The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.ec.Lots A&B-Blk 105.28-81�9, q:o\ .pannah Dustin Building Condominiumization E C ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 South Galena Street .Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 - 47331 52100 GMP/CONCEPTUAL 63722 47332 52100 GMP/PRELIMINARY 63723 47333 52100 GMP/FINAL _ 63724 47341 52100 SUB/CONCEPTUAL 63725 47342 52100 SUB/PRELIMINARY 63726 47343 52100 SUS/FINAL 63727 47350 52100 _c EXCEPT/EXEMPTIOf I-Ac" 63728 47350 52100 REZONING 63729 - 47360 52100 SPECIAL REVIEW�.-- SUB-TOTAL County 00113 63711 47331 - 52200 GMP/GENERAL 63712 47332 52200 GMP/DETAILED 63713 • 47333 52200 GMP/FINAL 63714 47341 - 52200 SUB/GENERAL 63715 47342 52200 SUB/DETAILED 63716 47343 52200 SUB/FINAL 63717 47350 52200 SPECIAL REVIEW 63718 47350 52200 REZONING 63719 47360 52200 SPECIAL. APPROVAL _ SUB -TOTAL PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 09000 52200 COUNTY CODE 63063 09000 52200 ALMANAC 63062 09000 00000 GMP 63066 09000 00000 COPY FEES 63069 09000 OTHER SUB -TOTAL TOTAL Name: t i / /r Phone: Address: 4.41 Project: / Check No. �`7r`. Date:. Additional Billing: No. of Hours: ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE :30 Sauth Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 (303) 925-2020 LAND USE APPLICATION FEES City 00113 - 63721 47331 52100 GMP/CONCEPTUAL 63722 47332 52100 GMP/PRELIMINARY 63723 47333 52100 GMP/FINAL 63724 47341 52100 SUB/CONCEPTUAL 63725 47342 52100 SUB/PRELIMINARY 63726 47343 52100 SUB/FINAL 63727 47350 52100 EXCEPT/EXEMPTION 63728 47350 52100 REZONING 63729 47360 52100 SPECIAL REVIEW SUB -TOTAL 'D County 00113 63711 47331 52200 GMP/GENERAL 63712 47332 52200 GMP/DETAILED 63713 47333 52200 GMP/FINAL 63714 47341 52200 SUB/GENERAL 63715 47342 52200 SUB/DETAILED 63716 47343 52200 SUB/FINAL 63717 47350 52200 SPECIAL REVIEW 63718 47350 52200 REZONING 63719 47360 52200 SPECIAL APPROVAL SUB -TOTAL PLANNING OFFICE SALES 00113 - 63061 09000 52200 COUNTY CODE 63063 09000 52200 ALMANAC 63062 09000 00000 GMP 63066 09000 00000 COPY FEES 63069 09000 OTHER SUB -TOTAL TOTAL � r T Name: Phone: Address: Project: i i u,4 1 1 r=' Date: Check No. Additional Billinq: No. of Hours: • • No. c28"8'I CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET 'Ass City of Aspen bo 1. DATE SUBMITTED: �hhl STAFF: 2. APPLICANT: eortao— -141ph 3. REPRESENTATIVE: 4. PROJECT NAME: yl,e( '1 z?-/ 5. LOCATION: 6. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning P.U.D. Special Review Growth Management HPC 6& _Subdivision Exception Exemption 70:30 Residential Bonus —�ni�� 71ilti(/f1�i�c.7��'G•i•L� 7. REFERRALS: Attorney Engineering Dept. Housing Water City Electric 8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS: //foJ o/q-hc US-F/ /,) Stream Margin 8040 Greenline View Plane Conditional Use Other Sanitation District School District Fire Marshal ,6 � Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas Parks S25' ,OI: State Highway Dept. Holy Cross Electric Other Mountain Bell r 417 A • 9. DISPOSITI � I P & Z Approved Denied Date 1) The applicant obtaining an encroachment license for the intrusion of the building into the S. Spring Street right-of-way; 2) The applicant agreeing to construct a five foot wide by four inch thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line; 3) The applicant revising the site plan to meet the comments contained in the Engineering Department memorandum dated May 5, 1981 and re -submitting the plat prior to review by City Council; Council Approved Denied Date ►��(A A-p A\,-�k-a- A l C ` fie. A. Q�,� A 2 10. ROUTING: Attorney Building Engineering Other 1• The applicant will revise the condom' um map prior to its recordat to the satisfaction of ment, sp fically: Engineering Depart- a. Clarifying that the Block number in the Owner's Certi- ficate refers to Block 105; b. Completing the index listing; C. Showing and dimensioning the parking spaces; d. Changing the dates on the City Council and Planning Commission approvals to 1984; , e. Specifying on the legends of sheets 2-4 that the "bearing" walls and "partition" walls are, in fact, "condominium unit limits". f. Completing the surveyor's Certificate to state his name and the date of his survey; g. Indicating the general common elements on Lots C and D; and 2. The applicant will produce adequate monumentation on the site to satisfy the Engineering Department prior to the recordation of the plat. 3. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion,of the Building into the South Spring Street right-of-way prior to the recordation of the plat. 4. The applicant will construct a five foot (5') wide by four inch (4") thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line prior to the conveyance of any condo- minium units and will agree to join an improvement district for the undergrounding of utilities if one is formed. 5. At the time of plat recordation, the applicant will submit deed restrictions limiting the rental or sale of the A -frame for five (5) years to moderate income employee housing guidelines, as these have been adopted by the Aspen City Council, and will submit a statement of subdivision excep- tion, to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 6. The applicant will otherwise comply with the requirements of Sections 20-22(a) and (b) for the rental and/or sale of the A -frame. 7. The applicant will comply with the following life, health and safety requirements of the Building Department prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit: & 0 0 For the Office Building: a. A one (1) hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building; b. The one (1) hour construction in the basement must be completed; C. The exit doors in the atrium area must be labeled; d. The missing fire hoses must be replaced; e. Handrails must be provided at all stairways; and f. The applicant will add a three foot (31) by six foot eight inch (6'8") exit door to the north space on the ground floor prior to its conveyance. For the Residential Building: a. Provide the required clearance for the woodstove chimney. b. Provide one stairway which meets code requirements. C. Enclose the gas flue which is exposed on the interior of the building. d. Provide required number of smoke detectors. e. Make the electrical panel accessible by removing the shelf. f. Do not use the front loft for sleeping purposes. g. Provide the lower bedroom with an egress window with a minimum area of 5.7 s.f., a minimum width of 20 inches, a minimum height of 24 inches and a maximum height for the sill of 44 inches. • CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen No. Staff: l� PROJECT NAME: }-iG� &44t.4,, 2 APPLICANT: Gar U�, Phone: REPRESENTATIVE: Phone: IRS TYPE OF APPLICATION: I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Final Plat II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step) 1. Conceptual Submission 2. Preliminary Plat 3. Final Plat III.EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step) IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step) 1. Special Review 2. Use Determination 3. Conditional Use REFERRALS: Attorney _Engineering Dept. Housing Water City Electric FINAL ROUTING: `/ Attorney V/ Building (Fee) ($1,840) ($1,120) ($ 560) ($1,290) ($ 830) ($ 560) ($1,010) ($ 465) Date Referred: loll-2-- Sanitation District Mountain Bell Parks Holy Cross Electric Fire Marshall/Building Dept. Engineering Other Date Routed: School District Rocky Mtn. Nat.Gas State Hgwy. Dept. Fire Chief Other is DISPOSITION: CITY P&Z REVIEW: ,4 o S4 � l9a`( CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: v �1�.n o-�h L'} l`is �( 1-yn— Lok�-o :-v CITY P&Z REVIEW: CITY COUNCIL REVIEW: Ordinance No. Ordinance No. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization DATE: February 13, 1984 APPROVED AS TO FORM: BACKGROUND On June 23, 1981, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Council approve the condominiumization of the Hannah Dustin Building (known then as the Vincenzi-Goldstein Subdivision Exception) located at 300 South Spring (across from the old Post Office). As one condition of that recommendation, the applicant was required to make some very extensive "life, health and safety" upgrades to the building, in conformance with an inspection made by former Chief Building Offi- cial, Herb Paddock. Due to the very costly nature of these require- ments, the applicant decided not to proceed forward with the condomi- niumization before City Council. Several months ago, I received a memo from the current Chief Building Official, Jim Wilson. Jim had performed his own inspection at the re- quest of the applicant and had found that "some of Paddock's require- ments are overly stringent and contrary to Section 20-22(e) of the Aspen Code (which states that) the intention of the inspection is not necessarily to bring old structures to full compliance with new con- struction codes." Based on this finding, Jim recommended the deletion of many of the items previously required by Herb. I contacted the applicant and suggested that it would be appropriate to initiate the condominiumization once again. Upon the submission of the application, the Engineering Department found that the applicant owned not only the two lots upon which the Hannah Dustin Building sits, but also the two adjacent lots, upon which a small A -frame house is located. The applicant has therefore revised his request to include all four lots and both structures for condominiumization. REVIEW COMMENTS The Engineering Department asks that a significant number of minor changes be made to the plat. These changes are found in the memo- randums from Chuck Roth dated October 31 and December 19, 1983, and are listed below as conditions. The Engineering Department has also addressed two issues which were reviewed during the prior considera- tion of this application. Specifically, 1. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion into South Spring Street; and 2. There is a need for a sidewalk on East Hyman Avenue. The Engineer recommends that the applicant join an improvement district for this purpose. The prior Engineer requested that the applicant actually construct the sidewalk. The Planning Office and Planning Commission prefer the latter approach to this issue, since this is a downtown commercial building where sidewalks are a necessity. The Housing Office found that the A -frame currently rents at rates within our employee housing guidelines. Therefore, they recommend that the applicant agree to a five year deed restriction on the unit to moderate income price guidelines, and that the applicant otherwise comply with Section 20-22 of the Code. • • MEMO: Hannah Dustin February 13, 1984 Page Two As noted above, the Building Department has performed a life, health and safety inspection of the office building. The revised list of requirements is included in Jim Wilson's memo dated September 19, 1983 and appears below as conditions of approval. Jim also performed an inspection of the A -frame and produced a memo an December 30, 1983 listing deficiencies needing attention. At the January 3, 1984 P&Z meeting, the applicant requested that P&Z eliminate some of these items as not being of a "life, health and safety" nature. P&Z deferred on this determination to Jim Wilson, who subsequently agreed to delete several items from that list. Jim's memo dated January 31, 1984 lists the items which he wants the applicant to rectify. The City Attorney sent us a memo on December 30 which raised a few issues mentioned by other reviewers. Gary Esary also asked that the applicant be required to file a Statement of Exception in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION The Planning Office recommends that City Council grant subdivision exception to the applicants for the Hannah Dustin Building for the purposes of its condominiumization. The Planning and Zoning Commis- sion concurred with this recommendation at their regular meeting on January 3, 1984. COUNCIL MOTION Should you concur with our recommendation, the appropriate motion is as follows: "Move to grant subdivision exception to the applicants from the Hannah Dustin Building for the purposes of its condominiumization, subject to the following conditions." 1. The applicant will revise the condominium map prior to its recordation, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Depart- ment, specifically: a. Clarifying that the Block number in the Owner's Certi- ficate refers to Block 105; b. Completing the index listing; C. Showing and dimensioning the parking spaces; d. Changing the dates on the City Council and Planning Commission approvals to 1984; e. Specifying on the legends of sheets 2-4 that the "bearing" walls and "partition" walls are, in fact, "condominium unit limits". f. Completing the surveyor's Certificate to state his name and the date of his survey; g. Indicating the general common elements on Lots C and D; and 2. The applicant will produce adequate monumentation on the site to satisfy the Engineering Department prior to the recordation of the plat. 3. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion of the Building into the South Spring Street right-of-way prior to the recordation of the plat. MEMO: Hannah Dustin February 13, 1984 Page Three 4. The applicant will construct a five foot (5') wide by four inch (4") thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line prior to the conveyance of any condo- minium units and will agree to join an improvement district for the undergrounding of utilities if one is formed. 5. At the time of plat recordation, the applicant will submit deed restrictions limiting the rental or sale of the A -frame for five (5) years to moderate income employee housing guidelines, as these have been adopted by the Aspen City Council, and will submit a statement of subdivision excep- tion, to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 6. The applicant will otherwise comply with the requirements of Sections 20-22(a) and (b) for the rental and/or sale of the A -frame. 