Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19810210 . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM II c. F.HO~CKn B. B. II L. co. Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Special Meeting, February 10, 1981 The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission held a special meeting on February 10, 1981. Olof Hedstrom called the meeting to order with members Roger Hunt, Perry Harvey, Lee Pardee, Jasmine Tygre, Joan Klar, and Al Blomquist present. Commisionmember Comments Roger moved that the Hemrneter 8040 Greenline review be discussed prior to the Old Business on tonite's agenda. (Thes was at the request of the applicant.) Jasmine seconded. All in favor. Hemmeter 8040 Greenline Alan Richman, of the Planning office, stated the applicant is requesting an 8040 Greenline review to permit remodeling of the Blitz House. The location of the property is Lot 14, Block 2 of the Anthony Acres Subdivision. The Planning Officer recommends that P and Z approve the applicant's request for 8040 Greenline Review for the purpose of remodeling the Blitz House, subject to the following conditions: 1. Installation of the fire safety measures described in the Engineering Department's memo dated February 4, 1981. 2. Mitigation, by the applicant, of the impacts associated with grading and construction activities. Said measures should include erosion controls and temporary and permanent landscaping of the site. Roger moved to approve the 8040 Greenline request for the Hemrneter application, conditioned on the above #1 and #2, and condition #3 being as follows: 3. The applicant will execute any documents deemed necessary by the City Attourney regarding emergency access and hold harmless clauses. Lee seconded. All in favor. The motion was carried. Old Business Litqe Annie and Subdivision Olaf read two letters into the public record, -Aspen Alps Condominium Association reo ground transportation concerns. -Grant Condominiums reo base facility Joe Wells said the Planning and Zoning has at least four items to consider in regard to Little Annie. They are: 1. Code Amendment, re: Dormitory as a conditional use under the R-6 RBO. 2. The Transit issue. 3. Engineering issues. 4. Draft Resolution for consideration. In response to #1, above, the members expressed their ideas and concerns. Finally they decided to further discuss this issue next week during the Public Hearing for the proposed Code Amendment. In response (hand out). be supplied meeting. to #2, above, Monroe Summers discussed his study The Commission decided more information should to them, and discussion would continue at a future At this time Olaf opened the continued Public Hearing. There were no public comments. Olaf entertained a motion to table this issue and to continue the public hearing on February 17, 1981. Roger Hunt so moved. Jasmine seconded. All in favor. Given Institute Rezoning Sunny Vann, Planning Office, recommended the Commission table this item to March 17, 1981. (This is at the request of the applicant's attorney). Olaf opened the continued public hearing. The addition of David Levy, attorney and immediate adjacent property owner since 1972. Levy said he has had continuous problems with Given Institute, particularly with parking, traffic and the handling of trash. He further stated that considering the problem they already have with these issues, 60 more people (residents) and 36 parking spaces will make it much worse. He expressed concern that our code states application for rezoning can only be heard, once a year, during the month of October. Proper ratification of adjacent landowners was not made at that time-therefore legally there is a problem. Roger moved to tagle action and to continue the public hearing to March 17, 1981 at the applicant's request. Lee seconded. All in favor. The motion was carried. Castlewood Headgate Preliminary Subdivision Sunny Vann, Planning Office, said this is a public hearing to consider the revised preliminary PUD subdivision submission for the Castlewood Headgate Project. Sunny gave a brief description of the history of the project. (Specific Planning office memorandum dated November 13, 1980) In summary, the Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's Preliminary PUD/Subdivision submission subject to the following: 1. The Engineering Department's conditions outlined in their memorandum dated February 3, 1981, 2. The completion of all outstanding final PUD subdivision submissions requirements prior to City Council review. Further, the Planning Office recommends approval of the rezoning to R15A-PUD-RBO and their request for Growth Management Exemption and condominiumization be approved subject to the deed restriction of the employee units to the $.70/sq. ft. guideline and compliance with the 6-month minimum lease restriction of Sections 20~22. With respect to their request for exception from that requirement the Planning Office would recommend denial. In essence, the applicants have met all the conditions that were outlined as parameters in the work session with City Council. They have reduced the price of the rental units, relocated the units and open space and access issues have all been resolved. Following presentations by persons representing the applicant's Olof re~opened the public hear~ng. Three letters were read into the record: 1. Bob Richelson, Los Angeles and Aspen resident. 2. Ed Suzaki, concerned with density and rental rates. 3. Richard Day -2- . - ,---",' RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORll \0 C. F. HOECKEL D. B. 8: L. CD. Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission, Special Meeting, February 10, 1981 The following persons made public comments at this meeting: Opal Marolt-for Judy Marolt-for Peggy Oberich-for vicki Marolt Buchanen-for Francis Whitaker-against Jack DeBuchter-for Jeff Saks-against Ed Suzaki-against Don Alexander-against Jim Reents-City Housing Director Hal Clark-against (read letter submitted by Pitkin County Parks Association) Dottie Keleher-for Olof closed the public hearing. After some discussion, Roger Hunt moved to approve PUD subdivision application as submitted conditioned on the following: 1. The engineering Department's conditions outlined in their memorandum dated February 3, 1981. 2. The completion of all outstanding final PUD/Subdivision submission requirements prior to City Council review. 3. Non-exemption of 6 month minimum lease restriction. Lee Pardee Seconded. Roll call vote as follows: Olof Hedstrom-opposed Perry Harvey-opposed Jasmine Tygre-opposed Roger Hunt-for Joan Klar-for Lee Pardee-for Al Blomquist-for 3 opposed 4 for The motion carried. Al Blomquist moved to approve rezoning. Lee Pardee seconded. Roll call vote exactly the same as above. 3-opposed. 4 for. The motion is carried Roger Hunt moved to recommend exemption from GMP based on 70:30. Lee Pardee seconded. Roll call vote exactly the same as above. 3-opposed. 4-for The motion is carried. Roger Hunt moved to recommend Subdiyision approval for purposes of condominiumization subject to deed restriction of employee units to $.70/Square feet and compliance with the six-month minimum lease provisions of Section 20-22. Lee Pardee seconded. Roll call vote as follows: Olof Hedstrom-opposed Perry Harvey-opposed Jasmine Tygre-opposed Roger Hunt-for Joan Klar-for Lee Pardee-for Al Blomquist-for 3-opposed 4-for The motion is carried. -3- - ~oger Hunt moved that the Planning ~nd and Zoning Commission draft a Resolution stating the minority opinion go to Council. Lee seconded. All in favor. Lee moved to adjourn the meeting. Joan seconded. The meeting adjourned at 9:00 P.M. 1:)~ ~ Denise P. Lee Deputy City Clerk ~ '-'