Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Land Use Case.233 Airport Rd.A116-99R
t 2643-342-00-001 A116-99R County Referral b --.-pi tkin County Airport Senic Overlay 4 9 4.41 VLCUL.9 /0/3 \ PARCEL ID: ~2643-342-00001 DATE RCVD: |12/28/99 =- # COPIES:|~ CASE NO~A116-99R CASE NAME:~Pitkin County Airport Senic Overlay review & Special Review PLNR:~ PROJ ADDR:~Pitkin County Airport CASE TYP:|County Referral STEPS1 OWN/APP: ADRj Cls/z:1 PHN:~ REP:| ADR: ~ C/S/z:i PHN:~ FEES DUE:~ FEES RCVD:~ STAT: ~--- REFERRALS~Comments due 1/17/2000 REF:~ BY| DUE:~ MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED . '- DATE OF FINAL ACTION:~ 1 j (4/9 e CITY COUNCIL:] REMARKS 13% pz: BOA: CLOSED:I I~ Ldfoo BY: 1-1- l~Uff- DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: ~ PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: Rwu C (3~ Co ow *vt ~ fit MEMORANDUM TO: Tamara Pregl, County Planner FROM: James Lindt, City Planning Technician THRU: Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Director RE: Pitkin County Airport Scenic Overlay Review & Special Review DATE: January 14,2000 The City Planning Staff reviewed the Pitkin County Airport application and had the following concerns: 1. Staff recommends that the County explore the possibility o f enhancing the landscaping around the Highway 82 corridor in this area to offset and minimize the visual impacts of the increased amount of pavement for parking vehicles and airplanes. 2. Staff recommends that the County develop a new berm configuration around the newly proposed vehicle parking lot to further minimize the visual impact of having parking closer to Highway 82. Staff believes that the existing berm does a good job of concealing much of the airport from Highway 82. Staff recommends that at a minimum the County replace the berm configuration that is presently in existence and move it closer to the highway to conceal the new parking area. 3. Staff also recommends that the County ensure that an adequate drainage plan is designed and implemented to control the increased runoff generated from additional impervious surfaces as proposed in the application. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comment on this County application. ASPEN/PITKIN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 Phone (970) 920-5090 FAX (970) 920-5439 MEMORANDUM TO: Attorney Engineer Zoning CDOT Aspen Fire City of Aspen Planning staff -m.-11 LL--' FROM: Tamara Pregl, Community Development Department RE: Pitkin County Airport Scenic Overlay Review & Special Review PID# 2643-342-00-001 P173-99 DATE: December 27, 1999 Attached for your review and comments are materials for an application by Pitkin County. This application will be reviewed by the Pitkin Planning & Zoning Commission on February 1,2000. Please return your comments to me no later than January 17,2000. Thank you. 9 1% r . € +44, .f r I I, ?44 ... Z. . . .4 1- t .... 2. _ 1 474 . I 1- 6 - -,41' a 0 - I. ' f - 2€ N ' , ,~ , - ,€561111,~11 1 : ill. f ,¢4f fp € t./11 .'L :g :./ 'tr . ti~ . ;119:,tht ... .' All .*I#/ . . , I lit ..,5., . 41 4/Alpi '.. 4. . 4/&4| I '71 I . . 7. I.- n ~ & 1. 1, . .... .6 a -.,99¢AA * ~ 0..0.If. . , .10=- . 164&.¥0' i J#* 4 F Ki'"taKI-:.:IKP .P · I - 4 - I .,41*.'44?2ff~ 0* 1 i i.... r . 4 4 4*11'fr. f.*ff'-ir 2.,11 '¥ 2. // . a//4p ' : v -/.471- Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Year 2000 Capital Improvements Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application December 1999 Sponsor: Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Pitkin County, Colorado Preparedby: TG Malloy Consulting, LLC 326 Garfield Avenue Carbondale, Colorado 81623 970.704.0152 Shannon Murphy Landscape Architect 174 Midland Avenue Basalt, Colorado 81621 970.927.2889 Isbill Associates/Ratheon Engineering Airport Consultants Englewood, Colorado 303.843.2200 Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Year 2000 Capital Improvements Scenic Overlay & Special Review Application Submittal Requirements 1. Proof of Ownership is on file with the County; 2. Legal Description of Property is also on file with the County, a vicinity map is included within the application as Figure 1; 3. Letter of Consent from owner authorizing TG Malloy Consulting to represent them in the processing of this land use application is included as Attachment A; 4. Two copies of the signed Fee Agreement were included with the application at submission; 5. Summary letter explaining the request and addressing compliance with the Pitkin County Land Use Code is satisfied within the body of this land use application; 6. Photos of the site as seen from Highway 82 are included within this application as Figures 9,10 and 11; 7. 24" x 36" Site Plan with topography is enclosed with this application and a reduced copy is included within the application text as Figure 5; 8. 24" x 36" Rough Grading Plan is enclosed and a reduced copy of this drawing is included in the text as Figure 6; 9. Landscaping for the project is shown on the Site Plan (Figure 5); 10. A list of Adjacent Property Owners was submitted to the Community Development Department with this application; 11. Copy of the Pre-Application Form is included as Attachment B; 12. Copy ofResolution 98-67 is included as Attachment C. Introduction The purpose o f this application is to seek approval for several improvements to the Aspen Pitkin County Airport as contained in the approved 1998 Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Airport Layout Plan Update. This Plan considered the entire airport property and all of the functions that occur on the property. The specific improvements requested in this application were identified as appropriate for this location in the Airport Layout Plan Update, which was reviewed and approved by the Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners and accepted by the Federal Aviation Administration. The requested improvements are identified in Phase I of the Capital Improvement Plan . The proposed improvements include: 1. Complete grading (approved in 1998) and paving of the General Aviation Apron on the north end of the airport to allow the relocation of airplane parking out of the Runway Object Free Area (OFA); 2. Install a small vehicle parking area for local-based aircraft owners; 3. Removal of paving along the west side of Taxiway A. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 1 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application 1 2'>64/ PA.3-1.kf--/ /i I *16 - 3 4 1 ' 04 ;' I. 9 82 1&% ' ·· --1.. 1 4.1 l -\ I 1... : ./ , 2/7.39 4 1 f C ---. ~ i - h ID»~~41 .,'. -1- .1.40 /2'f.r-+ 41, - . ..7.-11:£ *£1,Ld.__' f-il.-=<474~~< fl 't fz=,3231~-- · :cfeevi 12' '1 '/ 11 tr.-11 0 WA) f , .'- | ~· ~ ~ 1 *~ <- (;0;17J~ fg*>»-,9'4 f ' .4.91; fi ~,~4~ \ ..7 L 1 / / ,9.f.... > 1-s' ~~~~~*~~-47T r. \1 -11,1 14. C !. \ 1-31 L,~ ~*\< *--~,3--5~12-0~ i.~ ·, .. ~ ·, , · 7 4--7 ,, f# 132\-/-' 179«. 4_~ vis ti ~.<-1.*:4.1\220xeft»; - ..1-63 Jil, 3. h . 70% r' ,/ C--f . < -g •~6 i ..hi.--6.»r ...... 1 . 31 ./.1 .. bl 1, - .f U •.f I.-r .0 SP"P -r. 7 1~ /f -. 7644 ..... /'. .L * £ I -- rk. J .>/-/:'.-4 :..·-I \7--1 /3-457 4-9 Ljkjrf'.4 4/51 0.1 *Tr' ts £--r, C. , 97/4 ,/ 1<'41% .4 . 1 +1.,1- -%., t.-; -.- /1 I- ./1$ 1 , f 1 21 3 'ir a. 2.L---- 1 - 3-~- r ./' m " 4 0: 0 1 0/ r O . W 11 . , J , 1 - I ! :' - Ch - :' I. -5. - / ~ 1., 'V../.'.--,-. W- 1-lipad - 0 1, 1 £ .£' Nk ,-=54 . , 44 1,4 L -1 1, ..: l ;17' f RU,901rk W · . -- - 1 4 2 \ AL/*9.-rb-·'~-, '-i„.~_..._ : _. J= '1 %9:91*. ,« 11 - -2 - 11 . < d.*-6 1>-2 1 /1 .V / / 011€r Coly Form --111 0,.(.. ---% 7/43»11 1 ,/ , h., 0 11 , -*-* - -h 1\46.1, 1 ......,. 1% 1.' 3 · 1 PACF,- f :·.34\11 2 91 ill .bAspen/P~tkin County Airport -42<·S€. 10.9-~11,1,- 1-' 91-flf=~--„ - 221214 1 13 t j - , \per 11 i : : 2(1 3 i V 'T /le M Vil ' 3 % N - . .4 f ..423) 1..1/. AS 6.4 k . - 1 06 58~ 5 11 lintvpwu~ ·-; . +L'*2imal \ f . /1,1 9.. P -' Vt'rage R.' f *w 0*.-~4 6-F- :-1 4~------ -=- ... .. 1 - 1-2 "A '.' R 4/· 9 . - .gi-/-*.2' iff' 62 - 1.1 .--'*I ir- 2 i-4, 4.44 Ro 8,4. ... . . - I. >//S-9-*Re' ' UN>. . _4* / u~t€k v - -1 7 -Af 9 4 4 6. . -- -V -0 0, \-.I * - =:SC'N _ : /-- 4 -- 'L-- ' k - -·0 A= --4 -7 . ...-4- -•- I \C;P'Snow ass Ski Are 0 4,2.- O \-/ f /1 l #foroh · · .' - /40 W·d ..' . ..···· 1, I , 4 1 .. - · 1" ' c ., -_.--- - 4.?!ji *ci'.4--7-Z Q' p. \ : , Ffes¢rwirt>i j < . •9 9- r · v , 1 1. I l - 1 1, 177jly,4 -tf'R,Nt'v 82 i r. ,__ 1 7.4 ShaR ~' 1 ' 4 r / 17 , -:R:30'3Te,···tr r» ..... Buttermilk N»untain 4-, 11 - 'I f ·· , - l / 41 01 1 V 3 1. r T I. 9 ./ ..~~ ../.--j.,1~3:.r-,7/~'..... 21 5 /< .% . 4' ' A»Bp 'Grov€ c,- 'Al - 1 / 1 4 4--% -1- ' 12. /11 ~11 d'~ ~ , 7 ,-<1--*01 * 2- , I. ' I.-.i. ' 1 / +Se 7 .h O 61 1 m .. - - . j .-I.I./. i 1 e (r J ' t,£ ' . tli 1 ..% - I '4., 1. 19?0-6., . 4 8 4 -4.2 1 1 1 , 4 4 -43:~ 3 lv€I~pasa Road · M . 9. , , INA·. 27-%-LI&>2-·2] *TRA ·~ '.1-·11.4 '.5 - , f<j.2, ~,1.// t... '4 -4. 33 ~- ~ .. ' ' ' - IAS,)611 Moun h H .1,6 : , 2-1 -1/3 1 i 1.1 ffunk.··· ./ /, - - 1 E . / 2»+2/.717 385)- 0€L. ha· k ''P/i\spe 1..1 . 1 L, i i ( 3 16 ' jil 1 I 1 2 , 1 913|t . 7*11 A- . f , 13'-9 , "21, ~:- % , 1 , ! 7 0 , '. . . . 01. . \.4 .... .1 .1 -1/0...-1 ..... 1 -% 11.- 1 V # ,.1 / , ... MO,WA: - 6, . afl' , ./ C/' : 4, :,i# 9 B:i -!.2; .'I I ·· I ,; ,·f ~r ..0/ I. ~ I# I ./ f'\ \ ¢4:l '. eo#rikt..--: * 2'4' ~ h 4,-J'.9,3 ' 9-A i , . t! 414 1 I l · , I L /' i 1),(FJ#17 0 I ' 1 ' 24 · '1 - ' M : ' I /. ~%. .- A .-. ' I i, 1,;1 7 --/ 4/ f,N t 0. i..4 - · .» e ·-··~ ·~ , ji.\U·In NA' 541,91;~~ 3. 4:k j·:,:.''i 1 J . . '' 111, . . F#4 ) 4 j f,// -tir,'i'/ k F.: 7: ·1·. . ,/.4 '. ''11 1 4 A ... 49, .af (/ 3 4/ -30.-//fi 1-~~/,1 42 671:JA...7~2.j-i(-4*j r'Ki---4 1,1 4- \23 ,1.\ .2 - 1 h %5 r f k -- . , - / ' C . i £ 1, & 'u 7. i '1191 .