The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink Aboutcoa.lu.gm.TempleAllen.1977-GM-01 i..~ :\ '-fJL N~- ~. .--~ ----. ~~ ,! , ..,..,......,. ".1~ - y.~.;)<~~~-'''' ........ l ~lt '. ,.~\,Jl ,.' .,.... .4,." ~, .,,,, " Ii II " I: II I: II Ii Ii ..'J.~~! ,..f>>":! i . y' , .. .... ,~J 100 ....';,..11.. ..... Allen .: r~'l':l &, I'ative ~. ~ll ,..,..-.'" ",.... ,~ .~j .:~'-riSCt l_jJt. 2267 .~ ~!;:1Ular:.~l:1~e~i:,g ~ ~:,P~_~._~~~~ ._c~,!n~!l August 22, 1977 -'- t'. ",1. _..:------r- , I: II II SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Buchanan 'r\ i" ,I Karen Smith, planning office, told Council this exemption request grew out of the conceptual subdivision. There is a portion of the land starting at the center line of Gibson avenue that is within the County. It was decided to process a subdivision exemption application through the city and County. This comes from the P & Z with a recommendation of approval conditioned upon the land being dedicated to open space and right-of-way uses. Ms. Smith said she would add another condition, that is that the land be dedicated to both the City and County. The City Engineer has said that at some future date Gibson avenue may be re-aligned. councilma~ Wishart moved to approve the subdivision exemption with the conditions that the land be dedicated to open space and right-of-way and dedicated to both the city and county; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. ,~r ~J~ ._~l' ,., " TAKE YOUR MONEY AND RUN - Annual 10,000 meter Road Race city Manager Mahoney told Council this is a foot race on the streets of Aspen, and they are asking for pOlice to control some intersections and registration tables in the mall. councilwoman Johnston pointed out that every year there is a marathon in Aspen which has been participated in by local residentsi is this in competition with that. Mahoney answered he did not think so. Councilman Hershey asked who took responsibility for ['I' running this. Mahoney told Council it was Aspen SAvings ,I~an. Councilwoman Johnston asked that Mahoney check with other people to see if they have any problems with this II race. Ii !! Ii !i Ii :1 :: I ( l!l ". !~ ! Councilman Parry moved to approve the annual 10,000 meter road race; seconded by Council- man wishart. Councilwoman Johnston asked that the motion be amended that the City contact people to see if they object. Councilman Parry declined the amendment. All in favor, with the exception of Councilwoman Johnston. Motion carried. .~}:. ., <1 :'! SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION - Temple Allen Temple Allen told Council that he owned six lots at the end of Main street. Allen said he wanted to sell the Victorian house with two lots. There won't be any building on these lots; everything will remain the same as it is. Councilman Hershey read the motion from the P , Z recommending approval with two conditions; (1) a gravel sidewalk be improved with concrete surface, and (2) that lots K and L have access provided through the alley or with an easement through the adjacent lots. l' r! Councilman Van Ness asked what the pOlicy is requiring concrete sidewalks. he did not think it was necessary but if the P , Z recommended it, it is okay. Van Ness said he thought it was a bad precedent to require concrete sidewalks. Mahoney said Councilman .,. n !! f~ Councilman Parry moved to approve the subdivision exemption with the conditions as out- lined in the planning office memorandum; seconded by Councilman Wishart. Councilmembers Parry, Wishart, and Hershey in favor; Councilmembers Van Ness and Johnston opposed. Motion carried. , ~ :j f' Ii! H RELIEF FROM ADMINISTRATIVE DELAY - Bell Mountain Sports Chuck Vidal told Council he had a building where the circumstance is the tenant is closed this summer. They have tried to take this advantage to build a second floor which is 2,000 square feet. Th~y have been unable to do this because of administrative delay. Vidal told Council he would have to go before the historic review committee. The Bell Mountain Sports building may not have an opportunity to do anything next summer because the shop may not be closed. " ~ Councilman Parry moved to approve the exemption from administrative delaYi seconded by Councilman Van Ness." Councilwoman Johnston stated that every time the Council gives an exemption to administrative delay, they are hurting their case for the growth management plan. Councilwoman Johnston said she saw no virtue in increasing the mas,s of the building and loosing a small, funky building in Aspen. Councilman Parry disagreed, saying that he felt they could come up with a nice looking building. Councilman