The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.305 S Mill St.HPC18-93# 905 5, #1/6 Il 5 1 Popcorn Wagon Minor Devt Review HPC18-93 / 1 Cok /1 2 - 4.0 ). t. A 5 -1 <: ) k clÂ«el 5 h C Ad 2 z- .. j CASELOAD SUMMARY SHEET City of Aspen Historic Preservation Committee DATE RECEIVED: 05/11/93 CASE NUMBER: HPC 18-93 DATE COMPLETE: PARCEL ID#: PROJECT NAME: Popcorn Wagon Minor Development Review Project Address: S. Mill St. & Hyman Ave. APPLICANT: Jack Stanford Applicant Address: 855 Chatfield Rd., Aspen, CO REPRESENTATIVE: Scott Smith, Gibson Reno Architects Representative Address/Phone: 418 E. Cooper Aspen. CO 81611 925-5968 TYPE OF APPLICATION: 1 STEP: 2 STEP: 3 STEP: HPO Insubstantial Amendment or Exemption: HPC Meeting Dates: P&Z Meeting Date: CC Meeting Dates: 1st 2nd- REFERRALS: Planning Building Zoning City Engineer Parks Dept. City Attorney DATE REFERRED: INITIALS: DUE: FINAL ROUTING: DATE ROUTED: INITIAL: City Atty City Clerks Office Other: FILE STATUS AND LOCATION: COMMENTS: /7 devi./Al 6 1Â¥.\ 3\)\\\\ 1 MEMORANDUM To: Historic Preservation Committee From: Amy Amidon, Historic Preservation Officer Re: Popcorn Wagon, Minor Development Review Date: May 26, 1993 SUMMARY: The applicant requests HPC Minor Development approval to replace an existing wood fence trash enclosure with a new stucco finished concrete masonry unit trash enclosure. APPLICANT: Jack Stanford, represented by Scott Smith of Gibson and Reno Architects. LOCATION: 305 S. Mill Street, Block 82, Townsite of Aspen, Colorado. SITE, AREA AND BULK INFORMATION: Please refer to the supplernent provided by the applicant. PROJECT SUMMARY AND REVIEW PROCESS: All development in an .'H'I Historic Overlay District must meet all four Development Review Standards found in Section 7-601 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval. Attached are the applicant' s response to the Review Standards, description of the proposed project, drawings and supporting letter from the local trash hauler. 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H, " Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to a Historic Landmark... Response: There are no historic structures on this site, but several Aspen Landmarks are across the street from the trash receptacle. The materials proposed for the new receptacle are more in character with the existing surroundings than is the current wooden trash fence. 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: Staff finds that the proposed development is not larger than what exists now, is a visual improvement over the existing structure, and does not adversely affect the character of the neighborhood. The architect should consider some sort of a covering or roof structure over the receptacle, as surrounding buildings, namely the Wheeler, have a bird's eye view into the trash bins. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: Staff finds no new affect on the cultural value of adjacent historic structures. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The proposed development is freestanding and does not directly impact the architectural integrity of a designated historic structure. ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: 1) Approve the Minor Development application as submitted. 