- 4 - I ' ' '.14*. :1; .2 .....L -I . 7, '' 1 voii-74>--'ff,/,f//fl{ bi~ ··~ t)·) . ~· · ~'.-,\ ). \1 2 ~ 7·t *F.rVU./.. 0- I / % ./. 4-. 1 /)1 1 1.1 ; . . .% ~ 1/ , 011/ --·. ,9/7 ,-Maroon Bells-Sncy.vztiass i ",2'//.-1.·' ·r ,ilit it.~-14 1.'Ctinujld[Ofn , 5.·:,tly!\ i ... % ' '1.0 ./. 4 A- W r ...., - 917 i)-1-.r -v~Iderne* 2-· *-52>'* · 1 '. -1 -h. Y> 2 11.0 ~ - ~~ ~.2 -Jf j*@0 t• '1 : 'l · 1 -41 -': 91.,-4+7»*M // f H.9.. \1 1. i j f N-/1&·'' *:~ f ~ l, ~4?44·~2&274 22~S·.. 3.< ,/; '1, .*. 1 Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Year 2000 Capital Improvements Figure 1 - Vicinity Map 1 ./ g 'fr The County approved the rough grading for the expansion ofthe General Aviation Apron in 1998. Some of this grading work was conducted during the 1999 summer construction season. The remaining grading work can be completed under the previously granted approval. However, the installation of the road base and paving surface for the apron extension require Special Review and Scenic Overlay approval since this will involve more fill and will result in aircraft being parked closer to the Highway than in the current condition. Further review of this project is also required per Resolution 98-67 (See Attachment C). Background The Aspen/Pitkin County Airport is located approximately 3 miles northwest of the City ofAspen, just west of State Highway 82 in Unincorporated Pitkin County. The airport, encompasses approximately 572 acres in the Roaring Fork Valley at an elevation of 7,815 feet (see Figure 1, Vicinity Map). The National Plan of Integrated Airport Systems defines Aspen/Pitkin County Airport as a Primary Commercial Services Airport, (the airport enplanes at least 10,000 people annually and receives scheduled airline service). The airport is owned and operated by Pitkin County, which is the applicant for this land use application. The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) oversee major facility decisions and approve funding for major capital improvement projects, a full time manager oversees the day-to-day operations, performs strategic planning, and coordinates all development activities associated with the airport. 2 4 Construction History: The Civil Aeronautics Administration and Pitkin County, as airport sponsor, funded the initial construction of Runway 15/33, a connecting taxiway, and an apron in 1957. The original paved runway was 5,200 feet long by 60 feet. In 1958, the airport was officially dedicated as the Aspen-Pitkin County (Sardy Field) Airport. In 1963, the runway extended to 6,000 feet. By 1969, the runway was widened to 80 feet in order to accommodate larger aircraft. During the 1970s, in ordfer to focus on customer air service, the County planned and provided for centralized passenger service. A parcel of land containing approximately 29 acres was acquired to accommodate a new terminal building and an aircraft parking apron was constructed in 1973 to serve the new terminal. The new 17,500 square foot terminal building was constructed in 1976 and was the first commercial building in the United States to use passive solar heating. The runway was lengthened and widened in 1983 to 7,004 feet long by 100 feet wide. The entire terminal area was redeveloped in 1986 and 1987. This included new vehicular access roadways and the expansion of the terminal to 37,500 square feet. Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Layout Plan Update: Per Resolution No. 98-67, The Pitkin County Board of County Commissioners approved an amendment to the Pitkin County Airport Master Plan and Special Review for the Airport Carwash and Fueling Facility (see Attachment C). The 1998 Master Plan Update included a phased Capital Improvement Plan. This plan shows improvements in three phases; Phase I (1998-2002), Phase II (2003-2007) and Phase III (2008-2015). Figures 2, 3 and 4 depict the work to be conducted during each of these phases. The proposed improvements are identified in Phase I (Figure 2) as Item 6. As indicated previously, approval for the rough grading for the relocation of Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 3 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application 122-, Emudg.Lt EXISTING DEVELOPMENT (0 - (E) EXISTNG FUTURE - (R) TO BE REMOVED/RELOCATED (00 OBSTRUCTION UGHTED --I -------- FUTURE DEVELOPMENT 1. TERMINAL BUILDING (EXF) - EXISMG PROPERTY UNE 2. CONTROL TOWER (E)(F)(OL) --I 3. F.B.O. TERMINAL (E)(F) ----- FUTURE PROPERTY UNE »10, 4. F.B.0. HANGAR (E)(F) BUILDING RESTRICTION UNE (BRO 5. RENTAL CAR STORAGE LOT (01 - *0 \ X EXSTING FENCE 8. RENTAL CAR READY LOT <EXR) -% - 17/7 4 7. RENTAL CAR WASM FACILITY (F) M< an FUTURE FENCE 8. POLS (EXF) A;RPORT REFERENCE POINT 9. WIND CONE (E)(F)(OL) -0/ .f4// / e DCSTING BUILDINGS 1°' Zrl:;'3; Z;)AND COUNTY SHOPS (E) 0 0 ~00000~~/ i It)3; EXISTING BUILDINGS TO BE RELOCATED 0 9,1 12. GENERAL AVIATION -REDOWN APRON <E)(F)(R) --I 33,;ZS G '0 ..ixte/£,7 - FUTURE BULDINGS 13. PUBUC AUTOMOBILE PARKING (E)(F) 34/27 \ 14. SHORT ERU AUTO PARKING (Rm - SECTION CORNER - 15. LONG TERM AND EMPLOYEE AUTO PARKING CE)<F)(R) ,/ er \ 4 Ji/\ socs EXISTING CONTOUR 16. ROTALNG BEACON (E) J¢' / / 17. AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVAION SYSTEM (E) / ~ e • EXISUNG RUNWAY UGHT-q#% -4/ 5*10'01 \4~ 18. RADAR CONTROL FACIUTY (E)(F) MI 0- 24 , - » %~;1%3119« .L,3%51* 0 4.-0/. /1~ WiND CONE AND SEGMENTED C:RCLE 19. PAPI (0 Or *= 20. INDEX -8- ARFF BUILDING (E)(F)(R) - - <--*3576* i 4*99*ASS&32 FUTURE AV'IGAT'ION EASEMENT 21. VASI (E)(R) //. 22. VIND INSTRUMENT (EXR)(00 , 00 72\ 0 r - FUTURE UGHT RAIL 23. ARFF TRAINING PIT (E) %€,-- =ir \ 'ye 1 ,1 - 1 imph 24. PADO SHELTERS <F) C.. 0 j ASOS CRITICAL AREA 25. UGHT RAIL STATION (F) 49 y 1 b 1 r 3 FUTURE ROR SIGNS 0 -. J .92,227~'>· Clt- / .- - 23135 -- -9 PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 4£3: 2)' ,~* 1 -- -- 1 / i ~ 191- r I / 10 IGA·.D- . I <%01 lel . / / '' 43§33- / , i . - 00 41.·r- ·x --. - -2 / /*-43 65$'/Cu. - / -.5.59 -- , , -f>~ r '300.- 4 , 49/. --- 0.74*KL---' 2~05--1\ ¥ ..0 // P. .k 7 7 ./ ,+ -0 / S 9, 'KF© 'fl K.-0 . . i, /../ - / %4 - / -- 6 0 / 4- , - // n 062~6&- g €93 I /0- i EN=V&*Fww= - t.se , , 2 -- -- < ~21.1* 0 ~~~~35 0 - -r it 5€ 0€Cl EBE&- I r sU'O -~© 1 1 /55:/ 9?1 40 '·tlig,sy~ 5- 9 49& , /9.~7.27 7\ SURFACE . ./ * R + /4* » /2// 7 /1 /-,0.20 r, - ----'---- I - '0(& n ~* 72 15*, - 10000 1 i - 93 - ti-% \ ut.. // a , - ~-, /// \\iMy~~L CAPnAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE / ~ , ,/r .rl r 1 *09 \ 5(y) 1 0 , · .:>2 - . 16 (' 4140 i / f*:4-.·. r· 14y:-*-:19998-22002 044-0<I .=-~·.- . r . . - - :.I z·.-X \40 j / 4-2.185 COL AOS , \ ~~Ul 12 £ff ~~ - 0% 1998 RE}~BUTA.1/ RE©ON;l~CrAm CAR¤RAPRON & 74 cn€) 2000 -iA€E SNO#REMOVALmt-ENr . n. .: '' DISH SPEED PUN, W, SNEEPERNOTS,40-4 4 »~-«A c :0@ 1998 AGDUL MFONg~AIAY 151@yo -kd O :.: 4 o® 2000 m,4,1,1„A„GE,f,BeALAA,AiON-DN FIAIO _j\0230'~4 9® 1999 COAm=,tr- cAn„NE„AcamvrAPRON .66 %(43.i [Z}® ZOO, Am,ORrAMS,EMAN 41041,1NOTSHOWM 49 ER @ 2001 ma,NUAOCESS *~RO~leVIS BPOSmONSCUTOFROFAI '092 23 5 1999 REFIACESNOW REMOMAL ECAR~defir 00&84SNO-O-NOTSHOWN = un; 1,@ 2001 m1440Im,7161)VER,LAWU,ONAPRON/N,SE4 ~urrn 40**L "Ay :008 . . . ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 4'34* 4% £37€) 2000 COA67*UCTGE~.MLAMMIONAR/19 70000(UE &144 200, CONSATIT,EmETE,Ra,) 400 0 400 = i. Rille OUT -Im :i.= -429: 44. 1 1 1 SCALE IN FEE rn ~ 2002 19~,ND GE•mRAL,N~IK»1APRON WrO 337 ==9. Crl(~) 2000 COA5mUCT817709*117% FOR LOCAL 84SED AllOWT p En,U)YEE/LONG,EaWLOT 0 ® 2000 ACCM-E LAND FOR RtMEMY 33~ ma® 2002 MOOfrAE O,me 7ERR-ll Bil/13-6 ~ ISBILL ASSOCIATES ASE-1855 DES D.F.N. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM DR. D.C.C Figure 2 Raytheon Infrastructure Inc. -~4 ASPEN-PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT 1998 - 2002 ARPCRT COGLTANTS AURORA CaORADO ~ '~~0~ CH. N.EA PHONE (303) 36*-2500 FAX (303) 364-0257 ASPEN, COLORADO REV. NO. DATE DESCRIPTION up RP· H-Gl FIGURE IV-9 11.-1-'*1112 .ALamEZ~.ZAG~2U.[St EXISTING DEVELOPMENT (E) EXISANG (F) FUTURE , (R) TO BE REMOID/RELOCATED (01) OBSTRUCTION UGHTED ,•e-/1 -======= PJTURE DEVELOPMENT L TERMINAL BUILDING (E>(F) EXISTING PROPERR UNE 2. CONTROL TOWER (E)<F)(OL) - - - - - FUTURE PROPERTY UNE 3. F.8.0. TERMINAL (E)(F) --I 0927 ' 5. RE~ITAL- ~~TORAGE LOT (E)(F) '- BUILDING RESTRICTION UNE (BRI) ~ An \ - EXISTNG FENCE 6. RENTAL CAR READY LOT <E)(R) --- ~74~:& -XX- FUTURE FENCE 7. RENTAL CAR WASH FACIUTY (F) S. REILS (E)(F) -0 ; AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT 9. #1ND COKE (E)(F)(01.1 -04/ \ EXISTING BUILDINGS 10. MAINTENANCE AREA AND COUN-TY SHOPS (E) /./3>. ~ EZE EXISMNG BUILDINGS TO BE RELOCATED 11. FUEL FACILITY (E)(R) * SUv -1.30=p- 12. GENERAL AVIATION nEDOWN APRON (E)(F)(R) 33,28 .EXISRNG NPI RPZ *25' .&~CO FUTURE BUILDINGS 13, PUBUC AUTOMOBILE PARKING (EXF) 3~7 SECTION CORNER 14. SHORT TERM AUTO PARKING (E)(Fl - ~ , /1 \ 15. LONG TERM AND EMPLOYEE AUTO PARKING (E)(FXR) f 3**1\ EXISTING CONTOUR 16. ROTABNG BEACON (E', 1/ \ y 'fl 17. AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVAT;ON SYSTEM <E) 9 EXISTING RUNWAY UGHT 18. RADAR CONTROL FACIUTY (E)(F) C~ WIND CONE AND SEGMENTED CIRCLE 19. PAPI (F) L/ 20. INDEX 7 ARFF Bul'LOING (EXF)(12) € '6&&07,1« I irl *I 4·44·2924*S=S FUTURE AVIGA-CON EASEMENT 21. VASI (E)(R) 1 46.- / 22. WIND INSTRUMENT (EXR)(00 1 FUTURE LIGHT RAIL 23. ARFF TRAINING PIT (E) 0 -61:S- y 24. PATVO SHELTERS (F) -4.9,335-- 92119 7 - / ASOS CRITICAL AREA 25. UGHT RAIL STATION (23 1 - 7. I 1 7 o Efrs,+301-34*L - I .s.r k<56#affgatit---- 1 C FUTURE ROR SENS , 1 6- ~~~~~ PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED 2 Z :/ \ C ...- / - -* 7 +.*&90.:-* M- j al. 