HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.CU.123 W Francis St.A72-95VICKERY CONDITIONAL USE
2735-124-21-002
FOR A
A72-
DU
Aspen/Pitkin Community
Development Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(303) 920-5090
City Land Use Application Fees:
00113-63850-041
Deposit
-63855-042
Flat Fee
-63860-043
HPC
-63875-046
Zardng & Sign Permit
- MR011
Use Tax
County Land Use Application Fees:
00113-63800-033
Deposit
-63805-034
Flat Fee
-63820-037
Zoning
-63825-038
Board of Adjustment
Referral Fees:
00113-63810-035
Countv Engineer
00115-63340-163
City Engineer
00123-63340-190
Housing
00125-63340-205
Eaviromental Health
Sales:
00113-63830-039 County Code
-69000-145 Copy Fees
_ Other
Name:4A-16_ VIC ) 67_
Address: / SS
4 7JI - �
Zbtal / ! ld • ")6
Date heck:
Project:,
Case No: _
Phone:_ S (j No. of Copies
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 5 /16/95 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
DATE COMPLETE: 2735-124 21-002 A72-95
STAFF MEMBER:
PROJECT NAME: VICKERY CONDITIONAL USE FOR 2 ADU'S
Project Address: 123 WEST FRANCIS
Legal Address: LOTS C, D, E, AND E 1/2 OF B, BLOCK 56
APPLICANT: JAKE VICKERY
Applicant Address: 100 S. SPRING ST. 925-3660
REPRESENTATIVE: SAME
Representative Address/Phone:
Aspen, CO 81611
FEES: PLANNING $ 425 # APPS RECEIVED 10
ENGINEER $ # PLATS RECEIVED 10
HOUSING $
ENV. HEALTH $
TOTAL $ 425
TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: XX 2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date Juir- ��� PUBLIC HEARING: NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
CC Meeting Date
DRC Meeting Date
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
X City Engineer
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
City Electric
Envir.Hlth.
X Zoning
DATE REFERRED• T
FINAL ROUTING:
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO
X Parks Dept.
Bldg Inspector
Fire Marshal
Holy Cross
Mtn. Bell
ACSD
Energy Center
School District
Rocky Mtn NatGas
CDOT
Clean Air Board
Open Space Board
Other
Other
INITIALS: DUE•
DATE ROUTED: S' S INITIAL:
City Atty City Engineer
Housing Open Space
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
Zoning Env. Health
Other:
C� J
E3
ASPF\ . PITKf\
PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT
COMML\IT) DECELOP\tE\i DErARTNIENT
October 31, 1995
Jake Vickery
100 South Spring Street 1,03
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: 129 W. Francis ADU
Dear Jake:
In response Lo your letter dated October 25, 1995 regarding the ADU
approval for Unit "B" I offer the following comments.
The information submitted to the Planning office and referral
agencies indicated a two bedroom unit with an ADU above the garage.
This is the design and configuration that the Planning, office
reviewed and commented on to the Planning Commission. If there was
inaccurate information presented to the Commission, it should have
been indicated at the meeting, not five months after the approval.
As we discussed on the phone last week, any change. to the ADU from
its approved location and configuration above the garage will
require a full ADU review by the Planning and Zoning Commission. -
I understand your interest to sell the second parcel as soon as
possible for financial reasons. To avoid another hearing before
the Planning Commission, you may pay the cash -in -lieu fee for
affordable housing, or construct the ADU above the garage.
As always, I am happy to help you find a workable solution. Please
feel free to call me at 920-5106.
Sincerely,
,1. 1
Mary Backner
cc: Amy Amidon, HPC
Stan Clauson, ACDD
130 SOLTH GALE\:\ SFREET • Aa I'E\, COLORADO 81611 • PHO\E 303.920.5090 • Fix 303.420.5197
V,v,d-nn 4,1Nr DIRFIT Fxx 1.I\E: 3014-10.3439
r
RCHITECT
100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 63
POST OFFICE BOX 12360
TO: MARY LACKNER / AMY AMIDON ASPEN,COLORADO81612
TELE I'HONE / FACSIMILE
FROM: JAKE VICKERY (970) 9 2 5 - 3 6 6 0
RE: ADU APPROVAL FOR UNIT "B", 123/129 WEST FRANCIS
DATE: 10-25-95
During the course of a due diligence review by a prospective purchaser on this property,
certain matters of record in connection to this property appear unclear or inaccurate.
The purpose of this letter is to clarify these matters and set the record straight.
BACKGROUND
On May 8, 1995, a consolidated land use application was submitted to the planning
office containing a set of 11 "x17" plans for the above referenced project The timing of
this submittal related to a potential deadline anticipating a code revision which would
effect this project. This code amendment did not occur at that time and on May 15,
1995, a slightly revised and more detailed set of plans was resubmitted. A further
refined set of plans was finally reviewed and approved by HPC on May 24.
On June 20, 1995 the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission approved 2 ADU's for
the above referenced property.
In Staff's June 20, 1995 memo to P&Z regarding this project on page 3 (contained
within Item "C") the third paragraph reads as follows:
"The free market residence proposed to be a two bedroom, 2,970 sq. ft. unit. The
applicant has not indicated any basement level plans for this structure. The applicant is
seeking a 250 sq. ft FAR bonus for this unit.
two bedroom unit and the ADU is a studio,
adequate for the proposed development."
CLARIFICATION
Since the free market residence is only a
staff believes that two parking spaces are
The above quoted characterization by Staff of the proposed Unit "B" is not entirely
correct. References to an FAR of 2,970 sq. ft. are accurate, however, references to the
number of bedrooms is not. It is true that no basement plan was included in the original
May 8, 1995, submittal by our unintentional omission. This was subsequently corrected
and amended as described above. These more detailed plans indicate a full basement
containing three additional bedrooms and other spaces.
The applicant assumed that copies of these more complete plans had been distributed
to Staff for this ADU review. Evidently, this may not have happened. These more
complete plans were brought by the applicant to the June 20, 1995 review and used in
his presentation. A copy of them (as approved by HPC ) is attached for you reference.
•
•
At any rate, at no time has the applicant ever indicated that there would be no basement
integral with this unit or that the total number of bedrooms for this free market unit would
be only two. The more detailed plans show a total of 6 bedrooms inclusive of the ADU
studio.
Since the issue under contemplation in the above quoted paragraph was solely the
number of parking spaces to be provided and whereas Staff recommended that two be
provided and the P&Z required the full three spaces anyway, we submit that there is no
real impact from this confusion. We would like this letter to stand as a clarification to
this action and whatever appropriate action taken to clarify the official record.
We regret the confusion and would appreciate your prompt attention to this matter as it
involves an ongoing negotiation effecting this property.
r:.
•
1!
.45;0 yn, a o
u�
1
t,AUNc�,� t�f
ate- ��, �i� /M�►,� � �- -�.
