Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutLand Use Case.301 E Hyman Ave.56-8030\ t. 11 7«U,- 1,\UEL Ouse. 56-%0 -- f '460·44) 4.4.Ltifi- - ' - .1 - tta.4-20 - 494414 1 q ittte' 66 S ocwuv\-0/4 4/0 I 3 1 S 1 142=2 b.4 3€R:-:.-9..13 A ¥F - C No. 5-St) ,./ CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen 1. DATE SUBMITTED: STAFF: Sun'N V.n 2. APPLICANT: AD,MI. 11116 3. REPRESENTATIVE : D.1 6)66.,1 NIAk Gib..,, o.kihcls 4. PROJECT NAME: P~Nothv Lod, 6.fl'Vic' IWI- 5P«'41 giv,w 5. LOCATION : /*23/E:-277 ZO,Ez€,jkzpe /¥ '06 4/3> M./1 E~) 1 , I , O»JEEM #A/UAd + i 1.-JoUArul 6. TYPE OF APPLICATION: Rezoning Subdivision Stream Margin F.U.D. Exception 8040 Greenline ZSpecial Review Exemption View Plane Growth Management 70:30 Conditional Use HPC Residential Bonus Other E:Llrl.£31'EE #1«30/ d6 Ok-IrT 7. REFERRALS: b< Attorney Sanitation District School District 3< Engineering Dept. Fire Marshal Rocky Mtn. Nat. Gas ¥ Housi ng Parks State Highway Dept. Water Holy Cross Electric Other City Electric Mountain Bell 8. REVIEW REQUIREMENTS:-46214<UL (~'S~SC 7j-L~J~~ r 9. DISPOSITION: p & Z V~ Approved 4 Denied Date // 14 165 0-1_hp JECT --fr-··· 3-1 a*,8<Il- - 1,01 / r« ry€-T - .. FFL/:Trir- T/r- 1 1 r790 le -Th )«.. -LA* k.e, rF- FL-Ofh. rEIN //7 -.71 -3 / 1,<//T /(1 jrl>'1}14 : //-7-1-) Al ._(- -7/All+Kn~h FLJ)-41. 1<>nE=- ,/Gy.p /,0«7-'0-9/»5 J Council ~ Approved Denied Date .illigo Co 4 ou 421.0- ..,d L 2 + 1 A ji r . j A_ (I|-2 0 r li <, -j / t/hg. j 3 64- e,-il~ le. 9 -A K U '64 -4.1 zv<, 4- ,~.=f '-2 4. v.'-ej t 0 4.1 -~* 6\£,- 6\,t h -4 (LL.Al. i co *c j V 16 1 Ls 0) 4 LE- o c l„. p ~ <k g '-- s. .-Q- 4 -1 v.,#~.&3* 064< e,~,flo lets gr- 64-0 9 6% rt-) t Lo &~L 10. ROUTING: j f Attorney v Building Engineering Other . . 5401 0 . Regular Meeting Aspen City Council November 8, 1982 Ms. Penne pointed out that both projects require additional approvals. Employee housing ' units constructed as part of a commercial GMP project require approval of Council upon ~ recommendation of P & Z. The Whale of a Wash has to have a special review for an FAR ; bonus as well as HPC approval. The Rubey Park visitors center needs to be rezoned to SPA, , have an SPA plan adopted and get HPC approval. Ms. Penne told Council if they agreed 1, with ae P &Z recommendation, they should approve Resolution #32, Series of 1982. .u, Bil Dunaway asked if the Rubey Park Visitors Center had to receive voter approval. City i Manager Chapman said Rubey Park was paid for out of the general fund, not with six and seventh penny funds. The Charter requirement that there be voter approval because of open 1 space funds does not apply. I Councilwoman Michael moved to approve Resolution #32, Series of 1982; seconded by Council- . man Knecht. 1 Councilman Collins questioned the square footage on Rubey Park. Ms. Penne said the total ' commercial square footage requested is 5810 square feet. There are other areas that are ~' considered accessory to the type of use. There are subsequent reviews for this project. Councilman Collins asked what the rest of the area is as the total build out is more than 5810. square feet. Ms. Penne said there is employee housing, public space. 1 1 Monroe Summers told Council that the current zoning of Rubey Park, T, Transportation, allows r food service operations in support of a public facility. Summers said he feels that the public facility uses of the building, the transportation elements, hallways, restrooms, food service operations, lockers, all are exempt from competition under growth management. Mayor Edel said a restaurant is a commercial venture and should be counted. Vann said the zone allows certain uses as assessory to the transportation function; the applicant will have to come in in a subsequent review process and convince Council the nature of any , operation is in fact accessory. Whether or not Council concurs, is a separate issue. Councilwoman Michael asked how this allocation for GMP commercial project. can come to Council with a proviso the rest of the project will be dealt with later. Vann told Council' the applicant competed for 5810 square feet of commercial space. The applicant believes that certain uses are accessory to the public function of the building. Council, upon P & Z recommendation, must make the determination about the rest of the project. Vann said if Council does not agree about the rest of the project, the applicant will have to amend his application. If the applicant has to compete in the growth management competition for the rest of the square footage, he will have to wait until the next competition. Vann said . in public facilities of a transportation nature, he felt it would be appropriate for a commercial support to have something like coffee and doughnuts. Vann said if Council does decide to exempt the accessory uses, it will be subject to : mitigating the impacts of that space. Council may exact, as a condition of exemption, if i, there is employee housing generated, that they meet that need. Summers said there is a provision in the Code exempted food service operations in support o f public facilities. ! If Council does· not concur that the proposed food service square footage is an accessory h use, the project will have to go back through GMP or not be. Summers said the question is how much, or what, will be exempted. All in favor, Councilman Parry abstained. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #63, SERIES OF 1982 - Land Use Code Referral Fees Environmental Health Officer Tom Dunlop told Council the county has chosen not to address this ordinance so Council should not address it. ORDINANCE #64, SERIES OF 1982 - Food Service Establishment Fees Tom Dunlop, environmental health department, told Council as a result of escalating costs, , he is trying to generate more revenues. Dunlop said the environmental health department i, could charge for checking food service palns for new and remodeled restaurants. Dunlop said this would generate $2,000 a year. The department is not self-supporting but they E are trying to lessen the impact on the general fund. Councilman Collins said everytime ' the city provides a service to the citizens, they put the burden on them. There is already· a fee paid to the building department for plan checks. Councilman Collins pointed out this. would only raise a few thousand and would prefer not to charge businesses again. Council ~· agreed with this. Council told Tom Dunlop his department was doing a good job. MAIN STREET TRAFFIC LIGHTS Jay Hammond, engineering department, reminded Council there has been concern over the sequencing and the lengths of the traffic lights. Hammond met with the police chief and , Councilman Parry. The feeling was the sequences at Monarch and Aspen were too long a wait.H Mill and Main it is important to maintain a separation between the traffic and pedestrians.' This means keeping the pedestrian sequence and the no right turn on red. Hammond. said the ; green sequence on the Mill street side will be lengthened. The stop signs on Monarch and Bleeker will be reversed to create a direct alternative between Mill and Aspen. Hammond told Council the department of highways has had personnel in Aspen for awhile attempting to repair some of the electrical problems with the system. Hammond said that the syncronization of the three lights is not working. Hammond said he feels the city should go to the department of highways and tell them the system is not working, and that the lights should be repaired and functioning before winter, or replace the system. I Council agreed to have a meeting with the highway department as soon as possible. ENCROACHMENT REQUEST - Prospector Lodge Herb Paddock, representing the applicant, told Council they are requesting an encroachment i license on the Hyman Avenue side of 4 inches in a couple o f areas. The two entry areas r into the Prospector project 4 ' 4" into public property. 1 1 0 i! 5401. Regular Meeting Aspen City Council November 8, 1982 Councilman Parry moved to authorize and direct the Mayor to execute the standard city encroachment agreement for the encroachments on the right-of-way pursuant to Section 19-5 of the Municipal Code according to the map submitted for two 4-inch encroachments and A 52 square foot and 28 square foot encroachments for Code required stairwells; seconded by Councilman Collins. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Knecht. SUBDIVISION EXCEPTION - Little Victorians .-/ Colette Penne, planning office, told Council this is a request for subdivision exception to condominiumize eight units know as the Little Victorians located at 634 West Main. Ms. Penne said these units have all rented outside the income guidelines for the past eighteeni months. Councilman Parry moved to approve subdivision exception for the purpose of condominiumiza- tion of the Little Victorians apartments at 634 West Main with the following conditions; (1) improvements necessary to the building from the results of the building department inspections as summarized in the October 18, 1982, and October 19, 1982, building depart- ment memos must be made prior to the sale of any unit; (2) compliance with Section 20-22; (3) statement of exception from the full subdivision process for the purpose of condo- minimization and a declaration of restriction covenants be executed on forms approved by the city attorney; seconded by Councilman Collins. All in favor, motion carried. APPOINTMENTS TO BOARDS & COMMISSIONS Councilman Knecht moved to appoint David White as alternate to P & Z; seconded by Council- man Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Councilman Knecht moved to appoint Richard Head as alternate to the Board of Adjustment; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. ORDINANCE #51, SERIES OF 1982 - Fire Station Rezoning Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the public hearing. Councilman ParrY moved to adopt Ordinance #51, Series of 1982, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Knecht. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Collins, aye; Parry, aye; Knecht, aye; Mayor Edel, aye. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #55, SERESIF OF 1982 - Historic Code Amendments Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the public hearing. Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #55, Series of 1982; seconded by Councilman Collins. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Knecht, aye; Collins, aye; Parry, aye; Mayor Edel, aye. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #56, SERIES OF 1982 - Appropriations Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the public hearing. Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #56, Series of 1982, on second reading; seconded by Councilman Collins. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Parry, aye; Knecht, aye; Collins, aye; Mayor Edel, aye. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #57, SERIES OF 1982 - Appropriations Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. There were no comments. Mayor Edel closed the public hearing. , Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #57, Series of 1982, on second reading; seconded Motion carried. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Knecht, aye; Collins, aye; Parry, ORDINANCE #60, SERIES OF 1982.- Banning Leg Hold Traps Mayor Edel opened the public hearing. Randy Cote, Colorado Division of Wildlife, said ~ that if leghold traps are used properly the way they were intended, most injuries can be ~ ~ done away with. Cote said education of using traps would be more appropriate than banning them. Cote said once animals are trapped, it makes it much more difficult to trap them i again. Lisa Russell, animal control department, said dogs have been caught in these i traps add one dog had to have his leg amputated. Assistant City Attorney Gary Esary suggested amending the ordinance to allow the city manager to issue a permit to trap in time of danger, animal disease, etc. Council agreement Mayor Edel closed the public hearing. Councilman Parry moved to adopt Ordinance #60, Series of 1982, on second reading as amended; seconded by Councilman Collins. Roll call vote; Councilmembers Knecht, aye; Parry, aye; Collins, aye; Mayor Edel, aye. Motion carried. CONSENT AGENDA Councilman Parry moved to approve the consent agenda; seconded by Councilman Collins. All -in favor, motion carried. The consent agenda is (1) Liquor License renewals - Ute City i Banque; Clark's Market; Of Grape & Grain; Chart House; Maurice's; Golden Horn; Mother : Lodge; Elk's and Country Road; (2) Special Event Permits; Friends of the Winter concerts and Windstar. Councilman Collins moved to adjourn at 9:40 p.m.; seconded by Councilman Parry. All in favor, motion carried. Q Kathryn S. Koch G Citv Clerk C....---3 .A. CIT SPEN 13v,„,u,„ 6.,&1.. J*reet aspen,¥Olorade,81611 303-925*2020 MEMORANDUM DATE: November 3, 1982 TO: Members of City Council FROM: Gary Esary(~Et- RE: Request for Encroachment Request on Hyman Avenue/Prospector Lodge Approved for submission to City Council: 11 (l~f+13 Attached hereto is a copy of a letter request,£ g an encr#chment license onto the East Hyman Avenue right-of-Way on beharf of the Prospector Ldoge. 9 The letter asks for a 4-inch encroachment for rock veneer on the front of the building. However, since the letter was written, the applicant has amended his request to include an additional 52- square foot encroachment and a 28-square foot encroachment for required stairwells. Herb Paddock will be present to represent the applicant. A photo- copy map of the requested encroachments and a draft encroachment agreement are also attached. A marked improvements map will be available at the meeting. I spoke to Jay Hammond about this application and he grudgingly approves it. According to Jay, it was poor design to build to the property line without providing for required access, but given the present location of the building, the encroaching stairwells appear to be the only solution. Further, according to Jay, the encroachments at least still