'D /4 0 1 -01 /9 - -02 - 10<31 -3- , M-<MI /5.3 / // ~- 449% 1 A 'Li 2%0 . '3130 '1401 rk: 2 -+97 0-* 303- 1 2,4 - / - - 36 . 1/ - - ;12 6- Li- ' I -6253. / / #1.9 Or • 9 - OCA~%&. CREEK,~* -,;/1-yi«31 - -9 4. - O.#%*t, ..r - -/4-2 4 .ty, c --I> 53%- 7 5 51~>-0 9-3 , 5 - I. EXISTING VISUAL RPZ AND Md,f -5=YJ~~ ''. I ~2«9 --i ~- 8 ~~ ''le- 2 8 - - 12 4 O· 1 APPROACH SURFACE 5=0 ....-a>•n . + as-R:.- '55)Til -.9.' 7 \ 54# 000 I k -14 9.0+ 90\ 4 1 , 41 'lt 7/- ,*·*eky- , \ \\\ 4 111#h, i - ?Mh. 1 \ 10/-, 1 16, \ .-94 i 1 A E f 09 4 -- 54· ) 61(3 ~~ 'A & /.." 6/5/0% / 3*9 -Of 17< C<' / J al # CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN - PHASE H ; 1 , \ -a.53-/>-/ ''/ ./.0°10 200 - 2007 ~u:- p * :9. *. 6/1 f le /013~ \\~/ 77- \/EL- 1 1 29 / r--1 fil m#411:111:A,E ELMEAY 15,33 -... 1 4352 474 4,0+Wv/ 0 ~ 2$,064 al@WU'FRaEC,S liHllWtiONEWER#Ma<CA-9 7 L"El , I --- VEDCK[E TMAY -E NIM OF -PEr j 11 4 L~0-\'(ir Cm ® COA5™KT(EAAPRON~10047E,BOWTAW~G OUrOF,064 4 3¥Uf®« . El ® RELOCATED,JOWAYW SOU,H OF 25- Cm ® 8,5DUL Am!*Al IV,EN91, D,)•WAYLGOS -09-# r-27;4.E S ® Rei~BillaTE Ge,BMOLAy,KnONAPRON IMMSE m, 021(~) RELOCATE ARFF NJIni*BlO WET SIDE OFIR,NUM 15/33 2 MAGNE*(NCelli ANNUAL RATE OF WINGE . 4'54 W 400 0 400 800 1200 1 0 ® ACD!-FAAE) #654LL DFFEmanIAL GPS BOTSHOWN SCALE IN FEET 1 METER - 3.2808 FEET 1 FOOT = 0.3]48 METERS Ct] ® REW©47EO#11 CRESCROMO ~ ISBILL ASSOCIATES - - " CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM ASE-1855 DES O.F.N. Figure 3 Raytheon Infrastructure Inc. 4 ASPEN-PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT - acc 2003 - 2007 AmPORT CONS.1.TANTS - Ale~A. COLORADO 1 3~ ASPEN, COLORADO aL MER. PHONE (303) 364-2500 FAX (303) 364-0257 REV. vO. DITE OESCRIPTION .pp. APP. H.(11 FIGURE I¥-10 g x 61 v : 9 X --~*gRS '9. 00... ijad-W. .A[88}BLEGLu,KiLIZE ' EXISTING DEVELOPMENT (E) EXISTING (F) FUTURE ---/ (R) TO BE REMOVED /RELOCATED (OL) OESTRUC Tim UGHTED --- ------=- FUTURE DE'vELOPMENT 1. TERMINAL BUILDING (EXF) DOSTING PROPERTY UNE 2. CONTROL TOWER (E)(F)(CO ----- FUTURE PROPERTY UNE 3. F.B.O. TERMINAL (E)(F) 4. F.8.0. HANGAR (E)(F) - BUILDING RESTRICTION UNE (BRL) 5. RENTAL CAR STORAGE LOT <EXF) EXISING FENCE 6. RENTAL CAR READY LOT (E)(R) --. 'Pid \ X;< FUTURE FENCE 7. RENTAL CAR WASH FACUTY (F) . - 8. ROLS (E](F) \ 03 e AIRPORT REFERENCE POINT 9. WIND CONE (E)(F)<00 -/- - t.,/ 1 ED<]STING BUILDINGS 10. MAINTENANCE AREA AND COUNTY SHOPS (E; O ~0~ I EXISTING BUILDINGS TO BE RELOCATED 11. FUEL FACILITY (E)(R) ' 12. GENERAL AVIATION TIEDO¥¢N APRON (E)(F)<R) --- 33/3 2 5=3 FUTURE BUILDINGS 13. PUBUC AUTOMOBILE PARKING (E)(0 - - #S~At· 1-rgs) .MA»T 14. SHORT TERM AUTO PARKING (EXF) - ~ 227 f 3.1.40,1. 7810-2 SECTION CORNER - . - 44- - 15. LONG TERM AND EMPLOYEE AUTO PARKING (EXF)(R) loG EXISTING CONTOUR »»T N\N-- t '4\ 16. ROTATING BEACON (E) - 17. AUTOMATED SURFACE OBSERVATION SYSTEM (E) / ' -0. 15*--, I • ~< • EXISTING RL:NWAY UGHT Iii RADAR CONTROL FAOUTY <EXF) -- -/ *-11-2,9< 5-a~ 4bee/, , -·nfL / WIND CONE AND SEGMENTED CIRCLE 19. PAPI (F) 4-/ \ ....p 20. INDEX '13* ARFF BUILDING (EXF)(R) kmak«98&32 FUTURE AVIGATION EASEMENT 22. ~ INSmUMENT (E)(R)(OL) 0-425--w<lf -====272 - »s~~~~~~y~zEN-- / 24. PATIO SHELTERS (F) 1 - NA ./,- ' // RJTURE UGHT RAIL 23. ARFF TRAIN!NG PIT (E) if < 0)4 ASOS CRITICAL AREA 1 : f 25. UGHT RAIL STATION (F) , *.30735 5=122 / / 0 FUTURE RDR SIGNS V-- Ack.- t/) J-,··P 4/.%* .£4277¥~eR€0·· .. 4- 1 ·** .. - -/ / <3~00* 190 \ r-:52>0 4 ral» // ~~~~ PAVEMENT TO BE REMOVED -.) dr- / . Ee 9408067 r - -_ I. J -\/ 21-7 - C / P 1647.65 /34 € 0 \ ,/7% > »«21- /0 4% 69* 4 t41>- 246+ -G®-e'*,6- - 2* / / 4.:F//,50*t / . 1%51 -//95-7,115,90>AE,U/-2- <1>0 9 - '90 - -4.2 -1. - 10,4 1 X --53' 524 r-r- .-- €k-- ,·3.,€r . 1 ..d *CP/ - ~ / . .- c:Job\~ ' 0 - x 7\ 0,1- - / -<44-~--~-~~9%~*9 -40 - c > 0, ,SEE EXHIMT »A' i 1 1 -Lf> % ~v FOR LAND ACQUISITION--cas==========~~61--» 0-j-c-,' ,«5<S 0 7,0.-r / / 1/*M> I - 4.- / »»ti-CS- 4 ao*44< . 0- 0 " 4--.----VA-*£ -- -1---J 4 i./ f'94.3 121-4 -4, * S. 9//LE& 6 6. 1% --- - 35~ M* 0 1 -%- *I. , ------3"+980 9 9/f/ / 49 41<9»1/// -7 it , - 1/E€\94*12 7%8 6» %7* , M + t -1 - 1 - k.~16&* 1 , --rte 330--2- / '451 40\ / M -031 . / i i./ l \ 000 /- _ _ _C' -/ € '42 / / -1-V - ---- 2 - , 1-le ,-559/4 / / 1,63 44,6 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT -:PLAN - PHASE Ill \ \ ri 0 19 ; 5. 1 J ite 4 592 , 9/ r . -1 l/ 1 1 f - > +-- 2008 - 2015 \ 0 //9/94\ ™,~1 09'te 11 941# \\ 4./ / <s>- ~/7~ I~I ~ was * / COLORA 8. -- gER*./IFF#*~22...14**411.10"..,~r.kibiiztis5iizi 41%32 :, -- 6.ADISOUINEL""1*ri~*imrA,6.r.HIG:St <f*6.-:I ' C. 1 / . 91« // Cl~ 8-CA' CM'/RAPRON 10~E SOUIH i 3 / 23 ®mORTIA}OUTFUW LFO,TE,NOTSHOWN CE] (i> d~Imn?GEMNUA-IONAPRON B,4% M %21 ~) ReWI,Ir,(,El~X,WAY W 7 :0 -1201.42-E ~ MAY !983 MAGI~E-ENNI [ZIJ (i> CON,mUC,Sm,SS DVMEM)'ATRUV-,1580 ANNUAL RATE OF CHANGE 44% [23 ® ACOUmEA,F *MOK- 454* 4oct 0 e 800 1200 CE] ® ACOURE LAD - SL~-GUE PROPEm© SCALE IN FEET 1 IETE) = 3.2803 FEET ~ ~ 1 FOOT = 0.3043 NETERS 071 ~) ACOUEEMAD- SDVIEION PROPER,y § SEE EXD-r -A- OF ALP DRAWINGS O e AOOE-FU--S,U,#**JERPRO~Rn') ~ ISBILL ASSOCIATES ASE-1855 DES. O-FAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM Figure 4 Raytheon Infrastructure Inc. ,~ ASPEN-PITKIN COUNTY AIRPORT OR. D.CC 2008 - 2015 AIRPORT CONSULTANTS · AUROR4 COLORADO CH. BLER. PHONE (303) 364-25CC FAX <303) 364- 0257 ~~ ASPEN, COLORADO pGuRE rv-11 REV- NO. DATE CESCRIPT<N App APP. HAL aircraft and vehicle parking was approved in 1998 and was partially completed in the summer of 1999. The previous Master Plan for the airport was prepared in 1989. Since that time, there have been a number of changes to airport layout standards established by the FAA. Among these is the requirement that there be an 800 foot-wide area centered on the runway and extending 1000 feet beyond the end of each runway which must be clear of all objects not required for aeronautical function. This new requirement prohibited parked aircraft, fences, roads and trees within the Object Free Area (OFA). This required the County to begin considering alternatives to relocate the aircraft parking apron, fences and the topping or removal of trees. A preapplication conference was held with County Planning Staff on November 10,1999, and the summary is included as Attachment B. In this application, we will demonstrate compliance with the applicable provisions of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. Project Description The apron expansion project involves adding several feet of fill over the existing terrain and covering this rough grade with road base and paving. The road base and paving will add approximately 2 feet to the overall depth of the fill. The Grading Plan (Figure 6) shows the preexisting grade (prior to the grading conducted in the summer of 1999 - fine dashed contour lines), the existing grade (including the fill deposited last summer - heavy dashed contour lines) and the proposed rough grade (not including the road base and paving surface - solid contour lines). The heavy dashed line on this figure is the edge of the new extended apron. As depicted on this figure, an additional 2 to 4 feet of fill will be placed to bring the rough grade up to the desired elevation. This will require approximately 20,000 to 30,000 cubic yards of fill. The rough grade will then be augmented with an additional 2 feet of road base and pavement over the entire surface. It is this road base and pavement surface for which approval is sought in this application. The final surface elevation ofthe apron extension is depicted on the Site Plan (Figure 5). The total change in elevation over the current condition will be 6 feet at the north end of the apron decreasing to 2 feet at the south end of the apron extension area. The surface of the apron is pitched at approximately 2 % to allow the surface to sheet-drain to the north. Trench drainage will also be used to drain the surface of the apron. The grading plan has been designed to respond to existing drainage patterns, to provide a relatively flat apron surface and to minimize fill. The edge of the new landform has been designed to gradually transition back to the existing grade. The disturbed area will be reseeded with native grasses to allow it to blend with the existing landscape in the surrounding area. The proposed project is the first of a two-phase expansion ofthis portion of the General Aviation Apron, the purpose of which is to relocate aircraft currently parked closer to the runway and in some cases within the OFA. The second phase is intended to be constructed between 2003 and 2007 and is depicted as Item 4 on the Capital Improvement Plan - Phase II (Figure 3). As shown on this figure, the Phase II expansion will be located to the north of the proposed expansion. The Phase I apron expansion has been sized to accommodate 89 aircraft parked in three rows, as shown on the Site Plan (Figure 5). The Site Plan also shows a hanger, which includes 5 0 f the 89 aircraft that will be accommodated in this area. This hanger was approved in 1998 but has not yet been constructed. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 7 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application Runway 15/33 - 4 ·iM·. , 1,1 1*1--Yaving to be Removed I £ I I .- - - - --- - - / A 0- : W -- - --p----1.------4---- 4- / ,-4-22-g_ _ i -7- --r, -- -- -* 1 - I / ' I - %-- IN i : -- 1 \ 1 / 4 J / - 46 f 1 ... , lt, / /' AN.. I . I 1 /1\ / A. , /\ i l . / / I 1 1 1 1 /4 1 ' ' / 1 M f / .... 1 3, 1 1 // f , .1 /1, 1 :,8 11. 1 1 , 't' 1 -Proposed Light/Electrical ,/ & / \ 1 47/ / .. ... 1 .&. 1 / 2 4 1 1/ Outlet Locations , 1 1 1 1 .r #t 4- / 1 1 1 2 1 1 4% tj &1 1 - \ , / 1 \ \ \ I.* \ 4 1 / t'.--Ptopose,faving / / 1 \ u... . ' 1 1 A--- / 1 f , , I / , .'- ' .... , 4 , 1 1 , -- * - / i / I 1 . 