HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19830607
--
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
FO~M '. C. F. HOECKEL 8. B. II l. co.
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 7, 1983
Perry Harvey called the meeting to order at 5:05 p.m. with members Jasmine Tygre
Pat Fallin, Welton Anderson, Lee Pardee, David White and Roger Hunt present.
Commissioner
Comments
Lee Pardee said residents of Oklahoma Flats are concerned
about the Rio Grande area. It seems to be a storage yard for
a construction company as well as a lot of grading going on.
Pardee asked what the grading was for. Pardee said. he ;;ould
also like to know what the general plan for the impound lot
is; it seems to be getting bigger. Sunny Vann, planning
director, told P & Z he would have to check on both the
grading activity and the pipe storage. Harvey pointed out
that land was purchased with open space funds.
White said left turns onto Main are a problem, particularly
at Galena, Third and Fourth. Trucks and cars park all the
way up to intersections and those turning cannot see. Harvey
said that is under the purview of Council and should be brought
up at Citizen Participation at Council meetings.
White said he would like to see the alleys cleaned now that
it is summer. Vann suggested this be passed on to the city
manager and the CCLC.
Hunt said the city used car lot at Cemetery Lane is in opera-
tion again.
Hunt said he felt the exiting of the post office is going to
be a real interference with the Shapery property. Hunt said
the P & Z should require Trueman to file an SPA for the post
office parcel. Vann said the city's position is that this is
a Federal preemption; Hunt may take this up with the attorney's
office.Hunt said because of the angle of the building and the
exit, one has to swing far to the left, and this is intolerable
interference with Shapery. Hunt said he would like the post
office to correct this. Colette Penne told the Commission the
engineering department is looking at the circulation plan at
the request of the new owner.
Hunt said he was fortunate to travel by Amtrak on his vacation,
and discussed connected service from Glenwood to Aspen by
bus. They are very interested in this service. Amtrak said
they would like to sell tickets directly to Aspen, which is in
their capability as long as they are dealing with a PUC
licensee. Hunt said he hoped the transportation department
would carry through. Hunt said he felt this would be a good
marketing tool.
Alan Richman, planning office, reminded the Board of the meetin~
June 14 at 5:00 to discuss the growth management plan.
Lee Pardee asked what has happened to the Commissioners and
the smuggler improvement plan. Vann told P & Z the Council
and Commissioners have met regarding a Smuggler improvement
plan and were presented with the three phase plan for funding
basic improvements to solve existing problems, as well as to
enable improvements to be put in place in anticipation of
Silverking phase IV. This plan has received conceptual
approval. Phase I, which is $700 to 800,000, involves redoing
the Mill street bridge, part of Gibson road. This will be
done to county standards. This will solve the grade problem
on Gibson, will put in new utilities so as not to break the
street up another year.
Regular Meeting
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 7, 1983
L-3 Quota System Alan Richman, planning office, reminded P & Z they have had
Code Amendment a work session on this and gave the planning staff some
alternatives, which ranged from not doing anything to the
existing lodge quota and scoring system, to exempting some
lodges, to a separate L-3 quota system. The alternative the
P & Z wanted was to set up a competition system which would
be fair and easy to deal with for the L-3 lodges.
Richman told P & Z his solution was the existing scoring
system with modifications to deal with P & Z concepts without
creating a dual lodge scoring system, which would be cumber-
some. There is a quota for the L-l, L-2, CC and CL zone
district of 35 units, and in the L-3 zone district 10 units.
Harvey asked for a definition of "tourist dormitory units".
Richman said in the L-3 zone district, tourist dormitory
units is a permitted use. Richman has not checked the
definition of dormitory in the Code. The Commission asked
to see the definition.
Richman said one of the concerns of P & Z was the cost to an
applicant in the L-3 zone to get three or four rooms. Richman
has inserted "where applicable" in the information requirements
if it is beyond the level P & Z needs to see. Vann said it
would be difficult to write a separate set of guidelines for
the L-3 zone as there are so many different types of
facilities in so many different locations.
Richman told P & Z he used the words "or the addition thereto"
for the impacts, not on the whole building, but on the added
units. Vann said this provides an equitable opportunity for
someone adding three or four rooms to compete against someone
who is tearing down and reconstructing.
Richman said an area which seems to apply to L-3 and not
other zones is the rehabilitation and reconstruction of
existing units. Pardee said rather than giving points for
"higher quality" he would like to worded to state "signifi-
cantly higher quality". Richman said he could add language
that would say greater than just cosmetic upgrading. Vann
said these units have to meet the test for rehabilitation
or reconstruction. Some of these are outlined in the criteria.
Harvey said a lot of the L-3 lodges create problems with
off-street parking. Harvey said he would like information in
the application on what parking exists. Vann told the
Commission the Code says an application has to meet the new
increment of cars. Harvey said he would like the total
number of vehicles clarified. Vann said the parking situa-
tion will vary on a case by case basis and will depend upon
where the lodge is located.
