Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutminutes.apz.19731120 , , RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM 10 C.f.HOECKELB.B.&L,CD. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & zoning November 20, 1973 Meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Adams at 5:10 p.m. with Chuck Vidal, Bruce Gillis, Bryan Johnson, Jack Jenkins, Geri Vagneur, and Spence Schiffer. Also present City/county Planner Herb Bartel and Assistant Planner Donna Baer. Bruce Gillis made a motion to approve the minutes of November 6, 1973, seconded by Johnson. All in favor, motion carried. OLD BUSINESS Ordinance #19 Amendment Bartel informed the Commission that the City Council had passed the Ordinance #19 Amendment at a Special Meeting on Wednesday, November 14th. Stated that copies of Or- dinance #19 with the amendment incorporated in it would be available the following week. Bartel reminded the commission that the amendment allows the planning Office to make decisions on minimal building permits. Further allows the commission to combine all three review procedures in one meeting, and makes pro- visions to set density in some zones. Main Street Study Bartel stated that the State Highway Department study for Main Street was complete, and this item would be placed on the agenda for a December meeting. URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT PLAN Bartel submitted copies of the Urban Runoff Management Plan Resolution to the commission. "WHEREAS, it is the responsiblity of the Aspen Plan- ning commission to plan for the orderly growth and de- velopment of the City to promote the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, and WHEREAS, Wright-McLaughlin Engineers has prepared and submitted for planning commission consideration an "Urban Runoff Management Plan" for the city of Aspen, and WHEREAS, upon legal notice a public hearing to con- sider comments on above said plan was held November 6, 1973, and WHEREAS, the Planning commission has reviewed said plan and finds that its adoption would appreciably re- solve stream pollution problems caused by urban runoff, minimize property damage from flooding, and otherwise improve Aspen's environment through the proper manage- ment of storm runoff, NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Aspen Plan- ning and zoning COmmission hereby adopts the "Urban Run- off Management Plan", text and maps dated August, 1973, prepared by Wright-McLaughlin Engineers, Engineering Consultants, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that during implementation the location of detention ponds, drainage swales and storm sewers may be varied from that shown on the "Ur- ban Runoff Management Plan" so long as the objectives of the plan are accomplished." Bartel stated that there was $50,000 in the budget for the runoff problem and that the Planning Office had re- quested $4,000 for specific fee schedules. Gillis made a motion to adopt the Resolution ADopting the Urban Runoff Management Plan, seconded by Jenkins. All in favor, motion carried. - -...~"-...,"';.._-_._-""""--~ .. ----.~..,,--,~...,~.- " RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM 50 C.F.HOECKElB.B.81L.CO. Aspen Planning & Zoning November 20, 1973 Regular Meeting TREE ORDINANCE ROARING FORK FLOOD PLAIN STUDY ORDINANCE #19 EXEMPTION REPORT - Gleason Remodel Villa Condominium Subdivision Phase II - Resubmission of Preliminary Plat _'c<_"_''''''___ Bartel request the commission set a date for a public hearing on the proposed Tree Ordinance. Public Hearing on proposed Tree Ordinance was set for December 18th, 1973 at 5:00 p.m. Bartel request the Commission set a date for a public hearing on the Adoption of the Roaring Fork Flood Plain Study. Public Hearing on the Adoption of the Roaring Fork Flood Plain Study was set for December 18th, 1973 at 5:00 p.m. Bartel pointed out that the Commission could use this study for consideration of stream margin requests and subdivision review. Ms. Baer explained that the Gleason remodel was coming in under the recently adopted amendment to Ordinance #19. Ms. Baer pointed out that this project was on the land that was the proposed site for the Ute Avenue Condominiums. Submitted plans of existing house. Stated that Gleason wanted to finish the lower level into an additional sleep- ing area with bathroom. Further pointed out that the Planning Office was recom- mending that this be approved on the condition that the ditch remain where it is presently. Jenkins made Remodel with by Johnson. a motion to approve the proposed Gleason the condition of the Planning Office, seconded All in favor, motion carried. Bob Mitchell was present representing the Villa Condo- miniums. Stated that they had come before the commission in June and had run into a number of problems. Mitchell submitted a map showing the location of the pro- posed