9 h 2 ./ 4' 0/114- 4/ 4% 4 '90 2 f f f f ff / Object Free Area L / 44#0*/ FAV EkE+ 9 9,4-1 + 24249 + 21=.44=1 W - i 7 ~* << - ~-~ ~ _i~~~~~~MrailTicdowns _ ~ ExisUng Edge ofpavemT 4 1- .,10. Exi~412'-6' Berm to be Pemovcj~ Buildin estriction Line 71=f - f 1 -- 7- ----*/ 4 ~~ t:z~~ ~~~1=1 //C:~rp y ossible Futur,/Patio Shelters / 1434=:. 4 -*$- Approp@d Hanger (Not Constructedhit-~ -I--*I- Ex Green Chain Link Fence - / -- 3 -1 9-0/ 200' Setbac om CDOT ROW ~ Existing Gate / ~ : 11.4= +04= 4=14=1 +1.9-4= .91 0=. Ct/+melft=:.9 /43.11/12~-f~~3%~ 6-*-- frx-z--4*r~--+ 7-Kevegetate with Seede*Native Grasses b / e / A - 35.-rE- H - 11 x - U -1 U»Ufl li U"1 4114 Ir hagoz&'EkS£&1Etiwt ...U---~- " ~ :821*U¥=1:04£4-¥ 1/ .lA. , 1,(firrt): A, ,-' r- < .y,-. - -- - -- - - - XXX 1 -- E*ting Trees to Remain-4----1 '~·'•u'~•u/·-*-" ~--- / Proposed Parking I x - 1 f , + / 30 Spaces . N... 1 / \ 1 ./17 1 ..0. I Existing Edge of Gravel--7-A , /'~ K.LL 115/Illl\1111< 2 1 .L -Z y- /1 3/r- «- ' ' 2 1 /,24- - - - 4-4...=-2-2-»3 ./ .., / P / .-" ./ ·de. X--4- . - -* /'1,1.1 ) - - - - - 5 -- - - -2-- f€j L x-Lau- nn-J_ - -4-2 Tr_ _ -2.-:tuczLK 2//-- X \ ___X--I--X X-X - ~Existing Shrubs to Remain~ 47>- X'. X Existing fence CDOT ROW Highway 82 --------- - - ---- I - - SITE PLAN Aspen/ SHANNON MURPHY LANDSCAPE ARCHITEC1 IN-*/Sle No,th December 15, 1999 Pitkin Co Revised: e..1 Cok.•do Not for Construction Airport MI~7/I 970927.3/ :1. FIGURE 5 Proposed 2000 * e-1 - m Construction ....... Scnic: 1- =50 - 37u -1 \ 772+ I. /7 I I I . h I I I I , . I . . I . U I -1 4 \1 U \-6 \A \4 4 .& 4 ./ 1% 0 1 \ \ \ / 1 \ ~ 1 \ 1 I \ I $ i 1 1 i gRunway 15/33/1 1 \ 1 11\ 1 1 11 1 ' } 1 11 '1\/ 't'' 11 1 1 1 ' ' / 1 \ , 1 / / / \ 1 1 , 1 , 1 , I ' ' 1 \ I . \ , / V. ' . I - - / - / 1 '' ..0 / / / . - . i '' I . , * , 4 . r , ,- 12 ¥ *i - \ '11'. , ' 1 / \ / \ / I 1 1 1 , \ 1 1 1 1 , / 1 1 t / 1 \ 1 \ ' I i l 1/*1\11\ .// / , -- 4 / l r ' 0. 1 1 - 1 - / / t 1-1,\ 1 / / f ' 2 , 2 1 \,- - ' 1 / // 1 ---- -----0 --- i / , r 1/ / --- - .1 i \. - - -- - - db I --------Il- 1 --- 1- I - \ N 1 / // .~ --------- - - -4 - j *. I I. / - 1 \ . -- 1 1 ' . , 1 , ..... / / I 1 --1 3, , ~ ~ ~~ / / 11 / 1// 1 / Taxiway -A- / / / / \ . ~ / 4 #, 1 , 1 1,\ €:. 1 , # / 1 1 1 £ \*.I I / , / / 1 / / / I, / / , 1 , , 1 , 1 1 , \ \ \ / / i / 1 1 1 1 t \ 4- L Ar ' 1 / 0. /-1 1 1% / 1 / i ./, 1 I 4/ f / t.... , ' ERisting Contours // ' Future Taxiway A-/ , , , , , I I (1998) 1 1 / , I , , , -2~ \\ , 4 \ I . .*. , , 1 1 /\ 1 / t -1 I * 4 944#fag-*%--arrof-------//. / I , 1 , 1 1 1 /----1 ' 1 - , \ j / 1 0 - I - , / As Built Contours 1 , 1 , ./'...' 1 J J: 1 ... -4 - , / Completed Fall 1999 1999 GRADING . Dectruber 15,1999 -- ~--72-S, - -- --- - I 1 ---- / 1 lit _ , 1. fi' ,-I , - 1 - P , C . J- 1 - - - / r -Approved Contours :./ - FIGURE 6 1, . / . \ L . 1 / /1 ' ' - 0 ' ' --- / r, - «-_-1~-| r 1 . 1 1 41®' Aspen/ f--514 i, f / ~X' Pitkin Co 1 0/ .- 4 , 1- ./ , / /2/ LIN- /7 -Alf_- L~~~#*-9-----4_ -- .- 22-1- 0-- / / , '~ 1 - - - ..1, , / --- - --- / Airport I , , / 1 - / 1 1 .., -7 <- i- . . 2 . - -------t--- '' - / / , 1:1 - 1 -- ' f ' , _ i . F Proposed 2000 4·k Co•.t.uction " 174-.*SIOE , - 7 . , -----Al 71\ 0 t 41, / - 9 $ a . - /1 , , 1 -- I . I - -- . '' I l.* I ' SIWI11011 -Mirt.N¢OSCAPEARCIWECT , U - M \ : 1 - 1 - - , -- , I . .... es*J-- .. . . : -...._ -. -- Revegetate all disturbed areas 1,--U -/ - :r- M ' ~ --- 1 ~ ~ ~ ~-~ ~'- ~ ' ~~ ~ -' with seeded native grasses -- -- ------- - 7 - I. --- -- ---------1-------- -t-- -- - I./. / -- / mr- --3 71* , 1\ b --,--3->,- ,,Dr~, -4 -<=2¢~ZJE~~m-lI ---- -- - +A, ru==1 10 / 1 \ IC , I..... €=--- - 0 10 20' 30 100' North North 1 1 Not for Construction ew.. ../51 576/ '' ' 1 //./ 1 14 , / .------~~ghwa-82 __223*- 'it:Cy "' p 1 - Scale: r - 50' Z 0 H f + m.- 82 - --~ - -r 1 1 Existing T.*y Exisdng Gm,le ~ Puture Tur•ay E.stmg R=-7 1 -1 Section AA Highway 82 , 4 Future T.xkway 1 1 7 Existinz G:.le F ~ F Ex,sting Runway 0 1 Section BB ' 7708 7702 ~ 91 .' The improvements to be constructed during the 2000 construction season also include the removal of pavement along the west side of a portion of Taxiway A. The pavement to be removed is identified on the Site Plan (Figure 5). The total area of pavement to be removed along this taxiway is depicted on Figure 2 by a crosshatch pattern. This pavement is being removed to increase the distance between the runway and the taxiway. The pavement removal does not require any additional approvals and none are being requested in this application. We would point out that the removal of this paving reduces the total amount of paving being added to the airport grounds by the proposed General Aviation Apron expansion. The net increase in paving as a result of the proposed improvements to be constructed in the year 2000 is approximately 68,242 square feet. It should be noted that there will be a significant amount of additional pavement removed along the east side of Taxiway A as recommended in the Airport Layout Plan Update. The applicant is also proposing safety lighting in the aircraft parking area. The applicant proposes to install low level, bollard light fixtures. These fixtures will provide minimal illumination in the area where the electric sockets are located. Currently, aircraft users park their vehicles out near where their planes are parked and use the vehicle lights during loading, unloading and other preparation and maintenance procedures. This practice will be discouraged and a separate parking area is being constructed to accommodate this parking. Figure 7 is a specification sheet providing dimensions and other information for the proposed light fixtures. Figure 8 is a photograph of the fixture. These fixtures have been used elsewhere on the airport grounds and at the Intercept Lot. The fixtures are 3 96 feet tall and the light source is protected by a louvered shield. Since the elevation of the apron surface will be above that ofHighway 82, the light from these fixtures should not be visible from the Highway. There will be a total of,31 fixtures distributed among the aircraft as depicted by the dots on the Site Plan (Figure 5). The spacing of the fixtures has been designed to provide one fixture for every three aircraft in the double-parked rows and one for every two aircraft in the single-parked row. The proposed project also includes a small vehicle parking area to accommodate vehicles for the local- based aircraft operators. This parking area contains 30 spaces and is depicted on the Site Plan. As mentioned previously, these spaces are being constructed to provide an alternative to the parking that currently occurs out in the aircraft tiedown area. This parking area will be located outside of the security fence and will be accessed using an existing access road. The existing terrain in the area of the proposed vehicle parking lot is relatively level and is covered with gravel. The construction trailers for last year's improvement project were located in this area, The applicant would like to utilize this area for construction trailers and staging again next year. The proposed parking area will be surfaced with a recycled asphalt paving. No lighting is contemplated for this parking area. m The applicant also intends to extend the existing security fence to encompass the new apron expansion. Much of this fence was installed during the summer of 1999 and is currently in place. The portion of the fence which was installed in 1999 is depicted on the Site Plan as a line with a triple x symbol and is generally parallel to Highway 82 along the east side of the proposed apron expansion. The proposed extension of this fence is depicted as a line with a double x symbol. This new segment is approximately 570 feet in length and also runs along the east side of the expanded apron. The new fence segment ties in with an existing chain link fence at a point southwest of the proposed vehicle parking lot. The existing chain link fence is depicted as a line with a single x symbol on the Site Plan. The proposed fence will match the fence that was installed in 1999. This is an electric wire fence with treated wood posts. The fence, which was installed in 1999, can be seen in the photographs on Figures 9,10 and 11. The Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 10 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application 1 0 Base Detail Anchor Bolt 'h" x 12" 4 ~ 2" Bolt it -Projection r-~ Bolt Circle 6" ~ 1'~ .1'£ '\ ~ Conduit - 83/4" - - 83/4" - - 83/4" - - 83/4" - ~ Opening .,. Luminaire Larnp Light Source Lens Luminaire Finish Options Line Prefix Distribution Wattage Voltage Bollard, EL - . 35 HPS- High Pressure Sodium CA - 120V Standard LL - Less Lamp Vandal- External Louvers 50 (35,50,70,100 Watt) Clear 208V BRZ - Bronze CL - Coated Lamp Resistant, 70 DX - Deluxe Mercury Vapor Acrylic 240V COA - Cocoa NO - No Options Round 75 (50, 75, 100 Watt) 277V VAN - Vanilla Color Glo-Bands 100 MH - Metal Halide* 480V BLK - Black GBB - Blue Flat-Top Multi Tap WHT - White GBR - Red (70,100 Watt) MT- PLT - Platinum GBG - Green 8VRF INC - Incandescent (Max. 100 Watt) Dome-Top GBY - Yellow BVRD Architectural GBC - Clear 13 PL - Fluorescent (Optional) Glo·Top 26 (13,26 Watt) BRD - Brick Color Decals BVRG GYG - Gray Granite 45 - Light Gold RDG - Red Granite 20 - Charcoal Metallic LMS - Limestone 55 - Black DTS - Desertstone 94 - Blue Metallic MGR - Green 01 - Chrome Marble 59 - Dark Green GRN - Green 51 - Dark Red 21 - Tomato Red 309 - Putty 50 - White VL 1 . BVRF -EL - 70 - MH -CA - 120 - WHT - 20 D . i Figure 7 ./- . a 1 9 fhai~ -r.1~ i t**U 1 3.~ j ..' .