HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.ec.Adams Bonita Dr. 1987A da ms .a-735-IJA-c i -Gs5
Subdi✓l;ioh Excep-fion OSA - F 7
E
C
ASPEN/PITKIN
PLANNING OFFICE
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado Colorado 81611
-
(303) 925-2020
tJ
LAND USE APPLICATION
FEES
City
00113
- 63721
- 47331
GMP/CONCEPTUAL
- 63722
- 47332
GMP/PRELIMINARY
- 63723
- 47333
GMP/FINAL
- 63724
- 47341
SUB/CONCEPTUAL
- 63725
- 47342
SUB/PRELIMINARY
- 63726
- 47343
SUB/FINAL
- 63727
47350
ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS
- 63728
47360
ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
0
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
REFERRAL FEES:
00125
- 63730
47380
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
- 63730
47380
HOUSING
00115
- 63730
-47380
ENGINEERING
y
SUB -TOTAL
County
00113
- 63711
- 47431
GMP/GENERAL
- 63712
47432
GMP/DETAILED
- 63713
47433
GMP/FINAL
- 63714
47441
SUB/GENERAL
- 63715
- 47442
SUB/DETAILED
- 63716
- 47443
SUB/FINAL
- 63717
- 47450
ALL 2-STEP APPLICATIONS
- 63718
- 47460
ALL 1-STEP APPLICATIONS/
CONSENT AGENDA ITEMS
REFERRAL FEES.
00125
- 63730
47480
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
00123
- 63730
47480
HOUSING
00113
- 63731
47480
ENVIRONMENTAL COORD.
00113
- 63732
47480
ENGINEERING
SUB -TOTAL
PLANNING OFFICE SALES
00113
- 63061
- 09000
COUNTY CODE
- 63062
- 09000
COMP. PLAN
- 63066
- 09000
COPY FEES
- 63069
- 09000
OTHER
SUB -TOTAL
TOTAL
Name:TAIi"e �Qh�-+�PS�Pr Phone:
Address: 0'
Project:
S12otD, 0 IZ//A
E)
Check # 103/
Date:
Additional Billing:
# of Hours:
c a
6-22
•
01-2 v--3 a-2 i
S�S�/TZfi-7V�
OI,pjox 6r;nVr44% IZr )dqI
CASELOAD SUt+MI RY SHEET
-Iry • City of Aspen 4l a1736- lo�� " y` 035—
DATE RECEIVED:�-&-Iky CASE NO. 8 /
DATE RECEIVED COMPLETE:___ STAFF: S(�
PRODECT NAME: 17C-QrnS `7Ub 1V(SIoh �XCelmI!Oh
APPL ICANT : —Rob Q1t-� Qli�S
Applicant Address/Phone:
REPRES EN TAT IV E: eA"l �JC�PS7�Pr�
Representative Address/Phone :
Type of Application:
I. GMP/Subdivision/ PUD
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Preliminary Plat
3. Final Plat
II. Subdivision/PUD
i . Conceptual Submission
2. Preliminary Plat
3. Final Plat
III. All "Two Step" Applications
IV. All "One Step" Applications
V. Referral Fees - Environmental
Health, Housing Office
1. Minor Applications
2. Major Applications
Referral Fees. -
Engineering
Minor Applications
Major Applications
20
12
6
14
- -- --
9
6
11
5
2
5
9�-c -z,?30 a
$2,730.00
1,640.00
820 .00
$1190Ei-.00
1,220.00
820 .00
$1, 490 .00
$ 680.00f�SG
$ 50 .00
$ 125.00
80.00
200.00
P&Z CC MEETING DATE:
PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO
DATE REFERRED: <</ NlYrIN IT IALS�.:- V
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
REFEERRALS:
I/ I City Atty
Aspen Consol. S.D. School District
L' City Engineer
Mtn. Bell Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas
Housing Dir.
Parks Dept. State Hwy Dept (Glenwd)
Aspen Water
Holy Cross Electric State Eiwy Dept (Gr. Jtn)
City Electric
Fire Marshall Bldg: Zoning/Inspectn
Envir. Hlth.
Fire Chief Other:
Roaring Fork Transit Roaring Fork Energy Center
---- _______________
FINAL ROUTING:
DATE ROUTED: _ INITIAL:
City Atty V/
City Engineer Building Dept.
Other-
Other:
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION
l V iJ
DISPOSITION: ��ci:�rr ��b;+I�:S,�., �x<<r�T,.:, Or,
Reviewed by: ts�en P&Z City Council)
V C,�y (t.��, ► ecf'Q'`�ti'� Alt, ,�,,��%ti^ati��•,
exception for the purpose of amending the duplex condominiumizat-
ion approval for Lot 23, West Aspen Subdivision allowing the
addition of a bedroom within a 990 square foot expansion subject
to the following conditions:
1. A ;plat shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy meeting the standards of Section 20-15 of the
Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
specifically following the recommendations in the Engineer-
incj Department March 20, 1987 memorandum. Included on the
Plitt shall be a statement noting dedication of the triangu-
lar- parcel to the City with reference to the Book and Page
Number of the deed recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office.
2. The conditions of approval of the Brinkman Subdivision
Exemption, approved December 13, 1976, listed b, c, d, e,
and f shall still apply to this property.jbefb-
On December 13, 1976 City Council approved the Brinkman Subdivi-
sion Exemption for condomiumization of Lot 23, West Aspen
Subdivision subject to the following conditions:
a. There shall be no additional bath or bedrooms con-
structed in either dwelling unit.
b. In the event the existing structure is destroyed, or
replaced, the site shall not be considered available
for construction of two individual residences, but
there shall be permitted only the replacement of a
duplex or construction of one single family structure,
c. The applicant agrees to join any future improvement
districts formed for the purposes of constructing
street improvements (including sidewalk, curb, gutter
or paving) or undergrounding of overhead utility
liners, which include the subject property within the
proposed district,
d. The applicant agrees to reimburse the City for his
proportionate share of the cost of the above improve-
ments should the City elect to construct them without
the formation of a special assessment district,
e. Neither of the dwelling units shall be leased for a
period of six (6) months, except for two (2) short term
rentals, and
f. There shall be imposed a subdivision dedication fee
calculated pursuant to Section 20-18.
The applicant also dedicated a triangular piece of Lot 23 to the
City for park space in lieu of paying a park dedication fee.
-e Lodi-'(
1. Engineering Department: In a March 201 1987 memorandum Jim
Gibbard made the following comments with regard to the sufficien-
cy of the plat:
a. The survey information on the submitted plat
should include a legal description.
b. The site plan should include common areas,
existing utility sources and meter location, and a
disclosure of ownership.
