HomeMy WebLinkAboutlanduse case.su.Chance Claim.1983-SU-1
,^,
.~.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Land Use File
Gary Esary
Jay Hammond, Assistant city Engineer ~
FROM:
DATE:
August 17, 1983
RE:
Standard Improvement District Covenant
-------~------------------------------------------------------
Per our recent discussion, I am promulgating the following
revised language for the standard improvement district
covenant.
"In the event that any municipal improvement or improveme
of a kind contemplated in Section 20-16 of the Municipal
Code of the City of Aspen, as amended, became, in the so
judgement or discretion of .the City Council of the City
Aspen, necessary or desirable to the area of the above
described property, covenantors will make no objection t
any special assessment or special tax or proceeding ther
on the basis.that the property is adequately served by e
improvements and/or on the basis that the premises will
. not be served or benefited by the improvement or improve
proposed. Covenantor further agrees to join, upon the
demand therefor by theCi ty, any special improvement dist ict, .
.nrban renewal district, or downtown development district oim~
. for construction of such improvements (including, without \./
limitation, signage, drainage, underground utilities, pav d
streets and alleys, planting, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, I .
street lights, traffic circulation, trails, recreation fapilities,
berm~open space lands, public transportation facilities'l.
parking, etc.,) in the area of the above-described proper~y
or to reimburse the City of Aspen directly upon demand I
therefor if the City should choose to construct these
improvements without the formation of such a district." . r
I
JH/co
>
cc: Dan
Lou
Chuck
.
~
'.
^
^
t.
;~.>:
~.,. "',",.'"
t]~:;;.i::~,~ ,~,,,
Aspen/Pitl\kill~pl~'~ning Office
~'~l~:~:j{~~:~&:"::~~:';":':::;,:~\~~';:~~
13 0 si):q~tlj!~,g~l~:'g;.~i~ tree t
asp e ~~(1)jt~xiacd'~.. 81611
....~tr~$J.&j'?:3\~;; ~"
Karen,
The only modification in the conditions of Conceptual approval was 0
Condition #9 which now reads:
9. Legal description of proposed trail easement and its relationsh p
to adjoining properties and approval by Parks Director and PC A
and the Planning Department.
The applicant shall record covenants limiting use of the structu es to
single-familY and single-family with caretaker units.
The standard Housing Authority Employee Unit. Agreement be entere into
prior to issuance of a building permit and that the agreement be filed
with the Housing Authority.
~~ 8. The employee units must remain rental units and will be deed-rest icted
) ,q.,0-.
f-N .
,
(J..L !J....
q l-^'
, "
t:-J..c.~ t'
'" )Ob- ""
,\..."
O......j
p ~', ~
Lr''<\
~-
t,~~ k
(>'1.
<;.~
~J.-~'~\
The conditions of Preliminary Plat approval are as follows:
1. All representations made in the Conceptual Submission and Preli inary
Plat Submission to address the 16 conditions of conceptual PUD re
made a part of this approval.
2.
Access roads will be as represented to the Fire Department (20' tinimum
width and within 150' of all structures).
Confirmation of water rights for the Durant Mine water and an ag eement
with the City for its use.
The extension of 6" diameter water mains to within 100 feet of t e
3.
4.
dwelling units.
5. The four plat changes required in the Engineering Department mem of
3/22/84 be made prior to Final Plat.
6.
7.
9.
to the Moderate Income Enployee Guidelines.
The employee units must be available to the general public if not used
by the owners to house their employees and verification of emplo ment
of those persons living in the units must be completed and filed with
the Housing Office.
,
.
~ \({\
-;}/\_/---'
(/-{ ,)~
11.
XU'J,
/).. .::r..iJ:.,(-
C; ;;"
t, ,A
V\r:;;...\c:JrtJ.-
\", ,\
"-; \ '\ ,-L~\- ~ \"
0"
~I-,;A
/~
~
~
},
"'~, t.'.
-!c-....
*;~~~?::~S _ '.'
Asp e n /P i t klj;b~'pi3;pn in g Of fie e
,Q~:~:.,:-~'U'!:"\~;,..~';<;_:,~:.:5~:-:,"',~:: ':':',';":-:;:';:'3.-':"<_:1
13 0 s~.'i!....... :t..). ,1.'"4.~g.....:a.,.;".J.. ~".,.'.ij,,~.~;i~s t r e e t
a s e n-l'tk~;'c:~H(i'f:acl(r 81611
p , ~~?..ui2~~;Z1~~ "',"
10.
The recommendations of the McLaughlin Report and the Chen and Ass ciates
detailed review must be followed, in an ongoing relationship for approval
of the final design and through construction of the project, inc uding
coordination with the Engineering Department.
12.
Coordination of the grading plan with preservation of trees be mo itored
by the Engineering and/ or Parks Departments. R ., \.
A Common Facilities Maintenance Agreement and Deed estr~ct~on aga~nst
future Residential Development of the common area be submitted to and
13.
approved by the City Attorney prior to Final Plat review by Counc~l.
Submission of the Deed RestrictiOn concerning additional topsoil if areas
to be gardened be submitted for approval by the City Attorney pri r to
Final Plat review.
Recordation of the approved Alps Road Access Agreement.
14.
( /
~.
-
( .,
'I
t/
_....e..."'.'"..,..,!......."..",'..,
.--
".....,
~
. DISPOSITION:
(' ):YV'A yY\..Q.y\J
-y\<:.R...O
I
cm COUNCIL REVIEW, I k3/31 ~~Q .~, ~c QQ.?;;,b'l fjih w;ih
JIAO \'" UtrlU\ V'-Q <:-~X\-~(J>^$--: .. ./ I
. 1. Further investig~t:i.on ~f the. en;i~;~ri~g---ge-~i;.~y must be r
completed to assure suitability of the site for developm~nt. \
2. Definitive info.rmation be provided which removes the question
[of surface collapse or subsidence due to the possible \
existence of old mine shafts. I
,
Conformance with the Design Standards for Subdivision in I
Section 20-17 must be demonstrated in the Preliminary Plab
submission. I
The Preliminary Plat submission should include more detaited
proposals for landscaping, grading, containment of runoff
and control of erosion, to the satisfaction of the Engine ring
and Planning Departments.
3.
4.
5.
The relationship of this project with the Urban Runoff
Management Plan should be addressed with the appropriate :
easement language and parceling to accommodate the easemeft
requested by City Engineering. I
I
should be !I
measures must
I
I
Impacts o.f. grading and run-off on the Glory Hole Park pond
must be evaluated and, if necessary, an agreement for coni
tinuing maintenance should be drawn up with the City of I
Aspen. Continuing maintenance of the on-site ponds be ou~-
lined through a subdivision agreement at preliminary plat.1
All trees over six inches (6") in diameter which are to b~
removed must be shown on a site plan for consideration. i
I
A legal description of the proposed trail easement to be I
dedicated be supplied in the Preliminary Plat submission
for review by the Engineering and Parks Department.
6.
The potential toxicity of the mine tailings
addressed. If a problem exists, mitigation
be outlined.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Preliminary Plat should show a bedroom count for park de- I
dication fee calculation purposes. I
,
The shared access on Alps Road be formalized either throug~
a recorded agreement or easement. ['
The Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking and access arrangement!
should also be a recorded agreement or easement.
Any installation of wood burning devices shall be subject
to Ordinance 12 (Series of 1983).
11.
12.
13.J
14.
Drainage from roofs, paved areas and disturbed soil sites
must be retained on-site.
1
15.
Immediate vegetation of disturbed areas is required.
16.
The applicant will joint in a sidewalk, curb and gutter . .'
improvement district in the event one is formed. They wi~~
. .
~ ..
/l..Il~II~
.~,~ .
~ EXHIBIT "A"
^)-,
"~",,&W
eon..... __
--
MIchael H. Ban'l1t
Donavon D, Nick.
DavidE.Austln
-
Don'Py'e
DonaldC Webi!1'
JOMKBrlgl'lt
CrJarles 0 Keyes
William a O'NNI
Nell F. Dunbar
ROOMI 0, ${:arrow
Howaro 8. Browning
JaIMsR. Davis
Martin S. OldlOrd
--
C. James EriCbOn
Larry A. Sward
DavldO Gilla$J)ilt
James a Adkins
H. Kaneu
G.~
w amR.Hll1TlIlIOft
Jo W. Maas
"--
910 CooPltf"'~
GletlwOodSOt.,VS CC<lorado!1601
3039458664
Milo S. Ketchln
SpKiIII conSUQnt
E. \llJ,~ Konk..
(1923-1970)
AJ.Ryan
\1908.1967)
BOONDl\RY IESCRIPTICN
ASPEN CE\lID: SUBDIVIS!CN
A parcel of land situated in Sect:ia118, Township 10 South, Range 84 Wast
of the 6th P.M., City of Aspen, County of Pitkin, State of Colorado: .
m::>re particularly described as follows:
,
Camlencing at Corner No. 2 of Chance !ode, a rebar and cap L.S.#S933 in I
place, the True Point of Beg~; thence S.4s000'OO"E. 127.96 feet: ~oe
N.S3oS0'43"E. 152.15 feet to a pomt on the westerly right-of-way line ofl
ute Avenue; thence S.38035'34"E. along said right-of-way line 26.57 feet
to the northeasterly corner of rot 5 of the ute Nldition; thenoe leaving
said right-of-way S.55016'42"W. aloog the northerly line of said IDt 5,
94.74 feet to the nort:hwesterly corner of said rot 5; thence S.39057'31"E
along the westerly line .of said rot 5, 45.21 feet to the southwesterly
comer of said IDt 5; thenoe N.57029'49"E. along the southerly line of
IDt 5, 93.98 feet to a point on the westerly right-of-way line of said
Avenue; thence S.38035'34"E. along said right-of-way line 101.13 feet;
leavin; said right-of-way line S.54007'50"W. 91.02 feet; thence S.39057'2
7.90 feet; thence S.47007'OO"W. 963.63 feet; thence N.45010'00''W. 284.56
to a point on the northerly line of Chance Ulde Claim U.S.M.S. No. 1830;
N.45000'OO"E. along said northerly line 530.24 feet to a point on line 3-4
of the Little Nell Ulde, U.S.M.S. 3881, AM.; thenoe S.43046'OO"E. along sa1i.d
line 3-4 5.00 feet; t;hence N.45000'OO"E. 170.64 feet to a point on the I
southerly edge of the Aspen Alps private road right-of-way; thence along
said right-of-way along the arc of a curve to the left having a radius of 8.60
feet a distance of 21.32 feet (cOOrd bears S.58040'14"W. 21.15 feet) , to
a point on the northerly line of said Chance Wde Claim; thence N.4so00'OO E.
along said northerly line 243.49 feet to the True Point of Beginning; said
parcel oootains 6.86 ac:n!S, DDre or less.
lOO'lNl'., DC.
910 Cooper Avenue
Gle.m;cod Springs, CO 81601
April 28, 1984
LOT NO. BEDROOMS
Lot 1 4
Lot 2 4
Lot 3 4
Lot 4 5
Lot 5 5
Lot 6 4
Lot 7 6
Common Area
Within City
o
Parking Roads
Access & Parking
Easement to Aspen
Alps Condos 0
.~
EXHIBIT "13"
SITE DA'I~ TABULATION***
ACRES* SQUARE FEET
0.414** 18,024.8
0.346 15,073.6
0.514 22,397.8
0.491 21,396.2
0.461 20,076.6
0.363 15,803.5
0.652 28,412.9
0.249
0.47~ 20,540~
10,883.4
c~
BLDG. FOOT
SQ. FT.
1992
2226
3609
4856
5064
3336
6000
I
I
PRINT
i
Total
Subdivision
32
0.188 8,201.4
3.43
160,270.2
* 1 Acre= 43,560 sq. ft.
** All acreage has been rounded up to nearest 1000th
***Revised as of May 24,1984
27,083.0
, .
J^
/
EXHIBIT "c"
CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE
ASPEN CHANCE SUBDIVISION
Schedule
Protect trees to be saved
Cut down trees and brush
Tear down buildings
Haul debris
Layout roads, utilities
and building envelopes
~ough grade road, building
envelopes and re-contour terrain
Dig water lines and inst~ll
Dig sewer lines and install
Dig gas lines and install
Dig crawl space for house ~6
Dig and install electric lines,
install cable T.V. and phone in
same trench
Transplant trees by road
Start foundation on house ~2
Dig crawl space house ~6
Dig piling for house ~6
Final contouring south end
subdivision
Begin planting trees south side
Begin foundation house #6
Dig crawl space for House #7 and drive
piles
")1""'1
Date 1984
May 23rd
May 25th
May 28th
May 30th
June 6 th
June 11th
June 13th
June 15th
June 15th
June 18th
June 18th
June 19th
June 21st
June 21st
June 25th
June 25th
June 25th
/
/'
. ,
,-
,,"
-
Page TWo (Continued)
Schedule
Back fill house 12 and
begin landscaping
Finish contouring upper bench
and begin landscaping
Begin foundation for house 17
Begin landscaping on lined streams
Start work on rebuilding entrance
to mine
Finish work on drainage system
Start landscaping on middle level
Begin landscaping on lower level
Landscaper to begin laying sod
Landscaping for 1st year to be completed
Lay 6" of road base on all roads
Complete house 12
Complete house 16
Complete house 17
Start house 11
Start house 15
Complete landscaping on
houses 12 & 16
Begin landscaping on house 17
Complete landscaping on house 17
Pave roads to upper and lower houses
Complete landscaping around house 11
Complete landscaping around house 15
.~.
Date 1984
June 28+
I
July Is
July
July
July
,
~:::,:l
I
August l{th
October 5th
I
October t6th
DeCember! 21st
Februaryllst,1985
June Istl
I
June Istl
,
June 15t1
July 1st I
July 1st I
I
August 1st
.. I
I
Septembe 1st
Septembe 1st
October 5th
'.
')-
)~
Page Three (Continued)
Schedule
Complete house #1
Complete house #5
Start house U
Complete landscaping around house #4
Complete landscaping around house #3
Pave middle level roads
Complete house #4
Complete house #3
Finish clean-up on site
Date 1985
December 2 st
February Is ,1986
I
September 1st
I
October 15tt
October 15t
December 21lt
February IS~, 1987
May 15th, 1~87
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
!
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
\
I
!
!
\
June 1st
,
"I
.l1i
"
),-.
),-,
EXHIBIT "D"
LANDSCAPE DESIGN OBJECTIVE
The landscaping, commensurate with the building
construction and in accordance with the January 12, 1984,
memorandum from Jim HOlland, Director of Parks, and the
Conceptual Site Plan attached thereto, attached hereto as
Exhibit "I," is anticipated in being accomplished in a three
(3) year period. The first year will see the disturbed site
totally reshaped, utilities in place to each lot and
landscaping completed on Lots 2, 6 and 7. On the southern
boundary-line trees will be planted to provide visual
screening from the adjacent site. This will be accomplished
within the first summer of construction. The center three
(3) sites (3, 4, 5) will be covered with topsoil except the
house site per ~ and one of ~he three (3) sites will be
used to store, grow, and accl~mate the plants and trees
needed for the completion of the first year and the
screening trees, as many as practical, will be planted
around that area. The preliminary landscaping around Lot 1
will be done at the same time (summer 1984) after the
existing buildings have been removed. As each house is
completed the landscaping per the plans will be completed.
As much landscaping as practical will be done on each site
before construction takes place.
It is the intention of the OWner, who will live in
the house designed on Lot 7 to create a beautiful, natural
environment for the occupants of the site to enjoy.
....
....
PUD Exhibit D/CHANCB
~
. ~
,
",
') .1"'.
" I'"
EXHIBIT "E"
PARK DEDICATION FEE
proposed Development:
Lot 1
Lot 2
Lot 3
Lot 4
Lot 5
Lot 6
Lot 7
4 BR
4 BR
4 BR
5* BR
5* BR
4 BR
6* BR
~
*
Includes one (1) employee unit bedroom exempt from park
dedication fee requirements.
..,
.
There are eight (8) bedrooms existing on the site,
two (2) in the barn and one (1) each in the six (6) other
structures.
The October 1983, purchase price of $900,000.00
for the whole parcel (which includes substantial land, 3+
acres, in the County dedicated as open space), indicates the
fair market value of the property.
Calculate as follows:
$900,000.00 ~ 7 = $128,600.00 X .01 = $1,286.00
'lo!
Subtract 1 existing bedroom per lot except for Lot 7,
subtract 2 existing bedrooms, Lot 7.
Subtract employee bedrooms from Lots, 4, 5 and 7.
.......
Lot 1 (3 BR) 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 2 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 3 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 4 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 5 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 6 2.5 x 1,286
Lot 7 2.5 x 1,286
:~i
.....
..
TOTAL = 7x 2.5 x 1,286 '"' $22,505.00
PUD Exhibit E/CHANCE
..,
I"'"
'.-'~":';::'
. -"'''''"~;.'~.::,:
~,
A>
"
'>;,' ,
CITY OF/ASPEN
Jl@'I<"..""".".;.'."."."
130 S'1i'Jit~"iV€~.I~.;~ii~"hr~e t .
"::;,~'':;i,,~~'jii','~
If'tI~/,,\g 1611
......~
20
~
asp
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 20,-1984
TO: Planning Office
Engineerin9 Department
FROM: City Attorney
RE: Aspen Chance PUD/Subdivision Agreement
I find the annexed PUD and Subdivision Agreement for the Aspen
Chance Subdivision acceptable as to form subject to the_follqwing
1. The exhibits must be verified by the Planning Office and
Engineering Department as appropriate. The exhibits are:
Exhibit "A" - Plat
Exhibit "B" - Site Data Tabulation
Exhibit "CO - Improvement Schedule
Exhibit "0" - Landscaping Plan
Exhibit "En - Park Dedication Fee Calculation
In addition, I recommend that the copy of the drainage study and
soil and foundation investigation accompany the original agree-
ments.
2. I assume that Jim Adamski has approved the employee housing
dedication and restriction language set forth in Paragraph II
(Page 2).
3. I assume that the Finance Department has approved the $22,505
park dedication fee referred to in Paragraph VI.B, as calculated
in Exhibit "E".
4. The City Engineer should calculate the financial assurance
sum to be inserted in Paragraph X.
5. I note the fOllowing typographical errors.
- The words "NOW, THEREFORE" in Paragraph 5 of the recitals
appear to be redundant.
~
~
.~
~..
Memorandum Re: Aspen Chance
July 20, 1984
Page Two
The word "become" should be substituted for "became" in-
fourth line of Paragraph III.H (on Page 4}.
- An unnecessary figure "7" appears at the end of Paragraph
IV.A.
6. The original agreement should be executed by the applicant-,
with all exhibits attached as approved by the appropriate depart-
ments, and should be forwarded for execution by the Mayor and
immediate recording by the City Clerk.
PJT!mc
Attachment
~\
,1""\
/~~.-.
---
: i
,.
"
MEMORANDUM
DATE: July 19, 1984
,'.
TO: Planning Office
Engineering Department
FROM: City Attorney
,
RE: Aspen Chance PUD/Subdivision Agreement
\
I,
I find the annexed PUD and Subdivision Agreement for the Aspen I.:~
Chance Subdivision acceptable as to form subject to the fOIIOWi~9:
I
1. The exhibits must be verified by the Plann~ng Office and
Eng ineering Depa.rtment as appropriate. The exhibits are:
Exhibit "A" - Plat
Exhibit "B" - Site Data Tabulation
Exhibit "CO - Improvement Schedule
Exhibit "0" - Landscaping Plan
Exhibit "En - Park Dedication Fee Calculation
---;.
In additio~I recommend that the copy of , the drainage study and
soil and foundation investigation accompany,\~riginal agree-
ments.
2. I assume that Jim. Adamski has approved the employee housing
dedication and restriction language set forth in Paragraph II
(Page 2).
,'-"
.~
3. I assume that the Finance Department has approved the $ 22', 05
park dedication fee referred to in Paragraph VI.B, as 'calculate
, I
in Exhibit "E".
4. The City Engineer should calculate the financial assurance
sum to be inserted in Paragraph X.
,'.
The words "NOW, THEREFORE" in Paragraph 5 of the
I
,
i
\
\
reci tals!
5.
I note the following typographical errors.
appear to be redundant.
- The word "become" should be substituted for.. "became" i'n t e'
fourth line of Paragraph III.H (on Page 4). I .
I
- An unnecessary figure "7" appears at the end of Paragraph '.
\
IV.A. I
6. The original
exhibits attached
~k.
agreemen~xecuted
as approved by the
by the appl'icant, with all
should be forwarded for execution by
appropriate departments /
the Mayor .and immed iate
I
~
I
I
recording by the City Clerk.
PJT/mc
Attachment
"--..
"
?--,
.1""\.
.
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen.
I
I
rs)
N (,,2 ~9.3
o. l'~ u
Staff:~P
,.
:{ }
'\
.'V
PROJECT NAME:
APPLICANT:
REPRESENTATIVE:.1:>cu.\~ .~r.M\Wi
. 1<'aA1A\. ~
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
(Fee)
Phone:
'1;;l..S' 51l 3
Phone:
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Preliminary Plat
3. Final Plat
'I II. 'SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
($1,840)
($1, 120)
($ 560)
1. Conceptual Submission
($1,290)
($/~)
($ 560)
($l,OlQ)
b8'O
( $ ,%5-)
'/
.2. Preliminary Plat
3. Final Plat
III. EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step)
IV. SPE,CIAL REVIEW (1 step)
.1. Special Review 8040 &,ttnh(l('
(
V
x
X
2. Use Determination
,\0 c,~ P"'l.-
~._ \J'o"'>,."'~'2..Q
~,""",\C~ \1,0.'\ ~':'.:.J
3. Conditional Use
REFERRALS:
. ,,/ Attorney
~Engineering Dept.
AOUSing
Water.
City Electric
Date Referred:
Sanitation District
Mountain Bell
Pa rks
Holy. Cross .Electric. .
Zire Marshall/Building Dept.
FINAL ROUTING:
Date Routed:
. ~neering.. .
?"i;.~
\
V
Attorney
.. .../"Building
Sub
..
I
\
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
\
I
\
I
I
I
i
i
~_Schooi District
I
Rocky!Mtn. Nat.Ga~
State !H9WY' Dept.
Fire ~hief
./ Other ~~v. \\<A\ ~\.
I .
V
-ri
..~
-xU
-[0
...".,.,
,
.
r'\
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen
,,-..,
No. blJ-r i"
Staff: . .CP
I
\
I
.. \
\
I
I
I
I
\
I
I
PROJECT NAME: OAJIM-- CA~ . ~~
APPLICANT: ~....~ (1Jt.~, .lh.c- . Phone:
REPRESENTATIVE:. . ~ ~ Phone: "1OZS..rjP?'/
tJ~~~~ .qQ5-5"?18
TYPE OF APPLICATION:
I. GMP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Preliminary Plat
X
i.
3. Final Plat
II. SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
1. Conceptual Submission
2. Prel imi nary Pl at
3. Final Pl at
..:L-
'I.
III. EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step)
IV. SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step)
1. Special Review <;0<10
2. Use Determination
3. Conditional Use
. . REFERRALS:
. Y Attorney
X Engineering Dept.
Housing
',( Water
Ci ty El ectri c .
. '(Fee)
.($1,840)
($1,120)
($ 560)
Date Referred:
X Sanitation District
Mountain Bell
($1,290)
($ . 830)
($ 560)
($1,010)
($ 465)
~.
Holy Cross Electric
X. Fire Marshall/, uilding DeR
. i ~uif'oY\. H-I
Pa rks
FINAL ROUTING:
Attorney
Building
Engineering
Other
. Date Routed:
~a~~\e~~a~a ~~ ~~~&KhAhft A~ ~~^.~ ~~~-~~-~
Schoo District
Rocky \Mtn. Nat.Ga~
StatelHgWY. Dept.
x: Fire C~ief
I .
Other I
I
I.
/'
G
G
1"""\
,,~- '
1"'\
CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET
City of Aspen I
::~. :,;:.~rl'
=_":"" /::::-~;' )d&M"";(~~:~~'4JI'I+
REPRESENTATrVE:-1J~~~ ;!,-~ Phone: 9.t'S, S"7/J3
TYPE OF APPLICATION: (FEE) I
I. GNP/SUBDIVISION/PUD (4 step)
~
1.
Conceptual Submission
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
($2,730.00)
($1,640.00)
($ 820.00)
2.
3.
L
II.
SUBDIvrSION/PUD (4 step)
1.
Conceptual Submission
Preliminary Plat
Final Plat
($1,900.00)
($1,220.00)
($ 820.00) v.
2.
.J(.
.3.
III. EXCEPTION/EXEMPTION/REZONING (2 step). ($1,490.00)
.rv.
SPECIAL REVIEW (1 step)
($ 680.00)
l.
2.
Special Review
Use Determination
Conditional Use
7 .,-,y~ ~iJ
'Pub, tf~, L.-I
WJk>~
3.
4. ..Other:
P&Z MEETING DATE:
CC MEETING
DATE: y\\"", .)..'\ ", DATE
~,
REFERRED:
h:LS:.
_~ity Attorney
~City Engineer
~ousing Director
~Aspen Water Dept.
____City Electric
Aspen Consolo S.D.
----
_____Mountain Bell
_____Parks Dept.
~oly Cross Electric
Fire Marshall
_____School District
_____Rocky Mtn. Natura Gas
_____State Hwy Dept. lenwood)
_____State Hwy Dept. (G d. Jctn)
_____Building Dept.
_____Other:
Environmental Hlth. _____Fire Chief
FINAL ROUTrNG:
.'~;lty Att~rne
..!!t!J~her :
~ty Engineer
DATE ROUTED: . (p (j
~lding Dept.
<
0ther:
! I.
..1;'
.....i
FILE STATUS AND LOCATrON:
^
.""'"
MEMORANDU~l
TO:
Aspen City Council
FRO!l :
Alan Richman, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Chance - Final PUD Submission Case #062C-84
DATE:
May 29, 1984
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
-------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
INTRODUCTION
The representatives of Aspen Chance have submitted their final PUD sub-
division plat and agreement in order to complete the processin of
their land use application. To familiarize you once again with this
proposal, the Chance Claim site fronts on Ute Avenue, just eas of
the Aspen Alps Road and wraps around the tennis courts and through
the mine tailings in the area. The zoning of this land is R-15: PUD
on its lower portion and Conservation on its upper slopes.
The applicant's proposal is to reconstruct seven (7) existing free
market residences and to add three new moderate income employee u its,
all of which are exempt from our growth management regulati ns.
Prior approvals granted to the applicant are as follows:
Aspen P&Z Conceptual PUD approval
Aspen City Council Conceptual PUD app oval
Aspen P&Z Preliminary PUD approval,
8040 Greenline approval
The requests remaining before you are to act on the Final PUD/Subdiv sion
Plat and agreement and to exempt the employee units from the growth
management quota system. Following are the review comments in this
regard.
January 3, 1983
January 23, 1983
April 3, 1983
REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS I
I
Paul Taddune, Jay Hammond and I met on May 18, 1984, to revie the
plat and agreements in detail. In summary, we feel that these docu ents
are substantially in compliance with the provisions of our ode,
but some changes and additions will need to be made prior to your
final approval. We, therefore, wish to familiarize you wit the
issues involved in the application today and obtain your gui ance
in several discretionary areas so that final action can be aken
at your next regular meeting on June 11. These issues can be b oken
into the following groupings:
1. Changes/clarifications since Conceptual review; and
2. Changes/additions to plat/agreement.
Following is a discussion of these two aspects of the application
CHANGES/CLARIFICATIONS SINCE CONCEPTUAL REVIEW
During Conceptual review, the applicant proposed to create seven
(7) small lots, each containing less than the 15,000 s.f. req ired
in the R-15 zone, and to keep the remainder of the site in c mmon
open space. This arrangement complied with the underlying de sity
pf the site and kept the open areas of the site in common ownership,
guaranteeing a uniform maintenance approach. I
The final plan follows the revised pattern established at prelimJnary
PUD of creating lots which meet the underlying requirements 0 the
zone district, with only the following as cornman areas:
1. Sculpture garden and turnaround;
"--
Page 2
~,
,..-;.
2. Tennis court parking area; and
3. Land above 8040 foot elevation, to be used for sk' and
trail access.
While we do not have any disagreement with this approach, it does
require that we insure that the grading and landscaping prop sed
for the entire PUD is carried through on each of the fee simple lots
to obtain the intents and purposes of the PUD. More will be said
in this regard in the review of the agreement below.
Two items which have been clarified since Conceptual PUD are the
construction schedule and the grading/landscaping plan. The appl'cant
proposes to construct three (3) free market units in 1986, two (2)
free market units in 1985, and two (2) free market units in 986,
with one (1) employee unit being built in each of the three years.
All public and common area improvements will take place this su~er,
including: I
I
site grading;
perimeter landscaping and most internal landscaping;
drainage and paving; and
utility extensions.
The final plat reveals that extensive site grading will be taking
place. As your site visit demonstrated, this is a very distuFbed
site, with extensive mine tailings rendering the natural grade indis-
tinguishable. The applicant proposes to shape each building ite
as a platform, divided by sloping architectural earth forms. hile
we believe that the final shaping of the site will create a uch
more pleasing site design than is presently the case, you sh uld
be aware that some very substantial cuts and earth movements . ill
take place on the site this summer. The applicant proposes t~ do
much of the final planting this year and to use the water from the
Durant mine to irrigate the site so as to soften this impact. The
applicant has also agreed to preserve the most critical trees identi ied
by the Parks Director.
CHANGES/ADDITIONS TO PLAT/AGREEMENT
All significant issues flagged as conditions during the prior rev~ews
have been addressed within either the plat or the agreement. Theref re,
this discussion focuses on the adequacy of the provisions incl ded
in these documents and other items which should be added to t ese
documents. FOllowing is a summary of the issues identified by P ul,
Jay and myself.
1.
:t.
2.
Landscape Guarantee - Section 24-8.16 provides that 'the
City may require the applicant as a condition of final
approval of a PUD plan, to provide a guarantee for no ess
than 125% of the then current estimated cost of the landsca ing
improvements as estimated by the City Engineer to in ure
the installation of all landscaping shown and the conti. ued
maintenance and replacement of same for a period of two
(2) years after installation." The Planning Office and
the City Engineer feel that this guarantee is an essenial
item, due to the extensive site disturbance which is to
take place and the importance of obtaining a harmon'ous
site design in this lot line style of PUD plan. This guara,tee
is not now found in the agreement and we feel you sh uld
direct the applicant to add these provisions prior to our
final approval.
Improvements Guarantee - Section 20-16(c) provides, hat
the City Council may require that 100% of the current estimred
cost of improvements be guaranteed by the applicant in
the form of a cash escrow or an irrevocable sight dr ft
of commitment. In this case, the improvements (water and
sewer lines, roads, etc.) represent principally serv'ce
lines for this subdivision, and not main lines serving
,
___J
~
-.
Page 3
other developments. Furthermore, Jay informs us that t ese
improvements will not be dedicated to the public for m in-
tenance, since, for example, the streets are too seep
and do not meet our standards. Therefore, our down ide
risk if the improvements are not properly complete is
not significant from a City-wide standpoint. Howe er,
from the standpoint of consumer protection, we recom end
that you direct the applicant to revise the subdivi ion
agreement to add the appropriate guarantees prior to our
final approval.
3. Trail Alignment - At Preliminary Plat, there was consider ble
discussion of the alignment of the trail designed to con ect
this site to Aspen Mountain and through towards the Ute
Avenue trail. Apparently, it was required that the CPA
and Parks Director agree with the proposed alignment, and
such agreement has not yet been obtained. It is our un er-
standing that PCPA may want the trail to cross the prop rty
at a higher elevation than does the applicant. This i~sue
should be resolved so that the proper easement is recotded
on the plat. I
4. Land Dedication - The applicant proposes to dedicat to
Pitkin County approximately 2.75 acres of land above the
8040 greenline. To this point, no concern has been ra sed
that this land be dedicated to the City rather than the
County but Paul wanted you to have a chance to com ent
on this issue. The agreement also needs to be augme ted
to indicate the land which is to be dedicated, to rest ict
that it will remain as open space in perpetuity and to
insure that no more than ten (10) units are built on the
site.
I
5. Park Dedication Fee - The applicant proposes to pay a 'ark
dedication fee of $22,505.nO, due to the fact that uch
of the development is reconstruction and not new construct'on,
and due to the land being dedicated to the County. We
have submitted this information to the Zoning Enforce ent
Officer for confirmation of this value.
6. Water Rights - The applicant is asking to have the ity
grant it the water rights from the Durant Mine so it can
irrigate the PUD. We await comments from John Music in
response to this request. Jim Markalunas has asked for
a minor change in the applicant's proposed water sy tem
and the applicant has agreed to meet this requirement. I
7. Other Plat Changes - Jay Hammond has identified a ist
of needed changes to the Final Plat which should be compl ted
as outlined in his attached memorandum. We have also a ked
the applicant to make a series of changes to the lang age
included in the agreement.
PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office recommends that you table this application, but
first discuss the relevant issues and give us sufficient direc ion
to return to you with a plat and agreement in a form which can rec ive
final approval at your next meeting.
,-"
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen City Council
Alan Richman
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Chance
DATE:
May 29, 1984
================================================================!======
Since we drafted our original memo to you concerning the Aspen hance
Final PUD, the applicants and staff have been able to settl many
of the issues we presented to you. The applicant has submi ted a
new PUD Agreement, which, with some further review by the Pltnning
Office, City Engineer and City Attorney, will be ready for record tion.
The applicant has also been working with Jay to get the pIa into
the form necessary for recordation. I
Five issues still remain to be addressed. Four of the iSSUjS are
exactly as identified in our prior memo, and can be found on pages
two and three of that memo under the headings landscape guarantee, trail
alignment, land dedication and water rights. The last issuer park
dedication fee, has been verified as to the amount, provide~ that
you exempt the employee units from the fee, as permitted by the ode.
