HomeMy WebLinkAboutcoa.lu.gm.Cantrup,HansTop Of Mill.1978
Recor.lI~cndeu Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
Project L ~ f'~(c
Date aa /f' /t?/Y
,
A. Public racilities and Services (I~aximum of 21 poin~\_ FHaxil~um (jf
3.--jmints-fler. revi eVl e! el'1ent). J
1. %:A;;:_~/~~~&I/
3
-~_._._-~----_._---~_..-~._._---~-
._-_._------_._------~--~_._---.--
2. Sewer Serv i ce _____L___ _
~~~LaJ1(::!.-- /i&h.k~ ~ _______
'/r#ZfrL/<'-~.!~L__________
3. 'JD,"'"'" .
i f.I /!4o/Jt
.. .
__3____
---
----------.---.--------.-
---.".---- - .
4. Fire Protection " _~_____
~;t:{{t ;Cjlz1~"1:m~_____________
~~---~-"------- ------
_._--------_. ---~ -- --~._-_._._-~-------
5. Par')n'l Desi0n
Ji;;~:t.u.1LL:~2dl:f-gtg~
_-2_____
------.-----.------------
6. C~o-~' " ~ 71/}~. , , Zi- _--2_____
LL.' U/~ . ~-./
- _tL__ . L / ~~ ____
~-----------~- -----,-~-_._-_._---_._._---
-------_.~-~~-------------~--_.-. -------
7. Ener(~ ~
u~.;/. 1 . / --~---
-:;fdL~-;if.~~-./;thL=n
~-_._------------"--_._---_.._~_.-
,(j
.~
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 Doints)
1. Public Transportation
.:t7@/~1/~ ~
2-
3.
LL i / . -----;:;--
/. A.... /1////.4/;;&v
~~~~----
2. ~'t"tiO"
FaCilit~S &. ,---.;J--,-~--
~--~--~------------
--------------/_._-
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recy~ling Facilities
,0t~_~ ~ 7,
____2____
6.
7 ~i~~:i~i~;~=~~::~=
C. ..I-Iousing (r.laximum of 30 !:'oints)
1. i1iddle
2. Madera tc
~=---~~~=
/~----
3. LO\~
v-./:
Sub Total of Above Points
Bonus Points F ftU~ rr
/- .
JL__
Nal'le
'i ~./.bA~ -;,ftl'-.1OaM~~'
" /'
-
IkcOI:!r1Cndl'd Point Allccation
Res;(lcntii11 vroD:lsals
Project --lo/?-..pf.-- tJ1L'-:___.
Datc !1__ttlJe._ _______________
A. Public racilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per rCV1CVI elcnent).
1 ~ ~':C1ter ~)erv i ce
'?
~---- ---'-_._----_.~--- -----,. _. -'----------~~ - _._~----- ---- -- --....-
- -_.__.__.._~_____. '_~'_'" _u__.___ '. .___ ._.~__ _____________.___, __._....~__~____.___
-_._-----._-_._-~._-~-- --.-- ----- ----'-_.. --.----~.._-~_._---_.__._- -_. -.- ~.__.._-~_. -.------
2. Se~er Service
______Ik__. _
---_.__._-_._.~ -~-"--'-- ---"'. ---------,.-.-. - - ._------~~-_._------~-.__.- -------
--_..~--~.~~-----,.__._---_._~._---_._-~~--.-~_.._.._-------_._+---~ -----
3. Stom Dra i na(Jc
-----_._--------~ ---
._..~----_._-- ....~ -- ------_._~ _.-.~~.--~-----~---------_.._._.._----_... --'--.-, -
----.----- ---_._._._.~- .-.-._-~---~----~----_..-._-_._--_._~ ----------_.- --
t; . F i r~--P~~;~~-~i~~ ------..---------- . ---- ---- --------~=~=_:2.-~=
---- _._-~_.~- ......--~-.._-------_... - ~_.- -,~ ._-_._.._-~.---_.~-----~--.
-'- .-----.-----..--. --.-_..- -.-- .- - ----,.----~---_.. .----._------~._._-.--~_.._-----~--~---
.-.-------- ------- --- ----._._-. -..._----~-- -----.-. ---------n:;...----
5. I'ar~in'l Design './
_._----------_._~--_.-.---_.-._.. - -'---' ..--- .-.--~-_.- - _-._-------~ ._----~. -.. ._-
---_...._---_._._--~- -..-------- -.---------------. .--.- --.. --_.__._._--_._.~_.~..~._----
6. Roads
--- ---- - .. -- -- ----..-.....- ------- .-.--3------
- .--- --"- ---_. ... --'-'- --------------~-- --..------.-------.- ~ - . --~-_.-_.~--. _._".~----_._- - -.-
.--.- --.- . ---.-_._- .----.----. .---.. -- - ,--.-
- -.---_.__._. ..-.. -.------..- --..- ----- -.- --." -.- -
------------.--.-... ~....._. -" - _.~._~--
--, - ___._ .-0______- ____ _ __ _.____.
7. Ellet~JY
~
-..--....__.. _.._..______u_ ._. .._____..___. '_'-' __..._ ._______.__ ___._
- ._-~~~
,
B. Social Facilities iJnd Services (~"i1xjl!'UI'I of l~ noints)
1. Public Transportati0n .._2-____
2. P-o~~;e--;)r;;~~~~-~--- - ..---------- ---.----- ------------.-- ---;z..-'
3. Chilccare Faciliti~s
-- --..----.---------------..---- ------._-Z -----
4. Bi cycl e p-a~-~---------.-------..---~----n..-----~~u=--r=_==_-
- _._ ----;1- _ . ___..
5. Recycling Facilities . .v
6. Handicapped Design Features
~t--
7. COPlmercial Support Proximity
_L_____
- -------------------(/ '2.)
C. liousin'l (',laxi:nullI of 30 ('oints)
1. 11iddle
2. f'lodera te
3. LO\,I
4-
_/2_(1'
___4~__
Bonus Poi nts. ct:>
---------1.-:--~_ ~ _-_.:E~I_~~~~;~ q f I f?~ p!l4!, ___ =~=_-~-~_=~
'l- t;o('; ,,~. h (l.\li",,,.,,/J +.__C~,It{~~~_________
----2 - II/,)l)"-'II,",6'-L-~___----.:..___u__
Sub Jotal of Above Points
TOTAL POIriTS
--l2-i-
('wA
Nal'le
-
-
Recor.!r~cndeu Point Allccation
Residential Proposals
Project -;; f'
...1 -d //
/
Date _ ?7!4 -r~/~, /ilB
A. Public racilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per reViel-1 element).
1. ~ater Service
~---
-- -~--------_.-
----------~--_._.-
.~---_.__._._~--~_.~----._--_..._.
2. Sewer Service
____---1____ _
--._-------~---~--
3. Storm Dra i nage
__-.,3___
~--------~---------
4. Fire Protection
/
--..------.-.---------------..--
~--'---_._'_._---~-_._..-._-_._-_.._._-_.-
------_._- ---"---- .-._._-~._._----~._.
5. Parkin'l Design
_----7__
------------.-------..----------
------------------
6. Roads
-__.--V.._____
----------------------~_.__._~-_.-
7. Enerrc/
____3___
--------
-----------------------------
---.-----.--------
~b
/
/7
r'2--
,.':., .....
~
,
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximuM of 14 Doints)
1. Public Transportation
~___L-
2. Police Protection
3. Chilccare Facilities
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities
----~ -
______6__
--.----1----
_____ I
----------------------
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
C. Housing (r.laximum of 30 !:>oints)
1. i1i ddle
2. r'1oderate
3. L0\1
______L______
___I
(~1--- q
-_.__._~-
____l.:?:::-__
Ib 1-1-
J
Sub Total of Above Points
4~
Bonus Points 4 .
,;;~GV:Jr7~~.,k.
TOTAL porrns ~~
Name
c-:L% J .{ j::...J:,
Recor.!r~elld2(j Point Allocation
Residential Proposals
/
Project 7Oj? .:;F dlli..1-
Date
~/Ifhc:f
A. Public racilities and Services (I~aximum of 21 points - J:1aximum of
3 poi nts per revi ow e 1 Ol'lcnt).
3_
1. ~ater Service
._._---_._---------_.~----------.... -----
2. Sewer Service L
------ '..-
3. Storm Drainage
___2-
4. Fire Protection
-----~-
~________.____.__..~_v.__~___,_.______.~._._~..__._..
5. Parkin'l Design
___3 ___
--------~-----_._----_.__.._._---_._-~---~.,---_.
6. Roads
-----~ --
-~--------~_._~---------_.._--_._----
7. Enerrc/
____L_
--~------_.-
----,
CJV
. . ..~lI> .L
f' ...~
'~...,,,/
B. Social Facilities and Services (~aximu~ of 14 points)
1. Public Transportation
/
----
2. Police Protection
3. Childcare Facilities
4. Bicycle Paths
5. Recycling Facilities
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity
--;-
z
--=:_~
z..
_-L-
C. Housing (r.laximum of 30 points)
1. iliddle
2. lo1oderate
3. Low
-_:~@
------~- -
__...1:1.____
---rtGy-
----~---
.
. ,.....,
,
Sub Total of Above Points
Bonus Points
4??
.r;-
.. 1.1
," ""'tI(!..
- Il/;IJ'- .' r~
2-- f" i 'I ~ ".I .,...
"11.1- . '
I ..., ' :.A,'l.J'
I ),.w L '
,p......-.. r)J~
TOTAL POItHS
Nal!1e
(.,-I, r ~) II"~: '5
elf
"~
. , ,J'
I
, -
Project ~N.Jf__ Date jJj he. 78
A. Public racilities and Services (maximum of 21 points - maximum of
3 points per review element).
,i Recor.!J:1ended Poi nt A 11 ccati on
Residential Proposals
1. Hater Servi~e
:3
2. Sewer Service
3. Storm Drainage
::3
-.-----
4. Fire Protection
5. Parking Design
"5
6: Roads
"3
------------------.--..-. ---_._-~-- -----_._---_._--~ _._-.--
I,
7. Energy
3
B. Social Facilities and Services (maximum of 14 Doints)
-",.",,,,'
1. Public Tr~nsportatian
2-
._.._._-
2. Police Protection
.
__-L-___
3. Chilccare Facilitip.s
2-
__ _u___ _ .__
.--------- ----
_._-----~-_.~._----~.-~-
--------------.--.
4. Bicycle Paths
_l____
.-.:.---._---~...._--_._--_._----------
5. Recycling Facilities
--~-----
6. Handicapped Design Features
7. Commercial Support Proximity -
--1____
'0
C. Housing (maximum 'of 30 points)
1. i1iddle
2. r'1oderate -
3. Low
J-/ \-r~
IL f \--<,
- -----7 G- - ----
, .
~
-----~._---,--.--- -..-------~ - .-, _._-_._. --.- - ... __'_._ __ __._ - ____..,-0.-.___
--.--------- ------~..._--_._._-. --~---_._---_._.--,- .----.--.--. - _.- ---._-'-'~-- .-.-. ,..--.
-----.----~--..---,--.-.---.---- --" -_.~ ___. .-__._._____._______, 0-,.-'
- ------'.--.- --.--.----... ~ . '--'~"""'.-_ - ~_. ..._ .....__. . "_..r". _. _~_ _'_ --..',_ '.__ ._,
Sub T~tal of Above Points
Bonus
Poi nts I
'rrJ Cr-( ,'c-
. r
-:")c::c.. L C<J..
-~--
,r-:'OL-C-
3
I
TOTAL porrm
Nal!1e
LtA-cL
'j
47
~-
7.0 '
!:U:r;!~Li:lf:tl(;('d P1)ir~: 1\11(,: i'l_ ic;t\
l~r\c.'jd(\J'IL'i(:'1 fT();:'i' !l~,
1)1' \))('C t
TOP OF MILL
O<.J Le
February 22, 1978
.-- . -." .u___. .. . * "__HO'_.._..
p\. Pu;')"li:: rileil itic<; ;::t1d ~;(:I'\,jCljr)
3 [i(.;iit') W)~., !~cvic\',' (.'l(:r:i(':l-:~),
('-'1"'-'1"')-
;,", /, ,1,1:')
of 21 po-jilts -~ 1;]'~Jx'iniu,:: of
1. ~ater S0r'vi~~(~ 3 pts.
h__h_.___.._.~ .__
P.r:oj_e~_t_pr_opo_s_es _ _the__~~~s t~u~tio~ ..of a~ _ 8" _~a.~er. ~ o_op___~~tween
Mi 11 & Mona rch St!_eets_~.. Impr?Y~s.._~erY~~_~. t()_~r:ea._ _ _
2. S(-'i',I(T Serv ice ___l_pt.....
Mill Street line is bottleneck at Trueman. Major deficiency.
--. _._--~..._---_.. - - ---..-'. -"-',.--, -> -- - -. - -_..~--,- ... - ". ~._.~ - --.-~.. ---....--
.-----.- .,. .-.'.-.-.- .. - -._- ---.' -._---,- .---~..
3. StOr-i;l [w(drj0~]e
. ..-."- "- . -------..-.-._,_._- .-. -." "'---~-'-.-.., -..-, -._-.--..-.
-No problem
._,..,,-~.._. ---,-_._~._._._. ,..-.. --..
__3..p.ts,
..,. ---~--. -- -' --~'---~-' --. -_. ----,--- -._--,-- -"'
----. "-~'-'- .-.. .-.-____.__'.n.__.__._
, - "-".''''---'-''._._-. . ~._.------
(. F'i!1~: h'c;tectiOl:
Access & FtreFlw_s
_ .1 Jlt. .
5. Pi:r'L'inq Ul':-,i~jl!
3 pts.
Excellent underground
6. !\(),':(;::';
I~portant_new link between Mill & Monarch
3 _ pts ~
>'. ['1 I ':'j .~;.\:
- ~roper geQgraphi c or:i_entation, more than
and solar hot water. heat
3 pts..
adeqyate insulation
TOTAL PUBLIC FACILITIES & SERVICE porrns: ~P,ts.
F}. pJ':7
n. (~(J:.:ii:'1 i,ICi I it1(', dnr: ~A.'\'\,i; I"; (:';;))'.:1:]1':'1 elf )/i ~.I()liI!,"')
1. Fuh'iic Tr;.Ul;,:':}1"Ci1tipfi
Provi des new 1 inks' between Mi 11 & Monarch
2. Poiic(' Pl'oLpctiun
.
No impa<:.t
3. Ch'i'!(:cJi"C f<lcilit';(;:J
Employee building provides service for project
4. Gicyclc Pi~tltS
5. Hpcycl-in'J FClc';lit-ies
Bins provided on site
- ~._,-,_..--~-.- .-.-,--- P' ___" _'._ ..,___._..__
6. ];(HI~licappcd 1': 'S'I~-J:l h'i.:t\!r'~~:';
MeE!t~U._B.C.
I. eee 1~\~'Ci~11 Su )i)J~.t Pr'D>:il:~;'".'/
reasonable walking distance
.'..-- -...
SOCIAk~J\CU)TIE~&SERVIC.E.S TQJAI- POINTS ,.~ . C{q
C. .! :C'" ii. (ri, '. j,"i" "i :;(1 "";:::-)
J. ; " ! ,: ( ~ '! t '
:) VU;ii"i'dlC
J. l. (~,;.,
46.2% Low income and 15.4% Moderate income
TOTAL HOUSING POINTS - 16
2 pts.
:.1 ptL_ _ .
2 pt.
.,- -. . '.
___tpt..
1 pt.
_Lpt. ..
1 pt.
)(p
I~
'I .~
4pts
12 pts. .