+ zla
I
I
123/ 129 WEST FRANCIS
PROPOSED UNIT "B"
MAY 24, 1995
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
v,. f�t�ciS
6kf---� *+4
123/ 129 WEST FRANCIS
PROPOSED UNIT "B"
MAY 24, 1995
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
123/129 WEST FRANCIS
PROPOSED UNIT "B"
MAY 24,1995
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
•
�}urt so.
. _, HVIIJ
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Mary Lackner, Planner
RE: Vickery Conditional Use for 2 Accessory Dwelling Units
at 123 W. Francis - Public Hearing
DATE: June 20, 1995
SUMMARY: The applicant is seeking to voluntarily construct an
accessory dwelling unit in an existing historic residence that will
be remodeled and relocated on the parcel, this unit will be
referred to as ADU A. The applicant is also seeking approval to
construct a required accessory dwelling unit for a new free market
residence to be referenced as ADU B.
The applicant has obtained a GMQS Exemption from the Planning
Director for a second free market dwelling unit to be developed on
the 10,500 sq.ft. parcel. As part of the GMQS Exemption
requirements, the applicant must provide an accessory dwelling
unit, pay cash -in -lieu, or deed restrict the new residence to
resident occupancy. The applicant is also seeking condominization
of the parcel into a 6,000 sq.ft. lot and a 4,500 sq.ft. lot.
At the end of today's Commission agenda there is a work session
item to discuss a draft code amendment by Jake Vickery which
proposes a lot split provision for historically landmarked parcels.
The applicant is seeking that code amendment on this parcel so that
he does not need to go forward with a condominization.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the Vickery Conditional
Use for the two accessory dwelling units with conditions.
APPLICANT: Jake Vickery.
LOCATION: 123 W Francis Street, East 1/2 of Lot B & all of Lots
C, D, and E, Block 56, City and Townsite of Aspen.
ZONING: R-6 Medium Density Residential.
APPLICANT'S REQUEST: The applicant requests Conditional Use
approval to build one voluntary and one required accessory dwelling
unit on the subject parcel. The property is presently improved
with a historic residence that will be relocated to the eastern
portion of the property and will contain a below grade two bedroom
accessory dwelling unit of approximately 700 net leasable sq.ft.
This unit is voluntary and is referred to as ADU A. 4
The second accessory dwelling unit is proposed for a new residence
to be located on the western portion of the property. This ADU is
proposed to be an approximately 500 sq.ft. studio, with southern
exposure above the garage, and will be referenced as ADU B.
Please refer to application information, Exhibit "A".
REFERRAL COMMENTS: Comments from the Engineering Department are
included as Exhibit "B" and Housing Authority comments are included
as Exhibit "C".
STAFF COMMENTS: The Commission has the authority to review and
approve development applications for conditional uses pursuant to
the standards of Section 7-304:
A. The conditional use is consistent with the purposes,
goals, objectives and standards of the Aspen Area
Comprehensive Plan, and with the intent of the zone
district in which it is proposed to be located; and
Response: The proposed dwelling units have the potential to house
local employees, which is in compliance with the Aspen Area
Community Plan and the underlying zone district.
B. The conditional use is consistent and compatible
with the character of the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development and surrounding land
uses, or enhances the mixture of complimentary uses
and activities in the immediate vicinity of the
parcel proposed for development; and
Response: The accessory dwelling unit is compatible with the
character of the surrounding neighborhood. The units will not be
visible as a distinct unit from the exterior of either residence.
C. The location, size, design and operating
characteristics of the proposed conditional use
minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts,
impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation,
parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations
and odor on surrounding properties; and
Response: The accessory dwelling units will be completely
contained within the proposed residence.
ADU A, to be located within the basement of the historic residence,
will be accessed by an exterior stairwell adjacent to the garage.
The plans do not indicate any protection from the elements on this
stairway. There is also in interior stairway to access this unit.
The two bedroom unit is proposed with one lightwell on the east
side of the building. Staff believes the basement location of this
unit is marginal and would prefer to see the unit relocated above
grade. '
The historic residence is proposed to be a five bedroom, 1950
2
f
sq.ft. house which provides two parking spaces within a garage.
Staff does not believe only two parking spaces are adequate for the
proposed house and ADU with a total of seven bedrooms. Should the
Planning Commission approve this request, an additional parking
space reserved for use by the ADU shall be provided on site.
ADU B, to be located above the garage of the new free market
residence, will be accessed via an exterior stairway that is
protected by a roof overhang. This studio unit has direct southern
exposure. Staff believes this is a quality ADU unit.
The free market residence is proposed to be a two bedroom, 2,970
sq.ft. unit. The applicant has not indicated any basement level
plans for this structure. The applicant is seeking a 250 sq.ft.
FAR bonus for this unit. Since the free market residence is only
a two bedroom unit and the ADU is a studio, staff believes the two
proposed parking spaces are adequate for the proposed development.
As per past P&Z concerns, a recommended condition of approval
requires that the unit be identified on building permit plans as
a separate dwelling unit requiring compliance with U.B.C. Chapter
35 for sound attenuation.
D. There are adequate public facilities and services
to serve the conditional use including but not
limited to roads, potable water, sewer, solid
waste, parks, police, fire protection, emergency
medical services, hospital and medical services,
drainage systems, and schools; and
Response: The City Engineer, Chuck Roth has identified several
conditions of approval that would be applicable for both ADU's.
These conditions address site drainage, sidewalk areas,
encroachments, utilities, and work in the public right-of-way and
are included in the proposed conditions in the recommendation
section of this memorandum.
E. The applicant commits to supply affordable housing
to meet the incremental need for increased employees
generated by the conditional use; and
Response: ADU B will satisfy the requirements of Ordinance 1 for
a new single family residence. The applicant must file the
appropriate deed restrictions for resident occupancy for both
units, including a six month minimum lease. Proof of recordation
must be forwarded to the Planning Office prior to issuance of any
building permits.
F. The proposed conditional use complies with all
additional standards imposed on it by the Aspen Area "
Community Plan and by all other applicable
requirements of this chapter.
3
10 0
Response: This use complies with the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan
and all other applicable conditional use standards.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Planning staff recommends approval of the
Vickery Conditional Use ADU B. Staff recommends that the Planning
Commission request a redesign of ADU A to provide better access and
light to the unit. The following conditions are recommended for
each ADU:
1. The owner shall submit appropriate deed restrictions to the
Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority for approval. The
accessory dwelling units shall be deed restricted to resident
occupancy with a minimum six month lease. Upon approval by
the Housing Authority, the Owner shall record the deed
restriction with the Pitkin County Clerk and Recorder's
Office.
2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, a copy of the
recorded deed restriction for the accessory dwelling unit must
be forwarded to the Planning Office.
