The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.316 E Hopkins Ave.A40-96- Howling Wolf - 316 E. Hopkins --F 2737-073-29-008 - 96 SR-trash (bULA~880 'll.-U S R qS~1~--ABIAAW l~ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET - CITY OLASPEN .. DATE RECEIVED: 5/24/96 CASE # A40-96 DATE COMPLETE: STAFF: Suzanne Wolfi PARCEL ID # 2737-073-29-008 PROJECT NAME: Howling Wolf Special Review - Trash Area Project Address: 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen APPLICANT: 316 E. Hopkins Ltd. Address/Phone: 316 E. Hopkins, Aspen REPRESENTATIVE: Sven Alstrom, Architect Address/Phone: 312 F. Aspen Airport Business Center, 81611 ----- 925-1745 FEES: PLANNING $1050 #APPS RECEIVED 1 ENGINEER $105 # PLATS RECEIVED 9 HOUSING $0 ENV HEALTH $0 TYPE OF APPLICATION: TOTAL $1155 One Step AMT. RECEIVED $1050 -1-1.-4.-*al. 1 -4 - -- P&Z (.0 (LS C]Yes.E]No CC C]Yes C]No CC (2nd reading) [ZIYes UNo REFERRALS: U City Attorney U Aspen Fire Marshal U CDOT m City Engineer U City Water E ACSD U Zoning U City Electric U Holy Cross Electric U Housing U Clean Air Board U Rocky Mtn Natural Gas U Environmental Health U Open Space Board m Aspen School District U Parks El Other: U Other: 0 \ it DATE REFERRED: 9 1 -7/ ~ INITIALS: DATE DUE: & ~'l APPROVAL: Ordinance/Resolution # Date: Staff Approval Date: Plat Recorded: Book , Page CLOSED/FILED DATE: ~//747 INITIALS: -54//1/ ROUTE TO: 0 0 N A. MEMORANDUM Cur~j--it cO 0 TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission THRU: Dave Michaelson, Deputy Director 1~h L A FROM: Suzanne Wolff, Planner RE: Howling Wolf Special Review for Trash Area Reduction DATE: June 18,1996 SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting special review approval to reduce the required trash service area. The application packet is attached as Exhibit A. Staff recommends approval of the special review with conditions. APPLICANT: Howling Wolf, represented by Sven Alstrom LOCATION: 316 E. Hopkins Ave. ZONING: CC, Commercial Core LOT SIZE: 3,000 square feet BACKGROUND: The Howling Wolf is constructing an addition at the rear of the building to expand the kitchen and adding a basement to accommodate storage areas for the restaurant. The patio in the rear of the restaurant will be used for seasonal dining. HPC approved the addition on March 13, 1996. STAFF COMMENTS: In the Commercial Core, a trash/utility service area is required abutting the alley. For up to 6,000 square feet of net leasable floor area, the trash area shall be a minimum of 20 feet in length, measured parallel to the alley, with a minimum vertical clearance of 10 feet and a minimum depth of 10 feet at ground level. The applicant is proposing to reduce the required trash area to 10 feet by 10 feet. Pursuant to Section 26.64.040(C), the criteria for a special review to reduce the required trash service area are: 1. There is a demonstration that given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. Response: The Howling Wolf has approximately 2,500 square feet of net leasable floor area, including the patio dining area. Since the 20' x 10' x 10' trash area is intended to accommodate up to 6,000 square feet of net leasable floor area, a 10' x 10' x 10' trash area should be adequate. 2. Access to the utility/trash service area is adequate. Response: The trash area is accessed directly from the alley. 3. Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and makingthem easily movable by trashpersonnel. .. Response: The trash area will be enclosed by a 6 foot fence. Dumpsters shall be oriented with the "ears" facing the alley so as to be easily removed by trash personnel. 4. When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and mea.sures are taken to encourage trash compactions by other developments on the block. Response: Trash compaction is not proposed at this time. 5. The areaforpublic utility placement and maintenanceis adequate andsafe for the placement of ufil ities. rÂ« Response: The existing utilities in the alley will b~be impacted. 6. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction Of the access area. Response: The trash area is accessed directly from the alley. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval ofthe Howling Wolf special review to reduce the required trash area to 10' x 10' x 10', subjectto the following conditions: 1. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 2. Dumpsters shall be oriented with the "ears" facing the alley so as to be easily removed by trash personnel. 3. Access to the trash area from the alley shall be unobstructed. RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the special review for the Howling Wolf review to reduce the required trash area to 10' x 10' x 10', with the conditions as outlined in the Community Development Department Memo dated June 18,1996". Exhibits: "A" - Application Packet 2 e . Exhibit A ALSTROMGROUP P.C. 0 U 4. 1 7 1 A 4 ARCHITECTURE and INTERIOR DESIGN ~- , 312 F ASPEN AIRPORT BUSINESS CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 970 925 1745 . '+X -h 20 May, 1996 via fax / 920 5580 i' l. Suzanne Wolff, Planner ASPEN / PITKIN COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 130 S. Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 HOWLING WOLF / 316 East Hopkins Ltd. SPECIAL REVIEW TRASH AREA Building Permit Number 6 - 146 Dear Suzanne, Attached is our special review application for a 10 foot by 10 foot trash area for the Howling Wolf. FAR our current proposed FAR is 1557.62 square feet. this is 35% of the allowable FAR on this site in the commercial core. this project is mostly a kitchen and storage addition. although we are adding a dining patio for seasonal use we will have adequate trash area capacity with the 10x 10ft area proposed. SPECIAL REVIEW REQUIREMENTS 1.At this time we are less than half of the allowable FAR and therefore strongly can demonstrate that our trash area of 10 x 10 will be sufficient. 2. The trash area is immediately accessible from the alley. 3. The area is enclosed by a wood fence. required by HPC. 4. Current construction has not disturbed utilities in the area. the proposed location does not impact utility lines. 5. This trash area does not impact the main utility locations in the alley. please schedule our hearing as soon as possible we understood last week that the meeting prior to June 18 was already filled. Sincerely, 2%(tnv JOV'vu vv \ * Sven Erik Alstrom AIA ARCHITECT CC: Warren Ryan / 316 East Hopkins Ltd. 5/30/ 90 ' ATma]MENT 1 1) Project Name 4+OKILL N.0 RJOLM 2 ) Project I.Dcation .5 J (â‚¬ 'EAST H-OP K-/ M S LoT O 56064 30 - 61_r i a-F ASPal (indicate street address, lot & block number, legal description where appropriate) 3) Present Zonim 00 4) Iot Size 3 006 5) Applicant's Name, Address & Phone #~~47 1?AST- fl-Â©PkleS, LTD , 90 RYAN 60 -7/ 5 W , m ALN ASPEN 925 5387 6) Representative's Name, Address & Phone # 3>Inzkt ;ALSTRO/Â¥\ ALSIROr(\ efroP T?C, 61 2 'F AAM, 925 194.5 