Van Ness said this is talking about whether the growth management plan quota system should go on commercial space. Councilman Van Ness said if it is the intent of Council to exclude commercial space from the growth management plan, then Council is imposing an undue delay on getting this building up. councilman Wishart said if the Council keeps issuing exemptions, the City will never end up with a GMP, just a lot of people asking for exemptions. . ~ Councilrnembers Hershey, Parry, Van Ness in favor; councilmembers Johnston and Wishart Opposed. Motion carried. :i , XEROX CONTRACT - Ordinance #40, Series of 1977 Councilwoman Johnston asked why this item was on the agenda when Council voted against it. Councilman Hershey answered that the issue was brought up again by the police department. Sergeant Kreuser told Council that one person can no longer handle the dispatch center alone during the day. Last year the dispatch center made over 800 copies of records for people. The dispatch center has also taken over the records of the sheriff1s office. Kreuser presented the minutes of the joint meeting in November 1976 where Councilwoman Johnston suggested selling the mag card and purchasing a small Xerox machine. Finance '~...."..,. .-,;.....:lM'...."...~"J'-v,;,.,...,.:,'~~.'.....~:\?~'?t,:-"".~__""."... ~.." ,.,....., .~ "'-.""'.l""""'~' _~.,.:-~,~..'~'''.'' ,~.,"; ,",.~.~,' >.~:-. er.ADFORD PUBLISHING CO" DEN VCR ,.." RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS August 16; 19f7 Regular Meeting Jacobie Prelim- inary Plat - Public Hearing Temple Allen Subdivision Exemption Gignoux Lynch preliminary plat public hearing Planning and Zon~Commission the employees. Oates wondered if condominiumization was being treated differently than subdivision. Kane said subdivision is more restrictive. Kauffman said that this type of policy would be asking a few people to take on the burden of the community. Hedstrom moved to continue this hearing at 5:00 PM next Tuesday. Isaac seconded the motion. All in favor; meeting continued. Karen Smith presented the Jacobie Preliminary Plat for the Public Hearing. It is a five unit building on Park Circle. Four memos were presented for the record: 1) from the Planning Office on August 11, 1977; 2)from the City Engineer Dave Ellis on August 10, 1977; 3) from the Planning Office on July 20, 1977; and 4) from Mountain Bellon August 2, 1977. At the conceptual stage the Planning Office recommended approval subject to detailed technical review at the preliminax stage. The remaining disagreements can be resolved prior to final plat. Leonard Oates, attorney for the case, said that the main problem is a gap in ownership between two properties. This will be resolved. Collins opened the meeting to the public. There were no comments. The public portion was closed. Isaac asked why they were requesting a full subdivision. Smith said that full subdivision is at the option of the City Engineer. This requires compliance with design standards. Ensign moved to grant the preliminary plat approval for the Jacobie Condominiums Subdivision subject to the correction of several specified conditions. Hedstrom seconded the motion. All in favor; motion approved. Smith discussed the Temple Allen request for a subdivision exemption. It is six lots on Main Street in the 0 district. Allen wishes to separate lots K and L from the other four lots for the purpose of selling Aspen Valley Realty. The City Engineer (memo of August 10, 1977) has stated that the sidewalk is substandard. It needs to be concrete rather than gravel. There is no access permitted off Highway 82 thus access from the alley or the adjacent parking lot need to be granted. Temple Allen said that he would do whatever needed to be done to be granted this request. He stated that Mahoney had okayed the gravel sidewalk several years ago. Ensign moved to recommend approval of the Temple Allen request to be exempt from strict application of the subdivision regulation because requirements have been met and the intent of the regulation has been satisfied subject to replacement of the gravel sidewalk by concrete and access to lots K & L be allowed by easel'nent through the existing drive or alley. Baranko seconded the motion. All in favor; motion granted. Smith presented the Gignous Lynch preliminary plat for public hearing. The following memos were submitted for the record: 1) from the Planning Office on August 11,' 1977; . t1E110 '1'0: FJWI1 : DATE,: RE: J;lll~J:il ,;'11 'I'll )'J,J,!JiI I :Ie: IJ;:J'1,](,]'IlI:li'J' DAvr; ELl,]!; '-DZ" CITY ENGJ nElm t, L-/' August 10,1977 SUBDIVISIml EXEMPTlrnl REQUEST LOTS K-P, BLOCK 18 (Temple