Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19731023 I"" - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM" C.F.HOECKElB.B.I:I:l.CO. Special Meeting Aspen Planning & zoning October 23, 1973 Meeting was called to order at 5:15 p.m. by Chairman Jim Adams with Jack Jen- kins, Bruce Gillis, Geri Vagneur and Chuck Vidal. Also present City/county Planner Herb Bartel and Assistant Planner Donna Baer. Chairman Adams stated that he had received a letter of resignation from Com- mission member Barbara Lewis. Bartel pointed out that the City Council must now accept applications to fill the vacancy on the Commission. Geri Vagneur made a motion to recommend to the City Council that applications be accepted for the vacancy on the Commission, seconded by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. Chairman Adams reminded the commission that, according to the Planning & Zoning By-Laws, if a member of the Commission is absent from three meetings in a row, they are automatically off the Commission. 100' Setback Gillis questioned Bartel on whether or not the 100' set- back requirement is only applied to private residences. It was the general concensus of the commission that they would like the Engineering Department to bring all set- backs before the Commission for approval, especially as relates to waterlines. Schottland Agreement Bartel stated that Phase 5 of the Schottland Agreement had been completed. Bartel read the changes in the Agree- ment, adding that uses will come under review under Or- dinance #19. Further pointed out that the other conditions in the Agreement were the same. Vidal questioned how this procedure differs from a PUD. Jenkins questioned how the Commission could insure zoning to restrict additional phases. Bartel stated that the recommendations of the Commission become law for 1 year. Further stated that the commission would be making recommendations on zoning for the remain- der of the project. Vidal suggest the Planning Office keep an up-to-date check- list of this type of item to serve as a reminder to the Commission of items they would like to consider more fully before the end of Ordinance #19. Jenkins stated he would like the checklist presented to the Commission periodically. Buy-Out Parking Bartel stated that presently, the City is in court over the issure of buy-out parking. Further stated that he had dis- cussed the matter with City Attorney Sandra Stuller, and that until a decision has been reached on the matter, within the C-C area and the area malled, the Commission should go by the parking requirements set out in the Code with the understanding that if the case is overturned, the City would offer some alternative. Bartel stated that the decision could take as long as 90 days, and stated that if the City lost the decision, it would be appealed. Jenkins stated that he felt that persons obtaining new building permits were assuming a disproportionate part of " .""."-,~."...._...,,,,~..~~-~....-~,.."- . ... ..,.._."'","," ~_",~_u",.__,_'_"_~__'~'~'--'-'__W~ ........_. - ..- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORMSI C.f.HOEC,",ELB.B.a l. CO. Special Meeting Aspen planning & zoning October 23, 1973 the problem. Chairman Adams stated that he felt parking districts should be formed. Coachlight Chalet - Preliminary and Final Approval Ms. Baer stated that the previous conditions for approval given at the conceptual stage have been agreed upon. Fur- ther stated that construction had already begun, but did not think that a building permit had been issued. Ms. Baer pointed out that the Advisory Board recommended approval of the project. Bryan Johnson arrived. Gillis questioned the planning Office on punitive measures that might be taken against the owner for beginning con- struction without a building permit. Chairman Adams stated that the commission could not take action, that the Building Department would be the en- forcing body. Ms. Baer pointed out the owner had agreed to add a parking place on the east side of the building and sidewalks. Vidal made a motion to recommend approval, seconded by Gillis. All in favor, with the exception of Johnson, who abstained. Motion carried. ORDINANCE #19 REVIEW - CONCEPTUAL PRESENTATIONS Goomba's Restaurant Ms. Baer pointed out that the Engineering Department had recommended that no use be made of the alley - not a de- sirable access. Stated that this was a request for a take-out/delivery restaurant and would require an inter- ior remodel. Ms. Baer stated that the Planning Office was recommending that three --parking spaces. Ron Garfield, Attorney representing Tom Ianoco, stated that if the commission was talking about principal use, they were only required to provide one parking space. Garfield further pointed out that the applicant could provide parking on the property, and that he was entitled to 1 l2-foot curb cut. Ms. Baer stated that the applicant, should they choose to buy the parking, would be required to go to the Board of Adjustment. Garfield stated that the project would consist of approxi- mately 622 square feet of principal use. Dr. Barnard was present and stated that they would be willing to put in two parking spaces - one for the parking requirement and another for the delivery truck. Barnard further stated that he had no objection to the sidewalk being put in, but did not want to be required to put in in October and would like to do the entire block. -2- ,~-------~<'-------"""'~-~""';"'-'- ,- "" RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM 50 C.F.HOf:CKELB.B.8:L.CO. Special Meeting Aspen Planning & zoning october 23, 1973 Chairman Adams stated that the commission should leave the parking problem up to the ENgineering Department. Stated he had no objections to the proposed use. Gillis made a motion to approve the conceptual plan on the following conditions: (1) satisfactory negotiation with engineering and planning office regarding parking require- ments and access; (2) Construction of sidewalk as shown on plan. Motion was seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Bartel stated the commission could act on the conceptual plan, preliminary and final approval in the same meeting. Jenkins made a motion to approve the preliminary and final plan with the same conditions, seconded by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. par:agon Ms. Baer pointed out that the Paragon would be coming to the commission on a remodel project. Stated that the commission would need to look at the parking requirements due to additional restaurant space. Bibbig Residence Ms. Baer explained that this is a request to move a single family dwelling onto 17,000 sq. ft. lot. There is an existing single family dwelling on the site. Pointed out that the area is presently zoned multi-family. Vagneur stated that she would like to recommend that the center road service the area rather than Park Avenue. Jenkins made a motion to approve the project in the con- ceptual stage subject to the approval of driveway access and parking requirements by the Engineering and Planning Office. Motion seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Butcher Block Ms. Baer pointed out that this project was located in the C-l district. Stated the Advisory Board had recommended approval, subject to: (1) closing non-conforming curb cuts and constructing curb and gutter and sidewalk; (2) determining parking requirement with the Engineering, Planning Office and the City Attorney. Leonard Oates, Attorney representing the owner, stated he would like to ask the Commission for reconsideration - would prefer to act as soon as alternatives become avail- able. At this time, would prefer not to close the non- conforming curb cuts. Bartel stated the Commission could set the parking re- quirement for the C-l district. Oates stated they would be willing to commit to the requirements at some point in time when alternatives be- came availab~~. Vagneur suggest they not get rid of the nine existing spaces before the alternatives were available. Ms. Baer pointed out that the Advisory Board had suggested three parking spaces be required. Oates stated that they were willing to put in the side- -3- ",___",~,,,,,__,.""'-o_,,,...,...,.__,,..___~~"__ - ......" RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM5G C.F.HOECKElH.O.ll L. CO. Special Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning October 23, 1973 walks. Suggest they offer a time commitment for May 1. Fred Smith, member of the ADvisory Board, was present and stated that the ordinance provides for a bond in lieu of completion. Chuck Vidal made a motion to approve the conceptual, Pre- liminary and final stage subject to the May 1st, 1974 compliance, either buying-out or providing on the pro- perty 3 off-street parking spaces. Seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Aspen Tire Shop Jenkins left the table due to conflict of interest, and returned to the table as the applicant. Vidal left the meeting. Ms. Baer explained that this was a request for an addition of rest rooms and alteration. Pointed out that the Ad- visory Board had recommend approval subject to Planning Office determination that conditions of stream margin approval have been met. Jenkins stated that this would be an 8xlOx8 building which would be heated and have plumbing. Stated there would be no trees removed. Chairman Adams pointed out his concern for the appearance of the area. Felt the area should be cleaned up and some of the junk cars removed. Gillis stated he would like some type of burm or shrub- bery in front of the area where cars are parked. Felt the Commission should get a recommendation from the en- gineering department on the stream margin. Gillis made a motion to approve the request, noting the Commission's concern with the entry and parking paoblem and the necessity for consideration by the Engineering Department, with a May 1, 1974 limit. Motion seconded by Vagneur. All in favor, motion carried. Jenkins returned to the table. Blue Sky Condominiums Ms. Baer explained that this was a request for eight new cDndominium units. Stated that the Advisory Board had recommended approval subject to a covenant in the deed of sale restricting rentals to a period of no less than six months. Fred Smith pointed out that the entire project was lo- cated above the 80-40 Line. Pointed out that this pro- ject was initiated about 1 year before the 80-40 Line was in existance. Leonard Oates, ATtorney representing the developer, stated that they will offer a proposal as far as the purchaser- requirement is concerned. Jenkins made a motion to approve the conceptual stage subject to a covenant in the deed of sale restricting rentals to a period of no less than six months, seconded by Gillis. All in favor, motion carried. -4- __,_,,_,_~,,_____,~,,_~,_.,'_~"""H>'W_'''''''__'__''_'_'_'~.,-.~ I"" .-.. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM sa C.F.HOECKELB.O.&L.CO. Special Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning October 23, 1973 Jenkins made a motion to amend the previous motion to in- clude the fact that the commission had considered the 80- 40 Line and found it not to be applicable. Seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. Continental Inn Ms. Baer stated that this was a request for remodel. Fur- ther- 3tated that the Planning Office would like to tie down the square footage so that the possibility of ex- pansion could be determined. Gillis suggest the commission table consideration until the other problems with the Continental Inn had benn solved. Pointed out that there were problems concerning present density, etc... Fred Smith pointed out the poor condition of the parking facilities. Gillis made a motion to table consideration of this pro- ject until the planning Office has had a chance to deter- mine the status of the remodeling. Seconded by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. Gillis made a motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned at 7:30 p.m. ----~,..".__.,~-~-"..,~--'-~..,,----~~"._'~.,..~.,~~.-,.;--.~