7. The applicant will comply with the following life, health and safety requirements of the Building Department prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit: For the Office Building: a. A one (1) hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building; b. The one (1) hour construction in the basement must be completed; C. The exit doors in the atrium area must be labeled; d. The missing fire hoses must be replaced; e. Handrails must be provided at all stairways; and f. The applicant will add a three foot (3') by six foot eight inch (6'8") exit door to the north space on the ground floor prior to its conveyance. For the Residential Building: a. Provide the required clearance for the woodstove chimney. b. Provide one stairway which meets code requirements. C. Enclose the gas flue which is exposed on the interior of the building. d. Provide required number of smoke detectors. e. Make the electrical panel accessible by removing the shelf. f. Do not use the front loft for sleeping purposes. g. Provide the lower bedroom with an egress window with a minimum area of 5.7 s.f., a minimum width of 20 inches, a minimum height of 24 inches and a maximum height for the sill of 44 inches. AS;71ENc�oPITKIN 10GIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Allan Richman, Planning Department City of pen FROM: Herb Paddock, Chief Building Official RE: Vincenzi Condominization DATE: June 15, 1981 The following are items the Building Department requires to be addressed in conjunction wit'_i condominizat ion of the above. (1) Add sprinkler system per section 11 & 38 of 76 U.B.C. (2) Provide separation at basement with 3/4 hour door assembly per chapter 3305 of 76 U.B.C. (3) Incomplete 1-hour construction anid rated doors (20 minute rating) shall be added at basement. (4) Exit doors adjacent to courtyard shall be replaced with 3/4 hour rated doors and closures rather than sliding doors. These shall comply with height, width, and swing requirements of section 33 of the 76 U.B.C. (5) Additional glazing at court area shall_be replaced with wired glass. (6) Exit signs shall be placed at all exits at court area per section 3312 of 76 U.B.C. (7) Missing fire hoses shall be replaced, see 76 U.B.C. (8) Handrails shall be installed throughout the building in compliance with section 33 of 76 U.B.C. (9) All exits shall swing in the direction of travel at courtyard (10) (Guardrails shall meet requirements of section 33, minimum 42" height. These reflect all changes required by the Building Department. If some question about waivers by the Board of Appe�Lls on those items arise we need to contact Paul Taddune. If any of those items were waived, they were done so outside the perimeters of the Board's rights and power. cc: Gideon Kaufman Paul Taddune 506 East IVlain Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 U 303/925-5973 ASPEN*PITKIN *EGIONAL BUILT DEPARTMENT M E M O R A N D U M TO: Alan Richman FROM: Jim Wilson DATE: September 19, 1983 RE: Vincenzi Condominiumization I have been approached by George Vicenzi to reevaluate a fire, health, safety inspection performed by former Chief Building Official, Herb Paddock. In accordance with condominiumization procedure outlined in the Aspen Code, Mr. Paddock inspected Mr. Vincenzi's property at 300 S. Spring Street, known as the Hannah -Dustin Building and summarized the building's deficiencies in a memo to you dated June 15th, 1981 (see attached). Some of Paddock's requirements are overly stringent and contrary to section 20-22 (e) of the Aspen Code,".... the intention (of the inspection) is not necessarily to bring old structures to full compliance with new construc- tion codes." Note the frequency of which "76 U.B.C.", the code in effect at that time, appears in the memo. Specifically, I disagree with the requirements of items 1,4,5, and 9. Item 1 requires a fire sprinkler system, but the referenced code sections don't nor do any code sections require a fire sprinkler system in the Hannah - Dustin building. Items 4 and 5 deal with an existing atrium/courtyard that was allowed by Board of Appeals Case No. 69-1 heard on May 1, 1969. Mr. Paddock challenges the legality of the Board's decision in his closing paragraph, but the Aspen Code (Sec. 7-44) requires the greivance to be filed within 30 days of a decision. The requirement of item 9 cannot be substantiated with any code requirements applied to this building. Door swing is critical only in hazardous or assembly type occupancies. I don't see the "illegal" atrium as a life threatening safety hazard provided the current use and occupancy is maintained and each tenant is provided with an exterior exit independent of the atrium space. Each tenant space, with the exception of the north space on the ground floor, now has two exits. Mr. Vincenzi indicated that a 3'0" Y 618" door will be added as necessary. In addition to the door, the following items from Paddock's list must be done prior to condominiumization: 1) A 1-hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building. 2) Complete the 1-hour construction in the basement. 3) Label exit doors in atrium area offices: mail address: 110 East Hallam Street 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Memo Alan Richman Page Two 4) Replace missing fire hoses 5) Provide handrails at all stairways JW/df cc: George Vicenzi Gideon Kaufman Paul Tadune GIDEON I. KAUFMAN DAVID G. EISENSTEIN HAND DELIVERY LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 Alan Richman City and County 130 S. Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: October 10, 1983 Planning Office Re: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-8166 Pursuant to our meeting with Gary Esary concerning the Hannah Dustin condominiumization I write this letter to request a City Council hearing to reconsider the condominiumization of the Hannah Dustin. As you are aware on April 6, 1981 I applied for exception from subdivision regulations for the condominiumization of this office building. We received Planning and Zoning approval at their May 27, 1981 meeting. We appeared before the Aspen City Council on July 2, 1981 where we received approval for the condominiumization. However, there were certain conditions placed on the approval by the Building Department that we could not comply with and therefore, the application was tabled. The Building Inspector has re-examined the property and we have agreed with him to make certain health and safety improvements that are, we believe, more reasonable and more economically feasible. These conditions are spelled out in Jim Wilson's September 19, 1983, letter to Alan Richman. I believe all other aspects of the condominiumization remai n the same. The condominiumization ordinance has not been changed nor have any conditions changed that would in any way effect our approval. Now that the one outstanding issue of health and safety has been resolved with the Building Department, I believe we can wrap up the Hannah Dustin condominiumization. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me otherwise I look forward to this item being placed on the next available City Council agenda. Enclosed please find a check for $485.00, Alan Richman October 10, 1983 Page 2 and three condominium plats. Thank you very much for your help and consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By Gideo K ufman GK/kl Enclosures cc: George Vicenzi • C� MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Engineer FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: Hannah Dustin - Condominiumization DATE: October 12, 198*3 Attached for your review is an application by Gideon Kaufman on behalf of his client George Vicenzi for condominiumization of an existing commercial building. The building is located on Lots A and B, Block 105, East Aspen. This application was previously submitted under the name of Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision Exception (Condominiumization) in April of 1981, and no action was taken. The applicant is now resubmitting a request for condominiumization of the same building. This item has been scheduled before City Council on November 14, 1983. Please have your comments back to the Planning Office no later than October 31, 1983 in order for the Planning Office to have adequate time to prepare for the presentation before Council. Thank you. MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department a c DATE: October 31, 1983 RE: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization ------------------------------------------------------------ Having reviewed the above application and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. In the owner's certificate the block number is unclear. It looks like 108 or 109. 