Allen) An inspection of the abovc property reveals that there is no sidewalk meeting present codc requiremcnts on Lots K & L. For soine unknm-m reason a gravel vlalk was constructed along part of the property frontage v~len the extensive r0nodel was madc. The gravel walk should be replaced with a concrete \-lalk. Onc other comment, for information only, is that present acccss to Lots K & L is through Lot M. If the parceling occurs an access easement will be necessary or a ncw access constructed off the alley. No new driveways are allowed off Highway 82. Except for correction of thc sidewalk the engineering dcpartment has no problems vii th this subidvision exemption. M E M 0 R A " U U M . , TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Cv::nni'sion FROM: Planning Office (JS) PE: 'Rio Grande Specially Pla.nn~d flrea DATE: August 11, 1977 The master plan for the City's Rio Grande Property vlill be present at the Plann-ing and Zon'ing meeting this v;eek. The plan is requil'~d under the Specially Planned Area section of the zoning cod2. It presents a general layout of proposed uses and a matrix to identify area and bulk requirements, parking requirements and other restrictions on the development of the property. Adoption of a Specially Planned Area follows the rezoning procedures which requires two public hearings: one before the Planning and Zoning Commission and one before City Council. The Planning and Zoning publ ic hearing \~ill be scheduled for September 6, 1977. lmk . ~ II () L L i\ \' J) .': II. \ WI' /, 1 I ' j I ' 1 I r '( ~, /. 1 I /. II II U I 'jf)rH ;",;'_'!,'()f) '.(" i I '.HI' ~ ,. rt I I ",,' i 1.,1,' "."1 f ,.n/lHI ',', I "I ',1 VI r. 'I t rll ,. ',11" IJrt111 ",' Ill'.:'/'!)', 1!1)!-H/.,rll,Ol:f-JVI-.r, t. J' I h r,', rl I ~j ',"1 I,.r, ',',J' "J"'" Dr: Il'/!' fi, '_'J' ')H/. ',~) 11(,;'-',1 Pl.ff,'..I- r'f.plY T'.l !~OIJ'.T/.H~ r 1.11, 1:'j'll>INC. ....~<1 C (J,01'LP: lId ~_-r, A~';J"_~l,'-'" '-..";'-1,"-, ",ICIl "Irl,Lr-'ll(JrlF '-J2'..-',.r/C. '.Pl.^ 'J,UL ~l'~': July 18, 1977 Planning Commission City. of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Application for Subdivision Exemption Temple W. Allen, Applicant Lots K, L, M, 1'1, 0 and P Block 18 City and Townsite of Aspen Members of the Planning Commission: As behalf of Temple W. Allen, we submi~ this application for subdivision exemption. Mr. Allen owns the six lots on the north- east corner of Seventh and Main. The Victorian Office Building, occupied by Aspen Valley Realty, is on Lots K and L. Mr. Allen's restaurant, the Hickory House, occupies the other four lots. Mr. Allen proposes to sell Lots K and L and to retain Lots H, 1'1, 0 and P. Section 20-4 (c) of the 1.1unicipal Code provides that all six lots are considered an undivided parcel and that the pro- posed sale of the office building on Lots K and L constitutes a subdivision. ,Exemption is requested under Section 20-l9(b) on the grounds tha~ the proposed division of land is not within the intent and purpose of tho subdivision ordinance. In support of the applica- tion, the following reasons are submitted: 1. The property is fully 0C'veloped; no additional devcelopmcnt application is involved in the sllbcljvic>ion; / / '- Planninq .Ju 1 y 18, Puge 2 Commission 1977 , , I .)1"', II , , LI , A :, II .\ II ,\ 1('" ',2. All streets and utilities have been in place for many years; no engineering of subdivision improvements is involved; 3. The proposed division along existing lot lines will satisfy the lot area requirements for the O-Office Zoning District. JTHjpal Applicant's Address: 110 S. Riverside P.O. Box 1334 Aspen, Colorado 925-7814 . Yours very trUly.~~ //~7 ~-->/f-'" , ..' . '-~ <,~,<." "":'''~).,rf~ f,.. ., /~.,'" ...<' ""Vi"/i v~mec; T. Moran .'."'''--- of Holland & Hart ~ Drive 81611 - ~ ~ I t-"- I" '/''Y &~. , M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Temple Allen - Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K-P, Block 18 DATE: August 18, 1977 At their August 16th meeting, the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the subdivision exemption request of Mr. Temple Allen involving Lots K-P, Block 18, which are located on Main Street. Mr. Allen requested the exemption in order to separate Lots K and L for the purpose of sale. Aspen Valley Realty is located on Lots K and L while the Hickory House is located on the reamining lots to be retained by Mr. Allen. Their motion contained certain references made by the City Engineer as follows: 1. A condition that the gravel sidewalk be improved with a concrete surface in accordance with subdivision design standrads. 