provide for the minimum eight-foot sidewalk width. Finally, although the City has apparently granted minor encroach- ments in the past without cost and as a matter of course (the Woodstone and the Patio Building come to mind), the size of this encroachment may lead the City to consider a payment for this encroachment, either as a periodic rental or a one-time fee. GSE/mc Attachments .. MEMORANDUM DATE: November 3, 1982 TO: Members of City Council FROM: Gary Esary RE: Request for Encroachment Request on Hyman Avenue/Prospector Lodge Approved for submission to City Council: Attached hereto is a copy of a letter requesting an encrochment license onto the East Hyman Avenue right-of-way on behalf of tne Prospector Ldoge. The letter asks for a 4-inch encroachment for rock veneer on the front of the building. However, since the letter was written, the applicant has amended his request to include an additional 52- square foot encroachment and a 28-square foot encroachment for required stairwells. Herb Paddock will be present to represent the applicant. A photo- copy map of the requested encroachments and a draft encroachment agreement are also attached. A marked improvements map will be available at the meeting. I spoke to Jay hammond about this application and he grudgingly approves it. According to Jay, it was poor design to build to the property line without providing for required access, but given the present location of the building, the encroaching stairwells appear to be the only solution. Furtner, according to Jay, the encroachments at least still provide for the minimum eight-foot sidewalk width. Finally, although the City has apparently granted minor encroach- ments in the past without cost and as a matter of course (the hoodstone and the Patio Building come to mind), the size of this encroachment may lead the City to consider a payment for this encroachment, either as a periodic rental or a one-time fee. GSE/mc Attachments 6 ' .. rr 1,00.,1/- .6 , twp. ASPEN Mr. Gary Esseray Assistant City Attorney ]30 South Galena St. Aspen, Colorado REFRENCE: Encroachment License for Prospector Lodge Dear Gary, As we discussed yesterday, there is a 4 inch encroachment into public-right-of-way on the Hymen Street frontage of the Prospector Lodge. The attached survey verifies this situation. Per section 19-5 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code, I am requesting an encroachment license from the City of Aspen on behalf of the owner. A prompt scheduling for City Council review would be greatly appreciated. Additionally, I am working to obtain the necessary approvals from the Historic Preservation Committee due to unauthorized changes by the previous general contractors. Those changes are scheduled to be heard by the H.P.C. on October 12th. Finally, I am preparing a request for an ammendment to the Conditional Use approval to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Due to the addition of the Mechanical Room in the Parking Garage, there has been a reduction in the number of parking spaces from 17 to 16. I hope to have this scheduled for the November 16th Planning and Zoning Commission meeting for their review. Thank you again for your assistance in addressing the encroachment problem. Hopefully we can finally resolve all the problems connected with the Prospector Lodge and realize the use of an attractive facility that the owner and the City of Aspen can be proud to have available to the tourist industry. Sincerjely, -, 46 04£* He fb-i'586621< M-- XC Engineering Department Building Department Planning Department ASPEN ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 4974, ASPEN COLORADO 80611 [303]925-4112 -- 2999 1 Tr: 1 & Regular Meeting Aspen City Council November 24, 1980 419 2 1 and one single family residence. The entire Lakeview addition is zoned R-15/PUD; other .44 zones in the area are NC and S/C/I; San District is zoned public; Hallam lake and the i :, 3 Roaring Fork river area are zoned AF-L and Park. Originally, the applicants said they ' i ; i wanted to build a 10,000 square foot building, which would be permitted in the NC floor area ratio. The proposal is for 4 employee units on the first floor; offices on the ' ~ second floor, and two free market units on the top floor. Since then, it has become , 1 apparent none of the uses requested are conditional uses in the NC zone, and the applicant~ 1 will consider uses that are appropriate. vann told Council the applicants contend that the city's approval of Trueman Center, Post ' office, Mill street venture, etc. have impacted and changed the character of the R-15 Lakeview addition and has made their property unsuitable for residential development. vann pointed