3. The accessory dwelling unit shall be clearly identified as a
separate dwelling unit on building permit plans and shall
comply with U.B.C. Chapter 35 sound attenuation requirements.
4. During building permit plan review, the Zoning Enforcement
Officer and Housing Office shall make the final determination
that the unit meets the minimum size requirement of 300 sq. ft.
net liveable as defined in the Housing Authority Guidelines.
The accessory dwelling unit cannot be less than 300 sq.ft.
5. The accessory dwelling unit shall have a kitchen which is a
minimum of a two -burner stove with oven, standard sink, and
a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer.
6. The applicant shall meet the following requirements of the
City Engineer:
a. The new development plan shall provide for no more than
historic drainage flows to leave the site. Any increase
to historic storm run-off shall be maintained on site.
b. The Final Development Plan shall include a five foot wide
pedestrian usable space in the public right-of-way. The
applicant shall also prune the low tree limbs to a height
of seven feet to allow for pedestrian use in the public
right-of-way.
C. The improvement survey indicates fences being located
within both the Francis Street and alley rights -of -way.
4
It
The fences must either be relocated to private property,
or an encroachment license must be applied for prior to
the issuance of any building permits.
d. Any new surface utility needs for pedestals or other
equipment must be installed on an easement provided by
the applicant and not in the public right-of-way.
e. The final development plans must indicate the trash
storage area which cannot be located in the public right-
of-way. All trash storage areas should be indicated as
trash and recycle areas. Any trash and recycle areas
that include utility meters or other utility equipment
must provide that the utility equipment not be blocked
by trash and recycle containers.
f. The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5088)
for design considerations of development in the public
rights -of -way, parks department (920-5120) for vegetation
species, and shall obtain permits for any work or
development, including landscaping, within public rights -
of -way from city street department (920-5130).
7. The applicant shall meet with the Parks Department to review
the proposed vegetation alterations on site. This meeting
shall take place prior to the issuance of any permits for the
property. The applicant shall comply with the tree
replacement requirements of the Parks Department.
8. A designated parking space for each ADU must be provided on
site in addition to the two spaces provided for each free
market unit.
9. All material representations made by the applicant in the
application and during public meetings with the Planning and
Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered
conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other
conditions.
RECOMMENDED MOTION: "I move to approve the Conditional Use for two
accessory dwelling units to be located within two residences at 123
W. Francis with the conditions recommended in the Planning Office
memo dated June 20, 1995."
Exhibits:
"A" - Application Information
"B" - Engineering referral memo
"C" - Housing referral memo
5
It
0 Exhibit B
MEMORANDUM
To: Mary Lackner, Planning Office
From: Chuck Roth, Engineering Department
Date: June 13, 1995
Re: Vickery Conditional Use Review for an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
(123 West Francis Street; East 1/2 of Lot B & all of Lots C, D, E, Block 56, Original Aspen
Townsite)
Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the
Engineering Department has the following comments:
1. Site Drainage - One of the considerations of a development application for conditional use is
that there are adequate public facilities to service the use. One public facility that is inadequate is
the City street storm drainage system. The new development plan must provide for no more than
historic flows to leave the site. Any increase to historic storm run-off must be maintained on site.
2. Sidewalk Area - The public right-of-way between the property line and the curb is partially
obstructed by low tree limbs. It is recommended that a condition of approval be that the trees be
pruned up to a height of seven feet as needed to allow for pedestrian use of the public right-of-way.
In support of this, the final development plan should indicate a five foot wide pedestrian usable
space, a sidewalk "area."
3. Driveway - One driveway currently exists, but the applicant proposes to use the alley for access
to garages off the alley. This provides an excellent site design.
4. Encroachments - The improvement survey indicates fences being located within both the
Francis Street and alley public rights -of -way. The fences must either be relocated to private
property, or an encroachment license must be applied for prior to issuance of a building permit.
5. Parking - The indicated parking spaces meet the upcoming parking space ordinance.
6. Utilities - Any new surface utility needs for pedestals or other equipment must be installed on
an easement provided by the applicant and not in the public right-of-way.
7. Trash & Utility Area - The final development plans must indicate the trash storage area, which
may not be in the public right-of-way. All trash storage areas should be indicated as trash and
recycle areas. Any trash and recycle areas that include utility meters or other utility equipment
must provide that the utility equipment not be blocked by trash and recycle containers.
8. Work in the Public Right-of-way - Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and
development in public rights -of -way adjacent to private property, we advise the applicant as
follows:
The applicant shall consult city engineering (920-5088) for design considerations of
development within public rights -of -way, parks department (920-5120) for
vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including
landscaping, within public rights -of -way from city streets department (920-5130).
cc: Cris Caruso, Jake Vickery
M95. l25
2
EA
JUN 13 ' S5 09 = 49AN ASFEI f
USING ,-)F,; P . 1
Exhibit
C
MEB102aNDum
TO: Mary Lackner, Planning Office
FROM: Cindy Christensen, Housing office
DATE: June 13, 1995
RE: Vickery Conditional Use Review for an ADO
Parcel ID No. 2735-124-21-002
ISSUE: The applicant is requesting to provide two accessory
dwelling units -- one is for tje histcrical hcuse and would be a
voluntary unit and the second for the new single family unit, which
would be reavired.
BACKGROUND: The land area of the site is on two lots -- Lot A is
4,500 square faet and Lot B is 6,000 square feet. The proposal is
to add two ADU's -- cne bedroom required unit iz the single family
cottage and one voluntary two -bedroom unit in the existing cottage.
j XCQNN=ATTO14: The Housing office recommends approval upon the
following conditions:
1. The size of the accessory uni-�s must fall within the
guidelines of the City of Aspen Mt:nici.pal Code:
Accessary dwelling units shall contain not less than three hundred (300) square feet of
allowable floor area and not more than seven hundred (700) square feet of allowable floor
area. The unit shall be deed restricted, meeting the housing authority's guidelines for
resident occupied units and shall be limited to rental periods of nut less than sic (6) mon tts
n duration. Owners of the principal residence shah have the right to place a qualified
employee or employees of his or her choosing in the accessory dwelling unit.
The applicant will need to provide to the Housing Office
actual floor plans of the two accessory dwelling units, with
the net liveable square footage calculated as defined _n the
Aspen/Pitkin cour_ty Housing Gu_dellnes.
2. The kitchen must also he built to the fallowing specifications
and be shown on the plans:
IGtchen-For Accessary Dwelling Units and Caretaker Swelling Unita, a minimum of atwo-
burner stove with oven, standard sink, and a 6-cubic foot refrigerator plus freezer.
3. If approved, the applicant must provide tc the Hcuszng office
a sy.gned and recorded Deed Res=etion, which can be obtained
from the Housing office. The Housing Office must have the
recorded book and page number prior to building permit
approval.
