The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Caser.210 Lake Ave.A2-932<0 LaA Aje _ _ _9. ~ Schermer Hallam Lake Review 2735-124-88-004 A2-93 Â¢ 1--0----.*lic st awÂ·' vu J 645 \ - 4 /) L -. 1 : 4 F. CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen DATE RECEIVED: 01/19/93 PARCEL ID AND CASE NO. DATE COMPLETE: /4-C/73 2735-124-88-004 A2-93 STAFF MEMBER: KJ PROJECT NAME: Schermer Hallam Lake Review Project Address: 210 Lake Ave. Legal Address: Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition APPLICANT: Betty & Lloyd Schermer Applicant Address: 3990 Cuervo, Santa Barbara, CA 93108 REPRESENTATIVE: Doug Gravbeal, Cottle, Gravbeal & Yaw Representative Address/Phone: 510 E. Hyman, Suite 21 Aspen, CO 81611 925-2867 FEES: PLANNING $ 942.00 # APPS RECEIVED ENGINEER $ 93.00 # PLATS RECEIVED 9 HOUSING $ ENV. HEALTH $ TOTAL $1035.00 TYPE OF APPLICATION: STAFF APPROVAL: 1 STEP: X 2 STEP: - -------~ -- P&Z Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES C.EL VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO CC Meeting Date PUBLIC HEARING: YES NO VESTED RIGHTS: YES NO DRC Meeting Date REFERRALS: City Attorney Parks Dept. School District V City Engineer Bldg Inspector Rocky Mtn NatGas X Housing Dir. Fire Marshal CDOT Aspen Water Holy Cross Clean Air Board City Electric Mtn. Bell Open Space Bpard Envir.Hlth. ACSD 2 Other A C R - Zoning Energy Center 46 Other 1 --4- ~/1.4/2111 DUE: 3 / 1 DATE REFERRED: 6 11 INITIALS: 5 01/ FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: 1Â§~13 INITIAL: 54/ City Atty City Engineer Zoning Env. Health Housing - Open Space Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: .. COTTLE GRAYBEAL May 18, 1993 YAW ARCHITECTS LTD Ms. Kim Johnson, Planner City of Aspen Planning Office Aspen City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Schermer Residence 210 Lake Ave. Aspen, CO Dear Kim: On March 16, 1993 the City of Aspen P&Z approved the above project Hallam Bluff ESA Review with several conditions. Condition No. 8 stated: " A landscape plan and rear view landscape sketches shall be submitted and approved by ACES and Planning staff prior to issuance of any building permit. Only native vegetation may be installed in the rear yard." I have talked with Tom Cardamone regarding this condition. His recollection of what the condition should be and mine are different then the above written condition. We both recall discussing reviewing the rear landscape requirement after the north wall of the project is framed. This will allow the project to be viewed from the Hallam lake area to determine if it meets the landscape requirements. Part of the problem in reviewing the landscape scheme during the review process was understanding were the 50% landscape requirement was to viewed from. The two large spruce trees on the rear of the property provide more than the required screening from the ACES building, but provide a smaller percentage of coverage as you move to the west away from the buildings. We feel this is the best solution to the getting an accurate visual reading of the landscape screening. I am sending a copy of this letter to Tom Cardamone. Please call him or myself with any questions. If you have a problem with this resolution to Condition #8, please call me as soon as possible. We are close to pulling a building permit for this project and hope to encounter no more delays. Sincerely, 49-takE JOHN COTTI E AIA Doug GrayBeal AIA DOUG GRAYBEAL AZA Principal 1.ARRY YAW. AM MARK HENTHORN. AM Copy: Tom Cardamone 510 EAST HYMAN. SUITE 21 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE 303/925-2867 IAX 303/925-3736 . 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Kim Johnson, Planning Office RE: Schermer Hallam Lake Bluff ESA Review DATE: March 16, 1993 summary: The Planning Office recommends approval of this request with conditions. The applicant seeks to add onto an existing 2,200 single family residence and create a duplex totaling 4,150 s.f. FAR. Applicant: Lloyd and Betty Schermer, represented by Doug Graybeal Location: 210 Lake Ave. (Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition) Zoning: R-6, with Hallam Lake Bluff Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) overlay. The parcel is 10,760 s.f. Please see Exhibit "A" for vicinity map and Exhibit "B" for proposed site plan and site section. Referral Comments: See Exhibit "C" for complete memos. Parks Department: Rebecca Baker stated that any trees slated for relocation (broken or healthy) must receive tree removal/relocation permits from the Parks Department prior to issuance of a building permit. Prior to issuance of any building permits, tree protection barricades must be erected at the drip lines of the two large spruces in the rear year. The barricades shall be constructed to prevent soil compaction, material storage, and spillage of deleterious substances under the trees. Housing Office: The addition of another dwelling unit requires compliance with Ordinance 1 requirements. The cash-in-lieu payment in effect at the time must be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. The current rate is $8.33.00 per square foot of new construction (1,978 s.f.). A.C.E.S. - In a phone conversation with staff, Tom Cardamone expressed that a more complete landscape plan is necessary to determine the vegetation screening between the residence and the nature sanctuary. Tom also expressed concern about the "emergency lighting" which is mentioned as an exception to the lighting criteria. Low level, low voltage lighting is acceptable, but wall mounted floodlights are not acceptable. Engineering: Chuck Roth submits the following comments: 1) Provision of four new spaces with variance to one space (HPC) is acceptable. If the driveway is shared with the neighbor per the original site plan in the application, a signed access agreement .. must accompany the building permit application. If the driveway is fully contained on the Schermer property, final design details must be included on the Building Permit site plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The curb cut cannot exceed 10' in width. 2) A drainage plan for improvements from 1981 forward must be prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Construction certification by the engineer must be provided prior to issuance of C.0. 3) The site plan for building permit shall indicate a usable, five foot wide pedestrian space. 4) The fence which encroaches into the right-of-way must either be removed or receive an encroachment license from the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. Staff Comments: Hallam Lake Bluff E.S.A. Review: The intent of the Hallam Lake overlay area is to provide a minimal level of protection from development impacts on the A.C.E.S. nature preserve below this hillside. Various human impacts to the nature preserve that concern A.C.E.S. include visual, noise, and light intrusion as well as damage to the slope and vegetation which may increase runoff and erosion. The review standards contained in the ordinance are as follows: 1. NO development, excavation or fill, other than native vegetation planting, shall take place below the top of slope. Response: None of these activities will take place below the top of slope per the application. 2. All development within the 15' setback from the top of slope shall be at grade. Any proposed development not at grade within the 15' setback must be approved by special review pursuant to Section 7-404D of this Article 7. Response: An existing shed along the rear property line must be removed as part of the reconstruction/addition to the residence. The landscape plan does not show any other development (terraces, decks, spas, or patios) between the house and the top of slope. Therefore, any contemplated development of this type must be submitted for review as an amendment to this E.S.A. review. 3. All development outside the 15' setback from the top of slope shall not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. Height shall be measured and determined by the Zoning Officer utilizing that definition set forth at Section 3-101 of this Chapter 24. Response: The 3/9/93 revised section drawing shows that the 2 .. proposed structure to complies with this height limit. 4. A landscape plan shall be submitted with all development applications. Such plan shall include native vegetative screening of no less than 50 percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetative screening shall be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material should it die. Response: The landscaping plan indicates two huge spruce trees which block from view a fair amount of the structure from the rear. However, the tree-line sketch taken off of a photograph does not adequately show if 50% screening is accomplished as viewed squarely from the rear of the parcel. More information must be provided to staff and ACES to make the final determination. It is recommended that a supplemental landscape plan can be reviewed by staff and Tom Cardamone prior to issuance of a building permit. The plan also shows that three chokecherry trees and three russian olives will be relocated to the rear property line. The russian olive is not a native species to this hillside area. Any tree relocations must receive City's tree removal permits. 5. All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope. Response: The application states that all exterior lighting will be designed in accordance with this requirement except for emergency lighting. This exception concerns both staff and Tom Cardamone from ACES. Wall-mounted motion activated lighting would be a disturbance to the nature sanctuary below this property. Staff recommends a condition prohibiting wall-mounted motion activated lighting. Only low-level (3' high max.) low voltage pathway lighting should be used for emergency lighting. 6. No fill material or debris shall be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and rates must be maintained. Pools or hot tubs cannot be drained down the slope. Response: The application states that this requirement will be met. No hot tub is indicated on the plans. A drainage plan is being required by Engineering prior to issuance of a building permit. 