C. The recording information on the submitted plat
should also include a certificate showing approval
by the City Engineer and a certificate showing
approval by the Aspen City Council.
„IDlyLei .cZDili 4
TO: Aspen City Council
THRU: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager
FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office A-PI1,
RE: Adams Subdivision Exception
Case Number 2735-122-09-035 - 05A-87
DATE: April 22, 1987
-----------------------------------------------------------
Summary: The Planning Office recommends approval of the request-
ed subdivision exception subject to two conditions listed below.
Applicant: Robert Adams
Location: Lot 23, West Aspen Subdivision Filing #1, 803 and 805
Bonita Drive, City of Aspen.
Parcel Size: 16,893 square feet.
Maximum Allowed Floor Area (Duplex): 5,034 square feet.
Zoning: R-15
Applicant's Request: The applicant requests to amend the
condominiumization approval to add 990 square feet, including one
bedroom, to one half of the duplex (803 Bonita Drive).
Site Description: The subject site is located along the northern
boundary of the Municipal Golf Course and east of a small park
(with basketball court) within the West Aspen Subdivision
neighborhood. The flat topography and location within a develop-
ed subdivision present no particular construction constraints.
Applicable Sections of the Municipal Code: Section 20-23 of the
Subdivision Regulations states the requirements for condomiumiza-
tion. Amendments to a condomiumization plat are subject to review
by City Council through the subdivision exception procedures of
Section. 20-19.
Prior Council Action: At City Council's meeting of April 13,
1987, action was tabled to this meeting in order to give the
Planning Office and applicant time to seek more information on
the rationale for the "no additional bath or bedroom" condition
placed by Council in 1976.
On December 13, 1976 City Council approved the Brinkman Subdivi-
sion Exemption for condomiumization of Lot 23, West Aspen
Subdivision subject to the following conditions:
a. There shall be no additional bath or bedrooms con-
structed in either dwelling unit.
b. In the event the existing structure is destroyed, or
replaced, the site shall not be considered available
for construction of two individual residences, but
there shall be permitted only the replacement of a
duplex or construction of one single family structure,
C. The applicant agrees to join any future improvement
districts formed for the purposes of constructing
street improvements (including sidewalk, curb, gutter
or paving) or undergrounding of overhead utility
liners, which include the subject property within the
proposed district,
d. The applicant agrees to reimburse the City for his
proportionate share of the cost of the above improve-
ments should the City elect to construct them without
the formation of a special assessment district,
e. Neither of the dwelling units shall be leased for a
period of six (6) months, except for two (2) short term
rentals, and
f. There shall be imposed a subdivision dedication fee
calculated pursuant to Section 20-18.
The applicant also dedicated a triangular piece of Lot 23 to the
City for park space in lieu of paying a park dedication fee.
Problem Discussion:
A. Referral Comments:
1. Engineering Department: In a March 20, 1987 memorandum Jim
Gibbard made the following comments with regard to the sufficien-
cy of the plat:
a. The survey information on the submitted plat
should include a legal description.
b. The site plan should include common areas,
existing utility sources and meter location, and a
disclosure of ownership.
C. The recording information on the submitted plat
should also include a certificate showing approval
by the City Engineer and a certificate showing
approval by the Aspen City Council.
2
0 •
B. Planning Office Comments: At Council's direction, the
Planning Office and applicant further researched the rationale
for City Council's 1976 restriction on adding a bath or bedrooms
to this duplex. The former City Attorney, applicant's attorney,
applicant's wife, former Mayor, and a P&Z member were all
contacted. Minutes and dead files of other condominiumizations
of that period were also investigated to determine if any other
projects had this same condition. No one had a specific recol-
lection of that condition, nor did the files of other cases
reveal any general motivation prompting this. As recalled by the
parties contacted, issues of 1976 included: (1) making residences
in basically long-term residential neighborhoods into lodge or
dormitory type uses; (2) increasing bulk of structures, especial-
ly duplexes, and (3) parking problems resulting from intense use
of residential properties.
It should be noted that the six month minimum lease restriction
was just formulated in 1976 and was imposed on this structure to
address short -terming. The bulk issue has been addressed by
FAR calculations first adopted in 1977. Other structures in the
neighborhood have been built that are equally large or larger.
Finally, parking for this expansion has been determined to be
adequate for the six (6) bedrooms in the duplex structure.
The applicant's representative has argued that the existing two -
bedroom 2010 square foot unit is inadequate in size for the
present owners. Staff is still inclined to believe that making a
two bedroom unit into a larger three bedroom unit is not out of
character with the intensity of use or bulk of structures in the
neighborhood.
All the other conditions of approval for the 1976 Brinkman
condominiumization should still apply. The plating requirements
stated by the Engineering Department should also be met.
Additionally, included on the plat should be a note regarding the
dedication of the triangular parcel to the City.
Staff discussed with Michael Manchester, the project architect,
the situation where this unit would be over twice the size of the
other half of the duplex. A letter from the owner of 805 Bonita
Drive accepting the expansion has been presented.
Recommended Motion: "Move to approve the requested subdivision
exception for the purpose of amending the duplex condominiumizat-
ion approval for Lot 23, West Aspen Subdivision allowing the
addition of a bedroom within a 990 square foot expansion subject
to the following conditions:
1. A plat shall be submitted prior to issuance of a Certificate
of Occupancy meeting the standards of Section 20-15 of the
Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
specifically following the recommendations in the Engineer-
ing Department March 20, 1987 memorandum. Included on the
plat shall be a statement noting dedication of the triangu-
3
lar parcel to the City with reference to the Book and Page
Number of the deed recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office.
2. The conditions of approval of the Brinkman Subdivision
Exemption, approved December 13, 1976, listed b, c, d, e,
and f shall still apply to this property.
City Manager Recommendations:
sb.ad
4
T Michael
.,RrekiiteeV
•
Manchester
February 3, 1987
City of Aspen
Planning Department
Steve Berstein
RE: Amended Subdivision Exception
Lot 23
West Aspen Subdivision
Filing #1
Dear Steve,
FPiPMi o G87
The final design changes for the Robert Adams residence have been
completed and I am ready to proceed with the expidited review for a
Subdivision Exception, to amend the original agreement of December 14,
1976.
As we have discussed, ther are two primary areas of change. First the
Adams' would like to remodel the existing structure to enlarge the
Living Room. This would require a change in the footprint. I have
enclosed a drawing which indicates the magnitude of the change. Since
we have been unable to find a plat of the original footprint on file, it
is my understanding that we would submitting a new drawing to show the
revised building footprint.