Given the fact that the application has proceeded this far, and pr surning
that you can come to terms with the applicant on the above 'terns,
we recommend approval of this application by the following motio :
"Move to grant final PUD/Subdivision approval to the Aspen ~hance
application, and exemption from growth management and park dedi9ation
fee requirements for its 3 moderate income employee units, subject
to the following conditions: 1
,
Approval as to form and content of the PUD Agreeme~t by
the Planning Office, City Engineer and City Attorney. I
i
I
The Engineering and Parks Department will monitor the grading
activ1ti€'$ on the site to insure preservation of trees
and compliance with the approved plan. I
The applicant will record the access agreement for IAspen
Alps Road following its approval by the Alps' Homeo~ners
Association. :
The applicant will amend the final plat prior to recorJation
to conform with the requirements outlined by Jay Ha~mond
in his memo dated May 21,1984." \
I
I
,
I
I
i
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
~~<;~ &v-p<^""",,,-~
~.
~
MEMORANDUH
TO: ALAN RICHMAN, PLANNING OFFICE
FROM: JAY HMII>lOND, CITY ENGINEER<SIA (CO
DATE: ~1AY 21, 1984 1
RE: ASPEN CHANCE SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT
::;1:~:~~:f~::~::}~:~~~~~:~~:~~:~:ii~:~=~:t::;~~:~::;~~2EE~
Prior to recordation, the final plat should be amended to indlude
the following: \
1. Notations to indicate the common areas on the plat. iThe
map should clearly indicate common areas reserved fo the
subdivision owners as well as common areas intended for
public dedication or use as reflected in the subdivi. ion
agreement. I
,
I
2. Sheets for the final plat actually intended for recordation
should be renumbered and properly indexed. !
3. The subdivision should be tied to a government survey mon~nt.
4. Add a title insurance certificate to the plat. i
I
,
5. Amend the water system plan to show a revised desig~ as
requested in Jim Markalunas' May 10 memo and accepteq in
Karen Smith's letter of May 17. . I
,
,
,
,
6. Amend the grading plan to show drainage improvements indic~ted
in the preliminary plat. :
,
I
I
'I
I
1. Revision of the improvement distr ict language purusan~. to
our standard language. \
I
i
3. Comment from John Musick regarding the granting of waker
rights by the City from the Durant mine suggested in see ion
VIII of the agreement.
7.
Show all ditch and pond improvements.
Items of concern on the subdivision agreement include:
2.
Dedication of the public trail easement.
4. Provision of financial guarantees for the landscape plan
.
,
I"'"
-
Page 2
Aspen Chance Subdivision Final Plat
May 21, 1984
to the site during construction will be significant.
guarantees for revegetation of the site, tied to a date
will prevent the prolonged uglification of the site.
JH/co/Aspen.Chance
.
Fina cial
spec fic,
This letter is in respect to the memorandum from J.im Markaluias
to Alan Richman of May 10, 1984, requesting changes in the As en
Chance Final Plat. The applicant hereby commits that it w 11
make the requested changes pursuant to one of two oPti~lns
outlined in his memorandum. We will work with Fire and Wa er
Departments prior to building permit issuance to select he
alternative and meet standards and specifications. I
,
I
,
I
I
-.' ..~t~:~"~~WlJ'\{J'~r-?iI~r~" .
'. _I ,', '",'''.J\''~"\) " '~"sli r~I
l^.':...DI~ .':... YJ.'... ('/'; '....'..
I .-- ,
t.,' , 1
" _.' 1
: 'MAY 1 ,81984 ','
As:P~ I PlTKl:N co .'
" flANN1NG OffiCE'
\
^
KAREN B, SMITH, A.I.C,P.
Planning and Management Services
P,O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Phone: (303) 925-4894
Jay Hammond
City Engineer
130 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Jay:
Sincerely,
4b.S7~
Karen B. Smith, AICP
for ASPEN CHANCE, INC.
/'
KBS:klm
CCI Alan
cc I Neal
Richman
Myers
1""\
May 17, 1984
~
~
--rMMt
..,
~
ASPEN WATER DEPARTMENT
---------MEMO---------
00: ALAN RI CHMAN I
FROM: JI M MARKALUNAS I
~~~~~_:~~~~~~:~~~~_:~::~~~:~::______________________________J_______
We have reviewed the Final Plat Submission drawings and wish
to make the following comments:
Blow-offs are not acceptable.
hydrants installed on the end
per Fire and Water Department
We request looping,
of. eachS' niP line,
specifications.
or fire
and 1 ocat e
1. Fi re hydrant at the end of cul-de-sac, Dri ve A.
2. Fi re hydrant at the end of the water I I ne, Drl v B.
Or loop A to B.
3. Fi re hydrant at the end of water 1 I ne, Dri ve C.
I f you have any quest ions, pi ease feel free to contact me.
JJM:td
cc: KKBNA Inc., Consul t i ng Eng; neers
4421 Kipling
Wheatr i dge, CO. B0033
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
/'4..
f1E~lORANDUH
Jay Hammond, City Engineering Office
Paul Taddune, City Attorney
Jim Markalunas, Aspen Water Dept.
Alan Richman, Planning Office
Aspen Chance Subdivision - Final Plat
May 3, 1984
,.....,
----------------------------------------------------------------------
-- --- - -- -- -- -- --- -- -- --- -- - - - - --- -------------------------------------- --
I am forwarding herewith the Final Plat Submission materials receited
with regard to the Aspen Chance Subdivision. Please review tijis
material and return your referral comments to the Planning Office
no later than May 15, 1984. I
Colette Penne handled the previous submissions with regard to As~en
Chance, but Colette will not be in the office during this particu~ar
application's review and as a result I am handling the matter. 1,we
have scheduled this case for review by City Council on May 29 h.
In the event that I am unable to complete a thorough review of he
Final Plat Submission in time to prepare for the May 29th meeti g,
this case will be placed instead on the June 11th City Council agen a.
If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. I
Thank you.
I
,
.,
,
,
I
\
I
I
I
I
!~.
DAVID FINHOLM & ASSOl. . rES
Architects & Solar Consultants
P. O. Box 2839 Aspen, CO 81612
[L~lrlrr @[f lrOOt:Al~~JOlrlrt:Al[L
I.
DATE;
JOBNa.
(303) 925-5713
ATTENTI N
Colette Penne
RE:
TO
Colette Penne
As en Chance Subdivision
Planninq Office,City of Aspen
WE ARE SENDING YOU 0 Attached 0 Under separate cover via
the following items:
o Shop drawings
:g) Copy of letter
DJ:: Prints
D Change order
D Plans
D Samples
D Specifications !
"
XJ H:=I'I'1r:l
d")i"ered by Jim Hardy
COPI ES DATE NO. ,DESCRIPTION ,
4 4/30/84 Final Pl"l'I-, a"h~; ~~; ~~
I,
"
!
,
1
!
. I,
I
THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as checked below:
D For approval 0 Approved as submitted
0 For your use D Approved as noted
o As req uested 0 Returned for corrections
D For review and comment D
0 FOR BIDS DUE 19
o Resubmit_copies for approval
o Submit_copies for distribution
o Return_corrected prints
o PRINTS RETURNED AFTER LOAN TO US
REMARKS
i
\
\
\
I
I
i
COPY TO
~~
SIGNE :
If ",Clo.ure. are not a. noted, kindly notify at 0 ce. '
PRoooa240.2/~/lne"Grotoo.Mass.01471
.---
:' f""'\' ~a\'\<\~~
ASPEN.PITKIN' .-4EGIQNAL BUILDIO DEPART ENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Patsy Newbury, Zoning Official
DATE: April 3, 1984
RE: Aspen Chance
Karen Smith and I have review,ed the elevations .of the Aspen Chance property
and because of disturbed conditions, mine tailings,. and cuts made for existing
,buildings, have agreed that eleva.tions would be as shown on the site from
undisturbed area across the parcel, coming down the slope. Height of buildings
would be figured from those elevations.
PN/ar
offices:
'110 East: Hallam S~reet
Aspen, Colorado S'fS11 303/925-5973
mail address:
506, East; Main St; eet;
Aspen, Colorado B 611
r-.
.~
MEMORANDUM
TO:.
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE: Aspen Chance - Preliminary Subdivision, Preliminary UD,
8040 Greenline, GMP Exemption for Employee Housing
DATE:
April 3, 1984
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ---
LOCATION:
The Chance Claim
Frontage is on Ute Avenue just east of the Aspen Ips
Road.
ZONING:
R-15 PUD and C - Conservation
APPLICANT'S REOUEST:
The applicant is re.questin.g Preliminary Plat approval for SUbdivis{ron,
preliminary PUD approval, approval to build within 50 yards of he
8040 greenline and a GMP exemption for the construction of three
deed-restricted employee housing units.
REFERRAL COMMENTS:
The Fire Department met with the applicants and the City Engineering
Department. They report that the agreement reached was the addi t . on
of a new fire hydrant and the assurance of a 20 foot minimum acc ss
width for all roadways to within 15~feet of all structures propose .
The Environmental Health Department notes that compliance with Ordin nce
12 (Series of 1983) will be required for wood stoves and fireplac s.
Corrective measures may need to be. taken during. grading and construc1ion
phases. They find the drainage plans to be acceptable and in s me
aspects improvements over existing conditions. They suggest he
confirmation of water rights for the Durant Mine water and a chemi al
analysis of it prior to its use for irrigation purposes. Sewer serv~ce
by the AMSD complies with policies of this department. I
The Engineering Department haS no comments concerning the PUD jnd
no problems with creation of employee housing on the site since park ng
is adequate. They feel that although the grading plan indica es
significant disturbance to the site, since much of it is curren ly
mine tailings and debris, the result may be more "natural". T ey
are also concerned about the existence of 2" water lines and th ir
ability to supply adequate flows. particularly to the upper sit s.
The City of Aspen water main extension policy would require mini urn
6" diameter mains to be extended to within 100 feet of the dwell ng
units. Engineering reque.sts four plat changes (listed as I (a) (b) c)
and 2 on their memo of 3/22/84) and clarification of the exact locat on
of several spruce trees identified for preservation and coordination
of that effort with the grading plan.
The Building Department memo is attached. Much of their concern
over building design and heights after grading will be handled thro gh
the building permit process. A significant zoning issue identified
by Bill Drueding is discussed below.
The City Attorney's Office comments are:
,
L The legal description of the trail easement should be sUPPI,led
early in the process so that the Engineering and Par s
Depa rtmen ts can coordinate the proposed trail with existing
trails and trail plans.
r'
r--,
Page 2
2. The applicant represents that it will attempt to ke p a
"majori ty of existing trees" on the si te. The Code requ' res
review to remove trees of 6" diameter or more.
3. We assume that the Engineering Department will mon tor
closely all information concerning potential geologic haz rds
and the impacts of grading and run-off on the Glory ole
Park pond.. I
4. Mandatory PUD requires consideration of adequacy of inte nal
roads. The grade of the proposed access roads (6% and
8%) should be certified as adequate by the Fire Dist ict
for fire protection purposes. Also, although internal
traffic circulation will be on private roads, the jite
will be accessed by pub~ic roads that are being or may
be impacted by certain land use approvals and applicatio s.
The Housing Authority approved the plan for three employee u its
with the following conditions: I
,
1. Standard Housing Authority Employee Unit Agreement be ent red
into prior to issuance of a building permit and be filed
with the Housing Authority.
2. Units be restricted to moderate income guidelines.
3.
public if not used by
and that verification
in the units be compl ted
I
PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW: I
This review will proceed through consideration of the prelimiJary
PUD plan and 8040 greenline criteria and will address the conditi~ns
of 8040 greenline review. The conditions required by the Engineering
Department address any deficiences in the actual subdivision preliminary
plat. Consideration will also be given for the granting of a rMP
exemption for the provision of employee housing on the site.
The review criteria for mandatory PUD and 8040 greenline revi ws
are identical with the addition of one criteria in 8040. The rev ew
criteria and the applicant's proposals are as follows: I
1. Whether these exists sufficient water pressure and ot er
utilities to service the intended development.
Units be available to the general
the owners to house their employees
of employment of those persons living
and filed with the Housing Office.
The Water Department has indicated no problem with serv'ng
the project. Water is available in Ute Avenue and a m in
located in Alps Road. A sewer trunk line also exists in
Ute Avenue and the site has been served since 1975.
2. The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protecti n,
snow removal, and road maintenance. j'
~\ :"'{ As evidenced by the comments of the Fire Department a
y .;:-.7new fire hydrant will be added at a location prefer ed
'y"sr by the City Engineer and all roads will be 20 feet mini urn
",,:c/'" width and will access all structures within a dista ce
'J of 150 feet. The Final Plat must show these commitmen
The upper and lower portions of the property will be separat
accessed and roads will be adequate to accommodate th
functions.
/ 3.
The suitability of the site for development consider'ng
the slope, ground instability and possibility of mud fl w,
rock falls and avalanche dangers.
Based on the "Snow Avalanche Hazard Zones of the As en
Area" map prepared by Arthur Mears, the site is outside
-'"
Page 3
4.
/
V
5.
/
/
1"""\
1""'\
6.
any avalanche hazard. The preliminary plat submis ion
includes a study by Chen and Associates which addre sed
these stability questions and proposes solutions for founda ion
construction, introduction of properly compacted struct ral
fill to support floor slabs, use of retaining struct res
in some locations and specific design criteria for the
water features. We are convinced that the potential prob ems
raised by this criterion have been addressed and appropr ate
solutions are outlined to be follows. I
The effects of the development on the natural waterSi\.ed,
run-off, drainage, soil erosion, and consequent effects
on water pollution. I
I
The report by McLaughlin water Engineers included in the
submission addresses the impact of the development on the
site's historic drainage patterns (both for quantity and
quality). The plan proposed forstormwater, run-off rou ing
and detention provides for release at historic rates and
controls contamination of the run-off. The reviewers w re
aware of the preservation of the goals of the City's U ban
Runoff Management Plan and have proposed an easement or
dedication to the City which will preserve a route or
a future Spat Gulch/West Aspen Floodway. The propo al
is for a series of ponds, connected by spring water flow,
which are designed to trap and filter out sediment befere
proceeding to the pond at Glory Hole Park. A sedimentatfon
basin drywell system has been designed to minimize ~he
effect of surface runoff contamination. i
I
The possible effects on air quality in the area and citYWire.
Since this site is already a residential site, no l~ng
term effects are anticipated by its redevelopment. ~he
woodburning devices to be included in these structu es
must comply with the provisions of Ordinance 12 (Ser'es
of 1983). Construction dust must be controlled and immedi te
vegetation of disturbed areas will be required to cont .01
long term dust. I
The deSign and location of any proposed structure, roa~s,
driveways or trails and their compatibility with the terr~tn.
As commented on by the EngineeringD epartment, the propo~al
to regrade the tailings and to introduce up to four f et
of fill will totally alter the terrain, but the res It
may be more "natural." The placement of improvements ~n
the "new" terrain is done in such a way that structures
are concealed and blend into hillsides as well as offer
privacy to residents.
Whether prol?osed grading will result in the least disturba1ce
to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features.
The Chen report states that "natural hillsides in the ar a
appear to have a stable geologic history. Major stabili y
problems are not anticipated if site grading is carefully
planned and cuts and fills do not exceed approximate y
20 feet in height. Regrading Of the existing steep tailin s
slopes is recommended." The Engineering Department expressis
some concern over the fact that four feet of fill is propos d
in the area of some spruce trees identified for preservati n
and this will be flagged as a condition. The Direct r
of Parks reviewed the site plan with the applicant alJld
isolated four specific trees for preservation as well s
the tree line in the south corner of the property (rough y
along the 8030 line). The applicants are respecting th s
recommendation. The other natural feature that is bei g
used to enhance the property is the spring water whi h
will meander and pond throughout the property in a ve y
7.
Page 4
8.
,""'"
1-\
aesthetically pleasing arrangement.
The placement and clustering of structures so as to mlnl lze
roads, cutting and grading, and increase the open space
and preserve the mountain as a scenic resource.
Existing roads are being utilized, open space is considera Ie.
No structures are being proposed above the 8040 li e.
Concealment of structures is effective in preserVing\the
scenic aspects of the mountain.
The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain Ithe
open character of the mountain.
I
No variances are being requested from the area and bblk
requirements of the R-15 zone in the design of these strbc-
tures. The entire portion of the property above the Co nty
line will remain undeveloped. The .75 acre area wit in
the City but above the 8040 line will also be undevel ped
and is very positive in terms of maintaining the open character
of the mountain. Building heights will not exceed he
25 foot height requirement of the residential zones.
The Preliminary Subdivision Plat has been found to be complete by
the Engineering Department with a few minor corrections which w'll
be listed as condi tions. The single-family units are on 15,000 squ re
foot lots, as required by the R-15 zone. The remaining land a ea
will be common area and a proportionate, undivided interest in it
will be deeded in perpetuity to each lot owner with a deed restrict'on
against future residential development. An open space and com on
facilities maintenance agreement will bave to be filed accord ng
to Section 24-8.19 of the Municipal Code.
9.
./
The landscaping plan is a requirement of Final Plat, however, m ch
of the detailed landscaping proposal has been given to you as p rt
of this submission. Care has been taken to preserve signific nt
existing vegetation and extensive new plantings are proposed as
detailed on the landscape/site plan).
/
;' Section 24-8.15 requires that you consider the appropriateness of
the architecture according to the following guidelines:
I
It is not the purpose of this section that control of arcii-
tectural character should be so rigidly enforced that individ al
initiative is stifled in the design of any particular buildi g,
or substantial additional expense is required, rather it
is the intent of this section that any control exerci ed
by the minimum necessary to achieve the overall objecti es
of this article. (Note: Those objectives being the preservat an
of the visual character of the city, the stability of 1 nd
values and investmentr the public safety and general welf re
of the community.)
a.
b. Good archi tectural character is based upon the sui tabil 'ty
of a building for its purposes, upon the appropriate use
of materials, and upon the principles of harmony and proport'on
of the buildings with each other and the surrounding la d
uses.
c. Building design should minimize disturbances to the naturlal
terrain and maximize the preservation of existing vegetation,
as well as enhance drainage and reduce soil erosion. I
The site design aspects have been dealt with in earlier parts f
this memo. Structures have been sited for maximum privacy and minim m
J! visibility. Natural stone and wood are being used to blend wi h
the surroundings. Rooflines are varied to minimize mass and to ble d
with the hillsides. The massing, scale and materials are coordinat d
but individual structures have diverse features. The architectur 1
character is very acceptable, in our opinion.
I"'"
~
Page 5
/
The problem raised by the Building Department in their referral m~mo,
however, needs to be discussed by the Commission. The defini~ion
of a dwelling unit, as stated in Section 24-3.l(g) is, "one or ore
rooms, in addition to a kitchen and/or both facilities, intended
or designed for occupancy by a family or guests independent of oJher
families or guests." With the bridge elements in the design of sev ral
of these units leading to suites with separate bath facilities and
entrances, the concern expressed over their very ready convertabi ity
to separate living space ("bandit units") is justified. The applic nts
have agreed to either remove exterior entrances or to covenant the
particular units where this may be a problem. The City Atto ney
asks that you make a determination of the acceptability of one (or
both) of these alternatives and the appropriate changes be made p ior
to Final Plat review by Council.
/
Adherence
24-8.20.
follows:
to a project completion schedule is required by Sec ion
The development schedule offered by the applicant is as
l.
2.
3.
period of two to three years. M~st
area improvements will be comPlel ed
I
Upper driveway and turn-around; I
Drainage and paving (except around the three cen~er
houses);
Site grading;
Buildout will be over a
of the public and common
in 1984, specifically:
4. Utility extensions (underground); and
5. Landscaping (except around houses 3, 4 and 5).
"The landscaping commensurate with the building constr c-
tion is anticipated as being accomplished in a t 0-
year period. The first year will see the distur ed
site totally reshaped, utilities in place and landscap ng
completed on Lots 1, 2, 6 and 7. On the south rn
boundary line trees will be planted to provide vis al
screening from the adjacent site. (This will be comple ed
within the first year of construction). The cen er
three house sites (3, 4 and 5) will be covered w th
topsoil and one of the three sites will be used ito
.' store, grow, and acclimate the plants and trees neetd
for the completion of the first year and the screening
trees, as many as practical, will be planted aro~nd
that area." ,
J
The Housing Authority has reviewed and approved the employee hous
proposal. The units in which there will be a caretaker's unit
considered to be duplexes and are on duplex lots. They must rem
rental units. If they were to be condominiumized at any time,
rental structure of the units which were verified as existing
this parcel prior to this application would have to be supplied' or
the 18 mOnth period prior to the application date. We are quite
sure that several units would fall within employee housing guidelin s.
Since condominiumization is not being requested, this not an issue.
I
Finally, we will briefly review the conditions of the conceptuFl
approval: i
1. Further investigation of the engineering geology must be
completed to assure suitability of the site for development.
I
The "Soil and Foundation Investigation for Proposed Resident .'al
Development" which followed the "Preliminary Engineeri g
Geology Investigation" by Chen and Associates gave th se
assurances.
Page 6
i""""'.
.~
2. Definitive information be provided to remove questio of
surface collapse or subsidence.
Also assured in the follow-up report by Chen and Associa es.
3. Conformance of ~reliminary ~lat with Subdivision De ign
Standards of Section 20-17.
I
Approved with minor changes by Jay Hammond, City Enginee ing
Department.
4. Detailed landscaping, grading, drainage plans. Revi wed
in this memo.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
ll.
12.
13.
14.
15.
Relationship with the urban Runoff Management ~lan.
McLaughlin report addresses this and the 30 foot ease
is provided on the plat.
Potential toxicity of tailings and mitigation proposals.
I
I
ent
There is toxicity associated with the tailings and at Ie st
6" of topsoil will be introduced. The applicant and Envir n-
mental Health propOSe an on-going relationship thro gh
the grading and construction phases. Paving of drivew ys
and pedestrian paths will help. The applicant furt er
suggests that deed restrictions will require that additiopal
soil be added prior to any gardening activity. I
Impacts of grading and runoff into Glory Hole ~ark. I
,
The MCLaughlin report states that historic flows canlbe
maintained. The Engineering Department made no comm~nt
that a maintenance agreement is necessary.
All trees over 6" diameter to be removed must be shown.
Jim Holland's memo addresses the trees to be preser'fed
and the site plan accomplished that goal. I
Legal descriptip,n of prol?osed trail easement.+. 'i\'",;,~c\l..:;.I\-i0"i~' b
D-c\')o,V'\""'1 f~.<L'S. 4 OfPn>'-lo.Jl. \~"""\ \=lQ,-K-S h; r-Z..<J"vr ",,^c\ . ,-PAl..; ,-1
Shown ..on plat. f[Q, V'.,~'\ hf!,
Bedroom Count for Park Dedication Fee.
Shown on plat.
Shared access on Alps Road formalized through agreement.
Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking and aCCess agreement formaliz
Both in Draft Form for review by the .Aspen Alps' Board
of Directors. vllien accepted by them, they should be appro ed
by the City Attorney and recorded.
Wood burning devices will be gO'l."erned by Ordinance 12
of 1983).
I
(ser1es
1
I
i
I
I
Applicant is aware of this requirement.
Retention of roof drainage on site.
Systems are proposed in MCLaughlin Plan.
Immediate vegetation of disturbed areas.
Applicant will comply.
Page 7
16.
r-.
,-.,
The applicant will commit to future improvement distr cts
in their Subdivision Improvement Agreement which wil~ be
submitted with the Final Plat. I
\
I
I
TO be addressed in subdivision/PUD agreement.
PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office recommends that you grant Preliminary Plat ub-
division, Preliminary PUD and 8040 Greenline approval. We furt er
recommend that you recommend that a GMP exemption be given for the
construction of three deed-restricted employee housing units as propos d.
The recommended conditions are:
1. All representations made in the Conceptual Submission nd
Preliminary Plat Submission to address the 16 conditi ns
of conceptual PUD are made a part of this approval.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
12.
13.
Access roads will be as represented to the Fire Depa~tm nt
(20' minimum width and within 150' of all structure~).
-k fie,: fire hydrant \(i11 also be iaGta11ed7'
Confirmation of water rights for the Durant Mine wa
01 'l .; a c hem i c ul a n.a.Ly...s.i.s:....o..f..--i..t--w~.i-e,h--prove-s-rt---s-u+ta
,g , . t ' . "'-..:-..-- vJ/+ho.. c..;
or J.r!J.~a J.uu purpu::;eb yrJ.ur-...o,......." tI'S'e--as-S1:leh-;--
e r=-'- 0....''\ I
-r Q;~4'1,.~;'''J
~,... ;-kL<"-t.
The extension of 6" diameter water mains to within
feet of the dwelling units.
The four plat changes required in the Engineering Departm nt
memo of 3/22/84 be made prior to Final Plat.
I
The applicant shall eliminate the opportunity for s~~
lockable <::utrdrrce::; Lo ind';'vidttal tlnit's-or record covenanlt'S
limiting use of the structures to single-family and Sing e-
family with caretaker units, n '
of tag PlaRning Commies ion.
00
The standard Housing Authority Employee Unit Agreeme t
be entered into prior to issuance of a building perm't
and that the agreement be filed with the Housing Authority.
\
The employee units must remain rental units and will pe
deed-restricted to the Moderate Income Employee Guidelines~
The employee units must be available to the general pUblic
if not used by the owners to house their employees a d
verification of employment of those persons living in t e
units must be completed and filed with the Housing Office. I
10. The recommendations of the McLaughlin Re]?Ort and th,e chin, I,
,. and Associates,d,etaile.d tevi~w ~ .f.OllOW~d,'V1o...v"G-V'Q;o'4. <A-t1 ';' $1.' it>
~~,,~~<--~~ ~'?b f'''j'<'c,,! ''''JvA'B!ii Cog1:-~~~~" h;:~"-':~~
11. coor'dilnation ~ the grading plan with pres~vatlion of tfe If' tn - .,
be monitored by the Engineering and/or Parks Departments.
14.
A Common Facilities Maintenance Agreement aJ1~ed Restricti
against future residential development~<:: s~r~b~
and approved by the City Attorney prior to Final Plat revi w
by Counci l.
Submission of the Deed Restriction concerning addition 1
topsoil in areas to be gardened be submitted for approval
by the City Attorney prior to Final Plat revie",... _ .' ... I .
*t:...~ 7\~ r~j/\,.u:?,,~::=r:
Recordation of the approved Alps Road '
-P-arkifl~ ahd Acee S5 Ag L e<::llIt:U Ls. -
(',
0\ 0
\
Uj\.!;:, I -Pi '77 t ~, C\.C
, fl .'
CTr\. \r-~DIrI'::.s;:.c.p~~t'c\J''-) Cioi\S;: O-$;:
6'1~'~1..CoY"r'-c{'\'7._. " -' -y -\-.G
[It,of o.c..~L.\.."\'.<:~\.... +.(-'... 'o.~
"i". r':! ,j;\; f
\\, \.i l---,A,~"'(C, .\.1 "",
,/}J' .-:;- ,~..,' (", .: "'"'- ,
.;>j '..."< J~'
~9< No
~ -DCl..\i,d
f'",y-~
~ ~ tro-.r-""
",.......
!,-",
~~~~~iWfP}F~
420 E. HOPKINS STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
April 2, 1984
JIlr. David Finholm
PO Box 2839
Aspen, CO 81612
Re: Aspen Chance Subdivision
Dear Dave,
Thank you for the
this afternoon.
to be clarified.
Fi.rst, the hydrants currently located in the vicinity of your
project on Ute Ave. and Alps Road will prOVide us with the access
I
to wa~er we require. \
Secone, access to within the required 150' of your proposed
buildings for our :Engines will be deemed adequate with the 20' \
I
width you indicate. I
Third, you brought to our attention some other areas of concern I
that have evidently been expressed by other offices involved in :J
the review process. For example, the road grade serving lots 6 \
and 7. We are unable to comment regarding these additional req- I
uirements as they fall outside our area of concern. Any addition~l
variances you wish to address should be addressed to the office I
I
or individual bringing up these ma.tters'l
I
opportunity to meet with
Regarding our discussion,
you and your staff
there are three items
~1J/~.
rryl ob
AVFD, Capt.
"......,""""\
ASPEN ALPS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION
P.O. Box l228
Aspen, Colorado 8l6l2
March 30, 1984
Colette Penne
Aspen Planning Office
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Re: Aspen Chance Access
Dear Colette:
On Monday, March 26, 1984, the Aspen Alps Board of
Directors met concerning the Aspen Chance request for the
utilization of the Aspen Alps Road for access to its
proposed subdivision. At that particular time the Board of
Governors granted permission to Aspen Chance to utilize the
Alps road for access to the Aspen Chance Subdivision. The
document formalizing this agreement is in the process of
being prepared; however, I wish to represent to you, on
behalf of the Aspen Alps Board of Governors, that the access
for the Alps road has been approved.
If you have any questions, or if I can be of any
additional help to you, please feel free to contact me.
GGH/kl
cc: Gideon Kaufman, Esq.
.~
JOHN C; KEPHART & CO.
". ,.,,:~,..
~.
GRANO JUNClIDN lABDRA iDRIES
435 NORTH AVENUE
.
PHONE 242-1618
r
RECEIVED FROM:
.
GRANO JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501
Carol Ann Jacobson Realty
E. A. Zasacky
L
WATER UTILITY
Water
COUNTY
SOURCE OF SUPPLY
WHERE COLLECTED
COLLECTED BY
DATE SAMPLED
received 3/20/84,
I
3/29/84 \
Brian S. Bauerl
I
] 237 I
\
DATE ANAL YZEO
CHEMIST
SAMPLE #
NON-MANDATORY
PARAMETERS
I
RESULTS]
MANDATORY
PARAMETERS
MANDATORY
LIMITS
RESULTS 1
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL ANALYSIS OF POTABl.E WATER
SUGGESTED
LIMITS
,...... 0.3 mall n mn
-....... O.O$mo/1 n l"\ntL
C~ 1.0mg/l n nm
Zinc:. 5.0mg/1 () 004
Molybdenum mg/l n nnn
Ammon-Ia as N mg/1 n nn7
21:5 0.085
Phosphate as P mg/l
0.000 0.000
Boron mg/l
4.0 HERBICIDES
n lnrt
TURBIDITY
nu
Turbidity
1 TU
3.5
Arsenic
0.05 mg/1
0.000
Barium
1.mgJl
0.000
Cedmlum
0.0'0 mjI/'
n mm
.-
,"';~~'~.fi:;:~{
~~'~:~\;~::::
M"'*......
. , ,
SIrlIiniurn
0.0' """,
0.05 mjI/'
:.;";- - "
n OIYH'
SII_
CHLORINATED HYOROCARBONS
PESTICIDES
Endrln
Undane
MethOxychlOr"
Toxaphsne
ANIONS
8iearbol't8t8
Carbonate
Chloride
~lunrirl",
COLOR
15 COBALT UNITS
\
I
,
,
I
I
I
I
\
,\
Color
15 Cobalt Units
o
Total Hardness as
CaC03
rng/1
220
48.4
21.9
Calcium as CAC03
Magnaium
125 mg/1
:\
i
oWt.
oi>eI1
,ti~ooo
'176
232
380 02o;icc
500.....,..
Spec:frJc ConduC'tlinCfl
MfcromhC$
r-,
JOHN C. KEPHART & CO,
GRANO JUNCIIDN lAHDRA iDRIES
,.-"
.435 NOR'f'H AVENUE
.
GRANO JUNCTION, COLORADO 81501
received 3/20/84
3/29/84
Brian S. Bauer
.
PHONE 242~7618
r
RECEIveD FROM:
Carol Ann Jacobson Realty
E. A. Zasacky
L
WA TE A UTI L1TY
Water
DATE SAMPLED
COUNTY
DATE ANAL YZEO
SOURCE OF SUPPLY
CHEMtS-r
~"",,""'M,:
WHERE COLLECTED
SAMPLE #
1237
NON.MANDATORY SUGGESTED
RESUt. TS PARAMETERS LIMITS RESULTS
COLOR 15 COBALT UNITS
3.5 Color 15 Cobalt Units 0
0.000 Total Hardness as
CaC03 mg/1
0.000 Calcium as CAC03
0 noon M:agnesiom 125 mg/l
2'60""'"
COLLECTED BY
CHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL ANALYS!S OF POTABLE WATER
MANDATORY
PARAMETERS
MANDATORY
LIMITS
TURBIDITY
1TU
Turbidity
1 TU
Arsenic
0.05 mg/1
Sarium
-1. mg.ll
Cadmium
. Cbiomhm1
. .;.;
. . . ,
"/'W;~:~;f;
.-
tog/.1
...,.
:...;,
Mn..H.:
... : ': . ~
':'::~i".~'S01id1:
-""",
5ef,tinium
.":,,,.;. .,
..,:
,". ..
. .,o.OS""'"
Mlcromhcc.
$pecit'ic Conduc:tMlce
SlI_
CHLORINATEO HV'tlROCAABONS .
pESTICIDES
'>'Oft
0.3 mgl1
O;05mQ/1
Und8rnJ
1.0mg/1
Metho:xVChlor
5.0mg!1
T(:utaphe,..&
Molybdenum
mg!l
ANIONS
Ammonia as N
mg/1
BicarbonAte
213
0.000
4.0
0.100
0.151
30
RADIOACTIVITY
Phosphate as P
mg!1
Carbonate
Boron
mg/1
Chloride
HERBICIDES
Fluoride
2.4 - D
0.1 mg/1
Nitrate
2,4,5 ' TP
0.01 mg!l
Sulfate
CATIONS
Gros:sAJpha
15 pCil1
Calcium
5 pettI.
'_,'\i;:\"
':ij
Gross 'aeu
~: ,+\,':,'.:X~>2t.-:.:,',"',':io
, J"",,84d:iOnj;->226'+22$
, 0.891
'1. 7
mg/l
50pCil1
Mqnes;ium
Potlis$il'im
,,,-,,-,,,'
t, i;~'(
;':':';,'j',
"-'::~,.ri,
:':i.i'
,;?<:!
'"''''
.';i"'(''';'')j
;'i~1~_,,0;:;F:::T
ti:',::".'.','::'.'.",':-
,',"--"" ,',,',"
".,,~
_10m
,-".','.","""",'.",',,.-""..'
',...',.,,<'.::','C,,""':""
':-:i,:,,';';",',,'::,
.............C]
.IT I ~'nc
. ,
-. ., ...
f:., . .'; .'"'::!;'~">~ : "";',
: ;0:':000
'176
232
380 8250C
['\[1[1n
o noil
o om
o nnil
o nnn
nom
0.085
0,000
7.4
0.000
";;''','c'
r-..
,ro,.
TO:
:::'::~:::~'~i::a:::~:::::'Jr::;\~
ASPEN 1 PITKtN CO.