7. Site sections drawn by a registered architect, landscape architect, or engineer shall be submitted showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level. Response: The 3/9/93 revised sketch shows the slope and proposed structure. 3 .91/0'raY) 01\1\\\\ . RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends approval of the Schermer Hallam Lake Bluff ESA Review with the following conditions: 1. Any trees slated for relocation (broken or healthy) must receive tree removal/relocation permits from the Parks Department prior to issuance of a building permit. 2. Prior to issuance of any building permits, tree protection barricades must be erected at the drip lines of the two large spruces in the rear year. The barricades shall be constructed to prevent soil compaction, material storage, and spillage of deleterious substances under the trees. They shall remain in place throughout exterior construction and grading. 3. Compliance with Ordinance 1 is required. The cash-in-lieu payment based on new construction (1,978 s.f.) in effect at the time must be paid prior to issuance of any building permits. 4. If the driveway is shared with the neighbor per the original site plan in the application, a signed access agreement must accompany the building permit application. If the driveway is fully contained on the subject property, final design details must be included on the Building Permit site plan for approval by the City Engineer prior to issuance of the Building Permit. The curb cut cannot exceed 10' in width. 5. A drainage plan for improvements from 1981 forward must be prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Construction certification by the engineer must be provided prior to issuance of C.0. 6. The site plan for building permit shall indicate a usable, five foot wide pedestrian space. 7. The fence which encroaches into the right-of-way must either be removed or receive an encroachment license from the Engineering Department prior to the issuance of any building permits. 8. A landscape plan and rear view landscape sketches shall be submitted and approved by ACES and Planning staff prior to issuance of any building permit. Only native vegetation may be installed in the rear yard. , //7 //-- Any future landbcape development (including but not limited to decks, spa, terrace, fencing) errEEE-Tle--s-UEmitted-for-Fe*izew as.-aa-amendment -to-this-E +S. k.-review . 54,( t /lof- efic..it a,J 4341 / f ' 10. Only-low,level (31 high max.) low voltage._ pathway--lighting Se,/4,4 should be used for emergency lighting. 0644(bor $ Dburd /. /ODd 40 1/(511,h 4-toM ACE- 5 1 l_/6 NT "+ ILLÂ·L'Plf,â€žje ~VE*' 0 1 .M' 9 L' 5 ' t' C~ 4Af 4-0 572 yx 41'/ C 0 2 U ill O.L./ .. 11. All material representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: "A" - Vicinity Map "B" - Site Plan, Section, and Landscape Plan "C" - Referral Memos schermer.esa.memo 5 CCE + 1 r . 1 3111- : ... 1 1\.17:c~3~ElelpeÂ® STES AND STBUCÂ·i>4s : Â· S '.tio i. 1.1,13Â«.Fi' L----" JEGeo -4 21986 UPDA,;2 E-1=51 ~SPEX CA .3 Not â„¢ d.Â».1.4 0 21% Â»ck I de,$7*ted A not yet 6,6,41.<f . 1 7< 'vâ‚¬%9441 - -6225/Â£-17 \-1 . 1 6 &4141. , re! y.t de'*d 0 4 'gy/\ 0 . A 932%2==~:i. 2 07'Ir/// le. Fir h 1 bu-3- ~9223%2~~nit 0-- 0 990Â»44 .1 Â· 5.Â«r-rn,+Y euch , / IL--2=21\ 3 1 00 6.kft 1 .AK - U \1 , h. 1 h~ltf 4 Â«ft 0896-- r~ 9 Y /.< ~ . : j 974 -6, a .1Â»E 49. 2.,2.2 791 V . t> [1,0.313 NE di KEL lebEÂ»-1,16\- 34 =LA %94.-T - 0,50 ze**p,&#29 ..1,;tr [10.fil!11*1,-%fEE [[IIER [RED} Ujitlitu 11!-:~ . .jt--1 - , ER,E+*-amt' EE] 1]ilels [FriT[T[ iT[iIFFI liYF!3 RE]ml[FO!]iP%~FQ, - lf,Â·-Â·Â·.- Â· --~'%MILijAO,13;j~ 0 91- <100 EUCilliaÂ· 201 acil}*El.@La !12-u wFM BE Yds, 1 , rn A 33..-*-1-- 49 --fw-E5L- am#JÂ·omIN EET~IELPEt E.GLIE GEO] E.a l fâ‚¬FZR t.E~132(:--- . 9--- u...<::==- ?7 -- . 41 ULE Su~41 1111332Â·UlLUE.lkgs. l2211Â·,1!11.1.LJÂ·GgliI?jÂ· Em:LE "+Luil''.:.Cii.51 811~j lfâ‚¬1 111!1!1~11 auii~(723_ M.,=i'-- 4481 w -,AMUL Ill[Â® [EGOÂ·[[[E[Ii [IWID;GiFIE E;33 (FrE Fil SE? E<UP c.u.13 ETE] CE[[il EZA - - . -:NE[iD ~ EWE I EWIIII EE[Q [im!33 CgSS 12*C GEZE C ENE.EWIIQ,gÂ®* M. --' . 4, C . [ILEE ISEI!â‚¬19:LL_':u EN] EUE [mETI filmilD mIRE] f,37!:IiNTimiblf\ ti H :* FRE 7#313 vpf =af~ - L .~91-- 1 11"lillit 't2'2"9'<~'Â· o 7 1-31%23 29 ..., d [1~4 LL,4 17 . Per/= A . .' 0 1 0.44]Eliti]* - - v /.A {il_ .\. . - . I . TE fâ‚¬ iffu - 34 [9:1 ... Ne EE UL;4% pp 1 - ASPEN VICINITY MAP 62 0-Lid /89.-6 4-1....~ ff Â·16 11 -- , .... 111.19 . I . I. EXHIBIT APPROVED PLANNIN NG COMMISSION rf \543'/1 f EX.Am'12* |k 6 Wrl 41 ~-J 0<XE MVE fe.Â«2 r .r \161 0 . PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION to Remain 7 : --A-_ IT -~ __, APPROVED , j EXISTING - - 1 .1 h 4 1-1444* 4,1 ; SHED TO BE194 LUTION , 8- \\ L .-4 SNOW DOICP AREA ' SPRUCE TRKES . t -0 0. Â£ -1 4 Mom Olimi \ 1 1, to ... - 9. 1 ' - Add 5.-:.*4 1 , f 11 11 Cotton / TE-3.-11 , U+Remaid 4/ I - , .4 . ... I . #P, \ t. ,)1 1 4 \ It- 1, 1 , i 1 5*1 8 6- ' - i 2 2 -01 + I 1 1# Klf i f Existing Spruce i 16'-0" drive . -C r 8 * u ~El.OCATED &50* A,peD 1 ' rENCE 2 SETBACK LLNE 1% Â°OA 44'ROPERTY LINE - / M 1/ C/\ -+ 1 .> 4Â£- #Bl Â»LKWAY \ 210 LAKE AVE 1- -b -21 ~ ~~~~~Z-~*~,~~~___ Remove Broken ~ Exts]â„¢ PENCE- - -- - - -Â£192*1-- -__1 U)CATION * Cottonwood ~ 0 0 , nt, /1-- t -- 9 lit.- . Â»ar-co 063%2/ 11 4\ ~ Â£ ~ 410 60~G*@AL | , ~ l lial B-RAZA J;( / 4.'901.62 j 4.42* .*..,f>' CLA // SITE LINE AT TOWER PEAK-K. \4 Â»%360 ARC<57 . . i â€ž 4, TOP OF P,OOF \ NESNE LINE AT ROOF PEAK .- ~ N\~LEVATIOU 12.1.7@ J< f 2 3,94 \\11 O- CZ~ tu - 0 61 0- r 912 1 50 \ 7 2Â£ 1 -~ 1,5,~-~lq~'~1~- LEVEL-OFEXISTIUG GRADE ~ 1 / 27 ' i A~44#-*~ 9 4 2!091 M/)~~ =% 1 \ .202%x HALLAM LAKE REVIEW SITE SECTION . W q !\ 'lieeÂ«. 04 -0.- - J U , CO Q. SCALE 1"=10' 25 E 0- D , 2===m 22 Ull./.mil Jill It, i SCHERMER RESIDENCE 240 LANE AVE ASPEN COLORADO '4. u . ki# 7 149*f t.yq,â€¢*.1 L .-7 1-El. ttij*i I 11---13Â· ..e[ - -J.' $29- 1,9 ~Ro~DSâ‚¬-t) 1 ..' t F ./ y. i <G::ke@11#-F2 . 1 ADD 44 04 . : . k a . . I. I i Â£ 4 . .1 4 3 . A ... 4 ,f:* . 4 ... . 4 C . 1 .h , ...';F I J; 4 1.UE'\ 4 - I ----4 -, . -99 - 1 1. -W- Â£ZZEANX + * 4 . I FEr . . .dÂ»*4240?4 1...3*01,#f#-4- 4 . ' . Â·-~ ~w:*4&91 -~ ~ - I .-I J.*P. ' -' U. ~ 7 - I '. A 12 Â· 4/ I I 11" . i '' - . '. I / - ) . 5 . / ./ "-I ' R - . 4 1 .- . Â·Â· ... - 4.1 k Â·-- 7-Â¢:~ : Â· Â·iÂ·Â·.Â·::rp,Ed; 1 + :Â· :- 4- r 4. t Stil:,~. 4 ..turlk#Z nk *. ../ â€¢ . 447/ r,--6,4.2/. ec . I . --1 A 63 X-*4 -,Â·* â€¢,â€¢6,1-*AaÂ·x + 'Alll -ru - Dli:9.17 --'.r- -1 2,2.,1*..43744.~ C,..4-.r :- , A ':*1-%12Â·=1dÂ·Â·~ 20.- â€ž -41 1.. 214:8'JL - - I 6; , er'. 2. â‚¬49iajRâ‚¬Â·.â‚¬;:Â· ~f -' -* â€¢TÂ·- '74,1.-5 . 11 1 '- .. . r .1 1 . .11 . . 1.tmt,0,1, 0 1,441% f. ~.fÂ¥*Â¥f*49- -â‚¬r -- ~i -4/kfit,it z .--7,2-#.2, .%'. 0,0-74.- â‚¬342 y .'.,gra,/ a.ffr :... 444&= . ~ 431,f littlfil FV.I] 1 Â· 13*%5Â¢ ,~.&& 5 ...--*?*71 *232 .:.h ... .1 Â·Â·--4 -al-~91-5;G~- ~ .. ,- 1 - I =Â·<cr ...... 4 1/#45"Bmfu -LWolqfER*11/2.347W&** . - ... 41 3 Â·Â·<70Â£~2Â·1~ 4 421Â»W*1*le. 't 29%462'galhr~-i#34'A 45*22 Vil44~4 725181*1:.*Pleilf,%*01% *2 5* -1 $. . 1-8 4. . i, .4 i 9-â„¢41 -4 .A.1,>5%, 4*-â€¢ Â· . .<" - ' ...Â¢-1'. Lt,61.-1- -0, Â·. â€¢-a t'.;7 . t.4. .U,uy+1 6*144 1 1 L ".f,Â·e. 4 - w.Â· 9.,â€¢J t. , .... I. *I / ~I"... 5.Â·, N A r ) 1 *, 1+907, Â· . 7.--4 r ....et 1 2*4 4 6 -<pa.'Ch-"h-Â·'g '. 7,=1.1,9 1,1,", 4.,-bt- Â·~~Â¤~9 r%#il- 1rÂ·' 3,Fgj Â· 11'26 09=aae- . 5-2,7, r 29,1*m - - Â· Â· - -, -' - I_ V. - *+ 7->t 4 - 1,~.1 - .Al ~ Â·- . ---i 2 44544*. 9, - * 1 A.f r 'aÂ· -I -14 - Â· U/Â·/,Ac~%~. Aff.2*J. -9.: .Â¥411j N. D.C. . . 2 1' 4/4'.I Â· .,. .-*/ -... t# .... I- ~- ,..." ... 'Il I ~Lt=-1Â· 3 *41 4.0. 46 . 1*:219.4---*h Â·32Â¥97.74.--7 1 L.'....â€¢ f.*4 -. > . 2~-' 11Â·.2.C,#M:*47** -*Â¥Â·,731 Y V- ' :- 4. 11 â„¢2~FF Vâ‚¬ . I ..1 '. Al â€¢',~r.1,9' ' '- 54~1.7 4,- 12 2 GrN:.V.-kx.'390--Pul 11 . 678*1 rlefll*. aera......... i ./...... -I-' I....9/r /87*21;*+<grâ€¢- - - . 7 --~4Ca * ' --*-1-.-1F*f ... * . 3 1 7 4Â£41.-@Efâ‚¬5:' 1 34.ZEFEJ; - A:.. ~ ' -bfr rfy' . f~,~ / AV . u. I. 1 . 'Â·ht.4-1 -MA&Â· +.- *.C~*13 77,192'2:LgÂ«'A~ -4,(C"w,9-22Â·.A A'.-- ikoch ' . -41 1344'At,-.t:*Â»riS>j*ie'.euii11, -Â·-Â·Â·-Â· ' 4-4 0 2 2.:..421%- .;RI'.t-. ,- .tuictft.9*i. rÂ»3:,jig~.~~~~1 Kgz -449' c>0\ 4- ->0Â«;F-â€¢Ad.rL.kpfi.,021 ., 44 1 Ill - 4 .#Atail. -po'M F ' ..':'-tgo- 9.644:2.- 1 304.912* . &.2.1 -21--22<i.Rk.2-i'..4 ,i. ..4-,6 -0>71:-11--i 1 ---- 7-~~.~,Li."~-~3~v.~~~~TET-27'<tÂ»=>---p~<p7---- ---- -' - P#.'',3. -1&94 1 *12,5,1 . - .. IP; :'.1 4 1/ . . 1 4 4-i# 1 327 -- ~ 17 1 Itt - Il NX I E f = 4-=131-(t: 1. .C ----- 1 , *87'-lt F=-PE =--= -2-:-0-_ ---.-1, 9-_-tr '16-- ----- - --., F flo El - 2-Tit LE i -1-ttiji-[i~~~~~t{- -~1 <-~ ~3ff: u-[~1-3--lf- -~1~~<4~~~glg*t~~Ek 11 1 1 :1 -11 # it - - - 2- ---&*-1~-<_2- il -r--1 1 2 - t .4 PROPOSED ADDmON 1 PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION (REN4 O 3 0/J It F .. ,1 42 '21 Vel- 4.-4. 4\Â© 1 1 .C <v f..5 00 1 1 0 f 40 Y.1 1 .\ < - O 146 i--->,- ---23 - 2,<~a 901,53 1 %. %L \ / NOL->.2 0132-F 1 1 1 i ).... i 1 1 A 1- -, 4 Ly,t 4 /5 Â£ i l - Â¥ 4 A 4 , 1 6.0- 1 1 6*d.= 0&/ 6 % If *D 119 2 i 4 Â» O 4 24 â€¢ 4 / / , ~ l .A 7,444-21 '~ #4 1/ .1 \ 1 \ 6 U q u to f T-1-/ flup (3 2- q 1 14 Lu ) 1 thpl /-/// 4 1 -1 ===El r-ill ~ 20%1] I /1 1 /01 1 10 1 60 <6 I -- 11 e V - 1 42 Â£:49 4* E = 11- 40 â‚¬ U â‚¬ 9. Ry â‚¬/<SS 1 c-r 1~1 b .4 ' 1 0 1, L )331 IIi 4' : 2-'bw O b--tz,,, 9 1 jl. C- Al,11 1 '1 4 4 4 1 ---Phi Ill_1 <l 12 /1 p i 1 Â»-1--4 , I t-- -f~-4- 1 .1 11 i 11 , lilli 1 11/1 \1 10 1- 1 iff \I 1 1 It Â¤ 1,/ 19, ~ 14Nr5Eb 0 0 - - a ---cy \ fFABBAE- Pt-A R t./ â‚¬ 9 + cy 9 - 0 LO.L- 63.65 ?Â¥13 2 -- 6.6 2\ a R- 401 0L- O 65.0--- 0<y â‚¬V 49. /k 9361 I e -- 1 4. 