The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutLand Use Case.719 W Main St.HPC025-997 /9 0 04Â·0- 5 ~ ~ 2735-124-46-801 HPC025-99 ~ - 7th and Main affordable Housing - Final HPC B. , Rb K l-Â«40 6, 1 202,2 CASE NI-JMBER HPC025-99 PARCEL ID # 2735-124-46801 CASE NAME Seventh and Main Street Afordable Housina Proiect PROJECT ADDRESS Seventh and Main Street PLANNER Amv Guthrie CASE TYPE HPC Review of Affordable Housina OWNER/APPLICANT Citv of Asgen REPRESENTATIVE Bob Nevins Aspen/Pitkin Countv Housina Authoritv DATE OF FINAL ACTION 3/8/00 CITY COUNCIL ACTION PZ ACTION HPC Reso. #12-2000 ADMIN ACTION AD proved BOA ACTION DATE CLOSED 9/17/01 BY J. Lindt PARCEL ID: |2735-124-46801 --BATE RCVE [8/31/99 #COFIESTI CASE N-6| HPC-025 CASE NAME:~Seventh and Main Street Afordable Housing Project PLNR:~Amy Guthrie ~~ ' PROJ ADDR:|Seventh and Main Street CASE TYP:|HPC Review of Affordable Housing STEPS:~ OWN/APP: City of Aspen ADR~130 S. Galena C/S/Z:~Aspen/CO/81611 PHN:| REP:~Bob Nevins Aspen/Pitkin Co ADR:~ C/S/Z:IAspen/CO/81611 PHN1920-5050 FEES DUE:~0 FEES RCVD]O STAT: ~ REFERRALS| REF:| BY] - DUE:| MTG DATE REV BODY PH NOTICED Â· I /- . w..j , . | DATE OF FINAL ACT~Mil 3/3/>EP CITY COUNCIL: REMARKS| PZ: kiluc 'Reso.*)2--CO BOA: CLOSED:|**yo) BY: | cr-- LS Udf- DRAC: PLAT SUBMITD: | PLAT (BK,PG):| ADMIN: Ajolbrouwa 555 North Mill Street Aspen, CO 81611 Phone: 970.920.9428 RECE!VED S T UDI O B Fax: 970.920.7822 architects SER 1 9 5 - - 1 . ASPEN i PITKIN CQMMUNID' DEVELOPMENI Memo Project: 7th & Main Date: 12 September 2000 To: Amy Guthrie From: Gilbert Sanchez CC: Lee Novak Re: Revised Roof & Exterior at Third Floor Amy: We are requesting approval of a modest revision to the roof and exterior elevations at the third floor of the corner building at 7th & Main. This revision is illustrated in sketches CSK -4A, B&C attached. We believe this revision is necessary for the followin g reasons: 1. Framing and insulation requirements for the sloped roof above the enclosed living space have resulted in ceiling heights that are extremely low and do not conform to the UBC. The extension of the flat roof over this area permits us to adequately insulate the roof and obtain complying ceiling heights. 2. The Contractor is employing a prefabricated panel system for the walls in order to control the cost of this affordable housing project and to meet an ambitious schedule. The structural requirements of this system have resulted in unusually low window heights in the affected area. The extension of the flat roof permits us to provide these windows at a more reasonable height. 3. The revision requested does not exceed the allowable roof height for the property. This adjustment does not significantly impact the appearance and character of the project. It is consistent with the design intent while addressing important technical and code issues. Please call Scott Lindenau or me if you would like to discuss this in further detail. Thanks for your assistance. Gilbert 6/ D 9 OO -- 4-i' 2 0 6-3 /,4 1 4Cza Clo:=0 1 RIDGE ru 1 CO I ,-3 1â€žÂ»[ 44>, 1 -449. hil- 73;59 - --I- .-- -Ill- 5-XEJ \\ l\\ rn I t=j CD- 1 1 ~--7.-\ ---____JI *2306 \ 1 1 M en 1 1 1 'gz> 1/ 33<2 EN~, r-3-/-3 f ' 1 7 c-Â»3 1 1 / 50 Â¤0 \ 1 1 EP 2-' <-Dtz:j _J I Pt= ) r - L__ 50 Ot" 1\ 1 o E2 / 1 /1 t- ,-- NE@ =i.E= Em Pcl 1 F.3 V ~tkrU FT 1/8"/FT 401 ) 2Â¤ 50 0 Pc, 0 - 9 0 0 = 8 8 C./21---.- "23 11 1 \11 - - 1/ .\ 1 f I . ---- No--115: /2#FAC- 70 /200F- PCAN SM#%7 4 9-Â· 7 TITLE 1*&060 Pe,P PEW f 560 N G SHEET NUMBER PROJECT 7TH & MAIN 0914 - 44 DRAWING DATE 9.11Â·60 Sri UllÂ°OB DUWING SCALE ~ / r c hit ec t $ a C 2000 studio b architects p.c, oil rights reserved 555 n. milli street aspen co 881611 tel 970.920.9428 fox 970 920 7822 emcil sludiobÂ©sopris.no: T/ROOF rÂ·k \ "Illk TI R.0. 511 UL 03 - - =0 HEAW TIMBER COLUMN STAINED WOOD STRUTS 1 01 - l . 4 - CEMENTITOUS \A ...1-Â£= PANELS Â· 0 T/PLYWOOD 1 MD. WOOD CORNICE L BEAM L COLUMNS 0 ~AINED WOOD SIDING ~ ~ TO THE WEATHER El 6" PTD. CORNER BOARDS CTYPICAL) T/PLYWOOD SECOND FLOOR 1 0 CORRUGATED FIBERGLASS ?t GLAZING MINING W/STEEL FRAME 52 4 E \ 4 ' 4 4 e \B Â® ; PTD, WOOD WAINSCOT r- COMMERCIAL SPACE , METAL FLASHING T/PLYWOOD 1 1 1 -ER .%9-921---9 1 3 ' ---1- -8-h- 7- 7 1 1 u'spdosÂ©qoipnis 1!ou,a ZZRL'026'0Â£6 *O1 9Zk6'016'OLE 131 ll919 00 uadio 13@45 11]1UJ U 999 p/AJIS@J swbt.1 110 3.d stoe)!43,0 q 0'pnjs 0002 0 !9011.-In#le Ht#â€¢19 01 NiEWAN 133HS 5 No75/A-2/ =' 311ll NIVIN 9 HU D3[0Wd 31V0 9NIMVED 3105 DNIMnG 1- ri- ri- 71- ir i r -Ir -it -11 -1 I.JLJL-I _11_t . nu,9 1 T/ROOF -TE lET.-'-I V R,0 - - Pil U HEAVY TIMBER IC=JI- COLUMN -- U 5 - - T/PLYWOOD - 4~ 1 THIRD FLOOR - -9-Ellimp---_.- L U --= 00 1 - - --- Eli 11 0 - -- T/PLYWOOD d 1 SECOND FLOOR P LING -91,1~'331 4, PORCH BEYOND ttal ON WEST LEVATION ,=O--1 ~ IGN w/ HEADER AND DOOR -pm--1 , I - 3- f rr> 0..2 . b & 8 4 -1 T/PLYWOOD 1 MAIN FLOOR RESIDENCE ~-EC fDDi-0" 1 1 4 11 1 t '1 1.------------ 4 ,/. 1 ~ 1 1.____......__ 4 1 1, 11 le- -------- 1 '1 11-------------4 1 E-â‚¬9/ 1 â€ž071--wnlng Hlogs ESWAN 133Hi lau.5!JdOSÂ©CO:Pnls HOLUO 229Â£'026 OLO *(4 961,6 026'026 01 11918 00 uadso 1@ails 'll!W 'U 09 9@AJ@&@J 5146!J liD Â·5'd sloolluD,o q 0!pils 0001 0 311ll D3[Old 3190 9NIAWW0 31Â¥)f DNIMY110 ri- Ti- irir-1,-i DEVELOPMENT ORDER ofthe City of Aspen Community Development Department This Development Order. hereinafter "Order", is hereby issued pursuant to Section 26.304.070, "Development Orders", and Section 26.308.010, "Vested Property Rights", of the City of Aspen Municipal Code. This Order allows development of a site specific development plan pursuant to the provisions of the land use approvals, described herein. The effective date of this Order shall also be the initiation date of a three-year vested property right. The vested property right shall expire on the day after the third anniversary of the effective date of this Order, unless a building permit is approved pursuant to Section 26.304.075, or unless an exemption. extension, reinstatement, or a revocation is issued by City Council pursuant to Section 26.308.010. After Expiration of vested property rights, this Order shall remain in full force and effect. excluding any growth management allotments granted pursuant to Section 26.470. but shall be subj ect to any amendments to the Land Use Code adopted since the effective date of this Order. This Development Order is associated with the property noted below for the site specific development plan as described below. City of Aspen. 130 S. Galena St., Aspen. CO 81611 Property Owner's Name, Mailing Address and telephone number Lots A, B, C, Block 19 of the City and Townsite of Aspen. Parcel ID#2735-124-46-801 Legal Description and Street Address of Subject Property Final HPC Design Approval Written Description of the Site Specific Plan and/or Attachment Describing Plan Historic Preservation Resolution #_12-00.3/8/00 Land Use Approval(s) Received and Dates (Attach Final Ordinances or Resolutions) March 24,2000 Effective Date of Development Order (Same as date of publication of notice of approval.) March 25,2003 Expiration Date of Development Order (The extension. reinstatement, exemption from expiration and revocation may be pursued in accordance with Section 26.308.010 of the City of Aspen Municipal Code.) Issued this 24th day of March, 2000, by the City of Aspen Community 'opment Director. 1= Zoil LA 3Â»- Jwie Ann Woods, Community Development Director PUBLIC NOTICE Of DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL Notice is hereby given to the general public of the approval of a site specific development plan, and the creation of a vested property right pursuant to the Land Use Code of the City of Aspen and Title 24, Article 68, Colorado Revised Statutes, pertaining to the following described property: Lots A, B, C, Block 19 of the City and Townsite of Aspen, by resolution of the Historic Preservation Commission numbered 12, series of 2000. For further information contact Julie Ann Woods, at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Dept. 130 S. Galena St, Aspen, Colorado (970) 920-5090. City of Aspen Account Publish in The Aspen Times on March 24,2000 111'111 lilli 111111 lilli 1111 111111111111111111111111111 442765 04/28/2000 10:~ RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 1 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR FINAL DEVELOPMENT FOR A NEW MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 7â„¢ AND MAIN STREETS, LOTS A, B, AND C, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. /0, SERIES OF 2000 WHEREAS, the applicant, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Studio B Architects, has requested final design approval for the 7tll and Main Street Affordable Housing development, located at Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. The project involves building an 11 unit multi-family structure and neighborhood commercial element; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, i namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H, Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistefit with the character of the neighborhood o f the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and 64 a A n.24 5~50 WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated March 8, 2000, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on March 8, 2000, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of 6 to 0. THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the review standards are met and HPC grants final design approval for the 7tll and Main Affordable Housing development, located at Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the March 8,2000 meeting, as follows 1. The relocated ditch along Main Street shall match the size and character of the existing ditch. 2. The Housing Authority shall place a covenant on the project stating that the ditches may not be landscaped. i . The paint scheme for the project shall be approved by HPC in perpetuity. . HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 5. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 6. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Dfficer prior to applying for the building permit. 7. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 8. A detail of the corrugated fiberglass canopy must be reviewed and approved by staff and monitor. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of March, 2000. Approved as to Form: 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 442765 04/28/2000 10:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI 2 of 3 R 15.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO 1 David Noefer, Assistant Citlr Attorney 41 W Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION j \ SJ~ na Reid, Chair ATTEST: 4-Â«-311 Kathy StricklAnd, Chief Deputy Clerk 1111111111111'lili lilli "11111111111111111 lilli 1111 lili 1 442765 04/28/2000 10:24A RESOLUTI DAVIS SILVI ~ 3 of 3 R 15.00 0 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO ASPEN HISTO PRESERVATION COMMIS )N MINUTES OF, MARCH 8,2000 Chairperson Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Members in attendance were Mary Hirsch, Susan Dodington, Gilbert Sanchez and Lisa Markalunas. Jeffrey Halferty was seated at 5:05 and Heidi Freidland was seated at 5:20 p.m. Staff in attendance were Historic Preservation Officer, Amy Guthrie; Nick Lelack, Planner and Deputy Clerk Jackie Lothian. COMMISSIONER AND STAFF COMMENTS Amy informed the board that the E. Cooper Court project where the Langleys' live have had numerous issues regarding placement o f buildings on the lot and a stop order was issued on the Langleys' because it was not built in the right location. There is a parking space on the site, which is actually for the Hatem house, which is the historic barn. Because they didn't get the barn located in the right site the parking space is not wide ~ enough to meet our standards. They are going to the Board of Adjustment to ask for a variance for the parking space but legally need a recommendation from the HPC to present to the Board of Adjustment. MOTION: Mary made the motion to schedule the Langley parking issue at the next available meeting; second by Susan. All infavor, motion carried. Staff informed the applicant and board that the attorney will determine what type o f notice will be needed for the meeting. DISCLOSURES Gilbert relayed that he will be stepping down for 7th and Main. Amy Guthrie relayed that she will be stepping down for 920 W. Hallam. Heidi disclosed that she will be stepping down on 920 W. Hallam and 110 W. Main. 7th & MAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING FINAL REVIEW Staff recommended approval of the project and felt it is an excellent addition to Main Street. Council has given approval o f the project with the commercial corner store elements. All of the conditions are standard for HPC approval. The project is fairly large for Main Street and an important 1 ASPEN HISTO] PRESERVATION COMMIS~..JN MINUTES OF. MARCH 8,2000 part o f its success lies in the way they use color to break up the proj ect into smaller buildings. In the code the Community Development Director can make a determination on color. Sworn in were Scott Lindeneau, Mark Mahoney and Lee Novak. Lee Novak relayed that the design represents a successful re-interpretation of an historic building and the project appropriately combines traditional and modern materials. Lee presented samples ofproposed materials which include hardy plank. The small trees on 7th street will be transplanted in order to maintain the historic ditch. Openings were added to the lower levels of the carports to break up the wall. A traditional streetlight had to be added and an awning feature was added above the store to break up the commercial massing of the building. In response to the color condition the buildings will not be painted until next February and possibly the residents i and owners might want to change the color. A suggestion would be to require the developer or any future owners to consult with the Historical Preservation officer before changes or modifications to the color could be made. Lee also requested HPC input on the canopy and its design. Lisa asked for clarification regarding the style of the streetlight and it will be a replication o f the historic lights on Main Street. Jeffrey had some concerns about the hearty plank and the corrugated canopy over the store. Chairperson Suzannah Reid opened and closed the public hearing. Lisa felt due to the significance of that corner on Main Street HPC should review future paint schemes. The awning material selection seems a little severe. The maj ority o f the HPC also agreed that future paint schemes should be reviewed by the Historic Preservation Commission. Heidi stated for the record that she is not in favor o f the store. 2 ASPEN HISTOI PRESERVATION COMMIS~_ _)N MINUTES OF. MARCH 8,2000 Susan relayed that the panels look too industrial and Suzannah had concerns about the corrugated fiberglass also. The detailing of the fiberglass needs reviewed, as the fiberglass material needs to look substantial. Amy suggested that the detail of the fiberglass or metal needs to be presented to staff and monitor. MOTION: Jeffrey moved to grant final approval for 7th and Main Affordable Housing presented March 8,2000 with the following conditions: 1) The relocated ditch along Main Street shall match the size and character ofthe existing ditch. 2) The Housing Authority shelli place a covenant on the project stating that the ditches may not be landscaped. 3) The paint scheme for the project shall be approved by the HPC in i perpetuity. 4) HPC sta#and monitor must approve the type and location ofall exterior lighting fixtures. 5) There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 6) The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC stajfas part ofthe building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are know and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 7) All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 8) Details Of the canopy showing the fabrication need to be approved by staff and monitor. Motion second by Heidi. All infavor, motion carried 6-0. Yes vote: Mary, Lisa, Susan, Jeffrey, Suzannah, Heidi 920 W. HALLAM STREET, LOT A FINAL REVIEW - PH Amy and Heidi recused themselves. 3 ASPEN HISTOR_ - PRESERVATION COMMIS~_ - N MINUTES OF, MARCH 8,2000 Nick Lelack and Ron Robertson were sworn in. Nick relayed that staff continues to be in support o f the proj ect. The changes from conceptual are the addition of a master closet above the garage to the north of the master bedroom. The windows to the South and West ofthe master bedroom are larger than approved at Conceptual. The applicant stated that they grew to accommodate the views. The Community Development staff does not believe these windows are in the same style and design of the remainder ofthe house or the project as a whole. The west elevation is a prominent faGade visually and should be compatible with the building. Staff feels that the monitor and staff should approve another design of windows that would be compatible. The living room has been increased by four feet to the North. The Community Development staff requested guidance of the three windows on the south and the fence on the south elevation. The Community Development staff still feels that Lot A and B still overshadow the historic house. Ron Robertson felt that the larger window on the south made the wall more of an open feeling. He presented an alternative design exhibit A5 showing the windows at the same height. He also informed the board that on the Sardy house there is a roof fence and it helps give the project a notion of variety. Susan commented on the porch and possibly it could be moved to the west side to create interest on that elevation. The representative said due to the floor plans that would not be possible. Ron said the plate heights are still the same. Suzannah opened and closed the public hearing. Comments: Je ffrey relayed that he has concerns with the addition of the four feet as the house then starts to compete with the historic house. At one point the historic house was prominent to the street and with the four-foot addition it starts to diminish. The closet is acceptable but the roof needs simplified. 