out this property was acquired after the approvals of the Trueman Center and ; 1 the post office. Vann told Council the planning office feels that insufficient NC zones ; exist in the city to provide for neighborhood-oriented establishments. There is ample O, Office zoning throughout Aspen. Commercial and office zoning outside of the CC and C-1 ht will further increase the potential of commercial development outside the growth management ~, plan controls. This is a condition which the planning office, P&Z and city Council is a major contributor to the employee housing demand. Vann said the planning office ,~ feels that the area north of the Trueman Center has remained unchanged. The Trueman Center and post office represent complete the commercial development in that area and forms a boundary between NC and S/C/I uses and the residential Hallam lake area. Vann contended ., A N * that to permit further commercial development of this property would permit further ii 0 b F.: encroachment in a highly sensitive area. This would also further congest traffic down ] :1 J ~ there. The planning office recommendation was that P &Z and Council deny this request for rezoning :z to NC arguing that Puppy Smith street currently serves as a logical boundary between .1 6. > high intensity commercial uses and the low intensity environmentally related, open space i i, ~ areas to the northwest. The Lakeview addition R-15 zoning acts as a buffer zone between „ the two areas. Vann said in view of the extensive NC development currently existing in 4 the area, the ample availability of 0, Offize zoning in other parts of the city, and the , .~0 highly congested nature of Puppy Smith street, it is the opinion of the planning office J .2 4 that no demonstrable benefit results from allowing further commercial encroachment north 0 3~ of these boundaries. P & Z concurred with this recommendation and recommended denial i i: * on November 4. 11 41:1., El Councilman Behrendt moved to deny the applicant 's request for rezoning of Iats 1, 2 and 3 j 4 2% of block 4, Lakeview Addition, from R-15 mandatory PUD to neighborhood commercial; seconded jj *S by Councilman Collins. 1 11!' (i MC L Gideon Kaufman argued that this particular area has undergone some substantial changes and the basic question is where to draw the line. This particular property is the one that ; }·· ' Dis is impacted the most by what has gone on and is not suitable for residential applications.,i IN- Ci 114, ... The applicant is looking for a use for the property that is being denied them be the 1 W : 1 ... changes that have gone on in the area. This property is far enough away from Hallam Lake . E 4% that it will not affect it. Kaufman said the applicants are willing to work with the city so that the uses that go in there are minimal uses that do not impact the neighbor- 4 4 , As hood. il Councilwoman Michael asked if the planning office would feel that S/C/I zoning may be 11 1.7 & more appropriate. Vann stated the planning of f ice would argue against a change of zoning , 1 BUL in that location for the reasons in the memorandum. Councilwoman Michael said S/C/I '1' ' 4/ d . a*; would probably be more appropriate. The applicant's arguement of changed conditions is 1 . Elf very valid. Councilman Behrendt said he feels the benefit to the community of the , 4,1 :3. 7,1.7 environment area and open space area will be lost if this is approved. There will be w i ~' · *2 development going all over. Councilwoman Michael said she would be willing to look at S/C/I as it is needed and is more appropriate. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Parry. Motion carried. Ell: iff EMPLOYEE UNIT IN PROPSPECTOR LODGE 1 Em# , 1, L. Sunny Vann told Council this is a request for growth management exemption for an employee _44: housing unit to be constructed in the remodeled and expanded Prospector Lodge. This lodge 9 ·-.7 is a conditional use in the CC zone district. The proposal has gone through P&Z and 1 . • I £·A -- :f >02 HPC. The applicant is seeking approval for a proposed employee unit to replace an older , : unit; the proposed unit is 630 square feet. Dave Gibson told Council the old building 1 4 Will be torn down and redone. The new unit will have kitchen, bathroom, bedroom, etc. li .Ii ' 1 1 1 Council brought up who would oc cupy the unit; Gibson answered it is intended for an employee of the lodge. Councilman Behrendt noted this is proposed to be a moderate unit. 11 r. Jim Reents, housing director, said one factor is that this is new construction. Another POSsible factor is that when an employer is building units for his own employee, perhaps .1 71.