HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19790619
"""
/' .'.
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Regular MeetJ.ng
Aspen PLannJ.ng and ~onJ.ng CommJ.ssJ.on
June L~, L~/~
The Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission held a regular meeting on June 19, 1979,
at 5:00 PM in the City Council Chambers. Members present were Olaf Hedstrom,
Joan Klar, Welton Anderson and John Schuhmacher. Also present were Karen Smith
and Richard Grice of the Planning Office.
Approval of Minutes
Klar moved to approve the minutes of May
May 29 as presented, Anderson seconded.
motion approved.
22, May 23 and
All in favor,
Discussion of
Special Meeting
July 31, 1979
Grice asked the Board to set a special meeting for
July 31, 1979.
Klar moved to set a special meeting at 5:00
to tackle the agenda, Schuhmacher seconded.
motion approved.
PM, July 31,
All in favor,
Request by
Bert Bidwell
Grice said that on June 20, 1978, the P&Z reviewed an
application for a Children's Amusement Arcade at 312 S.
Mill Street. The Arcade was approved sUbject to the
option of this commission to review the operation at the
end of one year. Bert Bidwell has requested that they
exercise this option.
Bidwell stated that people in that block will testify
as to what has happened during the first 12 months of
operation. He asked that they schedule a public hearing.
Klar asked if there were any complaints from the Police
Department. Grice did not think so. She asked that they
give any comments they have.
Gary Plumley, owner of Of Grape and Grain, said that
there are more children hanging out in the alley since
the operation opened. They have had pilferage problems
from the delivery trucks in the alley and kids coming
in the back of the store. He said the kids have said
it is not a healthy place. He felt the City is remiss
by not providing a good place for kids to go. Hedstrom
felt the commission should exercise its option to review
the application with a public hearing. Anderson felt
they should have some noise information for comparison.
He felt they should solicit more public comment than just
the adjacent property owners. He asked the Times to
make a note of this hearing.
Klar moved to set a public hearing for the Children's
Amusement Arcade conditional use approval review by
P&Z on the special meeting July 31, 1979, Anderson
seconded. All in favor, motion approved.
Resolution of
Commendation for
Chic Collins
Schuhmacher moved to adopt the resolution, Anderson
seconded. All in favor, motion approved.
Tipple Lodge
Subdivision
Exemption
Grice introduced the application. This application
requests subdivision exemption for the condominiumization
of the Tipple Lodge located at 620 S. Galena and consisting
of 10 bedroom and bath units and 2 studio units. The
bedroom and bath units do not have kitchens. The Engin-
eering Department recommends approval without condition.
Grice read the definitions of dwelling unit and lodge unit.
He questioned if a lodge unit is allowed to be condominium-
ized, the owner could bring in appliances and change it
to a dwelling unit. If so, the condominiumization would
require a GMP allotment. Since this is not addressed in
the code, the Planning Office has asked the p&Z and Council
to make a policy decision on this. Hedstrom read the
definition of a lodge unit, "A building containing three
or more units none of which units contain kitchen facili-
tie;,-~;
-2-
Regular Meeting
June 19, 1979
Aspen Professional
Building,
SUbdivision
Exemption
R-15 Zone Redraft,
Public Hearing
Bil Dunaway
Aspen Planning and Zoning commission
ties intended for temporary occupancy of guests." He
asked if one unit is converted, would it change the
nature of the unit. Bil Dunaway said a condominium is
only a form of ownership, it has nothing to do with the
use of the structure.
JD Muller, representing the applicant, said the difference
is a lodge unit is a dwelling unit that does not have
a kitchen. He felt the definitions would fit since they
will be condominiumized without kitchen facilities.
Anderson noted the City has very little way of enforcing
this. He asked the proposed sale prices of the units.
Muller said there aren't any at this time. Grice felt
this condominiumization tends to increase the chances that
this will remove these units from the short term market.
Klar agreed that this will change the nature of this zone.
Muller did not agree. Hedstrom asked if they could
restrict the occupants by the subdivision agreement.
Anderson noted these are only enforceable by the associa-
tion. He felt this is too important an issue to decide
tonight. He suggested obtaining figures from the
Stonebridge Inn in Snowmass who condominiumized two years
ago. He felt this is a dangerous precedent to set and
could drastically affect the market for tourists.
Anderson moved to table the application for the Tipple
Lodge subdivision exemption pending receipt of further
information from the Planning Office and the applicant
to the July 31, 1979, meeting, Klar seconded. All in fa
favor, motion approved.
Grice introduced the application. The Professional
Building is exclusively occupied by commercial businesses
with no residential units involved. The City Engineering
Department and the City Attorney have recommended approval
without condition.
Klar moved to approve the request subdivision exemption
for the purpose of condominiumization of the Aspen Profes-
sional Building inasmuch as this condominiumization is
not within the intent and purposes of the regulations,
Anderson seconded. All in favor, motion approved.
Smith said this is a public hearing to consider a text
amendment to the code to create an R-15A zone district.
She submitted bhe Planning Office memo to the record.
The proposal results from the process of annexation.
The County does not permit duplexes in the R-15 zone
so there is a potential doubling of the density. This
amendment creates the same kind of zone district but
prohibits duplexes. Zoning these lands R-30 would
probably create nonconforming or substandard size lots.
Anderson asked if the R-15A allows duplexes on a 20,000
square foot lot. Smith said no, the R-15 would.
Hedstrom opened the public hearing,
Bil Dunaway of the Aspen Times said the County did allow
duplexes until fairly recently, He felt that duplexes
are one of the only ways people can afford to own their
own home. He felt this zone would be counterproductive.
Smith agreed that duplexes are good if they are employee
housing but most of the recently built duplexes are far
above the employee housing market. She suggested some
mechanism could be devised to restrict these units to the
housing guidelines. Hedstrom agreed with Dunaway and felt
that the areas being annexed should allow duplexes.
'-
.....,
BRADFORD PUBLISHING CO., DENVER
~.
-3-
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
June 19, 1979
Regular Meeting
Rezoning Lot 13,
Pitkin Mesa,
Public Hearing
Resolution on
Zoning Enforcement
Officer
Smith noted that allowing these duplex lots will increase
the buildout potential and effect the quota of the GMP.
Dunaway supported restricting 50% or one of the two units
to the price guidelines. The Board also supported this.
Anderson asked if the GMP quota was being adjusted as we
annex the county lands. Smith said not yet but they will.
Hedstrom closed the public hearing.
Anderson moved to recommend adoption of a new R-15A zone
district as presented by the Planning Office's memorandum
of June 15, 1979, with the addition that duplexes shall
be allowed when one of the two units in\the duplex is
deed restricted and conforms to the duly adopted housing
plan of the City of Aspen, Klar seconded. All in favor,
motion approved.
Smith said this is a public hearing to consider zoning
of Lot 13, Pitkin Mesa Subdivision, soon to be annexed,
The area is zoned R-15, the land in question has a duplex
on it. The Planning Office recommends R-15 consistent
with the surrounding neighborhood.
Hedstrom opened the public hearing. There were no comments.
Hedstrom closed the public hearing.
Anderson moved to rezone Lot 13, Pitkin Mesa Subdivision
to conform with the adjacent zoning of R-15, Klar seconded.
All in favor, motion approved.
The Commission asked the Planning Office to draft a
resolution recommending to City Council the hiring of a
zoning enforcement officer.
Anderson moved to adjourn the meeting, Klar seconded. All
in favor, motion approved. Meeting adjourned at 6:45 PM.
~tflf/~h )
Sheryl mmen, Deputy City Clerk