Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19810303 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves rOR~ \0 C. F. HOECKEL B. B. II L. co. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and Zoning Commision March 3, 1981 In Olof's absence, Lee Nominated Perry to be acting Chairman. Jasmine seconded. All in favor. Perry Harvey will act as Chairman for this meeting. Commissioner's Comments Roger noted that, regarding the airport study, all Planning and Zoning members should have copies. Alan Richman, Planning Office, said the City is represented primarily by staff members at this time. Roger felt the City Planning and zoning should be represented on this committiee. Perry Harvey stated there is a Resolution regarding the Landow Subdivision that he as acting Chairman should sign. Roger so moved. Jasmine soconded. All in favor. The motion is carried. Sunny said there is a Resolution regarding Little Annie that needs a motion to be signed as amended. Al so moved. Lee seconded. All in favor. The motion is carried. (The Resolution was signed by Lee Pardee as/per original autorization.) Alan Richman, Planning Office, said that earlier in the year, following a condominiumization applicatio~ City Council had expressed some concerns about the Lodge Condominiumization Ordinance. In response to this the Planning Office has proposed new language to Section 20-23 of the Code. The specific language can be found in the Planning Office memo dated February 26, 1981 (A.R.l. Code Amendment and Public Hearing Lodge Condominiurnization Perry opened the Public Hearing. There were no public comments. Perry closed the Public Hearing. The Planning and Zoning Commission agreed upon the changes they felt necessary. The Planning Office will now draft this into the. form of a Resolution and bring it back to the Planning and Zoning at the next meeting for their final approval. Jerome Hotel Conceptual PUD Alan Richman, Planning Office, stated this application is for a conceptual PUD Review for the Hotel Jerome for the purposes of remodeling the exisingcbuilding and constructing additional units to the north toward Bleeker Street. The applicant is proposing a total of 114 rooms on the site, to consist of the existing 39 rooms to be renovated and remodeled in to 34 rooms in the present building, the addition of 76 new rooms in the new building. The current zoning on the north portion of the site is o-office while the portion along Main Street is zoned CC-Commercial Core. The planning Office recommends that Planning and Zoning approve the applicant's request for conceptual PUD review for the purposes of remodeling and expanding the Hotel Jerome,subject to the following conditions. 1. That the applicant develop alternative plans, to be presented prior to conceptual review by Council, to provide parking for some of the guests and employees of the hotel; .__..<e._______..""'''''__,,.,..... ..~..... Jerome Hotel Conceptual PUD cont. 2, That the appl~ant ~nst~~l qn ~ndu~tr~~~ ~tyve trash compaction facility to handle all solid waste generated at the hotel, access by single curb cut on Bleeker Street, 3. That the applicant agree to a delivery how limitation for all services provided to the hotel, the exact nature of which is to be determined through consultation with the Planning Office; 4. That the applicant provide further detail prior to conceptual review by Council regarding the arrangements for housing employees to be housed, the possible location of the units, and the amount of money to be contributed by the applicant to the project; 5. that the applicant be required to provide new sidewalks along Main, Monarch and Bleeker as well as curb and gutter as needed. In addition, if construction causes and damage to the new sidewalk and curb along Mill Street, the applicant be required to replace those sections. John Gilmore owner/applicant. spoke for his project. He stated he plans to seek historic designation for the original part of the building in the future. The Commission members discussed the proposed plan as presented at this time. They expressed their concerns and asked John Gilmore numerous questions. This included issues such as limo service (arrival and departure area) use of inside space, trash collection, service and delivery, and parking. Starri Subdivision Exception Jack Johnson, Planning Office, stated this application is a reqest for subdivision exception for the purposes of condominiu- mizqtion of an existing duplex structure, The applicant is ~equesting a waiver to conceptual plan before City Counci~, and preliminary plat and final plat approval before Planning and Zoning, The location of the property is Lots M, Nand 0, Block 21, City and Townsite of Aspen, The current zoning is R-6 Residential. The Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's request for subdivision exception for purposes of condominiumi- zqtion subject to the following conditions, 1. Revision of the condominium plat prior to submission for signatures to indicate a lOlx7! electric/communications easement on the northeast corner of lot !'O". 2. The applicant entering into an "agreement" to join an improvement district for construction of sidewalk, curb and gutter in the event one is formed for this area. 3, The sole restriction for five years on the unit to be retained by the applicant with rental restrictions at the current rental rate with the City's annual allowable increase, Lee Pardee moved to recommend approval for a subdivision exception for Starri subdivision with the following conditions, #1 and #2 of the above Planning Office recommendation, #3. That if the units comply with Section 20-22 then they (both units) will be restricted and if they don't neither will be; such determine to be made by City Council, with legal opinion from City Attorney. Jasmine seconded. All in favor with the exception of Roger, The motion is carried. -2- 'J' , , . RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM 5~ C. F. HOECKEL B. B. !!. L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning and zoning Commission March 3, 1981 Studios West Subdivision Exception Jack Johnson, Planning Office, stated this is an application by studios West Apartments, a Colorado limited partnership, requesting subdivision exception for the purposes of condomin- iumizing an existing 14 unit residential complex. The applicant is requesting a waiver to conceptual approval before City Council, and Preliminary Plat and Final plat approval before Planning and zoning. The location of the property is Lots K, L, M and the west 27 feet of Lot N, Block 16, City and Townsite of Aspen. The current zoning is R-6 Residential. The Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's request for subdivision exceptionfor the purposes of condominiumization subject to the following conditions. 1. Compliance with requests by the Engineering Department as per memo dated February 19, 1981, 2. Full compliance with Section 20~22 of the Municipal Code regarding written notice to tenants offering unit for sale, maximum six month restricted leases, etc! ~erry Harvey entertained a motion to recommend subdivision exc~ption for the purposes of condominiurnizing Studio West Apartments conditioned upon #1 and #2 of Planning Office memo above. Also, conditioned upon designation on the final condominium plat of 14 parking spaces on the north side of the structure. Al so moved. Jasmine seconded. Perry restated his motion to state that the North side of the structure be design~ted as parking regardless of the number of spaces. Roger feels there should be 14 spaces. Al agreed. The motion was then amended to designate the current 11 spaces. Al so moved the amended motion. Jasmine seconded. All in favor with the exception of Roger. The motion is carried. Jasmine moved to Perry seconded. 8:00 P.M. adjourn. All in favor. The meeting adjourned at ~;J~)~ Denise P. Lee Deputy City Clerk -3- ,..-..".,' -. '--'~'''''''''''''''"''"'''~~''"~~~-~.-.~.~'.'''~-~'...,,,~..~.-.~'