2. The index listing is not complete. 3. No encroachment license is indicated for encroachments on So. Spring Street right-of-way. 4. It appears from the record that Lots A, B, C and D of Block 105 are under the single ownership of the Hannah Dustin Building Associates. Therefore, application must be made for a lot split. The split should be along a line permitting a minimum of 15' rear yard from the principal building. 5. Parking spaces must need to be shown and dimensioned. 6. The northeast monument is not indicated as found or set. 7. The legends on sheets 2-4 specify "bearing" walls and "partition" walls. One symbol only should be used, and it should be called "condominium unit limits." 8. This application was reviewed by the Engineering Department on May 5, 1981. Comments from the memo have been included herein. 9. Change City approval certificate to read: approved by the City Council of Aspen on the day of , 1983. Signed this day of , 1983." CR/co Enclosure GIDEON I. KAUFMAN DAVID G. EISENSTEIN • • LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 November 28, 1983 HAND DELIVERY Alan Richman Planning Office City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization. Dear Alan: TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-8166 Please consider this letter a revision to my October 10, 1983 letter asking for a reconsideration of the Hannah Dustin condominiumization. Since my October 10, 1983 letter the Engineering Department discovered that adjacent lots owned by the applicant were not included in the original condominiumization application thereby requiring an amendment to the original condominiumization application. Please consider this letter an amendment to our condominiumization application which now includes the omitted lots. Based on George's meeting with you and Gary Esary enclosed please find a check in the amount of $545.00 as well as the newly revised condominium plat. I would appreciate your placing this item on the next available agenda. Thank you for your help and consideration in this matter. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By GK/kl Enclosures • • GIDEON I. KAUFMAN DAVID G. EISENSTEIN HAND DELIVERY Alan Richman Planning Office City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 Dear Alan: LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION BOX 10001 611 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 December 1, 1983 Re: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization. TELEPHONE AREA CODE 303 925-8166 Please consider this letter the supplemental information that you requested concerning the A -frame located on the Hannah Dustin property. While I don't believe the Condominiumization Ordinance 20-22 is intended to cover a situation such as we have in the Hannah Dustin situation. The City attorney takes a different position and feels that it should be included. Therefore the following information is necessary for you to determine the employee impact of this particular condominiumization. The unit presently contains 865 square feet and rents for $600.00 per month. This would have it fall within the low, moderate, middle income guidelines. If a five year restriction is going to be placed on the unit we would ask that the restriction be placed to the present rental and any increases would be governed by the percent of increase granted by the City Council to low, moderate and middle income guidelines. If you need any additional information please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, LAW OFFICES OF GIDEON I. KAUFMAN, a Professional Corporation By Gideo Kaufman GK/kl Enclosures 0 S . 75' 011 I*'E SE' LAC[ L I a :1 ! , HARCLD W ;0%SC'4. A FIEGISTE%+ED SORVENCR It: 7H1i S'--E Oc C0_r_:%CC-. ......... ...... -',F- IMPROVE4:MENT SURVEY B LOTS A B B BL K. 105 ASPEN JOHNSON L ONGFEL L 0 W 8 ASSOC., 111C. • • MEMORANDUM TO: City Engineer City Attorney Building Department Housing Office FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: Hannah Dustin - Condominiumization DATE: December 5, 1983 Attached for your review and referral comments is an application which has been revised on the Hannah Dustin Condominiumization. The Engineering Department and City Attorney received copies of the first application and therefore this is a re -referral for your review. The Building Department and Housing Office are receiving this application for the first time. This application was pre- viously submitted under the name of Vicenzi/Goldstein Subdivision Exception in April of 1981 and referred again this year on October 12 under the name of Hannah Dustin to the City Attorney and City Engineer. No action was taken in either case. This case has been scheduled before the Planning and Zoning Commis- sion for January 3, 1984. Please have your comments back to the Planning Office no later than December 21, 1983, in order for the Planning Office to have adequate time to prepare for the presenta- tion before P&Z. Thank you. III M E M O R A N D U M pitkin county 506 east main street aspen, colorado 81611 TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: James L. Adamski, Housing Office •� RE: Hannah Dustin - Condominiumization DATE: December 13, 1983 NAME OF APPLICANT: Hannah Dustin NAME OF PROJECT: Hannah Dustin - Condominiumization NATURE OF PROJECT: The Condominiumization of office space and the deed restriction of the a -frame on the adjoinging lot. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the information provided to this office, it is agreed that this application be approved with the following conditions: 1. That the a -frame have a five year deed restriction placed on it. 2. That the a -frame have the 1983 guidelines for low and moderate rental restrictions applied. 3. That the applicant comply with Sec. 20-22 of the municiple code of the City of Aspen, Colorado. • MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning Office FROM: Chuck Roth, City Engineering Department C DATE: December 19, 1983 RE: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization ----------------------------------------------------------- Having reviewed the above application, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Most of the comments of October 31 have not been addressed. A copy of that memo is attached. 2. The southeast corner must be monumented prior to recordation of plat. 3. The surveyor's certificate is incomplete. It must state his name and on what date the survey was made under his supervision. 4. For clarity, please indicate G.C.E. also on Lots C&D. 5. The plat needs a title certificate and a mortgagee's certificate. 