The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.610 W Francis St.A44-95F- 2735-124-26-005 A44-95 1 f-3 4 14; 4 1- \1 10 F .. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 04/10/95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: 2735-124-26-005 A44-95 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: Hirschfield Special Overlay Review Project Address: 610 W. Francis Legal Address: Lot E, 4 of H, all of I, Block 22 APPLICANT: Robert & Sheri Hirschfield Applicant Address: 5895 SW 91 St., Miami, FL REPRESENTATIVE: Dave Panico 923-5394 Representative Address/Phone: Aspen, CO 81611 FEES: PLANNING $ 425 (DUE) # APPS RECEIVED 9 ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $ TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Board Envir.Hlth. ACSD Other Zoning Energy Center Other DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing - Open Space - Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: ,. .. MEMORANDUM TO: Overlay Zone District Sub-Committee FROM: Leslie Lamont, Deputy Director j Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer . i RE: 610 West Francis FAR Overlay Review DATE: May 30, 1995 SUMMARY: This review is based on the General Guidelines found in the recently adopted Neighborhood Character Guidelines and the specific guidelines for the West End Neighborhood. Special Review and compliance with the review is mandatory because the parcel is 4500 square feet. Planning staff believes that this project substantially complies with the General Guidelines and the guidelines for the West End. APPLICANTS: Dr. Robert Hirschfield represented by Dave Panico LOCATION: 610 West Francis ZONING: R-6 STAFF COMMENTS: Please refer to the application for a complete representation of the proposal. Planning Staff finds that the project is substantially in compliance with the Neighborhood Character Guidelines. The steep roof pitches, presence of porches and other one story elements and placement of the second story within the roof mass help the structure to appear in scale with the surrounding neighborhood. There are many smaller historic structures in the area of this lot, but none on this blockface or on the opposite blockface. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the development at 610 W. Francis Street as proposed. 1 MS KIM JOHNSON 130 S. GALENA ST. ASPEN, CO. DEAR KIM, AS THE REPRESENTATIVE OF MR. & MRS ROBERT HIRSCHFIELD, I AM SUBMITTING THIS APPLICATION FOR THE F.A.R. OVERLAY REVIEW FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 601 W. FRANCIS ST. THE HIRSCHFIELDS WOULD LIKE TO MAKE RENOVATIONS AND ADDITIONS TO AN EXISTING RESIDENCE PRESENTLY,COMPRISED OF 1974 SQ. FT IN 2 STORIES ABOVE GRADE AND A 600 SQ. FT. BASEMENT. THE RESIDENCE IS LOCATED IN THE WEST END NEIGHBORHOOD. AS TO THIS PROJECT'S COMPLIANCE WITH THE GENERAL GUIDELINES, I WILL ATTEMPT TO ADDRESS THEM POINT BY POINT. MASS & SCALE THE