Vann said the P & Z could take the position that rehabilitation
reconstruction points are necessary to meet the threshold; if
an applicant does not do some, they cannot be competitive.
Pardee said the applicant who gets and deserves the points is
the one who needs to redo his lodge, rather than the lodge
who wants just to add to its inventory of units. Vann said
the Commission could set this up so that the worst projects
can gain the most points, as long as no project is precluded
from meeting the threshold.
Pardee said the goal of the L-3 zone was to upgrade substand-
ard lodging, and these should be able to compete successfully
against new lodging. Vann said the planning staff will run
some test scoring of new units versus rehabilitation. Harvey
said the question is the multiplier for rehabilitation/
reconstruction a significant effect in reaching the threshold.
Pardee pointed out this already gets ten points.
-
\, I
".-.
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1 00 Leaves
Regular Meeting
June 7, 1983
FORM" C. F. HOECKEL B. 8. Il: c. ~O.
L-3 Quota
System Code
Amendment
Planning and Zoning Commission
-3-
Pat Fallin said she is in favor of giving those in need of
rehabilitation extra points. Ms. Fallin said she would like
to see the scores. Vann said there is a need to resolve the
problem in the community of the older lodges, as well as
balancing this against the management of growth. Vann said
the build out for L-3 lodges is limited. Not everyone will
want to bulldoze their lodge and totally reconstruct. There
is the possibility in some years, no one will apply. There
is the possibility of awarding a bonus or multiple year
quotas. Vann said the P & Z can examine the quotas in all
areas of the GMP, and if this quota does not address the
problems in the L-3 zone, P & Z can change the quota.
Hunt said he felt there should be a multiplier for rehabilita-
tion/reconstruction. White said there should be a multiplier.
Pardee said 10 points, or 10 per cent is fine. Ms. Tygre
would like to see the scenarios from the planning staff.
Ms. Tygre said she is leaning towards more points for rehabili-
tation/reconstruction rather than expansion. Pardee said
this category should be as important as employee housing, which
is 15 points and raise the total to 106 points. Harvey said
he would also like the language on rehabilitation/reconstruc-
tion clarified.
Vann told the Commission they will have to decide from where
the 10 unit quota for L-3 should corne from. Harvey said he
does not know what the effect of 10 units would be but does
not want to lose an applicant because he feels it is not worth
it.
Harvey opened the public hearing.
Gideon Kaufman said the city has made the determination to let
a new segment grow, the L-3 segment. Kaufman said it would
me a mistake not to give a good size quota to the L-3, not
reducing the L-~ and L-2 quotas. The quota should not be
taken out of the residential quota, which is irrelevant, and
the residential quota has just been studied and left at 39
units. Kaufman said he did not see leaving roads in as a
scoring item in L-3 because a small lodge cannot deal with
that.
Pardee said an applicant should not be able to add units
unless they are going to upgrade the existing units. The
purpose of the L-3 zone is to increase the quality of existing
lodging. Pardee said every applicant should meet the minimum
by improving what they have. Vann agreed that most applicants
will not be able to get two points for roads, but when the
P & Z has multiple applicants, they will have criteria for
which one will receive the limited quota. This is a way of
measuring the least impact of a project, it does not require
an applicant to spend funds in this category to receive points.
P & Z requested staff to look at the threshold limits to
perhaps lower it. Vann said there are two choices, this can
be geared for an applicant does not get expansion unless they
are improving the existing or that applicant could be equally
competitive with an applicant who wants to expand one or two
rooms. Vann said the staff can try to design a regulation
with the flexibility to deal with both situations.
Regular Meeting
Change In
Use
Charlemagne
Restaurant,
Expansion of
Conditional
Use
Planning and Zoning Commission
June 7, 1983
Harvey said he did not see how the Commission could look at an
expansion without looking at the existing. Ms. Fallin said she
preferred a balance. Pardee said this passed on the basis of
an incentive to upgrade the existing lodges; those units that
are not up to par should win the competition.
Harvey asked how the commission feels about the quota and from
where should it be created. Anderson said between 10 to 15
units is okay. Maybe for the first year there shouldn't be
a quota to see what happens. Anderson said the quota for L-3
should be in addition to the existing quota for other zones.
Ms. Fallin said the quota should be a minimum of ten, and this
should be on top of all the quotas, at least for the first
year. Hunt said as long as the P & Z has the flexibility to
allow more than ten units in any years, ten units is fine.
White said he would like a minimum of 20 units on top with 10
corning from residential. Pardee said he felt 10 units are
sufficient with the quota on top. Ms. Tygre said 10 units is
fine with using a bonus or future year's allocation. Ms.
Tygre said she is opposed to increasing the size of the pie,
or the growth. Ms. Tygre said the 10 units should corne out of
the existing quota probably out of the L-l, L-2 quota.