6. The subdivider must covenant to join an improvement district for sidewalk, curb and gutter and for the undergrounding of utilities (electric, telephone, cable TV, etc.) CR/co Enclosure cc: Jay Hammond, Assistant City Engineer Gary Esary, Assistant City Attorney Louis Buettner, City Surveyor CITY OF ASPEN 130 south galena street aspen, colorado 81611 303-925 -2020 MEMORANDUM DATE: December 30, 1983 TO: Alan Richman FROM: Gary Esari�_WL RE: Hannah Dustin Condo Alan, since we've had several meetings on this application, I think all the legal issues are already in the record. Of course, the applicant should be required to file a Statement of Exception and Employee Housing Deed Restriction, in a form accept- able to the City Attorney. I can't see a designation for the "A" frame, i.e. Unit , G.C.E., L.C.E. Applicant and reviewer should be aware that Engineering is devel- oping a new standard (or codifying an old standard) for condo plats (and all subdivision exception plats) and a cursory look at the submitted plat reveals the lack of a title statement. There appears to be an encroachment on the right-of-way that might require an encroachment license agreement. Please check with Engineering on this. GSE/mc ASPEN*PITKIN a-GIONAL BUILCINO DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman, Planning FROM: Jim Wilson, Building Official DATE: December 30, 1983 RE: Hannah -Dustin Condominiumization A fire, health and safety inspection was done for the single family dwelling designated as "A -Frame House" on the site survey of the Hannah -Dustin condominium map. The 1973 Uniform Housing Code adopted by the City of Aspen (Section 7-196, Aspen Municipal Code) was used as a guideline and the following deficiencies were noted: 1; No legal exit doors; 2) Woodstove chimney lacks required clearance; 3) Spiral and straight stairways illegal; -) Gas flue exposed and unprotected on interior of building; 3) Front sleeping loft does not meet minimum room dimensions; 6) No sleeping areas have emergency egress windows; 7) No smoke detectors; Ceiling height in bathroom too low; 3) Electrical panel not readily accessible; 10) Insufficient convenience outlets as evidenced by extensive use of extension cords and cube taps. JW/ar offices: mail address: 110 East Hallam Street 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 E C. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization DATE: January 3, 1984 BACKGROUND On June 23, 1981, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Council approve the condominiumization of the Hannah Dustin Building (known then as the Vincenzi-Goldstein Subdivision Exception) located at 300 South Spring (across from the old Post Office). As one condition of your recommendation, the applicant was required to make some very extensive "life, health and safety" upgrades to the building, in conformance with an inspection made by former Chief Building Official, Herb Paddock. Due to the very costly nature of these requirements, the applicant decided not to proceed forward with the condominiumization before City Council. Several months ago, I received a memo from the current Chief Building Official, Jim Wilson. Jim had performed his own inspection at the re- quest of the applicant and had found that "some of Paddock's require- ments are overly stringent and contrary to Section 20-22(e) of the Aspen Code (which states that) the intention of the inspection is not necessarily to bring old structures to full compliance with new con- struction codes." Based on this finding, Jim recommended the deletion of many of the items previously required by Herb. I contacted the applicant and suggested that it would be appropriate to initiate the condominiumization once again. Upon the submission of the application, the Engineering Department found that the applicant owned not only the two lots upon which the Hannah Dustin Building sits, but also the two adjacent lots, upon which a small A -frame house is located. The applicant has therefore revised his request to include all four lots and both structures for condominiumization. REVIEW COMMENTS The Engineering Department asks that a significant number of minor changes be made to the plat. These changes are found in the memorandums from Chuck Roth dated October 31 and December 19, 1983, and are listed below as conditions. The Engineering Department has also addressed two issues which were reviewed during the prior consideration of this application. Specifically, 1. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion into South Spring Street; and 2. There is a need for a sidewalk on East Hyman Avenue. The Engineer recommends that the applicant join an improvement district for this purpose. The prior Engineer requested that the applicant actually construct the sidewalk. The Planning Office prefers the latter approach to this issue. The Housing Office found that the A -frame currently rents at rates within our employee housing guidelines. Therefore, they recommend that the applicant agree to a five year deed restriction on the unit to moderate income price guidelines, and that the applicant otherwise comply with Section 20-22 of the Code. MEMO: Hannah Dustin January 3, 1984 Page Two As noted above, the Building Department has performed a life, health and safety inspection of the office building. An inspection was also performed for the A -frame. The revised list of requirements is in- cluded in Jim Wilson's memo dated September 19, 1983 and appears below as conditions of approval. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION The Planning Office recommends that you recommend that City Council grant subdivision exception to the applicants for the Hannah Dustin Building for the purposes of its condominiumization, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicant will revise the condominium map, to the satis- faction of the Engineering Department, specifically: a. Clarifying that the Block number in the Owner's Certi- ficate refers to Block 105; b. Completing the index listing; C. Showing and dimensioning the parking spaces; d. Changing dates on the City Council and Planning Com- mission approvals to 1984; e. Specifying on the legends of sheets 2-4 that the "bear- ing" walls and "partition" walls are, in fact, "condo- minium unit limits". f. Completing the surveyor's Certificate to state his name and the date of his survey; g. Indicating the general common elements on Lots C and D; and h. Providing a title certificate and mortgagee's certi- ficate. 2. The applicant will prodequate adequate monumentation on the site to satisfy the Engineering Department prior to the recordation of the plat. 3. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion of the Building into the South Spring Street right-of-way. 4. The applicant will construct a five foot (5') wide by four inch (4") thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line and will agree to join an improvement district for the undergrounding of utilities if one is formed. 5. The applicant will submit deed restrictions limiting the rental or sale of the A -frame for five (5) years to moderate income employee housing guidelines, as these have been adopted by the Aspen City Council. 6. The applicant will otherwise comply with the requirements of Sections 20-22(a) and (b) for the rental and/or sale of the A -frame. 