The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutresolution.hpc.001-2018 ! IIIIIIIVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVIIIVIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII RECEPTION#: 645633, R: $23.00, D: $0.00 DOC CODE: RESOLUTION Pg 1 of 3, 03106/2018 at 02:13:31 PM RESOLUTION #1 Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO (SERIES OF 2018) A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION GRANTING FINAL MAJOR DEVELOPMENT AND FINAL COMMERCIAL DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL FOR 533 E. MAIN STREET,LOTS A-I, BLOCK 93, CITY OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO Parcel ID: 2 73 7-0 73-31-801 WHEREAS, on June 6, 2017, the Community Development Department received an application from The Archdiocese of Denver/St. Mary Catholic Church, represented by Charles Cunniffe Architects and Stan Clauson Associates for the following land use review approvals: Final Major Development and Final Commercial Design review; and WHEREAS, the Aspen Community Development Department reviewed the proposed Application and recommended approval with conditions; and; WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 26.304, Common Development Review Procedures,- and rocedures:and Section 26.304.060.B.4, Modification of Review Procedures, all necessary land use reviews, as identified herein, have been combined to be considered by the Historic Preservation Commission at a duly noticed public hearing after considering recommendations by the Community Development Director; and, WHEREAS, such combination of review procedures was done to ensure clarity of review, was accomplished with all required public noticing provided as evidencedby an affidavit of public noticing submitted to the record, and the..public was provided a thorough and full review of the proposed development; and. WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission reviewed the Application at a duly noticed public hearing on February 14, 2018, during which time the recommendations of the Community Development Director and comments from the public were requested and heard by the Historic Preservation Commission: and, WHEREAS, during a duly noticed public hearing on February 14, 2018, the Historic Preservation Commission approved Resolution #1, Series of 2018, by a 6 to 0 vote, granting approval with the conditions listed hereinafter. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ASPEN,COLORADO THAT: Section 1• Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the Historic Preservation Commission hereby grants Final Major Development and Final Commercial Design Review approval with the following conditions: 1. Prior to submittal of a building permit, provide further detailing of the columns supporting the front porch to reduce their mass and clarify how they connect to the steps and the roof soffit, for review and approval by staff and monitor. _ Historic Preservation Commission Resolution#I, Series 2018 Page I of 3 2. The revisions to the.porch steps pointing towards Main Street may require the approval of an encroachment license by Engineering. 3. Prior to submittal for building permit, provide more detailed drawings of the proposed front porch hand rails for-review and approval by staff and monitor. 4. Prior to submittal for building permit, provide cut sheets of the new windows on the north fagade for review and approval by staff. 5. Prior to submittal for building permit, provide a proposed modification to the screen wall on the north side of the pavilion which complies with height limits. The modification requires review and approval by staff and monitor. 6. Prior to submittal for building permit, verify that horizontal mullions on the north face of the addition align with horizontal mullions or other elements on the church structure, for review and approval by staff and monitor. 7. Prior to submittal for building permit, more detail on the way in which the connector attaches to the historic structure require requires review and approval by staff and monitor to avoid unnecessary irreversible damage to the masonry. 8. Prior to submittal for building permit, a specific brick sample must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor as part of Phase 2 permit review. HPC has typically preferred a brick which relates to the color of the historic masonry but has a more crisp profile or different dimension. 9. The possible relocation of the transformer further west along the alley, and improvements to the existing driveway, such as installation of a grass paver surface, may require additional input or approvals by City Departments such as Engineering and Parks. 10. Any commitments, such as bicycle racks and trip reduction measures, made in the TIA/MMLOS submitted for HPC Conceptual Review and not completed as part of the recent sidewalk improvements may be required as part of any building permit related to Phase 2 of this project. 11. Per Council Ordinance 912, Series of 2017, no later than fourteen (14) days following Final Major Development approval by the Historic Preservation Commission. the City Clerk shall cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the jurisdictional boundaries of the City of Aspen, a notice advising the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan and creation of a vested property right pursuant to Chapter 26.308, Vested Property Rights. Pursuant to § 26.304.070(A), Development Orders. such notice shall be substantially in the following form: Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right, valid for a period of five (5)years, pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: 104 S. Galena Street and 533 E. Main Street, St. Mary's Catholic Church, Lots A-1, Block 93, City and Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. Nothing in this approval shall exempt the Development Order from subsequent reviews and approvals required by this Ordinance of the general rules, regulations and ordinances or the City of Aspen provided that such reviews and approvals are not inconsistent with this Ordinance. Historic Preservation Commission Resolution N I, Series 2018 Page 2 of 3 The vested rights granted hereby shall be subject to all rights of referendum and judicial review. The period of time permitted by law to exercise the right of referendum to refer to the electorate this Section of this Ordinance granting vested rights: or, to seek judicial review of the grant of vested rights shall not begin to run until the date of publication of the notice of final development approval as set forth above. The rights of referendum described herein shall be no greater than those set forth in the Colorado Constitution and the Aspen Home Rule Charter. Section 2: All material representations . and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before the Community Development Department and the Historic Preservation Commission are hereby incorporated in such plan development approvals and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by other specific conditions or an authorized authority. Section 3: This Resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as herein provided, and the same shall be conducted and concluded'under such prior ordinances. Section 4: If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Resolution is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate; distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions thereof. FINALLY, adopted, passed and approved this 14th day of February, 2018. Approved as to form: Approved as to content: ro /James R. True,City Attorney Gr G qerpeood, Chair Attest: C, '� Nicole Henning, Deputy ty/Clerk Historic Preservation Commission Resolution#l, Series 2018 Page 3 of 3