-4*IN" . · -4/3:%49%,im.............A ..: hi.,t?JY:0;KE- CRt, ' ~4**1 9.2 000J 1%»·R · 1 , CP m THE ARCHITECTURE OF LIGHT smaller fence visible in the foreground of these photographs marks the edge of the right-of-way for Highway 82. No fill or other disturbance will occur beyond this fence. The proposed apron extension has been designed to accommodate aircraft shelters (Patio Shelters) that have been identified in this area on the Airport Layout Plan Update. Approval for these shelters is not requested at this time as their exact design, location and type has not yet been determined. There are several issues associated with these shelters that the County may wish to discuss during the review of this application. These include what type of shelter should be used (Patio Shelter or T Hanger), how funds for these shelters and the pavement and road base under them will be paid for (the FAA will not fund these improvements). The type of shelter is important because the grading and drainage for the apron surface may be different depending on the type of shelter to be installed. Scenic Overlay Review The proposed project is located within the mapped scenic overlay area for Highway 82 and is not eligible for exemption or planning director sign-off under the current provisions ofthe Pitkin County Land Use Code. The Planning Commission is the approving body on the Scenic Review and is a recommending body on the Special Review. The Board of County Commissioners has final approval authority on the Special Review aspects of this project. Public hearings at both the Planning Commission and Board level are required. The primary issues with respect to visual impacts from this project are the installation of 2 feet of road base and pavement, which will be deposited over the approved rough grade fill for the General Aviation Apron expansion and the use of the extended apron for aircraft and vehicle parking. In the following paragraphs we will discuss the projects compliance with the applicable Scenic Overlay criteria. The actual code text has been included in italics for reference. 3-60-040 Scenic Overlay Standards Figures 9, 10 and 11 are photographs taken of the proposed development site from Highway 82. Generally, the proposed improvements will be more noticeable from the southbound (upvalley) travel lanes. Figures 9 and 10 include photographs taken from four different locations along the southbound (upvalley) lanes. Figure 11 shows the views of the site from the downvalley lanes. These photographs show the site as it exists today with the new fence and fill that were constructed in the summer of this year. The new fence in these photographs extends well beyond the area where the proposed apron expansion (Phase I) will occur. E. Review criteria for development within the Scenic Overlay and Ridgeline mapping shall be as follows: 1. Whether the proposed development has utilized existing topography and natural vegetation, such as ridges and hills to screen buildings to the maximum extent possible. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 13 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application - 11-VIP Corner of electric fence , installed in 1999. ¥4 - -44'e . - ...g - ..4 41*4 = , . . '27.. .. 1) View to the south across apron expansion area from southbound Highway 82. Area filled in 1999. ,~+- %- r. *I./.-~-WAJ··-=A=- _ t~• f 4-j 1 -1- 1 -tz 2 - ' --- - -t#413 6222 / A--63--_~-J~gu-,...*3~.24-4-J %,-:*~'- ''3 -/ %. Figure 9 9 Aspen/Pitkin County Airport 2) View to the southwest across apron expansion area from southbound Highway Year 2000 Capital Improvements 82. Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application December 1999 .. 1 lili 1 1 11111~~1~1~1~1~11,11 1 # ~r~.t =-- Figure 10 Aspen/Pitkin County Airport Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application Year 2000 Capital Improvements December 1999 1. 6. Fence along Highway 82 R.O.W. .- -4. 1) View to the west across apron expansion area from southbound Highway 82. Note aircraft parked in the background. ,·ir- . - I-. - .7. 1 - -Il,';-i ~ ----%- 1...1-1 - r-IE ' -MI _ - '~ 4_rfa~tw~#*7~€F//01*i-i/~p.~.AN--:5 +/'.'.11?0~09/44- il --1- 14,.I.~61;2 - d= -77':~A4~=i1*-•@~~~~ - 24.:1 3%#fm N . L ---llully' -'9~lilD 1-9- 1»6 1 r- 1@aid/glfbE,#lill-~Uk®Al./iti; -- i p.- 4 - 1* 4 16%44)A// 2) View to the west across proposed apron expansion area from southbound Highway 82. Note fill in the foreground and new fence. - 4 UN. - 4,=== ---31=~ Proposed apron expansion area. - Point of perimeter fence Extension. --I----I- Approximate location of vehicle parking area. --0.-a 1~jE~.294'K¢~l-~~/R - ......../IM. ..Imil/,Audtrrtirrirrireti..../*.1/ill.lb -A 4 D - I.-vill .....Id....£2*#2,1. - - - -- .- 1 - =62,-0-....i .7 -3 2310.j-liery-fi 4,3.-3- A--11*77- -r a ..juf.'T-:--7:,~ ----- - - ez- 7.-- - - - -.- - - . 1.---,--r-4,9..~- - Existing slope and vegetation ~ - I To be retained. ~4-1&,6"/-'-I- . - .8 1 "%// I . -V'- - /g/N/ABils'IM,ie.- 1) View to the northwest towards the proposed vehicle parking area from 2) View to the northwest across the proposed apron expansion area from northbound Highway 82. northbound Highway 82. 5/1:lglia<+Elp.....=<lljlll~ illiiiimllili~ilillillillilillillillillillillillillillilillill~ - · t€i=,1 -- ~ .---. - -£ . J - -- - =1- » m-- - --6 + ..319=* Figure 11 1,2 Aspen/Pitkin County Airport 3) View to the west across the proposed apron expansion area from northbound Highway 82. Note aircraft in the background. Year 2000 Capital Improvements Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application December 1999 RESPONSE: The approved rough grade fill has been partially completed pursuant to a previous approval. This fill has been in place on the site since last summer. This application deals only with the installation of the road base and pavement surface, which will add approximately 2 feet to the approved grading. When completed, the apron extension will add between 2 and 6 feet of fill over the existing terrain along Highway 82. The proposed development area can be divided into two areas in terms of existing terrain. Figure 5 shows an area of existing shrubs between the Highway and the proposed apron expansion. These shrubs mark the northern edge of the area where fill will occur along the Highway. These shrubs are highlighted in photograph #2 on Figure 11. The portion of the site to the south of these shrubs is an existing elevated bench that is somewhat screened from the Highway. The proposed apron expansion and aircraft parking in this area will have little or no additional visual impact on the Highway. The aircraft that wilI be parked in this area will be largely screened from view from the Highway. The area to the north of the existing vegetation identified on Figure 5 is where most of the fill will occur. The addition of 2 feet of road base and pavement to the approved rough grade fill will not significantly increase the visual impacts of the apron expansion and was contemplated when the approval was granted for the rough grading in 1998. The existing bench and shrubs referred to above also help screen the project and aircraft parking as viewed from the north bound (downvalley) travel lanes. This grade change obscures the site until vehicles reach a point approximately 400 feet upvalley of the Air Traffic Control Tower. One exception iN the small vehicle parking lot, which will be visible from the northbound (downvalley) lanes of Highway 82. The approximate location of this parking lot is labeled on photograph #1 on Figure 11. The parking lot is located in front of and among other structures and improvements on the airport grounds and should not create a noticeable change in the view of the airport from the Highway. 2. Whether the proposed development has been designed to complement the natural topography of the land, including, whenever possible and appropriate, the utilization of innovative architectural techniques such as earth sheltered design, natural materials and coloring, non-reflectability and clustering of structures on the least visible portions of the site. RESPONSE: The proposed road base and pavement are part of the overall land form that includes the rough grading approved last year. The grading for this landform has been designed to provide a gradual transition back to the existing grade. Figure 5 shows the gradual eurving contours of the proposed fill along the Highway. There are similar rolling landforms in the surrounding landscape currently, as shown by the photographs on Figure 9. This new slope will be seeded with native grasses after construction, which will help the new slope blend in with the existing landscape. 3. Whether the proposed development 's height and bulk has been designed to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, the visibility of buildings from the highway and public viewplanes. RESPONSE: There are no buildings included in this proposal. 4. The proposed structure shall be placed so it does not break a ridgeline, unless there are no alternate building sites on the lot. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 17 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application RESPONSE: There are no structures included in this proposal. The apron expansion will create a new sloped area, a portion of which will be visibile from the Highway. This land form will not break a ridgeline. The Airport Layout Plan Update identifies this area as the location for construction of Patio Shelters in the future. Approval for these shelters is not requested at this time. However, the shelters are generally low tying roof structures which, if located in the areas shown on the Airport Layout Plan Update, will not break a ridgeline. 