PROJECT AS IT IS PROPOSED, WILL (RELATIVE TO IT'S IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORS) BE PERCEIVED AS RATHER SMALL. THE RESIDENCE IMMEDIATELY TO THE WEST WILL TOWER OVER THIS PROJECT. THE HOUSES TO THE SOUTH AND DIAGONALLY ACROSS THE CORNER OF FIFTH AND FRANCIS ARE BOTH QUITE LARGE COMPARED TO THIS RESIDENCE. DIRECTLY ACROSS THE STREET TO THE EAST IS AN OLDER, SMALLER HOUSE PROBABLY BUILT IN THE LATE 1800'S OR EARLY 1900'S. ACROSS THE STREET TO THE NORTH IS A 1 STORY PANABODE STRUCTURE TYPICALLY BUILT IN THE 1950'S. BECAUSE IT IS SURROUNDED BY THESE OPPOSITES IN SIZE, THIS PROJECT WILL FIT PERFECTLY AS A MEDIAN STRUCTURE. THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE WILL BE PERCIEVED AS A ONE STORY STRUCTURE WITH A DORMER ROOF TO TRAFFIC ON 5TH STREET. THE ROOF VOLUME RISES TO THE WEST SO AS TO HIDE THE LARGER HOUSE TO THE WEST. THE MASSING ELEMENTS OF THIS HOUSE ARE IN KEEPING WITH THOSE SEEN TRADITIONALLY IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD, WITH ONLY THE EXISTING NORTH AND THE PROPOSED WEST WALLS BEING LONGER THAN 20 FT. THE WINDOWS AND DOORS ON ALL ELEVATIONS, EXCEPT THE SOUTH, WILL BE OF TRADITIONAL SCALE. THE WINDOWS FACING THE ALLEY WILL BE TALL AND WIDE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF VIEWS AND SOLAR GAIN POTENTIAL. THE STREET ELEVATION WILL BE TRADITIONAL IN NATURE WITH A SLIGHTLY RAISED PORCH WRAPPING THE SOUTH EASTERN END OF THE HOUSE. THE FASCIA AND WINDOW HEAD HEIGHT ARE IN KEEPING WITH THOSE FOUND ELSEWHERE IN THE WEST END. THE ENTRANCE WILL BE OF A TRADITIONAL SCALE. BUILDING FORM THE BASIC FORM OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT WILL BE RECTANGULAR WITH A DORMER ELEMENT SKEWED AT 45 TO THE MAIN STRUCTURE. A ROUNDED 'BOW' ELEMENT ADDS VISUAL INTEREST TO THE FIRST FLOOR PORCH AREA, BUT THE ROOF FORM IS STILL RECTANGULAR. THE ROOF FORMS ARE ALL GABLE AND OF A PITCH THAT IS TRADITIONAL TO THE WEST END. THE PORCH PROVIDES THE DEEP OVER HANGS DESIRED BY YHE GUIDELINES. SITE DESIGN THE MAIN ENTRANCE ADDRESSES FIFTH STREET AND IS LOCATED IN THE LONGEST AND MOST PROMINENT FACADE OF THE STRUCTURE. THE EXISTING STRUCTURE, THAT WILL BE RETAINED, SITS CLOSE TO THE NORTHERN SET BACK. THE RESIDENCE TO THE WEST IS SITUATED SIMILARLY. THIS SAME HOUSE SITS CLOSE TO OR ON IT'S SETBACK TO THE SOUTH. THEREFORE THE CONCEPT OF RESPECTING THE EXISTING SETBACKS SHOULD BE MOOT. THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE IS ORIENTED SO THAT IT WILL REINFORCE THE EXISTING NEIGHBORHOOD GRID. THE ENTRANCE WILL BE AT OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE STREET LEVEL. THE PROPOSED ADDITION WILL BLOCK EAST LIGHT FROM THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE ADJACENT RESIDENCE TO THE WEST. THERE ARE TWO SMALL WINDOWS ON THAT FACADE PRESENTLY BLOCKED BY FENCES AND TREES. BUILDING MATERIALS THE USE OF CLAPBOARD SIDING WILL HELP BRING ANY