SilL> Trrf,:1 ur /Ii)(,"" 1\,iIlL',
42 pts.
GonT:, PC.'! nts I,!
If
Ii
TOT/\I I'J I ,iTS
42 pts
l
"
:
00
I~ ill' lce \.
"
---....-...-----.- I-
I!
,
.'
"'
CITY ~'Dt"",,-ASPEN
,,'~-ir~(:.
1 3 0 S o,."".,k"-"l.": "~'l:~. S t r e e t
aspen, 81611
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 26, 1978
TO: Dill Kane
City Planner
FROM: George Newell
Fire Marshal
RE: Cantrup Application
On the 18th of January, 1978, I inspected Hans cantrup's
Continental Inn. There I found electrical code, building code,
and fire safety code violations of such severity that I was forced
to close a portion of the building to protect the safety of the
public. On the 24th of January, I re-inspected to determine
compliance with my orders and found that some of the rooms desig-
nated as employee housing were being rented to out of town guests.
On the basis of my first inspection, I request that you
table Mr. cantrup's request for allotments under the Growth
Management Plan until such time as he completes all necessary
fire and life safety corrections, since Mr. Cantrup has demon-
strated such a gross disregard for the laws governing the use
of the structures he has now constructed.
On the basis of my second inspection, I suggest to you
that there is no basis for a good faith agreement with Mr. cantrup
since he has demonstrated a mis-use of the allotment and zoning
system as I understand it.
GN:mc
-<.~
REFeRRAL
TO: Aspen Fire District
FROM: .Aspen/Pitkin Planning Office
RE: Analysis of Impact on the Aspen Fire Department
DATE: _
The Aspen/Pitkin Planning OFfice is reviewing a development proposal,
and requires an analysis of the proposal's impact on the capacity of
the fire department facility by considering the ability of the Fire
Department to provide fire protection according to the established
response standards of the appropriate district without the necessity
of establishing a new station or requiring addition of major equipment
to an existing station.
The attached application form identifies the location, size and type
'of development. Please review the application and indicate the category
of impact below.
Project:
DF AA,~&-
Referral Submission Date: , l.f F.J-7fJ
ToP
The proposed project will have the following type of impact on the capacity
of the Fire Department.
()
Negligible impact - substantial excess capacity
exists to provide fire protection according to the
established response standards of the appropriate
district without the necessity of establishing a new
station or requiring addition of major equipment
(such as hydrants, wet standpipes, etc.) to an
existing station.
C/
Moderate impa~ - only moderate capacity exists to
provide fire protection according to the established
response standards of the appropriate district
without. the necessity of establishing a new station
or requiring addition of miljor equipment (such as
hydrants, wet standpipes, etc.) to an existing
station~
~
Substanti aU1pJ1_c.t~ - thi s developmcnt wi 11 over-
burden the CilpilCity of the fil'e departmr>nt to pl-ovide
fire protection according to the established response
standards of the appropriate district. without the
necessity of cstahlishing a new station or requiring
addition of major equipment (such as hydrants, wet
standpipes, etc.) .to an existing station.
---------,----_._----_.,.._,,--~~..._._---._~._---_..
Si'lllilture
......~~. ...
--'- - _.-.----I~i;.J75
-~._-~..~,--------~_.- --_....-_...-- .
RCF ll'.iU\l
._ ___''___.'._ __ '_n_. __._~__'___'__~~__.
TO:
!,,~\!J('n : .~ :,_:~o;go "[oj L-,r;
\1-) 'Liltic;i"
'; f: l--i' L
FRO:1:
J\spcn/f"itkin rl.;)nn-i\'lq Office:
1;[: l\naIYo-ic; of 111i~ilct c:: S2"liF1C Tllilt,:,enL Ccp2c:ity
01\1"[:
February 5, 1978
.._"__ 'H__"._,.____n___.. .._..~_.,_._..__..____.___..~.__..______~__ ._._________________ -- --- .-.. '..'_u'_ .,...--------'~ .
':h~ i".:/Pi:..::;ii Pls.nn'ln~] Office is r-rviev,"lnq ;} c:C::\li:1U\J1T:cnt propo::.;al ~
and r 'f:ulY'[-_:, i)r' (_In(,_-ly~,':s Dr the n\~oDu(:21'~; ir:~pi:1C~~, Qj'\ the Ci':'l(~city of the
Su,:';:qc t~C:(j'L;::_<it fltC~ \"1 1:</ con~)'ide)'iilj C>:CE:'S':, CC:i:"icity of '~h(: SJ'stCni~
loc() tlO(1 t:!I~' r:f:~::.'(;~-;t t\"uni: or cC;-ln(::ctin:J St''''l':-~r' l'ir:'~'~,
Ti~e :.:tr,::.''";
n': dC::'vL'i
d 2lpp'licat'l(i(l 10('):1 identifies the lo:.((:ion~ size:
.". P'lc;J:;e l"i:~v-iC'..J the C:P1Jlicutiqn ()ndit;d;cr:t..E'
,
(inG
tlic
type
c.~~L-cqcr-'y
OT i ~,"( [>1:'iO:;I.
P:'C,l'r:-' IQQ.,Q.tJv1ill-Ls.ubm.i tted by Copland... Hagmal4...Yaw.::_architect.sJ----_
Refcrr21 Submission Date.
FebruaryH d978_______________
Thz: P;"O\"lIY:f:U project \'J111 h;:;ve the folloviing tYf1-:; of iin;)act Cri the copi'~c-it,>,
of th::; S2VJJge trc::{:~trnent system.
/--,
...!
l'n['ll'n~r'l(' 1"")\::'1"1' cl,~1,...1'..,r'J"...'-.1 oVcnc,s C-",-,r1't'! c'f,"I~~l'':''
_~".i..~_~J.~,,'~~_~_...!.;_:.t':-~I.:__':" - .)_J~"",.u iL~l; l:," _:-~. , (..~.c,'-- , L, .,J
at t,he se\,'i:1ge treDtry.?n"t planT. 0tlO ilL: t.;--;: n~2drf::'=---t
trllnl~ or connect.i riQ se\"i~;-> 'I-j ne to accor:-';,IC 'Le thi s
d(~v(: 1 op':>,cn t.
/-:J
!"ig_qe!~_il',!:,~~jJ).1.'-'.}_~,~~_ -- oilly Plodci~(:tte capr',~l L-r' fi"lr.ts at
file' "('\'~""'::l ~-IO(',"'.te'..""-I-l- ',1"'11"~ "',,'--' .~l-I'o tl"'-' II"",->o,-.t
v' ..) ..,,<:'-~ \, :.,t -,,,~.I l. fl. G t, lJ. C\ U i", LV: '-..-n.~;'\
trui"ik or' CO!-r:H~cti r(j Sf;\/C~" 1 i ni:: to arcon~:-"",:.j~~te tlri s
ch--]vr'l O\-::lie:lt.
&1
.~iilij~~U~) !:I.r~ .0J__ililllt~,~_t. -\~l'i s dt~\e 1 C;)nI:~n t.. \,) i 'j -I . O\{ et- ,
b:)tC~C:li r:nc Capi:l.C1l.'.,' o~ thr~ ~;C','.i2f' trecn_('i,<.nr., ~jlanL
or thc~ Ile(~rest t'l L!i"'!:: CJ!"' conne:..: Li ng se\'!et I 'i IlC~.
_ TO ,He:: /'-t 1"-'- 5,n. <~6--r
C():;l:~lelits: .....f:_!::!!_L::!J.._L___;i-'J._~_{_c-I:: _--L_~_~~_~s..l,4..~L-r 1\ JI:.. i" E.~... ~ A - AS
t-{ ,..,6-. 1--1-1 (C(4 IS A-/'!>o ~ I S'r-r: t:.e:e:p j- rile: /'1ll>b"~ OF /'7''-<-
.Al:..:L.-.__ ~ [I..- .____- ,,_~.. ,':"'1 f ,- - h. --L.~_J. .$:,:" 1 ~. ,..." # .. ~ - _J._~__L I-----,-i - . . .-
ST7t"~F-'r A, A HA~/-Iu"','=- ;rv~l {~L:~o>- THe I'~o:re.c.r
/\ ~ - L'" ---'....._-LI ~__:z _..~_.~___ <J:..J..------oL-..,.L.L- ~ ..... . . ~ v,~-,I-, '_.L:_ J ~ ~,,\
4-0 CA ./0;-
Ii"___~ ~ ~ __ _ ~___ . ..Jt!.~___/:1j_~'"___._r:A-€E_L__'_=_L!':cE__A "/"'/1 "-s,
TO. _ _ t'Li;;___I:i/l v,t-c..b___f:..'?_:"/} "-i"'_'7.!>. ___~..U_H 6__J'3:,.,U_"i2_tvl?_~ 1"'-____ "-He.te.~
Si'PI,:lII:C _~_~.._A-s..b--.h-~&--- _ IU"[E.(L~~_('f >V
[>A sse, THlf!iJv;': N- r H (':
TeV~/'-?A_ s '-"'t~~/""'lrlc)~'
.sTE f's
;1
Ii (2,:':'
'r /-11 .s
f!,F.O:I1-"- rAI""C:;- /3'1"
rrlC
/)/Srl€-/cT TO
//Vv/3 Irl "'-t'trr,:
r> (lLJ ,. <-e "1
:"1- r-::a.
7'0
C DNe
v ~ Jo,,-t/1-J fOe) S~I ~'-c:.. ~OL""'I'''''.
T- . .. . Ii .I ......~ ;&, - ~
;.. .!. , , .~ s. ~ . ,-~-
/1 ^ I
~ . r <= ~ - y , ~ If
..t ~_
A... _
J
..
,
,
, ,
, .
s.
.....1. ...
,-
I r ..
pL--lIl--r CAPAc'T"/ / S
SvFF ICfC_,
jf'-"C'.."
H!'[- i_'r~i(flL
.......,
, /
__ _~..._..._____.____. .....___ _. .__.._ __.,__._~__ _._~_ ._. n' _. _ ...__._. _.
"10:
A<;pen Ci ty [-nu! r:c~!'r
Ff~(j>1 :
f\s pf'n! I' i t!-:i n [>1 ijf]n -i n~ DYii U:
r~[: Analy:;i~; of Irnpi1ct 011 SLorrn U-~'dir:.~j{J'~', 1\~_rL'inj Dl~S'i~Ji-l, and ROi:l(:
D!\T[ :
.- ---_.----. ,,---.,-.------.-- "---.---------.-----...--.--.- _.~----_.._-_...._--.... .---- ---....------- .-_.-------
Tli.:: !\'~pcn!I)-i in P'[ann'in'j 0I1'1c(\ -is rr-:-\'-i:;\'jing a dcvs'lcr!nent pro;~'osc'l)
(And U'i~-(?C; (:fl a.rial.vs'is of .the prop(,_;:_~: IS'; cL en t;i(~ c:i]J::Jcity of
~)tOI';'t inDf.i(:~ por-i:.iriq (i :,i~jtl~. Clrid :. bv C0f(,,'!0El'-infj c0pi:\cit:y
of tk: dl'(l-in:-' fi:cilitic::; to {Jckc:IH-cely d-i::; c of the Sll (jce ru::oTf;
CC:'i F.u~;'-;nc} t d~'sir(~l.,-)':-itj' of the ocslgfi ..st.re<:;t jJ{JTkiny 81'2;:IS;
and cC!J!s-idc;f'ing the Cdj;ac'j i:J' of rnJ.jc)( st{'c-'et linkc:_Uc.
The ~;tterh(-:d ({i-;plicc,t'ion L-~nri -idc~nJl,;fi2S th0~. lor:(;,t";cn, sizc: 2nd type of
.dt'\:~lO[>;1l-::'i"l:. F-i2a~::e rev'iC\.'l thf' dPf'liCution and -inc!icatc the catC::9or.V
of FlI;)2lct bel m-,: ,
Project: _________.JJl.I1l..Q:Ll'1i.U--LSuQll1j tte9__Jll1_~~lJ:)1i!D.ch_JJA.9m1lJ)-,-law(arch; tects)
Rdenu 1 Submi ss! on DJtc: __.February14 ,J97.!L__________.________ ----------
Tf!o proposEd project \'Iil'] hliVC the f0r;U/!'ing type of 'impact en the CDp2cit,j'
o'r-:
STODJ.'[ D:)!\.IN/~,G[
jf
N::-.: ,'ii(jlble i rf-.. s'lbS-l-~ld';;:i p'u.(',::r c?!'lci1-v px" t..':;
_;~~ .'_"__;':' .,...u ~o"~'.-' -......-.,.)..).)(.. '., ~
)'0;" di'~i,j na~je C-111 ::H:;S 1:.0 l;(j(':qtJ(~t:;l'y (1-: :;pose of 1.:1,:2
sur-f2cc runoff of thc~ proposed d:?vel (:p:l1cnt \\litlwu;-.
syst'- cxt.cj:~)'ions bc.)''():~d these noni'a.~I'ly instcdl Ll.'/
the t; 1 or>_:.:r-.
CJ
~_ ") "I'I"l'\~('+ _ on1 \I 1,':;flf'Y"-:-o c--..rl'.'c--i ~-v nyi c'ts -rrl~~
. ,_. I.'.J:_~. -:.':~ ; l ') 1__ \. "" t... .n,..(j ,_ \,_,_, ,-_, _, , l '. ,
'driJ, iL~_;l= i'liL-j(':; Yo (,dcq'~I(~':.('l}r disp~)~',.:l llf the
~)Lir'f::,,-:c: runG of (: pl~(lpV, d,~v(~lc nt \.;ithcui-.
sysL'" E);ten.iol-iS bC~.'y'Ot,c1 thl'..SC: :lG1'n!~:11y 'ii.;~-;tLlll('(.! L1J'
the L: I OpL::
n
S~'!~LsL',~ntii'11'j ct this dcvclopmcrlt viill (;vcr-
bUI"{:(-';1 1 Ci:~]i1C Ly of the dl'iJinaqe faci'litics to
ddequl:'~cl~-.! clispu:-,-.~ of the slll'f:1cC nrnl:,ii7 of the
r1)"opn~<'d ~pv()'lo:;:'>:-'llt \\'ithout :~ysti:'nl l.;x'Lc'ns;oi!s
beyot"id 'Uwse riOri:l(t'! iy ;nstzil'led by thE dc'vi.'lu;:!('l'
C~,)TI~S: ._.Me---~---~----~-~~
~.t:::. .'ft::~tr:_~~
=:iJ,~~:~:.._._~=:::. ...
."._._.____...._..____. _______n._"_.__.__ ~ -------~.-
-I -
/j
x
/j
""..."
.....,
'--'
pr [' II I "
:\. d ,,:
i 'j! '~ T I" ,
. ,,,':' i
N[: l-j r:-:! -,
',' dJ',I,llt-'
"f ur tri':_: (f:~'("
tC' "I (Pi L)
') VI;, ,; 'j ~
iJnd St11ct,'",l'
(~/: ; 'i ';
li!I';
.,';r'lii;-'! .
. ,J (..-xce' ,. ~., - '
'(.f; i I .' '.) (.C'ti(j(i t"'y
. r "! WI ,),"" : .:' f''i. i', !.,;
C:i P'i'ifJj . ' ,.d" ~'!I':'iL l"i" ,,,~
.,~, ~,Ut-rT-' ....', '
"..'_' ~ c(.'nvl'n'~, (;:1'.
..1 \.n
, t
riff
. l'
<.:I'jll
L ",
t1.orJ~'!';; ,r.'
;:: Lij r:-!