* the city ought not get involved in that guideline. The employer will have to pay the ~ employee. Council had a long discussion about who could live in the unit. Ms. Butterbaugh f I Pointed out if this unit is restricted to an employee of the lodge, the question of what :t , .F..1.-6 | Pr-ice guidelines should be used is moot because the unit is probably part of his salary. ! 3 ' ~ Councilwoman Michael moved to exempt· the proposed Prospector Lodge employee housing unit : '1 - 212 ~ from compliance with growth management procedures subject to the following conditions; 1 '11 .1 f'*. 1 + 11= ..44 i (1) the deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period of 50 years under ' 1. -44, 11 , 1 ~ the city' s low income rental guidelines, said restriction to be executed prior to the p ,.,-anz I ./. issuance of a building permit; (2) the construction of the employee housing unit otherwise 1 - -:R: 1 Complying with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determination of com-· 1 , 2-4~ ~ Pliance to be made at such time that working drawings are submitted for a building permit P ; "3 ept. Behrendt. All in favor, with the exception of Councilman Collins. Motion carried. ~ and (3) occupants of said unit be employees of the Prospector Lodge; seconded by Councilman , 11 1 , r f It. Ii:14 11 1 , 21 17 ~~ 1 J.!~ f... tl "048*494,0 5*ef'W#$~4~©;:1,§911<09[ .. .. -54#'40..,wi~ 1 1 4 91*31*33 € ''.i/, I t , -Pi-naai te.I. ./2 t 3 M ~ r-*12- /4 0,-41 c.1 ri- L.. 5/»·p-/ C Att-125 h 4,62 + C. I t. L 4) 0 4.6 ch'-t' 22*-09-,057- - - - ) .' -. Cadacm r,1... I - 1 rl . . 1.2. I . '·Lr ...4/ . . .. 7, . 1 4-1 0 1 6 14'i:*./7. - 8 71.6=2=--lw . . . . .93,1 - P.. I 'll 7... 1 i 4- 49 -9 /9/ . '. 52,2-34 --=--7 A 3 Et-t !11{-- /4 1 1 1.4 , 4 # 4 . . - Fi f '3 3 :-: r f . . 2 44 -- 1 . 4 -- fl 1 /1-7.1 · £5~eL.~,0,1 _ , I. :.. 1 1 :5 Fit; K I . E---rk 1 61 P 2/ .4 .. . .. .. Fil t.1 '. .. l . 2, . 1 1 5 1 - 1- i t It . fi 4 9 a il... .- , , - - 1 .1 i .. J 4 1 . . , h i-, . .=.--'!--4 - : 1 1 -1 , '14. m 4 T-+1=te· ·572,1*er ~ l.t 4 .. 1 0 3 1 - "6,",11/ >4 4'3 - PAAM/I--HAY :50'1.-01-6 14 , ff-:--r .9-0*1't·- E-L--e=M -79 al. 336 4 . .-7:/ 41 El :. . 2 41 I 4-1 : I C R · Il 651 ce ed ....:. , 4 , 14 r .24 i ' ·i F . 2- r--N' 41 . . . 2, 1 .- 4 1 04 .2- . tle ./1 I 1 P .49,1 1 11 A - , t 1/ . =«-1.51,31 11 . ' . ... .. 1 1 . b - i .. , ,· ill -- I 1 -1 11 I . 1 . I £ 44 . . . . 1 I r« 31 1- . .. . I. 1 . 1 . 11 11. '1 El ,I j fL.It A 1 9<TV 1 1 . -1 1 . 1· 0 ·- .1.i . · . -126 -:.- - :4 0 4.' 0, 444}' . . . . . . . . 9- .. il J 1 - . 2-ER )St.i 2 1 111 ,Tlie .... . 11 1 44 r 1 2 1 144 - LL...i '·L- 1 .li 1 16 *-1 -·' 3 11 ]Fl' - - - 1 . 1 . € 11+3-------- 1 - 7% -_]j '___ 41 L 4-1. ib! , 1 /2,3.0 »... ·:4'K,3'»"F 'aw,r .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen City Council FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office RE: Prospector Lodge, Employee Unit Special Review DATE: November 18, 1980 APPROVED AS TO FORM FOR CITY COUNCIL: ~202 / 24=3 Background Pursuant to Section 24-10.2H, the applicanlf is requesting special review approval to construct an employee housing unit in the Prospector Lodge. Such units are exempt from Growth Management subject to the approval of the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning & Zoning Commission. On August 19th, 1980 the applicant received approval from the Planning & Zoning Commission to renovate and expand the lodge, a conditional use in the CC zone district, and for exemption from Mandatory P.U.D. As the attached letter indicates, the applicant proposes to construct an approxi- mately 630 sq.ft.one-bedroom employee housing unit to replace an existing efficiency unit of approximatley 250 sq. feet. The new one- bedroom unit is intended to house the lodge's resident manager and will contain its own kitchen, fireplace, balcony and semi-private entry. The applicant proposes to deed restrict the unit for a period of 50 years under the City's moderate income guidelines. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's request and recommends approval without conditions. The Housing Director has also reviewed the application and concurs with the moderate income rental restriction. Recommendation In view of the City's desire to encourage incorporation of employee housing in commercial operations, and the fact that the provision of an employee unit was a condition of the applicant's prior P&Z approval, the Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's request subject to the following stipulations: 1. The deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period of 50 years under the city's moderate income rental guidelines, said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The construction