HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.20070306
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06. 2007
COMMENTS ............................................................................................................ 2
DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST............................................. 2
MINUTES .................................................................................................................2
COOPER STREET PIER REDEVELOPMENT ...................................................... 2
SMUGGLER RACQUET CLUB CONCEPTUAL PUD ........................................2
ISIS THEATRE GROWTH MANAGEMENT........................................................ 7
I
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06. 2007
Ruth Kruger opened the regular meeting of the Aspen Planning Commission in
Sister Cities Meeting Room at 4:30pm. Dylan Johns was excused from the first
and third items on the agenda; Brian Speck was excused. LJ Erspamer, David
Guthrie, Elizabeth Atkins, Steve Skadron, John Rowland and Ruth Kruger were
present. Staff in attendance: Jim True, Special Counsel; Joyce Allgaier and Jessica
Garrow, Community Development; Jackie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk.
COMMENTS
Ruth Kruger welcomed the new members and Jim True as Special Counsel.
DECLARATIONS OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
Dylan Johns was conflicted on Smuggler Racquet Club and Cooper Street Pier
Redevelopment.
MINUTES
MOTION: Liz Atkins moved to approve the minutes from February 6th and 20th;
seconded by Steve Skadron. APPROVED. David Guthrie and LJ Erspamer abstained.
Public Hearing:
COOPER STREET PIER REDEVELOPMENT
Ruth Kruger opened the public hearing for Cooper Street.
MOTION: David Guthrie moved to continue the hearing to April 3rd; Liz Atkins
seconded. All infavor, APPROVED.
Continued Public Hearing:
SMUGGLER RACQUET CLUB CONCEPTUAL PUD
Ruth Kruger opened the public hearing for the Smuggler Racquet Club Conceptual
PUD. Jessica Garrow said the applicant was Aspen Land Fund II, LLC
represented by John Sarpa, Sunny Vann and Kim Weil. John Moore of the
Smuggler Racquet Club was also present.
Garrow stated this was a detailed proposal and a complicated site; there was a site
visit earlier. Garrow said that there was county zoning ofR15 on this property; it
was annexed into the city in the 1950s with the Hughes addition but never rezoned
to city zoning. There were approximately 4.6 acres, including the cabin near Park
Circle and the Racquet Club off of Matchless Drive; the applicant submitted the
proposal in July 2006 proposing subdivision to develop affordable housing
mitigation for the Lodge at Aspen Mountain on the top part of the parcel and
redevelop the Racquet Club in the existing location. The applicant proposed to
2
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06. 2007
dedicate the cabin historic, which would be final at Council; the minutes from the
HPC Meeting were attached.
Garrow said the broader picture of this site was subdivision of the parcel into 3
lots; rezoning of Lot 1 to AH PUD, Rural Residential for the Racquet Club and
Historic Preservation for the cabin. A conditional use approval will be needed to
accommodate some of the uses on the racquet club site. There will be a Growth
Management Review for the Affordable housing and the Racquet Club site to
determine the employee generation. A Special Review will be need for parking on
both sites; Residential Design Standard Review for the Affordable Housing;
Commercial Design Review for the Club redevelopment and an administrative
determination to allow for the affordable housing unit on the racquet club parcel.
Garrow utilized a map (exhibit B) to delineate the lots with different colors. There
were 32 affordable housing units; 16 one bedroom units, 8 two bedrooms and 8
three bedroom units. There were 15 foot setbacks near building A, 10 foot
setbacks near building C and side setbacks of 5 feet. Garrow said there were 35
parking spaces proposed for the affordable housing units with 1 space assigned to
each unit; special review was needed for parking because it was located outside the
Aspen Infill area so that the requirement was 56 spaces. Garrow said that staff felt
that the design could do a better job relating to the cabin through the use of
inflection and materials that differentiate the new development from the historic
resource; staff would like to see the site opened up. Staff also wanted to see the
circulation simplified to buildings A and C.