2) Approve the Minor Development application with conditions to be met prior to the issuance of a building permit. 3) Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy (specific recommendations should be offered.) 4) Deny Minor Development approval finding that the application does not meet the development review standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the HPC approve Minor Development after discussion of the desirability of a cover for the receptacle. Additional Comments: hp.popcorn jjj . , ATma]MENI, 1 Y ... . . > IAND WE APHIMTInI yflul 1) Project Name : POPCORN WAGON Â· 2) Project Locatial #)% South Mill St.29-- (indicate street address, lot & block Ilinber, legal description,here arpropriate) . cc 4) Ict Size 3) Present Zoning 5) Applicant's Name, Mdress & *bone # Jack Stanford *855 Chakfield Road, Aspen, CO 925-7726 6) Bepresentative's Name, Address & Ehone # Gibson & Reno Atchi fprÂ·te 418 East Cooper, Aspen, CO 925-5968 7 ) 9Ypd of Appligatirn (please check all that apply): .. 4 cancer"lal TTi gtoric Dev. Ocnditirnal Use - Conceptial SPA - Special Rewiew Final SPA $ Final Historic Dev. 8040 Greenline -Congeptual r{ID . 4 3 Minor Histomic Dev. Stmam Margin Â· Â· ~ Final ED Ill- Hi st=ic Dawlition lp,mi-A in yiâ€¢,9 PIAâ„¢2 - ai,divisirn - lii AL,ric Designalicn Cotylminlimi zatirn Â· --...I Teod/MÂ® Amenhent Â· _-- G*33 M.lo~ent Iot Split/Int line (203 83mption Adjustment 8 ) Desdriptien of 141$=ting UsesÂ· (number and 3 1=Ype of mrigting struchnfs; agmnmte sq. ft. 1 Nmhar of bp,kocins; any pacevious agroval g granted to the propert:y). The existing use consists of a walk-up restaurant, approximately 55 s.f. in size. 9) Description of Develgment Application Replacement of ansexisting wood fence trash enclosure with a concrete masonry unit with stucco f inish fence trash enclosure - 10) Have you attached the followim? x ~sponse to Attadianent 2, Mini]Eum Submission Colitents x / Respaise to Attadment 3, Specific Sulnission Contents x ReSP~nse to Al:tad]IIErt 4, Review Standards far Your Application 1111111 IL ~'- GIBSON & FRENO â€¢ AFRCHITECTS [DAVID F GIBSON. AIA AUGUSTG FIEND. AIA SCOTT C. SMITH, AIA May 6, 1993 Ms. Kim Johnson Aspen/Pitkin County Planning Department City of Aspen 130 S. Galena St. Aspen, CO 81611 RE: PROPOSED POPCORN WAGON FENCE WASH ENCLOSURE 305 SOUTH MILL STREET ASPEN, CO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION MINOR DEVELOPMENT Dear Kim: Enclosed is a submission for Historic Preservation Commission, Minor Development review related to the proposed replacement of the Popcorn Wagon's track enclosure fence. Included in the submission are twelve copies of each of the following: 1. Land-Use Application Form 2. Supplement to Historic Preservation Development Application Form 3. Description of Minimum Contents for All Development Applications 4. Description of Specific Contents for Minor Development 5. Review Standards 6. Proposed design drawings 7. Trash Company Letter As the owner would like to construct this project before the summer season begins, we would appreciate being scheduled for the earliest Historic Preservation Commission Meeting. If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me. SincereJ,Â¥tours, A