4 ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSiuN MINUTES OF. MARCH 8, 2000 Je ffrey had no problems with the iron fence and he prefers Exhibit A5. He also has concerns with the scallop shingles. Gilbert is also opposed to the four-foot addition. Regarding the second story bedroom window he likes the distinctness. The closet addition results in more massing. Possibly look at a different roof form instead of carrying it all the way over to the closet, possibly a shed roof form that has a lower profile. The windows on the south are acceptable. The iron fence seems a little too much and a simpler detail is recommended. Mary informed the board that at conceptual the two buildings complimented the historic house and now at final they overwhelm it. She also agreed with Gilbert and Jeffrey that she would not support the additional four feet. The master closet addition is not acceptable and if it was desirable it should have been discussed at conceptual. The heavy metal material is not compatible f and the proposed roofline is not appropriate. From conceptual the house has turned into a huge building. Mary stated to Ron that she supported him all the way on conceptual but will not support the numerous revisions. Susan also stated that she is not in favor o f the additional four feet nor the roof. The historic house has to be the most prominent. The closet is huge and the request is inappropriate. The buildings need to be kept smaller in order to give the historic house prominence. Exhibit A5 in the window change is acceptable. The iron fence should be simplified. Lisa agreed primarily with Mary's comments. Both ofthe properties overwhelm the historic house. It gives you the feeling of a "canyon effect" with the little house stuck in the middle. She would not support the project as presented. The window changes are not appropriate for the structure and the massing is too grand. Suzannah agreed with all of the other commissioner' s comments. At conceptual two simple straightforward modest buildings were presented and now there are more roof shapes, numerous different kinds of window openings. The two buildings need to stay as simple as they can be. 5 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 7th and Main Affordable Housing- Final Review DATE: March 8,2000 SUMMARY: The applicants request final HPC approval to construct an 11 unit multi- th family housing development and small commercial space at the corner of 7 and Main Streets. The property is vacant and is located in the Main Street Historic District, on its western edge. HPC granted conceptual approval for the project on October 13, 1999 by a 7-0 vote (minutes attached.) APPLICANT: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (FINAL) No approval for any development in the "LI," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed noor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant 1 to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2),for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: Historically Main Street was a mix of large and small single family homes, commercial structures, and churches. This character is maintained today, with several lodges adding to the diversity of uses and architecture in the neighborhood. The proposal before HPC is for an 11 unit multi-family structure, including a small neighborhood commercial store. The architecture of the project reflects both residential and commercial patterns that were typical of Aspen in the late 1800's. The project is broken down into what appears to be a group of buildings. Part of the structure has gabled roofs drawn from the miner' s cottages in the area, and part of the structure reflects the character of false front buildings like the Mesa Store. The creation of a secondary structure along the alley is also consistent with the historic building patterns in the area. Staff finds the project to be a successful reinterpretation of the Aspen's Victorian era architecture, and a positive addition to the Main Street Historic District. Some of the materials selected for the building are traditional for local structures. such as wood siding and trim, wood porch posts, and corrugated metal roofs. Other materials, such as the standing seam metal roof and the cementitious panels, make the building of it's own time. Based on HPC input, the design now includes a canopy at the commercial space windows along the east and west sides of the carports. and a dormer on the east side of the gable roofed buildings. The size of the panels on the carport have been reduced per HPC' s direction, the ditch will remain in its existing location along 7th Street, and courtyard elevations have been developed. The 7th and Main project has undergone a lengthy review process, including reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Growth Management Commission, and City Council. Many elements of the proposal, such as the number of units to be built, parking spaces to be provided, whether or not there should be commercial space, setbacks, and height, will be decided by these other boards. HPC is not asked to grant any variances for the project. The board should be aware however that the setbacks that are to be provided are less than what would typically be required in the office zone district, and the height of the flat roofed portion of the building is 30 feet rather than the required 25 feet. Note that a flat roofed building is normally restricted to 25 feet, however a gable roofed building could have a roof peak well over 30 feet according to the way that height is measured. Staff has included HPC's suggested condition of approval that there be convenants placed on the project that will prevent landscaping in the irrigation ditches. to preserve their historic character. The relocated ditch on the Main Street side shall match the appearance of the existing ditch. 2 The other condition of approval suggested by staff deals with the paint scheme for the building. HPC does not typically review color, however one thing that makes this project successful is the way that color is used in the renderings. Each of the three buildings has a different main body color, and on the three story piece, wall planes that are set back from the front fagade are painted a light color, which breaks up the mass of the building. Bright trim colors on the ground floor emphasize the entries into the buildings, and other colors accent architectural details such as horizontal beltcourses, and the struts supporting the third story roof. While staff considered trying to word a condition of approval that simply required a similar complexity to the paint scheme. the most effective way to ensure that the buildings will have the character that has been presented is to make that color scheme a condition of approval. Please note on the landscape plan that a spruce tree is indicated for the corner of 7m and Main Streets, but it is being removed from the plan. b. The proposed development renects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The proj ect is located at the western entrance into the historic district, and there are numerous historic structures in the area. No resources are directly next to this site, making it an appropriate location for a structure of the size proposed. Across the street, the Christian Science building is substantial enough to balance the height of the three story building. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the historic significance of any adjacent parcels. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS All residential development in the City of Aspen requiring a building permit from the City of Aspen, except for residential development within the R-15B zone district. shall comply with the residential design standards as specified in by the Administrative Checklist unless otherwise granted a variance by the Design Review Appeal Board as established in Chapter 26.222 or unless granted a variance through some other required C9 review process by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission. Response: The project is in compliance with all of the "Residential Design Standards." ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to final review. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff finds that the development review standards have been met and recommends that HPC grant final approval for 7tll and Main Affordable LIousing, as presented on March 8,2000, with the following conditions: 1. The relocated ditch along Main Street shall match the size and character of the existing ditch. 2. The Housing Authority shall place a covenant on the project stating that the ditches may not be landscaped. 3. The paint scheme for the project shall be as represented in the colored renderings presented to HPC. 4. HPC staff and monitor must approve the type and location of all exterior lighting fixtures. 5. There shall be no deviations from the exterior elevations as approved without first being reviewed and approved by HPC staff and monitor. 6. The applicant shall be required to provide the contractor with copies of the HPC resolution applicable to this project. The contractor must submit a letter addressed to HPC staff as part of the building permit application indicating that all conditions of approval are known and understood and must meet with the Historic Preservation Officer prior to applying for the building permit. 7. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. Exhibits: Resolution No. , Series of 2000 A. Staff memo dated March 8,2000. B. Minutes from conceptual approval. C. Application. 4 %4 13-) MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director (JAAA. Av- v - Joyce Ohlson. Deputy Planning Director /7 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 701 and Main Affordable Housing- Conceptual review (continued from September 85 1999) DATE: October 13,1999 SUMMARY: The applicants request HPC approval to construct an 11 unit multi-fumily housing development and small commercial space at the corner of 7th and Main Streets. The property is vacant and is located in the Main Street Historic District, on its western edge. HPC held a public hearing on the project on September 8th and continued the review primarily with concerns about the character of the streetfacing elevations. (Other issues such as parking and storage were discussed, but will be decided by the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council.) The applicant has submitted revised north and west elevations for HPC review. APPLICANT: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H." Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all ofthe following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the 1 Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. Response: Historically, Main Street was a mix of large and small single family homes, commercial structures. and churches. This character is maintained today. with several lodges adding to the diversity of uses and architecture in the neighborhood. The proposal before HPC is for an 11 unit multi-family structure, including a small neighborhood commercial store. The architecture of the project reflects both residential and commercial patterns that were typical of Aspen in the late 1800's. The project is broken down into what appears to be a group of buildings. Part of the structure has gabled roofs drawn from the miner' s cottages in the area. and part of the structure reflects the character of false front buildings like the Mesa Store. The creation of a secondary structure along the alley is also consistent with the historic building patterns in the area. Staff finds the project to be a successful reinterpretation of the Aspen vernacular architecture, and a positive addition to the Main Street Historic District. Some of the materials selected for the building are traditional for local structures. such as wood siding and trim, wood porch posts. and corrugated metal roofs. Other materials. such as the standing seam metal roof and the cementitious panels, make the building of it's own time. (Please note that the panels are to be dyed to tie into the color scheme of the project and will not be gray.) The revised elevations show additional detailing on the north and west fagade, as requested by HPC. Staff finds the changes have improved the building's compatibility with the district. The courtyard elevations of the buildings are not included in the packet and have not been fully developed at this time. The architects have represented however that they will be consistent with the materials and detailing of the public facades. These elevations must be presented for final review. The project requires a lengthy review process, including reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Growth Management Commission. and City Council. Many elements of the project. such as the number of units to be built, parking spaces to be provided, whether or not there should be commercial space, setbacks. and height. will be decided by these other boards. HPC is not asked to grant any variances for the project. The board should be aware however that the setbacks that are to be provided are less than what would typically be required in the office zone district, and the height of the flat roofed portion of the building is 30 feet rather than the required 25 feet. Note that a flat roofed building is normally 2 restricted to 25 feet however a gable roofed building could have a roof peak well over 30 feet according to the way that height is measured. As noted above. the neighborhood commercial use is not within the HPC' s purview, and the HPC is generally not concerned with the use of a building. However, the board should consider the roots of historic preservation in the basic concept of maintaining livable communities and offer support for the idea. The commercial space is proposed to be a place for social interaction. There are numerous people living full time in the surrounding area (and there are expected to be more with the redevelopment of the Bavarian. the Forest Service site. and proposed development on the Gramiger property) and the store will not only provide a service, but also be a gathering place. Staffs only concern with the proposed project, as discussed on September 88, is with the landscape plan, which the applicant is restudying. There are no existing trees on the site. The proposed landscape plan, which is only schematic at this point, shows all of the open space being planted or otherwise treated with a grid pattern, which staff finds is not consistent with the character of adjacent historic sites. Similarly, staff is concerned with the treatment of the historic ditch. which is in the City owned right-of-way along the length of this block. The project will be required to provide some sidewalks. which will make the area pedestrian friendly and also allow for a proposed transit stop in the future. However. the sidewalk should be designed in a way that avoids a relocation of the historic ditch if possible, and meanders around the trees. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The project is located at the western entrance into the historic district, and there are numerous historic structures in the area. No resources are directly next to this site, making it an appropriate location for a structure of the size proposed. Across the street. the Christian Science building is substantial enough to balance the height of the three story building. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the historic significance of any adjacent parcels. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. J Response: The project does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS All residential development in the City of Aspen requiring a building permit from the City of Aspen. except for residential development within the R-15B zone district, shall comply with the residential design standards as specified in by the Administrative Checklist unless otherwise granted a variance by the Design Review Appeal Board as established in Chapter 26.222 or unless granted a variance through some other required review process by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission. Response: The project is in compliance with all of the "Residential Design Standards." ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to final review. , â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that HPC grant conceptual approval for 7th and Main Affordable Housing, as presented on October 13, 1999, with the following conditions: 1. Complete the courtyard elevations of the buildings for final review. 2. HPC should consider the roots of historic preservation in the basic concept of maintaining livable communities and offer support for the idea of the neighborhood commercial space. 3. While outdoor seating will be desired for the commercial space, and some screening for privacy is needed for the street facing units, staff recommends that trees and hardscape elements be minimized along the street facades in favor of more grass. 4. The sidewalk along Main Street should be designed in a way that avoids a relocation of the historic ditch if possible, and meanders around the trees. 5. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval. unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 4 J -â€¢i , . i,~ W.,14. ==M ? .."'41 - /1 Â¥ 1 li 1 1 *. ... I 1 11 lilli % lilli] 1 il li ~ JIll , 4 -1> 1111312-!.G~ , Â£. ; '1!N 'Wl-- ' 3 L --- --- ----- LYL ~ 1 1 1 - 1 - -1 -2 M $. 1 11 J / . --IEOEIN 1 -2[1 4/ge "li m-1 'i.ElffEL.~ ~m8' - Â¢ f - 42*f -3.1: i 11=PIJ 4124.1 1 * 2 - - 1 1~ 111111 ~111 li l i [ J li li 11'K , 1 ~ a~ 1 I t -1--1 Aa 7-71-11 ' 7/9 7 Â· Â· 5...11 It 7th and main AH Ischematic design l 27july 1999 STUDIO 1 elevations architects * AUÂ¥0/*9 \A>Â¢4\K 1 01) ''4. /0 4 11 /1 1 .:1 1 i. 1 1...4 4 . 1, Â»t E 1 1 E - ~ l-~= . 1 iTFI - --f97f~ J 1 :l_ullâ€¢ 1. 1 11.n~i 1 /~ 1 .-2 1 . I - :1 1 4 14 /rtr, 1 .4 Z.1 .7 1 . 1 4, 4 h 11 -r-l -1./1 f , 1114- 4.41 1 -/ 2/ . *-J / - ~ 4. ' 7 - 7-UNil IL 11 1,1% - 7th and main AH Ischematic design I 27 july 1999 STUDIO _1_ elevations archite C 15 ASPEN HISTOR PRESERVATION COMMISL'- N MINUTES OF. OCTOBER 13, 1999 Chairperson Suzannah Reid called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. Members in attendance were Roger Moyer, Susan Dodington, Lisa Markalunas, Jeffrey Halferty, Heidi Friedland, Mary Hirsch and Christie Kienast. Excused was Maureen Poschman. Staff in attendance were Assistant City Attorney, David Hoefer; Historic Preservation Officer, Amy Guthrie and ChiefDeputy City Clerk, Kathy Strickland. MOTION: Suzannah moved to approve the minutes of July 28th, August 25th and Sept. 22,nd; second by Susan. All infavor, motion carried. The Board nominated Suzannah Reid as Chair and Roger as Vice-chair. 135 W. HOPK[INS AVE. - LANDMARK DESIGNATION - PUBLIC HEARING - CONCEPTUAL MOTION: Christie moved to continue the public hearing on 135 W. Hopkins Ave. to October 27, 1999; second by Heidi. All in favor, motion carried. Yes vote: Roger, Suzannah, Je#rey, Susan, Heidi, Lisa, Christie. 7â„¢ & MAIN STREET AFFORDABLE HOUSING -CONCEPTUAL Amy informed the board that the architects did try to address the concerns o f the architectural character of the streets fagades of the buildings. The court.yard elevations need submitted and staff supports neighborhood commercial space. The landscape plan also needs reviewed but can wait till final as well as the irrigation ditch. Sworn in were Lee Novak, Mark Mahoney, Scott Lindeneau. Lee addressed the board and the project is 100% affordable housing with a small neighborhood commercial and 10 one bedroom and one two bedroom on the third floor. Mark presented the landscape plan which is a random pattern and informal. The landscaping on the Main Street side has been downsized. In the center 1 -5*.lj l \O l A- S ASPEN HISTORI RESERVATION COMMISS MINUTES OF, OCTOBER 13. 1999 there is a lot of privacy shrubbery. Along the carport there are four foot high shrubs. Regarding the ditch a sidewalk will have to be provided. They are proposing a similar solution to what exists further down Main Street which has a small snow dump, a four foot sidewalk and the ditch along side of it. The snow dump and sidewalk are a city requirement. The ditch provides a nice transition between public and private sectors. It would be moved two feet to the east. Hardy plank is the proposed material which is a "cementicious" panel. It can be painted. Board and batten is in the gables and a dormer has been added on the east side of the gabled buildings in order to break it up. The west elevation has been softened up. CLARIFICATIONS Christie inquired about the distances from the development to the sidewalk on Main Street. The housing is set back three or four feet from the sidewalk. Lee said they are trying to preserve some of the distance from the sidewalk to the living room because o f the potential transit stops and possibly light rail. The material selected has durability for the homeowner. Lisa asked if the same constraints regarding the ditch exist on 7th Street, and they do. When you replicate a ditch they look different than the way they are naturally. Lee said it is not the goal to have numerous stones and flowers in the ditch. At final review if the HPC wants covenants regarding the ditch that can be explored. Jeffrey suggested restudy o f the stair. Some of the buildings have slab on grade and could a basement be dug? Lee said it was $50,000 to $60,000 cheaper to just do an insulated slab. There is a 60 to 100 square foot storage unit Heidi asked if windows could be added to the east elevations to break up the wall. Lee said on the car port level a window could be added as it would add light to that space. 2 ASPEN HISTORI RESERVATION COMMISS] MINUTES OF. OCTOBER 13. 