4 9% 4,4 â‚¬ 99/62 N 47 42'19' 1 1 FLO. N 47 42'49* E I *400 - -=k=qubÂ« PLANNI ~~ONING COMMISSION EXHIBI , APPROVED 19 BY RESOLUTION MEMORANDUM To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer (3-,g~ I)ate: March 10, 1993 Re: Schermer Hallam Lake Review - Additional Information Parking & Driveway - Section 19-101 of the Municipal Code specifies that there be 25' between driveways/curb cuts, "except common driveways may be used on adjoining properties." The land use review process is not intended to provide final approvals for development in the public right-of-way, which approval is obtained when excavation permits are applied for. However it is desirable to identify as many issues as possible. The xerox copy of the map that you dropped off only shows two parking spaces. The other two still must be indicated on the final development plan. The 19'-20.5' is acceptable for the turning radius into the garage. I would prefer for the driveway width in the public right-of-way to be 10' with the widening for parking spaces to be on private property. The 19' does provide adequate width for the parallel parking maneuver. Section 19-101(a) of the code requires that the driveway apron between the valley pan at the pavement edge and the property line be paved for the full width of the driveway. ec: Bob Gish, Public Works Director M93.65 .. MEMORANDUM To: Kim Johnson, Planning Office From: Chuck Roth, City Engineer (~0,~__ Date: February 27, 1993 Re: Schermer Hallam Lake Review Having reviewed the above referenced application, and having made a site inspection, the Engineering Department has the following comments: 1. Parking - Reference is made in the application to providing on-site parking. This should be documented on a development plan. The applicant requests a "variance" in parking requirements from five spaces to four. Is this a variance that is granted by the HPC given the designation of the property? Since the project is providing an excellent improvement by adding four on-site parking spaces, the Engineering Department would not object to permitting one less space than required by code. We do however need to have a plan showing the spaces in order to be able to certify their size and vehicle turning movements. Driveway - The application discusses an agreement to use the adjacent property owners driveway. Having one less curb cut and driveway is a benefit to the neighborhood as well as to the applicant and the project. Perhaps the applicant should obtain a written easement for the driveway use. 2. Storm Runoff - The history of additions to the structure is not clear as regards storm runoff considerations. The 1981 subdivision approvals for this property included compliance with Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f of the Municipal Code. The site visit did not reveal an obvious drainage problem either onto Lake Street or over the hillside into Hallam Lake. However, a drainage plan for improvements since 1981 and for currently proposed improvements, including any new impermeable surfaces such as a concrete patio, must be prepared by a registered engineer prior to issuance of a building permit. Any drainage mitigation measures designed by the engineer shall be certified as constructed prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. Mitigation of storm run-off during project construction should be provided as needed to keep any storm runoff from exposed earth on site. 3. Given the continuous problems of unapproved work and development in public rights- of-way, we would advise the applicant as follows: .. The applicant shall consult City Engineering (920-5080) for design considerations of development within public rights-of-way, Parks Department (920-5120) for vegetation species, and shall obtain permits for any work or development, including landscaping, within public rights-of-way from Streets Department (920-5130). This requirement relates to referenced proposed landscaping improvements and any other work contemplated for the public right-of-way adjacent to the applicant's property. The Engineering Department is particularly concerned about possible landscaping proposals for the public right-of-way. The site improvement survey makes reference to a site plan for proposed landscaping revisions, but we did not receive a copy of landscaping proposals. "Sidewalk" -The recently adopted Pedestrian Plan has reinforced the public right-of-way design guideline of West End area residences maintaining a space of the public right-of- way to be usable for pedestrians. The construction of concrete sidewalks is not required and is in fact prohibited in the West End, but the final project site plan must indicate a usable, five foot wide pedestrian space, preferably with a five foot buffer area between the edge of the concrete drainage pan and the pedestrian use area. The site visit did not reveal landscaping underneath the snow, but there was no existing vegetation visible that would compromise pedestrian use. Encroachment - There is a fence that encroaches into the public right-of-way about four feet. It would be typical to require such an encroachment to be relocated at a time when redevelopment of a property is being undertaken. The proposed redevelopment should include relocating the fence onto the applicant's property, however the applicant does have the right to apply for an encroachment license from the Engineering Department. Recommended Conditions of Approval 1. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a development plan shall be submitted to and approved by the Engineering Department. 2. Prior to issuance of a building permit, a drainage plan prepared by a registered engineer must be submitted which addresses new construction and meets the requirements of Section 24-7-1004.C.4.f of the Municipal Code. Prior to issuance of a C.O., the engineer must certify the construction of any drainage improvements. 3. The applicant shall agree to join any future improvement districts which may be formed for the purpose of constructing improvements in the public right-of-way. ec: Bob Gish, Public Works Director M93.52 .. MEMORANDUM TO: Kim Johnson, Planning Office FROM: Tom Baker, Housing Offic~ DATE: February 16, 1993 RE: Referral Comment: Schermer Hallam Lake Review REFERRAL COMMENT: Article 5 Division 7 Affordable Housing Impact Fee (aka Ordinance 1, 1990) applies to this application. Based upon the information in the application package, it appears that the applicant will be required to mitigate for 1,978 square feet of new construction. Currently, the cash-in-lieu payment for this type of development is $8.33/square foot of new construction. However, the cash-in-lieu payment shall be determined at the time of building permit and is based upon the existing cash-in-lieu requirement for a moderate income employee. ref.schermer 1 $ -- - i i : i CA 31 P< U <1 , IE 5-Â·CÂ· a :T,-,E :7 . * H.: : ' f;:S. ''.:. .2.-t:j:ti:-4 269 121*~,~J bi '140,1,40114&94}:ikkii:}*,il:'&,4.â€žNi'*b<D:>i I 'TI ' . ' S 4- *El : - - 1,1 - 11'N ... - ---- , Â·Â·r :t /:.Â·f-10Â·3 ,-2,-2Â·-: in,1,:-1.Â·-- ''-I-' ~--'-I#.-I ' '-* I-7 -.* 1 - !.0, ':u/:6: Â·Â·â‚¬1.-p-:-:-12 - '2 '' - 31...,El-1 ar ~ 'T FN,-: Â·"Â·.10i :Â·Â·{1; b-:6 C Zk-%? !;~ to; 5Â·:j ~~~~:i:-:>fiii}i:titi:i?}??fj?i?>i':~:~:':*24:::1)...1. ~':~2~t':1:11,1.11 1:1~1,~1, ~1:'::.~11 ~ ~ T 0 1 !:7 7 4 C. O 2-- - - - 1 3,gs :CI I 9,113. Or ..9 .4-.r. I o.: C., . - ,-.ii-.- .-- 7T ./Â£- 2 -1 7 1 -n J B S ~ 4::Â·u..i :0*-6 lili- â‚¬ A. -rE- _1_ 2.-c -2- -21 --1 ----x â€¢ZE2 1 1. 1 -~ 1.- 1 1 1 1 te, TE 6 411!,11141[0Â£%10'f-,Kf'll r~ IÂ·~7' 1'13 '1 -44 #111! i'1Â·1 14 -'4'lt I,: .-z. .=..=. .-.I.- _ I-== --câ€¢.--- â€¢11/01-g â€¢Lj - t.â€¢---Ij. + 1 .J 9--- f Â·*f':*~A 1.41 L: U 'g :43.C :E; tf . : t5=37MFY :41:-:09 22 I - 2 6 te-- L._y - - I.J 1. . , t~ Â·:14'RIS i 11:~'-fi4lf.ry',Itlit~0~,1-1 11'1~1 ..41.: .- it t='i-:Ii:Ilil,-1111 - L. ' 1-1 1 111= 4 6Â· :*IM '~ '|14' '1!5+11Â·1!p]*-14[il~'Ell~ b kir.,SQI-/1-16.4!~4't 1111 1111141,iLIN A 1|' ,; 1 111 1 1 111,1 lili , lili 142:71:i..: pi./.::.:.:...i / 9.::5*4;,Â·5 :.; Â·2429:ellÂ· ...1, - .... f:Â·:54%A / ..Rh?kÂ».445SECÂ·Â· d . 6*FM.>ii;:~fii~i;ii?9}*R;:32%:U:izE?#:girÂ·,ft,i':':x,::4?i?}~:..-2' ; :2 '':?A.-?t-- i.:54:%,~.*1$1*@i, 1 ..1...2,108..t .:.: ':.2.i}%$' .: r 't :Â·:Â·-:Â·-44.:943)>2'1::.,6,4~"i:?iti"}Fi{444.i?Q*: . '4.,Af.'.'M.4, .....,7,*.,4" Â·-Â·.Â·Â·5>3b>>4Â»0954Â·Â·:, Â· , 4~41-41 1 I (: '.2 1 0.0 . -4 -. 40>? i!949$*s#*-4*624*A&*,Ngâ‚¬344-:ctz,~--1-44 - -f....4:--r--Cf'J Â·1...1,*ALF.47*8.1&41**,4414#:*i~liGFS)M*IRM i'.34 7 4.34*.-94 3.9,814: ~--~:34 ::Â·'.il: .:.AÂ©>4..1 ..... Â· a#{41*adb: ~~ ~ ~~~:~g~~~~-Er:jii:K#*M~J.WAJAAW&#8,8/ K.Nok'. ... a ::#3};lijiti{~''Ii*>'Bilii~Jii*RLA'.8**94*: *fifkir-ekx ! 11 10034q~EALI ,11 : i r40 \ 8- ft*4 1 (/ j \434 1 SITE LINE AT TOWER PEAK-JK; \6 Â· k e \0\\\ . <-40 RELy . ~~~<4 TOP of AooF L r.'Lt, \<, 1 ELEVATIOU 121.75~ / SNE LINE AT ROOF PEAK --/ >6 33 Â«\1 \,1 1 0 61 0 21 /5 1150 8 2 09 * a- 92 2 - - LEVELOFEXISTIUG GRADE -t-- j'51 - .1 I , 27' 411 1 4 9 61., 2!(FollrrrI),~ \0 HALLAM LAKE REVIEW SITE SECTION a.'MI- 1 4> WI L 01Â« MIM OOTILE GRAYBEAL SCALE 1"=10' YAW AIZ ARCHnECIS bIR n. E!21 MoÂ«*,0 - SCHERMER RESIDENCE 210 LAKE AVE ASPEN COLORADO ,38019 =10 d Â«251Â¥242300Â¥93-7 6 4 .. -- January 14, 1993 COTTLE GRAYBEAL City of Aspen Planning Office YAW Aspen Historic Preservation Committee ARCHITECTS LTD Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission Aspen City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Dear Planning Officials, Commissioners and Committee Members: On behalf of the Schermer's I summit this application for Significant Historic Development and Hallam Lake Review. Attached are the required documents for these reviews. Please contact me with any questions about this documentation. My clients the Schermers have recently purchased the property on Lot 19, Block 103; Hallam's Addition Aspen, Colorado also known as 210 Lake Avenue Aspen, Colorado. They intent to renovate the existing single family residence, add a basement, built an addition on to the existing structure and use it as a duplex. The two units will be used by family members and not condominiumized or sold off as separate units. The existing structure is the last in a series of single family residences in the neighborhood to be developed into duplex units. The lot is within the WPW Subdivision approved in 1978. The lot was purchased by Nancy Oliphant after the subdivision. It was renovated and added on to in 1979-1980. Part of the front porch was enclosed, windows replaced and the house resided. In 1981 a new enclosed rear porch or greenhouse/hot tub room was added. These are two of many additions made to the property through time. In 1990 the house was investigated by the Aspen Planning Office for its historical significance. At that time it was determined the "Integrity has been comprised due to substantial modification" and "the significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this structure is representative of Aspen's mining era. It is of historical importance by illustrating the family home environment and lifestyle of the average citizen of Aspen which was dominated by the silver mining industry". At the time it was also noted the house has had as many as four additions. In 1980 another study provided similar findings "represents a type, period, or method of construction and contributes to the significance of a historic district." At that time this was a minor category finding. See attached information. I understand from Nancy Oliphant she tried to have the house designated as a historic structure after her purchase and was deigned. JOHN COTTLE, AIA According to the attached documents she was told by Sam Caudill that it "wasn't DOUG GRAYBEAL AIA worth it". In 1980 after a renovation she successfully achieved designation as a LARRY YAW AM MARK HENTHORN, AIA historic structure. See attached resolution by the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee. This designation was achieved after part of the front porch was enclosed 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ASPEN. COLORADO 81611 PHONE 303/92>2867 FAX 303/925-3736 .. 