1.1", ;(,
) 1 ~I (I
to vi c_'" -, ,
. r (i ',.:: "~ 1.' ,! 1 I ,~. '.
a.! ~l __)0 i {, (\.' f ., .
"J ;)~ r C~ <
~. 01: 'ly
C.
.(r.-,(,:)';-_I'" '" .
_ _ c(; 1;;'("11' I' - .
., _' ~. ~ _j' (,y l' j
I'r' 1r'n OJ ."..,....s fo'~
. ,-::. I:) c. r,'-:i; .:: \: -j -I~' .^., I
'-' 1)('1/",1 .' "I )1'(-)'\-:>'--'"
, .\. Lu S LJt f . ,., . .> ,''--~' (
. ,(.,_,', CO:lvcjri(~)'l:C~
_J, t 'i"'~ -!
I';',')U:, ;
Subsl,-, ;',-!- ~ '1 .
-b~-' _,I, <, I (!, 1
v '
'" ,; L~ cc
]Jor\'i ,'r' -
~ ' .I:; ur~~()s \"/i';-~
Ot rii.lV;"t-: "." J' .,d
_.... ~) dr' i' bee: ,
.. th'i" dEI'"'l
f - 'L OI)IIIP'l'" '
or thp cJ'-,"," t" ~-I L. \'Fj 11 oV".j,..'
,'M . - 'on' I (Jli 'rr OJ ,,"
, .'" i-' r .' ,,01 I -' tt" t
v L,I "1' _, .' ,'0
Ce,]"c". ., Jlwl H,n"..,---
. .11(,tiCP ,e'I-)rl _ ,.. "i \ ,-,l_~ n[',:n'.lnt
~ ..., U (:>'(-" +- " ,'-'
..}(!.I v</ exits.
CCl'1jIW:'l':ts:
/7'- 0 -- -- -
V~~~ -- '
___ ___ IV. -- ._~
____ __ __~ _ "--~.,._ _____ o-n.
....~..... -, w.__ <-,_~ ~c.,..
u ~"~ _ ;;:t;;-f;zf:;:--f:L=-~
___._..__......____ -Urr~~--- __._ ' J~.~-.-iJ
>A
o
CJ
Rnf''''''''
.!..y:'~:):)
NC01". ,.,
_,.__>"_..,l,t! I',; € irll~ ;:-'
to ptDV r:-;~--~~~~:; , - subst.-""JL-i-'"
1-1""" ~.., 'J( ti'" " ' "," ," I excc
"nr,,'- ".' ... 11',.Sri' ,.f'-h, -' _,'ss C.WilC''-'' -
,,+,,":,l. ..;,uCls::2nl.,",.1'1' ,:,) VI ,.,Il: (Irono',,".'.d tJ~' 1_,~,\" 2X1StS
,)dLL",,'F' I..' ,1,'., r e 'Q -
" 0' ( 1 J GJlf'J) ""I . ,,- p'{c:I'-'''' '
01' tlt.,~ ,; . lve:--, ",t." :,- li\, P"lst" -.~- ,-!/yij(-"Ylt
, ' . _' _" I r:c- T"C' ,-,.
d"t: nec('~s-jt\' f' ,I~' 1_~1(-" CY'l,t'" J ...lc1jf'IC
an!/u~ I'".-~" .' lJ. .)!'ov.". J lr'" st"e""
, ,,(~llln_"\-.II,'.',.'.~,., t j )'_';/;'-1 "'I'~ "~,' -,"L s'-'st"
_' . " ',r" , . , ,-"
"" . ., ' ,_ .,,,SeD rued -,,' ,"'"
'- ],,1 i (~ll 9 (-.'
Hodp)~;'l-:-.'~ :.
11'ec~~~s:-(~f: -P~~'~1~~.t - lil0dc~r'(i.tp r':>!-' .
alh' ,1,,_ prlll'(I<;' - ,_u:JaC1ty ("""
....er inn P'l"t' ',' '~-. llcv;:'l .t ._"I,)l:S f'o',' t"
tl .' ,_^ ' 'I' , ' II'" II"
Ie ["-i'" . ,],) 1_1'2if-i~' . \'11 cI,c," ( c"'- "
Pr'O\I.<;_.':,l.d:9 str-cc.~t ~..yd'- p,_,ttITIlS 01' ~~,:,::;ustanti(111Y
".1!..1 111"~-'-"" ",.".0," 0',- +'-, _"U I (j(1ciinq'
_ ,.~, l.V'-.I.J(l ~, l.-JI~ 1'lnC"""'"
_ '_" I o--..r .. _: -I " ,-'.( -. '0-' - f .
ud !:i I C(~C\:~ ;v ,I ~--,. I l.j U
_,. (',Il'",/ UI~ 1 '---'; l
'-., l,lCr1dlj( l
,?ub" [(!!','I '
b"UrC!c:II,'~__~l!'I'p,,_ct "" this Uf'li0 -
or t",-.:. ' CC1PUC t\f oj- t~-. ~"': I upment '
I" ol'c"l ,. J <it' ("n" - \;111 over-
or tl,,:- ._1 u(J(llr~q or ,'1--' _ ,.",JL'lng 'l\'1''-'
" 11"C"-' '+ .I~ l' 1'" !" IC D""
and/or 1;~"l.~J.)l t,y of pruv_ldl.::",'~inJ strcc;'L cvs.\i t,l.LCrnS ~
"d tlten(~r""" liJ lnr~'::-!"'\. .." ..JJ' .,em
. ",.., "">c,, "," ".j ."
C"..,,,ot,, _.~._ """"
_l Vv1 __A /' vi --~ .-,--
.J..(':2~'-~__'_~~'~ k.eJ
_~ ~ ~__~~4'JL.,
:;::i~f-: .e.f-~ ,~~-~~?~
.,_____ .. _._._ ~_~~Jl~
r\\to __~/;3 !z!-~-
Si -
~ ,~!!hitLJre
2
I" [ I,': 0 II t, Ii Ii :j "
nl:
Cit .,'
.-' " \,1;:.".. I;,
, ,::: --~ r i '~.
{I:.l:;.,j 1'~n-\.(U"i.l'i-iL.'ti ~:(:;f!;L .1.iU\'i Chr;-'i_"i,:t
!\:lr;(':'1 T\'-',i'l~, ,ini"t.:lt-i C:l [ i'\~ .'tn-:~..l' L
Leu:n)i '''!;"i'''.)('-l.-i-t.-: :;' !~:-:::":i:'
~, i\j'\~; {,;~ IJC .. r i: /..'[It
I~:; r' i ;"(-' ! '1 '; ~\'-i ct,
1\.:;f:C'11 C-i c, i nc:c\-'
i'i'j:,"n Ul::'!in'inl] ()i'fic::~
1',_:
Grc',d i~;l
I',
it fJ 'I (]ll L:!::~\'c 1
t rl'ojc(":t:)
i [.;
FcbY'L:,:'
,
! 97L(
_.____ ._~~. ....~_ _ ~__ _,_,__'__~"'U" .. __'0'_',_,_ ~.___.._..__,,____'___~"'___'_'____'__'~' -. --.. _.-_._..~,.-- -.-"---
()12
iC!l \~( '0 ~\lbmitteJ 1:0
2::tr; 1 i c. ; t: c v~~,~ \';,i:'j ch
:1 2".;;;i',o;n1- P'l n (T:';
r i-lt~:, i:l lL :~~!t..\:
~_., 1.;";! n 'j :-j
PO] ;>~\S(~ 'r'>:d ;:;ti:.::ehe( n-l i>:: p;,,::j(;ct~;
C'f~'jcc bl'lic;rjl 1 ~ 'l:rnj, (_,flt_1 ;'''.:', ;'1("'
, '
fit'>: I}' 2\(.1 (( Ci
LI(::: are: ~(?n
(Dch
i:-i:
In
i;
,.," r
':~, '-, ;".",
l:o h!~\
i-":"\'! r
t;\bt d::-:ltt.Fi~:~i:~ \\,,;
V,I..,
;"_':.., ,~; LS
i::,:(/ ;1 d \' 2 C,
Ci :~~ lH'0(!:Y3(:d
,+ t di"\:: ; l;,
c;,~ \,:-~ 1 c: :.'i'",- ,-:~- C'!;
i,l....
Tri(:~-"(' (ir{~
',-,/()
,or
',; ~ ':'
,I;
'" :,:--: '-: ~J j ; ,~: .)
ftill u:' ., tho:.::(~ f' 1 r:J.
1 :;"C:S ~ C! . "I ';:, ';j c,,:..
"; c:} t'i ~l'~:;
':-_!. "-<"I' t:'){~
C:{ fi c.:: ~
t>1', i'
iJ::" be (,:'\,:'i,~:
.-.,,-.
{IrO; cJi ::'_C
rctUl"'ii':>:l Ie, i
or (i::, k 'i ,~.~
;2 p! C.n;) i >:.1
'/,,?i" "Lt-i') i~~ ;'.:i(,) ~,'st
::.r" C.iL:< 2J~C: ;,: -i I
, \.:
,.,;,,!i.
Pi'UC( :):) (~}-)P
ti :-;10 ::'C::\'2c!:i'i r?
.~) I
L ~ ;--:;'
fc.t lie>:t yc(~r-.
'n: cdl:~ YO:,),
I):
r
NOTi
Yi_::/\::~: F~;~ rLif\r',~
(~i \" ')'" : i' .
",.\'t-;,'ii t I'
l-".C
,'t
:y:_ ~'\~~ T-~~~ ';> -:i,r.~:
, : :;'\: IT -;-' fli- {;('! ", '-. i :
,- '';0. 1-'. ',r"
\ ':. -,. ~;' j; :.. ;'..'
h:,'LiJL:'!J
TI.';')
'Il: ~ i:
\{\\ ~(.Q
K ~ rl \J,\Ju LV
~o" tl II. ~ ' u c ~ .t (,1
/--- ~~O'-\ I 1,..1\-1 G~ (VD"~ .11
(\ "L.('1. o/'J \)12 \lO(
,<i.lL ,t" - (10"; . f ~bU ~~\l L
~" ()(" ~ I; Tv<
'\1\'" s;~u ~c.'1 I ~I( 1-9-<- ~ _ (
\ '\ I R. J\ 't!) I I" co' \ Q
lA' ~.Q\ \_ r ~ ~Ql>.. \,~o;.. -~,l
.,.\,J \ 1~'1:.. 10"" I ,,--c&- ~s\ ~olL
"'~' \\lC ~ ,il~t. ~p . l~ ~
vI'-I \1'1' \1\ \1~ ~\' t t(~''1
"c-t 0;\ -{ ~x .\,lll.. i ,.-
\0\ ~w<- t1'A"c 'o~~U II. v ~\.\(~\ytll'(
___ v.~\ c;'''\' '\ ,u... (',,\II p~
,I ~I.A. ~ i""~\\JL. '~t'^ I~ . N,..v"~
~\ . ~,"\\ 0' .,.9 iQ~ I': 0 ( .".( .1V I
(LIlYV'" 01\'" \ \~ c1Q (I. \ ~ .II ;:A, v,
') \V-O\I.. \;c.~"l"-"M\'6-\~\,.( C'rLC\/ I~t
,"'.to' \It' ",.t ~ . ).\11
to '\ fl" \\~\h '
e'l. 0 \?e.
tl:C.
- \ \.
\,
q\.~ -\
I'"
\,.~
e"""
I}.
('
---
--
\
RLFU;J:11l
_.. "_"._'__'_ .'_..__.____.u____ _ _ __._,_..__.~_...___'_""_ . .___',__ ._'_____" __..._______M_n..___.. - .----....---.--.-.--.
"TO: 1',::P('ii i;ol-ic.:' D~~nj)r"i::;i ;i:-
FI(Oii:
!I:;pen/i'i tki Ii Pl allni nr, [);ri Cl,
1;[:
fmalysis of Imrnct on l.
1\::PUl 1'0';; ce D2part!nr,'nt
Dl.,TF: :
February 5, 1978
.._---_...-.. ..-------..----.-......-.--..------.--'.. -._,._-'"-~_._- _._..-_._--~-_.._------..__.__..._-_.~. ..-. . .-.-,-------.-
Th(~ /P-;tJin P-lc,n(lin~ Off-;c:;: is reviC;,rinfl a d(~v(\lGr:il-::.~n1. propo::ol,
and r{:'C;Li -I j"l:~~ &n cH,zl.l:/:; i s of' U:e proposer! f~. "ll:ip:-;ct or; the CJf.kcl -i:y cf
the !'olic(-! [!~ cons-;Jt:ri~lq the: c:dyj';ity of o.n')"( in,
rJolicc: s{~cutity :;2(',.'-ic\::s to jj]"\)\i-ide [)('uLe:ction 0c(:()r~.~in~] to rCdsuni:;blc;
l~CS sc st&110aj" ~Ji'lil0Ut tilP ncc:cssity ()f a(i~itiorldl frlcilit'iE~s
P(;fSO:iI:(; ()( eqlj-j (it,
The 2'Lt cd oppl'icclt>ion f()r~i: -ic!~nt"if-ies the lOCitt'lon, size <Jno type;
. of dc,,'r.:1opl!ient. Vl:-:a,se revif:.\'/ the a;)p1ic(1'i:-lon a.nd indicate the catego\'y
of i\;~;(\ ct bel 0\','.
Project: TOE....Qf~ill (submitle..cL.Q.y..iQjU~.n_(iJ'-Clqman, Yaw - archite<;:t;~L__
Ref2n'G 1
Sllbmiss i Oil DJte: ,_!ebruary-14,-J.9]?-~-----__--n----
The ptOrOscd pro C'ct \'/i 11 hi:\ve th~ fo'llo\'iing type of impJ.ct on the C~;pi..:_cit.Y
of tl'i2 Aspc.n (lal C2 Depart!nOllt:
c/
Nealilliblr imna~t - substantial excess capacitv rxist5
C6-I:iSici-cl-~-;"n0 "~li1eH~bility uf current. police ~,ccll>it.\,
serv-;ces to pr'ovide protection occor-ding to 1"(~(:_'-;ori(lh'ie
rcspol;se stc,\lUdt'ds \'JithouL the l1c;cl?ss'ity o~; dOel']..
tionJl fac'llitiess porsonncl or cqL!i t.
C!
nod,ry~a.t(~, iiTir'E~ct - only moder(~tc: ((l.!Jilcit.y exis-Ls con..
sT(re)'^-i-i\g--f\"I;~-i\T)~'il-jty of current pol'ice securi.t.y
services to provide P1"'(;"L.c:cl.ioit (H:co(c\il"i~1 to re6sor]i1b-!c~
respons2 Stl;lidtll~ds \.,'"ithuut the llc:cclsity of ciddi..
tional facilit:if.:\s, pcrsonne'l or E~qlJ"ip:i:E'nt.