Secondly, the Adams' would like to put a new Master Bedroom over the new
Living Room. In the Statement Of Exemption, (enclosed), provision 'A'
says: "there shall be no additional bath or bedrooms constructed in
either dwelling unit,". There is no information in any of the minutes
of City Council or the Planning and Zoning Commission to indicate the
reason for this provision, nor is there any indication as to the number
of bedrooms and baths which were present at the time the original
submission was granted. The building is presently designed to have one
Master Bedroom and two secondary bedrooms, which we feel is appropriate.
I have also enclosed the check for $ 485.00 as you had indicated
earlier. It is my desire to proceed with this process as expeditiously
as is possible, so please do not hesitate to call me if you need any
more information.
Sincerely,
T. Michael Manchester
Architect
0 202 C Ventnor Ave., Aspen, CO 81611 303-920-2302 ■
Cl
0,
April 8, 1987
City of Aspen
Planning Department
City Council
130 S. Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
To Whom It May Concern:
APR 2 31981
I am the Owner of the north half of the duplex on Lot 23, West Aspen
Subdivision, Filing #1.
The architect and the owners have shown me the drawings and the model of
the proposed addition to the north half of the building and I do not
have any concerns with allowing the Adams' to modify the existing
building to better suit their needs.
I think that the addition will be an asset to the entire building.
Sincerely,
Ruth Hanrahan
805 Bonita
Aspen, Colorado 81611
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
THRU: Robert S. Anderson, Jr., City Manager I
FROM: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
RE: Adams Subdivision Exception
Case Number 2735-122-09-035 - 05A-87
DATE: April 8, 1987
-----------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------
Summary: The Planning Office recommends approval of the request-
ed subdivision exception subject to two conditions listed below.
Applicant: Robert Adams
Location: Lot 23, West Aspen Subdivision Filing #1, 803 and 805
Bonita Drive, City of Aspen.
Parcel Size: 16,893 square feet.
Maximum Allowed Floor Area (Duplex): 5,034 square feet.
Zoning: R-15
Applicant's Request: The applicant requests to amend the
condominiumization approval to add 1540 square feet, including
one bedroom, to one half of the duplex (803 Bonita Drive).
Site Description: The subject site is located along the northern
boundary of the Municipal Golf Course and east of a small park
(with basketball court) within the West Aspen Subdivision
neighborhood. The flat topography and location within a develop-
ed subdivision present no particular construction constraints.
Applicable Sections of the Municipal Code: Section 20-23 of the
Subdivision Regulations states the requirements for condomiumiza-
tion. Amendments to a condomiumization plat are subject to review
by City Council through the subdivision exception procedures of
Section 20-19.
Prior Council Action: On December 13, 1976 City Council approved
the Brinkman Subdivision Exemption for condomiumization of Lot
23, West. Aspen Subdivision subject to the following conditions:
a. There shall be no additional bath or bedrooms con-
structed in either dwelling unit.
b. In the event the existing structure is destroyed, or
replaced, the site shall not be considered available
for construction of two individual residences, but
there shall be permitted only the replacement of a
duplex or construction of one single family structure,
c. The applicant agrees to join any future improvement
districts formed for the purposes of constructing
street improvements (including sidewalk, curb, gutter
or paving) or undergrounding of overhead utility
liners, which include the subject property within the
proposed district,
d. The applicant agrees to reimburse the City for his
proportionate share of the cost of the above improve-
ments should the City elect to construct them without
the formation of a special assessment district,
e. Neither of the dwelling units shall be leased for a
period of six (6) months, except for two (2) short term
rentals, and
f. There shall be imposed a subdivision dedication fee
calculated pursuant to Section 20-18.
The applicant also dedicated a triangular piece of Lot 23 to the
City for park space in lieu of paying a park dedication fee.
Problem Discussion:
A. Referral Comments:
1. Engineering Department: In a March 20, 1987 memorandum Jim
Gibbard made the following comments with regard to the sufficien-
cy of the plat:
a. The survey information on the submitted plat
should include a legal description.
b. The site plan should include common areas,
existing utility sources and meter location, and a
disclosure of ownership.
C. The recording information on the submitted plat
should also include a certificate showing approval
by the City Engineer and a certificate showing
approval by the Aspen City Council.
B. Planning Office Comments: Following a check of all available
City records, we find that rationale for City Council's 1976
restriction on adding a bath or bedrooms to this duplex is not at
all documented. The applicant's representative has argued that
the existing two -bedroom 2010 square foot unit is inadequate in
size for the present owners. Staff is inclined to believe that
making a two bedroom unit into a larger three bedroom unit is not
2
out of character with the intensity of use or bulk of structures
in the neighborhood.
Through the provision of a proposed new driveway turnaround,
adequate parking spaces would be provided to meet the one space
per bedroom requirement. According to the applicant, a total of
six bedrooms in the two units would exist after the addition. No
other impacts pertinent to condomiumization review have been
identified.
All the other conditions of approval for the 1976 Brinkman
condominiumization should still apply. The plating requirements
stated by the Engineering Department should also be met.
Additionally, included on the plat should be a note regarding the
dedication of the triangular parcel to the City.
Staff discussed with Michael Manchester, the project architect,
the situation where this unit would be over twice the size of the
other half of the duplex. He stated that the owner has verbally
agreed to the addition and a letter from the owner accepting the
expansion will be presented at your meeting.
Recommended Motion: "Move to approve the requested subdivision
exception for the purpose of amending the duplex condominiumizat-
ion approval for Lot 23, West Aspen Subdivision allowing the
addition of a bedroom within a 1540 square foot expansion subject
to the following conditions:
1. A plat shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building
permit meeting the standards of Section 20-15 of the
Municipal Code to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
specifically following the recommendations in the Engineer-
ing Department March 20, 1987 memorandum. Included on the
plat shall be a statement noting dedication of the triangu-
lar parcel to the City with reference to the Book and Page
Number of the deed recorded with the Pitkin County Clerk and
Recorder's Office.
2. The conditions of approval of the Brinkman Subdivision
Exemption, approved December 13, 1976, listed b, c, d, e,
and f shall still apply to this property.
City Manager Recommendations:
sb.ad
3
MEMORANDUM
TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
FROM: Jim Gibbard, Engineering Department
DATE: March 20, 1987
RE: Adams Subdivision Exception
c MAR 1 91987
The Engineering Department has reviewed the above application and
has the following comments:
1. The survey information on the submitted plat should also
include a legal description.
2. The site plan should also include common areas, existing
utility sources and meter locations, and a disclosure of owner-
ship.