2. A notation that access to Lots K and L, should the parceling occur will have to be provided through the alley or by granting an easement through the adjacent lots. Inasmuch as the proposed division, with the conditions noted above, would comply with subdivision design standards, full subdivision review procedures are not warranted and the subdivision exemption request merits approval. lmk 1" '--, , ~ , '..,..It,' M E M 0 RAN DUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Office (KS) RE: Temple Allen - Subdivision Exemption Request - Lots K-P, Block 18 DATE: August 12, 1977 This is an application for subdivision exemption under Section 20-19 of the Aspen Municipal Code. Mr. Allen is requesting the subdivision exemption in order to sell lots K and L on which is located Aspen Valley Realty. The other four lots where the Hickory House is located would be returned by Mr. Allen. J ' rr 1{1.1;, (;'\_ We have asked Dave Ellis to review the proposal for conformity with Subdivision design standards. He has noted a couple of items (i.e. sidewalks and no access off Highway 82) which should be conditions of your exemption. We agree with the applicant that the proposal will create a lot conforming with the O-office district requirements and that full subdivision review are unnecessary because the improvements are already in place and with the exception of Dave Ellis' comments are in conformance with subdivision design standards. lmk enc. . r \..- --., -- :) , HOLLAND & HART ATTORN EY5 AT LAW TELEPHONE 292-9200 AREA CODE 303 500 EQUITABLE BUilDING 730 SEVENTEENTH STREET CABLE ADDRESS HOLHART, DENVER DENVER, COLORADO P. O. BOX 8749 DENVER,COLORADO B0201 PLEASE REPLY TO: MOUNTAIN PLAZA BUILDING 434 E.COOPER STREET, ASPEN,COLORADO 81611 TELEPHONE 925-3476 AREA CODE 303 July 18, 1977 Planning Commission City of Aspen 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Re: Application for Subdivision Exemption Temple W. Allen, Applicant Lots K, L, M, N, 0 and P Block 18 City and Townsite of Aspen Members of the Planning Commission: As behalf of Temple W. Allen, we submit this application for subdivision exemption. Mr. Allen owns the six lots on the north- east corner of Seventh and Main. The Victorian Office Building, occupied by Aspen Valley Realty, is on Lots K and L. Mr. Allen's restaurant, the Hickory House, occupies the other four lots. Mr. Allen proposes to sell Lots K and L and to retain Lots M, N, 0 and P. Section 20-4(c) of the Municipal Code provides that all six lots are considered an undivided parcel and that the pro- posed sale of the office building on Lots K and L constitutes a subdivision. Exemption is requested under Section 20-19 (b) on the grounds that the proposed division of land is not within the intent and purpose of the subdivision ordinance. In support of the applica- tion, the following reasons are submitted: 1. The property is fully developed; no additional development application is involved in the subdivision; '" ",".''- HOLLAND &HART Planning Commission July 18, 1977 Page 2 , A "(;{' i;~/' - ~ d' " 1 "." ( ,B.c." ,-~ o...,..,~ " I, '0. I" , J'" .10 ^~!" 101,''! I ; i.- '(L/ :' (!..'~ 0V / , :) :- .. .. V' '5/ ,/ (' , 2. All streets and utili ties have been in place for many years; no engineering of subdivision improvements is involved; 3. The proposed division along existing lot lines will satisfy the lot area requirements for the a-Office Zoning District. Yours very trul /' ames T. Moran of Holland & Hart JTMjpal Applicant's Address: 110 S. Riverside Drive P.O. Box 1334 Aspen, Colorado 81611 925-7814 MEMO TO: FROM: DATE: RE: KAREN SMITH PLANNING DEPARTMENT DAVE ELLIS <::'l'\ i'" CITY ENGINEER '}r~ August 10,1977 SUBDIVISION EXEMPTION REQUEST LOTS K-P, BLOCK 18 (Temple Allen) An inspection of the above property reveals that there is no sidewalk meeting present code requirements on Lots K & L. For some unknown reason a gravel walk was constructed along part of the property frontage when the extensive remodel was made. The gravel walk should be replaced with a concrete walk. One other comment, for information only, is that present access to Lots K & L is through Lot M. If the parceling occurs an access easement will be necessary or a new access constructed off the alley. No new driveways are allowed off Highway 82. Except for correction of the sidewalk the engineering department has no problems with this subidvision exemption. tf~ 'EX. HF110RANnU~1 TO: CLAYTON z.1EYRING FR0!4 : HICR ~lAHONEY DATE: JULY 23, 1976 RE: PROPERTY OWNED BY TEMPLE W. ALLEN (PARK DEDICATION FEE) Please see attached copy of letter from Mr. James J. Mollica. I will accept Mr. ' ion of $127,500.00 as representing the value of ~~. property. PSM/pm