HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.sr.120 E Main St.A34-92
r-,
.~
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
DATE RECEIVED: 04/20/92
DATE COMPLETE:
PARCEL ID AND CASE NO.
2735-124-38-002 A34-92
STAFF MEMBER: LL
PROJECT NAME: (Old) Pitkin Countv Librarv Special Review to
Reduce Parkinq Mitiqation
Project Addres~~Main street
Legal Address: Lots M. N & 0: Block 66
APPLICANT: Pitkin Countv
Applicant Address:
REPRESENTATIVE:
Representative Address/Phone:
Sunnv Vann: Vann Associates
230 East Ho?kins Avenue
Aspen. CO 81611
--------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------
PAID: (YES) NO AMOUNT: $
NO. OF COPIES RECEIVED
1
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
1 STEP:
2 STEP:
P&Z Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
NO
VESTED RIGHTS:
YES
NO
CC Meeting Date
PUBLIC HEARING: YES
NO
VESTED RIGHTS:
YES
NO
Planning Director Approval:
Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption:
Paid:
Date:
---------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
REFERRALS:
City Attorney
city Engineer
Housing Dir.
Aspen Water
city Electric
Envir.Hlth.
Aspen Con. S.D.
Mtn Bell
Parks Dept.
Holy Cross
Fire Marshall
Building Inspector
Roaring Fork
Energy Center
School District
Rocky Mtn NatGas
State HwyDept(GW)
State HwyDept(GJ)
Other
DATE REFERRED: INITIALS:
===========================================================~~A1
FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: / - )' a INITIAL;'~C
___ City Atty ___ City Engineer ___Zoning ___Env. Health
___ Housing Other:
ti:ty ~~
FILE STATUS AND LOCATION:
i
I
I
I
I
'.'1
:;,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I'
I
I
I
*Iii
\/*~'" O()9201
f"""'...
: l.:~,
_'1 ,~
CITYOF1 ASPEN
PIll(IN COUNTY LIBRARY
1::'<) E. I"!AIN
,;SPEN, CO
fJjjj
PO APPROVAL
81611
7/3 (
DATE
201.938
PURCHnORDER #
PLEASE INVOICE:
CITY OF ASPEN
ACCOUNTS F'AYABLE
130 SO. GALENA ST.
ASPEN" COL.ORADO
PHONE #,,~ - = - 9C
503/'"I..:'MU"''',.Ju )
SHIP TO:
CITY OF ASPEN
PLANNING f" ZONING
1.30 S GALENA ST
ASPEN, CO
SHIP DATE: ()"i"/28/CJ2
REQUESTED BY: IvIAI"! FOr::
REQUISITION #: ':'>(>'7~n-'
REPRESENTATIVE'S NAME AND PHONE #
VENDOR PHONE #
VENDOR TAX ID #
QUANTITY I UNIT
1.
I DESCRIPTION
REFUND OF CODE AMENDt1ENT
APPLICATION FOR PITKIN
COUNTY LIBRARY MADE BY
r-::' I Tl< I ti~ COUNTY
I UNIT PRICE
9:1.2..0000
I TOTAL PRICE $
REMARKS:
F-::E:V-(.'j".!D r-;!::: C,CT)F /'t!"rf.:.::\iL:;";:: :\iT
,c)r~';-:'L_. I c;( ; .'t,TD!\:
~::'c)F;: ;'::' TI< T i\:
:""t')i i!\[TY
iv; (:, D r" y':,', ;:~' J: -r;.
,.
,.
....\1' .
PLEASE REFERENCE por, i ';'0 ON ALL SHIPMENTS, INVOICES, AND CORRESPONDENCE.
.'..,'n.' ,',_L.'
THE CITY OF ASPEN SALES TAX EXEMPT NUMBER IS 98-04557
VENDOR COPY -- WHITE
DEPT COPY -- YELLOW
NOT A VALID PURCHASE ORDER UNLESS SIGNED FOR APPROVAL ABOVE,
FINANCE COpy -- PINK
816l.1
DEPT
81611
':'''1.'-
;::).r'~
I TOTAL
912..00
.-:,.;,..
f"""'..
July 30, 1992
.,-"
JUL30
Leslie Lamont
Aspen/Pitkin county Planning Office
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Pitkin County Old Library Special Review
Dear Leslie:
Pitkin County
The County is in the process of selling the old library building,
therefore we request that our application for special review be
withdrawn and request a refund of fees paid. Thank you.