3. The recording information on the submitted plat should also
include a certificate showing approval by the City Engineer and a
certificate showing approval by the Aspen City Council.
jg/adamsexc
cc: Jay Hammond
• •
ASPEN/PITRIN PLANNING OFFICE
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 925-2020
Date i�-
This is to inform you that the Planning Office has completed its
preliminary review of le-) captioned application. We have determined
that your application IS ; NOT complete.
Additional items required include:
Disclosure of Ownership (one copy only needed)
Adjacent Property Owners List/Envelopes/Postage (one copy)
Additional copies of entire application
Authorization by owner for representative to submit applica-
tion
Response to list of items (attached/below) demonstrating
compliance with the applicable policies and regulations of the
Code, or other specific materials
A check in the amount of $
A. Your application i complete and we have act) u ed it for
review by the 0- 4' � �� G� � � o n - We will
call you if we nee any additional information prior to that
date. Several days prior to your hearing, we will call and
make available a copy of the memorandum. Please note that it
IS NOT your responsibility to post your property with a
sign, which we can provide you for a $3.00 fee.
B. Your application is incomplete, we have not scheduled it
review at this time. When we receive the materials we have
requested, we will place you on the next available_ agenda.
If you have any questions, please call
the planner assigned to your case.
Sincerely,
ASP N/P TRIN PLANNING OFFICE
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: City Attorney
City Fngineer
FROM: Stnve Rorstnin, Planning Office
RF: Adams Sohdivipjnn Fxceptjnn
OHTF: March 9, 1987
Attached for your review and comments is an application sohmitted
by T. Michael Manchester on behalf of his client, Robert Adams
requesting sohdivisinn exception to amend previous approval which
established cnndjtinns affecting an existing structure located at
West Aspen Sohdivisinn, \'nt l, R\nck 23^ The applicant wishes to
remnve the limitation on the footprint of the structure estah—
\ishQd in the prior review.
Please review this material and send your comments to this office
no later than March 30. 1987 so this office has adequate time to
prepare for its presentation hefnre City Council on April 13^
Thank you.
0
CITY OF ASPEN
130 §outh galena street
asp colora���1611
3-925 -
r
91987
DATE: March 18, 1987
TO: Steve Burstein, Planning Office
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Adams Subdivision Exception
We have no comments regarding this application at this time.
PJT/mc
STATEMENT OF EXEMPTION
0061 FROM THE DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISIOi3
nnGGg" WHEREAS, PETER BRINKMAN, is the owner of a parcel of
?and located in Pitkin County, Colorado, more particularly des-
cribed as:
Lot 1, Block 23, West Aspen Subdivision,
Pitkin County,
VIHEREAS, there exists on said property a duplex structure
in which the applicant wishes to separate interest without parcel-
ing the land on which said structure is situate, and
WHEREAS, there has been made an application for exemption
from the definition of subdivision for such conveyance of interests
pursuant to Section 20-19 of the Aspen Municipal Code, and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, at its
meeting held in July, 1976, has determined that such exemption is
appropriate provided that:
a. there shall be no additional bath or bedrooms'
-� constructed in either dwelling unit,
b. in the evert the existing structure is destroyed,
or replaced, the site shall not be considered available
for construction of two individual residences, but there
shall be permitted on!-,r the replacement of a duplex or
construction of one single family structure,
c. the applicane agrees to join any future improve-
ment districts formed for the purposes of constructing
street improvements (including sidewalk, curb, gutter or
paving) or undergrounding of overhead utility lines,
which include the subject property within the proposed
district,
d.. the applicant agrees to reimburse the City
for his proportionate share of the cost of the above
improvements should the City elect to construct them
without the formation of a special assessment district,
and
e. neither of the dwelling units shall be leased
for a period of six (6) months, except for two (2) short
term rentals,
f. that there be imposed a subdivision dedication
fee calculated pursuant to Section 20-18, th--xceFt4-en
of-subsect ou�4�18 �a� (5) to---the==rrt-rax-y-4-4otwithstand-
i-ng, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has found the proposed division
of interest in the existing structure to be without the intents and
purposes of subdivision regulation provided that the constraints
imposed in subsections a,b,c,d,e, and f, above, proposed by the
Planning and Zoning Commission, be maintained,
THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Aspen does
hereby determine that the pr-oposed division of interest in the
duplex structure situate on the above -described land is without
the intents and purposes of subdivision regulation, and does, for
such reason, grant an exemption from the definition of subdivision
.for such action,
- PROVIDED, HOWEVER, that this grant of exemption shall at
all times -be conditioned on compliance by the applicant, his heirs,
;assigns and successors in interest, with the conditions with respect
--to extension,- replacement and contribution to the cost of public
improvements and leasing, itemized in subparagraphs a through e
-above; which conditions shall be -deemed a covenant running with
--the land and burden the same,
PROVIDED, there shall be imposed a subdivision dedication
fee for such proposed conveyance of separate interests, the same
being payable -in full by the dedication to the City of Aspen by
Peter Brinkman or, his. successor of -a parcel of land comprising
871 square feet which is a narrow triang).e-pf land protruding
into the Aspen Municipal Golf Course.
Date:. 1?
• - - STA
TAND - , , IIX MAYOR
I, KATHRYN S.- HAUTER, do certify- that the fokegoing
Statement of Exemption from the definition of Subdivision was
considered and approved by the Aspen City Council at its regular
meeting held Monday_ December .13-, .1976,_ at which time the Mayor,
STACY STANDLEY, III, was authorized' -to execute the same on behalf
of the City of Aspen.-
_ - _ KATIIRY S . 1IAUTER, CITY CLERK
dssyor D4ccl�::r ,1� /G ,bcta•:cn
;•films i)T•:i:f.T, �tad�}'`J:;� as of the :3,�„�h
A. BRINIQ•1.�'•.ty, cul tuut+.lrric< to
of the
County of Pit}' iT1 anti :hate of Colorado, of the first part, and
�tni Led U11dC1: the' laws of: the
'ttl. C;1'I'Y or AS^I IJ, a rilLM .ciPal corporation, organized
�,)%,kSLste of colorado, of the second part:
of the first part, for and in consideration of the sutra of
%VITNESSET1l.ThaSaid aart tthe 1 Y _ _M__—.._._-- DOLLARS,
Ten Dollars ($10. 00) -- -- __w of the second part, the receipt
to the said l+:u•tY of the first p;u•t in hand paid by the said party
v:herc"f is hereby confessed and acknowledged. has [granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and by these presents
of the second kart, its
du (;rant, bargain, sell, convey and confirrn, unto the said part Y . of land,-ituate, lying -and being
• or parcel
heir --sand assigns forever, all the following described lot and State of Colorado, to wit:
in the • County r.f Pitkin -
A 1?arccl of land being part of Lot 23, Pest �spc.Tl Subdivision, riling
No. 1. Said parcel is rmre fully descrilrc? as follrr:Is: Ir-.c7j.nnln
at- the sou hernuost corner of said Lot 23, thence 147.69 f(-
..ct along
a curve to the 'left having a radius of 189.90 feet (the chord of c•;hich
}>sars N 290 29' 07" 1-1, .144. 00 feet) ; thence S 5?_ OG E,
91.95 feet; thence-.