PERCIEVED HEIGHT PROBLEMS DOWN. THE USE OF A STONE BASE AND 'WATER TABLE' BANDING GIVES A TRADITIONAL SCALE TO THE HOUSE AND SPECIFICALLY THE PORCH. THE ROOF WILL BE WOOD SHINGLES STAINED BLACK OR COMPOSITION SHINGLES. METAL ROOFING MAY BE USED ON THE PORCH. .. ARCHITECTUAL FEATURES WINDOWS WILL BE A COMBINATION OF TRADITIONAL DOUBLE HUNGS IN COMBINATION WITH FIXED GLAZING AND WILL BE OF PEDESTRIAN SCALE. THE PORCH COLUMN WILL HAVE A NON TRADITIONAL FLAVOR TO BREAK FROM TRADITIONAL ARCHITECTURE. THE MAIN ENTRANCE WILL BE CLEARLY DEFINED. SKYLIGHTS WILL BE LOCATED IN AREAS THAT CAN NOT BE SEEN FROM THE STREET. GARAGES THE GARAGE IS TO BE LOCATED AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE AND IS TO BE ACCESSED FROM THE ALLEY. THE DRIVEWAY SLOPE WILL MEET THE MUNICIPAL CODE. PARKING AND DRIVEWAYS (SEE ABOVE) PARKING WILL BE ALONG ALLEY. (SEE SITE PLAN) SERVICE AREAS SERVICE AREAS WILL BE LOCATED ON THE ALLEY (SEE SITE PLAN) IMPACT ON HISTORIC STRUCTURES THE EXISTING RESIDENCE IS NOT A HISTORIC STRUCTURE. DESIGN GOALS FOR THE WEST END NEIGHBORHOOD DUE TO THE FACT THAT THE RESIDENCE IS LOCATED ON A 4500 SQ. FT. LOT AND THEREFORE CAN BE COMPRISED OF ONLY 2820 SQ. FT. OF F.A.R., THE PROPOSED RESIDENCE ATTAINS GOAL ONE BY PRESERVING THE SCALE OF TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES. THE ENTRY FACADE ADDRESSES THE STREET AND IT'S MOST PROMINENT FEATURE IS A LONG PORCH WITH A PEDESTRIAN SCALE. THESE ELEMENTS HELP ATTAIN GOAL TWO. THE DESIGN INCORPORATES BOTH PORCHES, DORMERS AND VERTICALLY PROPORTIONED WINDOWS AND THEREFORE ATTAINS GOAL THREE BY PROMOTING THE DESIRED VISUAL INTEGRATION. DUE TO THE SMALL SIZE OF THE LOT AND THE NEED TO INTERGRATE INTO THE DESIGN AN EXISTING STRUCTURE, IT WOULD BE DIFFICULT TO INCORPORATE THE DESIRED ELEMENTS OF GOAL FOUR. .. 421/CE,4ulf Gali,&44 6Â£3;12Â£96%0 At @tdodemÂ© amit 4#Lâ‚¬*tdat %4â‚¬aU amd *La,40* 96 : 1Â¢4 A:,4 g,14.SOM, A.spe-~p/1,Â£-41 GCur~ /1,.u~",ced.,6- A.. 5,4 RE -1,4~*ot â€¢M ~+... ~- 64 jer M ;4,- 414 F.A. A. ove,1 4.:1 & A . 1, - -/1 A-*t 404 4- a., 02140,1.143 b,uâ€¢,4 P.20 030* F,1, Ast.'.. 6, 9 51 3 - 5-394) 4 -9w~wJ -c .4 >544 100 -a, -*/1.4,460 -14â‚¬ A-40 ..4 ~r,ke# &40&Â« '0Gi 64 9*4- 7"0/9.4 -M* Le## A -4- P.'.4 ji- SM +4 0â€žww ,~1 +4â€¢ -4 4.lot -,6. 114â€¢A .60Â¢ -04. 46 M #AL ,&â€¢A *ne~+ .I.â€¢ch 049 4 *v u ~440 44&5# eAR.cle, d&69â€ž j,-144 #fnes 7 tok.+ Alhes 1.- 47 &90- -85 44 5% -Ll,4,0,-4 W t,Al yyu&. UW' 'A 70,0-06: & ha.â€¢e 14* a 4*4 4 -0,-t .4.. /9 7 4 ~ 0,- Aowâ‚¬ stâ€¢ME,2 0. -,140 04..g .,., 4/4 WAS6 ~102&r -" Ce /993. 9,1 44 eAaâ€¢,04 j ..,02 _/101* 10., a.0..L â‚¬ 94 04, O,4 9 94 e-m- 51Â¥ =45 +Aiu cJ.-6... ...4 .0. 6,4.4.4 -Ally w4 944 YJAo 0,-t ),0.- .6., -,4.,4.-led. 47 -; 4 84.2, a.,4 ck liw4Ada.4 44 -4.u $* ect aer-r 4 6'6 * i 19.0,1 4Â£ 6,4.-,45 *A AO',44. .., 64 47,464 -4 CAOâ€¢,4 4/ZE 9%.ut .04;45 - AO-t. ...f -6â€¢* 4, 44 46./ dflo, Aâ€¢"44 02 -,AL ty,94 9Bfuot -u. . Wâ€¢. 