PLANNING OFFlce/
FRml:
DATE:
I
I
i
,
I
\
HaVing. reviewed the above application and made a site inspecqon,
the Engineering Department would offer the following comments I
regarding the Aspen Chance preliminary application. ,
I
I
I
I
1. The preliminary plat is generally complete with the fOllm1,ing
minor comments:
March 22, 1984
RE:
Aspen Chance Preliminary Subdivisionr P.U.D., 8040
Greenline and Special Review
PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION
a.
Clarify note on northwesterly lot line regarding
"exception to parcel no. 1."
Designate area of site exceeding 30% slope.
the
i
i
i
he
I
b.
c.
Identify trees noted to remain by Jim Holland on
plat.
2. There are several access easements ihdicated on the adjacknt
Aspen Alps property. The final plat should include references
to the book ~ndpage of any recorded easements on adjaCr'nt
parcels. The applicants should also provide documentat on
of their access agreement with the Alps.
,
3. The utility plan indicates small diameter water serv~ce
lines extending more than 100 feet into the subdivision.
The City of Aspen water main extension policy would requ~re
minimum 6 inch diameter mains be extended to within ]00
feet ~f the dwe~ling units. Main extensions could a~so
facilitate provision of improved fire protection. I
i
4. The grading plan would seem to indicate that some 4 fe~t
of fill is proposed in the area. of the spruce trees identif~ed
for preservation. Clarification of the exact location lof
these trees and subsequent coordination with the gradi1ng
plan may be needed.
I
I
,
We have no particular comments relative to P.U.D. at this time.1
I
\
1
i
Our only comments related to 8040 Greenline include the fOllowinr:
1. The grading plan indicates significant disturbance to t~e
site. howeverr this is due mostly to the fact that mu~h
of the site is currently mine tail ings and debris. SubstantiJ;ll
regrading couldr as the applicants claim. result in a mote
"natural" site. i
2. As noted above, there is conSiderable doubt as to the abili~y
of a 2 inch water line to supply adequate flows to the sever~l
units at the top of the site. I
I
\
PRELIMINARY P.U.D.
8040 GREENLIN~
SPECIAL REVIEw
i
hOUSi1g
\
i
I
1
i
We have no particular problems with creation of employee
on the site. Parking is adequate for this purpose.
JH/co
r-.
--.
.~~rf)(~~iW!Pff~
420 E, HOPKINS STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
)
13 March, 1984
Colette Penne
Planning Office
Re: Aspen Chance PUD Preliminary Submission
Dear Coliiltte,
Sorry its taken me till this date to get this review back to you.
This project has been before us earlier and resulted in
at the Fire House with myself, Jay Hammond, James Hardy
and Karen Smith (architect) present. This meeting took
the afternoon of January 11, 1984.
The net result of the discussions that took place was a verbal i
agreement on the part of the architects to add a new fire hydrant i
at a location preferred by Mr. Hammond and to ensure a 20 foot
minimum width of all access roadways to within 150 feetcof all
buildings proposed.
i
a meeting l
(architectv,
place in !
I see no notes or published intentions in this set ~f plans refl-
ecting this meeting or its results. Are they still intending to
incorporate these provisions?
:1>
,:,'~'
f""""..^
. , , ASPEN.PITKIN
ENVIRONMENTAL, HEALTH DEPARTMENT
HEMORANDUM
IV
Officer ~
TO.
.
"e.o.:he.tta" '!':eJirl:e.;: !'!':.1aood;n9i "De,pa.r;t.mell.t,
Robert F. Nelson, Environmental Health
~!arch 6, 1984
PROM:
DATE:
RE:
,Asp,en Chance PUD - Preliminary Subdivision Submissi n
This office has reviewed the additional material submitted fo
the referenced proposed ana offers the following comments:
AIR POLLUTION
There apparently ~las no mention of the installation of. w od
burning devfcesin the original submittal. As we understand
the' architectural pla,ns each residenc,e 'is to have one large
stone 'fireplace and the house on lots lI3and #7 are to have
an additional wood stove. None of the caretaker's units is
to have a wood burning de'vice. . Compliance with Ordinance 12
- Series 1983, wil.l require the wood Eitoves to meet emissi ns
standards and be on the list of. tested and certified sto es
which is 'available from this department.
During construction and reshaping of the tailings site it is
quite probable that windblown (fugitive) dust will becom a
problem, and corrective measures may be necessary. These
include watering, fencing,' or the use of chemical suppressan
This offi,ce should be consulted prior to beginning any la
scale earthmoving and covering of disturbed areas with tops il
and the 'paving of driv,eways, parking areas, and circulat .on
paths as outlined offers an effectiv'e ,and acceptable means of
dust cOntrol, and mi tigation of mine tailing toxicity.
SITE DRAINAC;E
The drainag,e plans in the McLaughlin Report are acceptab e,
and address department concerns regarding water quality. Run ff
from paved areas is contained and treated on-site .lith a dryw 11
located outside the lower limit of tailings deposition to pre v nt
leaching of heavy metals. The drainage pattern of lined ditc es
and ponds, to'gether .with the revegetation plans, should a so
improve the water quali ty of off-site runoff. By segregat nheg
storm drainage from impervious areas, the water quality of
mine and spring water is preserved and further improved by
.
'130 ~out;h Galana St;reet;
.ASpen, Colorado 8'18'1'1
303/S2S-' OeD
I
,
,
A- I"'. r-"
" :);;
.- '<(:'
Aspen Chance PUD - Preliminary Subdivision Submission
Narch 6, 1984
Page ?
flowing through ponas and lined decorative waterways wher it
will not contact tailings. This further controls the possibi ity
of picking up leachable lead, mercury, .arsenic and cyan'des
which are present in high concentrations in tested tailings
samples. The ponds and grass-lined fl'Oodway will also imp ove
the turbidity of a portion of runoff water fr'Om Spar Gulch.
.WATER: SUPPLY
Potable water from the City of Aspen system is acceptab e.
We note, 'however, that there are plans to use Durant !-line w ter
for irrigation of the landscaping. Further, the on-site water
supply offers a practical, inexpensive me,ans of controlling
fugitive dust. Prior to planning for these uses for Dur nt
Mine Portal and o,ther spring water there are'some issues w ich
we feel remain to be resolved. The applicant has not in he
submittals sholm water rights. Also, in question is the heavy
.metal concentrations in the mine discharge. These often an
be quite high, from silver-mines and may be toxic to pIa ts
if applied long term, such as fr'om a landscape irrigation syst m.
We would recommend a complete chemical analysis of the wa er
before using it to irrigate the landscaping which is to be est b-
lished for the site.
SEWAGE SYSTEM
Service to this project by. the Aspen ~ietr0 Sanitation Distr ct
collection system is in conformance with policies of this offi e.
BNjco
cc: Karen Smith
.',~
,
r-.
~,
PUBLIC NOTICE
s/perry Harvey
Chairman, Aspen Planning
and Zoning Commission I
Published in the Aspen Times on March 8, 1984.
City of Aspen Account,
,
r-.
'-",
APPENDIX A
ADJACENT LANDOWNERS
1. Lyle Reeder
P.O. Box 4859
Aspen, CO 81612
2. Bill Hewitt
P.O. Box l5155
Aspen, CO 81612
3. "1001 Mining Claim"
Harley Baldwin
l, W.' 72nd Street, Apt. 29D
New York, NY 10023
4. Aspen Alps Condominium Association
P.O. Box 1228' (80 owners)
Aspen, CO 81612
5. Clarendon Condominium Association
709 E. Durant (l5 owners)
Aspen, CO 81611
6. ,Grant Condominium Association
P.O. Box.K-3 (l40,owners)
Aspen, CO 81612
7. Gaard Hopkins Moses
P.O. Box 1388
Aspen, CO 81612
8. H.A.Bornefeld
George Mitchell
'5237 Cedar Creek Drive
Houston, TX 77056
9. Aspen Skiing Company
P.O. Box 1248
Aspen, CO 81612
r-..
.r-.
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
I hereby certify that on this b~ay of ~~
198 f.. a true and correct copy of the a.ttached Notice of Public I
Hearing was deposited in the United States mail, first-class postage
prepaid, to the adjacent property owners as indicated on the attathed
list of adjacent property owners which was supplied to the Planni~g
Office by the applicant in regard to the case named on the publici
notice.
.
\
'i
I
I
,
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I.
1
i
i
\
!
90.~ jf/~A-~ t)u/-V0-
J~et Lynn einstei
,.
"
r-.
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Colette Penne, Planning
v-JJ
& Patsy Newbury, Zoning
FROM:
Bill Drueding
DATE:
March 6, 1984
RE:
Aspen Chance Subdivision
Section 24-3.l(g) Dwelling Unit: "One or more rooms, in addition tOI
a kitchen and/or bath facilities, intended or designed for occupancy
by a family or guests independent of other families or guests." '
Unit #3:
Although we realize the architects desire to bridge the stream to 1
enhance the design, based on the above definition, the configuratio~
of the main suite could be considered a "bandit" unit. It does '
show its own entrance, two baths and the design indicates its
independence from the rest of the dwelling. A kitchen is not necessary
for a dwelling unit (kitchen and/or bath facilities).
Unit #4:
i
Once again the bridge concept lends itself to abuse as following the
same definition as above this could be considered a triplex.
Unit #5:
Although the bridge effect is not as obvious, this building should
be noted as my having the same concerns as above.
Unit #7:
Again the bridge effect could cause Suite #l and the Master
be considered their own units. The building here could now
a four-plex.
Suite to
be consildered
i
!
We appreciate the building design with bridges over the streams,
however, we are concerned that the design lends itself to abuses.
The code states kitchen and/or bath facilities. With the popularity!
of microwaves and wet bars, the independence of these appurtenances ~hat
would only need lock-off doors, we are concerned that Planning & zoning
and the applicant are aware of this situation. This may be more of .
an enforcement problem than a design problem.
The design is nice, however, the requirements and interpretation set'
out alone are as they have always been enforced. In the case of unit
#7, for instance, with separate entrances as shown, could even be .
considered a hotel or multiple family unit containing four separate
dwelling units. We feel it will be necessary to get a variance for
design in order for this department to approve the plans proposed.
Section 24-3.7(g) Height provisions: "The height of a building shall]
be the maximum distance possible measured at right angles to the .
natural undisturbed ground slope to the top of a flat or mansard roof,
or the mean height between the eaves and ridge of a gable, hip, .
gambrel or similar pitched roof. The ridge of a gable, hip, gambrel i
or similar pitched roof may not exceed over five (5) feet above the
specified maximum height limit..."
There will be considerable grading, therefore changing the "natural !
undisturbed ground slope". The applicant should provide Patsy Newbu1y
with contour elevations. Height should be determined for compliance i
or a variance should be requested. '
I
I
'''"''
..-,:;;....---..........
.~\
f'.
CITY OF "ASPEN
130 south galena sheet
aspen, colorado .81611
303-925 -.2020
,.
. M E M 0 RAN D. U M
TO: KAREN SMITH, A.I.C.P.
SUNNY VANN, Planning Dept.
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
" ASPEN CHANCE SUBDIVISION "
I met today with David Finholm at the proposed site of the Aspen
Chance Subdivision. Having walked the area 8nd reviewed the Conceptual
Site Plan with Mr, Finholm and their landscape contractor, I feel comfor~
table with their plans for this area and have received their verbal assu~ance
.that the following items of concern will be noted during application and I
construction, if approved.
There are 4 existing trees on site that I am particularly concerned !
with leaving undisturbed. Clumps of trees other than those will most
certainly be preserved for screening as well, and even added to, but the!
!
Conceptual Site Plan illustrates proper concern for them. Most do not
apply under Ordinance anyway.
Please note the approximate locations of these trees on the attached!
,
plan.
TA]
one 20" cottonwood just east of the tennis courts, near
Ute Avenue
[B]
[C)
My
of
be
three very prominent 15" fir near the middle of the property
,
!
line in the south corner I'
along the 8030 line, not
I
,
i
!
i
final cone'ern
the property,
disturbed,
is that the tree
starting roughly
r".
r"
, IlstT'rJ' C ffl1,v cp.,
c::>;aq- ~C T/O/J.~
. '.!~ .~,
, . ,", '.'::~:;~
'",' .T
'",
.J
.-:.:..........,-::- ~":".'
- ":. ~
Cel! J ,., i: "1/ Rf'~ <" / tr)Z! .." ,.... ',1?;"h 'U't>'r1:"D, .j,<:PJ/j5,;;<:),,~ ,;'
'! r?~,,':.<:^ .... ,,'f!^, ,( i/Ffre:..~'f...E..... "-^,,,,,'C'.,;.-~~~.l:&'~.f~.~..r"':~""~;(';"'.;_;"
Ii 'I:"/O-:4'Z.1t1CJ:'~'''''<#.~~!8PilL.' : ... ...., j
';"~":~.,r~'~':?';':7 .,.. ",... , ~
'i~I,~~4~-~.~.f'''' s? .': S:;,.. 0"'/1
~if ~~f,l P,F'cIt: iJ%~:,<;flj,if,e. fiR ~,~'?,f ~<JAJ " ~
5,.\
.,
~;
.~,
~.
...r.i..
. .,.~~
.. h '''~"'_''. ,,~.
. ,~ "
,'F."~ '1
...'
._.-:~~.,~i/:.~/..: ,;.~,~,..:
......"
rr- 1/';;''''0' k. '. 0 )'
lr;/t)ce. . Tlv.-::$S f!!b1': cP~'C~QC)Tlf._
. . ." '. '.. .;~
'. . .
..:~,.:.:. ".: .:":~.r"~.""'" .
,Ffir.JCJ!-, . f/:
/ ,..
~. ~7 ~y
i
.~
9'~
"""'-",-'-'.
. . ."
. ~ ........ ....,._.".....~_..<:-~,. .... ._.~,~;~. h
. .'~ .
":;}I
. 'r't
. "'~
.."...,;.~.....,j
',.' " .. , 'f
.:,~~~~~~'.i. /~"': ..,. =-':;::";~1
"':,:",~~',<,'" 0..., ,.. ,... '.:2J
'. 'f.
." . ~."... . :.",,~.....~t;,.
". r..
.'",..
~/6f!r
.",ro..
-, ": .... '.' -,~.
.............-
, ,."
., .
':","
VI?W-S"....,.",_, ",
]) {AII1Il!6,e,:.
.;...
.~
f
..;^,..""('~'^ .",
, "t
-",~.,~':
','" ',1
,y,
'-'''j
E
.~'~
" ~
".J;
'J'
"'..::.A
.....,;"
, 'I'" .'. '''m~n., .,,~""."' "':' ......,
'd." ,. "_. 'p."
CJJ
~%~T<h~"i~~i;~:a~~~
...... ". :"~.... " _ ',' ,,',..f.'- / !'.":
:. ..... ",
.... . ,."....... . ,".".
.. ". ", . .;,.,,.:. .-.... '.., ,.. . ....... :' ," (" ~\ . . .; ,. .:.'.'..!;.!..,~,,':.
. . ", . . ....~:;.{~!:':;.< ",: .' '.. .'
-.~~~t:~t~r~~;ii~~~?,'
r,..'
. ..
'~;j:...
,',i"',-",
.,..;.~.>:..." ",
:!
"
'.
H
I'
i
1-'
....~.,+
I
,
:IT
.. .ff....
II
'II
H
I.j
I,
I!
,
I
II
d
:,'l" .,..
:,. ~
l'r" .........-~ . ~.....~.~.~:.._..:::.,..~.->-....,.., "'-,".""'~'" ....~t:;~.~....:.;~~:......
fji;~iii:!~};;~'rlt;--- -:- .
rj"" ..,' <'!":>A;c;;~'~~T-:~;r;~:rt~~~~;!~::;,~i.;:~l':::<:'" <j ?;:i~}~~"'.;~. .. .
'~f''''''''~-'''''_ -".., - ~---'<"'~-"'''''''~'''''~''''~~''':"-l7:: ..~..-".~M'1'@:~~-:e.~:!I.""~.q'.;~..~~rl~t~~ ~. YO .....,.,._._~_./I'"....... ':"_"_' _.......",.~... ._.
/~l. : '. '~':~fiiif~~:'i;~ri!~~~S~:tij~?r,~~!'(:c:~]i"']"~\~
,,;......,...,
.,,::::.,
."!.,... . .
'*:r:7~~": ~~'.
"
,.
~;.
''''i<;:;''''''
:."'" ..,,~ . . .
r-.
--,
....,.
"(
1YC?/..f1!i..f:.l1." SeE . i) () If. .'. . .G::., "..,......,'_._-"..l..^.....C.I~..CQatJ~,.._
9F.A/AI~J-y, Kt:-t) D. ~.,.;.,..,..., '4?L' ":.'T:::::<?....::~.;:;:1
....,..... .qL (;>L"t... ,,,,,LI/,t:A/ '(., .. ,l/ ....II~;,~:.f.."l......... :.l.L",.".....,.~... ....:.... _...'~;.:".',....'-".."._,....;
~~"" 'fi....$..e....d4;;-'f;'.5 s<..:.:.~~~ !Jtt.tI!J~,:,u ..'.. .,~~;~;,:;~0r~;~~~~i;
t;::.alV. S7:~I.l~LJ21l4/. . '.. .:L~.,;~.. ..':'!:'..(",.,;-;.,.":::\"r.:-'~''':':'>:''''''::!
~. .' '~.'
. "
"~,.,, . -
-j
1
.~.~...;.~: .~. ,:~,;; ...f.'....:<'.
"
.,,...,,, ,.".~"". "'''''~''''''
~...,~...:.~
...,..........
.. ,
_.......~.....~,.. ,d
..<,
..r.'
'1"'7\{) G' . "'"
I ...,: ". t-o,s,a:< ..
.....r.' . '!;"i,;.....~."'!' ":.~.
.,'
.;.,,~;~. :'"
. .;~.!
--j
"'J
r
I
"..",.'. --->"".,
'Jk_
''/
U1fb : '
. _... ....,f,1c._"
,M~t.;~'
....."":...........
"'".--;,
"""'-'
....~...,.
'. ~,~:, . -.,'
...<, "' ~ ",',' ','
JY;f1 ; .
". '\ 1'. ,. .
"'-',. "', I . .j." .__
" .... !
iii .,
.' .... . ...~ ._," :...,:.~
. .~ ,"., ,
, >."""~...".,,.., ,.
"
" n"~""
';.,
'.:-"IV;
'/ .
.' - ',' ~
._.~
", f,i
"J.::
"~"i':
. ".'.
"-" ~,;,"':J.
,,~
':j~
""",,,;;,'1
'''1<):':/''\'
,>:"/;.'.,,
:~~i
^."'.
i""
-.,..---
Dat.ed at Aspen, Colqrado, this
18th
"'-'''''''-~''''"'''''''';'~'''''''''':;'';''l.W'~'''''::,',
day of
August
.~ "
A,(), 1983 at 8 :00 A.M.
,1,'''':-;
Authorized S~nature
flY
I
Ste\VartTit~ Form OEZ 10182
,J""\,
,~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Cipy Attorney, Paul Taddune
vefty Engineering Dept., Jay Harrunond
H~ing Office, Jim Adamski
vE(~ding Department, Bill Drueding
vF1~ Chief, steve Crocket
vEfivironmental Health, Tom Dunlop
FROM:
Janet Weinstein, Planning Office
RE:
Aspen Chance PUD - preliminary Subdivision Submission
DATE:
February 22, 1984
!
Enclosed for your review is the Preliminary Subdivision Plat, preiimi-
nary PUD Plan, 8040 Greenline Review and Special Review of Employ~e
Housing materials with regard to the Aspen Chance PUD submission. i
Please review these materials carefully since this preliminary sub-
'mission does include some changes as compared to the conceptual s~b-
mission. Please return your referral corrunents to Colette Penne n~
later than March 6, 1984 in order for her to have adequate time t6
prepare for.the case presentation before City P&Z on March 20. 1
" !
Thank you. !
I
!
.,
~
~
Aspen/Pit
130 S J
^"";ning Office
November 17, 1983
Karen B. Smith, AICP
Planning and Management Services
P.o. Box 8575
Aspen, CO 81612
Dear Karen,
This letter is in response to your request for verification of un~ts
on the Hewitt Parcel at 901 Ute Avenue (Lot 5, ute Addition). Thf
letter from the Building Department of April 13, 1982, which you \
supplied, substantiates the existence of a duplex on: the lot. I
Section 24~11.2 of the Code provides for exemptions from Article tI,
the Growth Management Quota System. Subsection (a) of Section 24r
11.2 allows for the verification of single-family or duplex units!
simply through an application for a demolition permit through the]
Building Department. Reconstruction is limited to no more than t~e
verified total within five (5) years of the date of demolition. 4ny
building which is demolished shall be limited to reconstruction o~
the same site or on a contiguous site owned by the same individual.
,
i
In terms of your request to reserve the opportunity to further ex~mine
the evidence for possible additional units, we will certainly rev~ew
the information you supply. We want to caution you, however, tha~
Section 24-11.2 (a) specifies that "failure to '\,7erify the existing \
number of dwelling units . . . prior to their demolition shall refiult
in the loss of credi t for their reconstruction." i
,
,
!
I
!
Sincerely,
PLANNING OFFIlcE
SV: jlw
,1""\
.~
KAREN B. SMITH, A.I.C,P.
Planning and Management Services
P.O, Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Phone: (303) 925-4894
Mr. Sunny Vann
Planning Director
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
November l6, 1983
RE:
Verification of Units, Hewitt Property
I
Dear Sunny: !
As we discussed previously, Aspen Chance, Inc. is negotiatingJto
purchase the Hewitt parcel on Ute Avenue and intends to incl de
it in the subdivision application which we are about to subm~t.
Consequently, it is necessary to verify units on the parcel.
Based on conversations and correspondence between Hewit 's
attorney and the Building Department, there are two irnrnediat ly
verifiable units. We, therefore, request your verification at
this time of these two units, so we may proceed with the
application. I
We wish to reserve the opportunity, however, to further examibe
the evidence for any possible additional units on the Hewiltt
parcel or the Chance Claim. As you suggested, we may wish Ito
pursue the matter with the City Attorney to clarify issuks
involved with the eighth unit we sought to verify on the chanbe
Claim and with any additional units on the Hewitt parcel. I
Thank you again for your assistance.
Sincerely,
'"
~.8,~
Karen B. Smith, AICP
KBS:klm
'. ./ /
1""\. . ."." "
ASPENQPITKIN ~EGIONAL
r--;
BUILD;. ....G
i
DEPA~iMENT
Charl~s . Fagan, . Atty. at -Law
Aspen, CO .
. ,
I'
Ii
I
!
Apr ill3, 1982
Re:
William Hewldtt ~roperty
901 Ute Avenue
" .
, '
i
I,
,
\
1 .
i
I
Dear'Charles:
\
I
1
The propert~ described as Lot 5, Ute Additionl is noncollfOrmihg.
as to lot s~ze (4500 sq ft) in a R-15 zone. The use for a I.
duplex is a pre-existing use and the only allowable use fori
the property. It cannot be expanded, however repair is allowed,
, . . i .
I
1
I'
I
1
.I
Sincerely,
~ (\~.. '
.,..~. .,
l"... -'.---:";'~.'~ .'. "....: .... .' .' ,
,~.(y..:../"-J.. " ' -:---......... . ',', "".
,'. '( ., . ..'..~,
. Patsy Nelvbury ',' " (Q.yA.;..~' ,.
Building Official ..' '.' -::J.
.,.......
"
I
I
I
,
i
,
I
i
j,
'i'
~
i
1
i
I
i
,
.1.
,
,
I,
i
I
i
i
I
1
I
i
. I 'I
I
,
1
I
ot. I
50(3 East MaIn Street: .
, Aspen,. Colo.-ado 81611
. ';:)03/8251;"6973.
;,. .
~
-
--
- .~....----
!""'\
~,
KAREN B. SMITH. A.I,C,P,
Planning and Management Services
P.O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Phone: (303) 9254894
Mr. Sunny Vann,
Mr. Jim Wilson,
Ci ty of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Planning
Building
, /
DJ.rector
Inspector
I
,
September 20, 1983
I
Dear Sunny and Jim: i
It is the intention of my client to reconstruct dwelling units Ion
the Chance Claim (Spar) property. Therefore, pursuant to Sect~on
24-ll.2(a) of the Aspen Muncipal Code, I am requesting that ~ou
verify units on the property. To assist in your review, thelre
are seven buildings with ten units on the Chance Claim. 1
I
It is my understanding that the verified units would be exem~t
from the GMP Quota Competition. Given the PUD designation on the
property and the applicant' s intention to divide the property
into lots for future sale,' I assume the proper applications fcDr
reconstruction of verified units therefore will be a combin$d
subdivision and PUD. I
I
I
We would appreciate your response as soon as possible, so the
applicant can prepare the appropriate submission. . \
Sincerely, .
~. B .:!5ud{~
Karen B. Smith, AICP
for the applicant, Neal Myers
KBS:klm
cc: Collette Penne
I
I
1
'I
I
I
r>. n f) ^. l)<t LCITY OC: HO!;N.j..J:.Qt UNTY OF PIT.KIN.~U." ..C.Dlo..P ~FRADO.
, . ,\~-=l.. "'--lv-,ll, . '.11..'
ADDRESS I x n/lI.Yl1:=... . ..' ~o;-il.l.t(~ 11",1"\.1'. .'
Of JOB ....- . . 'S!..:' ^'~.' ~'V,. .... I',C , .j) .1.1' \. 'A .
. , ' _,vAIL Vv\ l\lll"><\ : 1;:,~IV\tl.1t...t Chi;
WHEN SIGNED AND VA:LIOATfD BY BU,!LO~N~ !~SPECTION OEP~R1.M.,ENT, THIS:PERMIT AUH:tORIZES' !HE .wORKpES:CRla~O.8E~O'tV. '
CLASS OF WORK: NEW 0' ADDI1'IONOALTERATION 0 . REPAII~~; MOVEO'!WRECKD
OWNE\AME~,\MI: ,~" ~D.w. Cz,. ADDRESS /?;o~ ~q'f . ~HONE:2~)~
: '" . . /) I J ~ " l .~' ~ LICENSE LICENSE .! '
~ NAME (AS LICENSED) . (hf/v..., VW(k:/J15"O t.--. --'€- ""CLASS . . NUMBERi
~ ADDRESS ." fA IOlk".../-- WtX b~/' YHONE
Z
o SUPERVISOR '() .1\ 1 ~'\-'I.
U FORTHISJOB. NAME l~'i1,u3!'{!:::""I1>'oh
PLUMBING .
: WASH TUB,
1 WA HR. CLOSET
WATER,
DISTRI6, SYST.
i WEe, . . :'
! OTHER DUrl..41i0 ;y-tz...-
: TOTAL ~ IXTt.H~E$
I SY FWORS ' di..
rTg~';Lo;'XTURES n V ALU'A TION $ 'I /;1L}'}1 (!C.--
. NOTES TO APPLICANT: OF WORK . . /(/ l/ t
FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 92S -1334 I rrli
I." VALUATION. OF. EACH O.F THE A'OVE UNITS SHALL" INCLUOEO IN THE VALUATION OF WORf(.! PFLLAEND T P Q T""i TAL FEE
FOR ALL WORt( DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCENS FULL RESPO'NSIRILITY FOR 1 1
COMPLIANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL nUMBING CODe REGULATIONS. PUSL1C HEALTH DEPAll.TMENT, ,DOUBLE CHECK 0 '-'""'11
STATE OF COLORADO" CITY OF' ASPEN ORDINANCES, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RES01.UTlONS, ~ ') U
CitY ORDINANCES, STATE LAWS, WHICHEVER APPLIES. . . ., , FEE 0 . CASH 0 oil It ':::> ,
JHQUIRED INSPECTIONS SHALL BE REQUESTED ONE WORI<ING DAY IN ADVAHCi. '.
PERMIT SUBJECT TO REVOCATION O.R SU".EN. SID7FO VIOLATION OF "NY LAWS GOVERNJNG SA. ME. 8UI,LDING. INSPECTION. DtPARTM. E.NT
A fIHALINSPE.CT ION SHA.LL BE ....OE ".EfORE OC:CUP ~Cy ISPERoMI,TTED:. . ^_ ' , '1
SIG~iURE . '(d\;' . .~~,"'~. f.......~. I :\U__ 11 0' 'J-C', . ~~< ../() .~ , '. q ~ 0
I; '- t.,~ I. ~. II':, ~!~~.:8~:.r"~I'
APPLICANT:. . \, . . ',' . ., \'. A. ..VPROVALB"..\ '. DATE.
THIS .FORM IS APEfl,MIT.ONLY' ~lY}n" . OAT"~'P""ITNO, 'L1~'N;I/;' RECfJPTSCLASS . AMOUNT,
iV) /., . '/ . .
WHEN VALIDATED HERE . I. .',' . ..... ~_?I ./C.3 ',.
,
FI.OOR'
i AUTO. WASHER
i BATH TUB',
: DRINK. FOUNTAIN
i DISH WASHE.R
FLOOR DRAIN
GARS. QJSPOSAL
! GRE,t..SE TR.AP
SA!'';:> TRAP
: SEWER-SANITARY
, SEWER-STORM
: SHOWER
SIt'-.;K
~
SLOP SINK '
1 ~p~{7~~~~~~~p. '
i Ugl!\.lAL
: WASH BOWL
....,-"-..,,.._.._..-.,
, '.'
,.PLUM8IN.C R
DOMESTIC A Pl,'
PERMIT
, .
41,
.
~t< 2 0$1
i.
I
,
i
SSMT.
6
I
. DAT~ CERTIFIED
. I DOMESTIC APPLIANCES
NO. OF DESCRIPTION! OF WORK
UNITS! .
. ,\
AUTOMAT:IC WASHE~ : .
DiSH WASHER' 01
1
.
OTHERS
2
.
4
s
'.f"
.
L/~
.
x
~
~
, . .' ......
.
. ~ ' .
I
/
,. .
. I
f
! '
WATER SOFTENER ! .
. ' .
.
'.1
OTHER~
I
" .'
I"
i
J
REMARKS'
'. '
,
, :
I
.. ,
.,
I.
I.
I
:i.
,
I
I
I
,
.{,'
. .
,
. .
,
.
.
.
.
.
AUTH~RIZ~D
!
,
I
.
AGENCY
. . .
,ZONING . '
DATE
.
.
PUBLIC HEAtTH
'STATE
ENGINEER'
i
!
. r '
. .
, '
.,.. .' ...
. -, - ...... - -
_.
0-cITY6~pi~N -..; C6liNTY~ OF PITKiN'
ADDRESS ,8 JoAt;,~ ,,:,1 f'O ,I<OQl.
OF JOB, "b \?' T' M I-V) ,B,' N,
.'GENERA.L ",
CONSTRUCT ON
PERMIT
., ','
'Ir
, WHEN SIGNED"AND VAliDA-TED -BY eUllOING INSpECTION DEPARTMENT' THIS .P~RMIT AUTHORIZES THE WORK DESCRIBEO BELOW'
, ", ' , " 'I
""
o
~
V
<(
'"
~
Z
o
V
A
PE
I
,
"
"
Lrlc.
Nb.
~ ALTERATION
~SS
REPAIR
MOVE 0 WRECK 0
, PHONE
LICENSE
NUMBER
NAME (AS LICENSED)
INS,URANCE
q :2'r-
~q6 +-, 0
ADDRESS, '
SUPERVISOR
FOR THIS JOB
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION'
SURVEY
BY
PHONE
"'. I
,
I
DATI' CERTIFIED
NAME
>POBPC~H'EA~T-H
AREA (S.f.)
AT GRADE: . .
HEIGHT ' '20 NO, I TOTAL '61..;~
(FEET)aPflt.())( ;) STO.", UNITS' (.oFC/
GARAt:"JZ1/0' /77'j:lGk-E '0 ATTAC,HEDO TOTAL
. ' '7'V , ./V00;5U 0 DETACHED 0 ROOMS.
FIRST 'SIZ'E : SPt~I:NG ':
FLOO:R" .
'"
l-
. is Cf.ILING
...
AGENCY
BUllOfNG'
REVIEW"'
.ZO~ING
OCCUPANCY'
GROUP
I
IV,
FIRE
ZONE
BASEMENT 4/~5 '
TYPE
'ON~TR.
SPAN
,AUTHORIZ D'
B',Y
z
o
i=
<(
o
Z
::l
o
,...
DEPTH C ... ,. .
~~:.."~? ,(;>(,//1
EXTERIOR e '
~mnNGc.:;<i$~((h
DA TE
, ' If
10
ROOf.
'P-ARKJ'NG.
I
!
I
EXTERIOR
FON. WALL
THICKNESS
. CAISSON'S, 0'
&GR.8EAMS
ROOF ING
MATERIAL
rt1~K 0
,
,
"
,
EXTERIO
WALL
MASONRY
. THICKNESS
. EN.GINEERIN.G
ABOVE
1ST F~R.
ABOVE'
2ND FLR.
ABOVE
'3RO FLR.
ABOvE
3RD FLR. ' .
~" BOV' -5 jj,. ,
IOK T fLR. , TV""''-'..
! REMARKS 5 C?-<L 'f>~ 0:1/-8..
l +t-Y1O,
() Ref-Vie {: .
ABovE
2ND fLR.
'1".'
W4--I6. c:
1
'x
,
!
! Nons TO APPLICANT:
FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CALL 925 ~ 73.3&
FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDER THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR
COMPUM~CE WITH .THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY
ZONING ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY ORDI~NCES ~HICHEVER
A'''''', 8C,srfi-)., l<tJl'Th1
SEi'ARATE PERMlTS MUST'BE 'OBTAiNED FOR EL.~tTR1CIlL, PLUMBING AND HEATING. siGNS,.
SWIMMING POOLS AND 'FENCES. ---:-- ....-
PERMIT EXPIRES tx) DAYS FROM DATE ISSUED UNLESS WORK 'IS,STARTED.
R~QUJRED"HSPECTlONSSHAL.L BE REQUESTED:ONE WORKING DA;Y IN AC)VANCE.
ALL FINAL INSpECTIONS SHALL BE MACE-ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCU~ANCY IS PERMITTED.
, , I~C
THIS BUILDING .SHALl NOT aE OCCUPIED UNTIL: A CERTifICATE OF ~CCUPANCY .HAS BEE~ ISSUE
PERMIT $UBJECT,TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSI'ON FOR VfOl ION,OF ANY LAWS GOVERNING SAME.