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Conceptual SPA - Conceptual Historic Dev. >- TRASH AREPJ-- Special Review Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline - Conceptual MJD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD Historic Demolition Mountain View Plane Subdivision Historic Designation Condeminiumization 'I'ext/Map Amendment - (24% AllatlIEIt Lot Split/Lot T.ine (2433 Exenption Adjustrent 8) Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.; ramâ€¢-er of bedrocus; any previous approvals granted to tile property). 2><\ST IN6 1:RE ST*uw<WT 4{ CDÂ£?FT<EE+1Â©L}SE 9) Description of DevelognerIt Application 5-FECLAL 'REWEU) FOR 10X {0 -TRAS+ AREA 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment 2, Mininim Sulnission Contents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents Resporse to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application CURRENT OUDe, PEÂ¥:BMIT + 9 - /44 akE .1-1.Pc MILE ON PROPERTY ALSO, .. SPECIAL REVIEW Application Package Content 4 Attached is a Development Application package for submission of your application. Included in this package are the following attachments: 1. Application Form 2. Description of Minimum Contents of Deve]opment Application 3. Description of Specific Contents for Submission of your Application 4. Copy of Review Standards for Your Application 5. Public Hearing Notice Requirements Summary 6. General Summary of Your Application Process Generally, to submit a complete application, you should fill in the application form and attach to it that written and mapped information identified in Attachments 2 and 3. Please note that all applications require responses to the review standards for that particular development type. The standards for your application are listed in Attachment 4. You can determine if your application requires that public notice be given by reviewing Attachment 5. Table 1 of that attachment will tell you whether or not your application requires notice and the form the notice should take. Your responsibilities in this regard are summarized in the cover explanation to the table. We strongly encourage all applicants to hold a pre-application conference with a Planning Office staff person so that the requirements for submitting a complete application can be fully described to you. Please also recognize that review of these materials does not substitute for a complete review of the Aspen Land Use Regulations. While this application package attempts to summarize the key provisions of the Code as. they apply to your type of development, it cannot possibly replicate the detail or the scope of the Code. If you have questions which are not answered by the materials in this package, we suggest that you contact the staff member assigned to ydur case or consult the applicable sections of the Aspen Land Ute Regulations. appcover . 26.64.040 3. Off-street parking provided for multi-family dwelling units which do not share a common parking area is not required to have unobstructed access to a street or alley, but may consist of garage area, parking strip or apron provided that the applicant demonstrates that adequate landscaping will be installed to reduce the parking's visual impact. Developments consisting of three or more dwelling units shall install one (1) planter buffer per three parking spaces. Planter buffers shall be a minimum of ten (10) feet long by two and one-half (2-1/2) feet wide by two (2) feet high unless otherwise varied by the Commission. The