Scott C. Smith, AIA 418 E. COOPER AVENIUE â€¢ ASPEN, COLORADO 81611 â€¢ 302/925-5968 â€¢ FAX 303/925-5993 SUPrLEMENT TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT APPLICATIONS . IMPORTANT Three sets of clearifully_labeled drawings must be submitted in a fortnat no larger than 11~17-, OR one dozen sets of blueprints may be submitted in lieu of the 11'xlr format. APPLICANT: Jack Stanford ADDRESS: 855 Chatfield Road, Aspen, CO ZONE DISTRICT: CC LOT SIZE (SQUARE FEET): n/a EXISTING FAR: ALLOWABLE FAR: n/a . PROPOSED FAR: none EXISTING NET LEASABLE (commercial): n/a none PROPOSED NET LEASABLE (commercial): EXISTING % OF SITE COVERAGE: n/a PROPOSED % OF SITE COVERAGE: n /a EXSTING % OF OPEN SPACE (Commercial): n /a- j - PROPOSED%OFOPEN SPACE (Commer.): n/a EXISTING MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal Bldg.: n/a / Accessorv Bldg: PROPOSED MAXIMUM HEIGHT: Principal BlÂ®.: n/a / Accessory BlÂ®: PROPOSED %OF DEMOLITION: -0- -0- EXISTING NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: I -0- PROPOSED NUMBER OF BEDROOMS: -0- EXISTING ON-SITE PARKING SPACES: ON-SITE PARKING SPACES REQUIRED: -0- This application is for a trash area fence. SETBACKS: EXISTING: ALLOWABLE: PROPOSED: 4' 6" Front: ' n/a Front: none Front: n/a Rear: n/a Reac none Rear: Side: n/a Side: none Side: 10- Combined Front/Rear: n/a Combined Frt/Rr: none - . Combined Front/Rear: n/a EXISTING NONCONFORMITIES/ ENCROACHMENTS: _ VARIATIONS REQUESTED (eligible for landmarks Onlv: character comDatibility finding must be made bv HPCE FAR: Minimum Distance Between Buildings: SETBACKS: Front: Parking Spaces: Rear: Open Space (Commercial): Side: Height (Cottage Infill Only): Combined Frt./Rr: Site Coverage (Cottage Infill Only): REVIEW STANDARDS: DEVELOPMENT IN THE HISTORIC OVERLAY DISTRICT A. The proposed development is compatible in character with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an H, Historic Overly District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard, and rear yard setbacks, extend into minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area, III'C shall find such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements; and There are no designated historic structures located on the parcel where the trash enclosure fence is being proposed. The Wheeler Opera House is located across the street from the proposed trash enclosure fence. In fact, the proposal is to upgrade the existing trash enclosure fence with higher quality materials for both visual and practical reasons. The proposal development will reflect a small scale (pedestrian) type screen. B. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development; and The neighborhood consists of commercial type buildings all being constructed out of hard surface materials such as brick. concrete masonry units, stone, etc. The proposed development is compatible with these characteristics in that the materials and scale are consistent and reflects the character of the neighborhood. C. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the cultural value of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels; and There are no historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development, however, the Wheeler Opera House is located across the street. The proposed development does not detract from the cultural value of the designated historic structure. In fact, the proposed development enhances the designated historic structure by screening a service area that has been in the current location for many years. The proposed development with its small scale quality materials, and care to detailing (in the gates) will enhance the pedestrian experience. D. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the Architectural integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. The proposed development does not diminish or detract from the Architectural integrity of the Wheeler Opera House in that it' s character is simple, one of quality materials, small scale, an attention to detailing. The proposed development takes on a "Quiet" characteristic relative to adjacent structures. m..1..i.4...1.1...11 1 iii 1 ~11.1 - 1 1.JnT,-Ill iii -7 1 i # 11 -- 1 I . Mt N sT I__ City of Aspen R lili ''.' 1 ''' 1 [TU I 1,1 1 1 1 Ilillill m 1 1 1 1 1 'fi IM '1 1 1 0 .-= - - .... 1 1 . Tl. c :~ i ~1 COMMERCIAL CORE ~ HOPKINS AVE. 1 IL HISTORIC OVERLAY 1 -1 1*2-au . . Lu L 31 Ig HYMAN AVE. W z DISTRICT 11 4 / T i i ... ~* 1 C 1 ~ WAGNER -- R AVE. | PARK lilli 110 POPCORN VVAGON -- ---- DURANT- -AV 305 râ€¢OUTH MILL STREET 0 PK'S INC. P.O. BOX 4775 ASPEN, CO 81612 GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS 418 EAST COOPER AVE. ASPEN, CO 81611 ATTENTION: HISTORICAL PRESERVATION COMMITTEE THIS LETTER WILL AUTHORIZE GIBSON & RENO ARCHITECTS TO REPRESENT PK'S INC. INTEREST IN SUBMITTING ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROPERTY AT 301 SOUTH MILL STREET, ASPEN COLORADO. SINCERELY YOURS, 9Â«4 JOHN J. STANFORD, VICE PRESIDENT Pak'M Services, Inc. RO. Box 187 Basalt, CO 81621 927-8078 May 3, 1993 Mr. Stanford RE: POPCORN WAGON 305 S. MILL Dear Mr. Stanford, The plans that Mr. August Reno had me look at for the trash compactor enclosed should work very wall. There should be enough room for 2-3 yard containers, 3-90 gallon recycling containers, and the grease trap dumpster. There is one addition you should consider and that would be to put a 7' high roof over the dumpater area to hinder the view to the folk. at the Wheeler Opera House. This would also help keep the mhow out of the area and make for easier dumping in the winter time. If you have any qestiona please feel freâ€¢ to give me a call at any time. Thank-You. sincerely ~3 Â»wr .*CORhu /Dâ€¢ncer Boothe, V.P . 11.# I Excellence Â«-f 6,-_uel 0 05. May 10, 1993 Ms. Kim Johnson Pitkin County/City of Aspen Planning Office 130 South Galena Aspen, CO. 81611 Dear Ms. Johnson: This letter will certify that the property located at 305 South Mill, Aspen," 'Colorado; known as the Aspen Commercial Condom- iniums, is owned by the Trust Estate of Robert Barnard, Dr. Wil- liam L. Comcowich, Trustee: a charitable remainder Trust to Stanford University. It is further acknowledged that parcel "A" of said property is leased to PK's Inc., dba. The Popcorn Wagon under that certain Assignment of Lease dated January 1, 1993. Under the terms of said Lease, PK's Inc. has the right to final