7. The applicant will commit, prior to the review of this appli- cation by City Council, that the life, health and safety requirements of the Building Department will be met, speci- fically: MEMO: Hannah Dustin0 • January 3, 1984 Page Three For the office building: a. A one (1) hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building; b. The one (1) hour construction in the basement must be completed; C. The exit doors in the atrium area must be labeled; d. The missing fire hoses must be replaced; e. Handrails must be provided at all stairways; and f. The applicant will add a three foot (3') by six foot eight inch (6'8") exit door as the Building Department finds necessary. For the residential building: a. Rectify the 10 deficiencies identified in the memo from Jim Wilson dated December 30, 1983. 8. The Applicant will comply with the conditions outlined in Gary Esary's memo dated December 30, 1983. �J MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Alan Richman, Planning Office RE: Hannah Dustin Condominiumization DATE: January 30, 1984 APPROVED AS TO FORM: BACKGROUND On June 23, 1981, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended that Council approve the condominiumization of the Hannah Dustin Building (known then as the Vincenzi-Goldstein Subdivision Exception) located at 300 South Spring (across from the old Post Office). As one condition of that recommendation, the applicant was required to make some very extensive "life, health and safety" upgrades to the building, in conformance with an inspection made by former Chief Building Official, Herb Paddock. Due to the very costly nature of these requirements, the applicant decided not to proceed forward with the condominiumization before City Council. Several months ago, I received a memo from the current Chief Building Official, Jim Wilson. Jim had performed his own inspection at the re- quest of the applicant and had found that "some of Paddock's require- ments are overly stringent and contrary to Section 20-22(e) of the Aspen Code (which states that) the intention of the inspection is not necessarily to bring old structures to full compliance with new con- struction codes." Based on this finding, Jim recommended the deletion of many of the items previously required by Herb. I contacted the applicant and suggested that it would be appropriate to initiate the condominiumization once again. Upon the submission of the application, the Engineering Department found that the applicant owned not only the two lots upon which the Hannah Dustin Building sits, but also the two adjacent lots, upon which a small A -frame house is located. The applicant has therefore revised his request to include all four lots and both structures for condominiumization. REVIEW COMMENTS The Engineering Department asks that a significant number of minor changes be made to the plat. These changes are found in the memorandums from Chuck Roth dated October 31 and December 19, 1983, and are listed below as conditions. The Engineering Department has also addressed two issues which were reviewed during the prior consideration of this application. Specifically, 1. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion into South Spring Street; and 2. There is a need for a sidewalk on East Hyman Avenue. The Engineer recommends that the applicant join an improvement district for this purpose. The prior Engineer requested that the applicant actually construct the sidewalk. The Planning Office and Planning Commission prefer the latter approach to this issue, since this is a downtown commercial building where sidewalks are a necessity. The Housing Office found that the A -frame currently rents at rates within our employee housing guidelines. Therefore, they recommend that the applicant agree to a five year deed restriction on the unit to moderate income price guidelines, and that the applicant otherwise comply with Section 20-22 of the Code. MEMO: Hannah Dustin January 30, 1984 Page Two As noted above, the Building Department has performed a life, health and safety inspection of the office building. The revised list of requirements is included in Jim Wilson's memo dated September 19, 1983 and appears below as conditions of approval. Jim also performed an inspection of the A -frame and produced a memo on December 30, 1983 listing deficiencies needing attention. At the January 3, 1984 P&Z meeting, the applicant requested that P&Z eliminate some of these items as not being of a "life, health and safety"nature. P&Z deferred on this determination to Jim Wilson, who subsequently agreed to delete several items from that list. The City Attorney sent us a memo on December 30 which raised a few issues mentioned by other reviewers. Gary Esary also asked that the applicant be required to file a Statement of Exception in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION The Planning Office recommends that City Council grant subdivision exception to the applicants for the Hannah Dustin Building for the purposes of its condominiumization. The Planning and Zoning Commis- sion concurred with this recommendation at their regular meeting on January 3, 1984. COUNCIL MOTION Should you concur with our recommendation, the appropriate motion is as follows: "Move to grant subdivision exception to the applicants from the Hannah Dustin Building for the purposes of its condominiumization, subject to the following conditions." 1. The applicant will revise the condominium map prior to its recordation, to the satisfaction of the Engineering Depart- ment, specifically: a. Clarifying that the Block number in the Owner's Certificate refers to Block 105; b. Completing the index listing; C. Showing and dimensioning the parking spaces; d. Changing the dates on the City Council and Planning Commission approvals to 1984; e. Specifying on the legends of sheets 2-4 that the "bearing" walls and "partition" walls are, in fact, "condominium unit limits". f. Completing the surveyor's Certificate to state his name and the date of his survey; g. Indicating the general common elements on Lots C and D; and 2. The applicant will produce adequate monumentation on the site to satisfy the Engineering Department prior to the recordation of the plat. 3. The applicant must obtain an encroachment license for the intrusion of the Building into the South Spring Street right-of-way prior to the recordation of the plat. • • MEMO: Hannah Dustin January 30, 1984 Page Three 4. The applicant will construct a five foot (5') wide by four inch (4") thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line prior to the conveyance of any condominium units and will agree to join an improvement district for the undergrounding of utilities if one is formed. 5. At the time of plat recordation, the applicant will submit deed restrictions limiting the rental or sale of the A - frame for five (5) years to moderate income employee housing guidelines, as these have been adopted by the Aspen City Council, and will submit a statement of subdivision exception, to be approved as to form by the City Attorney. 6. The applicant will otherwise comply with the requirements of Sections 20-22(a) and (b) for the rental and/or sale of the A -frame. 