location and dimensions of the planters may also be varied by the Commission based on site specific circumstances provided that no fewer than one (1) planter buffer is provided per three (3) off-street paIking spaces. Multi-family projects using this provision shall access parking from the alley, if available. C. Utility/trash service area. Whenever the special review is for reduclion of the dimensions of a ulility/trash service area, the development application shall be approved only if: 1. There is a demonstration that given the nature of the potential uses of the building and its total square footage, the utility/trash service area proposed to be provided will be adequate. 2. Access to the utility/trash service area is adequate. 3. Measures are provided for enclosing trash bins and making them easily movable by trash personnel. 4. When appropriate, provisions for trash compaction are provided by the proposed development and measures are taken to encourage trash compaction by other developments on the block. 5. The area for public utility placement and maintenance is adequate and safe for the placement of utilities. 6. Adequate provisions are incorporated to ensure the construction of the access area. F~ Hallam Lake Bluff ESA encroachment into fifteen-foot setback from top of slope or height limit. Whinever a special review is for development above or below grade within the fifteen-foot setback from top of slope as identified on a site specific section drawing or above the height limit established by the ESA, the development application shall be approved only if the following conditions have been met: 1. A unique condition exists on the site where strict adherence to the top of slope setback will create an unworkable design problem. 2. Any intrusion into the top of slope setback or height limit is minimized to the greatest extent possible. 3. Other parts of the structure or development on the site are located outside the top of slope setback line or height limit to the greatest extent possible. 4. Landscape treatment is increased to screen the structure or development in the setback from all adj0ning properties. ~g Subdivision design standards. Whenever a special review is for development which does not meet theâ€¢subdivision design standards of Section 20:88.040(C)(4), the development application shall be approved only if the following conditions have been met: 1. A unique situation exists for the development where strict adherence to the subdivision design standards would result in incompatibility with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan, the existing, neighboring development areas, and/or the goals of the community. 2. The applicant shall specify each design standard variation requested and provide justification for each variation request, providing design recommendations by professional engineers as necessary. (Ord. No. 6-1989, Â§ 9; Ord. No. 7-1989, Â§ 2; Ord. No. 16-1989, Â§ 3; Ord. No. 71-1990, Â§ 4; Ord. No. 35-1992, Â§ 2; Ord. No. 4-1993, Â§ 2; Ord No. 50-1994, Â§ 2; Ord. No. 69-1995, Â§ 2: Code 1971, Â§ 7-404) 593 CITY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PLANNER: Suzanne Wolff DATE: 4/5/96 PROJECT: Howling Wolf Special Review &kNID@4%*156iEF-9 REPRESENTATIVE: Sven Alstrom Â«Phone/Fax: 925- I7*5- OWNER: Rvanco TYPE OF APPLICATION: Special Review to reduce trash - Â° CommerciN GUSSE-xemption DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT/DEVELOPMENT: Propo~5' x 9'~rash