SIGNATURE " "
OF
APPLICANT:
THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONLVr
WHEN VALIDATED HERE , "
VALUATION $'
OFWORK '
PLAN
FILED
'"'") 00
, ;;L~O,
<> TO AL FEE
T
P
o;E~BL~ c::~; g $ q_ 0<>
BUILDING DEPARTMENT
r .b :';q~7) ·
· ~', ,', .., '''AT'''' '
\:1.
A.PPROVAI; BY, .
. ... AMO!Jt'ri" ~.'j, .
,
.: LICENSE Ii
PERM)T . N~..
'RECEIPTS CLASS.
/t~,'
,
, ,....-
;'-.J~_.
r
INSl'fCTc.!l'S CO'P'l
..~~~~
- .--_. .......--,..:....----.
- -- .- -- -- --.
1""""\
~,
KAREN B. SMITH, A.I.C.P.
Planning and Management Services
P.O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
ASPEN / PITKIN~,
PlANNING OfF'r
,
i
i
i
Phone: (303) 925-4894
Sunny Vann, Planning Director
l30 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
October 26, 1983
RE: Verification of Units - Aspen Chance Property I
Dear Sunny: I
In response to Ed Zasacky's letter of September 27, 1983, )-u
have indicated there is sufficient evidence for you to verify ~t
least seven existing dwelling units on the Chance Claim propert~.
The seven units included five single-family dwellings on t~e
lower part of the property and two units on the upper part, t e
barn and a single family dwelling next door. You asked f, r
further documentation regarding what we believe to be an eighth
unit and that is provided herein. [
The justification for verifying an eighth unit is primarily bas, d
on the existence of building permits dated June 23, 1971. Tpe
first, a general construction permit, refers to the construction
of a loft area unit. The second, a plumbing permit approves nbt
only a sink, a kitchen element, but also a washbowl and wat~r
closet, common bathroom elements. Harley Baldwin, the person w~o
sought the permits has verified for us that the purpose for those
permits was to construct a separate dwelling unit. I
According to the former Building Inspector (and the person who
approved both permits), Clayton Meyring, the zoning at the tif'e
was AR-l which permitted multi-family dwellings. Therefore, t e
addition of a second unit would have been permitted by t e
zoning. The building code allowed a studio dwelling of 2lw
square feet. !
I
The existence of a unit which predates the Baldwin application is
confirmed by tenants of the property as well as by reference ~n
the June 1971 construction permit to existing electrical a*,d
heating systems (see Notes to Applicant). I
i
The existence of at least two verifiable units in the barn s
further confirmed by Aspen Metro Sanitation records indicati g
there were four kitchen sinks in the barn at the time of sew r
hookup.
/"'"'"
,"-"
Sunny Vann, Planning Director
October 26, 1983
Page Two
I hope this will assist in your further determination of units on
the Chance Claim. We appreciate your expediting the matter to
date. As we are approaching a deadline regarding dur
application, we must beg a speedy response once more. Ple~se
call me if I can assist in any way. I
I
I
I
Sincerely yours,
~.~
Karen B. Smith, AICP
KBS:klm
r-"
r-"',
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
Mr. Sunny Vann, Planning Director
City of Aspen
l30 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
October 28, 1983
Dear Sunny:
I
This letter is to verify that I occupied the Durant Mine Barn ias
a residence prior to June 1971. There were bath and kitchen
facilities existing when I first lived there, which had been u~ed
by others prior to my residency. I
Sincerely yours,
STATE OF COLORADO
)
) ss.
)
was acknowledged before me this 31 s!... day J,f
, 1983 by Bill Jamison. Witness my hand and
commission expires August 26, 1986. i
/ '
'-- V ~ /1'/1 uJU/.. ,,~.
c t&D{.. 1'1- -
Nary P lic
450 S. G lena
Aspen, CO 81611
COUNTY OF PITKIN
/l,',' The foregoing
~! {' T7J b-<.,--
official seal. My
f"""'\.
~
KAREN B, SMITH. A,l.C.P,
Planning and Management Services
P.O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
October 3l, 1983
\
\
I
I
I
Phone: (303) 925-4894
Mr. Sunny Vann,
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Planning Director
Dear Sunny:
\
I
The attached letter is submitted pursuant to Collette Pennei s
req,uest f,or ad,ditional ~,'nforrnation to indicate that a, dwelliig
unit existed in the Durant Mine Barn prior to June 1971. Plea e
call me if you have any questions. For your information we pl n
to submit the application for subdivision approval November l7th
or sooner aiming for the December 20th Planning Comrnissi~n
meeting. Thanks for your continued assistance. I
I
Sincerely yours,
~d3 auL
\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Karen B. Smith, AICP
KBS:klm
cc: Collette Penne
I
I
i
I
\
I
I
I
\
i
I
I
r-.
r-.
Mr. Sunny Vann, Planning Director
City of Aspen
l30 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
I
\
I
I
I
I
\
,
!
October 28, 1983 \
i
Dear Sunny: I
This letter is to verify that I occupied the Durant Mine Barn ~s
a residence prior to June 1971. There were bath and kitchen
facilities existing when I first lived there, which had been ustd
by others prior to my residency.
Sincerely yours,
o
I
,
i
I
i
!
,
i
\
I
3;sL I
The foregoing was acknowledged before me this day of
(JC-t7Jtv-.1..-- , 1983 by Bill Jamison. Witness my hand and!
official seal. My commission eXPire;;August 26, 1986. \
~&~~//ll~7 \
Aspen, CO 81611 \
I
I
STATE OF COLORADO
I
)
I
S5.
COUNTY OF PITKIN
...."
r"1
~,
KAREN B. SMITH, A,r.C.P,
Planning and Management Services
P,O, Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Phone: (303) 925-4894
I
I
\
I
I
October 31, 1983 I
I
1
The attached letter is submitted pursuant to Collette PennEl's
request for additional information to indicate that a dwell~ng
unit existed in the Durant Mine Barn prior to June 1971. Ple~se
call me if you have any questions. For your information we p]an
to submit the application for subdivision approval November llth
or sooner aiming for the December 20th Planning Commission
meeting. Thanks for your continued assistance.
Sincerely yours, \
~@.~, I
Planning Director
Mr. Sunny Vann,
City of Aspen
130 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Dear Sunny:
Karen B. Smith, AICP
KBS:klm
cc: Collette Penne
,
r-.
r-.,
Phone: (303) 925-4894
]~",l"'~P, 9~ ~ ~~; ~!1ffi~,
.1\';' . !. .
I OCT 26 198 ii
Elh...> M... . I
ASPEN / PITK;N,gg,
PlANNING OfFKf
i
i
I
i
i
I
I
October 26, 1983 \
i
I
i
I
,
In response to Ed Zasacky's letter of September 27, 1983, ypu
have indicated there is sufficient evidence for you to verify at
least seven existing dwelling units on the Chance Claim property.
The seven units included five single-family dwellings on the
lower part of the property and two units on the upper part, tpe
barn and a single family dwelling next door. You asked fpr
further documentation regarding what we believe to be an eighfh
unit and that is provided herein.
I
The justification for verifying an eighth unit is primarily baS~d
on the existence of building permits dated June 23, 1971. The
first, a general construction permit, refers to the constructi~n
of a loft area unit. The second, a plumbing permit approves n~t
only a sink, a kitchen element, but also a washbowl and watEf'r
closet, common bathroom elements. Harley Baldwin, the person who
sought the permits has verified for us that the purpose for tho$e
permits was to construct a separate dwelling unit. I
,
,
According to the former Building Inspector (and the person who
approved both permits), Clayton Meyring, the zoning at the ti~e
was AR-1 which permitted multi-family dwellings. Therefore, the
addition of a second unit would have been permitted by the
zoning. The building code allowed 'a studio dwelling of 220
square feet. I
The existence of a unit which predates the Baldwin application Js
confirmed by tenants of the property as well as by reference qn
the June 1971 construction permit to existing electrical arid
heating systems (see Notes to Applicant) . i
The existence of at least two verifiable units in the barn ~s
further confirmed by Aspen Metro Sanitation records indicati g
there were four kitchen sinks in the barn at the time of sewer
hookup.
KAREN B. SMITH, A.I,C.P.
Planning and Management Services
P,O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Sunny Vann, Planning
l30 S. Galena Street
Aspen, CO 81611
Director
RE:
Verification of Units - Aspen Chance Property
Dear Sunny:
1""""\
,~
Sunny Vann, Planning Director
October 26, 1983
Page Two
I
I
I hope this will assist in your further determination of unitsjon
the Chance Claim." We appreciate your expediting the matter to
date. As we are approaching a deadline regarding ur
application, we must beg a speedy response once more. Plealse
call me if I can assist in any way. I
Sincerely yours,
kvJ3 .~~
Karen B. Smith, AICP
KBS:klm
I OJ '1 0, A-l4hQ"I~Y ~" 'f?J'~Nrst,,9 tU, ,NT, Y OF PITK,INU, 'r4LO, RADO
1 ADDRESS .l.--~lVrm \}1'e=:- ~1\J" CU-~J.tC~ 1f'\1~':,\ \,~
rOF JOB., '" SDAIL VV\IVilv;?\ :e~~M(I/,i':., '(1ri,;
! WHEN ~IGNED AND V~LtD~~ED BY BUlLO~N~ !~S:ECTlON OEP:"R~MENT THI~. PERMIT AU.THO~IZES :HE .wORK_D~~RIB~D:BE!--O'V . ,
I ' ' , '
'CLASS OF WORK:, NEW 0' ADDITfONO
OWNER NAMEQrnl/l\f1,ll~'~" ~D.I..V, Cz" ADDRESS &ox":fqcp
, ' .\ lS_ ~ LICENSE
NAME (AS LICENSED) (hfA... tAAt(k:.tf\S.O t.-, _ ~CLASS
'''\\ (..{ IAII,.+- ~\;tX b~/' YHONE
/) ,^ " "YM.'
l ~ 1 ~ . UJ D tc I V7 >'0 h
,PLUMBING R
,D(lMESTlC A PL. '
PERMIT
~'
".:;,if.;t1 "
.......
ALTERATION 0
REPAf~
MOVE' 0' 'WRECK 0
"
:2 :x-) k,
c::
o
"'"
u
<
a:
;-
Z
o
u
PHONE
LICENSE
NUMBER
ADDRESS
SUPERVISOR
FOR THIS JOB
~/ 2 0?31
FLOOR'
AliTO. WASHER
185MT.
.
.
.
s
,
7
S
OTHERS
DAT" CERTIFIED
, I DOMESTIC APPLf., NCES
~~Ii't DESCRIPTION OF WORK
NAME
PLUMBING
. D.~INf:. FOUNTAIN
Dl)H WASHER X
FlOO;;' D~AIN ')g:
, GARS DISPOSAL :' "
G;;:E,I..$.E ."AP ')(...~ ,'.
, ,
,
,
AUTOMATIC WASHE
,
SA, TH TUB
,
,
, '
,
,
,
,
" ,
t"
OISH WASHER 0, "II",
WATER SOFTENER. ,," . :
, '
,
, ,
"
, '
AGENCY ,
!
, 'I ' ,
,
I
I
I
1
1
SE\f"E~.STORM
" S"iOw::R
, '
OTHER-
IREMARICS
I . '
':1
I
I
,
SAt,;:> TRAP
,
. S~\"";R.SA"IITARY
,
"
, '
S I ~"':
'~
I
I
, '
I
, , i
I
, ,
,
5.\..010' SiNK
LI'..;~ERGROUND
S;'~fN:o(LE~5.YS. '
~ URI"',jAL
,
,
\VASH BOWL
,
AUTr~yRIZfD DATE
, I
I
I I
I
! !
VAtuATION ~ ff If<!. J)\a:-
OF WORK ~ '/ (/7/,
PLAN
FILED T
.ZONING
WA.,;t.{ rus
, WA.TE::': CLOSET
\"v,l.,HR.
DIST~ia. SYST.
PUBLIC HEALTH
WELL
. STATE
ENGINEER
OTn!' DU,11.O.4tiwl;r.z...
":"OTAt.. =:xrURES
:.:y ~:.OORS '
TGTAL ~:XTURES
ON ;03
fl
,~WTES TO APPLICANT:
FOR INSPECTIONS OR INFORMATION CAll. 925 _ 7336
;;-jE VALUATION OF EACH O,F THE ABOVE UNITS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE VALUATION OF WORK.
FOR ALL WORK DONE UNDeR THIS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FULL RESPONSIstllTY FOR
COfMLlANCE WITH THE TECHNICAL Pl.UMBING CODE REGULATIONS. PUSl.:C -HEAI.TH DEPAXlMENT. OOUBlE CHECK 0 111 ~')\,
Sit-if OF COLORADO. CITY OF-ASPEN ORDINANCES. AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOlU'TIONS, (? I ") U
Ciir O~DINANCES, STATE LAWS, WHICHEVER APPLIES. .. FEE 0 C~SHO i(}
R!QUllU"O INSPECTIONS SHALLBt REQUESTED ONE WORK:IHG DAY IN ADV....NCE:. '." .. It>
'" MIT sumer TO REVOCATION OR SUSPENSl07fO VIOLATION OF <'''' LAWS GOVERN ,ING SAME. BUILDIN, GINSPtCT, ION, DE'I ARTM, ENT
A FINAL INSPECTION SHALL BE, MADE ."O'E OCCUP HCY 1$ P,ERoMITTED" r, I^~',', . . '. 'I 1
SIGNA!URE'", " "....'~' " ,.",",' It'" ," , r,'<_, , ' " \ G~'~g-7
Or, "trJl, \r.-l~ \"I7M \. ','''4...2-, "lJo...', i'-'~ ,",' , ,,', "
APPLICANT: '~\"....r-l)I:.> , . ,Ir"{p, iff.! L/'" A"ROVALS" , , ,'DAn
T;-'Ii$ FOR,'J\ IS A PERMIT ONLY '~(, ,'_n , DAn, ,'ER'oUT "'0, , 'uerN;' II ",ClIPTS eLA" AMOUNT, '
WHEN VALIDATED HERE ,U ,~Ltq_7/ ./G pI'
,'I
p
-0 TOTAL FEE
, '
'-.1
0..CITYr~SP'EN -- iOU'NTY' OF PITKiN"
.~DDRSSS 8 "-) 0 ' A. ~~ A \ f'5R 01>\.
, OF JOt! J) I? ' IT ' '^ I-VI ~ ~
"
" ~ORADO
N.
,GENERAL I
CONSTRUCT ON ' "
PERMIT
~,",,"
[d
. WHEN SIGNED'AND VALIDATED -BY BUIL..DING INSPECTION OEP,ARTMENT n"IlS pERMIT AuTHORIZES THE '~ORK DESCRIBED BELOW'
BY
REPAIR,
MCW;! 0
WRECK 0
CLASS OF WORK:
OWN ER
NAME
PHONE
Q2'r
, PHONE
LICENSE
NUMBERj,
~96+-
I
I
DAT
lh~
~
LICENSE
CLASS
'"
i? NAME (AS LICENSED)
U
<
~ ADDRESS,'
z
o SUPERVISOR
U I FOR THIS J08 NAME
LEGAL
DESCRIPTION,
SURVEY
INSURANCE
o
". ,
CERTIFIED
FIRST
FLOO~
NO, I TOT At. 6"V~
'TOR'" UNIT' Lof"i
ATTACHED 0 TOTAl.
DETACHED 0 ROOMS.
-SIZE , SPtC1.NG SPAN
OCCUPANCY
GROUP
I
A Lit,
PE N~
I
I
IV.
FIRE
ZONE
AR.EA (S.F.)
AT GRACE'
HEIGHT
(mTjaffll.cK 50
BASEMENT 4/~t8 '
I DEPTH .....-. ,'-f
SHOW ("._:/ '
- G"AOE .? 111>7//1
o
EXTERIOR e'" IAt;;
~~~TINGc:Xt> -tltl ,CI~O
EXTERIOR . If CONe.
~DN. WALL 10
Tl--' ICKNESS' . 'MAS',y
TYPE
CONSTR;
-'
~
Cl
CE-!lING
AGENCY
. AUTH~iIZEf
OA TE
8UILDING
REVIEW
~t~~K 0
, CAISSON'S 0
&GltBEAMS,
ROOF
ZONING
i, PARKING
I
I
,
::>
o
"-
ROOF'ING
MATERIAL
.PUBLIC'HfALTH
EXTERIO
WALL
ABOVE .
2ND Ft.:R.
ABOVE
'3RO FLR.
" ENGINEERIN.G .
ABOVE
2ND FLR.
ABOvE
3RD FLR. .
c
NOTES TO APPLICANT:
FOR 1;-.<SPECT10N~ OR INFORMATION CALL 925 ~ 7JJO
rOR A~L WOftK DONE UNDER THJS PERMIT THE PERMITTEE ACCEPTS FUll RES?ONSISIUTr FOR
CO.'-A?L..lANCE WITH THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, THE COUNTY ZONING RESOLUTION OR CITY
ZONt~,'3 ORDINANCE, AND ALL OTHER COUNTY RESOLUTIONS OR CITY OitDltUdlCES y.'HICHSVER
A"LiES" 2'1'''7'''''1- <f?'i<tm"'1
S~i'ARATE PERMITS MUSTEE 'OBTAlNED fOR ELE'CTRICA'L, PLUMBING ANDHEATING,!tGNS,.
SW1M:VdNG POOLS ANO reNcH. ------. .... -
PERMiT EXPIRES 60 DAYS FROM DArE ISSUED UNLass WORK -IS STARTED.
R~QUIRED IHSPECTlOHS SHAlL BE REQUESTED, ONE WORKING DAY IN ADVANCE.
ALL FIHAL INSPECTIONS SHA.LL BE MACE,ON ALL ITEMS OF WORK BEFORE OCCUPANCY IS. PER.MITTED.
;J:/lOCC ~
T--ll$ SUILDING SHALL NOT BE OCCUPIED UNTIL A CERTIFICATE or: OCCUPANCY .HAS BEE~ ,ISSUE ". BUIL.DING ,DE PARTMENT
',"".IT IU,JECT TO REVOCATION OR IU'PENIION FOR VIOL ION OF ANT LAW' GOV'RN"ING SAME., (\', \\,'~~, ,",,' ,',' 11 -71
ISIGNb'!URE " , ' ", ' " ' ',~~ . ',\l.b -:-q;\ ' ,
APPLI=A~~T: ' . ~."" ',' APPROV~t Sy- .," '. \ -.: .. :I.. 'OATE \,
THIS FORM IS A PERMIT ONol Y Jtn 'LICENSE /I ,R,eElPT' CLASS' 'AMOUNT~, , '
WHEN VALIDATED HERE , " / C g.,"
I'
I
:\; l +t =.,,.., ..s.
'5 r () PC1-(,;ie .( ,
'g
[../1./6 OA
VALUATION (t
OF WORK .p
I PLAN
FILED T
,
I
I
I
;:'0
!
ow
r
P
-0- TO AL FEE
DOUBLE
CHECK 0
CASH 0
$
-5,
Dc)
".~'''','
"
--.-.
.I
!'!?7::~(,,;'S
~'.'V~V
"",~. i
C /.-...., ~,
.'
~ -,
To: Sunny Vann - City of Aspen, Planning Office
From: Ed Zasacky
Date: September 27, 1983
Re: Verification of existing units on the property known
as the Chance Mining Claim.
Steve Horowitz (current barn resident) states that he
moved into the barn in 1971 and that it had a kitchen at
that time that was shared by several separate unrelated
individuals. Steve added his in 1972 along with two
other occupants of the barn and more formally partitioned
the barn into four units.
/JJ~\
, -) !
"'-. /
In addition, I contacted Mrs. Dalton at Aspen Metro
Sanitation, She quoted me from her records that the five
lower single-family homes shown on Joe Wells inventory
(Exhibit A) as numbers 7,8,9,10,11 and also shown on the
improvement survey as F,E,D,G,C have been connected to
sewer since September 12, 1972. She also stated that the
upper area was connected to sewer on September 4, 1975 and
that the Durant Mine Barn fixture inventory listed four
kitchen sinks. Joe Well's field notes also show on----
Exhibit B, 11 single family structures of which five are
on the property as previously described and two single
family structures in the area of the Durant Mine Barn
access road. These units are then tallied on Exhibit C
which is the Area 13 totals.
The 1974 aerial photos (Exhibit D) shows the Durant Mine
Barn and the single-family structure next door. The 1979
aerial photo shows the same two structures circled in red,
Both photos show numerous automobiles parked around the
two structures indicating the occupancy by more than two
families of the two structures,
(5)
Ed Smart (former part-owner of the property) confirmed to
me that the lower five houses were moved onto the property
from the West End in 1963.
I understand from Karen Smith that a building permit was
obtained to add a unit to the Durant Mine Barn on June 23,
1971 by Harley Baldwin as per a conversation with Bill
Drueding.
^
r-.,
.
'.::--
KAREN B, SMITH, A.I.C,P,
Planning and Management Services
P.O. Box 8575
Aspen, Colorado 81612
Phone: (303) 925-4894
September 20,
i
I
I
i
I
i
i
19831
Mr. Sunny Vann, Planning
Mr. Jim Wilson, Building
City of Aspen
l30 S. Galena
Aspen, CO 81611
Director /
Inspector
Dear Sunny and Jim:
i
I
I
It is the intention of my client to reconstruct dwelling units pn
the Chance Claim (Spar) property. Therefore, pursuant to Section
24-ll.2(a) of the Aspen Muncipal Code, I am requesting that ybu
verify units on the property. To assist in your review, there
are seven buildings with ten units on the Chance Claim. \
It is my understanding that the verified units would be exem~t
from the GMP Quota Competition. Given the PUD designation on t!e
property and the applicant's intention to divide the proper y
into lots for future sale, I assume the proper applications fr
reconstruction of verified units therefore will be a combinJd
subdivision and PUD. I
We would appreciate your response as soon as possible, so tJe
applicant can prepare the appropriate submission. I
I
I
I
1
Sincerely,
~,B.~
I
I
I
\
\
\
I
I
\
I
Karen B. Smith, AICP
for the applicant, Neal Myers
KBS:klm
cc: Collette Penne
I?n,~~'
/?UIN~,~
,';-.,,,,;";;'>
h.','-
;..!'
, ,: iid(;,.,~,'",,~,~,";-' ,/, ,~, /"'
_ fi~, ";>'0 _ ,_ . . .. :.>-::;:./,,-,?.." . A ~'
{';;:;.--:;;/ /-,,~, "
~-O~~7;::$;,; "/,,. ,-,
~'.c~/?,,,'i0VZ'.. -- - . I I
~$3:$~~ ~ - 0 G-~\~;~' i
~i:~~ ~~,=~~ " - '~ \,\ (II' ,
flrz ",-.)):' 11'\<'- · >
., ' diJ' '{ , \',' , ',: ...:
\0' , . ~ >=' "~,, ., ·
!. " _ lC>'\" ",,7 C\t- t R~>t\ I I :l
" I T f\ "",-' f:~ ~ ul
dJ>!. i \::}_ - J:.:~1' ~ :::l
~ '~ ~' y~~, '!!J:2:l!r:fiX~, ~"~~~, ! i' "1
~ _ ~ d~.Y -"" W'! ~
,,\ ~ .~~ ~" , OV' '" ,"
,~\\ ~_ o-U",,-, .c,;r, "'. '"
I\~' ~ ~y , -'?~ ;
. .' ~~ ~ """ V" ,--'1''''1'<" "
, ..' ff:', yV1.' . ,
"t::! 1:':;1 JY B, VC ."" 'V'-@I
~ .:,:.' '\ -;% . ~ \----.,. .
_.... ~~~'\~ '. ~ J! \(, 1,1
"~r+- ~~\ "'----v5~%: \t$; . " , . .
I ' \ "'''''' . "", ' ~' II
-H ,. ,T '" "j
-I--i 1\\\ " ~VF "'" ~~ ' . ~cJl\ .,1 -' ' , 'S" m
h k+'JV)Jlt ~ . '" \ \ -
i4!'J" I?' is ' r: ~"""t ~ \\
I', \\\,-y;,N' ~",>,~--"')l Y
.., ~" \\.'\St/*,,~ · ~ '
,: . _'" '-- ''-'0 y; :- ..
Jd\' ' " . ' ,/ 1f;l ---
.~"", ~ ~ . /, \;W
! l~ I, 0 I ~ t .......----
$ ~ ~- ".~/!-@~~(~
t'\ ' I' ' I' ..
," ,,' ,,1'. " , " I (" '~-'
,ill
, ~ T i
.A ' !;;I T
, <~ - .!
~ J:.!."- .' I' - f " . I '.. l- ,,! I ---
"e" . · ' I" _'1 ' ,I
.
~. =__ =JJ .' /., jl:IIllTI1L A] ".. ":"""'" d" ri -
...... . .11 -1'1 \1, l!,,% _,,--'- - I U
_ ,,,'_ ,-r-< '-- ,- """ - ' -. -- . .. -- in
( __ . _J '. ~... ~~_,~'~-:xi :
___ '. "_ . ""_~.jf - i
.
I' ~r't tuelu ,~
~ V/~~vlrLt
';;.d'K f M <?
~ 1JlJ-t4 c't;!16('v
fit- 'tZuk/ ' /
w~ ~~~ /~~
''--...'
'"
'!k-7
:EL, ., SJEU ""--- f, ~~ -I"ge&qf,.., "
'~ atvu., ~-TC$!U-r;t;L . f?~.
~*~~!J~IWI&t~aJU-::r-~d-~ /fl&
~,fI.. w~kx~,~jQf-/$bk';4-v Ywt,~
,~~J~Y)B/+/o~, u
.~k: ~ //&fr ~~~fe/~ 'J4~/~ * o;,M:-
fk iMve.fo;rj @~"" &2? ~,"" i- enkik- ;,4-+, '
'" ~ Yjid.- w",dik.fL~""7, ' ~ 14...... ~ .,1-....
~~()dfh- ~~~Io lu~MfeL~
f<<-fmJ- -- .t, ".'& "' ~ '" eu4 fa "
wt.~:+ k ":'~ 1"J.e#M ~I a,_-/P.y' " .
IM~ "" j{. ~ ~ l'lf1ll, ""4-,
if tUt- -+ ~<<-f/!u ~i1t' ~ it ·
~u, 7-4;;(-..1' "of ",u, ~~
~ 1Jw JarA' ~(e/t~' .
~J~ S~,d~ t~~;f/l( ~
./U/e /~a ~'. / / '
[/ ,
IJ
!k
?\'" ,I!........... --, /J,' '
:;,~ r- _ 1! 607-"J' l~ '" VI) c. ,--L,_, ,
_,~,-i, ! Vir-lEi,>'''' j {I VV/l]TED-'
,'p " I CO 'Y!::L. - I.:l;- II ",j
, C~'vv /' , )1 l "/(DO, ,.- r:.-6-:I,"-',,----~: ~
/ ,\,,,, _ I -.' ..;:-_.1_ 'f" 'i
/" ".(--71 I ,"/,~~~~c::t
, ,,/~,,'\ / j '-- . '>l ~L" ~~ II
. E. "< "'", \ // i ...., 11 '
// '~~ ~ E. '-t ' J" ,"., ,,,,' ~J
<~" " ,,6''';,~, ",,' ~~ ,sc~t3/I,"" I~"r, ,[iJ~"""".:Q;;J '<1" ,
~",.\5':.5'" ,,"'~'C:9 " ,\ / " , !,''', , <D ," <D
, 6'_ '\., '" 6', ..' , , , ,,! I,' /'
.... ~/ ' " '., ./,"
....,. , /
,', " " ' " 'I" /
,_~ .""\., V" 6'"." ", () ;'15' >, ' " ' , 'I /'
'- ,,/' <?"," 0 : /
\. ' ~ ,0>'" ~ ,/
"
,,,'" Co JIT
\"""" "\.,' O>.9<?:,~f)" /' ~,~~~MlfIUMS /
~~ . ~ 1 /
"cOUIh '" ',/ i
/ k " .9" 900 E
/ ^ \ ~ ,O/~,,'., '. ~. [fj
.-/' ,/
~ ,,--< ~ '31",>'-. I
\;. (~ ' ."' ~. ~
~. ~ '~i\
&3 T~g~~~'\1 \
~ \
1\
'\
\
\
E((h;~;+ g
//
// /
, .
,.
,. ,
1// \' ,
\" "..~;
:\ .... /
'\ !
I, !
I, \ ;
! . I
, )/
Y'
'I ,t'
,-
/
/
,
/'
I
,
I
~ 5J}J
5/1 kf-
V'
___ . _~ J.
" I,
, "
"":.;:,/ .._)
-;\'--
. .;....-
..)
C';\"
U
",h'_.
i
I ;
\ '
,
\ i
1
\
::J:>- , I
:::s: ,.
""'1
.,.<, .
.../! I'
. ,
. I I
iT
1
I
I'
i
,
J
!
,-~'
~
.......w~
. ~~
j
I I I
1;14
I ' ~ I.
I
,! 'f') i
I ~ 'I
I I
I ' I I i
L,~=r_._L~l=.
,
I ........ I I I
j -,,-"-j
'"
b
':-.".--
!
!
-.-.
,
" \'"
cD"
~.
~\
...1.__
"
".;:-"
$=?>- ,,)
;:.1..-;"
8-/
~
'.~
-- 1'~
~
.
,
..
.......
--"-
<:>
.
I .
.,~~; ~5~~;"
:1>- ....1'>-
(c;o ~i
t\ t ~~).-
c.. -..g -9.\
:.:'- ~ x
. ...... ~ ;:
~..-' ,).:t:'.
"=',.;- :';~
,...,
V..J
V
~~
,.-
.........-
i~ ""~
;..'
r
..~,... "
--
~
,
--
-.....~
,
.
~
..
.
.
.
~
.
.
,"
~
.~"""':wu.. ,.........__ ..................
'. "'" ,
,
,
,
"
VI
,,-.
~-
.'
.'
,
.;
,-
,,' "
-~ I
-~. ' I -L. ~_.
." . . --1: :
, i-;-l~~!~..;..i-
"'S' ~~' ;',:<::'i,'~
(s '.. ... "";~:5'"., '-.J
~ =:: I~ -(~ I ~
t>-wr -'l" p-
I
=I~
~-f'-~ ~-tl ==--
--I '!i:1 ~
<0'*'1- \J\ ~ C;j t~ I ~~
I !,
· i I.. i .
--+'---r
. N I~,I~;~ . .
._._.. ..~_~........._..,......~_. ,.....w. ..,
'. ./ I --/ 1:./ I"
I ... \. .
it ~ fl"- i-il-~ ---
(l- ~ ':-" ;:.
1;".:' ~ ~ I I G j
I ~~ ~~, ~ I .! :; I
~ ~c- 0-- 1>1
<h-?-~ g
s" ',." :~,r" : ..
,----&$' 0-
s' s '~1
rL. r\ \. Q
f_ l::- t.... '(1\
" ~- ;
"
~~.'"
:s:~._
U__'
.Q
.'\'0,>
.' . ~ ,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
.
_~'ft
c
QJ
~
,
:'
,
,
';>
,~
--..~
(",:.~:) .~.
), ~'
fl. ':'\ N"
~ g ~',
,~\,1f .,; --r S'
(", ,!.?- ~ -
'(iT ~'~'I ii-, , a ~
t:@.i ~,.. -,
t ~)I ~ ~
,'I U
~' -:lo..
~ I.c~ N~ c~ k>b;,
_ _ _.__ n~*__ ---t" !
!'~ ~~ oP,~8d ff~
1_- N~ cfJ4,:l<l\~.hi~;<;. .
-~ iCo. ,,;:'SrlC,\J'1l --r. 1
, ' .-- '--l- i~:, lo~ ~i/; ,
C) -!
=: Sl~~t~ ~h~ll1 ~
->- ~p\dr (Kz) r:i
, -
> ,~Ti'lf\+" f~) f?
" "~;r- -MJ'JiP-j'I',r.:"':jl,. .~
. . ..It-,i-,,- .L"I;;,...';"l~.
---.. ---- _-4_: r;.:
. .. _~ IA H~ oPluailiy(1rl ~
'I ~ N~ W:9E? ~a'I\S 0-
,---..- --... -,---- " c
I .1.AI.L""J,,,,,,)....::::
~_u. _."-_ .__" ~_~ i~' tl-~ t. 'V<"u~ ~
._'-_ _..~_ __.J~ktEeJ~w>~I-r~L~
I ' -
! \.r,1 2L' .s:.
_~..__ .:.._ __.~~__ ':LJ~'~"')1 <l.-(;..;;i'..;
I I
, " !tt 'C'l-.'
~ ,'". i ltf-;:"l--i'~
t ....~...... _......
I /) ,I ... . ,
..J! \J11di:> l'IIIYlIUl,IlZt:l.:
~ ~ ___.. I
,
.~<<.:
'h-r:- -='",'
r/.) (.)
('i Cj'
c
.......-
..'~"", .
.-;
...:..-
C\ 1-" ,;,. /., r'\
~ ;', "'. ~" _~ .~ \1.'
- .- \J ;\~
~.'it;.3. .1',!~ 1" j-
.",'. r . (I' ~ \"1'
',,, -/ :L' ,
0') t,,;' n-') '" I
(,.;b "'I f' .~o,
~. ,_ .\Jl\;)
L" r' ~tr- y-;
f,'" t:)J 'I. .\,-
,.i... "" ._.' ~
.. ..... ",' ~ j.. ','
Q)
~
-"
C-
...,-
r.-
tro
"'t-
~
.:-'i-.-"
:S71
"
f.,',
CY
1....5'
~ ..(c>. -+>.
.~"
-~
..
"
..
~
'"
.
~
C:'
-l-.1
W- I,
Ui .,
, c -c:- :;=:\
:.:.;: :; '.;
.'", .I-~. '.
~IJ' A--
.i,t!lL~..
1 i:'i ',0
~j~ ~
~ I:Y -'
,,' ',~""~
C"t;.j ~ I);
u1 i-
\'ll~~
l.J.r:t.\- s
~'i SL .-1-
i' .. -~,
',.!" .',
.~ r " ... . ...
:-;'\ '
(lfi{ Q.I
Q) 1:-: '5
(~yc..
:-j-;',.- ~
".'\ ~
1 QJ
!
.......