5. Whether the proposed development has avoided the location of uses on the highest ground or most visible portion of the site as viewedfrom State Highway 82 and public rights-of-way, identified in Section (B)(1) above. RESPONSE: Once constructed, the proposed apron expansion will be used for aircraft and vehicle parking. The aircraft that will be parked in this area are small local-based planes as can bee seen in the background in the photographs on Figures 10 and 11. The surface elevation of the apron will be between 14 and 18 feet higher than the highway travel lanes. This elevation difference will help to screen this use from view. The vehicle parking area will not be screened from the southbound (upvalley) lanes of the Highway due to the difference in elevation between the parking area and the Highway and the existing vegetation. However, the parking lot will be visible from the northbound lanes as previously described. 6. Whether the,proposed development has been located outside of the designated Scenic Overlay, or on a suitable site at the greatest distance possible from State Highway 82 and identified ridgelines. RESPONSE: The entire site is located within the mapped Scenic Overlay Area. Location of the proposed improvements on this site is constrained by several factors including limitations related to the location of structures and parking which are established by the FAA. The site is not located within a ridgeline area and no ridgeline will be broken by any of the proposed improvements. 7. Whether the proposed development has been landscaped in accordance with the adopted State Highway 82 Corridor landscape guidelines and has preserved natural vegetation, to the maximum extent possible, including the avoidance of development within irrigated meadows. Existing vegetation shall be maintained to the maximum extent possible, while using existing vegetation to screen development. A landscaping plan shall be submitted by the applicant and approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. RESPONSE: The adopted State Highway 82 Corridor Landscape Guidelines identify four basic objectives as follows: 1. Preserve historical rural character; 2. Preserve spacious open views; 3. Preserve the natural ecosystem of the corridor; and 4. Landscaping should be self-maintaining. The site of the proposed improvements has historically been part of the airport grounds. The proposed improvements will expand on the existing historic use of the airport property. This Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 18 Scenic Overlay and Special Revieru Application expansion is being pursued as part of the functional and safety related improvements identified in the Airport Layout Plan Update. The area where the proposed improvements will be located is relatively open and currently is covered with native grasses and other ground cover as well as some existing shrubs most of which are to be preserved. The existing view across this site includes the grassy area in front of the airport runway and taxiway. Aircraft are currently parked in the area immediately behind the site along the east edge of Taxiway A. Thus, aircraft are visible from the Highway in this area of the airport. The proposed improvements will not substantially affect views across the airport grounds. The proposed road base and paving will have no adverse effect on the existing ecosystem over the already approved rough grading which covers the same area. The most significant change to the ecosystem will be the increased runoff from the hard surface of the apron. This will be handled by the relocated drainage swale, which will run along the west side of Highway for a distance of nearly M mile before entering Owl Creek. The Airport maintains a storm water runoff plan which is reviewed annually to monitor changes in the runoffvolume and water quality. The area disturbed during construction will be seeded with a native grass mix. This native grass mix will require little maintenance. The site where the proposed improvements will be located is part of the existing airport grounds and is not located in an irrigated meadow. As has been stated previously, there is very little existing vegetation except native grasses in the area where grading and paving are proposed. No vegetation other than grasses, other ground cover and a few shrubs will be removed as part of this project. 8. Whether the proposed development's exterior lighting has been designed in such a manner that light sources, such as facade and landscape lighting, will not be seen from public rights-of-way as identijied i in Section (B) (1). In addition, an application shall be consistent with the lighting regulations identijied in the Pitkin County Land Use Code. RESPONSE: The only lighting planned for this project is low-level, bollard lighting in the area of the aircraft tie downs. This lighting is for safety purposes and should have little or no impact on the Highway. Figure 7 is a spec sheet showing the light fixtures intended to be installed. Figure 8 shows the appearance of the fixtures. These lights will be 3 M feet in height and a Iouvered shield protects the light source. Tile nearest fixtures are over 240 feet from the southbound travel lanes of the Highway. To further minimize the potential for light impacts, the fixtures will be wired with a motion detector. It is also unlikely that these lights will be used after 11pm as no flights are allowed after this hour. In addition, the elevation of the apron surface is well above that of the Highway. The light source in these fixtures will not be visible from the Highway. Lighting will be consistent with the lighting regulations identified in the Pitkin County Land Use Code. 9. Landforms and earth moving shall generally not be acceptable as the sole measure of compliance with these regulations. However, they may be utilized in conjunction with other site techniques designed - into the development plan. These methods may be acceptable when utilized as one of several methods to complement and enhance development, rather than as the single device for screening developmentfrom view from the State Highway 82 Corridor and as mapped. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 19 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application RESPONSE: The only landform proposed as part of this project is the 2 feet of road base and paving to create the apron surface. No berms or other landforms are proposed for screening purposes and none are necessary to achieve compliance with the Scenic Review provisions. 10. Whether the proposed development has been designed so as to avoid, to the maximum extent possible, any Scenic Viewplane identified on the State Highway 82 Corridor Master Plan and Down Valley Comprehensive Plan. RESPONSE: There is no Scenic Viewplane mapped for this area. The nearest mapped Scenic Viewplane is located just downvalley of Maroon Creek Road and preserves the view of Pyramid Peak. 11. Inthe case where 1041 hazardareas may be inconflictwith preservationof scenicareas, the Board acknowledges that 1041 issues take precedence over scenic concerns. These issues shall be reviewed on a case by-case-basis. RESPONSE: There are no known 1041 issues associated with the area of the proposed improvements. Special Review Standards 3-210-010 - Special Review Criteria The following discussion addresses compliance with the applicable Special Review criteria. Direct excerpts from the Pitkin County Code are italicized, followed by a response regarding the proposed project's compliance with the Code. This section of the Code establishes review standards for uses designated as Special Review in Section 3-30 and Figure 3-1 (refer to Section 4-60 for procedures and Section 5-50 for submission contents). The Board of County Commissioners may approve with conditions or deny development applications for uses designated as special review uses within a zone district. Applications will be reviewed for compliance with all of the standards in this section. Major amendments to special review approvals shall be reviewed for compliance with the standards in this section pursuant to Section 4-60. Minor amendments to special review approvals may be permitted subject to compliance -with the standards in Section 3-200.80. A. The special review use shall consider: 1. The applicable County Master Plan; RESPONSE: The applicable Master Plan is the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Airport Layout Plan Update approved in 1998. The proposed improvements are recommendations of this Plan and are consistent with all provisions of this document. 2. County Land Use Policies in Article 2; Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 20 Scenic Overlay and Special Revieru Application RESPONSE: The applicable policies of the Code have been addressed elsewhere throughout this application. These issues were also addressed during the review of the Airport Layout Plan Update which was approved by the County and which recommends the improvements proposed in this land use application. The proposed improvements comply with the County's Land Use Policies. 3. The intentofthe Zone Districtinwhichitisproposed to belocated; RESPONSE: The airport is currently zoned Public (PUB), which lists airport as a special review use. The zone district intent statement also includes the following language: "development activity in this zone district should be based upon the adoption of a master plan." The adopted master plan for the airport is the Aspen-Pitkin County Airport Airport Layout Plan Update. The proposed improvements are identified in the adopted Master Plan for the airport. 