Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19830726 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves f ORM'~ C. F, 1l0fCK EL B. O. Ii l. C~. SPECIAL MEETING JULY 26, 1983 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION The Planning and Zoning Commission held a special meeting on July 26, 1983 at 5:00 p.m. in the Council chambers. Present were Perry Harvey, Roger Hunt, Lee Pardee, Pat Fallin, Jasmine Tygre, David lihite and Paul Sheldon. Commissioner Comments Growth ':.. Management Quota System Clarity and Consistency Resolution Mill Street Bridge Paul Taddune, City Attorney, told the Commission that the city Council held a meeting on July 25, 1983 and anounced '.that it had withdrawn.-. its objection to the Mill Street bridge. Paul emphasized that though the Council had withdrawn its objection it did not mean that they were not opposed to the Centennial project. Alan Richman of Planning presented the Clarity and Consistency of the Growth Management Quota System Resolution. Alan explained sections 1 and 2 and 3 of the resoultion dated July 26, 1983. Alan said that section 4 repeals applicants previous perfomance which after some discussion the Commission agreed to. Section 5 sets up two new criteria for the lot split GMP exemption to insure that that exemption is only available at one time to any particular piece of property. Section 6 contains a few new words and essentially deals with restrictive bedrooms in which the total number of bedrooms in the project determines the ratio for employee housing scoring. Alan suggested adding sections 7 and 8 to the resolution. These sections would include the new provision added to the lodge scoring system that should be in the residential and commercial scoring system as well. Alan said that this was the purpose of having applicants engage in a pre-application conference and understand the intent and purpose of both evaluation criteria and ratio requirements. Alan suggested using the exact same language that is present in the lodge scoring system. Perry Harvey opened the public hearing. Roger Hunt asked about the L-3 and rehabilitation. Alan said that it was in the L-3 resolution. Perry Harvey closed the public hearing. Roger Hunt moved to adopt Resolution 83-7 with the added amendments. Jasmine Tygre seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried. Glen Horn of planning requested that the Mill St. Bridge StreamcMargincReview be p]aced on the agenda. Roger Hunt moved to have the stream margin review placed on the agenda. Paul Sheldon seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried. Glen Horn said that the stream margin review was basically an enviromental review. There are several noticable criterai the pedestrian trail, the green vegetation of the river bank and the need to avoid excessive stream sedimentation. The Planning Office believes that these criteria will be met. The applicant has agreed to adhere to all representations made in the application, therefore, the Planning Office recommends approval of the stream margin review based upon the applicants meeting the conditions cited in the memorandum dated July 19,1983. Lee Pardee asked if the alignment of the bridge was the same. Glen said that it was slightly different, taking away the present curve. Sunny Vann, planning director, said that one of the questions that has come up is to have Council review trail work in that area. Sunny wanted to make sure that anything the Commission does, does not preclude Council from coming bacK and adressing the trails master plan and perhaps changing their minds. said that the treatment underneath the bridge would be a "riff-raff" with a 2-1 slope and anything could be constructed easily by moving a few logs. ,.._..,."_,.".~ e, _.~...,.._~_.;_..._...,..,_. ...__....o_,_..__,.....~__.__ r ' FORM 50 C.F.HOECHLR.8.ll:l.CO. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves Mill St. Bridge (cont.) Perry Harvey said that the Stream Margin Review as the Commission grants it simply states that the applicant conform to the code criteria. Mr Harvey said that the only thing that varies is revegetation, since it states in the criteria that vegetation shall not be removed. Perry asked if the applicant had a revegetation plan. Glen Horn pointed out that only a few shrubs and trees were under consideration and the applicant said that they would removectwoccottonwoods, grass and shrubs. The relandscaping plant materials will be contingent upon final engineering drawings. Site distances will also be taken into consideration. The applicant has agreed to revegetate according to all the plant species that are recommended in the greenway plan. Paul Sheldon asked if there was some way that the Commission could stipulate that the two trees could be replaced. The applicant said that vegetation growth including trees 2-3 inches in diameter was fairly dense around the bridge. The applicant also stated that the two trees to be removed would be in the south-west section of the bridge. Quite a few extra trees would also be planted by the parking lot at the Visual Arts Center. Perry Harvey asked what would be done with the current bridge foundation. Wbuld it be taken out and revegetated? The applicant said that after the vertical foundation walls are removed the embankment will be layed back on a two to one slope and lined with riff-raff and boulders. Paul Sheldon reiterated that the trees should be replaced. The applicant said that there would be no problem with that. Paul Sheldon moved to accept staff recommendation with the designated changes, whi~ are to replace the trees in the south-west quadrant. The motion is based on the staff recommendation dated July 19, 1983. David White seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried. David White moved to adjourn the special meeting. Paul Sheldon seconded the motion. All in favor, motion carried. The special meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission adjourned at 5:20 p.m. lie~. Ma kalunas city Clerk's Office -2-