Garrow said that Lot 2 (Racquet Club) was 2.97 acres including 2 indoor racquet
courts, club facilities, an affordable housing unit for the manager and 5 outdoor
courts. The setbacks include 20 feet along the West portion; there was a notch (20'
by 50') owned by someone else (according to John Moore the racquet club will
purchase this piece); along Lot 1 there was a 25 foot setback. Garrow said that
there were 38 proposed parking spaces on Lot 2; 2 for the affordable housing unit
and the rest for the club. Garrow said staff would like the building broken up
more. Staff recommended approval of the conceptual.
Ruth Kruger asked how we got from the first application design. Garrow replied
that was part of the first conversations staff had with the applicant dealing with the
way that the housing addressed the street, staff wanted a more pedestrian friendly
design. Staffwill address the sidewalk and an additional bus stop.
Sunny Vann said the problem arises from the residential design standards; when
this project was originally designed there was approval in the county for the type
of units in the first plan; the property does not abut the street and was not on a high
3
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06, 2007
pedestrian comer and the primary views were toward Aspen Mountain. Vann said
that staff asked to meet with the applicant regarding the first design and the new
design included the majority of units that abut the street. Vann said the historic
preservation officer wanted the cabin preserved.
John Sarpa introduced John Moore, Kim Weil and Sunny Vann. Sarpa said they
evolved to the current plan for staff support. Sarpa said that ALF approached John
Moore to purchase part ofthe land for the Lodge at Aspen Mountain housing
mitigation. Sarpa noted they were in a partnership with Smuggler Racquet Club.
Sarpa said that this was an extension of Smuggler Mine and the cabin drives a lot;
HPC review was first and designated that the cabin historic.
Sarpa said there was an old mine shaft located on the site; they hired HP Geotech
and will stay away from the shaft with buildings. Weil said that HP recommended
50 feet away with all but one building. Vann stated that it was not an open mine
but there were boulders pushed into it with top soil on the top during the superfund
reclamation; they were told that they could drive over it. Sarpa noted they also
have hired Tom Dunlop who was knowledgeable about the site.
John Moore said the courts building was sunk down 10 feet to comply with the
height requirements. Bill Lipsey, architect, said with the 2 indoor tennis courts the
building starts out at 120 feet by 120 feet with the clubhouse and affordable unit it
came out with a simple gable structure to accommodate the uses. Lipsey said the 1
story structures were subordinate to the big structure; one side had the clubhouse
and the other an affordable housing unit.
Weil stated with the influences of the cabin and the mine there were no places to
have any more street presence for the affordable housing; there was simple design
for the buildings. Weil said there were balconies, porches and the common
element of the rusty metal roofs like the tennis building. Weil said the cabin would
stand on its own and the architecture of the affordable units would be their own
architecture.
John Rowland said that he like the playfulness of the balconies. Weil replied that
the balconies move at different elevations.
Liz Atkins asked why staff wanted the street presence on the uphill side when the
view was that way. Garrow replied that staff was taking a long term view of
development in this area of town and the entrances were still off of the parking
area; there was a street presence.
4
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06. 2007
David Guthrie asked if the slope reduction was based upon the old topo or the new
topo. Sarpa said they were using the most current survey information and they
have reviewed it with staff. Weil said that there was a field topo from Sopris
Engineering in the packet. Vann said there was far more land area to
accommodate the density than was needed. Guthrie voiced concern for the
placement of the new bus stop and the decision would be at final. Guthrie said
there was parking heading in on Matchless. Weil responded there was a grade
change and a bit of a berm. Vann said there was a landscaping plan and at final
there would be a comprehensive landscape plan submitted and reviewed with
parks. Guthrie said that parking was a huge concern in this area. Atkins said that
she had issues with parking.
Steve Skadron asked why so much was happening at final in this case. Garrow
replied part of it was the unique circumstances of the lot without zoning; the
proposed zoning requires conditional uses. Skadron voiced concern for the bus
stop also. Skadron asked the applicant's responsibility with the racquet club was.
Sarpa replied that they approached the Smuggler Racquet Club to purchase part of
the parcel for the mitigation for the Lodge at Aspen Mountain. Skadron asked who
the Smuggler Racquet Club was. Moore replied it was 105 members with an
equity club that you buy into with annual dues; it was a non-profit 50lC7. Moore
said it was laid back and the membership was limited; there were some social
functions, brunches and pot luck dinners. Skadron asked how busy the club was.