approval of the Les- sor. Should you need further information, please contact Mr. John J. Stanford,Â·Â·Vice !President, PK's, Inc., P.O, Box 4775, Aspen, Col- orado, 81611, telephone (303) 925-7726. r Sincere , . Ly-*Â»00-6/ Estate of Robert Barnard Dr. William L. Comcowich, Trustee 420 W. Main Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 copy to: August Reno, Gibson & Reno Architects wlc: sa' Aspen Dental Arts Building 420 W. Main Aspen, Colorado 81611 303-925-7730 DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT The project consists of replacing an existing wood trash enclosure fence with a concrete masonry unit trash area enclosure fence with an exterior stucco finish. The size of proposed enclosure will be approximately the same size footprint wise (13'-0" x 12'-6"). The height of the proposed enclosure will be 6'-0". On top of the concrete masonry unit/stucco wall will be a cut sandstone cap. Architectural ornamented steel gates will allow access to the trash enclosure on the North side. '1111111. .litjaijj jint/'20'IN' Nl j}ifli jil .1 1,/lti /111111, 1"""jil'lij'ji|jilitill&,1 lilliffill' ' j l//11 ll/illil/l'/'l j lj /15Â·~l ,1;1,11,1!11/jilill{ PLANTER 44*$*f ff tlY#FDIflliff'llI-tf[ 1f-ill<j IN j//iill'litijit/Ilili, , ilifill, -lit,u-lJill/jit/lli~/~lifilit/{llit.. , -' ?h/jl / 1//ll lillifilil/////ljil//16 .441/F .// hLPTE : REMB, E e><2:. #aDO . reNCH TRA'*4 UN<SLOP EXG. PATIO 3 '}11}11}11}{211 1, '12, /! / \ 2~ 1 i y /441 / TRASH AREA 4 4 Fl*f~/NDÂ«/f \ , 4 141///Wi'fi# A *-N // i //./.7, 1 --- / 1 + 1 1 \42, oÂ·/Â§2< 19"0 cp.,752'L P'76 zk"u,~4 f . 7 F-' 60.-Es' 19' able,fc,- A N~5..41 . CH' 2 E:,4 1 91 PE \ 103 Â· 42 h .7 1 -O 1 EXG. PLANTER ~ _Exe, PLANTEÂ£ 4- \ lei. 01 ICM =114 W.,/1,#-1 7Â£ SYNTiel-t c STL.Cos EASE 6947, NE.1 441=g AtEÂ·al ~ 54-" F~DL>'51->1~ 1 N FiLA-Tl 01-4 EE,94 Rk 9 Cal-08. -TO 25â‚¬1 9â‚¬:LI 59 /4201 i-1-1561- 0 6â‚¬Â»S. Â»1 A.50.-1 Bry L.Â· 1-16212.1 2.Â¢:N-17â€¢,L. FLOAA C VEN:T-l CA U â‚¬- 60 Maile: : ,Al- e,*re .12 il I Pi LL 2*Jo. r 1Â© Â· - ~1. ~1*1 ~;0 ~1. ~ *U W I A H , 1 1 jkt' 11,2 1 1*lt ,- 1 - U N 11'5 1,4/; 5>* - _ li34" 1134 ' 1[*4' -t, DON-rl N U,9 05 Cy 'Eret 104 Li /7 . BEL- ~~-k- ~ -1 :LE)Et> Cy - LNEPGÂ· W 7] C // - .V Sti Et:3/ -- 4 - 1,1 pl PINI,HED, <4 p 1 NTEP. \X /ALL \ 04 V ARE i >Ft,XT'~ NG- d=F 19 --.-- - -b - 62(44.:t...IC:, . 6 GATE DETAIL -94" : 1 L ou \ 4, iqj 5.-1 .C i \1 1 \ 1 '4 5.6 7. J 6 -41,4 11_ L - 6 1 4 m E 1 -i p .7 3 -1 4 3 111 7 l .. AR ty y 1.- 44 2 W 9 14Â¢ 9 -\,3 1 f , Uj 1- I i q i Â·Â· 1 & d . i y...\\ . 1 . 1 ~ 2 1 ..Â·_21 -2-1-,_1_n._1_ 10J 413x-lx_u-_u~_3./12&11121_6111~121-12iff>1. 1. I \ \ - , Â«9.61Â»Â» 4100<43<~iftti~~FRE-- 7-3 19 ...t I h 07 - 1/ 4 1 4 0 .3 10\ \F Â¥ 3 0 0 5 -*. ~ ,- ~ 'A 1â‚¬ 4 41Â£41/6 M -74 4 1 Â·1 -~ bb 1- -- 1 i k Z .- ..2. 6 \.-Iifu 4 .0 Â« 114 9% 3 3 2 w 3 4 7 ~43 L (1 7 ,W 6 2 49 31 b 1 4 ; 4 16 2 6 n 1- R lu ' I 9 OFÂ£122 1 3 * 7 111 ?{246 34 4. 2- 1. - 0 - 1 2 e 5 9-* CRN 01 R 3 -j K f 9 A 2 .. k 70(&2 3 . 8 ki 1 &5 612 8 E =4 *9 * p 4 l . 4-4 hi -TER. 1 <Dk /~79*--; ~A h NOUSES 110 1 / =,1-91/ t GAI 4/NnierIC SÂ«LI SCO (71 / f.ur gTZÂ»48 ,$47.-- \\ h 1.-/ V 7.-0.4 X 1 -1 - 5 ='--4111 -Â·4 R/'334 t i 11 E nt---6 10 51â‚¬EL * ' . sl ~ ~ . PF'E Plu.Ep w/(*0. 