HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.Carriagehouse.A4386
(
L.B.:>Ji....Vfi.U--~Ul"l.1"llUt~ 'i:)Or..c.:a.
i("""<, City of Aspen 21..n -/~/-()5 -OO~
DATE RECENEDD'f..,/ft:.JI9",,; ('jE NO. L/.lfl-80
DATE RECENED COMPLETE: STAFF: Sr;,
PROJ Ecr NAME :61e fliH~If:' 4iV::E fill eL[)Y r:-2 (-PAr::: KU)0 '" SpeC! At lJiVlfl/)
\PPL lCANT : '
Applicant Address/Phone:
REPRES ENTA'l'N E~j)Ih)r {~ (p):=J:>(~ _
Representative ~Address/Phone :/ J I) r. ' ('U>pt'( ,Avr 1 ~)()1:::7YI (n
# ../
Rn / /
5 ::;Y0[
1.
Type of Application:
GMP/Subdi v ision/PUD
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Preliminary Plat
3. Final Plat
20
12
6
$2,730.00
1, 6 40 .00
820.00
II. SUbdivision/PUD
l~.,'~"'GO'nceptt1f.ll Submission
2. pr el imina ry Plat
3. Final Plat
14 ' -" $1.900 .00
9 1,220.00
6 820.00
/ 11 $1,490.00
5 $ 660.uu '~..:J1() CO
~ "
III. All ''Two Step" Appl ications
IV. All "One Step" Applications
V. Referral Fees - Environmental
Health, Housing Office
(
1. Minor Appl ications
2
$
50.00
2. Major Applications
Referral Fees-
Engineering'
Minqr Applications
Major Applications
5
$ 125.00
80.00
200.00
_.___.. ..;;":':,.-.;,..~.'.iU.I'. j.:.'.:....: ,"~:'u~.) ~r: :....'.',..'
. '.- ....- --- -------- ------ - ---- ----- -- - - --- - -- -------- --- --------... .-- -.- .----.,
.--------------------------------------------------------------------
/:2; v'--o J '"\
~z CC MEETING DATE: , PUBLIC HEARING: YES @J
DATE REFERRED: 1\.." "-<-v...'<'f::::, IN IT IALS :
=====================================4==================~============
REFERRALS:
Ci ty Atty
Ci ty Engi neer
Housing OiL
Aspen ~iater
City Electric
EnviL Hlth.
Aspen Consolo S.D.
Mtn. Bell
Par ks Dept.
Roly Cross Electric
Fire Marshall
Fire Chief
Roaring Fork Transit
____ School District
____ Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
_ StateHwy Dept (Glenwd)
____ Statellwy Dept (Gr.Jtn)
_ Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn
_Other:
_____ Roaring Fork Energy Center
====== ======== ==== = = ========='== = =======::::: === === ==== = == ===== ========='= ==
FINAL ROUTING:
DATE ROUTED: i1.,-4--gi
IN IT IAL : S '6
City Atty
____ City Engineer
v
Buil di ng Dept.
Other:
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
CASE DISPOSITION:
Dtr, f..)(\V'rl'Vl) DiPrJi
n rr.-~;1
Ctv,~ j"i tv('.( EfI'~~-r f I~,k~) ~f'4~ {U~/'.i,~ ,
A, ~n P&Z ~ty COUr'y
'---------------
tJ" c,.~'t,/{,j t!. f',r,q, 4. f.,y 1b;1jj ~i:1'
Reviewed by:
F:evie\'Jcd By:
J~18p~n P&Z
Ci ty Council
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
TH RlJ :
Robert S. Anderson, Jr. ~
Alan Richman, Planning and Development
Carriage House GMP Extension
Di rector NZ
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 10, 1986
----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The planning Office recommends that you grant a 180 day
extension to the Carriage House allocation.
PREVIOUS COUNCIL ACTION: On June 9, 1986 Council granted an
extension of the Carriage House Lodge GMP allocation to 6/30/86
to allow the applicant to submit plans to the Building Department
to construct the facility.
BACKGROUND: In order to comply with the provisions of Section 24-
l1.7(a) of the Code, the applicant submitted plans to the
Building Department to construct the Carriage House in June,
1986. According to the UBC, the appli cant has 180 days (i. e.,
until December, 1986) to obtain said permit or to obtain an
extension on the plan check from the Building Inspector.
However, Section 24-11.7(a)(2) states that the applicant must
obtain the permit within 120 rather than 180 days or the allo-
cation shall automatically expire. Council can grant an exten-
sion of said deadline by up to 180 days on a showing of good
cause and diligence, provided that said extension has been
requested prior to the end of the deadline period.
PROBLEM DISCUSSION: The principal problem with respect to this
request is that the applicant has requested it subsequent to the
end of the deadline period, since over 120 days has passed since
the plans were fir st submi tted. Therf ore, while the appH cant is
still on target for complying with the Building Code, his
allocation is in violation of thi s zoning provision and has
technically expired.