Moore said that the nets would be up in May and weather permitting people would
book the courts. Skadron asked why this application came in as one rather than
two separate applications. Garrow replied that it was one parcel. Vann said that
they originally thought that it was in the county; council likes to see the big picture
to see how everything works together and not parts of the puzzle. Vann said the
projects were sufficiently interrelated that it made sense to process as one
application.
John Rowland asked for a summary of the HPC process. Garrow responded that
the historic maps were reviewed by the historic preservation officer who
determined the materials used on the cabin were historic as part of the old
Smuggler mine used as an assayers office. Sarpa said the cabin has to be
disassembled, a foundation built and reassembled; HPC said that it had to go back
in the place exactly where the cabin sits now.
Liz Atkins asked if the outdoor tennis courts had lights and if they anticipated
using the indoor courts at night. Moore replied there were no lights for the outdoor
courts and do not anticipate any lights; conceivably the indoor courts will be used
at night, they can put a limit on but he did not think there would be any activity
after 10pm.
5
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06, 2007
LJ Erspamer asked if this was a 100% affordable housing project. Vann and Sarpa
replied 100% with no free market component on this site. Erspamer agreed that
this was a pedestrian area; he asked who would be involved in placing sidewalks.
Vann replied that they would cooperate with staff and engineering on sidewalks,
street lights and a RFT A bus stop. Erspamer asked where the snow storage would
be located. Vann replied that the final PUD would have designated snow storage
areas. Erspamer asked if they were aware of the traffic count on the Spruce and
Park comer. Vann said that Park Circle was adequate to carry the number of cars
and engineering did not require anything from this applicant. Erspamer asked
where they will park because 50% of the parking on Race Street was taken away.
Liz Atkins asked why they needed 38 parking spaces for 7 tennis courts. Moore
answered they have 8 or 9 functions a year and a tournament in the summer; they
will use those parking spaces.
Ruth Kruger asked what the categories were and if the affordable housing units
were for sale or rental units. Vann replied they were all for sale units and the exact
categories would be in accordance with APCHA prior to final approval. Kruger
asked how many spaces would be eliminated on Park Circle. Vann responded
none would be taken away as part of this project.
Public Comments:
Vince Galluccio, public submitted a letter and drawings into the record. Galluccio
asked the commission to look at the plan and said that the cabin could be moved.
John Rowland stated that he was perplexed with the cabin not being moved. This
was a great piece of property for employee housing.
Atkins said that she was concerned about the views; there were great views from
that parcel and the parking should not separate the views.
Kruger stated there were guidelines and regulations.
David Guthrie said that the Park Circle should not be an artery to Smuggler; there
was the whole point of design guidelines that this was part of the community.
Guthrie asked if they need to make findings and objective standards for projects.
Kruger said this was a great location for more affordable housing in town. Kruger
voiced concern for the project being under-parked; she said that parking should be
addressed at conceptual and that parking for this project should be more than 35
6
Aspen Plannin!!: & Zonin!!: Commission Meetin!!: Minutes - March 06. 2007
spaces. The commissioners supported more parking on the site. Skadron was not
as concerned about the parking.
The commission supported requesting HPC take another look at the placement of
the cabin.
MOTION: Elizabeth Atkins moved to continue the hearing for the Smuggler
Racquet Club to April 3rd; seconded by LJ Erspamer. All infavor, APPROVED.
PUBLIC HEARING:
ISIS THEATRE GROWTH MANAGEMENT
Ruth Kruger opened the Isis Theatre Growth Management. Only 3 members could
remain until 7:30pm.
MOTION: Elizabeth Atkins moved to continue the Isis Theatre Growth
Management hearing to Thursday, March 8th at noon is Sister Cities Meeting
Room; seconded by LJ Erspamer. All infavor, APPROVED.
Meeting adjourned at 7:04 p.m.
ckie Lothian, Deputy City Clerk
7