64, 452 6.3,- .1 / - . 1 .C..J, 8 - 0. '1 . 1. - 4 1.\ 1 1 K 1 --- - 4 4+9>es p Fla 5 -, 1 4 6<PH C. ~C NORTH ELEVATION~ ~ WEST Et.EVATION D - 05;0 k e 04-P= 11Â£21 \/4' m 1 -O" ~ QMÂ»Emc- <5*r.Xjl/0 - - 631 <PrcuE LAF 1 i 0.- . 1 1 . .1 . I-- j. : r=.3. - >1 i , 1 - - 4 SOUTH ELEVATION 5 EAST ELEVATION 'r-- ~ .*I + 1- A.â€¢'ew-''u,w b -orÂ·â„¢Â·'Â·n'lÂ· . c~~ >ph-/_._7Â». -_re . .r Â·rtâ€¢Mâ€¢eÂ· 1 134859 (1) m m lo mm 0 0 011 al (A mok 1 1 11,1 1 ill lili lilli j 1 1 - Illrifil/l/ilillill//llirlil//l1/j1iilt/t/lilvlillill//li/fllil///i /1/l/il//li//liil//Ii:i/jitin /uNNN i /~l#lilli1 /f/ ijjl'' "jill//tII - 111 M [9 m 00 V Mro 1~11!lill'llill' hliblib lili I ; ~~ jj111#*/1~ 111/ 1/1~// 19////I/lil i~l/lil ji i///ilii//ji//i j/li' ii/j //il lji/ ilililill /// ll/lhill i-lfj//1-111l 1/U ;/ iIl ~~ I/jj 2 lid 0 > Ia 0 GO . /1 > \~10 un/--r,/U,- 77///777-/./ / 5J /// \t-% W Illindi liji//illl /lfill/ //j ll/l ji/%U't/l//i/// hj.- r GAI 7 EXG.PLAN-fER (D m l Ill liii]; U-Ki-7 X 1, {\ 1-1 A i. - E [.1 #'-i _ LJL i_.t ' Â·Â·- c- --FfEE Flu-ED \.. w/ Â»40. 64. | =-r --Â» p .. r C.J, 1 \\ .1. / . e. ...1 2 3 - LU 04, 4 1 , & E+lpet> 199Â£ 10000 g >W J 1 //0 1 OU4IO W 300,7 1 '4 dOW C. hup-rE: Hap[A/te e>,A Nasc) f NORTH ELEVATION ~VVEST ELEVATION .. T>ENCH TPA'5SH IBH,SWFUkE: 046 14:91 1/+1= 1 Lott ' EXG. PATIO 1 ill' m . /A V. //Â» A J ./1//r>\ i\\ Z AM"/17t-a f . 4 Yo////774//l A J / j ~ 5+SÂ»Emc- 9,uc.60 ~\\ 4 TRASH AREA /--\- i. 0.-rÂ¥ 9'reâ€¢AE C,'+~ ~~ \ 4 X 41- C *71-0 . , 1 1 ... 1 1 . . . 1 , 1 , 0 . :N 111 X2105**56 / - 4%305~>tkix / . a r .. . 1... X.44Â«//IÂ¥17,4447 ~ , ------ ----- ' 421 0 91Â·meL Ptâ‚¬ 4:W,AN f C.:. \5.J.----> ' Â·'/P!14Â£:> 1.04eJe~erE 4) r f . - > , (*/ 1 a.. St pe 1 /71 t- k , 01 3, f. . EXG. PLANTER Exe. PLANTER- + ~ SOUTH ELE~ATION 5 EAST ELEVATIO- . 449 11-0, - / i i ... -- e . f 1 { 0 9 tLOT 2%1DNE C>(7(SANt>EltNE3 111 1'.2 Idet' i:'B I 4 53,/N-THE:TIC STLCOS A/ER , c Â¥95/f~*E CD'f& BEÂ·INFL,FiAKLE ME=Â·91+ 94*FED#On>Rive- -5204 1 iviA:LA-no,4 EÂ»*RE .Ack,e;IVE. 2~~I th.11Â·~9\0,4 9.1 ce tr 4 4 COUDI* 772 tÂ£ SEL.12Â¢TEC> ~ -Â®*Fl Â»KE,4 -rn .g eÂ»/ AÂ«2:1.1 iTE<=~r 4 ./. ' FÂ»r,1Â£09 w~' aro>Cy r-Â«TI N- I &Â»1623 -TO A LEI 0 (=wes. MAX)*4*y L~.Il-9 -~~ 9~ tyw61-th*-Â£-1-. NI LINE OF EXG. CURS ~ ~ ~ < 1-101â€¢424*4.3.4- B-Â·IG CE !4'6.0. --44$66""IN'*IDL VEr<rt CA l.lp' ~ Flare .- .At <S-,Â·*re: a,Â»124 5-0 F j IiI 4 - Fl LL 2*40. MA964.4 Ry b.// 1&< tt t 12 1 l- I ~11 1 1140' UN 175 *6*422-1- + . /4 ~ ~ 7,-af&-do-tfli~-jfeiM'llf.v- 1159Â· L, i R: 1Â·4#4 REINF. r>*05 -/1 MYMAN :1 1*+,1 1[34' 11 1[4. 1[$*0. '1/ Ty OON-tlNUOU~Â·l,-FI .3Â¢>l<fj ,/0~2'5'U 2111 , SITE PLAN (v'Erirric:>4 U.>9 / 3Â» f/5 j , 0~ 1620 -tute iâ€¢Bal %.M- . ~*-0 U, A / 00 FMMIE. W/ L.ELCEP /r- i - 0 1- 0 iNk' 4 2 1.1 1-TEREÂ·D .A'}RNE,3, ' $ 0 ~*(-IHPi MINISHEC>~ ' / , - 94 4 331 FRIHED * It~thtner:/Ii 24 *10021 FrEEL ~ ~ / REUPED, câ€ž,a-1,12, FINISÂ·HED <c =p \ El / Z0 FR\NI E P * r>Â£11 NTEP. E f :0 1 V#" sMÂ£:er rl.4-re --i- -> 1 . 11 4 -7/ 1 9-reEL jj 0 ]M M57!E : 9.J FfÂ»' All- - f/ >/'~ N Ec:; 8*64 Rl \ HAR;2>4Â«E 1 It/f i. -25 SUP'P;17,Â·er . 4 - : gi 11 7--IZZED.2->I . ._ . .. 1 COUR. 1 L 0640â€¢Â·1<9, \ L I j 1 o Ba ET=. Xi a M 4 ~ GATE DETAIL \ -9411: 1'01 .1 0 . .0 7 22.0 e> . SHEET NO: -tELE: rt.