•
•
123 WEST FRANCIS
RCHITECT
V I C K E R Y
JAKE VICKERY
100 SOUTH SPRING ST. 03
POST OFFICE BOX 12360
ASPEN, COLORADO 81612
TELEPHONE / FACSIMILE
( 3 0 3 1 9 2 5 - 3 6 6 0
r,101
A K E
May 8, 1995.
Amy Amidon
Aspen Historic Preservation Commission
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: 123 WEST FRANCIS
Dear Amy,
Please find attached our combined Land Use Application for HPC Landmark Designation,
HPC Conceptual Review including relocation and partial demolition of existing structures,
Special Review for Ordinance #35, GMQS Exemption for additional free market unit, and
Conditional Use Review for 2 Accessory Dwelling Units for proposed development at 123
West Francis.
Information provided for Review:
1. Application Summary
2. Combined Land Use Application Form
3. Compliance with Review Standards for Landmark Designation
4. Supplement to Historic Preservation Development Application Form
5. Compliance with Review Standards for HPC Conceptual Review of
Significant Development including on site relocation and partial demolition
of existing structures.
6. Special Review Compliance with Ordinance 35
7. Compliance for Conditional Use for 2 Accessory Dwelling Units
8. Specific Submittal for GMQS Exemption by Director for a new free market
unit
9. 50 scale Adjacency Map and Neighborhood Photos
10. Vicinity Map
11. Survey
12. Disclosure of Ownership
13. Owner's Authorization to Represent
14. Applicant's letter requesting designation grant and waiving of park
dedication fees
15. 1 set of 11"x17" reduced (1/8" scale)copies of all drawings including
existing and proposed site plans, floor plans, and elevations.
16. Check for Review fee.
Sincerely,
•
Jake Vickery, Architect
PROPOSED LANDMARKING & 2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES
123 WEST FRANCIS
APPLICATION SUMMARY
May 8, 1995
The applicant would like to create two single family cottages and two accessory
dwelling units, one voluntary and one required.
2. The applicant is proposing to Landmark the property and conform to preservation
guidelines to achieve this goal in the most compatible way.
3. This is consistent with the R-6 Zone and the AACP. It supports the ideas of
smaller scale houses and historical preservation.
4. The existing cottage has changed little over the last 40 years with the exception of
a incompatible addition to the rear. Existing outbuildings are non -conforming and
this situation would be improved by this application.
5. Using the R-6 Zone requirements for Duplex, 4,170 FARsf are available. This FAR
has been apportioned to the two building sites identified on the plans as "Lot A"
and "Lot B". "Lot A" is apportioned 1450 FARsf, "Lot B" is apportioned 2,720
FARsf.
6. The land area of the site has been apportioned as follows: Lot A is 4,500 sf, Lot B
is 6,000 sf. Development on these Lots has been designed to conform to
underlying zoning as if they were lots of record as much as possible considering
the adjustments necessitated by preservation of the historical structures.
7. The two dwellings units have been separated to maintain the historical integrity of
the existing historical structures. This is preferable to adjoining new square
footage to the small scale massing of the historical cottage. The proposed plan is
to create separate, independent and compatible structures off mixed scale and
architectural interest. This protects the integrity of the historical resource and adds
a variety and interest to the neighborhood.
8. This fragmentation strategy would require a 500 FAR bonus from HPC available to
Landmarks and a finding of "more compatibility." A 500 sf bonus is being
requested for the historical cottage. Currently it is 1,680 sf. Removal of the
incompatible addition reduces the square footage to 1,363 sf exclusive of garages
and sheds.
9. Two ADU are applied for. One is for the Historical House and is voluntary. The
second is for the new single family unit and is required, These units are proposed
subgrade because of the limitations on FAR and coverage.
•
•
110. Have you attached the following?
YES Response to Attachment 2, Minimum Submission Contents
YES Response to Attachment 3, Specific Submission Contents
YES Response to Attachment 4, Review Standards for Your Application
• •
LAND USE APPLICATION FORM
1. Project Name: 123 WEST FRANCIS
2. Project Location: 123 WEST FRANCIS
(Indicate street address, lot and block number, legal description where appropriate.)
3. Present Zoning R6 4. Lot Size 10.500 SF
5. Applicant's Name, Address & Phone # JAKE VICKERY, 100 SOUTH SPRING STREET #3
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611. 970 925 3660
6. Representative's Name, Address & Phone # SAME AS #5
7. Type of Application (Please check all that apply):
X Conditional Use
X Special Review
8040 Greenline
Stream Margin
Conceptual SPA
Final SPA
Conceptual PUD
Final PUD
Mountain View Plane Subdivision
X Condominium ization Text/Map Amendment
Lot Split/Lot Line Adjustment
X Conceptual Historical Dev.
Final Historic Dev.
Minor Historic Dev.
X Historic Demolition
X Historic Designation
GMQS Allotment
X GMQS Exemption
8. Description of Existing Uses (number and type of existing structures; approximate sq. ft.;
number of bedrooms; any previous approvals granted to the property).
SITE IS CURRENTLY DEVELOPED WITH HISTORICAL MINER'S COTTAGE OF
APPROXIMATELY. SF, WITH SEVERAL ADDITIONS AND MUCH DEFERRED
MAINTENANCE
9. Description of Development Application
TO DEMOLISH A PORTION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURES PRESERVE REMAINING
STRUCTURES, RELOCATE EXISTING COTTAGE TO ONE SIDE OF SITE AND
CONSTRUCT A SECOND SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE.
0 •
APPLICATION FOR LANDMARK DESIGNATION - ATTACHMENTS
123 WEST FRANCIS
May 8, 1995
(attachment #, Item #)
(2-2) Street Address
123 West Francis
Aspen, Colorado 81611
(2-3) Legal Description
Lots C,D,E, and East 1/2 of B, Block 56
City and Township of Aspen,
Pitkin County, Colorado
(2-4) See attached Vicinity Map
(2-5) Compliance with Review Standards
This property meets review standards B, C, E and F and qualifies to
be a local designated landmark. It was built in 1888 and much of
the original materials are intact. Vernacular in nature, it suffers from
several incompatible non -historic additions and deferred
maintenance, and is representative of Aspen's Victorian past.
(3-1) See attached Boundary Survey
(3-2A) Jake Vickery is acting own his own behalf. See attached contract to
purchase authorizing Jake Vickery to act as Owner's Representative.
(3-26) See attached letter requesting designation grant, and waiver of Application
and Park Dedication Fees.
a as aC as f�' = as a=at ai a� as a. '><aC1Caa aW• • ■t " •/►. ��
` ma s m aia am s t— s "Las asf !�
/00 /�� A
c
1.?
+ ki
d
u
c 4
o�
a
1
O �
R
O
�
M `
ram,.
� o
x !�
/O1 123 129 13,5
`p W. F'RAN C ES
Q t
S�
s�
0
I 120 126 /3
I.