1 , and the rear porch enclosed area was added. In 1990 Nancy Oliphant was granted an approval by the Historic Preservation Committee for an extended back porch and a second story addition. The - improvements were never made. See attached letter and information from Nick Mc Grath. During Nancy's renovation a new foundation was added to support the structure. Unfortunately the crawl space under the house was dug out further to accommodate a mechanical system and adequate ground support for the foundation did not , remain. To remedy this situation we intend to temporarily relocate the structure on the property, build a new foundation and basement then replace the structure on the new supports. During the 1979-1980 renovation the house was totally resided and trimmed, several of the windows were replaced, in one case with a bay window and a metal roof was added. We intent to remove the metal roof replace it with new wood shingles and restructure the roof to support current snow load requirements. We also intent to remove the bay window and part of the structure. Appropriately scaled double hung, double glazed thermal windows will replace dilapidated and inappropriate windows. There are several manufactures who are replicating older windows with current i technologies and energy saving features. We wish to take advantage of these improvements. We also are relocating two windows to work better with the space : inside the existing structure. Several windows appear to have been relocated during i the previous renovations and our relocation will enhance the overall appearance. The existing siding which is not original will be replaced with new siding of the same scale and proportions. To accommodate some of the difficulties of the site and the desire to provide off ' street parking for the property that current possess none, the latest rear porch addition and one or two of the earlier additions to the structure will be removed. This will allow the duplex layout to be configured so we may share and improve an existing driveway with the neighbor to the west, 212 Lake Avenue. The removal of these later additions also allows the duplex to be configured so a visual break from the old to the new is provided. This will also allow two very large evergreens in the rear of the property to be retained. We have meet with the owner of 212 Lake Avenue, Jonathon Lewis and he has approved of the share driveway and layout shown in the attached drawings. With the sharing of a driveway to create off street parking on a property that currently has none we request a variance from the required five parking spaces to four spaces. This is appropriate for the property location. We understand surrounding properties have received approvals for less off street parking. On the front side of the structure we will be removing the enclosed porch addition ' and returning this area to its original appearance. As stated in the research , 1 I . document produced by the planning office the house is of historic importance by illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyle of Aspen not because of its architecture. We are holding back the addition to the structure so the original shape i of the cross gabled roof is still evident. Behind the crossing of the main roof a dormer element has been added on the east leaving the existing cave line exposed. Where the original eave line ends the addition has been stepped back to differentiate between old and new. On the west the new addition has been stepped forward with , a change in roof form to again differentiate between old and new. The main roof element behind the original cross gabled roof form is another higher cross gabled ~ roof to reflect on the unique character of the original but not to mimic it. In this case different roof forms from the different elements of the house intersect the main ' roof breaking up the massing adding interest. A small shed structure exist on and over the rear property line. It was renovated into a garage, small office and bedroom space by the previous owner. In a conversation with the previous owner she indicated a nothing substandard structure 1 was severely modified into useable space. In a conversation with Tom Caradome of the Aspen Center for Environmental Studies he recalled the shed renovation being two smaller sheds converted into one larger structure. The shed violates the require i building setbacks and the Hallam Lake Bluff Review standards, plus many Aspen building code requirements. We intend to remove the structure. In researching the original subdivision of the property, the original survey shows no shed structure(s) in this location. The documents do show and discuss a larger structure on this and an ~ adjacent lot. This structure was required to be removed during subdivision and was , done so. In researching the historic records in the Aspen planning office with , Roxanne Eflin and the records of the Aspen Historic Society no evidence of this : shed(s) existence was uncovered. i The renovation and addition proposed to this property will allow the preservation of the home environment of the residence and its historic importance to the community. It is the last of several structures in the neighborhood to be renovated and added onto. The size and scale of this new structure will be smaller than the adjacent structures. The ratio of building foot print and building size to lot area is smaller than two similar structures directly west. Being an infill project between two larger residences and the last in a row of renovated single family residences into duplex structures, this project is appropriate and consistent with the character of the neighborhood and the community. It preserves the character for the original structure and clearly separates old for new. The architectural integrity of the structure has been enhanced and the addition does not diminish or detract from the original structure. Because of the constraints of the site and the desire to preserve the integrity of the original structure we are requesting the approval of a variance to allow a stairway from the lower level basement to encroach into the east setback by a maximum of three feet. This request is appropriate since the stairway serves as a code required egress from the lower level and is a below grade encroachment. Per the City of 1 1 Aspen Planning Office request this encroachment has been discussed with the City if : Aspen Building Department and they feel the request is appropriate. We appreciate your time and efforts in reviewing this application. Our request are - reasonable and comply with the intent of the code and the preservation of historic ' structures as they have been classified for the benefit of the community. ' Sincerely, 41092- Doug Graybeal AIA Principal i Attachments 1 1 I , .. January 14, 1992 210 Lake Avenue Response to Hallam Lake Review Standards Requirements Response (1) No development, excavation or fill will take place below the top of slope. (2) All development within the 15 foot setback will be at grade. (3) All development outside the 15 foot setback from the top of slope will not exceed a height delineated by a line drawn at a 45 degree angle from ground level at the top of slope. (4) A landscape plan for the property is attached. Native vegetation will be retained and used for 50 percent of the development as viewed from the rear (slope) of the parcel. All vegetation will be maintained in perpetuity and shall be replaced with the same or comparable material shbuld it die. (5) All exterior lighting shall be low and downcast with no light(s) directed toward the nature preserve or located down the slope, except for emergency security lighting attached to the building. (6) No fill materials or debris will be placed on the face of the slope. Historic drainage patterns and tates will be retained. No pools or hot tubs will drain down the slope. (7) A site segion drawn by a registered architect showing all existing and proposed site elements, the top of slope, and pertinent elevations above sea level is attached. /fkclot\0023\ - 5 m=29 42,\ i~ (7*22~i*fi \9)\ 1 B. RI- 1// 1 /7Â¥CkbL A SITE LINE AT TOWER PEAK 4t SITE LINE AT ROOF PEAK .- C \1 kkl* , HALLAM LAKE REVIEW SITE SECTION . COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW SCALE 1"=10' ~DRCHITECIS noE ~m- SCHERMER RESIDENCE 210 LAKE AVE ASPEN COLORADO IAND USE APPIIaTICN IUM t 1) Project Name . SCM'/6 er Residence - ~ . 