1999 Chairperson opened the public hearing. Roger felt that the canopy Exhibit I would be the best design for the corner store. On the hardy plank Roger suggested a paint or cement stain finish. The landscape plan, Exhibit IV should include the ditch. The dormer on the East Side is a good addition. Jeffrey felt that the hardy plank panels seemed too large and possibly the size could be adjusted on the alley building. Susan felt that the hardy plank seemed too industrial. She also agreed with Heidi about the addition of the window in the carports. The majority of the board felt that the ditch locations should not be retained if possible but due to code requirements if they have to be moved they should be simple and true to the historic ditches that exist. Lisa said the hardy plank is a little industrial. Christie felt the commercial space was appropriate. Possibly incorporate a more traditional double hung window. Restudy bringing the buildings back further than four feet from the sidewalk on the Main Street side. Suzannah supports the commercial space and the awning is inevitable for the retail space. She feels the commercial space will be an asset to the community. The relocation of the ditch is acceptable but some control should be placed on what can be filled in etc. The hardy plank on the alley building is appropriate. Lee responded and said they will look into the hardy plank and possibly have a piece painted for final. The ditch will be addressed. Lee said he felt it important to preserve the courtyard space rather than pushing the buildings back further from Main Street. MOTION: Roger moved that HPC grant conceptual approval for 78 and Main affordable housing as presented Oct. 13, 1999 in two parts: 3 ASPEN HISTOR PRESERVATION COMMIS: h MINUTES OF, OCTOBER 13. 1999 Part I - That the HPC encourage the city to support the idea of the + neighborhood commercial space. Part II 1) That the landscape plan as submitted be approved. 2) Study the possibility of a covenant on how the ditch is landscaped over time. 3) All representation made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation Commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. 4) That the west detail is submitted showing the trim detail and that the canopy is included. 5) That the hardy plank panels are coated in same manner with a color. 6) Study the west and east elevation of the car port buildings to add window or windows as presented. 7) Dormer on the east side is included at final. 8) Finding that the project meets allfour of the development review standards. Motion second by Jejfrey. Clarification: The outdoor seating is included in the landscape plan. The relocation of the ditch in the plan is also accepted. Yes vote: Roger, Suzannah, Je#rey, Susan, Heidi, Lisa, Christie 205 S. MILL STREET - MINOR DEVELOPMENT Jeffrey recused himself. Amy relayed that the application is for new cell phone antennas on top of the building where Eddie Bauer is. They will be visible and possible screening should be recommended. Staff recommends that the antennas be painted to blend. MOTION: Roger moved to approve the changes for the cellular facility at 205 S. Mill Street with the following conditions: 4 Proposed Development for property located on the corner of 7th Street and Main St.: 1. 12 Employee housing Units 2. only 9 onsite parking spaces 3. Commercial development (located on corner of 7th and Main) proposed mini- market. 4. Applying for a variance for 2 feet higher in height of structure. Concerns regarding this development: 1. Parking is already tight in the neighborhood. The next door office building has an. average of 8 cars parking on the proposed empty lot. People already often park in the alley causing difficulties for us getting out of our assigned carports and parking spaces. I think that at the least every unit should have 1 parking space on site because most units will probably have owners with 2 cars not just one. 2. As I mentioned above, parking is already a problem. I do not want a commercial space proposed as a mini-mart causing more parking problems and noise. 3. There needs to be a large enough trash and recyclable area. I do not want their owners coming over and using West Hopkins employee housing's trash area when their trash and recyclable containers are full. 4. I am against giving the proposed development a variance for height restriction of 2 extra feet. They accidentally built the West Hopkins employee housing 2 feet too high and were forced to comply, so the builders cut off two feet from the top of the ridgeline. Our views and privacy will be threatened already with ally development. 5. Hours should be limited for construction because of noise (like 9AM to 5PM Mon.-Fri. only). Alley needs to be kept open and clear and unblocked. I need to be able to get in and out of my carport easily. 6. I would like to see them go back to the other proposal of 9 units with 9 parking spaces and no commercial space. 7. Also, with the increase of traffic on this block and alleyway. I would like for the alleyway to be permanently paved. Ifyou have some of these same concerns and/or other concerns, please come to all the public meetings. It really does make a difference. This is our chance to let the City of Aspen know how you feel; it is too late to complain after everything has been passed. The first meeting will be with the HPC on September 8, 1999 at 5 PM in the basement of City Hall. There will also be public meeting with the Planning and Zoning Commission. You can call 920-5090 for times. If you have any questions or concerns you wish to share with me, please let me know. Thank you. Tonya Terry-Unit 744 Community Development Department 130 South Galena, 3rd Floor -*20 973rL=&,ox, --=-3 â€¢ i, CO 81611 RECEIVED 3 AUG 2 6 1999 1 3~-31:2%1 Z 0 7 3 ?21: ASPEN / PITKIN U.S. POS 1â„¢nuM' JNITV DEVELOPMEN -.- 77 I END TERRY 2=444 720 WEST HOPKINS : --9 to liL ASPEN CO 81611 144. Â«23 i fee/64.400 Unt./Ch cArÂ· U UNP 4/7f 4 3.-- 9 try*lywh) 484'*4 -*.,a, VU' 'OVO*> L 15?0,44#08 'VIBE !4'lu- PUBLIC NOTICE RE: 7â„¢ AND MAIN STREET AFFORDABLE HOUSING- CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a public hearing will be held on Wednesday, September 8, 1999 at a meeting to begin at 5:00 p.m. before the Aspen Historic Preservation Commission, Council Chambers, City Hall, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, to consider an application submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, requesting conceptual design approval for an affordable housing development, including a small commercial element, located on the corner of 7th and Main Streets, Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. For further information, contact Amy Guthrie at the Aspen/Pitkin Community Development Department, 130 S. Galena St., Aspen, CO (970) 920-5096, amyg@ci.aspen.co.us. s/Suzannah Reid, Chair . Aspen Historic Preservation Commission Published in the Aspen Times on August 21, 1999 City of Aspen Account ----1- 1 4 Â£---mat--- ----, r.. -. -1 1 ~1- ~M\1 -- --~.- 1/Pri 71/,MFMff 1 - - 1 1 12%6 ,- 1 12 ---------- - tk -- - -S---1 ......../.--li--1 /~ / 2:Ff'. ,-L 4 D. . , .. 1 t. 7 L .. A //Ill' NO- /-, - '1-# ~4/" - --~ ~ , 6 --- --- 1 , EL# ./.T- OIL~JIE,int -.--- 9~ #.-~ '--~ . 0-1 41,01/64&/4.MI~.I".gimmWi -4 4.-19= li ..9 11 --=2 4 -- -- 4 ff . Itilimllilililig##;1'lli H -2111 . 2 -- . --1.8.-mimi-'-,p-. - M1/I/94,4 - 1,1.'Â¥9-4- + .='.-.-79-*.' ii ~*+ -2._ _1 15 7 11-- 1-3// ---- -- 1 ' 7.:24 .. ..7 -I .L' 3.. lk-/6/+7.- lE*,4~2_ _W----c-- 1 â€ž=.I -'l ..14*b 3- <46Â¥ ' i: 1,i, , .. . --r_ - â€¢ 1 *-lr .. p 1 1 . J.. r --1 119 ,..1-84 -,.:. i Â· 4 ."U"t. .- gm'. i 1{ . -' . l 1 Â£ 'Bir.;* 1 1 . 1 , --4.. i \ , iMain Street Elevation 1 #:TUDIOR architects 1 il"F#/**IC.'*Wk.~ ..2 ...../. I ':*g: 7 - -b.-/ I ri kit /1 1 -004 11 11 413%11 7 11- 1--. 0. . 8 .2. - .8.02* L ..4-lA -C:3. - / 2 1.1 L.12.1 -- .rl 4 4.- - 4~11 E-Tic=-4 Â«- ' .4*litt~ '50' 5,4.4.~,r - 2 ..2. 211 7-= - -- + - Wh - . I / IAÂ· F 7ix//1.06 ..ds *4 I .. . 1 . 51' 4,19:.:Â·Â·t-,r.& P . tfi-lit 4%- . d h#*â€¢.2. 4-q -9 46 . 1 f= -f 4 â‚¬121 1 1 1 1 - .4.- J. . UTE. 1 3.*44 . 6 1 6...: - â€¢ 1. /i,- r i. 1 1, tel f - ..fie. , -1 1, 1.-3 - * '..'*. 3 6 4 * 7th Street Elevation .STUDIO B architects J==a ( l - 42- -- Illmt] 2 - 11 r -/ - .i 4 1.1 Â·-ef,â€¢ i 1 U 41,1- 1 1-* 1 +Al 1 ' 1 4Â¢ - U 74*Ftzn_rzzy _IM,1 1,3 --* " 1, 1 1.1 41. . F ' 4 4 3. ! .5 , ' 11 IC~-1 11.-1 1- ~ -1 11,1 0 , , .i 1 - L ~.l' 1 '' . 1 t. 4 fi 4 '. 1~' iki A ' , Jr* . l I <,i .3 1.'. H r.-- ir . I 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 5 1-JUD 1 0 1 2/1Â¢PPL elevations archttects 1 -- 1 --11.. r --1- - --ill--I--1 i..=I -fil#-i--1--+t--*--- -I .... --- 1 1 Â¥ 1.1.. " 11' 1 1,1 ,11 1 1.11 1.1 1 1 1 1,1.11 lili f .If,1, 11 1" - --W- ill--. -*lill.- .t.Udulilualidualute.11.LUUMilittl=:illl-UL_,lutl,â€žLU:- 4. 1 5 , 'Uif.~I: 'tit/t ;/L Â·iÂ·'f :' 4LLILL~tl'{31;1!;U;:!111~t?~1.1Llit#?In,lLUP"14"jill:t?ttljj/~041#fifillfill'!1/lll!1jlll'll?!11;Il:1?!t!1'11!!1lltill'l fll#flf,mi - ------ -i~l- 1+11 i ni,. ;17' 74 i 11 lilli. / 0 904~ 1 lili 1 ,?11' 1 , /'/ /t/' 4, ,0 0<55.5#51 9/ ' fil .l 1 1 -1 !1111 ll! .11 L Ul .l D -Jjll111 -1 ( 111 .1 -1 !11 -! Ul -l J -j l Hlmiul ll' 1''t; hl H. ? ! j kill ! 11 N 11 .1 LNEJU11.littil 1111.1 11 11(/1 l d-11 f HI! U.11 4~40 1. I1 1 ~ 1-1 11 11 111 ' 11 '1 ,\>f 1 1 1 1 11 1 MEMORANDUM TO: Aspen Historic Preservation Commission 1 THRU: Julie Ann Woods, Community Development Director Joyce Ohlson, Deputy Planning Director 1 FROM: Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer RE: 7a and Main Affordable Housing- Conceptual review DATE: September 8, 1999 SUMMARY: The applicants request HPC approval to construct an 11 unit multi-family housing development and small commercial space at the corner of 7th and Main Streets. The property is vacant and is located in the Main Street Historic District, on its western edge. APPLICANT: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Studio B Architects. LOCATION: Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen. SIGNIFICANT DEVELOPMENT (CONCEPTUAL) No approval for any development in the "H," Historic Overlay District, or involving historic landmarks shall be granted unless the Historic Preservation Commission finds that all of the following standards (Section 26.415.010.C.5) are met: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, scale, site plan, massing and volume with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H," Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an historic landmark. For historic landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot, exceed the allowed noor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet, or exceed the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, the Historic Preservation Commission may grant necessary variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this Section exceed those variations allowed under Section 26.520.040(B)(2), for detached accessory dwelling units. 1 98241 6, 4-' i 11 Response: Historically, Main Street was a mix of large and small single family homes, commercial structures, and churches. This character is maintained today, with several lodges adding to the diversity of uses and architecture in the neighborhood. The proposal before HPC is for an 11 unit multi-family structure, including a small neighborhood commercial element. The architecture of the project reflects both residential and commercial patterns that were typical of Aspen in the late 1800's. The project is broken down into what appears to be a group of buildings. Part of the structure has gabled roofs drawn from the miner' s cottages in the area, and part of the structure reflects the character of false front buildings like the Mesa Store. The creation of a secondary structure along the alley is also consistent with the historic building patterns in the area. Staff finds the project to be a successful reinterpretation of the Aspen vernacular architecture, and a positive addition to the Main Street Historic District. Some of the materials selected for the building are traditional for local structures, such as wood siding and trim, wood porch posts5 and corrugated metal roofs. Other materials, such as the standing seam metal roof and the cementitious panels, make the building of it's own time. (Please note that the panels are to be dyed to tie into the color scheme of the project and will not be gray.) The courtyard elevations of the buildings are not included in the packet and have not been developed at this time. The architect has represented however that they will be consistent with the materials and detailing of the public facades. These elevations must be presented for final review. The project requires a lengthy review process, including reviews by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Growth Management Commission, and City Council. Many elements of the project, such as the number of units to be built, parking spaces to be provided, whether or not there should be commercial space, setbacks, and height, will be decided by these other boards. LIPC is not asked to grant any variances for the project. The board should be aware however that the setbacks that are to be provided are less than what would typically be required in the office zone district, and the height of the flat roofed portion of the building is 30 feet rather than the required 25 feet. Note that a flat roofed building is normally restricted to 25 feet, however a gable roofed building could have a roof peak well over 30 feet according to the way that height is measured. As noted above, the neighborhood commercial element is not within the HPC's purview, and the HPC is generally not concerned with the use of a building. However, the board should consider the roots of historic preservation in the basic concept of maintaining livable communities and offer support for the idea. The commercial space is proposed to be a place for social interaction. There are numerous people living full time in the surrounding area and the store will not only provide a service, but also be a gathering place. 2 Staff's only concern with the proposed project is with the landscape plan. There are no trees on the site currently. The proposed landscape plan, which is only schematic at this point, shows all of the open space being planted or otherwise treated with a grid pattern. As HPC has discussed recently, especially on this end of Main Street, the historic pattern is to have structures set back somewhat from the sidewalk, with an area of yard in front of them. There are generally not trees in this space. While outdoor seating will be desired for the commercial space, and some screening for privacy is needed for the street facing units, staff recommends these elements be minimized in favor of more grass. Similarly, staff is concerned with the treatment of the historic ditch, which is in the City owned right-of-way along the length of this block. The project will be required to provide some sidewalks, which will make the area pedestrian friendly and also allow for a proposed transit stop in the future. However, the sidewalk should be designed in a way that avoids a relocation of the historic ditch if possible, and meanders around the trees. Planning staff also recommends that the entry into the commercial space be placed on the corner. This is a typical treatment for historic corner stores, and also allows the space to be oriented to transit stops that will be located on both 7th Street and Main Street. b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The project is located at the western entrance into the historic district, and there are numerous historic structures in the area. No resources are directly next to this site, making it an appropriate location for a structure of the size proposed. Across the street, the Christian Science building is substantial enough to balance the height of the three story building. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or adjacent parcels. Response: The project will not affect the historic significance of any adjacent parcels. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: The project does not affect the architectural character or integrity of any historic structure. 3 RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS All residential development in the City of Aspen requiring a building permit from the City of Aspen, except for residential development within the R-15B zone district, shall comply with the residential design standards as specified in by the Administrative Checklist unless otherwise granted a variance by the Design Review Appeal Board as established in Chapter 26.222 or unless granted a variance through some other required review process by the Historic Preservation Commission, the Board of Adjustment or the Planning and Zoning Commission. Response: The project is in compliance with all of the "Residential Design Standards." ALTERNATIVES: The HPC may consider any of the following alternatives: â€¢ Approve the application as submitted. â€¢ Approve the application with conditions to be met prior to final review. â€¢ Table action to allow the applicant further time for restudy. (Specific recommendations should be offered.) â€¢ Deny approval finding that the application does not meet the Development Review Standards. RECOMMENDATION AND RECOMMENDED MOTION: Staff recommends that th HPC grant conceptual approval for 7 and Main Affordable Housing with the following conditions: 1. Complete the courtyard elevations of the buildings for final review. 2. HPC should consider the roots of historic preservation in the basic concept of maintaining livable communities and offer support for the idea of the neighborhood commercial space. 3. Place the entry into the commercial space on the corner. 4. While outdoor seating will be desired for the commercial space, and some screening for privacy is needed for the street facing units, staff recommends that trees and hardscape elements be minimized along the street facades in favor of more grass. 5. The sidewalk along Main Street should be designed in a way that avoids a relocation of the historic ditch if possible, and meanders around the trees. 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. ~ 96004 - *11 4.1 A- r' 1 20 --bescj, â‚¬-1 L.j un < 4 ---5-21 Exhibits: Resolution No. , Series of 1999 A. Staff memo dated September 8, 1999. B. Application. 5 RESOLUTION OF THE ASPEN HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT FOR A NEW MULTI-FAMILY AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT AT 7TH AND MAIN STREETS, LOTS A, B, AND C, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN, COLORADO RESOLUTION NO. , SERIES OF 1999 WHEREAS, the applicant, the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority, represented by Studio B Architects, has requested conceptual design approval for the 7th and Main Street Affordable Housing development, located at Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite o f Aspen. The project involves building an 11 unit multi-family structure and neighborhood commercial element; and WHEREAS, all development in an "H," Historic Overlay District or development involving a historic landmark must meet all four Development Review Standards of Section 26.415.010.C.5 of the Aspen Land Use Code in order for HPC to grant approval, namely: 1. Standard: The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in a "H," Historic Overlay District or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. For Historic Landmarks where proposed development would extend into front yard, side yard and rear yard setbacks, extend into the minimum distance between buildings on the lot or exceed the allowed floor area by up to five hundred (500) square feet or the allowed site coverage by up to five (5) percent, HPC may grant such variances after making a finding that such variation is more compatible in character with the historic landmark and the neighborhood, than would be development in accord with dimensional requirements. In no event shall variations pursuant to this section exceed those variations allowed under the Cottage Infill Program for detached accessory dwelling units pursuant to Section 26.40.090(B)(2). 2. Standard: The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. 3. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development or on adjacent parcels. 