXEMiTIO: :,:OM THE FULL SUBDIVISION PROCESS FOR THE PO E OF T E S L OF LOTS A. B. C. D. and E. BLOCK 33. EAST ASPEN ADDITION TO THE CITY OF ASPEN WHEREAS, THOMAS H. FELLMAN (hereinafter referred to as the "Applicant"), is the owner of a parcel of real property located in the city of Aspen, pitkin County, Colorado, described as Lots A, B, C, D, and E, Block 33, East Aspen Addition to the City of Aspen; and WHEREAS, Applicant has requested an exemption pursuant to section 24-7-1003.A.2 of the Muncipal Code of the city of Aspen of a split of such lot (the "Lot Split"); and WHEREAS, the Aspen city council determined at its meeting of July 11, 1994, that such exemption was appropriate and granted the same, subject, however, to certain conditions as set forth below. NOW, THEREFORE, the City council of Aspen, Colorado, does determine that the application for exemption from the full subdivision process for the purpose of the above-described Lot Split is proper, and hereby grants an exemption from the full subdivision process for such Lot Split. PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that the foregoing subdivision exemption is expressly conditioned upon: 1. The elevation of the site appears to be somewhat greater than that of roads and properties to the north and east. Fill may have been placed on site, and the natural grade should be checked as it will determine the allowable top-of-structure elevation. 2. The parcels shall meet storm run-off requirements of section 24-7-1004.C.4.f at the time of development. 3. Any work ip the public right-of-way, including landscaping, shall obtain permits from the City Streets Department. 4. Lots A, B, and the western one-half (1/2) of C, Wlii be the single-family parcel. The eastern one-half (1/2) of Lot C, D, and E will be the duplex parcel. Any additional development is required to comply with the unde~lying zone district regulations and growth management. This shall be noted on the Plat. 5. 'fhat the Final Plat of Lot Split (the "Final Plat") depicting the Lot Split and this Subdivision Exemption Agreement must be approved by the Planning Office and the Engineering Deparment, and recorded with the pitkin County Clerk and Recorder within one hundred eighty (180) days of the approval date thereof. 6. A Sidewalk, Curb and Gutter shall be constructed prior to the issuance of a CErtificate of Occupancy for the residence on each lot. - 1 - ___.v_"'.'." >-.., -~-,.~----,_._- -- ._-"_..-.-,~..."'"""."~~-_.__.._. - " City of Aspen Pre-Application Conference Summary Project It .//1.1 J1 Applicant's Representative Representative's Phone Owner's Name ~.. The applicant has heen requested to respond to the following items anu provide the following reports: 7-1(J{'3(,~)~) 8'-/01 (c) Comments .y,k/fl/lfl,1O, _ 6~ hiU'f,lztl/l -/?v 4?IJ;'J;,t , uN 61.1 h~<f'/t.v. ity !d sfz;:r AtJ(/"~ ".. cr::/,;;,.hw witl;', rtft/I/dde>, ..cuI, b~ f Idlll4Jy [",jut;' .I,d (J fJt.tJltK I SF The review is: (P&Z only) ~(P&Z anu CC) Public Hearing: (yes) <G> ~-Ult {<-<L~ /10Cf~1 (1-'<' k"ff'?vf-rl Deposit for the Application Review: j.1' 78 Referral agency flat fees: 4 ~h TOTALDEI'OSIT f. .5t3,<j-r1- 0 71{ (Auuitional hours are billeu at a rate of 163/hr.) Land Use Code Section Referral Agencies f!t4 !I~'tr v To Apply Submit the Following Inl'onnation: ~ ~{ ~ {j, 10, Proof of ownership, Signeu fee agreement. Applicant's name, auuress anu telephone number in a letter signeu by the applicant which also states the name, auuress and telephone number of the representative, Total deposit for review of the application $~, L copies of the complete application packet and maps, Summary leller explaining the request (existing conditions and proposed uses), including street address and legal description of the property, An 8 1/2" by II" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen, Site plan shall incluue property boundaries, lot size, proposeu access, and physical features (urainageways, streams, rivers, ete,) a~d,j,W -1LM!l .Juhil/\() d..t:3d/ These items need to be submitted if circleu: Nd .,f/1{JIJ -> a, ,If, X, X List of adjacent properly owners within 300 feet of the subject property with addresses, S i Ie photos, Proof of legal access to the pared. Historic Preservation Commission review/approval. ,- f ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 Sou'" Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 920-5090 j~/,,/7//! ...."yJ ?L Address: '1,0/ 77 91., -:J/y~,jr, , Yl f- Check #: C; '5 q I) Date: Ie [ LAND USE APPLICATION FEES ,- CITY: ! ;63250-134 -63270-136 -63280-137 -63300-139 -63310-140 -63320-141 -63330-150 -63432-157 -63432-157 -MROll If';' ~ HISTORIC PRESERVATION: -63335-151 .- -63336-152 -63337-153 ;- -63338-154 j, -63339-155 f COUNTY: ~ -63160-126 -63170-127 -63180-128 -63190-129 -63200-130 -63210-131 -63220-132 -63230-133 -63240-149 -'53450-146 -63235-148 :,t " ~ REFERRAL FEES: " -63360-143 00115 -63340-163 00123 -63340-190 00125 ! -63340-205 ! PLANNING OFFICE SALES: -63080-122 -69000-145 Name: z:c GMP/Conceptual GMP/Final SUB/Conceptual SUB/Final AII-2 Step Applications AliI Step Applications Staff Approval Zoning Plan Check Sign Permrt Use Tax for Sign Permits Exemption Minor Major Devel. Sign~, Devel. Demolition GMP/General GMP/Detailed GMP/Final SUB/General SUB/Detailed SUB/Final All 2 Step Applications All 1 Step Applications Staff Approval Board of Adjustment Zoning Plan Check Engineering - County Engineering - City Housing Environmental Hea~h County Code Other (Copy Fees) TOTAL 'l'l'f,O(/ ~k () /J /0 7~ (if) /<;/1./ Phone: Project: ;z:;/ /.?/ nY"-- ~'/ -:z, /...:;r- No of Copies: /