It is my recollection that Council purposely set a 120 day period
for the deadline to obtain a permit, in order that construction
would proceed expeditiously once an allocation is granted. It is
clear now that by establishing two different "clocks" for
appl icants to follow in the zoning and building codes, we have
created unnecessary confusion for applicants. The problem of
variations between our codes is one of the key findings of our
Code Simplification study, and is something we intend to correct.
It seems unfair to me to penalize this applicant, who was aJ.mJ.ng
to obtain a permit by December, by catching him between the two
deadl ines. We recommend that an extension be granted and that
staff work to resolve the differences between the two Codes in
our simplification effort.
RECOMMENDED MOTION:
"Move to grant an extension of 180 days to the allocation to
the Carriage House."
CITY MANAGER' S RECOMMENDATION:
.r 0 ;lC.&v~,
AR.2
~~ GIBSON &. REND. ARCHITECTS
November 6, 1986
Mr. Alan Richman
Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: CARRIAGE HOUSE
Dear Alan:
On behalf of my client Ralph Melville, and in accordance with
Sec. 24-11. 7 (a) (2), I wish to request a time extension of 120
days to the normal plan checking and building permitting period.
As you know, plans sufficient for Building Permit were submitted
to the Building Department in June, 1986, along with the required
plan check fee.
Since June, the plans have been undergoing review by the Building
Department, Zoning Official, Engineering Department, and Planning
Department, are currently in midst of this process.
I request this consideration only because the review process has
been, and is presently, a process over which neither I nor my
client have any great degree of control.
Once the permit is obtained, construction is anticipated to begin
within the suggested time period of 120 days (i.e. Spring, 1987).
Thank you for your consideration.
Respe:tf~~::it~ed'
4#1. Gibson, AlA
DFG/rm
c: Ralph Melville
418 E. COOPER AVENUE
ASPEN,COLORADO 816fl
308/925.5968
.,.""'
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen City COuncil
Robert S. Anderson, Jr.
Steve Burstein, Planning Office ~
Carriage House Empl oyee Parking
THRO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
November 3, 1986
================================================================
SUMMARY: The Planning Office recommends approval of the request-
ed parking requirement of one space for on-site employee housing
of ,the carriage House project.
zmING: L-l
LOCATION: 204 E. Durant Avenue, Lot K,L,M,N and 0, City and
Townsi te of Aspen.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests a reduction in the
approved carriage House employee unit parking from three parking
spaces to one space. In total, there would be 29 parking spaces
for the 28 lodge units and three on-site employee units.
BACKGROUND: On May 27, 1986 the amended Carriage House GMP
application received City Council's approval. As part of that
application, the parking program consisted of five spaces along
the alley and twenty-six spaces in an underground garage. In the
underground garage, two spaces were stacked. As noti ced by
Zoning Official Bill Drueding, Section 24-4.2 (a) of the Munici-
pal Code does not allow obstructed access for spaces; therefore,
the appli<.:~nt wishes to delete these stacked parking spaces.
APLICABLB SECTIONS OP THE CODE: There is a parking requirement
of one space per lodge bedroom in the L-l zone district in
Section 24-4.5 (c) of the Municipal Code. Employee parking is set
by special review of the Council according to Section 24-4 .l(c).
PROBLEM DISCUSSION:
would be provided for
5.2 employees) and 28
rooms.
In the proposed parking plan, one space
the employee housing units on-site (housing
spaces would be maintained for the 28 lodge
The Planning Office believes that the requested reduction is
reasonable because the 29 spaces being provided should be
adequate for the project. The lodge does not have a full
restaurant, which is a conditional use in the L-l zone that would
~
.-,
r'
-----
.~._..c","...~,_.~.~....
'.
generate addi ti onal traff ic. In addi tion, given the central
location of the lodge and the prior studies that support the
finding that not all guests have cars, we agree with the appli-
cant that parking demand for the project should be amply handled
by the parking program as proposed. This reduction would also be
consi stent with the zero employee parking requirement attached to
the Lodge at Aspen's amended proposal approved by' Council on
August 11, 1986, which we feel is comparable.
RECOMMBHDED IIOTIOR:
"Move to approve the setting of one parking space for on-
site employee housing in the Carriage House lodge project."
CITY MARMER' S RECOMMBHDATIOR:
68.52
2
~
....-.,
/"""
.-
~.
"
~\:: GIBSON & RENO . ARCHITECTS
October 16, 1986
Planning Office
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado
Street
81611
Attn: Steve Burstein
RE: CARRIAGE HOUSE; EXEMPTION FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING
Dear Steve:
We wish to request Exemption from provision two of Employee
Parking Spaces in the plans for the new Carriage House Lodge at
204 East Durant Street. The revised parking plan would then have
5 surface spaces along the alley and 24 underground spaces; total
of 29 spaces. (See enclosed GMP - approved parking plans -
spaces to be exempted are those numbered 25 and 26.)