2) Project Incation 210 Lake Avenue, Aspen, Colorado Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition to the City & Townsite of Aspeg_ - (indicate street address; lot & block Inuber,.legal descniption where apprcuriate) 3) Preserrt Zoning R-6 4) Lot Size, 10,760 sq.ft. 5) Amlicarrt's Name, bdiress & Ihone # Schermer 3990 Cuervo Avehue, Santa Barbara, CA 93108 805-569-3151 6) Represerriative's Name, Address & Phone # Doug Graybeal 303-925-2867 Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Ltd., 510 East Hyman Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 7) Type of Application (please check all that apply): Conditional Use Concembial SPA X oonce:]hu'l Histairic Dev. - (HFC Review) Special Review - Final SPA Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline . Cbnoeptual POD Minor Historic Dev. Stream Margin Final POD - Historic Demolition Mlintain View Plane - Subdivision Historic Designaticn - . Â·Â· (bndaninilmtization - Texti/Map Anra#Writ . GM@S Allatmerrt Int Split9Iot Line X Hallam Lake Review - QUS Exaption Â· Adjustment 8) Description of Existing Uses (reber and type of existing- structures - approodmate sq. ft.; number of bedroans; any previous approvals granted tb the property). One existing single family residence, approximately 1,500 sq.ft., no garaqe. or driveway. Historic Designation July 14, 1980 (previously deigned). November 14, 1990 final approval granted for improvements not built. (See attached information) 9) Description of Developnent Application Owner wishes to renovate the existing building, add a basement, add on to residence, and use as a duplex residence. 10) Have you attached the following? Response to Attachment. 2, Mini]ILIm Submission Corrtents Response to Attachment 3, Specific Slhniggion OCrItents Response to Attachmerrt 4, Review Standards for Your Application 111 N .. , 4 ASPEN/PITKIN PLANNING OFFICE Agreement for Payment of City of Aspen Development Application Fees CITY OF ASPEN (hereinafter CI1"y) and Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects Ltd. (hereinafter APPLICANT) AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPLICANT has submitted to CITY an application for Schermer Residence 210 Lake Avenue, Aspen, Cblorado (hereinafter, THE PROJECT). 2. APPLICANT understands and agrees that City of Aspen Ordinance No. 44 (Series of 1991) establishes a fee structure for Planning Office applications and the payment of all processing fees is a condition precedent to a determination of application completeness. 3. APPLICANT and CITY agree that because of the size, nature or scope of the proposed project, it is not possible at this time to ascertain the full extent of the costs involved in processing the application. APPLICANT and CITY further agree that it is in the interest of the parties to allow APPLICANT to make payment of an initial deposit and to thereafter permit additional costs to be billed to APPLICANT on a monthly basis. APPLICANT agrees he will be benefited by retaining greater cash liquidity and will make additional payments upon notification by the CITY when they are necessary as costs are incurred. CITY agrees it will be benefited through the greater certainty of recovering its full costs to process APPLICANT'S application. 4. CITY and APPLICANT further agree that it is impracticable for CITY staff to complete processing or present sufficient information to the Planning Commission and/or City Council to enable the Planning Commission and/or City Council to make legally required findings for project approval, unless current billings are paid in full prior to decision. SUPPLE~ENT TO HISTORIC PRES~VATION ~-- DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS IMPORTANT Three. sets of clear. fully labeled drawings must be submitted in a format no larger than 11."x17", OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11"x1 r format. APPLICANT: Schermer ADDRESS: 210 Lake Avenue ZONE DISTRICT: Rn6. LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): 10.760 SF EXISTING FAR: 2,208 SF ALLOWABLE FAR: 4,186 SF PROPOSED FAR: - Approximately 4,150 SF EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commerdal): NA PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): NA 7 EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: 16% PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: 24% 2,0 4 ,? 60Â¥ . EXISTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): NA P80POSED % OF OPEN SPACE (Commer.): NA EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Princioal Bldg.: 25 Mid Point / Accessory Bldg: 2lft &212ft PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: . Prindoal Bldc,: 25 Mid Point / Accessory Bldo: None PROPOSED % OF DEMOLITION: 25 % including r-eat.slidd,.-21%-withbut rear shed EXISTING NUMBEROF BEDROOMS: 3 PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: 5 EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: None ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: 5 (4 proposed) SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: Front: 25 Front: 15 Front: 15 Rear: 44- Rear: 1 5 Rear: ?3 Side: 15.5 &24 Side: 15 Side: 183& 19 Combined Front/Rear: 69 Combined Fri/RrB & 37 Combined Fron[/Rear: 37 EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ Fencd over Â·proprerty lines and auxilary ENCROACHMENTS: huilrling i,4 nvpr prnpprfy linp Anri pnernmehpie into rear yard setback VARIATIONS REQUESTED (elioible for Landmarks Only: character comoatibilitv findina must be made by HPC): FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Pravidinjz_.1Â·'lissl than =11Â·7- Rear: Open Space (Commerdal): requi?ed Side: * Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): *below grade egress stair encroachment f 2$ c f veLL 7 \2 .. . a HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL BUILDING/STRUCTURE FORM State Site Number: Local Site Number: 210.LA Photo Information: ASP-K-30 & 31 Township 10 South Range 85 West Section 12 USGS Quad Name Aspen Year 1960 X 7.5' 15' Building or Structure Name: Jessie & Cordelia Waters House Full Street Address: 210 Lake Avenue Legal Description: Lots 21 & 22, Block 103 Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen City Aspen County Pitkin Historic District or Neighborhood Name: West End Owner: Private/State/Federal Private / Nancy Oliphant Owner's Mailing Address: 210 Lake Avenue, Aspen, CO 81611 ARCHITECTURAL DESCRIPTION Building Type: Residential Architectural Style: Cross Gabled Miner's Cottage with rear addition Dimensions: L: X W: = Square Feet: Number of Stories: 1 and 2 stories Building Plan (Footprint, Shape): Irregular Landscaping or Special Setting Features: Some trees, one native deciduous, northwest corner; wrought iron fence around yard Associated Buildings, Features or Objects - Describe Material and Function (map number / name): 2 historic small wood sheds at rear property line For the following categories include materials, techniques and styles in the description as appropriate: Roof: Cross qable, rear shed, standing seam, corruqated type metal Walls: Horizontal wood lap siding, clapboard Foundation / Basement: Concrete Chimney(s): None Windows: One-over-one double-hung, some replacement Doors: 1/2 light over wood panel; none original Porches: Wrap around front, front shed with turned posts and balusters, cut out brackets General Architectural Description: Miner's cottage with dominant front facing qable, decorative trim at porch and qable ends, hipped side additions and bay (rear). ' 4 .. Page 2 of 2 State Site Number Local Site Number 210.LA FUNCTION ARCHITECTURAL HISTORY Current Use: Residential Architect: Unknown Original use: Residential Builder: Unknown Intermediate Use: Residential Construction Date: 1889 Actual X Estimate _ Assessor Based On: MODIFICATIONS AND/OR ADDITIONS Minor Moderate Major X Moved Date Describe Modifications and Date: Replacement materials, windows, doors, additions; dates unknown Additions and Date: Minimum of 4 modest additions to residence (dates unknown), enclosed porch NATIONAL/STATE REGISTER ELIGIBILITY AND CRITERIA Is listed on National Register; State Register Is eligible for National Register; State Register Meets National Register Criteria: A B C D E Map Kev Local Rating and Landmark Designation 1 1 :-1 Significant: Listed on or is eligible for National Register Contributing: Resource has maintained historic or Zl - architectural integrity. 0 Supporting: Original integrity lost due to alterations, however, is "retrievable" with substantial effort. Locally Designated Landmark Justify Assessment; Integrity has been compromised due to substantial modifications Associated Contexts and Historical Information: The significance of this residential strucqure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although this strucqure is representative of Aspen's mining era. It is of historical importance bv illustrating the family/home environment and lifestyles of the average citizen of Aspen which was then dominated bv the silver mining industry. Other Recording Information Specific References to the Structure/Building: Pitkin County Court- house Records; Sanborn and Sons Insurance Maps Archaeological Potential: N (Y or N) Justify: Recorded By: John Sweeney, Intern Date: August 21, 1990 Affiliation: Aspen Historic Preservation Committee - City of Aspen Project Manager: Roxanne Eflin, Historic Preservation Officer/Planner 4 .,6kADO CULTURAL RESOURCE ~VEY ~Colorado Preservation Office 1300 Broadway, Denver, CO 80203 / ~ARCHITECTURAL/HISTORICAL COMPONENT FORM - IMPORTANT: USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE GREEN INVENTORY RECORD FORM FOR FOR RECORDING HISTORIC STRUCTURES AND DISTRICTS. USE SEPARATELY FOR RECORDING STRUCTURES LOCATED WITHIN DISTRICT BOUNDARIES. 1) Resource No. 5PT-116 2) Temp No. 91 3) Name JESSIE/CORDELIA WATERS House 4) Address 210 Lake Avenue 31 District Name Hallam Lake Historic District I. INTEGRITY: 6) Condition: Good * Fair Deteriorated ~ -.Ii--* 7) Original Use Residential 81 Present Use Residential 91 Original Site * Moved Date(s).ef Move: N/A 10) Unaltered Altered * Explain: Original porch has been ohanged. II. DESCRIPTIONi 111 Building Materials Wood 121 Construction Date circa 1889 131 Architect/Builder unknown 14) Architectural Style C.s). Victorian 15) Special Features/Surroundings: N/A 161 Arlhaeol6gical Potential: Yes Nga 'Unknown * Explain: III. CULTURAL ACTIVITIES: Key the resource type (ie: house, barn, shed, school, church, etc) to the cultural activity theme and sub-theme category associated with it. 17) THEME . Residential 18) SUB-THEME .lirban 19) TYPES Single-familv f ':lit, .A RESOURCE NO. 5FT-756+IA.k:*....-9Â·Â·Â·4Â· -- -iÂ·Â·.-Â·--0~...:Â·Â·.i.;i'*iÂ·.*:;â€ž*-.~zi,~4*11 .. &974*IUM ~415#.4','Â·*Et. ~Â·. *. ----- A2 /Qi/5//g' Â· '. i. .\ 9,41*0.9. :'227*~*, '1 r ,, â€¢ 1 / B~..24.-41 Â·Â·y,t,)/Falk''b icl~.2 T:~-/ 19 / 0-1- . 1.4:/le,ILâ€¢--i j' . '-.79.J,f ,- 1~=ar . 2 j 3*it" - -22~ - 4-- 9 Frame Number "12:12 A~..9,9F-11.9,7*1 .. -~ -~ * *b 3-2' L.