J;
S
0--
I
,
,-.....1.-
;;,
'~,t'"'"' t '1~~l'i~.}~$,1J:,''''.,z;:;::;,~',:';F::,'';'~7';:::,,;~.:.
1"""\,
^
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen City..Council
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE:
Aspen Chance Subdivision
DATE:
January 23, 1984
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
LOCATION
The Chance Claim
Frontage is on Ute Avenue just east of the Aspen ~lps
Road (please refer to Page 3 of the submission for! a
vicinity map) .
ZONING
R-15 PUD and C - Conservation
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting conceptual subdivision and conceptual, PUD
approval and approval to build within 50 yards of the 8040 greenl;ine.
GMP exemption is being requested for 3 deed-restricted employee '
units.
REFERRAL COMMENTS
,
The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District says the project can b~
serviced by them. A trunk line lies in Ute Avenue.
The Water Department anticipates minimal impact on the existing w~ter
system. Water would be available from Ute Avenue and/or the 6" ll\b.in
supplying the Alps development in Alps Road. They add that, "duel to
the layout of the property, we may require that the developer locrte
the metering near the access road into the property in the event the
service lines are in excess of one hundred feet." I
The Building Department raises several points, some of which late~
reviews may address. These are:
1.
The access to the site should be formally addressed as
easement or recorded agreement.
,
I
an
I
,
I
!
2. The Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking arrangement should be
defined. I
I
3. A bedroom count is necessary for park dedication fee ca~cu-
lation. I
i
4. Two summers ago there was a problem with grading that ;
,
occurred above this site. It caused Glory Hole Park to;
fill with sediment that was carried through this site. I
I
will this be fully addressed? 1
I
,
,
The Environmental Health Department notes that no proposal for inr
stallation of wood burning devices is included in the applicationl.
Any such installation will be governed by Ordinance 12 (Series of!
1983). Windblown dust during construction must be controlled andj
immediate vegetation of disturbed areas will be required as a long
term dust control measure. Drainage from roofs, paved areas and;
disturbed soil sites must be retained on-site either with drywells,
non-discharging holding ponds or discharge across vegetated areas! on
the property. Construction noise will be regulated by the City o~
Aspen Noise Abatement Ordinance. I
The City Engineering Department feels the application is generallY
adequate for conceptual subdivision purposes. without an indicat~on
of how parceling will occur, however, it is not possible to fully!
r-"
^
Aspen Chance Subdivision
January 23, 1984
Page Two
evaluate provision of access
sizing of the proposed lots.
review, the City Engineering
rights-of-way, utility easements, an~
with respect to the criteria of 8049
Department offered the following comments:
,
Ill..
2.
This parcel is of particular importance relative to the!
Urban Runoff Management Plan adopted by the City of Asp~n.
We have, during various discussions with the developer,!
expressed the importance of an adequate drainage easemept
to accommodate anticipated flows from the Spar Gulch area
under the Runoff Plan. Further parceling should consid~r
this easement. '
Grading proposed for the site will result in considerabie
disturbance to the existing terrain. As the applicatior
points out, much of the site is covered with mine tailirgs
and substantial regrading will be done to create a more!
"natural" configuration. Substantial disruption will b~
necessary, however, and subsequent approvals should conr
sider the potential for toxicity in the tailings and ho~
topsoil placement and revegetation will minimize any po~en-
tial hazard. We would expect the applicant to pursue
further subsurface investigations as recommended by Chep
and Associates."
The City Attorney's Office comments are as follows:
1.
,
The legal description of the trail easement should be :
supplied early in the process so that the Engineering a~d
Parks Departments can coordinate the proposed trail wi~h
existing trails and trail plans.
The applicant represents that it will attempt to keep ~
"majority of existing trees" on the site. The Code re-i
quires review to remove trees of 6" diameter or more.
2.
3.
We assume that the Engineering Department will monitor
closely all information concerning potential geologic
hazards and the impacts of grading and run-off on the
Hole Park pond.
Glory
4.
I
i
Mandatory PUD requires consideration of adequacy of in~
ternal roads. The grade of the proposed access roads <16%
and 8%) should be certified as adequate by the Fire Di~-
trict for fire protection purposes. Also, although in~er-
nal traffic circulation will be on private roads, the ~ite
will be accessed by public roads that are being or may !be
impacted by certain land use approvals and application~.
PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW
I
Verification of Units - The seven free-market residential units ~ro-
posed for th~s project are exempted from residential growth mana ement
competition as per Section 24-11.2(a). The letter from the Plan ing
Office verifying the existence of seven residential units for regon-
struction is included in the submission materials and attached tq
this memo. The exemption allows for the reconstruction of any build-
ing existing as of November 14, 1977, provided no additional dweJhing
units are created. The verified number of units must be reconst~ucted
within five years of the date of demolition. Any building whichiis
demolished shall be limited to reconstruction on the same site o~ on
a contiguous site owned by the same individual. '
Employee Housing - An additional exemption from residential growth
management competition is being requested as per Section 24-11.2~f)
for the construction of three deed restricted employee housing rental
units which will be included within three of the free-market resfdential
structures. The inclusion of these three units came later in thd
submission process, therefore, no comments are yet available from the
Housing Authority. The applicant is planning to meet with the HOusing
'.,.......,,......., i
" ]
Aspen Chance Subdi~ision I
January 23, 1984 " i
Page Three 'I I
\ ,
, ,
, ,
Authority and their\recommendation will be available by the preli~inary
stage of review. S~ecifics concerning the location and type of :
units, number of befrooms, size of the units, and the proposed prlice
categories will be reviewed and outlined for you. The price cate~ory
submitted by the applicant at this point in time is for moderate iin-
come rental units, the acceptance of which will be based on current
community need. Th~ added density of these units has been calculrted
by considering the tlhree structures which will have employee units as
duplex units. The s\ite is large enough to accommodate this densiity.
I i
As explained in the tPPlication, the entire ownership parcel con~ists
of nearly 7 acres whtch straddles the City/County line. The County
portion of the prope~ty is not being proposed for development. ~he
portion in the City c~nsists of an area of .75 acres zoned C - C~nser-
vation which lies abo~e the 8040 line, on which no development i~
planned, nor was permissible density calculated including this aIiea.
Below the 8040 line is 3.61 acres zoned R-15 PUD (which requires i
slope reduction for density calculations). Appendix B of the su~-
mission details the density calculation procedure as per Section 124-
8.18 of the Municipal Code. The net amount of land available fo~
density calculations is 144,907 square feet. The R-15 zone requ~res
20,000 square feet per duplex and 15,000 square feet per single- !
family use. This application proposes three duplexes {units wit~
caretaker apartments} and four single-family houses. The duplexes
require a lot area of 60,000 square feet and the single-family utiits
require 60,000 square feet for a total land area requirement of
120,000 sq. ft., which is exceeded by this parcel.
REVIEW PROCESS
The other reviews this application is presently being considered
under include the conceptual planned unit development plan {Sect~on
24-8.7}, conceptual subdivision (Section 20-10) and 8040 greenlide
review (Section 24-6.2). This memo will initially address concentual
subdivision, then proceed through conceptual PUD and 8040 greenl~ne
review.
Conceptual Subdivision
As stated in Section 20-7, the purpose of conceptual review is to
"authorize further study on the project" and some aspects of thiE!
proposal are very preliminary at this time. Specifically, the q~es-
tion of the suitability of the land for subdivision (Section 20-~)
will need to be proven in the subsequent review steps. A prelim~nary
review of the engineering geology of the site has been completedlby
Chen and Associates and attached as Appendix E to the applicatiod.
This information is being taken further by the applicant in thei~
more detailed site planning. The results of further investigatiqn
and more detailed proposals concerning landscaping, grading, contain-
ment of runoff, control of erosion, and suitability of the mine I
tailings will be basic to an evaluation of site suitability. Th~
site is outside mapped avalanche hazard zones. There may be some
flooding considerations associated with peak run-off periods, and the
question of the existence of old mine shafts which would indicat~
potential surface subsidence should be eliminated. Conformance ~ith
Section 20-17 Design Standards for Subdivisions must be demonstr~ted
in the Preliminary Plat submission for all streets and related i~-
provements, easements, utilities and public dedications. I
,
i
The present plan proposes to retain access to the site off Aspen:Alps
Road per an existing agreement and to provide a single access to]Ute
Avenue. The existing driveway to the upper bench will remain as]
internal access at a grade of 8% and other internal circulation will
be at grades of 6% or less. The subdivision design standards sett 10%
as maximum grade for local rights-of-way. Parking will be provided
at one space/bedroom internally on the site and will be eliminat~d
from Ute Avenue. The Alps tennis courts will be provided with access
and separate parking. The Attorney's comments concerning the po~ential
inadequacy of Ute Avenue are well taken, however, this project if$ a
,~
,I""'.,
Aspen Chance Subdivision
January 23, 1984
Page Four
reconstruction project and not a growth generator. Numbers of
and cars may be less than the current situation on the parcel.
I
pepple
I
i
Conceptual PUD Plan
The applicant intends to delineate relatively small lots so that ,
"extensive common area will be preserved for joint use." The sit~ is
unique in that an extensive amount of mine tailings exist, natura~
spring water runs through the parcel, and the topography can be ap
asset in terms of fitting structures into hillsides to reduce the~r
visibility and allow them to become part of their natural surrounp-
ings. A site visit has been scheduled to facilitate evaluation olf
this building placement and the applicant will be supplying additiional
elevations for your review at the meeti~g. !
i
The applicant submits that the site design proposed addresses thel
purposes of the PUD section of the Code in several ways. They ha~e
also indicated that no variations from the requirements of the u~der-
lying zone will be requested. Full evaluation of any variations ~ill
be reviewed at Preliminary Plat, when lot lines are delineated. '
!
,
The purposes of a Planned unit Development as listed in Section 214-
8.1 are as follows: i
i
I
(a) Promote greater variety in the type, design and layout !of
buildings; 1
i
(b) Improve the design, character and quality of new develop-
ment;
(c) Promote more efficient use of land and public streets,
utilities and governmental services;
(d) Preserve open space as development occurs;
(e)
Provide procedures so as to relate the
layout of residential development to a
thus encourage the preservation of the
and scenic features; and
type, design anq
particular site iand
site's unique ncltural,
!
(f)
Achieve a beneficial land use relationship with
areas.
i
surrou~ding
I
The applicant has addressed these purposes with the following prqposals:
The existing topography will be altered by the reshaping anq
terracing of the mine tailings for the purposes of shielding
buildings from view, maximizing privacy and solar gain. The
natural bench at the upper part of the property will be mai~-
tained and used as the site for two of the structures. Twoi
structures exist there now and are virtually hidden from viJw by
existing slope and vegetation. :
I
I
effort will be made to "keJp
All trees over 6" in diam~ter
and should be shown on a de-
I
I
!
The applicant has stated that an
the majority of existing trees."
must be individually considered,
tailed landscaping plan.
utilities will be placed underground on the site.
Natural spring water that runs through the site will be re-i
directed and ponds will be created. The ponds will be both I
functional, in terms of handling runoff, and aesthetic, as ~
visual amenity for the site and the occupants. The ponds w~ll
be used to reduce sedimentation of run-off before it ultimately
discharges into Glory Hole Park. Catch basins are being in1
troduced to retain run-off from paved surfaces. '
Existing accesses will be maintained to minimize the amount!of
paved surfaces. The 6%-8% grades are within the acceptable!
range of the Code standards, however, the Fire Chief must s~b-
stantiate their acceptability for emergency access. !
I
Aspen Chance Subdivision
January 23, 1984
Page Five
,
I
I
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
At this conceptual stage of the review process, it appears that t~e
applillcation will utilize the flexibility of the PUD provisions to,
develop a design for the site which utilizes its assets and liabili-
ties in a way which will enhance the site. until details are avatl-
able on the grading and terracing of the site and the positioningjand
heights of structures are supplied, it is difficult to evaluate tre
merits of the site plan. '
r,
,'-'
As required by section 24-8.7, the application must include a stare-
ment of intention for future ownership of all portions of the PUDlo
The owner of the parcel plans to retain one of the upper sites as! his
home, then sell the other six sites with limited land area. Each!
purchaser will have an interest in the common area. I
8040 Greenline Review
I
~re
I
,
,
I
I
,
The review criteria for mandatory PUD and 8040 greenline reviews
identical with the addition of one criteria in 8040. The review
criteria and the applicant's proposals are as follows:
1.
Whether there exists sufficient water pressure and othet
utilities to service the intended development. !
The Water Department has indicated no problem with serv~ng
the project. Water is available in Ute Avenue and a majin
exists in Alps Road. A sewer trunk line also exists ini Ute
Avenue and the site has been served since 1975. '
I
,
!
2. The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protectipn,
snow removal, and road maintenance.
The upper and lower portions of the porperty will be sej-
parately acc~ssed and roads will have to be ?f accepta~le
grades and w~dths to accommodate these funct~ons. I
3. The suitability of the site for development considerin~ the
slope, ground instability and possibility of mud flow, jrock
falls and avalanche dangers. '
Preliminary work indicates that any geologic hazards c~n
"probably be mitigated by engineering design." This ralther
ambiguous statement needs to be clarified with definits en-
gineering design proposals before you can determine si~e
suitability in a definitive way. Based on the "Snow Avia-
lanche Hazard Zones of the Aspen Area" map prepared by j
Arthur Mears, the site is outside any avalanche hazard.!
4.
The effects of the
run-off, drainage,
water pollution.
,
development on the natural watershed,
soil erosion and consequent effects ion
I
i
I
I
The proposal for a series of ponds, connected by spring
water flow, which will be designed to trap and filter dut
sediment before proceeding to the pond at Glory Hole sdunds
workable. with more calculations of the efficiency of !such
a system, it may be necessary to consider a maintenance
agreement with the City of Aspen for the Glory Hole porid if
additional sediment is introduced. The Engineering De~art-
ment also requests that an adequate drainage easement he
provided relative to the City's adopted Urban Runoff M~nage-
ment Plan. Engineered catch basins are being built to i
handle surface runoff and to eliminate oil and asphalt I
contamination of the spring water. !
I
I
The possible effects on air quality in the area and ci~y
wide.
5.
,
i
Since this site is already a residential site, no longiterm
effects are anticipated by its redevelopment. If wood,
burning devices are to be included in these structures~
^
Aspen Chance Subdiv~ on
January 23, 1984
Page Six
I
I
I
I
I
,
their installation will be controlled by Ordinance 12 I
(Series of 1983). Construction dust must be controlled land
immediate vegetation of disturbed areas will be required to
control long term dust. i
/~
,
6. The design and location of any proposed structure, roads,
driveways or trails and their compatibility with the terrain.
Subsequent information on the grading plan is necessary I to
fully evaluate this criteria. It appears at this stagef
that if the regrading of the mine tailings can be accom~
plished as the conceptual presentation indicates, the I
placement of improvements will conceal structures, blen~
with the "new" terrain and offer privacy to residents. !
7.
Whether proposed grading will result in the least dis- I
turbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features.
j
I
The Engineering Department comments indicate problems w~th
this criteria. They feel that the proposed grading wili
result in "considerable disturbance to the existing terfain."
They also question potential for toxicity in the mine I
tailings and suggest that mitigation measures (such as 1
topsoil placement and revegetation) be investigated. Tre
subsurface investigations recommended by Chen and AsSoco.ates
should be completed and will help with more complete in~orma-
tion in the evaluation of the proposed grading plan. '
8.
The placement and clustering of structures so as to min~mize
roads, cutting and grading, and increase the open space] and
preserve the mountain as a scenic resource. '
i
Existing roads are being utilized~ open space is consid~r-
able if the amount of property being undeveloped is taken
into consideration. No structures are being proposed a~ove
the 8040 line. The evaluation of building height can b~st
be considered at the site visit. Concealment of strucbures
is an important aspect of this project.
9. The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain ~he
open character of the mountain.
Until new grades and building heights are detailed, it jis
difficult to evaluate this. However, the renderings tq be
supplied and the site visit will aid in this evaluation.
The fact that the entire portion of the property above jthe
County line will remain undeveloped, as will the .75 adre
above the 8040 line, is very positive in maintaining t~e
mountain's open character. The applicant feels that tHe
area and bulk requirements of the R-15 zone, including 1
height, can be adhered to in the design of the structu~es.
Other Considerations
The applicant wishes to dedicate a trail easement of 40' in widtH
with a developed trail of 8' in width to the City of Aspen for sWi-in
or hiking access from Aspen Mountain. Work is in progress to obtain
the cooperation of adjacent owners to extend the trail to Ute Av~nue,
connecting the Gant and the Aspen Club. I
I
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ACTION
The Planning and Zoning Commission recommends approval of the concep-
tual subdivision and conceptual planned unit development plan fon the
construction of seven (7) units on the Chance Claim (Spar) prope~ty
as presented. They deferred action on the GMP exemption request1for
three (3) employee rental units in three of the proposed structUTIes
to Preliminary Plat. The Housing Authority had not reviewed the!
application, so P&Z did not have a recommendation from them to rJview.
They also deferred action on the 8040 greenline to Preliminary p~at so
that more detailed information could be considered to determine dom~
pliance with the criteria.
-
^
Aspen Chance Subdiv~_ion
January 23, 1984
Page Seven
f'\
PLANNING OFFICE AND,PL1\NNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office and the Planning and Zoning Commission recomm~nd
approval of conceptual subdivision and conceptual PUD with the fotlow-
ing conditions: '
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Further investigation,6f~the engineering geology must be
completed to assure suitability of the site for develop~ent.
Definitive information be provided which
of surface collapse or subsidence due to
existence of old mine shafts.
removes the qu~stion
the possible I
!
,
I
!
, I
:L1'1
Pilat
Conformance with the Design Standards
Section 20-17 must be demonstrated in
submission.
for Subdivision
the Preliminary
i
The Preliminary Plat submission should include more det~iled
proposals for landscaping, grading, containment of runo~f
and control of erosion, to the satisfaction of the Engiheering
and Planning Departments. !
The relationship of this project with the Urban Runoff I
Management Plan should be addressed with the appropriat~
easement language and parceling to accommodate the easement
requested by City Engineering. '
6. The potential toxicity of the mine tailings should be i
addressed. If a problem exists, mitigation measures m~st
be outlined.
7. Impacts of grading and run-off on the Glory Hole Park ~ond
must be evaluated and, if necessary, an agreement for don-
tinuing maintenance should be drawn up with the City oB
Aspen. Continuing maintenance of the on-site ponds be lout-
lined through a subdivision agreement at preliminary p~at.
,
i
8. All trees over six inches (6") in diameter which are td be
removed must be shown on a site plan for consideration.!
9. A legal description of the proposed trail easement to Je
dedicated be supplied in the Preliminary Plat submissidn
for review by the Engineering and Parks Department. '
10. Preliminary Plat should show a bedroom count for park de-
dication fee calculation purposes.
11. The shared access on Alps Road be formalized either th~ough
a recorded agreement or easement.
12. The Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking and access arrange~ent
should also be a recorded agreement or easement. '
13.
14.
Any installation of wood burning devices shall be
to Ordinance 12 (Series of 1983).
b" i
su Ject
I
i
Drainage from roofs, paved areas and disturbed soil
must be retained on-site.
,1
S:Lu.es
!
15. Immediate vegetation of disturbed areas is required.
16.
c/-'i-
-~~~," ....
() (-;1
CJ -,,::L
""-.:.;.,.-......{ .~
d '::::5
c,
~
'v .
-.,~~": :(--
C,,_,~' {~
--/; ,,/
--~--~-;..o
The applicant will joint in a sidewalk, curb and
improvement district in the event one is formed.
~articipate to the extent of their 'frontage.
i
gutter
Theyiwill
,
I
I
I
i
r--
-,
. '
.
.--
.;.::.;.
, ""....
~'
.0.-
.--
-
-
--
-
-
.
"
" " ,,',,,
" ,'. .,~.
.."
.,,'
"
"',
',~ '"
.~', .. " ~,
"',,";:':",
"'",
',,"
','''.
, :."
'''.
'" ,
~.::,;: :',:~:\j ::;:'\;~'",":::",:" ,: ':~"~'" ":"::"~~f?';';'~~::'>~'" >:' , ',; ;.:. :," < ',:
, ' ,"" ,:'::,;: ,'~:~(~;~~r~~~~I~lfffl~~:pj.l,..~.,,:.~:~::fl~~
,,:' ,;~", ':,:,::, ': ..:, .1: ~O'''::':S''.'''>"'t, ''';''~~:i'ti.il~''':\;;:;'';'' 't' ""n.:e' ,(" ," '.:
..' '. ..,.... ::.... "",':' .::I>~'\ .~, ..,~:i.~li{~~. ,~~:"'. .~,.".'.. .""., :
"'.... . . "', ..... ~..:) ..,-;':10' "''-'~'''~; ""~'" " ..
"',..' ',' '.,..: /, ' , ;', .',' " , '~." ri~~..;;;.\;I~.'~~,;e,." '81..~.1'.,'
'c.,'..,:.., .'.'::';...,',./:'..,',:i,,<,alS;'ell\o;..'~'~tv!r~4',U:\&:) ..:u;, '" "
;","i'" .1:'....: ,\'. '.:' ';:~ ,"~' ".'.:.' , ,:~",~..t,(~:.::r,.'~':':,"!!:'o!,-:!" '""
'. I,.
,;.:,;,.......,.." .:".,
.""...
"'\' ,.":,, ',.
~ . ,'. .,:' ,'"
:: ',,' ',":..,"~.'. "I, "":~'~."
.' .~ ~: :'.S:':~;:f
';,',,'.',
. ,"." ~~~, '
....
'.[.' ,
.....:
,
'..""
. ..""
: ,,' .~.; :,":,
, ,~,..,:':'
" ,
" "",' . ,
":..".: ."" """:,',,,,,..,": .,
':,~lSl0;v:eml:>\E'rJ. r"i
. ' '.'" , , " ,~ ',. "
"',1'"
.''''..
,.,"'" ,
,'\" '
,.'. '
,1'98.3
"',,",',
"
. '.: ~r :.".
',,'"
','"
'''".;,"'"
'.
"'",,'
'. ..".
",',",
.'
:';'::
.:'
,,'.
.:, .,'
;'"
" ~
. ,.',
A. "
. ~ ,,:'
.".'
\, ~...: '~",' j"~,
,~" ",~::; :::' ,
,?'l:.,.:";,,, " ..
. '.' ...~ '
" ,;';".:
"",;',:..',,'
,';':,
--.
-,
i
,i.
,
"
"t
;"
I
"j:'"
",::'oi"
'ir':
""
....
,"i
!
.",'
,
"',:'+
;
~
/'-'~\
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
Jay Hammond, City Engineering~
FROM:
DATE:
December l6, 1983
RE:
Aspen Chance Conceptual Subdivision, Conceptual
P.U.D. and 8040 Greenline Review
Having reviewed the above application, and made a
the City Engineering Department has the following
,
. . I .
s~te ~nsp!=ct~on,
,
comments: 1
I
!
Conceptual Subdivision
The application is generally adequate for conceptual subdivision
purposes however, it lacks any indication of how parceling
will occur. We are concerned with adequate provision of
access rights-of-way, utility easements, and sizing of the !
proposed lots. In addition, since access is provided via the
Aspen Alps private road, the applicant should be required !
to provide a copy of the agreement with the Alps.
Conceptual P.U.D.
The Engineering Department has no particular comments or concerns
regarding the variances being requested under P.U.D. at this
time.
8040 Greenline Review
With respect to the criteria of 8040 review, the City Engin~ering
Department would offer a couple of comments:
1. This parcel is of particular importance relative to the,
Urban Runoff Management Plan adopted by the City of Aspen. iWe
have, during various discussions with the developer, expres~ed
the importence of an adeuqate drainage easement to accommod~te
anticipated flows from the spar Gulch area under the Runoff '
Plan. Further parceling should consider this easement.
2. Grading proposed for the site will result in considerablie
disturbance to the existing terrain. As the application i
points out, much of the site is covered with mine tailings ar,d
substantial regarding will be done to create a more "naturalt
configuration. Substantial disruption will be necessary, ,
however, and subsequent approvals should consider the potent~al
for toxicity in the tailings and how topsoil placement and i
revegetation will minimize any potential hazard. We would i
expect the applicant to pursue further subsurface investigat~ons
as recommended by Chen, and Associates. !
JHjco
1"""\
,'-",
PEN
130
asp
WATER DEPARTMENT
!!!!!QB:!B.Q'!!'!!
TO: SUNNY VAN, PLANNING DEPARTMENT
FROM: JIM MARKALUNAS
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1983
RE: ASPEN CHANCE SUBDIVISION
We have reviewed the application for the Aspen Chance Subdivision adjacent
to Ute Avenue and it is our opinion that the proposed development will have
minimal impact on the existing water system and water would be available
from Ute Avenue and/or the 6" main supplying the Alps development in Alps
Road, Due to the layout of the property we may require that the developer
locate the metering near the access road into the property in the event the
service lines are in excess of one hundred feet,
JM:lf
--)~ 1tIA'if""'~
-'~,~
~ ' Lfj)
I
[
DEe 0 1 ~f6.0:
A" ,_
A~N-/'P4+Klff~
PLANNING OFFICE,
1 ' "'. .it.,(~:.$~ti::'h:""i;...~~W
~",-"",,,,,,,,,,........,.....,.'<.,t"...~,....._.,,.._,.....,, -" _",,:.
~ ""'~.#.~,.;\
e" ,.,"
~,'
1"""\ ,r..,
, "ASPEN.ATKIN
',EMaAa~E~T~:;:",;'~AI..T~ ',DEPARTMENT
',<:, '.-, ",^,- C' ,"',:,.,";': ':"J.":,,', .:-;. .._-",'" <:". _' ."-,, , ,','"._ ",.,.' _",," ",'" , ,,," ,'""
.-
MEMORANDUM
, ,'. '
TO: 'J~~~~~~~~~W#:'il~~'
, ' ", '" ,,, , , ".,
FROM:
Thomas. S.Du-nlop~
Director (:si)
Environmental 'Health
Department
DATE: December I, 1983
RE: 'Aspen Chase .subdivision,
... -,'-"--_:'-;..;.';~-.:.:..._'~'_...._,~~~-.;.;..',:-...:~'~;;...~'~ ~~ .:.._- -'--'- --'-_:_'- --,- ---- - ---- --....-
"" "'-,' '-," ",--_. '"
,
The above-mentioned submittal has been reviewed by ihis
office for 'the ::Eo1Iowing>environmental concerns.
Air Pollution:
Th,ere ,is no ,mention 6fthe, installatiqn of wood burning
devices .in thestructu-re "proposed. :Pf'in fact such devices
are plann!=d.theywill begovei;ned by Ordinance 12 series
. of 1983. This, in e,ssence controls 'the design and numbers
of solid fuel burning facilities.
Familiarization with'Ordinance,12 by the applicant is
recoinrnended.
Dur:ing coristruc,tiOn should windb10wn (fugitive) Ciust become
a, ,probJ;:em' to the neigbborhood cO,rrectivemeasures will be
required. This may take the form 'of watering, fencing or the
use of chemica'l suppressants.
,
Immedia te vegetp:tion of dhlturbed areas will b,e required as
' a, long term ,dust control'measure.
Site Drainage:
Drainage from roofs, paved ar,eas and disturbed soil sites sba~l
be retained on-site. This 'may 'be. accomplis'hedwith dry wells,
non-di'schargi'ng,'holding ponds or discharge, acress vegetated
area's .on -the property. -
. . ~ ~ ":" '.~ ,
This ,xeq1:lirement.will not preclude the normal discharge off
'the property_ofspr,ing qr sur.racewaterwhich historically
ha~'run through the property.
,
Due to' the negative i~pactson receiving waters of parking lot
and roof -draiflage these tY:8es of waste water, are being asked
tone :retained on-site. '
130 :Sou~h m.;;len.. Street
Asp..n, Colbrado 81811
I
303/92s'-~20
",.....,
~
,
Pa,ge 2
,December 1, 1983
Asp-en ChaseSu.bdivision
Noise Abatement:
No long term negative influences of: noise generated from
this proj-ect are anticipated.
Construc,tioll noise will be regulated by the City of Aspen
NoIse Abatement Ordinance.
Water Supply: I
Service of this complex by the City of Aspen water distributjl. on
system is in conformance with policies of this office.
:::,::::t:. project by the' ""pen ""tra sanitation Di.tdlt
collection system in in conformance with policies of this
off~; I
I
TSDjco
..
^
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE:
Aspen Chance Subdivision
DATE:
January 3, 1984
LOCATION
The Chance Claim
i
I
I
I
I,
Avenue just east of the Aspen 41ps
to Page 3 of the submission fot a
I
Frontage is on Ute
Road (please refer
vicinity map) .
ZONING
R-15 PUD and C - Conservation
APPLICANT'S REQUEST
The applicant is requesting conceptual subdivision and conceptual PUD
approval and approval to build within 50 yards of the 8040 green~ine.
GMP exemption is being requested for 3 deed-restricted employee i
units.
REFERRAL COMMENTS
i
The Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District says the project can b~
serviced by them. A trunk line lies in Ute Avenue. i
The Water Department anticipates minimal impact on the existing w~ter
system. Water would be available from Ute Avenue and/or the 6" m~in
supplying the Alps development in Alps Road. They add that, "duel to
the layout of the property, we may require that the developer locate
the metering near the access road into the property in the event ~he
service lines are in excess of one hundred feet." i
I
The Building Department raises several points, some of which later
reviews may address. These are: i
1. The access to the site should be formally addressed as ~n
easement or recorded agreement.
2. The Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking arrangement should fue
"
defined.
3. A bedroom count is necessary for park dedication fee calcu-
i
lation.
4. Two summers ago there was a problem with grading that i
, , ,
occurred above thls slte. It caused Glory Hole Park tol
fill with sediment that was carried through this site.
will this be fully addressed?
The Environmental Health Department notes that no proposal for in~
stallation of wood burning devices is included in the application.i
Any such installation will be governed by Ordinance 12 (Series of !
1983). Windblown dust during construction must be controlled and i
immediate vegetation of disturbed areas will be required as a lon~
term dust control measure. Drainage from roofs, paved areas and '
disturbed soil sites must be retained on-site either with drywells[,
non-discharging holding ponds or discharge across vegetated areas Ibn
the property. Construction noise will be regulated by the City of
Aspen Noise Abatement Ordinance. i
,
I
The City Engineering Department feels the application is generally!
adequate for conceptual subdivision purposes. Without an indicatioh of
how parceling will occur, however, it is not possible to fully eva~uate
provision of access rights-of-way, utility easements, and sizing o~
,1"""'\,
,-....
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Two
the proposed lots. With respect to the
City Engineering Department offered the
criteria of 8040 review,:
following comments: :
the
"1.
i
This parcel is of particular importance relative to the
Urban Runoff Management Plan adopted by the City of As~en.
We have, during various discussions with the developerj,
expressed the importance of an adequate drainage easement
to accommodate anticipated flows from the Spar Gulch a~ea
under the Runoff Plan. Further parceling should consi~er
this easement.
,
2. Grading proposed for the site will result in considerable
disturbance to the existing terrain. As the application
points out, much of the site is covered with mine tailings
and substantial regrading will be done to create a mor~
"natural" configuration. Substantial disruption will be
,
necessary, however, and subsequent approvals should con-
sider the potential for toxicity in the tailings and hqw
topsoil placement and revegetation will minimize any pqten-
tial hazard. We would expect the applicant to pursue '
further subsurface investigations as recommended by Chen
and Associates."
The City Attorney's Office comments are as follows:
1. The legal description of the trail easement should be
supplied early in the process so that the Engineering and
Parks Departments can coordinate the proposed trail wit~
existing trails and trail plans.
2. The applicant represents that it will attempt to keep a]
"majority of existing trees" on the site. The Code re-i
quires review to remove trees of 6" diameter or more.
3. We assume that the Engineering Department will monitor
closely all information concerning potential geologic :
hazards and the impacts of grading and run-off on the Glory
Hole Park pond.
4. Mandatory PUD requires consideration of adequacy of in-i
ternal roads. The g):'ade of the proposed access roads ($%
and 8%) should be certified as adequate by the Fire Dis+
trict for fire protection purposes. Also, although int~r-
nal traffic circulation will be on private roads, the s~te
will be accessed by public roads that are being or may Re
impacted by certain land use approvals and applications.]
"
PLANNING OFFICE REVIEW
Verification of Units - The seven free-market residential units p~o-
posed for this project are exempted from residential growth managciment
competition as per Section 24-1l.2(a). The letter from the Planni~g
Office verifying the existence of seven residential units for recon-
struction is included in the submission materials and attached to I
this memo. The exemption allows for the reconstruction of any bui~d-
,
ing existing as of November 14, 1977, p):'ovided no additional dwell~ng
units are created. The verified number of units must be reconstrupted
within five years of the date of demolition. Any building which ip
demolished shall be limited to reconstruction on the same site or on
a contiguous site owned by the same individual. i
Employee Housing - An additional exemption from residential growth,
management competition is being requested as per Section 24-l1.2(fl
for the construction of three deed restricted employee housing rental
units which will be included within three of the free-market residEkntial
structures. The inclusion of these three units came later in the i
submission process, therefore, no comments are yet available from the
Housing Authority. The applicant is planning to meet with the Hou~ing
Authority and their recommendation will be available by the preliminary
stage of review. Specifics concerning the location and type of
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Three
'I
I
\
I
,
,
!
i
units, number of bedrooms, size of the units, and the proposed p~ice
categories will be reviewed and outlined for you. The price cat~gory
submitted by the applicant at this point in time is for moderatei in-
come rental units, the acceptance of which will be based on curr~nt
community need. The added density of these units has been calcuLated
by considering the three structures which will have employee units as
duplex units. The site is large enough to accommodate this density.
1
I"'"'.
,-...
As explained in the application, the entire ownership parcel consists
of nearly 7 acres which straddles the City/County line. The courity
portion of the property is not being proposed for development. The
portion in the City consists of an area of .75 acres zoned C - C~nser-
vat ion which lies above the 8040 line, on which no development is
planned, nor was permissible density calculated including this a:qea.