4,â€¢LA -A -4~ A a &*&9 0 4*rho O et 0)64 /4 44 30&AL +c/'Al # 62 e--1-:*7, Joy4 Â£ ity,-e a.0/ =c--2â‚¬ I @#i= 4 69%*det .. dTh *u060 uLA,6 01~466 A @ttAdo,tte amd 4'Li*iat @La,tâ‚¬# a,nd 92*athon at 40 94 4 -1 â€¢4 * 0/ O,"- -3,â€¢= .,c -Ack, 44 -444*J -44 4.1 4441, . *416â€ž A.3 1/16 644 Ulâ€¢JÂ· 1. 0~- '- g-1.a 6-1 rÂ·- 4 *At -494 A. 4-340, 4004. 2/o *1 6.444 cqhâ€¢ c.rnâ‚¬/ 04 5-% a. 00 #4 //am,) 4 4 -w -0,â€¢.i',40,4 "r., Azf-4, 2â€¢ 004 IM#t. 3:n 44 -cae.*, 6.5 JAck .a... alk , 9-diâ€¢, he.-4, 14# *Gy .4 -40,#41~~t ~401 4,49, 0.01. turt A 6-,A -PÂ¥ I .0- 4 44 -W# 4 ect 0.64 -1.e .m 74,4 4<t -4-' A .02 94 â€¢4 2 0 '64. a 066*- '-1â‚¬a+ Â®&.4. AD.& 4.-4.11 12 4, Mat ;48 RA W VAL gr-2 -AM--2 acak .# 94 7,265 k 4--46600- 44*~As -7 144-*AD c.._ la Aout 98.44,0 40- a.oe --1 k. 4,1, 4 A , 244, 4 A Betemp|Isjud 4444. *A heâ€¢r~Ar, Na .JLAq 46 Wid H -6.tâ€¢Me'"8 p m Q. oe j.-deâ€ž. 6 am *44 ,,I. "4â€¢) ak" -1 44 M 06â€¢y, 6- -4.A **54 94 UUJ 84. A &* /4.1.AGE *g 6,;, *w 60; M #0 6*0 4*45* A.Â¢ 1-0- 0A /teâ€¢,02Â»â€¢Ce . 6(â€¢064,5 prw..1 4 -ulk, 4f Â·-4 il~.f 514 ~40â€¢to J~K a. 19/&u+*Aifhjort *#icÂ® of 14 9?aectet 76 9649,62. PITKIN COUNTY IREASURER rs 01544/00044 A 411 <trll ~?Y 4 '506 E MAiN b T , GTE 211 01501/03000 ASPEN, COLORADO 8lbll TAX NOTICE (303) 920-5170 ~ 2.12.--,1,44-46'iÂ¢Â·fIER,Edijk*4#A*(6tttiV-~0-3}: 2. ..:1.., L~,~-'22,~:-.~45(145-NOM@RELIS*6Â·iÂ©4190*.TAXES,4#-6ISTRÂ®TED=.: 1 994 1995 1-Ars 0/01-00855 ?:yfjÂ¢*Ii*Â£6* i#be.TE UNPAIb-ty:43*:.{>:ro T.HE:*Up,WINOrAGENÂ¢.IEÂ§QÂ·- ~3-553234#.8(#F-1>2~tÂ·~feriff~-'t-: ~1-**Irt [$15{RICT.lil;~ -- HIMSCI[FIFLD, SHERI A. pi :KI'N 311.41 111RDE:1F1ELD, ROBERT F. AS IT TENANTS UPENSPAct 108.88 5895 6# 9 tRi 61 I J DIE 240.30 MIAMI EL 33196 COLO RbR 25. 6 4 30.3h 1.1 4-1 ~ 1 AUP FIkf 7 8.1 0 ;( 21 }+1 ,- 14 324.11 j..?492tliFJ,>96.3E~â‚¬*%,ErrtÂ»Â»Â·1Â·-->- ~.e.,- *~,~â€ž.. .., . ..A.. ...9 4 .- 4.1.ke- . 9 . . . + 1/1. i/i 1.-1,0%,5,-*#FAVAiduEKR~T*PR4**t41/1~r.: ji'~4?2144&~~t/~'.,,~'=i,Â·.i,*,-.'21.2,~pi-.'--,'.Â· ~...b. ~ ~~;,~.~~~5i,~LU~*1(.LV:4'7-. 55â‚¬;i~.3 TM;-f40--'2bl,. 4 52 C[}f; S 1 T Y A.,it) Â£ T 8% F 6 Y'i-t. OF -ASPEN Â·1 - 1 Â·: 1 '- ACTUAL yALUE 4b7.'500 ANMUL AMEE 17.17 L OU< 22 LJF F 1/2 JF 11 -ASSESSED VALUE , 1 ' 6 0, 1 2 0 1 0 .QO '4* f, AE 0 641Â·54 L D f. 1 SEWER CHARGES U. 00 CITY. LIENS' - CITY IMPRV. DiST- 0 -0 6 MILL LEVY 29.981 Per $ 1,000 of 'assessed valuatibn ~Of. FIRSfÂ·AALE b:/.-Â· f.:-SECOND-HAihI'-~- . 410* TOTAti. 901â€¢23 .*(,1.23 1,2**02.4â‚¬ G OC - W â„¢tucti 1~t_LL_./m./-------#Fr1ll:26"/- DUE BY FEB. 28 DUE BY JUNE 15 DUE BY APRIL 30 1002.af, *#10LIT STATE LEGISLATIVE FUNDING YOUR SCHOOL GENERAL FUND MILL LEVY WOULD HAVE BEEN 8.585 INSTEAD OF 6.',85 MILLS ---- APPUCANT: 14124 Mize 1202*EIZI 1-IleEOUPIELD ADDRESS: 6,10 Ht pizaNC 10 ZCNE DSTRICT: ~/464yrÂ·- END? LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 4eaD Â¢ EXISTING FAR: 1414* ALLOWABLE FAR: â‚¬ 105â‚¬0 0 PROPOSED FAR: - ~~ iO 4~ EGST1NG NET LEASABLE (commerdal}: PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (ccmmercial): EX!57ING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 21.070 A A Q.01 PRCPOSED % CFSITE COVERAGE: -rl . 