68.70 feet along a curve to the left having a radius of. 236.63 chord
tof
�
(the• choof. r��v.ch bears S 00 AV 52
int
beginning. Said parcel contains 1, 02-5�.W. 68.47 feet)sa. ft. inore• to Po or less.
:. _
�ivate .roa and other uses aUpurLenant
ri"i').].s parcel. of land shall be usecl:;rc; sT G:.} \-
G' . ✓
and necessary for the care a: ?-- -.•al'�:=�st;.a' munipipal parks, includin? the
j..
r�. sn�n
municipal golf course, iny. ;
cp-tuay'loar, 6—SA'�' • urtenances thereunto belonging, or in any wise
TOGETHER With all and singula *:=Lidataments and appurtenances
rents, issues, and profits thereof; and all the
appertaining, and thv reversion and re ve :yemainder and re of the first part, either in law or equity,
estate, right, interest, claim and demand wi; ,tsoevel of the said part V
of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditatnents and appurtenances.
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and.descttbnd the said I�athe ptVrtenances unto the said
of the second part, its heirs and assigns forever. A covenant,
part Y heirs, and administrators, do es
of the fiat part, for him self hiS rs, exheirs and assigns,
of the second part, its
grant, bargain and agree to and with the said part Y he is well seized of :he premises above
that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents fee
conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible
sell and conveytilesame in manner andformasaafoesaid, and
right, full power and lawful authority to grant, b g
that the same are free and clear from all former except -anti t c?en r 1 t taxes sales,liens,
1976t payab] Cmin � and
encumbrances of whateverkind or nature soever.,
1977, and subjec� to all reservations, restrictions, covenants and utility
ea :r-ents of record in the records of the Clerk and CountY recorder of Pitkin
but not limi.tcd to the Protective
County, State of Colorado, including,
Covenants recorded in Boo;c 2.2tL
9, at Wage 78, as aTnded by instrurent recorded
in Book 229, at Page 507 and in Book 309, at Pack 499.
nntl the ah ,a a b:u aincd pra•miscs in the quirt and laeaceable put.session of the said part V
of the second part
its heir: sand assil;nz, ns::ainst all anal cvut v lmr.on or Ix•rsmts I'M fully cl:6111inS; or to claim the \vhala
"r and• part thcra•vf, the swill l,:u•t V
of the first part shall turd will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND
IN WITNEISS Will.1"roI••.Th,• said la:al•t V
(if the first p:u't Im ram, hereunto set Ills
,......s -.„J .,•:,I the dsay anal ya•:u fir:-t above written.
tii;;m•d. Sealed and 1�rlivesysl iss the i•s r>ence of
a
I-- }---- -- -_ .--- Isis at 'T'IT:F •J�. �•3TtL`l:�t�`I, c"Ul tuvrarried manl•,AI
W
ITONAt.D f;ARF16LD
ANDREW V. 1!KCIIT
)SftUO1tE .1. f•I•:1't:tt`fON
GARIFIL:l.l) & 1iI:C'11'1'
AT•1•t11INKYA AT LAW
VICTOIt1AN SOVARR IIUILDINO
ti
601 C. 11MAN 8.1•ft F.KT
ASPEN, COLORADO 81011
February 24, 1977
Mr. Mick Mahoney
City Manager, City of Aspen
130 South Galena
Aspen, Colorado 81611
G
StIITK 201
Tut.r:raunK
l'Sn:ll 02G-1030
l
RE: Pete. Brink an
Park a� ion
Dear Mick:
Enclosed please find a copy of the Deed I have
sent to Peter Brinkman for his signature. You will note
it contains the provisions we discussed on the telephone.
Upon the return of the Deed to Aspen and its
recording, I will have the original returned to you for your
records.
Please contact me if you have any questions.
w
BAP/kjk
Enclosure
Very truly yours,
GARrIELD & HECHT
/0/,,-
Brooke A. Peterson
i� nntl t11c 10hoYtr h:uF;lined premises in the quiet 1111t1 ptnlcenble possession of the said Part V of the second part.
1. its heit•; ttntl assigns, ntx:linst all and every person or person; i..twrull%- t•L•tinling ar tO Cl.-lint the ".hole
I! or:lnt.p:1111hercuf, the suit) part y of the fir: t p1u.t : hull and will lC:\ttR:\\'C AND FORT: VER DEFT:\D.
Il
IN 11•ITNESI'b 11.11EREl)h'.The said part y of the first p:trt hug hcrcuntu •et his
�� Iuultl 11m11•attl tht. day to111 y4e.11• first 11ho1 c lcrittcn.
tiil;urd,�rulvund.(cli�erta) in tile Irsetrof _._(SFALI
hj'IER A. ul uwarried man
�I ... , ..._ . _ .... _ ,... .-•- •--- --- -- •--- . - _.�.._—.._.._... _�_..._---- _..�__I>1':ALA
_ .. _........ .......... ......_... _..._ .� . ..._ _._.__._._._.,-.. -- -lit:.�l.�
i
STATE OF COLORADO )
ss.
County of Pitkin )
.The foregoing was acknowledged before me this <�tr��day
OfArbldcc-'70 , 1976, by STACY STANDLEY, III and KATHRYN S.
HAUTER, personally known to me to be the Mayor and City Clerk,
respectively,of the City of Aspen.
Witness my hand and official seal.
My.Commission expires: 7j/9/r%% /
Notaryy Public
i
OnAb. CAD _55C%4�'F 1 •CA'
1 5 9.2 8 1 71- 12
y
J
N
to
In
,`sa
2
�
o ..
N e
h
w
r
453s' U•' b
a.I
J n
me6 ro
N
a z
2.6
�.7
I , � S•3.
1
I m N
I 1.•2• r
I b
1 -z z
I
1 77450
I ,
I
I
UNDERGROUtJO UTIUTN EASEMENT 10'
G,O.4s' I
r- N 62`Ob'W rv8,v' .
FNDRLBCaR0.CAf'
m
Pl�RCC� 2 .