* - a _34,1 Facade Orientation prrvna_ :/1 1 1%/*. ---It- mm#l'- ....I/;.lillilliliL*fli,di.wiffiet; *4;rw .ijaT- ' / .. .e 0 -- ./ .,tr*. , 0 ..,, 74': , râ‚¬ >t'.4 - * 4 4, b:.. 1. 1/â€¢i . 24 - ..24 4 i.-*Wf~ ~; 344 ./<-- [402Â·*1'**1%*fli#*le.<51'10 IN. SIGNIFICANCEP Assess wheth~er or-not'the resource has any historical or architectural merit by checking appropr-late categories and justifying below. Include any relevant historical data. 20) Architectural Significance: 21) Historical Significance: Represents work of a master Associated with significant persons Possesses high artistic values _Associated with significant events or * Represents a type, period, or patterns * Contributes to the significance of an method of construction historic district The significance of this residential structure is not of those who owned it or lived in it, nor of its architecture, although it is representative of Aspen's mining era. It is of historical importance by illustrating the family/home environment and life style(s) Â·Â·433' of the average citizen in Aspen which was then dominated by the silver mining industry. -2--2 - 3-9-2 . .:-'* ' - D~ . -1 2.-241: t -." 22) List Any Associated Cultural Group: none V. REFERENCES: Pitkin County Courthouse records Â· RECORDER__.~%9.0 Kirkpatrick DATE Sept. 30, 1980 9,2.6 . y k. $ 9 .. 1 . j ASPEN HISTORIC SITES/STRUCTURES INVENTORY , 1980 1 , \03~ 21, 2.2- 2- 10 LAKE .Ave . BLOCK/LOT(s) ADDRESS ' INSTRUMENT/DATE GRANTOR GRANTEE YEAR/TAX ASSESSMENT 64AD (pl j#J 86 1-kALLAM /.Ak )2Â· 13. il). .5Wic-,a-XÂ©/, [20tjain 31~88. 441.1_.A-yv\ LAÂ£)D Co. uha,Stic l/U A:TE2Â£> W P 6 1 (O leTe 002 DED A WA-TEes CATFHE.2/UE. E. 1}41(61+04 LUD 9}20 19% CLAR-A 6-rp-1 c.*LAAÂ» J - L< Ii) t-FfE FRAn c Â·H-UetÂ» WD qpcque 1Â»UL-Â» 4)-L*80 2/rn.â‚¬.6Â«u) . RESOURCES: 1. Pitkin CountyÂ·Abstract of Lots Books Grantor/Grantee Books Grantee/Grantor Books 2. Pitkin County Tax Assessment Rolls (on microfilm) RESEARCHER: ~CA 6. Hi AMPA-re-joll- Ocw. ' 63 CONCLUSIONS: .. HOLLAND & HART ATTORNEYS AT LAW DENVER 600 EAST MAIN STREET TELEPHONE (303) 925-3476 DENVER TECH CENTER ASPEN, COLORADO 81611-1953 FACSIMILE (303) 925-9367 COLORADO SPRINGS ASPEN BILLINGS BOISE CHEYENNE JACKSON WASHINGTON, D.C. December 30, 1992 ARTHUR C. DAILY Doug Graybeal Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects 510 E. Hyman Avenue Aspen, CO 81611 Re: Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition to the Citv and Townsite of Aspen Dear Doug: Record title to the captioned property is presently held a follows: Lloyd G. Schermer and Betty A. Schermer, as life tenants until the death of the survivor of them, as joint tenants with right of survivorship, and Gregory P. Schermer and Grant E. Schemer, remaindermen, each as to an undivided one-half interest. s inc#Glyl - 1,- *Ah AFâ‚¬hur- 02 Daily 4 jr Holland & Hart ACD/caf CC: Mr. and Mrs. Lloyd G. Schermer .. 3990 Cuervo Ave. Santa Barbara, CA 93108 January 2, 1993 City of Aspen Planning Office City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, Ltd. to act as representative for our property at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot 19 Block 13; Hallam's Addition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. SiÂ®erely, 44~ 2 Betty A d LLoyd Schermer .. 9450 Grant Creek Rd. Missoula, MT 59802 January 2, 1993 City of Aspen Planning Office City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, Ltd. to act as representative for our property at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot 19 Block 13; Hallam's Addition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely, .0 0 0 7.J 1-- - L.-AyonÂ»-Â«3 Grant E. Schermer .. -- 3090 Lundy Lane Bettendorf, IA 52722 January 2, 1993 City of Aspen Planning Office City Hall 130 South Galena Aspen, Colorado 81611 Ladies and Gentlemen: This letter authorizes Doug Graybeal of Cottle Graybeal Yaw Architects, Ltd. to act as representative for our property at 210 Lake Avenue, also known as Lot 19 Block 13; Hallam'sAddition, Aspen, Colorado, before the Historic Preservation Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Sincerely LAL Greg67 P. Schermer AE E 8 879% FATI ~ i(< '' NOV 2 3 892 J, NICHOLAS MCGRATH. P.C. Suite 203 :lip 600 East Hopkins Avenue A Professional Corporation :!1\\1 Aspen, Colorado 81611 Attorneys At Law : U J l-_-- Telephone [303) 925-2612 Telecopier (303] 925-4402 J. Nicholas McGrath* Michael C. Ireland November 20, 1992 Jeanne C. Doremus Mr. Doug Graybeal Cottle, Graybeal, Yaw, Architects Ltd. 510 East Hyman Ave., Suite 21 Aspen, CO 81611 Re: 210 Lake Avenue. HPC Dear Doug: Records at City Hall and the building department show that the front porch and siding replacement was approved prior to designation of the house as an historic structure. The permit was approved and fees paid on September 25, 1979. Interestingly, the permit is also initialed as having HPC approval on September 20, 1979. The HPC recommended historic designation by resolution dated June 9, 1980 and the city designated the house as historic on July 14, 1980. With the exception of a hot tub and some electrical outlets, the only major improvement requested after designation was the addition of a back porch and second story addition of about 500 square feet. The plans for that work were reviewed by the HPC and final approval was granted on November 14, 1990 but Nancy did not do the improvements. It is likely that the photographs obtained by Roxanne Eflin were taken prior to historic designation in 1980 and prior to the improvements in 1979. Incidentally, Nancy recalls attempting to obtain historic designation prior to 1990 and being rebuffed. A note in the building department file confirms that the owners of the house sought designation and were told by Sam Caudill that it "wasn't worth it." I enclose documents showing that the front porch approvals predated historic designation. If you have any questions, please call my associate Mick Ireland. He did the research in this matter. Thank you. Sincerely, J. NICHOLAS McGRATH, P.C. BY: J. Nicholas MeGrath cc: Richard E. Wright, III, Esq. Arthur C. Daily, Esq. m9.2 oliphn20.ltr *Member, Colo. (1971). Calif. (19694 and D.C. (1966) bars .. 14 k: .t For 20*#306 '' ~ '~ I j Date 8/27 Time /0: /0 4~.~ ~ P.M. ~ While You Were Away M >7aÂ»-~0~Â°9' ~~/ 4/ 1 of 4/ 0 Lklie, A VU) VO ~ Phone No. 9 as- 199 1 3 Extension ' Area Code Number Returned Telephoned (/ Call URGENT Please Please Call Was In See Me Will Call " Again Will Return MesÂ§age d 211-tÂ·Â£,o 30520/ >4 ,aggi --C>A Q $1-64*8~An al- :32 ,;1 â€ž .b. .$2 ' ./Rq '5 ~0,$. *â€žE~~4,1*:', :'S,*~ 8/6-+ QAAÂ£ SLO C.uUÂ«.U 3,Â£1, 2 uke.2.1 Â»di, 8. *hmimtÂ®mÂ®M)10*1*WARM# L.,3 %4 At.27147Â£4 pLE Signed,/62 20(7,7746(/69 PADMASTER V-8003-P U 50 SHEETS' .. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves I # â€¢1..... I ./. 16 . ASPEN NISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMIT 'TEE RESOLUTION WHEREAS, evaluation of the Oliphant Residence, located at 210 Lake Avenue, has determined that the guidelines and standards of Section 24-9.3 Standards for Designation of the H, Historic Over- lay District has been met for designation, and WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Conunittee has received the present owners ' request for such designation, NOW,. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESER- VATION COMMITTEE OF THE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: That the structure located on Lot 19, Block 103, Hallam's Addition to the City of Aspen, is recommended for a H, Historic Overlay District. Dated: f \ it.-2. i / 'Ego 1 -3 11, O-1 7 \ I, 6 (,sci.Hl UAWSÂ© i) / / , Secretary to the Aspen 1 1 Historic Preservation Committee,~/ ~0 certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Hif~toric Preservation Coininittee at its meeting held 700 u >17 , 1980. j '1 11 LF.lk# r,Al < jbÂ·&Â»A (;06-Â·-2 Secretargr U . 4......40''llailigild/ ... 4--- 4 *fty L . 4.. 'f,9,47 ~.1-4..840*6,-#A#avNdi., ia 4 4 .6,, BOOK:392 pACE:158 .. 1 1 (Series of 1980T- H :. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING AS AN HISTORIC STRUCTURE AND SITE THE LOCATION OF THE OLIPHANT RESIDENCE CONSISTING OF LOT 19, BLOCK 103, HALLAM ADDITION WI1EREAS, subsequent to receiving affirmative recommendations from the Aspen Historic Preservation Committee, the City Council has determined that the designation of the Oliphant Residence as an historic site is appropriate. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIiE CITY OF ASPEN, COLORADO: Section 1 That the following described area and structures thereon are hereby designated as an H, Historic Overlay District, pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of Chapter 24 of the Aspen Municipal Code, Lot 19, Block 103 Hallam Addition to tiie City of Aspen , Section 2 If any section, subsection, sentence, clause, phrase or por- tion of this ordinance is for any reason held invalid or unconsti- tutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining por- tions thereof. Section 3 A public hearing on the ordinance shall be held on the ,/-0 Â«-' day of all,-2.6 , 1980, at 5:00 P.M. in the t , 9 City Council Chambers, Aspen City Hall, Aspen, Colorado, fifteen days prior to which hearing public notice of the same shall be -..,. e . 41.~.:~... 1 444 .0-'. 'main-*- 4111; ~Mwi . - 14. . 2, ~tTRODUCCD, READ AnD enDERED published as prov idod by law by ~ 0 ~~;'~ ,~ ~ i the City Council of the City of Aspen, Colorado, at its regular meeting held on the (JN day of VL tÂ«_~- , 1980. 0 HermAi Edel ' Mayor ' r-''l : F 4:~ ' :.ATTESTÂ·: 62Â·.. 2 0 9, /: E E Na#hrÂ¥+ S/ Koch city:Â·Clerk 94_2 FINALLY adopted, passed and approved on the /1/ day of CU-40 , 1980. 0 v,ICAM !) Heirman Edel' Mayor .~>ATTEST:~ -' Â·. ~144Â·Â« /14Â« ./ ~athryp, S.;Koch city<Clerk 2 . I . BUILDINGPERMITAPPLICATION - General Construction CITY OF ASPEN Permit 1 130 SOUTH GALENA STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 344-79 (303) 925 2020 Applicant to complete numbered spaces only. IE JOB ADDRESS Z 11 210 Lake Avenue <O LOT NO. BLOCK TRACT OR SUBDIVISION (USEEATTACHEDSHEET) ,73 LEGAL 1. DESER. 19 103 C= 0- OWNER MAILADDRESS ZIP PHONE Â»0 925-]026 -1 Â» 2. Nancy Oliphant Box 8854 81611 923-4968 m CONTRACTOR MAILADDRESS PlloNE LICENSE NO. O rn 3. 