4. The character ofthe immediate vicinity ofthe parcel proposed for development andsurrounding land uses, or enhance the mixture of complimentary uses and activities in the immediate vicinity of the parcel proposed for development. RESPONSE: The proposed improvements are intended to accommodate uses that already exist on the airport grounds, but are located in areas considered unsafe or inappropriate by the Federal Aviation Administration. The apron expansion will provide aircraft parking some of which is currently occurring within the Building Restriction Line and Object Free Area. This condition is considered unsafe. There will be no increase in the number of planes that can be stored on the airport grounds as a result of these improvements. The expanded apron will simply provide a safer location for aircraft storage. In fact, according to the Aspen Base Operations (ABC)) the Airport has lost over 100,000 square feet of area which had previously been used for aircraft parking. Similarly, the proposed vehicle parking area will provide parking for persons utilizing the local-based aircraft. Currently, these vehicles are parked out near where the aircraft are parked. B. The location, size, design and operating characteristics of the proposed special review use must be in harmony with the surrounding area and minimizes adverse effects, including visual impacts, impacts on pedestrian and vehicular circulation, parking, trash, service delivery, noise, vibrations, and odor on surroundmg properties. RESPONSE: The proposed improvements are intended to provide better and safer locations for uses that already exist on the airport grounds. There will be no change in the size or basic operating characteristics of the airport operation as a result of these improvements. C, There must be adequate public facilities and services to serve the special review use including but not limited to roads, potable water, sewer, soled waste, parks, police, fre protection, emergency medical services, hospital and medical services, drainage systems, and schools. RESPONSE: All necessary public facilities and services are available on-site. D. An application for a special review use must demonstrate to the Board of County Commissioners that the proposed development will not: Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 21 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application 1. Materially endanger the public health, safety or welfare; and RESPONSE: The project has been designed to pose no danger to public health, safety and welfare. 2. Substantially injure the value Of adjoining or abutting property. RESPONSE: No significant impacts are expected from the proposed improvements above and beyond those currently associated with airport operations. Summary The proposed improvements are recommended in the Airport Layout Plan Update and have been shown to be consistent with the Scenic Overlay and Special Review Standards of the Pitkin County Land Use Code. We, therefore, request that the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners grant Scenic Overlay and Special Review approval for the improvements as requested in this application. Aspen/Pitkin County Airport - Year 2000 Capital Improvements 22 Scenic Overlay and Special Review Application Attachment A DEC 20 '99 11: PITKIN CNTY AIRPORT P. 1 Sardy Field Aspen/Pitkin County Airport 1-1 0233 East Airport Aoad Aspen, Colorado 81611 970/920-5384 FAX 970/920-5378 December 20, 1999 Suzanne Wolff Pitkin County community Development Department 130 South Galena Street Aspen, CO 84611 To Whom It May Concern: By this letter, the Aspen/Pitkin County·Airport hereby authorizes TO Malloy Consulting, LLC; Shannon Murphy, Landscape Architect and Isbill Associates/Ratheon Engineering to represent us in'matters related to the land use application for the year 2000 Capital Improvements for which we are seeking Scenic Overlay and Special Review approval from Pitkin County, This includes the preparation and submission of the land use application and representation of this application before the applicable appointed and elected boards. Sincerely, Petdr Van ]*t Aspen/Pit16n County Airport Cc: Tim Malloy File. Attachment B NOV 11 '99 0 41 PITKIN COUNTY ADMIN P.1 PIT KIN COUNTY PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY PROJECT: Pitkin County Airport Scenic Overlay Review and Special Review LOCATION: pitkiii County Airport adjacentro Storc JIighway 82 and Owl Creek Riiad. OWNER: 130:rd of CM,unty Commissioners REPIUOSENTATIVE: Shannon Murphy PHONE/FAX: 927-2889/927-0538 Tim Malloy PHONE/FAX: 704-0152/704-QI.51 DA'IE: :4<n·cniber 10, 1999 PLANNER: Tamara Pregl. 920-5103 Type 01' Applicalion: Scenic Ovel'lay Review and Special Review Description :Df P:·oject/Development: The applicant proposes to reconfigure tile General Aviction apron on ihe noll.h end (,f ths. airpoit to i·el~,cated airplane parking out of the Runway Object Free Area. The Applicant is also proposing the ctitwiliction e )1: 1, m]Inber of airplane hanger or T ·shelters for local base air-crafm. In addition, the applicant i.s proposing a r,;11'1·.inF lot near the control tower fur private airplane owners. Al'¢:as tn which the Applicant has been requested to respond. types of reports requested· 1.#r.d l'se Code Sections to be addressed in letter of request (application): - Section 3-60-040, Scenic Overiay Rcvicw Section 3.210, Specin J Review >Staff will refer the application to the following agencies: County Attorney. Zlining, Courity linginect, CDOT. As:,cn Fit·(, Pi (acclion Dheic}. and C:ty Planning and Zoning Erv·.ew by: 19&2 and BOCC. Public Hearing? Yes, at BOCC. A public notice sign shall bc posted on the properly :it Jo.int I 5 di:.9 prior co the hearrng pursuant to Section 4-90 of thc Land Use Codc. The Applicant shall mail noti · ef: to MA adingmt property owners at least 30 days prior to the hearing with the return address of the Community Development,Department (a ci,py of notice shali be obtained from the Community Development Departme:,iri. The names .·.11[1 ·addremes shall be those on the current tax records of Pitkin County as they appcarcd no more th=.a 60 days prior to the date of the public hearing. Whst fee is the applicant requested to submit: Total Deposit: $2,520 981 1,6,1-p. Office (deposit) $2,220 (additional hrs arc billed at a rate of $ 185/hr): 12,3 feeral Iree:i: Clurk and Recorder - $300; Fees for the County Engineer wilI be bijled on the flnol bill or a late Of $65/ht,ur. Numbe Of ropies of the application and maps to be submitted: 18 Please submit: A li.st of adjacent property owners and 2 copies of the 'Agreement To Pay' form (do rio{ include r.·ith (:a~h pocket copy ) For a complete application, please include the following in each packet: w S i unmary lotter explitining the request and addre,ning al J L.and Use Code standards listed libove. u I.':,rcel description. including description and vicinity map. 4.'o, ticnt ' r<im prl,perty (,wner(s) to process applicalion and authorizing thc representative (i f appliclible) :~ 'root of owncrship (from a title corrpany or attorney licensed in the State of Colorado). ,- '..50 W X 1 / site plan with topography (2' contours). Il' ~ Photos 01' the site as 5een from pubic viewplanes. w :caled elevation drawings. I ),ands,cape Plan, i ./C,y:11 Access (sufficient information to demonstrate adequate legal access to ihc propcrly). '- :l,py ofthis pre-app fin·m. NOTE: Thic prect.pplication conference summarv is advisory in nature and not binding on the Count¥. The infornintion prow'ded iii thly sfely·),tv.u-7 is based on current zoning standards and st€#3 interpretations based upon repre,re)11.ation.% Of the a;trilicani. Addltional inlormation muy be requi.red upon complgte review of the application. Attachment C i lillii lilli ilitil iiliJ u uillwilll Ill lilli lili El A V i J - 261 4- UU - 3.3 i 416900 35/15/1998 12:43P M~UTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 13 9 3.30 0 3.30 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMM[SSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO, GRA>EnNG APPROVAL TO THE PrrKIN COUNTY AIRPORT MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT AND SPECIAL REVIEW AMENDMENT FOR THE .AIRPORT CARWASH AND FUELING FACIrry l A Resoiurion No. 9843 / RAY 3 998 :SPED. . - #.IM ir/-T'rlT e CCMMUNIT: CE. ELS.PMEN; 1. The Board of Counry Commissioners of Pitkin Counry. hereafter :'Appiicanr;'. as owner of the Pitkin Counry Airport. has appiied to rhe Board of Councy Commissioners ofPitkin Counry. Coicrado. hereafter "Board", for approval of an amendment ro the 1989 Pitkin Counry Airpor[ Master Plan and an amendment to tile Special Review approval granted for the airport canvash and fueling facuiry. 2. The Applicant proposes ro update the Airport Layout Plan (ALP), which was adopred as a component of the 1989 Airport Masre: Plan. The ALF is intended to reflecr current federai reguiarions and design criteria and serves as an agreement benveen the airport and the FAA as to the funire deveiopment of the airport in compliance with federai legisia:tion. The property is zoned Public and conmins 572 acres. 4. Said parcel is described in Exhibit A artached. 5. The Planning Commission reviewed tile application at a regular meeting on February 17.1998. and recommended approval subject to conditions. 6. The Board heard this application at a public hearing on April 21 1998, at which time evidence and testimony was presented with respect to the application. 