Below the 8040 line is 3.61 acres zoned R-15 PUD (which requires i
slope reduction for density calculations). Appendix B of the su~-
mission details the density calculation procedure as per Section 124-
8.18 of the Municipal Code. The net amount of land available fop
density calculations is 144,907 square feet. The R-15 zone requ~res
20,000 square feet per duplex and 15,000 square feet per single- i
family use. This application proposes three duplexes (units wit~
caretaker apartments) and four single-family houses. The duplexe~
require a lot area of 60,000 square feet and the single-family un~ts
require 60,000 square feet for a total land area requirement of I
120,000 sq. ft., which is exceeded by this parcel.
REVIEW PROCESS
The other reviews this application is presently being considered I
under include the conceptual planned unit development plan (Section
24-8.7), conceptual subdivision (Section 20-10) and 8040 greenline
review (Section 24-6.2). This memo will initially address conceptual
subdivision, then proceed through conceptual PUD and 8040 greenliIjle
review.
Conceptual Subdivision
As stated in Section 20-7, the purpose of conceptual review is to,
"authorize further study on the project" and some aspects of this:
proposal are very preliminary at this time. Specifically, the qU$S-
tion of the suitability of the land for subdivision (Section 20-9}1
will need to be proven in the subsequent review steps. A preliminary
review of the engineering geology of the site has been completed ~y
Chen and Associates and attached as Appendix E to the application.!
This information is being taken further by the applicant in their ,
more detailed site planning. The results of further investigation!
and more detailed proposals concerning landscaping, grading, conta\in-
ment of runoff, control of erosion, and suitability of the mine
tailings will be basic to an evaluation of site suitability. The
site is outside mapped avalanche hazard zones. There may be some
flooding considerations associated with peak run-off periods, and the
question of the existence of old mine shafts which would indicate
potential surface subsidence should be eliminated. Conformance with
Section 20-17 Design Standards for Subdivisions must be demonstrated
in the Preliminary Plat submission for all streets and related im-!
provements, easements" utilities and public dedications. '
The present plan proposes to retain access to the site off Aspen Alps
Road per an existing agreement and to provide a single access to i
Ute Avenue. The existing driveway to the upper bench will remain As
internal access at a grade of 8% and other internal circulation will
be at grades of 6% or less. The subdivision design standards set 10%
as maximum grade for local rights-of-way. Parking will be provided
at one space/bedroom internally on the site and will be eliminated i
from Ute Avenue. The Alps tennis courts will be provided with accsss
and separate parking. The Attorney's comments concerning the pote~tial
inadequacy of Ute Avenue are well taken, however, this project is al
reconstruction project and not a growth generator. Numbers of peop!le
and cars may be less than the current situation on the parcel.
,r-,
r-,
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Four
ConceptualPUD Plan
The applicant intends to delineate relatively small lots so that
"extensive common area will be preserved for joint use." The site is
unique in that an extensive amount of mine tailings exist, natur4l
spring water runs through the parcel, and the topography can be an
asset in terms of fitting structures into hillsides to reduce th~ir
visibility and allow them to become part of their natural surroundings.
A site visit has been scheduled to facilitate evaluation of this!
building placement and the applicant will be supplying additiona1
elevations for your review at the meeting. i
I
!
The applicant submits that the site design proposed addresses th~
purposes of the PUD section of the Code in several ways. They h~ve
also indicated that few variations from the requirements of the uIlider-
lying zone will be requested. Full evaluation of any variations iwill
be reviewed at Preliminary Plat, when lot lines are delineated. '
The purposes of a Planned unit Development as listed in Section 214-
8.1 are as follows:
(a) Promote greater variety in the type, design and layout pf
buildings;
(b) Improve the design, character and quality of new develop-
ment;
(c) Promote more efficient use of land and public streets,
utilities and governmental services;
(d) Preserve open space as development occurs;
(e)
Provide procedures so as to relate the type, design and!
layout of residential development to a particular site ~nd
thus encourage the preservation of the site's unique natural,
and scenic features; and
(f)
Achieve a beneficial land use relationship with
areas.
surrounding
i
,
The applicant has addressed these purposes with the following proposals:
The existing topography will be altered by, the reshaping and,
terracing of the mine tailings for the purposes of shielding!
buildings from view, maximizing privacy and solar gain. The'
natural bench at the upper part of the property will be maint
tained and used as the site for two of the structures. Two 1
structures exist there now and are virtually hidden from vie~ by
existing slope and vegetation. ;
The applicant has stated that an
the majority of existing trees."
must be individually COnsidered,
tailed landscaping plan.
effort will be made to "keep
, . !
All trees over 6" ln dlametier
and should be shown on a deJ
utilities will be placed underground on the site.
Natural spring water that runs through the site will be re-
directed and ponds will be created. The ponds will be both
functional, in terms of handling runoff, and aesthetic, as a
visual amenity for the site and the occupants. The ponds wilil
be used to reduce sedimentation of run-off before it ultimate1ly
discharges into Glory Hole Park. Catch basins are being in- i
troduced to retain run-off from paved surfaces. i
,
I
Existing accesses will be maintained to minimize the amount o~
paved surfaces. The 6%-8% grades are within the acceptable i
range of the Code standards, however, the Fire Chief must sub~
stantiate their acceptability for emergency access.
,;.^
i
I
I
I
\
j
I
At this conceptual stage of the review process, it appears that ~he
application will utilize the flexibility of the PUD provisions t~
develop a design for the site which utilizes its assets and liabili-
ties in a way which will enhance the site. Until details are av~il-
able on the grading and terracing of the site and the positioning and
heights of structures are supplied, it is difficult to evaluate the
merits of the site plan. '
r-.
,r.."
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Five
As required by Section 24-8.7, the application must include a state-
I
ment of intention for future ownership of all portions of the PU~.
The owner of the parcel plans to retain one of the upper sites a~ his
home, then sell the other six sites with limited land area. Each
purchaser will have an interest in the common area. I
8040 Greenline Review
The review criteria for mandatory PUD and 8040 greenline
identical with the addition of one criteria in 8040. The
criteria and the applicant's proposals are as follows:
1. whether there exists sufficient water pressure and oth~r
utilities to service the intended development.
i
, I
revJ.ews jare
review I
The Water Department has indicated no problem with ser~J.ng
the project. Water is available in Ute Avenue and a maiin exists
in Alps Road. A sewer trunk line also exists in Ute AJenue
]
and the site has been served since 1975.
2. The existence of adequate roads to insure fire protectipn,
snow removal, and road maintenance.
The upper and lower portions of the porperty will be se~
parately accessed and roads will have to be of acceptab~e
grades and widths to accommodate these functions. '
3. The suitability of the site for development considering! the
slope, ground instability and possibility of mud flow, rock
falls and avalanche dangers.
Preliminary work indicates that any geologic hazards ca~
"probably be mitigated by engineering design." This rat.her
ambiguous statement needs to be clarified with definite;en-
gineering design proposals before you can determine sit~
suitability in a definitive way. Based on the "Snow Ava-
lanche Hazard Zones of the Aspen Area" map prepared by
Arthur Mears, the site is outside any avalanche hazard.
4. The effects of the development on the natural watershed)
run-off, drainage, soil erosion and consequent effects dm
water pollution.
The proposal for a series of ponds, connected by spring!
water flow, which will be designed to trap and filter out
sediment before proceeding to the pond at Glory Hole soqnds
workable. with more calculations of the efficiency of ~uch
a system, it may be necessary to consider a maintenance:
agreement with the City of Aspen for the Glory Hole Pond if
additional sediment is introduced. The Engineering Depairt-
ment also requests that an adequate drainage easement b~
provided relative to the City's adopted Urban Runoff Manjage-
ment Plan. Engineered catch basins are being built to
handle surface runoff and to eliminate oil and asphalt
contamination of the spring water.
5.
The possible effects on air quality in the area and
wide.
,
city]
I
Since this site is already a residential site, no long t~rm
effects are anticipated by its redevelopment. If wood
burning devices are to be included in these structures,
,I""',
r'\,
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Six
i
I
i
I
their installation will be controlled by Ordinance 12 !
(Series of 1983). Construction dust must be controlle6 and
immediate vegetation of disturbed areas will be requir~d to
control long term dust. 1
6. The design and location of any proposed structure, roa~s,
driveways or trails and their compatibility with the t~rrain.
I
Subsequent information on the grading plan is necessart to
fully evaluate this criteria. It appears at this stage,
that if the regrading of the mine tailings can be acco~-
plished as the conceptual presentation indicates, the !
placement of improvements will conceal structures, ble~d
with the "new" terrain and offer privacy to residents. '
7. whether proposed grading will result in the least dis-!
turbance to the terrain, vegetation and natural land features.
The Engineering Department comments indicate problems ~ith
this criteria. They feel that the proposed grading wi~l
result in "considerable disturbance to the existing teIfrain."
They also question potential for toxicity in the mine '
tailings and suggest that mitigation measures (such as I
topsoil placement and revegetation) be investigated. ~he
subsurface investigations recommended by Chen and Assoqiates
should be completed and will help with more complete informa-
tion in the evaluation of the proposed grading plan.
8. The placement and clustering of structures so as to mi~imize
roads, cutting and grading, and increase the open space! and
preserve the mountain as a scenic resource.
,
Existing roads are being utilized, open space is consi~er-
able if the amount of property being undeveloped is taken
into consideration. No structures are being proposed above
the 8040 line. The evaluation of building height can b~st
be considered at the site visit. Concealment of structures
is an important aspect of this project. '
9. The reduction of building height and bulk to maintain tre
open character of the mountain.
Until new grades and building heights are detailed, it ~s
difficult to evaluate this. However, the renderings to'be
supplied and the site visit will aid in this evaluation~
The fact that the entire portion of the property above the
county line will remain undeveloped, as will the .75 ad:e
above the 8040 line, is very positive in maintaining the
mountain's open character. The applicant feels that the
area and bulk requirements of the R-15 zone, including !
height, can be adhered to in the design of the structur$s.
Other Considerations
The applicant wishes to dedicate a trail easement of 40' in width!
" ,
with a developed trail of 8' in width to the City of Aspen for ski-~n
or hiking access from Aspen Mountain. Work is in progress to obtciin
the cooperation of adjacent owners to extend the trail to Ute Ave~,ue,
connecting the Gant and the Aspen Club. I
PLANNING OFFICE RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Office recommends approval of the conceptual subdivi~ion
and conceptual planned unit development plan for the construction pf
seven (7) units on the Chance Claim (Spar) property as presented. I We
further recommend that action on the GMP exemption request for three
(3) employee rental units in three of the proposed structures be I
deferred to Preliminary Plat review, by which time the Housing Authority
will have reviewed the request and made a recommendation. We finally
/
,
I
I
i
I
i
,
"
recommend that action on the 804,0 greeline review be deferred tol Pre-
liminary Plat so that more information can be considered to determine
compliance with the criteria. The following conditions are recommended
for the conceptual approvals: i
.
r-.
.,-"
MEMO: Aspen Chance
January 3, 1984
Page Seven
1. Further investigation of the engineering geology must be
completed to assure suitability of the site for development.
1
,
2. Definitive information be provided which removes the q~estion
of surface collapse or subsidence due to the possible i
existence of old mine shafts.
3. Conformance with the Design Standards for Subdivision in
Section 20-17 must be demonstrated in the Preliminary tlat
submission.
4. The Preliminary Plat submission should include more detailed
I
proposals for landscaping, grading, containment of runoff
and control of erosion, to the satisfaction. of the Eng~neering
and Planning Departments.
5. The relationship of this project with the Urban Runoff i
Management Plan should be addressed with the appropria~e
easement language and parceling to accommodate the eas~ment
requested by City Engineering. '
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
lfo,
The potential toxicity of the mine tailings
addressed. If a problem exists, mitigation
be outlined.
should be ,
measures muist
I
Impacts of grading and run-off on the Glory Hole Park pond
must be evaluated and, if necessary, an agreement for con-
tinuing mai~ten,ance Sh(;lUld be drawn up wi th th~ City Ot;'1 i
Aspen. ~d-;~f:'fit: f'VU-"\..lv,i-.er(DJ1.~ o..C.-;{JL crr1" ""d"--',f.{H04.l'O ~-, ii.
o-i:cI-/i~ -.!-tuan,,,,w, 0" :SL.....bd! V':$f~-M\o.?f'LsVO'-Q_VW C<.::.l' P""'-"if"",,cO''''j FyQt:
All trees over six inches (6") in diameter which are to! be '
removed must be shown on a site plan for consideration.!
A legal description of the proposed trail easement to b$
dedicated be supplied in the Preliminary Plat submissio~
for review by the Engineering and Parks Department. .
Preliminary Plat should show a bedroom count for park de-
dication fee calculation purposes.
The shared access on Alps Road be formalized either through
a recorded agreement or easement. I
The Aspen Alps Tennis Court parking and access arrangement
should also be a recorded agreement or easement. 1
Any installation of wood burning devices shall be subjeqt
to Ordinance 12 (Series of 1983).
1
Drainage from roofs, paved areas and disturbed soil siteis
must be retained on-site.
Immediate vegetation of disturbed areas is required. ,
-----; ('.. 'f' " d 01 II
I !/'....R....-, O-FfJ...\;'1 \'.,::u....,,:;r (..0" i :' 0 I v'> 1'/\ CA .:;;;,' IGilJQ.Y.(K I (A,CI-l.o :"""
~' ;VVI~rD\I-e..~~-Jdl:;:tn<=:-T 1'V'L'i-t-0l.. e.,Il,kV.:::1- O/,R,IS
o~. I f-U,'{\ will riA.r.tIC,/,,,,,,,,J-,,-- +O'1-\;'Y_ Q.:X'-k,,',-1
-I (.uL1 v -\.N--Cn'\~~_-. I
/
"
/
Phone: (303) 925-4894
~, ,~, I
!
i
KAREN ,B, SMITH, A.I.C,P.!
Planning and Management Services ;;j)c;J (-;:';jQl;?\/pr=1illli
P.O, Box 8575 I L,;,i, I.'),,>," i, \f/ nJ;) 1[1
Aspen, Colorado 81612 iHi? """-"-""d"\lill
Hr~ J "\;1J 'J ~: H~1:1
{~H' fiB {,.:;, ;:;\
I ~\\ ' . ,,'. y.: .
LJ:""', _/,
,\SPtN I Pi fKft'J CO. );
PLANNING OFFICE /!
Mayor Stirling
Members of the Aspen City Council
l30 S. Galena Street
Aspen, co 81611
i."
~,~ ,~~.", ~, . '~":;"'''''''''''-<'''''''~''::'''.';'''<t)/~;~;;:
January 23, 1984
RE: Aspen Chance Subdivision - Site Inspection
On the January 30th Council agenda you will be considering ithe
Aspen Chance Subdivision application. In, (lrder to Help
familiarize you with the proposal as it relates toth,e site, [the
applicant, with the agreement .of the Mayor, has scheduled a site
inspection prior to the meeting. David Finholm, EdZasacky add I
will meet you at the corner of Ute 'Avenue and Aspen Alps Road! at
4:()O'p.m., Monday, January 30th. We ,will tour the site, pd,int
out the location of proposed structures and improvements, iand
answer. any questions you may have. The approximate location land
height .of buildings have been staked. A similar site inspect~on
was held prior to the Planning Commission meeting and it pro\Ved
helpful to discussion of the important site design isspes
involved in the planned unit development and other requip:-ed
reviews.
Sincere ly ,
~13.~
Karen B. smith, AICP
KBS:klm
,-..",
..:"':
~~~~~
"-.,,,
420 E, HOPKINS STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
MEMO ANDUM
Tn: Planning Office
FROM: AVFD Plans-checking Committee
RE: ~AJ r1.&.,.~ SuW'\';_~;DA
DATE: -J-') - ~'1
Herewith find our review of the named application before your office,
a~-.?
AVFD Plans checklist 1283
Cover
,1""""\
,1""""\
@o/f~~~~fW~
420 E, HOPKINS STREET
ASPEN, COLORADO 81611
i
The Aspen Volunteer Fire Department welcomes the opportunity to participate within
the framework that is determining the future configuration of our town, Ins~far
as our concern is the protection of life and property, we have prepared the f:ollowing
guidelines to establish a sense of balance between our capabilities as a depa~tment
and the locations we might be called upon to defend. '
To insure fairness and equality of application, the most r,ecent edition of th~
Uniform Fire Code will serve,as final authority in our evaluations, '
This review of plans is intended to impact final approval of a given project., There-
fore we see most plans in a "conceptual "form. In many cases specific items bf inter-
est are simply not available for review as they don't exist in hardcopy,
It is recommended that this checklist be reviewed at some subsequent time to
insure that these items of concern have been addressed, We at the department!
will gladly perform this check at the direction of the Planning Office or in
cooperation with the Building Department,
Each item of the checklist is
which stands for Insufficient
will appear at the end of the
preceeded by three possible indicators: (OK).;, UD),
Data; and (NOT OK), General comments and clarifications
prepared 1 i st.
AVFD Plans checklist 1283
Page 1
~
~
.
ROADWAYS
(OK) (~~ ,I
Any roa~ay tb be considered as access for fire apparatus shall be an all weather
driving surface of not less than 24 feet of unobstructed width capable of supporting
the imposed loads of the apparatus, All turning radius shall be adequate andla "
minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet, 6 inches shall be maintained, '
~ (ID) , :
The required width ,of access shall not be obstructed in any manner, including:
parking of vehicles. Legal signs and/or other appropriate notice prohigiting\
obstruction shall be required and maintained.
(OK) ~~~' I,
An access roadway shall be extended to within 150 feet of all portions of the:
exterior wall of the first story of any building, Where this access cannot b~
reasonably provided, approved fire protection and suppression systems may be
substituted, subject to review and approval by the Fire Chief,
(OK) ~~ ~ '(:1l8;.
Curb cu s shall be a minimum of thirty feet for commercial or multi-family
driveways, Curb cuts for public roadways shall be determined by the Town
Engineer,
(OK) mC'...A~+..~,
Privat~rculatlOn~rives shall be a minimum of 22 feet wide excluding parking,
except where water mains are laid when they shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide!
excluding parking,
(OK) ~ Q(j t)8( '.
The dnveway in a parking lot shall be a minimum of 22 feet wide excluding par~ing,
except where water mains are laid when they shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide!
excluding parking,
(OK) ~e<<:): ~
Radius at 90 degree turns shall be a minimum of 25 feet at the inside curb and i
50 feet at the ourside curb,
(OK) ~8:C1, (~< '
Dead s that exceed 150 feet in length shall be prOVided with
provision. "K turns"shall be a minimum of 75 feet long and 15
Cul-de-sacs shall provide a radius minimum of 50 feet.
turnaround
feet wide.
(OK) ~'f ?'"'~.. ~~ i
Fire access roadways may be used for pedestrian and/or bicycle traffic, Roadways
so used will ensure ease of access to pedestrians by their design, It may be
necessary to eliminate access to such roadways by unauthorized vehicles by
posting of legal signs and/or a design device, In no case may such 1 imiting"
design or device prohibit immediate access by emergancy vehicles,
(OK)~)' "
Buildings 3 stories or higher must provide at least 2 clear means of access for i
a snorkle apparatus to a site no closer than 5 feet or no farther than 25 feet '
from the first floor of the building at the exterior wall,
AVFD Plans checklist
Page 2
/'""'>.
/'""'>.
.
HYDRANTS AND FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS
(OK) .~).~
All premises where buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed,
and are located more than 150 feet from access roadways shall be provided wIth
an approved fire hydrant or other fire suppression system as reviewed and approved
by the Fire Chief,
'I
(OK) (rp..~)oWn, ']
From closest point of roadway access to a given building a maximum distance Ito
the nearest hydrant shall be established. In residential areas the maximum]
shall be 600 feet, in commercial areas 300 feet, in the core area the maximum
shall be 2 city blocks as they exist or are to be built per the proposal be~ng
reviewed. '
i~~)hY~~ha~e located at least 50 feet from all structures in the
vicinity whenever possible,
(OK) ~C) ~
All hy rants shafl be located on the high side of the fire access road. Hydrants
shall be a minimum of 10 feet from the paved surface or "edge" of the access! road,
The center of the "steamer" connection shall be a minimum of 3 feet above th~
finish surface of the access road and shall be situated so that the "steamer!'
connection shall face the road, Clearance shall be maintained around the hy~rant
so as to allow the use of all outlets without kinking th~ hose and to allow the
use of a 24 inch hydrant wrench on the stem nut without having to remove theiwrench,
~~~~ ~;~n~)lo~a within parking lots must be accessible without obstruc~ion
but protected, This protection will be no closer than 5 feet from all sides lof
the hydrant and a minimum of 8 inches high, One access area centered on the]
~steamer" connection shall be maintained at least 20 feet wide, '
/
~ (NOT OK) ~
The"builder or developer is required to demonstrate that the proposed comp1exi or
individual buildings will fall within the storage and distribution water systiems
ability to deliver fire flow, Computations required shall be ISO "Procedures!
for Needed Fire Flow", 1980 edition, No combustible construction shall start!
at a p1 anned site until such computati ons demonstrate adequate protecti on,
*
trfflT ~ (ID)
The Builder or developer is required to check the Uniform Building and Fire
Codes for requirements of automatic sprinkler system and audio/visual alarm
sys tems "
(OK) ~ ~r~i
In bui dings to be provided with standpipe connections, the proposed locations
of the siames and any associated audio/visual alarms shall be approved by the!
Fire Department, Clear access to all connections shall be provided for and
maintained,
(OK) ~.)J#l,
In a standpipe installation, a charged
150 feet of every dwelling unit in the
AVFD Plans checklist
outlet shall be available to within
buil ding.
Page 3 I
r-,
,-.,
.
GENERAL REVIEW CRITERIA
(OK) ~~ ~
Firef er access into a building shall be provided for both by design and
special provisions if necessary. (Fire key boxes in security situations for
example,)
/ /~td ~d~~~~ses shall be visible from the nearest access roadway a
~t the driveway curb cut of buildings set back out of sight,
, (OK) ~ ~)_ ~'" ,
/ Bridges shall conform to all the same criteria as access roadways,
<jr iJ,.-, ,~ (ID)
~ectrical cut-offs shall be reasonably accessible, subject to approval of
Fire Chief.
(OK) 1!1--~~
Unusual vegetatlon conditions may exist in rural cases, Limitations may be
imposed for wildfire control.
AVFD Plans checklist
Page 4
^
,^
CIT
reet
611
,
Paul J, Taddun'c
City Attorney i
Gary $, Esary;
Assistant City Attorlney
!
Peggy Carlson i
Administrative Assistant
!
MEMORANDUM
DATE: December 27, 1983
TO:
Colette Penne
Gary Esar~
FROM:
RE:
Aspen Chance
This office has comments as follows:
1. Since the applicant is not counting the county part of the
parcel for development purposes, perhaps it would like to deed- ,
restrict that portion against further development -- perhaps by !
conservation easement. On a similar sUbject, we should get the
legal description of the trail easement early in the process so
parks and engineering can comment on the co-ordination of the
offered trail with established trails and trail plans.
2. There appears to me to be a dilemma in the unit-verificatiort
process in connection with the barn units. On one hand, .
regulation of all barn units may result in deed-restricted
employee housing. On the other hand, recognition of all barn
units might be recognition of illegal units and obviously would
result in a net increase in reconstructable units. The dilemma
lies in choosing between the growth-management goals and employe~
housing goals.
3. The applicant represents that it will attempt to keep a
"majority of existing trees" on the site (p. 2). Of course, the
Code requires permission to remove trees of6" diameter or more.
4. Although internal traffic circulation will be on private ,
roads, the site will be accessed by public roads that are being or
may be impacted by certain land-use approvals and applications, i
i.e. Ute-Benedict employee housing, Lyle Reeder's Lodge at Aspen
ana-Ski Company employee housing.
5. At this preliminary stage, the applicant's geologic cqnsul- :
tants say "in most cases, potentially adverse impact can probably]
be mitigated by engineering design" (emphasis added). Inother
.'
,-"""'.
^
.
Memorandum to Colette Penne
December 27, 1983
Page Two
applications with potential geologic hazard (700 S. Galena, for
one), we have crafted special approval conditions to meet this
problem. I assume Engineering will continue to watch this
closely.
6. I assume also that Engineering will be watching the impact ~f
the run-off ponds in the Glory Hole Park pond. Is that a publici
park?
7. Mandatory PUD requires consideration of adequacy of interna~
roads. The grade of the proposed access roads (6% and 8%), whil~
equal to the present grades, should be certified as adequate by
the Fire District for fire protection purposes.
I understand that there have been some changes to the application
since initial submission. This office has not seen the changes
and reserves comment on them.
GSE/mc
~
,
,~
MEMORANDUM
~o I ~
' "\
,I
DEe 07_1983)\,
ASPEN I PITKJ!ITCO,
'fLANNIHG OffICi
TO: Colette Penne, Planning
FROM:
Bill Drueding, zonin~
December 6, 1983 ' "
~"" """"""
\o....,,_,,_,.:uf* ,.~.~"__.o.'J,-"~.~,,,~~~~,',)i;, ':
~..~'-'.I.~""--.. ,,-......,---., ,_. .'
DATE:
RE: Aspen Chance Subdivision
My comments are more like questions of concern to be answered.
l) The application states it seeks Conceptual Subdivision and sale
of the units. If this creates property lines I feel we have to
look at setbacks. The two duplexes take direct access off Ute
Ave. at the bottom of the hill. The other five buildings take
access off Ute Ave. via a private road. Does the Alps Road access
become the "front yard" for the remaining five buildings.
2) The applicant states that there is "access to the site off
Aspen Alps Road by "agreement" with Aspen Alps Condo Assoc~at,ion".
will this be a recorded easement?
3) What will be the status of the Alps Tennis Court Parking on
this site?
4) How soon do we address park dedication fees? We can address
them at subdivision. Has there been a bedroom count?
5) About two summers ago we had a problem with grading that occurred
above this site. This caused Glory Hole Park to fill with sediment!
that has been carried through this site. Will this be fully
addressed?
-;,"',-,,-,
C>2~
^
Ol
(f)
;<-
3"
if f
:, ~
3' 0
~ bJ. ~
)>
o
"
,,-.,
~ '" --l
Q:I:::I:::r
,,<'{hm
, ~
'" 3
~ '"
'<3
Ocr
~<D
.D~
Co
"'-
en_
==r
Om
~ ~
~ . -....,
-0.2.
-'co
COo
1>>_
?J"-i
com
~3
--
en (li"
CD'CD
-.c-
00
g.:::I
3.'S'-
.W CD
U-:J
C:,',(1)
(h~
:::0;"0
~I>>
CD':~
O,CD
D.>:11>
='m
I>> I>>
g:<
_,I>>
en::
-'\l)
5'2:
I>> '"
:J _
'< 0
C,O --f
-0 :::r::::r
CD ..::::l' om
--.c
~~. <0 Q.
<D,g::::r'.~
Ear(').'.~
m-mo
'OQ) "0
c, ,=: 3
"0.<-.(1)
<om,':;)
~'(/),-
0..="0
_.' 'CD -"
:::l.tU_O
co =:J.'Q
:Ta.D.>
'" ,3
~:~
c:(");Ol
Q,)'::J"'Q.
=:'%",,0-
-(0' ~
"<oeD
0-0
_c..en
_...,ro
:T',E:.cn
CD,o.',-
:::I(D:T
<t>,-(f)'ctl
<C~ cO' c:
::r.:J....:J
0"' ..-'
0"" .0
"""<:c
::rm ,<D
O'tTo
Oro::r
P- :,;m
(/)(0;
"0 < 0'
(1) CD_
" -.([)
_..-....,
~"':E6
Q)' -",-
-<..(0 ',' s:
Q) -",(1)
-CD
",0 $:P.(I)
::J --.
CO-<:m
3'" '" 3 '(f),
'" ~~.c::r
:::100;::;:'0
en ~'(Q,~ (t)
o~...~.(I)3
-""""00
~~.~.~~
_. -. 0
gO:::l~_
-',:J(O"O._
m ..S=~ a '~
'""l <D"'C<,'''C
~ ,~:-".aa
-'-"~-'''C
~.':T"Q), Q'CD
"'-.- , ::l.
~ :Jij)oS:U,,,<
~en 8 ij).
,,<:0 g N
Ol" Cro,-Q
a<O"C:::l
'00 .::T.__CD
\t. '.,-C: c.
f--lO'!!!.;o
,.2:.'"-' '0.2.,;.
0_mc.n
en~,,, I
~~'~'~'''tJ
3 ...., Q..C
,,:2co
--0,'::' ~
, Q) - _...;.
.U!l -c:-::r
"'i. 0>""" Q.ro
r; ~m"~Q)
',' ''"''l_(tl,:E
SS ,me-v
l-"en"o:::
~,a -03, g
~" ~"'.~,.~""g:
.~ i5CT,~,:l
~''''''~,!e.,~
o,,~,' .o:m,CD
~c:.~"Q.~
:S::-:::;'-',D:l'cn
,CP ~?T
if.
(t,
o
~
:r
g-,
('> i
~
~t
~~
II>
(C
.,
l= ~
;s;:f..
:=t'..,
V\ - J
r>
--l-'
~
?<='
----""'-'---'-----,--'--,-'-:-'-,,-
--~_.._,'~~---~-,-"-
C en,c>,O
mgg"::3
:>~gg
(5,'",Ib""C', =:r
:;],,"Oc!!.
c:.'''Om-
CD (3-0
. <m-
Il> '0 >
:::"C~
Q',o, CD
-_ <,::S
~!!!.o
.:,o::r
<D, - g)
0",-,::3
o.:::ro
..::J,'(1) ',SD
"')>-
::::-,U):l
c '0'(')
0:'(1),':
5-:l;;
"03
o'.:r"l:)
'e- ~iD
I>>
CIl en
o~C/'J'~
~c_
;::;:0"0
en 0. en
o <'C:
::J '0'0-
- -'3
::ro,,__
<D:J'-
. ':~
0-1"
:T:TS:U
~"Q)'O
(0)""2..
(1;)'-0'" ,-.
0'0 f,l
mgo:
--m"o
3 _:::I
oc)"-
::J :J',Q
.-,
o
'"
I>>
~
(f)
C
"
"
~
)>~,=-
cii(..,)':::::o.
"00:"
"'(f)(f)
;:',- c:.
(,(;)5
o!!!.'<
'"
(X);:,,~
a; ,g)-;:,
..... en,;:,
.....,- ~
CD "'0
~"s:.
:J
"
5.
ee
o
~r
"
'0
~
2:
o
<
'"
3
cr
'"
~
-""
-
CD
'"
Co>
, I:
\,../\.'
,I
i
rs >' 00, C'1l ^
01. f./'J,' 0, SiC _,I>>
I, -0')(':;),(0
,g;~<Xl;!. :;,
tO~' ~ ,~",tD
,;:..,-() (.h-<!)","
o fJOU!
S' ;::2,
0'> ,~",-
'-J,. ::J::r
'" '"
<0
'"
3
'"
""
U!
'"
<
0'
'"
'"
'tl
ii
:l
:l
..
:1
:0
..
!!!.
tl'
ii
ii
:l>
g,
<
'"
o
:1
<D>om
NCA 001",0.
<f,1&",8'N
N::::l-,'~
S!.' ,,)>,..{A
-"():3,"~
0::>"-
e-'<
"''''
'-"'0
~to
.... CT
'"
o
:l
:IJ
'"
!!!.
-<
~
<D",>lDOO
CJ't<n,o DJO.l
't 15 .X :::, :S.
~".':J't\),~_'o.
-,L'" co.,,"T1
w'o -ic1:r:I
o :r:J"
00 Q,.9..
m 33
N ?o'
>
'"
'"
o
n
0;'
CD
'"
"..-,
f,
"
.
If
>
il
:;r
i
~
"
a
(D'
n
-
j
j
~
III
3
-.
""""1'
..
>mUl<:...l p>
"-".-....0
_,,(1) COQ..V
,ow"<'_'::I
CO 1>>,0 -. at
a: g;~-< , 0
-." "1l,""f....'
n,C,IJ -~ -,0
"" lUlU G)
(j) ,:::J '0' , -;;
,<1>
-'(0
~
::\>5.
-""
-<:lDl
;a.
c: s::
e-D)
"
() 0-
lft-1">s
~o-<
'1i .t 2}
6' 0
"""", ~:n
(I,)'CI\ ~.
I' .......ro.
.., :;;
fq.:.
;:t:'"
"'.~
-
Cl><ll Cl>Cl> 0
:r:.,Cui\):""'o
"
rrlW"TI1Jg
- - c--c
CD 'CD _,m _
< C:Jc:
m,m:""",.';' Q)
~.:Jco-. -
g 0- Oc5 "1l
'" .-:;; QC:
~,:JCTO
Co <0_.
CI),~,<D
()"=rSl
Q) -,.-.
'0 "C'<i
-',OC/J
:J,._
(Q-)>
1J':T,'O
-' co .'=1"
m-:" :--
:::::J' "'0:(1)
CC5:
00-
-t
::r
(3
c:
co
::r
"1l
c:
o
..,..
Cl>
b
....
b
....-l>-........O
J:i.WN:""'O
"
O--!Ul<:7tl
- 0) " -."
~,g, 5! 5"c
~~g.~Et
a:g ~r~~
o 0 :J-c 'Q.
-- <"
00 or
:E'2t 0
:::JIU :J
""
iil
::r
"5'
..
c.>
b
>
"
"S!.
(';'
"'.!.
0"
"
:n
""
,Q
c:
~
-3
l>>
"
-
..
~~AW~~ mw:'~'~~ N~NNN ~ ~
c; "'"
:'~u,
I\J
b
"ll
a
.r
$l.
Ul
~
o
'"
'"
o
~
-g
0"
"
."
~~
'"
~
..
~
b
"ll
a
g"
-
,.''t)
o
:::I
-
II)
:::::I
-
III
..~
~
e-
m
o
-
,.,->
....
4IiiliI,
I
]
j
I
j
I
I
I
~
.......
,:.lliiIili
,:..liiiIiI r ('"
,..
"'::r::>'O:; 1\)'
Q 0 m.~'~-f "b
m'_:E'''''C)'--:::r ..
~ ~_ -<:'~~(f>
1>> ~ -...t C1i,(I) "0
:]- g).--1>>
a. CD onLgo
::::J =''''"'1,,0..--(0
OOCDQ.::J.--
oen -COO
0..3-m-o
(D"'O~-Q)::J
(6' Q) <0 :fa~.
o~<(t)Q)-~
'"'0-(1) ci" n-w
3fJ):f.;:;::;:9..
mg ;+'~(t).....