project. Stated that access would be off of the powerhouse road. Jenkins questioned if the turn-around is satisfactory with the Fire Department. Developer stated that it had been okayed by Willard Clapper. Further stated that the open space was being provided by the river. Ms. Baer recommended that the northerly fire hydrants be relocated. Further would like to see trail alon the en- tire boundary and a pedestrian easement, relocation of a couple of the parking spaces, need clarification of owner- ship of the project. Ms. Baer stated that the planning Office needed appraisal submitted before the final plat for the 4% cash dedica- tion. Pointed out that the planning Office was not satis- fied with the access on public right-of-way. -2- _........~.~~~~-~ .........~~,=....' ", ,~_,_,,_,_,,__~_,,'_>._,....M'~ ~ -- RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves FORM ~a C. F. HOECK EL O. B. Ii L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & zoning November 20, 1973 Bill Caille, City Fire Marshall, stated that they would like to be able to get behind the buildings due to the steep grade. Further, would like to see sprinkling wall structures. Ed DelDuca, Assistant City Engineer, stated that they would like an agreement on an improvement district for that public road. Ms. Baer stated that the Planning Office felt the circu- lation problem is solved. Developer is providing 24 parking spaces. Chairman Adams stated he would like to table the consider- ation of this project until some of the problems had been cleared up. Jim Reser, from Tri-Co Management company, stated that Willard Clapper had given approval to the proposed access. Concensus of the project. public road, area. the Commission was to table consideration of Expressed concern on the access from a width of turnaround, and access out of the ORDINANCE #19 REVIEWS Chairman Adams stated that the Commission had discussed the problems facing them with Ordinance #19 reviews. Stated that the concensus of the commission was to table all the projects under the conceptual presentation of Ordinance #19, based on the following reasons: (1) would like cost-benefit considerations on a project-to-project basis; want to begin the economic impact evaluation of land-use concepts represented by the map and the mixed residential category in particular; Attorney Jim Moran was present and questioned the Com- mission to explain exactly what additional information they are requiring - need to know exactly what the re- quirements on "economic impact" includes. Bartel stated that in the near future, the commission would be able to give the specific requirements as to what type of information they will require. Stated that the second phase of the requirement is a cost-benefit comparison for the commission to review for the long run economic impact evaluation. Chairman Adams stated the commission would try to make a determination within thirty days, but didn't want to be pushed into any fast decisions. Further stated that the concensus of the Commission was that tourist-accom- modations should not be in mixed-residential. Moran questioned the commission on just exactly consti- tuted a tourist accommodation or resident accommodation. Bartel stated that the Planning Office and the Commission want to be specific in writing on what use information will be required. Would hope to be able to give specific examples in Aspen as to what was meant by the different categories. ~oran questioned the commission on when the public could expect these answers, and Bartel replied that this would -3- --"""...._~,,-~~._......._."'.,....~---.~-._~~. .-- ..-.-_.,. -'..",,--," ~ - RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 100 Leaves fORM 10 C.f.HOECKELB.B.ft L. CO. Regular Meeting Aspen Planning & Zoning November 20, 1973 be an immediate work item for the Commission. When questioned as to whether or not the Commission was seeking the same information on single-family dwellings, Chairman Adams stated that the impacts connected with single-family dwellings was not as great, so problably would not be tabled by the commission. Vidal stated that the evolution of the Ordinance#19 map was a compromise and that the attitude has been that it was still an open-type thing and represented a compro- mise. Chairman Adams stated that the additional information was needed in order to determine the impact on public facili- ties, the environment, and natural resources. Bartel stated that during the budget considerations, the Planning Office didn't feel it needed earmarked funds for environmental studies. Concensus of commission was to table all Ordinance #19 Conceptual presentations at this time. Gillis made a Johnson. All at 6:30 p.m. motion to adjourn the meeting, seconded by in favor, motion carried. Meeting adjourned ",-~,._,-----",,-~.,-",,'^'~"'~'-"""'~'~"-'-"'"'.' ....~-_.~,.~,,-, ".