area. &*85 Exemption is required to allow increase in net leasable square footage - the private stdra*-afea in the base,fent cJunts as net leasable square footage, but does not count as FAR. 1 /ox i O The applicant shall respond to the following items and provide the following reports: Land Use Code Section Comments 26.64.040(C), Special Review standards (attached) 26.102.040(A)(1)(b), Commercial GMQS Exemption - address use of the private storage and impacts (employee generation, parking) Referral Agencies: Engineer Review by: Director - GMQS Exemption P&Z - Special Review Public Hearing: No Planning Deposit: $1050 Referral Agency Fees: $105 (Engineer) TOTAL DEPOSIT: $1155 (additional hours are billed at a rate of $175/hour) To apply, submit the following information: 1. Proof of ownership 2. Signed fee agreement 3. Applicant' s name, address and telephone number in a letter signed by the applicant, which also states the name, address and telephone number of the representative. 4. Total deposit for review of the application 5. 12 copies of the complete application packet and maps (for Special Review) 6. Summary letter explaining the request (existing conditions and proposed uses), inlcuding street address and legal description of the property. 7. An 8 1/2" by 11" vicinity map locating the parcel within the City of Aspen. 8. Site plan shall include property boundaries, lot size, proposed access, and physical features (drainageways, streams, rivers, etc.) Submit the following items, if circled: a. Site photos b. Historic Preservation Commission review/approval Ff:3*QE2 WASPEN/PTTKIN PLANNING OFFICE 130 S. Galena Street Aspen. Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5090 FAX# (970) 920-5439 May 30,1996 Sven Alstrom, Architect 312 F. AABC Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Howling Wolf Special Review - Trash Area Case A40-96 Dear Sven. The Planning Office has completed its preliminary review of the captioned application. We have determined that this application is complete. I have enclosed an Agreement to Pay Form. please have it signed and returned as soon as possible. We have scheduled this application for review by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on Tuesday, Jun 18. 1996 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. Should this date be inconvenient for you please contact me within 3 working days of the date of this letter. After that the agenda date will be considered final and changes to the schedule or tabling of the application will only be allowed for unavoidable technical problems. The Friday before the meeting date, we will call to inform you that a copy of the memo pertaining to the application is available at the Planning Office. If you have any questions. please call the planner assigned to your case. Suzanne Wolff, at 920- 5093. Sincerely, t-040-/oic- Rhonda Harris Administrative Assistant ..4.2 ..9 ...f .4 r. t i.1- ., ;1Â·: V. 2 9 ;,3 11. lili. - ,#3-j. * -'41: -' 1 i: c * 4 2-2 9 MO-, L :A'/ 1 ' logn *in z ' 0-1Â»0 hiv==1 N f <NOI.LOnaLSNOP L $ 1.-6,2':/ 5 '" -11 VIVI Â»1 03 ' i';. 7.' Â¢ ), , - N O /1 3 0 31 9 N O 3 M 3 N - NÂ¥ld 210011 1SMI:1 , ..t,48 11 * 93*86 +101Â¢-1 11.d X/9 I ! , 90 3 , f -m--======E=========A=----: --4 - T U.*.76, - I a b , 1 o . Ot -96 - LA N . .4 // '\ 1 ' 7~4. - _ - , 16'.- il , 1 13 i. JI- -- I.* mÂ· 4,61 Â»,4/4 Zf - I - I â‚¬>NidÂ©L .1-1 . . 