-*r= 10' 14 x 10"tz, F*uiffEC; 0Â»46. -'TH,=A<ENEP 61-AP W/S 4+ D .0 6 CÂ«trl N \01.492/ A/EIQ G 'Idkyvll,Â¥31--ED' ,./ 4'tR4E 1 0 2 7 SECTION /4-"= c L on anNE]AV Eladoc)0 -1-SM] 03>103 00480-100 'NadSV atinSO,ONSI .. .. '~ -Â«\ \ ~~26021 / fRE Historic Preservation Committee >A ~.2>. Â· ' 44â‚¬9 Minutes of May 26, 1993 POPCORN WAGON - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy: The proposal is to replace an existing wood fence with a more substantial concrete/masonry stucco wall. My recommendations were that it doesn't represent a substantial change in size and does represent an improvement in the materials. I recommended that the architect consider a cover and also recommend approval. Scott Smith: I am representing the Popcorn Wagon and we desire an approval to replace the existing wooden trash enclosure with a concrete block structure. As a slight alternation from that the applicant would like to do and feels it is more in keeping with the structures on the site would be keep the new fence enclosure as a ~ painted concrete structure to match the existing building that it sits next too. The new structure would go exactly where the wooden fence is now in the same footprint area. Martha: In this particular situation is this a temporary use or structure or the Popcorn Wagon permanently fixed. Kathy: They had a conditional use approval and is permanent. Joe: What kind of lid is proposed. E.M. - Scott Smith: We might be over FAR so we are proposing to leave it the way it is right now, open. Bill: Is the committee agreeable to the change of material that is presented to me? Roger: Why do they need this change? Scott Smith: There were two main concerns, one because of the use of the fence for trash enclosures we were concerned that the stucco would not hold up very well and visually detract from that area. The other condition is that we would match the concrete block to the building behind it more closely than introducing another material in that one little area. Roger: Why not simply rebuild the wooden structure as it would not be permanent. Linda: The owners are looking to be able to hose down the area and clean it out after the trash is removed. It is used by Su Casa, L'Opera and people who do not have a real concern. Roger: This trash enclosure is actually for the building which is called the Wheeler Square. 3 -- Historic Preservation Committee Minutes of May 26, 1993 Joe: The building is owned by the trust and state of Barnard. Linda: The trash is used by other people. Roger: So the popcorn wagon is on a private lot. Linda: Yes. Jake: I would rather see a restudy to find a material that is compatible and durable, like brick to match L'Opera. Scott Smith: The front of the structure is a metal gate. Roger: We have a cement block building that is non-compatible with that block in this part of town. If we add another cement bumper we are adding to that non-compatibility. We are adding a kind of permanent structure. There is a solution, you put a railing around the area so when the truck slams the dumpster it hits the steel and doesn't put a hole in the block or the stucco or the wood. I would go back to the wood and clean it up and paint it and put a metal railing around the interior and put a substantial frame on to hold the doors. 