=--<:",'<00'" m-
(ii' ..... ?: g,~::
-cg"m,,-::J"-CD m
"""'I (/) :0 ._-<'0 ::J
o CD .....Q.
"'C _"'!=l =)>m
o Q) CIJ::JUlc;
ma-:-m"g ::J
a.UL -1 Q)::J (Q
o:r~iS:;!:c S"
"'"'1- ','0",- 0
....,::r"'ot: L
~-_ CD "0 0:::1 )> ~
a. ft"2.~:nr-~:>, ~,>
~.-< 0" Cii",:;::J-" .''':s-
::J_1>>_0C: ....j)
:Ttg:6'~ :
mt.. .....m en
-c
.
~
"0""1:1
.. .."
.2.0
~ ="
2. <1'"
(J) -0
-='
-
CD
..
~
~
;
""5
5'"
~
~
000 :D
CD Co <D
a~'3 m
"O{D"C =-
o,a.j: 0'
--0::1 -. ::J
-(t),' =:Q
"'"'10).... 2-
~ :: 0 00_,
!o'Q1;
='::s <-
{J)..;,. OJ.-
fJ> 3 3
'<'0
~_o uj"
t1> ~ 0
3~ ::>
0- ..
o=~
Q-.j.ij
u'_.c
:r::J ""'I
$)).1>> CD
(D-C 0
a..B :J,
::-0 :T
;::;:--~-- CD
:TeD I>>
AI a. ;;
.9: (') SO
Q) ~.
, ,
<<00 CT.)>(/)
~Q)o_(t)(O_(I)(!))>
-" ::J c:J.., =-0 n' _ ,:tN
o N" ::J. CO(J) (1)' Q: =.. .
~- ~ gQ8~rog Q.<A8
Q) 'a.:J""'I,CDJ\)~:.J:a,.
-01>>; (1) CJ)oo::......~ 0
"0 n. <"'"'I ~ .3-:: I . _"':T~."
-(') -. _ c: _ 0 ~ ~ \,U
o' Q ~'o '9, 3!::J' =-c: ~(1)
Q)o...-'Q)'Q)N-::JCD
0=:__-.....0.:;" ~:T;::;:~
:::J:]"'1>>, ,::I-.,CDen.".-
::t<OCD'n'~',-.-' ". , ~
en . ....__.~.......~"Q)"t(l)
. - <i3 =~(Qr..., ..... ..... c :0
o'SoO_'o CDe,CD
<n~$'C: ::::.e,!:'CD ~~.
c -. -, -~~ '" ::t"><(t)
~.a. 3!G>~~-IS: ~~:<
-.'" '" ;!:)>::> '" '0-32
~..,~.,,"'O,;:+,~ -........:;:
~2.,:2.....-"C<(I)..~ ~~en
-,;::J;~ CD: ~CD 0a..C:
m::T(Q, -. ~"<'3 3"- '"
.c.-.,CD a.. '... ::::J
."'0:;-''''''' ~.....
.C:,,,~ . ><r:T'~::r- 0
-.- 0 'CD-
<il:g 3 )>"'O"',..(f)
,3 = 3 "'::>t: '0., '"
{t)_.o _. ~($O a-e
::::J a'(IJ 0..,.....'- < ~o-"
.c;r',_.en _,_.,,1>>_...
. 0, o' :T =00 <n :J
o ::::J':J C:'.CD,< o~
_'-~ en ~CI)::::J~J::o.
_,0 D) 3cnS: (I)\ll~
:TQ::> "''''30;i",
(Ola. ,<(I).-.:s'
0'
-<
<0
~
f.
oct
. .
. .
..-
.-
..
.
......)> '" (f) 0"-:0 :;le.O
o~ 3 "'" C:~(I) (01)>-
,c.() '" ::::'::13 -'::3(1)
::> ::r '" ~a.~
c.,;::;: ~.'a. ~.'e!.o
-:m :!.(tl '0 < CO: DJ-.
~"o !!!. ' .. ""'I~
"'fJ> '" ~. 0.<0
UJ_ !" cO ~
!" t: <0 -
~ ::> xo ::::J.C:.c;
!!!. 5'- (t)'::::J1:J
~, UJ 0 0."'_
a. '" ::> Q)..e. :::T
,
'" s: ::> '" ::::J<tlCD
'" a.:c;- a.c: ::>
<<5' fJ> .....co ..;...:::::J<D
::> t: ",,,, ~'.-._'
CT "'0..... ::J..(i)t.C
- fJ> -'0 A.' Q):::T
0 - "'", (J)::3C"
'" o ~ 0. Q..Q
CT a "'".
;;; ![ 35' ~'.....::r
::> ~<O <D .1>>,0
0..:;0
a. <> ;-s 0..30..
:; 0
3 CD-.O"
"'" ;:::;:CD < ::::J'<
::r 3 ::r)> (1)'(1)..,
-._'('[)
::> 0 '"< .g~.~
::> -'CD
'" "'::> 3-''''
- '" ::::Jc ::::Jo
t: <il 0..", (DCC --
~ 0'_ :::sen:::::J
'" 0 ~'~(Q
0)-
fJ> '" -00 -fJ>
-t:
t: ::> (l) .-' ;:J"a
.. 0.. a.=r m".!
!'>
~o
,0
CD::>
, 0
.....(1)
"''0
~c
mat
::>-0
g.c
50
-<'0
t:
.".""
c~
0'"
~::>
, -
o
(f)
'"
!:l-
0'
::>
l\)
....
,
en
:..,
'"
::>
a.
-
o
~ ~.~
:;<0
o 5'",
g ,<0 "C
0' '0
(l) 0_
-oC o.
C ~'~
e?- -.0
fJ) ~'::J
C 00
0" ::::J.-at
a. !1!',,~
<, <D
iii' .Ch
g 3'
'0 !O.
t: ;;;
01 ::>
t: '"
'" 0
::> t:
- fJ>
o '"
'i(? :g
(') ~
_ 0
g. ~
'"
o
,
~
p
,
!
,
0. 0"3 CD "0; a.5''ffl''O ozm N < g:. 0 oj
0'< .'g) 'co'_v;,'C' 'Om -0'::::J0. iii' .::s01
C' ,O(l)~3',::Jo cocn::Ja.::JO-'C: -CI
::::J"Tlc.(l).::r=:<n.......O'O.0..1>> . CD_O'(I)"<::Ji
- ~': 3. 3. co,,< ;:::;: a. ='.CD. _CD (..)a...... arCT 0' -!.';
,:". Ne!.(I). mO':.<(1) g(ilst:gS.~::~"C(I).::J ':"i
1D ::J.a:g"" cr~J\)a.CD sr, S:. ..()~ 0 ::J~~.. ....~.
(1)- en, =~~;:::;:;~c: ji;'" =:'CDtnO_: ~o ,C' ....~
::J,ocn .CD,<I,"(') :::J'~"'(,).::J. ~a. .:J.!, '\1-".
'" C'. ;:;:m:c.~' .f.D=:'~cc ~CD~~cn'I>>:r.,-
0. . I>> ::J c: .0:-...... '0,'0 CD <n, ""'I: I>> (J) _0, CD1-
-'S-O"'-"COtDQ):JQ)", 1>>. .<'0 .C: ""'I......:
(') --'-::J -. ......"',. .-.m ....0..,..(1) 3'
- )><D (J)ep : (') )> -. . .....3. ~.,0 - CD '- c:r 0 0'
3 < ~o><O)5.(IS:JO)~'C"N c)"cn-tl)CT""li
~ CD O:::;c:J 0)"0 o.gen~,o~o~g(t) m:
::;, ::J"'(I) :J:'!. =~ co- ~.('D::J::-(I)'o-1
,<t:", en"''''''lo::>:::> 0 CTCD"''''i>>'~. ':;0.'
..~:J (I) . ==",,~:e<Doa.O'";:,..a;o __CD!
"< _. cc_ '~--'A. ,0 a.', .:s.<,
mOD) -,......~... . c:'< ::ra.o::C<' g,co ~
.., =;:,0 o....::J._,CDCD ..~<1>:::f cool
enO a:Q.'c: 'C)"oo>a,:s,<.n_= .~"C"
-~::r.~ '~""l,O=D)I'~~ 3J::o.31
-::J' .o.-en, .....,' ~ -en (1)-' 0'.. :
CC~~-<1>~~~enO~-o~ .::J. ""lQ(I)~
o .-.,O,X- c (I) ..- ~OOC CD- .(I),::JI
, 1>>::J.Q)cntDenoo=:Jc:O::Tcn~-i
~.(Qar-"" C:,O"'O-::J',::JO~CD _<1>":='1'
:T 00>' .-.;2,(1) a:,a.(D ..(1).:;:_. 00 m Qi_.
;';;.:S;C'> :0 $1ttr~~(')(j)" (!)~g <0.;:;: .g~.=!
~m ~'~c:s' ....:E g~"C -erar-=< -<ga-l
~,(t)~(!),'(b :',:0 o>cn::JoQ ~,<:...,. ~.(I)!
~~ "('),~:cn~:cna:CD"'O'"C.....,;~O'\ o~Oi
(ii'0> ::;-,;:+'. . <D3'C;.m o..,CDt:::1"O'O) "O.:J".n'l
. Cf 0 '< VI." ""l :D';:::' "",0) . 0 mm 0
-.=30>-'i.ii.'ga",,<"O-::J.., ~""lC
::J CI) . '. ::J(/) 0-. ;.;.4_. O--<t> . '" m ~'I
_,::r_~ CC 0:""1_0'_0'1 CDtnS'5'(J) O>:::f.-.
::r (l)..::1" ~. (6"- (I)::::J ,I (1)Ct> CD (I) _. :::I=: ::J 1
(1)Q.(tb_ I CD a. (I),' .tVl ._(1) a._co!
I
I
I
I
I
!
,
w
Q
)so
."
,"2,
n
lit
-
0'
~
:D
CD
.Q
c:
iil
3
CD
~
-
1Il
2;
s:
'"
"""'"
~ ..
',' wt
~ ~,,-'l
...,~~
1.1'
. ~lr
~.
.--
~
.
I
I
i
m :Tsr::r~. ~'. . .:T~ 0 ...;::;- 5- a. ~ ...
< -- CD Cl) g,(Q(') -iCt>offi 0 (1)'~ 0
ill ~ ::> is: 0..2 ~ ::r""S!?-o"" '" 'Os-np-. ,
DlOO)' ''<", - . ""'I:::TO
---':E.' '. .'. (1)-"0001>>"0 ""C
fJ> <",. c:_.oc:n.-o,' -...... -"::J '::J '3")::!. """
-'.""'1: - m.::J c: -;::JO<o . -An 0
<<LQ.~::r <' ;:::;:.....2: 0"'0 (') ,cO CD-g .'
:J . -(Den .0)' (1) -CD - '_ CD :J:CCi (0:"
:;;:r,tp:rom-o 5.::1 (l)0.....::J (")
0" .:g.~"C::sa.- (t)'~ a );10 Di"S' 0: -
03_ CD 0,3 Q.roro cn<_.o 0
::J .::rDl"'O" (I) c.tn.3<O 3 - ~ CD
-('0""0 ::J."O~'"C :3. C.SU:
-g 'a.~tC -to ~'::r en'~ 9: ~ ~
0'" ro 0 01 0 @ ..0) ,....._. <5 cD :::!.
::,tn.CD"O::Ja..:T 5!? -~ c, '. . I
0-<<5 .0 ::r _"'S>>roN <: ~I" ~
O"::::J -'<'::J" -..... (I) .., 0
cD -I>>CD::r
::J~'25" ::J,~._~~I>> ~<r:~
~~~~S;:J'-'::J" .~.-
(t == 0). _. ~ -.~. .!e-
.. "'0 en ::J tn. I>> (D ::r - . -. '.
a a: g.-~"E.i ~. ,
:......(t) (')c: CD 1>>.0_)>. .;j1
<1>, l>> ::1,....,,0 C :::J"'..' fa. :
2. ""2.'::J" ,0<0, ~ ro:~=E9
::J ~. ::0 ...z.. .. ~ (I) C.m ,.9?..~
""C tOe. '::J"'o-',. . 0 '"0 ::J,= (I)
O'-CD.O....--"""I ')>. '::J';=I-
UJ om::>:; - COl" 0 ~ _ -<00;
"""I (1)-.(1) Q;,'cn, c:'O "0' c'CDj
3 ~ <g"<g'~:~. ;2.;~ g .;,.. ~2.g:
0) ~ (j. ur':.<_.O"CD;;--
::>0 t: '" 0"-01>> en ....,i
() -."....,':3:J ,::r::J 0.::+0 CD)
(1) 0 c' I c.. ::J CDcn ..(1):::J I:
'"
.;
~
..v
C'"
-
......
~~
.~
"'\J
....
....
I\)
..
..,.
.. .,.....
...
...
..
... r~
...
. . . . . . . . .
"0 ~, <: 0> <: !l 0>,'0) 0> ~ <D a.c: Q-S>> 0"'0, 0 0> 0>
~ m ::J ::J ~o ::J X'"""\'"fJ) -'-0; ::JO> -'to 0
- el.~ 0
0 s:- (I) 0. ~~ 0 ~ 0 Qo- r;.;'<;::-CD - 0. - ~
< (I) -(I) ::J" ;::;: ::J" " ci' (I) (I)
a 0 -or ~ m m S_ :;-~ 0 (I) Oc (I) 5~ (I) m
f}) - ::J~. f}) 0 ? 3 f})
<D g 0 tit. a: co g):- :> ::J f}) to
3 Q.'S' - :r -'< (I) -0> _0- :> (I) 0
m ~'a " 0 ~ ->< "0,_ -0 ::J
-0> ;:;- (I) CC(Q !o 0-- Ch,~, <D::J f}) -
Q3 (I) 0>,0 (I) (jJ 0> m m 0>(1) :r ~','~
c:= -to
~tn '~".'::J ""0 3 5- CD,.., :::J.0, u:r-"(f.l
~ 0 ::J'"O, ::J; ::J" 0.'0 CD" :r "C
(I) Q.;u - 0> !" ~ o "O'(Q
0> el. ::J" ar ::J.:-'
::J ~,'a (I) 5' (I) -,.:::1 "'"g) D) )>.,'"
0> (I) ::J CO,'.., 0 mlQ (D,(')
::J 0. ~ co'1J 3 0. S- ~- om; 3<D g(J)'~
0. - D)-'CD (I) (I)~<: 0'..... CD :'0-.
Q.o tn~', ~. ~ 0. eo,~ 0':::1 <:g, (I) ,co 0.
- sa. c:- c.' (1)::1('1)
=':0) (I) 0> '< 0 0 CD-.,.-._;:, ~ me. Ci)")> ,0.
--< fJ)' :l, "'1::_. cnl>> o.~
(I), ::J f}) -..:::1
::::::!.= :r :E 0 .:< <: 3 ::J";:;:S: 0 _0 "Ous,
::J ::J 0> (1)0> :<- 0> Q),0__ 0 0-0 "'cn-
to (I) ::J =0 sa. en X ::J'. :s (I) 3.2- o :>
0.' 0: e; CD -i (I) m
0> 3- m ::.,Or/)
_ ctl (1)0 <D 0> OJ" C'O 0.0 "
",,\""0,_' X - N" C:;:<DCO '0 (tl.;::J'"C:
~_3 '~ . , '0> ~ arB Q.d;(t)_
cOD>. to (I) lQ~ 0 0::3
:J::J::J ::J 0> ::V ~ ~',,:J < :> :::;, g3',~"
o. Q.a. -x 0> S. Q <0.
_mm 3 -- to 0. <D 0.0. eDi(t)
,... 0 --3 (I) ~ (I) C 5-'0
0> 0> N.,_. i f}) <D~ 0.' :::1.-' a. _.._'0
,0-'0 (I) N !" ~ ,,- 'c"'" <oc;D
<-,CD <0 - CD:)"
<D -"'(1) 0
:Eo. 0' "'C. !I" f}) '0 =:E - - :>30
<n ~ ~ (I) 16 :> 0>
~g) --,-'"""'l ,,- 0"'0) C ~
<:T-- .' CD-< ::J ::vcn Q.
- (jJ -..< s:- O> <n
=:0> 0 5:\:1) (I) !!!. c:0
0> 0> ,:<0 0> ,,;~ ,Cri -<',; ~9~
m <n .,< :J~;: <Of})
5!?gih" ,i:..
00,. -')> N
::J;iro',~,~
0"0' c (1)
o"'_o.:.a.
::::J"'-(tl"C:
5: ==-0. g
(Den o,a.
~''''(I)'' :3 (/)
- .'"
s-g: ~'" 9l'
:;:1'""l:(,Q(')
0.... '(t).'::r
=~'-l:a.-c
c:-:>;,...
!e.:::~:J
; .g). C:,O
-(')=-
m;:1'I._
0.3 !e_::J"
O(t)NCD
;:, .:::J.<T>-o
-'-0,.,
S',)> SO
(0";:,,"8.
'''0 :D-' (/) ~
-<D(/)(D"
Q)... (5'" :r:c.
;:,,<(')~
5' .Pl.... 2"<D
o'3t. Co (6'
C"cnm~
Q.-c "~ 0
'(1:r.CT-'''O
.. 0.::J 3
<:;:<0
" CD 3.
I'" "1):E 8 (l)o.c,
o Oc:-. 0 0."';1'
-0<:T=3",,~(I):>
com ff<D 3;=' 3 s.
~: ~c/f(/)5' CD"'-Ol>>' Q.
CD "'.-D:l:o a o:E"O:::]
!5I''','.~,<~(Q~~.~ g..f~
ii'~(')~;~<D~,~,';.<n~
=' . . ,ar2.3 aro tD:fA)
"-'0"'-':::] (0-
$) "'-i2,., Q) ~c.'"'O.$>>
;S":r . CD :;:"-0 ""en
~""m"~"O~8 c:~~2
~ .."0 o.~ ~3g.~ CD
o.=:<D.<D. ,3 (') ~o
-,"'00"- CD en 0_
<DCD::::;-I>>,.,c'_~
0-.-'0.('). .0...
-en.A).CD -"O'O'JI"
en c:.;:, =,a"O a-l:a.
;:::;:"'0 Q) =00-'8
CD "0 ::s <no;:+Q"
-. 00. 0 "'" _ - _.
(I)~- _CDA),-:E0
::s Si).. CD')> 0,. g;:::;:o
o Ui"~ (I)::s ;:;::rc:
-O'CD"O-<D:~'''''::S
-. .."" -Q) -.}l{ctli.o.
::l.:::J'" ,:J(Q:",' <n
-0> ~ ,::J"-i'20
::r<._~C':...,....:s
CD.CD,O.'g offi'"!t""Q
en m::::;-:s :T"05~
O'~. -, Dr 0, '""l:_(D
_-' C. "g.. -.0.2 ::r .<1.)'
'< '< . '::::10., .:CD .
if.
~j.
,x if
0=
.(1)
J}.
-
,0
~
tl
'0
'"
~
o
'"
.....
u;1
5-
o
c:-
o.
'"
0.
:i""
...
-i :..
::J"
(I) 0
0 or
:E co'
::J 0'
'" <n
"".' c:
.s. ~
-
::r: 0
(I) -
() 0
::J" ~
0> '"
::J co
0 ~
<D en
() ::J"
.. -c
3"
'{ii'
:>
"'
'0
co
::J
()
::J"
0>
::J
0
-(I)
:;-
~
:T~.Z
(l)(D'g,
o.o.~
CD;:,)>
!!e25'~'
~ ;;:g:=.9.
3C:- .'~.'CD
~;fi x Sl
-(1)y)(t)
....3-F .1>>' 0:.
~ '5.<"0
Ct1;..,.a."cp~
i(ll~."Oc
tl)ctlct),-
X"~ ."",0)
a.ctlWCh.=
"onoo
'<.... .':;:':'.:3
(IlCD '(I):'
go'(:-.
(1)&~.::J
-,.,. -."
0'" .~'
s:3Fu:
(1)fi~'.,t~tJ
g.=:oit iJ-
~m,~ "O<D
"0
!'!,Of'JC6
~3.o
0,,'<>::J
_(1)~CJ)
,
~
:s
..... '^
~"}-
~'~,.
-t
-...lo'
1lQ.![
)JI"
oJ 0',
....
~
1:.
.,-l ZZ
.""","_0 c c
- oO>~ 33
"0'0> _
::0 n .~:,~g-
~:..~O',.,. ,.,
0.0>0 00
$(' (z)"""'I. -,to_,
b'~~ ~~
-.::;,ro me:
a.S),) =,(")
3a 5'c
cn'O co ,'"
ro....:e c-~
$lm 3.
g.'~ ,~
N'~- ~r
t'~ J c
~~ 'f ~
-~ m to
m 3 0
'~J
i'-'
-i
f'
:>
o
~ ..~ ~ W~ (Qi
3 .1'01 (')CQ --
.:-l:a.l>>-.o:r ~
'J o,C)" S!::i;5'
.~ ~c: CD,CO (')
o'~g)o2;:;:
-cn'm:~ 0'<
r<oo.OG)
2.,(1) _CD
o )> ,a:Jeo
'03 !e__ ~
"C "',< =-
'" (J) .--
:Jco.O.lJ
Q.(')Q)
x::::;o-
(Doc
_:J'e
,;- OJ
::J .
'...'"
i.J-
Jj f ~ t~
.g D:l I>> C\) 6'"'"
..J (') (').0
~CD(j)(D
Q) _CJ)OO(/)
..
:>
f})
"0
'"
::J
()
~
0>
::J
o
'"
(J)
C
<:T
0.
,,"
(;;'
,;-
::J
"1)
a
'0
o
<n
(I)
0.
Z
0>
3
!'!
",,"'.' ......
I,
1
,
I
... A
:;". b
.k 0
i
'" 0
~ :J
n
3:: Cl)
"lJ
i -
I i
i
I ~
C
a
Q.
<
~
Q
:J
,a:a:
wi
!'"f-I
Ol,
C7"
cl
!i
01
"'i
2.1
oi
!!.i
Ol'
i
I
,I
^ ~~~l ~ (..) N
co..""'"
en ..; :J: 0 0-
mmcr:ll
~r-m:llOm
l> c.. !;j,"; mO
..;m:ll:J:o~
(5 0:11 com"..;
z .
== cn..;
m m'
o
..... r
en m
" ~
:J: Z
o 0
o
r
....
o
o
'"
o
o
"'"
o
0'
<::
ffi
:e
"
r
):>
Z
m
~
"
o
-,-.";
~,
<
-
o
-
z
-
-f
-<
3:
)>
."
:II":J:"
I l>-Ol'"
.... ;0..-0
en ",", m :II
-<
~.
~
~
f
~
..
n
; 3
, ~
,I ~
i
j
.
~
-..:-- ",-'.,.-.
i'I''','''':''''.'
!l
)""
I ~ -~- -
,;;I
iL--
'..
I"
:~
..
!
f
/,1> I
-:'("d~i
, >
! 0
.
- '
, I
I
rT'"
r'-~
\.. !
Ul'!;j\ve
", .._~..~
,
I)' ~ " i
'~", I,!' 'I
)),) ..',
-->) I,'
, Iii I "
-::::J:','" ,I .,r
"..':)) -i
,...=.=;' 'l
. ~,.,--,;,.
.:--~~~-----+~
~,
-".'.&,-" '.'~
':!""'+"':':"':".":';-
-',,,:;.!C:..,,.-:'O."..::
,,,,,,,,,,--",,,",,,-~...,^.-:-,.
>~
. .--.t'
~
I
ClI
"
3<-
-0)3-
::1.'::1<0
_._~
3"'"
-'<C',O)
NCD_
<Do a.
"-::!.
tl)CD<
~xCD
a. 0;-:;;
-Ol
<n -.'<
c"",
~<O
-",::r
mom
00<
mm(1)
, '" <T
!,A, CD
3~
:j",-
-0
30
-'"
N-
<D'"
a.
<0-
';0
0._
<D'"
"'",.
. '"
"'",
"a.
a.,
...-.J'
......,,' --.ii --.J
"-.,,
.
'.;
Dr m:gr:Ol"tJ (J)
-" -.30"0
::JQ~'CD:J.,~
."'.'m'::J.:J,.'Q.:::J'
C;<CQ;::;:Ch<O
5 Q.~,< :;; :;;
=C.C'o=:m
_CD:S"',-CD
a B a ,~O".""'I"
3!2.--="':;;
0_._. ",'_.
":::J,'J'::r:,o=
w..~ (l),,@
~. &> 3' t=,.~g
a._;:;~CD""'I
m (')0 tnQ,m
c:7(D~'9:
~g~g5,.ca
n~.3"'_ - 9-
CD:HQ mO,91
sn (/I. _'('D::J """""
~ao-<:7
=en...........
C"CDOOO
CD 9:i>>,-ccE
'~3::....~
(1)<00.0,_
a.:::J_s.~
,;,.;..or..... a., CD
0=;:) 0)'(/1
'a.gmfD,i
I ~ I.:J.
coo m:-f
"'C::':J..:T
m'~s..cn.'
::r~.o~_
~-:J"'"
=---< 3 ..
<n",,,,::E
-X'::I=
Q. _. - -
CDCh -
- _ c:r
en,"CCD
. ~
mOi:i)
:Js":::J
0.0.0..
mCD'~
::J co Q)
:::r..,'O
mO,CD
::Ie Q.
~:'::J.....
0.0
:r03
mOg)
",<-
'"O<t)::J
"....-
",:;;'"
0)::r::J
;m-Q,l
::I...a-
n a;
(D'::::J ::r
0..0,.0
;-::J,e::
lUCD=
.
0.<30-(0
Cii~CDm'CD'c::'
_to_.<O-_.
c~'::J::J'O:
"'1>> or _.
cr__.,en ::J
m'-'::I;:::;:tO
::10 '(1).(1).
(') ::J"'O 0.
m- :~. 0
m<-'::I
o.::J.tl).::J
=,0.0'0":;:"
:rc:':<o. "',m
(1).....
::r' =2:,~c
-.N(1). "'0
=(1)'::J"'''O
!'!2..:...a.,o"~
o.~ _
"', . ,CD ~..:. a."c
..... ...;:;:.....0
~..:r CD ;:J;
c:r~o
Q.';CD<::J
,~....."Q) 0
C"o.::::J.~.
CD"C'm .....
::J.O(O;::,-
o<Q,(I) (1)
::Tm;,Ocn
=r'"O-;:;:
=~S.CD
::T'm<'D :r
",,:;;'"
O,o.~'a5
~
"0 CD ::r"ODH>>~.- U'I
""'IrnQ)"'-::J~O W
.g -g' (J) ~,'~o. ~ :: ~cn
(D':n c: 0. 0.(1) ~ (1) <D
~..=.r::rCD ~Dl(h 0.' ..CD ~
'< _<D. '._ _,._~.. 0.,...
'-CDWCl '".':::J''' "~.';::j;'..... CD
.,'<::::J....9-,Q)m~lCD~ DJ
~ e:D) ~~3~-g CD &
'_0 -_Q),0,:::Sm~ r-
::rCO (J) ,0 Q.:Q)Jf1~ L>> I>>
CD' 0. 0)- <,::1,- :1"::;J
cn(h'im,Q.~ o.a
::t 02 ':E.' . ::Is>>SW ..)> g
C,fJ) CD 3;-,(0)'"0-
o -"'<C0,-....._
-'I>>~ . <D'O O,CDm "
~ "::J1>>5 0'2.::"s';O S-
a> ,W (1) ::;JertCDO:r (Q
II) 1>>"0 .., 0 Cirsuc:3
o o.c:':rar a.c !e....~ ."
::s 9:9.:::.0.'0 ti1..~;:;' m
st-o-. cr:r Q) o~)> ::I
<D '<.-O"::s_ _
::J < 00 a. _ (D.
c: 02 m:T'< cn::T::J
'0 -CD' -,P><:2,.'c.
"00.,'" :1':5.1>>CD
com-mcf-::JCD
""fJ).(D,<..' :::ro.o
"0'_.0),.< c:._.~....,
o<o.-m"'::T"~' _.
::1":;' c'-I>> <D(').o-
_. a;'~ ~'D2 .g>!
o CD <n, (') (Dco-..
:;'_..o::J(I).:::J(1)
0"'3 ""'c =-(0)(
_..~..,0=r"C(')
-m,l>>,cn..::;,(1)-m
:T:::l' CD CD _.,~.,Q)"'O
(I)_..,.0UJo:::J_
\
,-
,........
.
.
-.-.)>
~.~=
6)'<..0-
""'ere:
(1) (1)-"
0.:00:
00-'
<T3 '"
;.... to
(1)._(1). <n
OQ):::r
(i)::JD>
DJS'(6
;jar 0-
ntO CD
0.."'\..-<0
cn~':::J
:;;"0 2!,
;:;~ar
:::r-Q;,
_0,02
:T:::;:'
CD::ro.:
:::;:.(1) 0.'
en'f:!?m
c$"_.
~"~cc
oel::J
C.....CD
::J:ro.
o.(1)'(I)
:r::.o
~~s:
.' :::J'!!
:;:oar::r en
"':IE 5.30 -I N
0:::J. .::r
o,<tIm,SD CD
3,(ii;'.go
3,9.'~CD.~
oQ))>:::J(D
;:)m....(/)-,
m.o'5~"O
"""l::r......-Q)'
'~e.~mii1.
-0(')....
~i.~i
5:: Iii S.
-c','!'!2;5a.o
-,'-:::r::1
CD:",CD CD co
(f){Jl..-,.O
::,::~-
==2,:f
::r-oCD
m::r.....c
< <tI E;."O
CD'..@.'CD"O
SU-en(1)
:::JO:: "'\,
_.~.._.CI1
::J '''.-;::;:
-0" :TeD
CDm-cn
rnen~rQ)
en 0-.-. <n
=Q(t)~
::J. 0..,00
,
:\
.-
--..'~
,
~
'........
,'rJ/i
.......
_. -.cntuen-"OtOQ.D:l.....
5'Q.3::J '0 ~ ""'f<' iir ==:;-
." -(J)::f 1>>.a.~'o.g..('I) _0 o:II
a.:g..... =oc5'co CD:J g.~. C ~.
CD,O C:-..._ . a. en..;... ,....:.:;:).<0 (J"I
':' =,~ !2.$~ _(I) ~ ..,<o::r I
OQ)S'J,' "',.2tO ~, .' CD,,- =r'"
:::JCD.O)~co ~~...oQ (1) C
eno.x..,.. :J . ::;tC 0
;:; . -CD"C' D) '''.:;''=''0.
CD,~, ~,g:~. ~~,(I)3~ DrS
mo!e.--~ g'~'OCDCT:J':J
:J '3 (6,::J$1_CD'C/)-g.:J =~. 5'
0..(1)0.0' l)) -Q'<o<n':<Q.<o
cU.' =-3 0 ~ :Jo.' ffi ;;,0; 1>>.5. c: a;
""'f ':J. .' -."'O::J :J.o
g.g, 3,' Q)~,m:r Q;:;T;::;:C::
-...o,-t(') CDl>>'<CDo.:::;~
ar::r:::l::r~{Jf:::n>> 3.(1) CD
$lco,~a Q. (Dc. 5.0~C6,cn
C 0. CD";;: < X 02 .~ 0-.0-:;
... ;::;'--m~ '-. -.""'1 C ~". . ...J.'
mQ) .::;ren en O::J' .....'OeD
-",-:;; a==::r-."''''3-o
-. -_.::1 =-..0 "C"'O
o.c==::t'=cc CD C"'O"C'CD 0
<t>~O"(1)c. '(')(D",\_.::1_._.
en-~ ...... 02_ .'0-' .C1)
-..0 (l)o.-enc.c'O 0"'00
<0 C"'OCD O"'.en.., c:.., a....-
::J'"",,,,CA ......tu -'-'0
'" CD' _.g~ -Q)m 0 .'-:
...0 .(I)<O .....en Cl.;; CD::J 0.0.
~e:CD::1::T'enCD"'u m'O
3CD,a!.<~(D c2?~mo.asn,o'"
. ;::;:<Do'en 0(0"<1) '. .
CD'-'C.::J,-:J.:].,~cn N._O
3. ~o.o mtu' :i":r.<S' g,lm
en ..'~_,.....en ,'{I)::J(J)en,Q.:
I
1
I
I
1
I
1
J Ul
~;
11 S
01 "2.,
<1'1 c
~J!!.
=[ "tl
~I C
;10
"'I
==1
~I
CD,
0.1
.....i
::rl
ai
CI
tQ,'i
:1"1
"1
C1
OJ
~,"g,o:--o.'~.'
5>=:3:'::J
.....9::D:l.(1).CD
(0,.::1,: :r-~.S'
m<o _02 _.
soon) o=:
'~5.5.c5
0.....<0 (/)
3$"'0
<"'ID.5.:::S
C5.~;,_e
< {I),;:;':-'
<....._(1)
~'3':rcn
::;u::J to ;:;:'
_.(/),(1)<0
en(1)_:E;
:::e::s2=
=m'o-
....... '--0""
~Q.~CD
C/)"'C(1)...,
o....en(D
:T<':5' ~
~~s:~
"0'< .....CD
3~$C>.
.mCo:so
~. (p=m
3:;'0;-=
r::r~~o
'" a.", :;;
.
"j
I
.
--co
:::J'o,.c
CD m_~
- 0.'0:
m0_.
O'Q)'::J
"""'::J(O
-o.en
io.m
_....,
!e.~CD
CD;:J;g.
0'~"~'
oo'g
,,:;;'"
_QJCl.
:T::E:-
ctl 02:0
"''<:;;
0......,;:;:
;:j;""'I:::r
;:ro.en
(I)3or
5~'a
"O~c
~.Q).::1
. "g'c
",'"
.!II'&;
0.-
c'"
","
_0
0:;;
.
33".2"~
<D<C .....:3'
::sCOCD
0.'"0 ,en "'0
~g~iii"
0.0.0
'~.'C/)::r3
iii'mQ)co
....""" en:J,
0,(1) 0).....
~~..(ia'a
~'g}S;'C"
__.n.. c:
mCQo':':
:::t.:::J.....0'
0<0 c-'
:Jo. a c5
- '-en
05-Q)
.., Q)::I
::rm.::I a.'
moO.
et.2: Q'~
<oCD.~.'<O
m(53Q.
'.-.' .en 02
=='30>0:
CD,:::Jeo
a.'"