/'/
Substantial 'i;:ii'dct - this development I'Jill OV21'-
.GtJ-~~de-i~I.-{1i'L'\ 'b-:(lrt)! of current pol'icL: ~,ecuri ty ~:,ctviccs
to p~~(lvidc' pl'otection llfcord'inc.] to l'c(lson~lblc rl?SpO~lSC'
standi.u'cls \'J'i thout. the f1e;cess i"Ly oJ addi t i on;::J
filCi 1 it i e,;, personnel 01' equi pm,'nt.
g . \{.2 C-\i b~~II\'
C(liiinlPii i ,;: _L Jzs:.ft",iJ'f- .-A'f--)CJ (f.'L"-.___~~_ a<->/ol.0.~!:!::J,L_:'~u+-__~J_~
, ${ LQI.:"). _htill__ ~ _.. _~()-^-=-Q..y._df.~__.1'i__:1! ~___f1-#!9-1j!3 W{-f. -- flG-"."~-i"--~'!.-
L_ ~q(b,~ lit ~:h\l_jf~L_~Jc.~cR. _Il~ _ IH 1'" IiIYS-<.,1 __Jl.I<J<:5)_~__C'~ "tt_ fi~P"-I( I
ItL..:-Ik__jl_Q?~J?-)._ _,J__J)g __ ~J.l.e{-t' p__,!'I___ A1Ltc..~tlt11L__E...o!~e~ (~----
r<,>.o,; _i..,:, L.{l~1-_:.::f(~~,- .__Ji"''c:_LJ~_ _k_~LI t~- ._fu_stu:<:,; rL_ .._- -
Si(II1JiUI,(~i!!~_.______________, Dille "'?f!.Iz~_____u
- 1
]<LFLr::;U\I,
TO:
Ci ty iY; f\,'; !)Cn
ter' iJ:...l~)D) ~-.:'-,( [I t
I-POi'i:
r\s:)cn/Pit~:iil F'lcnn'in~] (jff';,.;(.
R[:
(Hied jsi s of Ti:<E ct. on ti I:.~ C;.: i s t'i "if] Vii) ;,e'f s)!;;i:P.ill ilnd capac i ty
U/\T[ :
February 5. 1978
__~__.__.__._.~_~.___"._._.__.,__~~_._________._.~_._ - __, __._._.______ _,_____.__.,__.___.___._.__ n_
The /\~,~.::,;:/i)i.::k.in r;'jc:nL'irl~: (lfficc is
an~1 reqllir(!!; nr: analy~is of the
01 o,V!:.i"i(::L':c' ','':e-'lel' (J iliipact Oi':
F:E, i I) or c0!'incct-i r:~j '; -j li~'~.
rev j (;~n n'j
D~'):-_ d 11 S i
a cleve: (i!':-i~:nt Pioi-JO::;i; 1
,--;- (0',', -,"-I"i~ ('\/L'I"~::l r-:"~:jr';""
'--'L. v _,,~ ,..i,'.., . I \"_':_[~~' L-~J
\F,tC:-' J r'es:;:.;; c' dF; the liC:"Al'~:-;t \'/!cCY
The attCic 1:1 Jppl-iCr'ltic:n form iCl{:'I.:t'ifif'~
devc'lcl;::!k!~;t. Please r(~'\";2",': tht~ (;,!,1[11 ic(~t~CJ,i
of -j 11';')0. c~. h (;: 0'.'/ .
eio':clt'jon, size zrd ty;:~c [)f
,1!1d ii'idici.l'L.c tile cut~<!O'jA'y
Pl'oj ~~ t:.. TOI?~~ilL.uJJ.bmH!l'!cL-~LCoplanc!.Llil1.!1.Qlm-'--y.a-w--~X-~h; t~cN_
. Refel'rai Sli~n1i ssi 0:1 Deefo :...L@r_lJ.~rL_14._liZ.1L~___~_____. __~________n
The PY-O',~)():::cd Droic:ct h'ill L \i€~ tr;c' fo-ilo\.-riri(j t)"llje of il::,'Jc!.ct on th2
. .~. - ~ ,
capi:}city of the S(~hQg,::: treatr:y?nt. ~ystcrn:
n
Np~f-l';0ibl(1 i:~-!.!,,?:\::t - s'dl)s-l.iJ,n'~-j0.1 e>:cess \';(iter cCl~'acity
e-x-isTs--2-il~T\')-i '1\ not _ I:TS 1y (If-feet \,!2tC(' pres~.u(;:~
in the: vicilrity of U-,e n2i:d"est V!CrLcr ri1J~n or comicctiri'j
\'iatu iinc.
o
I-'ioder;~\t{~ -ir::p.:IC'l .. only liin.;tcd \\j;j.tei~ C2 c';ty 0\i:,ts
-2~r;-cl.\~,.~~-:E"0r---r;\.:e-s-.;': \ !}'::~ \.:i -i -I bc a -rfectC'd 'j rt t lIe t'192,tCS t
v:ater' main or cor:nf:ctir:g V:6"CCi< lii']I:;.
)5-
SubstanticiO! h:i,Fi.ct - th-is d€:\'cJ 'it '11 ove'i'butden
th-(i-~Ti\T(il~.-fr~~~~.:.,i?l:!-.:;nt pli:Jlt 2nd s(~ric'uSI_\' rcd~)ce 'l.h2 //
pro""ut'l' in tile nCilY"cst I'::,in or co,'".: eli:':1 \:at(:,,' -i -inc. ~A/tt~
....
C .
O::11~~e n t s :
_5,~.__~~--~---=----------
___...n________~__ __.__,,___..___.____.__._.~____.__.._..,___._ -'-'-"--." ,---.--------.--.-' --,-,-_._- - -~- .------------.+ -.---.-.-.-
-_._~~--_.-------~-,-_..._---_..._--"'----------_.._._,._._.....------------,_._-,-,-~---_._._---~..._._----
_.___._ _.___._.~_______~.__O'________ ~_.._._ ..< _ .~, __-.-.._ ----- ..__._-- -.----------------.------~----
SO; ~'n0.tlJl.(l
ra7---- -' -.---- -- _____un, _______d
4~"~........
11:tl' d~_Ad
-~-.--....-----~--. <T
.
TO:
Planning Department
FROM:
Marky
DATE:
February 10, 1978
SUBJECT: Top of Mill Project
Submitted by Copland, Finholm, Yaw
The statement put forth under (aa Water System) is basically
correct, however, it must be understood that this proposed
development will have substantial impact upon the main
capacity in this general area. Therefore, approval must
be predicated upon construction of the 8" water main loop
between Mill and Monarch Streets. Construction of this loop
will greatly improve water circulation and provide for
increased system reliability. Therefore, we endorse this
project, if said project will affect this loop and credit
should be given the developer for attempting to upgrade the
water system in this area.
~'ncerelY'
_~ $Utdah~./v~
, Jim Markalunas
Jlvl:jmr
("
.
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Submitted to:
Applicant :
Architect:
,
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
Mr. Hans Cantrup
P. O. Box 388
Aspen, Colorado
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
. .
"
J_.f
.....
....."""
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
INTRODUCTORY
1. Project Name
2. Location:
3. Parcel Size'
4. Current Zoning District:
s. Zoning which Application
is filed:
6. Maximum BuiIdout under
Current Zoning:
7. Total Number of Units
Proposed and Bedroom
Mix:
8. Size of Units:
9. Price Range for Sale or
Rent'
TOP OF MILL PROJECT
South end of Mill Street, City of Aspen
36,000 S. F.
L-2 zone, City of Aspen Zoning Code
(RMP permitted use)
L-2, City of Aspen Zoning Code
(RMF zoning option)
29 one-bedroom units
or
36 studio units
26 units total, comprised of (10)
one-bedroom free market units
and (16) studio employee units
(a) One-bedroom free market units
@ 1,200 S. F. each
(b) Studio Employee units @ 360 S. F. each
(a) One-bedroom units sold at current
ma rket price
(b) Studio employee units rented at
$17,'i/month for single occupant
(c) Studio employee units rented at
$2()()/month for 2 person occupancy
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
10. Program Narrative:
The site is planned to pennit the functional organization of three
basic building groups comprised of low income and free market
units, in a scale compatible with neighboring structures.
Completing the link between Mill and Monarch Streets, as desired
by the City Planning Office, a new roadway easement provided by the
development divides the site into two parcels, each containing portions
of the proposed housing.
The upper (south) parcel contains (10) one-bedroom free market units
designed in townhouse configuration for {Xlrposes individual identity,
solar orientation and to further reduce wilding massing. The town-
houses are characterized by the sloped roofs particular to each unit,
the use of natural stone, cedar siding and exposed wood beams as
exterior materials.
The lower (north) parcel contains (16) studio employee units and day
care facilities configured in a stepped back wilding design to permit
individual unit view, solar orientation and appropriate scale at its
corner location. Wood siding, exposed beams and the stepped back
balcony elements characterize the exterior appearance of this complex.
In addition to retaining virtually all the existing spruce and aspen tree
groups, the finished site development will be completely landscaped
with native trees and plant materials, as existed prior to the early
mining days.
The floor area ratio pennitted by zoning, for this project, is FAR
1:1 or,36, 000 sq. ft. of building development. As designed, the total
project uses only 23,000 s. f., or approximately 63% of the allowed
FAR.
11. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
As shown on the Vicinity Map, the project is located at the top of Mill
Street in the L-2 zone. (L-2 zoning pennits multi-family units under
the same requirements as RjMF roning).
,.. .
, "
~>
,~
(
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
APPROVAL REQUEST
The 1975 Aspen Employee Survey clearly demonstrated that 52% of
the employees surveyed had household incomes less than $10,000
per year. This group is mainly comprised of the support employee,
a significantly large and important group to Aspen's economic
structure. These employees have been disenfranchised by the
unavailability of adequate housing at a price they can afford.
An important aspect of this project is the focus on housing for the
low income employee. Of the 26 total units proposed 62% (16 units)
are designed and designated to meet lower income needs. The merit
of the low income housing provided by this project cannot be measured,
only, as a percentage of total units. Their more important value in
meeting the low income need must consider that quality and size of
space (form) is being provided at rental rates even lower than con-
templated by the Growth Management guidelines.
.
Applying the standard used by the Planning Office, i. e. 30% of gross
income spent on housing, this project creates housing for 24 employees
(double occupancy per housing unit) with a salary of $4,000 per year.
TIle designated unit rent of $175 - $200 per month is significantly lower
than can be justified by normal development economics.
The development form does not create a remote employee section but
rather integrates the employee units on the same site with the free
market units, thereby insuring a relatively high quality employee
product.
This project offers major and immediate relief for the employee
housing deficit at a location within walking distance of all employ-
ment. shopping and recreational destinations. If approved by GMP
review, construction of the low income housing will begin immediately
and prior to construction of any free market units, which will be phased
volunta ril y.
.
In view of the urgent need for low income housing such as this project
will immediately provide, we urge that City Council authorize, for
this project, the construction of additional employee units as per-
mitted by Section 24-10.10 of Ordinance 48. (Series of 1977)
"..,
,
-...".,#
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Surrounding zoning is L-2 except for the R-IS-Lodge area to the
northeast and the city owned ski club parcel zoned fUblic directly
north of the project.
Surrounding land uses are a mix of lodges, multi-family units,
public and conservation lands, and the ski terrain above the 8,040
elevation line. Immediately surrounding complexes are the Mountain
Queen, Monarch 700, Fasching House, and the Fifth Avenue Condo-
miniums.
!
"-,,
H_ tz/~~ =--(:
EXI5Tl>lY MAll.',
IJO(,fU I'MK
J(IftY r.on ~
-->
W5 5TCf'
eo> ram.
t>J'.ANT AVEHLt:
ml'I'Vi ~T
ume flELL UFT
~a.~La:>!"
rmv.w CIlY 1m.
:.
11II W1l"E!I:!.Ii. un
. CD1l'\EI'U\L LGt&l:.
~ LOC&t I
b<J LoreE t
., ,,",
n re;lt:t:IffiI'J--I<;-~
D rm::jf'IJeL1C
Vicinity Map
-.....-
o 200 400
'00
f,oulh
~
,
. .. ~~
I '
- -t-1----
_J l -
,l:.'Jety~
I ST"'T\~
I
~._-
~ ?"!nET
~lW
I !19
iii
e d[ ~
Will
~ 1,,1
, ~ - I': I
cmwJ I ." , '
, I Ii m;:;, I -" Ai' r<o!t".W - UVP ~
~-i" (', ~_~ . "~-"'-'.I . ...-cC~- -?Tt1'"
',! / IIml!~..( ,~~ ..' ~~
,: I ~~... _ _'h~- .'1 ......... \ --1
Uf"Tf.A" j -- r'-l: :11.. 1 '~ '
",I I.' :',' , 'I
?Kl~t'lUIT f""'li I. : I
I j: I 11 I ,S'""Avt:f.llIE. ~
/< .; '" : II
~" G\l!'tIl _.J i_ . ll-- I Jl
-~ ~[11 - ~_:::")
,__ SKI CLue.
~ -~- -.-7. ~"-- -. i
/ ~ OY-" fUTl.J':f.l)~ ;...t'JEJI:: Llt-lE
\~L.. ""'" .,...,
,'0"" ~("~--EXI?1l~"'m.~cxorJ.bE
~4 ~J
\..._______.~~~d\ ':JT(K.#:1:
- --
[j~
I
!Ej
I I
I'W'V5W ro; \..WI"---
tua'l11l: VILlA
I
I '
K.~\..I e>t.lc.K
1
,
-!1.SCf1l1-6 ~
!
Site Context
~
o so 000
>00
-{7
'~l :
'---...,'
~-.
, ..
...
w
a:
..
'"
..
z
...
....
..
"
oj
u--r
mu""""
CON IlNlUIIS
~
D
./
i
"-
MIU STREET
I '
__J
ASPEN INN
I
i
.
o
~
...
z
~-.
o
o~~-~-.,~>\
o
IIIOUHTAIN
QUUN
,.. ....."""
\...
THE TOP
OF MILL STREET PRDJECT
...p.... CoI_ COPLAND
HAGMAN YAW LTO
/111 ARCHITECTS
_" Colo'_
~~
r J-J
rJ
'-----.j.r-.J
11'['-"
, ~iO
SITE PLAN
~
'"
(,.)
.,.-.
....-"
,
I-
W
W
a:
I-
en
..J
..J
-
:E
or
ell...
a:z
lUlU
122
eIlIU
ell
t-.~
...
ROAr/NAY EASEMENT
Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
-
......
I
80
~
If
o 10 20
40
.... '-
} w
W
/ a:
....
en
..J
..J
-
::E
LJ
Underground Parking Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
~
,,,
"'"
,",..'
,....-
14
I
. I
t.
I!
r
I
I
+------
--
PARKING FOR 26 CARS
\--1'".
NEW ROADWAY EASEMENT
EMPLOYEE HOUSING &
CHILD CARE FACILITY
-r--
t
I
I
80
rI.......I
o 10 20
40
I
I
elevator
recycling
center
I
I
\....)
\
I
I
I
,
~
,
:t:
....
:;,
o
C/l
z
o
~
~
w
:t:
~
w
><:
C/l
~
I
I
:PI..~
,. ~-~
~
'.'
r
I
.
.
~-~-
i
I
!
I
'-
~~;
. r_
,'t
~,. I~
.. ;
-I'
f
I
.
z
0
~
w
....
Cii
5
I
r ..
.~:t~. ~
"~"""
, ","~
+-. ~:/7J~
.
ARCHITECTURAL
-~
- -
o ~ 10 20 )0
,
o
I
UJj
,-,
~
STUDIO
1r
=I
~
Employee Housing Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
v
Size 360 8.f.
Rent $ 175 / month
I\......l I
o 2 4 8
I
16
~
.~~+:...
.1E1.~""
.......,....
.........
~~.
~
<)
o rnd1r?
LIVING
------------
~NING 0
i 1r
I
I
L____________
.
Lower Level Floor Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET
Size 1200 - 1400 s. f.
Sale market price
PROJECT
r-"1........I
o 2 4
,
8
I
16
~
'-- -
,....,
~.
. ~
BEDROOM
o
-r-
I
Typical Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
'_/
Size 1200-14005,f.
Sale Ma r ket Price
e
:--..1' I
o 2 4 8 16
,.,.
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
PUBLIC SERVICES
(aa) Water System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public water system to provide
for the needs of the proposed development without treatment plant or
other facility upgrading beyond those provided by the developer.