01.3 Scott Smith: We would like to have some kind of concrete wall. Bill: You could side the outside of the concrete wall in wood to match the entire block. Jake: It needs to be a nice element as the public walks past. Jack Stanford: We are trying to clean the entire area up. The wagon was built in 1913 and we are trying to make the rest of the area match. It also doesn't meet health code. We have talked with the people from the Wheeler Opera House and they want to see something done because as you are on the second floor looking across it is a real eye sore for the opera house. The trash dumpsters are picked up and put outside on the sidewalk and then picked up and that is not conducive. We are trying to share all the costs for everyone to use. It is on our property, however we do not use it and have our own dumpster area. We are trying to do this the least expensively as no one wants to pay for it. If it is brick I doubt if I could get four restaurants and eight tenants to agree to it. Jake: What they are proposing would be better than what they have. It is six feet high. MOTION: Jake made the motion to approve the minor development of the trash enclosure as presented with the change that the exterior 4 r-Â· 3 Historic Preservation Committee 7 Minutes of May 26, 1993 would be a split face concrete block color in a sandstone subject to the approval of a monitor and Staff. Also that the applicant consider the interior rail; second by Linda. All in favor, motion carries. Linda is the monitor. Kathy: The CCLC is very concerned about that area and the cracked cement. 716 W. FRANCIS - BELLINA RESIDENCE - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Amy: The applicant is proposing an ornamental fence for along the property line. MOTION: Roger made the motion to approve the minor development as proposed for 716 W. Francis finding that the fence meets all the standards; second by Jake. All in favor, motion carries. PIONEER PARK ASPEN HISTORIC TRUST FENCE Joe and Les stepped down. Amy: Les, myself and the artist who is doing the design reviewed the site. There is a stone wall and the iron fence sits on top of that. We are trying to negotiate on the other wall so we felt the need for the six foot high fence which the applicant is requesting. Bill: Part of the condition of the sale was a six foot high fence between their property and the park. Les: This is getting complicated, the owner thought they had a fence coming from the house the whole way down but when onsite we discovered that they did not have one and there was a 30 foot section that they did not have a permit for. They are going to come out with the six foot which I do not remember approving. I do not remember approving anything on the east side based on the fact that we didn't give them the deck because we didn't want to see it from the street. Bill: There is a sketch included in the application. Les: My feeling is that we approved the west side and Roxanne signed off. Amy: I do not feel that was the case, the fence was shown on the drawing and maybe it got overlooked. They also have a building permit. 5