HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.Allen Farre View.A2295ALLEN F'77-777 REVIEW
2737-181-48-704 A22-95
Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5090
City Land Use Application Fees: p0
00113-63850-041
Deposit — _— ��
-63855-042
Flat Fee------__—_--___—_ --�
-63860-043
11FC_
-63875-046
Zoning & Sign Permit--
- NMO 11
Use 'Tax
County Land Use
Application Fees:
00113-63800-033
Deposit
-63805••034
Flat Fee
-63820-037
Zoning
-63825-038
Board of Adjustment
Referral Fees:
00113 -3810-035
County Enginccr
00115-63340-163
City Engineer —_—_--- __—_
00123-63340-190
Housing
O0125-63340-205
Enviromental Health
Sales:
00113-63830-039
County Code
-69000-145
Copy Fees
Name:!
Address:
Phone:
Other
00
'Ibtal_____—A9-2
Date: Check:
-'-10 Project:
Case No: 6 .
No, of Copies
0
E
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 02/28/95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 2737-181-48-704 A22-95
STAFF MEMBER: KJ
PROJECT NAME: ALLEN F.A.R. REVIEW
Project Address: LOT 4, East Cooper Affordable Housing Subdivsn.
Legal Address: Aspen, Colorado 81611
APPLICANT: Douglas Allen 925-880 Fax: 925-9398
Applicant Address: 225 N. Mill St/210 Aspen, Colorado 81611
REPRESENTATIVE: Stan Mathis
Representative Address/Phone: 927-3415
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
FEES: PLANNING $ 489 # APPS RECEIVED 9
ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 9
FLAT FEE $
ENV.HEALTH $
TOTAL $ 489
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
STAFF APPROVAL:
1 STEP:
2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date
PUBLIC
HEARING:
YES
NO
VESTED
RIGHTS:
YES
NO
CC Meeting Date
PUBLIC
HEARING:
YES
NO
VESTED
RIGHTS:
YES
NO
DRC Meeting Date
-------------------
-------------------
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
City Engineer
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
City Electric
Envir.Hlth.
Zoning
DATE REFERRED:
----------------------
----------------------
FINAL ROUTING:
Parks Dept.
Bldg Inspector
Fire Marshal
Holy Cross
Mtn. Bell
ACSD
Energy Center
School District
Rocky Mtn NatGas
CDOT
Clean Air Board
Open Space Board
Other
Other
INITIALS: DUE:
------------------------------------
DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: jL
City Atty City Engineer
Housing Open Space
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
Zoning Env. Health
Other:
•
C]
Neighborhood Character
Design Committee
City of Aspen
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
DOUGLAS P. ALLEN
225 North Mill Street, Suite 210
Aspen, Colorado 81611
May 8, 1995
Re: Allen Residence --Lot 4, East Cooper Affordable Housing Subdivision
Dear Committee Members:
The above -referenced lot is in a newly created subdivision scheduled to have mix of
4,000-5,000 square foot single family residences and multi -family employee housing units. The
subdivision is located between Highway 82 and Riverside Subdivision and between the
Crestahaus Lodge and two story apartments. The character of the neighborhood is varied with
no particular design style or material usage. The lot is small with the Riverside Irrigation Ditch
running on two sides of the lot and the centerline of the Lacet Court as one of the property
boundaries. The site slopes to the Northeast and has heavy vegetation along the Southwest side
of the lot. Thank you.
,Lif `J
Allen
LTR\032
MESSAGE DISPLAY
TO Kim Johnson
From: Cindy Christensen
Postmark: Apr 14,95 9:52 AM
Status: Previously read
Subject: Lot 4, Lacet, Doug Allen
Message:
Doug Allen has signed the deed restriction, it has been recorded and
he has paid us his sales fee. I will be sending Doug a letter
stating what he needs to do upon completion of this unit. I will
mention that he has already received a deferred payment for another
RO unit and which one does he plan on making his residence since it
was our understanding that he was going to be living in the Lacet
home. I will also mention that he cannot own other residential
property within a 4 county region and it shows that he does. I will
cc you the letter on this when I have it written before I mail.
•
MEMORANDUM
TO: Kim Johnson, City Planner
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing Office
DATE: March 15, 1995
RE: LOT 4, LACET COURT
Doug Allen purchased Lot 4, Lacet Court, in June of 1994. At that
closing, a Memorandum of Acceptance should have been signed and
recorded which relates to the Occupancy and Resale Deed
Restriction, Agreement and Covenant (Resident Occupied Unit),
recorded in Book 731, Page 806, on November 18, 1993. Paragraph
3(c) states:
Except with respect to the initial sale of the Property prior to construction of a residence
thereon, Owner shall, upon closing, pay a fee to APCHA in an amount equal to one
percent (1%) of the sales price, or such other amount as required by APCHA guidelines.
Mr. Allen bought this lot from Robert Tobias who purchased this lot
from the developer.