The project water demand is directly related to the fixture unit count,
consisting of 356 F. U., which converts to 100 GIM maximum probable
flow (2" water service) or approximately 100 gal. /day/person as per
current ASHRE guide standards. Additionally the development is
providing an 8" water main loop between Mill and Monarch Streets
which will enable the water system to provide an upgraded level of
service to this project as well as the immediate neighborhood.
A project review by Mr. James Markalunus indicates that no fore-
seeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing water service at
adequate pressure levels and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity, will
result from the project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. James J. Markalunus,
Aspen Water Department, this section
(bb) Sewer System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public sewa ge disposal system to
serve the proposed development without system extensions and without
treatment plant upgrading.
;___J
The project site is served by an existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up Mill Street and located directly adjacent to the
project site.
,
Top of M ill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
loo/gal/day /person to project occupancy standards of 1. 5 persons
per one-bedroom unit and 1. 25 persons per studio unit, the total
project would generate only 3420 gallons per day. This would
add less than! of one percent to the plant capacity, thus is well
within the service capability of the present capacity.
A preliminary project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(cc) Storm Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on-site drainage
facilities. The project shalllB ve a series of dry wells and retention
wells sufficiently sized to retain and disperse site surface and roof
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have overflow outlets extending to Mill Street. A
planted diversion berm will be created at the uphill side of the project
to divert excessive surface drainage away from wilding development
that would result from abnormal precipitation.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program section
. ,
~
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide fire
response to the project according to the established response
standards.
The project site is located approximately 1,800 L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of 5
minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project site is served by (2) hydrants with adequate static
pressure and a third will be provided by the development. Two
adjacent roadways provide immediate access for fire vehicles.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, completely sprinkle red parking garage and
ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicates no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ee) Parking Design
The evaluation is the design of required parking with respect to
visual impact, exposed paving, convenience and safety.
All required parking for this project is accommodated by an under-
ground parking structure with natural grade and landscaping completely
reinstated over the enclosing surfaces. Virtually no surface parking
exists on the development site. The garage entry ramp will utilize a
snow melt system which will allow vehicle stop prior to exiting and
entering Mill Street. A cedar faced automatic door will be provided
for closure.
The parking garage will be completely sprinkle red to prevent fire
damage. All one-bedroom units are individually accessible from the
garage level and an elevator will be provided for general access to
the upper site level. A second pedestrian exit will allow direct access
to the employee unit complex.
Reference
A. Underground Parking Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(ff) Roads
The evaluation is the capacity of existing roads to service project
generated traffic without substantially overloading or altering existing
traffic patterns.
As shown on the Site Context Map, this section, the project is located
at the top of Mill Street. Directly to the west of the project and behind
the 700 Monarch complex is an existing (dead end) city dedicated R. O. W.
The Applicant intends to dedicate a R.O. W. through the project to com-
plete a loop road connection between Monarch and Mill Streets which
presently tenninate in dead ends.
Preliminary conversations with l-l. J. Stalf, City Transportation Adminis-
trator, indicate the loop connection would be of considerable advantage
as it would allow public transportation service to be provided to the
Lift 1-1\ ski easement for skier drop-off and to the heart of the L-2
tourist zone.
1 )
'--'
,
~
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Mr. Stalf agreed the loop connection could significantly reduce the
current traffic and parking congestion in the area by eliminating the
Monarch and Mill Street dead-end bottlenecks and by reducing the
Lift I-A parking pressures congesting Aspen Street, to the west.
An additional bus stop located at the project, on a level stop and
loading area, will conveniently serve this project as well as the
upper Mill-Galena Street neighborhood.
Examination of the traffic impact to the project is primarily based
on work generated by the UMTA transportation study and on recent
conversations with Mr. Steve Lockwood, Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc.,
Inc., Traffice Consultant for the UMTA study.
The 6.5 trips per unit for this project is less than the 10.0 trips
per unit and one-bedroom units generating less people and cor-
espondingly less trips than larger apartment or condominium units.
Total trips are then estimated between automobile and non-automobile
trips.
The table below shows the trip type and trip frequencies per day per
unit for a project unit, as estimated by Mr. Lockwood.
Estimated
Estimated Non - Automobile Estimated Non-
Trip Type One-way trips trip percentage automobile trips
Skiing/
recreation * .75 60% .5
Work 2.00 75% 1.5
Shopping and 1. 25 75% .9
ente rta inment
Personal 1. 00 50% .5
business
Other 1. 50 ~ .4
6.50 60% average 3. 8
:--.J
*The 60% non-automobile average for recreation trips assumes ap-
proximately 75%-80% of ski trips are non-automobile but only 50%-55%
of summer recreation trips arc non-automobile.
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Due to the project's convenient location to downtown Aspen,
Lift I-A and Rubey Park ski buses, and the proposed Monarch
and Mill Street bus route and stop, it is estimated a high per-
centage (60% to 75%) of skiing, work, shopping and entertainment
trips will be non-automobile trips.
As shown, potentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit
will be non-automobile trips. The estimated 2.8 automobile
one-way trips per day are equivalent to a resident's using his
car on an average of approximately one time per day. The
walking and public transportation convenience of the project's
location plus the project's low resident projection result in
minimal traffic impact created by the project.
Current detail traffic counts are not available for the area to
quantitatively estimate traffic impact.
Reference:
A. Site Context Map, this section
v
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(gg) Energy
The evaluation is ability of the project, its spaces and users, to
maximize the conservation of energy.
Consistant with the solar georgraphy of the site, all project con-
struction will be designed and built to maximize solar utilization
and to minimize heat loss, thus reducing the demand placed on the
fossil fuel resource for space heating. The following techniques
will be implemented in this project.
Insula tion
Significantly exceeding regulatory thermal standards, exterior
walls will be insulated to R=26 to 28 min.; roof composites to
R=42; floor composite to R=20, foundation perimeters to R=14.
South facing view windows (passive solar) will employ a moveable
insulation system.
Architectural
Architectural design configures buildings to optimize thermal
characteristics of the project. Exterior wall exposure is mini-
mized by townhouse conce(X (common wall), and by vertical space
organization (minimum ratio of exterior surfaces per sq. ft. of
occupied space). All buildings are oriented with highest use
interior spaces to the south to achieve view while maximizing
passive solar heating potential.
Glazed openings on non-south exposures will be limited to
Uniform Building Code minimums (to comply with ventilation re-
quirements). Opening surround details will be required to mini-
mize heat loss due to infiltration.
Partial flat roof surfaces are designed for all units to retain the
additional insulation value of snowfall layers.
':. )
---
" -,,-
-,
'-'
J
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Devices
Consistant with solar geograrny of site, solar collectors will be
utilized for domestic hot water heating. Electric energy will be
designated for primary space heating to reduce fossil fuel demand.
(approximately 50% of electric power used in Aspen area is hydro-
generated). Automatic thermostats will be specified to control
night time space temperatures. Fire place design will use double
damper control, exterior combustion air, glazed fire opening,
and heat return ducting. Humidification will be used to reduce
temperature required to achieve equal comfort levels.
Reference:
A. Architectural Drawings; l11ysical Design and Program Section
u
. . '.
W> ram.
/~1<!:5t'J1l>.I
,/ ~!:~
11111_11-'
IIllilJ
--.-
, --:':l:": '.:: ':""i(,,'IF\~
UFT I-WOJ E.W1:~ 0 ~.j,',~2:~!+~.'f ~ ---"""
-~\~"';i "'1' MU5"'ffT
,I
Iii m>.L" S'fF.
ii, Q
(~.Im~ STmGe
1 (:'XISTI~ ~ m>ro:W)
-)
H_ tiL/W>J~ 51J(EEr 1
EJl"T1~ M'U.?
\-J'lif'E1<. ~K
IClftY rn:K ?t1l.TlCl4
W5 ST~
:;u<ANT AYE~Ul:
ml'IV1 ?TmT
U11\.f ~EI.L UFT
!'mlr.W e<b I.a:>r"
Fl'lJfl?'f.D an' 11WL
_ UT1t"C!:LlAL caE
. Ut',~,EI'LIAL LVtGt.
WLJ WX'C I
r;:J LoreE z.
n 13lrorrw.-i?-L..D;;6t
m rI-I('(!f'lJeuc
Vicinity Map
--
o 200 400
'"
'O..th
"V?
, I
. --?'
THI TOP OF MILL ITAEET PAD"ECT COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTC ARCHITECTS . .
a~. ~ A_" COIO~_
~rm<
1 I I I ru""Y !'NOl
-- ~-+--c-- ~ \ 5Wl~ ~
W>1<lW-t - ~ )
o..mrr AIWUE ~ ~ Ii l \ J' \
JIL/~l II
rrav;f.O erN (t 1.1'1 ........................... ....... ..................... ....... ..a.......... .....)
1MI.- _J m I~.~ I: ~~,~ I
'""" ,_, n I 1 tM ~ [',
~~~! 11m
I \ ,I I
orgj lel e l1J ~ltt I! _ ~,~
~'w 'i ~ .', III "I ~_
Q ~ ~ 1 .l ~d' _nvm<a> W-> UVP ~
_ \ll7''''''''''{~~~ ~.:-~-'N~)j.~~/ ?T,,"
!-IFT f-A . '---':c~.!- 01 : L-,
i l'sif I II
::::. BI J,~~~!il ,.
-~~l ~~~--
AFT1'1C-lO?I-l 9'J~1!:'; /. ~ '\.. ~
/" "- ....., II
\~ ~ "0-
''0-'''<9 ~':
~4 (~
'-..:1.
- --
I
I
)
~.. A'iffUL ~
flIT1ft &' ~E~ U~E
EJi?Tl~ ioIATU 5rorJff.
~ 'WAm: 5TOl'A&E
Site Context
r-__
o !to 100 200
",""~
"../i
,__.i
~
-
,/'
PEN
130 s
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the subject
project which I understand to consist of (10) one-bedroom
town house units and (16) studio employee housing units
located adjacent to the Mountain Queen Condominium parcel
on Mill Street.
The project area is presently served by an 8" C.I.P.
water main alignment up Monarch Street terminating
along the roadway at the north boundary of the Mountain
Queen Condominiums and a 6" C.I.P. water main alignment
up Mill Street terminating near the southerly boundary
on the proposed project.
Two existing hydrants, No. 130 and No. 126, are located
directly adjacent to and approximately 180 L.F., respect-
ively, from the proposed project development. Hydrant
No. 126 has a tested static pressure of 63 psi and flow
of 2070 g.p.m. Hydrant No. 130 is at approximately the
equal pressure and flow characteristics.
The project development will provide an 8" C.I.P.
loop connection between the Monarch Street water
main and the Mill street water main which will provide
an acceptable level of water service to the proposed
development. This wil~ enable the water department
to provide an upgraded level of service to the immediate
neighborhood for the following reasons:
1..-)
a. Looped main will tend to equalize water pressure
for existing development served by Monarch Street
main and Mill Street main.
'f
""
1.1
h
I'
"
PEN
130 s
~ '
I
Letter to Larry Yaw
January 25, 1978
Page 2
b. Water is fed to existing development from two
directions.
c. Continuity and reliability of water service is
upgraded. The looped system of water mains allows
continued service to Mill and Monarch Streets
in the event of other unforeseen incidents which
formerly would have caused discontinued service
until repaired.
.
In addition the project will provide an 8" C.I.P.
water main extension up Mill Street terminating
at the southern periphery of the project development.
This will be done to anticipate future connection to
the new million gallon capacity water tank to be built
in Summer 1978 adjacent to the existing tank on Little
Nell. The subject project is located approximately
600 feet from the water storage tank. Future connection
to this water capacity will provide an upgraded level
of service to the subject project, thus no foreseeable
deficiencies provided that looped connection is constructed
per project proposal.
y yours,
M~~~
~.
Markalunus
Aspen Water Department
.
ASP[
SANITATION DISTRlrJ
p, 0, Dos 518
Tele. 915-~OI
ASPEN. COLORADO 81611
Jaouary 30, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P. O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the subject project with
regard to adequacy of sewage service. I understand the project to consist
of (10) one-bedroom town house units and (16) studio employee units.
The project area is presently served by an 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up Mill Street adjacent to the project site. The
present sewer plant capacity is 2.0 million gallons per day (M.G.D.),
and the present load is approximately 1.569 M.G.D., thus is running at
approximately 75% of capacity. A new addition to the plant in 1980 will
increase capacity by an additional 1.0 M.G.D.
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of 100 gal/day/
person to project occupaocy standards of 1.5 persons per one-bedroom unit
and 1.25 persons per studio unit, the total project would generate only
3420 gallons per day. This would add less than 1/4 of one percent to the
plant capacity.
Due to the uncertainty of the total number of proposed units and their
locations under the Growth Managemeot Plan, the total impact of the
approved units 00 the collection sewer lines can not be evaluated until
such time as the information for all projects under the Growth Management
Plan is available.
There presently exists sufficient plant capacity to treat the proposed
project.
If there are any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~!
Heiko Kuhn
District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District
.
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
FIRE PROTECTION
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposed for the above
referenced project from the standpoint of fire protection.
I understand the project to be comprised of (10) one-
bedroom town house units and (16) studio employee units
located adjacent to the Mountain Queen condominium on
Mill Street. Additionally the project will permit
connection for vehicular access between the top of
Monarch and Mill Streets.
The project area is presently served by two fire
hydrants whose tested pressure is approximately
63 psi. The water mains serving these hydrants will
be looped, thus equalizing the respective pressures
and providing continuous pressure capacity in the event
of water main breakage. The project will be served by
a third fire hydrant connected to the 8" looped main.
It is anticipated that the 8" main extension will connect
to the capacity of the proposed new Little Nell water tank,
thus further augmenting the hydrant pressure. The location
of hydrants relative to this project permits good fire
coverage at adequate pressure levels.
Fire vehicles and equipment will have good access to this
project particularly with the proposed connecting roadway
between Mill and Monarch Streets. The skier's easement
will also allow vehicular access to internal portions of
the site should that be necessary to deal quickly with
fire problems.
It is my opinion that the development proposed for this
site poses no foreseeable deficiencies related to fire
protection.
Very truly yours,
.~) i
.
((~~t(.. li( ('(:';
Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
CITY
130 s
treet
1611
January 30, 1978
~1r. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd.
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: 'IDP OF MILL STREE:l' PRQJECT
!)ear Mr. Yaw:
A transportation sYstem linking dc:Mnta-m Aspen ",ith Lift 1'\ is currently
nnder study. ~7hether this link is bv way of buses or fixed rail (trolley),
a corridor is required fran the comer of D.1rant and Galena Streets to
Lift lA.
The proposed Top of Mill Street Project appears to be along the route
being considered, linking various City prooerties wit.D. the lift area.
Therefore, preservation of a transportation corridor through this project
\\Quld be beneficial to the eventual implE!laltation of transoortation
service along the base of Aspen 'bnntain.
In addition, the City wishes to reserve the right to erect a shelter,
bus stop and necessary signs along tlris corridor in the event service
is initiated in the future.
S~CEr:~; y~rs' "
~y(!/z(..(t/ ~~i
Harold Stalf /
Transportation Director
HS/my
:J
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
SOCIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
(aa) Public TranslXlrtation
The evaluation is the ability of the project to be serviced by public
translXlrtation.
As described earlier and as shown on the Site Context Drawing, this
section, project development will provide a loop road connection
between Mill and Monarch Streets allowing Public translXlrtation
to service Lift I-A and the L-2 tourist zone.