914g
I
1
�.% iWD1T•c4rJ
q).1 13
tJ 52• o� ��
FND SP1K0 �_
Ft• ms-gc
L` 147• co9
t_.OT 2 3
WEST LISPEN SUe>D1VIS1COIt'll
Fl l_t t�G Na.1
1
1
It
\
\ L•
\
PA�CE;3
IU2'3�
R+ 2 ��•�3
L• G�B•70
FND RE66�R Q CAC
I, Harold 1.7. Johnson (Johnson -Longfellow? & Associates) ,
a regi stere6 s,.arve�,-or in the state of Cclorado, do hereby
certify that on the 13th day of October, 1976, a survey
was made under my direct supervision of t'ie rror_erty shot.%n
hereon and a two-story frame duplex was found to be located
entirely within the lot lines. Corners .,ere found or set
as shov.n on this plat. All easements or encroachments
in evidence or }mown to me are sho%%'n - Said survey is true
and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Johnson -Longfellow & Associates
By
Harold W . J011 G LS 9 018
fo-.a� o •.C��
December 10, 197G
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen City Council
FROM: Planning Staff (IIC)
RE: Subdivision Exemption - Duplex owned by Peter Brinkman
DATE: December 9, 1976
This is a request for subdivision exemption by Peter. Brinkman on
Lot 1, Block 23, Aspen Townsite to condominiumi.ze an existing duplex.
The property is contiguous to the Aspen Golf Course and children's
park. The request was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission
on July 20, 1976 conditioned on the following comments of the Planning
Office:
I. We have contacted the Parks Department concerning
possible land dedication for children's park.
They recommend public dedication of certain land
contiguous to the park as fulfillment of the open
space dedication requirements. This request is
precipitated by the unusual_ configuration pro-
truding into the Golf Course and park area. The
application has agreed to this request and for this
parcel of approximately 871 square feet in size
will submit a deed to the'City.
2. We suggest requiring appropriate restrictions on
the units for limiting use to a minimum of six (6)
month leases.
3. The Engineering Department has no comments on the
request.
The Planning Office recommends approval of the Subdivision Exemption
conditioned on the above requirements. A survey of the property and
land to be deeded to the City will be available for inspection at your
December 13, 1976 meeting.
eri
nJ
Ve
ME
.. L.�� _._...__. Il
,•i,atcs stated they felt that to put this resti.iluuui1 v„ L„1� ..uN�,..^ ••�u��� ••-� (,
Ilc,ne of. the neighbors this restriction on their proOas.not
. Coates stated they would
o alon , he neighbors want to impose thindition on the neighborhood.
be happy to g `�
9.his additional restriction was not part of the zoning aneven contemplated when i
tl,�, structure was built.
1-0111 Marshall, resident of the neighborhood, had gotten 28 .signatures of people in the
I
ne1.ghborliood. The residents feel that this unit will become a Saturday to Saturday rental)
•II1e neighbors have no way of stopping this. Marshall stated if the residents could gbt
Nome commitment that the duplex, would not turn into short-term rental, fine. Otherwise
it will become tourist zone.
Mayor Standley said the neighbors concern is legitmate and Council is sympathetic.
1¢i�et.her Coates gets the exemption or not, or goes through full subdivision review, the end;l
result will be the same. There is little reason to not allow the condominiumization.
,Cris has reached an i.mpass as the project is already done. The only thing the Council cane
do is entertain and support a letter of agreement to do whatever the rest of the neighbor -I
hood agrees to. Mayor Standley said he felt the Council had probably done as much as II
possible trying to help out the residents. II
City Attorney Stuller suggested that if the neighborhood was going to put a rental II
restriction on their homes, that it should be by restrictive covenant so that the City is
not involved at all. Ms. Stuller pointed out that the difficulty is defining the neigh- l
borhood, and what to do about the one person who refuses to sign. If this is the nclgh=
borhood objective, they could satisfy this independent of the City Council. Coates
stated he would agree to go along with what the other neighbors agree to, any restrictions
to be placed on the whole neighborhood. Coates stated they did not feel they should be a
singled out in the neighborhood. City Attorney Stuller said this should be a private
matter which should be resolved among the participants. The Council cannot solve all the
weaknesses in the plan.
Councilman Behrendt moved to approve the exemption from subdivision by Mr. Coates and to II
!incorporate with it the general body of paragraph 3 in the letter from Garfield and `
f llecht; seconded by Councilman Parry. Councilwoman Pedersen asked Councilman Behrendt to
reconsider the motion to incorporate the whole letter; Councilman Behrendt agreed; so did
V l reconsideruncilman Parry. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Johnston. Motion
carried.
EXEMPTION FROM SUBDIVISION - Peter Brinkman
Iial Clark, planning office, told Council this was a request for subdivision exemption 4
' 'n from Peter Brinkman for property located adjacent to the golf course. This was reviewed ;I
by the P & 2 in July 1976 and approval was recommended. The planning office recommends ii
that rather than a fee dedication, a land dedication be given to the City. The lot is i
shaped with a piece sticking out into the golf course. The planning office had asked the
applicant to square off the land and give the land to the City for the children's park 1,
to the six month rental restriction
and the golf course. The applicant agreed to this and .
1 Councilman Behrendt moved to approve the exemption from subdivision; seconded by Councilma
Wishart. All in favor, motion carried.
HOTEL JEROME - Conceptual Subdivision Presentation
=
Bill Kane, Director of planning, told Council this is a review of conceptual presentation II
j for PUD for the proposed expansion of the Hotel Jerome. Council should give a clear
reading of the overall suitability of the project. The project has been on -going for a
�( long time as a result of the initial investigation of the fire marshal finding that the it
second and third floors of the building are unsafe. Due to inadequate access, plumbing
and wiri ndeficiencies the building is in a position to be condemned. The owner of I,
g
the hotel came back with a proposal for expansion. The property in consideration, wniCn i
is north of the existing hotel, is zoned office which permits .75:1 in office space. !
I
The planning office has identified several key issues in the development of this project.
(1) At a general level, expansion of tourists accommodations in the City is not a desirables
objective. (2) Expansion of the Hotel Jerome would involve a very massive structure.
' These negative issues are counterbalanced by encouraging the development of a first class
tourist hotel in Aspen. It is the feeling of the planning office that the Hotel Jerome
represents the best opportunity for this by virtue of its location, its deteriorated
condition, and the opportunity to fix up a building that should share a prominent role in
i the City. The building should be preserved and enhanced.
The existing hotel is 44,000 square feet; the proposed expansion is 60,000 square feet.
Kane showed Council a•model of the proposed expansion. 6,000 square feet of the expansion
would be accessory hotel commercial use. The applicant is basically requesting a rezoning
i from Office to Commercial/Lodge.