of the employee unit otherwise complying with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determination of compliance to be made at such time that working drawings are submitted for a building permit. The Planning & Zoning Commission concurred with the Planning Office recommen- dation and approved the applicant's request subject to the above conditions on November 4th, 1980. Should Council also concur with the above recommendations, the appropriate motion is as follows: "I move to exempt the proposed Prospector Lodge employee housing unit from compliance with Growth Management procedures subject to the following conditions" 1. The deed restriction of the one-bedroom employee unit for a period of 50 years under the city's moderate income rental guidelines. said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The construction of the employee housing unit otherwise complying with all requirements imposed by the zoning code, a final determi- nation of compliance to be made at such time that working drawings , are submitted for a building permit. . 4 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office RE: Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review DATE: October 30, 1980 Background Pursuant to Section 24-10.2(h), the applicant is requesting special review approval to construct an employee housing unit in the Prospector Lodge. Such units are exempt from Growth Management subject to the approval of the City Council upon the recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission. On August 19, 1980, the applicant received approval from the Planning and Zoning Commission to renovate and expand the lodge, a conditional use in the CC zone district, and for exemption from mandatory PUD. As the attached letter indicates, the applicant proposes to construct an approximately 630 square foot, one bedroom employee housing unit to replace an existing efficiency unit of approximately 250 square feet. The new one bedroom unit is intended to house the lodgets resident manager and will contain its own kitchen, fireplace, balcony and semi-private entry. The applicant proposes to deed restrict the unit for a period of fifty years under the City's moder- ate income guidelines. The Engineering Department has reviewed the applicant's request and recommends approval without conditions. The Housing Director has also reviewed the application and concurs with the moderate income rental restrictions. Recommendation In view of the City's desire to encourage the incorporation of employee housing in commercial operations, and the fact that the provision of an em- ployee unit was a condition of the applicant's prior P&Z approval, the Planning Office recommends approval of the applicant's request subject to the following: 1. The deed restriction of the one bedroom employee unit for a period of fifty years under the City's moderate income rental guidelines, said restriction to be executed prior to the issuance of a building permit. 2. The construction of the employee unit otherwise complying with all requirements imposed by the Zoning Code, a final determination of compliance to be made at such time as working drawings are submitted for a building permit. .. TO: Sunny Var~ FROM: Jim Reents - DATE: October 30, 1980 SUBJECT: Prospector Lodge I would endorse the inclusion of this unit within the rebuild of the Prospector Lodge. It is my understanding that this will be a manager's apartment and as such should not be deed restricted for any more than the moderate income guidelines. JR: ds 4 0 CITY AI**PEN 130 soutirgalenastreet aspen ~~~~~1611 MEMORANDUM TO: Sunny Vann, Planning Office FROM: Fritz Bruggemeier, Engineering Department '~'~ ~" DATE: October 29, 1980 RE: Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review The Engineering Department recommends the approval of the Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review. Ey/~.;1 .. MEMORANDUM TO: City Attorney City Housing Director City Engineer FROM: Sunny Vann, Planning Office RE: Prospector Lodge Employee Unit Special Review DATE: October 8, 1980 The attached application requests special review approval for the Prospector Lodge employee unit. It is scheduled to come before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission on November 4, 1980; therefore, please get any comments conerning this application to me no later than October 23, 1980. Thanks. .. - Pielstick Gibson 6 Associates Architects 520 E. Cooper Avenue, Suite 205 Aspen, CO 81611 Tel. 000/925-1666 October 6, 1980 TO: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RE: PROSPECTOR LODGE EMPLOYEE UNIT Gentlemen: We are proposing to provide a 630 square foot one-bedroom employee c unit to replace an existing efficiency unit of about 250 square feet. The new unit has its own kitchen, fireplace, balcony, view, and semi-private air lock entry. It has convenient access to the desk/ lounge area where the employee will work. All these amenities are lacking in present unit, and the 150% increase is size is sorely needed. We propose to deed restrict this unit to the "moderate" price rental range and request your approval to so do. Vprhy truly v611*1 . ~'94 3 (b-4·u-- David F. Gibson DFG/hob 0 2 -34/1757*-aD,-1 :*-.4, 4 ' · ( 9,9.