The Planning Office, in 1974, required dedication of the west IXlr-
tion of the loop road by the Mountain Queen Condominium develop-
ment in specific anticipation of creating a bus loop to serve Lift I-A
and the tourist zone. Conversations with H.]. Stalf, Public
TranslXlrtation Administrator, indicate that bus transit, to service
this route, will be implemented at the earliest date consistant with
funding. The route will provide direct service to this project.
Additionally, a bus stop located on this project (intersection of
Mill and S. Galena Streets) will be provided.
Reference:
A. Project vicinity map; this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter from Mr. Harold]. Stalf. Public
TranslXlrtation Administrator, Public Services Section
(bb) Police Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Police Department to provide
normal protection services to the project with current personnel
and equipment.
v
j'
"
.
Top of M ill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
lOO/gal/day /person to project occupancy standards of 1. 5 persons
per one- bedroom unit and 1. 25 persons per studio unit, the total
project would generate only 3420 gallons per day. This would
add less than { of one percent to the plant capacity, thus is well
within the service capability of the present capacity.
A prelimina ry project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75%, capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
.
13. Project review letter from Mr. I1eiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(cc) Storm Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
disp:>se of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on -site drainage
facilities. The project shall In ve a series of dry wells and retention
wells sufficiently sized to retain and disperse site surface and roof
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have ove-tflow outlets extending to Mill Street. A
planted diversion benn will bc creatl.>d at the uphill side of the project
to divert excessive surface drainage away from building development
that would result from abnormal precipitation.
J{-:;ference
^. Site Plan: n1ysical Design and Program section
.
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide fire
response to the project according to the established response
standa rds.
The project site is located approximately 1,800 L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of 5
minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project site is served by (2) hydrants with adequate static
pressure and a third will be provided by the development. Two
adjacent roadways provide immediate access for fire vehicles.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, completely sprinkle red parking garage and
ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicates no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
u
... ...~
,
.....",
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
This project, by virtue of providing a connecting link between
the top of Mill and Monarch Streets, significantly upgrades the
pedestrian/skier movement opportunities for the neighoorhood
lodging and condominium destinations as shown on the Site Con-
text Map. This link allows direct pedestrian movement between
Lift I-A and the high density lodging neighoorhood served by
Mill and South Galena Streets.
Additionally augmenting the circulation opportunities of the
neighoorhood, the project provides skiers easement, along
the easterly ooundry, connecting the lower ski slopes to the
skier easement proposed through the Aspen Inn Complex.
Connecting to the City System, sidewalks will be constructed
adjacent to the project along Mill Street and along the new
roadway loop.
Connections to other city systems may be seen on the Site
Vicinity Map, this section.
Reference:
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Site Vicinity Map, this section
(ee) Recycling Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of refuse recycling facilities in
the project development.
Such facilities will be provided in the parking garage portion of
the project, conveniently accessible to ooth occupants and pick
up of the separated refuse by the recycle center vehicle.
Consistant with the recommendation of Mr. Dennis Holmes of
the City Recycling Center the project will separate containers
for glass, tin, aluminum, and newspapers in a location accessible
to a parked 5 ton flatbed truck, 20 feet long.
I I
"_.j
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ff) Design Features for the Handicapped
The evaluation is the ability of the project to accommodate safe,
convenient movement for handicapped persons.
The site and building design will pennit unobstructed movement
(for a wheel chair confined person) from any location in the
covered parking garage to virtually every condominium unit.
This is accomplished by means of hydraulic elevator and path
surfaces which will not exceed a slope of 1: 15 (U. B. C. requirement).
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
B. Floor Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(gg) Proximity to Commercial SUp(Xlrt Facilities
The evaluation is convenient walking distance from the Project to
commercial sUP(Xlrt facilities.
This project is located on equavilent 3 ~ city blocks to the C-C
zone and approximately 1000 ft. (4 minutes walking distance to
the downtown Mall system).
Reference
A. Site Vicinity Map; this section
.
'-
"
\ ~,l!
~
;; ~/Q)Yfo
\=i,9{5
;)to
.
"....
,
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
The evaluation is the percentage of low and moderate income housing
units provided by the development:
15-29% of project units designated Moderated Income are awarded
4 (X>ints. 45-59% of project units designated Low Income housing
are awarded 12 points.
The project is comprised of total units of which (10) units are desig-
nated as single bedroom condominiums and (16) units as studio employee
units.
A s shown by the typical unit plan, this section, each studio unit is
approximately 360 s. f. and is, additionally, sup(X>rted by common
laundry, storage, parking and day care facilities. Upon receiving
GMP approval, that portion of the project comprising Employee
Housing would be immediately constructed and available for oc-
cupancy prior to December, 1978.
The employee unit mix and rent structure for this project is submitted
a s follows:
No. %of Total * Annual Total * Annual
)f total monthly Income monthly Income
Units project Designation rent/one Group/ rent/two Group/
units occupant each occupants each
occuoant occupant
12 46.2% Lcw Income $l75/mo. $7000/yr. $200/mo $4000/yr.
4 15.4% Moderate $250/mo. $10,000/ $275/mo $5500/yr.
Income yr.
* Annual income group calculated using 30% of gross annual income
allocated to housing cost (Planning Office Standard).
..
~.. .,.;1'
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
The rental structure for the employee units is designed to permit an
important, now economically disenfranchized, support group to main-
tain low rent housing within walking distance of major employment
areas in Aspen.
Spending 30% of annual income f(!)r rent, a single occupant making
$7000/yr. may afford a studio or, if sharing a studio, 2 persons
making $4000/yr. each can afford a unit. Assuming 50% of single
occupancy and 50% double occupancy, the 16 units provided would
house 24 employees whose annual income is $4000 or greater. The
project thus offers choice and flexibility while accommodating a
large range of low income employee groups.
Located in the Lodge district, the project is virtually next door to
major generators of employment whose general salary offerings
allow affordability for this project.
The indicated unit mix of Low and Moderate Income units is a direct
function of maximizing points (thus assumed income mix preference)
under the GMP housing guidelines. If, however, it is requested by
the Planning Office that the unit mix be altered to provide 100% Low
Income, consistant with Gl\1P point awards presently available.,the
mix will be changed accordingly.
A total of 16 points is anticipated under the Housing section for this
project submission.
Reference
A. Typical Unit Floor Plan; this section
B. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program section
, ,
'i,,-.../
,
/
,',
......,,#
,:\ ,', ~,:\ ...."...
~,~, ., . . . ", ',-0..'
"""". "-" .', .""" ,,,'" "
,''- :\',<'. ft"'" ",'. . >- .
".~,....:\.., ~I\.'.,:\... '..,;
'~'," ' "" "" '.".,"\.,'-
'. '-.,',,, ",' "-
~"'"'.<''' "
iJ'
"'=
STUDIO
,-..,
.,
I
c:::J
KITCHEN
~o .H.
~ 0_ "'CJ(
1.++-+ t
o~ 10
, .-+-t'
1f>
=I
...."
,J
~
Employee Housing Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Size 360 s.f.
Rent $175/month
~ I
o 2 4 8
I
16
~
I., I
south
.' ", ' ,
. .
EJ<1~T1'-i7 MAU.~
rfllQ; 5W1l>l
-.L.,t;. ~ 5W1"-1
111 __ ...
, __t__
~.-
~~I~~~I~&~~' \ ,--'
\)~Hlq .,.Iq~ I
";....".r,II:.;~..:.... ........;,/<........1 , ~~
.. '''':''''.':''''''':'''':'I:'i~
. oL..,4<L~/:"IY \
UfT \-A~~ E.Af.:ft!E~ "'..n~'.-~..-. ".~?:--:-..:.'!l tti#----t040
-~\ .. "',,-
i
H_t.l/tW~ =--f
\JO&fU: r7>1<:K
eu; STCl"
.-:lftY 1m< ?\llJlOl
W> mIrE.
7JJ<ANT AVE~Uf:
~~T
I111le ~~LL LIFT
rmtr.W ell? lLl?I"
fm'l?XP CIlY 1l'IJL
_ Ul1t"atW.. un
. CLl1l'\ErLIAL LOl:Gt.
~ LCt&t I
r:J LCQ;E l
IIIIIJ] n:'5IWlTlAl. -IS - LlU>t
m m:.::!f'lJel.IC
Vicinity Map
800
'Ioulh
'~~:.?'
- -r--
o 200 400
I
'-,.,'"
THE TOP DF MILL STREET PAD"ECT C~AND MADMAN YAW LTC ARCHITECTS
"__ft, ~ ..........~_
.-
W'hNEJ( rm<
~- jE~ J
--
CITY (,............................................................I......................~
~ ~ m I~. '1 H !~
"I ~
I
,
,
I1OIlIJ't:H ?naT
...,
i
~ ell? UVf"-~ I u;g
[j~j:~ 8 [JJi ri._ ,- ,
-... -" ~ .ALre.14 e>L1c..K
=1"1< VillA - I II! ~ U ! I i
, ~ ,I , _~""'~~
~ la:> I i II "I ~~ : T
~ 1,1 I I '- I
~ I ~ 11\I,).1... ,. ~'j/ r'fl>lt>'.W_t.a)f"f
,,\!:;; _ ___ " ?Tl'r
7'~}j. -c".;w. ~=Jr.-.: C
lIFlI-A. ~w-'-r~~-l.............'\j.. :11 '~ '
I I i, ;J . I I I
';l(II'J6EME~ ~I I I . .....i" : I ,
~H auEEH .,,' J;. ~:i i Ii
;.. A~flJE. UlHW?
AFfE~ 9'JEl">
" / ~"-- '...... ~
(~ ~ ~O
'''" ~'
~ r~
5(;" '-.y
_ _ . .. - --rrD!t"W ~ 5TOl'A&E
flfTmO &. \.j<fE~ UHf:
EJI'5Tl1-b ,JAfU?rCJrJbf.
Site Context
--
,
o " 000
"'"
~"
"'-:7
'--.x--
THE. TOP OF MILL .TAEET PRDJECT COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTC ARCHITeCTS
I a.pen. ICOI~ "'"-~.._
.
verage
oints A.
3.
I.',)" ~
:!>
~ V"
,3
J
A
"-l,t?
1.1
"I
C7'-
J ",...
._ .I .......
1.5. v
I,d.,
I
t
1.;1.
q1
'-/
1978
I
GROWTn MJ\NAGEMENT RESIDENTIAL' \ .'1
'rALLY SJlEETS / / 0("" VI
'\'" .
~\
Project Name: 'TOP Or 't'\\\...L
./
B.
Public Facilities . CC FD WA JS JK 011 DE
. . . .
~?) 3 ,3 3 '7 .
1. Water Service ./
2. Sewer Service I I '- I I
3. Storm Drainage ..J-.. . .--, . "7, 2
4. Fire Protection -- I ~ 1 )..
r"
5. Parkinq Desiqn , \~ . ....~ ,
, -, '. ~.
6. Roads , -, ;..' ~ ') . ;!~
7. Lnergv " , , - . '.":> ' -
-
BONUS , - .~ I
...-~ ..,.. """'-.
Social Facilities and Services
CC FB WA . JS JK OH DE
L Public /
Transportation -~ '; I ",
- r--o,. -
2. Police Protectic:1 I I - - 1 .
~ ,-...
3. Childcil!:e --. -'\
Facil i ties ~ -- -
~:::./.. ~ ,- ..- .-
4. Bicycle Paths I / 1 I I
5. Recycling Facilities ! I -- .., r."::""
-- ~
6. l~andicapped Design
1 I .. I -,
Features '. .-l.. -- .
7. commercial Sup?ort I I / /
Proximity ...,
,-
BONUS I " I I
~
Housing . JS JK OH
CC FB \'IA DE
1. Biddle I . .. . ' .
2. I-\oderate 'r 4- '1 u --
3. LOW / :, I~ ("" j"- /"1.
BO:lUS .<><' .-, ,<
.,.. --
W~ -I/;t ': ~ '-47 :,~./ .---~
.~
TOTAL POINTS '6 -;;u
c.
1f~''{;
A
l-f t.J. ~
'('(.0
, I
I. . I"
v:J:(.!','~~(" ....< . ..'V
(11)/', .J
...1.. . L ~ .. t,............
I,
\ "" . I Ie-
\...). ....... ~ -'"'
. '. \ ~ \ 1-,."
7k +1(,,:A- (.1-
.~, k
,'") \.<~ ~L. . '--
lOP OF MILL
PROJECT
Grovvth Management
Plan Submission
/"......-
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Submitted to:
Applicant :
Architect:
--
City of Aspen Planning Department
130 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
Mr. Hans Cantrup
P. Q, Box 388
Aspen, Colorado
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado
o
o
I
iil
3
go
i
-
~
ce'
::J
Top of Mill Project
-
Growth Management
Plan Submission
INTRODUCTORY
1. Project Name
2. Location:
3. Parcel Size:
4. Current Zoning District:
S. Zoning which Application
is filed:
6. Maximum Buildout under
Current Zoning:
7. Total Number of Units
Proposed and Bedroom
Mix:
8. Size of Units:
9. Price Range for Sale or
Rent'
lDP OF MILL PROJECT
South end of Mill Street, City of Aspen
36,000 S. F.
L-2 zone, City of Aspen Zoning Code
(RMF permitted use)
L-2, City of Aspen Zoning Code
(RMF zoning option)
29 one-bedroom units
or
36 studio units
26 units total, comprised of (10)
one-bedroom free market units
and (16) studio employee units
(a) One-bedroom free market units
@ I, 200 S. F. each
(b) Studio Employee units @ 360 S. F. each
(a) One-bedroom units sold at current
ma rket price
(b) Studio employee units rented at
$I7S/month for single occupant
(c) Studio employee units rented at
$200/month for 2 person occupancy
"r'''""
/""~-
Top of Mill Project
~...
Growth Management
Plan Submission
10. Program Narrative:
The site is planned to pennit the functional organization of three
basic building groups comprised of low income and free market
units, in a scale compatible with neighboring structures.
Completing the link between Mill and Monarch Streets, as desired
by the City Planning Office, a new roadway easement provided by the
development divides the site into two parcels, each containing portions
of the proposed housing.
The upper (south) parcel contains (10) one-bedroom free market units
designed in townhouse configuration for purposes individual identity,
solar orientation and to further reduce building massing. The town-
houses are characterized by the sloped roofs particular to each unit,
the use of natural stone, cedar siding and exposed wood beams as
exterior materials.
The lower (north) parcel contains (16) studio employee units and day
care facilities configured in a stepped back building design to permit
individual unit view, solar orientation and appropriate scale at its
corner location. Wood siding, exposed beams and the stepped back
balcony elements characterize the exterior appearance of this complex.
In addition to retaining virtually all the existing spruce and aspen tree
groups, the finished site development will be completely landscaped
with native trees and plant materials, as existed prior to the early
mining days.
The floor area ratio pennitted by zoning, for this project, is FAR
1: 1 or,36, 000 sq. ft. of building development. As designed, the total
project uses only 23,000 s. f., or approximately 63% of the allowed
FAR.
11. Surrounding Zoning and Land Uses
As shown on the Vicinity Map, the project is located at the top of Mill
Street in the L -2 zone. (L -2 zoning pennits multi -family units under
the same requirements as RjMF zoning).
r"
'-.'
/ '
,
#
--
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Surrounding zoning is L-2 except for the R-IS-Lodge area to the
northeast and the city owned ski club parcel zoned Public directly
north of the project.
Surrounding land uses are a mix of lodges, multi -family units,
public and conservation lands, and the ski terrain above the 8,040
elevation line. Immediately surrounding complexes are the Mountain
Queen, Monarch 700, Fasching House, and the Fifth Avenue Condo-
miniums.
--, "'~.
. CCl1t"ti:r-W- un
. UMMEI<:C.IAL LOC&f.