F77-
75 I Q \
��aaz cca�—cac c==z===�=z__=======a==�+=--c=aaas asaa•
¢'III N' Pipc
2 412 420 a34 p
- 75 "
o q
:ax
74
_T7-z
N
x
d
T�7
-4o
N
t
s
t
•
i
J-
12,3 129 /35
FRAN C ES
A
120 /Z C 134 i ?
0
lxk
l'� y
co
e
l r
SUPPLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS
IMPORTANT
Three sets of clear, fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11"X17", OR one
dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"X17" format.
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
ZONE DISTRICT:
LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET)
EXISTING FAR. -
ALLOWABLE FAR:
PROPOSED FAR:
EXISTING NET LEASABLE (Commercial):
PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (Commercial)
EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE:
PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE:
EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE:
PROPOSED % OF OPEN SPACE.
EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT:
PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION:
EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:
PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS:
EXISTING ON -SITE PARKING SPACES:
ON -SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED:
SETBACKS:
EXISTING:
JAKE VICKERY
100 SOUTH SPRING STREET # 3. ASPEN CO
10.500 SF
1.680 SF HOUSE + 364 SF SHEDS + 228 SFGARAGE
4,170 SF
4670SF
N/A
21.6% (2.272 SF)
37.5% (3.937.5)
78.4%
62.5%
25 FEET MIDPOINT
25 FEET MIDPOINT
36% (877.5 SF)
ALLOWABLE:
PROPOSED:
Front: 20.3 `
Front: 10' Front:
11�5Y
Rear: 27'
Rear: 10' Rear:
15'
Side: 31765'
Side: 15'l36' Side:
5'l 2.SI
Combined Frt/Rr: 47.3'
Combined Frt/Rr: 309 Combined Frt/Rr: 30'
EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/
GARAGE IN FRONT AND SIDE SETBACKS
SHEDS IN REAR
ENCROACHMENTS:
SETBACKS
VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for Landmarks only character compatibility
finding must be made by
HPQ
FAR: 500 SF INCREASE
Minimum Distance Between Buildings:
SETBACKS: Front:
Parking Spaces:
5
Rear: TO 5'
Open Space (Commercial):
N/A
Side: TO 2.5'
Height (Cottage Infill Only):
N/A
Combined Frt/Rr: TO 10'
Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only):
10%
0
Sheetl
•
123 WEST FRANCIS
1123DATA3.XLS
SITE WORKSHEET
516/95
LOT'A'
LOT'B'
IEXISITNG
SITE AREA
4,500
6,000
4500+6000
10,500
I
FAR
Underlying Allowable
2,820
3,240
6,060
4,170.
Assigned/Aportioned
1,450
2,720
4,170
HPC Bonus
500
0
500
5001.
ADU Bonus (P&Z)
350
350
3501.
Total
1,950
3,070
6,910
1 5,0201
COVERAGE
Underlying allowable
2,250
2,400
4,650
2,887.6.
Assigned/Aportioned
1,4501
1437.5
2,887.5
HPC Bonus
5251
1,050
525
ADU Bonus
1
525
525
Total 1
1,9751
1962.5
5,7001
3,937.5
Page 1
0
u
APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
OF SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT - SUPPLEMENT
123 WEST FRANCIS
(attachment #, Item #)
(2-1) see attached Owner's Authorization Letter
(2-2) see attached Legal Description
(2-3) see attached Disclosure of Ownership
(2-4) see attached Vicinity Map
(2-5) Compliance with relevant Review Standards:
Please see Application Summary for additional information.
Phase 1 of this proposal relocates the existing house and back shed on
site. It removes incompatible additions, particularly on the south east
corner and places the historical structure on a competent foundation
(basement). It cleans up areas of the structure that are deteriorated and
restores important elements of the house to improve its integrity and
contribution to the streetscape. It preserves existing trees as much as
possible. The front garage would be demolished because it is structurally
unsound. The small shed would be preserved as a play house/gardeners
shed. The existing large shed would be relocated and used as a one car
garage. The presence of the sheds and alley elements of this proposal
as well as the desire to use the yard area for people instead of cars
requires the requested reduction in required parking spaces.
Phase 2 of this proposal adds a compatible second detached single
family residence to the property. Because it is separated, the placement
of the additional square footage on site impacts the historical structure
the least and affords more flexibility for the design of the new structure.
Phase 3 of this proposal demolishes the rear portion of the historic
structure to add a secondary tallish element with additional space needed
to bring the historical cottage up to current livability standards. The new
addition would be of current technology but derivative and subordinate in
style, design, and treatment. The tallish element preserves useable open
space valid addition giving the cottage current relevance. The proposed
ADU's would add on -site housing for two to four local residents.
Specific Replies:
(4A) The roof forms and general massing are similar to the historical
resource in shape and proportion but smaller in scale. Detailing
will be related but thinner and lighter and will be clearly
distinguishable from the old. It is compatible in character to the
historic resource.
(413) The neighborhood is predominantly renovated Victorians and a
few Neo-Victorians,. There is a non -historic two story chalet style
structure directly to the East. The proposed development is
extremely compatible and sensitive to the neighborhood.
The placement of the new Phase 2 square footage in a separate
structure and the new Phase 3 square footage in a hyphenated a
"secondary" massing is consistent with HPC directives. It
achieves a high level of compatibility with multiple structures
occupying other similar historical parcels.
(4C) The proposed additions are to the rear and side of the existing
resource. In addition, its placement preserves and utilizes the
existing front yard alignment created by house on the West and
preserves side yard and side yard trees. Preservation of the
structure intact is far preferable to adding on or corrupting the
historical resource by adding to and adding a massive upper level.
In this manner, the cultural value is maintained.
(41D) The architectural integrity of the existing structure is kept intact
with the additions clearly separated and their own architectural
elements. The Phase 3 demolition is interior to the property and
has minimal effect on the alleyscale or streetscape. It is the least
impactive demolition alternative and maintains in tact the primary
facade.
(3A-1) see attached survey and site plan
(3A-2) Materials will be similar to existing but lighter and smaller proportion.
(3A-3) see statements above - paragraphs 5 A through D
(3A-4) This project falls into Category C: erection of a structure greater then 250
gsf.