(b @,rES.
0=.::1
03, ~m
-'"
, , ,
.
~' !
2!.30"3-1
c.0)...-.::r I
''''-3''''' '
. '~<n ~r m I
Dr. -.., :
--coN..O
(1)0(1):2:' I
.~":73,$" ],
; (1)_m $l
a.:sen.c
m:S!! 2?~~
.....;:;:.::1""
m wCOo
0.-.-
CDQt7'_
'" 3'<::r
c.O'C/)c: (Ij)
::Jmen'O".
CD...::) -.C"
0. a.,5 =
'0-9:
:roo ::J
O""m,-'cc
0>:;;3",
::Jo '2.-,
0.0 !Den
5'0. 0.
-mtu<D
.0.::1 ::+!'!2.
g 0,;0'<0
CDcn5;ffi
:::ro'~o.
"=::JCD_
T(1) 0.0
."
C
.S'
ii
o
~
'"
~
'"
:I"
'6'
So
-
:I"
'"
"
c:
o
c
~
ar
'en
~
0-
'"
C
"
a.
<D
cd
a
c
"
a.
o
"
'"
;::;:
'"
,
I
I"""'.
naO-DJIA
Oc m:J 0-
C:=:0Q.:
:J'n. CD ",:Ii
,__. :CD
~c5 :g.' ~ go'
.. !!!.-~,,'cn
;.., CO: CD m
- ::J '=.(1)
'"'<." !!'.aa
'-"'cn (l)
a.O<Q.::J
(DtI),Oc.
::>CD:;:CD
_.., _.0.
<;,:J_
Q.' mCO-p
CD" ......<0
(1)--""'--
'n,o'oes
:1,:03...
a,~,,::J'
__._.CD
(0.(1)-......
..mo,a: CDCD
-,-::I'
c_.=
"'0-,:)
CD :;:af<o
:i.~!!!.9..
"0' ,,",":In
0Q)~Q.
::>;:l -,
o ;l90
'::S"',g, CD.:t,
Ol
.
.'
m',. ;-0:'0-- 0'
":0= =,c 5; 0
::J":r~a..-
?UQ ~"5',~..
(I) !fJ <Om
:Ii (/)''''0
0" ~ CD
~"'oo..
S. CD
Q) CD-(1)'en
"::J 0(1)'--
0.'.--<0
(5"S>>:J
-':J'O"m
(")',=:.i:L-
(1) 0,0,_.,;
Q) -::T.o
",',(I)mO
(1)-::],- ,...,.
_.'<<0
3~'(ii"Q)
0> CD", C"2.
_0.- mN
o ,0),,' ~ CD
'::>
Q..c. 0 S
(0< a. CD
~.i (0'3
'(0-',"">1:\)
:J,::I_,C/)
:;: 0'",
n,s>>. "'-.
0,< -0":)
~:lnc(Q
0<--'0
a:.=:--i5::-
CD'O'5"g
7? (Q-(D
0.0:-0'0 _.C"(/)- COO'" ',33. =0.-(')--'"
CD::J'.,_:J~,OaCDe"s>>_,~:Jw,
Q) ::"'-.-....""S>>_.g), _.., _..........J;:;:O.._O,S>> < CD
-." .--,'^ -""".':J_"" _. :Ii,'''' -'en -I>>' - mo
<c"0 _ ,,,,,,,,~,S1),,,, (Q ..... ::e" :J(O.;::reo _"<_CD(/) _
::1',(1),.:::;:.[: 'ct) CIli, "_ 5.,='tC",'CD,'Q)nD),CD(II..~O
Q:j,',,',Q) o<.):.,~'2.C:CO-'b:C ,CD~' ;=.,(II'Q)<Ocg,,'
=, :J:"O"(O CI,), "~,',::I ~ '0",~~:Jm",C4-0(1)'S:',:Ja n
oo.:-<tl'< "0.0- a. )>,(D - Q; 0., ,',(DO 0)0,;-.
~en::1.:-=Q)':J:E(D- m ~ <09:~!h g:,::::"..;,~:g ir
. -'<: :,^':)_,o,,;:1en O,';:;;-',::t'_"'_",-",_,,(II,:, 'N
....- ",:r., Q) -0 - ,Q)" -'(1) OJ, - - , ,m
<,~, ~ ~,'CD'-;"^'a' 0 ,...."^.g:':J'",2".en,' ,Cl),:S.:J" ....
~~ ~(b3":,~,,< 3 Q :~e[cg. ~s:mQ.' m .'e-
tD(I)-!b.!>>, m 0"'2. "0, :::I ',::= o.,e: c:O'""
en 3'~)>"O ' ':::I-u)'~~5'm~(D~~'(D)>
- .......,.... 0 0.:.., :r=o.< ,...,.:;::'.:$.,'(')'0.'(1)....
::r -(1)-_ " (o<tl3, ' -.-- ''''(1), ,::), OJ
(1)'P;n:-lC/) :E '00 0., -~:E m tE 0)0 ~m m
.....'_., ,',--' ',-" -., ,_':J _._ ' Cl._"^,.'(J)',"O _
,-"en :J:-'...J =3,' :;rQ)i'--' 0.:<':"'" =. ""''''-',
0>0>0:-0 ''''-<OCD<I>3::>)>CD3
~.< Q)',~ 0'3'0,,<"0 een....coco-o"O-.
en:D:l<,,$:::b,. CD CD'C,'O''Oo'fij,.m:J CD'-o,,~~
0,::::D:l..C1><: Q):JCO i5r <.:;) :::1-. ~o CD m...,
->~gr,~~ Q5a.:r:J0:,<n:'-=: 3';::;:'0"::J0.,<
"'O-:J,(/)tb,-' ~~.o..CD , '"O(I),~a.O" CD
~-~g.O'5.' ~<~mo.:CD ~,g,,(,.,>r,<~
5~"0""'a> O::l" -m(Q,-.m (') -'eDOm,C)' ,,'-.
'::r-Cl)CD,CO"'<O <no ocnO', :J
o 3Q),Q., -~,~? cO. 3 . Q)_::J --f i m
O_NQ)::t: 0^'-'m::>3 :J,c,O,;,,_,_'
::r Q:l 'o.'s:u .., -:J " '::t;:;:--_.
CCD""'N -,:::t.co"'Q)iC'O "O......_.C'O",;:)
:::10,;:0 '0)', ::ro ,0'::) ,:) ..,....:0,..,0)(0
-<, J2'e'Q,a, CD::J~_~.o.a. g.~~_CD ace
~'~"" C&',~,,'N -gCir,~ gg ,~ ~":T,"00,-g)>~
N:J 0:-0 CD::) D:l 0 .' -I>> ';:1 CD _
0) -.::-.0::::1 =.0::S oC9.'Q) '<,''''':& ~.(I),O
..,:J :::1<2.. Q) 3< 0. ::i::J.'" O""'::,:J :J'O co
nco co I (I)' 1<, ,I, I 'rCD CD ':J, ,I I' 1 '<
-~''''"''''-~-''':-'~'''-'~"''''''''''''~~~,..""~..:.,;.,,;;.,.;.,,..;,~--:~....:.;~
-'_.
::r::>
a9:
C:$.
<00.
::rc
_0>
<1>-
,
;~
0..,
:rli
<0_
o,.f:;.
-CD
3'"
:r<n
<oar
~:g
=CD
=>0.
<0
fnc.
o
:;:
::>
.
.
-
::r
CD
~"O
g:a
~"
..;..CD
0'"
"'0
o ::!.
OCD
i>>'~
'0>
co,:::
!)J;g
?~
~
en
o
-
(3
3
'"
o
C
.:;.
:;
CD
;:;:
::r
CD
,
0.
~.
"
,
::> :;:
0>0
-0
Co.
01
--:.G)
"'::>
~o.
o~
Co
:'::J
0. CD
--:r .....
<00>
!'O"
~
CD
3
tll
a;
~
..
iii
o
0-
iO
::>
0.
:;:
;:;:
::r
~
o 3 :;: C:-" )>
::(1)0:'" ~Q.:
~.~s:~<;.!
o en-o'o. ...;
_.,(DC-..... _
(0'''0"0 :;,,0.<;
~...er~.,c. ~cr
=0>3::rlR..
:: ar~~:I:i'
.~,~~,CD:,O,..
=8,,0-:;;:2
=+(D CD <'D'<D 0
~ en (J),CD.<,::JCD
CD0en.:J~
-0"..- 0
:!': 0'<.2-.... -
::::1-'."";:r-
... ::T.= .~~<D.~
-0(1), mID ,(1)
""'I c: ..:3a.-~
0." Q)ro....::J
a>"O&: c.<m
$l<D:<n;tl)~3
_.....,:J:3. C:::'.Q)
o Q),o a. Q) ,-'
::J ::J.. '<(')
. Q.::E Q).0::;.
0- 'CD CD QJO
. ::Ie
:;:300.;;;
CD.O-_
: < (I):T'ci"'
'O!!.C: CD::J
gZ>~c:'~
-. c:,Q.-o :-
g --CD\,) a
0.'9 a ~ CD
.
. .
i ~ 5-
:a ~
:rcr Q,;
lp::>
,
o
3' a
-
::r 0
CD
<5'
~.
,
CD
"
fR
'0> -
::> "
0. ::r
0>
a ;
o "
- a;
,
:ra
<I>
'" 0
a:
o
3
3 :;
S' CD
~r g-
~. ?
1"""'.,
Qi..m'(D'c:e -
::>3 iO" _,::r
0." <" s: CD -l'Ci)
",-0> CD -.c::r_
OO=..,:J"OCD'(D
...>< 0 en" CD
':0(1)0. ::'-':'0 CD(S"C
. 0,<""'1 < S>>
o -=:::1..G)'"C. Q) co
.2: 0 co"",o:=(I)
9! =0:3 0.", ::10'0)
''',-'- '-":3
=-il 00(.01>>
.,< :3"_--::::J_::::J
.(1) <D CD ~ ....0 =0-
..0, 00 ::r_c"",,-
,:.c. ... -CD. (I) 01'
:~::J 'en..' 0)---
::r::;:CD(IIoi"SilS'
CD <::r... -"
QI-CDOO".CD::r
(1)0"'.<."'-3
-m<=o::r
_.::r-:::J::S"O CD CD
gCDm $D<D",:J
-cn....,:rS>>~:E.-
c-.o (1)'< 0 CD
a.S':r-.. _
CD-.-tn -t:Eo
"C)'a>::r_ :T.
. ::SO'CD :T<D.'
0._ <D_
3.Ei ~gs~
_,0) CD ::r-.:S
w -<:<D,-3
~_e..,oo
O"m ~'c::J 6'
.. oO:s__
2.::r2.;:;:::rc:
:r 2.' .o!: 2.
."..o-,---,::J CD (it,
cC.--,-- .
,,..,(1)::T:r=o
_0.(1).(0;0 :J
gm~st2..~;e
;o::E::JCD.......,m
mCD..C::T<OS'
Q.""'I)> _"CD_...
",(1)=<00.0"
'<'<0 )>CD,0....
_0 ~< <.CDCD
O::;::-'........~<:.
.." '''::T,:;, o "CD .
_,3CDc::"C_'C
~J2. CD <0,3 ::rei
::::IX .. ..CD........
c' C'>:: c;;~~ ~. a. 5-
:3 CD:=<D...,o=
:=:.....::JD) 0,,3==
~ CO(Q co ::J.. <0 Ci'
~coQ.~!,!
o...s:m~.O-f
"'(I)~<1).c::r
O"::r'o-- (II (1)
CD m -"" (1) CD'
-<CDCm
Q CD o:J ::J-"
(t)o--^a.0
O).CD.;:rQ._OO
::J(t)..~ 0":;5.
o.::>o.~.CD.::!:
-0 .-'''00
=::-0.=0'.., err
a5~g~a
_.CD:S-::J 0 ~
<n: 0 _. ._Q)
(J).ar (J) C/) 0._
5.Q."O~::S~
~r-~(i):3 ~
ar~c3 m CD
;a~ if3.~ '{'.
-m.
o 'CD..~
=nCD-l
o =-':T
:;:O::rCD
_.::1(0-
::S'cni
<CLI>><
-l3-
3::r CD,
0> CD CD:;;:
::s .m-
::s"C ::s.~
~.a,c.=
,_._.(1)
-.CO.-:r::1.
00(1)1>>
CD_..,
CD.(DO
m_-
1:1. c.O r::r
mOo"" 0
fC..,(I)_
.a> CD '0) ::r
;;J:lo..OO..,,_
"'<I>::r
cu<DmCD
::s.00 0,;0
Q.-c.(I)
.....::T"',(I)
-CDCDm
;::00.(1)0
m(1)0._
0.. (0-
:::roo.o
3 ~ma
(I) en (I) 0
::).~.o _
-g):J_
)> -. ~. af
":"':':J:Jo
g....;!... 8.
.CD'en (I)
1
1
I
1
~
rrI
.,
;;1
g;
=>
-j
I
I
I
1
,
,
I
""P
F
~i
OJ:!
:Db
~1i
-111
111:1
:.E-::
.::J
111
...ID
:s
~
3:
.
:s
Q.
1\)
-
C
~
"-- --'-- b=
i"
4!IiiIIik
....
Q.::T-I
-..-.....
g,~!!.
. ~-
;a:co l'!
::'-'0 -l
=s:u:s
m-<D
_::r
:!.:l;o
0QJ..(")
Q:l(l)!!.
=o-C)"
rga,'::J
3co
(!) (Q-
::J,~,'ll)
".-to ':J
cj:;.'om
oox
=''=0"
...,..-
gr Q). S"
::J,::;::(Q
C.'CD """'
O::lc
~ :::!:.a.
::J.O-'
",:J3
uo-<D
a,<-.;a,
'< "'T1Q)
:T'.a-~
(ON,Cfj
,Q:llJJ2S
'OCDQ)
'0::],:;,
r<Pa.
'-.j
," ",
.:.ra:
'~"1il <T"'
'r "
-.: 0-(1)-(1)''-",--3' '""'0.,,
o m<D:-.:T.;1::T, '::J(t)-
...,,(J)Q)a~Q1 <0_.<0 -g"N:.o.Ch 1>>:
Q) ~arc'c5.2!. Is. ~4)ar <cog
2!.g Cl,cnacoQ. (1)_ 0;::... ::"3
,",'-0" 0 .:" CD.,-:: 0 ~-'n '(I)
C,< Dl-ftj. .-,.,OO::J'
-....,.. -,-0) (") -'0 0 _.mC';:] _\
ij"e!.C5a,Cir;;,::.a:=Dro 0
"0':7 O..:(/): m<D 3 (I) 3 =:',(1). _.
<DCD ^ <('I) -- '3 "'C'm.' 0 "0.0"
~cO~:r~~ 3:T, c: fI)::J ..._s:
Cr:T(Q"~..",=r,o<D".~-a!A'OCD3 a:
::J en- .,' " -!:2,.';' -.O"T1 --_
. . ',' =r::J' <:.' _.mcn,or-"O'::J
:e:co (D'S>> 3-. :!.'co-,<D, -0" ::J:;T(Q
-'3' '-'''<-'"Ql(J)Q)0
:f' .:E.Ci}"O ..~.,< -1. a.' .' en'
-'~-'-,:<.O:Q)'cn::T ~'N:r
::I, ::J-e. en"" c: Cl) CD ""co!!..
0"'(1) .- (I)'(Q . 3 c' eg'"
:T .< o""-m ~ en '00:r
CD ... (l).. 0"'. 0;:+ _I>>. _, ... _
Q)~O' 3 <1r;is !S" 'S;;'.."~.m
o '!J JJ ... '"'1(1) ""<0 iil ::J
A2:3 CDO::s 9:()~(J) 0 Q.
0=(00. tI) 0 ~ c (1)--'0
men:;,.. .CD'::s (Q .., '.:3':::In
ar:'a:-,~,(D_Q) '.<D'~'3CD<O S!.
OJ'Q)-,O'.g.:r:3..::S:<., .0'4)
:e"C1't:m<DQ.':::, (1)~-...
_: ..,:::1_ CT'C: :0.'< m.._CT ~
= mSraf__"-',2:.(;i"'< 5.c
CT 3:,:r3~' "S-'. 0.0, m,a:n-"
CD OJ"". ...(D. .' a. 0'" '.__=
- --. ,-"'::S.CD'-<DO':::IO
gr" =',0',0 'CD, -::S"CD--'<0::1
(Q ()~',,~:::I.~ :;o:>,3~>~
,<0 :0-.-0.0 Ocn-',_ -,
CD :::I'CO,' ::S.o"" 3 CD 3. <D ;j'
0. .1,:J<O_-,.1 I I. en CD
.-
.....
~:~, 5r~5 Q
$",a; == 0 :i .~
,en :t:::J1662:
:l; ::;'lij ::l. <T:J
~,;~-,.~"..~.~
CD::S;;J'O'5i..~
0':3'0-(1) -'::;r
ij)~,::rfJ ~...,~
:::J O':::J' c: :rCD
0. m'(I)~ 0 _.
:r ~CD, . 3. en
co::rc.o .'Q)
- CD,--ro::s
:l; 0_'"
-. "Oo-;;J' M:o
=r'~"'ro .(tl. m u
< '0, .'''0
:t~."<D.ooo
<O'<ce::s::s~
CD 0 ~. 9:,'-5
x-a.:::t:T_.
-.-CD 0..<0-
!e.::r. '.=:J. '<
-'roo. '. c: _
ca. tIJ .:o9..':g 0
<CD'~- ro, Q
m'O) ro,:::I".., ro
co. ",..<'0 .'0)
ro"tIJ~ CD,U_
_,:::1,(1))( 0 (()
e a. a',ur,a::!:
5"5',-. -0.<
::s' 0. 0 :;::J a>
. <.:::J'(Q.o,"O
-. 03 -~.
0.-. .<
C;-,_._,lJJ
,m:r::l.:r .....
-,(()<D CD CD
.-
','.'.... ..
r-,
Q 0 :r~
CD .0, co _
ago"
<D<D-Q.
,,~' a:
::Lo.Q) cO.
< <Do.;:,
Q:I <'(I)
OcomtD
'<-::s:l
:l;.g a.Q.
;;:3cn ,:T
2: (D~l'D
::S:JC_
-om
-.............
::r.-c..........
roO atm.
~3(1) ~
,m ""'00')>
o.:::J".-(I)
CD(1):J-o
0.0 .......,
!!: c g~
.......,0.-
~aCDO
, C a.~
::J_-
0.0'<
-'-.. :::s
:3-.0
CO ::.....
''Q):r,Q)
..,; <D.~a.
(1).__
.?>..~,:T,
a)..... CD
....~;.cn
- .:::s....-.
Q;~7
Q)~O>
CtIJ<D-
-':)cn...
0(1) en_.Q
3"Coc
OO,.~.m
<T::l.3=
::;"'",..
(I).::::t_...
c:oQ~
-0,.....,:::1 .;..;.::r
"':l; '" '"
O.-.r!.-
==:o
~.,(1) =~
<-:J ctl_
~ osn 0.
mg';:T :J
"<..,mo
C/J...Q).o_'
~(Q 0-
::;"'3i[
;~3"C
4), _CD ..,
" ~aSt
''U' :J __Q
<<o'!!.-n
:<'D'Q)o
p. :J,O ~.
c.(ti-
a.~ =:
_.Q) :J
.~. '::1m
o a.",
~'.-g...~
,Q)r::Tm
cg.'.g: C}
oM
"1,
oM .
....
..
i
,
,
i
I
i
,
i
en (J m < a. en ti'C"'~']I'
"OmenCDCDM:O . .
~<n"O .~. (JJ <D::S::S-'5,.::1
:::S:5" ~""'cO.... 0.2.,:'0
co en _Q) ::Ioen_:::::,1
<:: _-:::sCD.' (")..1>>,....,
Di,o "0',,<.'0. '~O::l Q;:,:[.
-Q) '._O::S'. Q.;
'" 2!.S-< 0':3 '" ....'1'
:" --~<; .'<::(t).::I"
3 (Q e ~'J:- oat>> I
~.!~1;;, !tl:;:
o '0,)' ...... .....,'-..
=(O=: =:;...g CD (D,
Q)' 9:-<". ~~~. cr a' '1'
::J'" .....--,::J. en
a.ll ~cO ~~ g- g- II
Q)m-(')< ...
(JJ a,(t) -- mo)> I
U ~.(I)tIJ (i)0 en i
:r:rOCD'<....::s..:
~ -; 9:':_.., '.~~ i
- 0 ;= 3::SC:' 2. <D
0.'(1) 0 ctl ~.5Cir:s:: i
O.::S :::S::l, '_.0. 0 ~I
::Ice' --o,::sc [
- -- Q), O-CC O"'cn
Q) ~:D.::s .::I,_"<,z,
2.(t)SQ.O:::TmQ;
::s.., _0.,,__
mro O:Tm O,en (J) !':'"
- a. =c: ." c: (t) (')
g',g':;,,:: :.<g~'~, 'j"
~O.~ __"en..co 1
003'" '" ::>"o.a. '
_.:r I 0 (D ._.;'j
v:
,
,
I
"I
'. ..
50:S. ;!',~g-'m- ~.3:-:s~'i6,'3 g....~
(I)..~. ~<D ,Q. .g:5..~ g g.o~.9: ,~i
0"5'co <0 "0 s>> 0 (Q :30 -g...... 0 -. I
<D,(O .~, 0 =.;:e m~ Q. :E. a ::s '.
CD mW'''D:_~. --.0-...... i
':':~:':,,=.'~ QS.';>l,g:fi,?, 3"0' '~.'<S'.'~ i
"':::> Dr 0_ ;:; en_ ~ :w. 3:.0.::s- ,CL'D) .' (') I
' ,:',:'<050 -:oA) g) :r:" "Ocr::s-'o I'
" COo. ","0 :J '< 0 , ~:!. 3 '" '" c
.CD. '-c:_ '-cn\'u~"~'OJ'::S I
c.,- 3 r::T ::S-o ,:;s' CD' CD - 0":0 en _ i
. '.::1" -(') ..- .::1:::1 ......(1):"< I
-co,-"o'-C.0 ~<D(Q CD--3.. :
0: 0t:.... ~ Q. .....::s)> .:.1
....()~.o"o.aril::s:.-m :Tco,-CDcn i
1>>';:;:::J ..<D. 5")> '=<o.!l.g ~.. $3;.:c
cn':< co, iifC< 0 'm ,CD.. . a_CD.
::+o.=-~(I) mg.::s 0'~'.:;:'O:::J
<D,_::S ::+::r::S ::s' CD Q,(/). ......_ 0
S)>^,:ECD ~.cr mO~:Tl:T-
en.'en '0 0 G). (I) (') ::::~:e CD,', I>>
"0 "0 c -CD 0 N.: :T.-..Q): f!.':J'.
<1:>(1) .Q)- m .':3")(0 Q). -. a. 0 _ (')
('):::1, .o.::s c -"0 CT,rn ::r- _'< CD
:=. "O~- C1J(I) (t) !."O .C ',.
o '-i a g- ~ m a,ji;::ra -f e.; :;-
? ::r"O :E0'"""I <D.~:t-o =r-coP
CD: O. .....<c. 0 O(l)CD;...
~en.~ ::;,:r _::s-~~ ::::~r;;.. .!
~ ,~...~ ~ ~,~ 2.!';~:~.':8'a !
1>>2:~~ m_....3o:E,cgco
= ~m (J),""'l ~Q),u 3 05:.(1),,<<1'
<0 ::]. -::s '(0 -. Q. Qi_.....S'Q. en
::I <O:J._ CD a.Qi.,.."......:a.~ m-
3 .....,"C~Q) CI) 0 m(l)"CcoQ),m
CD-...."., c.([): Q) ctl Q)"g':.., Q.en a.
a.~~9 ?"'Q) 9 a.<f ::I ,~,cp\<P :r
'_I
"
,1
l
,,[
I
I
1
,
'1
..
..
...,.;4
'..
~
)::It
I
)::It-
.'
:'
.....
--
...
...
f
~ ' .,1
f:.
~. :-1
'~
'of
...
,
I."
;liIfoIi
.. ".,...--r4Ii.,.... ·
.~ .. .. ,.
..............:._, r"',....,.... _'_~"_''''
..,.,~, '~H,...,~~".,-'t-._,..,_...
!
"
I
"
I
"
11
"
"
,
d
ii
d
i
"
,
'i
"
U
:;
'i
,.[
"
,
,I
i
~
;i
\
\j ~
,Hlro () t1 ~'() ~
ro ~o'.ro i:l 0 ! ":'"\
t'D f-I.rt' m .....::s I "0
rT en,,<: rT rT'-'. i
rT~{R'~, i
~,.ri'~',~!, 5
...,,, I--' ""'''' n ~~
i:l""0 , H
[~';8, ;.1,11", :
ro <: rT II ','"
o () en ..... ::l"t:r ."
Hl g ro go'lro.. 0::0
1'i' rT <:: '
::rt1 i:l ::rtfll c<:
roo.....o~o! ,g;:
5 ~;;r e'I'; ~
.....0. rT i:l I
rT 010, 10
en ~ I t<J
i:l S Hl 1 t<J
~ ..... 0 0 roi 0
l--'-rtQd1 m:
,...en ro ::rnH "-
,... t1 ~ 0 1 GJ
~ Pl'O S ~.. CIl
0" ::r rT ro i:l! t-'l
ro ro ro rT en ..... i ::0
t1 O' rT' H
Pl CD ..... I 1111 ()
'0 ::sU' , 'i t-'l
'0 i:l () :l;ll t<J
t1 0 0 ....', 0
o , S ,...,
K () ro ,..., t<J:;::
.....0 ro
S i:lt1S O"i
Pl rT ro '0 ro 1 ."
rT t1 i:l ,... ! b
ro 0 rT 0 () 1
~t;'~~ gl ~
8~, t1'g~,~" ql5
~.~..~ ..... ~ i C
<:0. 'n'CIl
cn.....(1) rt H
.a 01-" t-'l ro z
<:: <::..... ::rOo G)
Pl en i:l 0. ro
t1,...ro ro tn..... C
ro,,,<: en ro,ro i:l Z
- 0. H
t-'l
CIl
~l
rT
g'
i"'"
'\
-
o
,-..,
i
!'l 0 P !If ~ >, I
. I
'a I
"'0 0 c} ,-- ~ ,'g
~ Oi. I>> I
n [ ::J :a: :::J
3 0 Q. ,;- Q.
:r (Jl -n !!! I>> n
I>> <= 0- <C - C1l
~ 0 0-
-< .. ~ c: ::J en
m 0 )> CD 0
- ,I
::J 0 ~ -
<0 .. 0- c
I>>
5' :; ,2;: , ~ ::J
~ ::J 0
.. 0- .. en
~ ~
(Jl ::J
5' ::J' :; !!!.
<0 -6' .. .:<
C-
O 0 0
(l)
0 ::J I>>
0 2'. 0'
<0 CD 0;'
'< 2I
:D .gO
(l)
-0
0
~
I
i
I
I
I
i
I
i
----.,......-.----."-..---
._.
,
,
I
b
.
~
.oUi ... '" "'0 ,..
;'!l:. ~ ~ ~# ..
+ ~ ~
'"O~ ~ . "', a.
'llIUa. , I '" -
g~o ~~~'~ '" ....
o-~ o :$t '#- 0 .. ..
aco_ "0 ct, (IJ i' "
5"~;g (])(I)(/)- Q.
_ _0 ..
~mc8 00" .. 0
00" ""'" " "
... '" '" "
i'n ..::r
3_0 a
~J:"3 ~ ::r ,...
"N.. ~ 0. >
<0 ~-c €. .. z
~~~ -<n " C
.... ".0 !!!,
.:.n.g ~ \ 01: " m'
,0.. ::t ,.-, ....
(f)~" -; 0 ,...
~g~ Q. ,~'5>>~~:. .. i5
m ..... '0) .&:t- o';: c;
,~"'a' -0)(,0)0) I: tii
05""< cO- C I\) ~ !. ,~
,;e:; 5' 0' ,...
o.:! .. m
901!-r c;; "
;;;" ." >
a;~~. 0' c 0
. '" ~ .. 0' ::ll "0
)I;~3 0 i->" " l:l -g
{lllll>>
a-" '" --i' '" C
..-~ " -<'f 0 !'!- :s
0" m
?::ofq !!!. ~ 0..- tEi z a.
"''"0
!S::<! -< 0 Ut,O,O ."err- en >C
n.~~ .;;q =i
(') s.'-a. ~ 01
'6"ii'5" II> .., ,..c
~EIC n is" ..I>>
0:;,0 <: .Q g
aoo [ .. I:
3' ~
!IlOQ ,5" ; ,...
.... " ~ (')
"--< c:
Co", !. ,...
~! go >
~ ...
"-0 0' 5
0,,- cf "
3'i!
..~ ",- 00 ~'
~. ~! -it; ~
Co... ~~I :> -"
~fn: ." Go
o,'i\) .p n> '"
SZ .OJ ".., -... ..
00 0"'''' --a "'
;>>"3 <:!. ....n_ !.
-a- ..J ~i 0"
!l~ f. "
0- u>
.o. "
gg ......1
.. 0
0
-J
~\
"'.,,,,"<,,,,0, r"""'-~~_~,_"
..
..
..
..
00
~!!.
, l-g.
':g.e
e&
'0.
0.
x-g
~g
a
;-
'"
;;
<;
3
c
;;
'."C
.-
~
'.:;'
en
,~
',g
,.':!f'
'.:.
}-
'"
'm
m
a
..
...
'r--
.,,~
-0
0_
0"
~-
>>
".,<; s=
.oc::
..
a
<0
oW
~~.I::.
c.en
C.-S"
"10
<0",-
x
-
<n..
2:~
$1.'<
, 5;@..
~ctf
.:: ~lI\
001- It 00
....
0Cl
II
o
,
,
!\
o
.0
C
~
&
~
9-
!!!.
8
fill
i
0. lJJ\--
!\oJf'..-J
'~ :r. ~os
a a' w....
!i \5' .:: \
0'
-~
.......(
-0>
ct>,'=
~o
.;:!:l:
"O~
-(l)(i"
So.en
<ilL>
_c:
~..
c:~
0'"
"""::"lJ
~'"
"'~
en
Z
,t ii~
;::
.t:: .J:;r=
,~ wo-<
, ....~
~..c
..'"
o
C
-0
r
m
x
ttU
c
()
J:: ~C!
co wUl:o
oJ -.l om
"" 000
.-:
~i
_j-t/1
.r;
00
""~'
-
o
o
11-.
W I
;~~: iJI-
8~.J Ul\.ll1l1l
z! '-",~ ~?'~
~s." 3'0.
5"" ?";-
0'0. ..,.
-Q 0'(0
~~ -Ql
em .~
'Q m
&
m
n
~
m
0.
~
6" -
,
..
-.
z
~
(j)
L>
c:
..
~
'"
."
o
o
or
10
'C1>
-,
-\
-l
o
-l
l>
,...
...
,...
o
o
::D
l>>
::D'tII
rn"i
l> ~
l>Q.
,...-
,...)C
00,
:E
rn
o
o
Z
In
=4
'!1
.-.......,.
.........'
j
>'~
.
/""
,~
MEMORANDUM
-"
TO:
City Attorney
city Engineer
City Water*
Aspen Consolidated Sanitation District
Environmental Health
Building Department, Bill Drueding
Fire Chief, Jinx Capparrelli
".;-.
'.......
........
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE:
Aspen Chance Subdivision
DATE:
November 29, 1983
Attached for your review is an application submitted by Karen B.
Smith, on behalf of Aspen Chance, Inc., fOr conceptual approval
of the Aspen Chance Subdivision. The application seeks approval
for the reconstruction of nine units on the Chance Claim on
Ute Avenue and a small adjacent parcel (the site is on Ute Avenuei
just east of Aspen Alps Road). This application also seeks !
approval for a conceptual planned unit development site plan and '
8040 greenline review approval. This case has been scheduled for'
January 3, 1984, before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission. i
We would appreciate having your referral comments back to the ,
Planning Office no later than December 20, 1983, in order to have!
adequate time to prepare for its presentation.
Thank you.
*The City Water Department has already received a copy of this
submission, directly from the applicant.
J'j-il S f ~Q , 0 Sr?-l":> De "s-....0,-,.,1:'~-
c.A-~ f3e se-J(..''''c.en
-rr4 r.:
A.s n;:;_::::.::) i- S~:"'","=>,;'\\-Cf'> $A-"'t.l'-J\.""/~_
r:;,( Si"'.c...tC.i-. A
7'""1C. '- -It:.
(3 '11
1
'-Il,,,;
i
./--1, e: J>
/..--.. 'Ur-e.. Iit.....e F()~ ,..HIS ('/lO::r-C<:'f
/J.. ..e. ~ L? _
...~s p.c~ co --50 C-; I') ,,-,..t--':)
,.j....A1-lt"/1'1:..);,._... ~/"fr-'lI:c..I.-
///~;Cn,
~
~
MEMORANDUM
TO:
4y Att<;>rney
....ei,9. 11 Eng l.neer
~j;.y Water*
~-pen Consolidated Sanitation District
~~ronmental Health
~ildingDepartment, Bill Drueding
Fire Chief, Jinx Capparrelli
FROM:
Colette Penne, Planning Office
RE:
Aspen Chance Subdivision
DATE:
November 29, 1983
~ttached for your review is an application submitted by Karen B.
Smith, on behalf of Aspen Chance, Inc., for conceptual approval
of the Aspen Chance Subdivision. The application seeks approval
for the reconstruction of nine units on the Chance Claim on I;
Ute Avenue and a small adjacent parcel (the site is on Ute Avenue,
just east of Aspen Alps Road). This application also seeks
approval for a conceptual planned unit development site plan and
8040 greenline review approval. This case has been scheduled for!
January 3, 1984, before the Aspen Planning and Zoning Commission.:
We would appreciate having your referral comments back to the
Planning Office no later than December 20, 1983, in order to have!
adequate time to prepare for its presentation.
Thank you.
*The City Water Department has already received a copy of this
submission, directly from the applicant.
~~:..~
, "".,-""",\1
~. -..
,
',->
.
I
\
t
~
_~,J
~
.
~s
t
:-
...,
...."....;-.....
-. "-
.--.
, '
).t.
.
',,' ~.'
.
~ '\'-,:
.
~....'".,-, "