7. The Board finds that the applica€on generally complies with the applicable sections of the Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board that it does hereby grant approval of an amendment to the Pitkin County Airport Master Plan and an amendment to the Special Review approval granted for the airport carwash and fieting facility, subject to the following conditions: i Ililll lilli illill mul -9' lili Illilll IiI lili lili i ..li 416900 35/ 15/ 1998 1: RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI Resoiurion No. 98-/- 2 .f 13 R 3.30 0 3.L_ ,- 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Page 2 1. Prior to issuance of a buiiding permit for the canvash and fueiing facility, the applicanr shall submit a fugitive dust control pian for review and approvai by the Environmental Health Department. The canvash and fueiing fac.iir. snail comciy wirh ail condiIiOnS of anproval of Board Resoiurion No. 94-43. Planning Commission Resoiurion Ng. PZ-94-04. and the Administrative Decision of the Lommunity Deveiooment Director recorded as Reception No. -107231. 0. The Airoort Layout Plan shail be amended as foilows: • Illuscare transir and cedestrian corridors ber.veen the highway and the RETA bus sheiter .and the airport. • illusrrate a proposed starion for :he proposed light rail system. 4. Any erade modifications or c:rculator :perimerer; roads on [he sourh side of the airoor[ shail be impiemented concurrenr wirh or subsequenr zo the reakignment of Owi Creek Road. 5. The following proposed projects snail require further review: Phase I (1998-20021 • Modify air carrier :erminai buiiding • Relocate rental car storage sourh of intercent lot • Construct General .AviaIion aRron ro relocare parking out of the Runway Object Free Area (ROFA) • ConstrucI patio sheiters for local based aircraft • Airport Masrer Plan Update • Terminal access improvemenrs • Relocate long rerm and employee parking south of inrercept lot Phase II (2003-20071 • Construct General Aviarion aRron to relocate parking oUI ofROFA • Relocate ARFF building ro west side of runway • Install Runway 33 runway end identifier lights • Relocate Owi Creek Road Our of ROFA • Install medium intensiry taxiway lights . . Phase III (2008-20151 • Expand terminal building • Expand air carrier apron to south • Airport Layout Plan Update • Construct bypass taxiway at Runway 15 end 6. The applicant may install three dual 400 watt light fixmres on free standing 40 foot tall poles adjacent to the main terminal in the locations shown on the attached Exhibit B. NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PUBLISHED IN THE ASPEN TIMES ON THE 21st DAY OF MARCH, 1998. 1 illill ilill ililll illill I l]*Ililll Ill lilli lili i.,1 I Resolution No. 98- U . 418900 05/15/1998 12: OLUTI DAVIS SILVI 3 9/ 13 R 8.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO Page 3 APPROVED AND ADOPTED-~N THE 22nd DAY OF APRIL, 1998. 0 P A. ,~91,0~103~9 0 -9 -9 T BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF PITKIN COUNTY. COLORADO , By £-~LS../*7€1-4 <~~~~Li~ ATTEST: Dorothea Farris. Chair Trie 4 / 11 / 99 11 1 rier.44 7- .,ilu/n i 1-01*0*6 Amote. 1. De'u Deputy Clerk and Recorder APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: 1 d i in 0,3/4164 - r John Ely, 9 { 24 Ll (7 Cindy Houben. ~01« County Attorney Communiry Deveiopment Director Case #P3-98 PID #2643-342-00-851 suzannew\pitkinicases\mstrpin\airport\reso.doc 1 1 . . . 8 . . . . 4 4 . \ I 41-1 mel 4 1 \ 0 1 \ \ \-5 \-1 1 -1 . a \-1 \3 \-1 1-5 \-1 lib \-3 \3 ; -1 I \0 \# \ 1 1 6 \9 V Ce . 4 6 4 6 6 <% 0 y 6 ./ e \ \ 0 \ \ \ \\ \\ 1 1 1 C I \ \ \ I I IRunway 15/33~ 1 1 1\ 1 11/1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 / 1 ) 1 1 li/ t / 1 1\\ /\ 11\,//1 t / 1 \ / 1 , 1 \ 1 1 , , \ ' I / . 1 . \ , e I ,/ / / I , I . C , , 1 - / 0 f , \ \, , , 1 1 . /fr / 1 4 1 , / I / / / ./ , ' / , f , / , , \ 1 / \ , 1 I / / / / / / ~ /~ f )7 \\/ / , I \ / i + i i / 1 \'It 1 1, \\1 \f / // C / lil-1 1 \ / / / 1 1// 1 / / \ N / 1 i i/...\ \ i\ I / 1/'Cl' 1 / / 4 / \ 1 \ 1 / / / 1 - , I i \ / i C / I- / - 1 -4. - 371 C r I / / i / 1 \ ---- , / - ./ --- -- -*-il---- \*.i ---4- 4-- -I. -- ---- - ------ . / / 2 / -- - ------- -- ---- 1 "S / . 16%4 h -I- -~ N \ -0- I- ---- Ill --- 0 / / 1 - - 1 1 \ \ \ 1 i / il ----- - I.-- - #.- / -- . 1 1 / I / , 1 / \Cl</ I 1 / 1 / I / 1 / / \ %\\ / / It / , . 1 1 1 1 \ .\ 1 / ~ Taxiway "A" ' / 1 1 1 \/ / 1 1,/ 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1/ 1 1 1 / 1 1 \-- \ I 1 1 1 1 1 1 /,/ j 1 1 \\ 11 1 /\ 1 1 \ 1 \ 1 11 , / ,t / 111 1 1 1 1 ' ' I 1 1 3 1 1 ~-/1 / 7- - L- ----Ill--I- / . / / . / / /r C 1 1 Future Taxiway "A'L / ' / ~ ' 1 / 1 j \ 1 / : / / 1 # /1 Existing Contou©l ''\\ (1998) * \ 1#11 1 It \ 1 / / / / -1; / 1 / I / / - -- i 1 ./. // f ' C , 1 / -- , 1 1 . P L k / / 7 ~~~ ' ~ ~ ~~'~ ~m,0- As Built Contoui-s / / 1 - / I /7 75:'A - --1 / - li\ \ I -- 1999 GRADING / 1 -- ~ - , I. - , . / 15~ , +/ Completed Fall ]999 \ 1 1 / 1 1 , ~/J / 2 / 11 , 1 / // , / , 4--- <-*-, - - --- -*2~7--40., // ~ December 15,1999 ---' , -- , Revised: I - -- , - --- -- --- / 1 - -- , -- 1 1 - - - -- I E- 1 / 0/ 1/ 1 - \ i /< ·Approved Contours , C I - I , 1 , 1), . , 1 1\ , 1 1 i i\ 1 / i / FIGURE 6 / \ I /// 1 11 1 1 1 - V 1 / .C / ---- ,/ u 1 - / 1, 1 / A \ ' , I. I .- / I / 1 ---17_-«7 i X i - / 1 - \1, 11/ - f I -/ \ 1 - ./. -- 1 . , .40 , - 1 1 speni 1 / , / - .0/ , - / / +11\ - W -% .' ' 1, I i - I- - 31*- 9-\ -5-7 \ / - /- 11-: I // I /'' g<WM-*Z- I -2, s I --1 -- - P i tkin Co / A.- -- , 1 , / I - /-- .1~% ./ \ , ' ' , 1,1 ---1 A / Airport , - - - ./ , 1 , \- 4/ 1 - / ' - 'r -- - - -- -- CO,1 - 1 - - 41 / \ f I % -- I . 1 , - Proposed 2000 -- / j 1 - \ , r . / C 1 00, f' I / '00\ - . - \ C / 00 AS - 1 1 ./ 1 6 - - - Construction '~'b / - A __,f_t:I{f - - - - l- -- -U\tlf '48/1 'bo 1 " ~ (+311 - I- - 1 .Ill 6--- 1----I'll- Ill... , ---I../ -I--I'll-- -'/-- -Il--I 42- --1 I \ 49 / /'' 0//// ,\ /// .-*7 , / N / / 1-- .-' A 2 I , a SHANNON MURPHY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ,/ - / 174 Midland Ave, S102 , /0 /49 ./ I / // lilli / / Basalt // . 1 4% I. I , / 1 4 \ / 9 / Colorado - .- -. 4, Revegetate all disturbed areas - ~ with seeded native grasses # C --- -- 17.- 0- ** - -*0 - -2/--3.- ....0. ./. - \ \ i. ap , / I / - -0 -- .0 970 927 2889 / - lax 2-29~€25***:- I \ - *+ -'.-.-~--'.--0.-4 -1 ... -..---------.'- -" -* 12«««////// 1 1 \ , / 1\\ - ' ---- 4-- 970 927.0538 \ em@ . 1 - M=1 1 1 * r- -- 1 1\ murphy@rot net - - 359<deell- r --*0-* ..0 0' 10' 20' 50' 100' North 72-- ) ?N----33*-3-=1~~*.%~- -M-6/ A-X-% , -X-X 6 1 1 : / --IK---1073/05.-. i . I I . /1 - 0 /..I.-1. -Cicir: . -- , / 4 X / Nforth V ¥ X/-%-%'f./.::i, *-00* - To/Aspen / 0// / Not for Construction ---- High,Nay 82 1 \ 4 _»2Zlfs,6 *is0:::..5 ' ---- 1 - , 1 1 ~71 1 ' 31 20 / / 7 0' 25' 50' 100' 0/ %\ Ap/4*--·* dpi / .5/ -.3„91 - /49% ,\636// ,«/ .12/ 2 ----~ Scale: 1" = 50' f\/ r\ , 0 <+1 Ip + e fl- .._--_=32-11EE~,.. Hig!migy_11 , Existing Taxiway , i , Fence Existing Grade ~ 1 Future Taxiway ~ Existing Runway ~ r i 1 ........-/-- 1 1 -7 1 Section AA Highway 82 6 ' Future Taxiway U =Fence Existing Grade ~ Existing Runway <| 1 -- -------------- -- r Sectu= . . « .. .# 0 7708 ~ 7706 *7702 1 . . . 0 . . . . Runway 15/33 . I A. - 30 P 24.. \\Lf J 4, -Paving to be Removed ./ - 1 : i AC 1.k' .1/'. U / -- I-- - ).L-- -- x \ 1% ir.. \ 0 - 1 ,1 4 1 - I \ - _,2 - / 1 \ - \ - . ·..1/. \ .-/ \ \ - h -- , i h - \ ---- - -- - 1 1 A - -- %-0--Ill -- - ---.. - --I. & \ 0. 9 ------ - 9 -- h -- ---I. ...... - -27 -- ...-*.-1- - -- --7- L. 2,- =..I .-- .---0 '-.0.- =2„ *"'- --'.-. ...... ..Il. -- -0- 0-Ii--09"-- - -- - %- t - %--*--- - . ~ 1 1 1 \ , 2 \ n - 1\ 1 1 / / / / 1 22'·/ f , 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 1 / 1 / i ·,4 j j j , 1 ~ / t .1/' 1 / / / 1,1.. 1 / \1 1 1 1 ji\ , 11 1 / 1 1 1 1 / 1 1 i. / 1 1 1 1 DIL..1 1 4 .// 11 1 . / / 1Kt / 1 1 \ /1 i .4 f / ~4. f 1 1 \ 1 1 /-Proposed Ligh /Electrical / - '\P.- ~ V Outlet Locatk ns T i' / 1 1 1 f 2 -r 7 .. 1/ 0/ . / 1 TV/ A, 12/ 0//1 .----*- / / / / €11 k~ 9 9 - / / &/ /9 - 1 11 %3\ hl / / £ i ~ 4-Propostg* aving , , / , 1- 1 - - - % 0 / / 1 ~ Taxiway "A" / 1 -___ /f ' r \ 1- 1 / / /4003\r 1 / 4/ . 0/ 44/ S INt \ ~\ / Object Free Area / \ I i / / -I.- 2 .. 1 ... CL- 4 --1--__1 21 *AC_3C=JI .1 .. -- .1 T< _ F 1 W 72 ~ ---ll[-C..1 - 7.w_ 9 --Ill - -1 1 ~ Existing Edge of Pavemen~~ 1 Exi74 2'-6' Berm to be Removet f ) _ - - - - ~,/ - - - -- Buildin estriction Line 2/1 F ,-c~nitTicdowns ~ - ~, -21. - f f -r'. <<1-~possible F~ur€/~~io Shelters .. 1 ---flt.~ L=5=i 'u---0-~.~ r-·~~l._1 T1_11- 411-2261*fu&.-fflld i 95/60 5 CNE' 11171---t-_lit 1 T m--1'L.- 7- E ...3• r--*-3 1 1 CT- - 0 / 1 0 - tr---'~-31 - . tr- -Ti,1/ ~LI -L_14--If ~70----- 200' Setbac rom CDOT ROW----01/ - , I Approx(d Hanger (Not Constructed.*d- 1/ 11 - 34 \ Ex Green Chain Link Fence ,/ - 1 ---Il- -· --1 04 -- j - 2 1 - - -1 Existing Gate / / \ 1-1 0 - --i -- i-l »e »-- 1 f Al, evegetate with Seede*Native ,_.fl Grasses . / --11- / 19.=1=/9. cul= =2¤ . It CIL--rl ~ t~ W • lit- r k.-.., W . W 111 332 -*/ . di L--13:--1/ r 1 . -1~ f--1-- «j / - i 0/4 -- 40 . / i #A 3)<_*._-_--2-121 = -AA-·- *x-7 - 1,9 .w· ap. 2% / il. XX /~ AX XM- %/' Electric Fen:e alled 19- li ./*/...'./.- / - - Proposed Electric Fene·: \ 1 K jity $ r 3 1 -1 -------< XXX- 1 -A, // / / , / .. \ 1 - 1 X/,- / Existing Trees to Reniaill- 1 '-0"t..,, -#-'- -- / Proposed Parking I / 30 Spaces i , 1 - \ 1 . 1 1 l i li 1 I 1 1, \ \ C - V Existing Edge of Gravel----*1 j / 24A. 1 ' 1 1,111 Il~ · ) 1 - 1- l / ,) / /1 , /' -44 - A / // 1 -I ---- \ 1 .3 ./.3~1 , 3- 7 -/ 1 ) - 1 - 1 / 1- J --- 1 --- A-57 - -- 1 ---- - // /- / -- 3.. , 1/ , 2, 4. / - - - - - -3 I.$ -L C - - - -7333 - --.TILI_-- 3 ------*-2-_7___ - - --- '1 1 21 c f A-- X- -E-X x-* 1 - - A-x- I I. A- A-#-A- . I. X-X Ze 3 ~Existing Shrubs to Remain~ ,·1,- Existing fence CDOT ROW 1 -- - Highway 82 - - - 9 -- -1 . r .- SITE PLAN Aspen/ SHANNON MURPHY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ~ 174 Midland Ave. S102 North - December 15, 1999 Revised: Pitkin CO Basall Colorado Not for Construction Airport phone 970.927.2889 lax Lir Z 970.927,0538 FIGURE 5 Proposed 2000 0' 25' 50' 100 email Construction < murphy@rol.nel Scale: 1" = 50' ........