Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19800108 "-, -,,~ RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FOlllI!\O C.F.HOECKELB.B.ltl.CO. Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission January 08, 1980 Regular Neeting The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission held a regular meeting on January 08, 1980, at 5:0hPM in the City Council Chambers. Members present were Olof Hedstrom, Welton Anderson, Parry Harvey, Roger Hunt and Nancy McDonnell. Also, present were Karen Smith, Joe Wells, Sunny Vann all of the Planning Office, and Ron Stock, City Attorney, and Jay Hammond of the Engineering Office. Approval of 1.1inutes Commissionmember Comments Little Annie Rezoning Request Law Enforcement Facility Public Hearing All agreed they had not had enough time to complete the reading of the minutes. The minutes were tabled until next meeting of January 22, 1980. Motion made, Roger Hunt, seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Karen Smith announced the presentation of the Zoning En- forcement Officer Resolution is scheduled for January 14, 1980, City Council meeting. Also, the Housing Program followup meeting is scheduled for January 10, 1980 from 5:00 to 7:00 P.M., and the Housing Overlay is scheduled for January 14, 1980. Joe Hells of the Planning Office introduced the Little Annie Rezoning Request which should be tied to the PUD and Subdivision Request since the facilities are not per- mitted in the R15 zone district. ~his is on the agenda simply to ask that the P & Z formally request a schedul- ing of a Public Hearing for January 22, 1980. A portion of the site is to be down zoned from R15 to RR Rural Resi- dential and a portion would have to be upzoned to R6 for employee housing. Roger Hunt moved to schedule a Public Hearing for Little Annie Rezoning Request which shall be initiated by the P & Z Commission on January 22, 1980. Helton Anderson, seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Karen Smith of the Planning Office asked to consider this later in the meeting since the parties involved are not at this meeting as of yet. Olof Hedstrom agreed and asked to proceed with the business at hand. After a few minutes of discussion this public hearing was reopened and pro- ceeded. Joe Wells introduced the Law Enforcement Facility Rezoning Request application with two alternatives in this pre- posal. First is the request on the Oden property, 'Which is a parcel behind the Mill and Main Building and between this and Caps Auto Supply along Mill Street. A rezoning request on that site from "0", Office zoning to "Pub", Public zoning to accommodate the Law Enforcement Facility. The alternative is a site on city owned property behind the Courthouse generally due north of the Courthouse at the present set of stairs down to the parking area. How- ever the request by the County has been modified to only be a request for the commencement of an S.P.A. process on the city owned site, specifically the portion behind the Courthouse, dropping the request for rezoning on the Oden property for financial reasons stated in the attached memo by George Ochs dated December 17, 1979. Possibly a land trade potential would be available. George Ochs introduced his comments on the request to re- zone the area that is presently zoned S.P.A. to Public and that area is 17,600 sq. ft. This is the adoption of - -2- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORII!\O C.F.HOECKELB.9.ll:L.CO. Re-lJll1;::ar Mc.c.t-in'J A~ppn Plnnninq and Zoning Commission January 08, 1980 the developement plan for that section of the S.P.A. zone, and that requires a rezoning procedure. The P & Z needs to approve the developement plan for a Law Enforcement Facility on this site or the initiation of the process. Some reconsideration is necessary due to the redeveloping by the architects of the size of the building and secondly the financial capabilities of the County. Olof Hedstrom closed the Public Hearing and considenJthis an informal discussion arriving at an expression of opinion from the commission with no formal action to be taken. Perry Harvey commented he felt there is a lack of required information to make judgement or give guidance and it seems to give severe access problem for emergency vehicles and questions the uses of the proposals. Welton Anderson agreed with Perry and also questions the access problems. Olof Hedstrom agreed with both and commented that the ac- cess problems can be solved but more needed information on the total areas usage and requirements is necessary. He disagrees with the piece meal developement and need to consider the public use of this site. Roger Hunt agreed and that process should include the Galena Street extension. Nancy McDonnell agreed and felt it is our responsiblity to get that plan together so that procedure of projects of this nature can be done. Olof Hedstrom asked for a motion of an adoption of a re- solution incorporating the comments of the commission- members. Roger Hunt so moved, Welton Anderson seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Mountain Forge Parking Olof Hedstrom stated consideration will be taken informal- ly due to having the Planning Office presentation and comments and recommendation come before us for formal ac- tion, but would here the matters in question since the applicant is present. Don introduced the request for variance from parking facilities for office use and felt since no ac- tion would be considered at this time, they should wait and be put on the January 22, 1980 agenda for formal ac- tion. TDR Discussion Ron Stock presented the changes made in the draft of this Ordinance being: Section 2, paragraph A, line 10, "sub- section and reconstruction an illegal" should be "legally". Section 1 was changed, the floor area ratio and not allow mixed projects. Section 2-11.2 changed saying in order to have an approval process for the TDR of a lodge, would have to be approved under Section 24-10.12 and the right to reconstruct pursuant to the section is nontransferable. Anytime a conversion to employee housing takes place, a special approval will be required. I would like to see included in this ordinance to a time limitation on con- forming rebuilding uses. FORIIl ~ C. F.HOECKEL B. B.ll: L. co. - -3- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission January 08, 1980 Regular Meeting Bli tz II Subdivision Exemption Hamilton Subdi- vision Exemption Karen Smith wanted to point out Section 1 changed regard- ing the internal floor area ratio. The ability for an application to apply for a 1.5 to 1 floor area ratio is in addition of the TDR and the 1.25 to 1 bases FAR. Due to the diliberation on the allowed time span to have property reconstructed with building permits the added wording by Ron Stock states; must be constructed within one year or such later time as maybe under exception of Section 24-10.12. All agreed. Sunny Vann of the Planning Office introduced the Blitz II Subdivision Exemption in the L-2, Lodge Two Zone, on South Galena Street, Lot 15, Anthony Acres Subdivision consisting of a new duplex under construction. The Engi- neering Department recommends approval subject to four conditions. The City Attorney and the Housing Director have no objections. The Planning Office recommends appro- val sUbject to the conditions stipulated in the Engineer- ing Department's memorandum dated December 7, 1979. Welton Anderson moved to recommend approval of the Blitz II Subdivision Exemption, Lot 15, Anthony Acres Subdivi- sion, subject to conditions in compliance with Engineer- ing Departments memorandum dated December 7, 1979. Nancy McDonnell, seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Sunny Vann introduced the George Hamilton Subdivision Exemption, Lots K, L, M, Block 26, Aspen Townsite at 540 West Smuggler. One-half of the duplex is owner occupied and the remaining unit is utilized as a guest house. The Engineering Department recommends approval subject to three conditions. The City Attorney recommends approval conditioned upon the owner/applicant complying with the notice and option provision and six-month minimum lease requirement of SEction 20-22 of the Municipal Code. The Planning Office recommends approval subject to compli- ance with the stipulations contained in _the Engineering Department's memo of December 31, 1979 and the notice and option and six-month minimum lease provisions of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code. Welton Anderson moved to recommend approval of the Hamil- ton Subdivision Exemption, Lots K, L, and M, Block 26, Aspen Townsite at 540 West Smuggler, subject to conditions in compliance with Engineering Department's memorandum dated December 31, 1979 and the notice and option and six-month minimum lease provisions of Section 20-22 of the Municipal Code. Perry Harvey, seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Nancy McDonnell moved to adjourn the meeting, Welton Anderson seconded. All in favor, motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M. ~ ~O))'itL Sandi Meredith, Deputy City Clerk