0
•
123 WEST FRANCIS
5-8-95
EXTERIOR MATERIALS SPECIFICATION
Existina
New
Exposed Foundation
concrete
stone veneer
Sill Skirt
existing (1x10)
1 x 10 cedar
Watertable
existing (20)
1-1/2" x 2-1/2" beveled
Typical Horizontal siding
existing
cedar ahvg
(1/2"x 5-1/2"
1/2"x7-1/2"
4" exposure)
6" exposure
Typical Vertical Siding
n/a
cedar ahvg 1 x6 T&G
Vertical
Wainscoting
n/a
2-1/4" cedar beadboard
Typical corner trim
existing (1 "x4")
1 x4
Typical window and door trim
existing (1 "x4")
standard brickmold
Rake Board
existing (1 "x 10")
1 x6
Typical Fascia
1 x6
1 x5
Secondary Fascia
n/a
10 flat
Soffit
1 x
3/8" ply - cedar beadboard
Exterior doors
existing
Pella Wood - full light
Typical Roofing
asphalt shingles
cedar shingles
Secondary roofing
n/a
metal standing seam - 12"
Window - single
existing wood
Pella Wood Architect Series
Windows - Array
n/a
Pella Wood Architect Series
COMPLIANCE WITH NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER GUIDELINES
123 WEST FRANCIS
May 8, 1995
Information submitted elsewhere in this application is integral with this application,
particularly the section on HPC Conceptual Review. Please refer to those sections for
additional information.
Below please find supplemental specific replies to items enumerated on the application.
5. Applicant's Description: The neighborhood is mostly upscaled (literally!)
renovated Victorians and a few Neo-Victorians. The structure directly East is a
2 story triangular chalet style structure probably of 50's vintage. It is a classic
West Wend Neighborhood and is located on the pedestrian route to the Music
Tent. The facade line is approximately 15 feet back on the side of the street this
development is located. There is a mixture of scale in the neighborhood.
6. Compliance:
The proposed development meets all of the goals (A through D) of the
Neighborhood Character Guidelines. Because of its high level of compliance
with the neighborhood character guidelines, this development warrants approval
at maximum FARsf.
Please refer to attached checklist. Guidelines are complied with unless
otherwise noted.
Please see attached drawings and photographs
0
GUIDELINES CHECKLIST
General Guidelines for all core neighborhood
Mass and scale
1. Human scale
2. Similar scale as neighborhood
a. setback large masses
b. divide into modules, use hyphens or connectors if necessary
c. step down in height and scale towards smaller adjacent structures
d. locate floor area in secondary structures
e. human scale windows and doors
3. Street elevation scale as traditional
4. Entries scaled as traditional, no grand entries
Building Form
5. Roof form visual continuity
a. compound and varied rectangular forms
b. gable roofs, overhangs
c. simple character with appurtenances, dormers, bays, wings, recesses
(d) no large or long uninterrupted wall surfaces
(f) solid to void ratio as traditional
Site Design
6. Entry oriented toward street
a. primary facade pedestrian scale and visual interest
b. respect setback and alignment patterns
d. yards and entries at street level
e. reflect grid if applicable
(f) semi -transparent fences, low walls, walks, hedges, screening/buffer
(g) front yard as neighborhood
7. a. Entry at Traditional level
b. avoid sunken terraces
8. Maintain solar access
Building Materials
9. a. human scale materials
b. native materials
c. durable materials
d. variety in trim, native preferred
e. shingles and standing seam metai roof
•
0
Architectural Features
10. Pedestrian friendly Features
a. window and doors and details inviting
b. creativity and personal
c. distinguish old and new if appropriate
d. trim as traditional scale
e. primary entrance clearly defined.
(f) variety and playful appurtenances
(g) porches
(h) variety of window and door designs
11. Minimize solar collectors and skylights
b. away from street
c. flush with roof
Garages
12. minimize impact of garage
a. detached preferred
b. locate to rear first or side second avoid front
c. small size door, blind doors
d. garage facing front<50%. single preferred
e. slope driveway towards garage (no)
f. minimize wall area used for garage doors
Driveways
13 minimize visual impact
a. rear or side, no front circular drives
b. no pull in front setback parking
c. minimize hard surfaces
d. porous, decorative drive materials different from street
Service areas
14. a. locate service areas to rear
b. screen with fences or planting
Impact on Historical
15. preserve
a. minimize impacts
b. see historic guidelines, contemporary interpretations
16. minimize impact on adjacent historical structures
a. designated properties
b. step new larger buildings
c. edges of historical areas
•
APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE - 2 ADU's
123 WEST FRANCIS
May 8, 1995
(Attachment #, Item #)
(2-1) see attached Owner's Authorization Letter
(2-2) see attached Legal Description
(2-3) see attached Disclosure of Ownership
(2-4) see attached Vicinity Map
(2-5) Compliance with relevant Review Standards:
This proposal is to add 2 ADUs: one bedroom required unit in the new
single family cottage (B) and one voluntary two bedroom unit in the Existing
Cottage.
The existing cottage structure is an historical resource. The proposed
addition will accommodate 2 employees or an employee family. The new
addition is placed above and to the rear of the existing non -historic addition
to minimize impact on the historical resource and the site. Please refer to
other sections of this application for more detail regarding the proposed
development. is
Please see Items 4A through 4F below for a more detailed explanation of
conformance to specific standards.
The proposed work is under review by the Historical Preservation Commission and
additional information is available in the related Combined HPC Landmark
Designation and Conceptual Review Application.
(4-A) The Aspen Land use code permits a duplex or 2 single family houses on
Lots of 6,000 square feet if the property is a Designated Historical
Landmark. This property is 10,500 sf and can accommodate the proposed
development without significant impact to neighbors. It provides smaller
scale structures in units of ownership more accessible to local resident
families.
• 0
(4-113) The ADU's provide an accessory residential use in the R6 Zone and mix in
a variety of housing types in the neighborhood. They are compatible with
other residential uses in immediate vicinity. The massing of the addition
units into separate and distinct forms located on to the rear and side of the
property is similar to the multiple structures occupying some of the near -by
properties.
(4-C) The proposed location below grade maintains open space and minimizes
the mass above grade. Light and air are provides by generous light wells.
(4-D) Services will be an extension of the services already in place and are
adequate.
(4-E) This proposal will not generate any new employees and provides on -site
housing for two to four resident employees.
(4-F) This proposal conforms to the Aspen Area Comprehensive Plan and other
requirements of the Code.
• 0
APPLICATION FOR GMQS EXEMPTION
SPECIFIC SUBMITTAL
123 WEST FRANCIS
May 8, 1995
GMQS EXEMPTION
Request is hereby made for a GMQS Exemption by Director pursuant to Section 8-104-A-1-b-3
of the Code. The proposed development complies with this standard in providing only one new
unit of density on an historically landmarked property.
(6-1) Description
This request for exemption would allow the existing historical residence to remain in its current
location on the site, with its primary street facades unaltered. This proposal does relocate an
out building to a different location on the property allowing it to also be preserved in tact. New
floor area has been added to the interior of the property in such a way as to minimize impacts
on the integrity of the historical structures. New square footage has been placed subgrade to
minimize any impact on the historical structures. The resultant configuration allows for only 4
additional parking spaces on site without detracting from the historical resource. Please refer to
other sections of this application for additional detail on the proposed development.
(6-2)
Complete set of architectural preliminary drawings are attached.
(6-3)
Contained herein are applications for Landmark Designation and HPC Conceptual Review.
(6-4)
Copies of recorded documents which affects development: None.