' II
1 Councilwoman Johnston asked about the possibility of the City purchasing the Hotel Jerome
to preserve the building, pe-haps use it for employee housing. Councilman Wishart pointed
out the cost of renovating it for the City would be great; and if the City owned the
building it would (1) put the City in the hole financially and (2) change the flavor of ,
p the hotel.
bJohn Gilmore,. owner of the Motel, told Council that at this point, he had approximately. I
1 $900,000 iri the property. It will cost approximately $50 per foot to remodel the building.:.
is Ti- ,•:,_____ .____a_7—A _t_ L,,,;irl;nrt hA wrtiild have a 3k million dollar building and 35 is
NOVEMBER, 1974
ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION EXEMPTION FROM THE
DEFINITION OF SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
WHEREAS, Peter Brinkman has made application for
an exemption from the definition of subdivision regulations
pursuant to Section 20-10 (c) of the subdivision regulations,
and
WHEREAS, the request is to allow condominiumization
of an existing duplex on already platted Lot 1, Block 23 of
West Aspen Subdivision, and
WHEREAS, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
has reviewed said request and finds that the design require-
ment of 20-7 of the subdivision regulations have been met,
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Aspen
Planning and Zoning Commission exempts said duplex on Lot
1, Block 23 of West Aspen Subdivision from the definition of
subdivision.
q
:UHrMAN / ,
ASP PLANNING COMMISS N
. .... .... .
DATED THIS DAY OF
1974.
surveyor: fouled several discrepancies.
Barnard ulcwed that t.h(13enc-dict exemption be grant rd an
•ion
the groun(I s that they are not within the intcnts and
purposes of subdivision. seconded. All in favor,
�
)tlotioIi carried.
M�.)cldal.one:;, located next to the Denedi.cl.s, were also in
need of an exemption to correct- the deed.
Jol-)nson moved that the Maddalone exemption 'be granted on
..)Lion
-the grounds that they are without the purpose of the
definition of: subdivision. Jenkins seconded.. All in favor_,
motion carried.
Brinkman Duplex
Request was made to condominimize an existing duplex on
----- --~-- -'r
• Lat- 1, Block 23, West Aspen Subidivision. Mojo felt that
'� -"`i-t
should be exempt from the definition of subdivision
because of platted lots and blocks.
ion
Barnard moved to grant an exemption from subidivision and
Jenkins seconded. All. in.favor, motion carried.
^0-v.,00c1 Condominiums
Attorney Jon Mulford represented the Redwood Condominiums
and AnthonCastel.lac kz who would like to be excmptccl
✓
from Subdivision regulations because the building has
existed for years and has utility and water hookups. Them
would be two potential owners, John Prosser and Dwight
Shellman, who would use it for employee housing. Barnard
questioned whether it was on platted lots and blocks and
Mr. Mulford explained that the portion Castellack owns
he purchased from the Railroad years ago. Barnard stated
tha the law was clear that if it is not on lots and b7_or.}:�,_
then it comes under Subdivision. Mulford argued that the
definition refers to concerns over access and utilities
and they have taken care.'of both of those problems.
tdojo said that the Planning Office didn't really understa nc
-about the access of the road. Johnson asked if there was
an easement to the road and Mulford said that there wasn't
one.
Mojo said that the Planning Office couldn't recommend
approval since it is without the intents and purposes of
Subdivision and Stanford said that the purpose of those
regulations is to make sure any devlopment that happens
happens according to certain standards.
Schiffer suggested tabling the action until the road ea-e-
ment problem is worked out with the Planning Office.
:.Cion
Barnard moved to table the motion until the Planning Officc
has a chance to research the road access problem. Jenkins
Lion
seconded. All in favor, motion carried.
Barnard moved that they have„ a study session on the parking
problems for after the next regular meeting. Johnson
seconded.. All in favor, motion carried. :
Stanford s, ji.cl that another subject the Couunission :-should
discuss Mould be the housing problem.
aonkins moved to adjourn:land Johnson seconded. All in
favor, inecti.ng ad jourrio.d at 5: 30 p.m.
Uc�_f;LlLy City Clerk
J loll/lUllly 1.-11u.4 1 t.t1l1u-11y uuu VVl J. ...11-v.. .. .��.v y��yj i.4 A lkI
1 - loa o operate on the peopert Collins said that the
��-�y�- Cx W oth L1SeS in the area mug t be own before that decisionpI G� 0could be made. Collins said that the more definitive in-
UJL��. �' c formation that was available, the more intelligent deci.sioi,
6
v\4�hti could be made. Ile suggested tabling_ any action until L-h:i�.
information was available. Collins entertained a motion
to table action. Michael. McVey suggested cici�iz�g-some-sor.
buffer as a business, rather than a less appropriate use.
Motion to Table
Action
Brinkman Subdiv-
ision --request
for su c iv '
exemption
Bunt moved to table the item until further plans could be
obtained. Keinast seconded. All in favor, motion carried.
Brinkman Subdivision --Request for subdivision exertion____
Iial Clark gave the recommendations from the Planning Offic-
Planning requests that the leasing provision be applied
to the applicant as a condition for the subdivision e;:em;-)-
tion, with a 6 month minimum leasing condition. Planning
had talked with the Parks Dept. regarding land dedication
as the open space dedication requir_emant. The Parks Dept.
encouraged the developer to do this. The Planning Office
recommends that the dedication fee be the 46sq. ft.
set aside as open space. Brooke Peterson was present to
represent the Brinkman Subdivision. Ile added that the own-
er had no objection to the dedication fee being in the fort"
of land. The Commission discussed the plans with Mr.
Peterson.
Clark explained the formula used to derive tle dedication
Dedication fee fee. Ile said that ususlly the fee is in the form of
money, but that Planning specifically requests that this
one be in the form of land dedication.
MEC
10 C. P. NCECKEE C. !. A E. CJ. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves
Continued Meeting Plannincf and Zoning July 27, 1976
Clark explained that the exemption entailed exempting the applicant
from full conceptual, preliminary, and final plat requirements. The
recortmiendation from Planning and approval by Council is all the
applicant has to go through if the exemption is granted.
I
Motion
Dick Keinast moved to grant subdivision exemption conditional on
to
the conunents from the Planning Office described in the memo dated
grant
July 15, 1976, and conditional on the squaring off of the lot•to_be
Ada a t e--6,64iea-t-ion fee-. � sc a_�e e a 6
Clark
corrected the figure ot� 436 Sq . f t . to 871 Sq . f t .
liedstrom seconded. All but Hunt were in favor. Motion carried.