4. Standard: The proposed development enhances or does not diminish from the architectural character or integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof; and WHEREAS, Amy Guthrie, in her staff report dated September 8, 1999, performed an analysis of the application based on the standards, found favorably for the application, and recommended approval with conditions; and WHEREAS, at their regular meeting on September 8, 1999, the Historic Preservation Commission considered the application, found the application to meet the standards, and approved the application with conditions by a vote of to . THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That conceptual design approval for the 78 and Main Affordable Housing development, located at Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, City and Townsite of Aspen, as presented at the September 8, 1999 meeting, be approved with the following conditions: 1. Complete the courtyard elevations of the buildings for final review. 2. HPC should consider the roots of historic preservation in the basic concept of maintaining livable communities and offer support for the idea of the neighborhood commercial space. 3. Place the entry into the commercial space on the corner. 4. While outdoor seating will be desired for the commercial space, and some screening for privacy is needed for the street facing units, staff recommends that trees and hardscape elements be minimized along the street facades in favor of more grass. 5. The sidewalk along Main Street should be designed in a way that avoids a relocation of the historic ditch if possible, and meanders around the trees. 6. All representations made by the applicant in the application and during public meetings with the Historic Preservation commission shall be adhered to and considered conditions of approval, unless otherwise amended by other conditions. APPROVED BY THE COMMISSION at its regular meeting on the 8th day of September, 1999. Approved as to Form: David Hoefer, Assistant City Attorney Approved as to Content: HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION Suzannah Reid, Chairman ATTEST: Kathy Strickland, Chief Deputy Clerk 1 Li SEVENTH AND MAIN STREET AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO HISTORIC PRESERVATION COMMISSION FOR L J - CONCEPTUAL REVIEW F AND RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW AUGUST, 1999 11 T -1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. INTRODUCTION ............................................ .. 1 II. CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN ............................ 2 III. HPC CONCEPTUAL REVIEW IV. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW ................... ..8 V. CONCLUSION ................................................ 9 EXHIBITS #1 Letter Authorizing Submission of Application #2 Warranty Deed #3 Title Insurance Commitment #A Pre-Application Conference Summary MAPS AND DRAWINGS Vicinity Map Precedent Studies Improvements Survey Block Plan Site Plan Floor and Roof Plans Elevations I. APPLICATION REQUEST This is an application to develop a new affordable housing project, including a small convenience commercial establishment, at Seventh Street and Main Street in Aspen. The subject property is a 9,000 square foot parcel, whose legal description is Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, Aspen Townsite. It is currently zoned Office (O), and is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. The property is vacant, although during the holiday season, it has traditionally been used for the sale of Christmas trees. According to the May, 1904 Sanborne map, a single family house and two out-buildings were located on Lots A and B, and a single family residence with two out-buildings occupied Lot C. The application is being submitted by the Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority (hereinafter, "the Applicant"). The City of Aspen owns the subject property, but has designated the Housing Authority as its representative for purposes of this application (see letter from the Executive Director of the Authority, attached hereto as Exhibit #1). A copy of the warranty deed and title insurance commitment, demonstrating the City's ownership of the property, are attached hereto as Exhibits #2 and #3. A pre-application conference was held with representatives of the City on January 25, 1999 (see Pre-Application Conference Summary, attached hereto as Exhibit #4). Based on that meeting, it was confirmed that the following land development approvals are required by the Aspen Land Use Code to accomplish this project: . Development in an "H", Historic Overlay District, pursuant to Chapter 26.415 of the Land Use Code. . Residential design standards review, pursuant to Section 26.410 of the Land Use Code. . Rezoning of the property from Office (O) to Specially Planned Area/Affordable Housing (SPA/AH/PUD), pursuant to Chapter 26.310 of the Land Use Code. . SPA review and PUD review, pursuant to Chapters 26.440 and 26.445 of the Land Use Code. â€¢ Commercial GMQS allocations pursuant to Section 26.470.100 and GMQS exemption for affordable housing pursuant to Section 26.470.040 J. of the Land Use Code. . Subdivision review, pursuant to Chapter 26.480 of the Land Use Code. . Special review to establish the parking requirements for the AH zone district, pursuant to Section 26.515.040 of the Land Use Code. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 1 ' i 1- 1 Processing of this application will follow a multi-step process, including hearings before the Historic Preservation Commission (HPC), Growth Management Commission (GMC), Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z), and City Council (Council). Staff identified several possible sequences for these reviews. The most logical sequence is as follows: Step 1: HPC - Conceptual Review; Residential Design Standards Review Step 2: GMC - Commercial Scoring; Exemption for Affordable Housing Step 3: P&Z - Rezoning; Conceptual SPA/PUD; Special Review for Parking Step 4: Council - Rezoning; Conceptual SPA/PUD; GMQS Allocations and Exemption Step 5: P&Z - Final SPA/PUD; Subdivision Step 6: Council - Final SPA/PUD; Subdivision Step 7: HPC - Final Review The purpose of this application package is to provide the necessary materials to allow HPC to review the conceptual application and for HPC to make a determination of the project's compliance with the residential design standards. A companion application package for GMC/P&Z/Council conceptual review is also being prepared, and will be submitted in the nearfuture. A follow-up application, addressing the final review procedures, will be submitted following completion of the conceptual review. The following sections of this application are organized to respond to the standards of the Land Use Code for each of the applicable review procedures. First, however, a brief description of the proposed development is provided. II. CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN As shown in the accompanying drawings, the proposed development will contain eleven (11) affordable housing units. Ten (10) of the units will be one (1) bedroom units; the other unit will be a two (2) bedroom unit, for a total of twelve (12) bedrooms proposed for the site. There is also a small convenience commercial establishment planned for the space on the 9 ground floor right at the corner of Seventh Street and Main Street. Eight (8) parking spaces will be provided for the affordable housing units, located off the alley between Main Street - and West Hopkins. Additional parking (3-4 spaces) is planned to be provided off-site, in the garage below Benedict Commons. No parking is proposed for the commercial space. -3 The site plan illustrates the overall layout of the proposed development. It shows that the proposed development faces the two primary street fronts and the alley, allowing a central commons area to be created in the middle of the project for informal use by the residents. It also illustrates the conceptual locations for planned landscaping, and indicates that a sidewalk is planned along both street fronts. The ditches will be maintained as open features along both of these streets. Vehicle access to the project will be from the alley. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 2 In order to accomplish the proposed development program, it is necessary to rezone the property. The underlying Office (0) zoning designation will not allow the proposed density of housing, nor would it permit the proposed commercial use. Therefore, the applicant will be applying to rezone the property to Specially Planned Area (SPA), with an underlying zone district designation of AH/PUD (Affordable Housing/Planned Unit Development). The following table identifies the dimensional requirements of the AH/PUD zone district and lists how the proposed conceptual development will comply with these requirements. TABLE 1 AH/PUD ZONE DISTRICT DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Requirement Code Standard Proposed Conditions Minimum Lot Size 3,000 s.f. 9,000 s.f. Minimum Lot Area Per Dwelling 1 bedroom: 400 sq. ft. 10 units @ 400 sq. ft. Unit 2 bedroom: 800 sq. ft. + 1 unit @ 800 sq. ft. = 4,800 sq. ft.; 9,000 sq. ft. is available for density Minimum Lot Width To be set via PUD 90 feet Minimum Front Yard To be set via PUD 8 feet Minimum Side Yard To be set via PUD west side: 5 feet east side: 5 feet Minimum Rear Yard To be set via PUD 3 feet Maximum Height To be set via PUD 30 feet Minimum Distance Between To be set via PUD See note below Buildings on the Lot Minimum Percent of Open Space To be set via PUD 12.5 percent (1,150 sq. ft.) Maximum External Floor Area 9,900 sq. ft. (1.1:1) 8,640 sq. ft. (0.96:1) Minimum Number of Off-Street To be set by special 8 spaces on-site Parking Spaces revievv 3-4 spaces off-site Note: Since all of the buildings are linked, the distance between the buildings has not been identified. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 3 III. HPC CONCEPTUAL REVIEW As noted above, the subject property is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. Section 26.415.010 C.1.d. of the Aspen Land Use Code defines the construction of a new structure within an "H", Historic Overlay District, as significant development. Section 26.415.010 C.5. of the Land Use Code establishes the review standards for significant development. These standards, and the applicant's responses to them, are as follows: a. The proposed development is compatible in general design, massing and volume, scale, and site plan with designated historic structures located on the parcel and with development on adjacent parcels when the subject site is in an "H", Historic Overlay District, or is adjacent to an Historic Landmark. Response: There are no designated historic structures located on the subject parcel or on adjacent parcels, but the property is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. Following is an analysis of how the design and site plan of the proposed development will be compatible with that of nearby properties located along Main Street. Design, Massing, Volume, and Scale The buildings within this project have been designed to break the scale of the development into a number of smaller forms. This is done by the inclusion of porches at the front of the buildings, the use of a cornice between floors, the provision of setbacks at the upper stories, and the introduction of variety in building forms, roof lines, and building materials. As a result, the project appears to be composed of several smaller elements that could have developed over time, rather than appearing to be a single building that was built all at once. In fact, this is the way that several of the older lodges along Main Street have developed, evolving over time as they were added on to in different periods of Aspen's history. The distinct forms also reflect the fact that this will be a mixed use building. Research that the design team has conducted (see attached photos) regarding historic structures in Aspen and other Victorian-era towns shows that the proposed building forms were a traditional component of mixed use blocks. The gable and flat roof forms can both still be found along Main Street. The flat roof form recalls the false front of the Mesa Store Building and is also the roof form used in many commercial buildings in the downtown core; the pitched roof forms are typical of structures along Main Street and in the City's residential neighborhoods. The project has been designed to step up from the east, with a two story element along its eastern edge and a three story building at the property's western edge. The two story mass is compatible with the Victorian office building located immediately to the east of the subject property, and allows for a gradual step-up from the one story residence located to the east of the office building. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 4 The more prominent building on the corner is meant to punctuate or anchor Main Street, since it is the last building along the town's grid. It has been purposefully designed to appear to be an important building, because this corner is anticipated to become a critical junction in the City's future transit system, regardless of whether it is a bus or a rail system. Some of the other design elements that are consistent with surrounding parcels include the verticality and proportions of the windows, which are traditionally victorian in character and establish an appropriate sense of scale, and the fact that the first floor plate is at a level consistent with the rest of Main Street (that is, a garden elevation has not been introduced). A final important design element is that the project has been separated into a primary and a secondary mass. By locating some of the units and all of the parking in the secondary mass, the perceived mass and scale of the buildings along Main Street has been reduced. Site Plan The site plan for the project is also consistent with that of adjacent parcels and other projects along Main Street. For many years, this neighborhood has contained a mix of both commercial and residential uses, and this proposal reflects that mix. The buildings have been placed close to the edge of the street along both Main Street and Seventh Street, in an effort to contribute to the streetscape, encourage pedestrian activity, and to be transit oriented. A small front yard has also been provided, similar to that found in many of the properties along Main Street. Because the unit space at the corner of Seventh and Main will experience the greatest impacts from Main Street (traffic, noise, lights, etc.), this space is proposed for commercial purposes, rather than as a residential unit. Sidewalks are an important component of most of Main Street, including the entire length of Main Street on the northern side of the street, and all of Main Street up to Fifth Street i on the southern side of the street. By introducing a sidewalk along this portion of Main Street, the applicant would hope to initiate the process of creating a connection to the rest of the sidewalk system along the southern side of Main Street. This will require design ' creativity to relocate the ditch that currently fiows through the front of these properties, but this type of solution is already in place in front of the properties east of Fifth Street. The proposed site plan has been designed to emulate the features of several surrounding projects. It includes parking along the alley, with dwelling units above the parking, in the same manner as the adjacent Seventh and Hopkins affordable housing project. The site coverage and overall density of this project is also similar to that of the Seventh and Hopkins project, and the project has an internal courtyard designed to function in a manner similar to that of the Seventh and Hopkins project. Finally, as illustrated by the model for this ' block, this project has been designed to have a similar type of solid-to-void relationship as does the neighboring office building. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable IIousing Project Page 5 IJ P b. The proposed development reflects and is consistent with the character of the neighborhood of the parcel proposed for development. Response: The building forms that comprise this project contain many of the same elements found in other structures in the surrounding neighborhood. These elements include porches, varying roof lines, simple rectilinear forms as the primary building shape, gable roof forms and cornices used as accents, windows that are victorian in character, and the use of traditional building materials. These materials, which include primarily wood siding, wood columns, and cementitious panels, are consistent in character with those found in many other buildings along Main Street. The site plan will also be quite consistent with the character of the neighborhood. By placing buildings close to the street, providing a small front yard, introducing a sidewalk, and preserving the ditch and keeping it open, this infill project will emulate many of the site features found along the rest of Main Street. It will also complete the existing sidewalk 2 along Seventh Street that is currently built only along the southern half of the block. As noted above, the surrounding neighborhood has, for many years, contained a mix of both commercial and residential uses. This proposal will reflect both of these uses. This portion of Aspen, which has always been an area of resident housing (the Villas, 700, 710, and 720 West Hopkins, etc.), is in the process of becoming a new center for affordable housing. This began with the West Hopkins project, continued with the Hallam House conversion, and will extend into the future with the planned conversion of the Ullr Lodge to affordable housing, the proposed re-development of the Bavarian Inn property, and the proposed re-development of the Forest Service property to affordable housing. Th e proposed commercial use will provide a valuable service to all of these residents. The commercial use will also provide an alternative for employees working in the nearby offices and to persons staying in the remaining lodges, allowing them to make a purchase nearby instead of having to come downtown for all of their convenience needs. Introducing this type of business to the area, when combined with the addition of more residents in the neighborhood, will increase pedestrian activity in the area, and may attract other businesses to this portion of Main Street. This would help to revitalize the neighborhood and bring more life to a street that is now dominated by the automobile. c. The proposed development enhances or does not detract from the historic significance of designated historic structures located on the parcel proposed for development, or adjacent parcels. Response: Since this is a vacant parcel, there are no designated historic structures located on the subject parcel. There are also no designated historic structures located on parcels immediately adjacent to the subject parcel. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 6 by There are several historic structures located in the vicinity of the subject property. These are the Christian Science Church, located directly across Main Street from the subject property, 706 Main Street, a small residence also located across Main Street, and 709 W. Main Street, a small residence located on the same side of the street, but on the opposite corner from the subject property. On the next block to the east, 633 West Main, 616 West Main, and 612 West Main are also designated landmarks. Main Street is approximately one hundred feet (100') in width in this location. From a design standpoint, we believe the proposed development will have no physical impact on the significance of the historic structures that are located across such a wide and busy street from the subject property. The proposed development will also not detract from the historic significance of the small residence located at 709 West Main Street, since the existing victorian office building already provides a separation between the two properties, nor should it have any impact on the historic structures located further to the east of the property. In fact, the building and roof forms along the eastern edge of the affordable housing project recall the features of these historic structures, and are quite consistent and compatible with these important historic buildings. From a social perspective, we believe that the proposed development will enhance the significance of these structures. This will be achieved by the increased level of pedestrian activity that will be drawn to this site, as a result of the inclusion of neighborhood commercial space on the ground floor and from the addition of more permanent residents - to this area. This increased activity will allow more persons to appreciate the historic significance of these structures and the surrounding portion of Main Street, since more people will be walking through the area instead of just driving past it in a car or a bus. d. The proposed development enhances or does not diminish or detract from the architectural character and integrity of a designated historic structure or part thereof. Response: This application proposes to develop a vacant site, not to alter a designated historic structure. Therefore, it will in no way affect the architectural character or integrity of a designated structure or part thereof. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 7 IV. RESIDENTIAL DESIGN STANDARDS REVIEW The City has recently revised the residential design standards found in Section 26.410 of the Land Use Code. These revisions were adopted pursuant to Ordinance 20, Series of 1999. Following is a summary of the conformance of this project with each of the City's residential design standards. The Applicant is not requesting any variances from these standards. A. Site Design Standards. 1. Building orientation. Since this is a corner lot, the building facades facing both Main and Seventh streets have been designed to be parallel to the street. 2. Build to lines. At least 60% of the building facade along both streets will be located within ten feet (10') of the front lot line of the property. 3. Fences. There will not be a fence along either street facade that is higher than 42". Berms are not planned. B. Building Form. 1. Secondag Mass. The project has been designed into two basic masses. The primary mass is located along the front of the property, while the secondary mass is along the alley. The secondary mass contains the parking for the proposed dwellings, with dwelling units located above the parking areas. It is linked to the primary mass with a subordinate connecting element. C. Parking, Garages and Carports 1. Alley access. The proposed parking is located off the alley. D. Building Elements. 1. Street oriented entrance and principal window. The project has at least one (1) street-oriented entrance for every four (4) units. It also has street facing principal windows. The entry doors face the street and are no more than ten feet (10') from the front wall of the building. The doors are not taller than eight feet (8') in height. There are covered entry porches into several portions of the building, each of which has an area of more than fifty (50) sq. ft., and each of which has a depth of more than six feet (6'). Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Page 8 2. One story element. The proposed development includes a porch that will face both Main Street and Seventh and will comprise more than twenty percent (20%) of the building's overall width. 3. Windows. No street-facing windows span the area between nine feet (9') and twelve feet (12') above the finished first floor. Non-orthagonal windows are not included in the design. 4. Lightwells. Lightwells have been recessed behind the front wall of the building. E. Context. 1. Materials. Although several different types of exterior materials are planned, the quality of these materials and details will be consistent around the building. Materials will be used in ways that are true to their characteristics. No highly reflective surfaces are planned. 2. Inflection. Immediately to the east of the property is a two story building. Therefore, the units on the eastern side of the property have been stepped down to a two story configuration, to reflect the neighboring building. There is not a building immediately adjacent to the subject site in the westerly direction. V. CONCLUSION In summary, the Applicant has submitted all of the materials requested during the pre- application conference. The Applicant has responded to the applicable standards of the Aspen Land Use Code and has demonstrated the project's compliance with said standards. Should any reviewing agency request additional information, or need clarifications of any of the statements made herein, the Applicant will respond in a timely manner. Application for Seventh and Main Street Affordable }Iousing Project Page 9 EXHIBITS EXHIBIT #1 Housing Office City of Aspen/Pitkin County 530 East Main Street, Lower Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5050 Fax: (970) 920-5580 - August 17, 1999 Ms. Amy Guthrie, Historic Preservation Officer City of Aspen 130 South Galena Street Aspen, Colorado 81611 RE: 7th and Main Street Affordable Housing Project Dear Amy Guthrie: The City of Aspen is the owner of the 7th and Main Street site and has appointed the As~en/Pitkin County Housing Authority as its representative for this project. At its July 27 meeting, the Aspen City Council gave APCHA authority to proceed with a development application The Housing Authority hereby requests that the City waive the land use application fee for this project, since it is a 100 percent affordable housing project. Should you have any questions or need any additional information during the period of staff review of this application, please feel free to contact Lee Novak at 920-5137. Thank you for your department's assistance while this application was being prepared and for your continuing attention to this project. Very truly yours, ASPEN/PITKIN COUNTY HOUSING AUTHORITY Mary Roberts, Acting Executive Director 1(CCOIdell :11 I I..111 lilli ..1.11111.1 mi. 111.111 ..1..1111 ..1.1 11.111.1 Rcreptier, b 412624 01/16/1998 rÂ« 30P WD DAVIS SILVI EXHIBIT #2 1 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.-i N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO WARRANTY DEED '1'HIS DEED, Made this 16th day of January 19 98. between SEVENTH & MAIN VENTURE, a Colorado -general partnership of the * County of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantor, and THE CITY OF ASPEN, a municipal corporation whose legal addressis 130 S. Galena Street, Aspen, CO 81611 of the County Of Pitkin and State of Colorado, grantee: Wl I'NICSSEI'll, That the grantor for and iii consideration of the Stim of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration-----------1*kt=ARS. Ilic receipt atid suf Itciency of whichishetrhy :ic knowl cd! Red, has gr:int edi, hargained. wild niul c imve>,cd, a i il hy the sc presents does grant, hargitin, sell, Lrtinvey and confirm, unto tile grantee, his heirs and as signs forever, all be real property togetber wit h imprnvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the Qi d County of Pitkin and State of Colorado described as follows: Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN; c Art.1 \ E :113/ 0 0 k o IE, 3 Eli O-22- as known by street and number as: assessor's schedule or parcel number: 9 'rOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments ami appurtellatices thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profils thereof. and all the estate, right, litle, interest, claitn and demand whatsoever of the grantor, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with,the hereditainents and appurtenances. 9- 1'O11AVE AND TO 11O LI) the said preinises al,ove bareined and described. with the appurtenances, unto the grantee, his heirs and assigns forever. And the grantor, for himse If, his heirs, and personal te presentatives,doescovenant, grant, bargain, anjagreeto and withthe grantee,Iii she s and ~- assigns, thitt at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these pirsents, he is well seized of tlic premises above conveyed, I as good, sure, per feet, absolute and inde feasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and has good right, full power and lawful Buthorily to gram, bargain, sell and convey tile salne in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same ate free and clear from all former atid other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments, encumbrances and restrictions of whatever kind or nature soever. except general real estate taxes for 1998 and subsequent years, and those matters set forth on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and ' made a part hereof. The grantor shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND,heabove-bargained premises itt thequiet and peaceable possession of the grantee, his heirsand assigns, against alland everypersonorpersonslawfullyclaimingthe wholeoranyparttliereof. The singularnumbershallinclude theptural, ~~Iti~!te plural the singular, and ihe use of any gender shall be applicable to all genders. Â£, j ) IN WITNESS WHEREOF the grantor has executed this deed on the date set forth above. +SEVEMTH & MAI,14 ~MTURE, a Colorgd~ general partnership (,Ay Zilk(4, 2 J. 49-4,0 liup Â£( 26172, tv 6 11; in Cl n Do 4 :hy ~kES. 289312%4 49-49ral Partner ,#/51/LA.<6620â‚¬AA"u- 1 J 'Sh . ,rik:k.4.9.V/Zâ‚¬,6,6-,hbd; 22@9-140Â£~A~lit By:--> *02-404,0 *'g-546&i--44*'7 2~Am'y +w 4*<'7- N CUBCOTT ROLLES (14 his att6rney-in-fad PNERICK J. GALLWOHER (by hU attorney- - Charles G. Rolles), General Partner in-fact, Charles G. Rolles), General 4-25 STATE OF COLORADO Partner ,'- f SSÂ· County of Pitkin / &1 January 1 he foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of .19 98 , by CHARLES G. ROLLES, as General partner of SEVENT11 & MAIN VENTURE a Colorado ~:n~:airKYrtnership, and 45 attorney-in-fact for SCOTT ROLLES and PATRICK J. GALLAGFER, Partnerk 01 said partnershlp. My commission expires , 19 ~~ Â· Witness my hand and offi cial seal. i E.,t d k.4 _ O 1-\1 /6 1, lt'vL,1 \11 / AL 0,1/ 'Whr.ry atic \ OPUDLIE/~ r , 91 in Denver, ilisert "Cityhnd " C 44 C; 2- ' / Name ind Address of Pcnon Creating Newly Created Legal Desctiption (Â§ 3 8-33-106.3, C.R.S ) ..*-2-2.17 - No. 932A. Rev. 4-94. WARRANTY DEED (For Pholographle Record) Bradford Publishing, 174 3 Wazee St., Denver, CO 80202 - (303) 292-2500 - 4.94 ACTUAL CONSIDERATION $660,000. EXEN~ 9~RETT 414 'TY OF 3 rip 9661/91/10 03AI3D33 N0I183U1)30 bIBESNU EXHIBIT "A" Reservations and exceptions as set forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 215 and in Book 59 at Page 434 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". : Provisions of Ordinance No. 60, Series 1976, designating the property to be part of a historic district. 1111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111 412624 01/16/1998 02:30P WD DAVIS SILVI 2 of 2 R 11.00 D 0.00 N 0.00 PITKIN COUNTY CO --=------------ EXHIBIT #3 FNT CONDUTMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: 10/28/97 at 08:30 A.M. Case No. PCT12428 2. Policy or Policies to be issued: (a) ALTA Owner's Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ 660,000.00 Premium$ 1,664.00 i. Proposed Insured: Rate:STANDARD THE CITY OF ASPEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (b) ALTA Loan Policy-Form 1992 Amount$ Premium$ Proposed Insured: Rate: 3. Title to the FEE SIMPLE es=ace or interest in the land described or referred to in this Commicmen= is at the effective date hereof vested in: SEVENTH & MAIN VENTURE, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP 4. The land referred to in this Commitment is situated in the County of PITKIN, State of COLORADO and is described as follows: LOTS A, B, AND C, BLOCK 19, CITY AND TOWNSITE OF ASPEN PITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC. Schedule A-PG.1 601 E. HOPKINS This Commitment is invalid ASPEN, CO. 81611 unless the Insuring 970-925-1766 Provisions and Schedules 970-925-6527 FAX A and B are attached. AUTHORIZED AGENT FNT SCHEDULE B - SECTION 1 REQUIREMENTS The following are the requiremenss co be complied with: ITEM (a) Payment to or for the account of the grantors or mortgagors of the full consideration for the estate or interest to be insured. ITEM (b) Proper inscrument(s) creacing the estate or interest to be insured must be executed and duly filed for record to-wit: 1. Release by the Public Trustee oâ‚¬ the, Deed of Trust from : SEVENTH & MAIN VENTURE to the Public Trustee of the County of PITKIN for the use of : THE BANK OF ASPEN original amount : $148,500.00 dated : September 5, 1986 recorded : December 13, 1986 in Book 525 at Page 705 recencion no. : 284306 The abcve Deed of Trust was extended by instrument recorded November 7, 1991 in Book 661 at Page 530. . 2. Release by the Public Trusnee c= =ne, Deed of Trust from : SEVENTH & MAIN VENTURE to the Public Trustee of the Councy of PITKIN for the use of : THE BANK Cy ASPEN original amount : $205,000.00 dated : May 25, 1993 recorded : July Â·2, 1993 in Book 716 at Page 837 reception no. : 358457 3. Deed, executed by the Parcners of : SEVENTH & MAIN VENTURE, A COLORADO GENERAL PARTNERSHIP TO : CITY OF ASPEN, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION NOTE: If this transaction constitutes the sole or major assets of the partnership, evidence satisfactory to the Company must be submitted that the person(s) executing the above Deed have full and proper authority to bind the partnership pursuant to the sale contemplated herein. 4. Ordinance from The City of Aspen, authorizing the purchase of subject property. 5. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Real Estate Transfer Tax as established by Ordinance No. 20 (Series of 1979) and Ordinance No. 13 (Series of 1990) has been paid or exempted. 6. Certificate of nonforeign status executed by the transferor(s). (This instrument is not required to be recorded) 7. Completion of Form DR 1079 regarding the witholding of Colorado Tax on the sale by certain persons, corporations and firms selling Real Property in the State of Colorado. (This instrument is not required to be recorded) (Continued) FNT 8. Evidence satisfactory to the Company that the Declaration of Sale Notice to County Assessor as required by H.B. 1288 has been complied with. (This instrumenc is not required to be recorded, but must be delivered to and retained by the Assessors Office in the County in which the property is situated) FNT SCHEDULE B SECTION 2 EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are dispcsed of to the sacisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in passession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easemencs, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines. shortage in area, encroachments, any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor, or material heretofore cr hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public reccrds or attaching subsequent to the effective dace hereof but prior co the dace the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Ccmmitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessment, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service or for any other special taxing district. 7. Reservations and exceptions as sec forth in the Deed from the City of Aspen recorded in Book 59 at Page 215 and in Book 59 at Page 434 providing as follows: "That no title shall be hereby acquired to any mine of gold, silver, cinnabar or copper or to any valid mining claim or possession held under existing laws". 8. Provisions of Ordinance No. 60, Series 1976, designating the property to be part of a historic district. This commitment is invalid unless Schedule 3-Section 2 the Insuring Provisions and Schedules Commitment No. PCT12428 A and B are attached. - JUL 13 ' 39 -09:BEAM 'ASPEN HOI I':ING ,EFC 7. d EXHIBIT #4 C]TY OF ASPEN PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE SUMMARY' ANNER: Mitch Haas. 920-5095 DATE: 1/25/99 'JECT: 7th and Main Affordable Housing Development Proposal --- PKITH a Neighborhood Commercial component RESENTATIVE: Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority: 920-5050: Bob Nevins and Lee Novak /NER: APCHA E OF APPLICATION: Specially Planned Area (SPA); Rezoning (for SPA designation); Subdivision: GMQS Exemption for AH units; GMQS Scoring and Competition for Commercial Development Allocations; id, Significant Development in an s;H," Historic Overlay District (moving o f historic structures and ndmarking procedures to be covered under separate Summary from Amy Guthrie), TRIPTION: Applicant seeks to develop between eight (8) and fourteen (14) affordable housing units, .iostly of the one-bedroom variety, and a small neighborhood commercial component consisting of a invenience-type store. The size is 9,000 square feet, zoned Office (O), and is located on the southeast comer f the intersection of 7th Avenue and Main Street. Multi-family housing is a pennined use in the O zone aistrict, but neighborhood commercial uses of the type being contemplated are not. Therefore: the applicant -ould need to designate the site as an SPA in order to accommodate the neighborhood commercial use --- :signation ofthis site as an SPA would be highly consistent with the Purpose of SPAs as described in Section 26.30,010 and with the Standards for Designation, as found at Section 26.80.030(A); therefore, staff would ipport the designation and associated rezoning (map amendment). With an SPA, all dimensional quirements, including off-street parking standards: are set as part of the SPA review with the underlying zone listrict used only for guidance. ffordable housing deed restricted in accordance with the Housing Guidelines may be exempt by City Council from the growth management competition and scoring procedures pursuant to a determination of "the city's :ed for such housing, considering the proposed development's compliance with an adopted housing plan. the unber of dwelling units proposed and their location, the type of dwelling units proposed. specifically -Egarding the number of bedrooms in each unit, the size of the dwelling unit. the rental/sale mix of the oposed development, and the proposed price categories to which the dwelling units are to be deed restricted aection 26.102.040(C)(1)(b))." These determinations will take into account the recommendations of the 7 :owth Management Commission regarding the project's consistency with the standards of Section .102,090(J) -- bur prior to the Growth >Ianage:nent Commission hearing. the GMC must get a formal ecommendation from the Housing Board. Nevertheless, the neighborhood commercial component of the velopment would represent unallocated commercial deveiopment rights and would. therefore. require receipt development allocations through the Commercial Growth Management Scoring and Competition Procedures. Commercial GMQS Scoring and Competition applications must be submitted by September 15. .so of concern, this site represents a critical piece of the Entrance to Aspen and, as such. site design and irchitectural considerations will be Crucial. Also, note that all developments of multi-family housing are quired to obtain Subdivision approval. and all residential development must conform to the Residential Â¢sign Standards, unless a variance is granted. Lastly. since the site is in an Historic Overlay District. all 1-velopment must be reviewed and approved by the Historic Preservation Commission pursuant to Section .72.010(D) and (F), as well as to the procedural requirements of Section 26.102.050(F), ILL 1'3 ' 3'zÂ· 33: 21 AM ASPEN Hell EING OFC - OR: 1) HPC Conceptual; 2) P&Z for (Subdivision), Rezoning, SPA Conceptual; 3) Council for (Subdivision), Rezoning, SPA Conceptual: 4) Housing Board for GMQS Exemption recommendation; 5) GMC for Exemption and Scoring recoinmendations; 6) P&Z for (Subdivision), SPA Final: 7) Council for GMQS Scoring/Allocation, GMQS Exemption, (Subdivision). SPA Final: and, 8) HPC Final. These sequences can be mi xed and matched to suite your needs, provided the agreed upon procedure is approved by the Community Deveiopment DireCIOr. In the event rhat you should have any questions regarding the foregoing, please do not hesitate to contact Mitch Haas of the Community Development Department at 920.5095. * The foregoing summary is advisory only and is not binding on the City. The opinions contained herein are based on current zoning and regulations. which are subject to change in the future, and upon factual representations that may or may not be accurate. The summary does not. in any way. create a legal or vested right, MAPS AND DRAWINGS 7th & Main Affordable Housing Project Aspen, Colorado DIRECTORY OWNER: Historical Preservation Commision city of aspen 130 s. galena Conceptual Review aspen, co 81611 8 September 1999 ARCHrrECT: studio b architects 555 n. mill st. aspen, co 81611 / , 4 INDEX 46% 04 , . 