,-:,4 15'
fl
L_ f o
ASPEN O
INSTI IUT E
1
GI�LESP,�
NonTA
�, C
_ SMUGGLER
.Sale 2
C__-J L. J C
••••••••••••••. IIALL AM
43--
_
-:1 C_J Cs
RIMN ��
C C
_110 IIUPKINS
'9 {
O9
9 �
2 ? �
MALLAM l",9
LAKE
110
C�C
C.J C-7 C
CCQ
1/4 MILE
mj.�p ww INNa5k.
t,ocAjrw1Vtc4jv(Tv M#vo
D /
4 _ QE�
r
r
�r
9 O
rO
LONE PINE o
GISSON
c
r UKlAl1OMA FLAT
LJ PARKING
KING
11, UTr
IT
Iw
American Land Tide Association Commitment - Modified 3178
COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE ISSUED BY
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, A Texas Corporation, herein called the Company, for
valuable consideration, hereby commits to issue its policy or policies of title insurance, as identified in
Schedule A, in favor of the proposed Insured named in Schedule A, as owner or mortgagee of the estate
or interest covered hereby in the land described or referred to in Schedule A, upon payment of the
premiums and charges therefor; all subject to the provisions of Schedules A and B and to the Conditions
and Stipulations hereof.
This Commitment shall be effective only when the identity of the proposed Insured and the amount of
the policy or policies committed for have been inserted in Schedule A hereof by the Company, either
at the time of the issuance of this Commitment or by subsequent endorsement.
This Commitment is preliminary to the issuance of such policy or policies of title insurance and all
liability and obligations hereunder shall cease and terminate six months after the effective date hereof
or when the policy or policies committed for shall issue, whichever first occurs, provided that the
failure to issue such policy or policies is not the fault of the Company.
Signed under seal for the Company, but this Commitment shall not be valid or binding until it bears an
authorized Countersignature.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Stewart Title Guaranty Company has caused its corporate name and seal to
be hereunto affixed by its duly authorized officers on the date shown in Schedule A.
STEWART TITLE
GUARANTY COMPANY
%kb ,,%t`E
Chairmen of the Boa W`4'�a °�4 President
1908 .o•'
* .s. ,►
Countersigned:
Authors ersigna
STEWART TrrLE OF ASPEN, INC.
Agent ID #06011A
Order No. 00021768-C2
•
00021768-C2
t: April .20, 1995 at 8:00
_or Policies to be issued:
T.A. Owner's (standard)
ed Insured.
r ;JACJC H. VICRERY
,(b)A.L.T.A. Mortgagee's (standard)
Proposed Insured:
(c) Leasehold
Proposed Insured:
3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commitment and covered herein is
fee simple
4. Tule to the fee estate or interest in said land. is at the effective date hereof vested in:
HAROLD QUAM AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/2 INTEREST, VERONICA M. MARTIN AS TO AN
UNDIVIDED 1/6TH INTEREST, CARROLL QUAM AS To AN UNDIVIDED 1/6TH INTEREST AND
LORRIE CRUMLEY AS TO AN UNDIVIDED 1/6TH INTEREST
S. The land referred to in this Commitment is described as follows:
The East one-half of Lot B, and all of Lots C, D, and E.
Block 56,
City and Townsite of Aspen
County of pitkin, State of Colorado
STATEMENT OF CHARGES
These charges are due and payable before a
Policy can be issued.
Owners premium
Tax Certificate
"7FWART TI OF ASPEN, INC.
Authorized Countersignature
$ 2,207.00
$ 10.00
UPDATED: 04/13/95 10:1 •
C: WWWOMCONIRACTIVICKERY.DOC
THIS ADDENDUM HAS NEITHER BEEN PREPARED NOR APPROVED BY THE COLORADO REAL
ESTATE COMMISSION. IT MUST BE REVIEWED BY LEGAL COUNSEL OF YOUR CHOICE.
calendar days from the date this instrument becomes at contract or the date specified herein,
the seller may, at seller's option, declare this contract null and void.
10. ENTIRE AGREEMENT - Buyer hereby agrees by way of Buyer's signature hereunder that Buyer
is relying solely and exclusively on the statements, conditions and warranties set forth in the
Contract and this Addendum. Buyer hereby agrees that Buyer is not relying on any oral
agreement or written representation not contained in the Contract or this Addendum, including,
but not limited to, statements or representations made by agents, advertisements or brochures.
11. FUNDS AT CLOSING - On the Closing Date, the cash to close and any other funds required
shall be delivered by the Buyer either in cash or an electronic transfer funds and no other form
of delivery of such monies shall be acceptable unless they represent immediately available
funds.
FURTHER ASSURANCES - Each of the parties agree to execute, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record, or cause to be executed, acknowledged, delivered, filed and recorded, such further
instruments and documents, and such certificates, and to do all things and acts as the other
party may reasonably require in order to carry out the intentions of this Contract and the
transaction contemplated hereby.
12. INSPECTION - Seller has negotiated and contracted to sell the subject property in its present
condition. Buyer acknowledges that Seller is conveying all improvements on the property in
their current condition "as -is" without warranty either express or implied. It is incumbent upon
Buyer to inspect all aspects and intended uses of the subject property, including but not limited
to HPC Designation, to Buyer's satisfaction during the inspection period. Buyer may inspect all
aspects of the subject property pursuant to the terms and remedies of the Inspection Paragraph.
13. INTERPRETATIONS - No provision of this Contract shall be construed against or interpreted to
the disadvantage of any parry by reason of such party having or being deemed to have
requested, drafted, required, or structured such provision.
14. LAND DEVELOPMENT FEES - Pursuant to the Inspection paragraph, it shall be incumbent
upon Buyer to investigate any and all fees related to the development of the subject property.
15. LAND USE APPLICATIONS - Seller hereby permits and authorizes Buyer to submit during the
Inspection and Closing period any and all land use applications for proposed development of
the property so long as such applications and approvals are contingent upon Buyer or his
assigns closing on the property. Costs related to such applications shall be the sole
responsibility of the Buyer. Seller makes no representations or warranties as to land use or
development potential of the property and this contract is specifically not contingent upon
approval of any of such applications. In the event that Buyer receives any such land use
approvals, zoning changes or the like and does not close this contract pursuant to its terms,
Buyer agrees that all such approvals shall be the property of Seller, including but not limited to
any renderings, conceptual drawings, designs and architectural proprietary work product used
or filed in any approvals or pending land use applications with the City of Aspen.
16. LEGAL COUNSEL - This is a legal instrument and Joshua & Co. of Aspen, Inc. recommends that
you seek legal, tax and individual counsel before signing this agreement.
17. LICENSED AGENT - Buyer states that Jack H. Vickery is a licensed Real Estate Broker in the
State of Colorado acting on his own behalf and shall receive a credit towards the sales price
equal to a co-op fee of 2.5% of the Purchase Price.