~ LOCGt I
f:;.] L0r6E l
n re51t:WllAL-I'>-LCl;f;of:
m rA':Kjf'UBlIC
Vicinity Map
EXI"TI~ MAll.';
W'f1~ m::K
IOIeef rm ~
_ I'aJTE.
_~T
~E!lJ?Lall"
LIFT I-Ai ~ EA?el1eflf
/1>40
W5 STOl"
t>JI'ANT A'iE~ut:
LIT\1.f ~El.L LIFT
~ 01Y11<AIL
ri'VJfCf "{1"E
~~\.I'JE~ STm&e
(EX6TI~ ~~)
r- .....r--:
o 200 400
~
'00
THE TOP 01= MILL STREET PROJECT COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTD At=lCHITECTS
A..p'''. CDlor..,l" A po 'Coto ,,10
) I J jKU&Yl1>J<K JI
WAbHEI: I?/(l( ~.__ _ \5TATI0I-l ~ '
W'>mJlE-f ~ )
-~~] 1=] [ JI
If
~ ?TmT
-
IT/.l'tI5W elf.> La:>I"
[j1Q ; ~
~re~ "ll~K
~m: VIllA
f'W'jq;.H1lV
c.<<iMJ
Sf> AVE~~ U>I-I~
~~QIJl:tH
AFTl'rnz>i.J ~tl':'>
flITU"" e.' \.Q\TEI< LiHE
-EJ(I5Tl1-l9 \.tATEr 5faAbE
rn?!t>'W ~ STOrA/iE
Site Context
~
o 50 100
,
200
~
!I',"
.'",'..
I-
W
w
0:
I-
Ul
..
Z
w
-'
..
"
J
ASPEN INN
i
~
i
~
~
700 MONARCH
L_
----- ~
'--
--,
"
AFT Ii HUE
CON I IUMS
D
MILL STREET
o
i
I
I
f-
I
----.J
-_r[j
.L~"
---~f-(O
MOUNTAIN
QUEEN
~
SITE PLAN
~
01020 40 eo
THE TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT COPLAND HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
"'"p"n, C",lo~..dD ""P' ' CO" ""
r---
~
-
t-
w
w
a:
t-
oo
...I
...I
-
~
Ill....
a::z
Ww
i22
IIlW
III
~~
ROAr:JNAY EASEMENT
ri......J
o 10 20
Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
~,r
40
I
80
-
.-
-
i
)
I-
W
W
a:
I-
en
....I
....I
-
::E
Underground Parking Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
~
".-~,
'''"."..
,..-.....\
,../
I
: I
_I
t
I
I
k-__
PARKING FOR 26 CARS
I
L
NEW ROADWAY EASEMENT
EMPLOYEE HOUSING &
CHILD CARE FACILITY
I'L....J
o 10 20
I
80
40
I
I
elevator
recycling
center
.
I
.J~
'.~.~ "fe,
>"tl.' "
/}7' !
r
i
I
:-\ ~
'-~
. 'IA~
-" ~~
):. /~~:.
:J:
...
::::l
o
<Il
z
o
fii
~
-'
w
:J:
~
w
"
<Il
l
.
.
f
I~~ ~
d.~
. ,,1J':'- - ~ ,
f&Y; "':::
~
I
f
I
z
o
i=
bl
<Il
W
...
iii
!
f
t~l
'~}j;N;
I
ARCHITECTURAL
~~
o 5 10 20 30
.~.-
D
STUDIO
c:=J
o
1r
=I
1=
,-
Employee Housing Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Size 360 s.t.
Rent $175/month
~ I
o 2 4 8
I
16
~
.~
....'-
-~--
e,...................
.............Oi.
~.~!+...
R.!..~...
~~:..Oi.
~..~
.,
o
o Ibml81
LIVING
DINING 0
I
I
I
I
L______~_____
~
Lower Level Floor Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Size 1200 -1400 s.t.
Sale market price
r-1.....J I
o 2 4 B
]
16
~
/U'..""
BEDROOM
o
d
n
L-J
Typical Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Size 1200-14005,f,
Sale Ma r ket Price ~
1"'"'"\....0 , I
0 2 4 8 16
.:0
o
w
-.
Q)
-
Pf
-.
-
~
go
~
~.
".."
._ _.c-:.._,-
,- ...~".~ ....,."..."..
,.,"""
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
APPROVAL REQUEST
The 1975 Aspen Employee Survey clearly demonstrated that 52% of
the employees surveyed had household incomes less than $10, ()()()
per year. This group is mainly comprised of the support employee,
a significantly large and important group to Aspen's economic
structure. These employees have been disenfranchised by the
unavailability of adequate housing at a price they can afford.
An important aspect of this project is the focus on housing for the
low income employee. Of the 26 total units proposed 62% (16 units)
are designed and designated to meet lower income needs. The merit
of the low income housing provided by this project cannot be measured,
only, as a percentage of total units. Their more important value in
meeting the low income need must consider that quality and size of
space (form) is being provided at rental rates even lower than con-
templated by the Growth Management guidelines.
Applying the standard used by the Planning Office, i. e. 30% of gross
income spent on housing, this project creates housing for 24 employees
(double occupancy per housing unit) with a salary of $4,000 per year.
The designated unit rent of $175 - $200 per month is significantly lower
than can be justified by normal development economics.
The development form does not create a remote employee section but
rather integrates the employee units on the same site with the free
market units, thereby insuring a relatively high quality employee
product.
This project offers major and immediate relief for the employee
housing deficit at a location within walking distance of all employ-
ment, shopping and recreational destinations. If approved by GtvlP
review, construction of the low income housing will begin immediately
and prior to construction of any free market units, which will be phased
voluntarily.
In view of the urgent need for low income housing such as this project
will immediately provide, we urge that City Council authorize, for
this project, the construction of additional employee units as per-
mitted by Section 24-10.10 of Ordinance 48. (Series of 1977)
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
SOCIAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES
(aa) Public Transportation
The evaluation is the ability of the project to be serviced by public
transportation.
As described earlier and as shown on the Site Context Drawing, this
section, project development will provide a loop road connection
between Mill and Monarch Streets allowing Public transportation
to service Lift I-A and the L-2 tourist zone.
The Planning Office, in 1974, required dedication of the west por-
tion of the loop road by the Mountain Queen Condominium develop-
ment in specific anticipation of creating a bus loop to serve Lift I-A
and the tourist zone. Conversations with H. J. Stalf, Public
Transportation Administrator, indicate that bus transit, to service
this route, will be implemented at the earliest date consistant with
funding. The route will provide direct service to this project.
Additionally, a bus stop located on this project (intersection of
Mill and S. Galena Streets) will be provided.
Reference:
A. Project vicinity map; this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter from Mr. Harold J. Stalf, Public
Transportation Administrator, Public Services Section
(bb) Police Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Police Department to provide
nonnal protection services to the project with current personnel
and equipment.
..........
,
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
100/gal/day /person to project occupancy standards of 1. 5 persons
per one- bedroom unit and 1. 25 persons per studio unit, the total
project would generate only 3420 gallons per day. This would
add less than { of one percent to the plant capacity, thus is well
within the service capability of the present capacity.
A preliminary project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(ec) Storm Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on -site drainage
facilities. The project shall ill ve a series of dry wells and retention
wells sufficiently sized to retain and disperse site surface and roof
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have overflow outlets extending to Mill Street. A
planted diversion berm will be created at the uphill side of the project
to divert excessive surface drainage away from building development
that would result from abnormal precipitation.
Heference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program section
,J '~
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide fire
response to the project according to the established response
standa ros.
The project site is located approximately 1,800 L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of 5
minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project site is served by (2) hydrants with adequate static
pressure and a third will be provided by the development. Two
adjacent roadways provide immediate access for fire vehicles.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, completely sprinkle red parking garage and
ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicates no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
This project, by virtue of providing a connecting link between
the top of Mill and Monarch Streets, significantly upgrades the
pedestrian/skier movement opportunities for the neighborhood
lodging and condominium destinations as shown on the Site Con-
text Map. This link allows direct pedestrian movement between
Lift I-A and the high density lodging neighborhood served by
Mill and South Galena Streets.
Additionally augmenting the circulation opportunities of the
neighborhood, the project provides skiers easement, along
the easterly boundry, connecting the lower ski slopes to the
skier easement proposed through the Aspen Inn Complex.
Connecting to the City System, sidewalks will be constructed
adjacent to the project along Mill Street and along the new
roadway loop.
Connections to other city systems may be seen on the Site
Vicinity Map, this section.
Reference:
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Site Vicinity Map, this section
(ee) Recycling Facilities
The evaluation is the provision of refuse recycling facilities in
the project development.
Such facilities will be provided in the parking garage portion of
the project, conveniently accessible to both occupants and pick
up of the separated refuse by the recycle center vehicle.
Consistant with the recommendation of Mr. Dennis Holmes of
the City Recycling Center the project will separate containers
for glass, tin, aluminum, and newspapers in a location accessible
to a parked 5 ton flatbed truck, 20 feet long.
.'.-.....
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ff) Design Features for the Handicapped
The evaluation is the ability of the project to accommodate safe,
convenient movement for handicapped persons.
The site and building design will permit unobstructed movement
(for a wheel chair confined person) from any location in the
covered parking garage to virtually every condominium unit.
This is accomplished by means of hydraulic elevator and path
surfaces which will not exceed a slope of I: 15 (U. B. C. requirement).
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
B. Floor Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(gg) Proximity to Commercial Sup{X)rt Facilities
The evaluation is convenient walking distance from the Project to
commercial sup{X)rt facilities.
This project is located on equavilent 3~ city blocks to the C-C
zone and approximately 1000 ft. (4 minutes walking distance to
the downtown Mall system).
Reference
A. Site Vicinity Map; this section
,-,,,,,
.
r-O""
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
EMPLOYEE HOUSING
The evaluation is the percentage of low and moderate income housing
units provided by the development:
15-29% of project units designated Moderated Income are awarded
4 (Xlints. 45-59% of project units designated Low Income housing
are awarded 12 (Xlints.
The project is comprised of total units of which (10) units are desig-
nated as single bedroom condominiums and (16) units as studio employee
units.
A s shown by the typical unit plan, this section, each studio unit is
approximately 360 s. f. and is, additionally, sup(Xlrted by common
laundry, storage, parking and day care facilities. Upon receiving
GMP approval, that (Xlrtion of the project comprising Employee
Housing would be immediately constructed and available for oc-
cupancy prior to December, 1978.
The employee unit mix and rent structure for this project is submitted
as follows:
No. % of Total * Annual Total * Annual
)f total monthly Income monthly Income
Unit s project Designation rent/one Group/ rent/two Group/
units occupant each occupants each
occupant occuoant
12 46.2% Law Income $175/mo. $7000/yr. $200/mo $4000/yr.
14 15.4% Moderate $250/mo. $10, 000/ $275/mo $5500/yr.
Income yr.
* Annual income group calculated using 30% of gross annual income
allocated to housing cost (Planning Office Standard).
~-
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
The rental structure for the employee units is designed to permit an
important, now economically disenfranchized, support group to main-
tain low rent housing within walking distance of major employment
areas in Aspen.
Spending 30% of annual income fl!)r rent, a single occupant making
$7000/yr. may afford a studio or, if sharing a studio, 2 persons
making $4000/yr. each can afford a unit. Assuming 50% of single
occupancy and 50% double occupancy, the 16 units provided would
house 24 employees whose annual income is $4000 or greater.The
project thus offers choice and flexibility while accommodating a
large range of low income employee groups.
Located in the Lodge district, the project is virtually next door to
major generators of employment whose general salary offerings
allow affordability for this project.
The indicated unit mix of Low and Moderate Income units is a direct
function of maximizing points (thus assumed income mix preference)
under the GMP housing guidelines. If, however, it is requested by
the Planning Office that the unit mix be altered to provide 100% Low
Income, consistant with GMP point awards presently available.the
mix will be changed accordingly.
A total of 16 points is anticipated under the Housing section for this
project submission.
Reference
A. Typical Unit Floor Plan; this section
B. Architectural Drawings; Physical Design and Program section
~.~'...
/1"" ^-"
\". ./
.~H".
.,.........
",,-
-'
o
STUDIO
CJ
KITCHEN
o
o
4r
=I
1=
Employee Housing Unit Plan
TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Size 360 s.f.
Rent $175/month
~ I
o 2 4 8
~
I
16
HI6!M'<(U/tW~ =1
EJ(ISTl~ MAllb
W6hff.~ F,.\I(K
I(U!:!'Y rm< 'SWlCl4
W? I'WT"E.
1;.)5 5TCI"
IAJI<ANT A'IE~Uf
t'I\WI<'l,H ~T
LITl1.e ~ELL LIFT
~ elb UVf'
~ Ci1Y 1lWL
I'IVJECT 5'TE
(~\.I4rE~ STOOGe
(EX~TIi-& $~)
_ call1Et:CW. em:
. cml1EroAL LotGE.
~ LOCAS-EJ
~::::<[ LCM1E 2.
n re5lromAL-I?-Ll)[;€lf.
m l'MKjf'Uet.lc
Vicinity Map
~
o 200 400
,
800
~
THE TOP OF MilL STREET PROJECT COPL.ANO HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
""p.m, CalON.do A..p,"" C;OIO~,"!D
J-{
] [
~D CI1'i (n ,.. .i...I...... .................... ........r....................................)
D~i ;,1
I-lAGNEIII?J<K
j
l ru~Y PAl:!<.
5TATIOI-l ~
j
[jrg
~
~
l
MmH ?n:aT
I'T/J!lJ5W etJ'j l.a>P
=111, VILLA
ALrel4 1'L1CK
~11V
?'" AVEHLJ~ ~tl?!>
AFT1'rn>?>l ~EI(",
fU11Jl:E &" >bI[E~ UHE
EJI?1l1-8 WAre/: 51mbt
-
~ wa:m: 5TorA&E
...
Site Context
~
o 50 100 200
w
...
THE TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT COPLANO HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A..p",n, Cclo..aclo Asp",", Colo"Cleo
.,---~ ......;..
o
o
>
,
~
5l
Pi.
f€'
<
~.
"
""',
,
"'-""",,
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
PUBLIC SERVICES
(aa) Water System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public water system to provide
for the needs of the proposed development without treatment plant or
other facility upgrading beyond those provided by the developer.
The project water demand is directly related to the fixture unit count,
consisting of 356 F. U., which converts to 100 GIN: maximum probable
flow (2" water service) or approximately 100 gal. /day /person as per
current ASHRE guide standards. Additionally the development is
providing an 8" water main loop between Mill and Monarch Streets
which will enable the water system to provide an upgraded level of
service to this project as well as the immediate neighborhood.
A project review by Mr. James Markalunus indicates that no fore-
seeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing water service at
adequate pressure levels and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity, will
result from the project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. James J. Markalunus,
Aspen Water Department, this section
(bb) Sewer System
The evaluation is the capacity of the public sewage disposal system to
serve the proposed development without system extensions and without
treatment plant upgrading.
p',.""
The project site is served by an existing 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up Mill Street and located directly adjacent to the
project site.
-
1''''-
,,",...,#
'.
~
..
Top of Mill Project'
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of
lOO/gal/day /person to project occupancy standards of 1. 5 persons
per one-bedroom unit and 1. 25 persons per studio unit, the total
project would generate only 3420 gallons per day. This would
add less than :l: of one percent to the plant capacity, thus is well
within the service capability of the present capacity.
A preliminary project review by Mr. Heiko Kuhn indicates that no
foreseeable deficiencies exist with regard to providing sewage
service to this project and no substantive impact on the treatment
plant, which is currently utilized at approximately 75% capacity,
will result from this project development.