1 4 i.Â»Ve. - Â·4, z___--___--Zll at: ... -; 't 'Â·,'I iz'14 ---- VICINITY MAP ..i-r I. . *ff 5 - I -'.--- - --- --r- 2-Â»\ PRECEDENT STUDIES - . -- - - - -. - -9.- fh 1.f , --- - I - - t.- . r 'i 4 ---- - - BLOCK PLAN - ill' . - Â·7;27:liNIV~ *6â€¢~/'1 ,- -~E -/t,ul LANDSCAPE PLAN 1.16'' J .'0 4./.1 - m -~n-- ..~~~ / 105.-2. 0 rz_. BASEMENT PLAN -- - 4.-â€¢--4-0037 - 3 GROUND FLOOR PLAN SECOND FLOOR PLAN ~0*431*1 : .0, . 1 /1 96 . , , , ' ,~1 .:' do. t j 6 '1 -t.-# - 7.-4, 9 . W. . vy i THIRD FLOOR PLAN 7,Â· f j j. ~,/T JI': i : ~. ~. ili ..~~~...:_1.2.--1 2 y <1-f ROOF PLAN 1.t k 4-<4., '.".1 -Pre ELEVATIONS lfâ‚¬14.,-1.'*?Actior.:2 J \4 $ 61 4 ELEVATIONS . . 1 fix I . 11 ... . 2.. :.. , V ... :'KÂ·>b:'1. ti.'.I:~744; ' 'Â· 'teÂ·t)Â·:Â·Â·>'i~;Ai.AdÂ·'f,Â£Â·'4,%Y e A,i...re,:;:..rhiÂ·Â·rtiN-'2 . ' laâ‚¬Â·1 1% Â·,0/'/AtÂ·'Â·16*t . , '. 1, ... . U'I' '7.';0â‚¬4 : ' 6 1 .0 Â· .t Â· tki . Â· . 1 .. 4,1 7%1 <- 4 . I . : * f ...4,961~ . ....... I . . . F I i I - pl r. .-i, 10, 1 1 1 . 1 '1 1 . Ill ' 111 1 1111 . * I I .4 â€¢r I . ./ .%,r .in r ' 1 , , -l .=1 I i./I: 10 I ..1.4: I 1 'j 1 4 11 ' 4 .,1 1 7 711 li ~m Z Â· 1 . '11 , . - ' ~ Â·t 1, ti , .*04-02.-eye--- 9.42Â· i k.ye .9-. J Â· b Q.'2:Z, . ~. . -- 4 6 . ..-rÂ· 19. ,2.kÂ».,FA-'2]tt f.l 0 .' :-14Â·Â·'t: i:.<r:it:~.4 â€¢â€¢ I t. f 7 Â· . 61. I I 1 , ' t. . 1 3 . . 12.94* 023 t: . Â·Â·Â· 0â‚¬.0 , 12 P.- -â€¢ â€¢ r Jâ€¢ 8 i.'.<11 Re==114.Â·#Â· '14. 6,1 ,.. r 40 *u(t==:214%;96. --Â· ~ 3&7,i-Â· Â»i,~24:91-"*-I Al,CY<,ff ., ' 1 --24* rÂ¥ *- ,--9 r. 4 , ilt. - lk. i .*4 '. '4 1 f PU '11#. - i :49Â¥Â¢ J. r 1 f 1, . 1Â· r, $ ' i: 1 4 4Â· 1. i - - 11:iTifiELE,0. tifi . 1/51, 11 )'fw. % *%1 ; 11Â·tiqUiT-T__- i.:41.-h 1, 1~.~Â·-~~~~~ .. 4 . , 13"r Â· *- .: ' C 14 4*1 54.i ..1 W'.1-!ijle"llittot':U ... - 1%3.k'////0/1/AA: ... - r ./.,/, /12'iT3Ff.10"Mt I.. 1-, 1- rfP" 4 -- , Filiff 44<... .1 )///$/81.1/8 . 4 , :u, X ... 4 -I . Off. <~'M'j~111 , 4.0.1 . 0,21 fh . -, . I ,4 \UE 111,-. he .- a , . 'Uff# I . lib j , 1. 1, tiâ€ž../.. Bhut.- 4 .0 ';6 , I , C Â·. 1. 7 " ...1 ' I t. :4 1...1 , 2.1 .n:'}t - -,1 - 1--li~ .0- I.--f-jits) 2 :-6.->j. 2- , . 1 . N,-IR==7 . .i 1 B (fl i 1 24 i '1%0 -1,-2,1 40* guaTi~,fi,S,%iji~~~ . 4 A li* '"4/ 444.1 4. 2 34111114 ' 9 It 1, '11;1~1115-,44Â· Ill - 11 k. . Â· Sl *01 -t, 1 1 F 4y~~t...., 7.1 ~tit>', â€¢â€¢ / 1 %111111158Â¢ '41<111*. 34(j~ i ~~~ ~~4441Â£ :JO ,â‚¬31 . '74-' ' 1 v,Â· illill . t Â·,74 1, 6 \J t*it,, ilirk 1 CDCa 1 0) 44 i,@1, 0 t (D ASPEN - 1 9 5 . ... il i 4 COLORADO 1 3/â€¢tr KWâ€¢* A 6- 1 1. . 9 IJ ; 5 1 C k A / 0 2 R./St 3 N tma, St 4 C.*D,-=1 1. 1 A,U A., CO 4 6 0/4 0 I 11- C , M..LI 4 1 3- 5 1 M.JI-Â¢ P.rt PI 9 hts,cc~ 1.â€¢ 0 â€¢0 9 6 HO Smu,:Â»r Orr- 0 /5Â·â€¢tr~\ 1/1 7 * 1~ -C 8 / 12 1,~rnar A. I 3 D- Am i:fea#il 14 M,dbid A. 1Â· Hf)it,r-7 4 1.15 M.,0.. a Virl-t/'Ai Nduy ' 9 --r 1 i , 1 + 4 1 , 0 1 ' .4/ 1 % MOAD CLA**PÂ£Aâ„¢- , 82 1-- 1 , 1 A. ' j 1 1/2 MIE ' \Sk --- - .Lm. 1.12 1~Â¢LOMETER -4 4 tÂ· ' 1, C . Â¢j 1-4. 4 '49/ 7-0 A. 0 --- .2. I.- i - . 7,4,9.1 - 7.--- . ---7 221- 429 36 ' f'.9 J . 4 v'- L .1. t --- - I e - -- .4 T-7 - -- f t. - W - 4, ~ :,a , 4- -1. a 1 - - : 14' 0.0161. 7 2- 7 -1 - '94 + 1 3 '41 -- 0 - LE> " 6.u-1 - , ..4*,4 7 ~ Ii--. - - 2- L 7 . ..Â· 0 1 ver,id, ....'L--râ‚¬1 -, 666L 1snfine 9L I uBIsep 01}eluellos I HÂ¥ Ulell! pue tilt delu Al,UIOHA . .PES T MAIN STREET .,0â‚¬, Â»E,E A., 4 *1%4 -1 I. 0â‚¬rt. . T.1.I - 200.0 23aa- / / 44 1 .-. 4 1/71 1 l /0 CAP ..\ 1 1 - 1 INCM . 10 FEET ' ~ SCALE / :E / .21 0 5 10 15 20 CONTOU* INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT 1/ 2 1 1 1 l l -2-ltl_Wl.484*- --111?o-1 60 - f Â· 4 LOT j 1 - 1 1. -- / /1 497 8 1 0 ill 1 \ f h / 01 1 ' ho ' LOT 4 - C filb 1 lili, 1 1 CITY -- / - / LEGEND & NOTES I FOUIE) SURVEY WOâ€¢AMENT REIAR WITH CAP Al NOTED 1 8 V IKE OR P-K MAIL SURVEY CONTROL 1 If 1 LOT I $ VACANT -8- ICOO FENCE I --*- - ELEVATION DATW H ARBITRARY IASED ON SET T.I.I AS SHOWN CONTOUR INTERVAL i S I FOOT t-*17/,". 4 \\ 1 1 TITLE *ORWATI ON FURNISHED BY REW & CAP 16129 ~ \ pITKIN COUNTY TITLE, INC 41 --- 3 co~. i r.Â£ w rio pc T - 4-e- - . \ I DATED / 1950 0/FICIAL WAF Of nâ‚¬ CITY OF ASPEN WAS USED FOR RECORD 1 1 0 0 , SURVEY 1 -ORMAT I ON 11 -=ne =1 ALLEY BLOCK 19 Â»kÂ« Mls ~hÂ» ELECTRIC TIERE IS NO POSTED INESS -rT#3' 29 TRAN.*R COTTO-000 TREE CAL 1 PER AS SHIN j e {2' 01Â· ".,DE, ~ FRUIT TREE l l / TOPOGRAPHIC & IMPROVEMENT SURVEY CERTIFICATION / ASPEN / PITKIN COUNTY 0.4,9.. *-,DE. p. Reet..EtED Lue .M<Non nl ,â€¢â‚¬ 11.lE 1 HOUSING AUTHORITY oF COUIADO. WEREIY CERT I Fr THIT THIS FLAT RAS PREPARED PROM , FIELD SURVE'r PERFOR,â‚¬0 1,NOER MY 3<â€¢ERÂ¥1;ION IN _bleÂ£~. 994 A,0 I S TRUE /40 -RECT TO THE IEST Of KNOILEOOE AND BELIEF. THIS CENTIFICATIONIS Â¥010 1,-*f~"1~1*AT AMPED 011 AN DEPOSIT CERTIFICATE LOTS A, 8&C 8 LOCK 19, 1,0.e DAS fLYDAY OF A/-24~~'Â£1(~33~ OR,Gl MAL ILUEFR liT . CITY & TOWNSItE OF ASPEN, PITKIN COUNTY, COLORADO E-17/u, 01 91*7,6120 .0 ij Dâ‚¬EPO.ITED THIS DAY OF 19.-IN Â»DK OF r. COUNT, S AREA - 9.000 SO FT Â·/- Leâ‚¬) SURVEY .ATS IT PAGE . RECEPTIO' /0 TH,$ 1 ...0 SUR VEY ./.T CO-/1/1.1./ 1â‚¬CT 10.3.-51'02 cOl -AD' RE Â¥, 6ED .TAT-$ Wlb W kiRTbC MLS 1 â€¢119 / 1.2.6...,/Â·4 ~ PREPARED IÂ¥ ..7-TION 12 M/TY CLERK ~ *-...............T 0-I. I........ T.--IP 10 Sollâ„¢, .... 85 .ST 0.. P.1 ASPEN SURVEY ENGINEERS INC. -e .- -r I.CT IM â„¢11 PLAT 'ITW1~ n - -- ~nU .. 0- .rf ,-ECT Im 11Â¢14 rUT ...... I. TD- *... 2,0 S GALINA STREET ASPEN, Colo 81611 -- nâ‚¬ -â„¢ I ....wl./1- ... .... PHON</FAX <9701 925-3/16 Jâ€¢6 .. 28301 NOV. 04, 1 99* - --- I 1 N 6TH STIEST -1 L fitill- ~ 911 4 , 4 Y \11 9.4 1 0 - -1 V. I *-Xlxl 4 4 /11 III 1 -1 1 0 - 1 Z 4 1 ILl 11 1 -1 I hi 7TH sT R-EET 1 , J 1 ~"1 9 0 -0 > p Z 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 h. block plan Dia i .-<* -14./-2~~4.--c. -*-- - ..:'-v<- â€¢-....#. r-- -p.' : 7 't jit ,). f/n2-~ 1 .. 4.7 . 8 1 ~ I--.-/ i f 1 4. f IiI - 1 4' ' . E f 1 1 fhtliu Illl"nÂ·-111! ali~ 2 i it Ililic -r,71 li(|tt!1/111~j~1~11!1/~'~i'1.1~1~iil~l~11~it~~1// ~~~i'j ~~~~iillt(U!~(len,l i.,{!Illl'11 IFII!~1!lili;~il.111,11â€¢,111 1 14 4-4 -h lili 1 1 \Ill,1 / 111 N 11' t. 41/ .. 15 1)11 1 31 111 11 . HY lilli 1 111'ill./11111'til 111111111 ' I '1 '.-- -- 1111 1' [v|lillilliI'll' Iinli|lit irligpip' 1~~t*Yjil~IljA -1 - / ir f.-).T.W.\41 D il '79'. m ...*- r ilt Â£ concept: 07.7. --1, - -245- 32=ticE'11"lili' lillibl':111"LI'l,111.11,i<ill# 11'i:iqilzilit' 4 sc h e~ ea A dirll agefrÂ°ondethevia ~~ ,~ < Er-- /k-3-Â·h/Â«4/33.9/1~ a paved ground plane, to i A ~2><I~ u.,ql] reflect the project's density I -- - -" 4 - --- ~41-0,~ uwh-En-:41--fla:zzksli.-1~ . 1- 1 and mixed use program . malmHil' 11,f, 1 --Â»41 O d K c~ " 1 I the paving uses open joints, 6 r 4 planted with lawn or low : b 4 groundcover to minimize ~ ~ \4%,k t..â€žÂ£ impervious surface a . ~ III 1---/t I,h It bosqueof columnaraspens " are set in the commons to , scale the buildings to the. ~, 4 pedestrian, minimizing the Â¢ F â€¢ buildings 3 story height. d .: - f -" t.--.2~1'll,1 3- " .41 -- H + 1 the central commons is not Â·Â· . +111 t envisioned as a programmed space; instead allowing - flexibility to adapt to the -4 3 3 r- 1 - //lilli ..Â».-Â«11'm residents needs over tim e 1 ..4_1 .1 1 1 1 ''1 + 1 All #11- / *44 1/ Ilft o [1 -~~ti--~44 p m *l,~--q/1 1>Â»~'"1 ' 4 1 L_ul:L' ..#---1 *Â«.44.- ja:lib.1 0 ) --. 0.- I I I. D tr 0 04 --ED>41-L' 1 1 1\\\ 1 1/ 11 1\ I e H T U R e T A A N 4 1 T 0 4 E- 6 7-E A , - Â· - 4- i [? E W A. 6. At O ex, d ~'~:< .1 0 -Â·Â· ' rae E 11 61 \ sT M * 2 1- 0 - Al A 6 \ i \1 7 27-Yer:4-f'. Â·-0.+"-Le'Ult-- P.4 W' '=.-, > MÂ·~ ~ p---- -- - --- ---7 3----------7 1,==31 U) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.,1 - 1 1 51 0 CD 1 Ill | 02,Â·0- 24-,<:3&'(28 gs. ea> I e.~,e. 1 1 1 - -C 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 CIO 1 1 1 1 1 Ill --- --1 Ii----------U 6 f 4 I 2-..-D. $*f. B =mÂ·rÂ«it./1/41 - Z 1 1 :IÂ« --'42Â·**3%â‚¬'AÂ«*I 2:14.Â· .-.. -~.4 .-4 1 1 1 j 1 1 MaoriÂ»11 CAL- ) ELEÂ£7[P4CAL- 7 0,901/7 7-:b.c>.3 1 1 - f M ' Â«31 __1~ 11' ~ 11 1 i r.!Ila ,- t..1-4 ''11 Ii' h 1 1~111'j~1 4 , 1 t. 1 5.0, e. 1 - --4 UN IT 9772<AGE COMI MERS-l,AL -- 57-0005 1 -- ~ t. --Â·-..*.- ..mk Â· Â«I/#I: ..-â€¢.Â·4'.- Â·Â·*-Â·Â·Â· "t, *I...C.:.2-.;: , 'i- - *........â€¢ 6 ) BASEMENT PLAN d I 01 5 10 hf):Â· "'' ~.Â·'-'81?.r'-i ' E.tke,-Â·..46;â€¢1*6:**,c, Â»-460 666L AinE zg I uf3!sap 0!lewellos I HV Ulell.1 pUE Ll;z < ueld lueulaseq i-1-2.-" n ' 7.b '' ' ip, 4â€¢Â·bÂ·. Â·'~7.:i.Â·7'f 1 - PROF'EM-Ty LINE ---J 100.O' â‚¬ - . 1 FT i 21 â‚¬ 4% 4 4_~, / A 1 1 4 1 1 - 1 9\ 1 1 1 1 \ 1% 4 -41 ' i , 1 / B f r 4.-1 i 9 1 M {71 1 ;Lt 1 1 U t. - ~ 1 EL M . 1.69. 1 1 1 -62-3-1*4 1 . I ' m . 1 R 0 9 = 0 ----- I Â·11 " ~ Â· Â·Â·Â· 1 1 1, 1 1 11 .. 1 ./ - ' f. - . . 1 -J- 4. 11 .... 1, I ! g j 74 4 \ 12 1 1 , $. Pr-- 72 ~ 1__ P g 5 <-Ld 1- m ;ti IN 2 7 MO m 1 7=j tru Â£ 1 J :-Â»- V Â¥ 2-71 77 1 -14 =1 1 1-) . 24 --. t +lt -I .- r.- - 9 f 1 \\ 11 t- . Â·, .1 Â·al w il 111-111 *1~ I.,1 --- T 1 L__ 0 01 -3 73 0 C Z 0 71 r- 0 O X) -0 7 Z '. h {*p;, 7t 1-1 and main A H j schematic design 1 27 july 1999 Si.UDIO R :F 4.1 5 architects ground floor plan 4%149**&:b#*U 66.MON FAA<-\Ne f-OF- (53 RI PAPLic I N 6 COMI MON AKEA De )*..4 IÂ·--/ **/L I 'LI Â« -1* tz i I 77 4 - ---1 Lt_7 1 Â¥ w. -1 - ---4 1 -- -----*.------4-, - t 14 0 y- -- TtÂ· i f -- 1 1- 1~- 4 \ -t' ///C. --8 k JE \ DI f, 1, ~ t 1 L f - 4/2- U == 1 I 'i 1 . 15 111 1 1 1111111'i lillit ~ 4 1111; A-- --4- E- ==P _1 11 1 WI LAÂ·-4*Â·42.- &/2 -.1 ,20â€¢DAJ-b 6 *0?4%4441*4--6 int f - tit 1 1\\1 , 11 T f . --7 1 - - till 19 IN 1,1 f '1 \+ ,- 4 122 . 1 30 2 EÂ«in\4 , 1 - - hi f 2 ? U lEt--- -*1 211-1 r 1 --- TraGErn:g-,~IU~.. . 7.4 ~ 22-I.71~ I i ..1 , 1 1 1-1.1 ---4 - 0 14 STUDIO B 7th and main AH l schematic design 1 27 july 1999 943 -*t second floor plan architects 2â‚¬DACEPM '0\ NV-ld 310013 GNODBS IC t'Illl 111~I~I I'llIlliullri~ a T g - li A- -1. - 1 lit .' ' 1--1. 97 , 1 - T- --* -- - - M 16 -7 1 - f --- . '~h- Â· l.luâ€¢u. t-=2*61.Â£Â·T -r 0 17 -1 I 11 pO 2 0 0 0 70 -0 r- Z ~ 7th and main AH l schematic designl 27 july 1999 STUD-ID I archite CtS third floor plan :-4 2% t. -- 0 4 - - /0 f + -4 E-=~- 6 -11 - , t# 20 --- 11 - ~ 92- ------ - -- 1 I - ---- - - - --- -13 - 4 ------ 1 m - I - I - - - 1~1 Â§ 2 &14 -4\11 70 Â© 4 %> e a 9 1,2 92 33 0 0 1. ~t Tl -0 Z 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 illillillillillillitillilillillilllmmegmi roof plan architects tot ,1 0 =PraÂ»W 3 **9 1- C- S & -_ililll[[~:e: A U 1,4.â€ž 3.' I lillill..:47. i -46 --I El -I~'64*~Ijs 1 1 1 Z 31 # 7m -â€¢,,'214. .1:41 .------0 CO : ' tt.- .'Â£4 m ---- IF===1-~ RN-Ni ------ m Flie 0 j,1 Z Â·34'.0-9'#i*h 1 11 >< 57&,Er:/1,,71 - U Iii ,/ I'K 1228 1 1 1 -,F?' 141- 11 - -1 9-4=4-ID , i 1. !1 -1 1 ' f--- ~111 1 -~Prt-- Etrf/awinv:)&73 1 1 1 U 111 1 - 1 J *\1 - 5- - 1 11 1 Mi l 1 1 =ZE 1 -32 3 -- m L .t = 1 11 - r \4 - 1 1 1 - 1 2 -21 .44 11 I ; 9 cf 41 4 t 4 4 U" 21 L 80' h*<IMUM HE{efil- . 7th and main AH I schematic design I 27 july 1 999 STUDIOB elevations arch,tecls F. r-- F-4 3 WOOD Slotr46 NOI1VA313 133hLLS H.I.~ 9 9,- -T j P A- - 1 -- - - -1 f.-4 1 , 1 4 1 / -- 1. 1 11 -- -- tÂ·Â·-- 1 - -1 lili 4-- ....4 ' - Ii=1111 lili â€¢ 1 kÂ· Â· -4 4- 1 :===r l/4//7 L .1 [-1-4 ! 11111 L t : : . 1TFT :=: %36\\ /44\ :':''l *phA 1----- 6 .... 11 1111 . -- -3 - - 11 11 lillil 1 1 1 11 1 . IIi 1 11,11 ESy..'$.1...,7.1 r'.,nfl ===4 1 139*269- - 1 : i ~ 'Â·4 Â·A,Â·Â· 0.22.A't .0.< m 1 1 11 1 1-1 11.~ '4: 1Â·Â·Â·24-' .....':: 9 ' 4 i 111 1 111 i -11-12 1. 1 Mur...,,40/:57 1 l ILLi '1 #41 - 61:4..tj -#RENS?:8 1 1 1 1.**:24 - f -1 I 4 -: 1 1 t -L==1 ' 0 11 ~111! ~ 1 1 , 1 411 j [13- - i 1 ' - "il 'i,1~ill, 11~1, STUDIOB 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 elevations architects ' f EAST ELEVATION NOUV/\313 HlnOS 2.-1 G-ENVU Snonlia.I\Eyi93 -- - \HOOD SIDING SH INeLES - 'kee MAJ-r 4 ' 1 F 7 .O p 1. 92 1, ; 21 f 1 .*Der- -ap ~ r-*- . . - Â· , r. *y..W. -W ..... . ---- 4% s.:: -- -1.-==a:F~ - ---- 19,4, 14 1 .... & 3:0 I . - -E--Â·-.--27- U .< '1; Â· re .'1 4'prl , 1" - -4- 9-&=LE--17,2 7 .- 4-' 1, f/4 M. - - I , . 7>/ 'U Aâ€¢' - 2*' , , 2 . n.- 1, - U. . - ''' , .â€ž54--r- irr, 1*." , ..â€ž,....'.1 ...'. ..im:.21.,Â·11:,r '41.,4 1,, ,.,i. 1 714..1 . .... 1*Imi'-7.59:-will,*1-~---....w ... r y 92 / 'Â·flfÂ· ' A i , 4//â€ž-4 4 - -. t. 4 ' 1 1 t,4 c - h * 2 4 7 1 , Egihi'7~Plip;Ai2% Â·44 *40 +U -- -- Ii- - ..4 Â· >Â°' ., '7 , 4. 4 J t .i , - ' - -=% ri - '- - -j-91. f =191&*i.i,1*401 ,& 4,1.1 ./ 1/ I ./ 64.trt , , ~-Â·DÂ·--4. Ef-t *7 - ~f 1 , . 7 Ke.2.'Ed a .....C '1 1 '7(&03.1 r.--7 .; ~ ~ tz:~11 t j \ ' t 7Â·Â·rf' fÂ·Â· '11â€¢,â€¢â€¢1â€¢ 1-1" 1 I -1-%4 B ' Â·Â· Â¥F:- -&/. 11"' ~</T ''9 I.. i JL' 1....14~ 1 .l f k-1 1 1.6>;4 :0 r - I Â£ Â· 15 L ~'Â·10 1,Â¢tÂ·fale 54 C 4 W E ST Her K-IMS -h\ -Lar- 4-- E 0-13 ; Sroâ€ž V 41 111 I-- -I--illi--Ill-- U - k ALLEY Vl - h It-3 , 1 m -I .~-1. 1 2 1 tf 1 9:rofy 1 STORY 1 - 1 r A 1 1 1/t AIN STR-EET V h fi 1 1 V 1 srogy U--~ 1 9rogy 1 4 11-=r r ! 4- --4, k N 6TH STLEET 1C.=4 03 0 0, Â£ 1.1,1 1, 1 _--4--- -*=E=EE*~~ 1=4 1 ' CD , 1 0) 0) A 1/ ' 0 h Ar .1 , C\1 F= 0 1 0 11 4 - i , I 1 1 1 1 -1 - 2 -1--rk rE] 14- - i-------il~*:3~~EEEU 19 ----- --- - 11 .._ _ - 0 1-_4~ 1-1 1 GROUND FLOOR PLAN | AN*&121 .l .--I- 0 1' 6' \01 r - ,- Itt-91- 0 - 61 -g--- - L - 1 Isep ol:ew.uos I HV u!2!13 pUE 412 ~Â· ueid ioon punoi!5 , 41 i - 1 'f ~ 4 11 1 b . 1 i - 4 I 1 '. 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 8 ..1 architects second floor plan '01 3 jo NV1d 300-Id ONODEIS - Fl- 0 al - Â£ 0 I r' '. E A-n - 11 1 7 1 1 .0/.I ......4... 4Â·. i Â·- . ---1 . L t - L/L * Â·l - i - .V . 1 fj 3 n t 1-â€¢4---4..4===4- 4 THIRD FLOOR PLAN m.m.= - -- 0.1' 67 /2, .///'/A/.I;.1 - 666L Ainf ZE I ueisep 01:eulellos I HV UIBLU pUB 41Â£ ~ 1-7 third floor plan IC:*=,1 1,1 I 1/ U WGLP 5'TKUTÂ» m Afetâ€¢.UT 0-ilivel-Se - WOOP *121!961 fz 0 Wa75) 5,121rk:31 ,Al-WAINUM- 010.40 WOOP WMPOWD WOOD COLUNND 97-OFEFKONT- EXAZIN,3 - - A . - GE:MENITITL~US' - -~ - Â°ifift --r PANEL-6 666 L *In[LE I uSisep o!,eluellos I Hv unnu pug 41Â£ elevations F>ROFEATY LINE-~ 11 4 -1Â»1 4==Ell 2 1, t===t --T . 1 - -r ~ 1- -T t-1 77' Tit-1 - --~14 gl---Ii-Ill-- 14 04.---- =-# 0 4-i--U-1.1 , f ....----4 t~12=211 i tr~ f 51 . -------- 41 < th 9 ---- 4 i M 9 -- Â·- 1-I*--Â»bT a , t T I _-0.41+4-4-4 -4-72...12_- -tr- 9-~2ETTT-1--Itill-1-rrt-f I lit , -fil ]_43_t flit_[li ' 0 n 0 0 1 - -- 11 1 1 1 i 1 I ''1 45 1 LL -f ---- Ipt t=t 1 \ :hu E 1 . \ W .-1 V -1 4% 22 1-- 1 ~ -.- 12% 10 - 1 i - 4 - --1----- 143 44 .... Z L --T4 r-Â·-4 11 .1 0 ~ 1 Eff , frip-MiÂ· i,Â·i-=T--1 lt- - ~ *=il- Er_- It --11+I-1 4 ' pH Mil , 1-4.4.1,1.1 0 -1 - e '4,1 7th and main AH I schematic design I 27 july 1 999 ST.LIDIC B 411,4--- 1 ground floor plan archi lec:s OAN'OFT F+AANe f-or- ( 53 COM MON AKEA Ul '3 j NV-ld 2100-Id UNROND t=- 3 1 , , ; 1 -1 1 fra ' 7 - 2â‚¬ZaÂ«OM UN/711- _ ~ -- : !1 - f 1 - e,EL>gÂ£226/1 ~ 4 1 - 2â‚¬Â£33â‚¬63t5*f ~~ UN IT - j. UN IT 9 7 1 f . *t 11 1 I Qi< T TE=*11-17*71 1,)Tri-Irrifilfit inri~-Â»w 'P , T 1. 1 . ,- Ill 1 1 111111111 11 jill lilli 111 1 1 4 1. III I[]- 3 - 2Â£.DROOM N rl- . UNIT 1 1 --~22-6 -ji- -' .31 --11- _3_ ,' #-fi -mr---u==ti-7*Tor# - - .1 171; f 4 ==f 4 A -#--3 1--4 4 1 - eeD KOOK,1 - 2â‚¬:PR.Â£;O/VI / -DEDROPA/1 2 3- ___ 1 UNIT UNIT- UNIT - 11 - 0- 1 ~__~Â¤:z,__--~ t , t--th--41 *i-IFI-t t--~~~-~~~*.__.~*~4 -- .t=q=-r-=1 ,/./.. +~,~ SECOND FLOOR PLANj 1 1 O Â¢ 6' 10, m 1 1 - ilit ' 1 1 Jr.11 1.2 191 11'Il l i ' 1 1,1.tli 1 0 -- 11 1 ' 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 lili 1 1'' ~71 ' TE' 1 , 17 1 4 -t 1 #-, 1 .I 1 -- 1- 41 1-=r-tal qu..77 ; 1 1 E--+ IM r - - f -10 -- -- ,/Ti - ,-4 M Ul r-IJ 6 - ~-~ 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 S I U D 1 0 il third floor plan architeC15 NV-Id MOO--Id CNIH1 0 C) -C 0 E--------------1 1 1 1 1 ME,StÂ£Â«/CAL- ) ELEETÂ»CAL 1 ('ZA'yOUT T.5.0 3 1 2 1 1 1 1 lili ~~, i i -1.-3 - # i,1.:1 1- ~ i'111 - l 1 - 1 1 1 1 UNIT 9702*32 COMMEADAL, - - STOF,666 01 1 AR p>TA *.- 01 5 \0 r'*,it).4, *. 1 42 .1 - - 1 - I 6 6 6 L kin[LE I u 6 ! se p o ! , e lue 4 3 s I H V u ! 2 UU p U e 41 Z ~4 : uetd luelueseq 131 10=31 41 A ~alll[Ili?x, ~7Â«9: //Em Um.*~./1/.by~ ~.164-idv/Mm /7 U 1 1 L__11.,~ 11 NFII 11 N_MI 1111~ EF WOOD SrE<UTD al ADFHAL-r SH I Mel.ee 11 ;1 1-i - -7-F---i,=all=U671=1=117Flt-Imt=21 02--=in 11 -- I r i-=---1-iliffiF1 11110[ 11 -[Ell[- Il -104 WOOP *!PIHB ~*FEFEEFEE~~ j=====--'" 'Immtiliimitim, Inttle' 1 r)-1*20~L_- =uu'* ._ A-1 I -=t' 1111:imi,imm,mnlitittwil : --4 .= 0 Wa752 9 J 0|le AUG'KINUM-GUAO WoOP IV I N CPOWEI + 1__ ----0=223~ 11Â®fil!10*iÂ¥[- -=-7EFFR-=99Â»-=---ataill -11 11 11all 11 113*al ..9.=-4-7â€ž:1+IZZ. 1 rlf----90"limzf.Will'imm",97".m<.mu.#"991"/m.9/9 * Woop COLLIANS 1 1~300#RE.aft'al enryia.~z~ n milgetifjtnfinl t:2111-~9*r=-1 It i____-Il 1 1,~=r~jiRl1d1meIl ILAH t .~UTILL?EJ.1 Il ~it~~~h=~:*~am r=pi,a-â€žr--1 1 1.11 0 __~ 57TOREPÂ£,5;'INT i liv-i.14.Gul o .al:icidqia&. [zijWd#T ir-1 11 r----11 hM@111[311199@11_11*111*11 Will 11113-1-'14=n-114=~ _1-EZZIEZZI~ 10=UN*4111*Ung~____ ___ _ _ MAIN STREET ELEVATION e - 41 2 - 1 ~ 0 .2 -11- -- F=m==11 lEi. . - 11- 1 0 ~ .' I - _L ---- I - --r -1 af . , r- Â£ - 3 02=MENT--0-19 1-. - ... ---272 ' 44 - 1 FANE.1-6 11 -1- t] i 1-- 1.-- -i .- .1--- 1 1 1 - iâ€žIli 1111-1-[l]Â£+1111]lit : -2. r.9 7â„¢ STREET ELEVATION 2 4 * 6+74 666 L kin[ ZE I ufilsep oneule u!ELU pUB UJZ I jil. $ 1- Amm *4 7;1 1 ---f :11*45 ' A 1- '.- f 1 k E 1 1 , 3-41 A - . 1 r Â£ 4 k # # 4 â‚¬50, rf- 6, ir,-Ittk / - 111 H 1 + I -1 21 1,#/ p- 'i-- . 6 & t E --f~GU< *Ailt{ tr ,~ . -1 1.Fne 1 1 1-1 - 111= 11 A - 1 11 ~ ~-- 79 2&./.2:*r 4 : 1 1 Â£ - .1. 1111' 11 ' L 11 1 ( 11,~~~ ~4;El .. If IIi 1 1 ====L f Ntd 11 %1 1 7{ 11 :1 111'll lilli . +-11--0.- 12 Il 1===r p 11 11 1 11 ~.11 If I.11!111 111' 1 1111 ! 11:,1 1 1'. 1 ~ 11 '11 1 4 1 I Â« -4 - .1 1 f r'.11 4 - -- if a 01 7-F 16~ i, i -4 j 'lilli ~1 di 1 11,1 11, 11 1--1 1 1 Â£ 1 li~ , ~ ' !11 1 1! hÂ«F*0 7th and main AH l schematic design I 27 july 1999 ST U DIOU 1,> elevatlons architects EAST ELEVATION NOLLVA313 HlnOS I k.:4:.- . 1 0 , Housing Office City of Aspen/Pitkin County 530 East Main Street, Lower Level Aspen, Colorado 81611 (970) 920-5050 Fax: (970) 920-5580 February 23,2000 Amy Guthrie City of Aspen Historic Preservation Officer 130 S. Galena Street Aspen, Colorado Dear Ms. Guthrie: Attached is the Aspen/Pitkin County's submittal for final Historic Preservation Commission review. Fourteen (14) sets of drawings will be submitted separately. If you have any questions about this submittal, please contact Lee Novak at 920-5137. Sincerely, Mary J. Roberts Executive Director Aspen/Pitkin County Housing Authority I. Introduction This is an application for final Historic Preservation Review of the proposed 7th and Main Street Affordable Housing and Corner Store project. The Aspen/ Pitkin County Housing Office (hereinafter "the applicant") is acting as a representative of the City of Aspen, the parcel owner. The subject property is a 9,000 square foot parcel, whose legal description is Lots A, B, and C, Block 19, Aspen Townsite. The property is located within the Main Street Historic Overlay District. The lot is currently vacant. The applicant is proposing to develop a mixed use project on the site. The project will include eleven (11) affordable housing units and a 650 square foot corner store. Ten (10) of those units will be one bedrooms, and one (1) unit will be a two bedroom. Eight (8) parking spaces will be provided for the affordable housing units in the structure on the alley. Three (3) additional spaces will be provided for remote parking in the garage at Benedict Commons. No parking will be provided for the commercial store, but a delivery zone will be signed on Main Street. The Historic Preservation Commission provided conceptual approval to the project by a 7-0 vote. Since that time, a conceptual/final application was submitted and reviewed by the Housing Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission, and the Growth Management Commission. At the time of this application, the City Council had approved the project at first reading. II. Final Submission Requirements The standards for final submission were supplied by the Historic Preservation Officer. These standards, and the applicant' s responses to them, are as follows: 1. An accurate representation of alt major building materials, such as samples and photographs, to be usedfor the proposed development. At the final review hearing, the applicant will present a materials board which shows the types of materials being proposed, as well as colors that may be used. Those materials include hardiplank siding, wood siding, wood window trim, asphalt roofing and metal roofing. 