Mr. Allen has signed the Memorandum of Acceptance and it is in the
process of being recorded. There is still the fee of $2,140 that
has not been paid to the Housing Office. I spoke with Mr. Allen
this week and he is aware that this amount is still owed to the
Housing Office.
• •
DO UGLAS P. ALLEN
225 North Mill Street, Suite 210
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Douglas P. Allen
Patricia K. Massender
February 28, 1995
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Lot 4, Lacet Subdivision
To Whom It May Concern:
(303) 925-8800
FAX (303) 925-9398
In connection with the Neighborhood Guidelines Review Application, I enclose my check
in the amount of $489.00 together with a copy of my owner's policy of title insurance reflecting
ownership in my name.
This letter also authorizes Stan Mathis to process the application on my behalf.
DPA/pjh
Enclosures
LTR\101
FEBRUARY 28, 1995
ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER
DESIGN COMMITTEE
C/O ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
CITY OF ASPEN
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET
ASPEN,COLORADO 81611
ATTN: K I M JOHNSON
RE. DOUG ALLEN: LOT 4 EAST COOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING
COMMITTEE MEMBERS;
THE FOLLOWING IS A DESCRIPITION OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER IN
WHICH THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE IS TO BE LOCATED.
THERE ARE A VARIETY OF USES IN THIS PART OF ASPEN. THEY RANGE FROM
SMALL MOTELS (CRESTAHAUS); LARGE HOMES AT THE ASPEN CLUB SUB-
DIVISION; THE ASPEN ATHLETIC CLUB; A THREE STOREY EMPLOYEE HOUSING
COMPLEX; AND A SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION THAT DEFIES ANY
DESCRIPTION OF CONTINUITY.
THE DIVERSE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SURROUNDING NEIGHBORHOOD IMPLIES
THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE NEIGHBORING USES,
STYLE, SCALE AND MATERIALS.
B*DOUALLEN
SUN
MATINS
ARCHUCRIE
.011 S
PI,j'Y%G F
Post
Office
Box
1984
Aspen
Colorado
81612
303/920-1434
FEBRUARY 28, 1995
ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER
DESIGN COMMITTEE
C/O ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE
CITY OF ASPEN
130 SOUTH GALENA STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
ATTN: K I M JOHNSON
RE: DOUG ALLEN
DEAR COMMITTEE MEMBERS;
THE APPLICANT, DOUG ALLEN, IS REQUESTING AN APPROVAL FOR A 2,839
S.F. AFFORDABLE HOUSING RESIDENCE LOCATED ON LOT 4 OF THE EAST
COOPER AFFORDABLE HOUSING SUBDIVISION (LACET). THE LOT SIZE IS
6,691 S.F. ALLOWING A FLOOR AREA OF 3,439 S.F., 85% OF WHICH EQUALS
2,923 S.F. WHICH WOULD EXCLUDE THE APPLICANT FROM THIS REVIEW.
HOWEVER, THE PRIVATE ACCESS ROAD (BARB'S WAY) HAS A 20' WIDE R.O.W.
ALONG THE N.E. PROPERTY LINE, THE AREA OF WHICH MUST BE DEDUCTED
FROM THE ACTUAL AREA OF THE LOT FOR THE CALCULATION OF ALLOWABLE
FLOOR AREA. HAVING DEDUCTED THE AREA OF THE R.Q.W. (1,860 S.F.) THE
FLOOR AREA IS THEN REDUCED TO 2,912 S.F., 85% OF WHICH EQUALS 2,476
S.F., WHICH REQUIRES REVIEW BY THIS COMMITTEE SINCE THE PROPOSED
AREA IS 353 S.F. GREATER THAN ALLOWED UNDER THE 85% RULE.
THE SITE IS OUTSIDE OF THE BOUNDRY OF ANY OF THE FIVE RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOODS AS SHOWN ON THE ATTACHED VICINITY MAP. THE
STAN COMMITTEE REVIEW STANDARDS WILL BE BASED ON THE GENERAL GUIDE -
MATE LINES FOR ALL CORE AREA NEIGHBORHOODS. THEREFORE, THE DISCUSSION
ARCEUMT[HAT FOLLOWS, RESPONDS TO CHAPTER 1 OF THE ASPEN NEIGHBORHOOD
,AND CHARACTER DESIGN GUIDELINES.
PUNNING
Post MASS & SCALE
Office
98 11) THE SCALE AND PROPORTION OF THE VARIOUS BUILDING COMPONENTS
984
Aspen ARE SMALL IN SCALE TO THE OVERALL MASS OF THE BUILDING. ALL
Colorado
81612 BUILDING COMPONENTS BEGIN AND END WITHIN ANY ONE FLOOR LEVEL.
303/920-1434 THE OVER HANGS AND RECESSED SPACES ARE NOT TO LARGE SO AS TO
CREATE A MONUMENTAL SCALE.