0 f O EXISTING % OFCPEN SPACE (Commercial): PROPOSED % CFOPEN SPACE (Commer.): EXISTiNG MAXIMUM HEGHT: Pindcal Bldc.: 22' t , Accessory 81dc: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEiGHT: Princical Bldc.: 1 Accesscm adat PROPOSE) % CF DEMCLITION: 800% EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDRCOMS: S . PROPOSED NUMBER CF BEDRCOMS: 4 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: 0 ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 4 SEZE.Em: PROPOSED: 1-24< *=41 EXISTING: 11 ALLOWA8LE: Front: 14'4 Front Miki toi Front: Reac 42'-nr Reac MIN 101 Reac t7Lell 14'-O'1 Side: ~li-T--ill Side: 5'/t~*#'Ifit#ide: 51-ty?* .-1 1/ Combined Front/Rear: -=n~~sr- Combined Frt/RE ' 30' Combined Front/Rear: EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ NONE, ENCRCACHMENTS: VARIATIONS REQUESTED (elicitle for Landmarks Only: character compatibiiiN findinc must be made bv HPC).: FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildngs: SETBACKS: Front: , Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined FrUR: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): P. 1. MAY. 28 ' 96 311.FPM - Postle Fax Note 7671 In.te -----=--2Â«WI-1 haIAAL__ 1007 (h AA-Ilk-L 'CO- fli AD'k-2- - Pho,~ 22Â£15 - 1110*0 -5 1 LL- THE CITY oF ASPEN Parks Office 920-5120 TREE REMOVAL PERMIT APPLICATION The following is an outline to assist in the preparation of a t= removal permit 1) Outline/Sketh/Drawing of properly to include: (please allach 2 copies) a) Property address. b) Property boundaries. c) Locations of buildings on the property. d) Location, diameter, and species of tree,s on pmperty and designate with arrows or circles which trees are to bc removed. 24 84Â£â€žMmÂ£4 â€ž â€ž 40 # w /f*â€¢#c-,5 549' , /13, cu j dp. 3) List trees to be removed, species and diameter at 4.5' above grade. ~.~ ** P'VE 74 ~ fl fit.64,141 6 + 4., P *B.-lf*I a. o. . r 1 + 14" <SftuU- Â¥- Sâ‚¬ A/Â£046.:74 ,/ &doÂ£4& a12$-f 4,0â€¢44* 8# pr...6/-1~ t . t. 4. A S"â€¢) 9. 8Â¢ .1,9. 'g A .A Sâ€žt 4)'~42&tfo/*A;Spat'- 86 w,~4,0 A Ze. a 70 86 gicaâ€¢ vâ€¢Â¥eb 5) Mitigation Plan (relocation of trees or replacement of comparable worth trees as referenced in Aspen Municipal Code Sec. 13-76, (e)). Add to Property Drawing. a) Location of replaccment/relocation trocs. b) Size and species of trees to be replaced. 6) Cornpledon Datc of Preject. 374?. f , /49 Â¥ 7) Porson rÂ¢aponsible for project (applicant): 512. 