To review the facts of this project, Amended GMP Approval for the
Lodge was granted in June, 1986, including a total of 28 lodge
rooms and 3 on-site employee rooms housing a total of 5.25
employees.
We feel that the reduced on-site parking to be provided will
still be more-than-adequate for guests and employees, given the
surrounding on-street parking, and the prevailing cars per guest
room ratio which is about .6 in the summer and around .4 in the
winter season during periods of full occupancy.
'l2::Iha you for ~ ur consideration.
, ~
. #,
David F. Gi son, AlA
DFG/rm
c: Ralph Melville
418 E. COOPER AVENUE
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
303/825.5868
~
.'
I'
~
c
u
Z
~
u
I
N
.
;
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
N
~r-I
~
~
!
c
L
:~
,
t
I
,
.
I
,
,
I
t
u
z
;;
c
C
~
,--
,,-..,
t'
~
I
~
c
e
.
.
N
.
N
N
N
;
c:--e
C
N
~
~
;
~
=
:
=
-
.
N
'~ ~
;:. ~
;t~
+" ~
~
..--"
------..- ---,
::, ::c-----
....i:'t..
L
~/
c
~.
::J [:::> ~ e
r \j~ 0 1-'<
Jt~
~/ !
c ,
e '
. ,
.
l::::,
i'
t-..
(
,
e--
~c: '
-
,;
.
~
.
~
,.-..
:: ~ t"
~ ~
~ -
~
a
o
o
z
w
.
U
z
w
.-
~
o
~
~
.. ..: . ..~IJ
.., ~'
" :/..~
o
~
-f-
a
.
.
.
..
"'~
-,
~, ':lol
1,:,. ,
~ " I
...I . .~
~ ,~.,.
" J: I \~\
,,'==- f..
'.
\\ ,
'." I
"
-,
I ".
~,\i
, " ' ~,\ '
.'
,"
a
o
o
z
u
z ,
;:.'
,II(
'a
" ,
."..- !i
/ Z
Q
i ~lJ\
j --'-\J1
r...L '-J
C/ i
81L'lI!\LI !==
.~-
ill I l-
i c
!
,
,
.:
./
p
.
. J,~/
~l
..J Ir~
Q. ,
a:
o
o
..J
LL
I- .
; :t
w
(/)
~I
'~
r.
.:. 0'
~:E-o
.. 0"
~ ~
<0
'0
go
" .
a:g
oOa.
e:"
0<
"
.c
a
w
u
.
z
c
Ii
il
.
c
o
.
.
w
u
.
~
.
.
I
'1 'J.,...,-y" :. L~ Jj
4-:-, J " ' 'r 1': '.;c - . i""'" ~
....... , . I ': ,," "
' r ' . _ ~, ,
'i '1- I ,\.
.' " . .'-" .....: I ......
1':!it1f. ~ 11, . ..-0. \ \' c' " u.
,! : I
t I) II, t-----1 "
' .r .. ,II,.
..1 ~ '\\. y
'L; : 1"- '"
",
:.....u.i(
.."H
'I . ,
~
j .:~
",~ (
" '~
. . - :)
11 ~ :~, ,-
")-A, ~
, . .;~
'4, I
I .
--
-
~7:
t::)l; ~ .
.' :~.J- J
(1)(')
~ ::j ~ ." ~ J
0- m :II · ., r I
1- ;2g . c ~ i:l' "."
> m ' ,l....-"Iftr
Z :z: ' .t:_ ,
.- ~ ~I:rt)r--,
.... gtr" 1:\ ~_ .
CO ," .
(X). , ..
Q)
fy
.IPl15
k'
C)
6'
..
I >g
{!Joe-
"'.,
?",
.. ~::J
jI O.?
0>
-~
"0
Q.:;r
Q:::
<l)
C>
-
co
22 _.,.
-. -1.-
:.-1
I
I
<:>:::-:;:::.:
~':---"',
~::-:
..
.
.
'. r=;
" m
'. .. "l~
- L~
-
='.
,<
Jllitf[ U il!b
~
'.':I~ b:!fID
~
.
m
'fh.-
.....
/
i=::
I~
~ ,I~
~.
. !
~~' '1
,
-
W:
\
.::..
'1
I
. 'I
J
1*
J:lli ~
/ ~ .~ D' ·
j,k , = "
n ~12II n 1111 "
}:. fllIllll! 1=: ~ ~ 0 ~
~< iL' 11 !If.
'- jjc)/l\. IT nr-.,r<
*ulU r l~
L} \_- 'o-~. l) ~,~
'..
!
-...