Revision to Office Zone
Revision to
John Stanford of the Planning Office said that if P&Z was in agree -
Office Zone
ment with the memo in the previous packet regarding the historic I
disf-rinf- ciPCtinnal-inr ni...,..,.,'.. __.., , - . . , � I;
.................
FOUND: REBAR 86 CAP
ffifffldyt
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
SCALE: I°= 10'
BASIS OF BEARING : FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN.
SIUITVEYDR9S CERTIFICATE
1, DANIEL F M-KENZIE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON JUNE 11 TH., 1585, A
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION
OF LOT 23, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING 1, CITY OFASPEN,
COLORADO.
-4 "
ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: DANIEL F. MC-KENZIE
JUNE. 4TH., 1585. L.S. 20151
VOTICE. According to Colorado law you must commence env I.—
based upon any detect in this survey within six years after you first discover Alpine zourveys , Inc. Surveyed G' I I ' 8S
such defect. In no even: may any action based upon any defect in this surveyDrafted ro' 14 ' B5
be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown hereon. Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
Revisions
Title BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY
Job No 85 - 55
Client ADAMS
'Vol'
LOT 24
-, NE A
DDME
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
L.S. 7168
S 50°49'E
131.00 5
et.lo l0 -,/"1 Fr
i LtY.PT10N GI.1 '
o rrE �
d
GRAVEL DRIVEW a -
' I
-- ...........
•• .' ••NEMI G1ZIvLWMY?U0•.FA20LJU17 ... •• ,•,,+
��. _ _ _ - _ - _ 0.6 TYPICAL
10.6
� I
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
L.S. 7168
MULTI -LEVEL WOOD DU
I /
N
I / / 5'S
I
68 23
N 52°06' W
FOUND:REBARB
L.S. 9018
LOOT 23
WEST ASPEN SUB MMON � N
N
HUNG 1 17,915 SQ.FT ±
�64
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
SCALE: I"= 10'
BASIS OF BEARING : FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN.
SURVEYOR"'S CERTIFICATE
1, DANIEL F. M'KENZIE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ONJUNE 11TH,,1965, A
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION
OF LOT 23, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING I, CITY OF ASPEN,
COLORADO,
ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: DANIEL F McKENZIE
JUNK Ili-TH., 1985. L.S. 201S1
i.
0 1 1 1981
VOTICE According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action
used upon any defect in this survey within six years after you first discover
AlminAm CIav—�..^ I--
••r•• •-- ----� �-Y , �.. , �urveyea 6 I I a5 Revisions
is shown Drafted G 14' 85
be commenced more than ten years from the date of the certification shown
hereon Post Office Box 1730
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
Title BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY
Job No 85 - 55
Client ADAMS
BOOMTA DDME
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
L. S. 7168
y. S 5Oo49'E 171"00
71"72
I
}I
GRAVEL DRIVEWAY N
PARCEL I
7745 SQ. FT 9148 PARCEL
FT. f
r OB TYPICAL
w /
10•C
N -
O
OD
N/ i r
14 6
.243
10.5
i
/ i
j
z /M LTI-LE�WOOD Ex
co
0 O
LOT 24 LPN
2-6 10.1 7.7 / ,
N`Io48W o.
- --
- —
Z5
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
L S. 7168
68 23
N 52006' W
lb
N �
BB o T
o c
ro
w
o
co
In
Z LOT 2 3
i
WEST ASPEN SUB MM OON � N
D �
HUNG T 17,919 SQ. FT ±
aIGNED THIS DAY Or , i�3(,/,
WILLIAM L. STIRLING, MAYOR • ATTEST' KATHRYN KOCH, CITY CLERK
ACCLP-ED FOR FILING IN T"iE OFrE OF `FIE CL,_ ,r', %I,ND FECORDE.R OF
PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, THIS _ L)1W OF _ , 1J87,
IN PLAT POOK AT PAGE
CLERK AND RLCORDEP,
NOTICE According to Colorado law you must commence any legal action
;usedupon any defect , this survey within va years nyd you tustdi stover Alpine Survevs . Inc
such detect In no evenm : ay any action Dasasetl upon any detect in this survev
FOUND : REBAR B
L.S. 9018
S52'06'E
91-9s
/9
PARCEL 3
1027 SQ. FT :
N
0 5 10 20 30 40 50
SCALE I"= 10'
BASIS OF BEARING � FOUND MONUMENTS AS SHOWN,
SURVIEBYOR"S (CERTIFICATE
AT]E
I, DANIEL F. M-KENZIE HEREBY CERTIFY THAT ON JUNE IITH.,1985, A
SURVEY WAS PERFORMED UNDER MY DIRECTION AND SUPERVISION
OF LOT 23, WEST ASPEN SUBDIVISION, FILING I, CITY OF ASPEN
COLORADO.
ALPINE SURVEYS, INC. BY: DANIEL F McKENZIE
JUNE 14-TH., 1585. L.S. 20151
NOTES:
I. FAF,'EL:J i A,.J 2 AS SF40WN FAIL MATHEMATICAL CLOSURE
e
II
.
.._. .c:•ratvr to J' L' 0
! o eCertificationsnown _ _. _ _G' Ii�' B5
hereon Post Office Box 1730 Drafted
Aspen, Colorado 81612
303 925 2688
ritie BUILDING PERMIT SURVEY
Job No 85 - 55-2
Client ADAMS
BOM TA
DRoVFc
Z
Ir
a w
w _
m v
IL tr)
O 0
r
U) M
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
— L.S. 7168
N
N
N
J
FOUND: REBAR 8 CAP
L.S. 7168
S 50049'E
131.00
16X r E t'b
21�MD.1 - v� 21 F-r i
GRAVEL DRIVEW a \
. s......... ,1, ... .. --. - —�- I r '
I a
i 0 '8TYPICAL 1
I I ,
�j � I
I
— — — — — — — — — + i
146 2J+3,/
00
2.7
3'S
35
MULTI- EVEL WOOD DUPLEX
I � ,
7-0
I ' '
kn
55
5
N
68.23
N 52"06 W
FOUND: REBAR 8 CA
L_ S. 90 i 8
L ()! T 2 3
WEST ASPPEN SUBUTIMOONN N
)HUNG 1 17,915 SQ. FT. ± �
O n 3
is Remodel/tia a j hon
West Aspen Subdivision
Colorado
k
cq
SIN I h� ; ' ---
4b
F —T
rin"
A-f
oArPP 1 TI PN4
Adams Remodel/Addition.
Lot 23 West Aspenb• •
Aspen Colorado --
v
__j
I