2. Finalized drawings of the proposal at 1/4"=1'0 scale. The required drawings are attached to this letter. 3. A statement ofthe effect ofthe details ofthe proposed development onthe original design of the historic structure (if applicable) and character of the neighborhood. During conceptual review, the Commission agreed that the massing and site design for the project were appropriate for the historic overlay district. The applicant has detailed the project to be consistent with the historic neighborhood. Some of the materials selected, such as wood siding and trim, wood porch posts and corrugated metal roofs, are traditional materials. Others, such as cementitious panels and standing seam metal roofs, are more modern. These newer materials do not overwhelm the traditional materials, but instead help to emphasize that this project while respecting the historic neighborhood is new. In addition, the verticality and proportion of the windows are traditionally Victorian in character and establish an appropriate sense of scale. Finally, no highly reflective surfaces are planned. 4. A statement of how the final development plan conforms to the representations made during the conceptual review and responds to any conditions placed thereon. Very few changes have been made to the design presented at conceptual submittal. The following changes have been made: â€¢ The landscape plan has been altered on the 7th Street side. The new design maintains the existing ditch alignment along 7th Street, and will require transplanting the existing trees to allow for the sidewalk alignment. â€¢ Openings have been added to the lower-level east and west elevations of the carport building. These changes were requested during HPC conceptual review. â€¢ The cementitious panel sizes have been reduced from 2' 6" X 5' 6" to 2' 0" X 4' 0". This was requested by HPC during conceptual review. â€¢ A street light has been added to the southwest corner of the site. This was required by the city engineering department. â€¢ An awning was incorporated into the design of the commercial space. This further breaks up the mass of the three story building and further segregates the commercial from the residential uses. III. Conclusion In summary, the applicant has responded to the requests made during HPC conceptual review. The applicant has responded to the applicable standards and demonstrated compliance with said standards. Should any reviewing agency request additional information, or need clarifications of any of the statements made herein, that applicant will respond in a timely manner. 1 1 C . i 1 / 1 1 - 1 1. 1 4 111 11 1 ,w.- DECK -* ' DECK t: " 4(/ 11 111 11 1 0 0 a -c--w,60 #MITUA,tw- C r.13. SUPR) 62- #1 91**L- f{#E 124 tls OPW'*03,9 ON 00/IT >'In 4Lon c-)d V V 1 01 10 01 :: q 1,0 u / NEW COAK. ~ 0//- 4645'uÂ¢LA. 6Â» TITLE U}Of 13,0 WRLOUMOA. GlÂ¥&\fr S SHEET NUMBER 65Â·24 4 PROJECT 7TH & MAIN DRAWING DATE 6. 1 1-8/ -1Â· TUOIDB *. - , DRAWING SCALE l/+ q architects C 2900 s t u dio t) o r c h ite c 1 spc oiliâ€¢ghts reserv . mill, street aspeÂ· co 81611 tel 970.920 9428 'cx 970.920.75 oil studiobÂ©sopris net l3'-1 07-221 01 Lor /1 1 - toi/1/" 1 3 '- lolbY - 1/ L Â£04211 / L 0 fLÂ» 4 '- occ .., 4/LOS - -Ttgo#L- 56*WALK 2/' ~ F Al,rapo â‚¬UL. F'PE {th#RhAL Â¢ . 1 ENO VKE Â»/1%120;ES -~ -- IM- 149( 4 P Evao ' / st, P 10* \66*10 5um#Ts t== 0 f*mÂ«91Â¥05% -Re or -- .. rr I . : S : I ' 50:Ere;14< --7 - 1 1 1 1 1 4 /-O/7 54?eou,Â¢1*i (,fluÂ¢744 k >-4 mu Â¥(PE> (L#Â¥1 l.4 Q L.Vof ta}MÂ·04,44.9 SHEET NUMBER PROJECT 7TH & MAIN 6 5 - 2,6 D DUWING DATE 12 01 -0 / - -1. Inalol DRAWING SCALE 1(1/u chitects 2 r C 2000 studio borchitects pc oil fights ,eserved 555 n mali street ospeÂ·Â·Â· co 881 tel 970.920.9428 fox 970.920.7822 e.r.git stud;obesopris.net -*T..'...%*,9.:/..1 Thu Feb 24 08: 53: 59 2000 I 1 . . I , 1 - - --~440.~JN~ 2 , , I .... \ ' .1.4. NW -6 5/4. - - - - - -Ill- ------- --7 0 1 1 1 1 -- E o mi 0 1 1 1 1 1= 2 11111 1 111111 1 1. 41 @IN 11 / i /: \ 4-1 / - 11 \ 1 _127 1 14 1 Â»13:Â¥*'**4...1 1 \ -Ill i L LUGst :RVED RIGHTS, INCLUDING COPYRIGHT THERETO ALL RIGHTS RESERVED Â©1 m-- - 44 1 4 .... 0 4 I Â¥ . - . p-- 1 8 1 1 U.U. -i-. 0 11111111=.111.~1 -1 11~11 10...1111~L 11-1 11...." U...." L-_1-1 Iii Ill-11 ./ 1...1 ill-11 11...m 11~11 11~11 ill:zilli â€¢ilihillivil - 1.1 11.1 ....... . 1 ~ - 4 I...1 - 1 1 11 U..." U...11 0 I.-11 11--il 1,"...~ !~11111111111111!11llilill111111111111111!~~ 1.. 0 1.14 .. .. A A .m ST lolo.1 . - - I -- . .. I . : I ..1.:.; . . - . . . . I . . 1 1 I :Â·- - 0. I D D ..... . D.: - 1 .-- . 0- I : 1.- 0- D . .- .- - .- . . 8/7 7 . ..: I . - I . ... 0 --= MATCH LINE MATCH LINE 1 1 1 MECHANIGAL 1 1 1 0 ~T.O.CONG 1 111 E 84'-8 3/4" r -19 1 0 11 Of 1 di STORA*E STORAeE .9--2 1 CD 3. H Z 6 7 STORAaE STORAGE - 1 (86 Se 2 1 ELECTRICAL 06 0 D 11 | 1 02 59 02 se r ~ 7 z I / ~ 11 / fga (63*\ Ld -J 1 r V-*-7 \ 11 /SIB~ i --7 r - I ll h 11 U i liu' 1 - 7 1 1 11 ---1 L -1- STORAaE | RESIDENTIAL STORAE ~ T.O.GONG RESIDENTIAL STORAE _ 848 3/4" - - r -1 11 lilli/1 lili 1 111 11/1 lili 1 g U 1 ----i \ Colih STAIRIA[pLLI Iflilli 1 1 STORAaE _____ ( ~ STORABE 020 lilli lilli 1 1 ZE 1 - 1.L 11 N 3 ~': 1 1 1 1 1 Hi (84 9) ~ -__ - (75 9) i i i + C <i i a up .AÂ· 7: 1 1 24 464 0 13.66Â· 1 id'-3 I 1/44 - - 11111111 -1 4 - 1 lilli ll r--1 CIZIZED M 1 1 141 - STAIRMELL STORAeE 11 STORAGE /61\ . 1 - - ~ I - CON L J -1 131 1 -N 10 -- - (75 Se - CO 0 08 Sp) 0 /bok / - 11 :1 11 --1- - 0 _3Â£_ -c,E i r 1 6 - 7 V .0 1 - 11 k<J, I 6.2 11 \ /2,14 . --- 5-1-ORAaE < , a> =A= 11 \ ~ -- -1.- - 2 i Â· 0, cÂ» O H STORAGE - -0 - X @ co (74 SF) ~ Up (75 Se COMMERCIAL STORASE co 5 11 11 1 - .C= 01 1 1 L---_--_____-__--__--- 1.- 1 -- 0).- 1 1 [7 -3 ~ T.O.GONG 0 -CE L--3 L__1 aq'-8 3/4" EN , STORAÂ®E 6 (85 SF) 00 m CS r[-n r--1 1 1 E--1 LO LEd im i I mm 1 101 Ill , In L-2 1 1 L-1 L_-2 2 - SETBACK --------------------- PROPERrr LINE ~ Rev. Date: Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: N LOWER LEVEL PUN Sheet #: LOWER LEVEL PLAN A A2.Oa lM" = 1'-0" 318Â¥02308:IV NIVIAI 133hllS NIVIN 193M 002 00Â¥Â¥0100'NadSÂ¥ OBAMBSEN S.LH91& 119 013kl3HliHC=udo:) 9NlonlONI 'Sl,491& aEIANaSEM MaH-LO -TrÂ¢ aNV AHOinlÂ¥1$ MÂ¥1 NOINWOO -11Â¥ NIV.Laa 11VHS -0'd 91031IHOUV El OIOnlS -0*d S1O31IHO~V 13 01001$ 30 NOISSMM)d NaLLIBM BOIkld 3H1 inOH.LIM 031doo klo (]3Sn 39 Awy NOLLVINklo:INI SIHi do lbivd ON -0-d 81031:HOE:V 3 010(US =10 A.1-113dOUd 3141 Sl 1Nal'ynO DO SIH.L N D a3NIV1NOO 1NEUNI NDISaa aNV NOLLVEHO=INIBB *0'd S.LOaliHONV i OICIALS 966J @ ty = El E 1/fll ~ ~ i C 9 0 00 dse leell I qo,pnj s Wed Feb 23 21: 26: 43 2000 -11 T'11111 5.-10. 111-1. 2.-6 5/4. 6-21/7 5'-6 1/:r 6.-7 0 8,111/4. 6*6 1/4. 1'-101/2' 15'-01/2' 24 ,/2~ lei-O, 2/â€¢ 1. -I- I. .-I-.-.-I .-.-I 1 IR @7' = '- MATCH LINE -*- -~ Â·-MATCH LINE lilli l \ 1 2220 1 1 ----1 --1 0 2---- --- ------- LLI 0 1 1 kr.o.PLYNÂ° CD /12\ ~133\ 7100'ZO. 1 Z UNIT 101 - LIVINe ROOM I J 06 0 BEDROOM BEDROOM 1 Ir r- U Epe JAIA 1- KITCHEN 4 ~=E~ 16 BEDROOM \ 1 Z V- E 2 2 10'-5. 103 102 ~LOSEL - - CLOSET - 6 105 0 0 1 11 1-1 1%2 D /16ih 101 1121 - --CJV- a 2 01013 toi e DaBO V N )<22* Eae)-li -- ~j BATH BATH 0 101 101 KITCHEN -c*r = ~:~HEN* <N- - F Ef-7 BATH O 31 g ~ ECE~ 102 2. ! 1 21!. V...1 1 STAIRWELL 11#1 IDN 11 0| .81..10'-3. iz 103 Â·rrPE 2 97/4 E rrpe a 'IM E - W Ml --,2 - - CLOSET .1... J *4 + - -1 158Â£21 1 - 1 1 -ma--- 2 2 L - L N 4 Pool = 11111111 10 | m t- _ ___ k 1 | - - | 1 1 1 1 IRA"= '-3 3/4" 01 -- co 01 9- TOILET ~ co .e,~ ~133~ 100 k B IZE.2 -- - 1 1 1 i D 1 1 6.2 1 T.o.PLYPNE> - - Â® c a 7,33-0. -- - 1,-01/2 6'-O1/2. 5Â·-2' It/2 r ./ - fo L UNIT 103 UNIT 102 v k LIVINe ROOM LIVINe ROOM - : = L_ = 1 0 1 ~lah-|| 71 & p --0 E E cv =a, W COMMERCIAL ..1 1 7 1 T.O.PLÂ»ID ~~ | 103 1 1 - 00 e = Ck 0 9, 46'-10" f 10 ~00 1 1 10 k SET BACK --- ---1- 1 --- -- - -- --- -- - 1 0 0 D A B ~ IRev. IDate: 1 Sutref 201'-4 1/2" = ARCH. 100'-0" 11-4 1/4 7,-115/8. 101/4' PROPERTY LINE 14â€¢ 6-4. 6'-6. .... 5.â€¢ Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 Issue date: 7-[O 42' ... 640â€¢ 20-# - Drawing Title: 16'4 MAIN LEVEL PLAN Sheet #: N 1 MAIN LEVEL PLAN A A2. I a 1/4"=-*0" 318Â¥CR:10=13Â¥ NIV 133hI1S NIVW 1SaM 002 00Â¥80100'NadSV 80 -1 a3AU3S3U 91.H918 -11Â¥ 0.1-3BEH11Helk,AdOO 9NlanlONI '91Helk, 03AklaSEkl XJEIH.LO -1-â„¢ aNV AMOin LVIS MVI NOININOO -177 NIV13kd -1-1VHS -O d 91031!HOWV 8 Olan.LS O d 9103.LIHOZWV 9 Olan.LS =IO NOISSI,yhlad Nal.LihIM 230Ihld 3H1 .LAOH.LIM C]3:dOO Â¥0 03Sn 39 AVIN NOI.LvrlaO:INI SIH.L :IO .Lavd ON -O d 9103.LIHOEJV El OlaniS JO A.LBEIciONd 3HI SI 1NBINROOD S)Hl NO 03NIV.LNOO 1N31NI NDIS30 aNV NOI.LVINWOJNI 3H1 0-d $1031:HOHV 8 OICIALS 8663 @ L Lei opejoloo Wed Feb 23 17: 28: 01 2000 T.O.GONG. lot'-6 7/le" DUMPSTER 11 ' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 PA INe AREA FOR FIVE VECHIGL ARKINe AREA FOR THREE VEC ICLES HANDICAP PARKINe STORAGE T.O.GONG. STORAeE 101'-4 11/10Â· 1 0 $ Â¢ 11,1 1 5 2 ~i UP lili lili up 1-Il]ELI_____1___1 L[lillI I 1 1 1 0< 060 1 1 II 1 --3 1 1- - -Â»-977TT= 1 1 / 6-64 -6+ 1 1 MATCH LINE MATCH LINE --.-.-. - I ~+I I -ri' * i777 - ' - . - ' -. - I 2 7 -1 1 1 --1-------------3 / \ i T.OPLYND 109 ]02 ,33'-0. A A UNIT 101 LIVINe ROOM BEDROOM D BEDROOM r ERM MA T'01 -9 t. 1 .%28-QQM le 4-10 01 =ty- 00 N 00 - ON 103 103 102 B --GLOSET - G los 11.2 1 102 0 -02 CLOSET 0 0 0- CD D D N 11 4 1 A 101 0 O,9 101 A E 101 101 -2.M o F De X22P 9830 PIA I 09 (21 7 0 ~ BATH BATH p TH DN 1 - a- UD KITCHEN f~33 - . xe 1 8 '=10'-31 03 42' , ImA, 112 #tAIM L LAI ~ DE 4 STAIDELL| | DN (0 (5 = 2 .....0 E II,!1211 il +P.- 0 N -6 -QU22EI (D L N :SoO- 8 2 , -1 1 h- L '1111~ 9 1 -- 1 0),0 uP 91Â· 0 "= 63 3/4, -- a).- -- 0 -0 E - TOILET 100 EN ' *90 11 B 0 | T.O.PLY* T.O.PLYVD h. - 11 1 oo,-o" -- . =Z ro UNIT 105 UNIT 102 W L,iVE@-EOM LIVINe ROOM | | | 6 1 â€¢ 'W 9, 11 1 1 1 log 1 TO.PLryÂ© COMMERCIAL | ~ 103 1 6 e - O 0 gel-lo - 0 SET BACK 1 L 1__________________31 1 1-___ ------ --- -- ----- _ ----- ---- 2 Rev. ~Date A B Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 PROPERTY LINE - |SSUe date: Suter 201'-4 1/2" = ARCH. IOOLO" Drawing Title: - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - MAIN LEVEL PLAN Sheet #: N /43 MAIN LEVEL PLAN A2. I < 13/16":=1-'-6" fJ 318Vabl03=IV 1331~ O3AHEISEN SLHDIEI TT, 013blatillHOIHAdOO 9NlanlONI 'Sl-Helhl 03AZ13S38 83~410 11Â¥ ONV *80101,VLS MVI NO~INOO 11Â¥ NIV13U 1-TVHS 0-d 9103-LIHOMV 8 0!0019 -0-d 9103-LIHO~V E OIOn.LS 30 NOISSI,lidad Naillk,AA kdOIhld aH.1. lnOH.LIM 03!doo 80 clasn 381 AVA NOI-LWJMOANI SIHi do ltivd ON '0-d $1031IHOMV El OloniS dO.UkladOhid 3Hi SI .LNBINnOOQ SIH,1 NO 03NIV-LNOO 1NalNI Ne]Saa aNV NOUVINWOJNI 3HL 'Od S1031Â»10BV 8 olanls 86$ @ L 1,91. peJOI00 4 jiou 999 Wed Feb 23 21: 36: 40 2000 Wed Feb 23 17: 57: 02 2000 Â¢ . 1 1 ' , $ I 20'-8 17 It-0. - I . 1 L - - - - 1 1 1 I i.. 19.1 1 1 lilli - ~1 ~ -biTUUV 9-3 1 / -12\- 1 1 1 1 1 k) 1 1 1 1 7 J 70 A l > 1 1 1 70 01 11 / m 3 -1 10 m J Â·Z - -91 -1 A * 1 ---2 - g % 4 41 0 .. 1 0 ---- 1 ---- 1 1 N .. 1 ii 1 271 1 1 6 6 -- 4 u 1 8 8 14-- 6 002 1 1 1 - E--- .. 1 lul 1. I mil 4 1 13 1 1 Â· 4 1 : 1 Ell r- . 41-0. 1 .. 1-7-11142Â· 1%. I r 0-3 1/2. 8 & - 1 li 1 11 :1 1: I i.r-- 1 .: 1 1 / .A: 1 1 E-- 1 4-- 9 1. r Ix E- -- 59 --- 18; _ -- 4 .I % 3 / 6 1 1 1 & 1 1 / F . f-- -~- .Mi -2 - I 111 i i I A@ -=Ei-- - - 4 4 -0 I - 1 ---- 1 1 4 I. 1 1 .... ...0. . .. Z I , 29-91/2. . I I 9 2 19 2 14 6 - i R # 1 STUDIO _8_ 7TH & MAIN AFFORDABLE 1 , HOUSING PROJECT architects 700 WEST MAIN STREET 1 - ASPEN, COLORADO C 11 1 1 555 northmill street, aspen colorado 81611 L- (970) 920.9428 fax (970.920 7822 e-mail studiob@sopris.net 14---- -.-.-.-A-2-111~=.~ 11 I'-to. DLIO' HANDICAP PARKINe FARKINe AREA FOR THREE VEG4ICLEB 5'-6' 8 NÂ¥ld 13A31 14&;G + Nnd 13All NIVW 0002 AblvANVT VO .. 0/1 .4 1,17 "1 117 11'1 94â€¢ -4- W.4 WD' 0,0.. ~ - - I.Ii--I. - #*-I - - - - - - - - - - - Il-.- - - - AW 4020 CMT3056 CMT 034 CMT2.40 ----------------- --------9-- -- -- --------- 1--------------------- CMT3042 MT3042 AWN26 6 ------ lilli 1 - k CMT3.40 0 0 740" | 1 1 UNIT 207 UNIT 206 EL) I . ..1 ~2EQQM -DECK 1 - .2=11 ~ 0/2 lo,1=,1 LIVING ROOM LIVINe ROOM ~:*Eblk ~ aMEL l 9' 21_0" 6'-0 I/2" b 0" 6'-0" -5!mtEN .kno.pLYMP 10'-01/7 3070 'floq'-10 15/16" CMT2640 | 1 1 2 2O 1 1 1 E k i I IT-Tkl -Â£2----- - 1% KE;j Closer o COBET--- * r lt; 1 1 1 1 KITCHEN | P ~ -1 ' ~/ T.O.il I O WE -7 W _Â¤8It!_ 1 RA 1 05 064 0 1 BA ~f BEDROOM BEDROOM vj * ~ ~ I a ZO, U. /8 1 TO.PLYMP 1m CM 2640 ~ 3 -TTE:3-:RieÂ· z 3070 g g Em C e < 1 5 & 1 1 1 2 I JESR --- ---Ii------- -- - - - --- C T2034 CMT 056 CMT3 C 2.34 ---- - ---27 -- 3 C 3056 06 0 3070 n 0 7 q 11" 1 0 7 q-11" 1 11'llill'111 , ON ON 11 111111'll II DN 1 1- h -- aMi 11'r .4111, *â€¢*VW -IMOWIP 11~41,21 .,1 121 -60111, 1 --- - ..0 2-8- MATCH LINE MATCH INE ' 2,_ 11 1 7,1 = 11 i .1 .-.-.-.-.Il. --1. -. .r .4.2. 240* -- ..14â€¢ 1 1 1 .- | DHG 440 DHG 440 1 1 1 1 1-1 N | / 1 1 1 IR | | | UNIT 20 1 1 Iii 2 L[*1282OM ~ PORCH PHI 1 DGH3450 DGH3450 AWN 018 DE /- 300 | 30 1 C=ZED 1 I DHG3450 DHG3450 DHG3450 DHG3450 = CN ~ !4 Al - - 0Â» <D r 00 N CO 2 121 OP 1 1 1 Cul 0 ==EQQIÂ·i 1 1 .0 2 0% 1 1 1 | UNIT 204 UNIT 203 k I...~ T.G. O 229 2' " 5'-5" 9Â£0,1 i | h B LIVINe ROOM LIVINe ROOM 1 8.5" I N mi I 0 0) O 0 | '-â€¢63.0.piypID A T.Opur, Â® < _ 0 00-0 ~ 7 10Â©1'-3 3/4" V 104 -5 w ~ D GLosET /*i\ difi -2 - 0 1 ---ly - Â·- 0, 6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 20 0&= ~4 --~ 0 11 .C - 2O 2| 2- ~ ~ R 7"p L ~3/4" 0â„¢. STAIEEEL-L DN - CD Â·- DN 2 11 lili - .co 42 0 - k h 12'-It 1/2" & E 044 1 1 1 -____ 2 1 & -O E 9 r. , 1 111 11 2 1 1 9 201 1 1 R 1.1. 10/ I 1 31'll Z Â£ .CMÂ® p L UP 1 !Iii & 0 B L__ 11111111 1 .Lr 1 CM 440 B TH 114 ILIQUB 1 LO . 20 V# 80 W *9'J 7 Â·dalbl De N CLOSET & LE.J *a | 20 - .I=l O.W. - ~ \ KITCHEN A b. 8 c D REF. I 4-0 il e D830 0830 MA â€¢ _ 1 Le._11 -2IL 20 A -~ D .ImL ---- 2 9 2 -1 - 20 11 CLOSET CLOSET u || ~ (1 1 | 1 1 1.-Up g 1t: BEDROOM 1 1 1 1 T.O.PLÂ¥WD WIT.222 13IE:n74" J BEDROOM -~8221 | 'P Â¤ LIVINe ROOM 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 Ill k 2 i & 1 1 1 1 2 -51 2447 --------- EAU- -CITE --------- --- MT 64 MT 6 DHG2.40 DHG2440 D 30 0 DH 3 0 DH 30 0 SET BACK ~Rev. ~Date: Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: VEÂ¥ 2 1'-7 1/2" = ARGH. 100'-0" SECOND LEVEL PLAN N 1146 0,4. 1,2' 10. 0,4. â€¢44.4, apâ€¢'1 vr PAV~ - Sheet#: PROPERTY LINE - - - Ii#-I -i.--- - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1,60*4â€¢ ~0# ,~ SECOND LEVEL PLAN A2.2 CMT2 40 STO 6056 318Â¥0230=13Â¥ 103 CBAht3S38 S.LH915111V 013513HllHDIMAdOO ONIOn-lONI 'Sl-HOIhi 03/\213838 W ]H10 -11Â¥ ONV AMO-LO1Â¥19 AAVI NOFIINOO 1-1Â¥ NIVLBU 11VHS -3-d 91031-IHONV 8 Otan-LS '0'd S.LOB.LIHOBV 8 Olan-LS 30 NOISS[,8,83d N31.LIUM WOIhldd alÂ·LL lnOH.LIM 031dOO MO 03Sn 38 AVIN NOI-1-V~HOANI SIHI :10 lk[Vd ON O d 6103-LIHOMV 8 OlanlS JO A.1.bladOhid 3,U SI JNBINnOOC] SIHINO 03NIVINOO-LNEINI NDIS30 ONV NOI.1.VINHO:INI 3+U '0 d Sl.OallHOSIV El Olan-LS 966L @ DHG2434 0* 1 0 Wed Feb 23 21: 40: 02 2000 f 164I 1/4' .47 15~01,2, 24 1/20 1.1-0. .1-6 / 11111111111 MATCH LINE Il @7" = '-5' MATCH INE ----------------- 1. 1. .1 91-4 0 .' 1/2. 01'-41/2. 2'.101/2. 9'-6 0/4. .Ll . 8'-11 5. 6. 1/4. I 1 1 1 1 = I 1 hi 1 11 1 -7 -- 1 1 I I 1 1 1 1 / 1 N 1 1 1 1 X O LU -- -------7---- ----- ----- ----7------- --- 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 UNIT 201 0- 1 LIVINe ROOM PORCH P ROH CD I Z 1 1 1 1 - 1 r - 20 20 ~ 0 A A 2 00 M '3 K26Â£EN O B II 1 1 1 BEDROOM *1 1 1 1 1 = 1 Nize 'i243 T.C. A 1 1 1 1 4 1 1 1 -UNIT-221 UNIT 203 1 1 2' 0 3'-5" 3.0. 4 ~ LIVINe ROOM LIVINe ROOM ~ 9 5'-5" 1 1 . 3 1 1 1 9 0 1 11 â€¢11 T.O.PLYVÂ© 1 T.OPLYND ~7-243-3/4" -7Â»Ila 5/4. /533\ 1 /33\ /33i\ CLOSET /531\ RBI\ 00 ------gy--- 1 1 1 49 1 1 1 20'CLOSE 1 I I I I l _BATE_ T 20 20 -1' | | 1 R -1' |= i_313/4" C. ~ (1 ~ ST&!EhELL i i ~ DN 8 1 1 I DN 4.-0. i 11 lili 1 - --- ,&.A62 1 1 hi 12'-111/2" '**rrÂ·PE 5 -1 --1 ---1 1 0 ---1 -------- -- 2 V 9 2 & 2 1.89 7. 1- -- 93 1 1 - 201 I R 74 = '-3| 3/ 0 I 4-0. TO, 1 1 1 1 --11 1 0 0@L 11 1 11 up 2~ 3/4 h k j r --- -- 1 4'-111 IIIII1 -KITOHEN I BATH BATH KITCHEN K-31 - - 6 1 Al I 0F1 - -4 6 - - 20 met WAL __ A 4, 7 1.=121 Deao N CLOSET ~ â€žI~Z- B SM 00 N r N 1 co | 20 20 | - - '-0. D REF:. | 1 0-0 20 I 1 j KITCHEN ~ 9 4 8 D830 INA = L..g_J BATH 20 1 - . All to -1 1 I L -2-=- ==p f MI/4. - to- O 266 4 -- - m =Dll- 1 0.2 r..3 0 0 11 6- 20 20 /2----- F 1 1 6230 2 20 0 c A G 1 ----- Uâ‚¬a- 20 D r E 20 - - 11 [3][@ 1 - :x= CLOSET t37 E F ~GLOSET 1 r r 1 1 1 0-111 1324 \P I el-on 9 2 9 3 1 1 1 1 UP Plf \\ 1 = 0 - BEDROOM 1 A lili = 1 1 1 1 : 1 TOPLYWD - .co 1 r %1 71 1 1 || | | UNIT 202 -CE - -TEER-374" EN 1 BEDROOM BEDROOM I P I LIVINe ROOM - =c, W 1 li 2 1 LWI ' ~ . & 1 1 1 1 00 1 1 1 11 "CS k 10 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 R 1 1 --- -------- SET BACK -- -- il -I I -i---- - URVEY 2 1'-611/2" = ARCH. 100'-0" It'-6 5/e 5 // 10'-6 9/4 Bul 8/4, 1'-6â€¢ .7 1/12' 5'-1 - 5'-ll/2Â· 4'-71/2. - PROPERTY LINE J - Il - ' ~Rev. ~Date: 17-0 9/4. 7'-101/2â€¢ 15'. 20'-6. Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: 78'-00 Drawing Title: SECOND LEVEL PLAN Sheet# N 1 SECOND LEVEL PLAN A A2.2a 318Â¥0230=I=IV NIV 133hllS NIVIN 193M OOZ 00Â¥610100'NadSV aaAMBSBU S.LHOM -11,1 01383H11.HS,BAdOO DNIOn-10NI 'SiHelhl 03AB3S3kl WEIH1011V CNV AVOinl-V.LS MV-1 NOK,100 119 NIV13B 11Â¥HS 'O'd $103.LIHOkIV 3 OlaniS *0'd SlOal.IHOW 8 OIC]nle =10 NOISSIANBd N3.LLIHM UOIhid 3HllnOH.LIM 031dOO GO CIESn 38 AVIN NOLLW,hIO~INI SIH130-Lavd ON '0'd S.LO31!HOBV g OlanlS do A.LaadONd 3141 SI .LN31Nn3Oa SIHi NO OaNIVINOO lNEUNI N91830 GNV NOI-LVV,MOJNI 3,U -0-d 9103.LIHOWÂ¥ 8 010019 866& @ e '1 e eAV Wed Feb 23 21: 59: 47 2000 60'-<)~ . 0 44 10. , 26-5 02' . 1.-1 1/2. D'-5 W 11'411/4. , 5'-1 1/4' 0 10'-150' It'-150 liP-51/2. .-----I -i-I--* --Il ----I - - - - ----- i---I- ..-**I- -Ill-I- -WI- - - I.-I -- Il-li . I.------ .-*.--I -- - -I+I - I -I-li- - - -ill-- - - ill 4 , ib 11 1. 11 1' ' ' '==*I | ' 1 ..fEam.~ 65 1 1 8111 4 UNIT 20-1 UNIT 206 - 3 BIG) Â«@241 - 4200, 2 BEDROOM DECK ~ - 1 1 2- 1 LIVINe ROOM LIVINe ROOM ~4 KITCHEN h @p I BATH I LU 1 1 3 Izf ITB w,p-, I,B Â§ 4 F ~ 4~04 IEM 61 1 ~T.O.PLÂ¥IND 6,-O1/2" 0 ..0,#"., .lheÂ¢ 0,-0., C7 -~~~ | 0 1 1 1---1~ KITCHEN ' 1 104'-10 15/16" 10'-0 1/2. 0- *11" let 11 153% 111Â»==Â«1 --= 1 CD 1 Ir .-N 8 1 1 z 121 4\ 1 84 Imt i 141 \2/ 1 1 /4 4-1 i L+J -- 1 1 F. - 1 1 . 060 '-1 1 - -1 | AL - 1 1- 2 11 CLOSE- 80) /52h ~ CLOSET ~ ELOSET ---1 \GO $1- . 1- 1 1 1 1 4-11 ~Aj 1 11 11 'V \ ' - - - Mf /,en .1 N 1 -,1~ 1 1 Un KITCHEN 1 1 UNIT 205 1 -1 rrIE 1 '448.1 r A li- 1 1% BATH **EL 4 _If-d LIVINe ROOM 1 =d~ BIN&1 c/- 1 TYPE D V.68 1 Â£ BkR-- BEDROOM BEDROOM I Â«f--7* 1 1 1 11/9 000=D Por ~ ID.~ ~ T.O.PLI'kle 1 11 1 t--41 nl~*,1 - .q'-10 15/16" Ti 1 =1 fÂ®6\ b 48/7\ 1 â‚¬ 31 1 1 Fl C. 1 /21\ 1 1 2HO 1 1 E -- 1-7 ~\ I i, li ike#i dÂ· ki If m===4 r Â·li I . 1 --------------------t----I-k-flitiu-1-t-tit-I-kitit-4-I-tit-------------1----------ti4-I-t-tltiu-i-t-t-4-I-t-ti#WIH-i-----IJ l L__- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Rf@ [t" 1 4311" 1 "7â€¢il"i= 1-Ill i i i I i I i i iii 1 < DN DN- > llllllllll1lll1ll 11111111111'll'll I 1 1 DN lillill].Il.<.1.1.1.11:I'l [[[[1111111111111 1 1- 1 -14-1- 1 ro 10,-4 5/3. , 5,-11 1,2. . 6'-8 1/2 . 5.-111/2. I 15'-0 9/V , 44-6 u I -1-to 0/DI 14 3/4 8.-6 1,2. . 3'-61/4. . 7- - 11- -- -I â€¢ C==0 0 01 r-- -- 11.1/7 I /61110' I 26.5 142â€¢ 00 N 00 e v .. . 