HomeMy WebLinkAboutresolution.apz.02-2018 RECEPTION#: 645634, R: $28.00, D: $0.00
DOC CODE: RESOLUTION
Pg 1 of 4, 0 310,512018 at 02:13:32 PM
Janice K. Vos Caudill, Pitkin County, CO
RESOLUTION NO. 2
(SERIES OF 2018)
A RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
APPROVING SPECIAL REVIEW FOR AN ALTERNATIVE TOP OF SLOPE
DETERMINATION,A STREAM MARGIN REVIEW AND A RESIDENTIAL DESIGN
STANDARD VARIATION FOR A PROPERTY LOCATED LOT 13, BLACK BIRCH
ESTATES SUDIVISION,ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED MAY
1, 1967 IN PLAT BOOK 3 AT PAGE 244, COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1130 BLACK BIRCH DRIVE.
Parcel No. 2735-013-07-009
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department received an application from
Beth Held at Forum Phi Architecture LLC, on behalf of Riverfront Fork LLC, requesting Special
Review approval for an alternative Top of Slope Determination, Stream Margin Review, and
Residential Design Standard Variation for the property at 1 130 Black.Birch Drive; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Department Staff reviewed the application
for compliance with the applicable review standards; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Engineering Department provided consultation to the
applicant and approved the proposed alternative Top of Slope; and,
WHEREAS, upon review of the application, the applicable Land Use Code standards,
the Community Development Director recommended approval of the Special Review for an
alternative Top of Slope, Stream Margin Review, and denial of a Residential Design Standard
Variation; and,
. WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission has reviewed and
considered the development proposal under the applicable provisions of the Municipal Code as
identified herein, has reviewed and considered the recommendation of the Community
Development Director, and has taken and considered public comment at a duly noticed public
hearing on February 20,2018; and,
WHEREAS, the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that the
development proposal meets the applicable review criteria and that the approval of the request is
consistent with the goals and objectives of the Land Use Code; and,
WHEREAS,the City of Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission finds that this Resolution
furthers and is necessary for the promotion of public health, safety, and welfare; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved Resolution #2, Series of
2018, by a three to zero (3 - 0) vote, granting approval of Special Review, Stream Margin, and
Residential Design Standard Variation as identified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission:
Section 1: Special Review for Top of Slope
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves an alternative top of slope determination via
Special Review as identified in the attached Exhibit A. The applicant shall submit a Site
Improvement Survey/Plat for the City of Aspen Review and approval depicting the approved
Top of Slope within 180 days of this approval.
Section 2: Stream Margin Review
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves a Stream Margin Review with the following
conditions of approval:
A. Engineering Conditions of Approval
1. All vegetation below the 15' top of slope setback must be replaced with native
vegetation.
2. Any excavation below the 15' top of slope,setback must be performed by hand.
3. All stormwater runoff must be captured and treated outside of the 15' Top of
Slope setback.
4. Ditch must be lined with bentonite liner. Details to be provided at Building Permit
submittal.
B. Parks Conditions of Approval
1. No machinery, storage of material, foot or vehicle traffic allowed below 15' top
of slope setback.
2. Fencing at the 15' Top of Slope Setback is required prior to any demolition and
throughout the project until the revegetation process commences.
3. Any roots over two (2) inches will require inspection and approval sof City
Forrester before cutting.
4. Air Spading required around perimeter of excavation.
Section 3: Residential Design Standard Variation
Pursuant to the procedures and standards set forth in Title 26 of the Aspen Municipal Code, the
Planning and Zoning Commission hereby approves the request for a Residential Design Standard
Variation for Section 26.410.030.E.2, Window Placement to allow for a twelve (12) foot tall
window on the front most street facing fapade, or west elevation, of the proposed development.
Section 4•
This approval does not exempt the project from compliance with applicable zoning, building, or
any other applicable code regulations within the City of Aspen's Municipal Code. The applicant
must submit a building permit application demonstrating compliance with all applicable codes
prior to any development on site.
Section 5:
All material representations and commitments made by the Applicant pursuant to the development
proposal approvals as herein awarded, whether in public hearing or documentation presented before
the Planning and Zoning Commission, are hereby incorporated in such site development approvals
and the same shall be complied with as if fully set forth herein, unless amended by an authorized
entity.
Section 6•
This resolution shall not affect any existing litigation and shall not operate as an abatement of any
action or proceeding now pending under or by virtue of the ordinances repealed or amended as
herein provided,and the same shall be conducted and concluded under such prior ordinances:
Section 7•
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this resolution is for any reason
held invalid or unconstitutional in a court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a
separate, distinct and independent provision and shall not affect the validity of the remaining
portions thereof.
APPROVED by the Commission at its meeting on February 20, 2018.
APPROVED AS TO FORM: PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION:
im True, City Attomey Ski 10
�
es Ch '
'
AT +ST:
A161
Linda Manning, City Clerk
Attachments:
Exhibit A: Site Improvement Survey/Plat Identifying Alternative Top of Slope
! e [ lA �• � k'1I 8 IN
]FE� i'1
!�� P t `[` e' Pf
lit
S
tF ifi t iceE 5:�[.1[! �6 X45 S
� �i bi �. > e� e{:{ve t EAe p e; :�! .y i z 1 �.LI,I !y 14f�'StE!• ,.... �� s=_
A _•. a �9 S• lfC s E;i Es I I � E: ?�i[? ga � .€ s=:s
�rti 1:] E� � F to ��! v [ [ e n e ��. �4 Eap�l�!�• ��1� �_ ��_
-rl 1. x i - .•3 P! i 3 i! E 4Fp f�z •�E� ��1•II .F till�pt!F!j
( 7 s tt .! ! 1;qq i EE _I i I a �] Ifii 3 i [E(� t.,.•
t €t pvE�iaef 6 F F
t
\ g6
[
e odPue 1
U
00
0
C2 0
0
at 4
1 81
rA
Y � Z � •( i
Oxb':E: 9apA F; \`'7pl�d',� tpE . _ AakI
Ifkv
Atli it
�e• ''t'.--rte / .%/ �7�.r � './` ��¢� 6
` Apl�/ ./•/H � �� B iil