Reference
A. Site Context Map, this section
B. Project review letter from Mr. Heiko Kuhn, District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District, this section
(cc) Storm Drainage
The evaluation is the capacity of drainage facilities to adequately
dispose of surface runoff without public drainage system expansion.
The drainage control system for this project will collect and retain
all site runoff and interrupted subsurface flow with on-site drainage
facilities. The proj ect shall tn ve a series of dry wells and retention
wells sufficiently sized to retain and disperse site surface and roof
water runoff. Consistant with standard engineering practice, the
drywells will have overflow outlets extending to Mill Street. A
planted diversion berm will be created at the uphill side of the project
to divert excessive surface drainage away from wilding development
that would result from abnormal precipitation.
Reference
A. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program section
~
,-
~
'-
,
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(dd) Fire Protection
The evaluation is the ability of the Fire Department to provide fire
response to the project according to the established response
standards.
The project site is located approximately 1,800 L. F. (5 city blocks)
from the fire station and can expect a maximum response time of 5
minutes from alert siren to equipment arrival at site fire location.
The project site is served by (2) hydrants with adequate static
pressure and a third will be provided by the development. Two
adjacent roadways provide immediate access for fire vehicles.
The building development will be additionally protected by a dry
standpipe system, completely sprinkle red parking garage and
ionic smoke detection in individual units.
A project review by Mr. Willard Clapper indicates no foreseeable
deficiencies exist with regard to fire protection.
Reference:
A. Project Vicinity Map, this section
B. Site Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
C. Project review letter by Mr. Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
,f" """
'.
....,.;'
#'
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(ee) Parking Design
The evaluation is the design of required parking with respect to
visual impact, exposed paving, convenience and safety.
All required parking for this project is accommodated by an under-
ground parking structure with natural grade and landscaping completely
reinstated over the enclosing surfaces. Virtually no surface parking
exists on the development site. The garage entry ramp will utilize a
snow melt system which will allow vehicle stop prior to exiting and
entering Mill Street. A cedar faced automatic door will be provided
for closure.
The parking garage will be completely sprinkle red to prevent fire
damage. All one-bedroom units are individually accessible from the
garage level and an elevator will be provided for general access to
the upper site level. A second pedestrian exit will allow direct access
to the employee unit complex.
.-
Reference
A. Underground Parking Plan; Physical Design and Program Section
(ff) Roads
The evaluation is the capacity of existing roads to service project
generated traffic without substantially overloading or altering existing
traffic patterns.
As shown on the Site Context Map, this section, the project is located
at the top of Mill Street. Directly to the west of the project and behind
the 700 Monarch complex is an existing (dead end) city dedicated R. O. W.
The Applicant intends to dedicate a R.O. W. through the project to com-
plete a loop road connection between Monarch and Mill Streets which
presently tenninate in dead ends.
Preliminary conversations with B.l. Stalf, City Transportation Adminis-
trator, indicate the loop connection would be of considerable advantage
as it would allow public transportation service to be provided to the
Lift l-A ski easement for skier drop-off and to the heart of the L-2
tourist zone.
"."'
-.
"....'
/'
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Mr. Stalf agreed the loop connection could significantly reduce the
current traffic and parking congestion in the area by eliminating the
Monarch and Mill Street dead-end bottlenecks and by reducing the
Lift I-A parking pressures congesting Aspen Street, to the west.
An additional bus stop located at the project, on a level stop and
loading area, will conveniently serve this project as well as the
upper Mill-Galena Street neighborhood.
Examination of the traffic impact to the project is primarily based
on work generated by the UMTA transportation study and on recent
conversations with Mr. Steve Lockwood, Alan M. Voorhees & Assoc. ,
Inc., Traffice Consultant for the UMTA study.
The 6.5 trips per unit for this project is less than the 10.0 trips
per unit and one-bedroom units generating less people and cor-
espondingly less trips than larger apartment or condominium units.
Total trips are then estimated between automobile and non-automobile
trips.
The table below shows the trip type and trip frequencies per day per
unit for a project unit, as estimated by Mr. Lockwood.
Estimated
Non-Automobile
trip percentage
Trip Type
Estimated
One-way trips
Estimated Non-
automobile trips
Skiing/
recreation*
.75
60%
75%
75%
.5
Work
2.00
1.5
Shopping and
entertainment
1. 25
.9
Persona I
business
1. 00
50%
. 5
Other
1. 50
~
.4
6.50
60% average
3.8
*The 60% non-automobile average for recreation trips assumes ap-
proximately 75%-80% of ski trips are non-automobile but only 50%-55%
of summer recreation trips are non-automobile.
-.
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Due to the project's convenient location to downtown Aspen,
Lift I-A and Rubey Park ski buses, and the proposed Monarch
and Mill Street bus route and stop, it is estimated a high per-
centage (60% to 75%) of skiing, work, shopping and entertainment
trips will be non-automobile trips.
As shown, potentially 60% of the total projected trips per unit
will be non-automobile trips. The estimated 2.8 automobile
one-way trips per day are equivalent to a resident's using his
car on an average of approximately one time per day. The
walking and public transportation convenience of the project's
location plus the project's low resident projection result in
minimal traffic impact created by the project.
Current detail traffic counts are not available for the area to
quantitatively estimate traffic impact.
Reference:
A. Site Context Map, this section
~
"".,,",,~
'".",~,
'.,.,.J
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
(gg) Energy
The evaluation is ability of the project, its spaces and users, to
maximize the conservation of energy.
Consistant with the solar georgraphy of the site, all project con-
struction will be designed and built to maximize solar utilization
and to minimize heat loss, thus reducing the demand placed on the
fossil fuel resource for space heating. The following techniques
will be implemented in this project.
Insula tion
Significantly exceeding regulatory thermal standards, exterior
walls will be insulated to R=26 to 28 min.; roof composites to
R=42; floor composite to R=20, foundation perimeters to R=14.
South facing view windows (passive solar) will employ a moveable
insulation system.
Architectural
Architectural design configures buildings to optimize thermal
characteristics of the project. Exterior wall exposure is mini-
mized by townhouse concept (common wall), and by vertical space
organization (minimum ratio of exterior surfaces per sq. ft. of
occupied space). All buildings are oriented with highest use
interior spaces to the south to achieve view while maximizing
passive solar heating potential.
Glazed openings on non -south exposures will be limited to
Uniform Building Code minimums (to comply with ventilation re-
quirements). Opening surround details will be required to mini-
mize heat loss due to infiltration.
Partial flat roof surfaces are designed for all units to retain the
additional insulation value of snowfall layers.
......
.-,
'-"'"
,. ""
-,.,--
Top of Mill Project
Growth Management
Plan Submission
Devices
Consistant with solar geography of site, solar collectors will be
utilized for domestic hot water heating. Electric energy will be
designated for primary space heating to reduce fossil fuel demand.
(approximately 50% of electric power used in Aspen area is hydro-
generated). Automatic thermostats will be specified to control
night time space temperatures. Fire place design will use double
damper control, exterior combustion air, glazed fire opening,
and heat return ducting. Humidification will be used to reduce
temperature required to achieve equal comfort levels.
Reference:
A. Architectural Drawings; Ibysical Design and Program Section
fll(C 5\1'Jl1Jl-l
HIOOW'l( !>t/I'/J~ 51l\EEf--f
EJ<1?Tl>J& MALL.?
W'h1-U I'Al':K
I(Ue!:Y rm: '51)\Il1Jl-l
->
W? mm.
W5 5T~
ru<ANT A'lEHUl:
t'/WUH ~T
ume HEll LIfT
fm'l7"W etJ? t.mf'
I1'VIl/5ED CI1Y 1AAI~
f'rOJUT 9TE.
~SL~~ =me
(EXI5TIH:1~~)
_ ffi1t1ElUoIL em:
. cml'\EI't.IAL LOCGl:.
~ Lot&t I
~;'.J LOWE l
.......
n re51WlTW.-I'>-u:wt.
m l'M'Kjf'Uel-IC
Vicinity Map
-~
o 200 400
"'0
Q
~
THE TOP OF MilL STREET PROJECT COPLA.ND HAGMAN YAW LTO ARCHITECTS
A..p..n, Colorado A"p"" Colo.."do
W\bNE~ mK
d-i I l ~UetYmK j
~ 5TATIIJI-l ~
~"" "'!'~"'f"~"""""~"""'~~'''''''''~~'''~'~''"''
nu.w<CH ?1mT' 11
rTO!V5W W? l.WP
-- II
.Al.re~ !ll.ICK
t:l:tCM1TE VI LLA
~ ~ . I. rlVI't>!Et>W5L.a?Pf
, .. I ~
llllJlllWlUllUlll ruUIIIJIt~CI _~ .....1:'") I ~,..tf'
\r!.-.. .._>,' ..:~4..~.'. l( l(: '"1
LIFT I-A ~ 7 ,,~"""'''''''''''''''"''i'''''!C~'.'''1 -:::::IJ : lI~cl
I dill I 1 ~.. ",.
, ~ I"" " .
">KIE.'6ttlE>I1' I I filii"' ,,',',m:
, I I " J ;'" AVEHU~ ~w,;,
mJfI?J~ "Ul'~~ _J " '" "~'
<",< , ,
F1.SCHl~ i1?U5E
1"C+WVl1/V
~ ~,~ < / '---"" ~
,<'~ f040 _.Q
'0-\'6' ~:
~4 e)
-- --
flIllJ~ P,' \IA1'E~ L1~E
EX15TlJ.l5' \oIAlEJt: 5farJ>he
~ w.mi( ?TOI"A&E
Site Context
~
o 50 100
,
200
@
ir
THE TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT COPLANO HAGMAN YAW LTO A~CH.ITECTS
A..pcn, Calo....do A..p"" Cc'a~adc
/~_. ....,
...""
'.
'. .""
PEN
130 s
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the subject
project which I understand to consist of (10) one-bedroom
town house units and (16) studio employee housing units
located adjacent to the Mountain Queen Condominium parcel
on Mill Street.
The project area is presently served by an 8" C.I.P.
water main alignment up Monarch Street terminating
along the roadway at the north boundary of the Mountain
Queen Condominiums and a 6" C.I.P. water main alignment
up Mill Street terminating near the southerly boundary
on the proposed project.
Two existing hydrants, No. 130 and No. 126, are located
directly adjacent to and approximately 180 L.F., respect-
ively, from the proposed project development. Hydrant
No. 126 has a tested static pressure of 63 psi and flow
of 2070 g.p.m. Hydrant No. 130 is at approximately the
equal pressure and flow characteristics.
The project development will provide an 8" C.I.P.
loop connection between the Monarch Street water
main and the Mill street water main which will provide
an acceptable level of water service to the proposed
development. This will enable the water department
to provide an upgraded level of service to the immediate
neighborhood for the following reasons:
a. Looped main will tend to equalize water pressure
for existing development served by Monarch Street
main and Mill Street main.
.
"....'..,
"-"
""",,"';
-
CITY
130 s
Letter to Larry Yaw
January 25, 1978
Page 2
b. Water is fed to existing development from two
directions.
c. Continuity and reliability of water service is
upgraded. The looped system of water mains allows
continued service to Mill and Monarch Streets
in the event of other unforeseen incidents which
formerly would have caused discontinued service
until repaired.
In addition the project will provide an 8" C.I.P.
water main extension up Mill Street terminating
at the southern periphery of the project development.
This will be done to anticipate future connection to
the new million gallon capacity water tank to be built
in Summer 1978 adjacent to the existing tank on Little
Nell. The subject project is located approximately
600 feet from the water storage tank. Future connection
to this water capacity will provide an upgraded level
of service to the subject project, thus no foreseeable
deficiencies provided that looped connection is constructed
per project proposal.
ry trulY yours,
~1tI~1,.... ~.
':t! Markalunus
;
".James
Aspen Water Department
,
'--..
A~EN SANITATION DIS~ICT
P. O. Box 528 Tel.. 925-3601
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
Janua ry 30, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P. O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL PROJECT
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposal for the subject project with
regard to adequacy of sewage service. I understand the project to consist
of (10) one-bedroom town house units and (16) studio employee units.
The project area is presently served by an 8" sewer line in serviceable
condition extending up Mill Street adjacent to the project site. The
present sewer plant capacity is 2.0 million gallons per day (M.G.D.),
and the present load is approximately 1.569 M.G.D., thus is running at
approximately 75% of capacity. A new addition to the plant in 1980 will
increase capacity by an additional 1.0 M.G.D.
Applying the Colorado State Department of Health standard of 100 gal/day/
person to project occupancy standards of 1.5 persons per one-bedroom unit
and 1.25 persons per studio unit, the total project would generate only
3420 gallons per day. This would add less than 1/4 of one percent to the
plant capacity.
Due to the uncertainty of the total number of proposed units and their
locations under the Growth Management Plan, the total impact of the
approved units on the collection sewer lines can not be evaluated until
such time as the information for all projects under the Growth Management
Plan is available.
There presently exists sufficient plant capacity to treat the proposed
proj ec t.
If there are any questions, please contact this office.
Very truly yours,
~~
He i ko Kuhn
District Manager,
Aspen Sanitation District
,f'
,~.
January 25, 1978
Mr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagman Yaw Ltd
P.O. Box 2736
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: PROPOSED TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
FIRE PROTECTION
Dear Mr. Yaw:
I have reviewed the development proposed for the above
referenced project from the standpoint of fire protection.
I understand the project to be comprised of (10) one-
bedroom town house units and (16) studio employee units
located adjacent to the Mountain Queen condominium on
Mill Street. Additionally the project will permit
connection for vehicular access between the top of
Monarch and Mill Streets.
The project area is presently served by two fire
hydrants whose tested pressure is approximately
63 psi. The water mains serving these hydrants will
be looped, thus equalizing the respective pressures
and providing continuous pressure capacity in the event
of water main breakage. The project will be served by
a third fire hydrant connected to the 8" looped main.
It is anticipated that the 8" main extension will connect
to the capacity of the proposed new Little Nell water tank,
thus further augmenting the hydrant pressure. The location
of hydrants relative to this project permits good fire
coverage at adequate pressure levels.
Fire vehicles and equipment will have good access to this
project particularly with the proposed connecting roadway
between Mill and Monarch Streets. The skier's easement
will also allow vehicular access to internal portions of
the site should that be necessary to deal quickly with
fire problems.
It is my opinion that the development proposed for this
site poses no foreseeable deficiencies related to fire
protection.
Very truly yours,
-:J! , '
(/[~~ ((':dl/(' fi~'yv,
Willard C. Clapper
Chief, Aspen Volunteer Fire Department
r.',
"
,.. .'
"
CITY
130 s
tree t
1611
January 30, 1978
Hr. Larry Yaw
Copland Hagnan Yaw Ltd.
210 South Galena Street
Aspen, Colorado 81611
RE: TOP OF MILL STREET PROJECT
Clear Mr. Ya",:
A transportation system linking dCMntCMn Aspen "lith Lift 1'1. is =rently
under study. 1i'Jhether this link is by way of buses or fixed rail (trolley),
a corridor is required fran the corner of Durant and Galena Streets to
Lift lA.
The proposed Top of Mill Street Project appears to be along the route
being considered, linking various City properties with the lift area.
Therefore, preservation of a transportation corridor through this project
v.ould be beneficial to the eventual implementation of transportation
service along the base of Aspen~untain.
In addition, the City wishes to reserve the right to erect a shelter,
bus stop and necessary signs along this corridor in the event service
is initiated in the future.
;;2::;g;il
Harold S~~~
Transportation Director
HS/my