£09;raare,jvc1973-029 49 v:prt·ikr-%»R - '/43.2 . -'--- - -- --- --7:-3+I~TLYbiI;7 -71 1 1 «¥ UP ~ L._LY . 1 .. .-L-LAI wArn••& 4 111111 1 41 L.,4,11=4 1 . 1 1 1 1 1 T- 1°0 k_-_lt-+ ~ . ?264 -L U ~01 1 ..1 4 .1 j i Ti» ni¢ ri % - m /=-13-4 1 -1. . J M {~=:-' 5Lmai,M~~k ii, B m---_~ i - ~ - -£3 1 .5 Ci 0 & #*,CHA * i L14-- 1 5 11 1 EL=11/11'€1/ U. 91- - t--1 5 - r -~ -3<- 15' -. Cl 4 - 0 4 y 4 PMFIenEE- UNIT- -li:thABLJWJQXD;464-t•7011·-26.45 :14:27.-1.k Grl,-,·'t,r:T-4.117,"<ga•'7-ir•*-m~335,2-2-2.Z~~ ia-:S-:,2*11 ·/19* :·.r./,4/. •*Ul·. *Idb'I,•62·2.'lBS tlet*CRI, Mi//st/7*0~&60#465'446'ENP.2//£-t,~200£1*LI'l:".u:C. -4.#>. 9/1*11.idba&,2-I 7 THE WAfTs COMPANY 5959 Topanga Canyon Boulevard Woodland Hills, California 91367 (213} 702-9223 • (213) 702-0400 . STEPHEN S. WATTS President ~ ~TY OF ASP~* MEMO FROM PAUL J. TADDUNE, CITY ATTORNEY -1* u -32-7-73,-0 ' 1 /ke Duo ie eflaerA ~* b Af 1£ 9 A-Awaoly 0.4 P'€* 27 /) U OF¢Z /-711 h Wd Apla C<(Ajl/v A~. 'p 14,4,. 1 1.-41, 4 "k#/03 r-, 4 4,7. 50, * /400 / l (13 /7,1. 9, 4 t 1 8030 3 -* -0/ ~ ~0;-~ 19 tt n <11(871 1,1,(bl, - f $,c 0,0 ye,-, B-<; 4 5,;1 . j j 1 Mil 111 1 li 4-4. 40 4,; / 111 1 U . 0 adj t' d ' . 4.2. . . 1. r 4 · t 4~4 4/<4 : :r.4 4 - .. I. 4. . 4 .:4 - . ./ ' r - -4 17 ~ - 4 R Z 1 *6 9 c Nite 9/0 l Ja 0».CS,L 1 -4604. i In · 4 -. A~ VE, 4 r.* /-£7*V 1 9 72-1 vt, 1 P.fl *AU- .. ASPEN 4*j z_£1€#t Ch/Z-:528P'P7--;0,0 '6 2/ock 81 Les 4,4 (2/ h 195/2£71 727 915;3.'2. &404 Ze/2*L+00+ 5 «" Ue.£ VWWJ /52:357 025*.*:4/ 15*12 ~ 0/50!.'' z.kf·tk, 2-AL- +5,· i., > 23-- -I-7'< 4/ 9, iY. 62 G' 'Tr- W C ST- =7-F©fLU-1£1-i- ~ fiy -67- 614».-4/1 ... 4 4'K. 2'- 47- t-«Er 676 412*14- 10 6·ue»·3 /k€- Payazn j EAT- e F ZU-4 2.- c . - 415 77+51-- h-4 LL ,~ LET ~204}LO/ke) Ckja-- #22~20//2-4•'-7% /9, 4 0 Eflad.d 0,0 Plfic_g.ruwy- er 4 42 £ 00 fet ASPEN ENGINEEAING ASSOCIATES, INC. P.O. BOX 4974, ASPEN COLORADO 80611 (303)925-4112 revision no. date by 11,•054.U HYMAN AVEL · p___~ 'Le $ 1 47FLIVELFV-er- M.t-Imv-4 =20'.-4 6. J»d,AL.#C ,~~~~' CAT=AL $ ~ *95;2- 9\UP-+T CA 846 25,7>e»-4 EP,••.,BUS:>9 - 934 MUNt- -Drl,A4 Carl 1 4.0 4 44.6 1 . 1. - 07 4/6 - E.,u.#Hmevrt• . . .... . . -1 . €34 /1--4„93 * 2 4 . di. I . .i /. al*$12,f .- . 124 . F. , 1 1. 4 . i ti ..Nf: · 01% 410 M lik/4 ...0~~ & 3 3{91 *1 -1- 16 ~, ~ 3 I L . · ,r, . __ 0 ts t + K -14 -- -i___ 1- - 3·4. &1 -4 - ir · .¢ 1 ·-4 +7/141 Llti"'"Illlillllillllliillll,4 -3 . . ..h . .y' ., 1 , -- 21 1 311 __ Smwk , . I .'v-~ ...7 - 2 1 1 .. 4 { -2 - -149- . I N|-pli7ET- r - 1 : -:. 0 1/ . 0 4 6 1 41 1. . 1 01 M * 140 0 ' m h d) 0 9 1 .. 4% A 0 1 ·T 4 0° 774*EE> 61»F·h- 0 - 4 ty&#MI~~4~...AME. e / 0 & 25 4 00 »A·9/1-,4 f©r St.31 6011-4 6 1 - 4, ....0- 1 - . 94 le F+Ls-+~"*9--A¢'tz- 24..e/; -79 4,1. as.~ . 2 ~GY .0. · 1~1 1 0 1 CE . ; r. 1 .. ' 2 ·· . (-.- f*/1 R...... -A-sy- rr.\ / 9 -p N.-4 4 4 0 0 /49 0 0 0 0 0 0 5%70 1 ----99--"-9-ll-tfl - --- 1 - .... . i $ /1 . 741 ))33 1 1 % . 4, . . 1.-.~.·, -•-- - '- 1, ~ 4 . ..r K ' I < 11 I 20411 4 ,/1. . 1. . 1. 41 . ~ »en/ · .1. u dly 1-41,.ki-LL-/1 . . . -- --*- Ill- -- -**& - 4-Sk (\ liz~I 0 1 1 . -,23 1 21(21 4101 ., 1 ..1 i TUD 1 1 *.1'T- 1 4 ./ I 624_jii-j~I' :0~ ·~~ · ..1 0 -3 c 9 1 t' ~ L_._ . I l» , .. 22 1 0,4 60-6 WAL·,L. ---·~ m - CD -0 • U) 9 e·_ - j~ ~ ~0 4 0#(44*vif »249/0 H O UJ 2 B c2a-*C. . 151-ACAL. )AAL-L. 4 -'v /.rb 6 Vibdz"Ve 111*4 . -L - -- - -2* .1 160' 04 l u-_21 0C h, 'M / *\ ae , 0 1 + 0 o r#-2 U] 0 60 4 U] J 0 1-1 -7-630>99 11'1,4 ~44/1 11*(•N 1,2.29, 6'2' (/bl N )3 2%5~ , *91 . T Zm E Il Ill U) ALLEY 1·-4%64 ·:5$Fyi-1.j=€ w 4 3-RESS Ir-*Pl CD«rEED Z -[+41.-9 - 3 74-2,* 0 £V 1\ Zm LL' 9 ZX w 0 4 0-m U] 0 4 0- ~. JAwl'Ers e. 8-€»ap- . +--H=zle-Epr- 6 1 TE 8-,AM CEOREN- TH«T A SUAMEY Al«.6 PEF2F~200-180 Lj»-41512# ter Sl.yF'U/e,Agtor-0 OF -THES 125#PFF,-1-<f- :9-*Wr-4 Mege/t-4 ,Ar-40 -T-4€T- -1348 8,--1<z,FU»z~i-~ple--11-9 --~~$~~ ProJect no. 1 M-1-25 +-1 »AN--4 A >r-N_32 trf-E AS ·2+V 1/>t N AN O t-4/TES . CER* Al:(D date i GUM)*,ak. 03, 812 73 drawn P'J /,Ac,*22·-LC:-A checked 1=. fa.~-S.EFK- 1.-,e. 912+ sheet £502.-b tr-*-04 ~.1»-ras 442- LLOG 02 89·Tne 9 WL-Lei ELLP-G26[EOE] N3dSV 3Da01 HOJLOadSOUd S133H1S HOHVNOIN 9 NVEAH 00980100 'N3dSV N l634 i