18. NATURALLY OCCURRING ELEMENTS - Radon has been known to exist within the State of
Colorado and Aspen. Buyer may investigate such pursuant to the Inspection Paragraph.
19. PURCHASE PRICE ADJUSTMENT - The purchase price shall be reduced by $4800 per month
for a closing that occurs earlier than the closing date indicated herein, but at no time shall the
purchase price amount be less than $915,000.
20. RENTAL RATES & INCOME - The Buyer represents that Buyer is not relying on Seller's or
Seller's agent's representations of past, present or future rental income in Buyer's decision to
purchase the subject property.
,c yA51 page 2
�_ �Z� fir/
11
May 8, 1995
City Council
City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
GRANT AND PARK DEDICATION FEE REQUEST
Dear Sirs:
We hereby request award of the $ 2,000 grant for having the property at 123 West
Francis, Aspen, designated as an Historical Landmark.
We further request that any Park Dedication fees be waived.
Sincerely,
Jake Vickery, Applicant I
100 South Spring Street #3
Aspen, Colorado 81611
I'•10'
0 10 30
94.40
LEGEND AND NOTES
N F
IEARNNw OAM ON MM CITY /MMMOM AN fMOw N 7f'Of•11.0
'+. Pa•
O
'♦
FOIN MYIY MpYMf At OEODIO®
CCC IOT N .
a .STRFI-1•i
SURVEY CONTM
IIT� Y MR
woe OR METAL
TITLE IMFOIOMnOM NMI111® IT,
\ n�W •
97.
1TEOAET TITLE ON ASPEN, INC.
ORDER
\
DATED. 3/20MIIH
` \
Ref a meaux INTO ALLEY
• _ CITY Molkeew M.
t7.7•
\ COf ELOCA w
M"IZMTAL CONTOft
w. i� `
07.
07.
/
Lr
/
97.9
; GARAGE
/
ON .a
q.t
e
NOOSE
y
/
/
yAIMM
N.
IDENTIFICATION
THEISOEH IOlD STATES THA R E' OH ' MEHEI W
FIELD fYRVEYEO DUI)IEV DEN L4 NHS Ale It NOMINATE
IMw tM TIE FIELD EVIDENCE M aIORN AND "t THERE AN NO
DItCKE►As EECOND
/
/
97. f
'
on aF SOODMY LI(I, C[pp�DLL ICTf EMCKOAO/BTTf,
EMBENTS " NIOHi{ of SAY IM FIELD UTIwAa 40 t110O1 TO ME
,*
N.f /
/
,a
ASIRIS
VTNILpI TI Eta 10
M.No
• /
F
6Aw9EVOEe
AP�9T clos6 T
9I VET" ARE EOF TIED. THIS SURVEY IS VOID UNLM W Ff/AM
tI IN THE a& as THE SURVEY" "L".
wT®L
9o.1
/
97.
pa,
.. ..97.*�
1N0/O1111 .L. W
/ N.f
w.
va.t
w
/ SINE __ _
N•7I
/
ASPENq
ONwII 11�AY D� IT NN t00R_OF THE
COUNTY f1ENR'S LAVE /U"' DADA A'.A /al OF FAP tiRVEYt Al ���
Al REC£►T104 MJ-a=S �__ THIS LAID s:•'^' FLAT
c_ VITM f_:T1ON N-lI-.O1 tOLOMW VIM ITATIEU.
SECTION 13. TOWNMI► 10 SOUTH, MMOE 61 RENT OF THE fob I.M.
IMPROVEMENT SURVEY
OF
THE
LAST ONE- F OF LOT 1. AND ALL OF LOTS C 0 A10 E, SLACK w,
CITY AND TOOL I TE OF ASPEN. ► I TS I N COUNTY
COLONA00.
CONTAINING 10.100 w. FT. -/-
NBAM fT
ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS, INC.
ale Sams "IaM /net
ASPEN. COARW 61611
PHOr. FAM 43031 Sri-atlf
DATE in
„w a5M
y
PUBLIC NOTICE
RE: 123 WEST FRANCIS CONDITIONAL USE REVIEW FOR ACCESSORY DWELLING
UNITS, LANDMARK DESIGNATION AND AMENDMENTS TO THE TEXT OF THE CITY
OF ASPEN LAND USE CODE REGULATIONS, CHAPTER 24 OF THE ASPEN
MUNICIPAL CODE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on
Tuesday, June 20, 1995 at a meeting to begin at 4:30 p.m. before
the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, 2nd Floor Meeting Room,
City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application
submitted by Jake Vickery, requesting Conditional Use approval for
two accessory dwelling units - a one bedroom unit in the proposed
new single family residence and a two bedroom unit in the existing
residence. The owner also requests Landmark Designation of the
site and amendments to the following sections of the Land Use Code:
Section 5-201, R-6 (Medium Density Residential) zone district;
Section 9-106, Non -conforming lots of record; and Article 8, Aspen
Area Growth Management Quota System (GMQS), to allow a lot split
on a historic landmark, which would create one conforming lot and
one non -conforming lot. The property is located at 123 West
Francis; Ez of Lot B, and all of Lots C, D and E, Block 56, City
and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Mary
Lackner or Amy Amidon at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development
Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO 920-5090
s/Bruce Kerr, Chairman
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
Published in the Aspen Times on June 3, 1995
City of Aspen Account
V c,� 3
0
ASPEN/PITKIN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Engineer
Housing Director
Aspen Water
Environmental Health
Electric
*Parks I
Zoning Officer
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Aspen Fire Protection District
FROM: MARY LACKNER, Planner
RE: VICKERY CONDITIONAL USE FOR ADU
Parcel ID No. 2735-124-21-002
DATE: JUNE 6, 1995
Attached for your review and comments is an application submitted by JAKE VICKERY
Please return your comments to me no later than JUNE 12, 1991
Thank you.
•
•
4---&77Aer rp F::l.
123 WEST FRANCIS
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
MAY 8, 1995
!
UO-"'Et�2- F
C l C,y u T",� p f:�_ PZ
u
I
123 WEST FRANCIS
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
MAY 8, 1995
W 1?J-r
,4r► vNy
f9d
- - JAKE VICKERY ARCMMCS
MAY 8, 1995
If
•
�IS t Ort�
bH I I I
I I
I�
•
My
IF
LUI
I
f
I I I
-I I i I I I I
�
------- I — —I---' t
---� — I I I
I I
--
I
Ill
4 rr�-- RAN
123 WEST FRANCIS
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
MAY 8, 1995
--- 123 WEST FRANCIS
- JAKE VICKERYARCHrrECTS Z
_ -_T$ -
I � �
i
I
i
i2:!2 vv�-r
0A,
JA" vlla-e,
/t1.
I
I
123 WEST FRANCIS
JAKE VICKERY ARCHITECTS
MAY 8, 1995