96,1. BiageÂ·bw- Property Owner Name of Architect or Cominxtion Revresentative 620 l, W Â· 1:11.KA,4 c 15 - %56&*.4*1111 (5,41 925 596 Address & Phone Number Company name Phone Number 43- 2-9.CK bÂ»/ I O 2- â‚¬ -04 Sigr~Gre C-/ Date Sig'*re Date 1 MAY.28 '96 ~PM P.2 8) Comments: The following is to be complewd by the City of Aspen Parks Depattment Comments: 7<0141=6 2., Y Propeny/Tme Inspection: ~ 49â€ž 9 42- .44 Inspxted by empe <0 Date 12xma*=NE. -7*-ua p/*â€¢15 .1,451 Suv vivâ‚¬ 4 1 1-6/41 $ yrs - LK.- 0*1â€¢ .,7 -7â€¢.â€¢7.f,4.r *'f 728* s / Denied dErge O. Robinson -5\4-40-(2L-3/d, c Palls Director, City of A8pCO QEI5'Gre Permit yalid for one year aftcr completion date of project Oine fi). 2 .. City of Aspen Pre-Application Conference Summary y-3 * 6 Planner ' Date Project #*-\_t c,c<1413(1 f--A K 6 f?-5 4 AvQ RD.*#Ak.*s Applicant's Representative r"-, r j 92 3 5- 394/~ Representative's Phone L/A i \ b irl NIC 0 Owner' s Manie rype of Applicalion / Descriplionof theproject/development being requested ~,01., 0 /,< 2 i. f ,9 09 A , A 4 1 40 4 y A , , MA~AA kf&42,&,t Ul-W#AAM.2 U 54 54 ; of 1 1.4.Â·, t.to ~ The applicant has been requested to respond to the following items and provide the following reports: Land Use Code Sectio,i CU,11!,lellis ,, Referral Agencies The Tevi*..is: (P&Z only) (CC on'f) (P&Z and CC) 1,"1>-1.fe#'mg: (yes) (no~ ~17/44* 147'2'J 0774&'-di Deposil lt,1- the Application Review: Referral agency flat fees: LOTALDEPOSIT 65 (Additional hours are billed at a rate of $163/hr.) To Apply Submit the Fullowing 1,11~(,Ii!11,14,11: 1. Proof of ownership. 2. Signed fcc agreement. 3. Applicam's name, address a,:d teleplititic number in a letter signed by the implicalil which also slales I lie naille, addiess alld telephone number of the representative. 4. Tolal cleposit fur review of the applicalic,11 $ L?45_Â· 5. .-1-_ copies of the cemplele al,lilicatic,11 packet and maps. 6. St,1111,iary letter explainhig the request (existing conditions and proposed uses), including streel address mid legal clescriplion of Ilie prnperly. 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinily map localing Ilie parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site plan sliall inchide properly boundaries, lot size, proposed access, and physical features (drailiageways, streams, rivers, etc.) 9. 10. These items need lo be submitted if circled: Isist of adjacept Priwerly ow,wrs within 300 feet of tlic subject properly with addresses. 04,3 Sile iNK*os,,MIL,df.~4~rriti,Q fk,0-1-tfD c. Proof of legal access to {lie paicel. d. Ilisloric Preservation Commission review/approval. / b 41 3 152<{ell NO Â·SFBtut ~ 11 1*Mal N \9 4 0 _-It V Â© kl ' la17~~ j 0-- 7 --- -- - - 07~47949771' i29114;fr-1 kIA *F-Â»Â£ E 1 110*t-INA 4%6 ~ MitiftÂ»Â»~Â·Â»39~ 10 geÂ·tal N 411{!11!1111,1'1'llilillilti L___ __ _ 1, --re oroe e D 1/. :'' .:4~4471,/4 .7/i,:., , i :31(0Â·Â·'ff~ U) - -~5 2 06.97 1 -fl ON z leÂ·e' 11.el --3- 4/49Â«1194..94Â»Â«jÂ«94'ff, T -0 2 - -A 1 8 fa~-1 NA el'ACE | :~Â»94-Â·Â·VF~â‚¬Â·Â«1 4 *R.6-. ; r 1 8<42:773<LA).56US<Liti>9,-.. 2~j/fl:4~ >~ii2Â·4 L.) ''~</: li K/>//15.,jfff/lf.