0 — 0
2) THE PROPOSED SITE IS BORDERED ON THE N.E. BY A 3 STOREY EMPLOYEE
HOUSING COMPLEX; ON THE SOUTH BY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES OF
4,000 S.F., ON THE NORTH BY AN OPEN SPACE AREA BORDERED BY
APARTMENTS AND ON THE WEST BY MEDIUM DENSE ASPENS AND A l 112
STOREY SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE AND BARN ON THE WEST. THE SITE IS
HIDDEN FROM HIGHWAY 82 BY THE EMPLOYEE HOUSING PROJECT. IT IS
ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO RELATE THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO ANY
EXISTING RESIDENCE IN THE ADJACENT NEIGHBORHOOD OF THE RIVERSIDE
ADDITION. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS 3 STOREYS WITH THE ENTIRE
FLOOR AREA LOCATED WITHIN ONE STRUCTURE. THE SIZE OF THE BUILD-
ING ENVELOPE DOES NOT ALLOW SECONDARY STRUCTURES AS SUGGESTED
OPENINGS IN THE EXTERIOR WALLS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE ARE 2
TO 3 TIMES TALLER THAN WIDE. THE NUMBER AND SIZE OF WINDOWS DO
NOT OVER POWER THE EXTERIOR WALL SURFACE OF THE PROPOSED
STRUCTURE.
�) THIS GUIDELINE IS DIFFICULT AND PERHAPS INAPPROPIATE FOR THIS
SITE WITH AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE CONFIGURATION OF THE LOT IE.
IS NOT RECTANGULAR AND NOT A STANDARD ASPEN TOWNSHIP LOT
(BASED ON 30', 45', OR 60' WIDE X 100' DEEP).
4) THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE NO GRAND ENTRY
BUILDING FORM
5) [a, b, c] ALL OF THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED IN THE PROPOSED
STRUCTURE.
STAN
%Tms
ARCHn(TURE
,W 6)
PLANNIlVG
Post 7 )
Office
Box
1984
Aspen
Colorado ,
81612 81 THIS STRUCTURE DOES NOT AFFECT SOLAR ACCESS TO ADJACENT SITES.
SITE DESIGN
THE PR I MARY ENTRANCE I S OR I ENTED TO THE STREET.
303/920-1434
THE BUILDING ENTRY IS ON THE UPPER FLOOR_ THERE IS A MIX OF
RESIDENCES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAT HAVE ENTRANCES EITHER AT
GRADE OR 1 STOREY ABOVE GRADE.
BUILDING MATERIALS
9) EVEN THOUGH THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS NOT CLAD IN NATURAL
MATERIALS, IT DOES FIT THE CONTEXT OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD GIVEN
THERE IS A M I X OF MATERIALS USED THROUGHOUT THE NEIGHBORHOOD
ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES
10) [a, b, c, d, & el ALL OF THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED.
1 1) THERE ARE NO SOLAR COLLECTORS OR SKYLIGHTS.
GARAGES
12) DUE TO THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING ENVELOPE, THERE ARE NOT MANY
OPTIONS, OTHER THAN WHAT IS SHOWN, FOR THE POSITION OF THE
GARAGE.
DRIVEWAYS
1 -:) THE DRIVEWAY SHOWN IS THE ONLY WAY TO ACCESS THE LOT
SERVICE AREAS
STAN
11OS 14) SERVICE AREAS WILL BE SCREENED
ARCIMMIE
AND
PIAM IMPACT ON HISTORIC BUILDINGS
Post
Office 15 & 16) THESE GUIDELINES ARE FOLLOWED.
Box
1984
Aspen
Colorado
81612
303/920-1434
E
is
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
ZONE DISTRICT:
LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET):
EXISTING FAR:
ALLOWABLE FAR:
PROPOSED FAR:
EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial):
PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial):
EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE:
PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE:
EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial):
PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.):
EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PRO:
RO SED 7W DEMOL
EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:
PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS
EXISTING ON -SITE PARKING SPACES:
ON -SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED:
SETBACKS:
EXISTING:
Front: 0
Rear: 10
Side: I
Combined Front/Rear:
EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/
ENCROACHMENTS:
ALA,W
LoT �-,; �.Goop� Ar-�+2pQrsr� ou51��t
L_ b� A
owl =Iiif. 115.615 CA *
ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED:
Front: Front:-- 20''rOM
Rear: \ 7IW. Rear: �� 4
Side: , Side: 1
Combined Frt/Rr: Combined Front/Re
e�
VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks Only: character compatibility finding must be made by HPC):
FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings:
SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces:
Rear: Open Space (Commercial):
Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only):
Combined FrtJRr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only):
y
r'�
fji
TV,
flew,,
Lr
Im. I
L Li
• n -.ram �
A
6
i'
It
40
Ir-Ism
...........
v
E