Si~lY'
,~
Reid Haughey
county Manager
pcsem/wp/7.158
Administration
530 E, Main. 3rd Floor
Aspen, CO 81611
(~03) 920-5200
FAX 920-5198
@ printed on recycled paper
County Commissioners
SuiteS
506 E. Main Street
Aspen, CO 81611
(303) 920-5150
County Attorney
Suite I
530 E, Main Street
Aspen, CO 8161 1
(303) 920-5190
Personnel and Finance
SuiteF
530 E. Main Street
Aspen. CO 6161 1
(303) 920-5220
Transportation
Facilities
76 Service Center Road
Aspen, C081611
(303) 920-5390
I"'"
I"",
"'- ~
Aspen/Pit
130
Asp
(303) 9 -
.',!'1i:.'
,:.\1;)'
, .,. JI,' ~~ t~
11\ \"",..;;",,1.;
";"y-:f.. ',' -II ,"..#' ..,
:. :;_:~ .f, ,;,;:;~,(:\[f:4
.~ J,'.-;"~;~('~ '<".f
l' - J.,J' - _I.
I I" ,~~::~/:.(/~.\
iqg Office
treet
611
20-5197
July 30, 1992
Pitkin County Finance Department
560 E. Main st.
Aspen, CO 81611
RE: Application Fee Refund
Dear Sir or Madam:
Enclosed please find a check from the City of Aspen in the amount
of $912.00 which is was for the Pitkin County Library Special
Review Application fee you submitted to us on May 13, 1992. Since
the application has been withdrawn we are returning this fee to
you.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Maggie McGrath
Administrative Secretary
MAM/mc
Enclosure
@"reCYcledPaper
~
,-".
- .
TO
Debbie Skehan
MESSAGE DISPLAY
i
cci Reid Haughey
From: Leslie Lamont
Postmark: Jul 20,92 9:15 AM'
Subject: Reply to a reply: pitkin county old library special review
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply text:
From Leslie Lamont:
fyi a quick note would be ok
Preceding message:
From Debbie Skehan:
I guess we should have a letter in file withdrawing this. Thanks
From Leslie Lamont:
as we discussed last week this file is colsed and the county should
receive a refund should i have the county write a letter asking that
the file be withdrawn? or can we just call it dead
-------========x========-------
/L/--71-t'~/ #- '[~. 0 )
[J.(J *
d00,58:7
1t1/ d <l9-
r-\
!"........,
APR 2 0 1(::92
V ANN ASSOCIATES
Planning Consultants
April 20,1992
HAND DELIVERED
Ms. Leslie Lamont, AICP
Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
Re: Pitkin County Library Special Review Application
Dear Leslie:
Please consider this letter an application for special review approval to reduce the
parking mitigation required pursuant to City Council Ordinance No. 15-90 for the conver-
sion of the old Pitkin County Library building to office use. The application is submitted
pursuant to Section 7-404.B. (and the proposed amendments thereto) of the Land Use
Regulations by the Pitkin County Library. Permission for Vann Associates, Planning
Consultants, to represent the Applicant was previously provided in connection with the
Applicant's text amendment application.
Background
On February 6, 1990, the Planning and Zoning Commission approved a growth manage-
ment quota system exemption to permit a so-called "change-in-use" of the old Pitkin
County Library building from public to office use. The GMQS exemption, which was
approved pursuant to Section 8-104.B.1.b. of the Regulations, was conditioned upon the
provision of sufficient parking and affordable housing to mitigate the additional demand
which would theoretically result from the building's change in use. In addition, the P&Z
recommended that the City Council rezone the library property from P, Public, to 0,
Office, to accommodate the change in use approval.
On April 23, 1990, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 90-15, which formally
rezoned the library property to 0, Office. As you know, the parking and affordable
housing mitigation requirement imposed by the P&Z as a condition of their GMQS
exemption approval was also imposed by the City Council as a condition of the rezoning.
The condition stated that the amount of parking required to mitigate the change in use
was to be based upon the applicable provisions of the Regulations, and that mitigation
could be accomplished via a cash-in-Iieu payment.
As the Applicant had previously received an employee credit in connection with the
approval of a GMQS exemption for the construction of the new library building on the
230 East Hopkins Avenue' Aspen, Colorado 81611 . 303/925-6958 . Fax 303/920-9310
f"""'..
.~
Ms. Leslie Lamont, AICP
April 20, 1992
Page 2
Rio Grande property, the amount of affordable housing required to mitigate the change
in use was to be based upon the total number of employees generated by the purchaser
of the building. The parking and affordable housing impacts resulting from the change in
use were required to be mitigated prior to the issuance of a building permit or a certifi-
cate of occupancy for the building.