~fff/Â·fJÂ·~,~~f>ff-~>Â·f~': >~Â·1/5/7232 1 ''Ii, 11 11 1 , ti! i Iii ; -MACE-1 No erÂ©aE . C tO:.~/2- , Â·Â·f; :..72... 1/52'112 4>IÂ·Â· :-L-1 f.~~ ,Â«,/ j .Â»1002~/ - - .-1 - ILELM ; 1 11.1-11 4Â«Â»Â»94 1 - Y//////// -4 - 1 7 - 1 7 0 - u lf; # -' ~Â»14-, 44 56TEN9 . \0 c / LA V-- 100,01 . ./. 4 1 . P-REÂ·Mar IN 11_ -10 FE-IN1 -- 10 FLE-F0'11 N 130 - EXIQUIN,51 +FÂ®Â£15Â£_nu/ll- *en!46 rgurr-r:cege 17 68 112AN. rLANTE17 2~[DNHie-1.zx=TrOH------------ - 4 ~ /39}NORTH F F 14 6 T. Cat/ =-1--_17- E--7 1-_ ,&4 1\1 1-[ 1 -FE- ED C < t=~~5 L D R E 5113) tg- t\1 (L E Ar Ft I 1- I /2 All tpet:>LAN 2,4 Ca\,11:7 Fb'NIno 12-4.931+ - 1 -,1-- =t- 1 ore A L L *T 1 1 1 1. . 11 7 - 4 11 Â»--1Â« --------- -1-9 --, 1 1 E ,-- r I , .11-_ 7-RUNLFO:*4 tÂ·.- -4- -_LIZ-2-20-11- --/~*~td?â€¢'6â‚¬- .- ~ , 1 1 i. i' :1 i i -__ -_11_--2 '9 ! L/1 1 d . t- 1 1 , <-4-6 -_- UNEK=5Â©*grED- -4- -_ 1 140'1 =11 h:k!-Afillk,AH,cbb 1=F 1 , i ' ; ' 2_*teP!.A'-Â»â‚¬Â·CD{ 080, ~It: 6>j ~ v' _2_- 1. le X 00 - ,- -1 i ~(37 -11 V 1 71 1. 4 L*UN.524 _ __1 4-11-6601-1 FIELD te HNT LEVEL - 1 3 30 + ' i < ,T , 4 . 0 FRANCES S T FOUND: REBAR W/ALU. CAP FOUND: L.S. 2633 S 75' 09' 11"E 45.00 CITYMONUMENT 14.9 * V 1 / 1 / / / / 1 / j l l '1 liÂ« 1 El 1 933Â« ill --- 1, 'llÂ·i l 1 lili 11 \ --- - WOOD FENCE 6, I W 4 '11 d ; 91 kJ N 0, 1 1 t=1 CONIC ~ 1 PAD '/N 79 09'It"W ' 4500 N f I A /L L[EY Â».. POWER TELE ~ 8 TV - - ~~- - \ 00001 1 1 N 14' 50'49"E .' a. ..........................--I:.....0 - . -- 7. 3.1.710 11/4 .9 0 _ _ ....0&.Illil... 0 .' ./INRN/3/Har ~;' 0~im~i~i G.r-'~,-~ * ~~--0--' - C) C O,0 COO 0 ~* 0.04.40 4 ---- .0 - L -- 18 9 1 ..4. 0 - ... -1.1.---- 1 1 -0 ....1 0 i 1*851, -. t.,41, G Uâ€¢V ., W.0 000 -- . 0, 0 -4 CD r -04 1 . 4 1... . I ... 7-1. - . - 0 .Â·0 - -2---- --O /0 1. ce. - .q L'Y22323) - 1 ~:~ i , 3.:):C.&3*01*i =-- -*.1 .0 4 I'l~litiljitilililicilli4lils*1*.*Ifililtillilifiiwilisitj:1*Â£~ihi:l4ililli~~ (.>Aw.6 Â·L ~, & 2~--~=M~ , -~~1~L- I . . 1 c .2 11 /11/f//~~1161:4- - - - I. 0. 44, P:i~NI *0141 W=11 94*,a. ~t,au-i~~*1",~i ~Â®1~i; 25 -0 ~ ***1v ..2. "r,T, I, 4., *0,1, Â» - tri@f ffw~Â©,~ , C 16.'.i /~ An.......fib-W i 2%. 21 O titotoloiC, O . 4 Â· ~ n .1,977/41/...... 74(4,/2/,â€ž==4 ... .+ - |10~~| i"",i-,*f~Qbw-fr - *LIVTZ:FT.# - -W Â·,7 4 --- r '. -0 -- 1 1 - F=1 -~E, -=-t- - 4- -p--4-3 f~ 1 4-1 ~ 1 11 r 1 4 J f 11 .l . /f I ~~PÂ»z:z-__r. 7.g--- I rE- 1-7 [--~- 1----FT- -[f--f-FT]- -f"--1; Ort--2-92--- .rr-*v --:-*,232-,ig~=e.i,ex -1- 7 1 -1.-i = 42 A ' ! 'r T - 7 -1! 1 -- t_ 21 1-_ij -A-L-~ '48 121~ ff/19Â«-t~Ilip------ 1 ff;-1 ~~ 5 MT-n 1 22 6-- L ~ 1_ Li- L_--_ Ilil I i _= i 2.-4. - ...r . - L L Al 2994Â»EeÂ«,tf~64--* 9 KL 427 45,3 ~ L~ 4~) 7~t-4 - & Â£-A -it-7 ~. ~ 11*f43 - EAÂ©T ELEVATION lD / 4 j \\ 44 1 11 /// 44 114 :l, Â·-4 1 11 12<14 Ii: 1 11 . hli -17 11 ..1 4=-6- 1-1 -// 1 1 11 111 \\ 2--1 - - 1 11 1 1 1 4 1 b 1.