Harvey said the Commission does have the ability to increase
the number of units per year, and this information should be
made available to the public. Harvey said the Commission
would like to stimulate this L-3 competition because it is
recognized as a problem. Harvey said the 10 quota should corne
on top of the existing quotas.
Harvey said he wanted the larger quota to attract applicants
to corne in and play the game. Vann said the reason the staff
recommended 10 unit quota is that they did not want to rob
any more quota from other GMP areas. Harvey said the consen-
sus of the Board is that they want a new quota, on top of
the existing quota. The Board feels that between 10 and 15
units is sufficient. Harvey said he would like it spelled out
in the resolution what the Board can do in terms of future
year's allocation or bonus units. Four Board members were
in favor of 10 units; three were in favor of 15.
Harvey closed the public hearing. Planning staff will bring
back a resolution for the Board to approve.
Anderson moved to table this until June
public hearing; seconded by Ms. Tygre.
carried.
21 and continue the
All in favor, motion
Colette Penne, planning office, told the P & Z this is a
request for an expansion of a conditional use of 637 square
feet upstairs area, which is presently an office. The
Charlemagne plans to use this as a combination waiting areal
bar lounge and a small office for the restaurant. Ms. Penne
said there are underground parking spaces and they will add
one more. This is of low impact expansion. The planning
office is recommended approval of this request.
Harvey opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Harvey closed the public hearing.
Pardee moved to approve conditional use approval and grant an
expansion of the existing conditional use permit to allow
Charlemagne to occupy 637 square feet of space on the second
floor of the Floradora building in addition to the existing
restaurant space; seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in favor,
motion carried.
~
, ,
FORM 10 C, f. ~OECKEL B. B. & L. CO.
Regular Meeting
Deane
Subdivision
Exception
Stream Margin
Review - Rolles
Whale of Wash
FAR Bonus
. ,
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
100 Leaves
Planning and Zoning Commission
-5-
June 7, 1983
Hunt moved to table Deane subdivision exception at the request
of the applicant; seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in favor,
motion carried.
Colette Penne, told P & Z this is a stream margin review in
the Black Birch estates, which is zoned R-15PUD. The request
is to build within 100 feet of the high water line of the
Roaring fork river. Ms. Penne said the intent of stream
margin review is "to guide the development and encourage
appropriate use of land in proximity of designated natural
water courses, to promote safety from flooing, and to prevent
impediment of natural water flow".
Ms. Penne said the plan submitted showed the house in the flood
plain, and the planning staff recommends this request be denied.
The architect, Torn Wells, resubmitted another plan showing
the house out of the flood plain. Harvey said the municipal
code state that no building will be located in the floor
hazard area; the P & Z cannot give a variance to that. Harvey
said he would be glad to look at a plan that is not in the
flood plain.
Torn Wells presented maps to the Board. Wells said he is
not questioning the stream margin review, but is questioning
the 100 year flood plain line. Ms. Penne said the Corps of
Engineers could redo the line; this would be an expensive
option, but if it is important to the applicant to be closer
to the river, it is an alternative. Wells showed another
plan with the house behind the flood plain line, which is
workable, but not as desirable.
Harvey asked if there was a trail easement. Ms. Penne said
the Rio Grande trail is on the other side of the river.
Harvey said any approval should be conditioned upon engineering
review and compliance with Section 24-6.3 and the criteria
listed in the planning office memorandum. Harvey requested
the plan dated June 3, 1983, be entered into record as the
correct plan, with the house behind the 100 year flood plain.
Anderson moved to approve the stream margin reveiw for the
Rolles residence conditioned upon review by the engineering
department, compliance with the criteria of Section 24-6.3
and the six conditions outlined in the planning office memo-
randum of June 7, 1983; seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in Favor,
motion carried.
Colette Penne, planning office, reminded the Board this has
gone through the GMP process. The applicant is asking for a
.2:1 bonus commercial space because .3:1 of employee housing
that been provided off-site. The total build out of this
will be 5,100 square feet. This project has both an alloca-
tion for commercial and residential. Harvey said he would
like the city attorney to approve the format to link the units
at Silverking with this project. Harvey pointed out if the
space is retail and commercial, the units at Silverking will
be moderate. If the Whale of Wash changes uses, one of the
units will become low income. Harvey said he wants this
cross referenced.
Ms. Fallin moved to approve the request for an additional .2:1
floor area ratio for the commercial space for the Whale of a
Wash, for a total buildout on the lot of 5,100 square feet,
conditioned upon the deed restriction of two two-bedroom units
at Hunter Creek properties with the price of rental categories
at moderate if the space is used for commercial, and one of
the bedroom units becoming a low income level if the Whale of
a Wash space becomes a combination of commercial and residential
conditioned upon approval by the city attorney of the documenta-
tion to effect all that, with an appropriate compliance and
enforcement mechanism; seconded by Ms. Tygre. All in favor,
motion carried.
Pardee moved to adjourn at 7:30 p.m.; seconded by Ms. Tygre.
All in favor, motion carried.
-
, I