1 owner/builder m ARCHITECT OR DESIGNER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 3] 4* self m ENGtNEER MAILADDRESS PHONE LICENSE NO. 5. USE OF BUILDING 6. single family dwelling 7. Class of work: m NEW *] ADDITION Â¤ ALTERATION 6 REPAIR 0 MOVE m WRECK V 8. Change of us& from PLAN CHECK FEE VALIDAIION Change of use to $28.00 PERMIT FEE PD.$28.00 8/15/79 #3759 9. Valuation of work: $ 11,000 56.00 'Pt) # Slpf:~- 9/as he<4 396f T01 AL FEE 10. REMARKS: siding, roof, underpinning $84.00 foundation. Replacing part of bldg. WATER TAP FEE rear of houser replacing porch in rear, replacing porch in front & roof. Type 01 Construction Occupancy Group Division BUILDING TO CONFORM TO BLDG.,ELEC., Size of Building No. of Stories Max. Oic. Load (Total Sauare Ft.) PLUIIBING & INSULATION CODES. Infpection required of frame,drywall, Firezone Use Zone Fire Sprinklers Required 0 Y es 0 No 1=2:h, infulation.Fler.& plumhing need to obtain permit. APPLICATION ACCEPTED PLANS CE{ECKED APPROVE,D FOr ISSUANCE OFFSTREETPARKINGSPACES: ev No. of Owetting Units Covered Uncovered DATE DATE DAT /4454, / Special Approvals REQUIRED AUTHORIZEDBY DATE NO TiCE /~PC 4/4Â·/: vi,/ râ‚¬.~u Fi, /.t, ZONING SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR El.CORICAL, PLUMBIN/j' HEATING, VENTILATING OR AIR CONDITIONING. HEALTH DEPT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID IF WORK OR CONSTRUCTION FIRE DEPT. AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IFCONSTRUC- TION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 SOIL REPORT DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORK IS COMMEN.CED. 1 HEnEEY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION PARK DEDICATION AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING TtlIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WaTER TAP WHETIIER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT. THE GRANTING OF A PEANUT DOES NOT PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCEL THE PROVISIONS OF ENG. DEPT. ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- OTFIER (SPECIFY) FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. Plans attached. SIGrJA TURE OF CONTRACÂ·TOR OR AUTHORIZ D AGENT (DATE) -6,- Tr ~~frof (-14 5 77. _11218_1121133 OF OÂ·.'#0('~EA (IF'â‚¬wf*{ERAUILDER) l' COAT E,I WHITED( INSPECTO~'S COPY YELLOW -ASSESSOR'S COPY PINK-BUILDINGDEPARTMENTFILE GOLD - CUSTOMER'S COPY - WORK STARTED W/THOUTPERMIT WILL BE DOUBLE FEE P RMIT ONLY 61:fil?Al i-*.1'1:36 17.75 LJ -9.95 0 l 3.0, U . 0.7 FF. P 1 -< 5 1 Â· M af l Ut N ewf<2.ReN ) , -~377---*i:i~ 7 19.3 â‚¬-Z- t 1 X 17.75' i 02 1 + U V NO- J 40 Â£ I- # 4 - - i m 9.95' X W - 3 0 O 01 - I ONE STORY FRAME HOUSE 3.0' 94-2<?. 9. .- 1-fy 5.9' 1.5' C. N Ul m th 14.8' \ 1 1 \tj 99 \, Y \9 , X L: 65.00' FENCE R â€¢ 401.20' LAKE AVENUE 14 N /. .. i 1, ' 1, i 1 1, HAROLD W. JOHNSON, (JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOCIATES, INC.) A REGISTERED SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF COLORADO, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT CN THE 29TH DAY OF JUNE, 2979, A SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OF LOT 19 BLOCK I 03 HALLAM'S ADDITION AS SHOWN ON AMENDED SHEET 3 SHAW, W. R W. SUB. EXEMPTION PLAT SHOWN HEREON AND THE IMPROVEMENTS WERE FOUND TO BE AS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. At.L EASEMENTS OR ENCROACHMENTS IN EVIDENCE OR KNOWN TO ME ARE St low N. SAID SURVEY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW & ASSOCIATES, INC. 81: r.*24*,47/â‚¬,2 -LLÂ·-2__.._- ._ Â· Arifti HAROLD W JOHN26N 'L.S. 9018 jÂ»)TA#JA \ 10Â», 4-91-Fric / . IMPROVEMENT SURVEY LOT 19 BLOCK 103 HALLAM'S ADD. AS SHOWN ON AMENDED SHEET 3 SHAW, W. R W. SUB. EXEMP'T ION PLAT JOHNSON-LONGFELLOW 8 ASSOCIATES, INC. BOX 554~ SNOWMASS VILLAGE, COLORADO 81615 JOB NO. 90-170 SCALE: 1"= id 1 JULY 13,1979 11.W. J.-G.R H. i . Â£ 8 - 04. > ti'-- :&.-9.'- '- :. 1, &594 Eau,â‚¬-Mainlstreet -:. - _.: -Â·-~~BUILDING-f-EAMITAPI?LICATION Â£2-4,: . ..:,1 ..f :,c ..;_-.,:-',,~,19~..1.Â·.{29*.. 1:,- i C h Aepenl"Colorado 81611 /f 30~3/425359*ji.3 #9 : ..r:.-",=- -- g:(-6.- 9~ 9....:j ...17:PA~P~,<~46.,1+-I<Il<I'- ~42 f1T&j~~: ~,;. Cf -3. t -ou---.90Â¤struct.ion -j .Tt.. 1~* . Permit-Â·- -*-- Ilk AEGIONAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT-n - --B . 221Â·2 - .6 1 1 L#.24: ,Â·'.4-0.1.. ,Â·- -~-- +'- 'Offt/JuMsdiction of Â»- . -- ....-- -1.,6-1.1.11...Z--i;:ju'*42.k.,22-26.21;AN~ ...AI .U-1--iiÂ·.4-JI 4,1 ,Â·.FI.I.=.Â«G.7..%.-El,US?401Â·LE-fÂ»*El 4--5 Applibant to cdrhplete numbered spaces only:- :.~99.-- - - .- 4,- -Â·Â· .Â· ...... #Ay:AÂ·:1,05 Â·- j. ,-i .,.*46291, - f thucÂ·~.1,J-~4/*.-Â·Â·f -c,-- .-z.;~:. -.~. 2.- .-, .r~.2---S.'... r.- f.~ R ' i~~22 1~:4 ..:, 9 4&:...2.~ .3.: 2 1 -3:. 2.t ~11-4~t-Ji?fiÂ·Â£~: u*JK#W - LOT NO...-7-27Â·... A i ...~. ... . .. . . 1. it 221 ;4-:~ ff&Â·Â·4.*2.- -~2227.1S~.02.'31311:;1.CA-1922Â·x.-41-94,2444%4;.345*.9.3.HE-5104Â¢U ,%?3231*. i . T - -Fa-Lf#T# ft-- . 4;..##: Â·r--r7 n62Â£Fc-*- 2 ,1.Â·~~ â‚¬f'.-it ~'. ;: Â·---; '-~. T. ..ft"...' -r:> -6-y.:. t'iÂ·?Id'.-,4eÂ· W:â€ž-Â·~mÂ»r'Mt: OWNER -2 ....-2.-LAL:- i L., ...,. Â·Â· Â· 7'i IL.'i .1: 4 < 1 . MAIL ADDRESS Â·Â·Â·Â· 0â€¢Â·,-C.,1 ..'11.1 Â·': 41â€¢4 ...-Â·Â·.4-4Â·.Â·. -Ovr,Â·pÂ·44-. E4'7-1-96.12<t,0.,Â·'.-ZIP.:.0. "--:ruÂ·-Â·--me:Anyr 2. 2 Kledii(Q~ 0-91*[4,1- :~ 4;.=~ t-'-ff- nia ,- .CALLE -AJe,111~j 814 1 1 ..1925-1024 .- . CONTRACIeR - 2.- - .445-Â·IÂ·.3.-.fÂ·.,-~i-Â·5'---2.-2 - :I .1 - MAIL ADDRESSL ;....Â·'.i:Â·:,'. '.7 Â· > Â·Â·it -2' Â· ~7, Â·Â·. i- Â·.--0 Â·Â·Â·< PHONE -Â·i Â· Â· , Â·:LICENSE NO. . ..... ....1.- '. . ./ -2Â·12:40... . 10 ARCHITECTOR DESIGNER ,"- -4.' ' 2.-- - : _ MAILADDRESS ..... .Â·'Â·53 -t N ..I -i:...,.7; i' PHONE . ENGINEER -r.._MAILADDRESS .:-* -'. ~ ' PHONE C ~ -. LIC.ENRE,79- :,1.Â·Â· .,- , &~Â·,F-- a,a USEOFBUILDING 6. - - + 1 ~f--fl31- 1.r~132-)1204,4Â·....> i - ~ ,> Â· ':r *7,44* ~'~Â·6 NEW -0-- 'ADDITION - .+0Â·ALTERATION;4-'24,0 REPAIR .rio MOyE ---76'Â·"WRECK.~ -t. :-Â·.-, AL ,+:0.-5- UL<*~t. 7 Â·Class of work: ..ed. 5.1 1 - - i. ...,/. .. 3133*253~&36 8. Changiof use from -:Â· ~- Â·' Â·Â·Â·Â·- - 1 PLAN CHECK FEE PERMIT FEE .. .. - . .-=, 1 9 - TOTAL. Fgg,0.2 ..:,P i. 4.7- Change of use to : ~ tÂ· Â· -'9 x1O -" Type of Construction ~Â·Â· Occupancy G<oup E- -Â· ,.9.2 nivlsion':Â·4:1..Â· -â€¢1â€¢.':E,Â·0Â·2-'4(' :91+ 9. Valuation of work:~$227 00 10. REMARKS:. -. j'. ~.i.Â» :4Â£ 4, . .. ri ... .. . 1 .. Size c' Building N.. ofSÂ· 5 ries Mal . O...LOIC Â· -- - - - (Total Square Ft.) 06 ,Â« 6- 4 Â·Â·Â·-Â·- -Â·-- - Â· ./6Â· .'54 .; Â·..'.I ,Â·Â· ~3.. 44' Fire Zone - 2 - Use Zone :.2 2, Â· Fire Spr,inklers Required 4,Â·- 10. -71~-7 Â· O Yes .-Â·b No k...... 2 -6Â·i - ri. p . r zy No. of Dwelling Units . . ' OFFSTREET PARKING SPACES: Covered JÂ· , 'I ~Â«, Uncovered .., ~ Â»t, ..,;,.. , ,,..n, Special Approvals REQUIRED AUTHORIZED BY -Â· -'- 7 -i; DATE '- '-h--' ' 2 ZONING -.-.....- ... ~,~,4 4< Â· - ~- ----- HEALTH DEPT. APPLICATION ACCEPTED 7 PLANS.CHEC 5ED, / APP,gpy[) Fo.â‚¬ISSUANCE - - -4-<0 , :.-~/ ~ =â€¢.. 4.-~/ .L:~ Â·ti j FIREEDEEPT. ' BY - + BY 'Â·-0 4.Y#/4/ 2-~ flttf*<Â·Â·. BY ~f#: ;' *00â‚¬20,44/1 1 Â¥ ' ~ ~" ~ 7. - ~~4 ;~p*'... ~SOIL REPORT . 7*. I-: I: I / 1.'~'mÂ·-*Il ..'7 'll.-arÂ»~. I....... DATE DATE ; DATF Â· ,â€¢ PARKDEDICATION --v-1.- Â·- -'---Â· ....Â· I-Â· Â·-- '2 --Â·.:12,:.3;ZÂ·'-tw' / . NOTICE SEPARATE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, WATER TAP P 1 k.1.9 k- Hâ‚¬>4 *-6 .. HEATING, VENTILATINGOR AIR CONDITIONING. - ENG. DEPT. THIS PERMIT BECOMES NULL AND VOID Ic WOQK 00 rn,werofir-rieN' AUTHORIZED IS NOT COMMENCED WITHIN 120 DAYS, OR IF CONSTRUC- - OTHER(SPECIFY) TION OR WORK IS SUSPENDED OR ABANDONED FOR A PERIOD OF 120 .lf J * ;: DAYS AT ANY TIME AFTER WORKIS COMVENCED. 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE READ AND EXAMINED THIS APPLICATION ~ AND KNOW THE SAME TO BE TRUE AND CORRECT. ALL PROVISIONS OF LAWS. AND ORDINANCES GOVERNING THIS TYPE OF WORK WILL BE COMPLIED WITH WHETHER SPECIFIED HEREIN OR NOT, THE GRANTING OF A PERMIT DOES NOT THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLY.WHEN VALIDATED n~ PRESUME TO GIVE AUTHORITY TO VIOLATE OR CANCE! THE PROVISIONS OF . 1 7 Â·un -7 4 9 P 41 4 Â» Â· -i-r - C C) ANY OTHER STATE OR LOCAL LAW REGULATING CONSTRUCTION OR THE PER- 1.Â»QRKSTABTEQ IMIHOUT PERMILWICE BE boll;BEEELORER FORMANCE OF CONSTRUCTION. 47~~_1~@*2 7 -; 1 Czi) 2*:>C c.:A .- --4- _ jrÂ·14 117# 7../ ; 1 [7-7.- SIGNATURE OF CONTRACÂ·TOR OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (DATE) iÂ· yr- r il , ' - ~~-*- 7,4- 2 ~7.Â·A ~ _04 { I.. 9,. r/'/lf' It - 4,2-Â»iÂ·r i 1 -9~Â«19#14,~ i:j i C 14.-is *2 - 1 :* 0 2 m -1 r- 6 .,-e .. C:3.- .SIGNATUREOFOWNERCIFOWNERSUILDER) Â· (DATE) ~Â· ~AÂ·4 PITKIN.COUNTY . :. ~-- U f= -t - ~' 71 .4f-'1. VAL.IDATIO%SEEN, COLORADO 81611 e - 015: I ' 1.- z PERMIT VALIDATION . CK. *, M.O. 852- CASH O Â· PLAN CHECK VALIDATION CK. 8 m.w. LI CASH 0 . 1.-71,1 1.%-1- : 9 WHITE-INSPECTOR'S COPY YELLOW -ASSESSOR'SCOPY PINK-BUILDINGDEPARTMENT FILE GOLD -CUSTOMER'S COPY 9- *5'12 .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of Nov. 14, 1990 , 210 LAKE AVENUE - FINAL DEVELOPMENT Roxanne: We have found that the applicant has met all of the conditions that were put upon the conceptual development application that was previously granted. We are recommending that HPC approve the application which shall be met and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: Restudy use of metal roofing with the goal of re- roofing with wood shingle, stained dark. Submit a basic preservation plan for remaining original elements and materials of the historic cottage. Bracken Raleigh, architect: We propose to take off the sunroom area and extend the porch out. In further study of the roof there is a ten inch differential that was found and I reapplied the back of the building to what was the front of the building so that is indicated on the different elevations throughout the house. The rest of the plan is the same and I modified the windows in the back to allow for interior centering of windows and to allow a transition around the corner in the back. There are two new windows since the Board last looked at the plans. The sloped area has now been leveled off and the deck extended. We plan to match the existing roofing and I will study a wood roof but the existing building is 2 by 6's that are awfully old to be thinking about having four feet of snow sitting on top of them. The roof was put on as it was leaking. Les: The only neighborhood comments were about the deck. Bracken: At conceptual we did agree to make it a solid railing around the deck if that was deemed necessary by the Board with a baluster look. That will create privacy between Nicholson and Nancy. Roger: I am fine with the proposal. Don: On the south you show deck that has a solid railing? Bracken: That is not solid and will not be altered at all. MOTION: Les made the motiort that the HPC grant final development approval for 210 Lake Avenue subject to the following condition which shall be met and approved by Staff prior to the issuance of a Building Permit: A basic preservation plan shall be submitted for remaining original elements and materials of the historic 2 .. Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of Nov. 14, 1990 cottage; second by Charles. All in favor of motion, motion carries. 824 E. COOPER - CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT - PUBLIC HEARING Chairman Bill Poss opened the public hearing. Barbara Long & Ken Moore are the architects for the project. Roxanne Eflin presented the over-view of the project as attached in records (see memo dated October 24, 1990). We are recommending that HPC grant conceptual approval subject to the following condition to be met at final: A representation of major building materials shall be presented at the meeting, with a complete narrative included in the Final Development application. All original lap siding shall be preserved where possible on the original portion of the cottage. Only those sections that have deteriorated significantly shall be replaced with duplicate siding material. Barbara: We flipped the building around and moved the bay window into the front and the forty fives onto the back. The cross gable is now in the back. We included the chimney on the east side and I kept the corner on the west side. Ken: We also brought the bottage up one foot and the addition down one foot which is represented on the model. Barbara: It was suggested that we add our transom window back in but we would prefer diagram 3A; larger windows which really make the addition different from the cottage. CLARIFICATIONS AND COMMITTEE COMMENTS Charles: It seems like the roof is too thin in terms of an actual roof material. Will the roof material be closer to where the windows are. Barbara: The inside would but we wanted to keep the outside a thinner fascia. A thin fascia coming out past the wall to kind of replicate what was on the cottage. Charles: I personally feel #3 is a little less fussy. Georgeann: I think the thin fascia works on the original building but I find it uncomfortable thought with the 3 TELEDYNE POST H77502 Ff = 10,000.0000 10,000.0000 FOUND: ~ ~tNA/7 1 REBARW/P4AS. CAP LS 20151 i 94\ \ \ R 96 \ \ u \\ 2 ,>r 06 J r.6044- 1 96 18 i y..7.9 . j $ e 1 4 : 044:*44 1 \(10 Â· \ 0 i \S : '54Â°--1-1 \ G f~DIKIT 2 , t 4/,43*filâ‚¬% "TOP OF 8LOPE" I . 1- 4 A .43 7 :6sk' De:â€¢ 1,Â°- ---*,~. \0 90, ''' 0/ .: 0 N U. - 2 . \ 1 04/ .. 44 y 464:V, \041 4*- 04 9 Â©000 \ "~-- *40 ~~00 f)~~~ 41 L O T .- Â« 4 g rs VA 64 :f: 2 RUB:6M~A.,4,1.0.0 1 75 + 1, , i 41 44-40 2 #1*5 \ . 4. : 9. >/ LGE Â¢v' NORTH \ Â»42 \ 44 i \ A. -trÂ¥-81 -1-11 \r , e. - 1 \\ 612. 1 t.f 1 4., 9 7-2-J l ! 1 ' 09Â¥/42 ~ ~9,Wl,4304 0 5 10 20 30 40 50 .- 4 W W 10 d28.3858 4Â» i LET\ SCALE: 1"= !O' 1 t 1-: I kÂ· \ ~M~ ~ i â€¢REBAR m PLAS.CAP BASI S OF BEARING: FOUND MONUMENTS FiEBARS W/ PLAS. CAPS er' ' / ~L 3 21~151 NE COR. TO SOUTHERLY COR. 325Â°57 30 W 4... 1 3 4 00 , /4 0.../ ,.. ~ - Sl*Â°47'14" E 10Â·61 SURVEYOR'S ~RTIFOCATE ~ 0 0 :5 0 24 0. 1. 1/ 4% 4 1 %\ILAM th 91 &' 4 COM!? 11Â·18 ' 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAn-THIS MAP ACCURATELY DEPICTS ?;09+ 4et, 2:~2> Â»<--_ 0>* $14/ A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION aN SEPT. 4,!99! 9 .1 ~41. 00 A ND O CT. 7,1992 OF LOT 19, SHAW AND THE W. R. W. J OINT LS 20151 VENTURE SUBD. EXEM@ZION AMENDED. THE ONE STOiY 0 / 7 1 6 f /. / 0 *,4+ Ck 0 0-4 /7 .. ..iÂ·... Â·~ ,Â·~~Â·; .4...I- ~: , Â·Â· 7 VI %02 9,910.5277 HOUSE WAS FOUND TO~ LOCATED ENTIRELY WITHIIHE .. i 4 10,030.8603 BOUNDARY LINES OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPE RTY. C-Â» d . 12- 1: : ~0 ef' THE LOCATION AND DIMENSIONS OF ALL BU[LDINGS IMPROVE- . , 4 â€¢ Ull" 0.1 1 /1 J 14 MENTS, EASEMENTS,RIGHTS-OF-WAY IN EVIDENCE' OR KNOWN /â€ž9 TO ME AND ENCROACHMENTS BY ORON THESE PREMISES ARE 1 40) 90 ACCURATELY SHOWN.SEE PITKIN COUNTY TITLE POLICY No. FROEBA W PLAS. CAP 9,894.9056 ~Â· 1 < 2 ~ 09#Je 'VAg PCT-6836 FOR MATTERS CONCERNING TH[S PROPERTY. 9,887.2425 1 Â· ~.0 - ..4. 2 :00 01>/ r 4... Jr 14 1 . / k ALPINE SURVEYS,INC. BY: OCT.20,1992 IR f</ 40. r .9> 0 4 18' 44. 96 1 0 ....... 0.. 45 / 5 2 / Â£ 2% A 4/0 e Af (f- /* NOTE: TOF*KAMP+'1 4 -TRNZES 5OBVIÂ£61ED 1,2.Â· 30.12. \ P ~4 Â· V :,klow DEFT;-4 - 1 34 VT. \Â¢o <e .do+ 0 .01 0 40' 9 LAUOSAPIPG REVISIOUS 6(. k-JOTEÂ· SEE arm PLAU FOR PRoRDNED /51 3 0 3 +2 e ~C 4.Ju 64*34 4 - Je * 00. / I 1 4 20 00 \ 4, '6. )1 1 2 4. * REBAR W/ PLAS.CAP 9,842.5297 LS 20151 9,923.2899 . .4 1 1 . 6 1 I L - NOTIC. According to Colo,ado law you must commerce any legal action based Surveyed 4 SEPT. 1991 Revisions 1 2 93 upon any detect in this wfily within three years afte, you hrst liscover such ditect. A;pine Surveys, Inc. Title Job No 91 - 67 X0~ i 'to:yQI.~ ~nt~,IMI'h,"7.~.6i *%42-~commen Drafted 19 OCT. 1992 1 11 -16 LOT 19 Client OL:PHANT - Post Office Box 1730 l Â· 25 -13 SHAWa THEW.R.W. Aspen, Colorado 81611 JOINT VENTURE SUBD. 303 925 2688 EXEMPTION AMENDED - .= lilli Ill- t 484 I - 41"/Min'llik........to,j ' 11 . .1111111111111111111111111111 1 - -- , g f COTTLE - f Ex.Am GRAYBEAL --7 to Remam f YAW L J Q 7 Â¥ ARCHITECTS -23ft-ki 2 01 - LTD 0 ~ 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 - 1...4 am /4 1... 1Â« PHONE 303/925-2867 Paris ne FAX 303/925-3736 - to Remain ..J Lu 0---- ---2 ~ \ EXISTING SHED TO BE 47 l y REMOVED Transplante ~ Russi* ves ~ f. I #9_ I E. ng Spruce r ve ' okech,fry i 4#Move 1 0 cheAy ain 3 1, ill - LORADO SPRUCE TREES SNCW DUMP AREA k i Move 1 .gO Â©0 \1 Existing p h.--U /3 Move ian Olives ~ 3Â«41_L. iâ€žâ€ž.cr to main 9.0 C.. I 1 90 /3 -1 0-:.* 1,1KJ / F Crl - - [ 430-. 11__ t CD -- Z 1 7 U /4 Cottonw 12' f \ 1 1 . .j emove 0 1 U~to Rem,1 1 131---- 0 ' Bro en l f .. MZ... 0 . . . . h / Zemeaini f , 8 hc~ 11 -Â» 1 * 18 *b h j 1 7 1 11 -, 16'-Â·0" drivewa* ,FA,4 OC Screen ~ Existing Spruct 1.L , . , *LOCATED Move Aspen ~SEnhA[K UNE 1 ~FENCE V /1 / It . ROPERTY LINE 1 1 -- 00 A 4 -~ / 1 ISSUE: /1/3 1/92 - - f ~ I REVISIONS: 1/15,93 . 11/ c..7 1- Â£ 1 4 ji-*tÂ«- #th i l / 1 212 LAKE AVE 1 ?b. 210 LAKE AVE - MNAwky = -- -11<-2- -A- i_.1 2 Remove Broken ~ t * Cottonwood \ EXISMNG FENCE- - - - - GATÂ¥ , .-N --7 0 - LOCATION , f f/. SnE PLAN .U 1 1-4...- - O / , I lf) PLN' j ' Uy> i A 1.4.42Ar 1 4 2 1 .."t I!,CL Obl ~h~~~'/,4 -~ 6/9 SCALE 1"=10'-D" Â£Â»"i J OF 4 ; 'A Â©1992 COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS. LTD. ~ r OaVHOUOO NGIcISV GIAV SINVE[ 01( 3 DIGISSIH H~WHGIHOS L.' COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS LTD 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 PHONE 303/925-2867 FAX 303/925-3736 1 - *- - ---A -Iâ‚¬IJEIGE-*1)10#KELI-- - , 1 1 1 1 \10 MASTE BEDROOM LIVING AREA /~ 2 j MEDIA/ EXERCISE ~ ~ 11.~~ 0 ~- fj LAUN Y N -- 1 -- ---- DN UP - MECHANICAL E W. BEDROOM OPE DINING 1 9 1 1 00 , - Eal _1101 UP D 01. 0 0 0 . HIS STUDY HER STUDY KITCHEN STORAGE - GARAGE - e . - BEDROOM - 7 1 11 \\ DDIt BEDROOM DN UP 1 11 1 1 It 1 11 11 1 \ /1 1 00- KITCHEN n / \2 J MECHANICAL - 1,~ t_J 1. BEDROOM STOR GE I~AUNDRY~ .h, 1 DINING ' \ * ISSUE: a 31.92 ~ SETBACK LINE PROPERTY LINE SrO AG ENTRY REVISIONS: 1 1 /9 - MEDIA/ EXCERSICE LIVING AREA --23 1 1 \ 1 1 1 \ 1- - - LOWER LEVEL PLAN MIDDLE LEVEL PLAN UPPER LEVEL PLAN - SA 1/ " 1' 0' j OF 4 . Â©1992 COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHITECTS, LTD. HONHGISSIH HSIWHEIHOS OaVHOEIOO NGIcISV DIAy GINVEI 0Ig [AL ECTS 1N, SUITE 21 400 81611 .2867 -fÂ« [59 11!H ------7- . _PROPOSED ADDITION - *___EXISI'ING ADDrrpl + -- ORIGINAL SrRUCrURE r------------ - - PROPOSED ORIGINAL STRUCTURE / - PROPOSED ADDITION TO BE REMOVED '1 PROPOSED - PROPOSED WEST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 1/ " 1'0' OF 4 ' Â©1992 COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW ARCHIECTS. L r 1 \ OaVHOE[OO NSIdSV GIAY GINVEI 0IE 1. 1- .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1 .....1 - 1 11~11=~111 mi.= .....1 - - .....1 igimillimilitilmi~Imilillif~"".~li, .....1 - ~I,i~MI~1~i~Il~2~i~I .....1 .~i==-Niii-9----m 1~---0-- 1.1.1,1 11 1 1 -1.1.1 Ilivillilli~/6.illilitillilf...........4:%::limil'llillimillilm/lililillillillililimililillill'Il/:le'l:'Im:':'I:/Imi:/I /51:'::1:1:~ill--illililililig/::mil.....1/Immil" - lih~]1~1~ :Il -=. 0.1 . . 1 ..0.0 , 11 0 ..0.0. 1 11 0 0:. el .. ,... 1 ..0.0 1 L. .....1 1-'_11././..............m"ilillill- .....1 .....1 3,1 -.-1-1-11/.1//1 11.-1 mililillilililill .-m.â€žm..4 .....1 mililill:Il::::Im:'Imilli:'illilil: Ill'llil.".........m .1~111'~Im'111=1==11111 ~ -~IIIIil!.,..mmiii!Ls.â€¢1221- 1,2,10!"J"*'='Ir='= I --Ill. .....1 I -4 1 9. i i ,i COTTLE GRAYBEAL YAW â‚¬13 4 - ARCHITECTS L %4 - .: LTD 510 EAST HYMAN, SUITE 21 F W ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 F:~ PHONE 303/925-2867 FAX 303/925-3736 05 f.4,6. It R: Ai 14 . 42'. __IL iii , 1 111 1/> 1 1.11 11 11.,4 11111 1 1: 111 1 /5. 'c 1 I 11 021 1 01,- F i iF 0%1- ~-- ~' || ~FE-pl[E- 12113111 t ki.. 4 1 1 / 11 I U.....41 I=11.- ~JL......_ ..IL_J--- ---------1_ Il ! 1 Il U H Illtiff#tHIC-- F ::Â·11*EqÂ«--1,;::,:,:,3,:,:,;:1:::;:;::-11%1, I L =Jt~Fl k g. 1 -~ -- 0 --.- Z ~131 /4* 4 a EXISTING NORTH ELEVATION EXISTING EAST ELEVATION cO ** ;El . . . . . 0 . 0 . 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 CO f . AN=TrrrMMY#mMrTmprm ISSUE: f 2211 [ 1 1111[L[Il! Ill !1!!!- .111-1-1-Â«Li 11111111111 le!111 1.1 1// 1 i 1,1 REVISIONS: /1 / -SE~27 ~ z~==========m-VrrTTT-7rTTT-r"rÂ·h.-- ..<:c:~Illilli 11~11111111111\. . EN*@6kWAUNkE:U:25 Ell 1 11 1-1 - -Â«-IPi-. - - --6IEJITI1LJPI Ill 11 IFIRIL__11 - i-- I r----7. r,rÂ·Â·frref,I - 1 FJL-m,-â‚¬231 lili !1111 - - --FE- -i _ EXISTING WEST ELEVATION EXISTING SOUTH ELEVATION - - 1 e.2 * ~OF 4 1 1 9 r. Â©19,2 COTTLE GRAY,EAL YAW ARCHIrECTS. LTD. 0, . OCIVHOUOO 'N5{cISV GIAV :FINVI 0-I 3