- - 4,2 1 1r ~2 _ 1 ---~fi-4yc-37--M]--71 -FT-T Â·T~ *___ --__4'' --- --- Illit I P. ~19-1~Of{ ~ 1 1 1 1 Â». I .-- ' -1- ....L_1 1 1 1 4--__Li-l 26&7 1 -1 'f --4 , 4 fi li *OUTH ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 40.4-42 4 0 +91 -1 -2 A N -1 ..1 -a 1N Et e .3 1 8 14 H 3(3 211 H T-- - 1 . . 4-+ w_=e li Â·Â· 1 Al_1)16- - t:1 - - - M F---- --4-1 klf--v-- --141 / - 8Â«~14 1 '' / p \\ -Â·'< A 7-di-1 Flo-z' 04 ).4 112 -, .; 1 1 L-91 4 \01 14__.. 2.-24 11.4.-----t=4 [09, 1 1 1/ ; f - 17 N 1 N) 61 2 4.1 ' 1%14\ 11 ~1 ...1 //4 - 1 /\ 4 i --+ -rb . 19 \\ 1 i.t i. N iff .4 1 10Â·\99 '1 1 Â» 1 1/ 1 Vg-219 9'NlAI-1 4. \ < Â» 9,1 11 ~ ~r K. i - 441 x GZI | A4\ >< o-z.1 | ; 1 7 41 4 wcr*asal _- 31* **530=toâ‚¬N L 1 ira to--1-0 1 # 4 - --4 ,- 1 - 1 -2-1,9 6 - . 1 , -t T --14i - jil- t --44.u*t-,-itjl~#-41- ,]T'Ndi;-Ff, 4(,1] 0 1 _.-149 ctote:r /*' 244 u.oger / W \ 6 \2. b , 1 4- 1:*....:4 1 T> 4_-. -- 17==lili 0 1 11 1 11 0,14:-Â· , 12 1 1 L --444 \ -H 15,EDIUDCÂ»/1 10_ _ 11Â£, Â°x i ty ler ' I. I .., Â· I -- VIEW TO efal WILL C 1 9 1 'te (1 4 -f J EL P UPPER LEVEL 7,22* 1/5 11 = 11- 0/1 30> ' 10 '94 ........ KIE 19 1154 5-80 MC954â€¢ t FRANCES ST FOUND: REBAR W/ ALU. CAP FOUND: L.S. 2633 S 75o 09'Il"E 45.00 CITY MONUMENT 0 . r r .' 14.9* 7 -- 1 --9 29.4 8.0- 1 1 1 ---1 1 1 1 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 FI Â» SCALE: 1" = 10 BASIS OFBEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS ASSHOWN e SURVIVORS CERTDFICATE 0 0 | ASURVEY MADE UNDER MYSUPERVISION ONMAY 12,1982,OF 6 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS N N I /20/ - THE EAST HALF OF LOT H AND ALLOF LOT I,BLOCK 22,CITY =l ~ 1/ ----- --g Â·JF ASPEN,COLORADO. / 2///i> -1/iJ'~f \\ I . \ N / / / / / // // / / j / 111 ll*LL-z_z ' 29.3 / / / / / .~ _-= c.~ft' C f. - i ALPINE SURVEYS - Â·, by: JAMES F RESER _-34*h*~-4//- - - -0 w MAY 13,1982 L.S. 9184 ..6419*A b - 41Â«Â«93 Z HOT o TUB G ~ , i l 9184 ~ ~ 2 / 4 , 12/7 9.Je, 43 41 .4/CD # 42 oF Co~40. Â»*.3. Â«MÂ¢TS WOOD FENCE EXCEPT AS SHOWN HEREON U fly: 1/ / 11 /1 1 2/ / 4 SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON 3-Â· 8 Â· 36- A VISUAL INSPECTION WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY NO CHANGES WERE FOUND CONC.' ~ PAD , 2 ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: /N 75~09'11"W 4500 4 t A //L LEY // 1 POWER TELE 8 TV . NOTICE According to Coloradolaw youmust commenceany legalaction Client PAN< CO based upon any defect in this survey within six years after you first discover Alpine Surveys, Inc. Surveyed 1 1 MAY 1982 SN Revisions 23 M AY 1986 Title BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY Job No 82- 60 - 2 suchdefect. In noevent may any action based upon any defectin thus survey. Drafted 12 MAY 1982 DIVIC be commenced morethan ten years trom the dated the certification shown E 1/2 LOT H ALL OF LOT 0 hereon Post Office Box 1730 Aspen, Colorado 81611 BLOCK 22 303 925 2688 COTY OF ASPEN COLORADO 0 . f . 0 . G ' Alli