2 2 - E--- 1 1 - -- 16'111/*P , S'-O' , 15'-0 02' , 7-51/1=2' I 10'-O. , 24. I -O- (D 1 1 1 1 1 4. 1 1 . 1 7 , . . . . 0 50 9 .0 11111111111 MATCH LINE MATCH LINE 1IR@-10=e'-5' - -------------------- 0 ~66 - f -1-2 -71Â· 7-1Â· 1--9- 7--1-.- ' Ch. a +4 42' .L41/2. .'-41/2Â· 2'40 !/7 , .46 5/4. 6'-' In' el-110/e 6.1/4. f i i i i i i i fiii f f f f xes f f i 1 = 0 .cÂ® w CO 0 N /43 SECOND LEVEL PLAN B < ~ 7 1/4"=100" Rev. Date: Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: SECOND LEVEL PLAN Sheet#: A2.2b 318Â¥ahl03=IV NIV 133hllS NIVIN 1SEM OOZ 00Â¥30-100 'NadSV N.... I O3Aaasaa S.LHOM 17Â¢ 0-1.3yaH-L lHE JAdOO eNIOnloNI 'SlHelhl 03Ah13S3hl MaH.LONÂ¢ aNV Ak,0101.VIS MVI NOINWOO 119 N[V13M 11VHS -Od 9103-LIHOMV B Olan.LS -0-d S1031.IHONV e Olonls Jo NOISSIml3d Nal.LIMAA ~OlMd 3,{1180,4.LIM aaldoo Ho Clasn 38 AW, NOLLÂ¥17%10:INI SIH.Ljo lhlvd ON '0'd S103.1.IH~V g Olan.LS 30 A.L.NadO&d 3HL Sl 1Narin000 SIH-L NO C]Elt 11Â¥1N001NaLN NDISEIC] aNÂ¥ NO11Â¥naO=INI BH Ud 9103Â·LIHONVE OIC'n-LS 066& @ LL9L 'leens Il 1JOU 999 2 p n i; .6 e %24 (0 Z 6) Thu Feb 24 08: 54: 52 2000 MATCH LINE MATCH LINE 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 1 0 216. . 4.-4 n . M 1/4â€¢ Ilut .1. . 49 1/2. 1 1 1 1 / 0 0 , mI- : 0 - 04 W / 1 LLI - - O MO 1Â»==Â«1 . 4W 9 0Â£ ma 1 1 1-1 A ZE - - - - - = *8 11 ----J 1 -- 1, 1 1 1 1 --t + 1 <Ao# $JR 05 0 BEDROOM B - ~4 ~0~ BEDROOM A 1 17 -07 71 1 1- C /53:\ - -1 6 1 < 41/ ' ' h 11 1 HALL ~T.O PLYPND Z 1 j -3 1 I),14 0 1 IA- 41 lliillil 11111111 1 1 1 11 1 1 *4 27.k 0/1 1 lk. 6 111 = 4,-6 3.4. 1 | STAIRMELL < ON 11---- 1 1 1 2 1 =*1--/ lillia 1 1 1 0 4,1114 09 0 ' i 1 2 11- - -Â« , 1 .- up> WY w v 1111111 1 1 11 11- - -1 - m I .. 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I PONCIER .- g 5 1111111 1 =.94#,r-. FETICAM /EN \ 1 IÂ»===41 -------' Â·--- 1 1 | ;=*â‚¬[AltÂ» 4-1~y j 8 -211=11.--- i .=5~*38Â°9911â‚¬) -0 11- - m- - 1 - -IL 1 - T 1 - L- - "- 5 -- KITCHEN --4* ' _r_ 2 . 1 00 N Â¥- N .lai\ 1 ORD 00 . 1 1 - 4 - li 1 - CIO 1 ~10 33 3 -, i - .!1 0 9 TA o '>Ei O*c 0.4 -11 _ ~*j CLOSET ~ 1 0 11 9 1 62 1 Z Res b X a> Ch = i al I 1 Ill 1 -1 5, 1 â€¢ 2---____- - 04 ~ T.O.PLYIND | 1 - CO 1 4 118'-5. .-r- 1 1 UNIT 301 0 1 1 #--1-= 1 6- 9 | ROOF BEL,PA | v LIVING ROOM 9 1 = 1 11 1 . 1 1 -0 E E N ' 1 1===- Il ----1 k 1- 1 1 . 1 1 11 1 1 1 00 CA 1' -41 r, 4 I . m e .. . \\ 1 1 ; h h W ID ~ 52TBACK lo 1 --------------------------------------------- 27.7.77.7.2~ 1 SURVEY 201'-4 1/2" = ARCH. 100'-O" U PROPERTY LINE . 18,1010Â· . .1 142. , 5,-1 ICI. . 4,11. . - - -*-*.- I.---1 - 74 , 20'4 2 I 32'-O' , Rev. Date: Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: THIRD LEVEL PLAN N Sheet #: (43 THIRD LEVEL PLAN A ( ~ j 1/4"=1'-0" A2.3a 31 VabIO=I=IV 03/\NES)hl SJ.HeIRJ 117 013513H1 iHE--:AdOO SNIOnlONI 'SlHely 03Ak13S3kl BIH-LO 11,1 aN'V AMOinlÂ¥.LS MV-1 NOIN INOO 11VNIVEW 11VHS *0-d S.LOaLIHOWÂ¥ 9 OlanlS Od 91031:HOSIV E) OIC]fLLS JO NOISS,INMad Nal.LIMMBOIbld 3HllnOH.LIMC]31dOO hdO a39n 38 AVIN NOI.LVMBOENI SIH.1.3018Â¥d ON Â·0Â·d SlogliHOMÂ¥ 8 Olanls dO A.LWadOhld 3HJ. SI .LNartnOOCI SIHI NO OBN]ViNO01NBIN NOISBa aNV NOU.VINMOaNI 33+ 'Od S.L0311140Â¥V 8 OlaniS 8666 @ ~0!pr~: ~I Wed Feb 23 23: 13: 19 2000 Thu Feb 24 09: 04: 23 2000 1- 1 1 1 -------- - 2--=-2--2-3-2--2 Z 2--3 1 r. 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -1 1 L 1 1 111 1 1 111 1 1 1 1 m 1 1 1 1 1 1 r- 1 L__ 1 1 - - - 11 1 - 1 - | -1 1 -- 1 1 1 1 1 1 Ill 1 1 1 1 1 r 1 1 11 1 -1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 -------- 1 1 ----- 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 11 Z 7TH & MAIN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT archi tects 700 WEST MAIN STREET ASPEN, COLORADO 555 northmill street, aspen colorado 81611 (970) 920.9428 f a x (970) . 920 7822 e-mail studiob@sopris.net 8 1998 STUDIO R ARCHITECTS P C THF INFORMATION AND nFRIGN INTFNT CONTAINFO ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THF PROPFRTY OF STUDIO R ARCHITFCTS PC NO PART OF â„¢18 INFORMATION MAY RF L ISFD OR COPIED WITHOUT THF PRIOR WRITTEN PFRMISSION OF STUDIO R ARCHITFCTS P C STUDIO R ARCHITECTS P C SHAI I RETAIN AI I COMMON I AW STATUTORY AND AI I OTHER RFRFRVEn RIGHTS INCI UnING COPYRIGHT THERFTO Al I RIGHTS RFSFRVED DECK mEl.On COURT YARD 1VlaH H NICINV19 MO-139 JOON 1Â¥10 MO138 34030 SIAMAL V NEd 366% L Nnd :10011 3 0002 AbIVANÂ¥r 40 uoi~~e~~~~s! igill STANDINe SEAM ROOFINe CEMENTITIOUS PANELS RUNNINe BOND PATTERN HEIeHT LIMIT ,|., 1269 1/2. -7- lit f.. I 99 ..il ' 11 IK'911 94Â£DOD GORNICE BOARD 4 BATTEN T.O.PLYPND /1 I - el)Ne 1 . 110'-1 1/2~ --1- INOOD SIDINe g I JOLDED m WOOD ANPOIN A CORRUeATED FIBEReLASS K 11 1 < 1â‚¬j AMININe b 1 T.OPLYMP _ _ _ _ ____ - -~- - ~~:~~- 7-iE*-3 3/E 1 1 2 1 00 Ill J I LIP' 111]1 1 g& STOREFRONT eLAZINe < 77; Z W 1-ILL ;ED 2 INOOD INAINSGOT 06 0 1 1 II 1 T.O.PLY,0 1/3070 1 1Â»--1 1 ARCH.100'-0" .11 k 1 - - -T--00-G T.O.PLÂ»NID I . EXT'e 20051 -- - - - - - - - - - - - - 3070 - -- - - - - --- - - - - 48'-10" 7 1 /Gil NORTH ELEVATION ~ 1 /3/4-Â«8" C==D N - 1 HEIeHT LIMIT *7~128'-4/2, - - _ 1 Illill _ Of 00 - <D 0Â£ 01 g ---I--- - T.O. ROOF /7 12573 15/ler--7- INOOD STRUTS 0 K 022 - - CD.- 0 -o E 1 T.OPLYPND ED 4 -~-115'-71/2" 7- .C U, - CEMENTITIOUS PANELS - - OO NOC~D SIDINe RUNNINS BOND PATTER~ m c & NOOD CORNICE Ld 11/N 11 07 Eg CABLE SYSTEM Elli 0 1 Lf'> LO STEEL HANDRAIL 4 K CORRUeATED FIBEReLASS T.O.PLYMP *1 /11 T.O.purpqp - _ _ _ _ - ro 15/%. - Ill-.- -ii--- TY- 104'-3 3/4" 1 XI/-1 ASPHALT SHINGLES 5TOREFRONT eLAZINS .13> 8 CEMENTITIOUS PANELS ~~ , 1 F 11 1 - - - - - - - - RUNNINe BOND COURSE hIOOD INAINSGOT T.O.GONG. 01'Zq-11/16~Â· mi Rev. ~Date: 7.0.PL//0 201'-4Â·14Â· . ARIH.too'-0â€¢ Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: TO.PLÂ¥IND 3070 EXT'e 201.52 1 Elli 201.21 1 1 Drawing Title: + 4640 - ------- Ef 1~ Ef 1 ELEVATIONS Sheet #: 9 WEST ELEVATION A). 1 f---I 318Â¥ahl083Â¥ 12EOOM~ON~~0 ~SB~ Â© 1998 STUDIO B ARCHITECTS P.C. â„¢E INFORMATION AND DESIGN INTENT CONTAINED ON THIS DOCUMENT IS THE PROPERTY OF STUDIO B ARCHITECTS P.C. NO PART OF THIS INFORMATION MAY BE USED OR COPIED WITHOUT THE PRIOR WRITTEN PERMISSION OF STUDIO B ARCHITECTS P.C. STUDIO B ARCHITECTS P.C. SHALL RETAIN ALL COMMON LAw STATUTORY AND ALL oâ„¢ER RESE~VED RIGHTS, I,CLUDIN~ COP,RIGHrl,E~TO ALL mGHT~ REBERvm 1.1,91,8 peJOI00 12.DUC Thu Feb 24 08: 30: 30 2000 GEMENTITIOUS PANELS ~_ RUNNINe BOND COURSE CORRUGATEDMETAL SIDING $ ROOFING 0 9=33111====2111--1 F-1 F--2-]117~3~1 F-3-1 1 01~--1~-~1~-~- ~-~-~1~~-h~1 --~~11'~fl~~-~1~ U 2 1 /43\ L / lili \ 41 5 STEEL HAND)RAIL Â¢ GABLE SYSTEM Ilife>11 B 3 1 lilli 1 /17 T.opt:YeD 1/11 111 -9-104'-10 15/16" 3070 - 1 - 1 -1.J- 7, Z--. 4 -P IC- .7 -J.11111-11- 1 1'.9.- 1-2.f'i--3 2 -. i -7 f.1 2-~'...9.111,3 Â· 4.:79 '1 --Ii.....,1 :Â·2 2'i-:. -:-Ir '.1.2' 'i'- M'i 11 -1 U..1 3,113-IN~Â«â‚¬1Â·121Â»2*â‚¬-2*Â«02Â«Â«4Â»Pa.li,f/C- . :: ilÂ·,1.Â·i'.'.â‚¬7'.,t' ''2 -1-1.- 1-11: .(1- 12Â«a'Â· --- ~'~ . ~' ~ ' ~ - - 3-,f- -,13 -.- , ~.2 -2472-2, :,T-i.- ...-IPJ:::f--:,~2 ,~ .-I:,fl - ', , - .5il 1. J I I 1 Â· 1 - 1 -1 -- 00 1- - 02 . 1 11 1- 1 - - -: - PARK.11_ L,NEA~150*-FIVE.'WEViole.I .'I' , t;:6-.il,-1.,.,.iOJ~v,Â·Â·1; ...': PÂ·Â·-- -Â·'..â€¢C >20, -Â· '~ ..'i~.-.:'2., -31- 4-190~12,9 05 7 m 1 1 11 1 2 2 El 1.1- O- ZB TO.GONG. --- - . .: 1,90=-V'41- .4;,17*L' 92,Â»,3*. ~.Â· i'.:.tÂ«.'*-trw :vâ€¢:Â·Â·,.P!~tf.-V, j Â·.9 --_ _ ~ ~ ~~ ExT'e 202.14 -t EXTS 202.31 z z mw EXT'6 202.01 , - *93 06 0 Ir 1- N SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" =1'-0' STANDINe BEAM ROOFINe ASPHALT SHINeLES T.OROOF - 00 N 123'-10 15/16 4-1 0 00 0 04 0 CD 0, 0 CN - &82 co .O r---191 4- 0 00 - N 0 STEEL HANDRAIL Â¢ ALUMINUM CLAD 0 -oE GEMENTITIOUS PANELS CABLE SYSTEM WOOP ANDOPI RUNNINe BOND COURSE WOOD SIDINe L & OO INOOD COLUMN m C= T.O.PLYND T.O.PLÂ¥IND M log'-1015/16" - - - - < - - - I - - - Oqua-5/4'ME I. LO 8 9 0 221 T.O.GONG. _ _ ioi'-q 11/1 " EX,f IR~DE 20201 T.O.PLâ„¢ID /1 ARCH.IOOW"__--2 --2- -2-- -s. ----~ - --- - - - - - - - - - - --- - 100'-O" EXTÂ·Â·e GIUDE 201.31 - - - - 48'-ZO' ~ -~ EXT'6 200.15 ~Rev. ~Date: Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: ELEVATIONS /4 EAST ELEVATION Sheet #: A3.2 L L 9 L 830100 se leails oris.net C---O STANDINe SEAM ROOFINe CORRUeATED METAL SIDINe Â¢ ROOFINe GEMENTITIOUS PANELS , RUNNING BOND COURSE ' 09 l STEEL HANDRAIL Â¢ CABLE SYSTEM 1211 ~ 1 !I I 4..1 1 -_ 1 1 -- '11 1 2_ ~_ ' IT 1 r 1,1- /1 T.o.pt.Â»ID ' ''' 79'724'-10 15/16" 3070 7 111 !11 8 l 39 El 1 T.o.CONG. _\__ _- __ ___ - - - _- - - __ - - -- - 2 4 gra aDR 06 0 EXTÂ·/ 201.31 ExIe 201.58 II EXT'e 2Ol.21 1- N COURTYARD ELEVATION: NORTH 1/4" = 1'-0" STANDINe SEAM 1~-HEIeHT LIMIT ROOFING 7 128'-q 1/2" STEEL HANDRAIL 4 IC==01 e CABLESYSTEM N 00 N 00 -Ii /* WOOD STRUTE L III 3 BOARD Â¢ BATTEN -0 .E SIDINe . 00 ./ A ALUMINUM GLAD at) 0, O MOOp ININDOINS 0 X @ m 41 - .Â¢0= 0 -0 A T.o.PLYWD tooi Ile'-71/211 N W.9 I - - - 1 - - I (0 0 -o E EN ' PÂ©OD SIDINe VA 00 00 ca, W 29 - 6- - 1 0 C= OO 11.<p>.11 LOW CEMENTITIOUS PANELS L= 0 0 6 6 RUNNINe BOND COURSE 0 0 â€ž ASPHALT SHINeLES T.O.PLÂ»Â© - I - - --- - 1 +332,1 1Oq'-6314" j--- - - - 3070 1 a il f 11 *A>11 ALâ‚¬fLY]g_ J,TOPLYRD -~-ARCH.100'-O" 3070 3070 ~Rev. pate: h' ARCH.IOOLOIl EXT'/ KIST 1 -4- EXT'/ 20014 Construction 04 JANUARY 2000 issue date: Drawing Title: ELEVATIONS 1 ' Sheet #: /41 COURTYARD ELEVATION: SOUTH C L f-1/4"-U-i;ii' A3.33 318VaBO:I 103fOhld 133319 03AblaSEM SlHE)11 11Â¥ 013BBH11,49!BAdOO ONIan-IONI 'S.1.14918 03AhlaSBhl BaH-1.011Â¥ ONV ANO.LnlÂ¥19 NAV-1 NOVIAOS -1-IV NIV1351 11VHS O'd S1031!HOZIV 8 OIOn.LS '0-d S.LOELIHOBV 9 Olan.LS 30 NOISSIrlhEd N311!MM 21017,3 3HlinOH.LIM 03!d00 280 03Sn 39 Avrt NOLLVINKJO=INI SIH-L tolhavd ON '0Â·d SloallHONÂ¥ 8 OlanlS JOA.LkiadOEid 3,41 St 1.NaMROOD SIHi NO ClaNIV-LNOO-LNEUNI NDISBOONÂ¥ NOLLWIHOaNI 3H.1. '0~d SlOallHOMV 8 01an.LS 066& @ L 1,910 Opej0100 Thu Feb 24 08: 32: 38 2000 DESIGNWORKSHOP 120 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-8354 Albuquerque Aspen Denver Facsimile (970) 920-138 Jackson Sau Paulo Santa Fe Tempe Lake Tahoe Vail Landscape Architecture Land Planning Urban Design Tourism Planning Client: Studio B Architects 555 North Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-9428 Aspen Housing Authority Alley 530 East Main St., Lower Level Colored Concrete Breezeway Slab Aspen, CO 81611 Score as Shown 970/920-5050 Parking Access from Alley E----------4UJ - /------.-- Proposed Street & IiI 3 1 1 6*-3-1 1 ~~~ Light #1 (D Carpqrt 1 ~ 1 ~ Carport 1 - (D C C 3 0 13 -Ex. Ditch Location Â© C W | to Remain . L I Pkg. 1 Pkg. 2 Pkg. 31 Pkg. 4 Pkg. 5 -~ g ~ | Pkg. 6 Pkg. 7 Pkg. 8 ~ || ~ Â¤Â£ (ADA) Cl uncolored Concrete 4 b & Apron | < .I| Uncolored Concrete Sic) & Apron | Ia_ Face of Curb: 17'-6 from PL i .E 0 â€¢1, L " EL Score as Shown . . . Score as Shown U. ---4 (Ref. Civil Dwgs.) C K 1 1 1 1%. | *2" Flagstone Pavers 1 1 IA. ' with Pebble Joints 1 1 C 9 e j GOÂ© 6" Flagstone pover steks-~ Storage ------ -- | Storage | , 4' Wooden Boardwalk u 111 /21- / (Extend flat over drainage) | REF. ARCHITECTURE ||| | ~~ |||||||||| | ri=r rl =ri=r I R *S= |FOR STAIR/LANDINGS ~|| 1111111111 1111111111 Provide Grip Surface as Required U LL---=--1- 1 11=1. U =LIU L -= = L =1= W 1=1 .. - / --- ----- NDING A -- - -, 1 1 ( : e. j E---i ~ravel Be404 1 Eitoirl 1 1 1 ~ E-- ~ ~ ~ ~| Snow Storage Zone Mr-r=iÂ· iii i UD -W-=4239209Â«Clo 1 9111 / 1.-2" Flagstone Pavers L=== 1 Proposed Sidewalk + f;~, LANDING ABO*11 (5' width) 7- 7---7~ | ~ ~ Uncolored 5' Concrete Sidewalk *+ Score as Shown 1 -* -*. U r Bike Rack w~ Gravel --J - | | Ref. Specs , ~ Unit Â· 2 1 1 |VI 1 1-vll JVIL EY-1= - 4' Wooden Boardwalk vt-----T <4 ~ (Extend flat over drainage) 1 47 - 1 /2/1 e Provide Grip Surface as Required -0 11 7 1 r 4 in 3 Ji It - 31 1 - .3 jiL 1 1 111 ~ / 1 11 1 -1 lili f 3 27 - 2 1 . r - 1 \ 1 liu l II i L,cd Lid I i E I E- 31 Ex. Tree to be Transplanted (typ.) 1 UBit g a r -1 - 11 Colored Concrete preezeway Slab ~ Concrete Curb & Gutter # DATE DESCRIPTION Score as Shown - Commercial Space: I r- 4'i Precast Colored Concrete Unit Pavers 11 Ir '10' ~ w~th Turf Bands Ref. Civil Drawings 7 -C61ored Concrete Entry Slab ' i - c S(bore as Shown Sidewalk with Design Development : Disabled Access Curb 2/24/00 HPC fi or,3 - | Bike Rack w/ Gravel ~ Ref. Specs Ref. Civil Drawings 00 4* 0005 0 11 -uumE . 4321@I~~~ Futu-e Cross'Nalk (N.I.C.) REV: ISSUE ~- ~~~~~'~ DATE: 11/10/99 - 0--A DRAWN: AG REVIEWED: roposed Ditch Location . -= - L-_ff -_ //__ e to Ex. Ditch @ PL ---V 1 ----1 -- ~Ref. Civil Drawings ~ cy' ccy, below Walk Culverts below Concrete Aving ,i/ .,*40 Proposed Ditch Culvert - p + Materials Plan e x. Ditch Location < 1=~ 1~ '~ ~ O ~ 5, Turf Snowitorage Zo* Â· Proposed Street 6 'L Â© .0 Light #1 / /1/ 11\ \ Use Aspen Historic Post and Luminere - - f f nÂ«'4' Wooden 04rdwalk -Realigned Ditch 77\ \ -4' Precast Colored Codvete Unit Pavers Concrete Curb & Gutter Ex. Street Light ~ ~ with Pebble Ba~s ~ - ~ Ref. Civil Drawings PROJECT NUMBER: 2239 -+ P,[mddeÂ·-Grip Surface as Required Ref. Civil Drawings Ex. Tree (typ.) Uncolored 5' Concrete Sidewalk m-r~ -~A~ 4' Wooden Boardwalk w/ 6" Steps ~ Score as Shown Provide Grip Surface os Required 5' Snow Storage Zone 0 4' 8' 16' Mai n Street -" , -" Scale: 1 =8 -0 SHEET NUMBER: L 1.00 Â©COPYR I GHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC, 1999 opeiO100 'uodsv pUU I~L DESIGNWORKSHOP 120 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-138 Albuquerque Aspen Denver Jackson Sau Paulo Santa Fe Tempe Lake Tahoe Vail Landscape Architecture Land Planning Urban Design Tourism Planning Client: Studio B Architects 555 North Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-9428 Aspen Housing Authority 530 East Main St., Lower Level Alley 970/920-5050 Aspen, CO 81611 Parking Access from Alley Â«11 -- 1-- --1 Â® Proposed street - 1~~ Light #1 f-f-fi Carpott Carport ie 1 03 ~<U -Ex. Ditch Location ~~ to Remain Pkg. 1 Pkg. 2 Pkg. 3. Pkg. 4 Pkg. 5 -~ ~ Pkg. 6 Pkg. 7 Pkg. 8 C + 11-~ ~ (ADA) CL + 2 Face of Curb: 17'-6 from PL " 51) (Ref. Civil Dwgs.) 1 1 1 1 111 ~ 1.1 ... + C 'F e j - m K Storage Storage - - - -7-1 i :' / 4' Wooden Boardwalk u l+ .-I | -T- 1- 'ho -r[ f == (Extend flat over drainage) 1+Fo - 0IR fr u + + 1 111 ,1 + t 1'11 It| 1 + +9+} Ul / 11 -- -- Ii -- ---- NDING A -- + 22# 0 20 20 -r1 1/ 4 -1 ) 64 1 A--- + 1 17 120 + +++ Snow Storage Zone _ -Tru iLl.- 0 0 1 - 0 0 -0~_ 1 2 (+0 Proposed Sidewalk ~ = 0) ...A 1 + F h + DING 0- 0 (5' width) 1 - 327 r.. 01 lit 1 11 + + t 0 1 1 1 01 8 Unit i 1 1 -brl 334L 1 ---I ~J~) - - t * MAT =4 = /-=== Ty , LÂ°J i 4' Wooden Boardwalk I 4 1 ~ (Extend flat over drainage) UL- 3 Ju . xyf Â® 1 in 1 1 Uy / 1 1 I 'l ' IrLAJ . Fl ti 3 --1- 1 (0 ) 111 2 <1 --2 ri 1 BERE I Ex. Tree to be Transplanted (typ.) Un~it un~ill LE- - 14- // Cpmmercial Space + 1./ 4-I | | | DATE DESCRIPTION +1 , # | L,,00/ 1 / Sidewalk with ~EETEE,m=:=:=:-----T ., 'EmiEEE~EEEmEBC=:~,~~=J--t: ~ ~ C , 9/%1~ir Disabled Access Curb 4 Design Development 1 -Jor'~- \ - 1 Bike Rack - + ) 2/24/00 HPC Low Flowering Tree 11 - - L -ME- - In 1 - 1 1\ ~, ill. \(Â°12151Â°,t= GIÂ°lo) , un + num 37-00/ 1/ i ------ Futu-e Crosswalk (N.I.C.) WW REVÂ· A l, 0 -1 - ---- 1 ** - 1 r10-1 -1 -221 [-2-I .9-I ,3/ ISSUE Proposed Ditch Location /3 -$*- /1 / DATE: 11/10/99 REVIEWED: tie to Ex. Ditch @ PL .9 I: Dfpr..' 0, I DRAWN: AG , Proposed Ditch Culvert li /, DEF, Asy below Walk \ 43. 47 l r Ex. Ditch Location e e r C 0,/- 1/,/f~ I .0, ..9 el 4/ Proposed Street Planting Plan 1 41 79 1 Light #1 Ex. Street Light ~ < / PROJECT NUMBER: 2239 Ex. Tree (typ.) - 5' Snow Storage Zone 4' Wooden Boardwalk FLJT (Extend flat over drainage) 0 4' 8' 16' Scale: 1"=8'-0" Mai n Street - SHEET NUMBER: L 3.00 Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC, 1999 Property Line 3IqupJIOJJV I Mpue q,L rasl /Rec i Encl. Opeloloo 'uodsv DESIGNWORKSHOP 120 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 Albuquerque Aspen Denver Jackson Sau Paulo Santa Fe Tempe Lake Tahoe Vail Landscape Architecture Land Planning Urban Design Tourism Planning Client: Studio B Architects Una 555 North Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-9428 U 33-- Aspen, CO 81611 Aspen Housing Authority l ----- ---- 157 530 East Main St., Lower Level LU 970/920-5050 2------ .. 1 Ak r.O.PLYWD , 1.: >>, -T.0. 7-18*1015/IIi" 4 1, f - 1- - 1 --1 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -I---- \ 1 11 1 1 1 0 - 1 - 1 T.O.CONC. 1 Yv 101'-9 11 " Alley ~H.100~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1~ 1J EXTO MUDE 20207 - Ji. T.O.PL EL 2 .0 -Â»-' 241'ill' e i W'!41 ... Hedgerow at Stair ... ... Proposed Crabapple East Elevation ARCH.100'-0"=201'-9 1/2" rÂ·Â·Â· HEIGHT UMIT ~ - 126;1 1/2"--~- -2 0-0 - - - T.O.PLYWD 1 --' 118 -50 -~- 1 - # DATE DESCRIPTION -3- Design Development F ~F -1.1 ~-- --- - 1 *9\ 41 $*7 1%1* -- - T.O.PLYWD ~ - - - 1 Lo.PLYWD - I - - ~~-Rii'-1 1,74 - -- 109'-1 1/4FT 1 + 1- REV: - -- 1 - ISSUE hf Â¥\ 1 DATE: 1110Â£29 I .1,11111\1 \) I DRAWN: AG REVIEWED: IL I -f A . \ -- - Sections . P 11 4 - - - - - .190'-ZE- 1 T.O.PLYND - - ~ 0 - - .U - - - - - - - - T.O.PLYWD \41 11 1, - - 7th STREET - "-- -1911!1. , 1~'lilui .. .... ... .. PROJECT NUMBER: 2239 ... ... 4. I .. Existing Deciduous Trees with Open Terrace Proposed Shrub Plantings - 2 . ... I. 7-7 Proposed Crabapple r off 8 Scale: 1"=4'-0" Main Street Elevation Proposed Spruce SHEET NUMBER: L 6.01 ARCH.100'-0"=201'-9 1/2" Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC. 1999 3IquploJJV U opeiOIOO 'uodsv BuisnoH . DESIGNWORKSHOP 120 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 Albuquerque Aspen Denver Jackson Sau Paulo Santa Fe Tempe Lake Tahoe Vail Landscape Architecture Land Planning Urban Design Tourism Planning Client: ~12311721171 M~~I~ Studio B Architects 555 North Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-9428 010 UN F Aspen Housing Authority 530 East Main St., Lower Level l u m G Ju 970/920-5050 Aspen, CO 81611 ~ T.O.PLIM) - . - I -- I - - . - - I . - I . I- . .- - -- . I- . ........... ....- . -- . . Il .l .......... . -'.- - - . - . I- ..- -- . - . I- .....- . - -~-109'-10 15/16" Tra h/Recycling T.O.CONC. 51) 7th Street m K Carports Breezeway Carports .t Â© Alley North Elevation a ARCH.100'-0"=201'-9 1/2" HEIGHT UMIT ~1286-9172" - - - 2-3 -4 -- Ed 1 T.O.PLYWD -1--- - 3 - ~18,5.- - - .---- ---- f - - - # DATE DESCRIPTION r 10 U 0 - - 1 1 - Design Development 69-10 157ir~- REV:--- .. ISSUE 1 DATE: 11/10/99 - - DRAWN: AG REVIEWED: Sections 1 \ 01111 '1 \ MAIN STREET ~ ~' ~ ' r 1 p .O.CONC , 0 -9 11 It ' 1 1 ~ /.)- ~ - Â©<' Y ) ; Ck 64 ; _ . .- - PROJECT NUMBER: 2239 - -- - --- ---- Alley T. O.PLYWD , ?lilill - Existing Deciduous Trees with Proposed Shrub Plantings Fl-.J.--~ Proposed Shrub Plan tings : 0 2' 4' 8' . f I .. . Scale: 1"=4'-0" 7th Street Elevation - 1 SHEET NUMBER: ARCH.100'-0"=201'-9 1/2" L 6.02 Proposed Spruce Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC, 1999 I i j giqupiOJJV opeio100 ~uodsv DESIGNWORKSHOP 120 East Main Street Aspen, CO 81611 (970) 925-8354 Facsimile (970) 920-1387 Albuquerque Aspen Denver Jackson Sau Paulo Santa Fe Tempe Lake Tahoe Vail Landscape Architecture Land Planning Urban Design Tourism PIanning Client: - Studio B Architects 555 North Mill St. Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-9428 El I1r~~311 IR-- lf' U u E U i / .4 / / / Aspen Housing Authority 530 East Main St., Lower Level Aspen, CO 81611 970/920-5050 ak T.O.PLYWD -Ill - - I.--- - - - ..l - . - I-.il . -Tfag'-1 01571 s" Trash- Rec cl A J 1 1 Af /1 0 1 - 7th STREET ...% . ... Proposed Shrub Plantings Breezeway Proposed Shrub Plantings Proposed Aspen Trees ~ t Courtyard South Elevation m ARCH.100'-0Â»=201'-9 1/2" 1 HEIGHT LIMIT ~ 1~128;-9172" - - 'EL m En â€¢k T.o.PLYWD i ~-118'-5- # DATE DESCRIPTION B H g 14>1 - - - F. 01] 23 In L 13-1 Design Development ~109'-1 10 - 109'-1 1/4* - - - - - - .- - - - _. ..- - - - -L .~_I:9:PLYW[~~ REV:--- ISSUE DRAWN: AG REVIEWED: / 1/ DATE: -11212229 A 9.11 / - \1 \ i 4 f 1 74 # - i ~, d / A Sections . 1 -I - 1 1 a \ iT.O.PL'AND 7th STREET -13,0.PLM- - - -- - - - - ~Â·~ ARCH.100'-OÂ» ~~7-ARCH.100'-O" .. .. PROJECT NUMBER: 2239 1 ' . r Â£ :'. li Proposed Shrub Plantings Proposed Aspen Trees 1 0 2' 4' 8' Scale: 1 "=4'-0" Courtyard North Elevation SHEET NUMBER: ARCH.100'-0"=201'-9 1/2" L 6.03 Â©COPYRIGHT DESIGNWORKSHOP INC, 1999 31 qu PI OJJV u opeioIOE) 'uadsv BUISnOH