7. The applicant will comply with the following life, health and safety requirements of the Building Department prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit: For the Office Building: a. A one (1) hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building; b. The one (1) hour construction in the basement must be completed; C. The exit doors in the atrium area must be labeled; d. The missing fire hoses must be replaced; e. Handrails must be provided at all stairways; and f. The applicant will add a three foot (3') by six foot eight inch (6'8") exit door to the north space on the ground floor prior to its conveyance. For the residential building: a. Provide the required clearance for the woodstove chimney. b. Provide one stairway which meets code requirements. C. Enclose the gas flue which is exposed on the interior of the building. d. Provide required number of smoke detectors. e. Make the electrical panel accessible by removing the shelf. ASPEN*PITKIN OEGIONAL BUILT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Alan Richman FROM: Jim Wilson 2b� DATE: January 31, 1984 RE: Hannah Dustin Building A fire, health and safety inspection was done for the single family dwelling designated as "A -Frame House" on the site survey of the Hannah -Dustin condominium map. The 1973 Uniform Housing Code adopted by the City of Aspen (Section 7-196, the Aspen Municipal Code) was used as a guideline and the following deficiencies were noted: 1) Woodstove Chimney lacks required clearance 2) Provide one legal stairway 3) Gas flue exposed and unprotected on interior of building 5) Front loft not to be used for sleeping 6) Lower B.R. to be provided with an egress window minimum area 5.7 S.F. with minimum width of 20" and minimum height of 24" maximum height of sill 44" 7) Electrical panel not readily accessible 8) No smoke detectors offices: mail address: 110 East Hallam Street 506 East Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 303/925-5973 Aspen, Colorado 81611 • y \A SI - 5 3 Lam. V AL, EDWARDS & TADDUNE ATTORNEYS AT LAW BARRY 0. EDWARDS PAUL J. TADOUNE January 23, 1985 Gideon Kaufman, Esq. 315 East Hyman Avenue Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Gideon: ❑ ASPEN PROFESSIONAL BUILDING OFFICES: 600 EAST HOPKINS. SUITE 304 ASPEN, CO 81611 (303) 925.9180 ❑ CITY HALL OFFICES: 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, CO 81611 (3031 925.3247 Flo�J 2 A l9w I Enclosed please find an original Subdivision Agreement which has been revised in accordance with staff comments and our discussion. Please have your clients execute the agreement and forward to my office, together with the original license agreement referred to in Paragraph 1. Additionally, I would appreciate agreement in the vicinity of the promised some time ago. Very truly yours, r-- Paul J. Taddune City Attorney PJ T/m c cc:� Planning Office Building Department Engineering Department receiving a copy of the trail Riverview Condominiums which was Ll SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT WHEREAS, GEORGE VICENZI and ALAN J. GOLDSTEIN (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Owner") are the owners of a parcel of land located in the City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, and more particularly described as Lots A, B, C and D, Block 105, City of Aspen, Pitkin County, Colorado, on which there is situated an office building and A -Frame; and, WHEREAS, Owner has reauested an exception from the full sub- division process for the purpose of subdividing the existing office building through condominiumization; and, WHEREAS, Owner has submitted a condominium/subdivision plat to City, incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" which the City Council desires to approve subject to the terms and conditions of this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colo- rado, does hereby grant an exception from the full subdivision process and grant subdivision approval expressly subject to and contingent upon fulfillment of the following terms and conditions agreed to by Owner and Owner's successors, heirs and assigns: 1. Owner shall secure and record a License Agreement for the intrusion of the building into the South Spring Street right- of-way prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit. 2. Owner shall construct a five-foot (5') wide by four inch (4") thick concrete sidewalk adjacent to the East Hyman Avenue property line prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit. 3. Owner shall comply with the following Life, Health and Safety requirements prior to the conveyance of any condominium unit. a. A one -hour fire door must separate the basement from the remainder of the building. b. The one -hour construction of the basement must be completed. C. The exit doors in the atrium area must be labeled. d. The missing fire hoses must be replaced. e. Hand rails must be provided on all stairways. f. Owner will add a three foot (3') by six foot eight inch (6'8") exit door to the north space on the ground floor. 4. Owner agrees to provide the following health and safety improvements for the residential building: a. Provide the required clearance for the wood stove chimney. b. Provide one stairway which meets Code require- ments . C. Enclose a gas flue which is exposed on the interior of the building. d. Provide required number of smoke detectors. e. Make the electrical panel accessible by removing the shelf. f. Provide the lower bedroom with an egress window with a minimum area of 5.75 square feet, a minimum width of 20 inches, a minimum height of 24 inches and a maximum height for the sill of 44 inches. 5. With respect to the residential building, Owner does hereby covenant with the City that: a. Any rental and/or sale shall comply with the requirements of Sections 20-22(a) and (b) of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen. b. The front loft shall not be used for sleeping pur- poses. 6. Owner does hereby covenant with the City that the rental and sale of the A -Frame located on the property and designated on the plat as the residential building shall be restricted in terms of its use and occupancy to rental and occupancy guidelines estab- lished by the City Council for moderate income employee housing for the next five (5) years. It is the understanding of the par- ties that the current tenant shall be allowed to stay in resi- dency. In the event a new tenant seeks 'to occupy the premises then this tenant can be selected by Owner provided the tenant is a qualified employee as determined by the City Council or its desig- nee. Qualified employee as used herein shall mean any person residing and employed in the City of Aspen or Pitkin County an average of thirty (30) hours per week, nine (9) months out of a twleve (12) month period who shall meet the moderate income and occupancy eligibility requirements generally established and K applied by the City with respect to employee housing. Verifica- tion of employment of those persons living in the employee units shall be completed and filed with the City Council or its designee by the owner of the unit. This employee restriction shall run with the land and shall be valid for five (5) years from the date of the recordation of the plat. 7. In the event that any municipal improvement or improve- ments of a kind contemplated in Section 20-16 of the Municipal Code of the City of Aspen, as amended, become in the sole judgment or discretion of the City Council of the City of Aspen necessary or desirable to the area of the above -described property. Owner will make no unreasonable objection to any special assessments or special tax or proceeding therefor on the basis that the property is adequately served by existing improvements and/or on the basis that the premises will not be served or benefited by the improve- ment or improvements proposed. Owner further agrees to join upon the demand therefor by the City any Special Improvement District, Urban Renewal District formed for construction of such improve- ments (including without limitation signage, drainage, underground utilities, paved streets and alleys, planting, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street lights, traffic circulation, trails, recreation facilities, open space lands, public transportation facilities, parking, etc.) in the area of the above -described property or to reimburse the City of Aspen directly upon demand therefor if the City should choose to construct these improvements without the formation of such a district. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have hereunder executed their hands and seals on the date and year indicated in full understanding and agreement to the terms and conditions herein contained. Dated this _ day of CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO A Colorado Municipal Corporation William L. Stirling, Mayor ATTEST: Kathryn S. Koch, City Clerk OWNER: George Vicenzi Alan J. Goldstein 1985. 3 STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Pitkin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1985, by William L. Stirling as Mayor and Kathryn S. Koch as City Clerk of the City of Aspen, Colorado. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public Address STATE OF COLORADO ss. County of Pitkin ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1985, by George Vicenzi. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public Address STATE OF ss. County of ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1985, by Alan J. Goldstein. WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL. My commission expires: Notary Public Address APPROVED AS TO FORM: Paul J. Taddune, City Attorney Dated this _ day of , 1985. 4 U '000-4rt CONDOMINIUM MAP OF ,. OWNERS CERTIFICATE HANNAH DUSTIN CONDOMINIUMS HANNAH DUSTIN BUILDING ASSOCIATES AS OWNER(S) OFLOT5AE.BHLOGK1050RIGINALASPE.NTOWNSIT A' -')PEN COLORADO, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT OF THE HANNAH DUSTIN CONDOMINIUMS HAS BEEN PREPARED PURSUANT TO THE PURPOSES STATED IN THE CONDOMINIUM DECLARATION FOR SAID CONDOMINIUMS DATED THIS DAY OF AND RE£ORDED IN BOOK ON PAGE OF THE RECORDS OF THE CLERK AND RECORDER OF THE COUNTY OF , STATE OF COLORADO. A L L EY BLOCK 105 APPROX. LOCATICIN OF 5ANITARY SEWER LINE O (N. 75� 09 I IvV. Izo oo' ) • 1`*5RE-BAP, Q15TU BED ELEC E TELE E TV I G_ C. E. In 1 T U 5.-7 6 DECK DEGK i 7.q k • p', I.O' _ SG.�'( O � ENGROAGHML_.NT - S 0 _ � 0- . � 1.0 to :.•. p2 3 SU STORY BRICK 5TRCTURF J W BA-SENAENT I If', �. 0 . Z 1.0� 64' ENCROACHMENT \ \\ or qu_ . 3i' \ 3.0 ho \ �o GAS 3 ,O 10.8 1 q G 8\ O�ck\ (9 70 \ l BRICK Q • �; 1p PATIO Wo00 0. ry u G. C. E. G.;. E. WALK - , .. h o (y FOUNTAIN -aD - � „A,. o (D Q FRANC 9.3, �.C.,E. G. C_ E Nvuse `�, 8.0 9.0' 3.0 W U cc )025 Q O'. . U \o \ 20 III N J .4 U i / 0 Z. r ^ \ C1 cli ENCROACpE5 I. I N wArr M \ a TYTTTgiT '- Lca ' - O 0 , c, c. E. CG. C. F_ w -. o 1,9 o •TOTAL AREA Z \i'Z000± . FT t'5 RE -BAR W/ALUM GAP 23-IG HORIZ . CONTROL BA515 OF BEF�RINGS�S . T5'CF11 1I" E .) 120. 03' (120.00 ) W0(1DMLUY n/�]/T,�111) SCALE I"=400' DURANT AVE W E. ZGOOPE �rAVE. a 35 I III®a IDO z 45 z E. HYMAN AV E . IIo 32 � 31 \ � 104 � GG � G4 -- - --- F\ r°Q4 Oy�tis mac\ yeti E . HYMAN AVE W u5 RE. -BAR " W/CAP 9o18 H. JONNSON :STORM SEWER MANHOLE OJ O 0 W W _0 C9 0 Q Z Z VJ VV WATER LINEW ti5 RE -BAR DISTURBED 5 W CDR, BLK. 104 U/ O �5 10 40 ��C�II�I��1nT0°CPf�� 5URvEY ORIENTED WITH POUND MONUMENTS FOUND SURVEY MON UM ENT fl. 0E5CR i BED CALL-5 IN ( ) RECORD ELEVATIONS BASED ON Iq,H CITY C»✓ A5PEN AERIAL SURVC.,Y ON A T.B.M. OF `ia Iq S ,a-T THE EA5-T elDE: OF- S. 5PRIN(3 AND THE GEN-TER OF E. HYMAN ST. L C E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT G.C.E, GENERAL C-c)MMOI�1 ELEMENT ZONIL0 O + 5ET P-K NAIL., 50PZVEY CONTROL. 0 MONUMENT TO 13G SGT U WATER VALVE. N 15 111 11"VV, IS.GZr =5 RE -BAR N/CAP TRI - CO q 184 5.E . COR . BLK qq STATE OF COLORADO GEORGE VICENZI S.S. GENERAL PARTNER COUNTY OF PITKIN THE FOREGOING OWNERS CERTIFICATE WAS ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS DAY OF , 19_, BY AS OWNER(S). W TNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL MY COMMISSION EXPIRES NOTARY PUBLIC ATE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE =�Ey EN VEERS. INC ), A RE.SiSTERED LAND SURVEYOR, HEREBY CERTIFY AS A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY D!RECT,CN AND SUPERVISION, OFLOT5A�.BB ORIGINAL ASPEN TCWVNSITE. SATE OF COLORADO, AND FCJND THEREON A(N) EXIJTING STRUCTURE ENT RE_r WIT" N THE BOUNDARY LINES OF SAID DESCR;BED PROPERTY AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT iBASEO ON THE FIELD EVIDENCE SHOWN AS rDUND" THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BOUNDARY L NES, BUILDING, AND IMPROVEMENTS. V EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE ACCURATELY SHOWN ; N S MAP, ANC 'HE MAP ACCURATELY AND SOBSTAN' -Y DEPICTS THE LOCATION AND THE 43R V`=_ \= '-ER-'CAL MEASURSEMENTS OF THE BJ'LD'NG, -HE CONDOMINIUM UNITS THEREIN, THE JNI- DES 3VA' CVS TnERE2F. THE DIMENSIONS OF SAID UNITS, AND THE E-EVAT"ONS OF THE FINISHED F_. -'== %NC CE - VAS DATE S'A-E :F S. S COUNTY OF ➢ TK N THE FORGNN? SURE" RS .ER- F'CATE WAS ACKNCWLEDGEC BEFORE ME TH S DAY OF 1198 _ BY -VESS My "-NC :V= cc C A- SEAL Mt __:MW S C\ E1=RES NOTARY PUSa ,C DATE PLANNING & ZONING APPROVAL S - ,CITY OF ASPEN, I&AS AP?R,.ED BY THE C,TY CF AS=E` =_-ti♦ .; 9 __� v_ _CVtM S ON THIS :.AY OF 980 CHIA M N ASPEN CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL -Y CF -,SEEN, WAS BY THE CITY DC�.VC _ OF ASPEN - 5 nAY OF IaRn AT — ES -CITY CLERK Mil'^R CITY ENGINEERS APPROVAL CITY OF ASPEN, WAS APPFrC•VED BY THE CITY CF ASPEN DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING, THIS DAY OF 1980. CITY ENGINEER CLERK & RECORDER'S ACCEPTANCE ACCE E_ F `C ',-rE OFFICE OF THE CLERK AND RECORCE=. CF E COUNTY OF D- _On n A- O'CLOCK _.M., THIS DAY OF , 198_. A' PAGE RECEPTION NO. CLERK AND RECORDER INDEX SHEET NO, I 51TL PLAN, CERTIF-IC.cTES� VICINITY MAP, LEGEND ENOTE5 (D CO O Q — w rr 00 O O Ln J N O Lr) U N X O z _ m Lli f0 O U O CL Q 105 U z V z W W 02 0 w a n LLl rr a - , h JOB NO. _= E T 1 OF 4 Io3�o -A r � BASEMENT �I O O O O LEGEND L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT G.0 E GENERAL_ COMMON EL-E.MENT BEARING WALL_ FIRST FLOOR 0 0' 1 SCALE 1" = 51 SHEET 2OF4 SOD NO. 103c-c7-A SECOND FLOOR w O O O LEGEND L.C. E, LI MITED COMMON ELEMENT G.C.E. GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT BEARING WALL PARTITION WALL EXISTING OR FUTVRC THIRD FLOOR SCALE I" = 51 SHEET 3 0F4 -)OB'-t I03G0-A. LEGEND L.C.E. LIMITED COMMON ELEMENT G.C.E. GENERAL COMMON ELEMENT FEARING WALL ROOF -79556 ROOF 7952 L FIN 15HED FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR FINISHED FLOOR '194Z3 1922 FINISHED FLOOR 1q IZ � WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 10 5 SCALE I" = 51 SHEET 40F4 13tt 103G0-P