In November of 1991, the Applicant and a prospective purchaser of the library property
submitted a request to the Planning Office for a clarification of the building's parking
requirement. The Applicant wished to obtain a credit against the required parking
mitigation for approximately nineteen (19), off-street parking spaces located adjacent to
the west side ofPaepcke Park. Tne purpose of the credit request was to reduce the
extent of the parking required to mitigate the building's change in. use, thereby enhancing
the marketability of the property.
The Planning Director formally denied the Applicant's request for a parking credit, and
the Applicant appealed the matter to the City Council for further consideration. While
the Council subsequently concurred with the Director's position, they indicated that they
would consider other alternatives regarding the mitigation of the library building's parking
requirement. As the possibility of a code amendment to address the parking issue was
raised by both the Council and the Planning Office, the Applicant is presently pursuing
this alternative.
An application to amend various provisions of the Regulations pertaining to the City's
off-street parking requirements was submitted by the Applicant on February 27, 1992.
After reviewing the application, the Planning Office recommended changes to the
proposed amendments, which were subsequently approved by the P&Z on March 31.
The application is scheduled for City Council review on April 27 and May 26, 1992.
While it is uncertain whether the proposed amendments will be approved by the Council,
the Applicant has elected to proceed with this special review application on the assump-
tion that the amended code language will be adopted as drafted.
Review Requirements
If adopted, the Applicant's proposed code amendments will allow the P&Z to reduce the
commercial parking requirement in the 0, Office, zone district from three (3) spaces to
one and one-half (1-1/2) spaces per one thousand (1,000) square feet of net leasable area,
and to permit the resulting requirement to be mitigated via a payment-in-Iieu of parking.
In addition, the amendments will allow the City Council to further reduce and/or waive
the parking requirement established by the P&Z. A further reduction and/or waiver is
also subject to special review approval, and is specifically limited to existing buildings for
which a .change-in-use. GMQS exemption is requested.
As Table 1 below indicates, the existing library building presently contains approximately
seven thousand five hundred and ninety (7,590) square feet of net leasable area. Based
on the 0, Office, zone district's commercial parking requirement of three (3) spaces per
f"""'..
,-,
Ms. Leslie Lamont, AICP
April 20, 1992
Page 3
one thousand (1,000) square feet of net leasable area, twenty-three (23) parking spaces
would theoretically be required to meet the office needs of the building.
Table 1
Net Leasable Area Calculations
1.
Gross Building Area (Sq. Ft.)l
Basement
Ground Floor
8,120
4,150
3,970
7,590
3,790
3,800
2.
Net Leasable Area (Sq. Ft.)
Basement
Ground Floor
All numbers rounded to the nearest ten (10) square feet.
As only one (1) parking space is available on-site, a maximum of twenty-two (22)
additional spaces, or an equivalent cash-in-lieu payment of $330,000.00, would arguably
be required to mitigate the building's off-street, parking requirement. As this require-
ment substantially impacts the marketability of the building, the Applicant hereby
requests special review approval from the P&Z to reduce the building's parking require-
ment to one and one-half (1-1/2) spaces per one thousand square feet, and to permit this
requirement to be mitigated via a cash-in-Iieu payment. The actual number of required
spaces will be determined by the net leasable requirements of the building's purchaser.
The Applicant's request is based upon the physically inability to provide additional
parking on-site; and the proximity of the property to the downtown area, an existing
RFfA bus stop, and the City's municipal parking garage. As the building's prior library
use was more intensive than the proposed office use, the lack of additional on-site
parking should have little, if any, adverse impact upon the surrounding area. In fact, on-
street parking impacts may actually decrease, depending upon the nature of the building's
future office use. The Applicant's request, therefore, is consistent with the special review
criteria of Sections 7-404.B.1. and 2., as amended.
To further reduce the burden of the building's parking mitigation requirement, the
Applicant also requests that the P&Z recommend to the City Council that the required
cash-in-Iieu payment be waived pursuant to Section 7-404.B.3., as amended. The old
library building is the recipient of a prior .change-in-use" approval, and a valid public
purpose would be served by retaining the building as opposed to its demolition and
reconstruction. Although the building is not historic, it significantly contributes to the
character of the Main Street Historic District.
f""""'..
..-.",
Ms. Leslie Lamont, AICP
April 20, 1992
Page 4
While no physically ability exits to provide additional parking on-site, sufficient public
parking is presently available in the immediate site area to adequately serve the building.
The location of a major RFfA bus stop on the property, and the Applicant's prior
conveyance of an easement for transit purposes, significantly supports alternative
transportation modes. Based on the above, the requested waiver should pose no
detriment to the community's public health, welfare or safety.
Should you have any questions, or require additional information, please do not hesitate
to call.
Sincerely,
SV:cwv
Attachment
c:\buslcity,applapp18192,sr