1% h y '11 . f 1 AlÂ¥ , . GN Ic@ 1.Hel 11># 1 1 | 11 . f A ' .1.Nivwn'â€¢<1926 biDINg 0 , SkiaÂ»,6 ~ J I. \ IF .. -1,1 .9 -- - -Â» 11 1 Et l V \ r I NI , 1101 f 962 i-NquÂ¥ LIVM &41, 1 161 2 ~ , 4* - -- - ./._ 1- 1 - LE]=1 --"~~ Et ~ . 1 - M J 8%91 .O u 5 u i â€¢L o J p "0\-36, 3 / 'UT / \ 1 1-4 03!ad , 140 6 . V 1-1 COONA _: .. .. .1 ~ 9693681 ~LLOnz:LLS 'CNOD JAL' 9,9 . /\ ,11 / 20 dOL / , NEHAL I>| I~'EN lit ~{ ~2 1000 +ISM 1%121% . 3al.01'. 1 . . e,op -01Â¥hin.LOD 242 225: 1__Â»~ 4-71 -1 1 \1 1109 4* FJ, NOISNIatqIC +068 ~0~ * 1 . . ELL EN)NIOÂ£) ... 4' 1001-i Ng I A L,N [1Â»11 *M- lit<| ./ 61-Pewdol<D Â· NOBGOV ' ~ -"' I 2 . u?dt , 1 iv, F <->-A", 1 Nal-Â£93>01 Clod,2'+1.1- ..14 - 97 6-IOMONI~IMOH 1 , _ - NA( 01 - >16 1 Jts<1 1-1 I kr 6000 95Â»U NIGN Â» 1 V O.Z: 1 , - , 1/ 1 ./ ' 11-Â·~Ar--1 \// 0 . , . '. 1. 231 - 437- " 4:~*--*=2=3=32.0-24+ - 9 9 \2111 WaN 7 1 W \\-1 - ..... #Deloid 49" IddiL - 71 - .1. N*LL Sag-1 OQI A bIENWOO tls I KGI *N?19 -Lf><g Kjl 4-3 1 kil.' i , ON GO =10 UQL ,Â· no 6 ,/Caj JNW Si- 96013 r /2 A. IbEA 221Â¥ \INIGH; : / \-= \..9. . -2- ...--+ 1 ./ 119.1... . 2 .. ' $4106 I fdbAA V OD 41 )(=1 8~(97 926 /026 SNOL.L>,62019#. 77Â£- 2 Â·- x . . 9' "M ;Lbly a .. ~ ll _ . 100<39)0*1 904"6 h/1214 -gas/109 229 I -J -, 1 --*Ms A.LOrl...LS / 29 -) c-rs u 0, ! 131 9FZ L 926 /0Z6 tiON'=i MI -_ * 1/ \6 / X.1.110-1001+ 33. :. 4 4 ... - r . . . E====21 - WOOC GON MI-NG - 11-66 -12<JGÂ»12 9 j .r / 7, 0 , 24.-i-- 7" L [9 L 8 03 'N3dSV nLD'*49 -31=2 w , , -Lila F'I '3 El V'V d ZLE /44/u ~29 -t: Â·Â·/\ ,1 1Â£ F EIN,3612*1.1 109. ..: 11 - Â·~30<] 0%11Â»19 , L+01/,29 1 '612 dRO~9/WOM151Â¥ ./ 9 W W W F.1 9 L -11 - NIEJAI ~Â· baho M N IVIAIG'hl a.1- .- 1 / --85946IE L. r \1 1 -0 4 4 -53' C ly 'diÂ»SvaL *C -T b .*.itil,!411'I ~,f,Jj/vi,41,~1~2-Y,3-'..><fkld -li:~4~ == 1 i -1-1 u c, & t,z- 4 9 + C LÂ¥,1 .bl~ 1 4 R;Eiliz>ga *01Â· 3/1 V L 3 . 1 90/19 Ter 1-1ZI t . 1 iddÂ«' 8 + 7 - eNI.LSIXâ‚¬ 3 N QI 1-Â¥-29 eisÂ»o - 1Â¥â‚¬ 99=60.9 ' -44+f ~ .. ~ ./. -Ii 101Â» _2,~1.--Â· 54Â·6Â·. M Â·1+~1 1,~- Â·~-LAM+~*Â©unfl,pMACU=4-;42=_iii.z:t z ' . -- GNIddOLÂ· 1 3 -2,=ONÂ·sc:L BhliÂ¢11119 11Â¥ 1 1,L 14..., / >10-1,29 ~1Â»/1~1 Y.L.9 2- , AÂ©JINE/\ i :---- / . 01-01 - * Â· q<.ict~ 91 1 739 1 1 Â£ 1 01 , 41 . / 1Â»PidAL_ 224Â¥!VIC]bVH Ll >Â¢2 l ': 110 -101 1 11*-led 0-121.1 4. 001 -lei. . ~ / 0 -4 1 \ 1199 >L Ct522 eNI-1-Hel -1 CIN V ... \ 1 S 2:0 19 4-4109 /1 *toN Â¥7-1 9 , 9 1 - 1 4 -Â»â€¢,KLE Or-~-p 4Â«% ; C,&23 04 IlÂ·Wel -1 ed**181% LIXE '3104 1 / / 2:2 3 9 611 = O]Alâ‚¬C *2%1911'>1 U-SXE * Ze/*06 114>(G rulÂ¥19 1.4 1 -4-*.- ' '1=2 ' 59 99 = ON SKI JAO(22:|' '2~311-9 1Nal./g sve 3019'6 1 912-liaL 62/\0 ; --11~CN9-1 F GN' P.KI/=0 ~Â· tw:i ' -~-- +LbON SV t'0-1 L :11,/ i ----. :2 2 G .L-hÂ»e â‚¬9 Jam N 214 9 N / 1 9 1 X 3 - NÂ¥ld *001:1 15*11 84 '12 bs â‚¬L'rle == Ol.LÂ»6:J ~GAM+6I hIOOCIDO CE'62-7 >IN16=19 11 -Ind -3 f M 4 ~ 4 1+00\I L '16'59 Bâ‚¬,9 = VebV NIOMMOO 'Fâ‚¬&!919 Ve'bV l 'ON *28 IMLG < 10â‚¬ n N O1-LOn y =SNes , A1 07(0 849 103 - 14 'bs 93 3 = Nou.i acV NE+ID.1-1>1 -11 '+1 +1 '3 ' te Â·.'Â·.lik 04 169 Z.J (GV; alÂ»' NO 4.1.On al.SNOP + 0 1 ..4 Â¢>1. I 06 'adÂ¥ â‚¬1 t. - O-?41 pi-"': 06/01/4 -4 - 4/115/5 'l ul 1 e 06 3 VA' 4 1 0 0 t 06 21Â¥M /6 4 .;9Â¢K 4 W Â¥14 65 (3 0.1 bil-Xe ) N 91-42-1 >1 / 3 't GN U..9 112 / \1 1 44 . 46 WctÂ¥ 9 _ 4 h :. N 1 - 1 1 v'%/1 Â»SWV 1 0 44 44 Wav M '19 IX E , j Ll 6226d J 9A0>04 GN . 1 - 9 - 1 9223 1 1. ..1-7! *V + Â¥Â¥ 329 2-NVelnÂ»U-Sgb 4 1. - /1 14.414 5 921014 -1,962Ng,9 EA L.9 1 XE (-- +40* ad , 1.9 1 XG 1 gg,IO+N Â¥*1 - r-i -4--EklitbA) NO 'hi2929 ONÂ¥ 5 q"1 $ 6981 dVE-1. 29*230 h Re..11 SllÂ»CLEC < NOiLOES' 11Â»!VI 99 GN LLC I Xs r-- al Us! x g ---0 Â·v ./lib S'llÂ»<LE<01 /Noll-029 VÂ»LE 29 - 21 1- UJINO CWHI) SNO[.LÂ¥/\212 CblÂ»*LL~~DOO*D 04 -- ~ 94 1 --9- 1- A NIV'Id =DOW 4Â¥ Ha 3 - CK p . NOLLOag 0NIC'llrf@ +V * SNOLLV/\21,2 eNIcalng Â¢29 t \11(21 xg [-91%2 fl ehilli{XE ~ ~ Nvid ING,InggÂ»g -39 829:NLQ K 261 N.=JAON/1 SNIÂ¥'lol hIOQ,4 196 2 144 - # 00 c~ IE}l , 9@NIMMBC 40 ><NONI , 9 â€¢ 1 0 . I . / ......ip %3* M / ' h . L., 11 .. . I '41 - 0 14 :5 :" Â· '%Â·It :Â·. , -4- 4Â· a A ..ri. - I ' 2 4Â· t.4 t. , - 11, I 4 '4 i 1 - 1.94 1 ' 1 ' 1 -0 4 146#ARSÂ« 101-oil AL Ler ~ ; ' 1 . 4 1%*Â»Â» - BEYOND Ft' ALLE* ..Â·,Wi 51* MOT HtlekÂ·+ :Ili INC)OD FENCE 07715Â»3---1 5-FA~~ BATE 0 " i ....3 1 1 11 ..4. 7 1 .Â·.,4 -4-1- _ '11 1 1. , / 1 '. - 20 MAY 90. ,-':, 19! 4Â¥hl 2\ MAR~ 9* i 1 OUTDODA DI NINe . . . -ift. 14"m i.- + i -COURTYARD ELEVATION - EAST -_COURTYARD ELEVATION - WEST ' 1/4"1:160" . 1 . < r. 1/4" : 11-0" ALSTROM/GROUP ~ 312 F A. A. B. C. 4 I " ASPEN, CO 81611 970/ 925 1745 TEL 970/ 925 4578 FX - 2 9 project HOWLING WOLF - I. . 1,Bi ADDITION date A6 ~ --- 1 id 4 0 + 11 MAR 96 44 1,512. drawing no. Al.ae 1 1 7 2 1 1 1 / p - I /4 4 i -7/ -~h ~3\\ / 1 1 -'= A - Â»1 1- 1 4, / 4.- , e Â£ f 1- , - 1. V......54 . r ' 0 0. 1 ./ " 'emia ' . , , . -1 -1*,9. 7 1 . 1 1 ..ty; t. ...54 Â¢ COURTYARD ELEVATION - NORâ„¢ 1/40:1'4" r , Â· Â»I.hi 9-tg $ ~ Â·*- Â·â€¢411 4 1 1 . tÂ·v C.-3 . n ,\/ I. ~ i .- - --I ... . -- I - I .--I / ,. Â· 1 1 NJUgji P< jg: iw 1 Â©CARD 4 SATTEN . 1 . ..... ...+ -- . - I. -7- ... . I I "- U, ... AS REQUIRED j li ' i'*A /-TE (-rrpicAR) /. SIDINe G NEPN ADDITION I , //2/.............. \\ e 17,+ \ /'>~%4 I I 940 0,> ~- *23 44 - - 1 , - 4 ..0 - 1 .-< 60 U~KnAIRD MEN ~ C ap< PT (TYPICAL. 1 1---th- â„¢As A /7 - - - -- -- 59 - / 2 , - . ~ | ~ 7'a'â€¢S! 5,4 h. : L - ---1- -1 -/~ 55%6 E 1 p=Ac i N, 4 1 1 I n #20"XiNS ' 1 4-- . SPEGIAL- 2 959 1.5-IN ' : 'Â·,* 2 119 ... , lot-d" -TRASH ~: APPLjoÂ»TloN 908.. Â«: .9 EXPS-TINe Tb REVA \1 4 AREA , 1012< joi AREA 1 / NORâ„¢ ELEVATION _ 1/4": 1 'Â·0" 20|-011 TRA 614 AREeA ---- ------ - -. ...~-=.~ ..-U-------7-+ --- .-P-- .9, .- SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4":1'-0" . , I-'.' a / W - -, I . . -/ I + r I - - I I I . - WOOD PeNCE ~ COURT-Y/#RD AND ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~_ ~~ ' , EXTERZ #off 3-TAIR t$SPHACT 'Sti NeLE 1900 f~ / - - - - - -< ' 2 . I... 1 " -~Â·-1 6364 / 1-1 -, ... 1/1 BEYONED - -.'~00,90 # aÂ»-r-rexi ' j 1 1/4003 SIC>I Ne,- ' 00 IV+Â©r 960 . 1 1 11 : 8 1. 1 1, 1. . AL. 29 MAR 90 1 41 i 2-1 VAR =* 96 p 1 1 2 - 1 + I\Â«9 90 E- 1.=fl .-' 22, 753 74 1 1 1- = - I.-/.li-' 1 0 NEN ADDITION Eah j uTINE, 51+36 TO RE VAI N . 1 ' 1 1. , L WEST ELEVATION _ â€ž 1/4":1'.0" 1 9 ALSTROM/GROUP EXISTINe 70 REMAN WEIN ADDITION 312 F A. A. B. C. . a .. ASPEN, CO 81611 - 970/ 925 1745 TEL 970/ 925 4578 FX . r ' â€žI /1= :.5-1- - p <3 ROOF' SEYOND <~/ 1XrÂ·:42 ..:.n . , . 5 WOOD FENCE HOWLING WOLF - r proiect Â·111 - ..:15 ./ / , , - - o cou:rrrÂ·*20 ADDITION N: 4/ 00< F.5 +09 ' /<1 XER KITZ:kÂ·+EN ADDITION F*070-~ ( 1-YPICA1.10. ~ date . 1 1 % 1 23FEB96 1 1 . . . . 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1. . 1 2. i. drawing no. Â·,4 P~. M=73 ,/ A3 r / ' i si' - ,, - BEARD 4 547-El\ t. I ' I. ' .... Irj/.CD SO Ne -~ I.- Â£-- ' . + 24 1 - 1 . 1 1 = irr ld-_c - 1 : - t. 0. -#I: I z I r , I 1 % 0/,1/ *:. / r EAST ELEVATION * 1/4":1'Â·0" I '' .. I 1 4.- 7 t.4 -i rkÂ·Â©4.:.Â·: , 0,1 1- , / 4 Â¥ t.'f Â· -r me .' ,